The amino terminus of the human C5a receptor is required for high affinity C5a binding and for receptor activation by C5a but not C5a analogs

C5a receptor oligomerization. I. Disulfide trapping reveals oligomers and potential contact surfaces in a G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), stimulated by hormones and sensory stimuli, act as molecular switches to relay activation to heterotrimeric G proteins. Recent studies suggest that GPCRs form dimeric or oligomeric structures, a phenomenon that has long been established for growth factor receptors. The elucidation of the domains of GPCRs that mediate receptor association is of critical importance for understanding the function of GPCR oligomers. Using a disulfide-trapping strategy to probe the intermolecular contact surfaces, we demonstrate cross-linking of C5a receptors in membranes prepared from both human neutrophils and stably transfected mammalian cells that is mediated by a cysteine in the second intracellular loop. To explore other surfaces that might be involved in the oligomerization of C5a receptors, we constructed receptors with individual cysteines in other intracellular regions. C5a receptors with a cysteine in the first intracellular loop or the carboxyl terminus displayed the fastest kinetics of dimer formation, whereas an intracellular loop 3 cysteine displayed minimal cross-linking. Since the rate of disulfide trapping reflects the proximity of sulfhydryl groups, assuming similar accessibility and flexibility, these results imply a symmetric dimer interface that may involve either transmembrane helices 1 and 2 or helix 4. However, neither model can account for the ability of the native cysteine in the second intracellular loop to mediate efficient crosslinking. Based on these observations, we propose that C5a receptors form higher order oligomers (i.e. tetramers) or clusters in the membrane.

Modulation of ligand selectivity by mutation of the first extracellular loop of the human C5a receptor 1 1Abbreviations: C5aR, human complement fragment 5a receptor; WT, wild-type; G105D, C5aR mutated to aspartate at glycine105; P103Y, C5aR mutated to tyrosine at proline105; P103Y/G105D, C5aR containing both substitutions; C5adR74, des arginated C5a; F-[OPchaWR], phenylalanine [l-ornithine-proline-d-cyclohexylalanine-tryptophan-arginine]; MeFKPchaWr, N-methyl-l-phenylalanine-lysine-proline-d-cyclohexylalanine-tryptophan-d-arginine; PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocytes; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; YSFKPMPLaR, l-tyrosine-serine-phenylalanine-lysine-proline-methionine-proline-leucine-d-alanine-arginine; and YSFKD(MeNle)PIAR, l-tyrosine-serine-phenylalanine-lysine-aspartate-N-methylnorleucine-proline-d-leucine-alanine-arginine

The cyclic C5a receptor antagonist, phenylalanine [L-ornithine-proline-D-cyclohexylalanine-tryptophan-arginine] (F-[OPchaWR]), has approximately 1000-fold less affinity for the C5a receptor (C5aR) on murine polymorphonuclear leukocytes than on human. Analysis of C5aR from different species shows that a possible cause of this difference is the variation in the sequence of the first extracellular loop of the receptor. The mouse receptor contains Y at a position analogous to P(103) in the human receptor, and D at G(105). To test this hypothesis, we expressed human C5aR mutants (P(103)Y, G(105)D and the double mutant, P(103)Y/G(105)D) in RBL-2H3 cells and investigated the effects of these mutations on binding affinity and receptor activation. All three mutant receptors had a higher affinity for human C5a than the wild-type receptor, but showed no significant difference in the ability of F-[OPchaWR] to inhibit human C5a binding. However, all of the mutant receptors had substantially lower affinities for the weak agonist, C5a des Arg(74) (C5adR(74)), and two altered receptors (G(105)D and P(103)Y/G(105)D) had much lower affinities for the C-terminal C5a agonist peptide analogue, L-tyrosine-serine-phenylalanine-lysine-proline-methionine-proline-leucine-D-alanine-arginine (YSFKPMPLaR). Although it is unlikely that differences at these residues are responsible for variations in the potency of F-[OPchaWR] across species, residues in the first extracellular loop are clearly involved in the recognition of both C5a and C5a agonists. The complex effects of mutating these residues on the affinity and response to C5a, C5adR(74), and the peptide analogues provide evidence of different binding modes for these ligands on the C5aR.

Sulfated tyrosines contribute to the formation of the C5a docking site of the human C5a anaphylatoxin receptor

The complement anaphylatoxin C5a and its seven-transmembrane segment (7TMS) receptor play an important role in host defense and in a number of inflammation-associated pathologies. The NH(2)-terminal domain of the C5a receptor (C5aR/CD88) contributes substantially to its ability to bind C5a. Here we show that the tyrosines at positions 11 and 14 of the C5aR are posttranslationally modified by the addition of sulfate groups. The sulfate moieties of each of these tyrosines are critical to the ability of the C5aR to bind C5a and to mobilize calcium. A C5aR variant lacking these sulfate moieties efficiently mobilized calcium in response to a small peptide agonist, but not to C5a, consistent with a two-site model of ligand association in which the tyrosine-sulfated region of the C5aR mediates the initial docking interaction. A peptide based on the NH(2) terminus of the C5aR and sulfated at these two tyrosines, but not its unsulfated analogue or a doubly sulfated control peptide, partially inhibited C5a association with its receptor. These observations clarify structural and mutagenic studies of the C5a/C5aR association and suggest that related 7TMS receptors are also modified by functionally important sulfate groups on their NH(2)-terminal tyrosines.

An activation switch in the ligand binding pocket of the C5a receptor

Although agonists are thought to occupy binding pockets within the seven-helix core of serpentine receptors, the topography of these binding pockets and the conformational changes responsible for receptor activation are poorly understood. To identify the ligand binding pocket in the receptor for complement factor 5a (C5aR), we assessed binding affinities of hexapeptide ligands, each mutated at a single position, for seven mutant C5aRs, each mutated at a single position in the putative ligand binding site. In ChaW (an antagonist) and W5Cha (an agonist), the side chains at position 5 are tryptophan and cyclohexylalanine, respectively. Comparisons of binding affinities indicated that the hexapeptide residue at this position interacts with two C5aR residues, Ile-116 (helix III) and Val-286 (helix VII); in a C5aR model these two side chains point toward one another. Both the I116A and the V286A mutations markedly increased binding affinity of W5Cha but not that of ChaW. Moreover, ChaW, the antagonist hexapeptide, acted as a full agonist on the I116A mutant. These results argue that C5aR residues Ile-116 and Val-286 interact with the side chain at position 5 of the hexapeptide ligand to form an activation switch. Based on this and previous work, we present a docking model for the hexapeptide within the C5aR binding pocket. We propose that agonists induce a small change in the relative orientations of helices III and VII and that these helices work together to allow movement of helix VI away from the receptor core, thereby triggering G protein activation.

Identification of four novel human G protein-coupled receptors expressed in the brain

We report the discovery and tissue distributions of four novel human genes, GPR61, GPR62, GPR63 and GPR77, all of which encode G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPR61 was discovered in a search of the patent literature which retrieved a rabbit DNA sequence partially encoding a novel GPCR. This sequence was used to obtain a full-length human cDNA encoding GPR61, a receptor of 417 amino acid length. A search of the GenBank genomic sequence databases revealed three previously unrecognized intronless genes encoding the orphan GPCrs (oGPCRs) GPR62, GPR63 and GPR77, with respective amino acid lengths of 368, 419 and 337. Sequence analysis revealed that GPR61 and GPR62, and a published orphan receptor p47MNR, shared the highest level of identities to each other, ranging from 36 to 45% in the transmembrane (TM) domains. Together, these three oGPCRs appear to comprise a novel subfamily of GPCRs, most closely related to the serotonin 5-HT(6) receptor. Sequence analysis of GPR63 and GPR77 revealed highest sequence identities in the TM regions with the oGPCR PSP24 (58%) and the anaphylatoxin C5a receptor (49%) respectively. Tissue distribution analyses detected the expression of all four novel genes in the human brain. GPR61 mRNA expression was detected in the caudate, putamen and thalamus of human brain, with a more widespread expression pattern in rat brain, with mRNA signals in areas of the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, hypothalamus and midbrain. GPR62 mRNA expression was detected in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, caudate, putamen, thalamus and hippocampus. GPR63 mRNA expression was detected in the frontal cortex, with lower levels in the thalamus, caudate, hypothalamus and midbrain. Analysis of GPR77 mRNA expression revealed signals in the frontal cortex, hippocampus and hypothalamus with high transcript levels in the liver.

The CXCR4 agonist ligand stromal derived factor-1 maintains high affinity for receptors in both Galpha(i)-coupled and uncoupled states

The alpha chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its only characterized chemokine ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), are postulated to be important in the development of the B-cell arm of the immune system. In addition, CXCR4 is a critical coreceptor in support of viral entry by T-cell line tropic strains (X4) of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1), viral variants which predominate in some infected individuals in end stage disease. SDF-1 can block X4-tropic HIV-1 infection of CD4+ target cells in vitro, and allelic variants of the human gene encoding SDF-1 in vivo correlate with delayed disease progression. Therefore, CXCR4 may be an appropriate target for therapeutic intervention in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and knowledge of the pharmacology of SDF-1 binding to its cognate receptor will be important in the interpretation of these experiments. We report here a Kd derived using a competition binding assay of 4.5 nM for CXCR4 endogenously expressed on peripheral blood monocytes and T-cells. This affinity is similar to that which SDF-1 exhibits when binding to endogenous CXCR4 on an established immortal Jurkat T-cell line as well as recombinant CXCR4 transfected into Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. We also demonstrate that the determined affinity of SDF-1 for CXCR4 is reflective of its ability to induce a CXCR4-mediated signal transduction in these different cell types. Furthermore, using Bordetella pertussis toxin, we observe that high affinity binding of SDF-1 to CXCR4 is independent of the G-protein coupled state of the receptor, as uncoupling of G-protein did not lead to the appearance of measurable low affinity SDF-1 binding sites. Moreover, binding affinity and receptor number were unaffected by uncoupling for both recombinant and endogenously expressed CXCR4. Thus, SDF-1 is novel among agonist ligands of G protein-coupled receptors in that it appears to have equal affinity for both the G protein-coupled and uncoupled states of CXCR4.

Requirements for C5a receptor-mediated IL-4 and IL-13 production and leukotriene C4 generation in human basophils

Anaphylatoxin derived from the fifth complement component (C5a) in the presence of IL-3 induces continuous leukotriene C4 generation and IL-4 and IL-13 expression in human basophils for a period of 16-18 h. This indicates that the G protein-coupled C5a receptor (C5aR) can induce long-lasting cellular responses. Using anti-N-terminal C5aR Abs, C-terminal C5a hexapeptide analogs, and pertussis toxin, we demonstrate that the putative activation site of the C5aR is both necessary and sufficient for these late cellular responses. Furthermore, continuous pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein-coupled receptor activation and receptor-ligand interaction is ongoing and required during the entire period of product release. However, the late basophil responses have a more stringent requirement for optimal receptor activation. Leukotriene C4 generation appears to be influenced mostly by the way the receptor is activated, because the most active hexapeptide is a superagonist for this response. By contrast, C5adesarg, lacking the C-terminal arginine, induces minimal lipid mediator formation but is fully active to induce IL-4 production and is even a superagonist for IL-13 release. Nevertheless, IL-4/IL-13 synthesis in response to C5adesarg could be blocked by both C-terminal antagonistic peptide as well as anti-N-terminal C5aR Abs, indicating only minor differences of ligand-receptor interactions between C5a and C5adesarg. Taken together, our data demonstrate that long-lasting and continuous signaling occurs through a limited activation domain of the C5aR, which can differentially promote separate basophil functions.

Identification of residues of CXCR4 critical for human immunodeficiency virus coreceptor and chemokine receptor activities

CXCR4 is a G-coupled receptor for the stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1) chemokine, and a CD4-associated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coreceptor. These functions were studied in a panel of CXCR4 mutants bearing deletions in the NH(2)-terminal extracellular domain (NT) or substitutions in the NT, the extracellular loops (ECL), or the transmembrane domains (TMs). The coreceptor activity of CXCR4 was markedly impaired by mutations of two Tyr residues in NT (Y7A/Y12A) or at a single Asp residue in ECL2 (D193A), ECL3 (D262A), or TMII (D97N). These acidic residues could engage electrostatical interactions with basic residues of the HIV-1 envelope protein gp120, known to contribute to the selectivity for CXCR4. The ability of CXCR4 mutants to bind SDF-1 and mediate cell signal was consistent with the two-site model of chemokine-receptor interaction. Site I involved in SDF-1 binding but not signaling was located in NT with particular importance of Glu(14) and/or Glu(15) and Tyr(21). Residues required for both SDF-1 binding and signaling, and thus probably part of site II, were identified in ECL2 (Asp(187)), TMII (Asp(97)), and TMVII (Glu(288)). The first residues () of NT also seem required for SDF-1 binding and signaling. A deletion in the third intracellular loop abolished signaling, probably by disrupting the coupling with G proteins. The identification of CXCR4 residues involved in the interaction with both SDF-1 and HIV-1 may account for the signaling activity of gp120 and has implications for the development of antiviral compounds.

Pharmacological characterization of antagonists of the C5a receptor

1. Potent and highly selective small molecule antagonists have recently been developed by us for C5a receptors (C5aR) on human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN). In this study we compared a new cyclic antagonist, F-[OPdChaWR], with an acyclic derivative, MeFKPdChaWr, for their capacities to bind to C5aR on human PMN and human umbilical artery membranes. We also compared their inhibition of myeloperoxidase (MPO) secretion from human PMNs and their inhibition of human umbilical artery contraction induced by human recombinant C5a. 2. In both PMNs and umbilical artery, the cyclic and acyclic C5a antagonists displayed insurmountable antagonism against C5a. There were differences in selectivities for the C5aR with F-[OPdChaWR] (pKb 8.64+/-0.21) being 30 times more potent than MeFKPdChaWr (pKb 7.16+/-0.11, P<0.05) in PMNs, but of similar potency (pKb 8.19+/-0.38 vs pKb 8.28+/-0.29, respectively) in umbilical artery. This trend was also reflected in their relative binding affinities, both antagonists having similar affinities (-logIC50 values) for C5aR in umbilical artery membranes (F-[OPdChaWR], 7.00+/-0.46; MeFKPdChaWr, 7.23+/-0.17), whereas in PMN membranes the C5aR affinity of the cycle F-[OPdChaWR] (7.05+/-0. 06) was four times higher than that of acyclic MeFKPdChaWr (6.43+/-0. 24, P<0.05). 3. In summary, the results reveal that these antagonists are insurmountable in nature against C5a for C5aR on at least two human cell types, and the differences in relative receptor binding affinities and antagonistic potencies against C5a are consistent with differences in receptors within these cell types. The nature of these differences is yet to be elucidated.

Structure-activity relationships of G protein-coupled receptors

The primary function of cell-surface receptors is to discriminate the specific signaling molecule or ligand from a large array of chemically diverse extracellular substances and to activate an effector signaling cascade that triggers an intracellular response and eventually a biological effect. G protein-coupled cell-surface receptors (GPCRs) mediate their intracellular actions through the activation of guanine nucleotide-binding signal-transducing proteins (G proteins), which form a diverse family of regulatory GTPases that, in the GTP-bound state, bind and activate downstream membrane-localized effectors. Hundreds of GPCRs signal through one or more of these G proteins in response to a large variety of stimuli including photons, neurotransmitters, and hormones of variable molecular structure. The mechanisms by which these ligands provoke activation of the receptor/G-protein system are highly complex and multifactorial. Knowledge and mapping of the structural determinants and requirements for optimal GPCR function are of paramount importance, not only for a better and more detailed understanding of the molecular basis of ligand action and receptor function in normal and abnormal conditions, but also for a rational design of early diagnostic and therapeutic tools that may allow exogenous regulation of receptor and G protein function in disease processes.

Ligand binding sites on guinea pig C3aR: point and deletion mutations in the large extracellular loop and vicinity

Human C3a receptor (huC3aR) belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor family chacterized by having seven transmembrane domains. The huC3aR is a unique member of this family having a large extracellular (EC) loop of 175 amino acids between the 4th and 5th transmembrane domains. Based on a comparison of C3aR sequences from several species, a number of charged and conserved amino acids (Asp182, Asp309, Asp310, and Arg331) in and near the large EC loop of guinea pig C3aR were replaced using site-directed mutagenesis. Competitive binding assays showed that changing Arg331 in guinea pig C3aR to Ala (or Gln), but not changing Asp182, Asp309, or Asp310 to Ala, resulted in complete loss of ligand binding activity. These results and major EC loop deletions demonstrated that an essential C3a binding site is present in the transmembrane portion of C3aR, but not in the large EC loop. Replacement of Arg331 by a noncharged residue was sufficient to eliminate ligand-receptor interactions.

Expression of the anaphylatoxin C5a receptor in non-myeloid cells

C5, a 74 amino acid peptide cleaved from the complement protein C5, represents the most potent anaphylatoxin and possesses inflammatory as well as immunomodulatory activities. In the past, expression of the receptor for the anaphylatoxin C5a (C5aR) has been thought to be restricted to cells of myeloid origin. However, recent evidence suggests that the C5aR is constitutively expressed in non-myeloid cells including epithelial, endothelial and smooth muscle cells in the human liver and lung. These findings are contrasted by results from our laboratory which demonstrated that in the normal human liver and lung C5aR expression is detectable exclusively in macrophages and macrophage-derived cells (Kupffer cells). Interestingly, we found evidence that C5aR expression may be inducible in epithelial cells as C5aR mRNA was observed in vivo in human keratinocytes of the inflamed but not of the normal skin. Herein we review the work of our laboratory and others on the expression of the C5aR in various human non-myeloid cells types. A better understanding of the expression patterns of this important anaphylatoxin receptor may provide new insights in the pathophysiological role of C5a in vivo.

Specific detection by flow cytometry of histidine-tagged ligands bound to their receptors using a tag-specific monoclonal antibody

Engineering proteins to contain a histidine (His)-tag has proved to be very useful for the purification and analyses of these molecules. In the present study, we demonstrate that the binding of His-tagged ligands to their receptors may be visualised by flow cytometry making use of a selected monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the His-tag. Employing this method, a recombinant C3a (rC3a) anaphylatoxin with a His-tag at its N-terminus could be shown to bind to C3a receptor (C3aR)-expressing RBL-2H3 transfectants with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of about 3 nM which is well within the range of published affinity constants. Binding of a recombinant interleukin-8 (rIL-8) molecule with a C-terminal His-tag to RBL-2H3 cells which stably express the IL-8 receptors CXCR1 or CXCR2 could also be demonstrated using the tag-specific mAb. Furthermore, aminoterminally tagged C5a molecules of rat or human origin could be shown to bind to the human C5a receptor (C5aR). However, the fluorescence signal of the binding of rat rC5a to the human C5aR was distinctly higher over a wide range of ligand concentrations than the signal of human rC5a binding although both ligands were equally potent in the induction of chemotaxis in C5aR-expressing cells. Thus, the tag-specific mAb was able to interfere with the binding of human but not rat rC5a to the human C5aR. This observation is in agreement with the hypothesis of a two binding site model for the interaction of human C5a with its receptor whereas a different binding mode may apply for rat C5a. Our data demonstrate that the selected His-tag specific mAb may be a valuable tool for the visualisation of the binding of recombinant ligands to their receptors and may also provide useful information on the specific binding properties of the ligands.

Identification of CXCR4 domains that support coreceptor and chemokine receptor functions

The interaction of the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) with its receptor CXCR4 is vital for cell trafficking during development, is capable of inhibiting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) utilization of CXCR4 as a coreceptor, and has been implicated in delaying disease progression to AIDS in vivo. Because of the importance of this chemokine-chemokine receptor pair to both development and disease, we investigated the molecular basis of the interaction between CXCR4 and its ligands SDF-1 and HIV-1 envelope. Using CXCR4 chimeras and mutants, we determined that SDF-1 requires the CXCR4 amino terminus for binding and activates downstream signaling pathways by interacting with the second extracellular loop of CXCR4. SDF-1-mediated activation of CXCR4 required the Asp-Arg-Tyr motif in the second intracellular loop of CXCR4, was pertussis toxin sensitive, and did not require the distal C-terminal tail of CXCR4. Several CXCR4 mutants that were not capable of binding SDF-1 or signaling still supported HIV-1 infection, indicating that the ability of CXCR4 to function as a coreceptor is independent of its ability to signal. Direct binding studies using the X4 gp120s HXB, BH8, and MN demonstrated the ability of HIV-1 gp120 to bind directly and specifically to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in a CD4-dependent manner, using a conformationally complex structure on CXCR4. Several CXCR4 variants that did not support binding of soluble gp120 could still function as viral coreceptors, indicating that detectable binding of monomeric gp120 is not always predictive of coreceptor function.

Chimeric receptors of the human C3a receptor and C5a receptor (CD88)

Chimeras were generated between the human anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a receptors (C3aR and C5aR, respectively) to define the structural requirements for ligand binding and discrimination. Chimeric receptors were generated by systematically exchanging between the two receptors four receptor modules (the N terminus, transmembrane regions 1 to 4, the second extracellular loop, and transmembrane region 5 to the C terminus). The mutants were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells (with or without Galpha-16) and analyzed for cell surface expression, binding of C3a and C5a, and functional responsiveness (calcium mobilization) toward C3a, C5a, and a C3a as well as a C5a analogue peptide. The data indicate that in both anaphylatoxin receptors the transmembrane regions and the second extracellular loop act as a functional unit that is disrupted by any reciprocal exchange. N-terminal substitution confirmed the two-binding site model for the human C5aR, in which the receptor N terminus is required for high affinity binding of the native ligand but not a C5a analogue peptide. In contrast, the human C3a receptor did not require the original N terminus for high affinity binding of and activation by C3a, a result that was confirmed by N-terminal deletion mutants. This indicates a completely different binding mode of the anaphylatoxins to their corresponding receptors. The C5a analogue peptide, but not C5a, was an agonist of the C3aR. Replacement of the C3aR N terminus by the C5aR sequence, however, lead to the generation of a true hybrid C3a/C5a receptor, which bound and functionally responded to both ligands, C3a and C5a.

Monomeric monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) binds and activates the MCP-1 receptor CCR2B

To address the role of dimerization in the function of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1, we mutated residues that comprise the core of the dimerization interface and characterized the ability of these mutants to dimerize and to bind and activate the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2b. One mutant, P8A*, does not dimerize. However, it has wild type binding affinity, stimulates chemotaxis, inhibits adenylate cyclase, and stimulates calcium influx with wild type potency and efficacy. These data suggest that MCP-1 binds and activates its receptor as a monomer. In contrast, Y13A*, another monomeric mutant, has a 100-fold weaker binding affinity, is a much less potent inhibitor of adenylate cyclase and stimulator of calcium influx, and is unable to stimulate chemotaxis. Thus Tyr13 may make important contacts with the receptor that are required for high affinity binding and signal transduction. We also explored whether a mutant, [1+9-76]MCP-1 (MCP-1 lacking residues 2-8), antagonizes wild type MCP-1 by competitive inhibition, or by a dominant negative mechanism wherein heterodimers of MCP-1 and [1+9-76]MCP-1 bind to the receptor but are signaling incompetent. Consistent with the finding that MCP-1 can bind and activate the receptor as a monomer, we demonstrate that binding of MCP-1 in the presence of [1+9-76]MCP-1 over a range of concentrations of both ligands fits well to a simple model in which monomeric [1+9-76]MCP-1 functions as a competitive inhibitor of monomeric MCP-1. These results are crucial for elucidating the molecular details of receptor binding and activation, for interpreting mutagenesis data, for understanding how antagonistic chemokine variants function, and for the design of receptor antagonists.

The amino terminus of human CCR5 is required for its function as a receptor for diverse human and simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins

The chemokine receptor CCR5 plays a key role in the CD4-dependent entry of human and simian immunodeficiency viruses into target cells. We have mapped the interaction sites on CCR5 for a number of novel anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibodies and have used these to study the role of the CCR5 N-terminal ectodomain in viral entry and to demonstrate differential CCR5 epitope expression on different cell types. Deletions of the CCR5 amino terminal domain or substitution with equivalent regions from other chemokine receptors did not affect cell surface expression or reactivity with loop-specific antibodies, suggesting that the loop regions remained conformationally intact. Exchanges of the amino terminal segment of CCR5 with the equivalent domains of CCR1, CCR2, and CXCR4 did not significantly affect infection with virus pseudotyped with envelope glycoproteins (Envs) from HIV-2 and SIV, but substitution with the CXCR4 sequence abrogated entry mediated by Env from HIV-1. In contrast, deletion of the amino terminus abrogated CCR5 receptor activity for all viral Envs examined. These data indicate that the amino terminus of CCR5 has an essential role in entry mediated by diverse viral Envs but that the sequence requirements are more relaxed for the HIV-2 and SIV Envs compared to the HIV-1 Env examined. This suggests that different viral Envs make distinct and specific interactions with the amino terminus of CCR5. Viral Env utilization of CCR5 expressed on 293-T cells does not always correlate with the cellular tropism of the virus, and one possible explanation is that Env-accessible interaction sites on CCR5 differ on different cell types. We therefore analyzed binding of several anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibodies to cell lines and primary cells that express this chemokine receptor and found that whereas all antibodies bound to CCR5-transfected 293T cells, several did not bind to PBMC. The results suggest that CCR5 undergoes cell type specific structural modifications which may affect interaction with different HIV and SIV envelope glycoproteins.

Binding and functional properties of recombinant and endogenous CXCR3 chemokine receptors

IP10 and MIG are two members of the CXC branch of the chemokine superfamily whose expression is dramatically up-regulated by interferon (IFN)-gamma. The proteins act largely on natural killer (NK)-cells and activated T-cells and have been implicated in mediating some of the effects of IFN-gamma and lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), as well as T-cell-dependent anti-tumor responses. Recently both chemokines have been shown to be functional agonists of the same G-protein-coupled receptor, CXCR3. We now report the pharmacological characterization of CXCR3 and find that, when heterologously expressed, CXCR3 binds IP10 and MIG with Ki values of 0.14 and 4.9 nM, respectively. The receptor has very modest affinity for SDF-1alpha and little or no affinity for other CXC-chemokines. The properties of the endogenous receptor expressed on activated T-cells are similar. Surprisingly, several CC-chemokines, particularly eotaxin and MCP-4, also compete with moderate affinity for the binding of IP10 to CXCR3. Eotaxin does not activate CXCR3 but, in CXCR3-transfected cells, can block IP10-mediated receptor activation. Eotaxin, therefore, may be a natural CXCR3 antagonist.

In vitro inhibition of the bioactivity of follicle-stimulating hormone by antisera against a peptide representing part of the FSH-receptor

The aim of the present work was to define an FSH receptor (FSHR) peptide that can induce antibodies that will inhibit the bioactivity of FSH. Therefore, the hFSHR sequence was aligned with that of all other known G-protein coupled receptors. An area with increased sequence homology was identified between the FSH-, LH-, TSH receptors, the C5a receptor and the IL8 receptor. The similarity consists of a richness in acidic (D and E) and hydrophobic (Y and F) residues. In hFSHR the sequence is EDNESSYSRGFDMTYTEFDYDLCNEVVD (amino acid 299-326). Research on both the C5a- and IL8-receptor has indicated that this part is responsible for hormone binding but not for signal transduction. Protamine. an antagonist for both the C5a- and IL8 receptor also inhibited the bioactivities of FSH and LH when tested in a bioassay. This suggests that in the hFSHR this region might also be involved in hormone binding. Specificity of this region towards the diverse ligands all binding to the C5a or to the IL8 receptor might be attributed to differences in the profile of alternating basic and hydrophobic residues. Therefore, the hypothesis was tested as to whether antisera raised against peptides of this FSHR-domain would inhibit FSH-bioactivity but not LH-bioactivity. Indeed antisera were found (anti-hFSHR 309-322) that inhibited the biological activity of FSH in a bioassay. These antisera proved to be specific since they did not inhibit the bioactivity of LH. These data suggest that the core sequence (hFSHR 309-322) of the aligned domain of the hFSHR, in analogy to the IL8- and C5a receptors, is involved in hormone binding and ligand specificity. This domain therefore forms a valuable tool in FSH- and FSHR research for scientific and medical purposes.

Residues 21-30 within the extracellular N-terminal region of the C5a receptor represent a binding domain for the C5a anaphylatoxin

The functions of the C5a anaphylatoxin are expressed through its interaction with a cell-surface receptor with seven transmembrane helices. The interaction of C5a with the receptor has been explained by a two-site model whereby recognition and effector sites on C5a bind, respectively, to recognition and effector domains on the receptor, leading to receptor activation (Chenoweth, D. E., and Hugli, T. E. (1980) Mol. Immunol. 17, 151-161. In addition, the extracellular N-terminal region of the C5a receptor has been implicated as the recognition domain for C5a, responsible for approximately 50% of the binding energy of the C5a-receptor complex (Mery, L., and Boulay, F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3457-3463; DeMartino, J. A., Van Riper, G., Siciliano, S. J., Molineaux, C. J., Konteatis, Z. D., Rosen, H., and Springer, M. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14446-14450). In this work, the interactions of C5a with the N-terminal domain of the C5a receptor were examined by use of recombinant human C5a molecules and peptide fragments M1NSFN5YTTPD10YGHYD15DKDTL20DLNTP25VDKTS30NTLR(hC5aRF-1-34), acetyl-HYD15DKDTL20DLNTP25VDKTS30NTLR (hC5aRF-13-34), and acetyl-TL20DLNTP25VDKTS30N-amide (hC5aRF-19-31) derived from human C5a receptor. Binding induced resonance perturbations in the NMR spectra of the receptor fragments and the C5a molecules indicated that the isolated Nterminal domain or residues 1-34 of the C5a receptor retain specific binding to C5a and to a C5a analog devoid of the agonistic C-terminal tail in the intact C5a. Residues of C5a perturbed by the binding of the receptor peptides are localized within the helical core of the C5a structure, in agreement with the results from functional studies employing mutated C5a and intact receptor molecules. All three receptor peptides, hC5aRF-1-34, hC5aRF-13-34, and hC5aRF-19-31, responded to the binding of C5a through the 21-30 region containing either hydrophobic, polar, or positively charged residues such as Thr24, Pro25, Val26, Lys28, Thr29, and Ser30. The 21-30 segment of all three receptor fragments was found to have a partially folded conformation in solution, independent of residues 1-18. These results indicate that a short peptide sequence, or residues 21-30, of the C5a receptor N terminus may constitute the binding domain for the recognition site on C5a.

Cloning and characterization of rat C3a receptor: differential expression of rat C3a and C5a receptors by LPS stimulation

The anaphylatoxin C3a, generated during complement activation, is a factor known to mediate various inflammatory reactions. The human C3a receptor (C3aR) was recently cloned and identified to be a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. C3aR is characterized by seven transmembrane domains including a large second extracellular loop that appears to be a unique feature of this receptor. Here we report the isolation of the rat C3aR clone and confirm that the isolated cDNA coded for rat C3aR based on C3a binding analysis to stably transfected cells. Northern blot analysis of rat C3aR revealed expression in various tissues, similar to that of human C3aR but dissimilar to rat C5aR. We found that expression of rat C3aR in various tissues did not increase significantly after LPS injection, whereas rat C5aR expression is greatly increased. These results suggest that expression of C3aR and C5aR is independently regulated in rat cells and tissues.

Complement factors and their receptors

In summary, recent advances in molecular cloning of anaphylatoxins and the anaphylatoxin receptors add new dimensions to our investigations and understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in anaphylatoxin action. Combining knowledge accumulated from peptide modeling of the ligands with mutagenesis studies of these ligands and their receptors makes it possible to more accurately model interactive sites and understand the sequence of molecular interactions required for cellular activation. In addition, these new developments provide valuable tools for investigating, yet unknown, activities and cellular targets of the anaphylatoxin molecules.

Two murine homologues of the human chemokine receptor CXCR4 mediating stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha activation of Gi2 are differentially expressed in vivo

Previous results have shown that pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi proteins are likely to be involved in regulating the emigration of mature thymocytes from the thymus. In this study, a low stringency polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach was used to identify Gi protein-coupled cell surface receptors expressed in mouse thymocytes. Among the ten G protein-coupled receptor cDNA isolated, the most prevalent cDNA encoded a polypeptide highly homologous to the human leukocyte-expressed seven-transmembrane-domain receptor LESTR, also referred to as HIV entry cofactor, fusin, or CXCR4. Isolation of full-length cDNA revealed that alternative RNA splicing produces transcripts encoding two isoforms of the murine LESTR, differing by the presence of two amino acids in the N-terminal portion of the longer protein. Functional reconstitution of recombinant murine LESTR with recombinant heterotrimeric G proteins in baculovirus-infected insect cells showed that both receptor variants mediate stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha activation of the pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein Gi2. Receptor subtype-specific reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis revealed differential expression of the two receptor mRNA in lymphoid tissues and brain, indicating that distinct functions are mediated by the two receptor isoforms in these tissues. The presence of LESTR mRNA in very early thymocytes as well as in immature (CD4+ CD8+) thymocytes suggests that both CD4 and LESTR are co-expressed and render developing human thymocytes susceptible for HIV entry, which may affect generation of both CD4+ CD8- and CD4- CD8+ mature lineages.

Mutations in the B2 bradykinin receptor reveal a different pattern of contacts for peptidic agonists and peptidic antagonists

The B2 bradykinin receptor, a seven-helix transmembrane receptor, binds the inflammatory mediator bradykinin (BK) and the structurally related peptide antagonist HOE-140. The binding of HOE-140 and the binding of bradykinin are mutually exclusive and competitive. Fifty-four site-specific receptor mutations were made. BK's affinity is reduced 2200-fold by F261A, 490-fold by T265A, 60-fold by D286A, and 3-10-fold by N200A, D268A, and Q290A. In contrast, HOE-140 affinity is reduced less than 7-fold by F254A, F261A, Y297A, and Q262A. The almost complete discordance of mutations that affect BK binding versus HOE-140 binding is surprising, but it was paralleled by the effect of single changes in BK and HOE-140. [Ala9]BK and [Ala6]BK are reduced in receptor binding affinity 27,000- and 150-fold, respectively, while [Ala9]HOE-140 affinity is reduced 7-fold and [Ala6]HOE-140 affinity is unchanged. NMR spectroscopy of all of the peptidic analogs of BK or HOE-140 revealed a beta-turn at the C terminus. Models of the receptor-ligand complex suggested that bradykinin is bound partially inside the helical bundle of the receptor with the amino terminus emerging from the extracellular side of helical bundle. In these models a salt bridge occurs between Arg9 and Asp286; the models also place Phe8 in a hydrophobic pocket midway through the transmembrane region. Models of HOE-140 binding to the receptor place its beta-turn one alpha-helical turn deeper and closer to helix 7 and helix 1 as compared with bradykinin-receptor complex models.

Molecular cloning and characterization of the human anaphylatoxin C3a receptor

In a human neutrophil cDNA library, an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor, HNFAG09, with 37% nucleotide identity to the C5a receptor (C5a-R, CD88) was identified. A novel feature of this gene, unlike C5a-R and other G-protein-coupled receptors, is the presence of an extraordinarily large predicted extracellular loop comprised of in excess of 160 amino acid residues between transmembrane domains 4 and 5. Northern blot analysis revealed that expression of mRNA for this receptor in human tissues, while similar, was distinct from C5a-R expression. Although there were differences in expression, transcripts for both receptors were detected in tissues throughout the body and the central nervous system. Mammalian cells stably expressing HNFAG09 specifically bound 125I-C3a and responded to a C3a carboxyl-terminal analogue synthetic peptide and to human C3a but not to rC5a with a robust calcium mobilization response. HNFAG09 encodes the human anaphylatoxin C3a receptor.

Molecular cloning and functional expression of murine JE (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) and murine macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha receptors: evidence for two closely linked C-C chemokine receptors on chromosome 9

We have isolated cDNA clones that encode two closely related, murine C-C chemokine receptors. Both receptors are members of the G-protein-coupled, seven-transmembrane domain family of receptors and are most closely related to the human monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptor. Expression of each of the receptors was detected in murine monocyte/macrophage cell lines, but not in nonhematopoietic lines. Expression of these receptors in Xenopus oocytes revealed that one receptor signaled in response to low nanomolar concentrations of murine JE, whereas the second receptor was activated by murine macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 1alpha and the human chemokines MIP-1beta and RANTES. Binding studies revealed high affinity binding of radiolabeled mJE to the mJE receptor and murine MIP-1alpha to the second receptor. Chromosomal localization indicated that the two receptor genes were clustered within 80 kilobases of each other on mouse chromosome 9. Creation of receptor chimeras suggested that the amino terminus was critically involved in mediating signal transduction and ligand specificity of the mJE receptor, but not the mMIP-1alpha receptor. The identification and cloning of two functional murine chemokine receptors provides important new tools for investigating the roles of these potent cytokines in vivo.

Extension of recombinant human RANTES by the retention of the initiating methionine produces a potent antagonist

Extension of recombinant human RANTES by a single residue at the amino terminus is sufficient to produce a potent and selective antagonist. RANTES is a proinflammatory cytokine that promotes cell accumulation and activation in chronic inflammatory diseases. When mature RANTES was expressed heterologously in Escherichia coli, the amino-terminal initiating methionine was not removed by the endogenous amino peptidases. This methionylated protein was fully folded but completely inactive in RANTES bioassays of calcium mobilization and chemotaxis of the promonocytic cell line THP-1. However, when assayed as an antagonist of both RANTES and macrophage inflammatory polypeptide-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) in these assays, the methionylated RANTES (Met-RANTES) inhibited the actions of both chemokines. T cell chemotaxis was similarly inhibited. The antagonistic effect was selective since Met-RANTES had no effect on interleukin-8- or monocyte chemotractant protein-1-induced responses in these cells. Met-RANTES can compete with both [125I]RANTES and [125I]IMP-1 alpha binding to THP-1 cells or to stably transfected HEK cells recombinantly expressing their common receptor, CC-CKR-1. These data show that the integrity of the amino terminus of RANTES is crucial to receptor binding and cellular activation.

The promiscuous chemokine binding profile of the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines is primarily localized to sequences in the amino-terminal domain

The Duffy antigen (DARC) is a promiscuous chemokine receptor that also binds Plasmodium vivax. DARC belongs to a family of heptahelical chemokine receptors that includes specific (IL-8RA) and shared (IL-8RB) IL-8 receptors. Ligand binding specificity of IL-8 receptors was localized to the amino-terminal extracellular (E1) domain. To determine the basis for promiscuous chemokine binding by DARC, a chimeric receptor composed of the E1 domain of DARC and hydrophobic helices and loops from IL-8RB (DARCe1/IL-8RB) was constructed. Scatchard analysis of stable transfectants demonstrated that the DARCe1/IL-8RB chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and melanoma growth stimulating activity (MGSA) with KD values almost identical to the native receptors. The hybrid receptor also bound RANTES, MCP-1, and MGSA-E6A (which binds DARC, but not IL-8RB), but not MIP-1 alpha, similarly to DARC. Ligand binding to DARC transfectants was unaltered by anti-Fy3, but inhibited by Fy6, which binds an epitope in the E1 domain. The epitope recognized by Fy3 was localized to the third extracellular loop by analysis of insect cells expressing chimeric receptors composed of complementary portions of DARC and IL-8RB. These findings implicate the E1 domain of DARC in multispecific chemokine binding.

Probing the "message:address" sites for chemoattractant binding to the C5a receptor. Mutagenesis of hydrophilic and proline residues within the transmembrane segments

The C5a anaphylatoxin ligand-receptor interaction on polymorphonuclear granulocytes stimulates chemotaxis, degranulation, and the oxidative burst. The receptor is a member of the large G-protein-coupled family. The ligand is a cationic peptide of 72 amino acids derived from the C5 component of complement and has been shown to have a number of structural requirements for interaction with the receptor. In order to probe the potential interaction sites between ligand and receptor, we constructed a series of mutated receptor molecules, targeting cysteines, prolines, and additional amino acids of interest because of combinations of charge or hydrophobicity and putative location with respect to the membrane. Transfected mutant receptors were analyzed for cell surface expression, ligand binding, and ligand-activated phospholipase C activity. The receptors created can be placed generally in four distinct classes: those which bind and signal like the natural receptor; those which bind but fail to transduce signals; those which are expressed but neither bind nor transduce signal; and those which are not expressed at the cell surface.

Mutation of glutamate 199 of the human C5a receptor defines a binding site for ligand distinct from the receptor N terminus

C5a, a potent chemoattractant for monocytes, neutrophils, and other leukocytes, binds to a cell surface receptor of the seven-transmembrane superfamily. Here we report the effects of substituting Gln for Glu199 of the human C5a receptor (hC5aR) expressed in a model cell system for chemoattractant receptor signaling, the rat basophilic leukemia cell line RBL-2H3. Both the binding affinity for hC5a and the EC50 for subsequent cellular signals are reduced 5-10-fold by this substitution. A peptide mimic of the C terminus of C5a also binds to, and activates, hC5aR. The response to this peptide is reduced in cells bearing mutated hC5aR, indicating that the mutation affects interactions with the C terminus of hC5a. The C-terminal peptide contains only two basic residues, a Lys and an Arg (assumed to be analogous to Lys68 and Arg74 of hC5a), which could act as counter-ions for Glu199 of the receptor. If the counter-ion on hC5a was Arg74, then it would be expected that intact hC5a and hC5a des-Arg74 would have identical affinities and potencies when interacting with mutant hC5aR. It was found, however, that the binding affinity and potency (for receptor signaling events) of hC5a des-Arg74 was always lower than for intact hC5a. Furthermore, the equivalent C-terminal peptide to hC5a des-Arg74 (i.e. lacking the C-terminal Arg) could partially activate the wild type but not the mutant receptor, whereas the converse peptide, containing Arg but containing Met instead of Lys, had equal potencies for both wild type and mutant receptors. Taken together these data indicate that Glu199 of hC5aR is not involved in an interaction with Arg74 of hC5a, but may interact with Lys68 of hC5a. Mutation of Glu199 defines a second ligand binding site on hC5aR, distinct from the previously characterized site on the receptor N terminus. Unlike the N-terminal binding site, this second site is associated not just with the interaction with hC5a, but also with receptor activation.

Arginine 206 of the C5a receptor is critical for ligand recognition and receptor activation by C-terminal hexapeptide analogs

C5a is a 74-amino-acid glycoprotein whose receptor is a member of the rhodopsin superfamily. While antagonists have been generated to many of these receptors, similar efforts directed at family members whose natural ligands are proteins have met with little success. The recent development of hexapeptide analogs of C5a has allowed us to begin elucidation of the molecular events that lead to activation by combining a structure/activity study of the ligand with receptor mutagenesis. Removal of the hexapeptide's C-terminal arginine reduces affinity by 100-fold and eliminates the ability of the ligand to activate the receptor. Both the guanidino side chain and the free carboxyl of the arginine participate in the interaction. The guanidino group makes the energy-yielding contact with the receptor, while the free carboxylate negates "electrostatic" interference with Arg-206 of the receptor. It is the apparent movement Arg-206 induced by this set of interactions that is responsible for activation, since conversion of Arg-206 to alanine eliminates the agonist activity of the hexapeptides. Surprisingly, activation is a nearly energy-neutral event and may reflect the binding process rather than the final resting site of the ligand.

G protein-coupled receptor structure and function: the impact of disease-causing mutations

Just as the discovery of 'inborn errors of metabolism' in humans contributed to our basic understanding of normal enzymatic pathways, so can genetic defects in signal transduction help to elucidate the functions normally subserved by different GPCR pathways. Identification and characterization of naturally occurring GPCR mutations not only has inherent value in understanding the molecular basis of disease, but can also accelerate progress in understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in GPCR synthesis, transport to the membrane, ligand binding, activation and deactivation.

Structure, function and cellular expression of complement anaphylatoxin receptors

The past year has seen significant advances in determining the important structural-functional domains of the complement C5a anaphylatoxin receptor. The current model suggests a two-site binding motif in which part of the amino-terminal extracellular domain of the receptor is recognized first by the amino-terminal end and disulfide-linked core of the C5a ligand. This is followed by interaction of the carboxy-terminal end of C5a with a second, and as yet undefined, site on the receptor that results in activating appropriate signal transduction pathways via receptor coupled G proteins. Another recent advance has been the discovery that the C5a receptor is expressed on non-myeloid cells, suggesting that C5a confers previously unexpected functions on certain target tissue cells, including bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells, hepatocytes, astrocytes, and vascular endothelial cells.