The stigma of epilepsy: a European perspective

Who is more important in stigmatization, family or friends?

INTRODUCTION

Although the knowledge about epilepsy is rapidly increasing, the rate of stigmatization still remains high among patients. Since stigmatization is a condition that reduces the quality of life of patients and adversely affects the treatment response, it is very important to reveal the contributing factors. In this study, it was aimed to investigate which of the current social support resources of the patients are related to stigmatization, whether the support received from family or friends and a special person.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients with epilepsy (30 males and 30 females) were included in the study. Sociodemographic data form, stigma scale of epilepsy, and multidimensional scale of perceived social support were administered to all participants.

RESULTS

Duration of education from sociodemographic variables and duration of epilepsy from clinical variables were associated with stigma scores (for each other, p < 0.01). While a negative correlation was determined between friend support, special person support scores, and total social support score and stigma scores (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively), no significant relationship was detected between family support score and stigma score.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the study show that the support of a friend and a special person may be more important than the family support in patients with epilepsy. When evaluating these patients, questioning the type and adequacy of social support that they receive and taking necessary interventions (such as forming peer support groups) may be helpful in reducing the perceived stigmatization.

Social impairment and stigma in genetic generalized epilepsies

INTRODUCTION

Patients with epilepsy have poor social outcome. Multifactorial factors are usually involved, but among them, stigma features may have an important role. Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs) were previously considered "benign" syndromes. The aim of our study was to assess social impairment and stigma in GGE and to evaluate differences between the following GGE subsyndromes: juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE), and generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone (GTCSA). Additionally, we compared these outcomes with outcomes from a cohort of patients with epilepsy with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS), a severe and difficult-to-treat syndrome. Results were compared with social data from the general population.

METHODS

Adult patients with epilepsy with a previously classified GGE or MTLE-HS were consecutively invited to fill in a sociodemographic and stigma questionnaire in outpatient clinic. Clinical data and psychiatric comorbidities were retrieved from clinical notes.

RESULTS

Questionnaires from 333 patients were obtained: 226/67% from patients with GGE (JME: 106/31.8%, GTCSA: 74/22.2%, and JAE: 46/13.8%) and 107/32.1% from patients with MTLE-HS. We found that patients with GGE have a good academic achievement but they have increased difficulties in finding a partner, higher rates of divorce, and a reduced number of children per woman and per man when compared with general population. We also observed that patients with GGE have higher rates of unemployment (22.6%) and lower monthly income than general population. Severe problems in housing were only seen in GGEs. Of these, 3 patients (1.3%) were in homeless condition. Over half (52%) of patients with MTLE-HS and over a quarter (28%) of patients with GGE experienced felt stigma. Psychiatric comorbidity was highly prevalent among GGE (34.1%), especially in patients with refractory epilepsy. Mood and anxiety disorders were the most prevalent conditions. No other significant differences were found between GGE subsyndromes.

DISCUSSION

We found an impairment in every social domain assessed (except in level of education) when compared with general population. Most of the social outcome parameters were unexpectedly close or similar to MTLE-HS or even worse as it was the prevalence of homelessness among GGE. Social impairment is underdiagnosed and might be considered in clinical practice even in syndromes for some time considered benign such as GGE.

Anxiety disorders in outpatient clinics of epilepsy in tertiary care hospitals: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although anxiety disorders (ADs) occur frequently in people with epilepsy (PWE) and impair quality of life and treatment outcomes, current efforts to categorize and investigate AD subtypes in PWE remain insufficient. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to determine the current prevalence rates of any AD type and various AD subtypes in PWE managed by outpatient clinics.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched to identify and select studies that assessed the prevalence of ADs or individual AD subtypes in adult PWE under the routine care of outpatient epilepsy clinics in tertiary hospitals. Only studies that used gold-standard diagnostic tools for assessing ADs were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The database search ultimately identified 15 studies, of which 9 provided current prevalence rates of any type of AD. The pooled estimated prevalence of any AD was 26.1 %. Of the 15 total studies, 13 provided current prevalence rates of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), revealing an overall estimated prevalence of 18.2 %. In terms of current prevalence rates, GAD was highest, followed by agoraphobia, social phobia, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Among PWE managed in the outpatient epilepsy clinics of tertiary care hospitals, the current prevalence of any AD was 26.1 %, and GAD was the most prevalent subtype of AD.

Epilepsy treatment gap and stigma reduction in Pakistan: A tested public awareness model

High epilepsy treatment gap (ETG) and stigma remain a major issue globally. Addressing the basic problems is necessary, for advances in management to be effective. According to the 1987 population-based study, prevalence of active epilepsy in Pakistan is 0.98% with 98.1% ETG in rural and 72.5% in urban population and the presence of stigma. These dismal figures were a stimulus for our reported activities. Recognizing the problems faced by 2.2 million people with epilepsy (PWE) in the country, a group of volunteers mostly from the medical community has attempted to address these issues with an ongoing sustained awareness program over the last 18 years, working within the constraints of prevailing healthcare system, with gratifying results. In 2001, under a nongovernmental organization (NGO), the Comprehensive Epilepsy Control Programme of Pakistan (CECP) was launched to address the various paucities in knowledge, attitude, and practice about epilepsy; especially ETG and stigma. The CECP has two primary components: Epilepsy Support Pakistan (CECP-ESP) for awareness and mass education and National Epilepsy Centre (CECP-NEC) for holistic management of PWE, professional education, and research. Both work in tandem, and there is an overlap of their activities. This article only evaluates the outcome of sustained awareness activities of the CECP-ESP, through direct and indirect measures after 5 years of its initiation. A significant reduction in ETG and stigma exclusively through public awareness has been possible. This model can be easily replicated by any country, with involvement of the local population.

Does the new Korean term for epilepsy reduce the stigma for Korean adults with epilepsy?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in stigma, disclosure management of epilepsy, and knowledge about epilepsy between patients with epilepsy who recognized and did not recognize the new Korean term for epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study. The Stigma Scale-Revised, the Disclosure Management Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and a questionnaire assessing knowledge about epilepsy were used. The set of questionnaires had two versions, using either the old or new name for epilepsy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

A total of 341 patients with epilepsy and 509 family members were recruited. Approximately 62% of patients felt some degree of epilepsy-related stigma. Mild stigma, severe concealment of epilepsy diagnosis, and increased knowledge about epilepsy were independently identified as factors associated with recognition of the new term in patients. Recognition of the new term was more prevalent in patients and family members with higher education, female family members, and family members having patients with younger age at seizure onset and shorter duration of epilepsy. There were no significant differences between the two types of questionnaires. About 81% of patients and 93% of family members had a positive attitude about renaming epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

The use of the new Korean term for epilepsy (cerebroelectric disorder) increased knowledge about epilepsy but did not reduce stigma and concealment of epilepsy diagnosis in Korean adults with epilepsy. Higher education may be an important factor for knowing the new term in patients and family members.

Anxiety disorders in predominantly African American and Caribbean American adults with intractable epilepsy: The role of perceived epilepsy stigma

INTRODUCTION

Anxiety disproportionately affects people with epilepsy (PWE) and leads to poor outcomes. Yet, risk factors are not well understood especially among underserved groups. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify epilepsy-specific predictors of anxiety disorders in predominantly African American and Caribbean American PWE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prevalence of anxiety disorders was established via diagnostic interview (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)). We identified the extent to which aspects of seizure burden (seizure frequency, seizure severity, convulsive vs. nonconvulsive seizures), seizure worry, and perceived epilepsy stigma were associated with anxiety disorder diagnosis. Finally, logistic regression assessed the overall and independent contributions of significant risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 60 participants (62% women, 52% African American, 27% Caribbean American, 20% Hispanic/Latino) with an average of 2 seizures per month. Nearly half of the sample (43%) had ≥1 anxiety disorder, with 62% of affected individuals qualifying for agoraphobia. Those with anxiety disorders tended to have convulsive seizures (p = 0.037) and endorsed greater seizure worry (p = 0.012), more general symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.005), and worse perceived epilepsy stigma (p = 0.003). Logistic regression accounted for 28% to 37.6% of the variance in anxiety disorder diagnostic status and correctly classified 73% of cases; however, only perceived epilepsy stigma made a unique contribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety disorders were prevalent in these predominantly African American and Caribbean American PWE. Epilepsy-specific risk factors included convulsive seizures, seizure worry, and perceived epilepsy stigma. Interventions aimed at treating anxiety disorders in diverse PWE may especially benefit from targeting stigma beliefs.

Epilepsy-associated stigma from the perspective of people with epilepsy and the community in Italy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the stigma related to epilepsy from the perspective of people with epilepsy (PWE) and from the Italian community (Rome and central Italy); moreover, the impact of the perceived stigma on the mood and quality of life of patients was also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 100 PWE and 202 nonepileptic subjects (NES). Both PWE and NES completed an Italian version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE), a 24-items questionnaire that has been demonstrated to allow the quantification of the stigma perception by patients and people from the community. Moreover, the PWE fulfilled a 3-item Jacoby's Stigma Scale, the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31 [Q3])), and Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) questionnaires for the evaluation of the quality of life and depressive symptoms. The results of the SSE were correlated with clinical and demographic details of PWE and NES, as well as the Q31 and BDI-II scores in PWE.

RESULTS

The SSE scores were significantly higher in NES with respect to PWE (respectively 47.1 vs 39.5, p < .001). Forty-two percent of PWE reported feeling stigmatized, with 5% reporting feeling highly stigmatized. In PWE, the perceived stigma was not correlated with seizure frequency but was significantly associated with worse quality of life, more severe depressive symptoms, and higher number of AEDs. The multiple regression analysis showed that the quality-of-life overall score and Q31 subscale exploring "social function" are the most significant predictors of stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

By using an Italian translation of the SSE questionnaire, even if we cannot consider our sample representative of the whole Italian community our study evidenced higher rates of stigma related to epilepsy in NES than in PWE. The PWE still experience feelings of stigmatization strongly correlated with higher depressive symptoms and worse quality of life that has proven to be the most significant predictor of stigma. Finally, seizure frequency does not affect the perceived stigma, which is instead significantly influenced by antiepileptic therapy.

Living with epilepsy in adolescence-A qualitative study of young people's experiences in Singapore: Peer socialization, autonomy, and self-esteem

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews of quantitative research on the effects of childhood epilepsy have established its association with higher levels of psychiatric diagnosis, externalizing and internalizing problems, lower health-related quality of life, social competence, and poorer academic achievements, compared with their peers. However, much less is known about young people's experiences of living with epilepsy and its impact on their development from their own perspectives.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 young people aged between 13 and 16 years. Participants were recruited as part of a larger mixed methods study examining individual and family influences on outcomes for young people with epilepsy. These young people attended an epilepsy clinic in KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. The framework approach to data management and analyses involved both inductive and deductive generation of themes.

RESULTS

Findings from young people's interviews provided in-depth descriptions of stressful circumstances encountered. Interconnectedness between severity of the impairment and its impact on key developmental tasks, such as independence, autonomy, and social development, were emphasized. Seizures and illness-related demands disrupted their day-to-day functioning and challenged their abilities to meet these tasks. In addition to these impairment effects, young people's experiences of social exclusion were also affected by social and environmental factors, which act as systemic barriers to participation. In turn, this has an effect on their self-esteem. Nevertheless, young people reported positive experiences, such as support from both family and friends, which served as protective factors against the stress of living with a chronic medical condition.

CONCLUSION

The demands of epilepsy affect various domains of young people's lives. In order to obtain a holistic understanding of young people's inclusion or exclusion to participation, it is necessary to consider impairment effects, barriers to doing, and barriers to being.

A scoping review of health-related stigma outcomes for high-burden diseases in low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND

Stigma is associated with health conditions that drive disease burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including HIV, tuberculosis, mental health problems, epilepsy, and substance use disorders. However, the literature discussing the relationship between stigma and health outcomes is largely fragmented within disease-specific siloes, thus limiting the identification of common moderators or mechanisms through which stigma potentiates adverse health outcomes as well as the development of broadly relevant stigma mitigation interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to provide a critical overview of the breadth of research on stigma for each of the five aforementioned conditions in LMICs, including their methodological strengths and limitations.

RESULTS

Across the range of diseases and disorders studied, stigma is associated with poor health outcomes, including help- and treatment-seeking behaviors. Common methodological limitations include a lack of prospective studies, non-representative samples resulting in limited generalizability, and a dearth of data on mediators and moderators of the relationship between stigma and health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing effective stigma mitigation interventions at scale necessitates transdisciplinary longitudinal studies that examine how stigma potentiates the risk for adverse outcomes for high-burden health conditions in community-based samples in LMICs.

A systematic review protocol of stigma among children and adolescents with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a neurological condition that is highly prevalent among children and adolescents with 80% of the victims living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Epilepsy is associated with high levels of both perceived and enacted stigma, which vary geographically and greatly affects the victims' quality of life and self-esteem. High rates of stigma are also a significant barrier to accessing medical care. Perceived and enacted epilepsy-related stigma is associated with various sociodemographic and clinical factors, which vary from place to place. Therefore, this review will determine the prevalence of stigma of epilepsy among children and adolescents and the associated factors worldwide.

METHODS

We will search for literature in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases as well as grey literature. We will also search via Google Scholar to capture relevant literature that may not be in the searched databases. We will then screen reference lists of included studies for more studies. Studies that have documented the prevalence of epilepsy-related perceived or enacted stigma and the associated factors will be eligible for inclusion. Data will be extracted in duplicates using a pre-piloted tool consisting of study and participant characteristics as well as pre-determined factors associated with epilepsy. Heterogeneity will be assessed by a forest plot and quantified by I2 statistic, and in case it is high, results will be reported as a narrative and it will further be explored by subgroup analysis. In case of homogeneity, meta-analysis will be done. Bias will be assessed using a critical appraisal tool developed for prevalence studies. The strength of evidence among the studies will be assessed using the GRADE approach.

DISCUSSION

Findings from this review will document the burden of stigma of epilepsy and the common contributing factors, which will form the building blocks of interventions that address this health challenge.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017058957.

[Psychometric properties of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy]

AIM

To assess the psychometric properties of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy, a short simple to complete questionnaire to quickly and reliably determine the presence and the level of perceived stigma in a particular patient, as well as to assess the prevalence, socio-demographic, clinical and socio-psychological factors associated with this phenomenon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 398 patients with epilepsy. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the psychometric characteristics of the scale.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The EFA showed a two-factor scale structure explaining 57.25% of the variance. Values of GFI 0.948, CFI 0.927 and RMSEA 0.057 after the data correction show a good conformity of the model to the empirical data. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.862 for the scale, 0.815 for factor 1, 0.809 for factor 2, which indicates a high consistency of both the entire scale and its subscales. The Russian-language variant of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy is a short, economical to use tool with good psychometric properties for assessing perceived stigma in patients with epilepsy.

Knowledge, attitude, and believes of epilepsy in local communities of Saudi Arabia

Aim of the Study

To assess public knowledge, attitude, and believes toward the epilepsy among local community populations in Shaqra Area, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

An organized 14 questionnaire was prepared to analyze public knowledge attitudes and believes about epilepsy. Study was conducted randomly in common public places in Shaqra City, Saudi Arabia, during the months of April and May 2016. Sample size includes 155 males and 130 females from Shaqra City of Saudi Arabia.

Results

The study analyzed the 285 local public including 155 male and 130 female contributors. About 68.38% male contributors and 63.07% female contributors studied Diploma or Bachelor education program. Female contributors (71.53%) were aware about epilepsy as compared with male contributors (58.70%). Maximum number of female contributors (82.30%) believes that epilepsy is treated by medication as compared with male contributors (58.70%).

Conclusion

The knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of the epilepsy are found to be much improved in local community of Saudi Arabia. In the modern era, people assume that epilepsy is still due to evil spirit. Many contributors think there should be restrictions on driving and getting jobs in epilepsy patient. Public awareness and educational campaigns should be included in modern methods of education to develop well-knowledged community, which will improve the quality of life of epileptic patients.

A cross-sectional comparative study of perceived stigma between patients with epilepsy and patients living with HIV/AIDS in Accra, Ghana

BACKGROUND

Health-related stigma is a great challenge to the treatment of diseases. In epilepsy like other conditions, it causes affected individuals to conceal their illness. In this study, we described stigma perceived by patients with epilepsy at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), a tertiary referral facility, and the Accra Psychiatry Hospital in Ghana (APH). We then compared the perception of stigma in patients with epilepsy to stigma perceived by persons living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (PLWHA), a chronic communicable disease stigmatized in Ghana.

METHODS

A total of 351 patients with epilepsy were recruited from both sites by systematic random sampling and interviewed. The Kilifi Stigma Scale for Epilepsy was used to determine individual patient's stigma score. Statistical analysis was done using multiple logistic regression analysis to control for the effect of measured independent variables that were significant on univariate analysis: age, gender, marital status, income, type of epilepsy, and the frequency of seizures, on the outcome variable. Comparative analysis of the mean stigma score in patients with epilepsy and persons living with HIV/AIDS was done using the Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank sum test).

RESULTS

The presence of perceived stigma using the Kilifi Stigma Score Estimation was 32.02% (62), 33.33% (49), and 28.88% (54) among respondents from KBTH, APH, and PLWHA respectively. Results from Wilcoxon rank sum test showed that the median stigma score between the three groups was significant; KBTH and APH (p-value; 0.0258), KBTH and PLWHA (p-value; 0.00001), and APH and PLWHA (p-value; 0.0000). Age (<40 years), seizure frequency, ethnic group (Ewe and Guan), and being divorced showed high odds for perceived stigma among KBTH patients with epilepsy. Having tertiary education led to lower odds for perceived stigma in epilepsy for APH patients with epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that epilepsy is associated with a high stigma perception. The perceived stigma was greater than stigma in PLWHAs in Accra. Stigma was affected by unemployment, ethnicity (Ewe and Guan), and uncontrolled seizures. Increasing age reduced perceived stigma and the management of patients with epilepsy in a psychiatric facility might have impacted negatively on the perceived stigma.

Assessment of components included in published societal perspective or QALY outcome economic analyses for antiepileptic drug treatment in chronic epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Antiepileptic drug (AED) treatments seek to control seizures with minimal or no adverse effects, effects which can substantially impact costs and outcomes for patients, caregivers, and third party payers. The First and Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine recommend inclusion of a societal reference case, even in studies conducted from a healthcare sector perspective, for comparability of findings across studies. Cost and outcome evaluation components include direct medical, non-direct medical-related (e.g. patient-time and transportation costs for treatment) and non-healthcare sectors (e.g. lost productivity).

AREAS COVERED

Guided by Second Panel recommendations, this review developed an overall impact inventory and detailed adverse effect impact inventory to assess the scope and methods in published economic evaluations of AED treatments for adults with chronic epilepsy. Societal perspective evaluations or evaluations that utilized quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as an outcome were reviewed. The majority of reviewed articles were healthcare sector perspective studies, methods for estimating QALYs varied widely, and a minority considered specific AED treatment adverse effects.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Only considering a healthcare sector perspective fails to provide full information for patients on AED treatments. Using an impact inventory to guide study scope and design will facilitate full reporting of costs and benefits.

Marriage in epilepsy: The impact of the question in knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys

BACKGROUND

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) questionnaire-based surveys have captured negative attitudes towards marriage involving people with epilepsy (PWE). The attitudes may vary according to the nature of the question posed, whether personal or generic, in addition to many other covariates.

METHODS

We carried out meta-proportion and -regression analyses of epilepsy-related KAP surveys published between 1970 and 2016 in the medical literature analysis retrieval system online (MEDLINE) database.

RESULTS

The pooled estimate of the proportion of those responding positively to the marriage question was 0.45 (95% confidence interval (_95%CI): 0.35 to 0.54; I²_res = 99.89%). The pooled proportion of positive responders to a personal question (0.40; _95%CI: 0.35 to 0.46) was significantly lower than those responding positively to a generic question (0.64; _95%CI: 0.57 to 0.70) (P = 0.001). When modeled individually in regression analyses, only the continent of origin of the survey (P = 0.001; tau²: 0.06; I²_res: 99.8%; adjusted R²: 11.4%) and subject population type (P = 0.02; tau²: 0.07; I²_res: 99.9%; adjusted R²: 4.2%) were associated with the pooled estimate of positive responders to the question on marriage.

CONCLUSIONS

Personal questions probing the possibility of marriage of self or family members to someone with epilepsy bring about negative attitudes more often than generic questions inquiring the marriage-worthiness of PWE.

Sociocultural aspects and different types of stigmatization in epilepsy

This literature review deals with knowledge and beliefs about epilepsy and with the attitude of patients, relatives, and society as a whole towards epilepsy. It discusses the stigma that is associated with the  disease and has a strong impact on patients with epilepsy and their  families. The problems of stigma or related concepts in different countries are analyzed.

Psychological treatments for adults and children with epilepsy: Evidence-based recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force

Given the significant impact that psychosocial factors and epilepsy treatments can have on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of individuals with epilepsy and their families, there is great clinical interest in the role of psychological evaluation and treatments to improve HRQOL and comorbidities. Therefore, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) charged the Psychology Task Force with the development of recommendations for clinical care based on evaluation of the evidence from their recent Cochrane review of psychological treatments in individuals with epilepsy. The literature search for a recent Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials investigating psychological treatments for individuals with epilepsy constitutes the key source of evidence for this article. To provide practical guidance to service providers, we provide ratings on study research designs based on (1) the American Academy of Neurology's Level of Evidence system and (2) the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. This paper is the culmination of an international collaboration process involving pediatric and adult psychologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and neuropsychiatrists. The process and conclusions were reviewed and approved by the ILAE Executive Committee. The strongest evidence for psychological interventions was identified for the most common mental health problems, including depression, neurocognitive disturbances, and medication adherence. Psychological interventions targeting the enhancement of HRQOL and adherence and a decrease in comorbidity symptoms (anxiety, depression) should be incorporated into comprehensive epilepsy care. There is a range of psychological strategies (ie, cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies) that show promise for improving the lives of persons with epilepsy, and clinical recommendations are provided to assist epilepsy health care providers in treating the comorbidities and challenges associated with epilepsy and its treatments.

Correlates of stigma in adults with epilepsy: A systematic review of quantitative studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to identify quantitative correlates, predictors, and outcomes of stigma in adults with epilepsy living in Western countries.

METHODS

To identify relevant literature, four academic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus) were systematically searched using key terms related to stigma and epilepsy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three research papers reporting findings from 25 quantitative studies of correlates of stigma in epilepsy were identified. The findings suggest that stigma can be predicted by demographic, illness-related, and psychosocial factors, although associations were found to be highly culturally specific. Outcomes of stigma in people with epilepsy were replicated more consistently across cultures, and its impact was significant. Detrimental effects included both worse physical health, including less effective management of the condition, and reduced psychological well-being, including difficulties such as depression and anxiety.

IMPLICATIONS

Educational initiatives and therapeutic interventions that aim to address stigma in people with epilepsy are recommended; however, these need to be culturally informed to ensure that they are valid and effective.

Investigating the awareness, behavior, and attitude toward epilepsy among university students in Benghazi, Libya

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the level of knowledge regarding epilepsy and attitudes prevalent toward people with epilepsy (PWE) among Libyan university students in comparison with international data.

METHODS

A self-administrated questionnaire on awareness regarding epilepsy and behaviors toward PWE was distributed among undergraduate students enrolled in the University of Benghazi. The collected data were analyzed against responses from an Italian survey that utilized a similar questionnaire to explore epilepsy-related knowledge and attitudes among Italian university students in Rome (Mecarelli et al., 2007).

RESULTS

Out of the 500 interviewed students, 96% successfully completed the survey. Further, 96.6% asserted that they possessed some knowledge regarding epilepsy, gained mainly from their families (76.6%). A total of 57.5% considered epilepsy to be a psychiatric disorder while 11.6% recommended psychological tests for the diagnosis of epilepsy. Moreover, 37.5% believed in ancient superstitions, such as possession by evil forces, as the underlying cause of the condition, and 31.8% recommended traditional remedies to cure it. Further, 66.6% deemed epilepsy as a barrier for career prospects, 41% indicated that it presents an impediment in participation in sports, and 35% considered it as an obstacle in marriage. Additionally, epilepsy was perceived as a severe illness by 53.3% of the respondents and considered to be a moderately severe condition by 43.7%. The responses were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) against the responses from the Italian study.

CONCLUSION

There is a reasonable level of awareness regarding epilepsy among Libyan students, though a lack of accuracy in the acquired knowledge exists. The ancient misconceptions regarding the nature of epilepsy and negative attitudes toward PWE appear to be rather common among the Libyan students. Consequently, the discrepancies in the views between the two surveys concerning the ways in which epilepsy is perceived and PWE are treated were extremely evident, thus reflecting the already established view that epilepsy faces greater stigma as a health condition in developing countries in comparison with Western nations.

Quality of Life and Stigma in Epilepsy, Perspectives from Selected Regions of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa

Epilepsy is an important and common worldwide public health problem that affects people of all ages. A significant number of individuals with epilepsy will be intractable to medication. These individuals experience an elevated mortality rate and negative psychosocial consequences of recurrent seizures. Surgery of epilepsy is highly effective to stop seizures in well-selected individuals, and seizure freedom is the most desirable result of epilepsy treatment due to the positive improvements in psychosocial function and the elimination of excess mortality associated with intractable epilepsy. Globally, there is inadequate data to fully assess epilepsy-related quality of life and stigma, although the preponderance of information we have points to a significant negative impact on people with epilepsy (PWE) and families of PWE. This review of the psychosocial impact of epilepsy focuses on regions of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa that have been analyzed with population study approaches to determine the prevalence of epilepsy, treatment gaps, as well as factors impacting psychosocial function of PWE and their families. This review additionally identifies models of care for medically intractable epilepsy that have potential to significantly improve psychosocial function.

Demographic and Clinical Correlates of Seizure Frequency: Findings from the Managing Epilepsy Well Network Database

Background and Purpose

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease that represents a tremendous burden on both patients and society in general. Studies have addressed how demographic variables, socioeconomic variables, and psychological comorbidity are related to the quality of life (QOL) of people with epilepsy (PWE). However, there has been less focus on how these factors may differ between patients who exhibit varying degrees of seizure control. This study utilized data from the Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with the aim of elucidating differences in demographic variables, depression, and QOL between adult PWE.

Methods

Demographic variables, depression, and QOL were compared between PWE who experience clinically relevant differences in seizure occurrence.

Results

Gender, ethnicity, race, education, income, and relationship status did not differ significantly between the seizure-frequency categories (p>0.05). People with worse seizure control were significantly younger (p=0.039), more depressed (as assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire) (p=0.036), and had lower QOL (as determined using the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy for Adults scale) (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The present results underscore the importance of early screening, detection, and treatment of depression, since these factors relate to both seizure occurrence and QOL in PWE.

Development of the perceived stigma scale and the concealment of epilepsy scale for the Turkish population

The aim of this study was to develop two culture-specific scales to measure the level of felt stigma, and level of concealment of Turkish adult people with epilepsy (PWE). For this purpose, a 10-item felt-stigma scale and a 17-item disclosure of epilepsy scale were developed and then applied to 200 adult PWE. After item and factor analyses of the stigma scale, the 10 items with a one-factor solution explained 45.6% of the variance with a 0.86 internal consistency value. Higher scores represent higher felt stigma. The concealment of epilepsy scale has 17 items loaded on one factor, which explained 45.1% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.92. The higher the score, the higher the concealment of illness by the participant. For convergent validity, the relationship between stigma and disclosure scales was examined, and a positive significant relation (r=0.64, p<0.000) was found.

Quality of life in Malaysian children with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Children with epilepsy (CWE) are at risk of impaired quality of life (QOL), and achieving a good QOL is an important treatment goal among CWE. To date, there are no published multiethnic QOL studies in Asia. Our study aimed to: i) investigate the QOL of multiethnic CWE in Malaysia as reported by both the child and parent; ii) determine the level of agreement between child-self report and parent-proxy report QOL; and iii) explore potential correlates of sociodemographic, epilepsy characteristics, and family functioning with QOL in CWE.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of all CWE aged 8-18years old with at least 6months' duration of epilepsy, minimum reading level of primary school education Year 1, and attending mainstream education. Quality of life was measured using the parent-proxy and child self-report of Quality of Life Measurement for Children with Epilepsy (CHEQOL-25) questionnaire. Total and subscale CHEQOL-25 scores were obtained. The levels of parent-child agreement were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Family functioning was assessed using the General functioning subscale (GF-12).

RESULTS

A total of 115 CWE and their parents participated in the study. In general, Malaysian parents rated children's total CHEQOL-25 scores poorer than the children themselves [mean total parent score: 68.56 (SD: 10.86); mean total child score: 71.82 (SD: 9.55)]. Agreement between child and parent on the CHEQOL-25 was poor to moderate (ICC ranged from 0.31-0.54), with greatest discordance in the epilepsy secrecy domain (ICC=0.31, p=0.026). Parent and child were more likely to agree on more external domains: intrapersonal/social (ICC=0.54, p<0.001) and interpersonal/emotional (ICC=0.50, p<0.001). Malay ethnicity, focal seizure and high seizure frequency (≥1 seizure per month) were associated with lower CHEQOL-25 scores. There was a significant but weak correlation between GF-12 and parent-proxy CHEQOL-25 Total Scores (r=-0.186, p=0.046).

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the importance to have the child's perspective of their QOL as the level of agreement between the parent and child reported scores were poor to moderate. Malaysian CWE of Malay ethnicity, those with focal seizures or high seizure frequency are at risk of poorer QOL.

Family Cohesion, Stigma, and Quality of Life in Dyads of Children With Epilepsy and Their Parents

Objective

To examine the mediating role of stigma on the links between family cohesion and quality of life (QoL) in children with epilepsy and their parents. Participants were 192 families attending three Portuguese public hospitals. Children and parents completed self-report measures of family cohesion, stigma, QoL, and health-related QoL (HRQoL). Neurologists assessed clinical variables. Structural equation modeling within the framework of the actor-partner interdependence model was used. The final model showed a good fit to the data, explaining 43% and 35% of the QoL outcomes of children and parents, respectively. Family cohesion was positively linked to QoL outcomes, directly for children and parents, and indirectly for children only, by way of negative links with perceived stigma. At the dyadic level, parents' perceptions of family cohesion were positively associated with children's HRQoL. A routine screening of those patients experiencing poorer HRQoL should include the assessment of family relationships and stigma.

A survey of epilepsy knowledge, attitudes and practice in school-aged children in Bangkok, Thailand

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the level of knowledge about epilepsy, attitude towards PWE and practice in school-aged children in Bangkok, Thailand. Significant findings from this study will be employed to develop a relevant and effective tool to educate children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Bangkok, Thailand, from August 2014 to December 2015. Study population included school-aged children between 9 and 14 years (4th to 8th grade). A structured age-appropriate, Thai culture-adjusted and simple 20-item questionnaire was used for this survey. The questionnaire comprised three domains which were eight items for knowledge (K), seven items for attitudes (A), and five items for practice (P). Descriptive and analytic statistics including Pearson's correlation were used to find correlation among KAP domains and age with KAP scores.

RESULTS

A total of 1040 students from 13 schools participated in our survey study. Mean age was 11.27 (SD 0.94). Some basic knowledge about epilepsy and practice of inserting objects into mouth of seizing persons account for a high magnitude of misunderstanding. Girls and older-aged children are associated with better positive attitudes towards epilepsy. It seems that educating children with knowledge of both epilepsy and first aid is necessary to improve positive attitudes among this age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the findings, our study suggests that a lack of knowledge in some aspects of KAP in children exists. Educational materials should contain basic knowledge about the simple pathogenesis of seizure, seizure types and seizure characteristics, and provide explanation as to why inserting objects into mouths of seizing persons is not recommended.

Validity of health insurance data to identify people with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Large administrative databases may prove useful to assess epilepsy-related comorbidity and mortality. Despite their increased use, their validity as data source in epilepsy is yet under-ascertained.

METHODS

Achmea is a large Dutch health insurance company covering about 25% of the population. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Achmea Health Insurance Database (AHID) over the period 2006-2009. To assess the validity of epilepsy codes in the AHID, we randomly invited 1000 individuals (age 18-75 years insured by Achmea), attending an epilepsy centre or a district hospital during 2006-2009, to participate. Informed consent was provided and 293 were eligible for inclusion. We compared the diagnostic codes for epilepsy in AHID with the diagnosis in their case-notes (reference standard). As additional measure of validity, we compared prevalence of epilepsy codes in AHID (based on anonymized data of all 26.297 subjects with this code in AHID) with epilepsy prevalence rates in the general Dutch population to estimate an age-specific standardized prevalence ratio.

RESULTS

We identified 293 participants with an epilepsy code in AHID. The majority (278) of them had a definite or possible diagnosis of epilepsy in the case-notes; i.e. a positive predictive value of 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). The overall prevalence of epilepsy codes in the AHID was slightly higher than the putative prevalence in the general Dutch population (7.4/1.000 vs. 6.8/1.000) with a Standardized Prevalence Ratio of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.08-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the validity of AHID data for a diagnosis of epilepsy and confirm previous work on using administrative data for epilepsy research.

The psychological costs of comparisons: Parents' social comparison moderates the links between family management of epilepsy and children's outcomes

Parents play a key role in how children deal with epilepsy. When diagnosed with health conditions, people seek comparison information from fellow patients and families, and this information has consequences for how they evaluate their situation. This study examined the moderating role of parents' social comparison orientation in the associations between family management (parental perceptions of family life difficulties and child's daily life) and adaptation outcomes of children with epilepsy (HRQoL and perceived stigma). Participants included 201 dyads of children with epilepsy and either their mother or father. The results showed that when parents perceived higher difficulties managing their child's epilepsy and/or reported that their child was more affected by this condition, children reported higher perceived stigma and worse HRQoL only when parents had a higher social comparison orientation. Our results are innovative in showing that when parents have a higher social comparison orientation, their children may be at increased risk of poorer outcomes.

‘I’d rather you didn’t come’: The impact of stigma on exercising with epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common but hidden disorder, leading to stigma in everyday life. Despite stigma being widely researched, little is known about the impact of stigma for people with epilepsy within a sports and exercise setting. Using constructionist grounded theory, we explored the barriers and adaptations to exercise for people with epilepsy. Three focus groups (2–3 participants per group) and three semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 participants in total). Stigma negatively impacted joining team sports, running groups, and disclosure to others. The effect of stigma was reduced by educating others about epilepsy, thus creating more awareness and understanding.

Deconstructing stigma in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: An exploratory study

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are classified as a mental disorder, the manifestations of which superficially resemble epileptic seizures. There is a notable lack of in-depth qualitative or quantitative studies investigating the stigma attached to PNES. The current study is an exploratory analysis into the nature of perceived stigma in those with PNES when compared with individuals with epilepsy. Individuals with epilepsy (n=78) and PNES (n=47) were recruited from a United Kingdom hospital or membership-led organizations for individuals living with seizures. Participants were asked to complete a series of questionnaires investigating health-related quality-of-life components (NEWQOL-6D), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (NDDI-E), seizure frequency and severity (LSSS-3), and illness perception (B-IPQ). Perceived stigma was measured using one question taken from the NEWQOL-6D. Individuals with PNES reported a greater level of perceived stigma than those with epilepsy (p=0.04). Our results indicate that the risk of experiencing perceived stigma in PNES was 42% higher than the risk in epilepsy. In epilepsy, but not PNES, perceived stigma was significantly associated with seizure frequency, anxiety, depression, and many of the sequelae of the condition. In both conditions, self-control was associated with stigma (rho≥0.34, p≤0.01). This study was exploratory, and so definitive conclusions cannot be made; however, our findings suggest that the majority (87.2%) of individuals with PNES reported experiencing some degree of perceived stigma, the risk of which is greater than that in epilepsy. Further research is needed into the prevalence, nature, and consequences of stigma in PNES.

Epilepsy and stigmatization in Turkey

Patients with epilepsy experience stigmatization quite often. Studies investigating stigmatization perceived by patients with epilepsy in Turkey are limited in number. In this study, we aimed to understand the relationship between stigmatization and psychopathology and also to identify the effects of stigmatization on the quality of life in epilepsy. Patients completed a socio-demographical data form and epilepsy information form. They were evaluated in terms of psychiatric diagnosis using SCID I and they were asked to complete SCL-90 R, Epilepsy Stigmatization Scale and SF 36. The percentages of patients who did and did not report perception of stigmatization were similar in the study group. Depression was the most common diagnosis followed by anxiety disorder. In comparison to patients who did not feel stigmatized, patients who reported perceived stigmatization had a higher frequency of generalized tonic clonic seizures and injuries during seizures and more frequently missed taking their medication. They also showed higher rates of both suicide attempts and psychopathology as evidenced by a higher rate of psychiatric diagnosis and higher score in all the subscales of SCL 90. With regard to their quality of life they were observed to be more disabled in the physical functioning, general health perception, vitality, social role functioning and mental health dimensions. A logistic regression analysis revealed that stigmatization was best predicted by three variables: history of suicide attempts, receiving a psychiatric diagnosis and higher score in SCL90PST. Our study has shown that psychopathology is a more significant predictor of stigmatization than the other variables related with seizure control.

Socialization characteristics in persons with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this report was to describe social behaviors and preferences in adults with epilepsy, including self-reported use of various socialization media (face-to-face and indirect communication) as well as perceived social barriers.

METHODS

1320 consecutive persons with epilepsy (PWEs) confirmed through inpatient video-EEG monitoring were administered a questionnaire on the day of their first appointment. The questionnaire was designed to assess preferences in socialization practices, frequency of interpersonal contact, use of social media, and perceived barriers to socialization. The survey was developed to gain a better understanding of the socialization behaviors and preferences of our patients for the future development of customized activities in our wellness program.

RESULTS

Our sample revealed higher rates of unemployment and single status as compared to the US Census of 2012. With regard socialization however, many were quite social (86% reported daily/weekly communication with friends and family via telephone, 71% saw relatives in person weekly, 68% saw friends weekly, and 65% reported using the computer daily/weekly to socialize). Facebook® was the preferred on-line social media. Indoor/solitary activities were most common with 63% stating they watch TV/read/use the computer followed by physical exercise and spending time outdoors (36%). The frequency of socialization with friends, relatives, and coworkers decreased with the respondents' age and the longer the respondent had carried the diagnosis of epilepsy. Respondents who were taking a greater number of AEDs or were considered refractory were less likely to consider participating in socialization-enhancing activities. The primary barriers to socialization that respondents endorsed were driving prohibition and medication side-effects. Respondents expressed the greatest interest in online support groups or educational programs (31%), office-based support groups (25%), and volunteering (19%).

CONCLUSION

Although the respondents indicate that they do face barriers to socialization, a majority report frequent communication with relatives and friends via phone, in-person and social media. When designing wellness interventions with this group of patients in the future, online, as well as face to face options for support appear to be desired by a number of PWEs.

Becoming comfortable with "my" epilepsy: Strategies that patients use in the journey from diagnosis to acceptance and disclosure

OBJECTIVE

Proponents of resilience theory have highlighted the importance of understanding the processes of resilience. The objective of the study was to explore how people with epilepsy reach a stage of being comfortable with their epilepsy. Identifying the processes used is important to developing effective self-management for people who are newly diagnosed with epilepsy.

METHOD

A grounded theory approach involving forty-nine consenting adult people with epilepsy (18 years and over), was used to explore their first-hand experiences of coming to terms with their epilepsy. Data were collected using one-to-one interview to elicit in-depth personal accounts of people with epilepsy's experiences of adjusting to their diagnosis of epilepsy. Using grounded theory's systematic inductive-deductive process data of analysis, the core findings that emerged from the open coding and inductive phase were analyzed independently by two researchers to ensure that findings were verified and validated across the interview dataset.

FINDINGS

Three core categories emerged as central to the journey that people experience after receiving their diagnosis of epilepsy towards becoming comfortable with their epilepsy. These were: i) meaning of "my" epilepsy diagnosis, to capture people with epilepsy's feelings, reactions and concerns after being diagnosed with epilepsy, ii) useful strategies, to identify what people with epilepsy did to become comfortable with their diagnosis, and iii) being comfortable with my epilepsy, to account for the frame of mind of people with epilepsy when they reach a point of accepting their diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

The findings provide important insights into the personal experiences of people with epilepsy after receiving their diagnosis and identifies a range of strategies they find useful in helping them reach a position of acceptance and being 'comfortable with my epilepsy'.

The relationship of seizure focus with depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with epilepsy

For youth with epilepsy, comorbid psychiatric conditions, such as depression and anxiety, require further examination as they carry increased risk for reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The current study assessed whether rates of depression, anxiety, and withdrawal behaviors differed based on seizure location. Data included parental ratings on the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2) and the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) questionnaire for 132 children and adolescents (mean age=11.34, SD=3.95) with generalized or partial (i.e., frontal [FLE] or temporal lobe epilepsy [TLE]) epilepsy. Our results identified clinically significant internalizing psychopathology in nearly half of our sample (41%). Although rates of internalizing behavior were similar between generalized and partial groups, children and adolescents with TLE demonstrated higher rates of depression compared to youth with FLE. No effects of laterality on internalizing behaviors were identified between TLE and FLE groups. Finally, for youth with TLE, parental depression ratings along with current number of antiepileptic medications (AEDs) were found to be significant barriers to HRQOL above and beyond anxiety, withdrawal, and epilepsy-specific variables. Temporal lobe epilepsy was associated with a two-fold risk of clinically significant depression ratings. These findings highlight the high prevalence of internalizing psychopathology features in pediatric epilepsy and offer further support for the relationship between depression and TLE in children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Perception of stigma and associated factors in people with epilepsy at Amanuel Specialized Mental Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

OBJECTIVE

Stigma is a major problem for people living with epilepsy. Perceived stigma may be more prevalent than enacted stigma and causes excessive worry for the individual even if it does not arise from a social interaction. Therefore, we assessed perceived stigma and associated factors among people with epilepsy.

METHODS

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May, 2013, among 423 samples of people with epilepsy.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine (40.7%) of the respondents perceived as they were stigmatised by other people with 19.5% highly stigmatised by their illness. Most of the respondents (54.9%) had one or more seizure attacks per month, 61.9% were under monotherapy and 52.5% had no side effects of antiepileptic drugs. Those respondents who were from rural, low income, divorced/widowed, with frequent seizure attack and side effects of antiepileptic drugs were more likely to felt stigmatised by other people due to their illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceived stigma was found to be a common problem among people living with epilepsy. Therefore, the finding suggests that the need of creating awareness and addressing incorrect conceptions attached to epilepsy.

Parent perspectives of the challenging aspects of disclosing a child's epilepsy diagnosis to others: Why don't they tell?

Objectives This study aimed to explore the challenges parents of children with epilepsy (CWE) experienced when deciding to disclose their child's epilepsy diagnosis to others. Methods Using a qualitative exploratory design, interviews were conducted with 34 parents (27 mothers and 7 fathers) of 29 CWE (aged 6-16 years). Parents were recruited from a neurology clinic of a specialist children's hospital and from a national epilepsy association. Interviews were directed by a semi-structured guide informed by a review of the literature. Data were transcribed verbatim, imported into NVivo, coded and thematically analysed. Results Findings revealed five themes representative of the core disclosure challenges parents encountered, many of which promoted concealment and/or selective disclosure, namely: seeking normalcy for the child, the invisibility of epilepsy, negative reactions to disclosure, contending with poor public perceptions of epilepsy and coming to terms with the diagnosis. Discussion This study presents crucial information for healthcare professionals (HCPs) who help families to navigate the disclosure decision-making process. Providing HCPs working with families living with epilepsy with insight into diagnosis disclosure challenges will enable them to recognise the support needs of parents and work collaboratively with families to tackle such difficulties, ultimately improving their psychosocial wellbeing.

Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices on Epilepsy among High School Students of Central Nepal

Introduction. Epilepsy continues to increase worldwide but, unfortunately, many high school students have inadequate knowledge of and negative beliefs towards the disease. We aimed to assess the knowledge, beliefs, and practices of epilepsy among high school students of Central Nepal. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed involving 1360 high school students from 33 private schools across Bharatpur, from June 2013 to July 2013, to assess their knowledge, beliefs, and practices (KBP) on epilepsy using a standardized questionnaire. The differences in mean KBP scores between different sexes, religions, and those personally knowing versus not knowing someone with epilepsy were assessed using independent t-tests; a Pearson correlation was calculated to assess the relationship between KBP scores and age. Results. Of 1360 participants, 79 (5.8%) students had never heard or read about epilepsy and were consequently excluded from statistical analysis. Only 261 out of 1360 (19.2%) had personally known someone with epilepsy. The mean KBP scores were 5.0/8, 7.4/12, and 1.7/3, respectively. Statistically significant differences were only observed in the knowledge component of the KBP score; female scored higher than males (p < 0.001) and, interestingly, students who had personally known a person with epilepsy actually knew less than those who had not known one (p = 0.018). We also found a significant negative correlation between knowledge and age (p = 0.003). Conclusions. The overall knowledge, beliefs, and practices appear to be inadequate, emphasizing the need for further educational intervention.

Disclosure management behaviors in Korean adults with well-controlled epilepsy: Their relation to perception of stigma

PURPOSE

In spite of the fact that epilepsy is a concealable stigmatized identity, there is little evidence pertaining to disclosure management in adults living with epilepsy. We determined the factors contributing to disclosure management strategies in adults living with well-controlled epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional multicenter study. Korean adults whose seizures had remitted for at least one year participated in this study. Using statistical analyses, we determined whether disclosure management behaviors measured using the Disclosure Management Scale (DMS) were related to demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables. The Stigma Scale and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) were used.

RESULTS

Of a total of 225 participants, 76% stated that they often or sometimes kept their epilepsy a secret, while 24% reported that they never or rarely kept their diagnosis hidden. The mean DMS score was 6.1 (SD=2.4). In univariate analyses, the DMS scores were significantly related to the HADS depression scores (r=0.187, p=0.005) and the presence of perceived stigma (p=0.001). In linear regression analyses, perceived stigma was identified only as an independent factor associated with DMS scores (p=0.031), while HADS depression lost significance (p=0.057). The presence of perceived stigma explained only 4.6% of the variance in DMS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that over 70% of Korean adults with well-controlled epilepsy often or sometimes keep their epilepsy a secret. Although perceived stigma is associated with concealment behaviors, it accounts for only a small proportion of the variance in disclosure management.

Individual and family factors associated with self-esteem in young people with epilepsy: A multiple mediation analysis

OBJECTIVE

As young people experience added demands from living with epilepsy, which may lead to poor psychosocial adjustment, it is essential to examine mechanisms of change to provide practitioners with knowledge to develop effective interventions. The aim of this study was to examine individual and family-level factors - stress and illness perceptions, coping behaviors and family resilience - that promote or maintain young people's self-esteem.

METHODS

From November 2013 to August 2014, young people attending a neurology clinic in KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, participated in a cross-sectional survey (n=152; 13-16years old). Multiple mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate whether these variables mediated the relationship between illness severity (i.e., low, moderate, high) and self-esteem.

RESULTS

Multiple mediation analyses demonstrated that illness severity had a direct effect on young people's self-esteem. Compared to those with moderate illness severity (reference group), young people with low severity had significantly higher self-esteem (c=3.42, p<0.05); while those with high severity had a more negative view of themselves (c=-3.93, p<0.001). Illness severity also had an indirect influence on self-esteem through its effects on mediators, such as perceived stress, illness perceptions and family resilience (D₁: Total ab=3.46, 95% CI 1.13, 5.71; D₂: Total ab=-2.80, 95% CI -4.35, -1.30). However, young people's coping levels did not predict their self-esteem, when accounting for the effects of other variables.

SIGNIFICANCE

The continued presence of seizure occurrences is likely to place greater demands on young people and their families: in turn, increased stress and negative illness perceptions negatively affected family processes that promote resilience. As the mediating effect of these modifiable factors were above and beyond the contributions of illness characteristics and young people's levels of coping, this has implications for developing individual and family interventions aimed to support young people living with epilepsy.

Self-esteem in adolescents with epilepsy: Psychosocial and seizure-related correlates

PURPOSE

This study evaluated self-esteem in adolescents with epilepsy and its association with psychosocial and disease-related variables.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study with patients enrolled between January and June 2010. Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventory for Children (CFSEI-2) was administered to 140 children with epilepsy and 50 children with asthma, aged 10-18years attending mainstream schools.

RESULTS

Adolescents with epilepsy had a significantly lower overall self-esteem score when compared with those with asthma, 17±5.21 versus 19.4±3.83, respectively (P=0.005). Thirty-one (22.1%) children with epilepsy compared with 4 (8.3%) with asthma had overall self-esteem score below the cutoff (P=0.034). There was a significant correlation between overall self-esteem score and duration of epilepsy, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety score, HADS depression score, and Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD symptoms and Normal-Behaviors (SWAN) rating combined score. The impact of various correlates on individual domains was not identical. Independent factors associated with low overall self-esteem were HADS depression score (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.2; P=0.002), duration of epilepsy (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.88; P=0.024), and father employment status economically inactive (OR: 11.9; 95% CI: 1.07, 125; P=0.044). Seizure-free ≥12months was a favorable factor that was less likely to be associated with low self-esteem (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.81; P=0.028).

CONCLUSION

Self-esteem was compromised in adolescents with epilepsy. A significant correlation between self-esteem and psychological comorbidities was demonstrated. Enhancing social support and education programs may improve the self-esteem and, ultimately, the lives of adolescents living with epilepsy.

Discrimination, domestic violence, abuse, and other adverse life events in people with epilepsy: Population-based study to assess the burden of these events and their contribution to psychopathology

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the experience of discrimination, domestic violence, abuse, and other stressful life events in people with epilepsy in comparison with the general population and people with other chronic conditions. To assess whether any excess relative burden of these adversities could explain the higher rates of depression in people with epilepsy.

METHODS

The Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2007 used comprehensive interviews with 7,403 individuals living in private residences in England. Doctor-diagnosed epilepsy and other chronic conditions were established by self-report. Discrimination, domestic violence, physical and sexual abuse, and other stressful life events were assessed using computerized self-completion and a face-to-face interview, respectively.

RESULTS

People with epilepsy were sevenfold more likely to have reported experiencing discrimination due to health problems (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-16.3), than the general population without epilepsy. This estimate was substantially greater in people with epilepsy than for people with other chronic conditions. People with epilepsy also had greater odds of experiencing domestic violence and sexual abuse than the general population, although these associations were also found in people with other chronic conditions. There was less evidence of an association between epilepsy and a history of physical abuse or having a greater burden of other stressful life events. In exploratory analyses, assuming they lie on the causal pathway, discrimination, domestic violence, and sexual abuse explained 42.7% of the total effect of the relationship between epilepsy and depression or anxiety disorders.

SIGNIFICANCE

People with epilepsy can face a range of psychosocial adversities and extensively report feeling discriminated against as compared to the general population. In addition, if confirmed in longitudinal studies, the results suggest that these psychosocial adversities may have a significant role in the development of psychiatric comorbidity and may be targets for future interventions.

Epilepsy and secondary perceived stigma in a social setting: A night at the theater

Stigma impacts >50% of persons with epilepsy (PWE) and is a key factory in quality of life. Stigma can be both enacted (external factors) and felt (internal factors). In this article, felt/perceived stigma is more broadly defined as a combination of internal factors and perceptions of external factors. Secondary perceived stigma is felt/perceived stigma by a third party. A key, but often underappreciated, consideration in felt/perceived stigma may occur when a seemingly innocuous statement by a speaker is perceived as stigmatizing by the PWE and/or even by an unintended third party. This autobiographic short report addresses secondary perceived stigma in a social setting, the theater.

Factors associated with perceived stigma among patients with epilepsy in Turkey

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is one of the most stigmatizing medical conditions. The purpose of this study was to examine the perception of stigma and factors associated with stigma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among patients attending an epilepsy outpatient clinic of a university hospital between February and October 2014. One hundred ninety-four patients who were over 18years of age, who were able to communicate, and who had a diagnosis of definite epilepsy constituted the study sample. Patients seizure-free for two years were excluded from the group. Three-item Jacoby's Stigma Scale was used to determine level of stigma, and Social Support Scale, Generalized Self-efficacy Scale, Epilepsy Knowledge Scale, and Epilepsy Attitude Scale were used to examine factors associated with stigma.

RESULTS

In total, 66 (34%) out of 194 subjects reported feeling stigmatized, with almost half of them (n=31) feeling highly stigmatized. Education, income, age at onset, seizure frequency in previous year, social support, and knowledge and attitudes towards epilepsy were significant factors determining scores on the stigma scale. It was also determined that stigma was associated with seeking help from mystics, disclosure of the diagnosis, and self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the findings of previous studies that have identified the importance of both clinical and nonclinical factors in understanding the stigma of epilepsy. Findings support the need for social support, knowledge, and awareness to decrease the stigma associated with epilepsy.

Should we stop saying "epileptic"? A comparison of the effect of the terms "epileptic" and "person with epilepsy"

OBJECTIVE

The advantages and disadvantages of using "epileptic" as a noun to describe someone with epilepsy have long been debated. Recent high-profile recommendations have stated that the term should not be used, including in English, as it perpetuates stigma. This decision was largely informed by a Brazilian Global Campaign Against Epilepsy study that reported experimental evidence indicating that, with students, the label evokes more negative attitudes than "person with epilepsy". The generalizability of this effect to different countries/cultures, and thus the justification for the recommendations, has never been tested.

METHODS

We replicated the Brazilian study in the UK, in English, while also addressing methodological limitations. It was powered to detect the effects reported by the Brazilian study, with 234 students completing a survey regarding epilepsy attitudes. Half were randomized to Group 1 and half to Group 2. In Group 1, patients were referred to as "people/person with epilepsy" within the attitudinal measures, while in Group 2 they were referred to as "epileptic/s". Measures included translations of the questions used in the Brazilian study and the Attitudes and Beliefs about Living with Epilepsy scale. Participants' epilepsy familiarity and knowledge were also assessed.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in characteristics. A comparison of their responses to the attitude measures revealed no statistically significant or meaningful differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In this English replication, the word "epileptic" did not provoke more negative attitudes. This suggests that the effect reported by the Brazilian study might be culturally dependent. Methodological limitations to that study might also be relevant. Our results have implications for the global debate about how negative attitudes towards epilepsy might be addressed. Simply not saying "epileptic" may not promote the positive attitudes towards epilepsy that had been expected. To know how to best refer to those with epilepsy, evidence on the preferences of those actually living with epilepsy is needed.

Determinants of felt stigma in epilepsy

The present study aimed to determine the level of felt stigma, overprotection, concealment, and concerns related to epilepsy in different life domains by using culturally-specific scales for Turkish individuals with epilepsy. Also, it aimed to detect relations among the study variables and to determine the variables which predict felt stigma. For this purpose, felt stigma scale, overprotection scale, concealment of epilepsy scale, and concerns of epilepsy scale were administered to two hundred adult persons with epilepsy (PWE). The results showed that almost half of the participants reported felt stigma, overprotection, concealment of epilepsy, concerns related to future occupation, and concerns related to social life. Almost all the study variables show correlations with each other. Concealment of epilepsy, concerns related to social life, and concerns related to future occupation were found as the predictors of felt stigma.

Persons with Epilepsy: Between Social Inclusion and Marginalisation

Background. Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that can lead to complex psychosocial consequences. Epilepsy can change the social status of persons with epilepsy (PWE) and has an effect on their social inclusion as well as their perception of social inclusion. This study aims to explore subjective experiences with social inclusion of PWE in Slovenia. Methods. This study takes a qualitative approach. Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted with eleven participants. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results. Epilepsy has physical, emotional, and social consequences. Physical consequences of epilepsy are mainly tiredness and exhaustion following an epileptic episode, frequently accompanied by headaches. Emotional consequences are different forms of fear. The main social consequence identified is a negative effect on PWE's social network, which leads to (self-)isolation and social distrust. Conclusion. PWE experience of social inclusion depends on various psychosocial factors and differs from person to person. The consequences of epilepsy are shown in PWE social contacts and their sense of social inclusion and autonomy.

Knowledge of epilepsy among persons with epilepsy in Turkey

PURPOSE

It has been shown in studies that there are knowledge gaps about epilepsy in both developing and developed countries all around the world. Lack of knowledge exists even among people with epilepsy (PWE), and this may affect their lives negatively. This study aimed to evaluate what PWE in Turkey know about their disease.

METHOD

A self-completed questionnaire consisting of demographic details, an item about perceived stigmatization, and 24 items about general knowledge of medical and social aspects of epilepsy was developed. Applicants were asked to answer 'true', 'false', or 'do not know' to each statement. The scores of the questionnaire were defined as low (< 15 point), medium (≥ 15-20), and high (≥ 20).

RESULTS

The mean score on the questionnaire was 15.17 ± 3.74 (range, 4-24). One hundred twenty-five PWE (37.9%) scored low, 170 PWE (51.5%) scored medium, and 35 PWE (10.6%) scored high. The education level and household income were highly correlated with the knowledge level. Higher education level (r: 0.31) and high income (r: 0.25) were correlated with higher mean scores (p < 0.01). Lack of information was present particularly in terms of etiology, management of seizures, and medication during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

We documented the knowledge deficit of PWE about their disease, a situation that may lead to suboptimal management and negative attitudes. We concluded that study programs should be organized and more education should be provided to PWE in order to overcome these issues.