Subcellular localization and endocytosis of homomeric gamma2 subunit splice variants of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors

In the fast lane: Receptor trafficking during status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and often is refractory to standard first-line treatments. A rapid loss of synaptic inhibition and development of pharmacoresistance to benzodiazepines (BZDs) occurs early during SE, while NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists remain effective treatments after BZDs have failed. Multimodal and subunit-selective receptor trafficking within minutes to an hour of SE involves GABA-A, NMDA, and AMPA receptors and contributes to shifts in the number and subunit composition of surface receptors with differential impacts on the physiology, pharmacology, and strength of GABAergic and glutamatergic currents at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites. During the first hour of SE, synaptic GABA-A receptors containing γ2 subunits move to the cell interior while extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors with δ subunits are preserved. Conversely, NMDA receptors containing N2B subunits are increased at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, and homomeric GluA1 ("GluA2-lacking") calcium permeant AMPA receptor surface expression also is increased. Molecular mechanisms, largely driven by NMDA receptor or calcium permeant AMPA receptor activation early during circuit hyperactivity, regulate subunit-specific interactions with proteins involved with synaptic scaffolding, adaptin-AP2/clathrin-dependent endocytosis, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention, and endosomal recycling. Reviewed here is how SE-induced shifts in receptor subunit composition and surface representation increase the excitatory to inhibitory imbalance that sustains seizures and fuels excitotoxicity contributing to chronic sequela such as "spontaneous recurrent seizures" (SRS). A role for early multimodal therapy is suggested both for treatment of SE and for prevention of long-term comorbidities.

Recruitment of Plasma Membrane GABA-A Receptors by Submembranous Gephyrin/Collybistin Clusters

It has been shown that subunit composition is the main determinant of the synaptic or extrasynaptic localization of GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs). Synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_ARs are involved in phasic and tonic inhibition, respectively. It has been proposed that synaptic GABA_ARs bind to the postsynaptic gephyrin/collybistin (Geph/CB) lattice, but not the typically extrasynaptic GABA_ARs. Nevertheless, there are no studies of the direct binding of various types of GABA_ARs with the submembranous Geph/CB lattice in the absence of other synaptic proteins, some of which are known to interact with GABA_ARs. We have reconstituted GABA_ARs of various subunit compositions, together with the Geph/CB scaffold, in HEK293 cells, and have investigated the recruitment of surface GABA_ARs by submembranous Geph/CB clusters. Results show that the typically synaptic α1β3γ2 GABA_ARs were trapped by submembranous Geph/CB clusters. The α5β3γ2 GABA_ARs, which are both synaptic and extrasynaptic, were also trapped by Geph/CB clusters. Extrasynaptic α4β3δ GABA_ARs consistently showed little or no trapping by the Geph/CB clusters. However, the extrasynaptic α6β3δ, α1β3, α6β3 (and less α4β3) GABA_ARs were highly trapped by the Geph/CB clusters. AMPA and NMDA glutamate receptors were not trapped. The results suggest: (I) in the absence of other synaptic molecules, the Geph/CB lattice has the capacity to trap not only synaptic but also several typically extrasynaptic GABA_ARs; (II) the Geph/CB lattice is important but does not play a decisive role in the synaptic localization of GABA_ARs; and (III) in neurons there must be mechanisms preventing the trapping of several typically extrasynaptic GABA_ARs by the postsynaptic Geph/CB lattice.

Cell surface expression of homomeric GABAA receptors depends on single residues in subunit transmembrane domains

Cell surface expression of type A GABA receptors (GABA_ARs) is a critical determinant of the efficacy of inhibitory neurotransmission. Pentameric GABA_ARs are assembled from a large pool of subunits according to precise co-assembly rules that limit the extent of receptor structural diversity. These rules ensure that particular subunits, such as ρ1 and β3, form functional cell surface ion channels when expressed alone in heterologous systems, whereas other brain-abundant subunits, such as α and γ, are retained within intracellular compartments. Why some of the most abundant GABA_AR subunits fail to form homomeric ion channels is unknown. Normally, surface expression of α and γ subunits requires co-assembly with β subunits via interactions between their N-terminal sequences in the endoplasmic reticulum. Here, using molecular biology, imaging, and electrophysiology with GABA_AR chimeras, we have identified two critical residues in the transmembrane domains of α and γ subunits, which, when substituted for their ρ1 counterparts, permit cell surface expression as homomers. Consistent with this, substitution of the ρ1 transmembrane residues for the α subunit equivalents reduced surface expression and altered channel gating, highlighting their importance for GABA_AR trafficking and signaling. Although not ligand-gated, the formation of α and γ homomeric ion channels at the cell surface was revealed by incorporating a mutation that imparts the functional signature of spontaneous channel activity. Our study identifies two single transmembrane residues that enable homomeric GABA_AR subunit cell surface trafficking and demonstrates that α and γ subunits can form functional ion channels.

Comparison of γ-Aminobutyric Acid, Type A (GABAA), Receptor αβγ and αβδ Expression Using Flow Cytometry and Electrophysiology: EVIDENCE FOR ALTERNATIVE SUBUNIT STOICHIOMETRIES AND ARRANGEMENTS

The subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of synaptic αβγ GABAA receptors are generally accepted as 2α:2β:1γ with a β-α-γ-β-α counterclockwise configuration, respectively. Whether extrasynaptic αβδ receptors adopt the analogous β-α-δ-β-α subunit configuration remains controversial. Using flow cytometry, we evaluated expression levels of human recombinant γ2 and δ subunits when co-transfected with α1 and/or β2 subunits in HEK293T cells. Nearly identical patterns of γ2 and δ subunit expression were observed as follows: both required co-transfection with α1 and β2 subunits for maximal expression; both were incorporated into receptors primarily at the expense of β2 subunits; and both yielded similar FRET profiles when probed for subunit adjacency, suggesting similar underlying subunit arrangements. However, because of a slower rate of δ subunit degradation, 10-fold less δ subunit cDNA was required to recapitulate γ2 subunit expression patterns and to eliminate the functional signature of α1β2 receptors. Interestingly, titrating γ2 or δ subunit cDNA levels progressively altered GABA-evoked currents, revealing more than one kinetic profile for both αβγ and αβδ receptors. This raised the possibility of alternative receptor isoforms, a hypothesis confirmed using concatameric constructs for αβγ receptors. Taken together, our results suggest a limited cohort of alternative subunit arrangements in addition to canonical β-α-γ/δ-β-α receptors, including β-α-γ/δ-α-α receptors at lower levels of γ2/δ expression and β-α-γ/δ-α-γ/δ receptors at higher levels of expression. These findings provide important insight into the role of GABAA receptor subunit under- or overexpression in disease states such as genetic epilepsies.

The G-protein coupled estrogen receptor, GPER: The inside and inside-out story

GPER possesses structural and functional characteristics shared by members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, the largest class of plasma membrane receptors. This newly appreciated estrogen receptor is localized predominately within intracellular membranes in most, but not all, cell types and its surface expression is modulated by steroid hormones and during tissue injury. An intracellular staining pattern is not unique among GPCRs, which employ a diverse array of molecular mechanisms that restrict cell surface expression and effectively regulating receptor binding and activation. The finding that GPER displays an intracellular predisposition has created some confusion as the estrogen-inducible transcription factors, ERα and ERβ, also reside intracellularly, and has led to complex suggestions of receptor interaction. GPER undergoes constitutive retrograde trafficking from the plasma membrane to the endoplasmic reticulum and recent studies indicate its interaction with PDZ binding proteins that sort transmembrane receptors to synaptosomes and endosomes. Genetic targeting and selective ligand approaches as well as cell models that express GPER in the absence of ERs clearly supports GPER as a bonafide "stand alone" receptor. Here, the molecular details that regulate GPER action, its cell biological activities and its implicated roles in physiological and pathological processes are reviewed.

Ring finger protein 34 (RNF34) interacts with and promotes γ-aminobutyric acid type-A receptor degradation via ubiquitination of the γ2 subunit

We have found that the large intracellular loop of the γ2 GABAA receptor (R) subunit (γ2IL) interacts with RNF34 (an E3 ubiquitin ligase), as shown by yeast two-hybrid and in vitro pulldown assays. In brain extracts, RNF34 co-immunoprecipitates with assembled GABAARs. In co-transfected HEK293 cells, RNF34 reduces the expression of the γ2 GABAAR subunit by increasing the ratio of ubiquitinated/nonubiquitinated γ2. Mutating several lysines of the γ2IL into arginines makes the γ2 subunit resistant to RNF34-induced degradation. RNF34 also reduces the expression of the γ2 subunit when α1 and β3 subunits are co-assembled with γ2. This effect is partially reversed by leupeptin or MG132, indicating that both the lysosomal and proteasomal degradation pathways are involved. Immunofluorescence of cultured hippocampal neurons shows that RNF34 forms clusters and that a subset of these clusters is associated with GABAergic synapses. This association is also observed in the intact rat brain by electron microscopy immunocytochemistry. RNF34 is not expressed until the 2nd postnatal week of rat brain development, being highly expressed in some interneurons. Overexpression of RNF34 in hippocampal neurons decreases the density of γ2 GABAAR clusters and the number of GABAergic contacts that these neurons receive. Knocking down endogenous RNF34 with shRNA leads to increased γ2 GABAAR cluster density and GABAergic innervation. The results indicate that RNF34 regulates postsynaptic γ2-GABAAR clustering and GABAergic synaptic innervation by interacting with and ubiquitinating the γ2-GABAAR subunit promoting GABAAR degradation.

Phosphorylation of GABAA receptors influences receptor trafficking and neurosteroid actions

RATIONALE

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) are the principal mediators of inhibitory transmission in the mammalian central nervous system. GABAARs can be localized at post-synaptic inhibitory specializations or at extrasynaptic sites. While synaptic GABAARs are activated transiently following the release of GABA from presynaptic vesicles, extrasynaptic GABAARs are typically activated continuously by ambient GABA concentrations and thus mediate tonic inhibition. The tonic inhibitory currents mediated by extrasynaptic GABAARs control neuronal excitability and the strength of synaptic transmission. However, the mechanisms by which neurons control the functional properties of extrasynaptic GABAARs had not yet been explored.

OBJECTIVES

We review GABAARs, how they are assembled and trafficked, and the role phosphorylation has on receptor insertion and membrane stabilization. Finally, we review the modulation of GABAARs by neurosteroids and how GABAAR phosphorylation can influence the actions of neurosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Trafficking and stability of functional channels to the membrane surface are critical for inhibitory efficacy. Phosphorylation of residues within GABAAR subunits plays an essential role in the assembly, trafficking, and cell surface stability of GABAARs. Neurosteroids are produced in the brain and are highly efficacious allosteric modulators of GABAAR-mediated current. This allosteric modulation by neurosteroids is influenced by the phosphorylated state of the GABAAR which is subunit dependent, adding temporal and regional variability to the neurosteroid response. Possible links between neurosteroid actions, phosphorylation, and GABAAR trafficking remain to be explored, but potential novel therapeutic targets may exist for numerous neurological and psychological disorders which are linked to fluctuations in neurosteroid levels and GABAA subunit expression.

Three epilepsy-associated GABRG2 missense mutations at the γ+/β- interface disrupt GABAA receptor assembly and trafficking by similar mechanisms but to different extents

We compared the effects of three missense mutations in the GABAA receptor γ2 subunit on GABAA receptor assembly, trafficking and function in HEK293T cells cotransfected with α1, β2, and wildtype or mutant γ2 subunits. The mutations R82Q and P83S were identified in families with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), and N79S was found in a single patient with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Although all three mutations were located in an N-terminal loop that contributes to the γ+/β- subunit-subunit interface, we found that each mutation impaired GABAA receptor assembly to a different extent. The γ2(R82Q) and γ2(P83S) subunits had reduced α1β2γ2 receptor surface expression due to impaired assembly into pentamers, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention and degradation. In contrast, γ2(N79S) subunits were efficiently assembled into GABAA receptors with only minimally altered receptor trafficking, suggesting that N79S was a rare or susceptibility variant rather than an epilepsy mutation. Increased structural variability at assembly motifs was predicted by R82Q and P83S, but not N79S, substitution, suggesting that R82Q and P83S substitutions were less tolerated. Membrane proteins with missense mutations that impair folding and assembly often can be "rescued" by decreased temperatures. We coexpressed wildtype or mutant γ2 subunits with α1 and β2 subunits and found increased surface and total levels of both wildtype and mutant γ2 subunits after decreasing the incubation temperature to 30°C for 24h, suggesting that lower temperatures increased GABAA receptor stability. Thus epilepsy-associated mutations N79S, R82Q and P83S disrupted GABAA receptor assembly to different extents, an effect that could be potentially rescued by facilitating protein folding and assembly.

Increases in [3H]muscimol and [3H]flumazenil binding in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia are linked to α4 and γ2S mRNA levels respectively

Background

GABA_A receptors (GABA_AR) are composed of several subunits that determine sensitivity to drugs, synaptic localisation and function. Recent studies suggest that agonists targeting selective GABA_AR subunits may have therapeutic value against the cognitive impairments observed in schizophrenia. In this study, we determined whether GABA_AR binding deficits exist in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of people with schizophrenia and tested if changes in GABA_AR binding are related to the changes in subunit mRNAs. The GABA orthosteric and the benzodiazepine allosteric binding sites were assessed autoradiographically using [³H]Muscimol and [³H]Flumazenil, respectively, in a large cohort of individuals with schizophrenia (n = 37) and their matched controls (n = 37). We measured, using qPCR, mRNA of β (β1, β2, β3), γ (γ1, γ2, γ2S for short and γ2L for long isoform, γ3) and δ subunits and used our previous measurements of GABA_AR α subunit mRNAs in order to relate mRNAs and binding through correlation and regression analysis.

Results

Significant increases in both [³H]Muscimol (p = 0.016) and [³H]Flumazenil (p = 0.012) binding were found in the DLPFC of schizophrenia patients. Expression levels of mRNA subunits measured did not show any significant difference in schizophrenia compared to controls. Regression analysis revealed that in schizophrenia, the [³H]Muscimol binding variance was most related to α4 mRNA levels and the [³H]Flumazenil binding variance was most related to γ2S subunit mRNA levels. [³H]Muscimol and [³H]Flumazenil binding were not affected by the lifetime anti-psychotics dose (chlorpromazine equivalent).

Conclusions

We report parallel increases in orthosteric and allosteric GABA_AR binding sites in the DLPFC in schizophrenia that may be related to a “shift” in subunit composition towards α4 and γ2S respectively, which may compromise normal GABAergic modulation and function. Our results may have implications for the development of treatment strategies that target specific GABA_AR receptor subunits.

Molecular and functional interaction between protocadherin-γC5 and GABAA receptors

We have found that the γ2 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor (γ2-GABA(A)R) specifically interacts with protocadherin-γC5 (Pcdh-γC5) in the rat brain. The interaction occurs between the large intracellular loop of the γ2-GABA(A)R and the cytoplasmic domain of Pcdh-γC5. In brain extracts, Pcdh-γC5 coimmunoprecipitates with GABA(A)Rs. In cotransfected HEK293 cells, Pcdh-γC5 promotes the transfer of γ2-GABA(A)R to the cell surface. We have previously shown that, in cultured hippocampal neurons, endogenous Pcdh-γC5 forms clusters, some of which associate with GABAergic synapses. Overexpression of Pcdh-γC5 in hippocampal neurons increases the density of γ2-GABA(A)R clusters but has no significant effect on the number of GABAergic contacts that these neurons receive, indicating that Pcdh-γC5 is not synaptogenic. Deletion of the cytoplasmic domain of Pcdh-γC5 enhanced its surface expression but decreased the association with both γ2-GABA(A)R clusters and presynaptic GABAergic contacts. Cultured hippocampal neurons from the Pcdh-γ triple C-type isoform knock-out (TCKO) mouse (Pcdhg(tcko/tcko)) showed plenty of GABAergic synaptic contacts, although their density was reduced compared with sister cultures from wild-type and heterozygous mice. Knocking down Pcdh-γC5 expression with shRNA decreased γ2-GABA(A)R cluster density and GABAergic innervation. The results indicate that, although Pcdh-γC5 is not essential for GABAergic synapse formation or GABA(A)R clustering, (1) Pcdh-γC5 regulates the surface expression of GABA(A)Rs via cis-cytoplasmic interaction with γ2-GABA(A)R, and (2) Pcdh-γC5 plays a role in the stabilization and maintenance of some GABAergic synapses.

The intronic GABRG2 mutation, IVS6+2T->G, associated with childhood absence epilepsy altered subunit mRNA intron splicing, activated nonsense-mediated decay, and produced a stable truncated γ2 subunit

The intronic GABRG2 mutation, IVS6+2T→G, was identified in an Australian family with childhood absence epilepsy and febrile seizures (Kananura et al., 2002). The GABRG2 intron 6 splice donor site was found to be mutated from GT to GG. We generated wild-type and mutant γ2 subunit bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) driven by a CMV promoter and expressed them in HEK293T cells and expressed wild-type and mutant γ2 subunit BACs containing the endogenous hGABRG2 promoter in transgenic mice. Wild-type and mutant GABRG2 mRNA splicing patterns were determined in both BAC-transfected HEK293T cells and transgenic mouse brain, and in both, the mutation abolished intron 6 splicing at the donor site, activated a cryptic splice site, generated partial intron 6 retention, and produced a frameshift in exon 7 that created a premature translation termination codon (PTC). The resultant mutant mRNA was either degraded partially by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay or translated to a stable, truncated subunit (the γ2-PTC subunit) containing the first six GABRG2 exons and a novel frameshifted 29 aa C-terminal tail. The γ2-PTC subunit was homologous to the mollusk AChBP (acetylcholine binding protein) but was not secreted from cells. It was retained in the ER and not expressed on the surface membrane, but it did oligomerize with α1 and β2 subunits. These results suggested that the GABRG2 mutation, IVS6+2T→G, reduced surface αβγ2 receptor levels, thus reducing GABAergic inhibition, by reducing GABRG2 transcript level and producing a stable, nonfunctional truncated subunit that had a dominant-negative effect on αβγ2 receptor assembly.

Retrograde transport of the transmembrane estrogen receptor, G-protein-coupled-receptor-30 (GPR30/GPER) from the plasma membrane towards the nucleus

G-protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30/GPER) belongs to the seven transmembrane receptor (7TMR) superfamily, the most common class of surface receptor with approximately 800 known members. GPER promotes estrogen binding and rapid signaling via membrane-associated enzymes resulting in increased cAMP and release of heparan bound epidermal growth factor (proHB-EGF) from breast cancer cells. However, GPER is predominately localized intracellularly in breast cancer cells with minor amounts of receptor on the cell surface, an observation that has caused some controversy regarding its potential role as a plasma membrane estrogen receptor. Using the widely employed approach of tracking recombinant 7TMRs by surface labeling live cells, we have begun to characterize and compare the endocytic fate of GPER to other similarly labeled 7TMRs. Upon ectopic expression in human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells, functional GPER is generated as these cells acquire the capacity to stimulate cAMP and activate cyclic AMP responsive binding protein in response to estradiol-17 beta stimulation. GPER is detectable on the cell surface by immunofluorescent analysis using HA-specific antibodies, albeit the bulk of the receptor is located intracellularly. Like β1AR (beta 1 adrenergic receptor) and CXCR4 (C-X-C chemokine receptor 4), GPER exits the plasma membrane via clathrin-coated pits and enters early endosomes. Interestingly, GPER has a destination that is uncommon among 7TMRs, as it accumulates in a perinuclear compartment. Like many 7TMRs (approximately one-third), GPER trafficking from the plasma membrane is constitutive (occurs in the absence of agonist). However, its route of intracellular trafficking is highly unusual, as 7TMRs typically recycle to the plasma membrane (e.g. β1AR) or are degraded in lysosomes (e.g. CXCR4). The accumulation of GPER in the perinuclear space and its possible significance for attenuating estrogen action via this newly recognized membrane estrogen receptor is discussed herein.

Down-modulation of the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, from the cell surface occurs via a trans-Golgi-proteasome pathway

GPER is a G(s)-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor that has been linked to specific estrogen binding and signaling activities that are manifested by plasma membrane-associated enzymes. However, in many cell types, GPER is predominately localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and only minor amounts of receptor are detectable at the cell surface, an observation that has caused controversy regarding its role as a plasma membrane estrogen receptor. Here, we show that GPER constitutively buds intracellularly into EEA-1+ endosomes from clathrin-coated pits. Nonvisual arrestins-2/-3 do not co-localize with GPER, and expression of arrestin-2 dominant-negative mutants lacking clathrin- or β-adaptin interaction sites fails to block GPER internalization suggesting that arrestins are not involved in GPER endocytosis. Like β1AR, which recycles to the plasma membrane, GPER co-traffics with transferrin+, Rab11+ recycling endosomes. However, endocytosed GPER does not recycle to the cell surface, but instead returns to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and does not re-enter the ER. GPER is ubiquitinated at the cell surface, exhibits a short half-life (t½;) <1 h), and is protected from degradation by the proteasome inhibitor, MG132. Disruption of the TGN by brefeldin A induces the accumulation of endocytosed GPER in Rab11+ perinuclear endosomes and prevents GPER degradation. Our results provide an explanation as to why GPER is not readily detected on the cell surface in some cell types and further suggest that TGN serves as the checkpoint for degradation of endocytosed GPER.

Wnt-5a modulates recycling of functional GABAA receptors on hippocampal neurons

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)-Rs) play a significant role in mediating fast synaptic inhibition and it is the main inhibitory receptor in the CNS. The role of Wnt signaling in coordinating synapse structure and function in the mature CNS is poorly understood. In previous studies we found that Wnt ligands can modulate excitatory synapses through remodeling both presynaptic and postsynaptic regions. In this current study we provide evidence for the effect of Wnt-5a on postsynaptic GABA(A)-Rs. We observed that Wnt-5a induces surface expression and maintenance of this receptor in the neuronal membrane. The evoked IPSC recordings in rat hippocampal slice indicate that Wnt-5a can regulates postsynaptically the hippocampal inhibitory synapses. We found also that Wnt-5a: (a) induces the insertion and clustering of GABA(A)-Rs in the membrane; (b) increases the amplitude of GABA-currents due exclusively to postsynaptic mechanisms; (c) does not affect the endocytic process, but increases the receptor recycling. Finally, all these effects on the GABA(A)-Rs are mediated by the activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). Therefore, we postulate that Wnt-5a, by activation of CaMKII, induces the recycling of functional GABA(A)-Rs on the mature hippocampal neurons.

The short splice variant of the gamma 2 subunit acts as an external modulator of GABA(A) receptor function

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) regulate the majority of fast inhibition in the mammalian brain and are the target for multiple drug types, including sleep aids, anti-anxiety medication, anesthetics, alcohol, and neurosteroids. A variety of subunits, including the highly distributed gamma2, allow for pharmacologic and kinetic differences in particular brain regions. The two common splice variants gamma2S (short) and gamma2L (long) show different patterns of regional distribution both in adult brain and during the course of development, but show few notable differences when incorporated into pentameric receptors. However, results presented here show that the gamma2S variant can strongly affect both GABA(A)R pharmacology and kinetics by acting as an external modulator of fully formed receptors. Mutation of one serine residue can confer gamma2S-like properties to gamma2L subunits, and addition of a modified gamma2 N-terminal polypeptide to the cell surface recapitulates the pharmacological effect. Thus, rather than incorporation of a separate accessory protein as with voltage-gated channels, this is an example of an ion channel using a common subunit for dual purposes. The modified receptor properties conferred by accessory gamma2S have implications for understanding GABA(A)R pharmacology, receptor kinetics, stoichiometry, GABAergic signaling in the brain during development, and altered function in disease states such as epilepsy.

A conserved Cys-loop receptor aspartate residue in the M3-M4 cytoplasmic loop is required for GABAA receptor assembly

Members of the Cys-loop superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, which mediate fast synaptic transmission in the nervous system, are assembled as heteropentamers from a large repertoire of neuronal subunits. Although several motifs in subunit N-terminal domains are known to be important for subunit assembly, increasing evidence points toward a role for C-terminal domains. Using a combination of flow cytometry, patch clamp recording, endoglycosidase H digestion, brefeldin A treatment, and analytic centrifugation, we identified a highly conserved aspartate residue at the boundary of the M3-M4 loop and the M4 domain that was required for binary and ternary gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor surface expression. Mutation of this residue caused mutant and partnering subunits to be retained in the endoplasmic reticulum, reflecting impaired forward trafficking. Interestingly although mutant and partnering wild type subunits could be coimmunoprecipitated, analytic centrifugation studies demonstrated decreased formation of pentameric receptors, suggesting that this residue played an important role in later steps of subunit oligomerization. We thus conclude that C-terminal motifs are also important determinants of Cys-loop receptor assembly.

Trafficking and potential assembly patterns of epsilon-containing GABAA receptors

Incorporation of the epsilon subunit into the GABAA receptor has been suggested to confer unusual, but variable, biophysical and pharmacological characteristics to both recombinant and native receptors. Due to their structural similarity with the gamma subunits, epsilon subunits have been assumed to substitute at the single position of the gamma subunit in assembled receptors. However, prior work suggests that functional variability in epsilon-containing receptors may reflect alternative sites of incorporation and of not just one, but possibly multiple epsilon subunits in the pentameric receptor complex. Here we present data indicating that increased expression of epsilon, in conjunction with alpha2 and beta3 subunits, results in expression of GABAA receptors with correspondingly altered rectification, deactivation and levels of spontaneous openings, but not increased total current density. We also provide data that the epsilon subunit, like the beta3 subunit, can self-export and data from chimeric receptors suggesting that similarities between the assembly domains of the beta3 and the epsilon subunits may allow the epsilon subunit to replace the beta, as well as the gamma, subunit. The substitution of an epsilon for a beta, as well as the gamma subunit and formation of receptors with alternative patterns of assembly with respect to epsilon incorporation may underlie the observed variability in both biophysical and pharmacological properties noted not only in recombinant, but also in native receptors.

GABAA receptors: properties and trafficking

Fast synaptic inhibition in the brain and spinal cord is mediated largely by ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. GABAA receptors play a key role in controlling neuronal activity; thus modulating their function will have important consequences for neuronal excitation. GABAA receptors are important therapeutic targets for a range of sedative, anxiolytic, and hypnotic agents and are involved in a number of CNS diseases, including sleep disturbances, anxiety, premenstrual syndrome, alcoholism, muscle spasms, Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorders, and epilepsy. This review focuses on the functional and pharmacological properties of GABAA receptors and trafficking as an essential mechanism underlying the dynamic regulation of synaptic strength.

Running to stand still: ionotropic receptor dynamics at central and peripheral synapses

For synapses to form and function, neurotransmitter receptors must be recruited to a location on the postsynaptic cell in direct apposition to presynaptic neurotransmitter release. However, once receptors are inserted into the postsynaptic membrane, they are not fixed in place but are continually exchanged between synaptic and extrasynaptic regions, and they cycle between the surface and intracellular compartments. This article highlights and compares the current knowledge about the dynamics of acetylcholine receptors at the vertebrate peripheral neuromuscular junction and AMPA, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors in central synapses.

A gamma 2(R43Q) mutation, linked to epilepsy in humans, alters GABAA receptor assembly and modifies subunit composition on the cell surface

Genetic defects leading to epilepsy have been identified in gamma2 GABA(A) receptor subunit. A gamma2(R43Q) substitution is linked to childhood absence epilepsy and febrile seizure, and a gamma2(K289M) mutation is associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus. To understand the effect of these mutations, surface targeting of GABA(A) receptors was analyzed by subunit-specific immunofluorescent labeling of living cells. We first transfected hippocampal neurons in culture with recombinant gamma2 constructs and showed that the gamma 2(R43Q) mutation prevented surface expression of the subunit, unlike gamma2(K289M) substitution. Several gamma2-subunit constructs, bearing point mutations within the Arg-43 domain, were expressed in COS-7 cells with alpha3- and beta3-subunits. R43Q and R43A substitutions dramatically reduced surface expression of the gamma2-subunit, whereas R43K, P44A, and D39A substitutions had a lesser, but still significant, impact and K289M substitution had no effect. Whereas the mutant gamma2(R43Q) was retained within intracellular compartments, alphabeta complexes were still targeted at the cell membrane. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that gamma2(R43Q) was able to associate with alpha3- or beta3-subunits, although the stoichiometry of the complex with alpha3 was altered. Our data show that gamma2(R43Q) is not a dominant negative and that the mutation leads to a modification of GABA(A) receptor subunit composition on the cell surface that impairs the synaptic targeting in neurons. This study reveals an involvement of the gamma2-Arg-43 domain in the control of receptor assembly that may be relevant to the effect of the heterozygous gamma2(R43Q) mutation leading to childhood absence epilepsy and febrile seizure.

Molecular organization and assembly of the central inhibitory postsynapse

gamma-Amino butyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors are the major sites of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain. GABAA receptors play an important role in regulating neuronal excitability and in addition have been implicated in numerous neurological disorders. In order to understand synaptic inhibition it is important to comprehend the cellular mechanisms, that neurons utilize to regulate the accumulation and regulation of GABAA receptors at postsynaptic inhibitory specializations. Over the past decade a number of GABAA receptor interacting proteins have been identified allowing us to further understand the trafficking, targeting and clustering of these receptors as well as the regulation of receptor stability. In the following review we examine the proteins identified as GABAA receptor binding partners and other components of the inhibitory postsynaptic scaffold, and how they contribute to the construction of inhibitory synapses and the dynamic modulation of synaptic inhibition.

The role of GABAA receptor biogenesis, structure and function in epilepsy

Maintaining the correct balance in neuronal activation is of paramount importance to normal brain function. Imbalances due to changes in excitation or inhibition can lead to a variety of disorders ranging from the clinically extreme (e.g. epilepsy) to the more subtle (e.g. anxiety). In the brain, the most common inhibitory synapses are regulated by GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid type A) receptors, a role commensurate with their importance as therapeutic targets. Remarkably, we still know relatively little about GABAA receptor biogenesis. Receptors are constructed as pentameric ion channels, with α and β subunits being the minimal requirement, and the incorporation of a γ subunit being necessary for benzodiazepine modulation and synaptic targeting. Insights have been provided by the discovery of several specific assembly signals within different GABAA receptor subunits. Moreover, a number of recent studies on GABAA receptor mutations associated with epilepsy have further enhanced our understanding of GABAA receptor biogenesis, structure and function.

Propofol block of I(h) contributes to the suppression of neuronal excitability and rhythmic burst firing in thalamocortical neurons

Although the depressant effects of the general anesthetic propofol on thalamocortical relay neurons clearly involve gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors, other mechanisms may be involved. The hyperpolarization-activated cation current (I(h)) regulates excitability and rhythmic firing in thalamocortical relay neurons in the ventrobasal (VB) complex of the thalamus. Here we investigated the effects of propofol on I(h)-related function in vitro and in vivo. In whole-cell current-clamp recordings from VB neurons in mouse (P23-35) brain slices, propofol markedly reduced the voltage sag and low-threshold rebound excitation that are characteristic of the activation of I(h). In whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings, propofol suppressed the I(h) conductance and slowed the kinetics of activation. The block of I(h) by propofol was associated with decreased regularity and frequency of delta-oscillations in VB neurons. The principal source of the I(h) current in these neurons is the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) type 2 channel. In human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells expressing recombinant mouse HCN2 channels, propofol decreased I(h) and slowed the rate of channel activation. We also investigated whether propofol might have persistent effects on thalamic excitability in the mouse. Three hours following an injection of propofol sufficient to produce loss-of-righting reflex in mice (P35), I(h) was decreased, and this was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in HCN2 and HCN4 immunoreactivity in thalamocortical neurons in vivo. These results suggest that suppression of I(h) may contribute to the inhibition of thalamocortical activity during propofol anesthesia. Longer-term effects represent a novel form of propofol-mediated regulation of I(h).

Why does fever trigger febrile seizures? GABAA receptor gamma2 subunit mutations associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsies have temperature-dependent trafficking deficiencies

With a worldwide incidence as high as 6.7% of children, febrile seizures are one of the most common reasons for seeking pediatric care, but the mechanisms underlying generation of febrile seizures are poorly understood. Febrile seizures have been suspected to have a genetic basis, and recently, mutations in GABAA receptor and sodium channel genes have been identified that are associated with febrile seizures and generalized seizures with febrile seizures plus pedigrees. Pentameric GABAA receptors mediate the majority of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain and are composed of combinations of alpha(1-6), beta(1-3), and gamma(1-3) subunits. In alphabetagamma2 GABAA receptors, the gamma2 subunit is critical for receptor trafficking, clustering, and synaptic maintenance, and mutations in the gamma2 subunit have been monogenically associated with autosomal dominant transmission of febrile seizures. Here, we report that whereas trafficking of wild-type alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors was slightly temperature dependent, trafficking of mutant alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors containing gamma2 subunit mutations [gamma2(R43Q), gamma2(K289M), and gamma2(Q351X)] associated with febrile seizures was highly temperature dependent. In contrast, trafficking of mutant alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors containing an alpha1 subunit mutation [alpha1(A322D)] not associated with febrile seizures was not highly temperature dependent. Brief increases in temperature from 37 to 40 degrees C rapidly (<10 min) impaired trafficking and/or accelerated endocytosis of heterozygous mutant alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors containing gamma2 subunit mutations associated with febrile seizures but not of wild-type alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors or heterozygous mutant alpha1(A322D)beta2gamma2 receptors, suggesting that febrile seizures may be produced by a temperature-induced dynamic reduction of susceptible mutant surface GABAA receptors in response to fever.

Antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs colocalize with 5-HT3 receptors in raft-like domains

Despite different chemical structure and pharmacodynamic signaling pathways, a variety of antidepressants and antipsychotics inhibit ion fluxes through 5-HT3 receptors in a noncompetitive manner with the exception of the known competitive antagonists mirtazapine and clozapine. To further investigate the mechanisms underlying the noncompetitive inhibition of the serotonin-evoked cation current, we quantified the concentrations of different types of antidepressants and antipsychotics in fractions of sucrose flotation gradients isolated from HEK293 (human embryonic kidney 293) cells stably transfected with the 5-HT3A receptor and of N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells in relation to the localization of the 5-HT3 receptor protein within the cell membrane. Western blots revealed a localization of the 5-HT3 receptor protein exclusively in the low buoyant density (LBD) fractions compatible with a localization within raft-like domains. Also, the antidepressants desipramine, fluoxetine, and reboxetine and the antipsychotics fluphenazine, haloperidol, and clozapine were markedly enriched in LBD fractions, whereas no accumulation occurs for mirtazapine, carbamazepine, moclobemide, and risperidone. The concentrations of psychopharmacological drugs within LBD fractions was strongly associated with their inhibitory potency against serotonin-induced cation currents. The noncompetitive antagonism of antidepressants at the 5-HT3 receptor was not conferred by an enhancement of receptor internalization as shown by immunofluorescence studies, assessment of receptor density in clathrin-coated vesicles, and electrophysiological recordings after coexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of dynamin I, which inhibits receptor internalization. In conclusion, enrichment of antidepressants and antipsychotics in raft-like domains within the cell membrane appears to be crucial for their antagonistic effects at ligand-gated ion channels such as 5-HT3 receptors.

Clustered and non-clustered GABAA receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons

In cultured hippocampal neurons, gamma2 subunit-containing GABA(A) Rs form large postsynaptic clusters at GABAergic synapses and small clusters outside GABAergic synapses. We now show that a pool of non-clustered gamma2 subunit-containing GABA(A) Rs are also present at the cell surface. We also demonstrate that myc- or EGFP-tagged gamma2, alpha2, beta3 or alpha1 subunits expressed in these neurons assemble with endogenous subunits, forming GABA(A) Rs that target large postsynaptic clusters, small clusters outside GABAergic synapses or a pool of non-clustered surface GABA(A) Rs. In contrast, myc- or EGFP-tagged delta subunits only form non-clustered GABA(A) Rs, which can be induced to form clusters by antibody capping. A myc-tagged chimeric gamma2 subunit possessing the large intracellular loop (IL) of the delta-subunit IL (myc gamma2S/delta-IL) assembled into GABA(A) Rs, but it did not form clusters, therefore behaving like the delta subunit. Thus, the large intracellular loops of gamma2 and delta play an important role in determining the synaptic clustering/non-clustering capacity of the GABA(A) Rs.

Distinct gamma2 subunit domains mediate clustering and synaptic function of postsynaptic GABAA receptors and gephyrin

Modulation of the concentration of postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors contributes to functional plasticity of inhibitory synapses. The gamma2 subunit of GABA(A) receptor is specifically required for clustering of these receptors, for recruitment of the submembrane scaffold protein gephyrin to postsynaptic sites, and for postsynaptic function of GABAergic inhibitory synapses. To elucidate this mechanism, we here have mapped the gamma2 subunit domains required for restoration of postsynaptic clustering and function of GABA(A) receptors in gamma2 subunit mutant neurons. Transfection of gamma2-/- neurons with the gamma2 subunit but not the alpha2 subunit rescues postsynaptic clustering of GABA(A) receptors, results in recruitment of gephyrin to postsynaptic sites, and restores the amplitude and frequency of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents to wild-type levels. Analogous analyses of chimeric gamma2/alpha2 subunit constructs indicate, unexpectedly, that the fourth transmembrane domain of the gamma2 subunit is required and sufficient for postsynaptic clustering of GABA(A) receptors, whereas cytoplasmic gamma2 subunit domains are dispensable. In contrast, both the major cytoplasmic loop and the fourth transmembrane domain of the gamma2 subunit contribute to efficient recruitment of gephyrin to postsynaptic receptor clusters and are essential for restoration of miniature IPSCs. Our study points to a novel mechanism involved in targeting of GABA(A) receptors and gephyrin to inhibitory synapses.

Dynamic mobility of functional GABAA receptors at inhibitory synapses

Importing functional GABAA receptors into synapses is fundamental for establishing and maintaining inhibitory transmission and for controlling neuronal excitability. By introducing a binding site for an irreversible inhibitor into the GABAA receptor alpha1 subunit channel lining region that can be accessed only when the receptor is activated, we have determined the dynamics of receptor mobility between synaptic and extrasynaptic locations in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. We demonstrate that the cell surface GABAA receptor population shows no fast recovery after irreversible inhibition. In contrast, after selective inhibition, the synaptic receptor population rapidly recovers by the import of new functional entities within minutes. The trafficking pathways that promote rapid importation of synaptic receptors do not involve insertion from intracellular pools, but reflect receptor diffusion within the plane of the membrane. This process offers the synapse a rapid mechanism to replenish functional GABAA receptors at inhibitory synapses and a means to control synaptic efficacy.

GABAergic signaling in the developing cerebellum

In the adult central nervous system (CNS), GABA is a predominant inhibitory neurotransmitter that regulates glutamatergic activity. Recent studies have revealed that GABA serves as an excitatory transmitter in the immature CNS and acts as a trophic factor for brain development. Furthermore, synaptic transmission by GABA is also involved in the expression of higher brain functions, such as memory, learning and anxiety. These results indicate that GABA plays various roles in the expression of brain functions and GABAergic roles change developmentally in accordance with alterations in GABAergic transmission and signaling. We have investigated morphologically the developmental changes in the GABAergic transmission system and the key factors important for the formation of GABAergic synapses and networks using the mouse cerebellum, which provides an ideal system for the investigation of brain development. Here, we focus on GABA and GABA(A) receptors in the developing cerebellum and address the processes of how GABA exerts its effect on developing neurons and the mechanisms underlying the formation of functional GABAergic synapses.

Internalized GABA-receptor subunits are transferred to an intracellular pool associated with the postsynaptic density

Endocytosis represents an important mechanism regulating cell-surface expression of neurotransmitter receptors, including GABAA receptors, in neurons. Little is known, however, about trafficking of internalized receptors. Here, we used antibody tagging in living rat hippocampal neurons in culture to monitor GABAA receptor internalization. We show that cell-surface receptors have a homogeneous distribution reflecting their mobility in the membrane. Unexpectedly, internalized GABAA receptors were detected mainly in a subsynaptic pool associated with gephyrin at postsynaptic sites, whereas AMPA-type glutamate receptors were accumulated in the soma. This process was time-dependent and could be prevented by blocking clathrin-coated vesicle endocytosis. In control experiments, the existence of an intracellular pool of GABAA receptors associated with gephyrin was confirmed independently of internalization of surface receptors, and constitutive endocytosis, unrelated to antibody-tagging, could be demonstrated for both AMPA and GABAA receptors using a biotinylation assay. These results suggest that cycling of GABAA receptors between the cell surface and the subsynaptic pool provides a mechanism for the short-term regulation of GABAergic neurotransmission. Furthermore, the close association of gephyrin with internalized GABAA receptors suggests a role in intracellular receptor trafficking.

The gamma2 subunit of GABA(A) receptors is a substrate for palmitoylation by GODZ

The neurotransmitter GABA activates heteropentameric GABA(A) receptors, which are composed mostly of alpha, beta, and gamma2 subunits. Regulated membrane trafficking and subcellular targeting of GABA(A) receptors is important for determining the efficacy of GABAergic inhibitory function. Of special interest is the gamma2 subunit, which is mostly dispensable for assembly and membrane insertion of functional receptors but essential for accumulation of GABA(A) receptors at synapses. In a search for novel receptor trafficking proteins, we have used the SOS-recruitment system and isolated a Golgi-specific DHHC zinc finger protein (GODZ) as a novel gamma2 subunit-interacting protein. GODZ is a member of the superfamily of DHHC cysteine-rich domain (DHHC-CRD) polytopic membrane proteins shown recently in yeast to represent palmitoyltransferases. GODZ mRNA is found in many tissues; however, in brain the protein is detected in neurons only and highly concentrated and asymmetrically distributed in the Golgi complex. GODZ interacts with a cysteine-rich 14-amino acid domain conserved specifically in the large cytoplasmic loop of gamma1-3 subunits but not in other GABA(A) receptor subunits. Coexpression of GODZ and GABA(A) receptors in heterologous cells results in palmitoylation of the gamma2 subunit in a cytoplasmic loop domain-dependent manner. Neuronal GABA(A) receptors are similarly palmitoylated. Thus, GODZ-mediated palmitoylation represents a novel posttranslational modification that is selective for gamma subunit-containing GABA(A) receptor subtypes, a mechanism that is likely to be important for regulated trafficking of these receptors in the secretory pathway.

The brefeldin A-inhibited GDP/GTP exchange factor 2, a protein involved in vesicular trafficking, interacts with the β subunits of the GABAA receptors

We have found that the brefeldin A-inhibited GDP/GTP exchange factor 2 (BIG2) interacts with the beta subunits of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A receptor (GABA(A)R). BIG2 is a Sec7 domain-containing guanine nucleotide exchange factor known to be involved in vesicular and protein trafficking. The interaction between the 110 amino acid C-terminal fragment of BIG2 and the large intracellular loop of the GABA(A)R beta subunits was revealed with a yeast two-hybrid assay. The native BIG2 and GABA(A)Rs interact in the brain since both coprecipitated from detergent extracts with either anti-GABA(A)R or anti-BIG2 antibodies. In transfected human embryonic kidney cell line 293 cells, BIG2 promotes the exit of GABA(A)Rs from endoplasmic reticulum. Double label immunofluorescence of cultured hippocampal neurons and electron microscopy immunocytochemistry of rat brain tissue show that BIG2 concentrates in the trans-Golgi network. BIG2 is also present in vesicle-like structures in the dendritic cytoplasm, sometimes colocalizing with GABA(A)Rs. BIG2 is present in both inhibitory GABAergic synapses that contain GABA(A)Rs and in asymmetric excitatory synapses. The results are consistent with the hypotheses that the interaction of BIG2 with the GABA(A)R beta subunits plays a role in the exocytosis and trafficking of assembled GABA(A)R to the cell surface.

Hetero-oligomerization between GABAA and GABAB Receptors Regulates GABAB Receptor Trafficking

The neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediates inhibitory signaling in the brain via stimulation of both GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)R), which are chloride-permeant ion channels, and GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)R), which signal through coupling to G proteins. Here we report physical interactions between these two different classes of GABA receptor. Association of the GABA(B) receptor 1 (GABA(B)R1) with the GABA(A) receptor gamma2S subunit robustly promotes cell surface expression of GABA(B)R1 in the absence of GABA(B)R2, a closely related GABA(B) receptor that is usually required for efficient trafficking of GABA(B)R1 to the cell surface. The GABA(B)R1/gamma2S complex is not detectably functional when expressed alone, as assessed in both ERK activation assays and physiological analyses in oocytes. However, the gamma2S subunit associates not only with GABA(B)R1 alone but also with the functional GABA(B)R1/GABA(B)R2 heterodimer to markedly enhance GABA(B) receptor internalization in response to agonist stimulation. These findings reveal that the GABA(B)R1/gamma2S interaction results in the regulation of multiple aspects of GABA(B) receptor trafficking, allowing for cross-talk between these two distinct classes of GABA receptor.

Expression of functional receptors by the human gamma-aminobutyric acid A gamma 2 subunit

gamma-Aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptors are heteromeric membrane proteins formed mainly by various combinations of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits; and it is commonly thought that the gamma 2 subunit alone does not form functional receptors. In contrast, we found that cDNA encoding the gamma 2L subunit of the human GABA(A) receptor, injected alone into Xenopus oocytes, expressed functional GABA receptors whose properties were investigated by using the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique. GABA elicited desensitizing membrane currents that recovered after a few minutes' wash. Repetitive applications of GABA induced a "run-up" of GABA currents that nearly doubled the amplitude of the first response. The GABA currents inverted direction at about -30 mV, indicating that they are carried mainly by Cl(-) ions. The homomeric gamma 2L receptors were also activated by beta-alanine > taurine > glycine, and, like some types of heteromeric GABA(A) receptors, the gamma 2L receptors were blocked by bicuculline and were potentiated by pentobarbital and flunitrazepam. These results indicate that the human gamma 2L subunit is capable of forming fully functional GABA receptors by itself in Xenopus oocytes and suggest that the roles proposed for the various subunits that make up the heteromeric GABA(A) receptors in situ require further clarification.

Intracellular localization and constitutive endocytosis of CXCR4 in human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells

CXCR4, the stromal cell-derived factor-1 receptor, plays an important role in the migration of hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells. The surface and cytoplasmic expression of CXCR4 on human hematopoietic CD34(+) cells was investigated. We show that its surface expression is low, whereas a large part of CXCR4 protein is sequestered intracellularly. Using confocal microscopy, we demonstrated that CXCR4 is colocalized with EEA-1, Rab5, Rab4, and Rab11, which are localized in early and recycling endosomes. No significant colocalization of CXCR4 with lysosomal markers CD63 and Lamp-1 was detected. Using antibody feeding experiments, we report a role for CXCR4 constitutive endocytosis in subcellular localization in stably transduced UT7-CXCR4-GFP and CD34(+) cells. Agonist-independent endocytosis of CXCR4 occurs through clathrin-coated vesicles. These data implicate a constitutive endocytosis in the regulation of CXCR4 membrane expression and suggest that constitutive endocytosis may be involved in the regulation of trafficking the human hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells to and in the bone marrow microenvironment.

Constitutive GABAA receptor endocytosis is dynamin-mediated and dependent on a dileucine AP2 adaptin-binding motif within the beta 2 subunit of the receptor

Receptor endocytosis is an important mechanism for regulating the synaptic efficacy of neurotransmitters. There is strong evidence that GABA(A) receptor endocytosis is clathrin-dependent; however, this process is not well understood. Here we demonstrate that in HEK 293 cells, endocytosis of GABA(A) receptors composed of either alpha1beta2gamma2Lor alpha1beta2 subunits is blocked by the dominant negative dynamin construct K44A. Furthermore, we identify a dileucine AP2 adaptin-binding motif within the receptor beta2 subunit that is critical for endocytosis. Internalization of GABAA receptors lacking this motif is dramatically inhibited, and the receptors appear to accumulate on the cell surface. Patch clamp analysis of receptors lacking the dileucine motif show that there is an increase in the peak amplitude of GABA-gated chloride currents compared with wild-type receptors. Additionally, GABA-gated chloride currents in HEK 293 cells expressing wild-type receptors are increased by introduction of a peptide corresponding to the dileucine motif region of the receptor beta2 subunit but not by a control peptide containing alanine substitutions for the dileucine motif. In mouse brain cerebral cortical neurons, the dileucine motif peptide increases GABA-gated chloride currents of native GABA(A) receptors. This is the first report to our knowledge that an AP2 adaptin dileucine recognition motif is critical for the endocytosis of ligand-gated ion channels belonging to this superfamily.

Formation and plasticity of GABAergic synapses: physiological mechanisms and pathophysiological implications

gamma-Aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors mediate most of the fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the CNS. They represent a major site of action for clinically relevant drugs, such as benzodiazepines and ethanol, and endogenous modulators, including neuroactive steroids. Alterations in GABA(A) receptor expression and function are thought to contribute to prevalent neurological and psychiatric diseases. Molecular cloning and immunochemical characterization of GABA(A) receptor subunits revealed a multiplicity of receptor subtypes with specific functional and pharmacological properties. A major tenet of these studies is that GABA(A) receptor heterogeneity represents a key factor for fine-tuning of inhibitory transmission under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. The aim of this review is to highlight recent findings on the regulation of GABA(A) receptor expression and function, focusing on the mechanisms of sorting, targeting, and synaptic clustering of GABA(A) receptor subtypes and their associated proteins, on trafficking of cell-surface receptors as a means of regulating synaptic (and extrasynaptic) transmission on a short-time basis, on the role of endogenous neurosteroids for GABA(A) receptor plasticity, and on alterations of GABA(A) receptor expression and localization in major neurological disorders. Altogether, the findings presented in this review underscore the necessity of considering GABA(A) receptor-mediated neurotransmission as a dynamic and highly flexible process controlled by multiple mechanisms operating at the molecular, cellular, and systemic level. Furthermore, the selected topics highlight the relevance of concepts derived from experimental studies for understanding GABA(A) receptor alterations in disease states and for designing improved therapeutic strategies based on subtype-selective drugs.

Mechanisms of GABAA receptor assembly and trafficking: implications for the modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission

Fast synaptic inhibition in the brain is largely mediated by ionotropic GABA receptors, which can be subdivided into GABAA and GABAC receptors based on pharmacological and molecular criteria. GABAA receptors are important therapeutic targets for a range of sedative, anxiolytic, and hypnotic agents and are implicated in several diseases including epilepsy, anxiety, depression, and substance abuse. In addition, modulating the efficacy of GABAergic neurotransmission may play a key role in neuronal plasticity. Recent studies have begun to reveal that the accumulation of ionotropic GABAA receptors at synapses is a highly regulated process that is facilitated by receptor-associated proteins and other cell-signaling molecules. This review focuses on recent experimental evidence detailing the mechanisms that control the assembly and transport of functional ionotropic GABAA receptors to cell surface sites, in addition to their stability at synaptic sites. These regulatory processes will be discussed within the context of the dynamic modulation of synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system (CNS).

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II phosphorylation of the GABAA receptor alpha1 subunit modulates benzodiazepine binding

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the primary neurotransmitter that is responsible for the fast inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. A major post-translational mechanism that can rapidly regulate GABAAR function is receptor phosphorylation. This study was designed to test the effect of endogenous calcium and calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaM kinase II) activation on both allosteric modulator binding and GABAA receptor subunit phosphorylation. Endogenous CaM kinase II activity was stimulated, and GABAA receptors were subsequently analyzed for bothallosteric modulator binding properties and immunoprecipitated and analyzed for subunit phosphorylation levels. A significant increase in allosteric-modulator binding of the GABAAR was observed under conditions maximal for CaM kinase II activation. In addition, CaM kinase II activation resulted in a direct increase in phosphorylation of the GABAA receptor alpha1 subunit. The data suggest that the CaM kinase II-dependent phosphorylation of the GABAA receptor alpha1 subunit modulated allosteric modulator binding to the GABAA receptor.

The relative amount of cRNA coding for gamma2 subunits affects stimulation by benzodiazepines in GABA(A) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

Benzodiazepine (BZD) potentiation of GABA-activated Cl(-)-current (I(GABA)) in recombinant GABA(A) receptors requires the presence of the gamma subunit. When alpha1, beta2 and gamma2S cRNA are expressed in a 1:1:1 ratio in Xenopus oocytes, BZD potentiation of I(GABA) is submaximal, variable and diminishes over time. Potentiation by BZDs is increased, more reproducible and is stabilized over time by increasing the relative amount of cRNA coding for the gamma2S subunit. In addition, GABA EC(50) values for alpha1beta2gamma2 (1:1:1) receptors are intermediate to values measured for alpha1beta2 (1:1) and alpha1beta2gamma2 (1:1:10) receptors. We conclude that co-expression of equal ratios of alpha1, beta2 and gamma2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes produces a mixed population of alpha1beta2 and alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors. Therefore, for accurate measurements of BZD potentiation it is necessary to inject a higher ratio of gamma2 subunit cRNA relative to alpha1 and beta2 cRNA. This results in a purer population of alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors.

GABAergic innervation organizes synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptor clustering in cultured hippocampal neurons

We have studied the effects of GABAergic innervation on the clustering of GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) in cultured hippocampal neurons. In the absence of GABAergic innervation, pyramidal cells form small (0.36 +/- 0.01 micrometer diameter) GABA(A)R clusters at their surface in the dendrites and soma. When receiving GABAergic innervation from glutamic acid decarboxylase-containing interneurons, pyramidal cells form large (1.62 +/- 0.08 micrometer breadth) GABA(A)R clusters at GABAergic synapses. This is accompanied by a disappearance of the small GABA(A)R clusters in the local area surrounding each GABAergic synapse. Although the large synaptic GABA(A)R clusters of any neuron contained all GABA(A)R subunits and isoforms expressed by that neuron, the small clusters not localized at GABAergic synapses showed significant heterogeneity in subunit and isoform composition. Another difference between large GABAergic and small non-GABAergic GABA(A)R clusters was that a significant proportion of the latter was juxtaposed to postsynaptic markers of glutamatergic synapses such as PSD-95 and AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit. The densities of both the glutamate receptor-associated and non-associated small GABA(A)R clusters were decreased in areas surrounding GABAergic synapses. However, no effect on the density or distribution of glutamate receptor clusters was observed. The results suggest that there are local signals generated at GABAergic synapses that induce both assembly of large synaptic GABA(A)R clusters at the synapse and disappearance of the small GABA(A)R clusters in the surrounding area. In the absence of GABAergic innervation, weaker GABA(A)R-clustering signals, generated at glutamatergic synapses, induce the formation of small postsynaptic GABA(A)R clusters that remain juxtaposed to glutamate receptors at glutamatergic synapses.

Agonists cause endocytosis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on cultured myotubes

Regulated trafficking of neurotransmitter receptors in excitable cells may play an important role in synaptic plasticity. In addition, agonist-induced endocytosis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in particular might be involved in nicotine tolerance and addiction. The existing evidence concerning regulated internalization of cell-surface nAChRs is indirect and equivocal, however. In the present study, radioligand binding and fluorescence microscopy were used to show that agonists cause substantial endocytosis of nAChRs on cultured myotubes. Exposure to carbachol or nicotine caused a decrease in the intensity of fluorescent labeling of clusters of cell-surface nAChRs that was blocked by low temperature. Overall, myotubes exposed to carbachol or nicotine bound 50-70% less [(125)I]-alpha-bungarotoxin on the cell surface than untreated cells. The effect of carbachol was significant within 5 min, increased progressively for at least 4 h, and had a sensitivity of 100 nM or less. Exposure to carbachol caused the appearance or dramatic expansion of an intracellular pool of nAChRs, which were localized to discrete, largely perinuclear structures. A pulse-chase labeling protocol allowed the selective labeling and localization of nAChRs that had been internalized from the cell surface. In untreated cells, very little internalization of nAChRs occurred over a period of 3 h, indicating that constitutive endocytosis of receptors over this period was minimal. Exposure to carbachol, however, caused a dramatic increase in the endocytosis of nAChRs. These results provide direct evidence that agonists, including the tobacco alkaloid nicotine, can cause substantial endocytosis of cell-surface nAChRs.

Constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of the GABA(A) receptor gamma 2 subunit in rat brain

GABA(A) receptors are the major sites of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain, where they are predominantly composed of alpha, beta and gamma2 subunits. A role for direct tyrosine phosphorylation of residues 365 and 367 (Y365/367) within the intracellular domain of the gamma2 subunit has been suggested to be important in modulating GABA(A) receptor function, based on the study of recombinant receptors. To address the relevance of these observations for neuronal GABA(A) receptors we have studied the phosphorylation of the gamma2 subunit in the brain. In adult rat brain the gamma2 subunit is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues, including Y365/367 as defined using a phosphospecific antisera. In cultured cortical neurones, phosphorylation of Y365/367 is highly regulated and was only evident upon inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases. We also establish that the tyrosine kinase Src is capable of specifically interacting with the intracellular domains of receptor beta and gamma2 subunits. This may specifically localise tyrosine kinase activity to GABA(A) receptors, facilitating rapid receptor tyrosine phosphorylation upon kinase activation. Together our results suggests that tyrosine phosphorylation of the gamma2 subunit, possibly by closely associated Src, may be a dynamic mechanism for regulating GABA(A) receptor function in the brain.