The association of height, weight, menstrual and reproductive events with breast cancer: results from two prospective studies on the island of Guernsey (United Kingdom)

Association of hormonal and reproductive factors with differentiated thyroid cancer risk in women: a pooled prospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is higher in women than in men but whether sex steroid hormones contribute to this difference remains unclear. Studies of reproductive and hormonal factors and thyroid cancer risk have provided inconsistent results.

METHODS

Original data from 1 252 907 women in 16 cohorts in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia were combined to evaluate associations of DTC risk with reproductive and hormonal factors. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 2142 women were diagnosed with DTC. Factors associated with higher risk of DTC included younger age at menarche (<10 vs 10-11 years; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64), younger (<40; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62) and older (≥55; HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.68) ages at menopause (vs 40-44 years), ever use of menopausal hormone therapy (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33) and previous hysterectomy (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.39) or bilateral oophorectomy (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.29). Factors associated with lower risk included longer-term use (≥5 vs <5 years) of oral contraceptives (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96) among those who ever used oral contraception and baseline post-menopausal status (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96). No associations were observed for parity, duration of menopausal hormone therapy use or lifetime number of reproductive years or ovulatory cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides some evidence linking reproductive and hormonal factors with risk of DTC. Results should be interpreted cautiously considering the modest strength of the associations and potential for exposure misclassification and detection bias. Prospective studies of pre-diagnostic circulating sex steroid hormone measurements and DTC risk may provide additional insight.

World Cancer Research Fund International: Continuous Update Project-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies on physical activity, sedentary behavior, adiposity, and weight change and breast cancer risk

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the complex associations between energy balance-related factors and breast cancer risk, for which previous evidence has suggested different associations in the life course of women and by hormone receptor (HR) status of the tumor.

METHODS

Relevant publications on adulthood physical activity, sedentary behavior, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, and weight change and pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer risk were identified in PubMed up to 30 April 2017. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to summarize the relative risks across studies.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six observational cohort studies comprising over 22,900 premenopausal and 103,000 postmenopausal breast cancer cases were meta-analyzed. Higher physical activity was inversely associated with both pre- and postmenopausal breast cancers, whereas increased sitting time was positively associated with postmenopausal breast cancer. Although higher early adult BMI (ages 18-30 years) was inversely associated with pre- and postmenopausal breast cancers, adult weight gain and greater body adiposity increased breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, and the increased risk was evident for HR+ but not HR- breast cancers, and among never but not current users of postmenopausal hormones. The evidence was less consistent in premenopausal women. There were no associations with adult weight gain, inverse associations with adult BMI (study baseline) and hip circumference, and non-significant associations with waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio that were reverted to positive associations on average in studies accounting for BMI. No significant associations were observed for HR-defined premenopausal breast cancers.

CONCLUSION

Better understanding on the impact of these factors on pre- and postmenopausal breast cancers and their subtypes along the life course is needed.

Height and Breast Cancer Risk: Evidence From Prospective Studies and Mendelian Randomization

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have linked adult height with breast cancer risk in women. However, the magnitude of the association, particularly by subtypes of breast cancer, has not been established. Furthermore, the mechanisms of the association remain unclear.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate associations between height and breast cancer risk using data from 159 prospective cohorts totaling 5216302 women, including 113178 events. In a consortium with individual-level data from 46325 case patients and 42482 control patients, we conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis using a genetic score that comprised 168 height-associated variants as an instrument. This association was further evaluated in a second consortium using summary statistics data from 16003 case patients and 41335 control patients.

RESULTS

The pooled relative risk of breast cancer was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.19) per 10cm increase in height in the meta-analysis of prospective studies. In Mendelian randomization analysis, the odds ratio of breast cancer per 10cm increase in genetically predicted height was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.32) in the first consortium and 1.21 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.39) in the second consortium. The association was found in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women but restricted to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Analyses of height-associated variants identified eight new loci associated with breast cancer risk after adjusting for multiple comparisons, including three loci at 1q21.2, DNAJC27, and CCDC91 at genome-wide significance level P < 5×10(-8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides strong evidence that adult height is a risk factor for breast cancer in women and certain genetic factors and biological pathways affecting adult height have an important role in the etiology of breast cancer.

Reproductive windows, genetic loci, and breast cancer risk

PURPOSE

The reproductive windows between age at menarche and age at first birth (standardized age at first birth) and from menarche to menopause (reproductive lifespan) may interact with genetic variants in association with breast cancer risk.

METHODS

We assessed this hypothesis in 6131 breast cancer cases and 7274 controls who participated in the population-based Collaborative Breast Cancer Study. Risk factor information was collected through telephone interviews, and DNA samples were collected on a subsample (N= 1484 cases, 1307 controls) to genotype for 13 genome-wide association study-identified loci. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and P values for the interaction between reproductive windows and genotypes were obtained by adding cross-product terms to statistical models.

RESULTS

For standardized age at first birth, the OR was 1.52 (CI, 1.36-1.71) comparing the highest quintile with the lowest quintile. Carrier status for rs10941679 (5p12) and rs10483813 (RAD51B) appeared to modify this relationship (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). For reproductive lifespan, the OR comparing the highest quintile with the lowest quintiles was 1.62 (CI, 1.35-1.95). No interactions were detected between genotype and reproductive lifespan (all P > .05). All results were similar regardless of ductal versus lobular breast cancer subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the reproductive windows are associated with breast cancer risk and that associations may vary by genetic variants.

Benign breast and gynecologic conditions, reproductive and hormonal factors, and risk of thyroid cancer

The higher incidence of thyroid cancer in women compared with men suggests an influence of sex steroid hormones in the etiology of this malignancy. We investigated a comprehensive set of potential indicators of lifetime sex steroid hormone exposure in relation to thyroid cancer risk. Using data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, which enrolled 70,047 women, 50 to 78 years old, we prospectively examined associations of self-reported history of benign breast and gynecologic conditions, reproductive factors, and exogenous sex hormone use with thyroid cancer risk. Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in models using age as the time metric. During follow-up (median, 11 years), 127 women were diagnosed with first primary thyroid cancer. Older age at natural menopause (≥55 vs. <50 years; HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.20-4.18), greater estimated lifetime number of ovulatory cycles (≥490 vs. <415 cycles; HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.33-4.30), greater number of live births (≥5 vs. 1-2; HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.82), and history of uterine fibroids (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.18-2.50) were associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. Earlier age at menarche, greater number of reproductive years, history of a tubal ligation, and history of ovarian cysts were nonsignificantly associated with increased thyroid cancer risk. No associations were observed for oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone therapy, or history of benign breast disease or endometriosis. In general, we found that factors reflecting a greater length of exposure to endogenous hormones, particularly during the reproductive years, were associated with risk of postmenopausal thyroid cancer.

The human breast and the ancestral reproductive cycle : A preliminary inquiry into breast cancer etiology

This paper, using modern Darwinian theory, proposes an explanation for the increasingly high incidence of breast cancer found among pre-and post-menopausal women living today in westernized countries. A number of factors have been said to be responsible: genetic inheritance (BRCA-1), diet (specifically the increased consumption of dietary fat), exposure to carcinogenic agents, lifetime menstrual activity, and reproductive factors. The primary aim of this paper is to demonstrate the value of a perspective based on Darwinian theory. In this paper, Darwinian theory is used to explore the possibility that the increased incidence of breast cancer is due primarily to the failure to complete in a timely manner the reproductive developmental cycle, beginning at menarche and continuing through a series of pregnancies and lactation. On the basis of comparative data, we assume that most women in ancestral populations began having children before age 20 or so and tended to remain either pregnant or nursing for most of their adult lives. If a woman did not have a child by age 25 or so, she probably would never have one. Therefore, selection would probably not have acted against deleterious traits, such as cancer, that appeared after that age, just as it does not act against such traits in old age.

A review of body size and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and African American women

Obesity is an epidemic in the United States, especially among Hispanics and African Americans. Studies of obesity and breast cancer risk have been conducted primarily in non-Hispanic whites. There have been few studies of the association between body mass index (BMI) or weight gain and the risk of breast cancer in minorities, and the results have been inconsistent. Because most studies are conducted primarily in non-Hispanic whites, the etiology of breast cancer in minorities is not well understood. The authors of the current report reviewed the literature on the association between obesity, weight, and weight gain and breast cancer in minorities using a combination of the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms "obesity," "body mass index," "weight," "weight gain," "Hispanic," and "African American." Only publications in English and with both risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals were considered. Forty-five studies of body size and breast cancer risk in non-Hispanic whites were identified. After an exhaustive search of the literature, only 3 studies of body size and breast cancer were conducted in Hispanic women were identified, and only 8 such studies in African American women were identified. The results were inconsistent in both race/ethnicity groups, with studies reporting positive, inverse, and null results. Thus, as obesity rates among Hispanics and African Americans continue to rise, there is an urgent need to identify the roles that both obesity and adult weight gain play in the development of breast cancer in these minorities. Additional studies are needed to provide more understanding of the etiology of this disease and to explain some of the disparities in incidence and mortality.

Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer: The influence of cumulative exposure to oestrogen and reproductive correlates. Results of the Marburg breast cancer and osteoporosis trial (MABOT)

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest an inverse relation between breast cancer and osteoporosis. Oestrogen is important in the pathophysiology of both breast and bone, and although cumulative exposure to oestrogen may explain the link between breast cancer and bone mass, this has never been proved. The Marburg breast cancer and osteoporosis trial (MABOT) aimed to elucidate the relation between breast cancer and bone mass ascertained by ultrasonometry measurement and to investigate whether endogenous and exogenous exposure to oestrogen and reproductive correlates has a role in this association.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study including 2492 women (mean age+/-S.D., 54.4+/-10.3 years) in whom diseases and drug treatments known to affect bone metabolism, except for HT, had been excluded. All women underwent ultrasonometry measurement at the heel; 242 of the women had an incident breast cancer without a prior, specific pharmacological breast cancer treatment. The ultrasonometry variables - speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and the stiffness index (SI) - were calculated and compared in women with and without breast cancer. Because of significant intergroup differences in factors such as age, body mass index and exposure to oestrogen, a multiple linear regression analysis as well as a second analysis of ultrasonometry variables was undertaken using a randomly selected sample of 242 healthy women post-matched with the breast cancer group for possible confounding variables. Odds ratios were used to compare the relation between breast cancer risk and ultrasonometry heel measurements.

RESULTS

Women with breast cancer were significantly older, weighed more, had a higher body mass index, were more likely to be parous and to have breast fed, were older at the menopause and had been exposed to oestrogen for longer than control women. In addition, the ultrasonometry variables speed of sound and the stiffness index T- and Z-score were significantly higher in women with breast cancer even after a matched pair analysis was performed (p<0.001). Additionally, results of a multiple linear regression showed that women with breast cancer had a significantly higher SOS (p<0.001), body weight (p<0.05) and duration of breast feeding (p<0.05) while osteoporotic fracture were reduced (p<0.001). When women with breast cancer and their matched controls were finally grouped according to SOS and T-score quartiles, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for breast cancer risk in the second, third and fourth quartiles compared with the lowest quartile were 2.5 (1.4-4.3), 3.1 (1.8-5.3) and 4.7 (2.7-8.2) as well as 1.9 (1.1-3.2), 2.3 (1.3-3.9) and 2.9 (1.7-5.0), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasonometry variables speed of sound, stiffness index, T- and Z-score are higher in women with an incident breast cancer than in healthy controls, even after post-matching for possible confounding variables. This association was confirmed in a multiple linear regression model. Women with SOS and T-score values in the higher quartiles have a greater risk of breast cancer than women in the lowest quartile. We found no association between the higher ultrasonometry variables and cancer specific characteristics or reproductive correlates such as age at menarche and menopause or cumulative oestrogen exposure. Although the biological mechanisms linking bone mass and the risk of breast cancer are not fully understood, factors other than reproductive correlates, endogenous and exogenous exposure to oestrogen must play a part.

Energy balance and breast cancer risk: a prospective cohort study

While there is evidence that breast cancer risk is positively associated with body mass index (in postmenopausal women) and energy intake and inversely associated with physical activity, few studies have examined breast cancer risk in association with energy balance, the balance between energy intake and expenditure. Therefore, in the cohort study reported here, we studied the independent and combined associations of vigorous physical activity, energy consumption, and body mass index (BMI), with breast cancer risk. The investigation was conducted in 49,613 Canadian women who were participants in the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) and who completed self-administered lifestyle and food frequency questionnaires between 1980 and 1985. Linkages to national mortality and cancer databases yielded data on deaths and cancer incidence, with follow-up ending between 1998 and 2000. During a mean 16.4 years of follow-up, we observed 2545 incident breast cancer cases. Due to exclusions for various reasons, the analyses were based on 40,318 subjects amongst whom there were 1673 incident cases of breast cancer. Participation in vigorous physical activity and body mass index were not independently associated with breast cancer risk in the total cohort. A statistically significant positive trend was observed, however, between energy intake and breast cancer risk (P (trend )= 0.01). Although there was some variation in risk associated with vigorous physical activity, and BMI when the analyses were stratified by menopausal status, these interactions were not statistically significant. The interaction between menopausal status and energy intake, however, was of borderline statistical significance (P (interaction )= 0.06), with a statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer associated with highest versus lowest quartile of energy intake among premenopausal women (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13- 1.85, P (trend) = 0.001). There was evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer associated with a relatively high body mass index among postmenopausal women in the highest quartile level of energy intake (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01- 2.93, P (trend) = 0.05). In addition, there was evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal, physically inactive, overweight/obese women who consumed > or =1972 kcal/day compared to physically active normal weight women who consumed <1972 kcal/day (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.08-2.37). Our data suggest that obese premenopausal women with relatively high energy intake may be at increased risk of breast cancer. In addition, energy imbalance, represented by a relatively high energy intake, lack of participation in vigorous physical activity, and a relatively high body mass index, may be associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly among premenopausal women.

Postmenopausal breast cancer risk and cumulative number of menstrual cycles

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the lifetime cumulative number of menstrual cycles, as an index for total exposure to endogenous estrogens, and the number of menstrual cycles until a first full-term pregnancy (FFTP), are associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Population-based study with data from the Prospect-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Naturally menopausal participants were eligible (n = 6,718). The cumulative number of menstrual cycles was computed in 6,031 (90%) women. We calculated the number of cycles until FFTP among parous participants. The number of menstrual cycles was impossible to compute in women who reported to be always irregular; therefore, we added the "always irregular" category in the analysis. During the 46,746 person-years of follow-up, 168 breast cancer cases were identified. Cox regression models were used and adjustments were made to account for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Even when our data does not show a clear linear gradient, we observed an increased breast cancer risk in women with a higher number of cumulative menstrual cycles in their lifetime. Using < or = 415 cycles as reference, the hazard ratio for the irregular group, 416-453, 454-490, and > or = 491 cycles was 1.11 (.56, 2.19), 1.88 (1.14, 3.12), 1.74 (1.05, 2.87), and 1.80 (1.09, 2.96), respectively. Although not statistically significant, and of less magnitude, the risk estimates for the number of cycles before FFTP showed the same tendency.

CONCLUSION

Among women who underwent natural menopause, a higher number of menstrual cycles in lifetime, reflecting a longer exposure to endogenous estrogens, is associated with an increased breast cancer risk.

Does obesity compromise survival in women with breast cancer?

Obesity, measured by high body mass index (BMI >30 kg/m2) is associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer but the effect of obesity on prognosis is not clear. A prospectively accrued and regularly validated database of 1579 patients with breast cancer treated in a district general hospital between 1963 and 1999 was analysed for clinical and pathological tumour characteristics including the family history, grade, tumour type, treatment and outcome. The risk factors and outcome of obese and non-obese patients were compared. Breast cancer in obese women was associated with significantly larger tumour size and worse Nottingham prognostic index. There was no statistically significant difference in overall and disease-free survival between obese and non-obese group. Hazard ratios (95% Cl) were 0.81 (0.62-1.06) and 0.80 (0.63-1.01), respectively. In the present study, obesity is not an indicator of worst prognosis of breast cancer.

Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature

A growing body of work indicates that exposures over the life course have important roles to play in the aetiology of breast cancer. This review synthesises the literature that has been published in the area of early life events and female breast cancer risk. The review finds some evidence, primarily from cohort studies on the relationship between birthweight and breast cancer, to suggest that in utero events are related to breast cancer risk in adulthood. Strong evidence to support a positive association between height and breast cancer exists. Postulated mechanisms for this relationship include the role of early diet in subsequent disease risk, and the influence of endogenous growth factors mediating the relationship. There is some evidence to suggest that leg length is the component of height which is generating the observed associations between height and breast cancer. There is no consistent pattern of association between relative weight in childhood or adolescence and risk of breast cancer. The evidence to suggest an association between physical activity in early life and breast cancer risk is convincing from case-control studies, but is not fully substantiated by the results of three cohort studies. There are inconsistent results regarding the association between smoking at a young age and breast cancer risk. There is little evidence for an association between passive smoking in early life and breast cancer risk. No clear association between early drinking and breast cancer risk exists. These results are discussed in relation to possible underlying mechanisms and health promotion strategies which could reduce breast cancer risk.

Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study of French women

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between breast cancer risk and the cumulative number of cycles before a first full-term pregnancy (FTP) and lifetime, taking age at menarche and at onset of regular cycling, periodicity and regularity of cycles, duration of periods of pregnancy, and lactation, oral contraceptive (OC) use, and age at menopause into account.

METHODS

The data were taken from the E3N prospective cohort study of women aged 40-65 years in 1990. A total of 1718 breast cancer cases were identified during the 579,525 person-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant linear relationship between breast cancer risk and both the cumulative number of cycles before a first FTP (p for trend < 0.0001) and lifetime (p for trend < 0.001), with multivariate relative risk (RR) of a similar magnitude for both variables. Compared to women with a lifetime number of cycles <402 (< or =30 years), the RR for those with a lifetime total of 403-441, 442-480, 481-520, and > or =521 cycles were 0.95 (0.75-1.21), 1.21 (0.97-1.52), 1.23 (0.96-1.58), and 1.60 (1.25-2.04), respectively. Results restricted to never OC users were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is needed to clarify whether the underlying factor is repeated exposure to fluctuating hormones, the number of anovular/ovular cycles, or the relative importance of the follicular and luteal phases.

Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Do they differ according to age at diagnosis?

Studies yielding results on risk factors stratified by age at diagnosis or menopausal status were reviewed to better understand the role of hormonal factors and to determine whether reproductive events influence breast cancer risk differently according to age at diagnosis of breast cancer. Through a Medline/Pubmed search, 26 articles providing risk estimates by age at diagnosis of breast cancer or by menopausal status were analysed. A decrease of about 9% of breast cancer risk was found for each additional year at menarche when breast cancer was diagnosed early or before the menopause, and of about 4% when diagnosed late or after. Breast cancer risk increased with increasing age at FFTP by 5% per year for breast cancer diagnosed early or before the menopause and by 3% for cancers diagnosed late or after the menopause. Each full term pregnancy (or child) led to a 3% reduction in the risk of breast cancer diagnosed early or before the menopause, whereas the reduction attained 12% for the breast cancers diagnosed later. No change in the effect of these three factors with time (date of diagnosis of the breast cancer before 1980 or after) was observed. These results support the hypothesis of an age-specific effect of the three breast cancer risk factors considered herein, based on the time of initiation of the carcinogenic process. These observations underline the importance of the time of initiation of the carcinogenic process in determining the effect of promoters such as reproductive factors. This largely unexplored aspect of breast carcinogenesis might open the way for new prevention approaches.

Bone mass and breast cancer risk in older women: differences by stage at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Older women with low bone mineral density (BMD) have a decreased incidence of breast cancer. It is not known whether this association is confined to early-stage, slow-growing tumors.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 8905 women who were 65 years of age or older during the period from 1986 through 1988 and had no history of breast cancer. At study entry, we used single-photon absorptiometry to measure each woman's BMD at three skeletal sites: the wrist, forearm, and heel. The women were followed for a mean of 6.5 years for the occurrence of breast cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

During 57 516 person-years of follow-up, 315 women developed primary invasive or in situ breast cancer. Multivariate analyses that adjusted for age, obesity, and other covariates revealed that the risk of breast cancer for women in the highest quartile of BMD for all three skeletal sites was 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4 to 5.3) times greater than that for women in the lowest quartile at all three skeletal sites. The magnitude of increased risk associated with high BMD differed by the stage of disease at diagnosis and was greater for more advanced tumors (relative risk [RR] for TNM [i.e., tumor-lymph node-metastasis] stage II or higher tumors = 5.6; 95% CI = 1.2 to 27.4) than for early-stage disease (RR for in situ/TNM stage I tumors = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.0 to 4.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly women with high BMD have an increased risk of breast cancer, especially advanced cancer, compared with women with low BMD. These findings suggest an association between osteoporosis and invasive breast cancer, two of the most prevalent conditions affecting an older woman's health.

Does childhood health affect chronic morbidity in later life?

Our analysis examines whether childhood health has long-term and enduring consequences for chronic morbidity. As a part of this analysis, we address two methodological issues of concern in the literature. Is adult height a surrogate for childhood health experiences in modeling chronic disease in later life? And, are the effects of adult socioeconomic status on chronic disease overestimated when childhood health is not accounted for? The analysis is based on a topical module to the third wave of the Health and Retirement Study, a representative survey of Americans aged 55-65 in 1996. Our results support the hypothesis that poor childhood health increases morbidity in later life. This association was found for cancer, lung disease, cardiovascular conditions, and arthritis/rheumatism. The associations were highly persistent in the face of statistical controls for both adult and childhood socioeconomic status. No support was found for using adult height as a proxy for the effects of childhood health experiences. Further, the effects of adult socioeconomic status were not overestimated when childhood health was excluded from the explanatory models. Our results point to the importance of an integrated health care policy based on the premise of maximizing health over the entire life cycle.

Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk

Epidemiological evidence implicating anthropometric risk factors in breast cancer aetiology is accumulating. For premenopausal women, breast cancer risk increases with increasing height, but decreases with higher weight or body mass index, and no association with increased central adiposity exists. For postmenopausal women, an increased risk of breast cancer is found with increasing levels of all the anthropometric variables including height, weight, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, waist circumference and weight gain. Weight loss appears to decrease risk, particularly if it occurs later in life. Breast size may be a risk factor for breast cancer, however, the current evidence is inconclusive. Several hypothesized biologic mechanisms exist to explain how anthropometric factors influence breast cancer risk. Obesity may increase levels of circulating endogenous sex hormones, insulin and insulin-like growth factors that all, in turn, increase breast cancer risk. Genetic predisposition to obesity and to specific body fat distributions are also implicated. With obesity, there are increased levels of fat tissue that can store toxins and can serve as a continuous source of carcinogens. Recommendations for future research on anthropometric factors and breast cancer are provided. Sufficient evidence exists to support strategies to avoid weight gain throughout life as a means of reducing postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

Migration patterns and breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many American Indian and Alaska Native women have lower incidence rates of breast carcinoma than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States. The rates in most areas, however, have increased in recent years. The author reviews the migration patterns and effects that might contribute to this change.

METHODS

A review of the literature on migration and breast carcinoma incidence was conducted.

RESULTS

Migration significantly impacts on breast carcinoma incidence in all groups of women studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Research must be designed that will explore the components of host, life-styles, and environment on breast carcinoma rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women to elucidate mechanisms of breast carcinoma etiology.

Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, medical and family history, and breast cancer

The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, family history of cancer, medical history, and reproductive factors and breast cancer was investigated in a population-based case-control study of French Canadians in Montreal. In this study, a total of 414 French-Canadian cases and 429 age- and language-matched population controls were interviewed. Ever-married women showed significantly lower risk (OR: 0.64 [0.45-0.92]) for breast cancer, as did smokers (OR: 0.73 [0.55-0.98]), particularly of nonfilter cigarettes (OR: 0.36 [0.17-0.72]). Weight history, both for the year before the diagnosis of breast cancer and 10 years previously, was associated with risk for the disease. A strong inverse relationship was found between the number of full-term pregnancies (OR: 0.48 [0.28-0.82]) and the risk of breast cancer, while the p trend for late age at first pregnancy (p = 0.02) and menopause (p = 0.004) was statistically significant. A history of breast problems (OR: 1.87 [1.34-2.60]) and a history of breast cancer in relatives (OR: 2.95 [1.63-5.34]) were strongly associated with risk. This study confirms the risk factors of late age at first full-term pregnancy, nulliparity, late age at menopause, and positive family history of breast cancer in the etiology of this disease. Perhaps the protective effect of smoking against breast cancer could be due to its antiestrogenic influence.

Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women

Adult obesity has been associated with an increased risk of post-menopausal breast cancer, but it is unclear whether this relationship reflects a causal role of obesity during childhood and adolescence, of weight gain during adult life or of adult obesity per se. In a population-based case-control study in all of Sweden, we included 3,345 (84% of all eligible) women aged 50-74 years with invasive breast cancer, and 3,454 (82% of all selected) controls of similar age. Mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews were used to collect detailed information on anthropometric measures. Odds ratios were estimated through multiple logistic regression. Women with the leanest somatotype at age 7 had about a 3-fold higher risk of breast cancer than the most obese (P for trend 0.0009). A suggested protective effect of a high body mass at age 18 and a detrimental influence of body mass 1 year prior to data collection largely reflected the effect of weight gain after age 18, a strong predictor of breast cancer risk. Among women at least 20 years post menopause, those who had gained 30 kg or more since age 18 had an odds ratio of 2.04 (95% confidence interval 1.20-3.48) of breast cancer compared with those who had maintained their weight unchanged. The effect of weight gain was unequivocal among non-users but not among users of hormone replacement therapy. Our findings have important implications, suggesting weight preservation as a means for prevention of post-menopausal breast cancer as well as a causal role of childhood body build in breast cancer etiology.

Height and breast cancer risk

The relationship between adult height and breast cancer risk was considered, combining data from two case-control studies, one conducted between 1983 and 1991 in northern Italy and the other between 1991 and 1994 in six Italian centres. Cases were 5984 women, below the age of 75 years, with histologically confirmed breast cancer, and controls were 5504 women admitted to hospital for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic, non-hormone-related diseases. No relationship was observed between height and the risk of breast cancer, with a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 0.96 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.85-1.08) for the tallest women (height > or = 166 cm) compared with the shortest (height < 156 cm). No significant heterogeneity was found across strata of age at diagnosis, education, body mass index, body weight, alcohol intake, age at menarche and menopause, parity, age at first birth, ever use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, history of benign breast disease and family history of breast cancer. Thus, this study indicates that adult height is not appreciably related to breast cancer risk in this Italian population.

Social, biological and reproductive characteristics of mothers of twins: implications for breast cancer risk

The biological, social and reproductive characteristics of women who have had twins were compared with those of other parous women using questionnaire data gathered for a prospective cohort study of women aged 35 and over on the island of Guernsey. Data for 97 mothers of twins and 4026 other parous women were available for analysis. The two groups were similar in height, first degree family history of breast cancer, use of hormone replacement therapy or other hormones, age at menarche, length of menstrual cycle and age at first and last birth. The mothers of twins were slightly heavier, more likely to smoke and consume more caffeine, less likely to have used oral contraceptives in the past, slightly younger when reaching the menopause and had a larger number of pregnancies. Adjustment for age did not alter these results. This study does not provide evidence that mothers of twins differ markedly from other parous women across a range of characteristics that might be associated with twinning or associated with breast cancer risk.

Anthropometric indices in relation to mammographic patterns among peri-menopausal women

The relationship between body height, weight and body mass index and mammographic patterns was examined among 3,208 Norwegian women, aged 40-56 years, participating in the Third Tromsø study. Standardized measurements of height and weight were recorded. Epidemiologic data were obtained through questionnaires. Mammograms were categorized into 5 groups based on anatomic-mammographic correlations. For analysis, patterns I-III were combined into a low-risk group and patterns IV and V into a high-risk group. Odd ratios (ORs), adjusted for menopausal status, age, parity, age at first birth, age at menarche and anthropometric measures, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. Body height was associated positively with high-risk patterns, while weight and body mass index were associated inversely with high-risk patterns. Women in the highest tertile of height were twice as likely (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.6-2.6) to have high-risk patterns compared with those in the lowest tertile, and women in the highest tertile of weight were 70% less likely (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4) to have high-risk patterns compared with those in the lowest tertile. Associations with body mass index were similar to those with weight. All associations were present when stratified by menopausal status. Among post-menopausal women, the inverse associations between body weight and body mass index and high-risk patterns decreased with increasing number of years since menopause. Our results indicate that body height and weight are independently associated with the mammographic pattern among peri-menopausal women. We suggest that body height and weight are related to mammographic patterns through different mechanisms.

Breast cancer risk is positively associated with height

Inter- and intra-national epidemiological studies point to an association between socio-economic status and breast cancer risk. Although there is no direct evidence, the most favoured reason for this relationship is nutritional. An enhanced dietary status, especially during childhood, would be reflected in adult body build. It is, therefore, surprising that there is uncertainty in the literature concerning the association between height and breast cancer risk. In reviewing the publications on this topic it became apparent that case-control studies which found no association between height and risk tended to use self-reported height. In contrast reports claiming a significant, and positive, correlation tended to use heights which were measured by the investigators. In a prospective study we found in a cohort of 2731 ostensibly normal women that, although there was a highly significant linear correlation between self-reported and measured height, the shortest women over-estimated their height whilst the tallest volunteers under-estimated theirs. The significance of crude relative risk and height in this cohort was markedly attenuated when self-reported height was used compared to measured height. Such a systematic error could have a profound effect on the conclusions of studies in this field which relied on self-reporting and could explain the conflicting reports in the literature.

Anthropometric measures and metabolic rate in association with risk of breast cancer (United States)

To investigate whether cancer risk-reduction seen in calorie-restricted animals also applies to breast cancer in women, we have analyzed data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the United States and subsequent follow-up surveys. During the follow-up of one to 155 months, 182 out of 7,622 women developed breast cancer. Due to biased under-reporting of dietary intake, the analysis did not examine calorie intake as an exposure variable, but rather focused on anthropometric measures and metabolic rate as biomarkers of nutritional balance. Multiple Cox regression analysis showed elevated odds ratios (OR) for height, elbow width, and skinfolds among postmenopausal women. ORs for the fifth quintile were 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-3.8), 2.3 (CI = 1.2-4.7), and 2.0 (CI = 1.0-4.0), respectively. Weight (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.2-5.1) and resting metabolic rate (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.0-4.0) were significant relative to the second quintile. Bitrochanteric breadth, sitting height, body fat, body mass index, or combination variables were not associated with cancer risk. It was concluded that in the analysis of breast cancer data, skeletal measures ought to be considered as routine potential confounders, and that using measured rather than estimated metabolic rates may improve risk prediction.

Is breast cancer avoidable? Could dietary changes help?

In the US, the life time odds of developing breast cancer has reached one in eight, with an incidence rate of 85 per 100,000 world population. The rate is half or less in women in some Mediterranean countries. At the extreme are rural African women whose rate is approximately 5-10 per 100,000. In African, compared with White women, protective factors include (1) reproductive behaviour, namely, slower growth before and after puberty, later age at menarche, high teenage pregnancy, high parity and long periods of lactation and amenorrhoea and (2) a diet of relatively low energy intake and of low-fat and high-fibre contents. In the Mediterranean setting, major dietary protective factors include a relatively low intake of saturated fat and high intakes of monounsaturated fat and of vegetables and fruit. Among White women, a reversion to protective reproductive behaviour is out of the question. Only in respect of diet, could significant avoiding action be taken. Adoption of an African type diet is wholly impracticable. Moreover, even conformation to a former Mediterranean diet, which is already changing, would be difficult, requiring reorientation of fat composition and large rises in intakes of vegetable and fruit. However, with resolution, were such changes made, at least by the very vulnerable, they would help, additionally, to protect against other diet-related cancers, especially colon cancer and against coronary heart disease.

Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Effect of age at diagnosis

The data from a French case-control study of 495 patients with breast cancer and 542 control subjects interviewed in five French public hospitals, were analyzed to assess the effect of reproductive factors (age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, the time interval between these two ages, and parity) on the risk of breast cancer. Age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, the time interval between these two ages, and parity appeared to have a limited influence on breast cancer risk. However, the relationship between these factors and the risk of breast cancer varied according to the age at breast cancer diagnosis. In the youngest group of women, the most consistent effects came from factors occurring early in life (menarche, first full-term pregnancy, and consequently the time interval between these two events). These factors had a null or weak effect on the oldest group of women. The protective effect of high parity was confined to the oldest group of women.

Nutritional risk factors for breast cancer

The observation of large differences in breast cancer rates between countries has led to the hypothesis that excessive intake of dietary fat is an important risk factor for breast cancer in women. Case-control and prospective studies, however, generally have failed to show associations between dietary fat and breast cancer risk. There therefore is only weak evidence that modest reductions in fat intake (for instance to levels of 30% of caloric intake from fat) will reduce breast cancer risk. The possible benefits of lowering fat intake to levels substantially below 30% of calories will need to be tested in a randomized trial. In the meantime, the possible roles of micronutrient imbalances and childhood nutritional factors need to be studied better. Obesity is related to breast cancer in a complex way that suggests that a hormonal correlate of excessive body weight might affect breast cancer growth and metastasis. The potential benefit of intentional weight loss as an adjunct breast cancer treatment deserves further study. Many studies have suggested that drinking alcohol, even at modest levels, might increase breast cancer risk. Because the potential benefits of modest levels of alcohol for cardiovascular disease may outweigh the risk for breast cancer, recommendations for total alcohol abstinence may be premature for women with an average breast cancer risk. Women at unusually high risk for breast cancer who have a lower-than-average risk for cardiovascular disease, however, might make an informed decision to abstain from alcohol intake. Following current dietary advice to increase the amount of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains in the diet while reducing fats is certainly prudent for women to reduce their risk of several chronic disease, but current data points to the somber conclusion that such changes probably will have little effect on breast cancer risk.

Cohorts and privacy

The extent to which major cohort studies now rely on centralized machine-readable files of personal records is taken largely for granted by investigators, but not by the public, privacy advocates, politicians, or the popular press. When widespread linkage into personal histories for statistical studies was first envisaged a few decades ago, it was regarded as impractical. But privacy advocates now fear the statistical uses even more than the administrative applications, perhaps because the latter are inevitable to prevent abuses, and often are associated with monetary benefits or personal convenience. Indeed a concept of 'privacy' has arisen that is deemed to be violated even in statistical studies where confidentiality is assured, unless the particular purpose is approved by all individuals. This concept motivates much of the political thinking. What could be lost to preventive medicine and clinical testing by this is illustrated with data from cohort studies reported in this journal (CCC) in 1993.