DIF-1 induces its own breakdown in Dictyostelium

Microbial Synthesis and Transformation of Inorganic and Organic Chlorine Compounds

Organic and inorganic chlorine compounds are formed by a broad range of natural geochemical, photochemical and biological processes. In addition, chlorine compounds are produced in large quantities for industrial, agricultural and pharmaceutical purposes, which has led to widespread environmental pollution. Abiotic transformations and microbial metabolism of inorganic and organic chlorine compounds combined with human activities constitute the chlorine cycle on Earth. Naturally occurring organochlorines compounds are synthesized and transformed by diverse groups of (micro)organisms in the presence or absence of oxygen. In turn, anthropogenic chlorine contaminants may be degraded under natural or stimulated conditions. Here, we review phylogeny, biochemistry and ecology of microorganisms mediating chlorination and dechlorination processes. In addition, the co-occurrence and potential interdependency of catabolic and anabolic transformations of natural and synthetic chlorine compounds are discussed for selected microorganisms and particular ecosystems.

An individual-level selection model for the apparent altruism exhibited by cellular slime moulds

In Dictyostelium discoideum, cells that become part of the stalk or basal disc display behaviour that can be interpreted as altruistic. Atzmony et al. (Curr Sci 72:142-145, 1997) had hypothesised that this behaviour could be the outcome of an adaptive strategy based on differing intrinsic quality as reflected by phenotypes that indicate differences in potential for survival and reproduction, followed by intercellular competition among amoebae of differing qualities. Low-quality amoebae would have a poor chance of succeeding in the competition to form spores; they could enhance their chances of survival by adopting a presumptive stalk strategy. Here we extend the hypothesis by making use of recent findings. Our approach is based on the view that an evolutionary explanation for the apparent altruism of stalk cells in D. discoideum must apply broadly to other cellular slime moulds (CSMs) that exhibit stalk cell death. Further, it must be capable of being modified to cover social behaviour in CSMs with an extracellular stalk, as well as in sorocarpic amoebae whose stalk cells are viable. With regard to D. discoideum, we suggest that (a) differentiation-inducing factor, thought of as a signal that inhibits amoebae from forming spores and induces them to differentiate into basal disc cells, is better viewed as a mediator of competition among post-aggregation amoebae and (b) the products of the 'recognition genes', tgrB and tgrC, allow an amoeba to assess its quality relative to that of its neighbours and move to a position within the aggregate that optimises its reproductive fitness. From this perspective, all cells behave in a manner that is 'selfish' rather than 'altruistic', albeit with different expectations of success.

LPP3, LPA and self-generated chemotactic gradients in biomedical science

Chemotaxis is a major driver of cancer spread, but in most cases we do not know where gradients of attractant come from. In the case of melanoma, chemotaxis to LPA is an important driver of metastasis, and the gradients are made by the tumour cells themselves, by locally breaking down ambient LPA. We have now made a general assay for self-generated chemotaxis, and used it to show that the enzyme LPP3 is responsible for breaking down LPA and thus creating the gradients. Further analysis shows LPP3 is important in several invasion assays, in particular 3D ones in which cells spread outwards through matrix. The new assays will illuminate where physiological self-generated gradients occur; we believe they will be common throughout biology and pathology.

Self-Generated Chemoattractant Gradients: Attractant Depletion Extends the Range and Robustness of Chemotaxis

Chemotaxis is fundamentally important, but the sources of gradients in vivo are rarely well understood. Here, we analyse self-generated chemotaxis, in which cells respond to gradients they have made themselves by breaking down globally available attractants, using both computational simulations and experiments. We show that chemoattractant degradation creates steep local gradients. This leads to surprising results, in particular the existence of a leading population of cells that moves highly directionally, while cells behind this group are undirected. This leading cell population is denser than those following, especially at high attractant concentrations. The local gradient moves with the leading cells as they interact with their surroundings, giving directed movement that is unusually robust and can operate over long distances. Even when gradients are applied from external sources, attractant breakdown greatly changes cells' responses and increases robustness. We also consider alternative mechanisms for directional decision-making and show that they do not predict the features of population migration we observe experimentally. Our findings provide useful diagnostics to allow identification of self-generated gradients and suggest that self-generated chemotaxis is unexpectedly universal in biology and medicine.

Identification of a eukaryotic reductive dechlorinase and characterization of its mechanism of action on its natural substrate

Chlorinated compounds are important environmental pollutants whose biodegradation may be limited by inefficient dechlorinating enzymes. Dictyostelium amoebae produce a chlorinated alkyl phenone called DIF which induces stalk cell differentiation during their multicellular development. Here we describe the identification of DIF dechlorinase. DIF dechlorinase is active when expressed in bacteria, and activity is lost from Dictyostelium cells when its gene, drcA, is knocked out. It has a K_m for DIF of 88 nM and K_cat of 6.7 s⁻¹. DrcA is related to glutathione S-transferases, but with a key asparagine-to-cysteine substitution in the catalytic pocket. When this change is reversed, the enzyme reverts to a glutathione S-transferase, thus suggesting a catalytic mechanism. DrcA offers new possibilities for the rational design of bioremediation strategies.

Non-genetic heterogeneity and cell fate choice in Dictyostelium discoideum

From microbes to metazoans, it is now clear that fluctuations in the abundance of mRNA transcripts and protein molecules enable genetically identical cells to oscillate between several distinct states (Kaern et al. 2005). Since this cell-cell variability does not derive from physical differences in the genetic code it is termed non-genetic heterogeneity. Non-genetic heterogeneity endows cell populations with useful capabilities they could never achieve if each cell were the same as its neighbors (Raj & van Oudenaarden 2008; Eldar & Elowitz 2010). One such example is seen during multicellular development and "salt and pepper" cell type differentiation. In this review, we will first examine the importance of non-genetic heterogeneity in initiating "salt and pepper" pattern formation during Dictyostelium discoideum development. Second, we will discuss the various ways in which non-genetic heterogeneity might be generated, as well as recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of heterogeneity in this system.

A simple mechanism for complex social behavior

The evolution of cooperation is a paradox because natural selection should favor exploitative individuals that avoid paying their fair share of any costs. Such conflict between the self-interests of cooperating individuals often results in the evolution of complex, opponent-specific, social strategies and counterstrategies. However, the genetic and biological mechanisms underlying complex social strategies, and therefore the evolution of cooperative behavior, are largely unknown. To address this dearth of empirical data, we combine mathematical modeling, molecular genetic, and developmental approaches to test whether variation in the production of and response to social signals is sufficient to generate the complex partner-specific social success seen in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Firstly, we find that the simple model of production of and response to social signals can generate the sort of apparent complex changes in social behavior seen in this system, without the need for partner recognition. Secondly, measurements of signal production and response in a mutant with a change in a single gene that leads to a shift in social behavior provide support for this model. Finally, these simple measurements of social signaling can also explain complex patterns of variation in social behavior generated by the natural genetic diversity found in isolates collected from the wild. Our studies therefore demonstrate a novel and elegantly simple underlying mechanistic basis for natural variation in complex social strategies in D. discoideum. More generally, they suggest that simple rules governing interactions between individuals can be sufficient to generate a diverse array of outcomes that appear complex and unpredictable when those rules are unknown.

Despite the appearance of cooperation in nature, selection should often favor exploitative individuals who perform less of any cooperative behaviors while maintaining the benefits accrued from the cooperative behavior of others. This conflict of interest among cooperating individuals can lead to the evolution of complex social strategies that depend on the identity (e.g. genotype or strategy) of the individuals with whom you interact. The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum provides a compelling model for studying such “partner specific” conflict and cooperation. Upon starvation, free-living amoebae aggregate and form a fruiting body composed of dead stalk cells and hardy spores. Different genotypes will aggregate to produce chimeric fruiting bodies, resulting in potential social conflict over who will contribute to the reproductive sporehead and who will “sacrifice” themselves to produce the dead stalk. The outcomes of competitive interactions in chimera appear complex, with social success being strongly partner specific. Here we propose a simple mechanism to explain social strategies in D. discoideum, based on the production of and response to stalk-inducing factors, the social signals that determine whether cells become stalk or spore. Indeed, measurements of signal production and response can predict social behavior of different strains, thus demonstrating a novel and elegantly simple underlying mechanistic basis for natural variation in complex facultative social strategies. This suggests that simple social rules can be sufficient to generate a diverse array of behavioral outcomes that appear complex and unpredictable when those rules are unknown.

Autophagic or necrotic cell death triggered by distinct motifs of the differentiation factor DIF-1

Autophagic or necrotic cell death (ACD and NCD, respectively), studied in the model organism Dictyostelium which offers unique advantages, require triggering by the same differentiation-inducing factor DIF-1. To initiate these two types of cell death, does DIF-1 act through only one or through two distinct recognition structures? Such distinct structures may recognize distinct motifs of DIF-1. To test this albeit indirectly, DIF-1 was modified at one or two of several positions, and the corresponding derivatives were tested for their abilities to induce ACD or NCD. The results strongly indicated that distinct biochemical motifs of DIF-1 were required to trigger ACD or NCD, and that these motifs were separately recognized at the onset of ACD or NCD. In addition, both ACD and NCD were induced more efficiently by DIF-1 than by either its precursors or its immediate catabolite. These results showed an unexpected relation between a differentiation factor, the cellular structures that recognize it, the cell death types it can trigger and the metabolic state of the cell. The latter seems to guide the choice of the signaling pathway to cell death, which in turn imposes the cell death type and the recognition pattern of the differentiation factor.

DIF-1 induces the basal disc of the Dictyostelium fruiting body

The polyketide DIF-1 induces Dictyostelium amoebae to form stalk cells in culture. To better define its role in normal development, we examined the phenotype of a mutant blocking the first step of DIF-1 synthesis, which lacks both DIF-1 and its biosynthetic intermediate, dM-DIF-1 (des-methyl-DIF-1). Slugs of this polyketide synthase mutant (stlB(-)) are long and thin and rapidly break up, leaving an immotile prespore mass. They have approximately 30% fewer prestalk cells than their wild-type parent and lack a subset of anterior-like cells, which later form the outer basal disc. This structure is missing from the fruiting body, which perhaps in consequence initiates culmination along the substratum. The lower cup is rudimentary at best and the spore mass, lacking support, slips down the stalk. The dmtA(-) methyltransferase mutant, blocked in the last step of DIF-1 synthesis, resembles the stlB(-) mutant but has delayed tip formation and fewer prestalk-O cells. This difference may be due to accumulation of dM-DIF-1 in the dmtA(-) mutant, since dM-DIF-1 inhibits prestalk-O differentiation. Thus, DIF-1 is required for slug migration and specifies the anterior-like cells forming the basal disc and much of the lower cup; significantly the DIF-1 biosynthetic pathway may supply a second signal - dM-DIF-1.

A bZIP/bRLZ transcription factor required for DIF signaling in Dictyostelium

The intermingled differentiation and sorting out of Dictyostelium prestalk-O and prespore cells requires the diffusible signaling molecule DIF-1, and provides an example of a spatial information-independent patterning mechanism. To further understand this patterning process, we used genetic selection to isolate mutants in the DIF-1 response pathway. The disrupted gene in one such mutant, dimA(-), encodes a bZIP/bRLZ transcription factor, which is required for every DIF-1 response investigated. Furthermore, the dimA(-) mutant shows strikingly similar developmental defects to the dmtA(-) mutant, which is specifically defective in DIF-1 synthesis. However, key differences exist: (1) the dmtA(-) mutant responds to DIF-1 but does not produce DIF-1; (2) the dimA(-) mutant produces DIF-1 but does not respond to DIF-1; and (3) the dimA(-) mutant exhibits cell autonomous defects in cell type differentiation. These results suggest that dimA encodes the key transcriptional regulator required to integrate DIF-1 signaling and subsequent patterning in Dictyostelium.

Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells

To investigate how cell type proportions are regulated during Dictyostelium development, we have attempted to find out which cell type produces DIF-1, a diffusible signal molecule inducing the differentiation of prestalk-O cells. DIF-1 is a chlorinated alkyl phenone that is synthesized from a C12 polyketide precursor by chlorination and methylation, with the final step catalysed by the dmtA methyltransferase. All our evidence points to the prespore cells as the major source of DIF-1. (1) dmtA mRNA and enzyme activity are greatly enriched in prespore compared with prestalk cells. The chlorinating activity is also somewhat prespore-enriched. (2) Expression of dmtA is induced by cyclic-AMP and this induction is inhibited by DIF-1. This regulatory behaviour is characteristic of prespore products. (3) Short-term labelling experiments, using the polyketide precursor, show that purified prespore cells produce DIF-1 at more than 20 times the rate of prestalk cells. (4) Although DIF-1 has little effect on its own synthesis in short-term labelling experiments, in long-term experiments, using 36Cl– as label, it is strongly inhibitory (IC50 about 5 nM), presumably because it represses expression of dmtA; this is again consistent with DIF-1 production by prespore cells. Inhibition takes about 1 hour to become effective.

We propose that prespore cells cross-induce the differentiation of prestalk-O cells by making DIF-1, and that this is one of the regulatory loops that sets the proportion of prespore-to-prestalk cells in the aggregate.

Environmental signaling: what embryos and evolution teach us about endocrine disrupting chemicals

The term "endocrine disrupting chemicals" is commonly used to describe environmental agents that alter the endocrine system. Laboratories working in this emerging field-environmental endocrine research-have looked at chemicals that mimic or block endogenous vertebrate steroid hormones by interacting with the hormone's receptor. Environmental chemicals known to do this do so most often with receptors derived from the steroid/thyroid/retinoid gene family. They include ubiquitous and persistent organochlorines, as well as plasticizers, pharmaceuticals, and natural hormones. These chemicals function as estrogens, antiestrogens, and antiandrogens but have few, if any, structural similarities. Therefore, receptor-based or functional assays have the best chance of detecting putative biological activity of environmental chemicals. Three nuclear estrogen receptor forms-alpha, beta, and gamma-as well as multiple membrane forms and a possible mitochondrial form have been reported, suggesting a previously unknown diversity of signaling pathways available to estrogenic chemicals. Examples of environmental or ambient estrogenization occur in laboratory experiments, zoo animals, domestic animals, wildlife, and humans. Environmentally estrogenized phenotypes may differ depending upon the time of exposure-i.e., whether the exposure occurred at a developmental (organizational and irreversible) or postdevelopmental (activational and reversible) stage. The term "estrogen" must be defined in each case, since steroidal estrogens differ among themselves and from synthetic or plant-derived chemicals. An "estrogen-like function" seems to be an evolutionarily ancient signal that has been retained in a number of chemicals, some of which are vertebrate hormones. Signaling, required for symbiosis between plants and bacteria, may be viewed, therefore, as an early example of hormone cross-talk. Developmental feminization at the structural or functional level is an emerging theme in species exposed, during embryonic or fetal life, to estrogenic compounds. Human experience as well as studies in experimental animals with the potent estrogen diethylstilbestrol provide informative models. Advances in the molecular genetics of sex differentiation in vertebrates facilitate mechanistic understanding. Experiments addressing the concept of gene imprinting or induction of epigenetic memory by estrogen or other hormones suggest a link to persistent, heritable phenotypic changes seen after developmental estrogenization, independent of mutagenesis. Environmental endocrine science provides a new context in which to examine the informational content of ecosystem-wide communication networks. As common features come to light, this research may allow us to predict environmentally induced alterations in internal signaling systems of vertebrates and some invertebrates and eventually to explicate environmental contributions to human reproductive and developmental health.

Rapid patterning in 2-D cultures of Dictyostelium cells and its relationship to zonal differentiation

Rapid patterning has been observed in confined 2-D cultures of Dictyostelium discoideum Ax-2 cells as an outer dark zone and a inner light zone. The width of outer zone was usually approximately100 microm, irrespective of the size of cell masses under atmospheric conditions. The width of the outer zone, however, changed depending on external O2 concentrations and reached up to 250 microm at 100% O2. A clear regional difference in tetramethyl rhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) staining was noticed between the outer zone and the inner zone: the inner zone was more strongly stained with TMRM than the outer zone, which faced the air. Using inhibitors of oxidative phosphorylation (dinitrophenol (DNP) or NaN3) and a specific inhibitor of CN-resistant respiration (benzohydroxamic acid (BHAM)), it has been demonstrated that the outer zone is basically formed by the O2 threshold for oxidative phosphorylation, while the inner cells mainly perform cyanide-resistant respiration. When cells around the early mound stage (just before prestalk and prespore differentiation) were cultured as 2-D cell masses, ecmA-expressing cells (pstA cells), ecmB-expressing cells (pstB cells) and D19-expressing cells (prespore; psp cells), arose in a position-dependent manner in the outer zone. In the inner zone, cell motility seemed to be markedly impaired and neither prestalk nor prespore differentiation occurred. In addition, once-differentiated prespore cells were found to dedifferentiate rapidly in the inner zone. The reason for dedifferentiation as well as for failure of cells to differentiate in the inner zone is discussed with reference to O2 radicals.

The role of DIF-1 signaling in Dictyostelium development

We have constructed a mutant blocked in the biosynthesis of DIF-1, a chlorinated signal molecule proposed to induce differentiation of both major prestalk cell types formed during Dictyostelium development. Surprisingly, the mutant still forms slugs retaining one prestalk cell type, the pstA cells, and can form mature stalk cells. However, the other major prestalk cell type, the pstO cells, is missing. Normal pstO cell differentiation and their patterning in the slug are restored by development on a uniform concentration of DIF-1. We conclude that pstO and pstA cells are in fact induced by separate signals and that DIF-1 is the pstO inducer. Positional information, in the form of DIF-1 gradients, is evidently not required for pstO cell induction.

Cell-fate choice in Dictyostelium: intrinsic biases modulate sensitivity to DIF signaling

Cell fate in Dictyostelium development depends on intrinsic differences between cells, dating from their growth period, and on cell interactions occurring during development. We have sought for a mechanism linking these two influences on cell fate. First, we confirmed earlier work showing that the vegetative differences are biases, not commitments, since cells that are stalky-biased when developed with one partner are sporey with another. Then we tested the idea that these biases operate by modulating the sensitivity of cells to the signals controlling cell fate during development. Cells grown without glucose are stalky-biased when developed with cells grown with glucose. We find, using monolayer culture conditions, that they are more sensitive to each of the stalk-inducing signals, DIFs 1-3. Mixing experiments show that this bias is a cell-intrinsic property. Cells initiating development early in the cell cycle are stalky compared to those initiating development later in the cycle. Likewise, they are more sensitive to DIF-1. Assays of standard markers for prestalk and prespore cell differentiation reveal similar differences in DIF-1 sensitivity between biased cells; DIF-1 dechlorinase (an early prestalk cell marker enzyme) behaves in a consistent manner. We propose that cell-fate biases are manifest as differences in sensitivity to DIF.

Integration of signaling networks that regulate Dictyostelium differentiation

In Dictyostelium amoebae, cell-type differentiation, spatial patterning, and morphogenesis are controlled by a combination of cell-autonomous mechanisms and intercellular signaling. A chemotactic aggregation of approximately 10(5) cells leads to the formation of a multicellular organism. Cell-type differentiation and cell sorting result in a small number of defined cell types organized along an anteroposterior axis. Finally, a mature fruiting body is created by the terminal differentiation of stalk and spore cells. Analysis of the regulatory program demonstrates a role for several molecules, including GSK-3, signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) factors, and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), that control spatial patterning in metazoans. Unexpectedly, two component systems containing histidine kinases and response regulators also play essential roles in controlling Dictyostelium development. This review focuses on the role of cAMP, which functions intracellularly to mediate the activity of PKA, an essential component in aggregation, cell-type specification, and terminal differentiation. Cytoplasmic cAMP levels are controlled through both the regulated activation of adenylyl cyclases and the degradation by a phosphodiesterase containing a two-component system response regulator. Extracellular cAMP regulates G-protein-dependent and -independent pathways to control aggregation as well as the activity of GSK-3 and the transcription factors GBF and STATa during multicellular development. The integration of these pathways with others regulated by the morphogen DIF-1 to control cell fate decisions are discussed.

Regulation of cell-fate determination in Dictyostelium

A key step in the development of all multicellular organisms is the differentiation of specialized cell types. The eukaryotic microorganism Dictyostelium discoideum provides a unique experimental system for studying cell-type determination and spatial patterning in a developing multicellular organism. Unlike metazoans, which become multicellular by undergoing many rounds of cell division after fertilization of an egg, the social amoeba Dictyostelium achieves multicellularity by the aggregation of approximately 10(5) cells in response to nutrient depletion. Following aggregation, cell-type differentiation and morphogenesis result in a multicellular organism with only a few cell types that exhibit a defined patterning along the anterior-posterior axis of the organism. Analysis of the mechanisms that control these processes is facilitated by the relative simplicity of Dictyostelium development and the availability of molecular, genetic, and cell biological tools. Interestingly, analysis has shown that many molecules that play integral roles in the development of higher eukaryotes, such as PKA, STATs, and GSK-3, are also essential for cell-type differentiation and patterning in Dictyostelium. The role of these and other signaling pathways in the induction, maintenance, and patterning of cell types during Dictyostelium development is discussed.

DIF signalling and cell fate

The DIFs are a family of secreted chlorinated molecules that control cell fate during development of Dictyostelium cells in culture and probably during normal development too. They induce stalk cell differentiation and suppress spore cell formation. The biosynthetic and inactivation pathways of DIF-1 (the major bioactivity) have been worked out. DIF-1 is probably synthesised in prespore cells and inactivated in prestalk cells, by dechlorination. Thus, each cell type tends to alter DIF-1 level so as to favour differentiation of the other cell type. This relationship leads to a model for cell-type proportioning during normal development.

Signalling pathways that direct prestalk and stalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium

Prestalk cell differentiation in Dictyostelium is induced by DIF and two DIF-induced genes, ecmA and ecmB, have revealed the existence of multiple prestalk and stalk cell sub-types. These different sub-types are defined by the pattern of expression of subfragments derived from the ecmA and ecmB promoters. These markers have been utilised in three ways; for fate mapping in vivo, to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying DIF signalling and to explore the relative requirement for DIF and other signalling molecules for prestalk and stalk cell differentiation in vitro. The heterogeneity of the prestalk and stalk populations seems to be reflected in differences in the cell signalling pathways that they utilise.

Functional promiscuity of gene regulation by serpentine receptors in Dictyostelium discoideum

Serpentine receptors such as smoothened and frizzled play important roles in cell fate determination during animal development. In Dictyostelium discoideum, four serpentine cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptors (cARs) regulate expression of multiple classes of developmental genes. To understand their function, it is essential to know whether each cAR is coupled to a specific gene regulatory pathway or whether specificity results from the different developmental regulation of individual cARs. To distinguish between these possibilities, we measured gene induction in car1 car3 double mutant cell lines that express equal levels of either cAR1, cAR2, or cAR3 under a constitutive promoter. We found that all cARs efficiently mediate both aggregative gene induction by cAMP pulses and induction of postaggregative and prespore genes by persistent cAMP stimulation. Two exceptions to this functional promiscuity were observed. (i) Only cAR1 can mediate adenosine inhibition of cAMP-induced prespore gene expression, a phenomenon that was found earlier in wild-type cells. cAR1's mediation of adenosine inhibition suggests that cAR1 normally mediates prespore gene induction. (ii) Only cAR2 allows entry into the prestalk pathway. Prestalk gene expression is induced by differentiation-inducing factor (DIF) but only after cells have been prestimulated with cAMP. We found that DIF-induced prestalk gene expression is 10 times higher in constitutive cAR2 expressors than in constitutive cAR1 or cAR3 expressors (which still have endogenous cAR2), suggesting that cAR2 mediates induction of DIF competence. Since in wild-type slugs cAR2 is expressed only in anterior cells, this could explain the so far puzzling observations that prestalk cells differentiate at the anterior region but that DIF levels are actually higher at the posterior region. After the initial induction of DIF competence, cAMP becomes a repressor of prestalk gene expression. This function can again be mediated by cAR1, cAR2, and cAR3.

The biosynthesis of differentiation-inducing factor, a chlorinated signal molecule regulating Dictyostelium development

Differentiation-inducing factor (DIF)-1 is a chlorinated alkyl phenone released by developing Dictyostelium amoebae, which induces them to differentiate into stalk cells. A biosynthetic pathway for DIF-1 is proposed from labeling, inhibitor, and enzymological experiments. Cells incorporate 36Cl- into DIF-1 during development, showing that the chlorine atoms originate from chloride ions; peak incorporation is at the first finger stage. DIF-1 synthesis can be blocked by cerulenin, a polyketide synthase inhibitor, suggesting that it is made from a polyketide. This is most likely the C12 polyketide (2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-1-hexan-1-one (THPH). Feeding experiments confirm that living cells can convert THPH to DIF-1. Conversion requires both chlorination and methylation of THPH, and enzymatic activities able to do this exist in cell lysates. The chlorinating activity, assayed using 36Cl-, is stimulated by H2O2 and requires both soluble and particulate components. It is specific for THPH and does not use this compound after O-methylation. The methyltransferase is soluble, uses S-adenosyl-L-methionine as a co-substrate, has a Km for dichloro-THPH of about 1.1 microM, and strongly prefers this substrate to close analogues. Both chlorinating and methyltransferase activities increase in development in parallel with DIF-1 production, and both are greatly reduced in a mutant strain that makes little DIF-1. It is proposed that DIF-1 is made by the initial assembly of a C12 polyketide skeleton, which is then chlorinated and methylated.

Autonomous and nonautonomous regulation of axis formation by antagonistic signaling via 7-span cAMP receptors and GSK3 in Dictyostelium

Early during Dictyostelium development a fundamental cell-fate decision establishes the anteroposterior (prestalk/prespore) axis. Signaling via the 7-transmembrane cAMP receptor CAR4 is essential for creating and maintaining a normal pattern; car4-null alleles have decreased levels of prestalk-specific mRNAs but enhanced expression of prespore genes. car4- cells produce all of the signals required for prestalk differentiation but lack an extracellular factor necessary for prespore differentiation of wild-type cells. This secreted factor decreases the sensitivity of prespore cells to inhibition by the prestalk morphogen DIF-1. At the cell autonomous level, CAR4 is linked to intracellular circuits that activate prestalk but inhibit prespore differentiation. The autonomous action of CAR4 is antagonistic to the positive intracellular signals mediated by another cAMP receptor, CAR1 and/or CAR3. Additional data indicate that these CAR-mediated pathways converge at the serine/threonine protein kinase GSK3, suggesting that the anterior (prestalk)/posterior (prespore) axis of Dictyostelium is regulated by an ancient mechanism that is shared by the Wnt/Fz circuits for dorsoventral patterning during early Xenopus development and establishing Drosophila segment polarity.

A slow sustained increase in cytosolic Ca2+ levels mediates stalk gene induction by differentiation inducing factor in Dictyostelium

During Dictyostelium stalk cell differentiation, cells vacuolate, synthesize a cellulose cell wall and die. This process of programmed cell death is accompanied by expression of the prestalk gene ecmB and induced by the differentiation inducing factor DIF. Using cell lines expressing the recombinant Ca2+-sensitive photoprotein apoaequorin, we found that 100 nM DIF increases cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) levels from approximately 50 to 150 nM over a period of 8 h. The Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor 2,5-di(tert-butyl)-1,4-hydroquinone (BHQ) induced a similar increase in [Ca2+]i levels and induced expression of the prestalk gene ecmB to the same level as DIF. The [Ca2+]i increases induced by DIF and BHQ showed similar kinetics and preceded ecmB gene expression by approximately 1-2 h. The Ca2+ chelator 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)-ethane-N,N,N'N'-tetra-acetic acid (BAPTA) efficiently inhibited the BHQ-induced [Ca2+]i increase and blocked DIF-induced expression of the ecmB gene. These data indicate that the effects of DIF on stalk gene expression are mediated by a sustained increase in [Ca2-]i. Sustained [Ca2+]i elevation mediates many forms of programmed cell death in vertebrates. The Dictyostelium system may be the earliest example of how this mechanism developed during early eukaryote evolution.

Evidence for positional differentiation of prestalk cells and for a morphogenetic gradient in Dictyostelium

We present evidence that Dictyostelium slug tip cells, the pstA cells, may arise by positional differentiation, but at a site remote from that which they will eventually occupy. When first detectable, the pstA cells form a peripheral ring surrounding the other prestalk cell subtype, the pstO cells, but subsequently move above the pstO cells to form the tip. Because pstA cell differentiation requires a 10-fold higher concentration of differentiation-inducing factor, the stalk cell inducer, the initial patterning seems likely to reflect the existence of a morphogenetic gradient. The subsequent redistribution of the two cell types is explicable by their different rates of chemotaxis to cyclic AMP. These results help reconcile the two apparently opposing views of pattern formation in Dictyostelium, that there is positional differentiation and that pattern formation occurs by cell sorting.

Integration of signaling information in controlling cell-fate decisions in Dictyostelium

Collapse

Evidence for a developmentally regulated prespore-specific glutamine synthetase in the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum

The enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS) is described for the first time in Dictyostelium discoideum. The appearance of this enzyme is developmentally regulated. The level of activity is low in vegetative cells and increases more than threefold during differentiation. Furthermore this enzyme is shown to be differentially localized in prespore cells, the specific activity being approximately fourfold higher than in prestalk cells. The enzyme has a pH optimum of 7.8 and 8.2 in the gamma-glutamyltransferase and gamma-glutamylsynthetase assays, respectively, and a temperature optimum of 45 degrees C. Kinetic studies of GS revealed apparent Km values of 5.9 mM, 0.009 mM and 8.6 mM for glutamine, ADP and NH2OH, respectively, in the gamma-glutamyltransferase assay, and of 2.2 mM, 0.12 mM and 0.64 mM for glutamate, ATP and NH2OH, respectively, in the gamma-glutamylsynthetase assay.

Metabolic pathways for differentiation-inducing factor-1 and their regulation are conserved between closely related Dictyostelium species, but not between distant members of the family

There is suggestive evidence that a conserved signalling system involving differentiation inducing factor-1 (DIF-1) controls stalk cell differentiation in a variety of slime mould species. In the standard laboratory species, Dictyostelium discoideum, DIF-1 is first inactivated by dechlorination catalysed by DIF-1 dechlorinase, then by several hydroxylation events, so that eventually about 12 metabolites are produced. If DIF-1 is used as a signal molecule in other species, they too must be able to metabolize it. We report here that the essentials of DIF-1 metabolism are conserved in D. mucoroides, the closest relative of D. discoideum. Both the dechlorinase and hydroxylase enzymes were present in D. mucoroides, and living cells of both species produced a similar spectrum of metabolites from [3H]DIF-1. Furthermore, DIF-1 dechlorinase was induced by DIF-1, as in D. discoideum, and this induction was repressed by ammonia and cAMP. DIF-1 dechlorinase could not be detected in cell extracts from D. minutum or Polysphondylium violaceum. However, living cells of both species are able to metabolize DIF-1; P. violaceum seems to produce a small amount of the monodechlorinated compound, DIF-3, but all other metabolites from both species appear to be unique. Thus all investigated species can metabolize DIF-1, but the exact route of metabolism is not highly conserved.

Differentiation-inducing-factor dechlorinase, a novel cytosolic dechlorinating enzyme from Dictyostelium discoideum

Differentiation-inducing factor 1 (DIF-1) is a dichlorinated alkyl phenone (1-[(3,5-dichloro-2,6-dihydroxy-4-methoxy)phenyl]hexan-1-one) from Dictyostelium discoideum, that induces amoebae to differentiate into stalk cells. It was shown previously that DIF-1 is rapidly metabolized into a series of more polar compounds by living cells [Traynor, D. & Kay, R.R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5291-5297]. The first step in DIF-1 metabolism is the formation of DIF metabolite 1 (now known to be DIF-3) by a monodechlorination. We report here the discovery of the enzyme activity catalyzing this dechlorination. A very sensitive enzyme assay was developed, using [3H]DIF-1 and a TLC system to separate DIF-1 from the product, DIF-3. DIF-1 3(5)-dechlorinase is present in the high-speed supernatant of cell lysates, and uses glutathione, at physiological concentrations, as cofactor. Kinetic measurements indicate a Km for DIF-1 of about 70 nM. The enzyme activity is inhibited by DIF-2 (the pentan-1-one analogue of DIF-1), with a median inhibitor concentration (IC50) of 1 microM, and DIF-3 (IC50 = 5 microM), which presumably act as substrates, but other compounds structurally related to DIF-1 were much less effective. Aurothioglucose, an inhibitor of selenocysteine enzymes, inhibited DIF-1 3(5)-dechlorinase with IC50 = 100 nM. DIF-1 3(5)-dechlorinase activity is developmentally regulated. It is essentially absent from growing cells and increases at the end of aggregation to reach a first peak of activity at the first finger stage, with a further rise at culmination.