90Y-DOTA-D-Phe1-Try3-octreotide in therapy of neuroendocrine malignancies

Altered biodistribution of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC during somatostatin analogue treatment

PURPOSE

The need for an interval between the administration of long-acting Somatostatin Receptor Analogues (SSA) and the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET has been questioned based on recent literature in the new EANM guidelines. Here an earlier studies showed that SSA injection immediately before SSTR PET had minimal effect on normal organ and tumor uptake (1). However, data are scarce and there are (small) differences between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC binding affinity, and it remains unknown whether these findings can be directly translated to scans with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC as well. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of SSA use on the biodistribution in a subsequent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT and compare this intra-individually across several cycles of SSA treatments.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 35 patients with NENs were included. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET at staging and after the 1st and 2nd cycle of SSA were included. SUVmean and SUVmax of blood, visceral organs, primary tumor and two metastases were determined. Also, the interval between SSA therapy and the PET scan was registered.

RESULTS

Treatment with SSA resulted in a significantly higher bloodpool activity and lower visceral tracer uptake. This effect was maintained after a 2nd cycle of SSA therapy. Furthermore, there was an inverse relationship between bloodpool tracer availability and visceral tracer binding and a positive correlation between bloodpool tracer availability and primary tumor tracer uptake. With an interval of up to 5 days, there was a significantly higher bloodpool activity than at longer intervals.

CONCLUSION

Absolute comparison of the SUV on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET should be done with caution as the altered biodistribution of the tracer after SSA treatment should be taken into account. We recommend not to perform a scan within the first 5 days after the injection of lanreotide.

Image-Guided Precision Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas

In this comprehensive review, we aimed to discuss the current state-of-the-art medical imaging for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) diagnosis and treatment. Despite major medical improvements, PPGLs, as with other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), leave clinicians facing several challenges; their inherent particularities and their diagnosis and treatment pose several challenges for clinicians due to their inherent complexity, and they require management by multidisciplinary teams. The conventional concepts of medical imaging are currently undergoing a paradigm shift, thanks to developments in radiomic and metabolic imaging. However, despite active research, clinical relevance of these new parameters remains unclear, and further multicentric studies are needed in order to validate and increase widespread use and integration in clinical routine. Use of AI in PPGLs may detect changes in tumor phenotype that precede classical medical imaging biomarkers, such as shape, texture, and size. Since PPGLs are rare, slow-growing, and heterogeneous, multicentric collaboration will be necessary to have enough data in order to develop new PPGL biomarkers. In this nonsystematic review, our aim is to present an exhaustive pedagogical tool based on real-world cases, dedicated to physicians dealing with PPGLs, augmented by perspectives of artificial intelligence and big data.

Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is the most common adult appendiceal malignant tumor, constituting 16% of gastrointestinal NENs. They are versatile tumors with varying morphology, immunohistochemistry, secretory properties, and cancer genomics. They are slow growing and clinically silent, to begin with, or present with features of nonspecific vague abdominal pain. Most acute presentations are attributed clinically to appendicitis, with most cases detected incidentally on pathology after an appendectomy. Approximately 40% of them present clinically with features of hormonal excess, which is likened to the functional secretory nature of their parent cell of origin. The symptoms of carcinoid syndrome render their presence clinically evident. However, slow growing and symptomatically silent in its initial stages, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix are aggressive and usually have hepatic and lymph node metastasis at presentation. This review article focuses on imaging characteristics, World Health Organization histopathological classification and grading, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union or International Cancer Control, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society standardized guidelines for reporting, data interpretation, early-stage management protocols, and advanced-stage appendiceal NENs. Guidelines are also set for the follow-up and reassessment. The role of targeted radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and high-dose somatostatin analogs in treating advanced disease are discussed, along with types of ablative therapies and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence. The search for newer location-specific biomarkers in NEN is also summarized. Regarding the varying aggressiveness of the tumor, there is a scope for research in the field, with plenty of data yet to be discovered.

In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.

Targeted α-Emitter Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, arising from cells of the endocrine system, with various clinical behaviors. Although these neoplasms are considered rare, a significant increase in the incidence and detectability of NET has been noted in many epidemiological studies in recent years. Among the various therapeutic options, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), using somatostatine has been shown to be highly effective and a well-tolerated therapy, improving survival parameters. The current use of radionuclides for PRRT is β-emitters. Due to hypoxia cancer tissue could be resistant for β-emitters. Quite long penetration range had a significant impact on side effects. α-particles with higher energy and shorter penetration range in comparison to β-particles, have distinct advantages for use in targeted therapy. The clinical experience with somatostatine based targeted α therapy (TAT) in NET showed very promising results even in patienicts refractory to treatment with β-emitters. This article summarizes current developments in preclinical and clinical investigation on TAT in NET.

SPECT performance evaluation on image of Yttrium 90 - Bremsstrahlung using Monte Carlo simulation

Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) is one of the most widely used radionuclides in Nuclear Medicine practice. However, characteristic energy of this beta emitter constitutes a difficulty for dose planning using SPECT imaging. This work aimed to study bremsstrahlung X-rays effects produced by ⁹⁰Y beta particles during SPECT image acquisition using Monte Carlo code MCNPX. Several simulations were carried out to evaluate different aspects that could affect SPECT image quality, such as: collimator type, source-collimator distance and composition of each interacting material. Two configurations of ⁹⁰Y sources were simulated: a point source in several spheres of different materials (soft tissue, water, articular cartilage, and bone) and dimensions with radius ranging from 1 to 20 mm; and a uniformly distributed source in a Lucite cylindrical phantom filled with water. It was evaluated the bremsstrahlung photon emission generated inside different materials; for this was considered the number photons that passing through every different sphere's surface for each radii and material. In case of cylindrical phantom filled with water, in order to obtain the energy deposited over NaI (Tl) crystal detector; there was considered Median Energy General Purpose (MEGP) and Low Energy High Resolution (LEHR) collimators. Moreover, using TMESH routine available in the MCNPX Monte Carlo code, energy distribution images according to the collimator type and the source-collimator distance were obtained. The simulation was validated by comparing with the spectral distribution of the ⁹⁰Y bremsstrahlung X-rays obtained experimentally from an acrylic cylindrical phantom. Results corroborated the importance of Monte Carlo simulation method to evaluate a performance of SPECT image acquisition with ⁹⁰Y. The best resolution was obtained with MEGP collimator independent of source-collimator distance.

Methods to Enhance the Metabolic Stability of Peptide-Based PET Radiopharmaceuticals

The high affinity and specificity of peptides towards biological targets, in addition to their favorable pharmacological properties, has encouraged the development of many peptide-based pharmaceuticals, including peptide-based positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals. However, the poor in vivo stability of unmodified peptides against proteolysis is a major challenge that must be overcome, as it can result in an impractically short in vivo biological half-life and a subsequently poor bioavailability when used in imaging and therapeutic applications. Consequently, many biologically and pharmacologically interesting peptide-based drugs may never see application. A potential way to overcome this is using peptide analogues designed to mimic the pharmacophore of a native peptide while also containing unnatural modifications that act to maintain or improve the pharmacological properties. This review explores strategies that have been developed to increase the metabolic stability of peptide-based pharmaceuticals. It includes modifications of the C- and/or N-termini, introduction of d- or other unnatural amino acids, backbone modification, PEGylation and alkyl chain incorporation, cyclization and peptide bond substitution, and where those strategies have been, or could be, applied to PET peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals.

Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous neoplasms with variable prognoses and clinical behaviors. The majority of well differentiated NETs express somatostatin receptors. Identification of these receptors has contributed to advancements in molecular and targeted radiotherapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular scans provide important diagnostic, staging, and prognostic data. Somatostatin-receptor imaging aids in selection of patients who are eligible for somatostatin-receptor-targeting therapies. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has recently demonstrated robust efficacy in a phase III study of progressive midgut NETs. Current studies are investigating novel receptor agonists and antagonists, new classes of radioactive isotopes, and radiosensitizing combination treatments.

SUMMARY

The sophistication of molecular imaging is improving and its importance is increasing as a diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic tool. Theranostics, the coupling of molecular imaging with receptor-targeted therapy, represents a novel approach to cancer treatment.

Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy Comes of Age

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a form of systemic radiotherapy shown to be effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The NETTER-1 trial was the first randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, and demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide. This article discusses the evolution of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, side effects, and potential future treatment approaches.

Renal Function Assessment During Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Theranostics labeled with Y-90 or Lu-177 are highly efficient therapeutic approaches for the systemic treatment of various cancers including neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been used for many years for metastatic or inoperable neuroendocrine tumors. However, renal and hematopoietic toxicities are the major limitations for this therapeutic approach. Kidneys have been considered as the "critical organ" because of the predominant glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption by the proximal tubules, and interstitial retention of the tracers. Severe nephrotoxity, which has been classified as grade 4-5 based on the "Common Terminology Criteria on Adverse Events," was reported in the range from 0%-14%. There are several risk factors for renal toxicity; patient-related risk factors include older age, preexisting renal disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous nephrotoxic chemotherapy, metastatic lesions close to renal parenchyma, and single kidney. There are also treatment-related issues, such as choice of radionuclide, cumulative radiation dose to kidneys, renal radiation dose per cycle, activity administered, number of cycles, and time interval between cycles. In the literature, nephrotoxicity caused by PRRT was documented using different criteria and renal function tests, from serum creatinine level to more accurate and sophisticated methods. Generally, serum creatinine level was used as a measure of kidney function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on serum creatinine was preferred by several authors. Most commonly used formulas for estimation of GFR are "Modifications of Diet in Renal Disease" (MDRD) equation and "Cockcroft-Gault" formulas. However, more precise methods than creatinine or creatinine clearance are recommended to assess renal function, such as GFR measurements using Tc-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), or measurement of Tc-99m-MAG3 clearance, particularly in patients with preexisting risk factors for long-term nephrotoxicity. Proximal tubular reabsorption and interstitial retention of tracers result in excessive renal irradiation. Coinfusion of positively charged amino acids, such as l-lysine and l-arginine, is recommended to decrease the renal retention of the tracers by inhibiting the proximal tubular reabsorption. Furthermore, nephrotoxicity may be reduced by dose fractionation. Patient-specific dosimetric studies showed that renal biological effective dose of <0Gy was safe for patients without any risk factors. A renal threshold value <28Gy was recommended for patients with risk factors. Despite kidney protection, renal function impairment can occur after PRRT, especially in patients with risk factors and high single or cumulative renal absorbed dose. Therefore, patient-specific dosimetry may be helpful in minimizing the renal absorbed dose while maximizing the tumor dose. In addition, close and accurate renal function monitoring using more precise methods, rather than plasma creatinine levels, is essential to diagnose the early renal functional changes and to follow-up the renal function during the treatment.

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.

Role of Somatostatin Analogues in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare epithelial neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation originating most commonly in the lungs and gastroenteropancreatic. Treatment includes surgery and other local therapies; treatment of inoperable disease centers around symptom management and control of tumor growth. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) have been a mainstay of managing hormone-related symptoms. Emerging evidence suggests that they are effective therapies for tumor control also. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with radiolabeled SSAs is a new, promising treatment for inoperable or metastatic NETs. This article reviews the role of SSAs in the treatment of NETs.

Systemic treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETS): current approaches and future options

OBJECTIVE

To describe recent advances in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

A review of the published English language literature on GEP-NET therapy with a focus on practice-changing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment remains a cornerstone of GEP-NET therapy, primarily for patients with hormonally functional tumors and midgut carcinoids. The biologic agents everolimus and sunitinib have similar tumor-stabilizing effects in pancreatic NETs and are both approved to treat progressive low-intermediate-grade tumors. Their role in nonpancreatic NETs remains controversial. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is effective against pancreatic NETs, but modern prospective data is lacking. Radiolabeled SSAs will likely become more widely available once phase III randomized studies are completed.

CONCLUSIONS

New treatment options for GEP-NETs have become available and highlight the necessity of developing predictive biomarkers that will allow for appropriate and individualized therapy selection.

Update on management of midgut neuroendocrine tumors

Midgut neuroendocrine tumors are typically indolent but can be fatal when advanced. They can also cause significant morbidity due to the characteristic carcinoid syndrome. Somatostatin analogs continue to be the mainstay of treatment given their antiproliferative properties, as well as inhibitory effects on hormones that cause carcinoid syndrome. There have been several recent advances in the systemic therapy of these tumors including consolidation of somatostatin analogs as the cornerstone of therapy, completion of pivotal trials with mTOR inhibitors, and the establishment of novel approaches including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and oral inhibitors of peripheral tryptophan hydroxylase in tumor and symptom control, respectively. In this review article, the recent advances are summarized and an updated approach to management is proposed.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors with (90)Y-DOTATOC: is treatment response predictable by pre-therapeutic uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATOC?

PURPOSE

PET with (68)Ga-DOTATOC allows for imaging and quantitative assessment of somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze whether pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT is able to predict response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with advanced stage NET were treated with a fixed dose of (90)Y-DOTATOC (5550 or 3700MBq). Prior to PRRT, each patient received (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Treatment results were evaluated after 3months by CT, tumor marker levels and clinical course and correlated with (68)Ga-DOTATOC uptake (SUVmax) and the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations (MBq/g). ROC analysis and pairwise comparison of area under the curve (AUC) were performed with pre-treatment uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATOC, assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC and treatment activity alone and in relation to body weight as continuous variables, and response/no response as classification variable.

RESULTS

According to conventional criteria (tumor shrinkage, decrease of tumor markers, improved or stable clinical condition), 20 patients were classified as responders, 16 as non-responders and in four patients findings were equivocal. Using a SUV more than 17.9 as cut-off for favorable outcome, PET was able to predict treatment response of all responders and 15 out of 16 non-responders. All four patients with equivocal findings showed SUV less than or equal to 17.9 and soon experienced tumor progression. The assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations using a cut-off more than 1.26MBq/g as predictor of response was able to correctly classify 19 out of 20 responders, and 14 out of 16 non-responders. In all patients with equivocal findings, the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC was below 1.26MBq/g.

CONCLUSION

Pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC tumor uptake as well as assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC are strongly associated with the results of subsequent PRRT. The defined cut-off values should be confirmed by prospective studies and may then provide the rationale for individual dosing and selecting patients with high likelihood of favorable treatment outcome.

Production and quality control of [(90)Y]DOTATOC for treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of 85 syntheses

The aim of this paper was to describe the optimized labeling protocol and quality control measures used in the production of [(90)Y]DOTATOC, starting from three different radioactivity levels to treat one, two, or three patients per therapeutic session. We investigated three different starting radioactivity levels. For the low radioactivity preparation we used 5138±280 MBq of [Y] isotope, for the medium radioactivity preparation we used 8893±900 MBq, and for the high radioactivity preparation we used 11250±715 MBq. The radiochemical purity levels for the low radioactivity preparation, medium radioactivity preparation, and high radioactivity preparation were 99.95±0.09, 99.84±0.34, and 99.84±0.53%, respectively, and the radiochemical yields of the labeling procedures were 77.52±1.28, 75.53±3.72, and 78.00±3.20%, respectively. Media fill validation of the process was performed, and the parameters of pH, bacterial endotoxins, sterility, and osmolality were tested at process control. All radiopharmaceutical preparations satisfied the predetermined specifications fixed in our protocol regardless of the starting radioactivity level. The validation of the method guaranteed the safety and quality of the final products, contributing to providing the basis for constructing an informative and successful clinical trial.

Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

The primary treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) is surgery with curative intent or debulking of the tumor mass. In case of metastatic disease, cytoreductive options are limited. A relatively new therapeutic modality, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, is currently available in a number of mostly European centers. Complete and partial responses obtained after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide are in the same range as after treatment with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (i.e. 10-30%). However, significant nephrotoxicity has been observed after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide. Options to improve PRRT may include combinations of radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs, intra-arterial administration, and the use of radiosensitizing drugs combined with PRRT. Other therapeutic applications of PRRT may include additional therapy cycles in patients with progressive disease after benefit from initial therapy, PRRT in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or PRRT combined with new targeted therapies, such as sunitinib or everolimus. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities, or comparing various radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

Systemic therapy of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

SUMMARY Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are normally included in trials comprising neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of different organs of origin. Typical and atypical carcinoids are regarded as low-grade NETs and show low proliferation rates and minor responses with classic chemotherapy regimens. Somatostatin analogs were traditionally applied in patients with carcinoid syndrome and recently also demonstrated tumor response. Recently, novel agents such as sunitinib and everolimus showed improved survival in randomized studies. These trials contained only low numbers of pNETs. Another promising field of targeted therapy in low-grade NETs includes peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. High-grade pNETs include large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. We will discuss large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and will address small-cell lung cancer at the end of this review.

Radionuclide therapy beyond radioiodine

For decades, Iodine-131 has been used for the treatment of patients with thyroid cancer. In recent years, increasingly, other radiopharmaceuticals are in clinical use in the treatment of various malignant diseases. Although in principle these therapies-as in all applications of radionuclides-special radiation protection measures are required, a separate nuclear medicine therapy department is not necessary in many cases due to the lower or lack of gamma radiation. In the following article, four different radionuclide therapies are more closely presented which are emerging in the last years. One of them is the "Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy," the so-called PRRT in which radiolabeled somatostatin (SST)-receptor(R) ligands are used in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. On the basis of radiolabeled antibodies against CD20-positive cells, the so-called radioimmunotherapy is used in the treatment of certain forms of malignant lymphoma. In primary or secondary liver tumors, the (90)Y-labeled particles can be administered. Last but not the least, the palliative approach of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals is noted in patients with painful bone metastases.

A new era for the systemic therapy of neuroendocrine tumors

Carcinoids and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are becoming increasingly common, with the majority of patients presenting with either lymph node involvement or metastatic disease. An improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these tumors has implicated several pathways that have led to new therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we describe the biology of neuroendocrine tumors and approaches to systemic therapy. We review early data regarding the use of cytotoxics and several recent studies employing more targeted approaches that promise to change the standard of care. Specifically, phase III studies indicate that pharmacologic inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with sunitinib, and of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus, appears to have altered the natural history of these diseases. These successes set the stage for further advances in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours

Malignant well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract are rare and clinically challenging heterogeneous neoplasms. This review focuses on neuroendocrine tumours grade 1 and grade 2 (new WHO classification 2010), in comparison to the neuroendocrine tumours grade 3 group, corresponding to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Surgical resection of the primary and metastases remains the only curative treatment, however many patients with neuroendocrine tumours are diagnosed once unresectable metastases have occurred; management of functioning syndromes with somatostatin analogues remains the priority. Pasireotide, a new somatostatin analogue, is currently undergoing evaluation for carcinoid syndrome. Treatment options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours differ from pancreatic gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumours: (a) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, streptozotocin-based chemotherapies are challenged by other cytotoxic agents (dacarbazine, temozolomide and oxaliplatin); two randomized, placebo-controlled phase III studies have demonstrated that everolimus and sunitinib significantly improved progression-free-survival; (b) in midgut neuroendocrine tumours, octreotide improved time-to-progression in patients with a low proliferation index and low liver burden; preliminary data suggesting efficacy of bevacizumab are still to be confirmed; the effect of everolimus associated with octreotide was almost significant on progression-free-survival in a phase III trial. Liver-directed therapies are effective in both tumour types. New techniques of embolization need further evaluation and must be formally compared to other therapies. Finally, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising activity in non-comparative studies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours.

Radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in patients with different types of advanced neuroendocrine tumour (NETs). A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1998 to November 2010. The Cochrane Library (to Issue 10, 2010) and the Standards and Guidelines Evidence Inventory of Cancer Guidelines, including over 1100 English-language cancer guidelines from January 2003 to June 2010, were also checked. No existing systematic reviews or clinical practice guidelines based on a systematic review or randomised controlled trials focusing on this topic were found. Twenty-four fully published articles were abstracted and summarised: 16 articles focused on five peptide receptor radionuclide therapy ((111)In-DTPAOC, (90)Y-DOTALAN, (90)Y-DOTATOC, (90)Y-DOTATATE, and (177)Lu-DOTATATE) and eight focused on (131)I-MIBG treatment. Limited evidence from a historical comparison of studies in one centre supported that (177)Lu-DOTATATE might be associated with greater clinical outcomes compared with (90)Y-DOTATOC or (111)In-DTPAOC. The severe toxicities for (177)Lu-DOTATATE included hepatic insufficiency in 0.6%, myelodysplastic syndrome in 0.8% and renal insufficiency in 0.4% of patients in this study. Insufficient evidence suggested efficacy of (131)I-MIBG in adult NET patients, but the overall tumour response rate from (131)I-MIBG was 27-75% for malignant neuroblastoma, paraganglioma or pheochromocytoma. Haematological toxicities were the main severe side-effects after (131)I-MIBG and 4% of patients developed secondary malignancies in one study. To date, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to be an acceptable option and is relatively safe in adult advanced NET patients with receptor uptake positive on scintigraphy, but patients' renal function must be monitored. (131)I-MIBG may be effective for malignant neuroblastoma, paraganglioma or pheochromocytoma, but its side-effects need to be considered. No strong evidence exists to support that one therapeutic radiopharmaceutical is more effective than others. Well-designed and good-quality randomised controlled trials are required on this research topic.

Targeted radionuclide therapy

Targeted radiotherapy is an evolving and promising modality of cancer treatment. The killing of cancer cells is achieved with the use of biological vectors and appropriate radionuclides. Among the many advantages of this approach are its selectiveness in delivering the radiation to the target, relatively less severe and infrequent side effects, and the possibility of assessing the uptake by the tumor prior to the therapy. Several different radiopharmaceuticals are currently being used by various administration routes and targeting mechanisms. This article aims to briefly review the current status of targeted radiotherapy as well as to outline the advantages and disadvantages of radionuclides used for this purpose.

Nuclear medicine techniques for the imaging and treatment of neuroendocrine tumours

Nuclear medicine plays a pivotal role in the imaging and treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with [(111)In-DTPA(0)]octreotide has proven its role in the diagnosis and staging of gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). New techniques in somatostatin receptor imaging include the use of different radiolabelled somatostatin analogues with higher affinity and different affinity profiles to the somatostatin receptor subtypes. Most of these analogues can also be labelled with positron-emitting radionuclides that are being used in positron emission tomography imaging. The latter imaging modality, especially in the combination with computed tomography, is of interest because of encouraging results in terms of improved imaging quality and detection capabilities. Considerable advances have been made in the imaging of NETs, but to find the ideal imaging method with increased sensitivity and better topographic localisation of the primary and metastatic disease remains the ultimate goal of research. This review provides an overview of the currently used imaging modalities and ongoing developments in the imaging of NETs, with the emphasis on nuclear medicine and puts them in perspective of clinical practice. The advantage of SRS over other imaging modalities in GEP-NETs is that it can be used to select patients with sufficient uptake for treatment with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new tool in the management of patients with inoperable or metastasised NETs as it can induce symptomatic improvement with all Indium-111, Yttrium-90 or Lutetium-177-labelled somatostatin analogues. The results that were obtained with [(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate are even more encouraging in terms of objective tumour responses with tumour regression and documented prolonged time to progression. In the largest group of patients receiving PRRT, treated with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate, a survival benefit of several years compared with historical controls has been reported.

Clinical results of radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours with 90Y-DOTATATE and tandem 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE: which is a better therapy option?

Purpose

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is a treatment option for patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours (NET). A combination treatment using the high-energy ⁹⁰Y beta emitter for larger lesions and the lower energy ¹⁷⁷Lu for smaller lesions has been postulated in the literature.The aim of the study was to evaluate combined ⁹⁰Y/¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy in comparison to ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE alone.

Methods

Fifty patients with disseminated NET were included in the study prospectively and divided into two groups: group A (n = 25) was treated with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE, whereas group B (n = 25) received the 1:1 ⁹⁰Y/¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. The administered activity was based on 3.7 GBq/m² body surface area in three to five cycles, with amino acid infusion for nephroprotection.

Results

The median overall survival time in group A was 26.2 months while in group B median survival was not reached. Overall survival was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.027). Median event-free survival time in group A was 21.4 months and in group B 29.4 months (p > 0.1). At the 12-month follow-up, comparison of group A vs group B showed stable disease (SD) in 13 vs 16 patients, disease regression (RD) in 5 vs 3 patients and disease progression (PD) in 3 vs 4 patients; 4 and 2 patients died, respectively. The 24-month follow-up results were SD in nine vs ten patients, RD in one patient vs none and PD in four patients in both groups; three and four patients died, respectively. Side effects were rare and mild.

Conclusion

The results indicate that therapy with tandem radioisotopes (⁹⁰Y/¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) provides longer overall survival than with a single radioisotope (⁹⁰Y-DOTATATE) and the safety of both methods is comparable.

Yttrium-90 (90Y) in the principal radionuclide therapies: an efficacy correlation between peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, radioimmunotherapy and transarterial radioembolization therapy. Ten years of experience (1999-2009)

The clinical application of the pure beta emitter (90)Y constitutes a fundamental advancement in non-invasive medicine. Nowadays, mainly three oncological therapies exploit the intrinsic emissive characteristic of (90)Y. Radionuclide therapies include peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumour (NET) treatment, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treatment and transarterial radioembolization therapy (TARET) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. The last ten years of clinical experience from E-PubMed research have been reviewed and an efficacy correlation between (90)Y-therapies has shown a better objective response rate for RIT (ORR 80±15%; range 53-100) compared to PRRT (ORR 23.5±14%; range 9-50), and TARET (ORR for mCRC, 40±25%; range 19-91, and ORR for HCC, 42±20%; range 20-82). This review reports on the state of the art of the efficacy of (90)Y-therapies from the last decade and discusses new perspectives of therapeutic development.

Somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is a promising tool in the management of patients with inoperable or metastasized neuroendocrine tumors. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all (111)Indium-, (90)Yttrium-, or (177)Lutetium-labeled somatostatin analogs used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. If kidney protective agents are used, the side-effects are few and mild, and the median duration of the therapy response is 30 and 40 months, respectively. Overall survival is several years from diagnosis. These data compare favorably with the limited number of alternative treatments. If more widespread use of PRRT can be guaranteed, such therapy may become the therapy of first choice.

Yttrium-90 DOTATOC therapy in GEP-NET and other SST2 expressing tumors: a selected review

Treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors with radiolabeled somatostatin analog is a promising option. Several phase I and phase II studies done at a few centers around the world reported encouraging results with [⁹⁰Y-DOTA-Tyr³]-octreotide (DOTATOC) and/or [(177)Lu-DOTA-Tyr³-Thr⁸]-octreotate (DOTATATE). The current article is a selective review of patients who were treated mainly with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC after failure with conventional therapy. The aim is to provide an updated comprehensive evaluation of the overall effectiveness of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC therapy in patients with somatostatin-positive tumors. Review of several studies revealed an objective response rate ranging from 20 to 28% for all neuroendocrine tumors (NET)s. For gastroenteropancreatic-NET (GEP-NET), the response rate was found to be consistently better in the range 28-38%. Overall, the cumulative response rate was found to be 24%. An important issue in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is the dose-response relationship and finding the correct dose of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC that will achieve an optimum tumor kill. Nephrotoxicity was common but could be minimized by taking adequate renal protective measures. In conclusion, PRRT remains a good option in patients with inoperable and/or metastatic NETs particularly of GEP origin. Over a decade of experience with ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC proves that it is still an effective tool for the treatment of large infiltrative NETs with achievement of objective radiological responses in nearly a quarter and disease stabilization in more than half the patients studied so far.

Role of somatostatins in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor development and therapy

The incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have increased in the past 20 years. GEP-NETs are heterogeneous tumors, in terms of clinical and biological features, that originate from the pancreas or the intestinal tract. Some GEP-NETs grow very slowly, some grow rapidly and do not cause symptoms, and others cause hormone hypersecretion and associated symptoms. Most GEP-NETs overexpress receptors for somatostatins. Somatostatins inhibit the release of many hormones and other secretory proteins; their effects are mediated by G protein-coupled receptors that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. Most GEP-NETs overexpress the somatostatin receptor SSTR2; somatostatin analogues are the best therapeutic option for functional neuroendocrine tumors because they reduce hormone-related symptoms and also have antitumor effects. Long-acting formulations of somatostatin analogues stabilize tumor growth over long periods. The development of radioactive analogues for imaging and peptide receptor radiotherapy has improved the management of GEP-NETs. Peptide receptor radiotherapy has significant antitumor effects, increasing overall survival times of patients with tumors that express a high density of SSTRs, particularly SSTR2 and SSTR5. The multi-receptor somatostatin analogue SOM230 (pasireotide) and chimeric molecules that bind SSTR2 and the dopamine receptor D2 are also being developed to treat patients with GEP-NETs. Combinations of radioactive labeled and unlabeled somatostatin analogues and therapeutics that inhibit other signaling pathways, such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and vascular endothelial growth factor, might be the most effective therapeutics for GEP-NETs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin receptor imaging with [(111)In-DTPA(0))octreotide has proven its role in the diagnosis and staging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues is a promising new tool in the management of patients with inoperable or metastasized, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all (111)In, (90)Y, or (177)Lu-labeled somatostatin analogues that have been used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The results that were obtained with [(90)Y-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate are very encouraging in terms of tumor regression. Also, if kidney protective agents are used, the side effects of this therapy are few and mild, and the median duration of the therapy response for these radiopharmaceuticals is 30 and 40 months, respectively. The patients' self-assessed quality of life increases significantly after treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate. Finally, compared with historical controls, there is a benefit in overall survival of several years from time of diagnosis in patients treated with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate. These data compare favorably with the limited number of alternative treatment approaches. If more widespread use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can be guaranteed, such therapy may well become the therapy of first choice in patients with metastasized or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Efficacy of using a standard activity of (131)I-MIBG therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the response to standard activity of (131)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), comparing overall survival of patients with symptomatic response, tumour size (as assessed by CT) and relevant plasma tumour markers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who had undergone (131)I-MIBG treatment between March 2001 and December 2006 was carried out. The administered activity of (131)I-MIBG was 5.5 GBq (NETs) and 7 GBq (phaeochromocytoma). Three cycles of treatment were planned with an interval of 10-12 weeks. A pre-therapy scan with (123)I-MIBG was performed to ascertain appropriate biodistribution.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were identified. Only two patients developed significant bone marrow suppression. Symptomatic response: data were available in 37 of 38 patients: 15 patients had improved symptoms, 19 had no improvement in symptoms and 3 were asymptomatic. In those with a symptomatic response, the median overall survival was 58 months vs no response of 20.0 months (p = 0.001). CT response: in those with stable disease, the median overall survival was 58 months compared with progressive disease of 16.0 months. The difference between these groups was significant (p = 0.006). Hormonal response: this was available in only 20 of 38 patients. The median overall survival was the same for patients that had increased hormone levels and patients that had stable/decreased hormone levels (48 months).

CONCLUSION

Standard activity (131)I-MIBG is well tolerated. Symptomatic response to treatment is a significant predictor of overall survival. Whilst CT response also appears to predict survival, hormonal levels do not appear to correlate with survival.

Peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for endocrine tumors

Peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is a promising option for the treatment of somatostatin-receptor-positive endocrine tumors. Treatment with somatostatin analogs labeled with (111)In, (90)Y or (177)Lu can result in symptomatic improvement, although tumor remission is seldom achieved with (111)In-labeled analogs. In this Review, the findings of several studies on the use of PRRT for endocrine tumors are evaluated. Large variation in the antitumor effects of (90)Y-octreotide was reported between studies: an objective response (> or =50% tumor regression) was achieved in 9-33% of patients. After treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate, an objective response was achieved in 29% of patients and a minor response (25-50% tumor regression) was achieved in 16% of patients; stable disease was present in 35% of patients. Treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate resulted in a survival benefit of several years and markedly improved quality of life. Serious, delayed adverse effects were rare after PRRT. Although randomized, clinical trials have not yet been performed, data on the use of PRRT compare favorably with those from other treatment approaches, such as chemotherapy. If these results can be replicated in large, controlled trials, PRRT might become the preferred option in patients with metastatic or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Bone marrow dosimetry in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate

Purpose

Adequate dosimetry is mandatory for effective and safe peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Besides the kidneys, the bone marrow is a potentially dose-limiting organ. The radiation dose to the bone marrow is usually calculated according to the MIRD scheme, where the accumulated activity in the bone marrow is calculated from the accumulated radioactivity of the radiopharmaceutical in the blood. This may underestimate the absorbed dose since stem cells express somatostatin receptors. We verified the blood-based method by comparing the activity in the blood with the radioactivity in bone marrow aspirates. Also, we evaluated the absorbed cross-dose from the source organs (liver, spleen, kidneys and blood), tumours and the so-called “remainder of the body” to the bone marrow.

Methods

Bone marrow aspirates were drawn in 15 patients after treatment with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate. Radioactivity in the bone marrow was compared with radioactivity in the blood drawn simultaneously. The nucleated cell fraction was isolated from the bone marrow aspirate and radioactivity was measured. The absorbed dose to the bone marrow was calculated. The results were correlated to the change in platelet counts 6 weeks after treatment.

Results

A strong linear correlation and high agreement between the measured radioactivities in the bone marrow aspirates and in the blood was found (r=0.914, p<0.001). No correlation between the calculated absorbed dose in the bone marrow and the change in platelets was found. There was a considerable contribution from other organs and the remainder of the body to the bone marrow absorbed dose.

Conclusion

(1) After PRRT with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate, the radioactivity concentration in the bone marrow is identical to that in the blood; (2) There is no significant binding of the radiopharmaceutical to bone marrow precursor stem cells; (3) The contribution of the cross dose from source organs and tumours to the bone marrow dose is significant; and (4) There is considerable variation in bone marrow absorbed dose between patients. These findings imply that for individual dose optimization, individual calculation of the bone marrow absorbed dose is necessary.

Medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are rare malignancies frequently diagnosed at a late stage, with symptoms related to bulky disease. Hormonal secretion, when responsible for symptoms, permits, on the other hand, early diagnosis of the disease. Surgery remains the cornerstone of therapeutic management. However, due to advanced disease, many patients are not candidates for aggressive surgical therapy. Tumor growth control and symptom management are thus achieved through medical approaches, including somatostatin (SST) analogs, chemotherapy, interferon, and more recently, targeted therapy. The purpose of this review is to collect, examine, and analyze data available in the literature regarding contemporary therapeutic management of PNET, with emphasis on medical approaches. It also offers perspectives on the future of molecular targeted therapies in these neoplasms. However, we point out that much of the literature published to date includes noncomparative studies (mainly phase II studies), leading to thorny interpretation of the results.

METHODS

A systematic search of all the literature in English regarding PNET was performed, based on a MEDLINE search (Pubmed) carried out from January 1970 to May 2005.

RESULTS

Approximately 40 trials, including over 1,000 patients, have been retrieved from our MEDLINE search. SST analogs and interferon therapies do allow control over hormone secretion and subsequent symptoms in the majority of treated subjects, but offer a poor tumor growth control rate. Chemotherapies, although more efficient in reducing tumor burden, are often toxic. New approaches such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether alone or in combination with surgery, conventional medical therapies represent a crucial aspect of PNET management. Hopefully, in the near future, a new era of antitumoral agents, such as targeted therapies, will strengthen our therapeutic arsenal, either alone or combined with other therapies.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues in patients with somatostatin receptor positive tumours

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is a promising treatment option for patients with inoperable or metastasised neuroendocrine tumours. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all of the various (111)In, (90)Y, or (177)Lu-labelled somatostatin analogues that have been used. Since tumour size reduction was seldom achieved with (111)Indium labelled somatostatin analogues, radiolabelled somatostatin analogues with beta-emitting isotopes like (90)Y and (177)Lu were developed. Reported anti-tumour effects of [(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide vary considerably between various studies: Tumour regression of 50% or more was achieved in 9 to 33% (mean 22%). With [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate treatments, tumour regression of 50% or more was achieved in 28% of patients and tumour regression of 25 to 50% in 19% of patients, stable disease was demonstrated in 35% and progressive disease in 18%. Predictive factors for tumour remission were high tumour uptake on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and limited amount of liver metastases. The side-effects of PRRT are few and mostly mild, certainly when using renal protective agents: Serious side-effects like myelodysplastic syndrome or renal failure are rare. The median duration of the therapy response for [(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate is 30 months and more than 36 months respectively. Lastly, quality of life improves significantly after treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate. These data compare favourably with the limited number of alternative treatment approaches, like chemotherapy. If more widespread use of PRRT is possible, such therapy might become the therapy of first choice in patients with metastasised or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Also the role in somatostatin receptor expressing non-GEP tumours, like metastasised paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma and non-radioiodine-avid differentiated thyroid carcinoma might become more important.

Treatment of patients who have endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues

Treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is a promising new tool in the management of patients who have inoperable or metastasized endocrine tumors. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all (111)In-, (90)Y-, or (177)Lu-labeled somatostatin analogs that have been used for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The results that were obtained with [(90)Y-DOTA degrees ,Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA degrees ,Tyr(3)]octreotate are encouraging in tumor regression. Also, if kidney-protective agents are used, the side effects of this therapy are few and mild. These data compare favorably with the limited number of alternative treatment approaches.

New developments in the treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Patients with metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors have traditionally been faced with few effective treatment options. Somatostatin analogs often successfully control symptoms of hormonal hypersecretion but seldom result in tumor regression. Some patients with hepatic metastases are also candidates for ablative therapies such as surgical debulking or embolization. The role of systemic agents such as interferon alfa or cytotoxic chemotherapy remains ill defined. The more prevalent use of these modalities has been restricted by low tumor response rates and the potential for toxicity. Novel agents, including radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, and inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin, have shown promising activity in recent clinical studies. Continued investigation of these agents should render a better understanding of their efficacy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Carcinoid Tumors

The generally indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors is an advantage in the management of patients who have localized disease, and surgery alone is often curative. This same property presents a challenge in the treatment of patients who have metastatic disease, in whom standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has a limited benefit. In such patients, the use of somatostatin analogs, interferon, and the treatment of hepatic metastases may provide effective palliation. The highly vascular nature of carcinoid tumors has led to the investigation of antiangiogenic agents in this setting. Preliminary reports of activity associated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway suggest that such strategies may play a role in the future treatment of patients who have this disease.

Neuroendocrine tumors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is an emerging and convincing treatment modality for patients with unresectable, somatostatin-receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours. Using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for imaging became the gold standard for staging of neuroendocrine tumours. The somatostatin receptor is strongly over-expressed in most tumours, resulting in high tumour-to-background ratios. Consequently, the next step was to try to treat these patients by increasing the radioactivity of the administered radiolabelled somatostatin analogue in an attempt to bring about tumour cure. Many patients have been treated successfully with this approach, roughly 25% of them achieving objective tumour shrinkage >50%. Serious side-effects have been rare. This article reviews the effectiveness and safety of the different radiolabelled somatostatin analogues used. Furthermore, clinical issues--including indication and timing of therapy--are discussed. Finally, important directions for future research are mentioned to illustrate new strategies for increasing therapy efficacy.