Performance comparison of anti-p504s (SP116) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody vs. Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-Human AMACR clone 13H4 when duplexed with VENTANA Basal Cell Cocktail (34βE12+p63) as a diagnostic aid for prostatic adenocarcinoma using immunohistochemistry

Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A-racemase (AMACR), also known as p504s, is overexpressed in prostatic adenocarcinoma and is frequently used in combination with basal cell markers to aid in diagnosing difficult prostate adenocarcinoma cases. In this retrospective method comparison study, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of the ready-to-use anti-p504s (SP116) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody compared to the monoclonal rabbit anti-human AMACR clone 13H4 in prostatic adenocarcinoma samples. De-identified prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue samples were stained with either the SP116 or 13H4 antibody clone in combination with the VENTANA Basal Cell Cocktail (34βE12+p63) and scored as positive or negative for prostatic adenocarcinoma. The scoring pathologist was blinded to the known historical diagnosis of each sample. The scoring pathologist correctly diagnosed each sample regardless of which p504s clone was used. Both assays using either clone were 100% concordant in their sensitivity and specificity. This study demonstrates that the ready-to-use anti-p504s (SP116) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody is equivalent to clone 13H4 concentrate when used according to package insert instructions in combination with the VENTANA Basal Cell Cocktail (34βE12+p63) to aid pathologists in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Phase-Regulated Sensing Mechanism of MoS2 Based Nanohybrids toward Point-of-Care Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) has been proven to be consistently overexpressed in prostate cancer epitheliums, and is expected to act as a positive biomarker for the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma in clinical practice. Here, a strategy for specific determination of AMACR in real human serum by using an electrochemical microsensor system is presented. In order to implement the protocol, a self-organized nanohybrid consisting of metal nanopillars in a 2D MoS₂ matrix is developed as material for the sensing interface. The testing signal outputs are strongly enhanced with the presence of the nanohybrids owing to that the metal pillars provide an efficient mass difussion and electron transfer path to the MoS₂ film surface. Furthermore, the phase-regulated sensing mechanism over MoS₂ is noticed and demonstrated by density functional theory calculation and experiments. The explored MoS₂ based nanohybrids are employed for the fabrication of an electrochemical microsensor, presenting good linear relationship in both ng µL^-1 and pg µL^-1 ranges for AMACR quantification. The sampling analysis of human serum indicates that this microsensor has good diagnostic specificity and sensitivity toward AMACR. The proposed electrochemical microsensor system also demonstrates the advantages of convenience, cost-effectiveness, and disposability, resulting in a potential integrated microsystem for point-of-care prostate cancer diagnosis.

[The value of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression in the progression of colonic carcinoma]

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression has been demonstrated in several normal tissues and in diverse types of carcinoma. Our aim was to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of AMACR in the sequence-progression of colonic cancer. We studied 237 cases, including samples of normal mucosa of the colon, adenomas with different degrees of dysplasia, colonic carcinomas, lymph nodes and liver metastases of colonic carcinomas. A scale of intensity and percentage of expression was used to analyze the AMACR immunohistochemical profile. The expression was nearly absent in samples of normal mucosa, increased in both adenomas and carcinomas, decreased in lymph node metastases but was significantly increased in liver metastases.

Significance of prostate cancer missed on needle biopsy tools for retrieving missed cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate needle biopsy (PNB) is required for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), but little is known about the frequency and clinical implication of false-negative results.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence and clinical impact of minute PCa missed on routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides, but retrieved by α-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

AMACR immunohistochemistry was used to detect PCa missed on H&E slides in a series of consecutive 1,672 PNB including 1,003 patients without evidence of PCa, and 669 patients with PCa meeting pathological criteria for active surveillance (PCAS) under current clinical investigation, including Gleason score ≤7 (3 + 4), <33% of biopsies involved by cancer, <50% of any core involved by cancer. Using improved multicore (pre-) embedding techniques a single AMACR immunostain/patient was sufficient to detect missed lesions.

RESULTS

In patients without histological evidence of PCa, AMACR immunohistochemistry retrieved minute PCa in 33 of 1,003 patients (3.29%) and atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP) in 17 of 1,003 patients (1.69%). Among 116 of 669 (17.34%) PCa patients meeting PCAS, detection of additional core(s) involved by cancer was found responsible for disease reclassification in 63 of 116 of patients (54.31%). Limitations include the single-institutional design of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

PCa missed on routine H&E histology was retrieved by AMACR in 8.91% of PNB, including 17.34% of PCa patients meeting PCAS. 54.31% of them have finally lost their eligibility for active surveillance after detecting additional cores involved by cancer. Underdiagnosis of limited adenocarcinoma on PNB is a matter of concern, but can be prevented by a single AMACR immunostain/patient if improved multicore (pre-) embedding techniques are used.

[Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: a distinct low-grade renal tumour]

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinicopathologic features of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC).

METHODS

The clinical, morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of 6 cases of CCPRCC were reviewed, with analysis of follow-up data.

RESULTS

There were altogether 3 men and 3 women. The mean age of patients was 56 years. The size of tumors ranged from 1.0 to 4.5 cm in greatest dimension. They had solid or solid-cystic cut surface. Histologically, the tumors were encapsulated and showed several morphologic patterns, with tubules, papillae, acini, interconnecting ribbons and macro/microcysts lined by single layer of cells with clear or small amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm and low-grade nuclei (corresponding to Fuhrman grade 1 or 2). Mitotic figures were rarely seen. Characteristically, there was linear arrangement of the nuclei away from the basement membrane, conferring an appearance similar to that of endometrial glands in early secretory phase. Tubules and cysts contained serosanguineous fluid or colloid-like secretion were identified. No foamy histiocytes, psammomatous calcifications or hemosiderin was present in the papillary areas. Two of the tumors showed focal or extensive angioleiomyoma/leiomyoma-like components. No coagulative necrosis, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, nor microscopic vascular invasion was observed. Immunohistochemically, all tumors showed strong co-expression of CK7 and CA9 (with characteristic "goblet" staining pattern). The staining for EMA, CK (AE1/AE3), vimentin, CK8, CK18, CK19 and PAX-8 were also positive in all cases. Ki-67 was expressed in less than or about 5% of the tumor cell nuclei. The staining for CD10, P504S, CD117, TFE3 and TFEB was negative. Follow-up data were available in all patients, with mean duration of 14 months (range = 7 to 27 months). All of the patients were disease-free after operation.

CONCLUSION

CCPRCC is a special type of low-grade renal neoplasm with characteristic histopathologic and immunohistochemical features. It needs to be distinguished from clear cell renal cell carcinoma or papillary renal cell carcinoma.

[Significance of P504s in distinction between solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors]

OBJECTIVE

To study the significance of P504s in differential diagnosis between solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET).

METHODS

Forty-three patients with SPTP and 41 patients with PanNET encountered during the period from 2007 to 2014 were recruited. Immunohistochemical study for vimentin, CD10, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, beta-catenin, CD99 and P504s in SPTP and PanNET was performed. The diagnostic value of P504s in differentiating SPTP from PanNET was analyzed.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical study showed that vimentin, CD10, chromogranin A, synaptophysin and CD99 were expressed both in SPTP and PanNET. All cases of SPTP showed granular cytoplasmic expression of P504s, whereas those of PanNET were negative.

CONCLUSION

P504s is a sensitive and useful marker for SPTP and can be used in the distinction between SPTP and PanNET.

[Clinicopathologic features of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis and prognosis of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC).

METHODS

The histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features were studied in 11 cases and follow-up data were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were a total of 3 females and 8 males. The age of patients were ranged from 33 to 72 years(mean age 52.5 years). The diameters of tumors varied from 1cm to 4 cm. Histologically, papillary and cystic architecture were present at least focally in all tumors. The papillae were covered by small to medium-sized cuboidal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm and often showed extensive secondary branching, which were often folded and densely packed, resulting in a solid appearance. The nuclei were round and uniform in shape; nucleoli were not prominent (Fuhrman grade 1 or 2). Neither mitotic figures nor necrosis was present. All 11 cases exhibited moderate to strong positivity for CK7, CA9, vimentin, and HIF-1α, coupled with negative reactions for CD10, P504S, and TFE3. Ksp-cadherin was positively expressed in 8 cases.VHL gene mutations were not found in all 11 cases. Losses of chromosomes 3 (monoploid chromosome 3) was detected in 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CCPRCC is uncommon and seemed to be an indolent tumor. The differential diagnosis should be included tumors, which harbor clear cell and papillary structure including clear cell renal cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, and CCPRCC. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis may be help for its diagnosis.

Oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological study emphasizing distinct morphology, extended immunohistochemical profile and cytogenetic features

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is traditionally classified into type 1 and type 2. Recently, an oncocytic variant of PRCC has been described. We report a series of 6 oncocytic renal papillary tumors (OPRCC) which tended to occur in older patients (mean, 56.8 years) with a male preference (male-to-female ratio is 5:1). All 6 patients are alive with no evidence of disease after initial resection, showing an indolent clinical behavior. Histologically, tumors exhibited predominant papillary structure with delicate fibrovascular cores. Papillae were lined by single layers of cells with large, deeply eosinophilic and finely granular cytoplasms and round regular nucleus. The phagocytosis of tumor cells was frequently and evidently seen in our cases that hemosiderin-laden tumor cells and foamy tumor cells were noticed in five and four cases respectively. All tumors were immunoreactive for racemase, vimentin, CD10, and MET and negative for CD117. While E-cadherin, EMA, and cytokeratin 7 exhibited variable immunopositivity. FISH analysis was performed in five of six cases and found heterogeneous results. Trisomy of chromosomes 7 was found in three cases and trisomy of chromosomes 17 in two cases. Loss of chromosome Y was noted in one of four tumors in male patients. MET gene status was also investigated by direct sequencing in all 6 cases and found no distinct mutation in any case. These results suggest that OPRCC shows distinct morphology, indolent clinical behavior, and similar immunohistochemical and cytogenetic features with PRCC, seems to be a variant in the PRCC group. Whether the strong expression of MET indicates a potential therapeutic target is still unknown and requires further investigation in clinical trials.

α-Methylacyl-CoA racemase spliced variants and their expression in normal and malignant prostate tissues

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the possibility of using α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) variants to improve the specificity of prostate cancer (CaP) detection. AMACR has been used as a diagnostic biomarker for CaP and is now a standard biomarker for needle biopsy specimens with ambiguous lesions.

METHODS

We used in silico analysis and molecular cloning to discover new AMACR variants and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to measure the transcript levels of AMACR and its variants in 4 prostate cell lines and in 23 pairs of CaP and adjacent normal tissue.

RESULTS

We found 4 novel variants, IAs, IBL, IBLd, and IBLi. Transcript levels of most AMACR variants were significantly upregulated in CaP compared with its adjacent normal counterparts. A variants, the functional variants based on bioinformatic analysis, showed levels of transcript expression in CaP in this order: IA≫IAd=IIA≫IIAs>IAs. In contrast, the expression of the B variants, which appear to be nonfunctional due to the absence of exon 3, was lower than that of the A variants. IB was the most abundant form of B variant; and expression of IIB was negligible. More important, the difference between levels of variant IA, IAd, IIA, IIAs, IB, and IBLi in CaP and normal tissue was significantly higher than the difference in levels of total AMACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that AMACR variants have better power than total AMACR in discriminating between CaP and adjacent normal tissue. These findings may be useful for the development of future diagnostic assays.

Molecular markers for prostatic cancer

Prostate cancer (caP) is a major public health problem. Many groups have attempted to identify prognostic risk factors to early detect caP and to identify who will need active treatment. Since the introduction of prostate specific antigen (PSA), diagnosis of caP has increased even as mortality for prostatic cancer has declined. Using current recommended guidelines, the PSA test suffers from both of limited specificity and sensitivity. With the aim to improve early detection of prostatic cancer the volume adjusted PSA, PSA isoforms and PSA kinetics have been investigated. Recently, technological advances in molecular assays have led to the discovery of new markers with high specificity. Further, proteomic array profiling and DNA methylation assays could provide for more accurate diagnosis and prognosis. Current evidence suggests that no single marker is likely to achieve the desired level of diagnostic and prognostic accuracy: future research should focus on validation of already existing biomarkers and the discovery of new markers to identify men with aggressive prostate cancer and to predict outcomes after therapies.

[Study on clinicopathologic features and immunophenotype of 114 cases of renal cell carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinicopathologic features and immunophenotype of renal cell carcinomas, and to discuss their diagnostic value.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic features of 114 cases of renal cell carcinoma were reviewed and categorized on the basis of 2004 WHO classification. Immunohistochemical study for a panel of antibodies (including CK, CD10, vimentin, CD117, AMACR, CK7 and TFE3) was carried out. The follow-up data, if available, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The cases were reclassified into 5 subtypes, including 77 cases (67.5%) of clear cell carcinoma (CCRCC), 11 cases (9.6%) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), 14 cases (12.3%) of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chrRCC), 10 cases (8.8%) of renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions (Xp11.2RCC) and 2 cases (1.8%) of unclassified renal cell carcinoma (unRCC). Immunohistochemical study showed that the expression rates of CK, CD10 and vimentin in CCRCC were 93.5% (72/77), 93.5% (72/77) and 75.3% (58/77), respectively. On the other hand, all the 11 cases of PRCC studied were positive for AMACR. The expression rate of CD117 in chrRCC was 78.5% (11/14). In the 10 cases of Xp11.2 RCC studied, the expression rates of TFE3, AMACR, CD10 and CK were 100% (10/10), 100% (10/10), 90% (9/10) and 70% (7/10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The various subtypes of renal cell carcinomas are heterogeneous in histologic appearance and demonstrate distinctive immunophenotype. The expressions of CD10, vimentin, CD117, AMACR, CK7 and TFE3 are helpful in the differential diagnosis.

[Late pathology advances in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer]

This review article presents the late advances in the pathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer, new concepts and predictive factors, emphasizing the new biomolecular markers in prostate cancer.

Search for residual prostate cancer on pT0 radical prostatectomy after positive biopsy

Reported incidence of no residual prostate cancer (i.e. pathological stage pT0) on radical prostatectomy ranges from 0.07 to 4.2%. The incidence is higher after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment. The aim of this study was to search for residual cancer on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens when an initial sampling failed to find the cancer in patients with positive biopsy. Our database of 1,328 consecutive patients whose biopsies and RP specimen were both examined at the Polytechnic University-United Hospitals of the Marche Region between March 1995 and June 2006 was reviewed. The radical prostatectomies were grossly completely sampled and examined with the whole mount technique. We identified eight patients (i.e. 0.6%; three untreated and five hormonally treated preoperatively, i.e. 0.3 and 0.8%, respectively, of the total number of RPs included in the study) with positive biopsy and with no residual cancer in the initial routine histological examination of the RP. The RP of this group of eight was subjected to additional sectioning and evaluation of the paraffin blocks of the prostatectomy, also after block-flipping, immunostaining with an antibody against CAM 5.2, p63, PSA, and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, and DNA specimen identity analysis. There were no cases with a false positive biopsy diagnosis, and cancer was not overlooked or missed in the initial routine histological examination of any of the 8 pT0 RPs. A minute focus of cancer (the diameter was always below 2.0 mm) was found on the additional sections in five. In particular, cancer was found after block-flipping in one of them. In an additional case, cancer was eventually discovered after immunostaining tissue sections for cytokeratin CAM 5.2, for p63 and PSA. In the remaining two cases (one untreated and the other hormonally treated), cancer was not found (0.15% of the 1,328 RPs included in the study); the review of the description of the macroscopic appearance of the RP and of its slides revealed that part of the peripheral zone corresponding to the site of the positive biopsy was missing, i.e. not removed from the patient at the time of the operation at least in one of the two. DNA specimen analysis confirmed the identity of the biopsy and prostatectomy in both. An extensive search for residual cancer reduces the number of pT0 RPs after a positive biopsy from 0.6 to 0.15%. It is recommended to have the needle biopsy reviewed, carefully look again at the radical prostatectomy, do deeper sections and then flip certain paraffin blocks. In addition, atypical foci should be stained for basal cell markers and often AMACR, especially in hormone-treated cases. If a block is missing part of the peripheral zone (capsular incision), this should be commented on. DNA analysis for tissue identity should be performed when the other steps have been taken without finding cancer.

α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S)/34βE12/p63 triple cocktail stain in prostatic adenocarcinoma after hormonal therapy

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) has recently been shown to be a highly sensitive marker for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, there is limited information concerning its utility as a marker for prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy. Our current investigation was conducted to evaluate the expression of AMACR in patients with prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy and assess its diagnostic utility in combination with p63 and high molecular weight cytokeratin (34betaE12) staining. Prostate tissues from 49 patients who had been treated with hormonal therapy were immunohistochemically analyzed for AMACR, 34betaE12, and p63 expression by a triple antibody cocktail stain. The staining intensities and the percentages of positively staining tumor cells were recorded. The correlations between AMACR expression and metastatic status, associated hormonal therapy regimens, and the extent of hormone therapy effect were analyzed. All malignant acini were completely negative for both basal cell markers (34betaE12 and p63). Tumor cells failed to demonstrate expression of AMACR in 14 (29%) of 49 cases. In the remaining 35 cases (71%), positive immunostaining for AMACR was noted, but with variable intensities and percentages of cells stained. Positive staining for AMACR in benign glands was not seen in any case. In all cases, basal cells were strongly stained by p63 in benign acini with a mean positive percentage of 96%. Similarly, basal cells in benign acini displayed moderate staining intensities for 34betaE12 in 3 (7%) of 41 cases and strong immunostaining for this marker in the remaining 38 cases (93%); the mean percentage of positive cells was 92%. alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression may be substantially diminished or entirely lost in prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy. This variation in AMACR expression does not correlate with the metastatic status, the modality of hormonal therapy, or the extent of therapy-related effect. It is important that pathologists be aware that some hormonally treated prostate carcinomas do not express AMACR, and that immunostaining in such cases must be interpreted with caution. A triple cocktail stain using AMACR, 34betaE12, and p63 can be helpful in evaluating prostate specimens for the presence of residual or recurrent carcinoma after hormonal therapy for cancer.

Renal papillary adenoma—a putative precursor of papillary renal cell carcinoma

The precursor lesions of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence, histomorphological features, and immunohistochemical features of papillary adenoma and elucidate its potential relationship to RCC. We reviewed 542 consecutive nephrectomy specimens over an 8-year period. Immunohistochemistry was carried out with antibodies specific for alpha-methyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) and glutathione S-transferase alpha (clear-cell RCC marker). Thirty-eight (7%) nephrectomy specimens showed histologic evidence of papillary adenoma. Of these 38 cases, 18 (47%) arose in the setting of papillary RCC (PRCC). Seven papillary adenomas (18%) occurred in the setting of acquired polycystic kidney disease (APKD), 6 in clear-cell RCCs, 3 in chromophobe RCCs, 2 in end-stage kidney disease, 1 in oncocytoma, 1 in angiomyolipoma, and 1 in renal schwannoma. Furthermore, papillary adenomas were more commonly found in kidneys removed for PRCC (25%, 18/71) than in kidneys harboring clear-cell RCC (1.9%, 6/318). Histomorphologically, papillary adenomas were characterized by varying proportions of papillae and tubules formed by cuboidal cells with scant basophilic cytoplasm similar to those in type 1 PRCC. Adenomas associated with PRCC tend to be multiple in number (61% [11/18] of cases had >2 adenomas; mean, 5). In contrast, 100% of papillary adenomas arising in other conditions had less than 2 adenomas. Most of the adenomas (82%, 31/38) stained strongly for AMACR in a fashion similar to that of PRCC. The 7 AMACR-negative cases all arose in the setting of APKD. In this study of surgical specimens, the high coincidence, multifocality, and histologic and immunohistochemical similarities between papillary adenoma and PRCC suggest that the 2 are strongly associated and may represent a continuum of 1 biologic process. In contrast, adenomas associated with APKD exhibit distinct morphological and immunohistochemical features and, therefore, may have an entirely different pathogenesis.

Is triple immunostaining with 34betaE12, p63, and racemase in prostate cancer advantageous? A tissue microarray study

This study aimed to determine the usefulness of a combination of 3 immunohistochemical markers, 34/betaE12, p63 and alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR), for the diagnosis of prostate cancer using tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from 91 archival radical prostatectomy specimens derived from the Pathology Department files of Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Triple immunostaining using a cocktail of these 3 antibodies was performed on TMA sections using the streptavidin-biotin method. When compared with immunohistochemical staining using the individual antibodies, we found that the triple cocktail allowed improved evaluation of basal cells in benign glands, and AMACR allowed simultaneous corroboration of malignant prostatic glands in the same section. We achieved a specificity of 100% with the triple cocktail, and sensitivity was acceptable, at 93.8%. In comparison, specificity and sensitivity of the individual antibodies were 95.5% and 97.3%, 93.3% and 93.8%, 97.0% and 95.6% for p63, 34betaE12, and AMACR, respectively. The triple cocktail offers a cost-effective way of evaluating abnormal prostatic glandular foci, in addition to maximizing the use of small tissue samples from prostatic needle biopsies.

[The value of using an AMACR/34betaE12/p63 cocktail double staining for diagnosis of prostate carcinoma and precarcinomatous lesions]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of using an AMACR/34betaE12/p63 cocktail and double-staining for the diagnosis of small focal protatic carcinoma and precarcinomatous lesions.

METHODS

A total of 130 consecutive cases were examined over a 3-month period, including 105 prostate needle biopsy samples, 6 radical prostatectomy specimens and 19 benign prostatic hyperplasia specimens which were excised transurethra or above pubis. 262 paraffin blocks of all the 1030 ones were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and by immunostains for AMACR, 34betaE12, p63, and an antibody cocktail comprising all the three with double-chromogen reaction. The diagnoses were then made according to the immunostaining, HE staining and clinical information.

RESULTS

In the sections stained by the 3-antibody cocktail, blue-black cytoplasmic staining was observed in the epithelial cells of prostatic carcinoma and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) the basal cells of benign glands were stained red. There were no red basal cells around the blue-black glandular epithelium of carcinoma, but discontinuous or consecutive red basal cells were present around the blue-black glandular epithelium of HGPIN. Prostatic carcinoma was found in 214 paraffin blocks (82%), including 31 small focal carcinoma. HGPIN were observed in 64 paraffin blocks (24%), including focal HGPIN and small gland alveolus HGPIN. AAH was found in one block. No benign glands were simultaneously positive for AMACR and negative for basal cell markers.

CONCLUSION

Inmmunohistochemistry studies using a 3-antibody cocktail and double staining can improve the detection rate of small focal prostatic carcinoma and HGPIN.

Nephrogenic Adenoma: Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Its Etiology and Differentiation From Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Context.—Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare benign lesion of the urinary tract. Owing to its strong association with a history of urinary tract irritation, nephrogenic adenoma was initially thought to originate from urothelial metaplasia; however, no solid proof of this association has been found. More recent investigation has pointed to a renal tubular cause. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic carcinoma, particularly when dealing with lesions from the prostatic urethra.

Objective.—To elucidate a possible histogenic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubules, and also to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic distinction between nephrogenic adenoma and prostate carcinoma.

Design.—Immunohistochemical studies were performed for P504S, prostate-specific antigen, CD10, p63, and epithelial membrane antigen on 9 cases of nephrogenic adenoma, 10 cases of normal renal parenchyma, and 10 cases of prostatic tissue, both benign and malignant.

Results.—Nephrogenic adenoma shares the same immunohistochemical profile as distal renal tubules: both are positive for P504S and epithelial membrane antigen and negative for p63, CD10, and prostate-specific antigen. Prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue was positive for P504S and prostate-specific antigen, and normal prostatic gland tissue was positive for prostate-specific antigen and negative for P504S; p63-stained basal cells in normal prostatic gland tissue but did not react with prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue. The CD10 inconsistently stained normal and neoplastic prostatic gland tissue. Epithelial membrane antigen stain was negative in prostatic carcinoma, with rare occasional reactivity in normal prostatic glands.

Conclusion.—These findings provide supporting evidence that nephrogenic adenoma is derived from distal renal tubules. Our results also demonstrated that the combination of P504S and prostate-specific antigen with epithelial membrane antigen is a valuable tool in distinguishing prostatic carcinoma from nephrogenic adenoma.

The prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptors PSGR and PSGR2 are prostate cancer biomarkers that are complementary to alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression can be useful in the diagnosis of small foci of prostate cancer on needle biopsy specimens, although it still has limitations in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. We have previously described the increased expression of two prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptors (PSGR and PSGR2) in human prostate cancer. To examine their potential usefulness as cancer biomarkers, we have evaluated their expression relative to AMACR in prostate cancer tissues.

METHODS

Expression of PSGR, PSGR2, and AMACR were examined by quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR in mRNAs from benign prostate and prostate cancer tissues. Expression of PSGR2 and AMACR was also examined by in situ hybridization using a prostate cancer tissue microarray.

RESULTS

By in situ hybridization, 24 of 40 prostate cancer cases showed concordant expression of PSGR2 and AMACR. However, in 16 cases there was significant discordance between expression levels of these two markers. By quantitative RT-PCR all three markers were substantially increased in cancer, with AMACR the most overexpressed (30-fold), followed by PSGR2 (13-fold) and PSGR (10-fold). AMACR was the best single marker of prostate cancer but in 7 of the 59 total cases the expression of AMACR was not significantly elevated while PSGR and/or PSGR2 were substantially elevated.

CONCLUSION

All three biomarkers are increased in prostate cancer but their expression is not completely concordant. There is a subset of cases in which analysis of expression of PSGR and/or PSGR2, in addition to AMACR, would be diagnostically useful.

Detection of prostate cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in needle biopsy specimens previously reported as negative for malignancy

AIMS

To investigate the possibility of detecting small focal prostatic cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (AMACR)/P504S immunohistochemistry on needle biopsy specimens that were previously interpreted as negative for carcinoma on routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections.

METHODS

Prostate needle biopsy specimens (n = 793) previously interpreted as benign prostatic tissue by conventional morphology from 239 patients with prostatic cancer diagnosed in other biopsy cores taken at the same biopsy session were stained with the P504S monoclonal antibody. If a biopsy specimen stained positively, two pathologists independently reviewed the original corresponding H&E-stained sections to establish the malignant diagnosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-four of the 793 biopsy specimens showed AMACR immunoreactivity; nine of these (9/793, 1.1%) contained previously unrecognized small focal prostatic carcinoma (Gleason 6, N = 8; Gleason 8, N = 1). Six of nine (67%) carcinomas showed foamy/pseudohyperplastic (N = 3) or atrophic (N = 3) features. Additionally, five biopsy specimens (5/793, 0.6%) with positive AMACR staining that did not meet the criteria for prostatic cancer on the original H&E slides were considered to be atypia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found a 1.1% false-negative rate for carcinoma on routine H&E-stained sections. AMACR immunohistochemical staining has shown the ability to improve detection of small focal prostatic carcinoma that could be missed by conventional histological examination.

Ancillary alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate in urinary cytology: a case report

BACKGROUND

Alpha-methylacyl-coA racemase (AMACR) was recently shown to be a sensitive immunohistochemical marker for substantiating a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Its applicability to exfoliative urinary cytology has not been investigated before.

CASE

The patient was a 77-year-old male with a history of persistent intermittent hematuria who was evaluated with urine cytology. Cytopathologic studies were interpreted to demonstrate "atypical urothelial cells." The patient was evaluated with computed tomography, which demonstrated new left hydroureter and hydronephrosis. He underwent cystoscopy, which showed an abnormal left hemitrigone with the left ureteral orifice obscured by an infiltrative mass. This area was biopsied, and histologic studies of the tissue chips demonstrated underlying prostatic adenocarcinoma directly invading the urothelium. We used AMACR immunoreactivity on a retrospectively studied, catheterized urine slide to confirm the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This case suggests that combined cytomorphology and immunocytochemisty for AMACR may allow an accurate identification of cells of prostatic adenocarcinoma when cytomorphologic studies or the clinical history raises the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer presenting with exfoliation of malignant cells into the urine.

Virtual microscopy in prostate histopathology: simultaneous viewing of biopsies stained sequentially with hematoxylin and eosin, and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase/p63 immunohistochemistry

PURPOSE

Histopathological diagnosis of small focus carcinomas in prostatic needle biopsies is often assisted by IHC. To make a definitive diagnosis the pathologist must compare IHC findings with hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology. We introduce what is to our knowledge a new application of virtual microscopy, in which hematoxylin and eosin, and IHC stains done sequentially on the same microscope slide can be simultaneously displayed and compared on a computer screen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 hematoxylin and eosin stained prostatic needle biopsies were scanned with a computer controlled microscope. The slides were destained and then immunostained with a cocktail of AMACR and p63 antibodies, which labels the nuclei of nonmalignant basal cells (p63) and the cytoplasm of neoplastic glandular cells suspicious for malignancy (AMACR). The slides were then scanned again and the pairs of virtual slides were aligned for synchronized viewing.

RESULTS

The presented technique was found helpful when suspicious lesions were small and when examining the immunoprofile of specimens was warranted, in addition to examining hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology. The usefulness of our approach based on virtual microscopy can be evaluated on the website , which also serves as an educational tool for self-learning the correlation between hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology, and AMACR/p63 IHC in prostate biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

The technology for simultaneously viewing sequentially hematoxylin and eosin and IHC stained prostate biopsies can be readily used for educational purposes, as exemplified by our website, and along with the availability of rapid virtual slide scanners it can also be used for clinical diagnostics.

Application of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a review

Alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) is a recently discovered enzyme protein that has been shown to be increased at both the mRNA and protein levels in prostatic adenocarcinoma as compared with normal prostatic tissues. Since its discovery, AMACR has gained wide acceptance for use in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in conjunction with morphology and immunohistochemical staining for basal cell markers. Numerous studies have consistently shown high sensitivity and specificity of AMACR for prostate cancer. This review focuses on AMACR expression in prostate cancer and its morphologic variants, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, adenosis and benign conditions of the prostate. In addition, we discuss AMACR expression in other tumors. We also focus on the utility and technical aspects of the now-popular "triple stain" immunohistochemical antibody cocktail, consisting of antibodies to high-molecular-weight keratin, p63 and AMACR. Finally, we emphasize diagnostic pitfalls in the application of AMACR to small, atypical foci of glands seen on prostate needle core biopsy and project future diagnostic as well as clinical applications for the protein.

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase as a marker in the differential diagnosis of metanephric adenoma

Metanephric adenoma (MA), a well-described renal neoplasm, usually behaves in a benign fashion. It may have areas that are morphologically similar to papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) type, or epithelial (tubular predominant) type Wilms' tumor. Prior immunohistochemical studies of MA have reported variable staining patterns. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a molecular marker for prostate carcinoma, has subsequently been found to be overexpressed in breast, colorectal and ovarian cancers, among others. Recent microarray analysis of renal tumors has shown an increase of AMACR mRNA levels in papillary RCC but not in other subtypes. We investigated the utility of immunohistochemical staining for AMACR, cytokeratin 7(CK7), CD57 and WT1 to differentiate between the above-mentioned three neoplasms. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 25 papillary RCC, 10 MAs and eight Wilms' tumors. AMACR was positive in one (10%) of 10 MAs and 24 (96%) of 25 papillary RCC, while it was negative in all Wilms' tumors. CK7 was positive in 20 of 25 papillary RCCs, focally positive in one Wilms' tumor and was negative in all MAs. CD57 was positive in all six MAs that were stained, focally positive in one of 25 papillary RCC and one of eight Wilms' tumors. WT1 was positive in seven of 10 MAs, three of 25 papillary RCCs and all eight Wilms' tumors. In conclusion, diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for AMACR may be useful in differentiating papillary RCC from MA but a panel which includes AMACR, CK7 and CD57 is better in this differential diagnosis. AMACR is not helpful in differentiating MA from Wilms' tumor, but CD57 is helpful in this differential diagnosis. WT1 may be useful in separating Wilms' tumor from MA and papillary RCC but is not helpful in differentiating MA from papillary RCC.

Differences between latent and clinical prostate carcinomas: lower cell proliferation activity in latent cases

BACKGROUND

Biological significance of prostate latent cancers as early phase of clinical cancers has been controversial. The characterization of the latent cancer may be important to investigate differences between latent and clinical prostate cancers.

METHODS

Latent cancers of the prostate, discovered at autopsy in men with no prior treatment for prostate disease and clinical prostate cancers, were compared for cell proliferation activities with parameters such as markers Ag-nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR), topoisomerase II-alpha, and Ki-67. We also immunohistochemically studied alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression that was recently identified as a possible positive marker of the prostate cancers. We analyzed 50 latent cancers and 50 clinical cancers, and samples were analyzed with Gleason grades or tumor volume.

RESULTS

In the latent cancers, Gleason grades 1-4 were observed, but in the clinical cancers Gleason grades 2-5 were recognized. Cell proliferation activities were significantly lower in the latent cancers in Gleason grade 3, and similar results were obtained but without statistical significance in Gleason grades 2 and 4. When analysis was performed according to the tumor size, it was shown that the growth activities of the tumor of the clinical cancer were higher than the latent cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that proliferation activities of the latent cancers were lower than the clinical cancers at the same Gleason grades. The data also suggest that latent cancers are just of preclinical stage and there is a possibility to progress to clinical ones by changing life style and longer life expectancy.

Routine immunohistochemical staining for high-molecular weight cytokeratin 34-beta and alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in postirradiation prostate biopsies

A total of 43 cases of postirradiation prostate cores were assessed in an attempt to determine if routine use of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in conjunction with high-molecular weight cytokeratin (HMWCK) would increase the recognition of carcinoma in postirradiation prostate biopsies. We concluded that in most cases the addition of AMACR in conjunction with HMWCK does not increase the recognition of prostatic adenocarcinoma, however it is supportive in nature. In one case the use of AMACR highlighted the extent of the adenocarcinoma which otherwise would have been designated as atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Further evaluation is required to assess the significance of a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation in postirradiation prostate biopsies.

Utility of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (p504s antibody) as a diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for cancer

Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR; P504S) is a mitochondrial and peroxisomal enzyme involved in the metabolism of branched-chain fatty acid and bile acid intermediates. Recently, AMACR has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in localized and metastatic prostate cancer and in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia but not in normal prostatic glands, suggesting that it may be an important tumor marker. This study examines AMACR expression in a variety of human cancers to assess its viability as a tumor marker in the clinical setting. Two hundred sixty-three cancers from different sites were examined in three multitumor tissue micro arrays, which included two or three tissue cores (1.0 mm in diameter) from each neoplastic and normal tissue specimen. Cancers studied included breast (94 cases), prostate (38), lung (28), endometrium (27), colon (29), ovary (26), and melanoma (21). Normal tissues in the microarray were prostate (15), lung (6), endometrium (5), colon (4), ovary (2), and skin (3). Sections were immunostained, after prior pressure cooker antigen retrieval, using rabbit monoclonal AMACR antibody (1:40) (Zeta Corp, Sierra Madre, CA) and horseradish peroxidase-labeled polymer conjugated secondary antibody (Envision, Dako, Carpinteria, CA). A section of prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was used as positive control. Protein expression was scored as negative, weak (faint cytoplasmic or granular apical staining), moderate (diffuse granular cytoplasmic stain), and strong (diffuse intense cytoplasmic stain). Only moderate and strong staining was considered as positive staining, based on prior work. AMACR protein overexpression was found in several cancers, including prostate (34/38 [89.5%]), colon (13/29 [44.8%]), lung (4/28 [14.3%]), melanoma (2/21 [9.5%]), endometrium (2/27 [7.4%]), and breast (3/94 [3.2%]). None of the ovarian cancers (26 cases) demonstrated AMACR overexpression. AMACR expression was not present in any of the normal tissues nor in benign prostatic tissue associated with prostate carcinomas. This study suggests that AMACR is potentially an important tumor marker, particularly for prostate and colon cancer. It may be a useful adjunct to an immunohistochemical panel employed in the differential diagnosis of colon versus ovarian and breast carcinoma; the latter two infrequently express AMACR.

Utilidad de Bcl-2 como nuevo marcador de expresión de células basales en patología prostática

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma of the prostate is often difficult in needle prostatic cores, where, additionally, the assessment of the presence of basal cells has demonstrated to be of paramount importance. Currently, the immunohistochemical expression of 34betaE12 antigen and p63 protein are the most utilized markers. In our study, we analyzed comparatively the expression of 34betaE12, p63, bcl-2 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase in order to evaluate the usefulness of bcl-2 as a new marker of the basal cells in prostatic pathology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study comprises radical prostatectomy specimens from 48 patients which were studied in order to determine the lack of staining of basal cells in invasive tumor areas together with the expression of racemase. Likewise, the presence of basal cells in areas of atrophy, hyperplasia, adenosis, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was also examined. Within the areas of adenosis and PIN a discontinuous pattern of basal cell expression was found in some cases. In 2 out of 48 cases (4,2%) of invasive carcinoma a weak bcl-2 expression without a basal cell distribution was found. Moreover, the expression of bcl-2 in the stromal lymphocytes appeared to be essential as an internal positive control of the technique.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to classical markers, we demonstrated the diagnostic value of bcl-2 as a new basal cell marker.

Effects of the dual 5 α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on apoptosis in primary cultures of prostate cancer epithelial cells and cell lines

BACKGROUND

The profound reduction in serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) observed with the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) dutasteride makes it an attractive agent for prostate cancer therapy. The objective of the current study was to determine whether dutasteride would induce apoptosis in a range of prostate epithelial cell lines and primary cultures.

METHODS

Both human prostate androgen-sensitive cell lines (PwR-1E, PNT-2, LNCaP, and PC3[AR2]) and an androgen-independent cell line (PC-3) were grown to confluence. Primary epithelial cells extracted from fresh prostate cancer radical prostatectomy specimens also were grown to confluence under optimal conditions. Total cellular protein was extracted to confirm cytokeratin 18 and antihuman alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression of the primary cells. Apoptosis was assessed by propidium iodide DNA staining and flow cytometry after 24 hours of culture in from 0 microM to 10 microM of dutasteride.

RESULTS

Dutasteride induced a dose-dependent increase in apoptosis in the androgen-sensitive prostate cell lines PwR-1E, PNT-2, and LNCaP and in the androgen receptor-expressing PC3(AR2) cell line. However, there was no significant apoptosis noted in the parental PC-3 cells. Of 16 primary epithelial cultures that were treated, 7 cultures were induced to undergo apoptosis, and 9 cultures were unresponsive. All primary cultures were positive for cytokeratin 18 expression, confirming their epithelial phenotype. Responder epithelial cells were positive for AMACR expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study confirmed that dutasteride differentially induced apoptosis in a subset of prostate cell lines and primary prostate epithelial cells. Understanding the cellular phenotype may indicate susceptible cells.

p63/AMACR antibody cocktail restaining of prostate needle biopsy tissues after transfer to charged slides: a viable approach in the diagnosis of small atypical foci that are lost on block sectioning

We assessed the utility of using a p63/a-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) antibody cocktail on destained H&E-stained sections. We transferred 61 stored (7-11 months old) and 10 recent (<1 month old) H&E-stained sections of prostate needle biopsy tissues to charged slides and subsequently stained them with a p63/AMACR immunohistochemical antibody cocktail. The AMACR and p63 staining intensities were compared with those obtained with the same antibody cocktail performed on sections recut directly from the paraffin block. Transfer of sections and subsequent immunohistochemical staining was successful in 69 (97%) of 71 cases. For stored cases, there were similar AMACR and p63 staining intensities in destained and recut sections in 55 (90%) and 11 (18%) of 61 cases, respectively. In recent sections, AMACR and p63 staining intensities were almost identical by both methods. We conclude that p63/AMACR cocktail immunostaining of destained H&E-stained sections is a viable approach in the workup of small "suspicious" foci in recently sectioned prostate needle biopsy tissues. This approach is best used when 2 or more H&E-stained sections harbor the suspicious focus, as we always recommended preservation of at least 1 H&E-stained section.

[Achievements in morphological diagnosis of prostatic cancer: alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A-racemase--a new marker of malignant cell transformation]

Gene P504S is considered as the most specific for prostatic carcinoma and its protein (alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemaze (AMACR/P504S) is higly sensitive and specific marker not only for adenocarcinoma cells but also for preceding changes - prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm (PIN). AMACR/P504S seems to be the first marker of malignant transformation and tumor progression. Use of immunohistochemical method for revealing this marker together with methods of basal prostatic cells observation (cytokeratin of a high molecular weight, cytokeratin 5/6, p63) improves morphological diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma, particularly on the material of needle biopsies. This combination allows one to identify neoplastic nature of some difficult lesions.

[Value of new prostate cancer markers: alpha methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) and p63]

The diagnosis of prostate cancer is based on histological examination of prostatic biopsies using histological criteria identified on standard stains. In certain lesions mimicking prostate cancer, the pathologist must perform immunohistochemical studies looking for loss of basal cells and antibodies directed against cytokeratin CK 903 (34bE12) or CK5/6, which sometimes give inconclusive results leading to a diagnosis of suspicious site. The discovery of overexpression of alpha-méthylacyl CoA racemase in prostate cancer using a microarray technique has allowed the development and marketing of an antibody (P504S /AMACR) which, in combination with a new basal cell marker (p63), is a very valuable tool for the pathologist in the management of suspicious sites and cancers less than 1 mm in diameter detected on prostatic biopsies.

Mass spectrometrical analysis of human serine racemase in foetal brain

We analysed human serine racemase for the first time from human foetal brain by mass spectrometrical methods, MALDI MS and MS/MS. The detection of human serine racemase from a transient area of human foetal brain, the perireticular nucleus, that is suggested to be mainly involved in guidance of corticofugal and thalamocortical fibers, may be a clue for the important role of this enzyme in neuronal migration and brain development via regulation of NMDA receptor activity.

Immunohistochemical Stains for p63 and α-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase, Versus a Cocktail Comprising Both, in the Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma

The diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma and especially minimal prostatic carcinoma can sometimes be challenging on needle core biopsy and occasionally immunohistochemistry is an aid in the diagnosis. Immunostains, such as those directed against the basal cell marker p63 and, more recently, employing antibodies reactive with alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), can be useful in this situation. The aim of this investigation was to assess the diagnostic utility of a p63/AMACR antibody cocktail and compare the staining pattern it produces with that using the individual antibodies alone. A retrospective review of 31 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens and 150 prostate needle biopsy samples was performed to select histologic sections showing foci of prostatic carcinoma and/or minimal prostatic carcinoma, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), as well as common benign mimickers of prostatic carcinoma, to include atrophy and basal cell hyperplasia, especially with prominent nucleoli. Serial histologic sections from the corresponding paraffin blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and by immunostains for p63, AMACR, and a prediluted antibody cocktail comprising both. The diagnostic utility of the cocktail was assessed, and the staining characteristics it produced were compared with those using the individual immunostains. In 430 foci, the cocktail produced a p63 staining profile identical to that using the single p63 antibody. Distinction of the nuclear p63 signal from the cytoplasmic AMACR localization was readily accomplished. There was an excellent agreement (kappa=0.91; P<0.0001) between the AMACR staining profile using the cocktail and the single AMACR antibody alone. The cocktail was very useful in highlighting prostatic carcinoma associated with HGPIN, flat and cribriform HGPIN, and distorted foci of minimal prostatic carcinoma. These data indicate that use of a p63/AMACR cocktail is essentially equivalent to use of each antibody separately for immunohistochemical confirmation of a diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsy. This cocktail would be of diagnostic utility when only limited tissue is available for immunohistochemical evaluation of small, diagnostically difficult foci in prostate needle biopsy tissue.

Using an AMACR (P504S)/34betaE12/p63 cocktail for the detection of small focal prostate carcinoma in needle biopsy specimens

We assessed the usefulness of immunohistochemical analysis with a 3-antibody cocktail (alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase [AMACR, or P504S], 34betaE12, p63) and a double-chromogen reaction for detection of limited prostate cancer in 138 needle biopsy specimens, including 82 with small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma and 56 benign prostates. When carcinoma was present, red cytoplasmic granular staining (AMACR) in the malignant glands and cells and dark brown nuclear (p63) and cytoplasmic (34betaE12) staining in basal cells of adjacent nonmalignant glands were found. Of 82 cases of small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma, 78 (95%) expressed AMACR; all malignant glands were negative for basal cell staining. All benign glands adjacent to malignant glands were recognized easily by basal cell marker positivity and little or no AMACR expression. No benign glands were simultaneously positive for AMACR and negative for basal cell markers (specificity, 100%). There were no differences in intensity and numbers of positive glands with double-chromogen staining compared with using 1-color staining. Our results indicate that immunohistochemistry with a 3-antibody cocktail and double chromogen is a simple and easy assay that can be used as a routine test, which overcomes the problems of studying small lesions in prostate needle biopsies with multiple immunohistochemical stains.

Use of novel immunohistochemical markers expressed in colonic adenocarcinoma to distinguish primary ovarian tumors from metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma, particularly endometrioid and mucinous subtypes, from metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the ovary is often difficult on histologic examination alone. Recently, three immunohistochemical markers CDX2, a homeobox gene encoding an intestine-specific transcription factor; alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR/P504S), a mitochondrial and peroxisomal enzyme with fairly restricted expression in selective tumors and beta-catenin, an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation product resulting in activation of the Wnt pathway, have been reported to have specific and sensitive expression in colorectal carcinomas. We evaluated a panel consisting of antibodies to CDX2, beta-catenin and P504S in 23 primary ovarian adenocarcinomas (13 mucinous and 10 endometrioid) and compared the findings to 22 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas (seven mucinous and 15 nonmucinous tumors with endometrioid-like morphology hereafter referred to as pseudo-endometrioid) to the ovary stained with the same panel. Twenty (91%) metastatic tumors expressed at least two markers and seven (32%) expressed all three. In contrast, only three (13%) primary ovarian tumors expressed at least two markers and none expressed all three. Strong (2+, 3+) and diffuse (>40%) expression for CDX2 was noted in 21 (95%) metastatic tumors and five (22%) primary ovarian tumors (three mucinous, two endometrioid). P504S was similarly expressed in seven (32%) metastatic and none of the primary ovarian carcinomas. Nuclear expression of beta-catenin was noted in 13 (59%) metastatic tumors and in eight cases (36%), it was diffuse and strong. In contrast, four (19%) primary tumors showed nuclear expression of this protein with only one (5%) case expressing it in a diffuse pattern. Immunohistochemical expression of gene products and enzymes of colorectal carcinogenesis in some primary ovarian carcinomas suggest that the morphologic similarities between colorectal and mucinous/endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary extends to the genetic level, although differences in the level of expression exist between these tumors. Diffuse expression of all three markers (CDX2, beta-catenin and P504S) in a tumor in the ovary was found to be virtually diagnostic of metastasis from a colorectal primary in this study.

Immunohistochemistry as a tool in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: an update

Immunohistochemistry has become an important tool in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. This article reviews the role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of the three main categories of ovarian tumors, with emphasis on recently developed antibodies. In the surface epithelial stromal category the most common problem is its discernment from metastasis. The use of differential cytokeratins, primarily CK7 and CK20, as well as Cdx-2, beta-catenin, and P504S in differentiating between metastatic adenocarcinoma, particularly of colorectal origin, and primary ovarian carcinoma is discussed. Dpc4 may be useful in distinguishing pancreatic from ovarian mucinous carcinomas, because up to 55% of pancreatic carcinomas lack Dpc4 expression, whereas the differential expression of mucin genes may be helpful in distinguishing between primary ovarian mucinous and metastatic tumors. Urothelial markers (thrombomodulin and uroplakin III) and renal cell carcinoma markers (CD10 and renal cell carcinoma marker) can be helpful in the diagnosis of metastatic urothelial and renal cell tumors to the ovary. The roles of inhibin, calretinin, CD99, and other recently described markers in the diagnosis of sex cord-stromal tumors are reviewed. The uses of OCT-4 (POU5F1) (a new highly sensitive and specific marker of dysgerminoma and embryonal carcinoma), CD30, and c-kit are also discussed.

Prospective evaluation of AMACR (P504S) and basal cell markers in the assessment of routine prostate needle biopsy specimens

Distinguishing benign prostate glands from malignant ones, based purely on morphology, on prostatic core needle biopsy specimens (PNBs) may prove difficult, particularly if the suspicious focus is small. In recent years, several immunohistochemical markers, including the basal cell cocktail (BCC), 34betaE12 and p63, and the prostate cancer (PCa) biomarker alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR), have been used as adjuvants to morphology, in these diagnostically challenging cases. We prospectively address the diagnostic utility of using the BCC, in combination with the commercially available AMACR monoclonal antibody, P504S, on PNBs that required immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies to make a diagnosis. The goals of this prospective study were to assess the day-to-day practice in an academic setting, to determine how often these IHC tests were used on routine PNBs, and to establish how often a combination of the BCC and P504S were helpful in diagnosing prostate cancer. A total of 772 prospectively collected PNB cases were examined over a 7-month period. IHC staining was performed in 171 cases (22%); 123 cases were stained with the BCC in addition to the commercially available monoclonal AMACR antibody. In 86 of these 123 cases (70%), both stains contributed to the final diagnosis: PCa in 44 cases, benign in 33 cases and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 9 cases. Of the remaining 37 cases (30%), 18 were called benign or PCa, based solely on appropriate staining with the BCC, with AMACR being noncontributory because the focus of interest had been cut through (12 cases), there was negative staining with AMACR (in 4 PCa cases), or there was positive staining with AMACR (in 2 benign cases showing atrophy). Nineteen of 37 cases were diagnosed as atypical small acinar proliferation. In these 19 cases either the focus had been cut through on one or both of the stains (11 cases), both AMACR and BCC failed to work (2 cases), AMACR was positive in the presence of patchy BCC staining (1 cases), AMACR was negative in the absence of BCC staining (3 cases), or despite appropriate staining the focus consisted of 1 gland and was considered too small to call carcinoma (2 cases). Additional IHC stains were performed in 171 of 772 cases; of these, 123 had sufficient material to perform both the BCC and P504S. The BCC when used in combination with AMACR rendered a diagnosis in almost 70% of cases. Using these stains in combination may be a better approach in diagnostically difficult cases as it increases the likelihood that a definitive diagnosis can be rendered while decreasing the likelihood of an equivocal diagnosis. However, a limitation of this approach is the loss of tissue in these small lesions, suggesting that combining AMACR and the BCC on a single slide would be superior to using either marker separately.

[Assessment of P504S immunohistochemistry in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of P504S immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Light microscopy and immunohistochemistry examinations (EnVision staining) were performed in 117 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma, PIN, AAH, ASAP, BPH and normal prostatic tissue to correlate the morphology and protein expression of P504S, 34betaE12, and P63.

RESULTS

Seventy-one of the 78 (91%) cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma stained positive for P504S, with strong cytoplasmic granular staining in most cases, and a weak or intense granular staining along the circumferential luminal and apical cell border membrane in a few cases. Negative P504S immunostaining was observed in 7 of 78 (9%) cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma, all of which were clear cell type prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cases of PIN (9 cases), AAH (6 cases) and ASAP (2 cases) showed various expression levels of P504S. Sixty-five of 68 (96%) cases of normal prostates and BPH were negative for P504S and basal cell hyperplasia cases were also negative.

CONCLUSIONS

P504S is a useful marker for microscopic diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, and immunohistochemistry study using a combination of P504S and 34betaE12/p63 may be of greater benefit in aiding the differential diagnoses.

Diagnostic utility of a p63/alpha-methyl-CoA-racemase (p504s) cocktail in atypical foci in the prostate

Prostatic needle biopsy is the preferred method for diagnosing early prostate cancer, providing specific information. In cases of histological cancer mimics, a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation suspected of but not diagnosed as malignancy can be made. In such cases, and in small focus carcinomas, pathologists use 34betaE12, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 or p63 immunostaining to label basal cells, and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR/p504s) immunostaining as a positive prostate cancer marker on two distinct slides. However, in cases of small foci, ambiguous lesions might disappear. The purpose of our study was to improve the sensitivity of a cocktail of two antibodies (p63/p504s) with a sample incubation on 260 prostatic specimens, in order to help make a decision in conjunction with standard histology and CK 5/6 immunostaining. We tested 101 small focus prostatic cancers, 104 atypical small acinar proliferation, 19 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, two atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and 34 benign mimics of cancer. After p63/p504s immunostaining, the final diagnoses retained were as follows: 154 prostatic cancers, 14 atypical small acinar proliferation, 30 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, three atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and 62 benign mimics of cancer. To differentiate malignant from benign lesions, we used the criteria of greater sensitivity to p504s/p63 (95%) than to CK 5/6 (57%) or p63 (86%), and higher specificity for p504s/p63 (95%) than for CK 5/6 (88%) or p63 (81%). With the p504s/p63 cocktail, 89% of the ambiguous lesions were classified vs 53% for CK 5/6. Combined use of the two antibodies, one (p504s) as a positive marker and the other (p63) as a negative marker, with a simple immunostaining procedure, may improve diagnostic performance, sensitivity and specificity, leading to a reduction in the risk of false negatives; this technique in cases of atypical small acinar proliferation should reduce the percentage of residual ambiguous lesions and the need for additional biopsies.

A novel diagnostic test for prostate cancer emerges from the determination of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme a racemase in prostatic secretions

PURPOSE

With the recent discovery that alpha-methlyacly-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) is over expressed in a majority of prostate cancer (CaP) specimens we developed a novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based approach that would predict the presence of CaP from prostatic secretions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients were enlisted in this study, including 10 with CaP, 2 with high grade PIN and 9 cancer-free individuals (7 healthy men and 2 with benign hyperplasia). Total cellular RNA was extracted from prostatic secretions obtained from post-massage urine specimens. Levels of AMCAR transcripts and prostate specific antigen (PSA) transcripts in these samples were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR analyses. Relative AMACR value scores (RAVSs) were calculated by normalizing the AMACR transcript level to that of PSA for each sample and multiplying by 100. An experimentally defined diagnostic cutoff RAVS value was determined in the cancer-free control group.

RESULTS

Neither AMACR nor PSA mRNA levels were predictive of CaP when used alone. However, using RAVS values and imposing a diagnostic cutoff value of 2 SDs above the mean RAVS in the cancer-free control group all 9 (100%) cancer-free individuals, including those with benign prostatic hyperplasia, were below the cutoff and 7 of 10 (70%) with CaP had RAVS above the cutoff. Furthermore, 2 of the 3 false-negative cases showed clinically insignificant disease. The 2 patients with high grade PIN were above the cutoff in this test.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study the quantification of AMACR transcripts normalized to PSA transcripts in prostatic secretions was shown to be predictive of CaP. Therefore, our novel approach using quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR to detect the AMACR-to-PSA transcript ratio shows promise as a noninvasive screening test for CaP. Furthermore, early results demonstrate a trend toward excluding patients with clinically insignificant disease that may not yet require aggressive treatment due to a low cancer burden.

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase: a multi-institutional study of a new prostate cancer marker

AIM

To test whether alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive and specific marker of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The expression levels of AMACR mRNA were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. A total of 807 prostatic specimens were further examined by immunohistochemistry specific for AMACR. Quantitative immunostaining analyses were carried out by using the ChromaVision Automated Cellular Imaging System and the Ariol SL-50 Imaging System, respectively. AMACR mRNA levels measured in prostatic adenocarcinoma were 55 times higher than those in benign prostate tissue. Of 454 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma, 441 were positive for AMACR, while 254 of 277 cases of benign prostate were negative for AMACR. The sensitivity and specificity of AMACR immunodetection of prostatic adenocarcinomas were 97% and 92%, respectively. Both positive and negative predictive values were 95%. By automatic imaging analyses, the AMACR immunostaining intensity and percentage in prostatic adenocarcinomas were also significantly higher than those in benign prostatic tissue (105.9 versus 16.1 for intensity, 45.7% versus 0.02% and 35.03% versus 4.64% for percentage, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the promising features of AMACR as a biomarker for prostate cancer in this large series and the potential to develop automated quantitative diagnostic tests.

[Detection of P504S (alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase) in prostatic adenocarcinomas]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the monoclonal antibody P504S (AMACR) in detection of prostatic adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

150 cases, including prostatic adenocarcinomas (n = 105), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, n = 42) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP, n = 3), were studied by immunohistiochemical analysis of P504S. The clinical data, HE, PSA and CK34betaE12 staining slides were reviewed in all of the cases.

RESULTS

P504S was strongly and diffusely positive (> or = +++) in 97.1% cases of prostatic adenocarcinomas and focally positive (+) in 2 cases, regardless of Gleason score, age and serum PSA. However, P504S was also positive in high grade PIN that surrounded adenocarcinomas (n = 24) and weakly positive (+) in benign prostatic hyperplasia that surrounded adenocarcinomas (8 out of 82 cases). In 42 cases of BPH, 10 cases (23.8%) show (+) staining, and 1 case (2.4%) shows (++) staining. P504S was negative in entire 8 cases of basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) and in 3 cases of ASAP.

CONCLUSION

P504S (AMACR), a recently established positive marker for prostatic adenocarcinomas, has good sensitivity (97.1%) and specificity (86.0%). It is crucial to correlate the P504S staining pattern with the findings of HE, PSA and CK34betaE12 (or p63) staining, as well as clinical information to reach a correct diagnosis.