Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Moving Toward Personalized Management

Patient-centered research in pediatric transplant: Engaging families and recipients

Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients navigate a lifelong journey that includes constant monitoring and challenges. Research priorities and questions in LT have traditionally been provider-driven. This project was a novel partnership between a learning health system dedicated to pediatric LT (Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation) and a parent-led advocacy group (Transplant Families) that aimed to prepare families and providers for collaborative patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). We developed 5 virtual modules to (1) teach participants about PCOR, and (2) elicit ideas for PCOR priorities and processes in pediatric LT. Parents and providers participated via self-guided online modules or focus groups. Participants included 240 patient partners and 133 pediatric LT providers from 16 centers over 2 years. We held 20 focus groups, including 5 to amplify underrepresented voices: young adults, Spanish speakers, and African Americans. Feedback was summarized to create a PCOR Roadmap, a guide for future PCOR in the Starzl Network, which was disseminated back to participants online and via webinars. Feedback from a diverse group of stakeholders allowed us to develop PCOR priorities and processes for the pediatric LT community. Our engagement strategies could be adapted by other transplant communities to facilitate patient and provider research partnerships.

Proceedings of the 28th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on "Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications." This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.

Cellular strategies to induce immune tolerance after liver transplantation: Clinical perspectives

Liver transplantation (LT) has become the most efficient treatment for pediatric and adult end-stage liver disease and the survival time after transplantation is becoming longer due to the development of surgical techniques and perioperative management. However, long-term side-effects of immunosuppressants, like infection, metabolic disorders and malignant tumor are gaining more attention. Immune tolerance is the status in which LT recipients no longer need to take any immunosuppressants, but the liver function and intrahepatic histology maintain normal. The approaches to achieve immune tolerance after transplantation include spontaneous, operational and induced tolerance. The first two means require no specific intervention but withdrawing immunosuppressant gradually during follow-up. No clinical factors or biomarkers so far could accurately predict who are suitable for immunosuppressant withdraw after transplantation. With the understanding to the underlying mechanisms of immune tolerance, many strategies have been developed to induce tolerance in LT recipients. Cellular strategy is one of the most promising methods for immune tolerance induction, including chimerism induced by hematopoietic stem cells and adoptive transfer of regulatory immune cells. The safety and efficacy of various cell products have been evaluated by prospective preclinical and clinical trials, while obstacles still exist before translating into clinical practice. Here, we will summarize the latest perspectives and concerns on the clinical application of cellular strategies in LT recipients.

Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Defining the T cell transcriptional landscape in pediatric liver transplant rejection at single cell resolution

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) affects >80% of pediatric liver transplant recipients within 5 years, and late ACR is associated with graft failure. Traditional anti-rejection therapy for late ACR is ineffective and has remained unchanged for six decades. Although CD8+ T cells promote late ACR, little has been done to define their specificity and gene expression. Here, we used single-cell sequencing and immune repertoire profiling (10X Genomics) on 30 cryopreserved 16G liver biopsies from 14 patients (5 pre-transplant or with no ACR, 9 with ACR). We identified expanded intragraft CD8+ T cell clonotypes (CD8EXP) and their gene expression profiles in response to anti-rejection treatment. Notably, we found that expanded CD8+ clonotypes (CD8EXP) bore markers of effector and CD56hiCD161- 'NK-like' T cells, retaining their clonotype identity and phenotype in subsequent biopsies from the same patients despite histologic ACR resolution. CD8EXP clonotypes localized to portal infiltrates during active ACR, and persisted in the lobule after histologic ACR resolution. CellPhoneDB analysis revealed differential crosstalk between KC and CD8EXP during late ACR, with activation of the LTB-LTBR pathway and downregulation of TGFß signaling. Therefore, persistently-detected intragraft CD8EXP clones remain active despite ACR treatment and may contribute to long-term allograft fibrosis and failure of operational tolerance.

Immunosuppression-Free Life after Pediatric Liver Transplant: A Case-Control Study from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplant (SPLIT) Registry

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients off immunosuppression (IS) with matched controls on IS using data from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplant (SPLIT) registry.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective case-control study. SPLIT participants <18 years of age, ≥4 years after isolated LT, and off IS for ≥1 year (cases) were age- and sex-matched 1:2 to patients with the same primary diagnosis and post-LT follow-up duration (controls). Primary outcomes included retransplantation, allograft rejection, IS comorbidities, and prevalence of SPLIT-derived composite ideal outcome (c-IO) achieved at the end of the follow-up period. Differences were compared using multiple linear regression for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for dichotomous data.

RESULTS

The study cohort was composed of 33 cases (42.4% male, 60.6% biliary atresia, median age at LT of 0.7 [P25, P75, 0.5, 1.6] years, median IS withdrawal time of 9 [P25, P75, 6, 12] years after LT) and 66 age- and sex-matched controls. No cases required retransplantation. Cases and controls had similar growth parameters, laboratory values, calculated glomerular filtration rates, rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, graft rejection, and attainment of c-IO.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in allograft rejection rates, IS complications, or c-IO prevalence were seen between SPLIT patients off IS and age- and sex-matched controls remaining on IS. Discontinuation of IS most commonly occurred in the context of rigorously designed IS withdrawal trials. The available sample size was small, affecting generalizability to the broader pediatric LT population.

Time since liver transplant and immunosuppression withdrawal outcomes: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Successful immunosuppression withdrawal (ISW) is possible for a subfraction of liver transplant (LT) recipients but the factors that define the risk of ISW failure are largely unknown. One candidate prognostic factor for ISW success or operational tolerance (OT) is longer time between LT and ISW which we term "pre-withdrawal time". To clarify the impact of pre-withdrawal time span on subsequent ISW success or failure, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically interrogated the literature for LT recipient ISW studies reporting pre-withdrawal time. Eligible articles from Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used for backward and forward citation searching. Pre-withdrawal time individual patient data (IPD) was requested from authors. Pooled mean differences and time-response curves were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies with 691 patients, 15 of which (620 patients) with IPD. Study-level risk of bias was heterogeneous. Mean pre-withdrawal time was greater by 427 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 67-788] in OT compared to non-OT patients. This increase was potentiated to 799 days (95% CI 369-1229) or 1074 days (95% CI 685-1463) when restricting analysis to adult or European study participants. In time-response meta-analysis for adult or European ISW candidates, likelihood of OT increased by 7% (95% CI 4-10%) per year after LT (GRADE low- and moderate-certainty of evidence, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the impact of pre-withdrawal time in ISW decision-making for adult and European LT recipients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021272995.

Balancing immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation: Playing the long game

The overarching goal in the care of pediatric liver transplant recipients is to optimize allograft and patient health. Balancing immunosuppression to maintain allograft health while avoiding medication side effects is essential for long-term survival and optimal quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Utilizing precision medicine to personalize immunosuppression, which includes minimization and withdrawal, is core to this effort. The unique anatomy and physiology of the liver make it more tolerant to immune-mediated injury and a more favorable organ for immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal. However, several challenges exist. Standard biochemical values and histologic features may not reliably predict allograft health after a reduction in immunosuppression. Additionally, biochemical values alone do not reliably identify which patients can successfully develop operational tolerance, as there may be occult allograft injury despite normal liver enzymes. Finally, the durability of tolerance after successful reduction in immunosuppression remains uncertain over time. Innovative tools show promise in circumventing these challenges, but more research is needed to determine actual clinical utility. While immunosuppression-free transplant may not be a current reality for most pediatric liver transplant recipients, strategies to safely minimize immunosuppression without compromising allograft health are within reach. Each liver allograft and recipient pair requires a different degree of immune modulation, and through a structured process of minimization and withdrawal, immunosuppression can indeed be tailored in a precise, personalized way to optimize outcomes. This review focuses on the progress that has been made to individualize immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation to ensure optimal allograft and recipient health.

Immunosuppression minimization is safe and associated with good long-term success in pediatric recipients of liver transplant

Immunosuppression reduction after liver transplant is an important strategy to mitigate long-term medication side effects. We describe our center's experience with immunosuppression minimization to once-daily calcineurin inhibitor dosing. Success was defined as continuing daily calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy with normal transaminases and no rejection. We performed a retrospective review of eligible children who received a liver transplant between 2009 and 2016, had a surveillance biopsy, and were on twice-daily calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy. Twenty-eight of 51 eligible patients were minimized to daily calcineurin inhibitor with goal 12-hour trough detectable. Nineteen patients (68%) had 1-year success, and 17 (61%) had long-term success at a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 2.9-6.6). Minimization failure occurred at a median of 0.6 years (IQR: 0.3-1.0) after dose reduction. Patients with long-term success had lower aspartate aminotransferase levels prior to minimization compared to those who failed with a median of 28.0 IU/L (IQR: 20.5-32.0) versus 32.0 IU/L (IQR: 30.0-37.0), p = 0.047. The long-term success group demonstrated a trend toward greater recipients of liver transplant from living donors (53% vs. 18%, p = 0.07). At the time of the last follow-up at a median of 5.0 years (IQR: 2.9-6.1) after surveillance biopsy, most (73%) patients who failed had returned to twice-daily calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy, all had liver enzymes <2 times the upper limit of normal, and there were no patient deaths or graft losses. In conclusion, immunosuppression minimization is safe in pediatric recipients of liver transplant and should be considered to reduce long-term medication side effects and improve patient quality of life. Future studies are necessary to follow long-term outcomes and develop biomarkers to predict minimization success.

Novel Noninvasive Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation: A Tool on the Doorstep of Clinical Utilization

Biomarkers have the potential to transform the detection, treatment, and outcomes of liver transplant complications, though their application is limited because of the lack of prospective validation. Although many genetic, proteomic, and immune markers correlating with allograft rejection and graft dysfunction have been described, evaluation of these markers in combination and validation among a broad liver transplant recipient population remain understudied. In this review, we present evidence supporting biomarker applications in 5 clinical liver transplant scenarios: (i) diagnosis of allograft rejection, (ii) prediction of allograft rejection, (iii) minimization of immunosuppression, (iv) detection of fibrosis and recurrent disease, and (v) prediction of renal recovery following liver transplantation. Current limitations for biomarker utilization and opportunities for further investigation are discussed. Accurate risk assessment, diagnosis, and evaluation of treatment responses using such noninvasive tools will pave the way for a more personalized and precise approach to management of the liver transplant patients that has profound potential to reduce morbidity and improve graft and patient longevity.

Evolving challenges with long-term care of liver transplant recipients

The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.

Mapping children by ALT 4-5 years after liver transplant: Potential individual and population applications

INTRODUCTION

Although clinicians repeatedly measure ALT to assess allograft health in children with liver transplants, they generally make decisions based on single values or qualitative trends without quantitative aggregation or synthesis. We therefore aimed to derive and test a holistic ALT metric for the 5th post-transplant year (Yr 4-5) that may better guide clinical decision-making and/or population comparisons.

METHODS

We derived the "adjusted mean Yr 4-5 ALT" for children transplanted in 2005-2016 by averaging the median ALT from each month. Patients in quartiles (Q1-4) defined by the adjusted mean Yr 4-5 ALT were compared by clinical variables, Yr 5-8 outcomes, and tacrolimus standard deviation (MLVI).

RESULTS

For 97 children [49 male; 77 deceased donors; median (IQR) age at LT 2.5 (0.8-11.7) years], the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile thresholds for adjusted mean Yr 4-5 ALT were 19, 28, and 47 U/L, respectively. Age, donor type, LT indication, rejection history, and mean tacrolimus levels did not differ between quartiles (Q). Children in Q4 had more Yr 4-5 acute rejection episodes (p < .01), higher Yr 4-5 MLVI (p < .01), and more Yr 5-8 for-cause liver biopsies (p < .01) than those in Q1 + Q2. Children in Q3 also had higher Yr 4-5 MLVI than Q1 + Q2 (p = .047). Rates of chronic rejection and therapeutic liver-related procedures were higher in Q4 but the difference did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

An integrated ALT metric calculated utilizing all available ALT values correlates with MLVI and future for-cause biopsies. Further study of this novel ALT metric as a predictor of clinical outcomes and descriptor of populations is warranted.

Achievement of operational tolerance in a pediatric liver transplant recipient following successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a different donor

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)-based approaches are increasingly investigated strategies to induce tolerance in recipients of solid allografts. However, in the majority of cases, these approaches rely on the infusion of hematopoietic stem cells recovered from the same solid organ donor. In this report, we describe the case of a boy who received liver transplantation from a deceased donor, who had successfully underwent allogeneic HSCT from an unrelated donor for hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia. In this patient, it was possible to permanently withdraw post-HSCT immune suppression without causing any sign of liver graft dysfunction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of operational tolerance documented in a patient who received combined liver transplantation and HSCT from different donors.

Proceedings of the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

After a virtual congress in 2021 and a previous absence in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society was held from May 4 to 7, 2022, in a hybrid format in Istanbul, with 1123 (58% on-site) liver transplant professionals from 61 countries attending the meeting. The hybrid format successfully achieved a balance of much yearned-for "in-person interaction" and global online participation. Almost 500 scientific abstracts were presented. In this report, the Vanguard Committee aims to present a summary of key invited lectures and selected abstracts for the liver transplant community.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with a higher mean fluorescence intensity are associated with graft fibrosis in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

The roles of post-transplant anti-HLA donor specific antibody (DSA) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT), including therapeutic strategies, remain controversial. This study aimed to identify the risks of post-transplant DSA for graft fibrosis progression in pediatric living donor LT (LDLT). We retrospectively evaluated 88 LDLT pediatric cases between December 1995 and November 2019. DSAs were assessed with single antigen bead test. Graft fibrosis was histopathologically scored with METAVIR and the centrilobular sinusoidal fibrosis system. Post-transplant DSAs were detected in 37 (52.9%) cases at 10.8 (1.3-26.9) years post-LDLT. The histopathological examination of 32 pediatric cases with post-transplant DSA revealed that 7 (21.9%) with a high DSA-MFI (≥9,378) showed graft fibrosis progression (≥F2). No graft fibrosis was observed in the subjects with a low DSA-MFI. The risk factors for developing graft fibrosis in pediatric cases with post-transplant DSA were an older graft age (>46.5 years old), lower platelet count (<10.7 × 104/ml) and higher Fib4 index (>0.7807, recipient age; >1.8952, donor age). Limited efficacy of additional immunosuppressants was observed in DSA positive pediatric cases. In conclusion, pediatric cases with a high DSA-MFI and risk factors should undergo a histological examination. The appropriate treatment for post-transplant DSA in pediatric LT needs to be determined.

Prope tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation: Experience at Shiraz Organ Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Children receive transplants at a younger age, and the period of immunosuppression therapy may extend over decades. However, immunosuppression seems to be responsible for long-term mortality and morbidity. Pediatric liver transplant recipients can benefit from achieving immune tolerance and the opportunity of freedom from lifelong immunosuppression. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of prope tolerance among pediatric liver transplant recipients and the characteristics of these patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study of pediatric liver transplant recipients, the medical records of transplant recipients treated at Shiraz Organ Transplant Center between 1994 and 2017 were reviewed. Prope tolerance was defined as normal laboratory values and stable clinical status on low-dose monotherapy. Children treated with low-dose monotherapy were categorized as the prope tolerant group. We compared the characteristics of prope tolerant recipients on low-dose monotherapy with patients on standard immunosuppression, i.e. full-dose tacrolimus plus steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. The data were analyzed with the t-test, chi-squared test, and a Cox proportional hazard model at a 5% significance level in SPSS software version 16.

RESULTS

A total of 585 children with a mean age of 8.32 ± 5.23 years were enrolled. 341 patients were categorized as prope tolerant and 244 comprised the full immunosuppression regimen group. Mean age at transplantation and rejection frequency were lower in the prope tolerant group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Based on the underlying diseases, metabolic/genetic, biliary tract, and cryptogenic liver diseases were significantly more prevalent in the prope tolerant group (p < 0.001). However, autoimmune liver disease was found to be more prevalent in the full immunosuppression regimen group. Also, those who received living organs (p = 0.001) and recipients of organs from female donors had a greater likelihood of achieving prope tolerant. According to the multiple Cox regression results, age at transplantation (p = 0.022), rejection frequency (p < 0.001), and autoimmune liver diseases (p = 0.028) had a prognostic effect on prope tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Factors as underlying disease, age at transplantation, and rejection frequency were factors that were predictive of prope tolerance in this sample of children. However, the risk of rejection should be considered during the tapering period.

Incidence and risk factors of subclinical rejection after pediatric liver transplantation, and impact on allograft fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is a common injury in protocol biopsy after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), but its effect on the recipient is not clearly understood. We herein investigated the incidence and risk factors involved in SCR and analyzed the relationship between SCR and allograft fibrosis (AF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the biopsy results from 507 children between May 2013 and May 2019, and 352 patients underwent protocol biopsy 2 years after pLT, 203 underwent protocol biopsy 5 years after pLT, and 48 underwent protocol biopsy both 2 and 5 years after pLT.

RESULTS

The incidence of SCR in the 5-year group was higher than that in the 2-year group (20.2% vs.13.4%, respectively, p = .033). The number of patients with mild and moderate SCR in the 5-year group was also higher than that in the 2-year group (p = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that acute rejection before liver biopsy and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were independent risk factors for SCR in the two groups, and that the incidence and severity of AF in protocol biopsies at both periods in the SCR group were higher than those in the non-SCR group (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and severity of SCR increased with the prolongation of protocol biopsy time. We postulate that acute rejection and DDLT are independent risk factors for SCR after transplantation. As the occurrence of SCR also augmented the incidence and severity of AF.

Next-generation pathology detection of T cell-antigen-presenting cell immune synapses in human liver allografts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In otherwise near-normal appearing biopsies by routine light microscopy, next-generation pathology (NGP) detected close pairings (immune pairs; iPAIRs) between lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that predicted immunosuppression weaning failure in pediatric liver transplant (LTx) recipients (Immunosuppression Withdrawal for Stable Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients [iWITH], NCT01638559). We hypothesized that NGP-detected iPAIRs enrich for true immune synapses, as determined by nuclear shape metrics, intercellular distances, and supramolecular activation complex (SMAC) formation.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Intralobular iPAIRs (CD45 high lymphocyte-major histocompatibility complex II + APC pairs; n = 1167, training set) were identified at low resolution from multiplex immunohistochemistry-stained liver biopsy slides from several multicenter LTx immunosuppression titration clinical trials (iWITH; NCT02474199 (Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) for Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Reduction (ARTEMIS); Prospective Longitudinal Study of iWITH Screen Failures Secondary to Histopathology). After excluding complex multicellular aggregates, high-resolution imaging was used to examine immune synapse formation ( n = 998). By enriching for close intranuclear lymphocyte-APC distance (mean: 0.713 μm) and lymphocyte nuclear flattening (mean ferret diameter: 2.1), SMAC formation was detected in 29% of iPAIR-engaged versus 9.5% of unpaired lymphocytes. Integration of these morphometrics enhanced NGP detection of immune synapses (ai-iSYN). Using iWITH preweaning biopsies from eligible patients ( n = 53; 18 tolerant, 35 nontolerant; testing set), ai-iSYN accurately predicted (87.3% accuracy vs. 81.4% for iPAIRs; 100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) immunosuppression weaning failure. This confirmed the presence and importance of intralobular immune synapse formation in liver allografts. Stratification of biopsy mRNA expression data by immune synapse quantity yielded the top 20 genes involved in T cell activation and immune synapse formation and stability.

CONCLUSIONS

NGP-detected immune synapses (subpathological rejection) in LTx patients prior to immunosuppression reduction suggests that NGP-detected (allo)immune activity usefulness for titration of immunosuppressive therapy in various settings.

Immunotolerance in liver transplantation: a primer for the clinician

The use of immunosuppressive medications for solid organ transplantation is associated with cardiovascular, metabolic, and oncologic complications. On the other hand, the development of graft rejection is associated with increased mortality and graft dysfunction. Liver transplant recipients can withdraw from immunosuppression without developing graft injury while preserving an adequate antimicrobial response - a characteristic known as immunotolerance. Immunotolerance can be spontaneously or pharmacologically achieved. Contrary to the classic dogma, clinical studies have elucidated low rates of true spontaneous immunotolerance (no serologic or histological markers of immune injury) among liver transplant recipients. However, clinical, serologic, and tissue biomarkers can aid in selecting patients in whom immunosuppression can be safely withdrawn. For those who failed an immunosuppression withdrawal trial or are at high risk of rejection, pharmacological interventions for immunotolerance induction are under development. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of immunotolerance, the clinical studies investigating predictors and biomarkers of spontaneous immunotolerance, as well as the potential pharmacological interventions for inducing it.

Genotype-guided model significantly improves accuracy of tacrolimus initial dosing after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The initial dose of tacrolimus after liver transplantation (LT) is critical for rapidly achieving the steady state of the drug concentration, minimizing the potential adverse reactions and warranting long-term patient prognosis. We aimed to develop and validate a genotype-guided model for determining personalized initial dose of tacrolimus.

METHODS

By combining pharmacokinetic modeling, pharmacogenomic analysis and multiple statistical methods, we developed a genotype-guided model to predict individualized tacrolimus initial dose after LT in the discovery (n = 150) and validation cohorts (n = 97) respectively. This model was further validated in a prospective, randomized and single-blind clinical trial from August, 2021 to February, 2022 (n = 40, ChiCTR2100050288).

FINDINGS

Our model included donor's and recipient's genotypes, recipient's weight and total bilirubin, which achieved an area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC of ROC) of 0.88 and 0.79 in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. We found that patients who were given tacrolimus within the recommended concentration range (RCR) (4-10 ng/mL), the new-onset metabolic syndromes are lower, especially for new-onset diabetes (p = 0.043). In the clinical trial, compared to those in experience-based (EB) group, patients in the model-based (MB) group were more likely to achieving the RCR (75% vs 40%, p = 0.025) with a more variable individualized dose (0.023-0.096 mg/kg/day vs 0.045-0.057 mg/kg/day). Moreover, significantly fewer medication adjustments were required for the MB group than the EB group (2.75 ± 2.01 vs 6.05 ± 3.35, p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Our genotype-based model significantly improved the initial dosing accuracy of tacrolimus and reduced the number of medication adjustments, which are critical for improving the prognosis of LT patients.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai three-year action plan, National Science and Technology Major Project of China.

Operational Tolerance after Liver Transplantation: First Report from India

Operational tolerance after liver transplantation is an ideal goal to avoid long-term morbidities associated with chronic immunosuppressive medication use. It is achievable in a highly selected group of post-transplant recipients but requires long-term follow-up and strict monitoring. We hereby report a post-transplant case who achieved spontaneous operational tolerance after inadvertent immunosuppression withdrawal.

Revisiting transplant immunology through the lens of single-cell technologies

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is the standard of care for end-stage organ disease. The most frequent complication of SOT involves allograft rejection, which may occur via T cell- and/or antibody-mediated mechanisms. Diagnosis of rejection in the clinical setting requires an invasive biopsy as there are currently no reliable biomarkers to detect rejection episodes. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to identify patients who exhibit operational tolerance and may be candidates for reduced or complete withdrawal of immunosuppression. Emerging single-cell technologies, including cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), imaging mass cytometry, and single-cell RNA sequencing, represent a new opportunity for deep characterization of pathogenic immune populations involved in both allograft rejection and tolerance in clinical samples. These techniques enable examination of both individual cellular phenotypes and cell-to-cell interactions, ultimately providing new insights into the complex pathophysiology of allograft rejection. However, working with these large, highly dimensional datasets requires expertise in advanced data processing and analysis using computational biology techniques. Machine learning algorithms represent an optimal strategy to analyze and create predictive models using these complex datasets and will likely be essential for future clinical application of patient level results based on single-cell data. Herein, we review the existing literature on single-cell techniques in the context of SOT.

Factors associated with improved patient and graft survival beyond 1 year in pediatric liver transplantation

With advances in surgical techniques, medical management, and more equitable allocation systems, children who receive a liver transplantation (LT) today can expect remarkable outcomes early after LT. However, beyond 1 year after transplant, attrition rates have not improved. We reviewed two separate eras (Era 1: January 1995-June 2004 vs. Era 2: July 2004-March 2018) of the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation registry to explore the evolution and associated factors contributing to late graft loss (LGL) and late mortality (LM). The fraction of long-term pediatric LT recipients surviving after 1 year with their first graft significantly improved (81.5% in Era 1 vs. 85.7% in Era 2; p < 0.0001). This improvement occurred despite significant changes in patient selection toward higher risk populations (p < 0.001) and without notable improvement in perioperative complications such as hepatic artery thrombosis (p = 0.24) and early posttransplant reoperation (p = 0.94) that have historically contributed to poor late-allograft outcomes. Improved outcomes were associated with changes in patient characteristics and perioperative practices, which subsequently impacted both early post-LT complications as well as other sequalae known to contribute to adverse events in long-term pediatric LT recipients. In conclusion, despite significant changes in patient selection toward higher risk populations, and without notable improvement in several perioperative complications known to contribute to poor late-allograft outcomes, significant improvements in LGL and a trend toward improvement in LM was seen in a more contemporary cohort of children receiving an LT.

Elevated fractional donor-derived cell-free DNA during subclinical graft injury after liver transplantation

Personalized immunosuppression (IS) promises to improve the balance of necessary control of alloreactivity and dose-dependent adverse effects of long-term IS such as kidney insufficiency, infections, and malignancies. The majority of liver transplantation (LT) recipients exhibit graft injuries (graft inflammation and/or fibrosis) that are not eligible for an IS reduction according to current Banff criteria, even when liver enzymes are normal or only marginally elevated. This cross-sectional study evaluated the noninvasive prediction of such subclinical graft injuries in surveillance liver biopsies via donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Absolute and fractional dd-cfDNA increased stepwise from patients without histological signs of rejection (n = 26) over subclinical graft injury (n = 61), including subclinical T cell-mediated rejection to clinical overt T cell-mediated rejection (n = 21). Thus, fractional plasma dd-cfDNA was significantly elevated paired to surveillance biopsies with relevant subclinical graft injury according to 2016 Banff criteria compared with those with minimal or absent histological graft injury. In contrast, the presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies was not associated with the amount of dd-cfDNA. The sensitivity and specificity of fractional dd-cfDNA to noninvasively predict relevant subclinical graft injury was rather limited with 73% and 52% at the cutoff value of 2.1% fractional dd-cfDNA. The positive predictive value of fractional dd-cfDNA above 2.1% was 76% to noninvasively predict subclinical graft injury, calculated on the prevalence of graft injury in our prospective surveillance biopsy program, whereas the negative predictive values was not predictive (47%). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA has a rather limited diagnostic fidelity in addition to other noninvasive markers for the assessment of subclinical graft injury in personalized IS approaches after LT in a cross-sectional setting.

Operational tolerance is not always permanent: A 10-year prospective study in pediatric liver transplantation recipients

Immunosuppression withdrawal can be safely performed in select liver transplantation recipients, but the long-term outcomes and sustainability of tolerance have not been well studied. We completed a 10-year prospective, observational study of 18 pediatric liver transplantation recipients with operational tolerance to (1) assess the sustainability of tolerance over time, (2) compare the clinical characteristics of patients who maintained versus lost tolerance, (3) characterize liver histopathology findings in surveillance liver biopsies; and (4) describe immunologic markers in patients with tolerance. Comparator patients from two clinical phenotype groups termed "stable" and "nontolerant" patients were used as controls. Of the 18 patients with operational tolerance, the majority of patients were males (n = 14, 78%) who were transplanted for cholestatic liver disease (n = 12, 67%). Median age at transplantation was 1.9 (range, 0.6-8) years. Median time after transplantation that immunosuppression had been discontinued was 13.1 (range, 2.9-22.1) years. As many as 11 (61%) maintained tolerance for a median of 10.4 (range, 1.9-22.1) years, whereas 7 (39%) lost tolerance after a median of 3.2 (range, 1.5-18.6) years. Populations of T regulatory cells (%CD4⁺ CD25^hi CD127^lo ) were significantly higher in patients with tolerance (p = 0.02). Our results emphasize that spontaneous operational tolerance is a dynamic and nonpermanent state. It is therefore essential for patients who are clinically stable off immunosuppression to undergo regular follow-up and laboratory monitoring, as well as surveillance biopsies to rule out subclinical rejection.

New Approaches to the Diagnosis of Rejection and Prediction of Tolerance in Liver Transplantation

Immunosuppression after liver transplantation is essential for preventing allograft rejection. However, long-term drug toxicity and associated complications necessitate investigation of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal protocols. Development of such protocols is hindered by reliance on current paradigms for monitoring allograft function and rejection status. The current standard of care for diagnosis of rejection is histopathologic assessment and grading of liver biopsies in accordance with the Banff Rejection Activity Index. However, this method is limited by cost, sampling variability, and interobserver variation. Moreover, the invasive nature of biopsy increases the risk of patient complications. Incorporating noninvasive techniques may supplement existing methods through improved understanding of rejection causes, hepatic spatial architecture, and the role of idiopathic fibroinflammatory regions. These techniques may also aid in quantification and help integrate emerging -omics analyses with current assessments. Alternatively, emerging noninvasive methods show potential to detect and distinguish between different types of rejection while minimizing risk of adverse advents. Although biomarkers have yet to replace biopsy, preliminary studies suggest that several classes of analytes may be used to detect rejection with greater sensitivity and in earlier stages than traditional methods, possibly when coupled with artificial intelligence. Here, we provide an overview of the latest efforts in optimizing the diagnosis of rejection in liver transplantation.

Minimal Development of Liver Fibrosis in Adult Tolerant Liver Transplant Recipients Late After Immunosuppressive Drug Weaning and Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Operationally tolerant liver transplant (LTx)-recipients can be weaned off immunosuppressive (IS) drugs without development of graft rejection. However, it is feared that liver fibrosis might develop after complete IS weaning. The purpose of this small single-center study was to assess liver fibrosis in adult tolerant LTx recipients long after LTx and IS weaning.

METHODS

Liver fibrosis was assessed in adult tolerant LTx-recipients (n = 9) using noninvasive transient elastography and measurements of multiple pro- and antifibrotic serum markers associated with liver fibrosis. The data was collected for 2 subsequent years; 8 and 9 years after IS weaning and 19 and 20 years after transplantation. Healthy individuals (n = 9) matched for age and sex were included as a reference for fibrosis-related serum markers. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the medical ethics committee of our institution.

RESULTS

Transient elastography indicated that 7 of 9 tolerant LTx recipients had no or minimal liver fibrosis (F0-F1), whereas 2 recipients had moderate or severe liver fibrosis (F2-F3). Most fibrosis-related serum markers in tolerant LTx recipients were within or close to the range obtained for healthy individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this small, single-center study indicated that most adult tolerant LTx recipients have no or minimal liver graft fibrosis long after transplantation and IS weaning, and their fibrosis-related serum marker profile indicates an absence of a profibrotic status.

Linked sensitization by memory CD4+ T cells prevents costimulation blockade–induced transplantation tolerance

Dominant infectious tolerance explains how brief tolerance-inducing therapies result in lifelong tolerance to donor antigens and “linked” third-party antigens, while recipient sensitization and ensuing immunological memory prevent the successful induction of transplant tolerance. In this study, we juxtapose these 2 concepts to test whether mechanisms of dominant infectious tolerance can control a limited repertoire of memory T and B cells. We show that sensitization to a single donor antigen is sufficient to prevent stable transplant tolerance, rendering it unstable. Mechanistic studies revealed that recall antibody responses and memory CD8⁺ T cell expansion were initially controlled, but memory CD4⁺Foxp3^– T cell (Tconv) responses were not. Remarkably, naive donor-specific Tconvs at tolerance induction also acquired a resistance to tolerance, proliferating and acquiring a phenotype similar to memory Tconvs. This phenomenon of “linked sensitization” underscores the challenges of reprogramming a primed immune response toward tolerance and identifies a potential therapeutic checkpoint for synergizing with costimulation blockade to achieve transplant tolerance in the clinic.

Proceedings of the 26th Annual Virtual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society

After a 1-y absence due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the 26th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society was held from May 15 to 18, 2021, in a virtual format. Clinicians and researchers from all over the world came together to share their knowledge on all the aspects of liver transplantation (LT). Apart from a focus on LT in times of coronavirus disease 2019, featured topics of this year's conference included infectious diseases in LT, living donation, machine perfusion, oncology, predictive scoring systems and updates in anesthesia/critical care, immunology, radiology, pathology, and pediatrics. This report presents highlights from invited lectures and a review of the select abstracts. The aim of this report, generated by the Vanguard Committee of International Liver Transplantation Society, is to provide a summary of the most recent developments in clinical practice and research in LT.

Mismatch epitope load predicts de novo-DSA-free survival in pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Our knowledge of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in liver transplantation continues to be defined. We hypothesized that differences of HLA-DR/DQ mismatches can improve precision in alloimmune risk categorization and be applied to tailor immunosuppression.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 244 pediatric patients consecutively transplanted at our center between 2003 and 2019 was performed to identify patients tested for dnDSA. Records were queried for: demographics, pre-transplant diagnosis, biopsy-proven T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), radiology proven biliary complications, tacrolimus trough levels, dnDSA characteristics, and HLA typing. The eplet mismatch analyses were performed using HLAMatchmaker^™ 3.1. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software version 3.40.

RESULTS

There were 99 dnDSA-negative patients and 73 dnDSA-positive patients (n = 70 against class II and n = 3 against class I and II). ROC analysis identified optimal cutoff of eplet mismatch load for dnDSA and defined risk groups for an alloimmune outcome. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests showed high eplet mismatch load was associated with shorter dnDSA-free survival (log-rank p = .001). Multivariable Cox regression models showed that tacrolimus coefficient of variation and tacrolimus mean levels were significantly associated with dnDSA-free survival (p < .001 and p = .036). Fisher's exact test showed that dnDSA was associated with an increased likelihood of TCMR (OR 14.94; 95% CI 3.65 - 61.19; p < .001). Patients without TCMR were more likely to have dnDSA to HLA-DQ7 and less likely to have dnDSA to HLA-DQ2 (p = .03, p = .080).

CONCLUSIONS

Mismatched epitope load predicts dnDSA-free survival in pediatric liver transplant, while dnDSA specificity may determine alloimmune outcome.

Graft Fibrosis Over 10 to 15 Years in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Multicenter Study of Paired, Longitudinal Surveillance Biopsies

Previous single-center, cross-sectional studies have reported a steep increase in the prevalence and severity of fibrosis through 10 to 15 years after pediatric liver transplantation. We report a multicenter study of paired surveillance biopsies in a contemporary cohort. Children who underwent liver transplant when younger than 6 years old and had paired surveillance liver biopsies were enrolled (n = 78, 35% girls, median 1.2 years old at transplant). A central pathologist graded inflammation, assessed rejection activity index, and staged fibrosis in the portal, sinusoidal, and perivenular compartments, allowing for calculation of the Liver Allograft Fibrosis Score (LAFSc). Analysis of variance tested associations between fibrosis progression and clinical parameters. The first biopsy, at a median 8.2 years (interquartile range, 5.9-11.6 years) after transplantation, showed absent to mild fibrosis (LAFSc 0-2) in 29%, moderate (LAFSc 3-5) in 56%, and severe (LAFSc 6-7) in 14% of patients. The second biopsy, at a median 4.7 years (IQR, 4.3-5.1 years) later, showed fibrosis progression (LAFSc increased by ≥3) in 10 (13%) and regression (LAFSc decreased by ≥3) in 4 (5%) patients. After adjusting for baseline LAFSc, younger age at transplant was the only risk factor for fibrosis progression. Although fibrosis prevalence and severity 6 to 12 years after transplant was similar to previous reports, fibrosis trajectory during the next 4 to 5 years was stable. Our data may be reassuring for children with consistently normal liver tests. A comprehensive understanding of factors determining allograft health during the very long term is essential to optimizing allograft and patient health.

Immunologic benefits of maternal living donor allografts in pediatric liver transplantation: fewer rejection episodes and no evidence of de novo allosensitization

BACKGROUND

Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients of maternal living liver donor (LLD) grafts have been reported to experience fewer rejection episodes. However, it is unclear whether this benefit translates to reduction in developing donor-specific antibody (DSA) among maternal-LLD recipients. The aim of this study was to compare immunologic outcomes among maternal-LLD, non-maternal-LLD, and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients.

METHODS

Children (≤18 years) who underwent LT between 1/1998 and 12/2019 at two high-volume LT centers in North America were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups by type of graft received (maternal-LLD, non-maternal LLD, and DDLT). Clinical variables and outcomes were compared according to each graft type.

RESULTS

A total of 450 pediatric primary LT were analyzed: 275 (61.1%) DDLT, 73 (16.2%) maternal-LLD, and 102 (22.6%) non-maternal-LLD. Children receiving LLD grafts were less likely to develop rejection when compared to the DDLT group (DDLT 46.9% vs. maternal-LLD 31.5% vs. non-maternal-LLD 28.4%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in rejection rates between maternal and non-maternal-LLD recipients. A higher percentage of maternal-LLD recipients were on immunosuppression monotherapy compared to non-maternal-LLD and DDLT recipients (6.7% vs. 1.2 vs. 2.4%, respectively). A subgroup of 68 patients were tested for DSA post-LT. Maternal-LLD recipients were less likely to develop de novo DSA (maternal-LLD 11.8% vs. non-maternal-LLD 19.3% vs. DDLT 43%, p = 0.018). None of the maternal-LLD recipients developed antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the concept of immunologic benefit of maternal-LLD in pediatric LT, with lower rates of rejection and allosensitization post-LT when compared to DDLT recipients.

Donor and recipient polygenic risk scores influence the risk of post-transplant diabetes

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) reduces allograft and recipient life span. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) show robust association with greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined the association of PTDM with T2D PRS in liver recipients (n = 1,581) and their donors (n = 1,555), and kidney recipients (n = 2,062) and their donors (n = 533). Recipient T2D PRS was associated with pre-transplant T2D and the development of PTDM. T2D PRS in liver donors, but not in kidney donors, was an independent risk factor for PTDM development. The inclusion of a combined liver donor and recipient T2D PRS significantly improved PTDM prediction compared with a model that included only clinical characteristics: the area under the curve (AUC) was 67.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 64.1-71.1%) for the combined T2D PRS versus 62.3% (95% CI 58.8-65.8%) for the clinical characteristics model (P = 0.0001). Liver recipients in the highest quintile of combined donor and recipient T2D PRS had the greatest risk of PTDM, with an odds ratio of 3.22 (95% CI 2.07-5.00) (P = 1.92 × 10^-7) compared with those in the lowest quintile. In conclusion, T2D PRS identifies transplant candidates with high risk of PTDM for which pre-emptive diabetes management and donor selection may be warranted.

Clinical characteristics of immune tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation

Background

Clinical operational tolerance is the ultimate goal for liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of immune tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation and to identify the possible predictors.

Methods

The clinical data from 37 cases of pediatric patients 2 year later after liver transplantation surgery in the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the status of the current immunosuppressant medications of the patients, they were divided into tolerance (n = 15) and Control (n = 22) groups. The current status regarding prope/operational tolerance was reviewed and screened based on the immunosuppressant medications.

Results

The patients in the tolerance group were younger than that of Controls (p < 0.001). The children in the tolerance group experienced no acute rejection episode and exhibited no obvious abnormalities in the liver function during the continuous follow-up period. The primary disease of the tolerance group were more often diagnosed with biliary atresia (p = 0.011), and received with a living donor liver graft (p = 0.005). There were less glomerular function, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension events presented in the tolerance group compared with the control group, indicating low toxicity profile.

Conclusion

In the current study, there were really certain quantity of recipients following liver transplantation attained long term immune tolerance, with low toxicity and satisfied liver graft function. The younger age of the recipient and maternal donor seems to promote long-term clinical immune tolerance. Further work in larger series should be required to describe the overall perspective of tolerance.

Not only a small liver - The pathologist's perspective in the pediatric liver transplant setting

Pediatric liver transplantation represents a safe and long-lasting treatment option for various disease types, requiring the pathologist’s input. Indeed, an accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial in reporting and grading native liver diseases, evaluating donor liver eligibility and identifying signs of organ injury in the post-transplant follow-up. However, as the procedure is more frequently and widely performed, deceptive and unexplored histopathologic features have emerged with relevant consequences on patient management, particularly when dealing with long-term treatment and weaning of immunosuppression.

In this complex and challenging scenario, this review aims to depict the most relevant histopathologic conditions which could be encountered in pediatric liver transplantation. We will tackle the conditions representing the main indications for transplantation in childhood as well as the complications burdening the post-transplant phases, either immunologically (i.e., rejection) or non-immunologically mediated. Lastly, we hope to provide concise, yet significant, suggestions related to innovative pathology techniques in pediatric liver transplantation.

Intra-Liver Allograft C3d-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Predict Rejection After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is no doubt that antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) brings a poor outcome for liver transplant recipients. However, the relationship between intragraft DSA (g-DSA), complement-binding abilities, and AMR remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled a total of 20 liver transplant recipients who underwent protocol or episode graft biopsies in the mid to long term after liver transplant (median 48.5, range 6-198 months), and their status of g-DSA and complement 3d (C3d)-binding abilities was assessed with the graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) technique.

RESULTS

The prevalence of g-DSA was 15.0 % in liver transplant recipients (3/20), and serum DSA (s-DSA) also existed in 15.0% of recipients. The number of g-DSA+/s-DSA+, g-DSA+/s-DSA-, g-DSA-/s-DSA+, and g-DSA-/s-DSA- cases are 1, 2, 2, and 15, respectively. The g-DSA+ group demonstrated a significant high rejection activity index: 3.67 ± 1.53, compared with the g-DSA- group: 1.24 ± 1.15 (P = .0045). Moreover, C3d-binding reaction was notably higher in the g-DSA+ group (C3d index: 1.87 ± 0.38 vs 0.76 ± 0.35) (P < .0001). Overall, the g-DSA+ group was more associated with liver allograft rejection-not only AMR, but also T cell-mediated rejection (P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the existence of g-DSA and intragraft C3d-binding reaction had a negative impact on the liver allografts, but in contrast s-DSA did not have any significant impact.

Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Hepatocytes Inhibit T Cell Proliferation In Vitro through Tryptophan Starvation

Regenerative medicine aims to replace damaged tissues by stimulating endogenous tissue repair or by transplanting autologous or allogeneic cells. Due to their capacity to produce unlimited numbers of cells of a given cell type, pluripotent stem cells, whether of embryonic origin or induced via the reprogramming of somatic cells, are of considerable therapeutic interest in the regenerative medicine field. However, regardless of the cell type, host immune responses present a barrier to success. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the immunological properties of human pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs). These cells expressed MHC class I molecules while they lacked MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD80 and CD86. Following stimulation with IFN-γ, HLCs upregulated CD40, PD-L1 and MHC class I molecules. When co-cultured with allogeneic T cells, HLCs did not induce T cell proliferation; furthermore, when T cells were stimulated via αCD3/CD28 beads, HLCs inhibited their proliferation via IDO1 and tryptophan deprivation. These results demonstrate that PSC-derived HLCs possess immunoregulatory functions, at least in vitro.

Non-invasive alloimmune risk stratification of long-term liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

RESULTS

In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression.

LAY SUMMARY

A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants

The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.

Clinical liver transplant tolerance: Recent topics

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression is essential after organ transplantation to prevent severe graft injury due to rejection, but in long-term, transplanted organs are generally accepted with minimal dose of immunosuppression, and adverse effects of it such as renal dysfunction, diabetes and development of malignancies might become to exceed over the benefits in majority of the cases. Accordingly, to achieve the immunologic tolerance has been the ultimate goal in organ transplantation, and the liver has been well recognized as the tolerogenic organ compared to other organs.

METHODS

We referred the reported studies showing the actual protocol to achieve the immunologic tolerance after clinical liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Actually, two main procedures as "elective weaning of immunosuppression" and/or "cell therapy" using various immune-related cells have been introduced to induce the immunologic tolerance in clinical liver transplantation. The cell therapy, especially using regulatory T-cell has been reported to achieve definitive immunologic tolerance in living donor liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Although it is still developing, the induction of immunologic tolerance in clinical liver transplantation is realistic. Herein, the current topics of immunologic tolerance in liver transplantation is described.

Strategies to Improve Immune Suppression Post-Liver Transplantation: A Review

Since the first liver transplantation operation (LT) in 1967 by Thomas Starzl, efforts to increase survival and prevent rejection have taken place. The development of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the 1980s led to a surge in survival post-transplantation, and since then, strategies to prevent graft loss and preserve long-term graft function have been prioritized. Allograft rejection is mediated by the host immune response to donor antigens. Prevention of rejection can be achieved through either immunosuppression or induction of tolerance. This leads to a clinical dilemma, as the choice of an immunosuppressive agent is not an easy task, with considerable patient and graft-related morbidities. On the other hand, the induction of graft tolerance remains a challenge. Despite the fact that the liver exhibits less rejection than any other transplanted organs, spontaneous graft tolerance is rare. Most immunosuppressive medications have been incriminated in renal, cardiovascular, and neurological complications, relapse of viral hepatitis, and recurrence of HCC and other cancers. Efforts to minimize immunosuppression are directed toward decreasing medication side effects, increasing cost effectiveness, and decreasing economic burden without increasing the risk of rejection. In this article, we will discuss recent advances in strategies for improving immunosuppression following liver transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.