151
|
Should inflammatory bowel disease be a contraindication to radiation therapy: a systematic review of acute and late toxicities. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [i.e., Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)] has been considered a relative contraindication for radiation therapy (RT) to the abdomen or pelvis, potentially preventing patients with a diagnosis of IBD from receiving definitive therapy for their malignancy.Method:Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) conventions, a PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was conducted using the keywords RT, brachytherapy, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and toxicity.Results:A total of 1,206 publications were screened with an addition of 8 studies identified through hand searching. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The total population across all studies was 497 patients, 50·5% having UC, 37% having CD and an additional 12·5% having unspecified IBD. Primary gastrointestinal malignancy (55%) followed by prostate cancer (40%) composed the bulk of the population. Acute and late grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal specific toxicity ranged from 0–23% to 0–13% respectively for those patients with IBD treated with RT to the abdomen or pelvis. In the literature reviewed, RT does not appear to increase fistula or stricture formation or IBD flares; however, one study did note RT to be a statistically significant risk factor for subsequent IBD flare on multivariate analysis.Conclusions:A review of reported acute and late toxicities suggests that patients with IBD should still be considered for definitive radiotherapy. Patient characteristics including IBD distribution relative to the irradiated field, inflammatory activity at the time of radiation, overall disease severity and disease phenotype in the case of CD (fistulising versus stricturing versus inflammatory only) should be considered on an individual basis when evaluating potential patients. When possible, advanced techniques with strict organ at risk dose constraints should be employed to limit toxicity in this patient population.
Collapse
|
152
|
Post-Operative Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020; 52:976-982. [PMID: 32936391 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00401-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (stage II/III) includes preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) followed by resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a new treatment paradigm that delivers systemic therapy prior to CRT aimed at improving outcomes for high-risk patients. Here we analyzed the national cancer database (NCDB) comparing short-term post-operative outcomes between patients receiving TNT and CRT. METHODS The NCDB was queried to identify patients with LARC between the 2004 and 2014 treated with TNT or CRT. Primary outcomes included post-operative 30-day mortality and readmissions between TNT and CRT which were analyzed via logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included post-operative length of stay (LOS) and OS which were compared with two-tailed t-test and Kaplan-Meier with log rank testing, respectively. RESULTS A total of 9066 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age at diagnosis that was 57 years (IQR, 19-65); 62.3% were male and 87.8% white. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of either standard CRT (97.2%) or TNT (2.8%). Patients treated at academic programs and those with N1 [p < 0.001, OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.71-3.19] or N2 [p < 0.001, OR 3.29, 95%CI 2.19-4.94] disease were associated with increased utilization of TNT. TNT was not significantly associated with either 30-day mortality (p = 1.0) or readmissions (p = 0.82). Further, there was no significant difference identified between CRT and TNT for hospital LOS or OS (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION This large-scale analysis of patients with LARC demonstrates increased utilization of TNT in patients harboring node-positive disease. Further, TNT does not appear to increase 30-day post-operative mortality, readmissions, or hospital LOS.
Collapse
|
153
|
Susko M, Wang CJ, Lazar AA, Kim S, Laffan A, Feng M, Ko A, Venook AP, Atreya CE, Van Loon K, Anwar M. Factors Impacting Differential Outcomes in the Definitive Radiation Treatment of Anal Cancer Between HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Patients. Oncologist 2020; 25:772-779. [PMID: 32390297 PMCID: PMC7485368 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is uncommon, yet seen more frequently in the setting of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Chemoradiotherapy is the definitive modality of treatment for patients with ASCC; this study examines factors impacting clinical outcomes in a large cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated for nonmetastatic ASCC at a single institution between 2005 and 2018. Freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS During the study period, 111 patients initiated definitive treatment for ASCC. Median age of the entire cohort was 56.7 years (interquartile range, 51.5-63.5), with 52 patients (46.8%) being HIV-positive. At median follow-up of 28.0 months, the 2- and 5-year FFLR were 78.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.4-87.0) and 74.6% (95% CI, 65.8-84.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed time from diagnosis to treatment initiation (median, 8 weeks; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10) to be significantly associated with worse FFLR and OS. HIV-positive patients had a trend toward worse FFLR (log-ranked p = .06). For HIV-positive patients with post-treatment CD4 less than 150 cells per mm3 , there was significantly worse OS (log-ranked p = .015). CONCLUSION A trend toward worse FFLR was seen in HIV-positive patients, despite similar baseline disease characteristics as HIV-negative patients. Worse FFLR and OS was significantly associated with increased time from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Poorer OS was seen in HIV-positive patients with a post-treatment CD4 count less than 150 cells per mm3 . IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma can represent a difficult clinical scenario. Definitive radiation with concurrent chemotherapy is highly effective but can result in significant toxicity and a decrease in CD4 count that could predispose to HIV-related complications. As HIV-positive patients have largely been excluded from prospective clinical trials, this study seeks to provide greater understanding of their outcomes with radiation therapy, potential predictors of worse local control and overall survival, and those most at risk after completion of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Susko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chia‐Ching Jackie Wang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General HospitalSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ann A. Lazar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Stephanie Kim
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General HospitalSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Angela Laffan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Andrew Ko
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alan P. Venook
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chloe E. Atreya
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Gao X, Goffredo P, Kahl AR, Charlton ME, Weigel RJ, Hassan I. Chemoradiation versus local excision in treatment of stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2020; 46:1663-1667. [PMID: 32199768 PMCID: PMC7434694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) but can have significant treatment related toxicities. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of local excision (LE) for stage I ASCC with comparable oncologic outcomes to CRT. We aimed to evaluate this finding in a large population-based database. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage I (T1N0M0) ASCC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2004-2015. Treatment approach was categorized as CRT or LE. Factors associated with treatment approach and cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed for the entire cohort and after stratification by tumor size (≤1 cm and 1-2 cm). RESULTS Among 883 patients, 56% had ASCCs 1-2 cm in size and 77% received CRT. Mean age was 60 years, 65% were female, and 90% were White. Factors independently associated with receiving CRT were, being female, higher tumor grade, and tumor size 1-2 cm. Unadjusted 5-year CSS for CRT was 96% while for LE it was 98% (p = 0.048). After adjusting for available confounders, treatment approach was not associated with worse CSS, however being Black (HR = 8.7) and uninsured (HR = 13.7) were independently associated with worse prognosis. After stratification by tumor size, there was still no significant difference in 5-year CSS by treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS LE was performed in a significant proportion of patients but was not independently associated with worse CSS compared to CRT. In appropriately selected patients with well differentiated ASCCs ≤1 cm, LE could be an acceptable management option but studies measuring outcomes such as local recurrence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Gao
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Paolo Goffredo
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Amanda R Kahl
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N Riverside Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Mary E Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N Riverside Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Ronald J Weigel
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Imran Hassan
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Camandaroba MPG, Iseas S, Oliveira C, Taboada RG, Xerfan MP, Mauro CC, Silva VS, Barros M, de Jesus VHF, Felismino T, Aguiar S, Gobo ML, Mello CA, Riechelmann RP. Disease-Free Survival and Time to Complete Response After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Anus According to HIV Infection. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:e129-e136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
156
|
Wallington DG, Holliday EB. Preparing Patients for Sexual Dysfunction After Radiation for Anorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:193-201. [PMID: 32777386 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Successful multimodality treatment of anorectal cancers has led to increased numbers of survivors who experience permanent, life-changing side effects of treatment. Little is known about sexual dysfunction (SD) in this population. The etiology of SD after anorectal cancer treatment is complex and multifactorial. However, pelvic radiation plays a significant negative role in anatomic, hormonal, and physiological aspects of sexual function. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Information was organized by key concepts useful for patient education, including (1) rates of SD after pelvic radiation for rectal cancer, (2) rates of SD after pelvic radiation for anal cancer, (3) mechanisms of SD and methods to reduce rates of SD, and (4) issues and opportunities related to patient education and discussion of SD after pelvic radiation. RESULTS SD after pelvic radiation for anorectal cancers is common in both men and women. Higher radiation doses may increase the risk for vaginal stenosis; however, it is unclear whether there are similar dose-volume relationships for men. Vaginal dilators and advanced radiation techniques can reduce the radiation dose to sexual organs at risk. Improvement is needed regarding counseling and education of patients about SD. CONCLUSIONS This review provides information from previously published studies that clinicians may use in their discussions with patients embarking on pelvic radiation for anorectal cancers. More modern, standardized, and complete data are needed to quantify the risk of SD after treatment. Some methods of sexual toxicity reduction have been studied, but further study into interventions aimed at treating postradiation sexual function are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Wallington
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Acute organ toxicity correlates with better clinical outcome after chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:168-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
158
|
Lum C, Prenen H, Body A, Lam M, Segelov E. A 2020 update of anal cancer: the increasing problem in women and expanding treatment landscape. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14:665-680. [PMID: 32458709 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1775583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anal cancer is a rare malignancy with increasing incidence, notably in women. This disease is highly associated with HPV infection and its incidence and mortality are currently rising. Most patients present with localized disease which has a high survival after definitive treatment with chemoradiation. For patients who develop metastatic disease or present with this de novo, survival is poor. AREAS COVERED This review provides a summary of current literature on anal cancer. With a focus on women, this includes current epidemiological trends, role of HPV, and the current and future treatment landscape, including HPV vaccination and immunotherapy. Screening currently focusses on HIV-positive men, missing most female cases. In curative disease, trials are investigating treatment de-intensification in good prognostic groups. Immunotherapy is showing early promise in the advanced disease setting. EXPERT OPINION Similar to cervical cancer, anal cancer is strongly associated with HPV, and therefore, broader implementation of screening programs may reduce its incidence. HPV vaccination is expected to reduce the development of (pre)malignant anal lesions. The emergence of biomarkers will assist patient treatment selection, allowing optimal balance of treatment efficacy and morbidity. It is hoped that new treatment approaches, including immunotherapy, will improve outcomes. International collaboration is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Lum
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Hans Prenen
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia.,Oncology Department, University Hospital Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Amy Body
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Marissa Lam
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia
| | - Eva Segelov
- Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University , Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND US health care is increasingly defined by over expenditure and inefficiency. Optimizing patient follow-up is critical, especially in cancers treated with high control rates. To optimize patient care, this study assessed time to disease recurrence or toxicity in patients with anal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 140 patients with biopsy-proven, nonmetastatic anal carcinoma, treated with chemoradiation utilizing intensity-modulated radiation therapy, were identified from our institutional database. This retrospective study evaluated local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and late ≥grade 3 toxicity (LG3T). Patients were followed posttreatment every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months in years 3 to 5, then yearly thereafter per NCCN recommendations. RESULTS The median age and follow-up was 58 years and 27 months, respectively. Patients were categorized into high (n=61; 44%) and low (n=77; 55%) risk groups based on stage. The 2-year LC, DMFS, and OS were 93%, 94%, and 89% and 5-year LC, DMFS, OS were 92%, 87%, and 85%, respectively. Overall, there were 29 events (9 LR, 11 DM, and 9 LG3T), with 62% of events occurring within year 1 and 79% within 2 years. Stratified by event type, at 2 years 89% of LR, 64% of DM, and 89% LG3T were identified. At the remaining follow-up points, the event incidence rate was 1.3%. CONCLUSION With the majority of recurrences/toxicities occurring within the first 2 years, a reduction in follow-up during years 3 to 5 may provide adequate surveillance. Revisions of the current recommendations could maximize resources while improving patient quality of life.
Collapse
|
160
|
Lee GC, Ricciardi R, Stafford C, Hong TS, Francone TD, Bordeianou LG, Kunitake H. Association of Time Between Radiation and Salvage APR and Margin Status in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation. Am Surg 2020; 86:703-714. [PMID: 32683973 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820923326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There is a controversy regarding the optimal time to assess anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) response to chemoradiation and when salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) should be offered. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with stage I-III anal SCC treated with chemoradiation in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). The time between radiation and APR was recorded. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to determine predictors of resection margin status and overall survival. The cohort included 23 050 patients, of whom 545 (2.4%) underwent salvage APR. The median (IQR) time between radiation and resection was 3.8 (2.4-5.5) months. The rate of positive margins was 19.0%. Positive margins were more common in male, non-white patients with larger tumors, pathologic upstaging of T stage, and ≥3 months between chemoradiation and resection (all P < .05). Observing for ≥3 months between chemoradiation and APR remained associated with positive margins, even after adjusting for pretreatment tumor size (odds ratio = 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.47). Our data, based on the largest published cohort of anal SCC patients treated with chemoradiation and subsequent APR, suggest that patients at high risk of local treatment failure, particularly non-white men with large tumors, may benefit from early interim restaging and earlier consideration of salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Lee
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rocco Ricciardi
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin Stafford
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- 2348 Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Todd D Francone
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hiroko Kunitake
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Pretta A, Trevisi E, Bregni G, Deleporte A, Hendlisz A, Sclafani F. Treatment compliance in early-stage anal cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1282-1284. [PMID: 32707167 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Pretta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Trevisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Bregni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Deleporte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Hendlisz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Sclafani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Noticewala SS, Ludmir EB, Eng C, Holliday EB, Minsky BD, Morris VK, Das P. Anal cancer treatment regimen considerations for the COVID-19 era: In regard to Tchelebi et al. Radiother Oncol 2020; 151:56-57. [PMID: 32710989 PMCID: PMC7375313 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal S Noticewala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, United States
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Knight K, Choong JX, McKee RF, Anderson JH, Horgan PG, McMillan DC, McDonald A, Roxburgh CS. The Influence of Systemic Inflammation on Treatment Response and Survival in Anal Squamous Cell Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e22-e30. [PMID: 32709540 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The incidence of anal squamous cell cancer (SCCA) is rising. Although chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provides a chance of cure, a proportion of patients have an incomplete response or develop recurrence. This study assessed the value of inflammation-based prognostic indicators, including the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in patients with SCCA treated by CRT with curative intent. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed SCCA were identified from pathology records. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were abstracted. The mGPS (0 = normal C-reactive protein [CRP] and albumin, 1 = CRP >10 mg/l and 2 = CRP >10 mg/l and albumin <35 mg/l) and NLR were calculated from routine blood tests obtained prior to CRT. RESULTS In total, 118 patients underwent CRT for SCCA between December 2007 and February 2018. Of these, 99 patients had appropriate pretreatment blood results available. Systemic inflammation as indicated by NLR >3 and mGPS >0 was present in 41% and 39% of patients, respectively. Most patients had T2 or larger tumours (n = 85, 86%) without nodal involvement (n = 64, 65%). An elevated mGPS was associated with more advanced T-stage (56% versus 35%, P = 0.036). NLR >5 was associated with nodal positivity (56% versus 31%, P = 0.047). On multivariate analysis, more advanced T-stage (odds ratio 7.49, 95% confidence interval 1.51-37.20, P = 0.014) and a raised mGPS (odds ratio 5.13, 95% confidence interval 1.25-21.14, P = 0.024) were independently related to incomplete CRT response. An elevated mGPS was prognostic of inferior survival (hazard ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.47-6.50, P = 0.003) and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 4.32, 95% confidence interval 1.54-12.15, P = 0.006), independent of TNM stage. CONCLUSION Systemic inflammation, as measured by the mGPS, is associated with an incomplete CRT response and is independently prognostic of inferior survival in patients with SCCA. The mGPS may offer a simple marker of inferior outcome that could be used to identify high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Knight
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
| | - J X Choong
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - R F McKee
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - J H Anderson
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - P G Horgan
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - D C McMillan
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - A McDonald
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - C S Roxburgh
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Rotundo MS, Zampino MG, Ravenda PS, Bagnardi V, Peveri G, Dell'Acqua V, Surgo A, Trovato C, Bottiglieri L, Bertani E, Petz WL, Fumagalli Romario U, Fazio N. Cisplatin plus capecitabine concomitant with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma: the experience of a single research cancer center. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920940945. [PMID: 32728394 PMCID: PMC7364808 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920940945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: The standard treatment of non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) consists of chemotherapy with mitomycin (MMC) plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) for 1–2 cycles concomitant with pelvic radiotherapy. Subsequent studies introduced cisplatin (CDDP) combined with 5FU, with unclear results. We evaluated the doublet capecitabine (C) and CDDP as a possible alternative to MMC-5FU regimen concomitant with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients and Methods: We carried out a retrospective study on 67 patients affected by stage I–III ASCC, treated with CDDP (60–70 mg/m2 every 21 days for two courses) plus C (825 mg/m2 twice daily for 5 days/week) chemotherapy concomitant with IMRT for curative intent. Results: At a median follow up of 41 months, the clinical complete response calculated at the 6-month time-point (6-moCR), the 6-month objective response rate and the 6-month disease control rate were 93%, 94%, and 99%, respectively. Disease-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 89%, 87%, and 85%, while the overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 100% and 95%. The colostomy-free survival rates were 90% at 1 year and 88% at 2 years. Grade 3–4 acute adverse events were reported in 61% of patients; predominantly skin toxicity (46%) and limited hematological toxicity (12%). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, chemotherapy with C plus CDDP concomitant with IMRT proved safe and effective, and may represent a possible alternative option to standard MMC-containing regimen for curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saveria Rotundo
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Paola Simona Ravenda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Giulia Peveri
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Cristina Trovato
- Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Luca Bottiglieri
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Emilio Bertani
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wanda Luisa Petz
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Standard treatment for early-stage squamous cell cancer of the anal canal (SCCA) includes concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to achieve curative intent. Treatment options are limited, however, especially with locoregional disease relapse occurring in 20-30% of patients and about 10-30% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. With more than 90% of SCCAs occurring in the setting of HPV, immune-based therapies are now the target of possible new treatments for this rare disease. This review highlights the role of immunotherapy in HPV-associated SCCA. RECENT FINDINGS Immunotherapy has been shown to extend progression-free survival and overall survival in various solid malignancies, including SCCA. So far, single-agent monotherapy with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab has shown durable clinical response with a tolerable side effect profile. The 2018 NCCN guidelines now advise nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy as second-line treatment in the management of metastatic SCCA. Further investigation with immunotherapy continues to be critical for such a rare malignancy with few treatment options.
Collapse
|
166
|
Martin D, Balermpas P, Gollrad J, Weiß C, Valentini C, Stuschke M, Schäfer H, Henkenberens C, Debus J, Krug D, Kuhnt T, Brunner T, Bostel T, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Nestle U, Combs SE, Belka C, Hautmann M, Hildebrandt G, Gani C, Polat B, Rödel C, Fokas E. RADIANCE - Radiochemotherapy with or without Durvalumab in the treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma: A randomized multicenter phase II trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 23:43-49. [PMID: 32420463 PMCID: PMC7218223 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) are increasing in frequency across the developed world. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally-advanced disease is approximately 60% after primary radiochemotherapy (RCT). There is a strong rationale for combining immunotherapy with RCT in patients with ASCC due to its association with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. METHODS/DESIGN RADIANCE is an investigator initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II trial testing the addition of Durvalumab, a PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, to standard RCT in 178 patients with locally advanced ASCC (T2 ≥ 4 cm Nany, cT3-4 and/or cN+). In the control arm, patients will be treated with standard mitomycin C (MMC)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based RCT. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) will be applied as follows: PTV_A (primary tumor) T1-T2 < 4 cm N+: 28 × 1.9 Gy = 53.2 Gy; or T2 ≥ 4 cm, T3-4 Nany: 31 × 1.9 Gy = 58.9 Gy; PTV_N (involved node): 28 × 1.8 Gy = 50.4 Gy ; and PTV_Elec (elective node): 28 × 1.43 Gy = 40.0 Gy over a period of 5,5-6 weeks. Concomitant chemotherapy will be administered using MMC with 5-FU during weeks 1 and 5 of radiotherapy (MMC 12 mg/m2, day 1 [maximum single dose 20 mg]; 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 days 1-4 and 29-32). In the experimental arm, Durvalmab (1500 mg absolute dose, intravenously) will be combined with the same RCT as in the control arm. Immunotherapy with Durvalumab will start 14 days before initiation of standard RCT, administered every four weeks (q4w) thereafter for a total of twelve doses. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) after 3 years. DISCUSSION As ASCC is considered an immunogenically "hot" tumor due to its association with HPV infection, the combination of RCT with Durvalumab may improve tumor control and long-term clinical outcome in this patient collective compared to RCT alone.
Collapse
Key Words
- 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil
- ASCC, anal squamous cell carcinoma
- Anal cancer
- CT, computed tomography
- DFS, disease-free survival
- Disease-free survival
- Durvalumab
- Immunotherapy
- MMC, mitomycin C
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- OS, overall survival
- PD-1, programmed death receptor 1
- PD-L1, programmed death receptor ligand 1
- Phase 2
- RCT, radiochemotherapy
- RT, radiotherapy
- Radiochemotherapy
- cCR, clinical complete response
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | | | - Johannes Gollrad
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Weiß
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Community Hospital Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Henning Schäfer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology,University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Saint A, Evesque L, François É. [Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal: Current management and prospects]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:792-799. [PMID: 32591138 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Anal canal cancer is a rare disease that accounts for 2.5% of digestive cancers. Squamous cell carcinomas are the most common histological form. Their incidence is in progression, probably due to the increase in Human Papilloma Virus infections. Metastatic forms account for 20% of anal canal cancers considering synchronous forms or metastatic recurrence of an initially localised disease. Their prognosis remains poor with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 30%. The first-line therapeutic standard based on the combination of cisplatin with 5-Fluorouracil has recently been challenged by carboplatin - paclitaxel and docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil regimens which are becoming new treatment options. In second-line setting, there is no international consensus. Anti-EGFRs and immunotherapy in combination or not with other molecules are promising but these results need to be confirmed. In this review, we report current and future data in the management of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal in unresectable locoregional recurrence or at metastatic stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angélique Saint
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie médicale, Nice, France.
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie médicale, Nice, France
| | - Éric François
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie médicale, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Ouchi A, Shida D, Hamaguchi T, Takashima A, Ito Y, Ueno H, Ishiguro M, Takii Y, Ikeda S, Ohue M, Fujita S, Shiozawa M, Kataoka K, Ito M, Tsukada Y, Akagi T, Inomata M, Shimada Y, Kanemitsu Y. Challenges of improving treatment outcomes for colorectal and anal cancers in Japan: the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:368-378. [PMID: 32115643 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major public health concern in Japan. While early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma treatment entails radical resection of the primary tumor, the importance of perioperative treatment is growing as physicians seek to further improve treatment outcomes. For anal squamous cell carcinoma, definitive chemoradiotherapy is superior to radical surgery in terms of improved patient quality of life. The Colorectal Cancer Study Group of the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group was established in 2001 and has worked to provide answers to common clinical questions and improve treatment outcomes for colorectal and anal cancers through 15 large-scale prospective clinical trials. Here, we discuss the current state of perioperative treatment for early-stage colon, rectal and anal cancers in Japan and approaches taken by the Colorectal Cancer Study Group/the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group to improve treatment outcomes for these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ouchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi
| | - Dai Shida
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Tetsuya Hamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama
| | - Atsuo Takashima
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama
| | - Megumi Ishiguro
- Department of Chemotherapy and Oncosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Medical Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Yasumasa Takii
- Department of Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima
| | - Masayuki Ohue
- Department of Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka
| | - Shin Fujita
- Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Tochigi
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama
| | - Kozo Kataoka
- Division of Lower GI, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba
| | - Yuichiro Tsukada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba
| | - Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Hospital, Oita
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Hospital, Oita
| | - Yasuhiro Shimada
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Use, Risk Factors, and Outcomes in a Canadian Population. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:748-757. [PMID: 32384405 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported that 30% to 40% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus will require salvage abdominoperineal resection after chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify the use, risk factors, and impact on survival of salvage abdominal perineal resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. DESIGN This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study. SETTINGS Patients treated in Ontario, Canada through a single-payer universal healthcare system, were included. PATIENTS Patients included all incident cases of squamous cell anal cancer who underwent curative intent radiotherapy from 2007 to 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Risk of salvage abdominoperineal resection, factors associated with salvage abdominoperineal resection, and survival were measured. RESULTS A total of 1125 patients were treated with curative intent radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the anus. Within this cohort, salvage surgery was performed in 8% (93/1125), whereas 14% (156/1125) required a permanent colostomy. In log-binomial regression, younger age was associated with salvage surgery, whereas sex, cancer stage, socioeconomic status, and HIV were not. There was a suggested lower risk of salvage surgery in those who completed chemoradiation (relative risk = 0.67 (95% CI, 0.43-1.03)). Crude 5-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% CI, 70%-76%) in those not requiring salvage surgery and 48% (95% CI, 37%-58%) in those who did. In Cox models, mortality was higher in patients requiring salvage surgery compared with those who did not (adjusted HR = 2.20 (95% CI, 1.65-2.94), whereas improved survival was seen in those who completed chemoradiation (HR = 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-0.82)) LIMITATIONS:: The study was limited by its potential residual confounding by indication for salvage surgery. CONCLUSIONS In this large, contemporary cohort of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, the proportion of patients undergoing salvage surgery was considerably lower than previous reports. Younger age was associated with salvage surgery, and there was a suggestion of lower risk of salvage surgery with completion of chemoradiation. Patients requiring salvage surgery had poor 5-year overall survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B205. RAP DE RESCATE PARA EL CARCINOMA ANAL DE CéLULAS ESCAMOSAS: USO, FACTORES DE RIESGO Y RESULTADOS EN UNA POBLACIóN CANADIENSE: Estudios anteriores han reportado que 30-40% de los pacientes con carcinoma de células escamosas del ano requerirán una resección abdominoperineal de rescate después de la quimiorradioterapia.Identificar la utilización, los factores de riesgo y el impacto en la supervivencia de la resección abdominoperineal de rescate para el carcinoma de células escamosas del ano.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, basado en la población.Todos los casos incidentes de cáncer anal de células escamosas que se sometieron a radioterapia con fines curativos de 2007 a 2015.Pacientes tratados en Ontario, Canadá, un sistema de salud universal de un solo pagador.Riesgo de resección abdominoperineal de rescate, factores asociados con la resección abdominoperineal de rescate y la supervivencia.1125 pacientes fueron tratados con radioterapia de intención curativa para el cáncer de células escamosas del ano. Dentro de esta cohorte, la cirugía de rescate se realizó en el 8% (93/1125), mientras que el 14% (156/1125) requirió una colostomía permanente. En la regresión log-binomial, la edad más joven se asoció con la cirugía de rescate, mientras que el sexo, la etapa del cáncer, el estado socioeconómico y el VIH no. Se sugirió un menor riesgo de cirugía de rescate en aquellos que completaron la quimiorradiación (RR 0,67; IC del 95%: 0,43 a 1,03). La tasa de supervivencia global bruta a 5 años fue del 73% (IC del 95%: 70-76%) en aquellos que no requirieron cirugía de rescate y del 48% (IC del 95%: 37-58%) en los que sí lo requirieron. En los modelos de Cox, la mortalidad fue mayor en los pacientes que requirieron cirugía de rescate en comparación con aquellos que no lo requirieron (HR ajustado 2.20, IC 95%: 1.65 - 2.94), mientras que se observó una mejor supervivencia en aquellos que completaron la quimiorradiación (HR 0.65, IC 95% 0.42 - 0,82).Posible confusión residual por indicación de cirugía de rescate.En esta gran cohorte contemporánea de pacientes con carcinoma de células escamosas del ano, la proporción de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de rescate fue considerablemente menor que los informes anteriores. La edad más temprana se asoció con la cirugía de rescate, y se sugirió un menor riesgo de cirugía de rescate con la finalización de la quimiorradiación. Los pacientes que requirieron cirugía de rescate tuvieron una deficiente supervivencia general de 5 años. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B205. (Traducción-Dr Gonzalo Hagerman).
Collapse
|
170
|
Nilsson MP, Nilsson ED, Johnsson A, Leon O, Gunnlaugsson A, Scherman J. Patterns of recurrence in anal cancer: a detailed analysis. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:125. [PMID: 32460785 PMCID: PMC7251738 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01567-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anal cancer is a rare disease, which might be the reason for the “one size fits all” approach still used for radiotherapy target contouring. To refine and individualize future guidelines, detailed and contemporary pattern of recurrence studies are needed. Methods Consecutive anal cancer patients, all treated with curative intent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), were retrospectively studied (n = 170). Data was extracted from medical records and radiological images. Radiotherapy planning CT’s and treatment plans were reviewed, and recurrences were mapped and categorized according to radiation dose. Results The mean dose to the primary tumor was 59.0 Gy. With a median follow-up of 50 months (range 14–117 months), 5-year anal cancer specific survival was 86.1%. Only 1 of 20 local recurrences was located outside the high dose (CTVT) volume. More patients experienced a distant recurrence (n = 34; 20.0%) than a locoregional recurrence (n = 24; 14.1%). Seven patients (4.2%) had a common iliac and/or para-aortic (CI/PA) recurrence. External iliac lymph node involvement (P = 0.04), and metastases in ≥3 inguinal or pelvic lymph node regions (P = 0.02) were associated with a 15–18% risk of CI/PA recurrence. Following chemoradiotherapy, 6 patients with recurrent or primary metastatic CI/PA lymph nodes were free of recurrence at last follow-up. The overall rate of ano-inguinal lymphatic drainage (AILD) recurrence was 2 of 170 (1.2%), and among patients with inguinal metastases at initial diagnosis it was 2 of 65 (3.1%). Conclusions We conclude that other measures than increased margins around the primary tumor are needed to improve local control. Furthermore, metastatic CI/PA lymph nodes, either at initial diagnosis or in the recurrent setting, should be considered potentially curable. Patients with certain patterns of metastatic pelvic lymph nodes might be at an increased risk of harboring tumor cells also in the CI/PA lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Erik D Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otilia Leon
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Martin D, von der Grün J, Rödel C, Fokas E. Management of anal cancer patients - a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:122. [PMID: 32450863 PMCID: PMC7249388 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01539-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy dose and target volume prescriptions for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) vary considerably in daily practice and guidelines, including those from NCCN, UK, Australasian, and ESMO. We conducted a pattern-of-care survey to assess the patient management in German speaking countries. Methods We developed an anonymous questionnaire comprising 18 questions on diagnosis and treatment of ASCC. The survey was sent to 361 DEGRO-associated institutions, including 41 university hospitals, 118 non-university institutions, and 202 private practices. Results We received a total of 101 (28%) surveys, including 20 (19.8%) from university, 36 (35.6%) from non-university clinics, and 45 (44.6%) from private practices. A total of 28 (27.8%) institutions reported to treat more than 5 patients with early-stage ASCC and 42 (41.6%) institutions treat more than 5 patients with locoregionally-advanced ASCC per year. Biopsy of suspicious inguinal nodes was advocated in only 12 (11.8%) centers. Screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is done in 28 (27.7%). Intensity modulated radiotherapy or similar techniques are used in 97%. The elective lymph node dose ranged from 30.6 Gy to 52.8 Gy, whereas 87% prescribed 50.4–55. 8 Gy (range: 30.6 to 59.4 Gy) to the involved lymph nodes. The dose to gross disease of cT1 or cT2 ASCC ranged from 50 to ≥60 Gy. For cT3 or cT4 tumors the target dose ranged from 54 Gy to more than 60 Gy, with 76 (75.2%) institutions prescribing 59.4 Gy. The preferred concurrent chemotherapy regimen was 5-FU/Mitomycin C, whereas 6 (6%) prescribed Capecitabine/Mitomycin C. HIV-positive patients are treated with full-dose CRT in 87 (86.1%) institutions. First assessment for clinical response is reported to be performed at 4–6 weeks after completion of CRT in 2 (2%) institutions, at 6–8 weeks in 20 (19.8%), and 79 (78%) institutions wait up to 5 months. Conclusions We observed marked differences in radiotherapy doses and treatment technique in patients with ASCC, and also variable approaches for patients with HIV. These data underline the need for an consensus treatment guideline for ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. .,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site: Frankfurt a. M, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Trilla-Fuertes L, Ghanem I, Maurel J, G-Pastrián L, Mendiola M, Peña C, López-Vacas R, Prado-Vázquez G, López-Camacho E, Zapater-Moros A, Heredia V, Cuatrecasas M, García-Alfonso P, Capdevila J, Conill C, García-Carbonero R, Heath KE, Ramos-Ruiz R, Llorens C, Campos-Barros Á, Gámez-Pozo A, Feliu J, Vara JÁF. Comprehensive Characterization of the Mutational Landscape in Localized Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Transl Oncol 2020; 13:100778. [PMID: 32422573 PMCID: PMC7229291 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is a rare neoplasm. Chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care, with no therapeutic advances achieved over the past three decades. Thus, a deeper molecular characterization of this disease is still necessary. We analyzed 46 paraffin-embedded tumor samples from patients diagnosed with primary ASCC by exome sequencing. A bioinformatics approach focused in the identification of high-impact genetic variants, which may act as drivers of oncogenesis, was performed. The relation between genetics variants and prognosis was also studied. The list of high-impact genetic variants was unique for each patient. However, the pathways in which these genes are involved are well-known hallmarks of cancer, such as angiogenesis or immune pathways. Additionally, we determined that genetic variants in BRCA2, ZNF750, FAM208B, ZNF599, and ZC3H13 genes are related with poor disease-free survival in ASCC. This may help to stratify the patient's prognosis and open new avenues for potential therapeutic intervention. In conclusion, sequencing of ASCC clinical samples appears an encouraging tool for the molecular portrait of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura G-Pastrián
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Mendiola
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Peña
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío López-Vacas
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elena López-Camacho
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Zapater-Moros
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victoria Heredia
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Translational Oncology Lab, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Medical Oncology Service, Vall Hebron University Hospital. Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Conill
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío García-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Ocubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Av. Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karen E Heath
- Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics, IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz /& CIBERER, Unit 753, ISCIII, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz
- Genomics Unit Cantoblanco, Parque Científico de Madrid, C/ Faraday 7, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Llorens
- Biotechvana SL, Parque Científico de Madrid, C/ Faraday 7, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Campos-Barros
- Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics, IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz /& CIBERER, Unit 753, ISCIII, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angelo Gámez-Pozo
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Cátedra UAM-Amgen, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Juan Ángel Fresno Vara
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Chargari C, Levy A, Paoletti X, Soria JC, Massard C, Weichselbaum RR, Deutsch E. Methodological Development of Combination Drug and Radiotherapy in Basic and Clinical Research. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4723-4736. [PMID: 32409306 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-4155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Newer technical improvements in radiation oncology have been rapidly implemented in recent decades, allowing an improved therapeutic ratio. The development of strategies using local and systemic treatments concurrently, mainly targeted therapies, has however plateaued. Targeted molecular compounds and immunotherapy are increasingly being incorporated as the new standard of care for a wide array of cancers. A better understanding of possible prior methodology issues is therefore required and should be integrated into upcoming early clinical trials including individualized radiotherapy-drug combinations. The outcome of clinical trials is influenced by the validity of the preclinical proofs of concept, the impact on normal tissue, the robustness of biomarkers and the quality of the delivery of radiation. Herein, key methodological aspects are discussed with the aim of optimizing the design and implementation of future precision drug-radiotherapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny sur Orge, France
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Xavier Paoletti
- University of Versailles St. Quentin, France
- Institut Curie INSERM U900, Biostatistics for Personalized Medicine Team, St. Cloud, France
| | | | - Christophe Massard
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
- Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Bluemke E, Bulte D, Bertrand A, George B, Cooke R, Chu KY, Durrant L, Goh V, Jacobs C, Ng SM, Strauss VY, Hawkins MA, Muirhead R. Oxygen-enhanced MRI MOLLI T1 mapping during chemoradiotherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 22:44-49. [PMID: 32211520 PMCID: PMC7082428 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T1-mapping was used to explore its effectiveness as a prognostic imaging biomarker for chemoradiotherapy outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS T2-weighted, T1 mapping, and oxygen-enhanced T1 maps were acquired before and after 8-10 fractions of chemoradiotherapy and examined whether the oxygen-enhanced MRI response relates to clinical outcome. Patient response to treatment was assessed 3 months following completion of chemoradiotherapy. A mean T1 was extracted from manually segmented tumour regions of interest and a paired two-tailed t-test was used to compare changes across the patient population. Regions of subcutaneous fat and muscle tissue were examined as control ROIs. RESULTS There was a significant increase in T1 of the tumour ROIs across patients following the 8-10 fractions of chemoradiotherapy (paired t-test, p < 0.001, n = 7). At baseline, prior to receiving chemoradiotherapy, there were no significant changes in T1 across patients from breathing oxygen (n = 9). In the post-chemoRT scans (8-10 fractions), there was a significant decrease in T1 of the tumour ROIs across patients when breathing 100% oxygen (paired t-test, p < 0.001, n = 8). Out of the 12 patients from which we successfully acquired a visit 1 T1-map, only 1 patient did not respond to treatment, therefore, we cannot correlate these results with clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS These clinical data demonstrate feasibility and potential for T1-mapping and oxygen enhanced T1-mapping to indicate perfusion or treatment response in tumours of this nature. These data show promise for future work with a larger cohort containing more non-responders, which would allow us to relate these measurements to clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Bluemke
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Bulte
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Ambre Bertrand
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Ben George
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Rosie Cooke
- Radiotherapy Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Kwun-Ye Chu
- Radiotherapy Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Durrant
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Vicky Goh
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Jacobs
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Stasya M. Ng
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Muirhead
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Mehta S, Ramey SJ, Kwon D, Rich BJ, Ahmed AA, Wolfson A, Yechieli R, Portelance L, Mellon EA. Impact of radiotherapy duration on overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:277-290. [PMID: 32399269 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2020.02.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prolongation of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of numerous types of cancer has been shown to reduce overall survival (OS). Treatment delays are common in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) due to the toxicity of definitive chemoradiation (CRT). The effect of these delays on outcomes has not been well evaluated. This study investigated the effects of RT prolongation on OS in patients receiving CRT for SCCA. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients diagnosed with SCCA and treated with CRT from 2004-2014. Cox proportional hazard regression models examined the effect of duration of RT, measured as fractions delivered per week, on OS. Negative binomial regression assessed the effects of demographic and prognostic factors on the duration of RT. Results A total of 8,948 patients were included in the analysis of factors impacting treatment duration, and 6,429 patients in the OS analysis. Multivariable analysis (MVA) showed female gender, non-private insurance, treatment at a low or intermediate volume facility, Charlson/Deyo score ≥2, and advanced disease were associated with longer RT duration. Treatment with IMRT, with single agent chemotherapy, at an academic center, and in later years were associated with shorter RT duration. A decrease in fractions delivered per week was independently associated with reduced OS with a cutoff of 4.72 fractions per week (about 2 missed fractions over a 30 fraction treatment) delineating the largest differences in OS. Conclusions Efforts should be made to avoid RT interruptions of any length in SCCA patients and to compensate for treatment breaks to reduce the total duration of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahil Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stephen J Ramey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin J Rich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Awad A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Aaron Wolfson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Raphael Yechieli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Dell'Acqua V, Surgo A, Arculeo S, Zerella MA, Bagnardi V, Frassoni S, Zampino MG, Ravenda PS, Rotundo MS, Kraja F, Kobiela J, Spychalski P, Fodor C, Gerardi MA, Cattani F, Bazani A, Petz W, Glynne-Jones R, Orecchia R, Leonardi MC, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of squamous cell anal canal cancer: acute and early-late toxicity, outcome, and efficacy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:685-694. [PMID: 32036405 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03517-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively review our experience on 84 patients with squamous cell anal canal cancer (SCAC) within 12 months after combined treatment with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), in terms of acute and early-late toxicity, overall treatment time and interruptions, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and tumor response. METHODS Acute gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and cutaneous (CU) toxicities were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Early-late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late radiation morbidity scoring system. Tumor response was evaluated with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1. RESULTS Acute toxicity for 84 subjects (100%): severe (≥ G3) GI and skin toxicity was observed in 4 (5%) and 19 patients (23%), respectively. Early-late toxicity for 73 subjects (87%): severe (≥ G3) GI and vulvo-vaginal toxicity was observed in 2 (3%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. No acute or early-late severe GU toxicity was reported. A treatment interruption occurred in 65 patients (77%). CFS was 96% (95% CI 89-99) at 6 months and 92% (95% CI 83-96) at 12 months. At 6 months complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) was observed in 70 (83%), 3 (4%), and 7 patients (8%), respectively. At 12 months, CR was observed in 60 patients (81%); eleven patients (15%) experienced PD. CONCLUSION Our study showed an excellent clinical result and very low acute toxicity rates, confirming the IMRT as standard of care for curative treatment of anal cancer patients. The current trial was registered with the number IEO N87/11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Radiation Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Simona Arculeo
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Simona Ravenda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Saveria Rotundo
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fatjona Kraja
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital Centre "Mother Theresa", Rruga e Dibrës 372, 1000, Tirana, AL, Albania
| | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Bazani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Wanda Petz
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Trilla-Fuertes L, Ghanem I, Gámez-Pozo A, Maurel J, G-Pastrián L, Mendiola M, Peña C, López-Vacas R, Prado-Vázquez G, López-Camacho E, Zapater-Moros A, Heredia V, Cuatrecasas M, García-Alfonso P, Capdevila J, Conill C, García-Carbonero R, Ramos-Ruiz R, Fortes C, Llorens C, Nanni P, Fresno Vara JÁ, Feliu J. Genetic Profile and Functional Proteomics of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Proposal for a Molecular Classification. Mol Cell Proteomics 2020; 19:690-700. [PMID: 32107283 PMCID: PMC7124473 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra120.001954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare tumor. Chemo-radiotherapy yields a 50% 3-year relapse-free survival rate in advanced anal cancer, so improved predictive markers and therapeutic options are needed. High-throughput proteomics and whole-exome sequencing were performed in 46 paraffin samples from anal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Hierarchical clustering was used to establish groups de novo Then, probabilistic graphical models were used to study the differences between groups of patients at the biological process level. A molecular classification into two groups of patients was established, one group with increased expression of proteins related to adhesion, T lymphocytes and glycolysis; and the other group with increased expression of proteins related to translation and ribosomes. The functional analysis by the probabilistic graphical model showed that these two groups presented differences in metabolism, mitochondria, translation, splicing and adhesion processes. Additionally, these groups showed different frequencies of genetic variants in some genes, such as ATM, SLFN11 and DST Finally, genetic and proteomic characteristics of these groups suggested the use of some possible targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angelo Gámez-Pozo
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura G-Pastrián
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Mendiola
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Peña
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío López-Vacas
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Elena López-Camacho
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Zapater-Moros
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victoria Heredia
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Translational Oncology Lab, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, /Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Medical Oncology Service, Vall Hebron University Hospital. Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Paseigg de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Conill
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío García-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Ocubre, Av. de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz
- Genomics Unit Cantoblanco, Parque Científico de Madrid, C/ Faraday 7, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudia Fortes
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, University of Zurich/ETH Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carlos Llorens
- Biotechvana SL, Parque Científico de Madrid, C/ Faraday 7, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Nanni
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, University of Zurich/ETH Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Juan Ángel Fresno Vara
- Molecular Oncology & Pathology Lab, Institute of Medical and Molecular Genetics-INGEMM, Hospital Universitario La Paz -IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Oncology-CIBERONC, ISCIII, Av. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain; Cátedra UAM-Amgen, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Kim KS, Chang AR, Kim K, Koh HK, Jang WI, Park HJ, Chang JH, Kim MS. Post-operative radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma incidentally discovered after local excision: a propensity score matched analysis of retrospective multicenter study. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190667. [PMID: 31825665 PMCID: PMC7055428 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of post-operative radiation therapy (RT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) incidentally detected after excision, and compare these outcomes with those of definitive RT without excision for exploring the possibility of treatment de-intensification. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 25 patients with T1-2N0-1 ASCC who underwent RT following incidental tumor resection were selected from multicenter retrospective database. And, we selected one-to-one matched 25 patients receiving definitive RT from the same database using propensity score matching method, and the outcomes were compared. RESULTS Median age was 60 years (range, 30-76), and 18 patients (72%) were female. 19 patients (76%) had T0/1 tumors and four patients (16%) had regional lymph node metastases. Hemorrhoidectomy was performed in eight patients (32%) and the others underwent local excision. 12 patients (48%) had microscopic or gross residual diseases. Median RT dose to the primary lesion was 50.4 Gy (range, 40-60). Concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 23 patients (92%). Median follow-up period was 71 months (range, 4.5-203.1 months). None of the patients showed recurrence during follow-up. However, one patient died after 6 months due to the chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicity. When compared with those patients receiving definitive RT, clinicopathological variables were well-balanced between the two groups. While matched paired patients treated with definitive RT received a higher median RT dose of 54 Gy (range, 45-61.2) and concurrent chemotherapy was given to 22 patients (88%), overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.262). CONCLUSION Patients treated with RT for early stage ASCC after local excision showed favorable treatment outcomes. Further study is warranted to justify the de-intensification of the treatment for these patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Post-operative RT can achieve favorable treatment outcomes in incidental ASCC with residual diseases after local excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers are bordered by radiosensitive visceral organs, resulting in a narrow therapeutic window. The search for more efficacious and tolerable therapies raises the possibility that proton beam therapy's (PBT) physical and dosimetric differences from conventional therapy may be better suited to treat both primary and recurrent disease, which carries its own unique challenges. Currently, the maximal efficacy of radiation plans for primary and recurrent anorectal cancer is constrained by delivery techniques and modalities which must consider feasibility challenges and toxicity secondary to exposure of organs at risk (OARs). Studies using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) demonstrate that more precise dose delivery to target volumes improves local control rates and reduces complications. By reducing the low-to-moderate radiation dose-bath to bone marrow, small and large bowel, and skin, PBT may offer an improved side-effect profile. The potential to reduce toxicity, increase patient compliance, minimize treatment breaks, and enable dose escalation or hypofractionation is appealing. In cases where prognosis is favorable, PBT may mitigate long-term morbidity such as secondary malignancies, femoral fractures, and small bowel obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Casadiego-Peña C, Torres-Minacapilli M, Najera M, Ferrer P, Chajon E, Marsiglia H. Difference in toxicity between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients with squamous-cell cancer of the anal canal treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:23-35. [PMID: 32175102 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2020.01.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal has been increasing over the last 30 years. HIV has been found to be a risk factor for the development of this disease; radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) may also be more toxic than in HIV-negative patients. The study aims at assessing whether there are any differences in terms of toxicity between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients treated with concomitant RTCT. Methods Search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (via Cochrane Library-Wiley), DARE, LILACS bibliographic databases. Experimental and analytical observational studies with at least two comparative arms were included: squamous-cell (SC) anal-canal cancer (ACC) treated with RTCT in HIV-positive vs. HIV-negative patients. Results Fifteen publications, 14 retrospective studies and 1 systematic review, were found. All radiotherapy (RT) techniques and all chemotherapeutic agents used to manage this disease were included. No differences were found in terms of duration (P=0.67) and dose (P=0.53) of RT, while CT results were contradictory. Acute and hematological toxicities were significantly higher in HIV-positive patients, while gastrointestinal, dermatological and chronic toxicities did not significantly differ between the two groups. Given the high heterogeneity of the studies, no objective comparison could be made between studies that included antiretrovirals and those that did not. Conclusions HIV-positive patients may be at higher risk for acute and hematological toxicity than HIV-negative patients. A precise conclusion cannot be drawn on the use of antiretrovirals, given the high heterogeneity of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Casadiego-Peña
- International Master in Advanced Radiotherapy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP)-Los Andes University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcelo Torres-Minacapilli
- International Master in Advanced Radiotherapy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP)-Los Andes University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Manuel Najera
- Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP), Santiago, Chile
| | - Pedro Ferrer
- Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP), Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Hugo Marsiglia
- International Master in Advanced Radiotherapy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP)-Los Andes University, Santiago, Chile.,Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez (FALP), Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Sauter M, Lombriser N, Bütikofer S, Keilholz G, Kranzbühler H, Heinrich H, Rogler G, Vavricka SR, Misselwitz B. Improved treatment outcome and lower skin toxicity with intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. 3D conventional radiotherapy in anal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:356-367. [PMID: 31980834 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01534-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for anal carcinoma (ACa). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been introduced, allowing focused irradiation of the tumor area. Whether physical benefits of IMRT translate to clinical benefits has not been sufficiently demonstrated. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 82 patients with newly diagnosed ACa. Patients treated with IMRT were compared with previous patients treated with conventional three-dimensional computational radiotherapy (3D-CRT). The influence of IMRT on complete remission and acute and chronic side effects was analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS 39/40 patients treated with IMRT were in complete remission after 1 year compared to 31/39 patients treated with 3D-CRT (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor T stage as well as lack of IMRT treatment as risk factors for persistent tumor at 6 months. No significant benefits of IMRT were apparent at later timepoints (median follow up 52 months, IQR: 31.5-71.8 months). Patients treated with IMRT had a significantly lower degree of skin toxicity (median 2 vs. 3 in a scale ranging from 0 to 3, p = 0.00092). Rates of hematological toxicity/proctitis were not reduced and rates of acute diarrhea increased (p = 0.034). Median length of hospitalization tended to be shorter in patients treated with IMRT (n. s.). CONCLUSION We present a real-world experience of shifting radiation technique from conventional 3D-CRT to IMRT. IMRT patients had better tumor control at 1 year and lower degrees of skin toxicity. Our data indicate that IMRT can enable therapies with lower side effects with equal or better oncological results for patients with ACa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sauter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland. .,University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Clarunis, Basel, Switzerland. .,Division of Gastroenterology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | - Simon Bütikofer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Georg Keilholz
- Division of Radio-Oncology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Henriette Heinrich
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,Division of Gastroenterology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Clarunis, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Feliu J, Garcia-Carbonero R, Capdevila J, Guasch I, Alonso-Orduna V, Lopez C, Garcia-Alfonso P, Castanon C, Sevilla I, Cerezo L, Conill C, Quintana-Angel B, Sanchez ME, Ghanem I, Martin-Richard M, Lopez-Gomez M, Leon A, Caro M, Fernandez T, Maurel J. VITAL phase 2 study: Upfront 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C, panitumumab and radiotherapy treatment in nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (GEMCAD 09-02). Cancer Med 2019; 9:1008-1016. [PMID: 31851776 PMCID: PMC6997048 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim VITAL, a phase II single‐arm study, aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of panitumumab addition to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU), mitomycin‐C (MMC) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC). Methods Adult, treatment‐naïve SCCAC patients (Stage T2‐T4, any N, M0) and ECOG‐PS ≤2, received panitumumab (6 mg/kg, day 1 and Q2W; 8 weeks), 5‐FU (1000 mg/m2/d, days 1‐4 and 29‐32), MMC (10 mg/m2, days 1 and 29) and RT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) to the primary tumor and mesorectal, iliac and inguinal lymph nodes, plus 10‐15 Gy boost dose to the primary tumor and affected lymph nodes. The primary objective was disease free survival rate (DFS) at 3‐years (expected 3‐year DFS rate: 73.7 ± 12%). Results Fifty‐eight patients (31 women; median age: 59 years; ECOG‐PS 0‐1:98%; TNM II [29%] (T2 or T3/N0/M0)/IIIA (T1‐T3/N1/M0 or T4/N0/M0) [21%]/IIIB (T4/N1/M0 or any T/N2 or N3/M0) [47%]/nonevaluable [4%]) were included. The median follow‐up was 45 months. The 3‐year DFS rate was 61.1% (95% CI: 47.1, 72.4). The 3‐year overall survival rate was 78.4% (95% CI: 65.1, 87.1). Eighteen patients (31.0%) required a colostomy within 2 years posttreatment. Grade 3‐4 toxicities were experienced by 53 (91%) patients. Most common grade 3‐4 treatment‐related events were radiation skin injury (40%) and neutropenia (24%). No toxic deaths occurred. Improved efficacy in colostomy‐free survival and complete response rate was observed in human papilloma virus positive patients. Conclusions Panitumumab addition to MMC‐5FU regimen in SCCAC patients increases toxicity and does not improve patients’ outcomes. RT plus MMC‐5FU remains the standard of care for localized SCCAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, CIBERONC, Catedra UAM-AMGEN, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Department of Medical Oncology, imas12, UCM, CNIO, CIBERONC, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Guasch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Althaia-Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso-Orduna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Aragon, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlos Lopez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Pilar Garcia-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Castanon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Virgen Blanca, Leon, Spain
| | - Isabel Sevilla
- Investigacion Clinica y Traslacional en Cancer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas de Malaga (IBIMA), Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
| | - Laura Cerezo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carles Conill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Begona Quintana-Angel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Maria E Sanchez
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Department of Medical Oncology, CIBERONC, Catedra UAM-AMGEN, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Martin-Richard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Lopez-Gomez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Leon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Monica Caro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO Badalona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Teresa Fernandez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumours Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
de Meric de Bellefon M, Lemanski C, Castan F, Samalin E, Mazard T, Lenglet A, Demontoy S, Riou O, Llacer-Moscardo C, Fenoglietto P, Aillères N, Thezenas S, Debrigode C, Vieillot S, Gourgou S, Azria D. Long-term follow-up experience in anal canal cancer treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Clinical outcomes, patterns of relapse and predictors of failure. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:141-147. [PMID: 31809980 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2007 to 2015, 193 patients were treated by IMRT for SCCAC. Radiotherapy delivered 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily-fractions to the primary tumor and elective nodal areas, immediately followed by a boost of 14.4-20 Gy to the primary tumor and involved nodes. Concurrent chemotherapy with 5-FU-mitomycin (MMC) or cisplatin was added for locally advanced tumors. Survivals were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Locoregional (LR) relapses were precisely assessed. Prognostic factors were evaluated by uni- and multivariate analyses. Late toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS Median follow-up was 70 months (range, 1-131). Forty-nine men (25%) and 144 women (75%) were analyzed. Median age was 62 years. Tumor stages were I, II, III and IV in 7%, 24%, 63% and 6% of cases, respectively. Chemotherapy was delivered in 167 patients (87%), mainly MMC (80%). Five-year OS, DFS, CFS and LR control rates were 74%, 68%, 66% and 85%, respectively. Forty-one patients (21%) had a relapse: 22 were LR, mostly in-field (68%). Predictors for LR failure were exclusive radiotherapy, chemotherapy lacking MMC and treatment breaks >3 days. Overall late toxicity ≥grade 2 occurred in 43% of patients, with 24% grade 3 and one case of grade 4 (hematuria). CONCLUSION CRT with IMRT assures excellent local control in locally advanced SCCAC with manageable long-term toxicity. Multicentric prospective trials are required to reinforce those results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maïlys de Meric de Bellefon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France.
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Castan
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, France
| | - Alexis Lenglet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvain Demontoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Carmen Llacer-Moscardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Thezenas
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - Charles Debrigode
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, CHU Nîmes, France
| | - Sabine Vieillot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Oncology Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Sophie Gourgou
- Biometrics Unit ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Federation of Radiation Oncology Montpellier-Nîmes, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute - University of Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Leccisotti L, Manfrida S, Barone R, Ripani D, Tagliaferri L, Masiello V, Privitera V, Gambacorta MA, Rufini V, Valentini V, Giordano A. The prognostic role of FDG PET/CT before combined radio-chemotherapy in anal cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med 2019; 34:65-73. [DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01416-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
185
|
Martin D, Rödel F, Balermpas P, Winkelmann R, Fokas E, Rödel C. C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio as Prognostic Marker for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1200. [PMID: 31788452 PMCID: PMC6856140 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the primary treatment for non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Despite favorable treatment outcomes in general, failure rates up to 40% occur in locally advanced disease. For treatment escalation or de-escalation strategies easily assessable and valid biomarkers are needed. Methods: We identified 125 patients with ASCC treated with standard CRT at our department. C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) was calculated dividing baseline CRP by baseline albumin levels. We used maximally selected rank statistics to dichotomize patients to high and low risk groups. Associations of CAR with clinicopathologic parameters were evaluated and the prognostic impact was tested using univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis. In a subset of 78 patients, pretreatment tumor tissue was available and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and p16INK4a status were scored by immunohistochemistry and correlated with CAR. Results: Advanced T-stage and male gender were significantly associated with higher baseline CAR. Using the calculated cutoff of 0.117, a high baseline CAR was also associated with worse locoregional control (p = 0.002), distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.01), disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.001). A combined risk score incorporating N-stage and CAR, termed N-CAR score, was associated with worse outcome across all endpoints and in multivariate analysis independent of T-stage and Gender (HR 4.27, p = 0.003). In the subset of 78 patients, a strong infiltration with intratumoral CD8+ TIL was associated with a significantly lower CAR (p = 0.007). CAR is an easily accessible biomarker that is associated with DFS. Our study revealed a possible link between chronic systemic inflammation and an impaired intratumoral immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ria Winkelmann
- Senckenberg Institute for Pathology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Partner Site Frankfurt am Main, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Russo S, Anker CJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Azad N, Bianchi N, Das P, Dragovic J, Goodman KA, Jones W, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Suh WW, Jabbour SK. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Anal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:591-605. [PMID: 31288054 PMCID: PMC11101015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Russo
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals, Cleveland Ohio
| | | | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, New York City, New York
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nancy Bianchi
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - William Jones
- UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Rachit Kumar
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Percy Lee
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Milton S. Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - W Warren Suh
- Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Long-term results achieved by guideline-based stage-dependent management of anal cancer in a non-HIV population. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1895-1905. [PMID: 31641849 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03396-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Therapy of anal cancer follows national and international guidelines that are mainly derived from randomized trials. This study aimed to analyze long-term results of stage-dependent treatment of anal cancer in a non-selected patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHOD All consecutive patients treated for anal cancer between 2000 and 2015 were retrieved from a prospective database. Risk-dependent screening for human immunodeficiency virus showed no infection. Main outcome measure was overall survival with respect to tumor site and treatment. Secondary endpoints were cause-specific survival, stoma free survival, and the rate of salvage operations. RESULTS In total, 106 patients were treated for anal cancer. Of those, 69 (65.1%) suffered from anal canal cancer and 37 (34.9%) from anal margin cancer. Three patients with synchronous distant metastases were excluded from analysis. The majority of patients (n = 79, 76.7%) were treated by chemoradiotherapy in curative intention. Twenty-two patients underwent local surgery. Five-year overall survival was 73.1% and cause-specific survival at 5 years was 87.4%. Overall, 14 patients (13.6%) needed salvage surgery. Their 5-year cause-specific survival was 57.7%. A permanent ostomy was avoided in 77.7%. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of anal cancer results in low rates of salvage surgery and permanent ostomies, when therapy was determined by a multidisciplinary team following national and international guidelines.
Collapse
|
188
|
Almaazmi H, Taylor JP, Stem M, Yu D, Lo BD, Safar B, Efron JE. Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Radiation Therapy Alone Must Be Avoided. J Surg Res 2019; 247:530-540. [PMID: 31648811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is the most common histological subtype of anal cancer. Rates have been observed to increase in recent years. Combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently the gold standard of treatment. The aim of this study is to assess ASCC prevalence, treatment trends, and overall survival (OS) in the United States. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage I-IV ASCC were identified from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was 5-year OS, which was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS 34,613 cases were included (stage I: 21.45%; II: 41.00%; III: 31.62%; IV: 5.94%), with an increasing trend in prevalence. CCRT was the most used treatment. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with CCRT, offered the best OS rates for stage I, II, and IV cancers (I: 84.87%; II: 75.12%; IV: 33.08%), comparable with survival of stage III patients treated with CCRT (III: 61.14%). Radiation alone had the worse OS rates, and on adjusted analysis, radiation treatment alone had the greatest risk of mortality (I: hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.54; P = 0.016; II: 2.05, 1.44-2.93, P < 0.001; IV: 1.99, 0.99-4.02, P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS ASCC has increased in prevalence, notably in stage III and IV disease. Although CCRT is the most commonly used treatment type for all stages of ASCC, multimodal treatment offers better OS in stages I, II, and IV. Treatment with radiation alone offers the worst OS no matter the stage and should no longer be used as a solitary treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamda Almaazmi
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James P Taylor
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David Yu
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian D Lo
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Bashar Safar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Saint A, Evesque L, Falk AT, Cavaglione G, Montagne L, Benezery K, Francois E. Mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil for second-line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal. Cancer Med 2019; 8:6853-6859. [PMID: 31524335 PMCID: PMC6853831 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second‐line management. 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic stage has never been evaluated. Patients and methods We report a retrospective analysis of patients treated with 5‐FU and mitomycin from 2000 to 2017 in our institution for a metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based regimen. The main outcome was progression‐free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. Results Nineteen patients, 15 women and four men, with a median age of 57 years were identified (range, 40‐79 years). Patients received a median of three cycles (1‐7) of mitomycin 5‐FU. A dose reduction was necessary in six patients (31.6%), one patient had to discontinue treatment following toxicity and no death was due to treatment toxicity was reported. An objective response was observed in five patients (26.4%, 95% CI 6.6‐46.2) including one complete response, six patients (31.6%, 95% CI 10.7‐52.5) showed tumor stabilization. Median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% CI 1‐5] and 7 months [95% CI 2.2‐11.8]. Responder had a median duration of response of 4 months [95% CI 1.8‐6.1] and one patient had 23 months duration of response. No significant difference was noted for PFS and OS for patients previously treated with mitomycin and 5‐FU at a local stage. Conclusion Mitomycin and 5‐FU regimen provides tumor control with acceptable tolerance. It is an option for patients with metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based chemotherapy. [Correction added on 9 October 2019, after first online publication: '5‐FU' was inadvertently removed from the Results and Conclusion and has now been added to the text.]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angélique Saint
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Alexander T Falk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Gérard Cavaglione
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Lucile Montagne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Eric Francois
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Chai CY, Tran Cao HS, Awad S, Massarweh NN. Management of Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:209-215. [PMID: 29049547 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christy Y Chai
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Samir Awad
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Houston Veterans Affairs (VA) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Varela Cagetti L, Zemmour C, Salem N, Minsat M, Ferrè M, Mailleux H, Giovaninni M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Ries P, Poizat F, Tallet A, Moureau-Zabotto L. High-dose-rate vs. low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for anal canal cancers. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:814-822. [PMID: 31515067 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after EBRT or radio chemotherapy for the treatment of anal canal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred patients with anal canal cancers were treated at our institution by ISBT [LDR (n = 50); HDR (n = 50)]. Chronic toxicity rates, local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival of the two different dose-rate brachytherapy modalities were analyzed and compared. RESULTS With a median followup of 42.2 months (95% CI, [34.5-48.8]), 9 (9% [4.8-16.2%]) local recurrences were observed, 4 (8% [3.2-18.8%]) in LDR vs. 5 (10% [4.4-21.4%]) in HDR group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28 [0.32-5.07], p = 0.73). The 5-year rate of local control for the entire population was 90% [81-95%], 93% [79-98%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.38). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 82% [71-90%], 88% [73-95%] vs. 72% [44-88%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.21). The 5-year overall survival rate for global population was 94% [84-98%], with no significant differences between LDR (97% [79-100%]) and HDR (93% [80-98%]) (p = 0.27). The 5-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% [83-96%], respectively, 95% [83-99%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR (p = 0.21). Significant differences were found in terms of chronic toxicity rates, with 28 (56% [42.3-68.8%]) patients concerned in low-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. 17 (34% [22.4-47.9%]) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (OR = 0.40 [0.18-0.91], p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Local recurrence rates were comparable between both groups; HDR brachytherapy seem to have a better toxicity profile. Our data confirmed the finding that HDR can be used to safely administer ISBT without increasing chronic toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christophe Zemmour
- Department of Clinical Research and Investigation, Biostatistics and Methodology Unit, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - Naji Salem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of RadiationOncolgy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Ferrè
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Hughes Mailleux
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Giovaninni
- Oncology and Endoscopic Unit, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Bernard Lelong
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Pauline Ries
- Department on Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Flora Poizat
- Department of Pathology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Agnès Tallet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
192
|
Savoie MB, Laffan A, Brickman C, Daniels B, Levin A, Rowen T, Smith J, Van Blarigan EL, Hope TA, Berry-Lawhorn JM, Anwar M, Van Loon K. A multi-disciplinary model of survivorship care following definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:906. [PMID: 31510960 PMCID: PMC6737598 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Following definitive chemoradiation for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), patients face a variety of chronic issues including: bowel dysfunction, accelerated bone loss, sexual dysfunction, and psychosocial distress. The increasing incidence of this disease, high cure rates, and significant long-term sequelae warrant increased focus on optimal survivorship care following definitive chemoradiation. In order to establish our survivorship care model for ASCC patients, a multi-disciplinary team of experts performed a comprehensive literature review and summarized best practices for the multi-disciplinary management of this unique patient population. We reviewed principle domains of our survivorship approach: (1) management of chronic toxicities; (2) sexual health; (3) HIV management in affected patients; (4) psychosocial wellbeing; and (5) surveillance for disease recurrence and survivorship care delivery. We provide recommendations for the optimization of survivorship care for ASCC patients can through a multi-disciplinary approach that supports physical and psychological wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa B Savoie
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Angela Laffan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Cristina Brickman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Bevin Daniels
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Anna Levin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Psycho-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Tami Rowen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - James Smith
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Erin L Van Blarigan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - J Michael Berry-Lawhorn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Nguyen C, Leslie S, Gross J, Dietz N, Lele SM, Sirineni G. Penile cancer with positive nodes: A case of HPV p16-positivity and its significance, implication of data from head and neck cancer. Urol Case Rep 2019; 27:101009. [PMID: 31516836 PMCID: PMC6737329 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.101009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is normally discovered in an early stage due to its visibility to the patient. This case report demonstrates a morbidly obese patient with a locally advanced penile cancer hidden by fatty tissue. Biopsy showed P16-positive tumor cells, which responded to concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with no evidence of disease at 24 months of follow-up. We also review the significance of p16-positive cell biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cam Nguyen
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Stephen Leslie
- Department of Urology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - John Gross
- Department of Pathology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Nicholas Dietz
- Department of Pathology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Subodh M Lele
- Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Gopi Sirineni
- Department of Radiology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Garant A, Magnan S, Devic S, Martin AG, Boutros M, Vasilevsky CA, Ferland S, Bujold A, DesGroseilliers S, Sebajang H, Richard C, Vuong T. Image Guided Adaptive Endorectal Brachytherapy in the Nonoperative Management of Patients With Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1005-1011. [PMID: 31476417 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Organ preservation or nonoperative management of rectal cancer is of growing interest. Image guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a radiation dose escalation modality: we explored its role in elderly patients unfit for surgery and patients refusing surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this registry study, patients with rectal cancer who were ineligible for surgery received 40 Gy in 16 fractions of pelvic external beam radiation therapy. They subsequently received 3 weekly image guided adaptive brachytherapy boosts of 10 Gy to the residual tumor, for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions. Complete clinical response (cCR) and local control were the primary endpoints. RESULTS 94 patients were included; the median age was 81.1 years. With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the proportion of cCR was 86.2%, the tumor regrowth proportion was 13.6%, and the cumulative incidence of local relapse was 2.7% at 1 year and 16.8% at 2 years. When considering responders and nonresponders, the 2-year local control was 71.5%. The overall survival at 2 years was 63.6%. Acute rectal grade 1 to 2 toxicity included all patients: 12.8% of patients had late bleeding requiring iron replacement, blood transfusions, or argon plasma therapy. CONCLUSIONS Results of this registry study, evaluating radiation dose escalation for elderly medically unfit patients with unselected tumors, reveal that a high proportion of patients achieved cCR with a manageable toxicity profile. This technology will likely contribute to the challenging nonoperative management paradigm of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelie Garant
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sindy Magnan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Slobodan Devic
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - André-Guy Martin
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Department of Radiation Oncology, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Ferland
- CISSSO, Hôpital de Gatineau, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gatineau, QC, Canada
| | - Alexis Bujold
- Hôptial Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Herawaty Sebajang
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carole Richard
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Té Vuong
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
da Costa SCS, Bonadio RC, Gabrielli FCG, Aranha AS, Dias Genta MLN, Miranda VC, de Freitas D, Abdo Filho E, Ferreira PAO, Machado KK, Scaranti M, Carvalho HDA, Estevez-Diz MDP. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Followed by Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3124-3131. [PMID: 31449470 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with cisplatin remains the standard treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), 40% of patients present with disease recurrence. Additional treatment strategies are required to improve outcomes. We conducted a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by CRT. METHODS In this phase II trial, patients with LACC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB to IVA or with positive lymph nodes) were randomly assigned to three cycles of NAC with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by standard CRT with weekly cisplatin plus pelvic radiotherapy or to standard CRT alone. The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate, 3-year locoregional control, 3-year overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS From 107 patients enrolled in the trial, 55 were randomly assigned to the NAC arm and 52 to the CRT-alone arm. The majority of patients had squamous cell carcinoma (87.8%). After a median follow-up of 31.7 months, NAC was associated with an inferior PFS, with 3-year PFS rates of 40.9% v 60.4% in the CRT arm (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.26; P = .033). NAC also was associated with a lower OS (3-year OS rate, 60.7% v 86.8%; hazard ratio, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.01; P = .006). After treatment completion, complete response rates were 56.3% in the NAC arm and 80.3% in the CRT arm (P = .008). Toxicities were similar in both arms, with the exception of hypomagnesemia and neuropathy being more common with NAC. CONCLUSION This study shows that the addition of NAC consisting of cisplatin and gemcitabine to standard CRT is not superior and is possibly inferior to CRT alone for the treatment of LACC.
Collapse
|
196
|
Lee A, Albert A, Sheth N, Adedoyin P, Rowley J, Schreiber D. Patterns of care and outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for anal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:623-631. [PMID: 31392042 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.02.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Definitive chemoradiation is the standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma. Compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly becoming the preferred technique in order to reduce treatment related toxicity. The objective of this study is to evaluate practice patterns and total radiation treatment times of two radiation modalities. Methods A total of 6,966 patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus who received definitive chemoradiation were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004-2013. Logistic regression was performed to assess for predictors of IMRT receipt. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS). Results In total, 3,868 (55.5%) received 3DCRT and 3,098 (44.5%) received IMRT. Total radiation treatment time was <7 weeks for 54.3% of patients treated with 3DCRT versus 63.8% of patients treated with IMRT. On multivariable logistic regression, positive clinical nodes (OR =1.20, P=0.001) and treatment at an academic facility (OR =1.23, P<0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of receiving IMRT. The 5-year OS was 73.0% for 3DCRT and 73.9% for IMRT (P=0.315). On multivariable analysis, total radiation treatment time ≥7 weeks (HR =1.33, P<0.001) was associated with worse survival while radiation modality (3DCRT vs. IMRT) did not impact survival (HR =0.98, P=0.763). Conclusions IMRT has dramatically increased in utilization from 2% to 65% during the study time period. IMRT was less likely than 3DCRT to have prolonged radiation treatment times, which was associated with worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Ashley Albert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Niki Sheth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Paul Adedoyin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jared Rowley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - David Schreiber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Summit Medical Group MD Anderson Cancer Center, Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Eng C, Jácome AA, Das P, Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Skibber JM, Wolff RA, Qiao W, Xing Y, Sethi S, Ohinata A, Crane CH. A Phase II Study of Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:301-306. [PMID: 31350201 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) presents a rising incidence in the United States. Standard of care for locally advanced disease is comprised of infusional 5-fluorouracil with mitomycin C or cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy (RT). We designed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a more convenient regimen composed of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a single-arm, phase II trial, with treatment-naive stage II to IIIB (TX,1-4NxM0) SCCA patients. The regimen was composed of capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice per day for 5 days) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2 weekly) during weeks 1 through 6, concurrent with RT (XELOX-XRT; group 1). After the first 11 patients, the study was amended to omit chemotherapy during the third and sixth weeks (group 2). The primary objective was 3-year time to treatment failure (TTF) and safety. Secondary objectives were complete response (CR) rate, locoregional control, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Twenty patients were enrolled. Seven patients of group 1 (63%) developed Grade 3 toxicity, which reduced to 22% in Group 2. No Grade 4 toxicities were noted. The median RT dose was 55 Gy. CR occurred in 100% of the 19 patients evaluable for response at 12 to 14 weeks. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, 2 patients had local recurrence and 1 had distant recurrence. Three-year TTF was 90.0%, with similar rates between groups 1 and 2 (respectively, 90.9% vs. 88.8%, P = .984). Three-year CFS was 90.0%. The median OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION The XELOX-XRT regimen is safe, with promising efficacy, and should be explored in larger trials for the treatment of locally advanced SCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Alexandre A Jácome
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John M Skibber
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yan Xing
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Salil Sethi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aki Ohinata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Buchberger D, Kreinbrink P, Kharofa J. Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Anal Cancer in Pelvic Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Series. Int J Part Ther 2019; 6:28-34. [PMID: 31773046 PMCID: PMC6871631 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00067.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of anal cancer in patients with kidney transplants has increased. The definitive treatment for anal cancer is chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. In kidney transplant recipients, sparing the pelvic kidney in the process of delivering radiation to the anus can be challenging. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has been proposed as an alternative to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of anal cancer in this population, given its increased ability to spare organs-at-risk. CASE SERIES We present 4 cases of patients with transplanted pelvic kidneys who subsequently developed anal cancer and were treated with IMPT from 2017 to 2019. CONCLUSION Use of IMPT appears to be an acceptable option for the treatment of anal cancer in patients with a pelvic kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Buchberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Paul Kreinbrink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
David JM, Yue Y, Blas K, Hendifar A, Kabolizadeh P, Tuli R. 18F-FDG PET Predicts Hematologic Toxicity in Patients with Locally Advanced Anal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:613-622. [PMID: 31681863 PMCID: PMC6817719 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hematologic toxicity (HT) during chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal cancer can lead to treatment breaks that compromise efficacy. We hypothesized that CRT-induced HT correlates with changes in active bone marrow (ABM) characterized by pre-/post-CRT positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography. Methods and materials Data from 36 patients with anal cancer who were treated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography scans 2 weeks before and 6 to 16 weeks after CRT were analyzed. Complete blood counts with differential within 2 weeks from, weekly during, and 2 week after treatment were obtained. HT was defined as baseline complete blood count change to nadir and posttreatment recovery. Total bone marrow was segmented into 2 subregions: lumbosacral (LS) pelvis (L5 vertebrae, sacrum, and coccyx) and lower pelvis (LP) (ilium, femoral head/neck, and greater and lesser trochanter). PET ABM was characterized as the volume having standard uptake value (SUV) greater than the mean uptake of unirradiated extrapelvic bone marrow. PET variables of pre-/post-CRT and HT predictors were analyzed by linear regression. Results Average pelvic ABM was significantly reduced from 52% to 41% in pre- to post-CRT PET scans for all patients (P = .0012). Regional analysis indicated significant post-CRT reduction of LS-ABM (P < .0001) and LP-ABM (P = .006). Linear regression analysis identified post-CRT SUVmean, differential ΔSUVmean, and ΔABM as correlating significantly with pre- and posttreatment HT. ΔWBC linearly correlated with ΔABM of LS and LP pelvis (P = .033 and P = .028, respectively). Dosimetrically, ABM was sensitive to higher radiation doses (>50 Gy) in terms of acute hematologic ΔWBC (P = .021) and ΔANC(P = .028). HT increased with increasing volume of ABM receiving 40 Gy. The results also suggest that ABM V40 Gy ≤ 20% to 25% may significantly reduce the risk of HT. Conclusions HT was significantly associated with ΔABM in patients with anal cancer who were treated with CRT. LS-ABM was a robust surrogate for evaluating CRT-induced HT. Our results suggest implementation of ABM dosimetric constraints, V40 Gy ≤ 20-25%, may significantly reduce HT and lead to decreased treatment delays associated with clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yong Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kevin Blas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Peyman Kabolizadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Abdelazim YA, Rushing CN, Palta M, Willett CG, Czito BG. Role of pelvic chemoradiation therapy in patients with initially metastatic anal canal cancer: A National Cancer Database review. Cancer 2019; 125:2115-2122. [PMID: 30825391 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the management of localized anal canal squamous cell carcinomas is well established, the role of pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) in the treatment of patients presenting with synchronous metastatic (stage IV) disease is poorly defined. This study used a national cancer database to compare the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with synchronous metastatic disease receiving CRT to the pelvis and patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone. METHODS This study included adult patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinomas presenting with synchronous metastases diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Multiple imputation and 2:1 propensity score matching were used to create a matched data set for testing. The proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the effect of the treatment group on OS. With only patients in the matched data set, the OS of the treatment groups was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method by treatment group. RESULTS This study started with an unmatched data set of 978 patients, and 582 patients were selected for the matched data set: 388 in the CRT group and 194 in the CT-alone group. The HR for the group effect was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.92; P = .006). The median OS was 21.1 months in the CRT group (95% CI, 17.4-24.0 months) and 14.6 months in the CT group (95% CI, 12.2-18.4 months). The corresponding 5-year OS rates were 23% (95% CI, 18%-28%) and 14% (95% CI, 7%-21%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this large series analyzing OS in patients with stage IV anal cancer, CRT was associated with improved OS in comparison with CT alone. Because of the lack of prospective data in this setting, this evidence will help to guide treatment approaches in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser A Abdelazim
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christel N Rushing
- Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|