Cost-effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl for High-risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia Despite Statin Treatment

Importance

The Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) demonstrated the efficacy of icosapent ethyl (IPE) for high-risk patients with hypertriglyceridemia and known cardiovascular disease or diabetes and at least 1 other risk factor who were treated with statins.

Objective

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of IPE compared with standard care for high-risk patients with hypertriglyceridemia despite statin treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

An in-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using patient-level study data from REDUCE-IT, and a lifetime analysis was performed using a microsimulation model and data from published literature. The study included 8179 patients with hypertriglyceridemia despite stable statin therapy recruited between November 21, 2011, and May 31, 2018. Analyses were performed from a US health care sector perspective. Statistical analysis was performed from March 1, 2018, to October 31, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to IPE, 4 g/d, or placebo and were followed up for a median of 4.9 years (IQR, 3.5-5.3 years). The cost of IPE was $4.16 per day after rebates using SSR Health net cost (SSR cost) and $9.28 per day with wholesale acquisition cost (WAC).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total direct health care costs (2019 US dollars), and cost-effectiveness.

Results

A total of 4089 patients (2927 men [71.6%]; median age, 64.0 years [IQR, 57.0-69.0 years]) were randomly assigned to receive IPE, and 4090 patients (2895 men [70.8%]; median age, 64.0 years [IQR, 57.0-69.0 years]) were randomly assigned to receive standard care. Treatment with IPE yielded more QALYs than standard care both in trial (3.34 vs 3.27; mean difference, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.12]) and over a lifetime projection (10.59 vs 10.35; mean difference, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.15-0.33]). In-trial, total health care costs were higher with IPE using either SSR cost ($18 786) or WAC ($24 544) than with standard care ($17 273; mean difference from SSR cost, $1513 [95% CI, $155-$2870]; mean difference from WAC, $7271 [95% CI, $5911-$8630]). Icosapent ethyl cost $22 311 per QALY gained using SSR cost and $107 218 per QALY gained using WAC. Over a lifetime, IPE was projected to be cost saving when using SSR cost ($195 276) compared with standard care ($197 064; mean difference, -$1788 [95% CI, -$9735 to $6159]) but to have higher costs when using WAC ($202 830) compared with standard care (mean difference, $5766 [95% CI, $1094-$10 438]). Compared with standard care, IPE had a 58.4% lifetime probability of costing less and being more effective when using SSR cost and an 89.4% probability of costing less than $50 000 per QALY gained when using SSR cost and a 72.5% probability of costing less than $50 000 per QALY gained when using WAC.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that, both in-trial and over the lifetime, IPE offers better cardiovascular outcomes than standard care in REDUCE-IT participants at common willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Association Between Poverty and Appropriate Statin Prescription for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia in the United States: An Analysis From the ACC NCDR PINNACLE Registry

BACKGROUND

Poverty is associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction and cardiac death, both of which are decreased by treatment of hyperlipidemia. There may be differences in the appropriate treatment of hyperlipidemia between richer and poorer Americans. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between income level and appropriate lipid-lowering therapy.

METHODS

We identified outpatient visits in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry and determined appropriateness of lipid-lowering therapy among patients in different income quintiles (Quintile 5 being the highest income quintile). Logistic regression at the patient level was performed to evaluate the independent association of income and the primary outcome of appropriate statin therapy. The analysis was repeated before and after November 2013 given a change in guideline definitions.

RESULTS

The study included 1,655,723 patients. Overall, 68-73% of patients were treated appropriately under the ATP III Guidelines and 57-62% of patients were treated appropriately under the ACC/AHA Guidelines. Patients in the wealthiest quintile had higher odds of appropriate statin therapy under both guidelines relative to patients in the poorest quintile (OR 1.06 [1.05-1.07] for ATP III and OR 1.03 [1.01-1.04] for ACC/AHA). In the whole sample, patients with higher estimated income had a small but significant increased likelihood of appropriate statin therapy (point-biserial correlation 0.035 [p < 0.001] for ATP III and 0.026 [p < 0.001] for ACC/AHA).

CONCLUSIONS

Here we describe a small association between appropriate statin use and income. Further investigation into barriers in the use of evidence-based therapies in poorer populations is needed.

Multiple chronic conditions at a major urban health system: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of frequencies, costs and comorbidity patterns

OBJECTIVE

To (1) examine the burden of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) in an urban health system, and (2) propose a methodology to identify subpopulations of interest based on diagnosis groups and costs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Mount Sinai Health System, set in all five boroughs of New York City, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

192 085 adult (18+) plan members of capitated Medicaid contracts between the Healthfirst managed care organisation and the Mount Sinai Health System in the years 2012 to 2014.

METHODS

We classified adults as having 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5+ chronic conditions from a list of 69 chronic conditions. After summarising the demographics, geography and prevalence of MCC within this population, we then described groups of patients (segments) using a novel methodology: we combinatorially defined 18 768 potential segments of patients by a pair of chronic conditions, a sex and an age group, and then ranked segments by (1) frequency, (2) cost and (3) ratios of observed to expected frequencies of co-occurring chronic conditions. We then compiled pairs of conditions that occur more frequently together than otherwise expected.

RESULTS

61.5% of the study population suffers from two or more chronic conditions. The most frequent dyad was hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (19%) and the most frequent triad was diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (10%). Women aged 50 to 65 with hypertension and hyperlipidaemia were the leading cost segment in the study population. Costs and prevalence of MCC increase with number of conditions and age. The disease dyads associated with the largest observed/expected ratios were pulmonary disease and myocardial infarction. Inter-borough range MCC prevalence was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this low-income, urban population, MCC is more prevalent (61%) than nationally (42%), motivating further research and intervention in this population. By identifying potential target populations in an interpretable manner, this segmenting methodology has utility for health services analysts.

Quantifying Unmet Need in Statin-Treated Hyperlipidemia Patients and the Potential Benefit of Further LDL-C Reduction Through an EHR-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Statins are effective in helping prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, studies suggest that only 20%-64% of patients taking statins achieve reasonable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) thresholds. On-treatment levels of LDL-C remain a key predictor of residual CVD event risk.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) determine how many patients on statins achieved the therapeutic threshold of LDL-C < 100 mg per dL (general cohort) and < 70 mg per dL (secondary prevention cohort, or subcohort, with preexisting CVD); (b) estimate the number of potentially avoidable CVD events if the threshold were reached; and (c) forecast potential cost savings.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study using electronic health record data from the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC) was conducted. The INPC provides comprehensive information about patients in Indiana across health care organizations and care settings. Patients were aged > 45 years and seen between January 1, 2012, and October 31, 2016 (ensuring study of contemporary practice), were statin-naive for 12 months before the index date of initiating statin therapy, and had an LDL-C value recorded 6-18 months after the index date. Subsequent to descriptive cohort analysis, the theoretical CVD risk reduction achievable by reaching the threshold was calculated using Framingham Risk Score and Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration formulas. Estimated potential cost savings used published first-year costs of CVD events, adjusted for inflation and discounted to the present day.

RESULTS

Of the 89,267 patients initiating statins, 30,083 (33.7%) did not achieve the LDL-C threshold (subcohort: 58.1%). In both groups, not achieving the threshold was associated with patients who were female, black, and those who had reduced medication adherence. Higher levels of preventive aspirin use and antihypertensive treatment were associated with threshold achievement. In both cohorts, approximately 64% of patients above the threshold were within 30 mg per dL of the respective threshold. Adherence to statin therapy regimen, judged by a medication possession ratio of ≥ 80%, was 57.4% in the general cohort and 56.7% in the subcohort. Of the patients who adhered to therapy, 23.7% of the general cohort and 50.5% of the subcohort had LDL-C levels that did not meet the threshold. 10-year CVD event risk in the at-or-above threshold group was 22.78% (SD = 17.24%) in the general cohort and 29.56% (SD = 18.19%) in the subcohort. By reducing LDL-C to the threshold, a potential relative risk reduction of 14.8% in the general cohort could avoid 1,173 CVD events over 10 years (subcohort: 15.7% and 454 events). Given first-year inpatient and follow-up costs of $37,300 per CVD event, this risk reduction could save about $1,455 per patient treated to reach the threshold (subcohort: $1,902; 2017 U.S. dollars) over a 10-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Across multiple health care systems in Indiana, between 34% (general cohort) and 58% (secondary prevention cohort) of patients treated with statins did not achieve therapeutic LDL-C thresholds. Based on current CVD event risk and cost projections, such patients seem to be at increased risk and may represent an important and potentially preventable burden on health care costs.

DISCLOSURES

Funding support for this study was provided by Merck (Kenilworth, NJ). Chase and Boggs are employed by Merck. Simpson is a consultant to Merck and Pfizer. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Cost-effectiveness of Financial Incentives for Patients and Physicians to Manage Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels

IMPORTANCE

Financial incentives shared between physicians and patients were shown to significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in a randomized clinical trial, but it is not known whether these health benefits are worth the added incentive and utilization costs required to achieve them.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of financial incentives on LDL-C level control.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this economic evaluation, a previously validated microsimulation computer model was parameterized using individual-level data from the randomized clinical trial on financial incentives, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys for model population inputs, and other published sources. The study was conducted from April 15, 2016, to March 29, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

The following interventions were used: (1) usual care, (2) trial control strategy (increased cholesterol level monitoring and use of electronic pill bottles), (3) financial incentives for physicians, (4) financial incentives for patients, and (5) incentives shared between physicians and patients.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Discounted costs (2017 US dollars), lifetime cardiovascular disease risk, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

The model population (n = 1 000 000 [30.7% women]) had similar mean (SD) age (61.5 [11.9] years) and LDL-C level (153.9 mg/dL) as the observed trial population (n = 1503 [42.7% women]; age, 62.0 [8.7] years; and LDL-C level, 160.6 mg/dL). Using base-case assumptions (including a 10-year waning period of LDL-C level reductions), the usual-care strategy was dominated (higher costs and lower QALYs) by all other strategies. Strategies for physician- or patient-only incentives were dominated by the shared-incentives strategy, which had an ICER of $60 000/QALY compared with the trial control strategy. In a sensitivity analysis regarding the duration of LDL-C level reductions, the shared-incentives strategy remained cost-effective (ICERs <$100 000/QALY and <$150 000/QALY) for scenarios with LDL-C level reductions lasting, with linear waning, at least 7 and 5 years, respectively. In the 1-way sensitivity analysis for the time horizon of the analysis, the ICER of the shared-incentives strategy exceeded $100 000/QALY at 11 years and $150 000/QALY at 8 years. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the shared-incentives intervention was cost-effective in 69% to 77% of iterations using cost-effectiveness thresholds of $100 000 to $150 000/QALY. Cost-effectiveness results were also sensitive to the duration of intervention costs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that the financial incentives shared between patients and physicians for LDL-C level control meet conventional standards of cost-effectiveness, but these results appeared to be sensitive to assumptions about the durations of LDL-C level reductions and years of intervention costs included, as well as to the choice of time horizon.

Methods for estimating costs in patients with hyperlipidemia experiencing their first cardiovascular event in the United Kingdom

AIMS

Methods for integrating external costs into clinical databases are not well-characterized. The purpose of this research was to describe and implement methods for estimating the cost of hospitalizations, prescriptions, and general practitioner and specialist visits used to manage hyperlipidemia patients experiencing cardiovascular (CV) events in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics data. Costs were incorporated based on reference costs from the National Health Service, and labor costs from the Personal Social Services Research Unit. The study population included patients seen by general practitioners in the UK from 2006-2012. Patients ≥18 years were selected at the time of their first CV-related hospitalization defined as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, or revascularization. To be included, patients must have received ≥2 lipid-lowering therapies. Outcome measures included healthcare utilization and direct medical costs for hospitalizations, medications, general practitioner visits, and specialist visits during the 6-month acute period, starting with the CV hospitalization, and during the subsequent 30-month long-term period.

RESULTS

There were 24,093 patients with a CV hospitalization included in the cohort. This study identified and costed 69,240 hospitalizations, 673,069 GP visits, 32,942 specialist visits, and 2,572,792 prescriptions, representing 855 unique drug and dose combinations. The mean acute period and mean annualized long-term period costs (2014£) were £4,060 and £1,433 for hospitalizations, £377 and £518 for GP visits, £59 and £103 for specialist visits, and £98 and £209 for medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital costs represent the largest portion of acute and long-term costs in this population. Detailed costing using utilization data is feasible and representative of UK clinical practice, but is labor intensive. The availability of a standardized coding system in the UK drug costing data would greatly facilitate drug costing.

A Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Outcomes-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lipid-Lowering Therapies

BACKGROUND

Previous reviews have evaluated economic analyses of lipid-lowering therapies using lipid levels as surrogate markers for cardiovascular disease. However, drug approval and health technology assessment agencies have stressed that surrogates should only be used in the absence of clinical endpoints.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and summarise the methodologies, weaknesses and strengths of economic models based on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event rates.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness evaluations of lipid-lowering therapies using cardiovascular event rates in adults with hyperlipidaemia were sought in Medline, Embase, Medline In-Process, PubMed and NHS EED and conference proceedings. Search results were independently screened, extracted and quality checked by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Searches until February 2016 retrieved 3443 records, from which 26 studies (29 publications) were selected. Twenty-two studies evaluated secondary prevention (four also assessed primary prevention), two considered only primary prevention and two included mixed primary and secondary prevention populations. Most studies (18) based treatment-effect estimates on single trials, although more recent evaluations deployed meta-analyses (5/10 over the last 10 years). Markov models (14 studies) were most commonly used and only one study employed discrete event simulation. Models varied particularly in terms of health states and treatment-effect duration. No studies used a systematic review to obtain utilities. Most studies took a healthcare perspective (21/26) and sourced resource use from key trials instead of local data. Overall, reporting quality was suboptimal.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reveals methodological changes over time, but reporting weaknesses remain, particularly with respect to transparency of model reporting.

Impact of a value-based formulary in three chronic disease cohorts

OBJECTIVES

Value-based insurance design has been suggested as an effective approach to ensure access to highvalue medications in health insurance markets. Premera Blue Cross, a large regional health plan, implemented a value-based formulary (VBF) for pharmaceuticals in 2010 that explicitly used cost-effectiveness analysis to inform medication co-payments. This study assesses the impact of a VBF on adherence and patient and health plan expenditures on 3 chronic disease states: diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

STUDY DESIGN

Interrupted time series design of employer-sponsored plans from 2006 to 2013. Beneficiaries exposed to the VBF formed the intervention group, and beneficiaries in similar plans without any changes in pharmacy benefits formed the control group.

METHODS

We measured medication expenditures from member, health plan, and member-plus-health plan (overall) perspectives and medication adherence as proportion of days covered. We conducted an exploratory analysis of medication utilization classifying medications according to whether co-payments moved up or down in the year following VBF implementation.

RESULTS

For the diabetes cohort, there was a statistically significant reduction in member and overall expenditures of $5 per member per month (PMPM) and $9 PMPM, respectively. For the hypertension cohort, there was a statistically significant reduction in member expenditures of $4 PMPM and an increase in health plan expenditures of $3 PMPM. There were no statistically significant effects on hyperlipidemia cohort expenditures or on medication adherence in any of the 3 disease cohorts. Exploratory analyses suggest that patients in the diabetes and hyperlipidemia cohorts were switching to higher-value medications.

CONCLUSIONS

A VBF can ensure access to high-value medications while maintaining affordability.

Healthcare costs associated with cardiovascular events in patients with hyperlipidemia or prior cardiovascular events: estimates from Swedish population-based register data

OBJECTIVES

To estimate healthcare costs of new cardiovascular (CV) events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart failure) in patients with hyperlipidemia or prior CV events.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using Swedish national registers and electronic medical records. Patients with hyperlipidemia or prior CV events were stratified into three cohorts based on CV risk level: history of major cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) risk-equivalent, and low/unknown risk. Propensity score matching was applied to compare patients with new events to patients without new events for estimation of incremental costs of any event and by event type.

RESULTS

A CV event resulted in increased costs over 3 years of follow-up, with the majority of costs occurring in the 1st year following the event. The mean incremental cost of patients with a history of major CVD (n = 6881) was €8588 during the 1st year following the event. This was similar to that of CHD risk-equivalent patients (n = 3226; €6663) and patients at low/unknown risk (n = 2497; €8346). Ischemic stroke resulted in the highest 1st-year cost for patients with a history of major CVD and CHD risk-equivalent patients (€10,194 and €9823, respectively); transient ischemic attack in the lowest (€3917 and €4140). Incremental costs remained elevated in all cohorts during all three follow-up years, with costs being highest in the major CVD history cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare costs of CV events are substantial and vary considerably by event type. Incremental costs remain elevated for several years after an event.

Estimating the future burden of cardiovascular disease and the value of lipid and blood pressure control therapies in China

BACKGROUND

Lifestyle and dietary changes reflect an ongoing epidemiological transition in China, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) playing an ever-increasing role in China's disease burden. This study assessed the burden of CVD and the potential value of lipid and blood pressure control strategies in China.

METHODS

We estimated the likely burden of CVD between 2016 and 2030 and how expanded use of lipid lowering and blood pressure control medication would impact that burden in the next 15 years. Accounting for the costs of drug use, we assessed the net social value of a policy that expands the utilization of lipid and blood pressure lowering therapies in China.

RESULTS

Rises in prevalence of CVD risk and population aging would likely increase the incidence of acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) by 75 million and strokes by 118 million, while the number of CVD deaths would rise by 39 million in total between 2016 and 2030. Universal treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia patients with lipid and blood pressure lowering therapies could avert between 10 and 20 million AMIs, between 8 and 30 million strokes, and between 3 and 10 million CVD deaths during the 2016-2030 period, producing a positive social value net of health care costs as high as $932 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of its aging population and epidemiological transition, China faces near-certain increases in CVD morbidity and mortality. Preventative measures such as effective lipid and blood pressure management may reduce CVD burden substantially and provide large social value. While the Chinese government is implementing more systematic approaches to health care delivery, prevention of CVD should be high on the agenda.

Costs for a health coaching intervention for chronic care management

OBJECTIVES

Health coaches can help patients gain knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage their chronic conditions. Coaches may be particularly valuable in resource-poor settings, but they are not typically reimbursed by insurance, raising questions about their budgetary impact.

STUDY DESIGN

The Health Coaching in Primary Care (HCPC) study was a randomized controlled trial that showed health coaches were effective at helping low-income patients improve control of their type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia at 12 months compared with usual care.

METHODS

We estimated the cost of employing 3 health coaches and mapped these costs to participants. We tested whether the added costs of the coaches were offset by any savings in healthcare utilization within 1 year. Healthcare utilization data were obtained from 5 sources. Multivariate models assessed differences in costs at 1 year controlling for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Coaches worked an average of 9 hours with each participant over the length of the study. On average, the health coach intervention cost $483 per participant per year. The average healthcare costs for the coaching group was $3207 compared with $3276 for the control group (P = .90). There was no evidence that the coaching intervention saved money at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Health coaches have been shown to improve clinical outcomes related to chronic disease management. We found that employing health coaches adds an additional cost of $483 per patient per year. The data do not suggest that health coaches pay for themselves by reducing healthcare utilization in the first year.

Reducing Medication Costs to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: A Community Guide Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are major cardiovascular disease risk factors. To modify them, patients often need to adopt healthier lifestyles and adhere to prescribed medications. However, patients' adherence to recommended treatments has been suboptimal. Reducing out-of-pocket costs (ROPC) to patients may improve medication adherence and consequently improve health outcomes. This Community Guide systematic review examined the effectiveness of ROPC for medications prescribed for patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

We assessed effectiveness and economics of ROPC for medications to treat hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or both. Per Community Guide review methods, reviewers identified, evaluated, and summarized available evidence published from January 1980 through July 2015.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the analysis. ROPC interventions resulted in increased medication adherence for patients taking blood pressure and cholesterol medications by a median of 3.0 percentage points; proportion achieving 80% adherence to medication increased by 5.1 percentage points. Blood pressure and cholesterol outcomes also improved. Nine studies were included in the economic review, with a median intervention cost of $172 per person per year and a median change in health care cost of -$127 per person per year.

CONCLUSION

ROPC for medications to treat hypertension and hyperlipidemia is effective in increasing medication adherence, and, thus, improving blood pressure and cholesterol outcomes. Most ROPC interventions are implemented in combination with evidence-based health care interventions such as team-based care with medication counseling. An overall conclusion about the economics of the intervention could not be reached with the small body of inconsistent cost-benefit evidence.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Diabetes Pay-For-Performance Program in Diabetes Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Pay for performance (P4P) has been used as a strategy to improve quality for patients with chronic illness. Little was known whether care provided to individuals with multiple chronic conditions in a P4P program were cost-effective. This study investigated cost effectiveness of a diabetes P4P program for caring patients with diabetes alone (DM alone) and diabetes with comorbid hypertension and hyperlipidemia (DMHH) from a single payer perspective in Taiwan. Analyzing data using population-based longitudinal databases, we compared costs and effectiveness between P4P and non-P4P diabetes patient groups in two cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match comparable control groups for intervention groups. Outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), program intervention costs, cost-savings and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). QALYs for P4P patients and non-P4P patients were 2.80 and 2.71 for the DM alone cohort and 2.74 and 2.66 for the DMHH patient cohort. The average incremental intervention costs per QALYs was TWD$167,251 in the DM alone cohort and TWD$145,474 in the DMHH cohort. The average incremental all-cause medical costs saved by the P4P program per QALYs were TWD$434,815 in DM alone cohort and TWD$506,199 in the DMHH cohort. The findings indicated that the P4P program for both cohorts were cost-effective and the resulting return on investment (ROI) was 2.60:1 in the DM alone cohort and 3.48:1 in the DMHH cohort. We conclude that the diabetes P4P program in both cohorts enabled the long-term cost-effective use of resources and cost-savings, especially for patients with multiple comorbid conditions.

Associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization is still limited. It is not clear whether better clinical outcomes derived from increasing statin adherence levels can be translated into cost savings and lower health care utilization.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, hospital admission, and emergency room (ER) visits after statin therapy is taken for 1 year.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to examine whether higher statin adherence level, measured as medication possession ratio (MPR), is associated with lower health care costs and hospital admission rate and with fewer ER visits. The study sample consisted of adult patients aged 18-64 years on an index date with continuous enrollment 12 months prior to and 12 months after the index date (the first fill date of a statin between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010). Study subjects also needed to have a minimum of 2 ICD-9-CM diagnoses for hyperlipidemia or diabetes in the pre-index date period. Main data sources were medical and prescription (Rx) claims, as well as enrollment files provided by a health benefit program and a medical carrier of state government and public school employees in a midwestern state. Study subjects were stratified into 8 groups based on statin MPR level: less than  40%, 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 70%-79%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100%. Total medical and Rx costs, as well as all-cause hospital admission rates and ER visits in a year after the index date, were computed based on medical and Rx claims. A separate breakout of statin costs, part of total Rx costs, was also computed. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were developed to test the hypothesis that higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower health care costs and utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 10,312 subjects met the criteria and were selected. The average statin MPR in a year after the index date was 71.95%. Mean total costs (medical + Rx) in a year after the index date were $6,064.36. There were significant variations in Rx costs and total health care costs as well as ER visits among the 8 patient groups stratified using the statin MPR level. A GLM model showed that all the ratios of health care costs among groups with statin MPR from 40%-59%, 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were larger than 1 and statistically significant compared with the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%, suggesting those groups had higher health care costs than the reference group with the lowest statin MPR level. Based on a logistic regression model of hospital utilization for this study population, all the odds ratios of all-cause hospitalization among the groups with higher statin MPR were not statistically significant, suggesting that the likelihood of hospitalization for patients with higher statin MPR was not statistically lower than that of the reference group with statin MPR less than 40%. After controlling for all other covariates, another GLM model based on the Poisson distribution and log link function showed that ratios of ER visits among groups with statin MPR from 60%-69%, 80%-84%, 85%-89%, 90%-95%, and 96%-100% were smaller than 1 and statistically significant, suggesting the groups had fewer ER visits than the reference group with statin MPR less than  40%. The patient group with statin MPR from 96%-100% was estimated to have the lowest number of ER visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results show that much higher statin adherence levels are related to fewer ER visits after statin treatment is taken for a year among beneficiaries; however, the study is inconclusive whether higher statin adherence levels are associated with lower overall health care costs in a year after statin therapy is taken. Further research is needed to evaluate the associations between statin adherence level, the cost of cardiovascular care alone, and utilization over a longer period.

Association of copayment with likelihood and level of adherence in new users of statins: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Statins remain a fundamental component of pharmacologic therapy for hyperlipidemia. Health benefits of statin therapy are jeopardized when adherence is reduced.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) assess the association between copayment and copayment type on statin adherence using 2 different thresholds of adherence and (b) identify the incremental change in statin adherence associated with presence of copayment and copayment type.

METHODS

We executed a retrospective cohort study of new users of statins with dyslipidemia from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) within the Veterans Integrated Service Network 22 who initiated a statin between November 30, 2006, and December 2, 2007. We used exposure categories of Any Copayment versus No Copayment, indicating a patient had a copayment or had no copayment in order to obtain medications, respectively. As a separate analysis, we varied the exposures to the standard VHA copayment categories: (a) Service-Connected (SC) Copayment (patients with service-related injury), (b) Non-Service-Connected (NSC) Copayment (patients without a service-related injury), and (c) No Copayment. Using each set of exposures, we conducted separate multiple logistic regression analyses using 2 different adherence outcomes based on medication possession ratio (MPR) threshold: (1) adherence defined as MPR ≥ 0.8 and (2) adherence defined as MPR ≥ 0.9. We then proceeded with multiple linear regression models to determine the incremental change in MPR associated with the 2 sets of exposures. Subjects were required to be enrolled in VHA services for at least 2 years prior to index date and throughout the 1-year study period.

RESULTS

A total of 4,886 subjects were identified for analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who did not pay a copayment for their statin medications were more likely to have adherence rates of ≥ 0.8 MPR and ≥ 0.9 MPR relative to the No Copayment Group with odds ratios (OR) of 1.19 (95% CI = 1.03-1.37) and 1.28 (95% CI = 1.11-1.48), respectively. The second analysis applied the VHA exposure categories of SC Copayment, NSC Copayment, and No Copayment. Using the 0.8 MPR or greater adherence threshold, the No Copayment group was associated with an increased likelihood of adherence versus the SC Copayment category as reference group with an OR of 1.31 (95% CI = 1.10-1.58). The NSC Copayment was associated with a nonsignificant increase in odds of adherence at the 0.8 MPR level or greater with OR of 1.12 (95% CI = 0.98-1.39). Using the 0.9 MPR level or greater, adherence threshold findings were similar. The No Copayment group produced an OR of 1.42 (95% CI = 1.17-1.71) compared with the SC Copayment group. The NSC Copayment group was associated with a nonsignificant increase in odds of adherence at the 0.9 MPR level or greater with an OR of 1.12 (95% CI = 0.97-1.38).The No Copayment group was associated with an increase in MPR of 0.02 (95% CI = 0.002-0.035) versus the Any Copayment category. Using the VHA copayment categories, we observed an increase in MPR for the No Copayment group versus the SC Copayment group of 0.03 (95% CI = 0.01-0.05). The NSC Copayment group was associated with a nonsignificant increase in MPR versus the SC Copayment group of 0.02 (95% CI = -0.003-0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients without out-of-pocket payments for their statins were more likely to adhere to therapy. Patients who pay a copayment for their statin medications were also compared with each other based on whether they (a) received any of their nonstatin prescriptions without a copayment or (b) paid a copayment on all of their prescriptions including statins. Our findings suggest that, among those that pay for their statins, patients are less adherent to their statins if other medications they are prescribed are copayment free. Thus, patient consumption behavior may be influenced by the relative cost of medications in patient prescription lists. Additional counseling on the necessity of adherence should be given to patients paying a copayment for their statin prescriptions.

Palm oil taxes and cardiovascular disease mortality in India: economic-epidemiologic model

OBJECTIVE

To examine the potential effect of a tax on palm oil on hyperlipidemia and on mortality due to cardiovascular disease in India.

DESIGN

Economic-epidemiologic model.

MODELING METHODS

A microsimulation model of mortality due to myocardial infarction and stroke among Indian populations was constructed, incorporating nationally representative data on systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, tobacco smoking, diabetes, and cardiovascular event history, and stratified by age, sex, and urban/rural residence. Household expenditure data were used to estimate the change in consumption of palm oil following changes in oil price and the potential substitution of alternative oils that might occur after imposition of a tax. A 20% excise tax on palm oil purchases was simulated over the period 2014-23.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The model was used to project future mortality due to myocardial infarction and stroke, as well as the potential effect of a tax on food insecurity, accounting for the effect of increased food prices.

RESULTS

A 20% tax on palm oil purchases would be expected to avert approximately 363,000 (95% confidence interval 247,000 to 479,000) deaths from myocardial infarctions and strokes over the period 2014-23 in India (1.3% reduction in cardiovascular deaths) if people do not substitute other oils for reduced palm oil consumption. Given estimates of substitution of palm oil with other oils following a 20% price increase for palm oil, the beneficial effects of increased polyunsaturated fat consumption would be expected to enhance the projected reduction in deaths to as much as 421,000 (256,000 to 586,000). The tax would be expected to benefit men more than women and urban populations more than rural populations, given differential consumption and cardiovascular risk. In a scenario incorporating the effect of taxation on overall food expenditures, the tax may increase food insecurity by <1%, resulting in 16,000 (95% confidence interval 12,000 to 22,000) deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Curtailing palm oil intake through taxation may modestly reduce hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular mortality, but with potential distributional consequences differentially benefiting male and urban populations, as well as affecting food security.

Budget impact of rosuvastatin initiation in high-risk hyperlipidemic patients from a US managed care perspective

INTRODUCTION

Statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, which, when elevated, represent a significant risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Hyperlipidemic patients at risk of CV events initiated on simvastatin or atorvastatin may be less likely to meet LDL-C goals (defined in National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines) and more likely to experience CV events than patients initiated on rosuvastatin. A 3-year budget impact model was developed to estimate the clinical impact and cost to a US managed care organization (MCO) with 1 million members of initiating high-risk hyperlipidemic patients on rosuvastatin rather than simvastatin or atorvastatin.

METHODS

A total of 1000 adult patients were assumed to initiate statins. The average baseline LDL-C level was 189 mg/dL. In scenario 1, all patients were initiated on simvastatin or atorvastatin and titrated to a higher dose, or switched to atorvastatin (if initiated on simvastatin) or rosuvastatin; in scenario 2, 50% of the 520 high-risk patients were initiated on rosuvastatin. Drug acquisition and administration costs were considered. Product labeling, clinical trial results, national prescription claims data, and published literature were used to populate the model.

RESULTS

Over 3 years, 75 additional patients reached their LDL-C goal in scenario 2, compared with scenario 1 (633 vs 558, respectively), at an increased cost of $240,628 ($1,415,516 vs $1,174,888, respectively). The additional per member per month (PMPM) cost of scenario 2 was $0.007.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis assumed that statin efficacy is the same in real life as in trials, and used titration and switching patterns not based on patients' goal attainment. However, sensitivity and scenario analyses showed that the model was less sensitive to these parameters than to cost-related parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating high-risk hyperlipidemic patients on rosuvastatin may increase the number of patients reaching LDL-C goal at a relatively modest increase in PMPM cost to an MCO.

Evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors, events, and costs across four BMI categories

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the 1-year cost of cardiovascular (CV) events by body mass index (BMI) subgroups from a US employer health plan perspective.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients aged 20-64 years from the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Record, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and MarketScan databases were used to determine prevalence of risk factors (RFs) and CV events and 1-year costs. Risk factors included hypertension (HTN), diabetes, and hyperlipidemia (HLD) and CV events included myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure, and stroke. CV event costs were determined from claims by ICD-9 code in patients with overweight/obesity.

RESULTS

Of 220,136 patients identified in GE, BMI was 25-26.9 in 19.4%, 27-29.9 in 30.4%, 30-34.9 in 27.9%, and ≥35 in 22.3%. Patients with diabetes, HTN, and HLD increased with BMI from 1.8% (25-26.9) to 11.4% (≥35) in males and 1.1% to 6.8% in females. Prevalence of CV events increased from 0.1% with no RFs up to 10.2% with multiple RFs. The average 1-year cost per patient increased from $1122 to $2383 as BMI increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher BMI values had an increased prevalence of RFs and CV events, which lead to higher average 1-year costs.

Impact of medical homes on quality, healthcare utilization, and costs

OBJECTIVES

To assess baseline quality metrics, healthcare utilization, and costs of commercially insured patients treated at practices participating in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) pilot.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study utilizing claims data for patients treated at PCMH and non-PCMH practices.

METHODS

Data from Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 1 of 14 plans in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, were queried for patients identified based on visits to PCMH and non-PCMH practices during 2007-2008; outcome metrics were formulated from the baseline calendar year, 2009. Differences in healthcare utilization were determined with x(2) and 2-sample t tests. Regression models were used to test differences in adjusted emergency department (ED) use, inpatient services, and costs.

RESULTS

The study included 31,032 PCMH and 350,015 non-PCMH patients. Among PCMH-treated patients, diabetics had higher rates of glycated hemoglobin testing; cardiovascular disease patients had higher rates of testing and better low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control; imaging rates for low back pain were lower; among pediatric patients, inappropriate antibiotic use for nonspecific or viral respiratory infections was lower. PCMH-treated adults and children had 12% and 23% lower odds of hospitalization, and required 11% and 17% fewer ED services, respectively, than non-PCMH patients. Risk-adjusted total per member per month costs were 8.6% and 14.5% lower for PCMH-treated pediatric and adult patients, respectively (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PCMH practices in this pilot were associated with better preventive health, higher levels of disease management, and lower resource utilization and costs in 2009 compared with practices not pursuing PCMH status.

Cost-effectiveness of statins revisited: lessons learned about the value of innovation

BACKGROUND

The economic evaluation of statins has undergone a development from risk-factor-based models to modeling of hard end points in clinical trials with a shift back to risk-factor models after increased confidence in their predictive power has now been established. At this point, we can look back on the historical economic data on simvastatin to see what lesson regarding reimbursement we can learn.

METHODS

Historical data on the usage and sales of simvastatin in Sweden were combined with published epidemiological and clinical data to calculate the social value of simvastatin to the present day and to make projection until projected until 2018. The distribution of the social surplus was calculated by taking the costs born by society and the producer of the drug into consideration.

RESULTS

The cost of simvastatin fell drastically following patent expiration, although the number of treated patients has continued to grow. Presently, the use of simvastatin is close to cost neutrality taking direct and indirect cost savings from reduced morbidity into account. However, the major part of the social surplus generated comes from the value of improved quality-adjusted survival. Of the social surplus generated, the producer appropriated 20-43% of the value during the on-patent period, a figure dropping to 1% following loss of exclusivity. The total producer surplus between 1987 and 2018 is 2-5% of the total social surplus.

CONCLUSION

Only a small part of the surplus value generated was appropriated by the producer. A regulatory and reimbursement approach that favors early market access and coverage with evidence development as opposed to long-term trials as a pre-requisite for launch is more attractive from both a company and social perspective.

Steroid avoidance reduce the cost of morbidities after live-donor renal allotransplants: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Steroids have had the main role in renal transplant for more than 4 decades. However, chronic use of steroids is associated with many comorbidities, owing to a lack of assessing cost-benefit of steroid avoidance in live-donor renal allotransplants. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, we aimed to assess the cost-benefit of a steroid-free immunosuppression regimen among Egyptian live-donor renal transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly allocated to receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for only 3 days (n=50 patients; study group) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids on a maintenance basis (n=50 patients; control group). All patients received basiliximab (Simulect) induction, with median follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

Both groups showed comparable graft and patient survivals, rejection episodes, and graft functioning. Posttransplant comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group. Hypertension was detected in 4% of steroid-free group versus 24% in the steroid-maintenance group (P = .0009). Posttransplant diabetes mellitus, serious infections, and hyperlipidemia were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group (P < .05). Associated hospitalization costs were 2.2-fold higher in the steroid-maintenance group than they were in the steroid-free group. One year after transplant, the cost of managing posttransplant comorbidities was significantly higher in steroid-maintenance group, despite comparable costs of immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In low, immunologic risk recipients of live-donor renal transplants, using basiliximab induction and maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, steroid avoidance was associated with lower first annual total costs despite comparable immunosuppression costs, which was attributed to lower costs of associated morbidities.

Comparative effectiveness of guidelines for the management of hyperlipidemia and hypertension for type 2 diabetes patients

BACKGROUND

Several guidelines to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetes patients exist in North America, Europe, and Australia. Their ability to achieve this goal efficiently is unclear.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Decision analysis was used to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of international contemporary guidelines for the management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia for patients aged 40-80 with type 2 diabetes. Measures of comparative effectiveness included the expected probability of a coronary or stroke event, incremental medication costs per event, and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent an event. All guidelines are equally effective, but they differ significantly in their medication costs. The range of NNT to prevent an event was small across guidelines (6.5-7.6 for males and 6.5-7.5 for females); a larger range of differences were observed for expected cost per event avoided (ranges, $117,269-$157,186 for males and $115,999-$163,775 for females). Australian and U.S. guidelines result in the highest and lowest expected costs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

International guidelines based on the same evidence and seeking the same goal are similar in their effectiveness; however, there are large differences in expected medication costs.

Variation in prescription use and spending for lipid-lowering and diabetes medications in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

OBJECTIVES

To examine variation in outpatient prescription use and spending for hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA) and its association with quality measures for these conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

We compared outpatient prescription use, spending, and quality of care across 135 VA medical centers (VAMCs) in fiscal year 2008, including 2.3 million patients dispensed lipid-lowering medications and 981,031 patients dispensed diabetes medications. At each facility, we calculated VAMC-level cost per patient for these medications, the proportion of patients taking brand-name drugs, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) scores for hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <100 mg/dL) and for diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin level >9% or not measured).

RESULTS

The median cost per patient for lipid-lowering agents in fiscal year 2008 was $49.60 and varied from $39.68 in the least expensive quartile of VAMCs to $69.57 in the most expensive quartile (P < .001). For diabetes agents, the median cost per patient was $158.34 and varied from $123.34 in the least expensive quartile to $198.31 in the most expensive quartile (P < .001). The proportion of patients dispensed brand-name oral drugs among these classes in the most expensive quartile of VAMCs was twice that in the least expensive quartile (P < .001). There was no correlation between VAMC-level prescription spending and performance on HEDIS measures for lipid-lowering drugs (r = 0.12 and r = 0.07) or for diabetes agents (r = -0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the existence of a closely managed formulary, significant variation in prescription spending and use of brand-name drugs exists in the VA. Although we could not explicitly risk-adjust, there appears to be no relationship between prescription spending and quality of care.

The modeled lifetime cost-effectiveness of published adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications

OBJECTIVE

 We sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of different interventions that have been shown to improve adherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy, by combining a burden of nonadherence model framework with literature-based data on adherence-improving interventions.

METHODS

  MEDLINE was reviewed for studies that evaluated ≥1 adherence intervention compared with a control, used an adherence measure other than self-report, and followed patients for ≥6 months. Effectiveness was assessed as Relative Improvement, ratio of adherence with an intervention versus control. Costs, standardized to 12 months and adjusted to 2007 US$, and effectiveness estimates for each intervention were entered into a previously published model designed to measure the burden of nonadherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications, in a hypertensive population. Outputs included direct medical costs and incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

 After screening, 23 eligible adherence-improving interventions were identified from 18 studies. Relative Improvement ranged from 1.13 to 3.60. After eliminating more costly/less effective interventions, two remained. Self-monitoring, reminders, and educational materials incurred total health-care costs of $17,520, and compared with no adherence intervention, had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $4984 per QALY gained. Pharmacist/nurse management incurred total health-care costs of $17,896, and versus self-monitoring, reminders, and education had an ICER of $6358 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

 Of published interventions shown to improve adherence, reminders and educational materials, and a pharmacist/nurse management program, appear to be cost-effective and should be considered before other interventions. Understanding relative cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions may guide design and implementation of efficient adherence-improving programs.

The economic consequences of non-adherence to lipid-lowering therapy: results from the Anglo-Scandinavian-Cardiac Outcomes Trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in clinical practice is less than ideal. Analysis of registry data has indicated that this is associated with poor outcomes. The objective of the present analysis was to assess the impact of high adherence to drug (defined as > 80% of days covered), compared with low adherence to drug (< 50% of days covered) in terms of risk of events and long-term economic consequences.

DESIGN

Open-label follow up of a randomised placebo-controlled trial in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models were used to assess the hazard ratio of patients with high adherence compared with low adherence while controlling for cardiovascular risk. A Markov model was used to predict the long-term costs and health outcomes associated with poor adherence during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Both statistical models indicated that high adherence is associated with improved prognosis [Cox model: 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.98, Poisson model hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.98]. Discounted at 3.5% per year, the Markov model predicts that as a consequence of higher adherence during the follow-up period, costs would be higher (1689 pounds per patient compared with 1323 pounds per patient) because of higher drug costs, but the projected survival and quality-adjusted survival (QALY) would also be longer (10.83 compared with 10.81 life years and 8.13 compared with 8.11 QALYs).

CONCLUSION

Given the higher risk of cardiovascular events associated with low adherence shown here, measures to improve adherence are an important part of the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Cost-effectiveness of single agent, uptitration and switching statin treatment strategies for lipid lowering in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

To assess which alternative treatment strategies are optimum in terms of cost-effectiveness (EUR/patient treated to target, EUR/PTT) in lowering cholesterol in high-risk patients with elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in Sweden.

METHODS

A probabilistic cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the mean expected costs and proportion of patients reaching goal attainment (defined as LDL-C < or =2.5 mmol/L [96.5 mg/dL]) at some point in time within a 52-week period following the initiation of statin therapy. Eight different statin treatment strategies were evaluated. Key data sources used in the modeling were the scientific literature, hospital tariffs and medicine price databases.

RESULTS

Depending on baseline LDL-C and the willingness-to-pay per additional PTT, the cost-effective alternative is always found among four out of the eight assessed treatment strategies (i.e. Simva10 --> Simva20 --> Simva40, Rosu10, Simva20 --> Rosu10 --> Rosu20 --> Rosu40, or Simva20 --> Simva40 --> Rosu20 --> Rosu40). An important finding was that when LDL-C level exceed 4.0 mmol/L (154mg/dL) and when willingness to pay is less than 500 EUR per additional PTT, the optimal treatment strategy would be to initiate cholesterol-lowering treatment directly with rosuvastatin 10 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the optimal approach to initiate lipid-lowering therapy would be to treat patients with the lower baseline LDL-C levels with the least costly treatment strategies, while initiating lipid-lowering treatment with a high-potency statin (rosuvastatin) in patients with moderately high or high baseline LDL-C levels. This recommendation can be assumed to be relevant particularly when the fact that after treatment initiation the majority of Swedish patients will not have any changes in their lipid-lowering medication or dose is taken into account. Finally, since only the short-term results are presented here, it would be valuable to conduct further studies of the long-term cost-effectiveness of different statin treatment strategies that focus on treatment persistence and LDL-C goal attainment in real practice.

Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants

Food insecurity refers to the inability to afford enough food for an active, healthy life. Numerous studies have shown associations between food insecurity and adverse health outcomes among children. Studies of the health effects of food insecurity among adults are more limited and generally focus on the association between food insecurity and self-reported disease. We therefore examined the association between food insecurity and clinical evidence of diet-sensitive chronic disease, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Our population-based sample included 5094 poor adults aged 18-65 y participating in the NHANES (1999-2004 waves). We estimated the association between food insecurity (assessed by the Food Security Survey Module) and self-reported or laboratory/examination evidence of diet-sensitive chronic disease using Poisson regression. We adjusted the models to account for differences in age, gender, race, educational attainment, and income. Food insecurity was associated with self-reported hypertension [adjusted relative risk (ARR) 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38] and hyperlipidemia (ARR 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.55), but not diabetes (ARR 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89-1.58). Food insecurity was associated with laboratory or examination evidence of hypertension (ARR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41) and diabetes (ARR 1.48; 95% CI, 0.94-2.32). The association with laboratory evidence of diabetes did not reach significance in the fully adjusted model unless we used a stricter definition of food insecurity (ARR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.44-4.08). These data show that food insecurity is associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Health policy discussions should focus increased attention on ability to afford high-quality foods for adults with or at risk for chronic disease.

Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of a medication copayment increase on adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective pre-post observational study.

METHODS

This study compared medication adherence at 4 Veterans Affairs medical centers between veterans who were exempt from copayments and propensity-matched veterans who were not exempt. The diabetes sample included 1069 exempt veterans and 1069 nonexempt veterans, the hypertension sample included 3545 exempt veterans and 3545 nonexempt veterans, and the sample of veterans taking statins included 2029 exempt veterans and 2029 nonexempt veterans. The main outcome measure was medication adherence 12 months before and 23 months after the copayment increase. Adherence differences were assessed in a difference-in-difference approach by using generalized estimating equations that controlled for time, copayment exemption, an interaction between time and copayment exemption, and patient demographics, site, and other factors.

RESULTS

Adherence to all medications increased in the short term for all veterans, but then declined in the longer term (February-December 2003). The change in adherence between the preperiod and the postperiod was significantly different for exempt and nonexempt veterans in all 3 cohorts, and nonadherence increased over time for veterans required to pay copayments. The impact of the copayment increase was particularly adverse for veterans with diabetes who were required to pay copayments.

CONCLUSION

A $5 copayment increase (from $2 to $7) adversely impacted medication adherence for veterans subject to copayments taking oral hypoglycemic agents, antihypertensive medications, or statins.

The cost and effectiveness of adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs*

AIMS

Adherence to cardiovascular medications is poor. Accordingly, interventions have been proposed to improve adherence. However, as intervention-associated costs are rarely considered in full, we sought to review the effectiveness and costs associated with different adherence-improving interventions for cardiovascular disease therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed MEDLINE to update a prior review of interventions to improve adherence with antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering therapy covering January 1972 to June 2002, to add studies published from July 2002 to October 2007. Eligible studies evaluated > or = 1 intervention compared with a control, used measures other than self-report, reported significant improvement in adherence and followed patients for > or = 6 months. Effectiveness was measured as relative improvement (RI), the ratio of adherence in the intervention group to the control group. Costs were calculated based on those reported in the analysis, if available or estimated based on resource use described. All costs were truncated to 6 months and adjusted to 2007 US$.

RESULTS

Of 755 new articles, five met all eligibility criteria. Combining with the prior review gave 23 interventions from 18 studies. RI in adherence ranged from 1.11 to 4.65. Six-month intervention costs ranged from $10 to $142 per patient. Reminders had the lowest effectiveness (RI: 1.11-1.14), but were least costly ($10/6 months). Case management was most effective (RI: 1.23-4.65), but the most costly ($90-$130/6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, we found a positive association between intervention costs and effectiveness. Therefore, consideration of intervention costs, along with the benefits afforded to adherence, may help guide the design and implementation of adherence-improving programs.

The clinical and economic burden of nonadherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine lifetime costs, morbidity, and mortality associated with varying adherence to antihypertensive and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statin) therapy in a hypertensive population.

METHODS

A model was constructed to compare costs and outcomes under three adherence scenarios: no treatment, ideal adherence, and real-world adherence. Simulated patients' characteristics matched those of participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm and event probabilities were calculated with Framingham Heart Study risk equations. The real-world adherence scenario employed adherence data from an observational study of a US population; risk reductions at each level of adherence were based on linear extrapolations from clinical trials. Outputs included life expectancy, frequencies of primary and secondary coronary heart disease and stroke, and direct medical costs in 2006 US$. The incremental cost per life-year gained and incremental cost per event avoided were calculated comparing the three adherence scenarios.

RESULTS

Mean life expectancy was 14.73 years (no-treatment scenario), 15.07 (real-world adherence), and 15.49 (ideal adherence). The average number of cardiovascular events per patients was 0.738 (no treatment), 0.610 (real-world adherence), and 0.441 (ideal adherence). The incremental cost of real-world adherence versus no treatment is $30,585 per life-year gained, and ideal adherence versus real-world adherence is $22,121 per life-year gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive and statin therapy at real-world adherence levels can be expected to receive approximately 50% of the potential benefit seen in clinical trials. Depending on its cost, the incremental benefits of an effective adherence intervention program could make it an attractive value.

The effect of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors on expenditures and productivity in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors on medical expenditures and missed work days.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The 2000 and 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey of the US population, was used to estimate the marginal effect of obesity (BMI > or = 30) on annual per-person medical expenditures and missed work days for patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension using multivariate regression methods controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, income, insurance, and smoking status. Maximum Likelihood Heckman Selection with Smearing retransformation was used to assess medical expenditures, and Negative Binomial regression was used for missed work days.

RESULTS

Normal weight individuals with diabetes, dyslipidemia, or hypertension had significantly greater medical expenditures than those without the respective condition ($6,006 (5,124-6,887), $4,760 (4,102-5,417), $3,911 (3,345-4,476)) and obesity significantly exacerbated this effect ($7,986 (7,397-8,574), $7,636 (7,072-8,200), $6,197 (5,745-6,649); $2007; all P < 0.05). In addition, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension resulted in greater missed work days (3.1 (0.94-6.21), 3.2 (0.42-7.91), 1.4 (0.0-3.52)) (all P < 0.05 except hypertension), which resulted in greater lost productivity ($433, $451, $199) and obesity significantly exacerbated the deleterious effect on work days (8.7 (4.44-15.2), 5.5 (2.18-10.5), 4.5 (2.92-6.34)) and lost productivity ($1,217, $763, $622) (all P < 0.05). In addition, medical expenditures increased for increasing weight category and increasing number of risk factors.

DISCUSSION

Obesity significantly exacerbates the deleterious effect of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension on medical expenditures and productivity loss in the United States. Obesity is preventable and public health efforts need to be undertaken to prevent its alarming increase in order to reduce the incidence and effect of cardiometabolic risk factors.

The cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden

This paper assessed the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden, using one model and a societal perspective. Cost-effective scenarios were found in all these chronic disorders. These findings are of relevance for decisions on the efficient allocation of health care resources.

INTRODUCTION

There is a need to assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of treatment of osteoporosis from a societal perspective and to relate this to the CE of interventions in other disease areas. This is of relevance for decisions on the efficient allocation of health care resources within and between disease areas. The purpose of the paper was to estimate the CE of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and to put that into the perspective of treating hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. The CE was assessed for different high risk female populations aged 50-80 years.

METHODS

The estimation of CE was based on a model populated with data for Sweden.

RESULTS

Compared to no intervention, a 5-year treatment of osteoporosis, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia, is cost effective for most of the assessed high risk female populations. The cost per gained quality adjusted life year (QALY) for the treatment of a 70-year-old woman never exceeded SEK 330,000 (US$ 44,000), which is generally judged as an acceptable cost for a gained QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that it is possible to produce reliable estimates of the CE of treatments in different disease areas within the context of a single model.

The value of a specialist lipid clinic

AIMS

To establish the value of the first 3 years of a cardiovascular risk factor clinic in tackling the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

A database review of all 339 patients referred to the clinic.

RESULTS

Blood pressure levels in the hypertensive patients were significantly reduced and 9% of the smokers managed to quit for 12 months, half of them subsequently relapsing. Ninety-eight oral glucose tolerance tests were performed and 40% were abnormal yielding 10 patients with hitherto unsuspected diabetes and 29 with impaired glucose tolerance. Sixty-four of the 97 referrals of patients in the primary prevention group (no evidence of CVD) were found to have calculated Framingham coronary heart disease risk estimates of < 15% per decade, the lowest being 0.3%. Lipid levels were significantly reduced in both the hypercholesterolaemic (n = 290) and hypertriglyceridaemic (n = 49) patient groups through the use of more potent statins, extensive use of combination therapy and appropriate use of fibrates and omega-3 fish oil supplements. The annual drug cost per patient treated only increased from 310.72 pounds sterling to 398.08 pounds sterling, yet there was a 3.5-fold increase in the number of patients achieving the General Medical Services 2 target of a total cholesterol < 5 mmol/l and a 4.5-fold increase in patients achieving the Joint British Societies 2 target of a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol < 2 mmol/l.

CONCLUSION

The need for a specialist clinic was demonstrated by the 66% of primary prevention referrals who did not meet the current NICE treatment threshold. Additionally, the clinic was able to diagnose and treat 39 patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus/impaired glucose tolerance and 12 with hypothyroidism. LDL cholesterol was reduced overall by 36% implying a greater than one-third reduction in future cardiovascular events before the improvements in blood pressure control and smoking cessation are included and this was achieved at marginal extra cost to the mean drug bill at referral.

Epidemiology and economics of statin use

In 2006 the State supported the purchase of statins by some Euro 120 million for some 466,366 patients. While about 50% is for secondary prevention of heart disease a disproportionate number of women are receiving treatment for primary prevention. For proprietary agents the monthly cost was largely explained by price and dosage (mg/day) and the average varied from Euro 29.2 for rosuvastatin (11 mg), Euro 38.2 simvastatin (21 mg), Euro 39.1 atorvastatin (19 mg), Euro 42.7 pravastatin (21 mg) and Euro 31.8 for generic prava/simvastatin (21 mg). Generic substitution for pravastatin and simvastatin would save Euro 6.4m. Applying the drug prices corresponding in the United Kingdom would result in savings of some Euro 35m per annum. While the increasing use of statins is justified on cost benefit/analysis considerable savings could be made through choice of the more potent statins, a greater use of generics and a flatter dose price structure.

The demand for statin: the effect of copay on utilization and compliance

Increasing drug costs in the US have prompted employers and insurers alike to turn to higher drug copays for cost containment. The effect of rising copays on compliance with statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) treatment has received surprisingly little attention in the applied literature. This paper uses pharmacy claims data from a commercially insured adult population to determine the effect of copay change on compliance at the individual level. Fixed effect logit and Poisson regressions estimate the effect of copays on monthly likelihood of high compliance and average monthly days of supply respectively. Higher copays reduce compliance among statin users, with less compliant patients responding more strongly to copay change than compliant patients. These results suggest that specific financial incentives given to less compliant patients could improve compliance with statin treatment at a relatively low cost.

The medical cost of cardiometabolic risk factor clusters in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and overweight/obesity often cluster together. The prevalence of these cardiometabolic risk factor clusters (CMRFCs) is increasing significantly for all sociodemographic groups, but little is known about their economic impact.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used (2000 and 2002). The current study estimated the national cost of CMRFCs independent of the cost of cardiovascular disease in the U.S., as well as the cost for all major payers and the marginal cost per individual using a Heckman selection model with Smearing retransformation. CMRFCs included BMI >or= 25 and two of the following three: diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and/or hypertension. All amounts are expressed in 2005 U.S. dollars.

RESULTS

National medical expenditures attributable to CMRFCs in the U.S. totaled 80 billion dollars, of which 27 billion dollars was spent on prescription drugs. Private insurance paid the largest amount of the national bill (28 billion dollars), followed by Medicare (11 billion dollars), Medicaid (6 billion dollars), and the Veterans Administration (4 billion dollars), whereas individuals paid 28 billion dollars out-of-pocket. For each individual with CMRFCs, 5477 dollars in medical expenditures was attributable to CMRFCs, of which 1832 dollars was for prescription drugs. On average, individuals with CMRFCs spent 1668 dollars out-of-pocket, of which 830 dollars was for prescription drugs.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study show that CMRFCs result in significant medical cost in the U.S. independent of the cost of cardiovascular disease. Individuals, private insurers, Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration, and other payers all share this burden.

Treatment of Hyperlipidemia With a Modified Low Density Lipoprotein Apheresis System With Dextran Sulfate

Many low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis systems have been applied to patients with hyperlipidemia, but these systems usually work on the basis of complicated equipment and the cost of treatment is expensive. In order to achieve effective treatment of hyperlipidemia at a lower cost, we developed a new LDL apheresis system with dextran sulfate (LAS-DS). In this study, 50 patients with hyperlipidemia were treated 120 times with the new LAS-DS. In each treatment, 600 +/- 100 mL of plasma (equal to approximately 25% of the total plasma of patients) was collected by apheresis, and DS solution and calcium chloride solution were added into the collected plasma as LDL absorber and catalyzer, respectively. DS selectively binds LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) under the catalysis of calcium ion and the LDL-C-DS complex is removed by centrifugation. The treated plasma was transfused back into the patients and the excessive calcium in the plasma was removed by the cation exchange column integrated in the transfusion set. After treatment with our new system, the acute mean LDL-C reduction was 97% in the apheresis plasma of hyperlipidemia patients. The corresponding reduction was 55.2% and 69.4% for total cholesterol and total triglyceride. There were insignificant reductions of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and albumin. The new LDL apheresis system with DS that we developed is very simple to operate without relying on complicated equipment, and it can achieve significant clinical results at a much lower cost compared with existing systems. Based on this study we think the new system can provide a safe, effective and much cheaper means for the treatment of hyperlipidemia patients.

Risk-factor clustering and cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertension often have other major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Little is known, however, about the extent of risk-factor clustering in these patients and its importance in CVD risk and medical-care costs.

METHODS

Study subjects were selected from the electronic medical records system of Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a large health maintenance organization, and included all patients aged > or =35 years with hypertension who were free of CVD in 1998. Subjects were stratified into eight risk-factor clusters based on whether or not they also had diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or a high body mass index (BMI). The risk of cardiovascular events was examined in each cluster over 6 years beginning January 1, 1999, using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Cumulative total medical-care costs (per patient) over 6 years also were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 57,573 patients with hypertension who were free of CVD in 1998 were identified; 56% of subjects also had diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or high BMI. In analyses controlling for age, sex, and smoking status, the relative risk of cardiovascular events over 6 years was highest for patients with comorbid diabetes, ranging from 2.07 (95% confidence interval, 1.86-2.30) for those with diabetes only to 2.80 (95% confidence interval, 2.48-3.17) for those with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and high BMI. Cumulative medical-care costs generally increased with additional risk factors. Comorbid diabetes had the greatest impact on costs over 6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 50% of patients with hypertension also had diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or high BMI. Patients with these additional risk factors (especially diabetes) had a substantially higher CVD risk and medical-care costs.

Factors associated with healthcare utilization costs for statin therapy--a pilot study in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Socio-economic status, comorbidities and adherence to statin therapy might affect the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects size of demographic factors, clinical factors and adherence to statin therapy on the direct medical costs for Chinese patients at high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational cohort study conducted in the outpatient departments of a public teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Patients at high risk of CHD who had been on statin monotherapy for < 12 months were recruited. Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Statin adherence was monitored prospectively over 6 months using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Total direct medical costs per member per month (cPMPM), including cost for clinic visits, statin medication, laboratory tests on lipids and management of CHD events if any, were calculated from the perspective of a public healthcare organization.

RESULTS

83 patients completed the study. Median cPMPM in 80 patients (96% of 83 patients) without a new CHD event (USD 42) and for 3 (4%) patients who experienced CHD events (USD 444) were significantly different (p = 0.003). History of congestive heart failure (beta = 1,957, 95% CI = 1,006 - 2,909), male gender (beta = 584, 95% CI = 215 - 952), coronary atherosclerosis (beta = 1,436, 95% CI = 538 - 2,334) and diabetes mellitus (beta = 604, 95% CI = 136 - 1,07 1) were positive predictors for cPMPM.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study male gender, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and coronary atherosclerosis appear to be significantly associated with higher costs for Chinese patients at high risk of CHD.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations with statin therapy

Statins have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with and without coronary heart disease, and in patients with elevated and normal or average cholesterol levels. Economic evaluations of these mortality trials have demonstrated statins to be cost-effective. As these trials were placebo comparisons, their results are now of limited use in guiding the drug therapy selection process. The more relevant questions today are focused on ways of optimising statin therapy. More recent studies have found that more intensive statin therapy, using high doses of these agents that produce substantially greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, are associated with greater benefit than less intensive statin therapy. These trials suggest that statins with greater efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, would be preferred over less effective statins. So far, economic analyses of these comparative studies have not been published. These economic studies are needed to support formulary and drug therapy selection decisions regarding statins.

Disparities among the disadvantaged: variation in lipid management in the Ohio Medicaid program

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities exist in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, but other non-clinical factors may influence treatment, further exacerbating disparities.

METHODS

Using Ohio Medicaid data from 1992 to 1999, we identified a sample of 19,106 individuals with CVD-related diagnoses or procedures. A review of pharmacy claims identified previous, new, and long-term users of lipid-lowering agents, including statins, fibrates, and bile sequestrants.

RESULTS

3,934 (20.6%) Medicaid beneficiaries used lipid-lowering medications previously, 1,598 (10.5%) filed new claims, and 2,998 of 5,532 (54.2%) previous or new users filed >or=6 claims for refills. Minority adults <or=60 years were least likely to have been previous users (0.80 [0.67, 0.96]), new users (0.75 [0.58, 0.98]), or to use lipid-lowering agents long-term (0.65 [0.49, 0.84]).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted efforts to enhance younger minority adults' receipt and long-term use of lipid-lowering agents may reduce risks for subsequent morbidity and mortality related to CVD.

A primer on dynamic optimization and optimal control in pharmacoeconomics

Pharmacoeconomic analyses employ a wide range of techniques and methods to help societies allocate scarce health-care resources wisely, fairly, and efficiently. Techniques such as dynamic optimization and optimal control, however, have yet to be exploited by this field. Although control theory has a long history in mathematical biology and disease management, its application to economic costs in these disciplines has not yet been explored. Pharmacoeconomics therefore may offer a particularly promising starting point because of the emphasis this field places on the economic perspective. Although challenges may exist to implementing these techniques in practice (at least in some settings), there will nevertheless be value to considering the dynamic perspective these techniques offer, which requires thinking more critically about the optimal allocation of scare health-care resources over time. Therefore, our article serves as a primer to introduce this dynamic perspective from an economic standpoint within the context of two examples of treating of hyperlipidemia.

Patient characteristics and costs associated with dyslipidaemia and related conditions in HIV-infected patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Metabolic abnormalities are common in HIV-infected individuals and, although multifactorial in origin, have been strongly associated with antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Using automated claims and clinical databases, combined with medical record data, we evaluated the burden of dyslipidaemia (DYS) and associated metabolic abnormalities among a cohort of 900 HIV-infected patients aged 18 years and older who received their care from a large multispecialty medical group between 1 January 1996 and 30 June 2002. A Cox proportional hazards model for DYS was developed. Resource use was compiled and subsequently costed with stratification to account for variable length of follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 3.3 years. DYS was present in 54% of the cohort and 3.4% experienced a cardiovascular (CV) event. Both unadjusted and adjusted results found patients with dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular events significantly more likely to have received protease inhibitor (PI) treatment for longer periods of time. In the Cox proportional hazards model the following factors were significantly associated with an increased risk for DYS: older age, white race, PI use and male sex. Diagnoses of hypertension, hepatitis C virus infection, depression or opportunistic infections were all negatively associated with a DYS diagnosis. When controlled for length of follow up, patients with DYS (and no CV-related events) incurred greater median and mean total average costs than patients without DYS or CV-related events. For patients with more than 2 years of follow up, these total cost differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that DYS is common among patients with HIV infection and is associated with increased use of medical resources.

Cholesterol: point-of-care testing

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding point-of-care (POC) cholesterol monitors and describe their role in pharmacy practice.

DATA SOURCES

Primary articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-May 2003); references cited in these articles provided additional resources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All of the articles identified from this search were reviewed, and all information deemed relevant was included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Hyperlipidemia is a well-established risk factor for coronary artery disease, which is the leading cause of death in the US. The use of POC cholesterol monitors may help to improve the identification and management of this disease. Pharmacists may use many of these devices in their practice and are also in an ideal position to provide patient education on selection and use of these monitors and interpretation of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of POC cholesterol monitors has increased in recent years. Based on currently available data, these monitors are best suited for screening purposes and to assist in the management of hyperlipidemia. There is not enough evidence to support the notion that POC cholesterol monitors can replace laboratory or office monitoring. Their application in the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia is also currently limited.

Cost of care for patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between attainment of treatment goals with lipid-lowering therapy and healthcare costs.

PARTICIPANTS

9789 patients who received treatment with a lipid-lowering agent at any time between 1 January 1993 and 14 April 2003.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A cohort study using linkage of patient medical records from 29 Swedish primary care centres and the Swedish national inpatient register. The primary outcomes of interest were the total costs of medical care and costs of cardiovascular-related inpatient care during the year before treatment initiation and during years 1, 2 and 3 of treatment. The cost data were analysed with a two-part random-effects regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 9789 patients identified in the database for the study, 6316 had at least one cholesterol measurement during the year after the index prescription and were included in the analysis. 37% of the patients attained the goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 3.0 mmol/L and total cholesterol < 5.0 mmol/L. Patients who attained treatment goal had 44% higher pre-treatment costs of care. During the first year of treatment, patients who attained treatment goal had 28% higher costs of care. After the first year, costs for goal-attaining patients were 17% higher. However, the cost of cardiovascular-related inpatient care in patients attaining cholesterol treatment goal was twice as high as in patients not achieving goal before treatment start and 40% lower 2-3 years after treatment start.

CONCLUSION

Patients reaching target cholesterol levels showed a trend of cost reductions over time, whereas no such trend could be found for patients not reaching goal levels. Reductions in costs were substantial for cardiovascular-related inpatient care for patients attaining cholesterol goals compared with patients not attaining cholesterol goals.

Managing dyslipidemia: putting the new guidelines to work

A nine-step process can be used to identify and manage patients with dyslipidemias, and clinicians can then fine-tune lipid-lowering interventions as needed. In helping patients reach lipid goals, pharmacists play important roles as both clinical managers and coaches. Multidisciplinary models of care in physician offices and hospitals provide pharmacists with important opportunities to apply their unique knowledge and indirectly obtain reimbursement for professional services.