In canine bacterial pneumonia circulating granulocyte counts determine outcome from donor cells

BACKGROUND

In experimental canine septic shock, depressed circulating granulocyte counts were associated with a poor outcome and increasing counts with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improved outcome. Therapeutic G-CSF, in contrast, did not improve circulating counts or outcome, and therefore investigation was undertaken to determine whether transfusing granulocytes therapeutically would improve outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-eight purpose-bred beagles underwent an intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus challenge and 4 hours later were randomly assigned to granulocyte (40-100 × 109 cells) or plasma transfusion.

RESULTS

Granulocyte transfusion significantly expanded the low circulating counts for hours compared to septic controls but was not associated with significant mortality benefit (1/14, 7% vs. 2/14, 14%, respectively; p = 0.29). Septic animals with higher granulocyte count at 4 hours (median [interquartile range] of 3.81 3.39-5.05] vs. 1.77 [1.25-2.50]) had significantly increased survival independent of whether they were transfused with granulocytes. In a subgroup analysis, animals with higher circulating granulocyte counts receiving donor granulocytes had worsened lung injury compared to septic controls. Conversely, donor granulocytes decreased lung injury in septic animals with lower counts.

CONCLUSION

During bacterial pneumonia, circulating counts predict the outcome of transfusing granulocytes. With low but normal counts, transfusing granulocytes does not improve survival and injures the lung, whereas for animals with very low counts, but not absolute neutropenia, granulocyte transfusion improves lung function.

In Vitro Function of Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia Granulocytes. Effects of Irradiation and Storage

Granulocyte function was studied in 9 patients with untreated, Ph1-positive chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML). The nitroblue tetrazolium reduction by stimulated granulocytes was impaired in all patients; 4 patients also had diminished phagocytosis and 2 others defective Chemotaxis. In spite of this variety of polymorphonuclear (PMN) functional impairments, there is little evidence of increased susceptibility to infections in CML patients. This suggests that CML-PMN leucocytes (PMNs) may be successfully used for transfusion into neutropenic recipients, as previously reported. To evaluate the effects of irradiation and liquid storage on CML-PMNs, 5 of our patients were subjected to leukapheresis by continuous-flow centrifugation in the Aminco Celltrifuge, and granulocyte functional capacities were also evaluated on the cell-rich plasma immediately after collection and after short-term storage at 4°C with or without irradiation (1500 rads). As evaluated by in vitro studies, granulocytes maintained, even after irradiation, functional activities similar to those found immediately after collection up to 24 h of storage at 4°C and presented a moderate loss of function after 48 h. Chemotaxis appeared to be the most sensitive detector for cellular damage of stored leucocytes, irradiated and non-irradiated, so that it might be used for assessment of leucocyte function before transfusion.

[Granulocyte transfusion – when and how should it be used?]

There are no randomized controlled trials proving the clinical benefit of granulocyte transfusions. However, clinical experience and a number of case studies suggest that granulocyte transfusions may be life-saving in certain situations. In our opinion granulocyte transfusions should be considered for patients with profound neutropenia and severe, life-threatening infection not responding to antibiotic or antifungal therapy. Since the clinical effect seems to be dose-dependent, the granulocyte concentrate should contain a large number of cells, which usually means that the donor should be mobilized with steroids and G-CSF. Regular blood donors as well as relatives to the patient can be used for granulocyte donations with apheresis technique after information of the process. Granulocyte transfusion should be given daily as long as the indication remains. The clinical efficacy of the transfusions should be evaluated daily.

De-escalation empirical antibiotic therapy improved survival for patients with severe aplastic anemia treated with antithymocyte globulin

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of de-escalation empirical therapy for controlling infection in patients with severe aplastic anaemia (SAA) treated with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Eighty-seven ATG-treated SAA patients who had microbiological culture-confirmed infections from 2006 to 2015 in our center were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy of de-escalation and non-de-escalation therapy was compared. Among all 87 patients, 63 patients were treated with de-escalation therapy and 24 patients with non-de-escalation therapy. More patients showed response to anti-infection treatment in de-escalation group than in non-de-escalation group both on day 7 (60.32% vs. 25.00%, P = 0.003) and on day 30 (79.37% vs. 58.33%, P = 0.047) since the initial antimicrobial therapy. On day 30, more patients had increased absolute neutrophil count in de-escalation group compared with non-de-escalation group (76.19% vs. 45.83%, P = 0.007), and de-escalation group had lower morality rate (17.46% vs. 37.50%, P = 0.047) and better survival outcome (P = 0.023) on day 90. Twenty-three patients in de-escalation group and 5 patients in non-escalation group received granulocyte transfusions. Granulocyte transfusions helped to control infections in both de-escalation group (P = 0.027) and non-de-escalation group (P = 0.042) on day 7, but did not improve survival on day 90. We concluded that de-escalation antibiotics improved survival in SAA patients after ATG treatment. Early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics pending microbiological cultures combined with a commitment to change to narrow-spectrum antibiotics should be recommended for controlling infections in SAA patients treated with ATG. Granulocyte transfusions might be an adjunctive therapy in controlling infections.

Granulocyte transfusions for treating infections in people with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Despite modern antimicrobials and supportive therapy bacterial and fungal infections are still major complications in people with prolonged disease-related or treatment-related neutropenia. Transfusions of granulocytes have a long history of usage in clinical practice to support and treat severe infection in high-risk groups of patients with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction. However, there is considerable current variability in therapeutic granulocyte transfusion practice, and uncertainty about the beneficial effect of transfusions given as an adjunct to antibiotics on mortality. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of granulocyte transfusions compared to no granulocyte transfusions as adjuncts to antimicrobials for treating infections in people with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil function aimed at reducing mortality and other adverse outcomes related to infection.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 2). MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1937), the Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1980) and ongoing trial databases to 11 February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing people with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil dysfunction receiving granulocyte transfusions to treat infection with a control group receiving no granulocyte transfusions. Neonates are the subject of another Cochrane review and were excluded from this review. There was no restriction by outcomes examined, language or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 10 trials that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 587 participants. We also identified another ongoing trial. These trials were conducted between 1975 and 2015. None of the studies included people with neutrophil dysfunction. The studies differed in the type of infections they included. Six studies included both children and adults, however data were not reported separately for children and adults. The two newest studies gave granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to donors; both were stopped early due to lack of recruitment. Three studies re-randomised participants and therefore quantitative analysis was unable to be performed.Overall the quality of the evidence was very low to low across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology. This was due to many of the studies being at high risk of bias, and many of the outcomes being imprecise.There may be no difference in all-cause mortality over 30 days between participants receiving therapeutic granulocyte transfusions and those that did not (six studies; 321 participants; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.04; very low-quality evidence). There were no differences between the granulocyte dose subgroups (< 1 x 10(10) per day versus ≥ 1 x 10(10) per day) (test for subgroup differences P = 0.39). There was a difference in all-cause mortality between the studies based on the age of the study (published before 2000 versus published 2000 or later) (test for subgroup differences P = 0.03). There was no difference in all-cause mortality between participants receiving granulocyte transfusions and those that did not in the newest study (one study; 111 participants; RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.73, low-quality evidence). There may be a reduction in all-cause mortality in participants receiving granulocyte transfusions compared to those that did not in studies published before the year 2000 (five studies; 210 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85; low-quality evidence).There may be no difference in clinical reversal of concurrent infection between participants receiving therapeutic granulocyte transfusions and those that did not (five studies; 286 participants; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.19; low-quality evidence).There is insufficient evidence to determine whether there is a difference in pulmonary serious adverse events (1 study; 24 participants; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.88; very low-quality evidence).None of the studies reported number of days on therapeutic antibiotics, number of adverse events requiring discontinuation of treatment, or quality of life.Six studies reported their funding sources and all were funded by governments or charities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people who are neutropenic due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy or a haematopoietic stem cell transplant, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether granulocyte transfusions affect all-cause mortality. To be able to detect a decrease in all-cause mortality from 35% to 30% would require a study containing at least 2748 participants (80% power, 5% significance). There is low-grade evidence that therapeutic granulocyte transfusions may not increase the number of participants with clinical resolution of an infection.

Granulocyte transfusions for preventing infections in people with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Despite modern antimicrobials and supportive therapy, bacterial and fungal infections are still major complications in people with prolonged disease-related or therapy-related neutropenia. Since the late 1990s there has been increasing demand for donated granulocyte transfusions to treat or prevent severe infections in people who lack their own functional granulocytes. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic granulocyte transfusions compared with a control population not receiving this intervention for preventing all-cause mortality, mortality due to infection, and evidence of infection due to infection or due to any other cause in people with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil function.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1937), theTransfusion Evidence Library (from 1980) and ongoing trial databases to April 20 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing people receiving granulocyte transfusions to prevent the development of infection with a control group receiving no granulocyte transfusions. Neonates are the subject of another Cochrane review and were excluded from this review. There was no restriction by outcomes examined, but this review focuses on mortality, mortality due to infection and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials met the inclusion criteria. One trial is still ongoing, leaving a total of 11 trials eligible involving 653 participants. These trials were conducted between 1978 and 2006 and enrolled participants from fairly comparable patient populations. None of the studies included people with neutrophil dysfunction. Ten studies included only adults, and two studies included children and adults. Ten of these studies contained separate data for each arm and were able to be critically appraised. One study re-randomised people and therefore quantitative analysis was unable to be performed.Overall, the quality of the evidence was very low to low across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology. This was due to many of the studies being at high risk of bias, and many of the outcome estimates being imprecise.All-cause mortality was reported for nine studies (609 participants). There was no difference in all-cause mortality over 30 days between people receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions and those that did not (seven studies; 437 participants; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.36, very low-quality evidence).Mortality due to infection was reported for seven studies (398 participants). There was no difference in mortality due to infection over 30 days between people receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions and those that did not (six studies; 286 participants; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.44, very low-quality evidence).The number of people with localised or systemic bacterial or fungal infections was reported for nine studies (609 participants). There were differences between the granulocyte dose subgroups (test for subgroup differences P = 0.01). There was no difference in the number of people with infections over 30 days between people receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions and those that did not in the low-dose granulocyte group (< 1.0 x 10(10) granulocytes per day) (four studies, 204 participants; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.20; very low-quality evidence). There was a decreased number of people with infections over 30 days in the people receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions in the intermediate-dose granulocyte group (1.0 x 10(10) to 4.0 x 10(10) granulocytes per day) (4 studies; 293 participants; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.63, low-quality evidence).There was a decreased number of participants with bacteraemia and fungaemia in the participants receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions (nine studies; 609 participants; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.65, low-quality evidence).There was no difference in the number of participants with localised bacterial or fungal infection in the participants receiving prophylactic granulocyte transfusions (six studies; 296 participants; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.14; very low-quality evidence).Serious adverse events were only reported for participants receiving granulocyte transfusions and donors of granulocyte transfusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people who are neutropenic due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy or a haematopoietic stem cell transplant, there is low-grade evidence that prophylactic granulocyte transfusions decrease the risk of bacteraemia or fungaemia. There is low-grade evidence that the effect of prophylactic granulocyte transfusions may be dose-dependent, a dose of at least 10 x 10(10) per day being more effective at decreasing the risk of infection. There is insufficient evidence to determine any difference in mortality rates due to infection, all-cause mortality, or serious adverse events.

Use of healthy-donor granulocyte transfusions to treat infections in neutropenic patients with myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms: experience in 74 patients treated with 373 granulocyte transfusions

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite limited evidence for efficacy, granulocyte transfusions (GTX) are used to prevent and treat opportunistic infections in patients with neutropenia.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-three GTX given to 74 patients were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

GTX were discontinued because of clinical improvement more often in patients with severe infections than in patients without severe infections (27 vs. 12%; p ≤ 0.002), whereas deaths resulted in discontinuation of GTX therapy less often in patients with severe infections than without (8 vs. 39%; p ≤ 0.002). Patients who died by 12 weeks after GTX initiation were more likely to have leukemia (p = 0.03), not to have recovery of neutrophil counts (p < 0.0001), and to have started GTX during a critical care unit stay (p < 0.001). Uses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (p ≤ 0.02) and interferon-γ (p ≤ 0.04) were more common in patients who survived. In patients with comorbidities (31%; odds ratio, OR, 12.6; 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.4-65.7; p ≤ 0.003), GTX was started in the critical care unit (OR 8.8; 95% CI 2.5-30.9; p < 0.001), and a high total bilirubin level at the end of GTX (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.2; p = 0.03) had a higher probability of death 12 weeks after GTX therapy commenced.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility that a niche population may benefit from GTX requires further assessment.

Granulocyte transfusions in hematologic malignancy patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte transfusions (GTXs) have been used successfully as an adjunctive treatment option for invasive infections in some neutropenic patients with underlying hematologic malignancy (HM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We sought to determine the impact of GTX as an adjunct to antifungal therapy in 128 patients with HM and prolonged neutropenia (≥14 days) with a proven or probable invasive aspergillosis (IA) infection by retrospectively reviewing our institutional database.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received GTX and 75 did not. By univariate analysis, patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis who received GTX were less likely to respond to antifungal therapy (P = 0.03), and more likely to die of IA (P = 0.009) when compared with the non-GTX group. Among patients who received GTX, 53% developed a pulmonary reaction. Furthermore, IA-related death was associated with the number of GTX given (P = 0.018) and the early initiation of GTX within 7 days after starting antifungal therapy (P = 0.001). By multivariate competing risk analysis, patients who received GTX were more likely to die of IA than patients who did not receive GTX (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that GTX does not improve response to antifungal therapy and is associated with worse outcomes of IA infection in HM patients, particularly those with pulmonary involvement.

Polycythemia in an infant secondary to granulocyte transfusions

Granulocyte transfusions may be useful for neutropenic pediatric patients with refractory bacterial or fungal infections. Many potential adverse sequelae associated with granulocyte transfusions are well recognized, including febrile reactions, fluid overload, alloimmunization, and lung injury. Other potential adverse sequelae, however, are less well known. This case report describes an infant with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis who developed polycythemia (hemoglobin 10-17.6 g/dl) following four daily transfusions of 20 ml/kg of apheresis collected, steroid stimulated donor granulocytes. Expanded knowledge of potential risks of transfused granulocytes will allow for rapid recognition of transfusion-related complications, should they occur.

Granulocyte transfusions for neonates with confirmed or suspected sepsis and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Neonates have immature granulopoiesis, which frequently results in neutropenia after sepsis. Neutropaenic septic neonates have a higher mortality than non-neutropenic septic neonates. Therefore, granulocyte transfusion to septic neutropenic neonates may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the effect of granulocyte or buffy coat transfusions as adjuncts to antibiotics, after confirmed or suspected sepsis in neutropenic neonates, on all-cause mortality during hospital stay and neurological outcome at ≥ year of age. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of granulocyte transfusions on length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge, adverse effects and immunologic outcomes at ≥ year of age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, proceedings of the PAS conferences and ongoing trials at clinicaltrials.gov and clinical-trials.com were searched in July 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies where neutropenic neonates with suspected or confirmed sepsis were randomised or quasi-randomised to granulocyte or buffy coat transfusions at any dose or duration, and reporting any outcome of interest were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals using the fixed effects model were reported for dichotomous outcomes. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials were eligible for inclusion. Forty-four infants with sepsis and neutropenia were randomised in three trials to granulocyte transfusions or placebo/no transfusion. In another trial, 35 infants with sepsis and neutropenia on antibiotics were randomised to granulocyte transfusion or IVIG.When granulocyte transfusion was compared with placebo or no transfusion, there was no significant difference in 'all-cause mortality' (three trials; typical RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.86; typical RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.21).When granulocyte transfusion was compared with intravenous immunoglobulin (one trial), there was a reduction in 'all-cause mortality' of borderline statistical significance (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04; RD -0.34, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.09; NNT 2.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.1).Pulmonary complications were the only adverse effect reported in the trials that used buffy coat transfusions. None of the trials reported on neurological outcome at one year of age or later, length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge or immunological outcome at one year of age or later.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is inconclusive evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to support or refute the routine use of granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic, septic neonates. Researchers are encouraged to conduct adequately powered multi-centre trials of granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic septic neonates.

Granulocyte transfusions in the G-CSF era. Where do we stand?

The efficacy of granulocytes transfusions (GTX) in either the prevention or treatment of neutropenic sepsis has been a controversial issue. Early studies employing steroid mobilised GTX showed variable, dose-dependent results and significant pulmonary toxicity was reported. With the introduction of the recombinant myeloid growth factor, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), the quantity of granulocytes that could be harvested was substantially increased leading to renewed interest in the clinical application of GTX. The administration of G-CSF to normal donors leads to significantly higher pre-harvest neutrophil counts and consequently larger granulocyte harvests. Infusion of G-CSF stimulated GTX results in measurable increases in the recipients' neutrophil count and may reduce the duration and severity of neutropenia. However, the efficacy of these GTX in treating or preventing established neutropenic sepsis remains to be established in prospective controlled clinical trials.

Granulocyte transfusions for preventing infections in patients with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Since the late 1990s there has been increasing demand for donated granulocyte transfusions to treat or prevent severe infections in patients who lack their own functional granulocytes. Other than in neonates, no systematic reviews have been performed for over 10 years relating to the efficacy of prophylactic granulocyte transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of granulocyte transfusions compared with a control population not receiving this intervention for preventing mortality due to infection or due to any other cause in patients with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil function.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 3, 2008, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other specialised databases up to October 2008. We also searched reference lists of articles and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patients receiving granulocyte transfusions to prevent the development of infection with a control group receiving no granulocyte transfusions. Neonates have been the subject of a recent review and were excluded. There was no restriction by outcomes examined, but this review focuses on mortality, mortality due to infection and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed potentially relevant studies for inclusion. Data were extracted by two review authors and the methodological quality was examined. Data were analysed using random and fixed effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials met the inclusion criteria. Allocation in all trials was random, with the control arm receiving no prophylactic therapy, except one trial in which the control group received specific prophylactic antibiotics. One study reported biological randomisation based upon the availability of suitably matched, related donors rather than strict randomisation. All trials were conducted over twenty years ago with one exception, a study from 2006 in which donors were pre-medicated with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) resulting in significantly higher mean doses of granulocytes collected for transfusion. Different policies otherwise applied for the schedule for transfusion, method of granulocyte procurement and criteria for defining infection. Combining the results showed a relative risk (RR) for mortality of 0.94 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.71 to 1.25). Exclusion of the two trials which reported transfusion of an average number of granulocytes below 1 x 10(10) indicated a summary RR for mortality and mortality due to infection of 0.89 (CI 0.64 to 1.24) and 0.36 (0.14 to 0.96) respectively.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The controlled trials that have been identified raise the possibility that prophylactic granulocyte transfusions at a dose of at least 1 x 10(10) may reduce the risk of mortality from infection. Overall mortality was not affected. However, the majority of studies were performed decades ago, and standards of supportive care have advanced considerably. These earlier trials were also based on transfusing lower yields of collected granulocytes than currently recommended. It is difficult to recommend prophylactic granulocyte transfusions outside the setting of ongoing controlled trials, given the resource and cost implications.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Larger trials are needed to establish the validity of the potential benefits raised by this review, in view of the methodological limitations, the small sample sizes and the heterogeneous definitions of infection that were encountered in the included studies.

[Granulocyte transfusion for the treatment of prolonged pneumonia in a patient with MDS-RAEB-2 at allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

We report that granulocyte transfusion (GTX) was effective for prolonged pneumonia at allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. A 58-year-old man with MDS-RAEB-2 was admitted to our hospital for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. He was complicated with pneumonia, which was not improved with G-CSF and antibiotics. We therefore decided to perform a GTX transplantation. During the period of neutropenia, pneumonia did not deteriorate. A combination of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and GTX is expected not only to improve transplantation results but also to expand the adaptation for transplantation. However, detailed investigation of the effect of GTX in allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be performed, and more cases should be accumulated.

Granulocyte transfusions in neutropaenic children: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte transfusions (GTX) have been used for decades in paediatric neutropaenic patients, but uncertainty remains regarding their effectiveness. We reviewed all the paediatric data available on GTX, to gain a insight in to the indications for use, favourable effects and side effects in patients and donors.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was done in MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and CENTRAL (1966 until 2006). All studies including children (1-18 years) who received GTX were included.

RESULTS

A total of 66 observational studies were included:Seven using prophylactic and 59 therapeutic GTX. Of the therapeutic studies 55 reported a proven sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria (34%) or fungal disease (48%) as the indication for GTX. Concerning effectiveness 70% survival was reported, but no controlled studies were identified. Side effects were mentioned in 27 studies including mild respiratory symptoms, allergic reactions and infection related complications (CMV). Side effects in the donor were mainly flu-like illness.

DISCUSSION

In this first review covering 30 years of experience on the use of GTX in children, we found no randomised evidence showing a positive benefit risk ratio. The available case reports and cohort studies alert us as to the potential benefits and harms of the use of GTX in neutropaenic children and provides the basis for a well designed trial in children.

Safety and efficacy of therapeutic early onset granulocyte transfusions in pediatric patients with neutropenia and severe infections

BACKGROUND

Bacterial and fungal infections in profound neutropenia after chemotherapy are associated with high mortality despite appropriate antibacterial and antifungal treatment. Granulocyte transfusions are used as a therapeutic addendum, but concern regarding pulmonary reactions often results in delayed use in clinical practice. Accordingly, many patients are already at advanced stages of their infectious disease once granulocytes are transfused. Thus, a prospective Phase II trial was conducted to test the safety and efficacy of therapeutic early-onset granulocyte transfusions in immunocompromised children with neutropenia and severe infections.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-seven children with hematologic disorder or malignancy and severe neutropenia with clinically and/or microbiologically documented severe infection unresponsive to standard treatment were included. They received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-elicited, crossmatched granulocyte concentrates every other day until complete recovery from infection was documented.

RESULTS

A median of two granulocyte transfusions with a median of 8 x 10(8) granulocytes per kilogram of body weight were administered. All transfusions were well tolerated, and no pulmonary symptoms were observed. A total of 92.6 percent of our patients were able to clear their initial infection, and 81.5 percent were alive and without signs or symptoms of their infection 1 month later. All six children with aspergillosis cleared their infection.

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF-elicited, crossmatched granulocyte concentrates are a safe and efficient therapeutic addendum in immunocompromised children with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections. Early transfusion of granulocyte concentrates can lead to an overall response rate of 92.6 percent without adverse events. Randomized clinical trials with an early-onset design are required to determine appropriate clinical applications.

Strategies to enhance immune function in hematopoietic transplantation recipients who have fungal infections

The challenges in the treatment of systemic fungal infections after HSCT include: (1) changing epidemiology as less drug-susceptible saprophytic fungi are increasingly associated with human disease; (2) the difficulty of early and correct diagnosis, even with the new generation of enzymatic immunoassays; (3) the inability to reduce or eliminate predisposing factors, especially severe immune suppression in most transplant patients with these infections and (4) the uncertain role of antifungal drug combinations and risk of drug antagonism complicating effective empiric-pre-emptive therapy. Current, developing and future immune enhancement strategies including recombinant granulocyte- and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), adjuvant pro-inflammatory cytokine therapy during mobilized donor granulocyte transfusions, therapeutic potential of pentraxin, adaptive immune transfer and dendritic cell fungal vaccines. Improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of fungal infections and of the complexity of host antifungal immune responses has provided the critical information to readdress existing treatment paradigms and further evaluate the role of GM-CSF and IFN-gamma early in the course of therapy against life-threatening fungal infections in high-risk patients following stem cell transplantation.

Successful treatment with allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and granulocyte transfusion for severe aplastic anemia with sinusitis

A 43-year-old woman with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) received anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporin A (CyA) and achieved hematological remission. Although she had maintained hematological remission, the disease relapsed 10 months after arbitrary discontinuance of maintenance therapy with CyA. Resumption of CyA therapy was not effective, and her condition became complicated with progressive sinusitis with bone destruction, which was refractory to antibiotics, antifungal agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and surgical drainage. Because of the necessity for early neutrophil recovery (to resolve the infection), we proceeded with a combination therapy using allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) promptly followed by granulocyte transfusion (GTX) from the same human leukocyte antigen-identical donor rather than carrying out a second immunosuppressive therapy. The patient showed temporal resolution of infection on the second day after a single GTX. Although the patient had pneumonia on day 11, it was resolved promptly after engraftment on day 16. This report suggests the clinical utility of a salvage therapy with allogeneic PBSCT followed by GTX in a particular case of recurrent SAA with refractory infections.

Inflammatory manifestations of experimental lymphatic insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Sustained lymph stagnation engenders a pathological response that is complex and not well characterized. Tissue inflammation in lymphedema may reflect either an active or passive consequence of impaired immune traffic.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We studied an experimental model of acute post-surgical lymphedema in the tails of female hairless, immunocompetent SKH-1 mice. We performed in vivo imaging of impaired immune traffic in experimental, murine acquired lymphatic insufficiency. We demonstrated impaired mobilization of immunocompetent cells from the lymphedematous region. These findings correlated with histopathological alterations and large-scale transcriptional profiling results. We found intense inflammatory changes in the dermis and the subdermis. The molecular pattern in the RNA extracted from the whole tissue was dominated by the upregulation of genes related to acute inflammation, immune response, complement activation, wound healing, fibrosis, and oxidative stress response.

CONCLUSIONS

We have characterized a mouse model of acute, acquired lymphedema using in vivo functional imaging and histopathological correlation. The model closely simulates the volume response, histopathology, and lymphoscintigraphic characteristics of human acquired lymphedema, and the response is accompanied by an increase in the number and size of microlymphatic structures in the lymphedematous cutaneous tissues. Molecular characterization through clustering of genes with known functions provides insights into processes and signaling pathways that compose the acute tissue response to lymph stagnation. Further study of genes identified through this effort will continue to elucidate the molecular mechanisms and lead to potential therapeutic strategies for lymphatic vascular insufficiency.

G-CSF mobilised granulocyte transfusions in 32 paediatric patients with neutropenic sepsis

Introduction

In this retrospective, uncontrolled, observational study, the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated granulocyte transfusions (GTX) in neutropenic paediatric patients with sepsis was evaluated.

Patients and methods

Granulocytes were collected from unrelated, ABO group-matched and cytomegalic-antibody compatible donors. For neutrophil mobilization, donors received a single subcutaneous dose of glycosylated G-CSF (Lenograstim, Chugai Pharma, Japan) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg). In total, 168 (range 1–19 per patient) GTX were transfused in 32 children with a median age of 7.4 (0.25 to 16) years.

Results

The underlying diseases comprised predominantly haematooncological malignancies (31 children). In 15 of 32 patients, neutropenia was related to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. All children suffered from sepsis based on international criteria (fever, tachycardia, respiratory rate >2 SD above normal in the context of a suspected or proven infection). In ten children bacteria were isolated, in six children a fungal infection was diagnosed and four sepsis episodes were caused by viral infections. GTX contained a median neutrophil number of 6.3 (range 1.9–13.9)×10¹⁰ per transfusion and obtained a sustained haematological response after GTX. Nineteen out of 32 children survived the neutropenic sepsis, particularly nine out of 11 patients with bacterial sepsis.

Discussion

In contrast to the non-survivors, we observed a significant decrease in the C-reactive protein levels shortly after initiation of the GTX treatment in the surviving patients. A clear-cut benefit of GTX for children with neutropenic sepsis cannot be concluded from these data, but in children with (severe) bacterial sepsis refractory to antibiotic treatment, GTX were feasible, safe and could reduce mortality rates in this subgroup of patients.

Granulocyte transfusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Granulocyte transfusions have been used for more than four decades. Several issues have complicated the analysis of previous studies, including the utilization of improved antimicrobials, the effects of recipient alloimmunization and variable cell dose. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for donor stimulation has revived interest in granulocyte transfusion. The aim of this review is to evaluate the most recent studies in granulocyte transfusion therapy and their clinical applicability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use has increased the granulocyte yield by approximately fourfold. Multiple recent studies have shown that granulocyte transfusions can be helpful in controlling severe infections progressing despite the use of appropriate antibiotics, with a response rate of 40-80% with variability in results depending on patient characteristics. This benefit is limited to a small patient population as the incidence of prolonged reversible neutropenia is relatively small. Severe side effects have been rare in those studies.

SUMMARY

Granulocyte transfusions are beneficial in neutropenic patients with severe uncontrolled infection. The underlying disease process is the major determinant of outcome in these patients. Because granulocyte transfusions are not commonly used, centers are not currently able to provide transfusions in a timely fashion. Nonalloimmunized patients can receive cells from nonmatched ABO compatible donors, while alloimmunized patients should receive granulocytes from either HLA-matched donors or donors selected by leukoagglutination or lymphocytotoxicity crossmatching. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal starting time and frequency of transfusions, and the best method for identifying donor-recipient compatibility.

Granulocyte?colony-stimulating factor?mobilized prophylactic granulocyte transfusions given after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation result in a modest reduction of febrile days and intravenous antibiotic usage

BACKGROUND

It was hypothesized that transfusion of two granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized prophylactic granulocyte components into allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant patients during the regimen-related neutropenic interval would result in clinical benefit.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HLA-matched sibling PBPC donors (n=151) were biologically randomized based on ABO mismatch to donate granulocyte components (Cohort G) or not donate granulocytes (control group, Cohort C). ABO-matched donors who did not meet other study-specific criteria were reassigned to Cohort C.

RESULTS

Feasibility, defined as the proportion of ABO-matched donors who underwent granulocyte collections, was 42 percent (53 of 125). The percentage of patients who developed fever during the initial hospitalization was greater in Cohort C versus Cohort G (82.7% vs. 64.2%; p=0.03). In the interval from when granulocyte transfusions were initially given in Cohort G (Day +3 or Day +5) until neutrophil engraftment, the number of febrile days was less in Cohort G versus Cohort C (median, 0 vs. 1; Mann-Whitney p=0.003). The median number of days of intravenous antibiotics given during the initial hospitalization was less in Cohort G versus Cohort C (9 vs. 11; Mann-Whitney p=0.03), a difference accounted for in the interval from Day +3 or Day +5 to neutrophil recovery. There was no significant difference in length of the initial hospital stay, acute graft-versus-host disease rates, or 100-day survival between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study demonstrates a modest, but significant, benefit of G-CSF-mobilized HLA-matched prophylactic granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic allogeneic PBPC recipients.

Recombinant interferon γ1b immune enhancement in 20 patients with hematologic malignancies and systemic opportunistic infections treated with donor granulocyte transfusions

BACKGROUND

The response to antifungal therapy alone often is suboptimal in patients with cancer who have therapy-refractory neutropenia, and even donor-derived granulocyte transfusions (GTX) are not always successful. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of immune enhancement using recombinant interferon gamma1b (rIFN-gamma1b) in patients with cancer who received GTX for refractory, systemic, opportunistic infections.

METHODS

Twenty recipients of high-dose donor GTX ( approximately 5.5 x 10(10) neutrophils per transfusion) who had received concurrent rIFN-gamma1b between October 2001 and December 2004 were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median age (+/- standard deviation [SD]) was 45 +/- 17 years. Ten patients (50%) were men, 17 patients (85%) had leukemia, and 3 patients (15%) had myelodysplastic syndrome. The median +/- SD Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 15 +/- 4 (range, 7-22). Most patients (n = 18 patients; 90%) had recurrent or refractory cancer. In 6 patients (30%) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, GTX plus rIFN-gamma1b was given a median +/- SD of 26 +/- 100 days (range, 12-372 days) after transplantation. Seventeen patients (85%) had neutropenia during GTX therapy. Five patients (25%) had possible invasive fungal infection, 3 patients (15%) had probable invasive fungal infection, and 11 patients (55%) had proven invasive fungal infection. One patient (5%) had refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Eight patients (40%) received corticosteroids during GTX plus rIFN-gamma1b therapy. Patients received a median +/- SD of 8 +/- 7 GTX doses (range, 4-28 doses) and 9 +/- 7 rIFN-gamma1b doses (range, 1-28 doses), for a mean +/- SD cumulative dose (CD) of 400 +/- 2621 microg. Other concomitant cytokines were granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (12 +/- 3 doses; CD, 6720 +/- 4721 microg) in 15 patients (75%) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (12 +/- 9 doses; CD, 4750 +/- 4410 microg) in 14 patients (70%). Four patients (20%) developed fever, and 2 patients (10%) developed skin rashes. Reversible liver dysfunction (n = 3 patients; 15%) and tachycardia (n = 1 patients; 5%) were considered rIFN-gamma1b-associated adverse reactions; whereas, in 1 patient (5%), transient dyspnea was attributed to GTX. Four weeks after therapy started, 9 patients (45%) had complete or partial resolution of infection; and, in another 3 patients (15%), the invasive fungal infection had become stable.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that no serious adverse events were associated with rIFN-gamma1b immune enhancement in patients with systemic opportunistic infections who received donor GTX therapy.

G-CSF-treated granulocytes inhibit acute graft-versus-host disease

It has been shown that in vivo and in vitro treatment with G-CSF induces the generation of low-density granulocytes (LDGs), which copurify with PBMCs and inhibit IFN-gamma production by human T cells. These results prompted us to postulate an immunomodulatory role for LDGs in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Here it is shown that in the mouse experimental model, in vivo and in vitro G-CSF treatment generates LDGs capable of inhibiting 80% of T-cell IFN-gamma production. To assess the role of these LDGs in aGVHD, lethally irradiated (C57BL/6 x BALB/c) F1 hosts were reconstituted with T cell-depleted bone marrow cells plus nylon wool-purified spleen cells from G-CSF-treated (G-NWS) or -nontreated (NWS) C57BL/6 donors. Recipients of G-NWS had a 75% survival rate in contrast to a rate of 25% in the NWS recipients. The protective effect was completely abolished, and the mortality rate was 100% if donor-cell infusion was treated with anti-Gr1. Moreover, if LDGs were infused with NWS, full protection of aGVHD was observed, and no signs of disease were evidenced by mortality rate, weight loss, or histopathology of target organs. These results revealed the unexpected immunosuppressive capacity of G-CSF based on the generation of LDGs, leading to the possibility of using these cells as inhibitors of aGVHD.

Bone marrow engraftment analysis after granulocyte transfusion

We present the case of a 6-year-old male who received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant as part of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The patient relapsed 5 months after transplantation and received additional chemotherapy. He acquired an angioinvasive fungal infection that required transfusion of granulocytes. Approximately 5 weeks after relapsing (181 days after transplant), a bone marrow specimen was taken for molecular engraftment analysis and flow cytometry to assess graft loss as well as residual disease. The engraftment results generated by the multiple short tandem repeat loci tested were inconsistent, and alleles were present at several loci that were of neither patient nor donor origin. An error in specimen identification was initially considered. Further investigation into the circumstances surrounding procurement of the patient's bone marrow aspirate revealed that the patient had received a granulocyte transfusion approximately 10 hours before the bone marrow specimen was taken. In addition, morphological and flow cytometric analyses of the same bone marrow aspirate demonstrated a significant degree of peripheral blood contamination. We determined that the unknown alleles in the bone marrow engraftment specimen were derived from the donor of the transfused granulocytes. This case illustrates that white cell transfusion can lead to erroneous bone marrow engraftment results, particularly if only one microsatellite locus is used to monitor engraftment.

[Blood product transfusion in the neonatal period]

Newborn infants in intensive care units, especially those born premature, are at particular risk for blood transfusion adverse effects. Aside improvements in the preparation of specific blood products for the neonatal period, such as multiple packed cells preparations from a single donor for multiple transfusions in premature infants, progress has involved prophylaxis of anemia of prematurity as well. Recombinant human erythropoietin has proven to be beneficial with high range evidence. Also, alternative methods have been proposed to compensate for the delay in the effect of rHuEPO, such as delayed clamping of umbilical cord at birth, or autologous placental blood transfusion. However, a better understanding of the indications of blood transfusion and the provision of practice guidelines may justify a re-evaluation of prophylactic strategies for anemia of prematurity.

Platelet and granulocyte alloimmunisation in multitransfused Tunisian patients

We determined the frequency of post-transfusion alloimmunisation against platelet and granulocyte antigens in 51 Tunisian polytransfused patients with haematological diseases. Serum samples were analysed by a standard and an antiglobulin-augmented lymphocytotoxicity technique, a granulocyte agglutination test, a granulocyte immunofluorescence test, a platelet immunofluorescence test and the monoclonal antibody-specific immobilisation of platelet antigens assay. No granulocyte-specific antibodies were detected. HLA antibodies were found in 58.8% of patients. Platelet-specific antibodies were detected in four patients and were directed against human platelet antigen (HPA)-5b, HPA-1b and HPA-3a. The three patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia developed anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies. This study provides immunogenetic information that could improve the management of transfusion therapy in Tunisia.

Granulocyte transfusions for treating infections in patients with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Transfusions of granulocytes have a long history of usage in clinical practice to support and treat severe infection in high risk groups of patients with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction. However, there is considerable current variability in therapeutic granulocyte transfusion practice, and uncertainty about the beneficial effect of transfusions given as an adjunct to antibiotics on mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions compared to no granulocyte transfusions for treating infections in patients with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil function in reducing mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in 2003. Searching was also undertaken on the OVID versions of Medline and Embase using an RCT search filter strategy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs involving transfusions of granulocytes, given therapeutically, to patients with neutropenia or disorders of neutrophil dysfunction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers completed data extraction independently. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model were reported for dichotomous outcomes. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were done and reported eg granulocyte dose.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight parallel RCTs were included with 310 total analysed patient episodes. Different policies were applied for the schedule of transfusion, method of granulocyte procurement and process of donor selection including leucocyte compatibility. Each study used different criteria for neutropenia (range < 0.1 to < 1.0 x 10(9)/L) and definition of infection requiring treatment. For mortality, which was extracted from six trials, the summary RR = 0.64 in favour of transfusion (95% CI 0.33, 1.26), but with evidence of significant statistical heterogeneity (Chi-square 11.3 and I(2) = 56%). The data for the combined RR for mortality for the four studies transfusing higher granulocyte doses greater than 1x10(10) indicated a significant summary RR= 0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.82); Chi-square 3.9, I(2) 23%. Data on rates of reversal of infection could be extracted from four studies, and the combined RR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71, 1.26), again with evidence of heterogeneity. In addition to the observed clinical diversity between all studies, uncertainty about the quantitative and qualitative analyses for these studies is compounded by methodological deficiencies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is inconclusive evidence from RCTs to support or refute the generalised use of granulocyte transfusion therapy in the most common neutropenic patient populations, that is caused by myeloablative chemotherapy with or without haematopoietic stem cell support. Contemporary well designed prospective trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention in these patient populations and to establish definitively whether it has clinical benefit. In such studies, average numbers of collected granulocytes for adults should be (at least) greater than 1x10(10).

Prophylactic and interventional granulocyte transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies and life-threatening infections during neutropenia

Patients with haematological malignancies and prolonged periods of neutropenia after chemotherapy are at high risk for severe bacterial and fungal infections. Those infections have long time been considered as a contraindication for subsequent haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We conducted a prospective, non-randomized study of granulocyte transfusions (GTX) to control acute life-threatening infections (44 episodes) and to prevent recurrence of severe fungal infections during HCT or intensive chemotherapy (23 episodes). GTX achieved control in 82% (36/44) of acute life-threatening infections. No single reactivation of a previous infection occurred under prophylactic GTX (0/23). Median survival was 170 days in the interventional group and 185 days in the prophylactic group; death in both patient groups was mainly due to underlying progressive malignant disease. We conclude that under GTX, the infection-related mortality even in high-risk patients is low. Due to a secondary prophylaxis with GTX, haematopoietic allografts can be safely given to patients with previous fungal infections.

Successful treatment of disseminated aspergillosis with the combination of voriconazole, caspofungin, granulocyte transfusions, and surgery followed by allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation in a patient with primary failure of an autologous stem cell graft

The treatment of disseminated aspergillus infections in neutropenic patients remains a major challenge in spite of several new antifungal drugs. We report the case of a patient with multiple myeloma in prolonged neutropenia after primary failure of an autologous stem cell graft who developed invasive aspergillosis despite voriconazole monotherapy. He responded to a combination of voriconazole and caspofungin, supported by granulocyte transfusions and surgery. A subsequent allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation did not lead to recurring aspergillus infection. The patient is well and free of clinical disease with respect to the fungal infection and myeloma more than 18 months after the allogeneic transplantation.

Granulocyte Transfusions in Children With Chronic Granulomatous Disease and Invasive Aspergillosis

The transfusion of granulocytes to restore host defenses in severely granulocytopenic patients or in patients with defective granulocyte functions has been studied for more than 60 years. However, inadequate dosage of cells and inconsistent efficacy has limited the usage of these transfusions. Recently, the use of mobilizing agents such as granulocyte colony stimulating factors and dexamethasone has renewed interest in these treatment modalities. The present study is conducted to determine an appropriate method of enriched granulocyte collection with Fresenius AS.TEC.204 cell separator (Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) and to evaluate the preliminary clinical results of granulocyte transfusion therapy in patients with chronic granulomatous disease and invasive Aspergillosis in parallel with in vitro granulocyte function. Three patients who have been treated for chronic granulomatous disease and invasive Aspergillosis received a total of 20 granulocyte transfusions. To mobilize granulocytes, healthy donors were given 450 microg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously and 8 mg of dexamethasone orally approximately 12 h before collection. Five microg/kg/day of G-CSF was also subcutaneously administered prior to granulocyte transfusions. The first patient received 4; the second, 14 and the third, 2 transfusions. The granulocyte count given to these patients ranged between 0.4 and 3.0 x 10(9)/kg. Most transfusions were well tolerated. The nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) tests that were done 16-24 h after the transfusion showed 14-46% dye reduction. Two of the three patients survived the infection. Granulocyte transfusions from G-CSF and dexamethasone stimulated donors could be a choice of treatment in chronic granulomatous disease patients, especially with disseminated invasive Aspergillosis.

Cytokine expanded myeloid precursors function as regulatory antigen-presenting cells and promote tolerance through IL-10-producing regulatory T cells

The initiation of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) after stem cell transplantation is dependent on direct Ag presentation by host APCs, whereas the effect of donor APC populations is unclear. We studied the role of indirect Ag presentation in allogenic T cell responses by adding populations of cytokine-expanded donor APC to hemopoietic grafts that would otherwise induce lethal GVHD. Progenipoietin-1 (a synthetic G-CSF/Flt-3 ligand molecule) and G-CSF expanded myeloid dendritic cells (DC), plasmacytoid DC, and a novel granulocyte-monocyte precursor population (GM) that differentiate into class II+,CD80/CD86+,CD40- APC during GVHD. Whereas addition of plasmacytoid and myeloid donor DC augmented GVHD, GM cells promoted transplant tolerance by MHC class II-restricted generation of IL-10-secreting, Ag-specific regulatory T cells. Importantly, although GM cells abrogated GVHD, graft-vs-leukemia effects were preserved. Thus, a population of cytokine-expanded GM precursors function as regulatory APCs, suggesting that G-CSF derivatives may have application in disorders characterized by a loss of self-tolerance.

Donor CD4+CD25+ T cells promote engraftment and tolerance following MHC-mismatched hematopoietic cell transplantation

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a potentially curative treatment for both inherited and acquired diseases of the hematopoietic compartment; however, its wider use is limited by the frequent and severe outcome of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Unfortunately, efforts to reduce GVHD by removing donor T cells have resulted in poor engraftment and elevated disease recurrence. Alternative cell populations capable of supporting allogeneic hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell engraftment without inducing GVHD could increase numbers of potential recipients while broadening the pool of acceptable donors. Although unfractionated CD4(+) T cells have not been shown to be an efficient facilitating population, CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory cells (T-reg's) were examined for their capacity to support allogeneic hematopoietic engraftment. In a murine fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched BMT model, cotransplantation of donor B6 T-reg's into sublethally conditioned BALB/c recipients supported significantly greater lineage-committed and multipotential donor progenitors in recipient spleens 1 week after transplantation and significantly increased long-term multilineage donor chimerism. Donor engraftment occurred without GVHD-related weight loss or lethality and was associated with tolerance to donor and host antigens by in vitro and in vivo analyses. Donor CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells may therefore represent a potential alternative to unfractionated T cells for promotion of allogeneic engraftment in clinical hematopoietic cell transplantation.

[Granulocyte transfusions for severe infections prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

The efficacy and safety of granulocyte transfusions were evaluated in two acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients for the control of severe infections (cervical cellulitis, sepsis) prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. One patient received 6 transfusions and the other 2 transfusions. The donors were given subcutaneous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus oral dexamethasone/betamethasone 12 hours before the scheduled collection. Granulocytes were obtained by standard leukapheresis procedures utilizing hydroxyethyl starch with processing of 7 liters of blood. The yield was 3.2-10.7 x 10(10) (0.7-2.1 x 10(9)/kg of recipient) granulocytes. Post-transfusion increases of peripheral blood neutrophil counts in the following morning were 300 to approximately 6,900/ml. Infections resolved and successful engraftment was obtained in both patients after the transplants. No severe adverse reactions were observed. These findings suggest that granulocyte transfusions are useful for control of severe infections prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Clinical efficacy and prediction of response to granulocyte transfusion therapy for patients with neutropenia-related infections

We investigated the efficacy of transfusing granulocytes into 32 patients with severe neutropenia-related infections and the factors that predict response to this therapy. Our findings suggest that granulocyte transfusion therapy is useful for treating neutropenic patients with fungal infections and that 99mTc-HMPAO-granulocyte scintigraphy can be used to predict response to granulocyte transfusion therapy.

Impact of high-dose granulocyte transfusions in patients with cancer with candidemia

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and feasibility of donor granulocyte transfusion therapy (GTX) have changed considerably over the past four decades. The authors sought to determine the impact of high-dose (approximately 5.5 x 10(10) cells) GTX in patients with candidemia.

METHODS

The authors' case-control retrospective analysis comprised 491 consecutive patients treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston,TX) from 1993 to 2000. The cohort included 29 patients with Candida species bloodstream infection who had received GTX and 462 who had not.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in age, gender, APACHE II score, recent chemotherapy received, broad-spectrum antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, radiotherapy, intravascular catheter, and concordant antifungal therapy (P > or = 0.1). The patients who received GTX compared with those who did not had a higher incidence of underlying leukemia (86% vs. 29%, P <0.001), persistent neutropenia (59% vs. 18%, P <0.001), non-Candida albicans candidemia (Candida glabrata, 35%; Candida krusei, 31%: 90% vs. 67%, P=0.01), and breakthrough invasive mycosis (62% vs. 23%, P <0.001). Neutropenia was more prolonged in patients who received GTX (28 vs. 10 days, P <0.001). Also, more of the patients who received GTX had received hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (28% vs. 13%, P = 0.03), exposure (within 4 weeks) to antifungals (79% vs. 38%, P <0.001), and stays in critical care units (62% vs. 40%, P=0.02). The overall attributable mortality rate for 25 evaluable recipients of GTX was 48% (n=12), compared with 45% (n=115) of 254 evaluable patients in the control group (P=0.5). Of the 158 patients with leukemia, 25 (16%) had received GTX. In patients with leukemia, more of those who had received GTX experienced disseminated candidiasis (44% vs. 26%; P <0.07) and persistent neutropenia (68% vs. 43%, P <0.02), had candidemia that was more prolonged (> 72 hours, P <0.02), and had more stays in critical care units (68% vs. 44%, P <0.03). On the bases of a reduced multivariate model, a significantly increased risk of death was found for patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (odds ratio [OR]=2.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.99-6.31; P <0.05), for patients with persistent neutropenia (OR=4.57; 95% CI, 1.99-10.47; P <0.0003), and for patients with leukemia who also had prolonged candidemia (OR=3.59; 95% CI, 1.61-7.98; P <0.002), disseminated candidiasis (OR=5.19; 95% CI, 2.17-12.42; P <0.0002), or non-C. albicans candidemia (OR=5.02; 95% CI, 1.07-23.64; P <0.04). In patients with leukemia, death was attributable to candidemia in 50% of the GTX recipients, compared with 59% of the non-GTX patients who had received antifungal therapy alone (P=0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the presence of multiple predictors of increased mortality, high-dose GTX therapy in these high-risk patients with cancer was associated with better than expected survival rates.

Stem cell transplantation post invasive fungal infection is a feasible task

Between March 1997 and January 2002, 18 consecutive patients (18-47 years) with hematological malignancies and previous proven invasive fungal infection underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) (10 matched sibling allograft, 6 autograft, and 2 haploidentical). All patients had full myeloablative conditioning. The fungal pathogens diagnosed were Aspergillus (14), Fusarium (2), Mucor (1), Exserohilum (1), and Candida (1), involving the lungs (15), sinuses (5), and liver (1). All patients were treated pre- and during transplant with systemic antifungal therapy. Eleven out of 18 (61%) patients survived the transplant. Only 1 of 5 patients who transplanted with an active fungal infection accompanied with active leukemia survived the transplant, compared with 10/13 (84%) survivals in patients who had no clinical and radiological signs of infection or active leukemia (P < 0.025). None of the autografted patients has died, compared with 7/12 allografted patients, of whom 5 underwent transplant with active hematological/active fungal disease. In only 3 patients was the cause of death reactivation of previous fungal infection. Both active fungal infection and active leukemia place patients at a very high risk for procedure-related mortality. Pre-transplant therapy of fungal infection, aiming to achieve a clinically undetectable state of infection, followed by an antifungal treatment during transplant may allow the SCT with no fungal reactivation in selected patients.

Granulocyte transfusion: revisited

Neutrophils are the immune system's main cellular defense against bacterial and fungal infections. Transfusion of granulocytes has been considered a therapeutic modality for severe bacterial and fungal infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia and with functional neutrophil disorders. Good theoretic and experimental evidence demonstrating granulocyte transfusion efficacy exists in preventing and treating severe infection. However, clinical evidence has been more difficult to interpret, with efficacy equivocal in many studies and further trials hindered by limitations in collecting adequate doses of leukocytes from healthy steroid-mobilized donors. The development and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to stimulate normal donors has generated renewed interest in granulocyte transfusions. In clinical studies, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has markedly enhanced the yield of leukocytes collected from normal donors, which may improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe infections and neutropenia who receive granulocyte transfusions. Preliminary clinical evidence, when correct granulocyte dose per patient body weight is optimized, suggests efficacy. However, well-designed randomized clinical trials are necessary to definitively establish granulocyte transfusions as a viable therapeutic modality in the treatment of severe bacterial and fungal infections in patients with functional neutrophil disorders or neutropenia.

Efficacy of granulocyte transfusions for neutropenia-related infections: retrospective analysis of predictive factors

BACKGROUND

The transfusion of G-CSf-primed granulocytes (GTX) might represent an important treatment option for neutropenia-related infections unresponsive to conventional antimicrobial therapies and to recombinant hematopoietic growth factors. However, few studies to date have identified the factors that can predict clinical outcome and the patient populations who are likely to benefit most from GTX. The primary endpoint of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of GTX in 22 patients with hematological malignancies who developed neutropenia-related bacterial and fungal infections that were unresponsive to appropriate antimicrobial therapies.

METHODS

Peripheral blood granulocytes were collected by continuous-flow leukapheresis from HLA-identical siblings after priming with G-CSF. The response to GTX was classified as 'favorable' if clinical symptoms and signs of infection resolved or 'unfavorable' if clinical symptoms and signs of infection were unchanged or worsened. Control of infection at Day 30 after the enrollment in the GTX program was considered as the outcome variable in multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Two patients died of infection before receiving the granulocyte concentrates. Bacterial infections (monomicrobial or mixed bacteremias) were documented in 11 patients, whereas fungal infections (fungemia or focal fungal infections) were diagnosed in seven patients. In two patients, no infecting agent could be isolated (clinical infection). Control of infection at Day 30 after the first GTX was achieved in 10 of 20 assemble patients. Overall, 54% of patients with bacterial infections had a favorable response, compared with 57% of patients with fungal infections. No differences in terms of survival were found when comparing patients with bacterial and those with fungal infections at a median follow-up 90 days from the first GTX. In univariate analysis, disease status before GTX, e.g., complete or partial remission, and spontaneous recovery of the neutrophil count were significantly associated with control of infection. when multivariate regression models were formed, the recovery 0.5 x 10 (9)/L PMN was the only parameter that significantly and independently correlated with a favorable response to GTX.

DISCUSSION

GTX can be used to successfully treat bacterial as well as fungal infections in severely neutropenic patients when administered early after the onset of febrile neutropenia in patients with remission of the underlying disease and who are likely to recover marrow function.

Granulocyte concentrates: how can we assess their quality?

The use of granulocyte transfusions to treat and prevent life-threatening infection in patients lacking neutrophil numbers or function may become increasingly important in aiding advances in the treatment of haematological malignancies. A critical factor in determining the outcome of granulocyte transfusion is the number of cells transfused, and collection of sufficiently high concentration of cells from donors remains challenging. A number of tests of granulocyte function can be performed in vitro to assess the quality of granulocyte concentrates, which may be useful in helping to optimize granulocyte collection, processing and storage methods. Studies that have examined neutrophil function in granulocyte concentrates to date have tended to focus on the assessment of viability, chemotaxis, phagocytosis and oxidative killing. How useful in vitro tests of neutrophil function are in predicting neutrophil function following granulocyte transfusion remains to be established in conjunction with well-designed clinical trials.