Break-through bleeding in relation to predicted factor VIII levels in patients receiving prophylactic treatment for severe hemophilia A

Genome Editing and Hematologic Malignancy

The modern genomic era has seen remarkable advancement in our understanding of the molecular basis for disease, yet translation of basic discoveries into new disease treatments has arguably lagged behind. Recently, breakthroughs in genome editing technologies have created hope for their potential to directly treat the genetic causes of disease. Like any therapeutic intervention, genome editing should be considered in light of its potential risks and benefits. In this review, we highlight the promise of genome editing therapies, as well as the conceptual and technical barriers to their clinical application, with a special emphasis on hematologic malignancies.

Joint Bleeding Tendencies in Adult Patients With Hemophilia: It's Not All Pharmacokinetics

Hemophilic arthropathy from joint bleeding remains a complication with major morbidity in the increasingly aging patients with hemophilia. Prophylactic clotting factor infusions, based on pharmacokinetic dosing to reduce bleeding rates, are being explored more and more. However, there is little evidence on the benefits of pharmacokinetic dosing in direct association with bleeding events. Here, we prospectively followed a cohort of adult patients with hemophilia A and B (n = 26) and arthropathic joints on various clotting factor products over a period of 2 years with clinical and radiographic joint health assessments, frequent joint ultrasound, and pharmacokinetic studies. Joint bleeds and synovitis with synovial vascularity changes were objectively diagnosed by musculoskeletal ultrasound and power Doppler and analyzed in relation to pharmacokinetic, joint- and patient-specific parameters. Results revealed that, contrary to common beliefs, bleeding episodes were not readily explained by pharmacokinetic features, as they were not associated with more time spent below certain clotting factor thresholds. Joint bleeding was found to be associated with prominent vascularity changes, suggesting that vascular remodeling and leakiness may contribute to joint bleeding that cannot be prevented by clotting factor replacement alone.

SHP656, a polysialylated recombinant factor VIII (PSA-rFVIII): First-in-human study evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in patients with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

SHP656 is the first factor VIII (FVIII) product developed using polysialylation (PSA) technology, in which full‐length recombinant (r) FVIII (anti‐haemophilic factor [recombinant]) is conjugated with a 20 kDa PSA polymer.

Aim

To compare the safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of SHP656 vs the parent rFVIII (octocog alfa) after single infusions of 25‐75 IU/kg in patients with severe haemophilia A (FVIII activity <1%).

Methods

Multinational, phase 1, prospective, open‐label, two‐period, fixed‐sequence, dose‐escalation trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02716194). Patients received single doses of rFVIII and then SHP656 sequentially at the same dose: 25 ± 3 IU/kg (Cohort 1), 50 ± 5 IU/kg (Cohort 2) and 75 ± 5 IU/kg (Cohort 3).

Results

Forty patients received rFVIII: 11 in Cohort 1, 16 in Cohort 2 and 13 in Cohort 3. Two patients withdrew before receiving SHP656, leaving 38 patients who completed the study and received both treatments. No treatment‐related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, deaths, study withdrawals, thrombotic events or allergic reactions were reported; and no significant treatment‐related changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors or antibodies to PSA. FVIII activity was significantly prolonged following SHP656 administration vs rFVIII with an approximately 1.5‐fold extension in mean residence time (P < .05). Exposure increased proportional to the SHP656 dose over the 25‐75 IU/kg dose range.

Conclusion

Polysialylation of rFVIII confers a half‐life extension similar to that of approved extended half‐life products that use either PEGylation or Fc fusion technology and was not associated with any treatment‐related adverse events.

Clinical application of Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo): Patterns of blood sampling and patient characteristics among clinician users

BACKGROUND

Use of population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) to facilitate PK-informed prophylaxis in clinical practice has gained momentum among haemophilia providers due to the accessibility of tools such as the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo) and availability of extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates. It is unknown how clinicians implement PopPK.

AIM

To investigate the evolution of PopPK use in clinical practice by comparing blood sampling strategies, patient features, and factor group between initial and recent periods of WAPPS-Hemo availability.

METHODS

PK data for haemophilia A and haemophilia B patients from two time periods were extracted from the WAPPS-Hemo database: early availability (10/2015-09/2016) and recent use (10/2017-09/2018). We compared patient characteristics (age, body weight, haemophilia type), product type and dose, and blood sampling times between the time frames.

RESULTS

Over 1900 eligible infusions were submitted to WAPPS-Hemo during the periods studied, with 85% representing FVIII concentrates. In the recent cohort, PK profiles were requested for younger patients (median age 18 vs 26 years), with increased proportional EHL FVIII use (29% vs 14% of infusions). High-use centres generally submitted fewer blood samples per infusion than non-high-use centres, although the number of samples collected by non-high-use centres decreased significantly over time. During both periods, blood sample timing was generally consistent with ISTH recommended windows.

CONCLUSION

The use of WAPPS-Hemo by haemophilia providers grew by over threefold between the time periods investigated. While sampling times have included key time points proposed first by Björkman since early WAPPS-Hemo usage, a trend towards minimizing sampling was observed.

Bayesian Forecasting Utilizing Bleeding Information to Support Dose Individualization of Factor VIII

Bayesian forecasting for dose individualization of prophylactic factor VIII replacement therapy using pharmacokinetic samples is challenged by large interindividual variability in the bleeding risk. A pharmacokinetic‐repeated time‐to‐event model‐based forecasting approach was developed to contrast the ability to predict the future occurrence of bleeds based on individual (i) pharmacokinetic, (ii) bleeding, and (iii) pharmacokinetic, bleeding and covariate information using observed data from the Long‐Term Efficacy Open‐Label Program in Severe Hemophilia A Disease (LEOPOLD) clinical trials (172 severe hemophilia A patients taking prophylactic treatment). The predictive performance assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65–0.69), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76–0.80), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77–0.81) for patients ≥ 12 years when using pharmacokinetics, bleeds, and all data, respectively, suggesting that individual bleed information adds value to the optimization of prophylactic dosing regimens in severe hemophilia A. Further steps to optimize the proposed tool for factor VIII dose adaptation in the clinic are required.

BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis is efficacious and well tolerated for up to >5 years with extended dosing intervals: PROTECT VIII extension interim results

Introduction

BAY 94‐9027 is an extended‒half‐life, site‐specifically PEGylated, B‐domain‒deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). The PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy of bleed control using extended‐interval prophylaxis with BAY 94‐9027 for 36 weeks.

Aim

To report long‐term efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with BAY 94‐9027 in a descriptive analysis of the ongoing PROTECT VIII extension with a total treatment time of up to >5 years.

Methods

Previously treated males aged 12‐65 years with severe haemophilia A who completed the PROTECT VIII main study were eligible for the open‐label extension. Patients received on‐demand treatment or prophylaxis (30‒40 IU/kg twice weekly, 45‒60 IU/kg every 5 days, or 60 IU/kg every 7 days) and could switch regimens as needed.

Results

Patients (N = 121; on demand, n = 14; prophylaxis, n = 107) accumulated a median (range) of 3.9 years (297‒1965 days) and 223 (23‒563) total exposure days by 31 January 2018. During the extension, median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for total bleeds were 1.6 (0.3; 4.6) for patients receiving prophylaxis and 34.1 (20.3; 36.6) for patients receiving on‐demand treatment. ABRs for twice‐weekly (n = 23), every‐5‐days (n = 33), every‐7‐days (n = 23) and variable frequency (n = 28) treatments were 1.7, 1.2, 0.7 and 3.1, respectively. Of prophylaxis patients, 20.6% were bleed‐free throughout the extension (median time, 3.2 years), and 51.0% were bleed‐free during the last 6 months. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors.

Conclusions

BAY 94‐9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well tolerated with dosing intervals up to every 7 days for a median (range) of 3.9 years (0.8‐5.4 years).

Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: Towards precision medicine

Patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) experience spontaneous limb- or life-threatening bleedings which are prevented by regular prophylactic intravenous infusions of the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX). Prophylaxis with subcutaneous long-acting non-factor products that improve in vivo thrombin generation is now under intensive investigation (concizumab, fitusiran) or successfully employed (emicizumab) in haemophilia patients. Both haemophilia patients with/without inhibitors take advantage of non-factor products employed alone. In those who also need bypassing agents (or FVIII concentrates) for breakthrough bleeds, thromboembolic events and/or thrombotic microangiopathy may occur. By enhancing thrombin generation, prothrombotic mutations co-segregating with FVIII/FIX gene mutations may trigger thrombotic episodes in HA patients carrying acquired thrombogenic factors (e.g. venous catheters). A thorough knowledge of individual needs increasingly contributed to improve comprehensive care and personalize treatments in haemophilia. Integrating genomics, lifestyle and environmental data is expected to be key to: 1) identify which haemophilia patients are less likely to benefit from a given intervention; 2) define optimal dosing and scheduling of bypassing agents (or FVIII) to employ in combination with non-factor products; 3) establish tests to monitor in vivo thrombin generation; 4) improve communication and deliver results to individuals. As individual outcomes will be improved and the risk of adverse events minimized, non-factor products will come into wider use within the haemophilia community, and patients will hopefully have no more risks of breakthrough bleeds. The risks of a normal life for a "former haemophilia patient" is likely to change the treatment landscape and the structure of haemophilia Centers.

Direct comparison of two extended-half-life recombinant FVIII products: a randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study in patients with severe hemophilia A

BAY 94-9027 is an extended-half-life, recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product conjugated with a 60-kDa branched polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule indicated for use in previously treated patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with hemophilia A. This randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BAY 94-9027 and rFVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in patients with hemophilia A. Patients aged 18-65 years with FVIII < 1% and ≥ 150 exposure days to FVIII were randomized to receive intravenous single-dose BAY 94-9027 60 IU/kg followed by rFVIIIFc 60 IU/kg or vice versa, with ≥ 7-day wash-out between doses. FVIII activity was measured by one-stage assay. PK parameters, including area under the curve from time 0 to the last data point (AUClast, primary parameter), half-life, and clearance were calculated. Eighteen patients were randomized and treated. No adverse events were observed. In the analysis set excluding one outlier, geometric mean (coefficient of variation [%CV, 95% confidence interval {CI}]) AUClast was significantly higher for BAY 94-9027 versus rFVIIIFc (2940 [37.8, 2440-3550] IU h/dL versus 2360 [31.8, 2010-2770] IU h/dL, p = 0.0001). A population PK model was developed to simulate time to reach FVIII threshold levels; median time to 1 IU/dL was approximately 13 h longer for BAY 94-9027 versus rFVIIIFc after a single infusion of 60 IU/kg. In conclusion, BAY 94-9027 had a superior PK profile versus rFVIIIFc. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03364998.

Relationship between factor VIII activity, bleeds and individual characteristics in severe hemophilia A patients

Pharmacokinetic-based prophylaxis of replacement factor VIII (FVIII) products has been encouraged in recent years, but the relationship between exposure (factor VIII activity) and response (bleeding frequency) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between FVIII dose, plasma FVIII activity, and bleeding patterns and individual characteristics in severe hemophilia A patients. Pooled pharmacokinetic and bleeding data during prophylactic treatment with BAY 81-8973 (octocog alfa) were obtained from the three LEOPOLD trials. The population pharmacokinetics of FVIII activity and longitudinal bleeding frequency, as well as bleeding severity, were described using non-linear mixed effects modeling in NONMEM. In total, 183 patients [median age 22 years (range, 1-61); weight 60 kg (11-124)] contributed with 1,535 plasma FVIII activity observations, 633 bleeds and 11 patient/study characteristics [median observation period 12 months (3.1-13.1)]. A parametric repeated time-to-categorical bleed model, guided by plasma FVIII activity from a 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic model, described the time to the occurrence of bleeds and their severity. Bleeding probability decreased with time of study, and a bleed was not found to affect the time of the next bleed. Several covariate effects were identified, including the bleeding history in the 12-month pre-study period increasing the bleeding hazard. However, unexplained inter-patient variability in the phenotypic bleeding pattern remained large (111%CV). Further studies to translate the model into a tool for dose individualization that considers the individual bleeding risk are required. Research was based on a post-hoc analysis of the LEOPOLD studies registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: 01029340, 01233258 and 01311648.

A novel, point-of-care, whole-blood assay utilizing dielectric spectroscopy is sensitive to coagulation factor replacement therapy in haemophilia A patients

BACKGROUND

Reliable monitoring of coagulation factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia, especially those with inhibitors, is an unmet clinical need. While useful, global assays, eg thromboelastography (TEG), rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thrombin generation assay (TGA), are cumbersome to use and not widely available.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of a novel, point-of-care, dielectric microsensor - ClotChip - to monitor coagulation factor replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia A, with and without inhibitors.

METHODS

The ClotChip T_peak parameter was assessed using whole-blood samples from children with severe haemophilia A, with (n = 6) and without (n = 12) inhibitors, collected pre- and postcoagulation factor replacement therapy. ROTEM, TGA and chromogenic FVIII assays were also performed. Healthy children (n = 50) served as controls.

RESULTS

ClotChip T_peak values exhibited a significant decrease for samples collected postcoagulation factor replacement therapy as compared to baseline (pretherapy) samples in patients with and without inhibitors. A difference in T_peak values was also noted at baseline among severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors as compared to those without inhibitors. ClotChip T_peak parameter exhibited a very strong correlation with clotting time (CT) of ROTEM, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin of TGA, and FVIII clotting activity.

CONCLUSIONS

ClotChip is sensitive to coagulation factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A, with and without inhibitors. ClotChip T_peak values correlate very well with ROTEM, TGA and FVIII assays, opening up possibilities for its use in personalized coagulation factor replacement therapy in haemophilia.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two extended half-life FVIII concentrates (Eloctate and Adynovate) in adolescents with hemophilia A: Is there a difference?

Essentials The PK parameters of Eloctate vs Adynovate were compared using one-stage and chromogenic assays in 25 boys (12-18 years). The FVIII levels were taken at 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours following a dose of either FVIII; levels analyzed by WAPPS PK program. The PK profiles (half-life, clearance, and time to 5%, 3%, and 1%) were not statistically different for the two EHL FVIIIs. The significant interpatient variability in PK is mainly related to VWF levels (and blood group).

BACKGROUND

A head-to-head comparison of the pharmokinetcs (PK) of extended half-life (EHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in the same subjects has not been reported. Recently, boys (ages 12-18 years) with hemophilia A in Canada were required to switch from Eloctate to Adynovate.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the PK profiles of Eloctate vs Adynovate in the same boys.

METHODS

Boys switching from Eloctate to Adynovate prophylaxis had FVIII levels sampled at 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours following a regular prophylactic infusion of Eloctate and then 1-3 months later, of Adynovate. Testing was done by one-stage assay (OSA) and chromogenic assay (CA). The PK parameters were determined with the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service (WAPPS)-Hemo PK tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-five boys (mean age 15.3 years; range: 12.1-18.4; 9 O blood group) underwent switching. Mean (range) terminal half-lives with the OSA were 16.1 hours (10.4 to 23.4; Eloctate) and 16.7 hours (11.0 to 23.6; Adynovate) (NS). With the CA, these were 18.0 hours (12.0 to 25.5; Eloctate) and 16.0 hours (10.3 to 22.9; Adynovate) (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two EHL-FVIIIs in clearance, area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC), Vss, or time for FVIII levels to drop to 5%, 3%, and 1%. At the 72-h time point, mean observed FVIII levels following a mean dose of 39.3 IU/kg of Eloctate were 4.4% (OSA) and 4.4% (CA). For Adynovate, these were 5.1% (OSA) and 5.3% (CA) following similar doses. There was considerable interpatient variation in PK, mainly explained by differences in blood group/von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Eloctate and Adynovate have almost identical PK parameters. When switching from one to another no prophylaxis regimen change is needed.

Fixed doses of N8-GP prophylaxis maintain moderate-to-mild factor VIII levels in the majority of patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII developed for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVE

To assess pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of N8-GP in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A, model the time spent at hemophilia thresholds of ≥1 and ≤5 IU/dL (moderate) or >5 IU/dL (mild) FVIII levels during N8-GP prophylaxis, and investigate the relationship between N8-GP half-life and von Willebrand factor (vWF).

METHODS

PK assessments were obtained from patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII < 1 IU/dL) participating in 4 clinical trials: pathfinder 1 (20-60 years); pathfinder 2 (12-17 and ≥18 years); pathfinder 5 (0-11 years), and pathfinder 7 (25-71 years). All PK profiles were assessed after washout and considered single-dose PK profiles. Pre- and postdose FVIII activity at steady state was measured at all visits.

RESULTS

From 69 patients, 108 PK profiles of N8-GP 50 IU/kg were assessed. Adults/adolescents received 50 IU/kg every 4 days, achieving mean trough levels of 3.0 IU/dL (95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.5, adults) and 2.7 IU/dL (1.8-4.0, adolescents). Children received 60 IU/kg twice weekly, leading to mean trough levels of 1.2 IU/dL (0.8-1.6, 0- to 5-year-olds) and 2.0 IU/dL (1.5-2.7, 6- to 11-year-olds). PK modeling predicted children dosed every 3 days and adults/adolescents dosed every 3 to 4 days would maintain FVIII levels >5 and >1 IU/dL for >80% and 100% of the time, respectively. N8-GP half-life correlated linearly with von Willebrand factor levels in adults/adolescents, less in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with fixed intervals (Q4D/twice weekly) and fixed weight-based dosing (50/60 IU/kg) ensured >1 IU/dL FVIII trough levels in both adults and children.

From the voices of people with haemophilia A and their caregivers: Challenges with current treatment, their impact on quality of life and desired improvements in future therapies

Introduction

Haemophilia A is a chronic disease requiring frequent intravenous infusions of recombinant factor VIII. Previous studies have shown that challenges associated with current treatments may have significant impacts on quality of life (QoL) that are as important as the health outcomes conferred by the therapy. Emerging therapeutic innovations offer the potential to mitigate treatment‐related challenges, and it is therefore important to develop a better understanding of patient and caregiver experiences with existing haemophilia A treatments in order to characterize the full value of new treatments.

Aim

To gather firsthand perspectives from people with haemophilia A (PWHA) and caregivers on the challenges with current treatment, their impact on QoL and desired improvements in future therapies.

Methods

Qualitative insights were gathered from 20 non‐inhibitor PWHA or caregivers of PWHA across Canada through one‐on‐one interviews; insights were further explored through focus group sessions to uncover overarching themes and prioritize issues with current treatments.

Results

PWHA and caregivers identified several challenges, including administration of intravenous infusions, coordination of treatment schedules and ensuring adequate medication and supplies. Participants described how these challenges impact psychosocial well‐being, physical health, personal/social life and work. Alternate modes of administration and longer‐lasting treatment effects were identified as desired improvements over current treatments.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the impact that existing haemophilia A treatments have on psychological well‐being, employment opportunities and adherence to treatment regimens. These considerations may help to inform decision‐making for policymakers and health systems around the true value of new therapies entering the haemophilia market.

Dose tailoring of human cell line-derived recombinant factor VIII simoctocog alfa: Using a limited sampling strategy in patients with severe haemophilia A

AIMS

The use of factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in haemophilia A is considered the standard of care, particularly in children. Despite adjustment of doses for body weight and/or age, a large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability between patients has been observed. PK-tailored prophylaxis may help clinicians adjust coagulation factor FVIII activity (FVIII:C) to the desired level, which may differ in individual patients. The objective was to develop a population PK model for simoctocog alfa based on pooled clinical trial data and to develop a Bayesian estimator to allow PK parameters in individual patients to be estimated using a reduced number of blood samples.

METHODS

PK data from 86 adults and 29 children/adolescents with severe haemophilia A were analysed. The FVIII data measured using 2 different assays (chromogenic and the 1-stage clotting assay) were fit to separate develop population PK models using nonlinear mixed-effect models. A Bayesian estimator was then developed to estimate the time above the threshold of 1%.

RESULTS

The PK data for chromogenic and the 1-stage clotting assays were both best described by a 2-compartment models. Simulations demonstrated good predictive capacity. The limited sampling strategy using blood sample at 3 and 24 hours allowed an accurate estimation of the time above the threshold of 1% FVIII:C (mean bias 0.01 and 0.11, mean precision 0.18 and 0.45 for 2 assay methods).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated that a Bayesian approach can help to reduce the number of samples required to estimate the time above the threshold of 1% FVIII:C with good accuracy.

PK-tailored tertiary prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A at Beijing Children's Hospital

IMPORTANCE

Tertiary prophylaxis using a low-dose regimen is usually insufficient to prevent recurrent joint bleeding and deterioration in joint diseases in children with severe hemophilia A. Pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing is a useful approach to increase the precision and efficiency of prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of PK-tailored tertiary prophylaxis in children with severe hemophilia A.

METHODS

We implemented a PK-tailored tertiary prophylaxis program for 15 boys with severe hemophilia A aged 5-16 years at Beijing Children's Hospital. Following PK testing and a 6-month evaluation period (phase I), 15 patients were divided in two groups according to individual PK data and actual bleeding: (1) a PK-tailored group [modified prophylaxis regimen according to PK data for the next 6 months (phase II); n = 8] and (2) a maintenance group (continued the original regimen for the next 6 months; n = 7). We compared the bleeding rate, infusion frequency, and factor VIII (FVIII) consumption between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the PK-tailored group, the median annual joint bleeding rate was reduced from 7.8 in phase I to 1.4 in phase II, mean annual total factor consumption increased from 1619.0 IU/kg in phase I to 2401.9 IU/kg in phase II, and median infusion frequency for prophylaxis increased from 104 times/year in phase I to 156 times/year in phase II (P < 0.05). Although the FVIII consumption increased, it remained at approximately half of the standard method.

INTERPRETATION

PK-tailored prophylaxis may represent a more efficient approach to individual prophylaxis in China, but further studies are required to verify this.

New therapies for hemophilia

Hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) are the most common severe bleeding disorders. Replacement therapy, providing the missing coagulation factor, has been the mainstay of treatment both prophylactically and to treat bleeding. Despite widespread availability of safe and effective replacement therapy, patients with HA and HB continue to experience a tremendous burden of treatment, breakthrough bleeding, and progressive joint disease, as well as high rates of inhibitor development. These remaining challenges are now being addressed by incredible advances in bioengineering. Recombinant bioengineering has led to replacement therapies with easier modes of administration, decreased immunogenicity, increased efficacy, and extended half-lives. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that acts as a substitutive therapy for HA, has been approved for patients with and without inhibitors. Novel compounds are in development to exploit the natural balance of hemostasis by targeting the natural anticoagulants protein C, protein S, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and antithrombin. The substitution and rebalancing therapies provide an opportunity for steady-state hemostatic control without exposure to immunogenic clotting factor proteins. As such, they may have broader applications outside those being investigated in the clinical trial programs.

Anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) therapy: a novel approach to the treatment of haemophilia

Novel approaches to the treatment of haemophilia are needed due to the limitations of the current standard of care, factor replacement therapy. Aspirations include lessening the treatment burden and effectively preventing joint damage. Treating haemophilia by restoring thrombin generation may be an effective approach. A promising target for restoring thrombin generation is tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), a multivalent Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor that regulates tissue factor-induced coagulation via factor Xa-dependent feedback inhibition of the tissue factor-factor VIIa complex. Inhibition of TFPI reverts the coagulation process to a more primitive state evolutionarily, whilst regulation by other natural inhibitors is preserved. An aptamer and three monoclonal antibodies directed against TFPI have been investigated in clinical trials. As well as improving thrombin generation in the range associated with mild haemophilia, anti-TFPI therapies have the advantage of subcutaneous administration. However, the therapeutic window needs to be defined along with the potential for complications due to the novel mechanism of action. This review provides an overview of TFPI, its role in normal coagulation, the rationale for TFPI inhibition, and a summary of anti-TFPI therapies, previously or currently in development.

Optimizing bleed prevention throughout the lifespan: Womb to Tomb

The focus of care providers, patients and families is the ability to tailor care for persons with haemophilia (PWH) across the lifespan. Care requires knowledge of the bleeding disorder and age-related complications, risk of therapeutic interventions, and evaluation of individual characteristics that contribute to outcomes. The ultimate goal is to live a normal life without the burden of bleeding, for PWH and carriers. A wide range of therapeutic options is required to achieve personalized care. Over the last decade, substantial therapeutic advantages have been achieved in the treatment of haemophilia that include the development of a robust array of factor concentrates, novel haemostatic agents, and increased knowledge and awareness of disease associated outcomes and risk factors. Significant strides on the road to accessible gene therapy have been realized. This increased range of therapeutic modalities provides options for development and implementation of care plans for each patient at each stage of life that are more flexible compared to prior care regimens. Paradigms for management of haemophilia are changing. As a community, we must work together to use these resources wisely, to learn from outcomes with new therapies and diagnostic tools, to assure all patients can achieve improved care and outcomes regardless of disease state or country of origin.

GlycoPEGylated recombinant factor IX for hemophilia B in context

Decisions over hemophilia treatment selection and switching involve balancing many clinical and patient-related factors. The current standard of care for patients with hemophilia B is prophylaxis with plasma-derived or recombinant factor IX (rFIX) concentrates. However, several extended half-life (EHL) rFIX products have recently been developed to improve treatment convenience and clinical outcomes for these patients. Nonacog beta pegol, an rFIX product that combines the FIX protein with a 40 kDa polyethylene glycol moiety, has been evaluated in 115 previously treated patients with hemophilia B (including 25 children) in the paradigm clinical trial program. FIX activity levels and pharmacokinetics were monitored throughout these trials and showed that nonacog beta pegol offers significant pharmacological improvements over standard FIX products. Once-weekly prophylaxis with nonacog beta pegol 40 IU/kg resulted in fewer bleeds in all patients (median annualized bleeding rate of 1.0 across all ages), resolved 90% of target joints, and improved health-related quality of life. No patients developed FIX inhibitors, and there were no thromboembolic events or unexpected safety concerns. Nonacog beta pegol was also safe and effective in the perioperative setting. These findings show that nonacog beta pegol is highly effective, while also offering more convenient dosing than standard FIX products. Nonacog beta pegol represents a significant advance in the current context of treatment for hemophilia B, offering effective management across several treatment modalities and settings, and potentially easing the treatment burden for patients of all ages. Meanwhile, the development of novel treatment strategies, such as gene therapy, anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibodies, and RNA interference therapy, may provide patients with additional therapeutic options, which would require reassessment of the role of EHL products in the future.

Adherence to prophylaxis in adolescents and young adults with severe haemophilia A, a qualitative study with patients

Introduction: Reported levels of adherence to prophylaxis among young people with haemophilia (YPH) vary widely and are predominately based on estimations made by healthcare professionals and parents. Reasons for (non)adherence among YPH in particular have not been evidenced.

Aim: to examine experiences in relation to prophylaxis with YPH themselves, and barriers and facilitators to their adherence.

Methods: 11 Participants were recruited in five haemophilia centres across England and Wales. All patients who met the inclusion criteria (aged 12-25, diagnosed with haemophilia, on prophylaxis) were approached during a routine check-up appointment, and all participants who agreed to take part were interviewed. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Results: Self-reported adherence to prophylaxis was good. Few participants admitted to intentionally skipping injections although they reported sometimes forgetting. However, due to the increasingly personalised and flexible approach to prophylaxis, adherence is not straightforward to define. Barriers to adherence included a busy lifestyle, dislike of the intravenous injection, venous access issues, anxiety or stress and being out of one’s normal routine. Support was an important facilitator to adherence, including support from health professionals at the haemophilia centre as well as friends. Parents appear to be very involved with their child’s haemophilia management, even after they leave home.

Conclusion: What this study adds is that the increasingly flexible and personalised approach to managing prophylaxis in haemophilia may sometimes lead to confusion around treatment frequency and dosing. This may lead to accidental non-adherence, which is distinct from both skipping and forgetting. Advice from haemophilia teams may not always be consistent and is likely to be interpreted differently by different individuals. Some additional training and education of patients and their families to increase their knowledge and skills around prophylaxis may reduce this confusion and therefore is likely to improve adherence further.

Practical aspects of extended half-life products for the treatment of haemophilia

Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are congenital X-linked bleeding disorders caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX), respectively. The preferred treatment option for patients with haemophilia is replacement therapy. For patients with severe disease, prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor is the treatment of choice; this has been shown to reduce arthropathy significantly, reduce the frequency of bleeds and improve patients' quality of life. Prophylaxis with standard recombinant factor requires regular intravenous infusion at least two (FIX) to three (FVIII) times a week. Recombinant FVIII and FIX products with an extended half-life are in development, or have been recently licensed. With reported mean half-life extensions of 1.5-1.8 times that of standard products for FVIII and 3-5 times that of standard products for FIX, these products have the potential to address many of the unmet needs of patients currently treated with standard factor concentrates. For example, they may encourage patients to switch from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis and improve the quality of life of patients receiving prophylaxis. Indeed, extended half-life products have the potential to reduce the burden of frequent intravenous injections, reducing the need for central venous lines in children, promote adherence, improve outcomes, potentially allow for more active lifestyles and, depending on the dosing regimen, increase factor trough levels. Members of the Zürich Haemophilia Forum convened for their 19th meeting to discuss the practicalities of incorporating new treatments into the management of people with haemophilia. This review of extended half-life products considers their introduction in haemophilia treatment, including the appropriate dose and schedule of infusions, laboratory monitoring, patient selection, safety considerations, and the economic aspects of care.

A Pharmacometric Approach to Substitute for a Conventional Dose-Finding Study in Rare Diseases: Example of Phase III Dose Selection for Emicizumab in Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab (ACE910) is a bispecific antibody mimicking the cofactor function of activated coagulation factor VIII. In phase I-I/II studies, emicizumab reduced the bleeding frequency in patients with severe hemophilia A, regardless of the presence of factor VIII inhibitors, at once-weekly subcutaneous doses of 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg.

METHODS

Using the phase I-I/II study data, population pharmacokinetic and repeated time-to-event (RTTE) modeling were performed to quantitatively characterize the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of emicizumab and reduction in bleeding frequency. Simulations were then performed to identify the minimal exposure expected to achieve zero bleeding events for 1 year in at least 50% of patients and to select the dosing regimens to be tested in phase III studies.

RESULTS

The RTTE model adequately predicted the bleeding onset over time as a function of plasma emicizumab concentration. Simulations suggested that plasma emicizumab concentrations of ≥  45 μg/mL should result in zero bleeding events for 1 year in at least 50% of patients. This efficacious exposure provided the basis for selecting previously untested dosing regimens of 1.5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks for phase III studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacometric approach guided the phase III dose selection of emicizumab in hemophilia A, without conducting a conventional dose-finding study. Phase III studies with the selected dosing regimens are currently ongoing. This case study indicates that a pharmacometric approach can substitute for a conventional dose-finding study in rare diseases and will streamline the drug development process.

Attempting to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence in haemophilia: The rationale for repeated ultrasound visualisations of the patient's joint status

Haemophilia is marked by joint bleeding (haemarthrosis) leading to cartilage damage (arthropathy). Lifelong prophylaxis-initiated after the first bleeding episode-leads to a dramatic decrease in arthropathy in haemophilia patients. However, adherence to continuous intravenous administrations of factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products is challenging, and patients potentially suffer from breakthrough bleedings while on prophylaxis. Newer FVIII/FIX products with enhanced convenience attributes and/or easier infusion procedures are intended to improve adherence. However, pharmacokinetic data should be harmonised with information from individual attitudes and treatment needs, to tailor intravenous dosing and scheduling in patients who receive extended half-life products. Nor is there sound evidence as to how subcutaneous non-FVIII/FIX replacement approaches (concizumab; emicizumab; fitusiran) or single intravenous injections of adeno-associated viral vectors (when employing gene therapy) will revolutionize adherence in haemophilia. In rheumatoid arthritis, repeated ultrasound examination of a patient's major joints is a valuable tool to educate patients and parents to understand the disease and provide an objective framework for clinicians to acknowledge patient's adherence. Joint ultrasound examination in haemophilia significantly correlates with cartilage damage, effusion, and synovial hypertrophy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, in patients with haemophilia undergoing prophylaxis with an extended half-life product for a ≈ 2.8 year period, a significant continued improvement in joint health is detected at the physical examination. This provides the rationale for studies on repeated ultrasound examinations of joint status to attempt to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence and help identify which approach is most suited on which occasion and for which patient.

Common themes and challenges in hemophilia care: a multinational perspective

OBJECTIVE

To identify ways that provision of hemophilia care can be maximized at the local level, irrespective of available resources or cultural or geographic challenges.

METHODS

The SHIELD group used its multinational experience to share examples of local initiatives that have been employed to deliver optimal hemophilia care.

RESULTS

The examples were reviewed and categorized into four key themes: guidelines and algorithms for delivery of care; collaboration with patients and allied groups for care and education; registries for the monitoring of treatment and outcomes and health care planning and delivery; and opportunities for personalization of care. These themes were then incorporated into a road map for collaborative care in hemophilia that reflected the contribution of best practice.

DISCUSSION

Differing healthcare reimbursement systems, budgetary constraints, and geographical and cultural factors make it difficult for any country to fully deliver ideal care for people with hemophilia. The SHIELD approach for collaborative care provides illustrative examples of how four key themes can be used to optimize hemophilia care in any setting.

ABBREVIATIONS

AHCDC: Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada; AICE: Italian Association of Hemophilia Centres; ATHN: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network; EAHAD: European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders; EHC: European Hemophilia Consortium; FIX: Coagulation Factor IX; FVIII: Coagulation Factor VIII; HAL: Haemophilia Activity List; HJHS: Haemophilia Joint Health Score; HTC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre; HTCCNC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre Collaborative Network of China; MASAC: Medical and Scientific Advisory Council; MDT: Multidisciplinary team; NHD: National Haemophilia Database; NHF: National Hemophilia Foundation; PK: Pharmacokinetics; POCUS: Point of care ultrasound; PWH: People with haemophilia; SHIELD: Supporting Hemophilia through International Education, Learning and Development; WFH: World Federation of Hemophilia.

Improved Pharmacokinetics with BAY 81-8973 Versus Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) Plasma/Albumin-Free Method: A Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Background

BAY 81-8973 is a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM)

Patients/Methods

In this phase I, open-label, crossover study, men aged 18–65 years with severe hemophilia A and ≥150 exposure days to FVIII were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or rAHF-PFM, followed by crossover to a single infusion of the other treatment. FVIII levels were measured in plasma over 48 h using one-stage and chromogenic assays. PK parameters, including area under the curve from time zero to the last data point (AUC_last; primary outcome) and half-life (t_½) were calculated. A population PK model was developed to simulate various treatment scenarios.

Results

Eighteen patients were randomized and analyzed. Using both assays, geometric mean (coefficient of variation [%CV]) AUC_last was significantly higher, and t_½ was significantly longer, for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM (one-stage, AUC_last: 1660 IU·h/dL [29.4] vs. 1310 IU·h/dL [29.0], p < 0.0001; one-stage, t_½: 14.5 [25.7] vs. 11.7 h [27.3], p < 0.0001). Simulations showed that median time to 1 IU/dL was approximately 27% longer for BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM over doses of 25–50 IU/kg; plasma levels >1 IU/dL could be maintained with 14.4 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 or 39.1 IU/kg rAHF-PFM 3×/week.

Conclusions

BAY 81-8973 showed a superior PK profile versus rAHF-PFM. The same FVIII trough threshold level could be achieved with lower doses of BAY 81-8973 versus rAHF-PFM.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02483208.

Pharmacokinetics and the transition to extended half-life factor concentrates: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

Extended half-life proteins (EHL) are increasingly used in clinical practice, but there is no standardized approach to sampling, interpretation and implementation of pharmacokinetics (PK) data to maximize treatment benefit. The goal of EHL treatment is to attain a trough level sufficient to protect against spontaneous bleeds and reduce infusion frequency and limitations on individual activity and lifestyle. Performing classical PK assessments requires multiple blood samples, which is burdensome for patients and providers. Herein we review a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approach to estimate individual PK parameters to transition patients from standard half-life (SHL) to EHL concentrates. We propose that a minimum of two to four post-infusion samples is sufficient to estimate individual PK profiles, with sufficient certainty to maintain factor levels above 1% and achieve bleed-free lifestyles. We also survey current PK use in patients transitioning to EHL, review key PK parameters and popPK models, and recommend an approach to using PK in patients initiating or switching to EHL.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Pilot evaluation of home delivery programme in haemophilia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Most of the clotting factor (CF) dispensations to haemophiliac patients are centralized in a few haemophilia treatment centres, necessitating frequent visits and long travel distances. The aim was to evaluate the home delivery programme developed by the Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Unit (OPCU) through the association of patients (ASHECOVA).

METHODS

A specific software programme was designed to communicate the individual CF requirements. Dispensations were prepared in advance, and an ASHECOVA member collected and delivered to patients' homes in optimal conditions. Data regarding the programme were analysed from December 2011 to December 2017. An electronic satisfaction survey with 34 questions was conducted, asking about organizational aspects, education and communication, use of apps and satisfaction level.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Forty-nine patients were included and 2464 home deliveries were made, without any reported incident related to dispensation errors, drug preservation, communication or confidentiality problems. This system avoids 11.4 annual dispensation visits per patient to OCPU, and a mean travel distance, time and cost of 1189.1 km, 945.3 minutes and 373.5 euros, respectively. Overall satisfaction with home delivery was 9.7, without any change suggested in the current system. Ninety-five per cent of individuals believed that the programme improves adherence and all patients would recommend it to other patients. The most common benefits reported were less frequent visits to hospital, reducing time and cost spent on transportation.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The home delivery programme guarantees a proper follow-up of treatments with full patient satisfaction. This programme allows OPCU to achieve better pharmaceutical care, traceability of the process and optimization of working times and CF stock management.

Preclinical pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of subcutaneously administered glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (N8-GP) and development of a human pharmacokinetic prediction model

Essentials N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A. Subcutaneous (SC) FVIII dosing might reduce the treatment burden of prophylaxis. SC N8-GP has a favorable PK profile in animal models and disappears from skin injection sites. Combined animal (SC) and clinical (IV) data suggest that daily SC dosing may provide prophylaxis.

SUMMARY

Background N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A. Subcutaneous administration of FVIII may reduce the treatment burden of prophylaxis; however, standard FVIII products have low bioavailability after subcutaneous dosing in animals. Objective To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, effectiveness and local distribution of subcutaneously administered N8-GP in preclinical models and predict the human pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Methods The pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered N8-GP were evaluated in FVIII knockout (F8-KO) mice and cynomolgus monkeys; a human PK prediction model in hemophilia A patients was developed. The hemostatic effect was evaluated in a tail vein bleeding model in F8-KO mice. The injection-site distribution and absorption of subcutaneously administered N8-GP were assessed in F8-KO mice by the use of temporal fluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry. Results Subcutaneously administered N8-GP had a bioavailability, a first-order absorption rate and a half-life, respectively, of 24%, 0.094 h-1 and 14 h in F8-KO mice, and 26%, 0.33 h-1 and 15 h in cynomolgus monkeys. A dose-dependent effect of subcutaneously administered N8-GP on blood loss was observed in mice. A minimal amount of N8-GP was detected at the injection site 48-72 h after single or multiple dose(s) in F8-KO mice. Subcutaneously administered N8-GP was localized to the skin around the injection site, with time-dependent disappearance from the depot. PK modeling predicted that subcutaneously administered N8-GP at a daily dose of 12.5 IU kg-1 will provide FVIII trough levels of 2.5-10% in 95% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Conclusions Subcutaneously administered N8-GP may provide effective hemophilia A prophylaxis. A phase I clinical trial is underway to investigate this possibility.

Pharmacokinetic modelling and validation of the half-life extension needed to reduce the burden of infusions compared with standard factor VIII

INTRODUCTION

Currently, no universally accepted definition of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) exists. Identifying the minimum half-life extension ratio required for a reduction in dosing frequency compared with standard rFVIII could enable a more practical approach to decisions around prophylaxis with EHL rFVIII.

AIM

To identify the half-life extension ratio required to decrease rFVIII dosing frequency by at least 1 day while maintaining the proportion of patients with plasma rFVIII levels above 1 IU/dL and without increasing the total weekly dose.

METHODS

A previously published population pharmacokinetic model for standard rFVIII was used to estimate the percentage of patients with factor VIII (FVIII) levels always >1 IU/dL using various benchmark regimens. Using modelling, dosing frequency was reduced while rFVIII half-life was extended until the percentage of patients with FVIII >1 IU/dL equalled that of the benchmark regimen.

RESULTS

Benchmark 3×/wk dosing totalling 100 IU/kg/wk of rFVIII resulted in 56.6% of patients with FVIII levels always >1 IU/dL. With 2×/wk dosing, totalling 80 or 90 IU/kg/wk, half-life extensions required to maintain 56.6% of patients at FVIII levels >1 IU/dL were 1.30 and 1.26, respectively. A half-life extension ratio of 1.33 was required to change dosing from every 48 hours to every 72 hours (both at 105 IU/kg/wk) while maintaining 92.8% of patients with FVIII >1 IU/dL.

CONCLUSION

Based on this investigation, EHL rFVIII products should have a minimum half-life extension ratio of 1.3 to provide a reduction in dosing frequency from 3× to 2×/wk compared with standard rFVIII products while maintaining the same minimum FVIII trough level.

Practical Implications of Factor IX Gene Transfer for Individuals with Hemophilia B: A Clinical Perspective

Gene therapy for severe hemophilia is on the cusp of entering clinical practice. However, there is limited clinical experience in this area given that gene transfer is a relatively recent technology. Therefore, this clinical perspective article will review the evidence supporting gene therapy in this field, examine ways to open a dialogue about gene therapy with patients in the clinic setting, and present a case of a participant in a recent clinical trial of gene therapy for hemophilia. Clinical trials in hemophilia using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors to transfer functional factor IX (FIX) have reported increases in FIX activity to functional levels, reduced bleed frequency, and a lessening or abrogation of the need for costly FIX replacement. The safety profile of AAV-mediated gene therapy also appears positive, with manageable, asymptomatic increases in liver enzymes being the most commonly described adverse event. Examining a clinical case in hemophilia B more closely, gene transfer decreased annualized bleeds from six (unknown or spontaneous) bleeds before treatment to three (spontaneous) bleeds after treatment alongside a 55% reduction in FIX replacement. The participant experienced an increase in traumatic bleeds after treatment, which appears to reflect increased physical activity and early prophylaxis discontinuation. After the gene transfer, the participant considered his hemophilia to be "cured," which emphasizes the need to manage patient expectations, particularly regarding activity levels and bleed risk in the immediate post-treatment period. Gene therapy for hemophilia has the potential to transform the lives of affected individuals and is likely to create a new class of hemophilia patient who has shifted from a severe to a mild phenotype. Despite having a mild phenotype, these individuals may retain a legacy of increased bleed risk and joint damage from their years with severe hemophilia and will need different clinical management compared to a more typical individual with mild hemophilia.

Optimization of prophylaxis for hemophilia A

Background & aims

Prophylactic injections of factor VIII reduce the incidence of bleeds and slow the development of joint damage in people with hemophilia. The aim of this study was to identify optimal person-specific prophylaxis regimens for children with hemophilia A.

Methods

Analytic and numerical methods were used to identify prophylaxis regimens which maximize the time for which plasma factor VIII concentrations exceed a threshold, maximize the lowest plasma factor VIII concentrations, and minimize risk of bleeds.

Results

It was demonstrated analytically that, for any injection schedule, the regimen that maximizes the lowest factor VIII concentration involves sharing doses between injections so that all of the trough concentrations in a prophylaxis cycle are equal. Numerical methods were used to identify optimal prophylaxis schedules and explore the trade-offs between efficacy and acceptability of different prophylaxis regimens. The prophylaxis regimen which minimizes risk of bleeds depends on the person’s pattern of physical activity and may differ greatly from prophylaxis regimens that optimize pharmacokinetic parameters. Prophylaxis regimens which minimize risk of bleeds also differ from prophylaxis regimens that are typically prescribed. Predictions about which regimen is optimal are sensitive to estimates of the effects on risk of bleeds of factor VIII concentration and physical activity.

Conclusion

The methods described here can be used to identify optimal, person-specific prophylaxis regimens for children with hemophilia A.

Setting the stage for individualized therapy in hemophilia: What role can pharmacokinetics play?

Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates (CFC) is the mainstay of treatment in hemophilia. Its widespread application has led to a dramatic decrease in morbidity and mortality in patients, with concomitant improvement of quality of life. However, dosing is challenging and costs are high. This review discusses benefits and limitations of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing of replacement therapy as an alternative for current dosing regimens. Dosing of CFC is now primarily based on body weight and based on its in vivo recovery (IVR). Benefits of PK-guided dosing include individualization of treatment with better targeting, more flexible blood sampling, increased insight into association of coagulation factor levels and bleeding, and potential overall lowering of overall costs. Limitations include a slight burden for the patient, and availability of closely collaborating, experienced clinical pharmacologists.

AAV5-Factor VIII Gene Transfer in Severe Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Patients with hemophilia A rely on exogenous factor VIII to prevent bleeding in joints, soft tissue, and the central nervous system. Although successful gene transfer has been reported in patients with hemophilia B, the large size of the factor VIII coding region has precluded improved outcomes with gene therapy in patients with hemophilia A.

METHODS

We infused a single intravenous dose of a codon-optimized adeno-associated virus serotype 5 (AAV5) vector encoding a B-domain-deleted human factor VIII (AAV5-hFVIII-SQ) in nine men with severe hemophilia A. Participants were enrolled sequentially into one of three dose cohorts (low dose [one participant], intermediate dose [one participant], and high dose [seven participants]) and were followed through 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Factor VIII activity levels remained at 3 IU or less per deciliter in the recipients of the low or intermediate dose. In the high-dose cohort, the factor VIII activity level was more than 5 IU per deciliter between weeks 2 and 9 after gene transfer in all seven participants, and the level in six participants increased to a normal value (>50 IU per deciliter) that was maintained at 1 year after receipt of the dose. In the high-dose cohort, the median annualized bleeding rate among participants who had previously received prophylactic therapy decreased from 16 events before the study to 1 event after gene transfer, and factor VIII use for participant-reported bleeding ceased in all the participants in this cohort by week 22. The primary adverse event was an elevation in the serum alanine aminotransferase level to 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range or less. Progression of preexisting chronic arthropathy in one participant was the only serious adverse event. No neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The infusion of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ was associated with the sustained normalization of factor VIII activity level over a period of 1 year in six of seven participants who received a high dose, with stabilization of hemostasis and a profound reduction in factor VIII use in all seven participants. In this small study, no safety events were noted, but no safety conclusions can be drawn. (Funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02576795 ; EudraCT number, 2014-003880-38 .).

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The prevention of bleeding by prophylactic factor replacement is the recommended approach for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis should be individualized to provide the best clinical benefit to each patient. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic approach is crucial. Areas covered: This review aims to concisely describe the basic principles of pharmacokinetics of FVIII, the role of population pharmacokinetic, the available different recombinant FVIII concentrates and the new extended half-life FVIII molecules with possible improvement in hemophilia A treatment. Expert opinion: Pharmacokinetic is a useful tool to predict the outcome of replacement therapy, even though a large inter-individual variability exists, becauseof several factors: age, weight, von Willebrand factor level, blood group, active bleed, presence of inhibitors to FVIII, FVIII concentrate. Among the different recombinant FVIII concentrates pharmacokinetic differences are minor and clinically not significant. The extended half-life FVIII products brings only moderate advances, as half life extension is limited to 1.5-1.8-fold in comparison to that of native FVIII. Thus, infusions could be done every fourth, rarely fifth day to ensure a safe through level and a significant benefit can be offered only to patients treated every other day or three times weekly.

Practical considerations in choosing a factor VIII prophylaxis regimen: Role of clinical phenotype and trough levels

Current therapy for haemophilia A is guided by severity of the disease, which in turn is best reflected in patients' endogenous factor VIII activity levels. For patients with severe haemophilia (particularly children), prophylaxis with continuous routine factor replacement has become standard of care in developed countries and is gradually becoming the standard of care in developing countries. The question arises then: what is an appropriate prophylaxis regimen to prevent bleeding events and arthropathy, while also maximizing patient quality of life and taking into consideration the costs of prophylaxis? Should all patients be treated with one standard, fixed prophylaxis regimen, or should prophylaxis be individualised for each patient? If so, what factors need to be considered in choosing the appropriate dose and frequency of factor administration? If prophylaxis is tailored to the individual patient, then patient-related factors (bleeding phenotype, activity profiles, age, joint status) and product-specific factors (half-life of the replacement factor in the individual patient) will determine the choice of regimen, whether it be a fixed-regimen prophylaxis or prophylaxis that is tailored to patient activity and bleeding risk. Regardless of the choice of prophylaxis regimen, for any regimen to be effective, adherence to therapy is key to optimising outcomes.

Break-through bleeding in relation to pharmacokinetics of Factor VIII in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As the pharmacokinetics (PK) of factor VIII (FVIII) is individualized in children with haemophilia A (HA), PK parameters may be indicators of patients' bleeding phenotype and instruction for their personalized replacement program.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between PK/FVIII level and bleeding frequency in Chinese paediatric patients with severe (HA).

METHODS

A total of 24 patients were enrolled in Beijing Children's Hospital from February to October 2015, all of whom were given 50 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates after a 72-hours washout period. Samples' activities (FVIII:C) were tested at 5 time points, using WinNonlin software for PK testing, and then the individual half-life(t_1/2 ) and the time (h) of FVIII concentrations <1 IU/dL within a week during prophylaxis were calculated. Baseline and the annual bleeding rate (ABR), annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean t_1/2 of FVIII was 10.20 ± 2.72 hours and the mean time of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week was 44.7 hours (-38.56 to 102.33 hours). A significant relationship between t_1/2 of FVIII and ABR₀ /AJBR₀ (baseline bleeding) was found (R²  = 0.75 and 0.62, P < .001). Besides, baseline and the annual bleeding rate during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia had a positive correlation with the time (hours) of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week (R²  = 0.67 and 0.52, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

t_1/2 was an important indicator to prevent bleeding in severe HA; the frequency of bleeding will be reduced with the increased of t_1/2 of FVIII. The data also demonstrates that increasing the time with a FVIII<1 IU/dL is associated with an increased rate of bleeding during prophylaxis.