Immunofluorescence study of patients with neuropathy and IgM M proteins

Neuropathy with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies: update on diagnosis, pathophysiology and management

Antimyelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is a rare autoimmune demyelinating peripheral neuropathy caused by IgM autoantibodies targeting MAG. The typical presentation is that of a slowly progressive, distal, length-dependent, predominantly sensory, sometimes ataxic neuropathy, frequently accompanied by upper limb tremor. Distal motor weakness may subsequently occur. The clinical presentation may vary and rarely be consistent with that of typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), as well as have an aggressive and rapidly disabling course. The diagnosis of anti-MAG neuropathy is based on the detection of anti-MAG antibodies through ELISA or western blot analysis, primarily in presence of an IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Anti-MAG neuropathy may occur without or with haematological malignancy. Electrophysiology is characteristic of a predominantly distal demyelinating neuropathy. Intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange have unproven benefits, but may provide short-term effects. Cytotoxic therapies are commonly used, although without an evidence base. Rituximab, an anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody was studied in two randomised controlled trials, neither of which achieved their primary outcome. However, a meta-analysis of these two studies demonstrated improvement of disability at 8-12 months. A recent trial with lenalidomide was interrupted prematurely due to a high rate of venous thromboembolism. There are currently two ongoing trials with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Symptom control is otherwise frequently needed. Outcome measures used for other inflammatory neuropathies present limitations in anti-MAG neuropathy. International registries such as the planned IMAGiNe study may, in future, provide answers to the many remaining questions.

The Role of Complement Activation in IgM M-Protein-Associated Neuropathies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Polyneuropathy associated with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy is characterized by slowly progressive, predominantly distal sensorimotor deficits, sensory ataxia, and electrophysiologic features of demyelination. IgM antibodies against myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) are present in serum from most patients. Nerve damage most likely results from the concerted action of binding of anti-MAG antibodies to nerves, followed by complement activation. The interaction of anti-MAG antibodies with complement activation and their relation to clinical characteristics have not been studied in detail. We studied the correlation among anti-MAG antibody titers, complement activation, and IgM-associated polyneuropathy disease severity.

METHODS

We used serum samples from 101 patients with IgM-associated polyneuropathy to assess IgM anti-MAG titers by ELISA and antibody-mediated complement deposition using both an ELISA-based system and a cell-based system of primate peripheral nerve slides. We studied correlations of complement activation with anti-MAG ELISA titers and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

IgM anti-MAG titers varied from negative to strongly positive. Complement deposition in the ELISA-based system correlated significantly with anti-MAG antibody titer (Spearman rho 0.80; p < 0.0001) despite large variability between serum samples with comparable anti-MAG titers. This variability was even larger in the cell-based assay, which also showed complement deposition in IgM anti-MAG negative patients, indicating the presence of autoantibodies directed against epitopes other than MAG in a subset of patients with IgM-associated polyneuropathy. Clinical characteristics did not correlate with anti-MAG titers or complement activation.

DISCUSSION

Anti-MAG antibody titers correlate with the level of complement activation in both ELISA and cell-based systems. However, clinical characteristics of IgM-associated polyneuropathy do not or only weakly correlate with titers or the level of complement deposition. The lack of clear correlations between complement activation and clinical characteristics does, at this stage, not support the use of complement inhibitors in the treatment of IgM-associated polyneuropathy.

Anti-MAG neuropathy: historical aspects, clinical-pathological correlations, and considerations for future therapeutical trials

BACKGROUND

 Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy present with distal demyelinating polyneuropathy, IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and elevated titers of anti-MAG antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

 This paper reviews what is known about the clinical presentation, course, pathophysiology, and treatment of anti-MAG neuropathy, with considerations for the design of therapeutic trials.

METHODS

 A literature review of the medical and scientific literature related to anti-MAG neuropathy, and the design of therapeutic clinical trials in peripheral neuropathy.

RESULTS

 Anti-MAG neuropathy can remain indolent for many years but then enter a progressive phase. Highly elevated antibody titers are diagnostic, but intermediate titers can also occur in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The peripheral nerves can become inexcitable, thereby masking the demyelinating abnormalities. There is good evidence that the anti-MAG antibodies cause neuropathy. Reduction of the autoantibody concentration by agents that target B-cells was reported to result in clinical improvement in case series and uncontrolled trials, but not in controlled clinical trials, probably due to inadequate trial design.

CONCLUSION

 We propose that therapeutic trials for anti-MAG neuropathy include patients with the typical presentation, some degree of weakness, highly elevated anti-MAG antibody titers, and at least one nerve exhibiting demyelinating range abnormalities. Treatment with one or a combination of anti-B-cell agents would aim at reducing the autoantibody concentration by at least 60%. A trial duration of 2 years may be required to show efficacy. The neuropathy impairment score of the lower extremities (NIS-LL) plus the Lower Limb Function (LLF) score would be a suitable primary outcome measure.

Investigation and Management of Immunoglobulin M- and Waldenström-Associated Peripheral Neuropathies

The immunoglobulin M (IgM)-associated peripheral neuropathies (PN) are a heterogeneous group of disorders representing most paraproteinemic neuropathy cases. They are associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Establishing a causal link between a paraprotein and neuropathy can be challenging but is necessary to adopt an appropriate therapeutic approach. The most common type of IgM-PN is Antimyelin-Associated-Glycoprotein neuropathy, but half of the cases are of other causes. Progressive functional impairment is an indication for treatment, even when the underlying disorder is IgM MGUS, involving either rituximab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy to achieve clinical stabilization.

Polyneuropathy Associated with IgM Monoclonal Gammopathy; Advances in Genetics and Treatment, Focusing on Anti-MAG Antibodies

With increasing age, the chances of developing either MGUS or polyneuropathy increase as well. In some cases, there is a causative relationship between the IgM M-protein and polyneuropathy. In approximately half of these cases, IgM targets the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). This results in chronic polyneuropathy with slowly progressive, predominantly sensory neurological deficits and distally demyelinating features in nerve conduction studies. Despite the disease being chronic and developing slowly, it can cause considerable impairment. We reviewed English medical publications between 1980 and May 2022 on IgM gammopathy-associated polyneuropathy, with special attention to studies addressing the pathophysiology or treatment of anti-MAG polyneuropathy. Treatment options have been limited to a temporizing effect of intravenous immunoglobulins in some patients and a more sustained effect of rituximab but in only 30 to 55 percent of patients. An increase in our knowledge concerning genetic mutations, particularly the MYD88L265P mutation, led to the development of novel targeted treatment options such as BTK inhibitors. Similarly, due to the increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of anti-MAG polyneuropathy, new treatment options are emerging. Since anti-MAG polyneuropathy is a rare disease with diverse symptomatology, large trials with good outcome measures are a challenge.

Antibody testing in neuropathy associated with anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein antibodies: where we are after 40 years

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is based on the presence of elevated titers of IgM anti-MAG antibodies, which are typically associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and a slowly progressive, distal demyelinating phenotype. The condition, however, can be under or over diagnosed in patients with mildly elevated antibody titers, absent monoclonal gammopathy, or an atypical presentation. The purpose of this paper is to examine recent advances in our understanding of the currently available anti-MAG antibody assays, their reliability, and their use in deciding treatment or monitoring the response to therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Higher titers of anti-MAG antibodies are more likely to be associated with the typical MAG phenotype or response to therapy. Mildly elevated antibody levels can occur in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Testing for cross-reactivity with HNK1 can add to the specificity of the antibody assays. Patients with MAG neuropathy can present with an atypical phenotype and in the absence of a detectable monoclonal gammopathy.

SUMMARY

Assays for anti-MAG antibodies by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay can be improved by testing for antibody binding at multiple serum dilutions, the inclusion of antigen-negative microwells as internal controls for each sample, testing for cross-reactivity with HNK1, and formal validation. The diagnosis needs to be considered in patients with demyelinating neuropathy, even in the absence of a monoclonal gammopathy or typical phenotype. The change in antibody levels needs to be considered in evaluating the response to therapy with B-cell depleting agents.

Diagnosis and management of sensory polyneuropathy

Sensory polyneuropathies, which are caused by dysfunction of peripheral sensory nerve fibers, are a heterogeneous group of disorders that range from the common diabetic neuropathy to the rare sensory neuronopathies. The presenting symptoms, acuity, time course, severity, and subsequent morbidity vary and depend on the type of fiber that is affected and the underlying cause. Damage to small thinly myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers results in neuropathic pain, whereas damage to large myelinated sensory afferents results in proprioceptive deficits and ataxia. The causes of these disorders are diverse and include metabolic, toxic, infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune, and genetic conditions. Idiopathic sensory polyneuropathies are common although they should be considered a diagnosis of exclusion. The diagnostic evaluation involves electrophysiologic testing including nerve conduction studies, histopathologic analysis of nerve tissue, serum studies, and sometimes autonomic testing and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. The treatment of these diseases depends on the underlying cause and may include immunotherapy, mitigation of risk factors, symptomatic treatment, and gene therapy, such as the recently developed RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotide therapies for transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Many of these disorders have no directed treatment, in which case management remains symptomatic and supportive. More research is needed into the underlying pathophysiology of nerve damage in these polyneuropathies to guide advances in treatment.

Immune-mediated neuropathies

Since the discovery of an acute monophasic paralysis, later coined Guillain-Barré syndrome, almost 100 years ago, and the discovery of chronic, steroid-responsive polyneuropathy 50 years ago, the spectrum of immune-mediated polyneuropathies has broadened, with various subtypes continuing to be identified, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). In general, these disorders are speculated to be caused by autoimmunity to proteins located at the node of Ranvier or components of myelin of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. Owing to the numerous subtypes of the immune-mediated neuropathies, making the right diagnosis in daily clinical practice is complicated. Moreover, treating these disorders, particularly their chronic variants, such as CIDP and MMN, poses a challenge. In general, management of these disorders includes immunotherapies, such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the emergence of more disease-specific immunotherapies should broaden the therapeutic options for these disabling diseases.

An update on the diagnosis and management of the polyneuropathy of POEMS syndrome

POEMS syndrome is a rare, chronic, disabling paraneoplastic disorder characterized by peripheral neuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal plasma cells disorder and skin changes. Diagnosis relies on the fulfillment of a set of clinical criteria of which polyneuropathy and a monoclonal plasma cell dyscrasia are early and essential features. Treatment may be either local or systemic and is aimed at the monoclonal plasma cell disorder. Our knowledge of the pathogenesis underlying the POEMS syndrome has advanced greatly over the past years, favoring an important progression in the recognition and management of this disorder. Here, we discuss the recent literature that has advanced our knowledge of the pathogenesis and clinical management of the polyneuropathy in POEMS syndrome.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) antibodies may be pathogenic in some people with immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be beneficial. This is an update of a review first published in 2003 and previously updated in 2006 and 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapy for IgM anti-MAG paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 1 February 2016 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also checked trials registers and bibliographies, and contacted authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs involving participants of any age treated with any type of immunotherapy for anti-MAG antibody-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of any severity.Our primary outcome measures were numbers of participants improved in disability assessed with either or both of the Neuropathy Impairment Scale (NIS) or the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at six months after randomisation. Secondary outcome measures were: mean improvement in disability, assessed with either the NIS or the mRS, 12 months after randomisation; change in impairment as measured by improvement in the 10-metre walk time, change in a validated linear disability measure such as the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) at six and 12 months after randomisation, change in subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation; change in serum IgM paraprotein concentration or anti-MAG antibody titre at six months after randomisation; and adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight eligible trials (236 participants), which tested intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), interferon alfa-2a, plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide and steroids, and rituximab. Two trials of IVIg (22 and 11 participants, including 20 with antibodies against MAG), had comparable interventions and outcomes, but both were short-term trials. We also included two trials of rituximab with comparable interventions and outcomes.There were very few clinical or statistically significant benefits of the treatments used on the outcomes predefined for this review, but not all the predefined outcomes were used in every included trial and more responsive outcomes are being developed. A well-performed trial of IVIg, which was at low risk of bias, showed a statistical benefit in terms of improvement in mRS at two weeks and 10-metre walk time at four weeks, but these short-term outcomes are of questionable clinical significance. Cyclophosphamide failed to show any benefit in the single trial's primary outcome, and showed a barely significant benefit in the primary outcome specified here, but some toxic adverse events were identified.Two trials of rituximab (80 participants) have been published, one of which (26 participants) was at high risk of bias. In the meta-analysis, although the data are of low quality, rituximab is beneficial in improving disability scales (Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) improved at eight to 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30 to 9.45; 73 participants)) and significantly more participants improve in the global impression of change score (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.71; 70 participants). Other measures did not improve significantly, but wide CIs do not preclude some effect. Reported adverse effects of rituximab were few, and mostly minor.There were few serious adverse events in the other trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-MAG paraproteinaemic neuropathy to form an evidence base supporting any particular immunotherapy treatment. IVIg has a statistically but probably not clinically significant benefit in the short term. The meta-analysis of two trials of rituximab provides, however, low-quality evidence of a benefit from this agent. The conclusions of this meta-analysis await confirmation, as one of the two included studies is of very low quality. We require large well-designed randomised trials of at least 12 months' duration to assess existing or novel therapies, preferably employing unified, consistent, well-designed, responsive, and valid outcome measures.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

Chronic neuropathies are operationally classified as primarily demyelinating or axonal, on the basis of electrodiagnostic or pathological criteria. Demyelinating neuropathies are further classified as hereditary or acquired-this distinction is important, because the acquired neuropathies are immune-mediated and, thus, amenable to treatment. The acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathies include chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathy associated with monoclonal IgM antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG; anti-MAG neuropathy), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and POEMS syndrome. They have characteristic--though overlapping--clinical presentations, are mediated by distinct immune mechanisms, and respond to different therapies. CIDP is the default diagnosis if the neuropathy is demyelinating and no other cause is found. Anti-MAG neuropathy is diagnosed on the basis of the presence of anti-MAG antibodies, MMN is characterized by multifocal weakness and motor conduction blocks, and POEMS syndrome is associated with IgG or IgA λ-type monoclonal gammopathy and osteosclerotic myeloma. The correct diagnosis, however, can be difficult to make in patients with atypical or overlapping presentations, or nondefinitive laboratory studies. First-line treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids or plasmapheresis for CIDP; IVIg for MMN; rituximab for anti-MAG neuropathy; and irradiation or chemotherapy for POEMS syndrome. A correct diagnosis is required for choosing the appropriate treatment, with the aim of preventing progressive neuropathy.

Neuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy

The association of neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy has been known for several years, even if the clinical and pathogenetic relevance of this association is not completely defined. This is not a marginal problem since monoclonal gammopathy is present in 1-3% of the population above 50 years in whom it is often asymptomatic, and in at least 8% of patients is associated with a symptomatic neuropathy, representing one of the leading causes of neuropathy in aged people. Monoclonal gammopathy may result from malignant lymphoproliferative diseases including multiple myeloma or solitary plasmocytoma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), other IgM-secreting lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and primary systemic amyloidosis (AL). In most instances it is not associated with any of these disorders and is defined monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) for its possible, though infrequent, evolution into malignant forms. Several data support the pathogenetic role of the monoclonal gammopathy in the neuropathy particularly when of IgM isotype where IgM reactivity to several neural antigens has been reported. Increased levels of VEGF have been implicated in POEMS syndrome. However, there are as yet no defined therapies for these neuropathies, as their efficacy has not been confirmed in randomized trials.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some people with immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be beneficial. This is an update of a review first published in 2003 and previously updated in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapy for IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register 6 June 2011), CENTRAL (2011, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2011) and EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2011) for controlled trials. We also checked bibliographies and contacted authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving participants of any age treated with any type of immunotherapy for anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of any severity.Our primary outcome measure was change in the Neuropathy Impairment Scale or Modified Rankin Scale at six months after randomisation. Secondary outcome measures were: Neuropathy Impairment Scale or the Modified Rankin Score at 12 months after randomisation; 10-metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation; IgM paraprotein levels and anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody titres at six months after randomisation; and adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two authors independently selected studies. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias in included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified seven eligible trials (182 participants), which tested intravenous immunoglobulin, alfa interferon alfa-2a, plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide and steroids, and rituximab. Only two trials, of intravenous immunoglobulin (with 33 participants, including 20 with antibodies against myelin-associated glycoprotein), had comparable interventions and outcomes, but both were short-term trials.There were no clinical or statistically significant benefits of the treatments used on the outcomes predefined for this review, but not all the predefined outcomes were used in every included trial. Intravenous immunoglobulin showed a statistical benefit in terms of improvement in Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10-metre walk time at four weeks. Cyclophosphamide failed to show any benefit in the trial's primary outcome, and showed a barely significant benefit in the primary outcome specified here, but some toxic adverse events were identified. A trial of rituximab was of poor methodological quality with a high risk of bias and a further larger study is awaited. Serious adverse events were few in the other trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to form an evidence base supporting any particular immunotherapy treatment. There is very low quality evidence of benefit from rituximab. Large well designed randomised trials of at least six to 12 months duration are required to assess existing or novel therapies, preferably employing unified, consistent, well designed, responsive and valid outcome measures.

Paraproteinemic neuropathy

Paraproteinemia frequently is associated with peripheral neuropathy. The clinical manifestations can be protean owing to the potential for multiple organ involvement. A methodical diagnostic approach to patients who have a plasma cell dyscrasia and neuropathy is necessary to ensure the appropriate detection of more widespread systemic involvement.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some people with IgM paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-myelin associated glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register (March 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2005) and EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2005) for controlled trials. We also checked bibliographies and contacted authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of participants of any age treated with any type of immunotherapy for anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of any severity. Our primary outcome measure was change in the Neuropathy Impairment Scale or Modified Rankin Scale at six months after randomisationSecondary outcome measures were: Neuropathy Impairment Scale or the Modified Rankin Score at 12 months after randomisation; ten-metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation; IgM paraprotein levels and anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibody titres at six months after randomisation and adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified eight possible trials. Of these, five randomised controlled trials were included after discussion between the authors. One author extracted and the other checked the data. No missing data could be obtained from trial authors.

MAIN RESULTS

The five eligible trials (97 participants) tested intravenous immunoglobulin, interferon-alpha or plasma exchange. Only two, of intravenous immunoglobulin, had comparable interventions and outcomes but both were short-term. There were no significant benefits of the treatments used in the outcomes predefined for this review, but not all the predefined outcomes were used in every included trial. Intravenous immunoglobulin showed benefits in terms of improvement in Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10-metre walk time at four weeks. Serious adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin are known to occur from observational studies but none were encountered in these trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-myelin associated glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to recommend any particular immunotherapy treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin is relatively safe and may produce some short-term benefit. Large well-designed randomised trials of at least six to 12 months duration are required to assess existing or novel therapies.

Immunoglobulin gene analysis in polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy

Antineural antibody activity is the implicated pathogenic mechanism in polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy. Recognition of antigen depends on immunoglobulin variable regions, encoded by V genes. We studied V(H)DJ(H) and V(L)J(L) gene use in monoclonal B cells by clonal analysis in 20 patients with polyneuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy. V genes associated with bacterial responses appear over-represented and V(H)3-23 was preferentially used, without association with specific D, J(H) or V(L)J(L). V genes revealed somatic mutation and intraclonal variation was found in 9 of 20 patients. Polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy may be caused by an immune response to bacterial antigens, which recruit somatically mutated autoreactive B cells.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some patients with IgM paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be of benefit in the treatment of the neuropathy. Many potential therapies have been described in small trials, uncontrolled studies and case reports.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register (August 2002) and MEDLINE (January 1966 - August 2002) and EMBASE (January 1980 - August 2002) for controlled trials, checked the bibliographies to identify other controlled trials and contacted authors and other experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

patients of any age with anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of any severity. Types of interventions: any type of immunotherapy. Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in the Neuropathy Disability Score or Modified Rankin Scale six months after randomisation Secondary: Neuropathy Disability Score and/or the Modified Rankin Score 12 months after randomisation. Ten metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation. IgM paraprotein levels and anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody titres six months after randomisation. Adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified six randomised controlled trials of which five were included after discussion between the authors. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. No missing data could be obtained from authors.

MAIN RESULTS

The five eligible trials used four of the many available immunotherapy treatments. Only two had comparable interventions and outcomes but these were only short-term studies. There were no significant benefits of the treatments used in the predefined outcomes. However intravenous immunoglobulin showed benefits in terms of improved Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10 metre walk time at four weeks. Serious adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin are known to occur from observational studies but none were encountered in these trials.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to recommend any particular immunotherapy treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin is relatively safe and may produce some short-term benefit. Large well designed randomised trials are required to assess the efficacy of promising new therapies.

Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies alter neurofilament spacing

Axon calibre is crucial to efficient impulse transmission in the peripheral nervous system. Neurofilament numbers determine gross axonal diameter, but intra-axonal distribution depends on the phosphorylation status of neurofilament sidearms. Myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) has been implicated in the signalling cascade controlling neurofilament phosphorylation and hence in the control of axon calibre. In an electron microscopic morphometric study we measured nearest neighbour neurofilament distances (NNND) in the axons of sural nerves from patients with anti-MAG paraproteinaemic neuropathies and compared these with normal human sural nerves and those from patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Axon calibre was similar in all groups. In normal human sural nerves, axonal NNND was correlated with axonal diameter (r = 0.56). In diseased axons this correlation did not exist. The NNND was significantly reduced in demyelinated axons (30.5+/-2.2 nm) and those with widely spaced myelin (28.9+/-1.3 nm) from patients with anti-MAG antibodies compared with normal axons from normal patients (39.8+/- 3.2 nm) or those with demyelinating neuropathy (35.8+/-4.6 nm). This reinforces the hypothesis that MAG is involved in the control of neurofilament spacing through sidearm phosphorylation and demonstrates a MAG-mediated pathogenic effect of the anti-MAG antibody in peripheral nerves.

Anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibodies: variability in patterns of IgM binding to peripheral nerve

We previously found that serums with anti-sulfatide antibodies have several different patterns of binding to neural tissue. In this study, we asked whether serums with anti-myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies also have similar variations in patterns of tissue binding. We examined binding to peripheral nerve in 49 serums with IgM anti-MAG antibodies and 13 serums with IgM anti-sulfoglucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG) antibodies but no MAG binding. We correlated patterns of binding with titers of IgM binding to MAG and SGPG measured by ELISA methods. Our results show that IgM in most anti-MAG serums stained areas of non-compact myelin, including the periaxonal and outer myelin membranes and Schmidt-Lanterman incisures. However, other patterns included IgM binding to areas of compact myelin and to non-myelin structures including axons and endoneurial macrophages. IgM in anti-SGPG serums bound to axons or macrophages, but rarely to myelin-related structures. A total of 11/62 (18%) of serums had IgM binding to axons, six with anti-MAG antibodies and five with anti-SGPG antibodies. The majority of these serums (73%) had SGPG titers greater than MAG titers when measured by ELISA. We conclude that anti-MAG serums have several different binding patterns to neural tissue, including axonal binding, especially when anti-MAG antibodies cross-react with SGPG. These different binding patterns may relate to the ability of anti-MAG serum IgM to bind both MAG and SGPG or to other molecules with a sulfated glucuronic acid epitope that are present in peripheral nerve.

Variability in immunohistochemistries of IgM M-proteins binding to sulfated glucuronyl paragloboside

Serum IgMs from 4 of 12 patients with polyneuropathy and IgM M-proteins that bind to sulfated glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG) strongly immunostained the human peripheral nerve myelin (group A), whereas those from the other eight patients strongly immunostained the cytoplasm of the Schwann cells surrounding the myelin sheath with only weak staining of the myelin (group B). Strong immunostaining of peripheral myelin by IgMs from group A patients may be due to the strong cross-reactivities against P0 and peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP-22), which are localized in compact myelin. Only three patients (all in group B) showed some response to the immunotherapies. Weak reactivities to P0 and and PMP-22 might indicate the possibility of improvement after the immunotherapies.

Treatment experience in patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy

We report our experience with 24 consecutively treated patients (15 men and 9 women, median age 64 years) with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy. The rates of response to plasma exchange (40%), immune globulin (16%), and cyclophosphamide-based therapy (36%) were similar. Five (24%) responded to the first treatment modality, 32% to a second, alternative modality, and 31% to a third. Only 4 of 12 responders had sustained improvement; the others relapsed after a median of 7 months. In those 4 patients, the median immunoglobulin M (IgM) level dropped by 25% compared to an increase of 24% in the nonresponders (P = 0.04). Thus, most patients with anti-MAG neuropathy failed to have sustained improvement after treatment, and none of the therapies emerged as superior. Disability improved transiently after therapy in approximately 50% of cases. A 25% reduction of the IgM level predicted sustained improvement, but was difficult to achieve. There were no clinical or electrodiagnostic features associated with a treatment response, nor did a reduction of the anti-MAG antibody titer correlate with clinical improvement.

Anti-sulfatide IgM antibodies in peripheral neuropathy

Anti-sulfatide IgM antibodies have been recently associated with neuropathy but the clinical and electrophysiological correlations of this reactivity remains unclear. We reviewed the clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with high anti-sulfatide titers detected in our laboratory from 1991 to 1998. Of the 564 patients with different neurological diagnosis tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 11 had high anti-sulfatide IgM titers (>1/8000), 26 had titers of 1/8000 while 78 had titers of 1/4000. All patients with high anti-sulfatide IgM titers had a chronic, dysimmune, mostly sensorimotor neuropathy that in seven was associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy. In most of these patients electrophysiological and morphological studies were consistent with a predominantly demyelinating neuropathy frequently associated with prominent axonal loss. Antibody titers of 1/8000, though always associated with neuropathy, did not correlate with a particular form or cause of neuropathy, while lower titers were equally distributed in patients with different neurological disorders. Our study indicate that high anti-sulfatide IgM titers (>1/8000) are highly predictive for a chronic, dysimmune, mostly demyelinating neuropathy often associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and may therefore have potential diagnostic relevance.

Long-term clinical and neurophysiological follow-up of patients with peripheral, neuropathy associated with benign monoclonal gammopathy

The incidence of hematological malignancy in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been assessed as 17% to 25%. To ascertain whether this is true of neuropathy associated with MGUS, a long-term (5-42 years) retrospective clinical and neurophysiological follow-up was conducted in 50 cases (immunoglobulin M [IgM], n = 38; IgG, n = 11; IgA, n = 1). Only three patients developed hematological malignancy. Of 25 survivors with IgM paraproteinemia, 7 had myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies with typical clinical features. Evoked distal muscle amplitudes were significantly smaller than for the other paraprotein classes. Preferential distal demyelination manifested by relative prolongation of distal motor latency was not apparent in the cases of long duration. Two patients with IgM antidisialosyl antibodies and cold agglutinating activity had a large fiber neuropathy with intermittent oculofacial involvement. Both responded to intravenous immunoglobulin. Findings in the remaining patients were varied. Recognition of IgM subgroups is important both for prognosis and possible response to treatment.

Sensorimotor polyneuropathy associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, IgM antigangliosides antibody and human T-cell leukemia virus I infection

A 65-year-old man presented with a sensorimotor polyneuropathy associated with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody to various gangliosides. Electrophysiological studies denoted significant abnormalities of motor and sensory nerve conduction. Although the pathology of sural nerve biopsy looked minimally affected, immunohistochemical studies showed specific binding of IgM to the human peripheral nerve. Our patient also had high titer of antibody to human T-cell leukemia virus I (HTLV-I) in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which might activate B-cell-mediated immunity and facilitate the production of IgM antibody. The other unique feature is the reactivity of antibody to gangliosides. The patient had IgM antibody reactivities to gangliosides with disialosyl residue such as GT1b, GQ1b and GD3, but not to GD1b. IgM antibody to gangliosides with disialosyl residue has been reported in ataxic symptoms, but our patient failed to demonstrate ataxia. Without reactivity to GD1b, sensory ataxic neuropathy might not develop even in the presence of antibody reactive to other gangliosides with disialosyl residue.

Paraproteinemia and neuropathy

Paraprotein-associated neuropathies are a diverse group of disorders. The pathogenesis of many of them is poorly understood. Treatments have usually consisted of plasma exchange, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and other immunosuppressive therapies. Response to treatment has varied from good to very poor. Most recent work in this field has had two goals: achieving a better understanding of pathogenesis and developing better treatments. Such diverse entities as hepatitis C virus, vascular endothelial growth factor, and cytokines now appear to play a role in pathogenesis. More aggressive therapies such a bone marrow transplantation, interferon-alpha, and Rituximab have shown some promise.

Anti-MAG IgM penetration into myelinated fibers correlates with the extent of myelin widening

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies penetration into myelinated peripheral nerve fibers and the widening of the peripheral myelin sheaths in anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) demyelinating IgM monoclonal polyneuropathy. Demyelinating polyneuropathy with monoclonal IgM is often associated with anti-MAG autoantibodies, which are thought to initiate the disease with IgM deposits usually present on the myelin sheaths. We analyzed nerve biopsies from 12 patients with an anti-MAG demyelinating neuropathy by confocal and electron microscopy. The total number of nerve fibers and the proportion of IgM-associated fibers were quantified after immunohistochemical staining. The affinities of IgM were examined by analyzing the binding pattern of serum IgM on normal peripheral nerve sections. Ultrastructural examinations of the biopsies showed a good correlation between in situ widened myelin sheaths and the IgM penetration level into myelinated fibers. The terminal complement complex appears not be involved in the penetration of IgM into the myelinated fibers. Our findings suggest a causative role of the IgM anti-MAG antibodies in the ultrastructural modifications of the myelin sheaths. The basement membrane and myelin components appear to be the major targets of the IgM monoclonal antibodies. However, the pathogenic mechanism whereby IgM antibodies reach their targets and induce nerve damage are still unclear.

Autoantibodies associated with peripheral neuropathy

High titers of serum antibodies to neural antigens occur in several forms of neuropathy. These include neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, inflammatory polyneuropathies, and paraneoplastic neuropathies. The antibodies frequently react with glycosylated cell surface molecules, including glycolipids, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans, but antibodies to intracellular proteins have also been described. There are several correlations between antibody specificity and clinical symptoms, such as anti-MAG antibodies with demyelinating sensory or sensorimotor neuropathy, anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies with motor nerve disorders, antibodies to gangliosides containing disialosyl moieties with sensory ataxic neuropathy and Miller-Fisher syndrome, and antibodies to the neuronal nuclear Hu antigens with paraneoplastic sensory neuronopathy. These correlations suggest that the neuropathies may be caused by the antibodies, but evidence for a causal relationship is stronger in some examples than others. In this review, we discuss the origins of the antibodies, evidence for and against their involvement in pathogenic mechanisms, and the implications of these findings for therapy.

Clinical features and anti-neural reactivity in neuropathy associated with IgG monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Neuropathy has been frequently reported in patients with IgG monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) but it is still unclear whether this association has clinical or pathogenetic relevance. In order to clarify the possible role of IgG MGUS in the neuropathy we correlated the clinical and electrophysiological features of the neuropathy with the duration and anti-neural activity of the M-protein in 17 patients with neuropathy and IgG MGUS. Ten patients (59%) had a chronic demyelinating neuropathy clinically indistinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) while 7 (41%) had a predominantly sensory axonal or mixed neuropathy. In 80% of patients in the CIDP-like and 28% in the sensory group the IgG M-protein became manifest several months to years after onset of the neuropathy. Antibodies to one or more neural antigens (including tubulin, a 35KD P0-like nerve myelin glycoprotein, GD1a, GM1 and chondrotin sulfate C) were found in 40% of patients with CIDP-like and 43% with sensory neuropathy but also in 37% patients with IgG MGUS without neuropathy. Neuropathy associated with IgG MGUS is probably less heterogeneous than previously considered suggesting that this association may not be merely casual. The evidence for primary pathogenetic role of IgG M-proteins in the neuropathy remains however elusive.

Variability in the binding of anti-MAG and anti-SGPG antibodies to target antigens in demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia

Densitometry of immunostained Western blots or thin layer chromatograms and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to compare the relative strengths of IgM binding to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), P0 glycoprotein, peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP-22), sulfate-3-glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and other potential target antigens in a series of eleven patients with sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy and IgM paraproteinemia. The IgM from all patients exhibited reactivity with both MAG and SGPG, and there was a statistically significant correlation between the overlay assays and ELISAs for measuring the strength of IgM binding to MAG and to SGPG. However, the data revealed variations in the relative strengths with which the antibodies bound to the potential target antigens and heterogeneity in their fine specificities. First, there was a poor correlation between the strength of binding to MAG and to SGPG, respectively. Second, reactivity with MAG or SGPG in a few of the patients was only detected by one of the two assay systems. Third, about one-third of the patients' IgM absolutely required the sulfate on SGPG for reactivity, whereas the others retained some reactivity after removal of the sulfate. Fourth, IgM from two of the patients exhibited unusually strong reactivity with the proteins of compact myelin, P0 and PMP22. These relative differences in strengths of antibody binding to the potential antigens were compared with the patients' clinical presentations and with their responses to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in a clinical trial in which they participated. For the most part, these variations did not correlate with clinical presentation, which was relatively homogeneous in this series of patients. However, an inverse relationship was noted between degree of reactivity to MAG by ELISA and response to IVIg. Two of the patients who responded had only mild elevations of IgM antibodies to nerve glycoconjugates and exhibited some unusual immunochemical and clinical characteristics in comparison to the other patients. The results demonstrate differences in the relative strengths with which anti-MAG and anti-SGPG IgM antibodies from different patients bind to potential neural target antigens which may affect pathogenic mechanisms and response to therapy.

Anti-GM2 IgM antibodies: clinical correlates and reactivity with a human neuroblastoma cell line

Anti-GM2 IgM antibodies have been reported in some patients with dysimmune neuropathy or lower motor neuron syndrome, in whom they were often associated with a concomitant reactivity with GM1. To investigate the possible clinical and pathogenetic relevance of these antibodies we measured serum anti-GM2 IgM titers by ELISA in 224 patients with different neuropathies and motor neuron disease and examined their binding to SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). High titers of anti-GM2 IgM antibodies were found in eight patients with dysimmune neuropathies including two with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), two with purely motor demyelinating neuropathy without conduction block (MN) and four with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). In two MMN patients reactivity with GM2 was associated with anti-GM1 reactivity and in one MN patient with anti-GM1, -GD1a and -GD1b reactivity. All but one patient had a concomitant reactivity with GalNAc-GD1a. Serum IgM from all positive patients intensely stained by IIF the surface of SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. This reactivity was blocked by serum pre-incubation with GM2, was not observed with sera from patients without anti-GM2 antibodies including those with high anti-GM1 or other anti-glycolipid antibodies, and correlated with the presence of GM2 in the SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. These findings indicate that anti-GM2 antibodies, though infrequent, are strictly associated with dysimmune neuropathies and suggest that SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells can be a suitable in vitro model to study the functional and biological effects of these antibodies.

Comparison of IgM-MGUS and IgG-MGUS polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and electrodiagnostic features and response to treatment in patients with IgM-MGUS and IgG-MGUS associated polyneuropathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients with MGUS associated neuropathy evaluated over 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 19 patients with IgM-MGUS and 15 with IgG-MGUS. There were no differences in age, duration of symptoms, or distribution of motor and sensory symptoms or signs. IgM-MGUS patients had prolonged distal latencies of the median and ulnar motor potentials, greater slowing of the peroneal nerve conduction velocity and more often absent ulnar sensory potentials. Half of the patients in both groups improved following immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

IgM-MGUS patients had more severe demyelination on the nerve conduction studies, but there were no clinical features that differentiated the 2 groups. IgM and IgG-MGUS patients improved with plasma exchange and other immune therapies. Anti-MAG antibodies failed to distinguish a subgroup of patients with IgM-MGUS neuropathy.

IgM anti-sulfatide autoantibodies: patterns of binding to cerebellum, dorsal root ganglion and peripheral nerve

Anti-sulfatide antibodies are associated with polyneuropathies having a prominent sensory component, but with variable degrees of motor and sensory loss, gait dysfunction and demyelination. In this study, we asked whether patterns of IgM binding to neural tissue in anti-sulfatide serums also demonstrated heterogeneity. We used immunocytochemical methods to examine IgM binding to peripheral nerve, dorsal root ganglion, and cerebellum in 41 serums with high titers of IgM anti-sulfatide antibodies. Our results showed that there were several different patterns of IgM binding to neural tissues in anti-sulfatide serums. In peripheral nerve the most common targets of IgM were axons, resident macrophages or Schwann cell cytoplasm. In the cerebellum, IgM bound to neuronal nuclei, white matter, or neuropil in molecular and granule cell layers. There was little binding of IgM to structures in the dorsal root ganglion. Patterns of IgM binding to peripheral nerve and cerebellum were related. Binding to neuronal nuclei in the cerebellum was usually found in serums that recognized peripheral nerve axons or macrophages. Serums with binding of IgM to cerebellar white matter usually recognized Schwann cell cytoplasm. We conclude that IgM anti-sulfatide antibodies may have several different tissue binding patterns in the peripheral and central nervous systems. These differences may be related to the variation in clinical neuropathy syndromes associated with apparently similar anti-sulfatide antibodies.

Axonal neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

OBJECTIVE

The neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is typically a predominantly demyelinating process that may have additional features of axonal degeneration. Sixteen patients with MGUS and a pure or predominantly axonal neuropathy are reported and compared with 20 consecutive patients with demyelinating neuropathy and MGUS who were seen during the same period.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with neuropathy and MGUS evaluated during a five year period.

RESULTS

The axonal group had mild, symmetric, slowly progressive, predominantly sensory neuropathy, usually limited to the legs. There were no differences in the age of onset or duration of symptoms at the time of presentation, initial symptoms, or the severity of weakness between the axonal and demyelinating cases. However, the axonal process was associated with less vibration and proprioceptive loss, did not include leg ataxia (present in 55% of patients with demyelinating type), less often had generalised areflexia (19% v 70%), IgM gammopathy (19% v 80%), and anti-MAG antibodies (0% v 40%), and had lower CSF protein concentrations (mean, 49 v 100 mg/dl). The illness was also generally milder with less disability (mean Rankin score 2.1 v 2.8). Fewer patients with axonal neuropathy improved with immunomodulating therapy (27% v 75%).

CONCLUSION

There is an axonal neuropathy associated with MGUS that is clinically and electrophysiologically distinct from the more typical demyelinating pattern.

Link between peripheral neuropathy and monoclonal dysglobulinemia: a study of 66 cases

The association of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and monoclonal dysglobulinemia has often been reported, although a direct link between the two is not readily established. Linkage is generally based on consideration of the clinical, electrophysiological and immunological findings along with details of the course. We report here a study of 66 of our own cases which benefitted from immunological and immunopathological analyses of serum. In 62 of these cases, histological and immunopathological examinations of nerve biopsy specimens were realized. Such a discussion about a link between the dysglobulinemia and the peripheral neuropathy is of clinical interest as it provides information for decisions about the continuation of potentially neurotoxic chemotherapy. In this prospective study conducted on a case by case basis, the origin of the neuropathy, whether due to the chemotherapy, the dysimmune process, the presence of abnormal immunoglobulins in the nerve, amyloid deposits, infiltration of nerve parenchyme by abnormal cells, or a combination of one or more of these mechanisms, could be determined in most cases. We divided our population of 66 patients into 4 etiological groups: group 1: direct link (56.1%), group 2: indirect link (12.7%), group 3: no link (10.6%), group 4: doubtful link (21.2%). In group 1 we found a statistically significant association between the peripheral neuropathy and an IgM kappa MGUS.

Anti-MAG and anti-SGPG antibodies in neuropathy

We compared the binding of human antibodies from patients with neuropathy to the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), to its cross-reactive glycolipid sulfoglucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and to sections of peripheral nerve. Titers were correlated with the clinical presentation and results of electrophysiological and pathological studies. Most patients had a predominantly sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy and highly elevated antibodies to both MAG and SGPG, but 2 had highly elevated antibodies to MAG alone, and 1 to SGPG alone. Two patients had predominantly motor neuropathy and highly elevated antibodies to SGPG which reacted with MAG by Western blot but not by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. One patient had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and antibodies to SGPG but not to MAG. These studies indicate that the neuropathic syndrome associated with anti-MAG or -SGPG antibodies are more heterogeneous than previously suspected, and that although most of the antibodies react with both MAG and SGPG, some may react with MAG or SGPG alone.

Neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies

Approximately 10% of patients with idiopathic peripheral neuropathy have an associated serum monoclonal gammopathy or M-protein. This represents six times the incidence of M-proteins found in the general population. In 5% of idiopathic peripheral neuropathy patients the M-protein is associated with an identifiable plasma cell dyscrasia. Sclerotic myeloma is particularly important to recognize because treatment may result in amelioration of the neuropathy and remission of the tumor. Patients with primary systemic amyloidosis often have preferential small fiber involvement with a dissociated sensory loss and autonomic dysfunction. The nerve root infiltration of lymphoproliferative disorders may simulate a polyradiculoneuropathy. In cases without an identifiable cause for the M-protein, referred to as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), the pathophysiologic basis for the neuropathy is poorly defined in most cases. A role for M-proteins with antibody activity to myelin-associated glycoprotein is provocative. This review summarizes current knowledge of this important group of disorders.

Neuropathy associated with "benign" anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein IgM gammopathy: clinical, immunological, neurophysiological pathological findings and response to treatment in 33 cases

We studied 33 patients presenting with a peripheral neuropathy associated with non-malignant anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) IgM monoclonal gammopathy (MG) in an attempt to delineate their clinical, immunological, electrophysiological and pathological characteristics; we also reviewed our experience concerning long-term follow-up and therapy. Peripheral neuropathy associated with non-malignant anti-MAG IgM MG was observed mostly in males (sex ratio 7.2), and mean age at onset was 67 years (range 46-81). A predominantly sensory pattern was noted in more than 80% of cases, although some patients were affected by a predominantly motor peripheral neuropathy. Although disease progression was slow in most cases, 45% of patients suffered severe disability, and in 2 cases, the patient's death appeared to stem directly from the neuropathy. The electrophysiological findings were indicative of a demyelinating process in 90% of cases, and electron microscopic examination of nerve biopsy specimens demonstrated widening of the myelin lamellae in more than 95% of cases. Most of our patients showed a disappointing response to steroids and chemotherapy or plasma exchanges. Intravenous immune globulin, evaluated in 17 patients, had a transient, mostly subjective effect in 35% and led to a clear-cut improvement in 24% of cases. We did not observe any correlation between the severity of the clinical picture and the anti-sulphoglucuronyl paragloboside antibody titre; in individual cases, clinical improvement occurred without lowering of IgM levels. Although the severity and the rate of progression may greatly vary from patient to patient, the combination of clinical, electrophysiological and pathological features delineates a characteristic pattern in peripheral neuropathy associated with non-malignant anti-MAG IgM MG.

Motor conduction parameters in neuropathies associated with anti-MAG antibodies and other types of demyelinating and axonal neuropathies

We measured residual latency (RL), motor conduction velocity (MCV), and terminal latency index (TLI) in 15 patients with neuropathy and anti-MAG or SGPG antibodies and compared these to values obtained in 103 patients with other types of polyneuropathy (PN) and to 57 normal subjects. Ten patients had anti-MAG antibody titers of 25,600 or higher, and 5 had titers between 800 and 12,600. Patients with the highest titers had longer RL, slower MCV and shorter TLI than those with lower titers, acute or chronic inflammatory demyelinating PN, hereditary neuropathy, and metabolic or axonal neuropathy. In contrast F-wave latencies did not contribute to the differentiation between the groups of demyelinating neuropathies. RL and TLI correlated best with anti-MAG antibody titers, whereas there was a poor correlation with anti-SGPG titers suggesting that MAG more than SGPG may be the antigen in PN, and that the distal nerves are affected more than their proximal segments. The RL rather than TLI turned out to be the best variable to classify the demyelinating type of anti-MAG neuropathy. Sural nerve biopsy in 5 of the patients with the highest titer of anti-MAG antibodies showed deposits of IgM and C3 on the myelin sheaths, pronounced demyelination and widening of the myelin lamellae. In 4 of the patients with lower titers demyelination was absent or less pronounced.

Pathogenesis and therapy of neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies

Approximately 10% of patients with peripheral neuropathy of otherwise unknown etiology have an associated monoclonal gammopathy. Both the neuropathies and the monoclonal gammopathies in these patients are heterogeneous, but several distinct clinical syndromes that may respond to specific therapies can be recognized. It is important to recognize these syndromes because monoclonal gammopathies also occur in 1% of the normal adult population, and in some cases, monoclonal gammopathies are coincidental and unrelated to the neuropathy. In patients with IgM monoclonal gammopathies, IgM M proteins frequently have autoantibody activity and are implicated in the pathogenesis of the neuropathy. IgM M proteins that bind to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) have been shown to cause demyelinating peripheral neuropathy; anti-GM1 antibody activity is associated with predominantly motor neuropathy, and anti-sulfatide or chondroitin sulfate antibodies are associated with sensory neuropathy. The IgM monoclonal gammopathies may be malignant or nonmalignant, and polyclonal antibodies with the same specificities are associated with similar clinical presentations in the absence of monoclonal gammopathy. IgG or IgA monoclonal gammopathies are associated with neuropathy in patients with osteosclerotic myeloma or the POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy myeloma, and skin changes). Amyloidosis or cryoglobulinemic neuropathies can occur with either IgM or IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathies. Therapeutic intervention depends on the specific clinical syndrome but is generally directed at removing the autoantibodies, reducing the number of monoclonal B cells, and interfering with the effector mechanisms.

Tomaculous neuropathy in chromosome 1 Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome

We performed morphological and immunohistochemical studies on sural nerve biopsies from two members of a Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1B family, in which a mutation of the P0 gene on chromosome 1 had been found. Biopsies showed a tomaculous neuropathy with loss of myelinated fibers and frequent small onion bulbs. Immunofluorescence with antibodies to P0 showed this protein to be present in tomaculous and non-tomaculous areas of the myelin sheath. The severity of the myelin abnormalities suggests that in this family Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease may result from a generalized disturbance of Schwann cells as a result of an abnormal P0 protein.

Peripheral neuropathy in IgM monoclonal gammopathy and Wäldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: a frequent complication in elderly males with low MAG-reactive serum monoclonal component

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a frequent complication during primary macroglobulinemia (PM), whose immunological genesis has been suggested by various authors. This study involved 65 PM patients (44 men and 21 women aged 35-78), diagnostically divided into MGUS (31 cases), and indolent (IWM, 24 cases) or symptomatic (WM, 10 cases) Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia groups. All patients underwent neurological examination, including electrodiagnostic evaluation and the determination of the serum titre of antimyelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). An evaluation was made of the prevalence of PN and its correlation with a series of hematological variables. The prevalence of PN was 31.6%: of those with PN, 73.1% manifested both clinical and electrophysiological signs of PN, primarily of the demyelinating type. Significant correlations emerged between the presence of PN and sex (M vs. F P = 0.0001), advanced age (P = 0.049), low MC levels (P = 0.025), high anti-MAG titres (P = 0.001) and high Hb levels (P = 0.001). No significant correlation with the diagnostic definition of PM was found, although the majority of cases with (particularly demyelinating) PN were MGUS or IWM. At multivariate analysis, the presence of PN significantly correlated with sex (P = 0.0001), age (P = 0.019), and anti-MAG titre (P = 0.001). Ten of the 26 PN cases showed no MAG reactivity. Significant correlations between PN and low serum MC levels/high MAG reactivity support the hypothesis of the antibody-mediated origin of many PN, and that the presence of PN depends on the characteristics of the proliferating pathological B clone, rather than on the tumor burden of the form of macroglobulinemia. Clinically, our data reconfirm the frequency of PN during PM and indicate simple clinicohematological variables useful for identifying patients at high neuropathic risk.

Immunoelectron microscopic localization of monoclonal IgM antibodies in gammopathy associated with peripheral demyelinative neuropathy

A sural nerve biopsy from a patient with benign monoclonal IgM kappa gammopathy and sensory-motor demyelinative neuropathy, revealed marked loss of myelinated fibers and focal axonal degeneration as well as widespread demyelination and remyelination with onion-skin formation. Almost all myelinated fibers displayed characteristic widening of the myelin lamellae as well as excessive thickness and/or exuberant outfoldings of myelin, reminiscent of that seen in tomaculous neuropathy. Many endoneurial capillaries were lined by fenestrated endothelium, indicating breakdown of a normal blood-nerve barrier. The endoneurium contained large amounts of extracellular proteinaceous material. Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy performed on the nerve of the patient, demonstrated selective deposition of IgM kappa gammaglobulin, exclusively in the areas of splittings of the myelin lamellae. Schwann cells contained cytoplasmic myelin debris labelled with IgM kappa only. In the indirect immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, serum of the patient reacted with the whole thickness of compact peripheral myelin of a normal human nerve. There was no immunoreactivity with the central myelin, Schwannoma cells, glial cells, axons or neurons. Demonstration of the selective presence of monoclonal IgM in widened lamellae of myelinated fibers, as well as bound to the internalized myelin debris in Schwann cells and macrophages, indicates a pathogenetic role of monoclonal paraprotein in myelin injury. Demyelination is promoted by development of endothelial fenestrations in the endoneurial capillaries and breakdown of the blood-nerve barrier.

Peripheral neuropathies associated with monoclonal proteins

Peripheral neuropathies associated with monoclonal proteins have received considerable attention as a clinically important group of chronic late-onset neuropathies. When a monoclonal protein is found in patients with peripheral neuropathy of unknown cause, as occurs in 10% of such cases, usually no associated disease is discovered; hence MGUS. Less often, disorders such as multiple myeloma, AL amyloidosis, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, osteosclerotic myeloma, and lymphoma are found. Demyelinating neuropathies associated with MGUS of all classes, but particularly IgM, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, and osteosclerotic myeloma typically follow an indolently progressive course, and frequently respond to treatments aimed at interfering with putative underlying immune mechanisms. By contrast, axonal neuropathies associated with MGUS, multiple myeloma, and AL amyloidosis have generally shown no response to therapy. Recently, IgM monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies directed against human peripheral nerve antigens including MAG and various glycolipids such as GM1 ganglioside have been found in patients with specific neuropathy syndromes. Anti-MAG antibodies occur in predominantly sensory demyelinating neuropathies, whereas elevated titers of anti-GM1 ganglioside antibodies are associated with lower motor neuron syndromes with multifocal motor conduction block. Although the evidence for autoimmune mechanisms in some monoclonal protein-associated neuropathies is mounting, a causal connection between monoclonal proteins and these neurologic syndromes has yet to be established.

Polyneuropathy associated with IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Although polyneuropathies associated with IgM and IgG monoclonal gammopathies have been well described, polyneuropathy with IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is less commonly seen and has not been well studied. We reviewed the clinical and electrodiagnostic features of 5 such patients, and the sural nerve biopsy findings in 4 of them. One patient was diabetic, while 4 were free of other diagnoses commonly associated with neuropathy. Clinical presentations were varied. Electrodiagnostic and histological studies ranged from primary demyelination to primary axon loss to a mixed axonal/demyelinating picture. Three patients who were treated appeared to respond to prednisone or intravenous gamma globulin, despite clear clinical, electrodiagnostic, and histological differences. We conclude that the polyneuropathy associated with IgA MGUS is heterogeneous, similar to that in IgM and IgG MGUS. A trial of immunomodulating therapy appears to be warranted in such patients if the neuropathy is sufficiently severe.