Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications

Sustainable development requires methods and tools to measure and compare the environmental impacts of human activities for the provision of goods and services (both of which are summarized under the term "products"). Environmental impacts include those from emissions into the environment and through the consumption of resources, as well as other interventions (e.g., land use) associated with providing products that occur when extracting resources, producing materials, manufacturing the products, during consumption/use, and at the products' end-of-life (collection/sorting, reuse, recycling, waste disposal). These emissions and consumptions contribute to a wide range of impacts, such as climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, tropospheric ozone (smog) creation, eutrophication, acidification, toxicological stress on human health and ecosystems, the depletion of resources, water use, land use, and noise-among others. A clear need, therefore, exists to be proactive and to provide complimentary insights, apart from current regulatory practices, to help reduce such impacts. Practitioners and researchers from many domains come together in life cycle assessment (LCA) to calculate indicators of the aforementioned potential environmental impacts that are linked to products-supporting the identification of opportunities for pollution prevention and reductions in resource consumption while taking the entire product life cycle into consideration. This paper, part 1 in a series of two, introduces the LCA framework and procedure, outlines how to define and model a product's life cycle, and provides an overview of available methods and tools for tabulating and compiling associated emissions and resource consumption data in a life cycle inventory (LCI). It also discusses the application of LCA in industry and policy making. The second paper, by Pennington et al. (Environ. Int. 2003, in press), highlights the key features, summarises available approaches, and outlines the key challenges of assessing the aforementioned inventory data in terms of contributions to environmental impacts (life cycle impact assessment, LCIA).

Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice

Providing our society with goods and services contributes to a wide range of environmental impacts. Waste generation, emissions and the consumption of resources occur at many stages in a product's life cycle-from raw material extraction, energy acquisition, production and manufacturing, use, reuse, recycling, through to ultimate disposal. These all contribute to impacts such as climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, photooxidant formation (smog), eutrophication, acidification, toxicological stress on human health and ecosystems, the depletion of resources and noise-among others. The need exists to address these product-related contributions more holistically and in an integrated manner, providing complimentary insights to those of regulatory/process-oriented methodologies. A previous article (Part 1, Rebitzer et al., 2004) outlined how to define and model a product's life cycle in current practice, as well as the methods and tools that are available for compiling the associated waste, emissions and resource consumption data into a life cycle inventory. This article highlights how practitioners and researchers from many domains have come together to provide indicators for the different impacts attributable to products in the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) phase of life cycle assessment (LCA).

Effects and serum levels of glibenclamide and its active metabolites in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects and serum levels of glibenclamide (Gb) and its active metabolites in patients on chronic Gb medication on different daily doses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes on regular Gb therapy (1.75-14.0 mg daily). Blood samples were taken immediately before and 90 min after regular Gb intake. A standardized breakfast was served 30 min after drug intake. Serum insulin and proinsulin levels were determined by ELISA methods without cross-reactivities. Serum drug levels were determined by HPLC. Fischer's R to Z-test (correlation coefficients) and paired Student t-tests were used when comparing values within the entire group and unpaired non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests were used when comparing high and low dose levels. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between daily Gb dose, on the one hand, and, on the other, HbAlc (r = 0.55), Delta-insulin (r = - 0.59) and Delta-proinsulin (r = - 0.52) levels. Significant correlations between Gb therapy duration and insulin (r = - 0.40) and proinsulin (r = - 0.34) secretion and between Gb dose and ratio proinsulin/insulin (RPI) at both time points (r = 0.32 and 0.30) were also found. The RPI was lower after Gb intake. In patients on > or = 10.5 mg steady state serum metabolite levels (Ml and Ml + M2) were higher (29(0-120) and 33 (0-120) ng/ml) than those of Gb itself (18(0-64) ng/ml). A great inter-subject variability in Gb levels at both time points was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that, in patients on chronic medication, Gb is capable of stimulating both insulin and proinsulin secretion; the effect on insulin release is relatively greater. The effect was more pronounced in patients on a low Gb dose, either because of less impaired beta-cells in those receiving low doses, or due to reduced sulphonylurea sensitivity in those on high dosage (down-regulation). In patients on a daily dose of 10.5 mg or more, serum metabolite levels of clinical relevance were demonstrated; the metabolites may contribute to hypoglycaemic events.

Effects and pharmacokinetics of oral glibenclamide and glipizide in Caucasian and Chinese patients with type-2 diabetes

The effects and kinetics of oral glibenclamide (Gb) and glipizide (Gz) were studied in Caucasian and Chinese patients (ten in each group) with type-2 diabetes. In randomised order, 2.5 mg Gb, 2.5 mg Gz or placebo was given orally before the administration of 75 g oral glucose. Concentrations of insulin and proinsulin were determined using radioimmunoassay (RIA) without cross-reactivities, and sulphonylurea concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). There were no significant interethnic differences in Gb or Gz effects whether on glucose, insulin or proinsulin/insulin ratio at any time point. Following Gz, however, Chinese patients had greater increments of serum proinsulin at 10-30 min compared with Caucasians. Apart from the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of Gz being higher among the Chinese, no significant interethnic differences in pharmacokinetics were found. It appears that the same dosage principles could be used for Caucasian and Chinese patients with type-2 diabetes when Gb or Gz are prescribed.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of intravenous glibenclamide in Caucasian and Chinese patients with type-2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

We analysed the kinetics and effects of glibenclamide (Gb) on glucose, insulin and proinsulin secretion in two ethnic groups (10 in each) of type-2 diabetic patients, one of Caucasian, the other of Chinese origin.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a global disease affecting all ethnic groups. There are ethnic differences in both the prevalence and metabolic characteristics of the disease. Important interethnic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences have been reported for several drugs. With few exceptions, detailed studies on sulphonylurea are lacking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients were studied on two occasions when either no Gb (control) or 1.25 mg Gb was administered i.v., immediately before the administration of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Concentrations of insulin and proinsulin were determined by means of radioimmunoassay without cross-reactivities. Gb concentration was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacodynamic results were calculated using net areas under the curves, with basal values set as zero. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

When glucose was administered orally without Gb, Chinese patients had higher plasma glucose increases at 10 min (7.6 mmol/l x min vs 2.6 mmol/l x min) and higher increases of plasma insulin levels than Caucasians at both 10 min (198 pmol/l x min vs 54 pmol/l x min) and 30 min (2286 pmol/l x min vs 1198 pmol/l x min). When Gb was administered, the plasma glucose increases were reduced, and the increases of serum insulin and proinsulin levels were greater in both ethnic groups. Compared with the basal values (-1 min), proinsulin/insulin ratios (RPI) were lowest at 10-30 min, followed by an increase. Chinese patients had higher increases of serum insulin levels at 10 min (1109 pmol/l x min vs 550 pmol/l x min) and a lower RPI at 30 min (6. 0% vs 7.6%) and 240 min (15.0% vs 21.0%) relative to Caucasians. Serum Gb data were best fitted to a biexponential i.v. model. There were no interethnic differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters.

CONCLUSION

In summary, following oral glucose administration without Gb, Chinese type-2 diabetic patients had higher plasma insulin levels but also higher plasma glucose levels during the first 10 min, which might reflect reduced insulin sensitivity or more rapid glucose absorption. Gb augmented glucose-induced release of both insulin and proinsulin in both ethnic groups; the effect on insulin secretion was more pronounced. In conclusion, minor pharmacodynamic but no pharmacokinetic differences were found between the two groups. It seems appropriate to employ the same dosage principles when using Gb in Caucasians and Chinese.

Is there a concentration-effect relationship for sulphonylureas?

Sulphonylureas have remained the mainstay of oral therapy for type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). They stimulate insulin release from pancreatic beta cells. Pharmacokinetic differences between the various sulphonylureas are of clinical importance in terms of the time to onset of action, timing of drug administration in relation to food intake, magnitude and duration of the glucose-lowering effect and the risk of serious hypoglycaemia. Recent studies with improved analytical sensitivity have shown that the elimination half-life of glibenclamide is longer than previously thought and that 2 metabolites of glibenclamide have significant hypoglycaemic activity. Furthermore, single dose studies in healthy volunteers using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model have identified clear concentration-effect relationships for both glibenclamide and its metabolites after oral and intravenous administration. Under multiple dose conditions, kinetic-dynamic relations have been identified with shorter-acting drugs in dosages that give discontinuous sulphonylurea exposure. However, at continuous exposure, i.e. sustained 24-hour therapeutic concentrations in plasma, there is evidence indicating the development of tolerance, which may be caused by downregulation of beta cell sensitivity. As more sophisticated concentration-effect studies appear, it has become evident that currently recommended maximum daily doses of many sulphonylureas are too high.

Pharmacokinetics of glibenclamide and its metabolites in diabetic patients with impaired renal function

BACKGROUND

Glibenclamide (Gb) may provoke long-lasting hypoglycaemic reactions, and one of the known risk factors is impaired renal function. We have demonstrated Gb to have a terminal elimination half-life of 15 h, and the main metabolites have a hypoglycaemic effect. With few exceptions, detailed studies on second generation sulphonylureas in diabetics with impaired renal function are lacking. Therefore, we analysed the pharmacokinetics of Gb and its active metabolites, 4-trans-hydroxyglibenclamide (M1) and 3-cis-hydroxy-glibenclamide (M2) in this patient group.

METHODS

Two groups of 11 diabetic patients with impaired renal function (IRF, iohexol clearance range 7-42 ml.min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2)) or normal renal function (NRF, iohexol clearance range 75-140 ml.min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2)) were compared. A single oral 7-mg dose of Gb was administered after overnight fasting. Serum samples and urine collections were obtained over 48 h and 24 h, respectively. Concentrations of Gb, M1 and M2 were determined by a sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography assay.

RESULTS

Peak serum values of M1 (24-85 ng.ml(-1) vs 16-57 ng.ml(-1)), M2 (7-22 ng.ml(-1) vs <5-18 ng.ml(-1)) and M1 + M2 (32-100 ng.ml(-1) vs 23-76 ng.ml(-1)) were higher in the IRF group. AUC and Cmax of Gb were lower and the clearance to bioavailability ratio (CL/f) was higher in the IRF group. AUC and Cmax of M1 were higher and CL/f lower in the IRF group. Much lower amounts of M and M2 were excreted in the urine in the IRF group (7.2% vs 26.4% in 24 h). The fraction of the Gb dose excreted as metabolites (fe(met) 0-24 h), ranged between 0.005 and 0.36 and correlated significantly with renal function measured by iohexol clearance. No other pharmacokinetic differences were found.

CONCLUSION

The differences in AUC, Cmax and CL/f of Gb may be explained by a higher free fraction in the IRF group which would increase Gb metabolic clearance. The inverse findings regarding M1 may be explained by the fact that the metabolites are primarily eliminated by the kidneys. After a single dose of Gb, neither Gb, M1 nor M2 seemed to accumulate in diabetic subjects with IRF. As only small amounts of M1 and M2 were excreted in the urine, this indicates one or several complementary non-renal elimination routes, e.g. shunting of metabolised Gb to the biliary excretion route and/or enterohepatic recycling of both metabolites and unmetabolised Gb.

Concentration-effect relations of glibenclamide and its active metabolites in man: modelling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

AIMS

The main purpose of this paper is to describe the relationship between serum concentrations of glibenclamide and its main metabolites and the effects on blood glucose levels, the clinically most relevant parameter to assess in diabetes.

METHODS

Serum concentrations and blood glucose lowering effects (expressed as percent blood glucose reduction vs placebo) of glibenclamide (Gb) and its active metabolites, 4-trans-hydroxy-(M1) and 3-cis-hydroxy-glibenclamide (M2), were analysed in eight healthy subjects participating in a placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blind crossover study, using intravenous administration of each compound as well as oral administration of Gb.

RESULTS

Plots of % blood glucose reduction vs log serum concentration demonstrated counter-clockwise hysteresis for parent drug and its metabolites. An effect compartment was linked to appropriate pharmacokinetic models and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling was used to fit the pharmacokinetics of Gb by both routes and the metabolites for each individual. Based on the individual concentration-time profiles a PK/PD-model was applied to all effect data simultaneously. An increase in the steady-state serum concentration when the effect is 50% of maximal, CEss50, was found in the sequence M1 (23 ng ml-1), M2 (37 ng ml-1) and Gb (108 ng ml-1). Corresponding interindividual variabilities expressed as CV% were 25%, 47% and 26%. The elimination rate constants from the effect site (kEO) were estimated and increased in the order M1 (0.178 h-1, CV 13%), M2 (0.479 h-1, CV 8.5%) and Gb (1.59 h-1, CV 36%). Corresponding equilibration half-lives for the effect site (kEO-HL) were 3.9 h, 1.4 h and 0.44 h. Estimated Emax-values obtained for M1, M2 and Gb were 40% (CV 30%), 27% (CV 56%) and 56% (CV 14%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that the two major metabolites of Gb are hypoglycaemic in man, that they may have higher activity at low concentrations and that they may have a longer effect duration than the parent drug.

Comparison of the kinetics of glyburide and its active metabolites in humans

The pharmacokinetics of glyburide (Gb) and its active metabolites, 4-trans-hydroxyglibenclamide (M1) and 3-cis-hydroxyglibenclamide (M2), were compared in eight healthy subjects. After an overnight fast, each subject received a 3.5-mg single dose of Gb, M1 or M2 intravenously in random cross-over order. For comparison, a 3.5-mg oral dose of micronized formulation of Gb was also given in a test. The subjects continued to fast until standard meals were given at 0.5 and 5.5 h after each dose. Serum samples and urine fractions were collected for 10 h. Serum concentrations of Gb, M1 and M2, and urine concentrations of M1 and M2 were determined by a selective and sensitive liquid chromatographic method. The two metabolites had very similar pharmacokinetic profiles, except for volume of distribution and renal clearance. Estimated mean volume of distribution, total and renal clearance of M1 and M2 were 20.8 +/- 8.4 litres, 11.9 +/- 1.7 litres/h, 13.5 +/- 3.7 litres/h and 15.5 +/- 5.5 litres, 10.4 +/- 1.3 litres/h, 8.6 +/- 1.6 litres/h, respectively. Estimates of the volume of distribution and total clearance were significantly higher than those of Gb, which were 7.44 +/- 1.53 litres, 4.42 +/- 0.56 litres/h intravenously and 9.32 +/- 2.79 litres, 4.09 +/- 0.45 litres/h orally. There was no significant difference in total metabolite urine recovery between intravenous or oral administration of Gb, suggesting almost complete oral bioavailability of the micronized glibenclamide formulation.

Hypoglycemic activity of glyburide (glibenclamide) metabolites in humans

OBJECTIVE

To assess the hypoglycemic effect and the insulin-releasing effect of the main glyburide (glibenclamide) metabolites 4-trans-hydroxy-glibenclamide (M1) and 3-cis-hydroxy-glibenclamide (M2) in humans.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight healthy subjects participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blind crossover study with five single-dose tests, 3 months apart: 3.5 mg glibenclamide (Gb) orally, 3.5 mg Gb intravenously, 3.5 mg M1 intravenously, 3.5 mg M2 intravenously, and placebo intravenously, each in the fasting state. Standardized meals were given 0.5 and 5.5 h after each medication. Blood glucose levels were measured by a glucose oxidase method, and serum insulin concentrations were analyzed by a specific immunoassay.

RESULTS

Blood glucose levels during the first 5 h were significantly lowered not only by Gb but also by M1 and M2. The mean +/- SE blood glucose reductions (versus placebo) expressed as percent of area under the curve (AUC) (0-5 h) were 18.2 +/- 3.3% for M1, 12.5 +/- 2.3% for M2, 19.9 +/- 2.1% for intravenous Gb, and 23.8 +/- 1.2% for Gb orally. Serum insulin levels were significantly increased by Gb as well as by M1 and M2. and M2.

CONCLUSIONS

The two main metabolites of glyburide (glibenclamide) have a hypoglycemic effect in humans, which is due to increased insulin secretion.

Slow elimination of glyburide in NIDDM subjects

OBJECTIVE

To determine the terminal elimination half-life of glyburide in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) subjects after cessation of long-term treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten NIDDM patients (5 of each sex, 36-72 years old, without hepatic or renal disease) taking a median glyburide dose of 14 mg/day, who were to start insulin therapy because of sulfonylurea failure, were studied. Serum glyburide concentrations, measured by a newly developed selective and sensitive liquid chromatographic method, were followed from 10 to 48 h after the last glyburide dose.

RESULTS

Serum glyburide levels declined in three different phases, with a terminal gamma-phase between 18 and 48 h having a mean +/- SD half-life of 15.0 +/- 6.7 h. Two patients had half-lives over 20 h. The half-life values did not correlate with fasting blood glucose, age, body weight, body mass index, or creatinine levels. The latter agrees with the assumption that glyburide is completely eliminated by metabolic transformation. Although longer than previously observed, the current half-life values are in accordance with clinical experience that glyburide is a long-acting sulfonylurea.

CONCLUSIONS

The elimination of glyburide in NIDDM subjects is slower than previously reported. The long half-life adds support to the use of a once-daily dosage of glyburide. It also justifies increased caution when using this sulfonylurea.

Cancer pain relief by continuous administration of epidural morphine in a hospital setting and at home

Fifteen patients with severe pain due to malignancy were treated by continuous epidural morphine infusions. A disposable external pump was used. Patients were treated in a hospital setting or at home for a total of 906 days. Pain intensity was estimated by VAS. The pumps functioned well. Bacterial growth was found in 0.6% of the balloon reservoirs used, while the epidural filters were free from growth. There were no clinical infections. It appears that this delivery system is safe, practical and suitable for use in the home environment.

Determination of glibenclamide and its two major metabolites in human serum and urine by column liquid chromatography

A simple reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method for the measurement of low concentrations of glibenclamide (glyburide) and its two major metabolites, 4-trans- and 3-cis-hydroxyglibenclamide, in human serum and urine has been developed. The compounds were extracted with n-hexane-dichloromethane (1:1). The UV detection wavelength was 203 nm. The minimum detectable serum level of glibenclamide was 1 ng ml (2 nM), and the relative standard deviation was 8.9% (n = 9). When maximum sensitivity was desired the metabolites were chromatographed separately. Metabolites in urine were measured by the same method after five-fold sample dilution. The utility of the method was tested on a healthy volunteer who ingested 3.5 mg of glibenclamide. The parent drug was present in the serum for at least 18 h, and the metabolites in the urine for at least 24 h.