1
|
Mancin S, Sguanci M, Andreoli D, Soekeland F, Anastasi G, Piredda M, De Marinis MG. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis. MethodsX 2024; 12:102532. [PMID: 38226356 PMCID: PMC10788252 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
A systematic review (SR) is a research method for synthesizing evidence on a specific topic. Among the various types of systematic reviews, there are SRs of guidelines (CPGs) and SRs of SRs. Traditionally, they are limited to just one type of secondary evidence. This paper introduces an innovative SR methodology that combines CPGs and SRs to improve evidence synthesis and overcome the limitations of isolated use. Essential steps that should always precede the actual research process include registering the research protocol, formulating research questions and setting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Using the PRISMA protocol for comprehensive database searches, it's crucial to combine keywords with boolean operators and remove duplicates. The eligibility of studies should be assessed by selecting potentially relevant articles through an initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a meticulous analysis of the full-texts. Rigorous evidence evaluation tools, such as AGREE II for CPGs and AMSTAR 2 for SRs, and the double reviewer approach ensure high-quality selections. Additionally, converting summarized results into percentages and applying statistical analyses facilitate interpretation and improve the reliability of rater assessments. A further characteristic of this methodology is its adaptability to the evolution of healthcare research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Mancin
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Sguanci
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Desirèe Andreoli
- Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fanny Soekeland
- University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giuliano Anastasi
- Department of Trauma, AOU G. Martino University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Michela Piredda
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia De Marinis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li M, Ma X, Xu H, Han M, Gou L, Du H, Wei L, Zhang D. Assessment of the quality, diagnosis, and therapeutic recommendations of clinical practice guidelines on patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 47:627-645. [PMID: 38307489 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
We conducted this study to systematically review and assess the current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The aim was to evaluate the quality of these included CPGs and provide clinicians with a convenient and comprehensive reference for updating their own CPGs. We searched four databases to identify eligible CPGs focusing on H. pylori diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The results were presented using evidence mappings. Quality and clinical applicability were assessed comprehensively using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX. Statistical tests, specifically Bonferroni tests, were employed to compare the quality between evidence-based guidelines and consensus. A total of 30 eligible CPGs were included, comprising 17 consensuses and 13 guidelines. The quality showed no statistical significance between consensuses and guidelines, mainly within the moderate to low range. Notably, recommendations across CPGs exhibited inconsistency. Nevertheless, concerning diagnosis, the urea breath test emerged as the most frequently recommended method for testing H. pylori. Regarding treatment, bismuth quadruple therapy stood out as the predominantly recommended eradication strategy, with high-dose dual therapy being a newly recommended option. Our findings suggest the need for specific organizations to update their CPGs on H. pylori or refer to recently published CPGs. Specifically, CPGs for pediatric cases require improvement and updating, while a notable absence of CPGs for the elderly was observed. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to improve the overall quality of CPGs related to H. pylori. Regarding recommendations, additional evidence is essential to elucidate the relationship between H. pylori infection and other diseases and refine test indications. Clinicians are encouraged to consider bismuth quadruple or high-dose dual therapy, incorporating locally sensitive antibiotics, as empirical radical therapy. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muyang Li
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xueni Ma
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Huimei Xu
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Mengyu Han
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lingzhu Gou
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Hongwei Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second People's Hospital of Lanzhou, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lina Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Dekui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Atkins E, Birmpili P, Kellar I, Glidewell L, Cromwell DA. Documentary analysis of national and international guidance for community clinicians referring patients with suspected chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002784. [PMID: 38769026 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed referral of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) from the community to vascular services may increase risk of amputation due to delayed revascularisation. Lack of appropriate guidance for clinicians in the community may contribute to this problem. This documentary analysis investigated referral guidance available to primary care clinicians. METHODS National and international documents providing guidance on CLTI management were identified by searching sources including Medline, Embase, Guidelines International Network and College/Society websites. Data were extracted on referral recommendations, target audience and author groups. Recommendations were coded according to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. Clinical practice guideline quality and ease of implementation were assessed independently by two reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) tools, respectively. RESULTS 12 documents containing guidance on CLTI referrals were included. Five were clinical practice guidelines. Nine targeted clinicians in the community among their audience, yet only one included a primary care clinician in their author group. Recommendations on identification and referral of CLTI were often in non-specific language and frequently assumed specialist knowledge of vascular disease. Just 4 of the 93 behaviour change techniques were identified in the guidance documents. Three relevant domains of the AGREE II tool were scored for five clinical practice guidelines: stakeholder involvement (range 21.4%-52.4%, mean 42.9%), clarity of presentation (range 71.4%-92.9%, mean 82.9%) and applicability (25.0%-57.1%, mean 36.8%). The GLIA tool identified barriers to ease of implementation for all five clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Most guidance for clinicians in the community on the management of CLTI has been written without their input and assumes knowledge of vascular disease, which may be lacking. Future guidance development should involve community clinicians, consider using additional behaviour change techniques, and improve the applicability and ease of implementation of recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Atkins
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Panagiota Birmpili
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
- Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | | | | | - David A Cromwell
- Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kanazaki R, Smith B, Bu S, Girgis A, Connor SJ. Is the European Crohn's and Colitis organisation (ECCO) e-guide an acceptable and feasible tool for increasing gastroenterologists' guideline adherence? A mixed methods evaluation. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24:529. [PMID: 38741179 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05540-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Management of inflammatory bowel disease is constantly evolving, increasing the importance for gastroenterologists to keep up to date with guidelines. Traditional implementation strategies have had only small positive impacts on clinical practice. eHealth strategies such as the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation e-guide may be beneficial for clinician decision making in keeping with guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the e-guide. METHODS A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability. Cognitive (think-aloud) interviews were conducted with Australian gastroenterologists while using the e-guide. Two clinical scenarios were developed to allow evaluation of various aspects of the e-guide. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative interview data and descriptive analysis to the quantitative and observational data. RESULTS Seventeen participants completed the study. Data saturation were reached. The ECCO e-guide was largely feasible and acceptable, as demonstrated by most clinical questions answered correctly, 87% reaching the answer within 3 min, and most feeling it was useful, would be beneficial to their practice and would use it again. Issues raised included difficulties with website navigation, layout of the e-guide and difficulties with access (network firewalls, paid subscription required). CONCLUSIONS The ECCO e-guide is largely acceptable and feasible for gastroenterologists to use. Aspects of the e-guide could be modified to improve user experience. This study highlights the importance of engaging end-users in the development and evaluation of clinician educational tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria Kanazaki
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Ben Smith
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stella Bu
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Susan J Connor
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milojevic M, Sousa-Uva M, Marin-Cuartas M, Kaul S, Nikolic A, Mandrola J, Sádaba JR, Myers PO. Same evidence different recommendations: a methodological assessment of transatlantic guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024:ezae184. [PMID: 38733575 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify methodological variations leading to varied recommendations between the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) valvular heart disease (VHD) Guidelines, and to suggest foundational steps towards standardizing guideline development. METHODS An in-depth analysis was conducted to evaluate the methodologies used in developing the Transatlantic Guidelines for managing VHD. The evaluation was benchmarked against the standards proposed by the Institute of Medicine. RESULTS Substantial discrepancies were noted in the methodologies utilized in development processes, including writing committee composition, evidence evaluation, conflict of interest management, and voting processes. Furthermore, despite their mutual differences, both methodologies also demonstrate notable deviations from the IOM standards in several essential areas, including literature review and evidence grading. These dual variances likely influenced divergent treatment recommendations. For example, the ESC/EACTS recommends transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for patients ineligible for mitral valve surgery, while the ACC/AHA recommends TEER based on anatomy, regardless of surgical risk. ESC/EACTS guidelines recommend a mechanical aortic prosthesis for patients under 60, while ACC/AHA guidelines recommend it for patients under 50. Notably, the ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS guidelines have differing age cut-offs for surgical over transcatheter aortic valve replacement (<65 and <75 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Variations in methodologies for developing CPGs have resulted in different treatment recommendations that may significantly impact global practice patterns. Standardization of essential processes is vital to increase the uniformity and credibility of CPGs, ultimately improving healthcare quality, reducing variability and enhancing trust in modern medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Milojevic
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Miguel Sousa-Uva
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mateo Marin-Cuartas
- University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sanjay Kaul
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Aleksandar Nikolic
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Acibadem-Sistina Hospital, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - John Mandrola
- Baptist Health Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - J Rafael Sádaba
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Spain
| | - Patrick O Myers
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mulakaluri A, Julian KR, Fernandez A, Kamal RN, Shapiro LM. Are Clinical Practice Guidelines Representative of Patients with Distal Radius Fractures? A Review of Patient Demographics and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Inform Guidelines. J Hand Surg Am 2024:S0363-5023(24)00148-5. [PMID: 38739072 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are recommendations developed for broad application to optimize high-quality care and decision-making. The composition of patients and outcome measures used in studies informing CPGs; however, has not been rigorously evaluated. With growing evidence that outcomes in musculoskeletal surgery vary by sociocultural factors, we aimed to: (1) review the linguistic, racial, and ethnic representation of the patients in the studies informing CPGs for distal radius fractures and (2) assess their use of linguistically and culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons website was used to identify relevant studies. Key variables were extracted, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, language of study, patient language and proficiency, patient race and ethnicity, and use of translated or culturally adapted PROMs. If provided, the clinical trial registration page for the study was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency of each variable. RESULTS Fifty-four published texts were evaluated. Participant language was reported in four (7%) of the published texts and six (11%) when including the clinical trial registration information. Of the published texts, one (2%) reported ethnic group/race data and 40 (74%) used PROMs. Of those using PROMs, eight (20%) of 40 reported the use of translated PROMs, and three (8%) of 40 reported the use of culturally adapted PROMs. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of reporting of linguistic, racial, and ethnic data and inconsistent use of PROMs, particularly those that are translated and culturally adapted, in studies included in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons CPG for distal radius fractures. As sociocultural characteristics and PROMs are associated with outcomes, ensuring they are broadly represented in studies, may improve equity and shared decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Greater inclusion and reporting of demographic data and PROMs are required in musculoskeletal studies to ensure broad applicability and advance health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Mulakaluri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kaitlyn R Julian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alicia Fernandez
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robin N Kamal
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA
| | - Lauren M Shapiro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fernandes C, Campbell-Scherer D, Lofters A, Grunfeld E, Aubrey-Bassler K, Cheung H, Latko K, Tink W, Lewanczuk R, Shea-Budgell M, Heisey R, Wong T, Yang H, Walji S, Wilson M, Holmes E, Lang-Robertson K, DeLonghi C, Manca DP. Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for primary prevention and screening: actionable recommendations and resources for primary care. BMC Prim Care 2024; 25:153. [PMID: 38711031 PMCID: PMC11071261 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02388-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesize high-quality information to support evidence-based clinical practice. In primary care, numerous CPGs must be integrated to address the needs of patients with multiple risks and conditions. The BETTER program aims to improve prevention and screening for cancer and chronic disease in primary care by synthesizing CPGs into integrated, actionable recommendations. We describe the process used to harmonize high-quality cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) CPGs to update the BETTER program. METHODS A review of CPG databases, repositories, and grey literature was conducted to identify international and Canadian (national and provincial) CPGs for CCDPS in adults 40-69 years of age across 19 topic areas: cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hepatitis C, obesity, osteoporosis, depression, and associated risk factors (i.e., diet, physical activity, alcohol, cannabis, drug, tobacco, and vaping/e-cigarette use). CPGs published in English between 2016 and 2021, applicable to adults, and containing CCDPS recommendations were included. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and a three-step process involving patients, health policy, content experts, primary care providers, and researchers was used to identify and synthesize recommendations. RESULTS We identified 51 international and Canadian CPGs and 22 guidelines developed by provincial organizations that provided relevant CCDPS recommendations. Clinical recommendations were extracted and reviewed for inclusion using the following criteria: 1) pertinence to primary prevention and screening, 2) relevance to adults ages 40-69, and 3) applicability to diverse primary care settings. Recommendations were synthesized and integrated into the BETTER toolkit alongside resources to support shared decision-making and care paths for the BETTER program. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive care requires the ability to address a person's overall health. An approach to identify high-quality clinical guidance to comprehensively address CCDPS is described. The process used to synthesize and harmonize implementable clinical recommendations may be useful to others wanting to integrate evidence across broad content areas to provide comprehensive care. The BETTER toolkit provides resources that clearly and succinctly present a breadth of clinical evidence that providers can use to assist with implementing CCDPS guidance in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Fernandes
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Denise Campbell-Scherer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Office of Lifelong Learning and the Physician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Discipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
- Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Heidi Cheung
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Katherine Latko
- College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy Tink
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Richard Lewanczuk
- Alberta Health Services, Alberta, AB, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Ruth Heisey
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tracy Wong
- Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Sakina Walji
- Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Margo Wilson
- Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Donna Patricia Manca
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Office of Lifelong Learning and the Physician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roth GS, Verlingue L, Sarabi M, Blanc JF, Boleslawski E, Boudjema K, Bretagne-Bignon AL, Camus-Duboc M, Coriat R, Créhange G, De Baere T, de la Fouchardière C, Dromain C, Edeline J, Gelli M, Guiu B, Horn S, Laurent-Croise V, Lepage C, Lièvre A, Lopez A, Manfredi S, Meilleroux J, Neuzillet C, Paradis V, Prat F, Ronot M, Rosmorduc O, Cunha AS, Soubrane O, Turpin A, Louvet C, Bouché O, Malka D. Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT). Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114000. [PMID: 38493667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023. RESULTS BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date. CONCLUSION These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gael S Roth
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes / Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Grenoble Alpes / Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309-INSERM U1209, Grenoble, France
| | - Loic Verlingue
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - Matthieu Sarabi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hopital privé Jean Mermoz, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Boleslawski
- Univ. Lille, INSERM U1189, CHU Lille, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantations, Lille, France
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Département de chirurgie viscérale hépatobiliaire, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Marine Camus-Duboc
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Service de gastroentérologie, d'endoscopie et d'oncologie digestive, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Thierry De Baere
- Département de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Clarisse Dromain
- Service de radiodiagnostic et radiologie interventionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Switzerland
| | | | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital - Montpellier School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Samy Horn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Valérie Laurent-Croise
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Hôpital de Brabois, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, INSERM Unité 1242, Rennes, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Sylvain Manfredi
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Julie Meilleroux
- Pathology and Cytology Department, CHU Toulouse, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Site Saint Cloud, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- Université Paris Cité, APHP.Nord Sce d'Anatomie Pathologique Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, INSERM UMR 1149, France
| | - Frédéric Prat
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Medical Imaging, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Rosmorduc
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Antonio Sa Cunha
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, CNRS UMR9020, Inserm UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille; GERCOR, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - David Malka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gardner M, Khorashad BS, Lee PA, Kogan BA, Sandberg DE. Recommendations for 46,XX Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Across Two Decades: Insights from the North American Differences of Sex Development Clinician Survey. Arch Sex Behav 2024; 53:1695-1711. [PMID: 38684620 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02853-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Several aspects of clinical management of 46,XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) remain unsettled and controversial. The North American Disorders/Differences of Sex Development (DSD) Clinician Survey investigated changes, over the last two decades, in clinical recommendations by specialists involved in the management of newborns with DSD. Members of the (Lawson Wilkins) Pediatric Endocrine Society and the Societies for Pediatric Urology participated in a web-based survey at three timepoints: 2003-2004 (T1, n = 432), 2010-2011 (T2, n = 441), and 2020 (T3, n = 272). Participants were presented with two clinical case scenarios-newborns with 46,XX CAH and either mild-to-moderate or severe genital masculinization-and asked for clinical recommendations. Across timepoints, most participants recommended rearing the newborn as a girl, that parents (in consultation with physicians) should make surgical decisions, performing early genitoplasty, and disclosing surgical history at younger ages. Several trends were identified: a small, but significant shift toward recommending a gender other than girl; recommending that adolescent patients serve as the genital surgery decision maker; performing genital surgery at later ages; and disclosing surgical details at younger ages. This is the first study assessing physician recommendations across two decades. Despite variability in the recommendations, most experts followed CAH clinical practice guidelines. The observation that some of the emerging trends do not align with expert opinion or empirical evidence should serve as both a cautionary note and a call for prospective studies examining patient outcomes associated with these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Gardner
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex, Building 16/G035E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Behzad Sorouri Khorashad
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex, Building 16/G035E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Peter A Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Barry A Kogan
- Department of Urology, Albany Medical College and Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - David E Sandberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex, Building 16/G035E, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor AH. Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:344. [PMID: 38693474 PMCID: PMC11061926 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 84% in the general adult population. To rationalise the management of LBP, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been issued in various countries around the world. This study aims to identify and compare the recommendations of recent CPGs for the management of LBP across the world. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and major guideline databases were searched from 2017 to 2022 to identify CPGs. CPGs focusing on information regarding the management and/or treatment of non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS Our analysis identified a total of 22 CPGs that met the inclusion criteria, and were of middle and high methodological quality as assessed by the AGREE II tool. The guidelines exhibited heterogeneity in their recommendations, particularly in the approach to different stages of LBP. For acute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For subacute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of NSAIDs, therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For chronic LBP, the guidelines recommended therapeutic exercise, the use of NSAIDs, spinal manipulation, and acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS Current CPGs provide recommendations for almost all major aspects of the management of LBP, but there is marked heterogeneity between them. Some recommendations lack clarity and overlap with other treatments within the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Zhou
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK.
| | - David Salman
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Alison H McGregor
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Klaps L, Verbist M, Bila M, Van Dessel J. Bridging the knowledge-Practice gap: Insights from a survey of Belgian dental professionals on diagnosis and supportive oral cancer treatment in comparison with international guidelines. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024:101891. [PMID: 38688402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early detection significantly improves the prognosis of oral cancer patients, contingent upon the knowledge of dental professionals. This study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge, practices and perceptions regarding oral cancer among dental professionals in Belgium. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was distributed via Qualtrics to general dentists, dental specialists, dental hygienists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The self-administered questionnaire comprised three sections: demographics (4 questions), knowledge (9 questions) and clinical practices (19 questions) related to oral cancer detection and treatment. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis, with Chi-square tests assessing responses by specialization, gender, years of experience and number of oral cancer patients treated. RESULTS A total of 262 questionnaires were completed, with the majority of respondents being general dentists (61%) followed by dental specialists (25%), oral hygienists (8%) and oral and maxillofacial surgeons (6%). 70% of the respondents reported treating fewer than four oral cancer patients throughout their careers. 5 out of the 9 knowledge questions achieved over 50% correct responses, with an average correct answer rate of 54%. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons and dental professionals who have treated more than four oral cancer patients, demonstrated significantly higher scores on multiple knowledge questions. Responses to clinically oriented questions showed less diversity across professions, and generally aligning with guidelines from professional oncological societies. CONCLUSION This survey highlights the need for enhanced education on oral cancer among Belgian dental professionals. Knowledge levels were notably higher among more experienced respondents. The development and implementation of comprehensive guidelines tailored to dentists and oral hygienists for oral cancer prevention and patient care are warranted to optimize clinical practice standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lien Klaps
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Maarten Verbist
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven and OMFS IMPATH research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Bila
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven and OMFS IMPATH research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Van Dessel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven and OMFS IMPATH research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kellum JA, Bagshaw SM, Demirjian S, Forni L, Joannidis M, Kampf JP, Koyner JL, Kwan T, McPherson P, Ostermann M, Prowle J, Ronco C, de la Salle J, Schneider A, Tolwani A, Zarbock A. CCL14 testing to guide clinical practice in patients with AKI: Results from an international expert panel. J Crit Care 2024; 82:154816. [PMID: 38678981 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) is a strong predictor of persistent stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI). Multiple clinical actions are recommended for AKI but how these are applied in individual patients and how the CCL14 test results may impact their application is unknown. METHODS We assembled an international panel of 12 experts and conducted a modified Delphi process to evaluate patients at risk for persistent stage 3 AKI (lasting 72 hours or longer). Using a Likert scale, we rated 11 clinical actions based on international guidelines applied to each case before and after CCL14 testing and analyzed the association between the strength and direction of recommendations and CCL14 results. RESULTS The strength and direction of clinical recommendations were strongly influenced by CCL14 results (P < 0.001 for the interaction). Nine (82%) recommendations for clinical actions were significantly impacted by CCL14 results (P < 0.001 comparing low to highest CCL14 risk category). CONCLUSIONS Most recommendations for care of patients with stage 2-3 by an international panel of experts were strongly modified by CCL14 test results. This work should set the stage for clinical practice protocols and studies to determine the effects of recommended actions informed by CCL14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Kellum
- The Center for Critical Care Nephrology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Sean M Bagshaw
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sevag Demirjian
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lui Forni
- Department of Intensive Care, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford and Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, UK
| | - Michael Joannidis
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - J Patrick Kampf
- Astute Medical, Inc. (A bioMérieux Company), 3550 General Atomics Ct., San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Jay L Koyner
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Kwan
- Astute Medical, Inc. (A bioMérieux Company), 3550 General Atomics Ct., San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Paul McPherson
- Astute Medical, Inc. (A bioMérieux Company), 3550 General Atomics Ct., San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | | | - John Prowle
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claudio Ronco
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | - Antoine Schneider
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ashita Tolwani
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Alexander Zarbock
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Norris SL. GRADE good practice statements: a time to say "good-bye"? A new typology for normative statements on interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 171:111371. [PMID: 38677562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical and public health guidelines include a variety of types of normative statements concerning interventions. "Recommendations" are usually the central focus, and are based on one or more systematic reviews of research evidence. Guidelines may include other types of normative statements, however, including Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Develoment, and Evaluation (GRADE) good (or best) practice statements (GPS), which represent recommendations that guideline panels feel are important but are not appropriate for formal ratings of quality of evidence because it is sufficiently obvious that desirable effects outweigh undesirable effects. These normative statements are typically supported by a great deal of high-certainty, indirect evidence, which the authors feel would be a waste of time to examine. There are a number of conceptual and methodological issues with GRADE GPS, however, and these are manifested in guidelines, including both inappropriate overuse and underuse, and unclear interpretation and impact among end-users. This situation has arisen in part from lack of clarity in, and misunderstandings of, GRADE guidance, the lumping of many different types of normative statements under one label ("GPS"), from limitations in GRADE's approach to linked bodies of evidence, and because the appropriate basis for many normative statements about interventions is not reviews of research evidence. A new typology is needed for normative statements on interventions and policies that are not optimally based on reviews of research evidence. PROPOSED TYPOLOGY This proposed typology differentiates normative statements about interventions by the type or nature of the most appropriate basis for the statement. The typology encompasses the range of statements encompassed by GPS, but provides a more nuanced categorization designed to assist both guideline developers and end-users. This typology encompasses two main types of normative statements about interventions (including policies): (1) statements that indicate when to use (or not) an intervention, which intervention to use, and if, when and how to use it and (2) the principles, practices, or norms that inform or underpin such interventions. These correspond to normative statements based on empirical evidence, and those based on human rights, ethics, or norms, respectively. Normative statements based on empirical evidence include: (1) recommendations based on systematic reviews of human or animal evidence on effectiveness and harms, including linked bodies of evidence; (2) normative statements based on scientific fundamentals (eg, physical/biological/chemical properties, theories, laws, or principles); and (3) implementation guidance based most commonly on experiential evidence such as case studies. Normative statements based on human rights, ethics, or norms include: (1) guiding principles, based on human rights standards and conventions and/or ethics principles; and (2) practice norms and standards, based on clinical and public health norms and/or professional standards. CONCLUSION There are conceptual and methodological problems with GRADE GPS, leading to their misapplication, with overuse and underuse. This paper presents a proposal for a new typology for normative statements on interventions, according to the basis for the statement. This typology encompasses and replaces GPS, providing a more nuanced set of statements. Testing of this proposed approach is needed among both guideline developers and end-users.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lakshmipathy D, Fritz C, Harris J, Athni T, Go B, Moreira A, Giordano C, Rajasekaran K. Systematic evaluation of Merkel cell carcinoma clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316:130. [PMID: 38662106 PMCID: PMC11045602 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02853-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare type of skin cancer that requires a multidisciplinary approach with a variety of specialists for management and treatment. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have recently been established to standardize management algorithms. The objective of this study was to appraise such CPGs via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Eight CPGs were identified via systematic literature search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Four appraisers trained in AGREE II protocols evaluated each CPG and deemed two CPGs as high quality, five as moderate quality, and one as low quality. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to verify reviewer consistency as excellent, good, and moderate across four, one, and one domain, respectively. The majority of MCC CPGs are lacking in specifying stakeholder involvement, applicability, and rigor of development. The two high quality CPGs are from the Alberta Health Services (AHS) and the collaboration between the European Dermatology Forum, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EDF/EADO/EORTC). The EDF/EADO/EORTC CPG had the highest overall score with no significant deficiencies across any domain. An important limitation is that the AGREE II instrument is not designed to evaluate the validity of each CPG's recommendations; conclusions therefore can only be drawn about each CPG's developmental quality. Future MCC CPGs may benefit from garnering public perspectives, inviting external expert review, and considering available resources and implementation barriers during their developmental stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Lakshmipathy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Christian Fritz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Jacob Harris
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tejas Athni
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beatrice Go
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Cerrene Giordano
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
SKELIN MARKO, PERKOV-STIPIČIN BRUNA, VUŠKOVIĆ SANJA, ŠANDRK PLEHAČEK MARINA, BAŠIĆ ANE, ŠARČEVIĆ DAVID, ILIĆ MAJA, KREČAK IVAN. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation supporting European society for medical oncology clinical practice guidelines. Oncol Res 2024; 32:807-815. [PMID: 38686053 PMCID: PMC11055998 DOI: 10.32604/or.2024.048948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines are among the most comprehensive and widely used clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) globally. However, the level of scientific evidence supporting ESMO CPG recommendations has not been systematically investigated. This study assessed ESMO CPG levels of evidence (LOE) and grades of recommendations (GOR), as well as their trends over time across various cancer settings. Methods We manually extracted every recommendation with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) classification from each CPG. We examined the distribution of LOE and GOR in all available ESMO CPG guidelines across different topics and cancer types. Results Among the 1,823 recommendations in the current CPG, 30% were classified as LOE I, and 43% were classified as GOR A. Overall, there was a slight decrease in LOE I (-2%) and an increase in the proportion of GOR A (+1%) in the current CPG compared to previous versions. The proportion of GOR A recommendations based on higher levels of evidence such as randomized trials (LOE I-II) shows a decrease (71% vs. 63%, p = 0.009) while recommendations based on lower levels of evidence (LOE III-V) show an increase (29% vs. 37%, p = 0.01) between previous and current version. In the current versions, the highest proportion of LOE I (42%) was found in recommendations related to pharmacotherapy, while the highest proportion of GOR A recommendations was found in the areas of pathology (50%) and diagnostic (50%) recommendations. Significant variability in LOE I and GOR A recommendations and their changes over time was observed across different cancer types. Conclusion One-third of the current ESMO CPG recommendations are supported by the highest level of evidence. More well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to increase the proportion of LOE I and GOR A recommendations, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MARKO SKELIN
- Pharmacy Department, General Hospital of Šibenik-Knin County, Šibenik, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Undergraduate Study in Nursing, University of Applied Sciences, Šibenik, Croatia
| | | | - SANJA VUŠKOVIĆ
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - ANE BAŠIĆ
- Pharmacies Prima Pharme, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - DAVID ŠARČEVIĆ
- Pharmacy Department, General Hospital Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
| | - MAJA ILIĆ
- Pharmacy Department, General Hospital Pula, Pula, Croatia
| | - IVAN KREČAK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Undergraduate Study in Nursing, University of Applied Sciences, Šibenik, Croatia
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Šibenik-Knin County, Šibenik, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tessler I, Wolfovitz A, Alon EE, Gecel NA, Livneh N, Zimlichman E, Klang E. ChatGPT's adherence to otolaryngology clinical practice guidelines. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024:10.1007/s00405-024-08634-9. [PMID: 38647684 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08634-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Large language models, including ChatGPT, has the potential to transform the way we approach medical knowledge, yet accuracy in clinical topics is critical. Here we assessed ChatGPT's performance in adhering to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines. METHODS We presented ChatGPT with 24 clinical otolaryngology questions based on the guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology. This was done three times (N = 72) to test the model's consistency. Two otolaryngologists evaluated the responses for accuracy and relevance to the guidelines. Cohen's Kappa was used to measure evaluator agreement, and Cronbach's alpha assessed the consistency of ChatGPT's responses. RESULTS The study revealed mixed results; 59.7% (43/72) of ChatGPT's responses were highly accurate, while only 2.8% (2/72) directly contradicted the guidelines. The model showed 100% accuracy in Head and Neck, but lower accuracy in Rhinology and Otology/Neurotology (66%), Laryngology (50%), and Pediatrics (8%). The model's responses were consistent in 17/24 (70.8%), with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.87, indicating a reasonable consistency across tests. CONCLUSIONS Using a guideline-based set of structured questions, ChatGPT demonstrates consistency but variable accuracy in otolaryngology. Its lower performance in some areas, especially Pediatrics, suggests that further rigorous evaluation is needed before considering real-world clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idit Tessler
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| | - Amit Wolfovitz
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran E Alon
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir A Gecel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nir Livneh
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eyal Zimlichman
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Hospital Management, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Eyal Klang
- The Division of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gawel EM, DiNardo LA, Corbin AF, Friedel JE, Carr MM. Second opinions: Do otolaryngologist demographics matter? Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104322. [PMID: 38692073 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pediatric patients and their caregivers may receive information from their primary care physician (PCP) that does not match current American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO) guidelines. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of parents deciding to seek a second opinion based on the demographics of pediatric otolaryngologists who deliver guideline supported advice, contrary to advice from their child's PCP. METHODS A survey was distributed to parents in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic between June 2021 and July 2023. Demographics included parent age category, gender, race, and age of youngest child. The survey included a scenario depicting recurrent otitis media with clear ears and a suggestion to defer tympanostomy tube insertion per AAO guidelines after their child's PCP recommended tubes. Thirteen variations of otolaryngologist photos were used in the case, including a control case with no picture. RESULTS Of the 658 participants, 460 (69.9 %) were female. 551 (83.7 %) were aged 30-49 years, 70 (10.7 %) were younger, and 37 (5.6 %) were older. 545 (82.8 %) were White, 30 (4.6 %) were Black, 20 (3.0 %) were Asian, and 31 (4.7 %) were Hispanic. 39.9 % of parents would seek a second opinion if an otolaryngologist recommended watchful waiting following evaluation of their child's otitis media. Participants given the control case were 2.23 times more likely to listen to the otolaryngologist's advice (p = .025). If a picture was provided, respondents were more likely to follow advice given if the pictured otolaryngologist was female (p = .025, OR = 1.47) or Asian (p = .042, OR = 1.53). CONCLUSION In this group, there is evidence that physician race and gender may influence decision making when considering action versus monitoring in the context of recurrent otitis media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Gawel
- Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | - Lauren A DiNardo
- Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | - Alexandra F Corbin
- Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | - Jonathan E Friedel
- Department of Psychology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.
| | - Michele M Carr
- Department of Otolaryngology, Jacobs School Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Durão S, Effa E, Mbeye N, Mthethwa M, McCaul M, Naude C, Brand A, Blose N, Mabetha D, Chibuzor M, Arikpo D, Chipojola R, Kunje G, Vandvik PO, Esu E, Lewin S, Kredo T. Using a priority setting exercise to identify priorities for guidelines on newborn and child health in South Africa, Malawi, and Nigeria. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:48. [PMID: 38627761 PMCID: PMC11020907 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01133-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sub-Saharan Africa is the region with the highest under-five mortality rate globally. Child healthcare decisions should be based on rigorously developed evidence-informed guidelines. The Global Evidence, Local Adaptation (GELA) project is enhancing capacity to use global research to develop locally relevant guidelines for newborn and child health in South Africa (SA), Malawi, and Nigeria. The first step in this process was to identify national priorities for newborn and child health guideline development, and this paper describes our approach. METHODS We followed a good practice method for priority setting, including stakeholder engagement, online priority setting surveys and consensus meetings, conducted separately in South Africa, Malawi and Nigeria. We established national Steering Groups (SG), comprising 10-13 members representing government, academia, and other stakeholders, identified through existing contacts and references, who helped prioritise initial topics identified by research teams and oversaw the process. Various stakeholders were consulted via online surveys to rate the importance of topics, with results informing consensus meetings with SGs where final priority topics were agreed. RESULTS Based on survey results, nine, 10 and 11 topics were identified in SA, Malawi, and Nigeria respectively, which informed consensus meetings. Through voting and discussion within meetings, and further engagement after the meetings, the top three priority topics were identified in each country. In SA, the topics concerned anemia prevention in infants and young children and post-discharge support for caregivers of preterm and LBW babies. In Malawi, they focused on enteral nutrition in critically ill children, diagnosis of childhood cancers in the community, and caring for neonates. In Nigeria, the topics focused on identifying pre-eclampsia in the community, hand hygiene compliance to prevent infections, and enteral nutrition for LBW and preterm infants. CONCLUSIONS Through dynamic and iterative stakeholder engagement, we identified three priority topics for guideline development on newborn and child health in SA, Malawi and Nigeria. Topics were specific to contexts, with no overlap, which highlights the importance of contextualised priority setting as well as of the relationships with key decisionmakers who help define the priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Durão
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Emmanuel Effa
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Nyanyiwe Mbeye
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Mashudu Mthethwa
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Michael McCaul
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Celeste Naude
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Amanda Brand
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ntombifuthi Blose
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Denny Mabetha
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Moriam Chibuzor
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Dachi Arikpo
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Roselyn Chipojola
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Gertrude Kunje
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Trust, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ekpereonne Esu
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Simon Lewin
- Department of Health Sciences Alesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tamara Kredo
- Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Keuning MW, Klarenbeek NN, Bout HJ, Broer A, Draaijer M, Hol J, Hollander N, Merelle M, Nassar-Sheikh Rashid A, Nusman C, Oostenbroek E, Ridderikhof ML, Roelofs M, van Rossem E, van der Schoor SRD, Schouten SM, Taselaar P, Vasse K, van Wermeskerken AM, van der Zande JMJ, Zuurbier R, Bijlsma MW, Pajkrt D, Plötz FB. Prospective multicenter evaluation of adherence to the Dutch guideline for children aged 0-16 years with fever without a source-febrile illness in children (FINCH) study. Eur J Pediatr 2024:10.1007/s00431-024-05553-z. [PMID: 38619569 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05553-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Evaluation of guidelines in actual practice is a crucial step in guideline improvement. A retrospective evaluation of the Dutch guideline for children with fever without an apparent source (FWS) showed 50% adherence in young infants. We prospectively evaluated adherence to the Dutch guideline and its impact on management in current practice. Prospective observational multicenter cross-sectional study, including children 3 days to 16 years old presented for FWS at one of seven emergency departments in participating secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the Netherlands. Adherence to the Dutch FWS guideline, adapted from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, was evaluated, and patterns in non-adherence and the impact of non-adherence on clinical outcomes and resource use were explored. Adherence to the guideline was 192/370 (52%). Adherence was lowest in patients categorized as high risk for severe infection (72/187, 39%), compared to the low-risk group (64/73, 88%). Differences in adherence were significant between risk categories (P < 0.001) but not between age categories. In case of non-adherence, less urinalysis, fewer bacterial cultures (blood, urine, and cerebral spinal fluid), and less empirical antibiotic treatment were performed (P < 0.050). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the non-adherence and the adherence group, particularly regarding missed severe infections. CONCLUSIONS We found a high non-adherence rate of 48%, which did not lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. This substantiates the need for a critical reevaluation of the FWS guideline and its indications for bacterial cultures, viral testing, and antibiotic treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN • Despite the development of national guidelines, variation in practice is still substantial in the assessment of febrile children to distinguish severe infection from mild self-limiting disease. • Previous retrospective research suggests low adherence to national guidelines for febrile children in practice. WHAT IS NEW • In case of non-adherence to the Dutch national guideline, similar to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline from the United Kingdom, physicians have used fewer resources than the guideline recommended without increasing missed severe infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya W Keuning
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pediatrics, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Hidde J Bout
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pediatrics, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amber Broer
- Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Melvin Draaijer
- Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hol
- Department of Pediatrics, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Hollander
- Department of Pediatrics, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Merelle
- Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte Nusman
- Department of Pediatrics, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Oostenbroek
- Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Milan L Ridderikhof
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC , University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manouck Roelofs
- Department of Pediatrics, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen van Rossem
- Department of Pediatrics, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sarah M Schouten
- Department of Pediatrics, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Taselaar
- Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Vasse
- Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Roy Zuurbier
- Department of Pediatrics, Tergooi MC, Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - Merijn W Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pediatrics, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dasja Pajkrt
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pediatrics, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans B Plötz
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Pediatrics, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Tergooi MC, Blaricum, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hirota S, Tateishi U, Nakamoto Y, Yamamoto H, Sakurai S, Kikuchi H, Kanda T, Kurokawa Y, Cho H, Nishida T, Sawaki A, Ozaka M, Komatsu Y, Naito Y, Honma Y, Takahashi F, Hashimoto H, Udo M, Araki M, Nishidate S. English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. Int J Clin Oncol 2024:10.1007/s10147-024-02488-1. [PMID: 38609732 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02488-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Hirota
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Hyogo Medical University School of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
| | - Ukihide Tateishi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Nakamoto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Yamamoto
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shinji Sakurai
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Gunma Central Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshirou Nishida
- Department of Surgery, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Sawaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Naito
- Department of General Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Honma
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Takahashi
- Department of Information Science, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | | | - Midori Udo
- Nursing Department, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Minako Araki
- Association of Chubu GIST Patients and Their Families, Nagoya, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen K, Lee Y, Kuriakose JP, Khan NS, Moreira A, Rajasekaran K. Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for salivary gland cancer management utilizing AGREE II instrument. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104285. [PMID: 38657536 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Salivary gland cancers (SGC) are rare neoplasms which comprise 1-5 % of all head and neck cancers. SGCs can be managed by resection, radiosurgery, chemotherapy, or a combination of these. Our team appraised the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for SGC treatment and management using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-II) instrument. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, & EMBASE were reviewed for CPGs regarding SGC management from database inception to January 1st, 2023. REVIEW METHODS The AGREE-II instrument was used by 4 reviewers to independently evaluate guidelines. Domain scores were generated with a satisfactory threshold being >60 % - a "high" quality CPG required >4 satisfactory domains. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used, via R 4.2.1., to determine inter-reviewer variability. RESULTS Literature review identified 645 articles, with six being included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the six included articles, one CPG was "high" quality and 5 were "low" quality. The domains with the highest scores were "Editorial Independence" (72.57 ± 36.60) and "Clarity and Presentation" (63.19 ± 26.08), while the lowest were "Rigor of Development" (34.03 ± 30.63) and "Applicability" (30.21 ± 30.46). ICC scores for each domain ranged from 0.937 to 0.983, indicating a high level of inter-rater agreement. CONCLUSION This study found that most CPGs for the treatment and management of SGC were of "low" quality, with only one guideline being considered "high" quality based on the standard set by the AGREE-II instrument. These findings indicate that there is a high level of variability and little standardization when it comes to the quality of CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiwen Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America. https://twitter.com/KChenTweets
| | - Young Lee
- Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States of America
| | - Jonathan P Kuriakose
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America. https://twitter.com/kuriousjon96
| | - Najm S Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America. https://twitter.com/Najm__Khan
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States of America
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hunter B, Dawes L, Wadsworth M, Sadler L, Edmonds L, McAra-Couper J, Allen-Mokaraka T, Groom KM. An evaluation of the quality, suitability and impact on equity of clinical practice guidelines relevant to preterm birth for use in Aotearoa New Zealand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:234. [PMID: 38570754 PMCID: PMC10993582 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06415-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and a defining event for pregnant people, infants, and whānau (extended families). Recommendations have been made for a national preterm birth prevention initiative focusing on equity in Aotearoa New Zealand, including the development of a national best practice guide. An understanding of the number and quality of guidelines, and consideration of their suitability and impact on equity is required. METHODS Guidelines were identified through a systematic literature search, search of professional bodies websites, and invitation to regional health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. Obstetric and midwifery clinical directors were invited to report on guideline use. Identified guidelines were appraised by a 23-member trans-disciplinary Review Panel; quantitatively using the AGREE-II instrument and qualitatively using modified ADAPTE questions. The quality of guidelines available but not in use was compared against those in current use, and by health services by level of maternity and neonatal care. Major themes affecting implementation and impact on equity were identified using Braun and Clarke methodology. RESULTS A total of 235 guidelines were included for appraisal. Guidelines available but not in use by regional health services scored higher in quality than guidelines in current use (median domain score Rigour and Development 47.5 versus 18.8, p < 0.001, median domain score Overall Assessment 62.5 versus 44.4, p < 0.001). Guidelines in use by regional health services with tertiary maternity and neonatal services had higher median AGREE II scores in several domains, than those with secondary level services (median domain score Overall Assessment 50.0 versus 37.5, p < 0.001). Groups identified by the Review Panel as experiencing the greatest constraints and limitations to guideline implementation were rural, provincial, low socioeconomic, Māori, and Pacific populations. Identified themes to improve equity included a targeted approach to groups experiencing the least advantage; a culturally considered approach; nationally consistent guidance; and improved funding to support implementation of guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS We have systematically identified and assessed guidelines on preterm birth. High-quality guidelines will inform a national best practice guide for use in Taonga Tuku Iho, a knowledge translation project for equity in preterm birth care and outcomes in Aotearoa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briar Hunter
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.
| | - Lisa Dawes
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- National Women's Health, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Makayla Wadsworth
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Lynn Sadler
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- National Women's Health, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Liza Edmonds
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Te Whatu Ora Southern, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Kõhatu Center for Hauora Māori, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Judith McAra-Couper
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Department of Midwifery, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Tina Allen-Mokaraka
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| | - Katie M Groom
- Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- Taonga Tuku Iho Principal Investigator Group, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
- National Women's Health, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bognanni A, Fiocchi A, Arasi S, Chu DK, Ansotegui I, Assa'ad AH, Bahna SL, Berni Canani R, Bozzola M, Dahdah L, Dupont C, Dziechciarz P, Ebisawa M, Firmino RT, Chu A, Galli E, Horvath A, Kamenwa R, Lack G, Li H, Martelli A, Nowak-Węgrzyn A, Papadopoulos NG, Pawankar R, Roldan Y, Said M, Sánchez-Borges M, Shamir R, Spergel JM, Szajewska H, Terracciano L, Vandenplas Y, Venter C, Waffenschmidt S, Waserman S, Warner A, Wong GW, Schünemann HJ, Brozek JL. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XII - Recommendations on milk formula supplements with and without probiotics for infants and toddlers with CMA. World Allergy Organ J 2024; 17:100888. [PMID: 38706757 PMCID: PMC11068951 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in infants. The replacement with specialized formulas is an established clinical approach to ensure adequate growth and minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions when breastfeeding is not possible. Still, given the availability of multiple options, such as extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein formula (eHF-CM), amino acid formula (AAF), hydrolyzed rice formula (HRF) and soy formulas (SF), there is some uncertainty as to the most suitable choice with respect to health outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of probiotics to a formula has been proposed as a potential approach to maximize benefit. Objective These evidence-based guidelines from the World Allergy Organization (WAO) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about the use of milk specialized formulas, with and without probiotics, for individuals with CMA. Methods WAO formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of all stakeholders and to minimize potential biases from competing interests. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to review by stakeholders. Results After reviewing the summarized evidence and thoroughly discussing the different management options, the WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using an extensively hydrolyzed (cow's milk) formula or a hydrolyzed rice formula as the first option for managing infants with immunoglobulin E (IgE) and non-IgE-mediated CMA who are not being breastfed. An amino-acid formula or a soy formula could be regarded as second and third options respectively; b) using either a formula without a probiotic or a casein-based extensively hydrolyzed formula containing Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) for infants with either IgE or non-IgE-mediated CMA.The issued recommendations are labeled as "conditional" following the GRADE approach due to the very low certainty about the health effects based on the available evidence. Conclusions If breastfeeding is not available, clinicians, patients, and their family members might want to discuss all the potential desirable and undesirable consequences of each formula in infants with CMA, integrating them with the patients' and caregivers' values and preferences, local availability, and cost, before deciding on a treatment option. We also suggest what research is needed to determine with greater certainty which formulas are likely to be the most beneficial, cost-effective, and equitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Bognanni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy
| | - Derek K. Chu
- Department of Medicine, Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amal H. Assa'ad
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sami L. Bahna
- Allergy and Immunology Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Roberto Berni Canani
- Pediatric Allergy Program at the Department of Translational Medical Science, and ImmunoNutritionLab at Ceinge Advanced Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Martin Bozzola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, British Hospital-Perdriel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lamia Dahdah
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy
| | - Christophe Dupont
- Paris Descartes University, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
- Clinique Marcel Sembat, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Piotr Dziechciarz
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ramon T. Firmino
- Faculty of Medical Sciences of Campina Grande, UNIFACISA University Centre, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil
| | - Alexandro Chu
- Department of Medicine, Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elena Galli
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, San Pietro Hospital - Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Horvath
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rose Kamenwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gideon Lack
- King's College London, Asthma-UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Department of Pediatric Allergy, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Haiqi Li
- Department of Primary Child Care, Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, China
| | - Alberto Martelli
- Member of Italian Society of Allergy and Pediatric Immunology (SIAIP), Italy
| | - Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Allergy Department, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yetiani Roldan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Said
- Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mario Sánchez-Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad and Clínica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Raanan Shamir
- Institute for Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jonathan M. Spergel
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hania Szajewska
- Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Luigi Terracciano
- Pediatric Primary Care, National Pediatric Health Care System, Milan, Italy
| | - Yvan Vandenplas
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carina Venter
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Siw Waffenschmidt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Gary W.K. Wong
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan L. Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pervez A, Bukhari MM, Chhapra R, Baig MI, Martins RS, Pirzada S, Rizvi NA, Aamdani SS, Ayub B, Rehman AA, Mustafa MA, Nadeem S, Asad N, Haider AH, Nadeem T. Adolopment of clinical practice guidelines and creation of referral pathways for psychiatric conditions in Pakistan. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia 2024; 23:100387. [PMID: 38486880 PMCID: PMC10938165 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders are highly prevalent in Pakistan and burdens the scarce number of psychiatrists present in the country. The establishment of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs) and primary-care referral pathways within the local context is imperative to make the process efficient. In this Health Policy, we aimed to develop EBCPGs and primary-care referral pathways that are specific to Pakistan's primary-care setting, with the aim of facilitating the management of psychiatric conditions. Ten EBCPGs were created through the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process; two recommendations were adopted with minor changes, 43 were excluded, and all others were adopted without any changes. Ten primary-care referral pathways for managing ten psychiatric disorders were created and 23 recommendations were added which will help to bridge the gap in care provision. These psychiatric referral pathways and EBCPGs will bring Pakistan's healthcare system a step closer to achieving optimal health outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Pervez
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | - Russell Seth Martins
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sonia Pirzada
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Nashia Ali Rizvi
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Bushra Ayub
- Learning Research Centre, Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Alina Abdul Rehman
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mohsin Ali Mustafa
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sarah Nadeem
- Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Nargis Asad
- Department of Psychiatry, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Tania Nadeem
- Department of Psychiatry, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brandt J, Bressi J, Lê ML, Neal D, Cadogan C, Witt-Doerring J, Witt-Doerring M, Wright S. Prescribing and deprescribing guidance for benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in adults with depression, anxiety, and insomnia: an international scoping review. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102507. [PMID: 38516102 PMCID: PMC10955669 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical practice guidelines and guidance documents routinely offer prescribing clinicians' recommendations and instruction on the use of psychotropic drugs for mental illness. We sought to characterise parameters relevant to prescribing and deprescribing of benzodiazepine (BZD) and benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA), in clinical practice guidelines and guidance documents internationally, for adult patients with unipolar depression, anxiety disorders and insomnia to understand similarities and discrepancies between evidence-based expert opinion. Methods A Scoping Review was conducted to characterize documents that offered evidence-based and/or consensus pharmacologic guidance on the management of unipolar depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders and insomnia. A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to October 13, 2023 and supplemented by a gray literature search. Documents were screened in Covidence for eligibility. Subsequent data-charting on eligible documents collected information on aspects of both prescribing and deprescribing. Findings 113 documents offering guidance on BZD/BZRA use were data-charted. Overall, documents gathered were from Asia (n = 11), Europe (n = 34), North America (n = 37), Oceania (n = 7), and South America (n = 4) with the remainder being "International" (n = 20) and not representative to any particular region or country. By condition the documents reviewed covered unipolar depressive disorders (n = 28), anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 42) and Insomnia (n = 25). Few documents (n = 18) were sufficiently specific and complete to consider as de-prescribing focused documents. Interpretation Documents were in concordance in terms of BZD and BZRA not being used routinely as first-line pharmacologic agents. When used, it is advisable to restrict their duration to "short-term" use with the most commonly recommended duration being less than four weeks. Documents were less consistent in terms of prescriptive recommendations for specific drug, dosing and administration pattern (i.e regular or 'as needed') selection for each condition. Deprescribing documents were unanimously in favor of gradual dose reduction and patient shared decision-making. However, approaches towards dose-tapering differed substantially. Finally, there were inconsistencies and/or insufficiency of detail, among deprescribing documents, in terms of switching to a long-acting BZD, use of adjunctive pharmacotherapies and micro-tapering. Funding The authors received no funding for this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaden Brandt
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jolene Bressi
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Wegman's School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher University, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mê-Linh Lê
- College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, MB, Canada
| | - Dejanee Neal
- Wegman's School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher University, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Josef Witt-Doerring
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Witt-Doerring Psychiatry, Heber City, UT, USA
| | - Marissa Witt-Doerring
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Witt-Doerring Psychiatry, Heber City, UT, USA
| | - Steven Wright
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Wright Medical Consulting, Ashland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Klein Haneveld MJ, Hieltjes IJ, Langendam MW, Cornel MC, Gaasterland CMW, van Eeghen AM. Improving care for rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines using AGREE II. Genet Med 2024; 26:101071. [PMID: 38224026 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability require lifelong multidisciplinary care. Clinical practice guidelines may support healthcare professionals in their daily practice, but guideline development for rare conditions can be challenging. In this systematic review, the characteristics and methodological quality of internationally published recommendations for this population are described to provide an overview of current guidelines and inform future efforts of European Reference Network ITHACA (Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism, and Congenital Anomalies). METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Orphanet were systematically searched to identify guidelines for conditions classified as "rare genetic intellectual disability" (ORPHA:183757). Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II tool. RESULTS Seventy internationally published guidelines, addressing the diagnosis and/or management of 28 conditions, were included. The methodological rigor of development was highly variable with limited reporting of literature searches and consensus methods. Stakeholder involvement and editorial independence varied as well. Implementation was rarely addressed. CONCLUSION Comprehensive, high-quality guidelines are lacking for many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Use and transparent reporting of sound development methodologies, active involvement of affected individuals and families, robust conflict of interest procedures, and attention to implementation are vital for enhancing the impact of clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirthe J Klein Haneveld
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iméze J Hieltjes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte M W Gaasterland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnies M van Eeghen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Advisium, 's Heeren Loo Zorggroep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Blay JY, Casali P, Ray-Coquard I, Seckl MJ, Gietema J, de Herder WW, Caplin M, Klümpen HJ, Glehen O, Wyrwicz L, Peeters R, Licitra L, Girard N, Piperno-Neumann S, Kapiteijn E, Idbaih A, Franceschi E, Trama A, Frezza AM, Hohenberger P, Hindi N, Martin-Broto J, Schell J, Rogasik M, Lejeune S, Oliver K, de Lorenzo F, Weinman A. Management of patients with rare adult solid cancers: objectives and evaluation of European reference networks (ERN) EURACAN. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 39:100861. [PMID: 38384730 PMCID: PMC10879812 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
About 500,000 patients with rare adult solid cancers (RASC) are diagnosed yearly in Europe. Delays and unequal quality of management impact negatively their survival. Since 2017, European reference networks (ERN) aim to improve the quality of care of patients with rare disease. The steering committee of EURACAN, including physicians, researchers and patients review here the previous actions, present objectives of the ERN EURACAN dedicated to RASC. EURACAN promoted management in reference centres, and equal implementation of excellence and innovation in Europe and developed 22 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, fourteen information brochures translated in 24 EU languages were developed in collaboration with patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and seventeen training session were organized. Nevertheless, connections to national networks in the 26 participating countries (106 centres), simplification of cross-border healthcare, international multidisciplinary tumour boards, registries and monitoring of the quality of care are still required. In this Health Policy, evaluation criteria of the performances of the network and of health care providers are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard & Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL) & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paolo Casali
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard & Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL) & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Michael J. Seckl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial College Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust (ICHNT), London, United Kingdom
| | - Jourik Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University of Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W. de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martyn Caplin
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Equipe CICLY & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Lucjan Wyrwicz
- M Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Robin Peeters
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Girard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Azienda USL / IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annalisa Trama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna-Maria Frezza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Hohenberger
- Div. of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Centre, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma (GEIS), Spain
| | - Javier Martin-Broto
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma (GEIS), Spain
| | | | | | - Stephane Lejeune
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kathy Oliver
- The International Brain Tumour Alliance (IBTA), Tadworth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ariane Weinman
- European Patient Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rodríguez-Orozco JE, Martínez-Rubio CF, Moreno-Vargas E, Peña-Ortiz A, Pizarro-Peñaranda MC, Rojo-Bustamante E, Villarreal-García DE, Bayona-Ortiz HF. Comparative global analysis of stroke rehabilitation recommendations across income levels. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 170:111334. [PMID: 38548231 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Successful implementation of stroke rehabilitation guidelines demands high-quality practice standards tailored to targeted sociodemographic contexts. The primary objective is to determine the quality differences in post-stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines (PGs), when comparing high-income countries (HIC) and low or middle-income countries (LMIC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a scoping review of PGs in English or Spanish, published between 2012 and 2021, and providing recommendations on post-stroke rehabilitation. We used Search engines, databases, guideline libraries, gray literature, and references from previous reviews on post-stroke rehabilitation as sources of evidence. Quality assessment of PGs was performed using 6P's, ELSE, IOM, and AGREE II instruments. We evaluated each item using a scale between 0 to 3, based on the confidence of adherence to the standard. For AGREE II, we followed the instruction manual for scoring. At least two reviewers were independently involved in every step of the process. A cloud-based spreadsheet was used to chart data. We compared the results of PGs originating from HIC with those from LMIC. RESULTS The inclusion criteria were met by 35 documents, which were subjected to evaluation. The study included 21 documents from HIC and 14 from middle-income countries (MIC). No manuscripts from low-income countries were available for inclusion in the study. The quality of PGs from MIC was found to be lower, in terms of methodological rigor and adherence to international recommendations for guidelines development. PGs from both groups of countries failed to include all target audiences and stakeholders (according to the 6P's criteria) and integration of ethical, legal, social, and economic considerations. CONCLUSION There are gaps in the quality and availability of stroke rehabilitation guidelines worldwide, especially in LMIC. Designing and providing financial support for the implementation of high-quality guidelines will contribute to more effective implementation strategies in stroke rehabilitation programs and lead to improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Fernando Martínez-Rubio
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Cra. 7 #117 -15, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad de los Andes, Cra. 7 #116-5, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad El Bosque, Ak. 9 #131a-2, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Eder Moreno-Vargas
- Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra. 98 #18-49, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
| | - Angélica Peña-Ortiz
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Cra. 7 #117 -15, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad de los Andes, Cra. 7 #116-5, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Estefanía Rojo-Bustamante
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Cra. 7 #117 -15, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad El Bosque, Ak. 9 #131a-2, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bolger LA, O'Riordan N, Allen C. A rapid improvement event: progesterone prescribing in prevention of miscarriage. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002517. [PMID: 38531628 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
A rapid improvement event (RIE) is a standard operational excellence technique that uses team-based problem solving to improve processes. In this study, a RIE was undertaken to improve progesterone prescribing rates for those with a history of miscarriage experiencing vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. This was on the basis of a recent change in guidelines regarding prescribing in these instances. NICE guidelines changed in November 2021 after Cochrane meta-analysis and the PRISM (Progesterone in Spontaneous Miscarriage) randomised control trial demonstrated a higher incidence of live births in those prescribed vaginal micronised progesterone for threatened miscarriage, when compared with those not prescribed it.A RIE involves a team approach and a standard sequence of events allowing analysis and improvement of a process. Analysis in the form of audit revealed a low progesterone prescribing rate for eligible patients in our unit. Dissection of this problem into its elements revealed a low level of staff knowledge regarding the change in guidelines and a lack of confidence in prescription of progesterone. A plan of actionable events to improve prescribing rates was devised. The updated guidance and local recommendations on appropriate micronised progesterone formulations were presented at hospital Grand Rounds with multidisciplinary attendance. Infographics were displayed in areas visible to stakeholders within the hospital and on the hospital's social media pages. The validity of these educational measures to improve the process was reaudited after 3 months.Progesterone prescribing improved by 48%. Those comfortable with prescribing as per the new guidelines improved from 43% to 78%. A RIE proved to be an effective and efficient approach to collaboration, decision-making and action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Anne Bolger
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicola O'Riordan
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathy Allen
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Scholes-Robertson N, Guha C, Gutman T, Howell M, Yip A, Cashmore B, Roberts I, Lopez-Vargas P, Wong G, MacGinley R, Synnot A, Craig JC, Jauré A, Krishnasamy R, Tunnicliffe DJ. Consumer involvement in the development and dissemination of chronic kidney disease guidelines: a summary of a meaningful and sustainable approach developed by Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 170:111330. [PMID: 38537911 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The involvement of consumers (people with lived experience of disease) in guidelines is widely advocated to improve their relevance and uptake. However, the approaches to consumer involvement in guidelines vary and are not well documented. We describe the consumer involvement framework of Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment Guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We used a descriptive document analysis to collate all relevant policies, documents, e-mails, and presentations on consumer involvement in our organizations. We performed a narrative synthesis of collated data to summarize our evolving consumer involvement approach in guidelines. RESULTS We involve consumers at all levels of Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment guideline development and dissemination according to their capacity, from conducting consumer workshops to inform the scope of guidelines, to including consumers as members of the guideline Working Groups and overseeing operations and governance as members of the Steering Committee and staff. Our approach has resulted in tangible outcomes including high-priority topics on patient education, psychosocial care, and clinical care pathways, and focusing the literature reviews to assess patient-important outcomes. The ongoing partnership with consumers led to the generation of consumer version guidelines to improve guideline dissemination and translation to support shared decision-making. CONCLUSION Meaningful consumer involvement can be achieved through a comprehensive approach across the entire lifecycle of guidelines. However, it must be individualized by ensuring that the involvement of consumers is timely and flexible. Future work is needed to assess the impact of consumer involvement in guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adela Yip
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brydee Cashmore
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ieyesha Roberts
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pamela Lopez-Vargas
- Child Protection Unit, The Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert MacGinley
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anneliese Synnot
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Allison Jauré
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rathika Krishnasamy
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
| | - David J Tunnicliffe
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ye Z, Lai H, Ning J, Liu J, Huang J, Yang S, Jin J, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhao H, Ge L. Traditional Chinese medicine for insomnia: Recommendation mapping of the global clinical guidelines. J Ethnopharmacol 2024; 322:117601. [PMID: 38122913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) represents a rich repository of empirically-developed traditional medicines. The findings call for more rigorous study into the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of TCM remedies to strengthen the evidence base. AIM OF THE STUDY To systematically review the quality of insomnia clinical practice guidelines that involve TCM recommendations and to summarize the certainty of evidence supporting the recommendations, strength, and consistency of recommendations, providing valuable research references for the development of future insomnia guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Sleep Research Society, Medsci, Medlive, British National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the International Guidelines Collaboration Network (GIN) for clinical practice guidelines on insomnia from inception to March 5, 2023. Four evaluators conducted independent assessments of the quality of the guidelines by employing the AGREE II tool. Subsequently, the guideline recommendations were consolidated and presented as evidence maps. RESULTS Thirteen clinical practice guidelines addressing insomnia, encompassing 211 recommendations (consisting of 127 evidence-based and 84 expert consensus recommendations), were deemed eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The evaluation results revealed an overall suboptimal quality, with the "scope and purpose" domain achieving the highest score (58.1%), while the "applicability" domain garnered the lowest score (13.0%). Specifically, it was observed that 74.8% (n = 95) of the evidence-based recommendations were supported by evidence of either very low or low certainty, in contrast to the expert consensus recommendations, which accounted for 61.9% (n = 52). We subsequently synthesized 44 recommendations into four evidence maps, focusing on proprietary Chinese medicines, Chinese medicine prescriptions, acupuncture, and massage, respectively. Notably, Chinese herbal remedies and acupuncture exhibited robust support, substantiated by high-certainty evidence, exemplified by interventions such as Xuefu Zhuyu decoction, spleen decoction, body acupuncture, and ear acupuncture, resulting in solid recommendations. Conversely, proprietary Chinese medicines needed more high-certainty evidence, predominantly yielding weak recommendations. As for other therapies, the level of certainty was predominantly categorized as low or very low. Recommendations about magnetic therapy, bathing, and fumigation relied primarily on expert consensus, needing more substantive clinical research evidence, consequently forming weak recommendations. Hot ironing and acupoint injection recommendations were weakly endorsed, primarily based on observational studies. Furthermore, interventions like qigong, gua sha, and moxibustion displayed a relatively limited number of clinical studies, necessitating further exploration to ascertain their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis revealed a need for substantial improvement in the quality of all the included guidelines related to insomnia. Notably, recommendations for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatments predominantly rely on low-certainty evidence. This study represents a pioneering effort in the utilization of recommendation mapping to both present and identify existing gaps in the evidence landscape within TCM therapies, thus setting the stage for future research initiatives. The evidence supporting TCM therapy recommendations must be fortified to achieve a more substantial level of recommendation and higher certainty. Consequently, there exists a critical and pressing demand for high-quality clinical investigations dedicated to TCM, with a specific focus on ascertaining its long-term efficacy, safety, and potential side effects in the context of insomnia treatment. These endeavors are poised to establish a robust scientific foundation to inform the development of TCM therapy recommendations within the insomnia guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziying Ye
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Honghao Lai
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jinling Ning
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jianing Liu
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jiajie Huang
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Sihong Yang
- Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayue Jin
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yajie Liu
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhao
- Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Van Houtte J, Vandenbussche N, Derom E, Schoenen J, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K. Oxygen as an abortive therapy in cluster headache: a narrative review and clinical practice aspects. Acta Neurol Belg 2024:10.1007/s13760-024-02506-z. [PMID: 38498266 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-024-02506-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Cluster headache (International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition, ICHD-3 3.1) is a primary headache disorder affecting around 0.12% of individuals. It is characterized by severe headache attacks causing significant negative impact on the lives of patients. While administration of 100% oxygen is considered to be the first-choice acute treatment, undertreatment also exists. Reasons for undertreatment may entail problems with the correct prescription of oxygen, reimbursement issues or the practical implementation of home oxygen therapy. The aim of this manuscript is to review the scientific evidence on oxygen therapy for cluster headache and provide a practical guidance for both physicians and patients to optimize its use in an acute setting. The current evidence of the administration of 100% oxygen as a safe and effective treatment for cluster headache is strong. Based on several clinical trials and surveys, the recommended flow rates range between 12 and 15 L/min via a non-rebreathing mask, for at least fifteen minutes. The frequency of cluster headache attacks and thus the need for acute treatment can be very high. Fortunately, the Belgian social security system provides a full and lifetime reimbursement of oxygen therapy for cluster headache if the diagnosis and the need for this therapy has been certified by a neurologist, neurosurgeon or neuropsychiatrist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Van Houtte
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Vandenbussche
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eric Derom
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Brussels University Hospital, Jette, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Aldahmashi H, Maneze D, Molloy L, Salamonson Y. Nurses' adoption of diabetes clinical practice guidelines in primary care and the impacts on patient outcomes and safety: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 154:104747. [PMID: 38531197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications related to diabetes mellitus impose substantial health and economic burdens to individuals and society. While clinical practice guidelines improve diabetes management in primary care settings, the variability in adherence to these guidelines persist. Hence, there is a need to comprehensively review existing evidence regarding factors influencing nurses' adherence to implementation of clinical practice guidelines to improve clinical care and patient safety. OBJECTIVE This integrative review seeks to investigate nurses' adherence to clinical guidelines for diabetes management in primary healthcare settings and to explore factors influencing effective implementation, focusing on the role of nurses and impacts on patient outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in March 2023 across six electronic databases. The search targeted studies that examined the use of Type 2 diabetes mellitus guidelines by nurses in primary healthcare settings with a focus on clinical management outcomes related to diabetes care or patient safety. Included studies were classified using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy, synthesised narratively and presented thematically. Reporting of the review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. (PROSPERO ID CRD42023394311). RESULTS The review included ten studies conducted between 2000 and 2020, and the results were categorised into three themes. These were: (i) Implementation strategies to promote clinical practice guidelines adherence, including health professional development, reminders for clinicians, patient-mediated interventions, health information systems, role expansion, and comprehensive package-of-care. A multifaceted educational approach emerged as the most effective strategy. (ii) Impact of guidelines adherence: These strategies consistently improved clinical management, lowering HbA1c levels, improving blood pressure and lipid profiles, and enhancing patient self-care engagement, along with increased nurses' adherence to diabetes clinical guidelines. (iii) The role of nurses in guideline implementation, enabling independent practice within multidisciplinary teams. Their roles encompassed patient education, collaborative practice with fellow healthcare professionals, program planning and execution, and comprehensive documentation review. Nurse-led interventions were effective in improving patient outcomes, underscoring the necessity of empowering nurses with greater autonomy in providing primary diabetes care. CONCLUSION Implementing a diverse range of strategies, focusing on comprehensive education for healthcare providers, is paramount for enhancing guideline adherence in diabetes care, to improve clinical management towards optimal patient health outcomes. Tailoring these strategies to meet local needs adds relevance to the guidelines. Empowering nurses to take a leading role in primary care not only enhances patient safety but also promotes quality of care, resulting in improved overall outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT In primary care, empowering nurses with diabetes guideline education and tailoring strategies to local needs enhance guideline adherence and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadwan Aldahmashi
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Della Maneze
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia; Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, Australia.
| | - Luke Molloy
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Yenna Salamonson
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yackel HD, Halpenny B, Abrahm JL, Ligibel J, Enzinger A, Lobach DF, Cooley ME. A qualitative analysis of algorithm-based decision support usability testing for symptom management across the trajectory of cancer care: one size does not fit all. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:63. [PMID: 38443870 PMCID: PMC10913367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02466-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with cancer experience symptoms that change across the disease trajectory. Due to the distress and cost associated with uncontrolled symptoms, improving symptom management is an important component of quality cancer care. Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising strategy to integrate clinical practice guideline (CPG)-based symptom management recommendations at the point of care. METHODS The objectives of this project were to develop and evaluate the usability of two symptom management algorithms (constipation and fatigue) across the trajectory of cancer care in patients with active disease treated in comprehensive or community cancer care settings to surveillance of cancer survivors in primary care practices. A modified ADAPTE process was used to develop algorithms based on national CPGs. Usability testing involved semi-structured interviews with clinicians from varied care settings, including comprehensive and community cancer centers, and primary care. The transcripts were analyzed with MAXQDA using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis method. A cross tabs analysis was also performed to assess the prevalence of themes and subthemes by cancer care setting. RESULTS A total of 17 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were interviewed for usability testing. Three main themes emerged: (1) Algorithms as useful, (2) Symptom management differences, and (3) Different target end-users. The cross-tabs analysis demonstrated differences among care trajectories and settings that originated in the Symptom management differences theme. The sub-themes of "Differences between diseases" and "Differences between care trajectories" originated from participants working in a comprehensive cancer center, which tends to be disease-specific locations for patients on active treatment. Meanwhile, participants from primary care identified the sub-theme of "Differences in settings," indicating that symptom management strategies are care setting specific. CONCLUSIONS While CDS can help promote evidence-based symptom management, systems providing care recommendations need to be specifically developed to fit patient characteristics and clinical context. Findings suggest that one set of algorithms will not be applicable throughout the entire cancer trajectory. Unique CDS for symptom management will be needed for patients who are cancer survivors being followed in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ligibel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David F Lobach
- Elimu Informatics, 1709 Julian Court, 94530, El Cerrito, CA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Al-Ashwal A, Alsagheir A, Al Dubayee M, Al-Khnifsawi M, Al-Sarraf A, Awan Z, Ben-Omran T, Al-Yaarubi S, Almutair A, Habeb A, Maatouk F, Alshareef M, Kholaif N, Blom D. Modern approaches to the management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in the Middle East and North Africa. J Clin Lipidol 2024; 18:e132-e141. [PMID: 38158247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a severe form of FH in which inheritance of two defective or null mutations in genes associated with metabolism of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) results in extremely high LDL-C, premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Treatment of HoFH comprises a multi-modal approach of statins, ezetimibe, lipoprotein apheresis; and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type, angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein. These treatments are generally costly, and patients also often require treatment for ASCVD consequent to HoFH. Therefore, in the interests of both economics and preservation of life, disease prevention via genetic screening and counselling is rapidly becoming a key element in the overall management of HoFH. Guidelines are available to assist diagnosis and treatment of HoFH; however, while advancements have been made in the management of the disease, there has been little systematic attention paid to prevention. Additionally, the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region has a higher prevalence of HoFH than most other regions - chiefly due to consanguinity. This has led to the establishment of regional lipid clinics and awareness programs that have thrown education and awareness of HoFH into sharp focus. Incorporation of principles of prevention, education, awareness, and data from real-world use of existing therapeutics will significantly enhance the effectiveness of future guidelines for the management of HoFH, particularly in the MENA region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Al-Ashwal
- Medical & Clinical Affairs, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Al-Ashwal)
| | - Afaf Alsagheir
- Pediatrics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Alsagheir)
| | - Mohammed Al Dubayee
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia (Dr Al Dubayee)
| | | | - Ahmed Al-Sarraf
- Sabah Al Ahmad Cardiac Center, Department Cardiology, Ministry of Health, Kuwait (Dr Al-Sarraf)
| | - Zuhier Awan
- Division of Clinical Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Abdullah Sulayman, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (Dr Awan)
| | - Tawfeg Ben-Omran
- Division of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Sidra Medicine and Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar (Dr Ben-Omran)
| | - Saif Al-Yaarubi
- Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman (Dr Al-Yaarubi)
| | - Angham Almutair
- King Abdullah Specialised Children's Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Almutair)
| | - Abdelhadi Habeb
- Pediatric Department, Prince Mohamed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia (Dr Habeb)
| | - Faouzi Maatouk
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Tunisia (Dr Maatouk)
| | - Manal Alshareef
- National Guard Hospital, Prince Mutib Ibn Abdullah Rd, National Guard District, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Alshareef)
| | - Naji Kholaif
- Heart Centre Cardiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Kholaif); Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Kholaif)
| | - Dirk Blom
- Division of Lipidology, Department of Medicine and Cape Heart Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (Dr Blom)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Howard C, Sell T, Abraham C, Anderson JM, Norris B, Anderson RM, Vu TK, Vassar M, Checketts JX. Inadequate harms reporting among randomized controlled trials cited as supporting evidence in the AAOS management of hip fractures in older adults clinical practice guideline recommendations. Injury 2024; 55:111326. [PMID: 38262332 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations within clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are heavily influenced by results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, it is imperative that all RCT outcomes are reported thoroughly to ensure CPGs are created using accurate information. Here, we evaluate the quality of harms reporting using the CONSORT Extension for Harms in RCTs underpinning recommendations in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults CPG. METHODS Each RCT cited as evidence for recommendations in the AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults CPG was evaluated using the CONSORT Extension for Harms to determine the quality of harms reporting. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, 95 % confidence intervals) were used to summarize adherence to CONSORT Harms items. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the CONSORT Harms influence on the quality of reporting over time. RESULTS Among the 156 RCTs identified, there were a total of 31,848 participants. Most RCTs were conducted at a single center (137; 87.8 %) and in a single-blind manner (130; 83.3 %). Fifty-four (34.6 %) RCTs did not provide funding statements. Trials adequately reported an average of 6.65 out of 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items (37.0 %). One RCT adequately reported all items, while five reported zero items. Forty-seven RCTs (30.1 %) reported ≥ 50 % of items and 73 (46.8 %) reported ≤ 33.3 % of items. The linear regression model demonstrated no significant increase in mean adherence over time (adjusted R2 = -0.006; p = 0.563). CONCLUSION Our results highlight inadequate harms reporting among RCTs in the AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Patients CPG. While the CONSORT Harms Extension was intended to enhance reporting, the linear regression model did not demonstrate significant improvements over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conner Howard
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
| | - Tianna Sell
- Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, NM, USA
| | - Christena Abraham
- Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - J Michael Anderson
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Brent Norris
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA; Orthopaedic Trauma Services of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Reece M Anderson
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Thuc K Vu
- Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Matt Vassar
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Jake X Checketts
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kubota K, Nakashima K, Nakashima K, Kataoka M, Inoue K, Goto M, Kanbayashi C, Hirokaga K, Yamaguchi K, Suzuki A. The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:157-164. [PMID: 37973686 PMCID: PMC10901949 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
This article provides updates to readers based on the newly published Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 2022 Edition. These guidelines incorporate the latest evaluation of evidence from studies of diagnostic accuracy. For each clinical question, outcomes for benefits and harms were established, and qualitative or quantitative systematic reviews were conducted. Recommendations were determined through voting by a multidisciplinary group, and guidelines were documented to facilitate shared decision-making among patients and medical professionals. The guidelines address screening, surveillance, and pre- and postoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. In an environment that demands an integrated approach, decisions are needed on how to utilize modalities, such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and PET/CT. Additionally, it is vital to understand the appropriate use of new technologies, such as tomosynthesis, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and to consider how best to adapt these methods for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kubota
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minami-koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kazutaka Nakashima
- Department of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Nakashima
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Breast Imaging and Breast Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masako Kataoka
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenich Inoue
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Breast Cancer Center, Shonan Memorial Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mariko Goto
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chizuko Kanbayashi
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirokaga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ken Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Akihiko Suzuki
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Strauss T, Günther C, Brück N. [Juvenile localized scleroderma]. Dermatologie (Heidelb) 2024; 75:208-213. [PMID: 38240812 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-023-05293-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Juvenile scleroderma, often referred to as juvenile localized scleroderma or "morphea", is a rare inflammatory disease of the skin and skin-related structures, accompanied by local sclerosis and tissue fibrosis. Depending on the clinical manifestation, four different subtypes can be defined: limited, generalized, linear, and mixed. To prevent possible sequelae of the disease, the diagnosis should be made as early as possible and therapy should be initiated at specialized centers in multiprofessional pediatric and dermatologic collaboration. In this review, we present the main clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of juvenile localized scleroderma and summarize recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timmy Strauss
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - Claudia Günther
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Normi Brück
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rhodes S, Dodd S, Deckert S, Vasanthan L, Qiu R, Rohde JF, Florez ID, Schmitt J, Nieuwlaat R, Kirkham J, Williamson PR. Representation of published core outcome sets in practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111311. [PMID: 38423401 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed standardized set of outcomes that should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in specific areas of health or health care. A COS is developed through a consensus process to ensure health care outcomes to be measured are relevant to decision-makers, including patients and health-care professionals. Use of COS in guideline development is likely to increase the relevance of the guideline to those decision-makers. Previous work has looked at the uptake of COS in trials, systematic reviews, health technology assessments and regulatory guidance but to date there has been no evaluation of the use of COS in practice guideline development. The objective of this study was to investigate the representation of core outcomes in a set of international practice guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We searched for clinical guidelines relevant to ten high-quality COS (with focus on the United Kingdom, Germany, China, India, Canada, Denmark, United States and World Health Organisation). We matched scope between COS and guideline in terms of condition, population and outcome. We calculated the proportion of guidelines mentioning or referencing COS and the proportion of COS domains specifically, or generally, matching to outcomes specified in each guideline populations, interventions, comparators and outcome (PICO) statement. RESULTS We found 38 guidelines that contained 170 PICO statements matching the scope of the ten COS and of sufficient quality to allow data extraction. None of the guidelines reviewed explicitly mentioned or referenced the relevant COS. The median (range) of the proportion of core outcomes covered either specifically or generally by the guideline PICO was 30% (0%-100%). CONCLUSION There is no evidence that COS are being used routinely to inform the guideline development process, and concordance between outcomes in published guidelines and those in COS is limited. Further work is warranted to explore barriers and facilitators in the use of COS when developing clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Rhodes
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Susanna Dodd
- MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L63 3GL, UK
| | - Stefanie Deckert
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lenny Vasanthan
- Physiotherapy Unit, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ruijin Qiu
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jeanett Friis Rohde
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark; The Danish Health Authority, Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Las Américas-AUNA, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Kirkham
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L63 3GL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yu W, Chen D, Ding X, Qiao L, Zhang L, Gao X, Yan Y, Mo W, Ma J, Yin M. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis. Eur Spine J 2024:10.1007/s00586-023-08127-z. [PMID: 38407614 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08127-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE As an important treatment for spinal metastasis, surgery has strict applicable conditions. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for spinal metastasis (SM), there are certain differences in the content, standardization and quality of the guidelines and it is necessary to make a critical appraisal of them. We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SM and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence, as to provide a reference for the standardization of surgical treatment plans, and help clinical front-line medical workers can make safe and effective clinical decisions faster. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase for three major databases and online guideline databases. According to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, the latest guidelines on the surgical treatment of SM were sorted out. AGREE II was used to evaluated the guideline's quality, and we extracted and compared the recommended treatment content of each guideline with evaluating by the evidence-grading scale. RESULTS Eight guidelines from 2013 to 2019 were included. Seven guidelines are comprehensive guidelines and one related to the reconstructive surgery of SM. Five guidelines were evaluated as "recommended," and three guidelines were evaluated as "recommended with modifications." Regarding the indications of surgery with SM, four guidelines, seven guidelines, seven guidelines, three guidelines and three guidelines recommended surgical treatment for patients with SM with intractable pain, mechanical instability, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), recurrent spinal metastasis (RSM), and survival predication, respectively. Regarding the surgical strategies, three guidelines recommended minimally invasive therapy but had strict indications. Six guidelines and five guidelines recommend palliative surgery and with receiving radiation therapy, respectively. For the aggressive surgery, only one guideline recommended to apply to patients in good general conditions who has isolated symptomatic SM. Regarding the surgical reconstructions, one guideline didn't recommend iliac bone graft and three guidelines recommended PMMA bone cement. CONCLUSION Most of the guidelines do not provide clear criteria for surgical application and provide more of a basic framework. The level of evidence for these surgical recommendations ranges from LOE B to D, and almost all guidelines recommend vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but for palliative and more aggressive surgery, which recommended to personalize specific surgical strategies with multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Yu
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Dingbang Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xing Ding
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Liang Qiao
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Luosheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yinjie Yan
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen Mo
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Junming Ma
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Mengchen Yin
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chang C, Sun J, Zhao X, Chen S, Song D, Wang L, Yang Y, Huang R, Zhang H, Du J. Clinical practice guidelines for the nutrition of colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:187. [PMID: 38396102 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08394-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to rigorously assess the methodological quality of published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to nutrition among colorectal cancer patients, to compile consensus recommendations, and to evaluate the quality of the included CPGs. METHODS The systematic search covered eight electronic databases, two relevant professional association websites, and six guideline websites from their inception up to January 22, 2023. The methodological quality of the eligible guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, and then, consensus recommendations were synthesized. The scores for each domain were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Using the mean score as the benchmark for comparison, they were subsequently ranked from highest to lowest. The included guidelines were then categorized as having "high," "moderate," or "low" quality based on their scores. RESULTS The literature search yielded ten guidelines. The findings indicated that the "Clarity of presentation" domain had the highest mean score (65.2 ± 7.7). This demonstrates how the guidelines effectively articulate recommendations. Additionally, the "Scope and purpose" domain achieved a mean score of 60.7 ± 10.9, followed by "Rigor of development" (51.7 ± 15.7), "Editorial independence" (51.1 ± 21), "Stakeholder involvement" (48 ± 16.8), and "Applicability" domains (47.5 ± 17.3). Two CPGs received an overall rating of "high quality" and were recommended; four CPGs received an overall rating of "moderate" and were recommended with modifications; and four CPGs received an overall rating of "low quality" and were not recommended. Furthermore, this study compiled twenty consensus recommendations related to nine distinct clinical issues. CONCLUSION This study identified disparities in the methodological quality of the included CPGs, particularly in the "Applicability" domain, thus emphasizing the need for advancement in clinical feasibility and implementation. Notably, there is few guidelines specifically targeting colorectal cancer nutrition. These synthesized findings provided an intuitive, convenient, and comprehensive reference for evaluating nutrition among colorectal cancer patients. When applying these results, users should make careful decisions based on their specific situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No.965 Xinjiang Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Xiaosu Zhao
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China.
| | - Si Chen
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Dongpo Song
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No.965 Xinjiang Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Lijie Wang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Yang Yang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Ruling Huang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Haijia Zhang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Jing Du
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lynne-Joseph A. The reproduction of knowledge hierarchies in transgender medicine: Professional, lay, and global expertise in clinical practice guidelines. Soc Sci Med 2024:116712. [PMID: 38443306 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The process for developing clinical practice guidelines in medicine has changed dramatically over time. Previously, small groups of clinicians crafted clinical practice guidelines based on their professional expertise, but guideline developers must increasingly consider patients' lay expertise, global expertise, and principles of evidence-based medicine. This article analyzes how the World Professional Association for Transgender Health grappled with diverse forms of expertise and evidence-based medicine in the process of creating its "Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8" (hereafter, SOC-8), a prominent set of clinical practice guidelines in transgender medicine. Analysis is based on 83 interviews with clinicians, patients, and activists in the U.S. and Thailand between 2019 and 2021, as well as observation of transgender health conferences and content analysis of written materials. I find that despite the ostensible goal of incorporating more diverse expertise in this version of the guidelines, the SOC-8 ultimately reproduced traditional knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine in which the lay expertise of transgender and gender non-conforming patients and expertise from the Global South remain marginalized. I attribute this re-marginalization to the regulatory objectivity enacted in the SOC-8 revision process, which re-legitimized professional expertise, established no formal infrastructure for ensuring the equal participation of Global South stakeholders, and permitted limited inclusion of lay expertise from transgender and gender non-conforming people with relatively high levels of privilege (according to race, education, and other social statuses). These findings have implications for future research on knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine and the creation of clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Lynne-Joseph
- Wichita State University, Department of Sociology, 1845 Fairmount Street, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Goossen K, Bieler D, Weise A, Nothacker M, Flohé S, Pieper D. Application of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process of the German polytrauma guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6. [PMID: 38381190 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the guideline development process of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries ('German polytrauma guideline') from the perspective of the guideline group, and to identify areas where this process may be improved in the future. METHODS We administered PANELVIEW to the participants of the 2022 update of the German polytrauma guideline. All guideline group members, including delegates of participating medical societies, steering group members, authors of guideline chapters, the chair, and methodological lead, were invited to participate. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Comments received were categorised by domains/items of the tool. RESULTS After the first, second, and last consensus conference, the guideline group was invited via email to participate in a web-based survey. Response rates were 36% (n/N = 13/36), 40% (12/30), and 37% (20/54), respectively. The mean scores for items ranged between 5.1 and 6.9 on a scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 7 (fully agree). Items with mean scores below 6.0 were related to (1) administration, (2) consideration of patients' views, perspectives, values, and preferences, and (3) the discussion of research gaps and needs for future research. CONCLUSION The PANELVIEW tool showed that the guideline group was satisfied with most aspects of the guideline development process. Areas for improvement of the process were identified. Strategies to improve response rates should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Käthe Goossen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Dan Bieler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), c/o Philipps Universität Marburg/AWMF Berlin, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Flohé
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mthethwa M, Mbeye NM, Effa E, Arikpo D, Blose N, Brand A, Chibuzor M, Chipojola R, Durao S, Esu E, Kallon II, Kunje G, Lakudzala S, Naude C, Leong TD, Lewin S, Mabetha D, McCaul M, Meremikwu M, Vandvik PO, Kredo T. Newborn and child health national and provincial clinical practice guidelines in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:221. [PMID: 38374031 PMCID: PMC10877834 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10682-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low and middle-income countries remain disproportionately affected by high rates of child mortality. Clinical practice guidelines are essential clinical tools supporting implementation of effective, safe, and cost-effective healthcare. High-quality evidence-based guidelines play a key role in improving clinical management to impact child mortality. We aimed to identify and assess the quality of guidelines for newborn and child health published in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi in the last 5 years (2017-2022). METHODS We searched relevant websites (June-July 2022), for publicly available national and subnational de novo or adapted guidelines, addressing newborn and child health in the three countries. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted information from eligible guidelines (scope, topic, target population and users, responsible developers, stakeholder consultation process, adaptation description, assessment of evidence certainty). We appraised guideline quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS We identified 40-guidelines from the three countries. Of these, 8/40 reported being adopted from a parent guideline. More guidelines (n = 19) provided guidance on communicable diseases than on non-communicable diseases (n = 8). Guidelines were most often developed by national health ministries (n = 30) and professional societies (n = 14). Eighteen guidelines reported on stakeholder consultation; with Nigeria (10/11) and Malawi (3/6) faring better than South Africa (5/23) in reporting this activity. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used in 1/7 guidelines that reported assessing certainty of evidence. Overall guidelines scored well on two AGREE II domains: scope and purpose median (IQR) score 68% (IQR 47-83), and clarity of presentation 81% (67-94). Domains critical for ensuring credible guidance scored below 20%: rigour of development 11% (4-32) and editorial independence 6% (0-27). CONCLUSION National ministries and professional societies drive guideline activities in Malawi, Nigeria and South Arica. However, the methods and reporting do not adhere to global standards. We found low AGREE II scores for rigour of guideline development and editorial independence and limited use of GRADE or adaptation methods. This undermines the credibility of available guidelines to support evidence-informed care. Our findings highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to strengthen partnerships, capacity, and support for guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashudu Mthethwa
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emmanuel Effa
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Dachi Arikpo
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Ntombifuthi Blose
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Amanda Brand
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Moriam Chibuzor
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Roselyn Chipojola
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Solange Durao
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ekpereonne Esu
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Idriss Ibrahim Kallon
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gertrude Kunje
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Suzgika Lakudzala
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Celeste Naude
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Trudy D Leong
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Simon Lewin
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Health Sciences Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Denny Mabetha
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael McCaul
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Martin Meremikwu
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tamara Kredo
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mohan D, Angus DC, Chang CCH, Elmer J, Fischhoff B, Rak KJ, Barnes JL, Peitzman AB, White DB. Using a theory-based, customized video game as an educational tool to improve physicians' trauma triage decisions: study protocol for a randomized cluster trial. Trials 2024; 25:127. [PMID: 38365758 PMCID: PMC10870723 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07961-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transfer of severely injured patients to trauma centers, either directly from the field or after evaluation at non-trauma centers, reduces preventable morbidity and mortality. Failure to transfer these patients appropriately (i.e., under-triage) remains common, and occurs in part because physicians at non-trauma centers make diagnostic errors when evaluating the severity of patients' injuries. We developed Night Shift, a theory-based adventure video game, to recalibrate physician heuristics (intuitive judgments) in trauma triage and established its efficacy in the laboratory. We plan a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to determine whether the game changes physician triage decisions in real-life and hypothesize that it will reduce the proportion of patients under-triaged. METHODS We will recruit 800 physicians who work in the emergency departments (EDs) of non-trauma centers in the US and will randomize them to the game (intervention) or to usual education and training (control). We will ask those in the intervention group to play Night Shift for 2 h within 2 weeks of enrollment and again for 20 min at quarterly intervals. Those in the control group will receive only usual education (i.e., nothing supplemental). We will then assess physicians' triage practices for older, severely injured adults in the 1-year following enrollment, using Medicare claims, and will compare under-triage (primary outcome), 30-day mortality and re-admissions, functional independence, and over-triage between the two groups. We will evaluate contextual factors influencing reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance with interviews of a subset of trial participants (n = 20) and of other key decision makers (e.g., patients, first responders, administrators [n = 100]). DISCUSSION The results of the trial will inform future efforts to improve the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage and will provide deeper understanding of effective strategies to reduce diagnostic errors during time-sensitive decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06063434 . Registered 26 September 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepika Mohan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, F1265 PUH, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Derek C Angus
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chung-Chou H Chang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Elmer
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Baruch Fischhoff
- Department of Engineering and Environmental Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kim J Rak
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacqueline L Barnes
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, F1265 PUH, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Douglas B White
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Blair A, Tan A, Homer CSE, Vogel JP. How do postnatal care guidelines in Australia compare to international standards? A scoping review and comparative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:121. [PMID: 38336632 PMCID: PMC10854083 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06295-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no single national guideline in Australia on the provision of postnatal care, which means there is potential for significant variation in the standard and quality of care. This review aimed to systematically identify, synthesise, and assess the quality of postnatal care guidelines produced for use in Australia. A second aim was to compare postnatal care recommendations in Australian guidelines to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) and the World Health Organization's (WHO) postnatal care recommendations, to identify gaps and areas of disagreement. We focussed on recommendations regarding postnatal assessment of the woman or newborn, infant feeding, discharge planning, or community-based care. METHODS A scoping review was undertaken informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A database search and a manual search of state and national government health departments, professional associations and research institute websites was performed to identify relevant guidelines and recommendations. Guideline quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. Guideline recommendations from Australia were mapped to 67 NICE/WHO recommendations. Recommendations that partially agreed, were modified, or in disagreement underwent further analysis. RESULTS A total of 31 Australian postnatal guidelines were identified and overall, these were of moderate- to high-quality. Of the 67 NICE/WHO recommendations, most agreed with the recommendations contained in Australian guidelines. There were five NICE/WHO recommendations with which corresponding Australian recommendations disagreed. There were 12 NICE/WHO recommendations that were commonly modified within Australia's guidelines. There were three NICE/WHO recommendations that did not appear in any Australian guideline. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations from postnatal guidelines in Australia have a high level of agreement with corresponding NICE/WHO recommendations. The few disagreements and modifications found in guideline recommendations - both across Australia's guidelines and between Australia's and the NICE/WHO guidelines - are worrying and warrant further examination, as they may result in different standards of care across Australia. Identified gaps in guidance should be prioritised for inclusion in new or updated guidelines where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Blair
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
| | - Annie Tan
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Caroline S E Homer
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Richaud C, Jochum F, Journo G, Toussaint A, Laurent M, Fontier Z, Langer A, Malhaire C, Laas E, Féron JG, Lecuru F, Pouget N, Guinebretière JM, El Zein S, Brain E, Watson S, Piperno-Neumann S, Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Bozec L, Hamy AS. Impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on the early management and outcomes of uterine sarcoma patients: A retrospective analysis from the French NETSARC network. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107319. [PMID: 38159391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Their diagnosis is often incidental, following surgery. Our goal was to examine the early management strategies for uterine sarcomas, and to assess the impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on both the management approaches and the clinical outcomes in patients with uterine sarcomas. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed medical records from patients with uterine sarcoma referred to the Institut Curie and registered in the database of the French NETSARC network. RESULTS In total, 100 patients, with a median age of 54 years, were included in the analyses. On MRI scans (n = 36), all patients had at least two signs suggestive of malignancy, and 77.8 % had four or more signs. No preoperative biopsy was performed in 65.6 % of cases. Only 14.1 % of patients underwent initial surgery at an expert center. Surgery performed outside the network was significantly associated with morcellation (32.9 % vs. 0 %; p = 0.036), fewer negative margins (R0 margins 52.4 % vs. 100 %; p = 0.006), and poor adherence to surgical guidelines (28.3 vs. 72.7 %; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that non-adherence to surgical recommendations was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival (HR = 0.54; 95 % CI [0.21-1.38]), but was an independent predictor of poor overall survival (HR = 0.12; 95 % CI [0.03-0.52]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Despite a high frequency of suspicious clinical and radiological signs, a large proportion of women undergoing sarcoma surgery are treated outside of expert networks. We provide guidelines, integrating the clinical context and radiological signs to encourage early referral to reference centers for sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse Richaud
- Department of Gynecology, Cochin Port-Royal Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Adriana Langer
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | | | - Enora Laas
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Guillaume Féron
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Pouget
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Sophie El Zein
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Sarah Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lowry V, Lavigne P, Zidarov D, Matifat E, Cormier AA, Desmeules F. A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Various Shoulder Disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:411-426. [PMID: 37832814 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) covering the management of common shoulder disorders. DATA SOURCES A systematic search of CPGs on specific shoulder disorders was conducted up to August 2022 in relevant databases. STUDY SELECTION Twenty-six CPGs on rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, RC tear, calcific tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral (GH) instability, GH osteoarthritis, or acromioclavicular disorders published from January 2008 onward were screened and included. DATA EXTRACTION CPGs methodological quality was assessed with the AGREE II checklist. All recommendations from CPGs were extracted and categorized by shoulder disorder and care components (evaluation, diagnostic imaging, medical, rehabilitation, and surgical treatments). After semantic analysis of the terminology, recommendations for each shoulder disorders were classified by 2 reviewers into "recommended," "may be recommended," or "not recommended." Disagreements were resolved by discussion until reviewers reached consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS Only 12 CPGs (46%) were of high quality with major limitations related to the applicability and editorial independence of the guidelines. The initial evaluation of shoulder pain should include patient's history, subjective evaluation focused on red flags, and clinical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging is usually not recommended to manage early shoulder pain, and recommendations for X-rays are conflicting. Acetaminophen, oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and rehabilitation including exercises were recommended or may be recommended to treat all shoulder pain disorders. Guidelines on surgical management recommendations differed; for example, 6 CPGs reported that acromioplasty was recommended or may be recommended in chronic RC tendinopathy, whereas 4 CPGs did not recommend it. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations vary for diagnostic imaging, conservative vs surgical treatment to manage shoulder pain, although several care components are consensual. The development of evidence-based, rigorous CPGs with a valid methodology and transparent reporting is warranted to improve overall shoulder pain care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Lowry
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Patrick Lavigne
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada; Surgery Department, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Diana Zidarov
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Montreal Research Center (CRIR), Montreal, Canada; Montreal University Institute for Physical Impairment Rehabilitation (IURDPM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Eveline Matifat
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lin FF, Murphy N, Martinez A, Marshall AP. Facilitators and barriers to evidence-based practice in central venous access device insertion and management in an intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2024; 80:103553. [PMID: 37783178 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research evidence and clinical practice guidelines exist on preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections. However, there is limited knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to evidence-based central venous access device care. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the facilitators and barriers to evidence-based central venous access device care in the adult intensive care setting. METHOD This exploratory qualitative study involved focus groups and interviews with registered nurses and physicians involved in central venous access device insertion and management in a tertiary Australian intensive care unit. Purposive sampling was used to recruit staff (n = 26) with varying years of clinical experience and clinical positions. Six focus groups and three individual interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Three overarching categories emerged: work structures to support optimal performance; processes to optimise quality of care, and factors influencing staff members' behaviour. Perceived facilitators to optimal central venous access device care included explicit language use in procedure documents, work-system integrated strategies, research evidence dissemination, audit, and feedback. However, there was a lack of consistency in practices such as audit, feedback, and patient participation. CONCLUSION To bring about effective improvement in central venous access device care, future interventions should be tailored to address identified barriers, including integrating audit and feedback into clinicians' work processes. Additionally, future research is needed to explore the role of patients and their families in central venous access device care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE When developing practice policies or procedure manuals, it is important to use explicit language to ensure clear communication of evidence-based recommendations to clinicians. Strategies integrated into work processes can enhance adherence to evidence-based practice. Large departments with limited educators should explore innovative methods like online education to ensure optimal central venous access device care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Fengzhi Lin
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia; Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Niki Murphy
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Angelly Martinez
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ammann AM, Pratt CG, Lewis JD, Ahmad SA, Shaughnessy E, Heelan AA. Breast infections: A review of current literature. Am J Surg 2024; 228:78-82. [PMID: 37949727 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast infections are common, affect women of all ages, and are associated with significant morbidity. Despite overall prevalence, treatment varies significantly based on provider or institution and no central treatment guidelines exist to direct the management of breast infections. This article provides a summary of the current trends in management of breast infections. The etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of mastitis and breast abscesses (and their relative subdivisions) are explored based on the current literature. Trends in microbiology are reviewed and an approach to antibiotic coverage is proposed. Overall, there is a lack of randomized-controlled trials focused on the treatment of breast infections. This has resulted in an absence of clinical practice guidelines for the management of breast abscesses and variable practice patterns. The development of best-care protocols or pathways could provide more uniformity in care of breast infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Ammann
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Catherine G Pratt
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Jaime D Lewis
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Shaughnessy
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Alicia A Heelan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|