Acetaminophen overdose: a 48-hour intravenous N-acetylcysteine treatment protocol

Drug-Induced Liver Disease

Drug-induced liver disease can result from dosage-dependent hepatotoxicity or from adverse reactions to drugs used in therapeutic dosage. The latter idiosyncratic hepatotoxins can cause clinical syndromes that mimic all known liver diseases, so that drugs must be considered as the possible causal agent for all unexplained cases of liver disease. The only specific antidote for dosage-dependent hepatotoxicity is n-acetylcysteine (and some other sulfhydryl donors), which is highly effective for the prevention of significant hepatotoxicity after acetaminophen overdose. Early diagnosis and prompt withdrawal of the offending drug is the key to successful management of most drug-induced liver diseases. The mainstay of treatment is supportive care, with careful monitoring for signs of acute liver failure or progression to chronic liver disease. In cases of liver failure, close liaison with a liver transplant center is crucial; referral for liver transplantation should be considered if standard transplant criteria are fulfilled. Pruritus is a major symptom of drug-induced cholestasis; protracted cases may respond to ursodeoxycholic acid. Corticosteroids can be considered for cases of drug-induced hepatitis, especially those with evidence of immune hypersensitivity, if no improvement is seen in 8 to 12 weeks. Although there are no controlled trials, some patients may respond favorably.

Update: the clinical importance of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in non-alcoholic and alcoholic subjects

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is one of the most commonly used over-the-counter medications. Taken in doses greater than 150 mg/kg/day (>10 g), it usually causes acute liver failure. The authors review mainly the management of acetaminophen toxicity in both users and nonusers of alcohol. Chronic alcoholics are a special subgroup, who risk serious toxicity when taking acetaminophen, even in therapeutic doses. The acetaminophen-alcohol interaction is complex, because acute and chronic ethanol have opposite effects. This review also considers physiological and clinical changes, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of acetaminophen poisoning.

Paracetamol, alcohol and the liver

It is claimed that chronic alcoholics are at increased risk of paracetamol (acetaminophen) hepatotoxicity not only following overdosage but also with its therapeutic use. Increased susceptibility is supposed to be due to induction of liver microsomal enzymes by ethanol with increased formation of the toxic metabolite of paracetamol. However, the clinical evidence in support of these claims is anecdotal and the same liver damage after overdosage occurs in patients who are not chronic alcoholics. Many alcoholic patients reported to have liver damage after taking paracetamol with 'therapeutic intent' had clearly taken substantial overdoses. No proper clinical studies have been carried out to investigate the alleged paracetamol-alcohol interaction and acute liver damage has never been produced by therapeutic doses of paracetamol given as a challenge to a chronic alcoholic. The paracetamol-alcohol interaction is complex; acute and chronic ethanol have opposite effects. In animals, chronic ethanol causes induction of hepatic microsomal enzymes and increases paracetamol hepatotoxicity as expected (ethanol primarily induces CYP2E1 and this isoform is important in the oxidative metabolism of paracetamol). However, in man, chronic alcohol ingestion causes only modest (about twofold) and short-lived induction of CYP2E1, and there is no corresponding increase (as claimed) in the toxic metabolic activation of paracetamol. The paracetamol-ethanol interaction is not specific for any one isoform of cytochrome P450, and it seems that isoenzymes other than CYP2E1 are primarily responsible for the oxidative metabolism of paracetamol in man. Acute ethanol inhibits the microsomal oxidation of paracetamol both in animals and man. This protects against liver damage in animals and there is evidence that it also does so in man. The protective effect disappears when ethanol is eliminated and the relative timing of ethanol and paracetamol intake is critical. In many of the reports where it is alleged that paracetamol hepatotoxicity was enhanced in chronic alcoholics, the reverse should have been the case because alcohol was actually taken at the same time as the paracetamol. Chronic alcoholics are likely to be most vulnerable to the toxic effects of paracetamol during the first few days of withdrawal but maximum therapeutic doses given at this time have no adverse effect on liver function tests. Although the possibility remains that chronic consumption of alcohol does increase the risk of paracetamol hepatotoxicity in man (perhaps by impairing glutathione synthesis), there is insufficient evidence to support the alleged major toxic interaction. It is astonishing that clinicians and others have unquestion-ingly accepted this supposed interaction in man for so long with such scant regard for scientific objectivity.

Acetaminophen intoxication during treatment: what you don't know can hurt you

For over two decades, pediatricians have been made aware of the potential risk associated with the acute ingestion of large single and/or multiple doses of acetaminophen (APAP). Clearly, APAP-induced hepatotoxicity remains as a recognized medical emergency which, when treated promptly with appropriate gastrointestinal decontamination and when indicated, with the antidote N-acetylcysteine, has a uniformly good clinical outcome. Recently, the hepatotoxic potential associated with "therapeutic" APAP administration has been brought to the attention of the pediatric community. This review explores the issue of APAP toxicity with therapeutic intent by examining both the clinical literature and also, relevant information concerning the basic pharmacology and toxicology of this old and widely used nonprescription drug. A "risk profile" is developed with regard to factors that may predispose infants and children to this iatrogenic form of toxicity so that the awareness of physicians and other caregivers (including parents) can be heightened and preventative education administered. As is true for most all potentially beneficial medicines used in pediatrics, awareness of the actual amount of drug received from all sources and caution to not exceed the age-appropriate dosing guidelines (i.e., both amount and duration) contained in the approved labeling for all products containing APAP will insure safe and effective therapy.

Utility of acetylcysteine in treating poisonings and adverse drug reactions

As recognition of the role of free radicals and reactive toxins in the pathogenesis of disease, poisoning, and adverse drug reactions has evolved, interest in the use of acetylcysteine as a modulator of these effects has steadily increased in recent years. Acetylcysteine is commonly thought to serve as a glutathione precursor and consequently can increase or sustain intracellular glutathione which scavenges reactive oxygen species caused by toxins or subsequent tissue injury. At least 10 additional mechanisms of action for acetylcysteine have been demonstrated in various laboratory models, but a unifying framework of its actions is still to be proposed. This paper reviews the current experimental and therapeutic status of acetylcysteine for the treatment of poisonings and adverse drug reactions. Of the 45 potential uses of acetylcysteine that were identified for the treatment of poisonings or adverse drug reactions, 14 of the toxic effects have little support for its use while promising results have been demonstrated for 27 toxicities. Currently, treatment of acute paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning is the only widely accepted clinical indication for acetylcysteine as a treatment for poisoning or adverse drug reactions. In many clinical situations acetylcysteine is used empirically utilising modifications of dosage regimens employed for paracetamol poisoning. Often it is difficult to determine the benefit of therapy with acetylcysteine owing to the nature of the toxicity being treated, the use of other therapies, the presence of comorbid conditions, and the small number of patients studied. The diverse and positive nature of the investigations suggest that there is considerable promise in acetylcysteine as a research tool and pharmacological agent.

Oral or intravenous N-acetylcysteine: which is the treatment of choice for acetaminophen (paracetamol) poisoning?

BACKGROUND

The optimal route and duration of administration for N-acetyl-cysteine in the management of acetaminophen (paracetamol) poisoning are controversial. It has been stated on the basis of a selected post-hoc analysis that oral N-acetylcysteine is superior to intravenous N-acetylcysteine in presentations later than 15 hours.

AIM OF STUDY

To investigate the efficacy of intravenous or oral N-acetylcysteine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed a series of acetaminophen poisonings treated with a protocol including activated charcoal and intravenous N-acetylcysteine. The outcomes assessed included use of N-acetylcysteine, adverse effects of intravenous N-acetylcysteine, and the occurrence of hepatotoxicity (transaminase > 1000 U/L). We incorporated these results in a meta-analysis of previously reported series of acetaminophen poisonings to compare the outcomes from intravenous and oral N-acetylcysteine use.

RESULTS

Of 981 patients admitted over 10 years, 4% (40) presented later than 24 hours and 10% (100) had concentrations of acetaminophen that indicated a probable or high risk of hepatotoxicity. The 30 patients who developed hepatotoxicity presented later, took larger amounts, had higher concentrations, and received N-acetylcysteine later than those who did not. No patients received a liver transplant but 2 patients died (one after referral to a transplant unit and one just before). Adverse reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine occurred in 6% (12/205) of patients but none prevented completion of the treatment. In the meta-analysis, those with probable or high risk concentrations had similar outcomes with intravenous (pooled n = 341) and oral N-acetylcysteine (pooled n = 1462) administration. Rates of hepatotoxicity for those treated within 10 hours (3 and 6%), late (10-24 hours: 30 and 26%), and overall (0-24 hours: 16 and 19%) were all similar. The proportion of patients classified as presenting later than 10 hours is much greater in the oral N-acetylcysteine studies (64%) than in many of the intravenous N-acetylcysteine studies (38%, 44%, and 63%).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences claimed between oral and intravenous N-acetylcysteine regimes are probably artifactual and relate to inappropriate subgroup analysis. A shorter hospital stay, patient and doctor convenience, and the concerns over the reduction in bioavailability of oral N-acetylcysteine by charcoal and vomiting make intravenous N-acetylcysteine preferable for most patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

Population-based incidence and outcome of acetaminophen poisoning by type of ingestion

OBJECTIVES

1) To determine, in a population-based sample, the observed frequency of acetaminophen overdose-related ED evaluation and hospitalization. 2) To examine the relative frequency of hospitalization by pattern of ingestion, the outcome of each group, and the presence or absence of postulated risk factors.

METHODS

This study was a 46-month, retrospective chart review of all acetaminophen-related visits, by patients at least 10 years of age, to either of the two hospitals that serve a four-county region of central Virginia.

RESULTS

Of 636 charts identified for review, only 137 involved acute or chronic acetaminophen overdose. One hundred twenty-six patients presented after an acute ingestion; 122 of these patients gave a history of a single, supratherapeutic ingestion of acetaminophen. Twenty-five patients were hospitalized for treatment. Eighteen of these were treated with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) based on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram; one suffered significant hepatic injury. The other seven presented at least 18 hours after ingestion, with no measurable serum acetaminophen. Two of these suffered significant hepatic injury. Four additional patients presented after multiple ingestions within 24 hours. Three were hospitalized, but none experienced significant injury. Only 11 patients were evaluated for chronic acetaminophen overmedication for pain (more than 6 g/day over a period of more than 24 hours). Four were admitted for treatment; three suffered significant hepatic injury. Thus, the observed incidence of acute acetaminophen ingestion in this region was 21.4/100,000/yr (95% CI = 17.7 to 25.2). The observed incidence of hospitalization for acute acetaminophen toxicity was 4.8/100,000/yr (95% CI = 3.0 to 6.5). The observed incidence of hospitalization for all acetaminophen poisoning was 5.5/100,000/yr (95% CI = 4.1 to 7.0). High ethanol consumption was present more frequently in those who suffered hepatic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients evaluated for acetaminophen ingestion present early following acute single overdose. Relatively few of these patients require hospitalization and, for those hospitalized, the outcome is good. More significantly, acetaminophen overdose patients whose risk cannot be estimated using the Rumack-Matthew nomogram represented 44% of those hospitalized and 83% of those who suffered significant hepatic injury. Emergency physicians need to determine how they can impact the outcome of these patients. Efforts should be directed at further characterizing historical, physical, and biochemical markers of risk and at determining in which circumstances hospitalization for NAC or other therapies is justified.

Mechanism of action and value of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of early and late acetaminophen poisoning: a critical review

INTRODUCTION

The mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine in early acetaminophen poisoning is well understood, but much remains to be learned of the mechanism of its possible benefit in acetaminophen poisoning presenting beyond 15 hours.

METHODS

Selective review of medical literature. N-acetylcysteine should be used in all cases of early acetaminophen poisoning where the plasma acetaminophen concentration lies "above the line;" which line is chosen depends on individual preference and whether enzyme induction is suspected. Particular care should be taken with the use of the nomogram for patients with chronic excess ingestion of acetaminophen or for those who have taken slow-release formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is a trend suggesting a beneficial effect of N-acetylcysteine in some patients presenting beyond 15 hours, further research is necessary to establish just how effective N-acetylcysteine is, particularly in patients presenting with fulminant hepatic failure. Candidate mechanisms for a beneficial effect in-clude improvement of liver blood flow, glutathione replenishment, modification of cytokine production, and free radical or oxygen scavenging. Hemody-namic and oxygen delivery and utilization parameters must be monitored carefully during delayed N-acetylcysteine treatment of patients with fulminant hepatic failure, as unwanted vasodilation may be deleterious to the maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure.

Management of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To develop management guidelines for the treatment of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and to assess the safety of restarting the infusion after a reaction.

METHODS

In phased 1, we used a 6-year retrospective case series of hospitalized patients and a review of the literature to develop the management guidelines for anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous NAC. In phase 2, these guidelines were evaluated prospectively in our poison-control center.

RESULTS

In phase 1, the charts of 11 patients with anaphylactoid reactions (9 cutaneous and 2 systemic) were reviewed. In most cases, no treatment or treatment with diphenhydramine alone or with salbutamol was sufficient to continue or restart NAC infusion safely. On the basis of our findings in those patients and on published experience, we concluded that anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous NAC are dose-related and the antihistamines are useful in controlling and in preventing recurrence of anaphylactoid symptoms. We developed the following guidelines: flushing requires no treatment, urticaria should be treated with diphenhydramine, and NAC infusion should be continued in both cases. Angioedema and respiratory symptoms each require the administration of diphenhydramine and symptomatic therapy. In these cases, NAC infusion should be stopped but, when necessary, can be started 1 hour after the administration of diphenhydramine in the absence of symptoms. In phase 2, 50 patients (31 cutaneous and 19 systemic reactions) were treated prospectively with the use of these guidelines. Recurrence of symptoms occurred in only one case involving a deviation from the guidelines. The NAC infusion was restarted immediately after the administration of diphenhydramine in a patient who sustained a systemic reaction.

CONCLUSION

Non-life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous NAC are treated easily and the infusion may be continued or restarted safely after the administration of diphenhydramine.

Use of ondansetron and other antiemetics in the management of toxic acetaminophen ingestions

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with acetaminophen toxicity and vomiting are often treated with antiemetics so that orally administered N-acetylcysteine can be retained. The policy at the West Virginia Poison Center is to reserve ondansetron, an antiemetic with a higher cost than other antiemetics, as a second line agent for patients presenting within 8 hours of an acetaminophen ingestion.

METHODS

A retrospective study of cases between January 1993 and December 1995, in which the primary or secondary drug ingested was an adult-strength, acetaminophen-only formulation and the ingestion resulted in vomiting. Seventy-eight patients with laboratory-verified acetaminophen toxicity and vomiting were evaluated for the type of antiemetics used and the antiemetic's effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of the 78 acetaminophen toxic patients with vomiting, 17/51 patients (33.3%) who received a nonondansetron antiemetic failed therapy and required IV ondansetron. Of the 24 patients who received ondansetron, 4 patients (16.7%) failed therapy. All four patients who failed ondansetron therapy had previously failed other antiemetic therapy.

DISCUSSION

Although ondansetron had a lower failure rate than nonondansetron antiemetics, almost two-thirds of acetaminophen toxic patients with vomiting did not require ondansetron to control their vomiting. Health care costs would have been higher had these patients received ondansetron as their initial therapy. Antiemetics were found to be highly effective as only 3/78 patients (4%) required IV N-acetylcysteine secondary to antiemetic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron should be utilized as a second-line agent in the management of acetaminophen toxic patients with vomiting. Because of its lower failure rate, ondansetron should be administered as a first-line agent in patients with a delay in N-acetylcysteine administration approaching 8 or more hours.

Intravenous administration of oral N-acetylcysteine

OBJECTIVE

To report the indications and adverse events associated with administration of the oral N-acetylcysteine preparation by the intravenous route.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series analysis of 226,720 Toxic Exposure Surveillance System data sheets from a certified regional poison center during the period January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1993.

SETTING

A regional poison center certified by the American Association of Poison Control Centers.

PATIENTS

Seventy-six patients treated with the oral N-acetylcysteine solution by the intravenous route.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We report the indications and adverse events associated with the intravenous administration of the oral N-acetylcysteine preparation. Four (4/76, 5.3%) patients developed adverse events attributable to N-acetylcysteine. None of these events involved hemodynamic, cardiovascular, or pulmonary effects. All reactions occurred during infusion of the initial N-acetylcysteine dose. There were three (3/76, 3.9%) deaths overall; however, they were not attributable to the intravenous administration of the oral N-acetylcysteine preparation.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of the oral N-acetylcysteine preparation appears to have limited adverse effects and offers another mechanism of delivery of the potentially lifesaving N-acetylcysteine when oral administration is not possible.

Efficacy of oral versus intravenous N-acetylcysteine in acetaminophen overdose: results of an open-label, clinical trial

We compared the clinical course of pediatric patients (n = 25) with acetaminophen poisoning treated with an investigational intravenous preparation of N-acetylcysteine (IV-NAC) with that of historical control subjects (n = 29) treated with conventional oral NAC (O-NAC) therapy. Patients received IV-NAC for 52 hours; historical control subjects received O-NAC (72 hours). There were no significant intergroup differences between treatment groups in age (15.5 vs 15.9 years), gender (88% vs 90% female) or distribution of risk categories (probable risk, 12 vs 15; high risk; 13 vs 14). The peak prothrombin time was significantly higher in the IV-NAC group (14.2 vs 13.6 seconds; p = 0.048). Mean treatment delay was significantly longer in the IV-NAC group (14.4 vs 10.4 hours; p = 0.001). Hepatoxicity was noted in two (8.0%) patients in the IV-NAC treatment group and two (6.9%) patients in the O-NAC group. All patients recovered. Our results indicate that 52 hours of intravenous NAC is as effective as 72 hours of oral NAC.

Cimetidine enhances the hepatoprotective action of N-acetylcysteine in mice treated with toxic doses of paracetamol

Paracetamol, in toxic doses, is associated with extensive liver damage. This represents one of the common causes of morbidity and mortality in drug poisoning cases. This study was undertaken to investigate the possible potentiation of the hepatoprotective action of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) by cimetidine (CMD), an inhibitor of hepatic microsomal oxidative enzymes. The effects of NAC, cimetidine and the two in combination, administered 2 h post-paracetamol dose, on mortality, plasma glutamic oxaloacetic (GOT) and glutamic pyruvic (GPT) transaminase activities and hepatic reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were investigated in mice 24 h after treatment with a single oral dose of paracetamol (400 mg/kg). Both NAC and cimetidine caused a partial improvement of survival rate, plasma GOT and GPT activities. In addition, they prevented the depletion of hepatic GSH contents. However, concomitant administration of NAC and cimetidine produced a 100% survival rate and a marked reduction in plasma GOT and GPT activities to within the normal range, while significantly raising hepatic GSH concentrations to values close to those measured in saline-treated control animals. It is therefore concluded that cimetidine and N-acetylcysteine may have an additive hepatoprotective action in the treatment of paracetamol overdose.

Pearls, pitfalls, and updates in toxicology

Pearls and pitfalls learned from our practical experiences caring for poisoned patients are presented. Clinical pearls include the following: using diagnostic tests to detect end-organ toxicity, applying physiologic principles to the management of hemodynamically unstable poisoned patients, and dealing with psychologic injuries from hazardous materials incidents. Recognizing serious complications from poisoning and adverse drug effects, including the serotonin syndrome, are offered as pitfalls. Pharmaceutical companies are rapidly developing and marketing new therapies. Therefore, updates on the evolving role of NAC as an antidote for acetaminophen poisoning, new psychotropic medications, and new antidotes were included in this article. These pearls, pitfalls, and updates are intended to provide practical information that is readily applicable to the clinical practice of emergency medicine.

Paracetamol overdose: pathophysiology and nursing management

Paracetamol overdose now represents one third of all self-poisoning cases. In contrast to other drugs, the use of paracetamol as a self-poisoning agent is increasing. As very large doses of the drug cause severe liver injury, which can result in fulminant hepatic failure when left untreated, it is essential that nurses have a complete understanding of the mechanisms of normal paracetamol metabolism, effects of overdosage and treatment strategies to guide the nursing management of clients. This review therefore critically examines the pathophysiology and nursing management of clients with acute paracetamol overdosage.

Thiols decrease human interleukin (IL) 4 production and IL-4-induced immunoglobulin synthesis

N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant precursor of intracellular glutathione (GSH), usually given in human as a mucolytic agent. In vitro, NAC and GSH have been shown to act on T cells by increasing interleukin (IL) 2 production, synthesis and turnover of IL-2 receptors, proliferation, cytotoxic properties, and resistance to apoptosis. We report here that NAC and GSH decrease in a dose-dependent manner human IL-4 production by stimulated peripheral blood T cells and by T helper (Th) 0- and Th2-like T cell clones. This effect was associated with a decrease in IL-4 messenger RNA transcription. In contrast, NAC and GSH had no effect on interferon gamma and increased IL-2 production and T cell proliferation. A functional consequence was the capacity of NAC and GSH to selectively decrease in a dose-dependent manner IL-4-induced immunoglobulin (Ig) E and IgG4 production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Interestingly, NAC and GSH also acted directly on purified tonsillar B cells by decreasing the mature epsilon messenger RNA, hence decreasing IgE production. In contrast, IgA and IgM production were not affected. At the same time, B cell proliferation was increased in a dose-dependent manner. Not all antioxidants tested but only SH-bearing molecules mimicked these properties. Finally, when given orally to mice, NAC decreased both IgE and IgG1 antibody responses to ovalbumin. These results demonstrate that NAC, GSH, and other thiols may control the production of both the Th2-derived cytokine IL-4 and IL-4-induced Ig in vitro and in vivo.

[Acute liver failure caused by paracetamol: should treatment with N-acetylcysteine be prolonged?]

BACKGROUND

Some cases of paracetamol-induced acute hepatic failure may require liver transplantation but the present shortage of graft urges the search for an alternate therapeutic approach.

CASE REPORT

A 17 year-old girl was admitted for sleepingness and vomiting after about 15 hours of voluntary but denied absorption of paracetamol. Plasma paracetamol concentration was 120 mg/l; factors VII+X level were 55% and factor V 106%. The patient was given IV N-acetylcysteine, 150 mg/kg/30 min, then 50 mg/kg/4 hours. Further decrease in facteur VII level led to pursue administration of N-acetylcysteine (total dose: 350 mg/kg/2 hours). While indication of liver transplantation was considered, clinical and laboratory findings definitely improved.

CONCLUSIONS

N-acetylcysteine may be effective even if administered late. Repeated determination of factor VII could be a good means for managing such a severe condition.

4-Methylpyrazole blocks acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in the rat

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 4-methylpyrazole inhibits the hepatotoxic effects of acetaminophen in a rat model. DESIGN AND TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: A nonblinded experiment using male Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Animals were divided into four groups. Groups 1 through 3 received 2,000 mg/kg acetaminophen by gavage; group 4 acted as a control. At four or eight hours, group 2 received 400 mg/kg 4-methylpyrazole; group 3 received 50 mg/kg 4-methylpyrazole. Blood samples were taken for measurements of serum AST and ALT levels. Livers were removed for microscopic examination and grading of necrosis.

RESULTS

Lower AST and ALT levels were obtained for both the 400-mg/kg (P < .01) and 50-mg/kg (P < .05) doses of 4-methylpyrazole administered four hours after acetaminophen. Although mean AST and ALT levels also were lower when 400 and 50 mg/kg 4-methylpyrazole were administered eight hours after acetaminophen, these results were not statistically significant. Median necrosis scores were 3 for rats receiving acetaminophen alone, 0.5 for those receiving acetaminophen and 400 mg/kg 4-methylpyrazole (P < .05), 1 for those receiving acetaminophen and 50 mg/kg 4-methylpyrazole (P < .05), and 0 for control rats (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

When administered four hours after a toxic dose of acetaminophen, 4-methylpyrazole significantly inhibits hepatotoxicity in the rat, as reflected by lower levels of serum transaminases and lesser degrees of hepatic necrosis.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning

Paracetamol poisoning caused by intentional overdose remains a common cause of morbidity. In this article the mechanism of toxicity and the clinical effects and treatment of poisoning, including specific antidotal therapy, are reviewed. Areas for further research directed at reducing morbidity and mortality from paracetamol poisoning are considered.

Paracetamol poisoning and the kidney

Nephrotoxicity is less common than hepatotoxicity in paracetamol overdose but renal tubular damage and acute renal failure occur even in the absence of hepatotoxicity. It is possible that antidotal therapy with agents such as N-acetylcysteine may not prevent renal toxicity and, indeed, on the basis of animal work, may actually potentiate tubular damage. Careful clinical attention should be paid to renal function in patients poisoned with paracetamol.