Alternative splicing of the mouse amelogenin primary RNA transcript

Mutations Causing X-Linked Amelogenesis Imperfecta Alter miRNA Formation from Amelogenin Exon4

Amelogenin plays a crucial role in tooth enamel formation, and mutations on X-chromosomal amelogenin cause X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). Amelogenin pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) is highly alternatively spliced, and during alternative splicing, exon4 is mostly skipped, leading to the formation of a microRNA (miR-exon4) that has been suggested to function in enamel and bone formation. While delivering the functional variation of amelogenin proteins, alternative splicing of exon4 is the decisive first step to producing miR-exon4. However, the factors that regulate the splicing of exon4 are not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the association between known mutations in exon4 and exon5 of X chromosome amelogenin that causes X-linked AI, the splicing of exon4, and miR-exon4 formation. Our results showed mutations in exon4 and exon5 of the amelogenin gene, including c.120T>C, c.152C>T, c.155C>G, and c.155delC, significantly affected the splicing of exon4 and subsequent miR-exon4 production. Using an amelogenin minigene transfected in HEK-293 cells, we observed increased inclusion of exon4 in amelogenin mRNA and reduced miR-exon4 production with these mutations. In silico analysis predicted that Ser/Arg-rich RNA splicing factor (SRSF) 2 and SRSF5 were the regulatory factors for exon4 and exon5 splicing, respectively. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay confirmed that SRSF2 binds to exon4 and SRSF5 binds to exon5, and mutations in each exon can alter SRSF binding. Transfection of the amelogenin minigene to LS8 ameloblastic cells suppressed expression of the known miR-exon4 direct targets, Nfia and Prkch, related to multiple pathways. Given the mutations on the minigene, the expression of Prkch has been significantly upregulated with c.155C>G and c.155delC mutations. Together, we confirmed that exon4 splicing is critical for miR-exon4 production, and mutations causing X-linked AI in exon4 and exon5 significantly affect exon4 splicing and following miR-exon4 production. The change in miR-exon4 would be an additional etiology of enamel defects seen in some X-linked AI.

An miRNA derived from amelogenin exon4 regulates expression of transcription factor Runx2 by directly targeting upstream activators Nfia and Prkch

Amel, the gene encoding the amelogenin protein involved in enamel formation, is highly alternatively spliced. When exon4 is excised, it can form a mature miRNA (miR-exon4) that has previously been suggested to indirectly regulate expression of the Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) involved in bone development in ameloblasts and osteoblasts. However, the precise mechanism of this regulation is unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify direct targets of miR-exon4. The transcription factor family nuclear factor I/A (NFI/A) is known to negatively regulate expression of Runx2 and is among the most highly predicted direct targets of miR-exon4 that link to Runx2. Immunostaining detected NFI/A in osteoblasts and ameloblasts in vivo, and reporter assays confirmed direct interaction of the Nfia 3'-UTR and miR-exon4. In addition, silencing of Nfia in MC3T3-E1-M14 osteoblasts resulted in subsequent downregulation of Runx2. In a monoclonal subclone (mi2) of MC3T3-E1 cells wherein mature miR-exon4 was functionally inhibited, we observed significantly downregulated Runx2 expression. We showed that NFI/A was significantly upregulated in mi2 cells at both mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, quantitative proteomics and pathway analysis of gene expression in mi2 cells suggested that miR-exon4 could directly target Prkch (protein kinase C-eta), possibly leading to RUNX2 regulation through mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase activation. Reporter assays also confirmed the direct interaction of miR-exon4 and the 3'-UTR of Prkch, and Western blot analysis confirmed significantly upregulated mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase phosphorylation in mi2 cells. Taken together, we conclude that Nfia and Prkch expression negatively correlates with miR-exon4-mediated Runx2 regulation in vivo and in vitro, suggesting miR-exon4 directly targets Nfia and Prkch to regulate Runx2.

Leucine rich amelogenin peptide prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice

Amelogenins, major extra cellular matrix proteins of developing tooth enamel, are predominantly expressed by ameloblasts and play significant roles in the formation of enamel. Recently, amelogenin has been detected in various epithelial and mesenchymal tissues, implicating that it might have distinct functions in various tissues. We have previously reported that leucine rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP), one of the alternate splice forms of amelogenin, regulates receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) expression in cementoblast/periodontal ligament cells, suggesting that the amelogenins, especially LRAP, might function as a signaling molecule in bone metabolism. The objective of this study was to identify and define LRAP functions in bone turnover. We engineered transgenic (TgLRAP) mice using a murine 2.3kb α1(I)-collagen promoter to drive expression of a transgene consisting of LRAP, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) to study functions of LRAP in bone formation and resorption. Calvarial cell cultures from the TgLRAP mice showed increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and increased formation of mineralized nodules compared to the cells derived from wild-type (WT) mice. The TgLRAP calvarial cells also showed an inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Gene expression comparison by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) in calvarial cells indicated that bone formation makers such as Runx2, Alp, and osteocalcin were increased in TgLRAP compared to the WT cells. Meanwhile, Rankl expression was decreased in the TgLRAP cells in vitro. The ovariectomized (OVX) TgLRAP mice resisted bone loss induced by ovariectomy resulting in higher bone mineral density in comparison to OVX WT mice. The quantitative analysis of calcein intakes indicated that the ovariectomy resulted in increased bone formation in both WT and TgLRAP mice; OVX TgLRAP appeared to show the most remarkably increased bone formation. The parameters for bone resorption in tissue sections showed increased number of osteoclasts in OVX WT, but not in OVX TgLRAP over that of sham operated WT or TgLRAP mice, supporting the observed bone phenotypes in OVX mice. This is the first report identifying that LRAP, one of the amelogenin splice variants, affects bone turnover in vivo.

Spatiotemporal Changes in Transcriptome of Odontogenic and Non-odontogenic Regions in the Dental Arch of Mus musculus

Over the past 40 years, studies on tooth regeneration have been conducted. These studies comprised two main flows: some focused on epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in the odontogenic region, whereas others focused on creating a supernumerary tooth in the non-odontogenic region. Recently, the scope of the research has moved from conventional gene modification and molecular therapy to genome and transcriptome sequencing analyses. However, these sequencing data have been produced only in the odontogenic region. We provide RNA-Seq data of not only the odontogenic region but also the non-odontogenic region, which loses tooth-forming capacity during development and remains a rudiment. Sequencing data were collected from mouse embryos at three different stages of tooth development. These data will expand our understanding of tooth development and will help in designing developmental and regenerative studies from a new perspective.

Minimal amelogenin domain for enamel formation

Amelogenin is the most abundant matrix protein guiding hydroxyapatite formation in enamel, the durable bioceramic tissue that covers vertebrate teeth. Here, we sought to refine structure-function for an amelogenin domain based on in vitro data showing a 42 amino acid amelogenin-derived peptide (ADP7) mimicked formation of hydroxyapatite similar to that observed for the full-length mouse 180 amino acid protein. In mice, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to express only ADP7 by the native amelogenin promoter. Analysis revealed ADP7 messenger RNA expression in developing mouse teeth with the formation of a thin layer of enamel. In vivo, ADP7 peptide partially replaced the function of the full-length amelogenin protein and its several protein isoforms. Protein structure-function relationships identified through in vitro assays can be deployed in whole model animals using CRISPR-Cas9 to validate function of a minimal protein domain to be translated for clinical use as an enamel biomimetic.

DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE

Dental enamel is the hardest and most mineralized tissue in extinct and extant vertebrate species and provides maximum durability that allows teeth to function as weapons and/or tools as well as for food processing. Enamel development and mineralization is an intricate process tightly regulated by cells of the enamel organ called ameloblasts. These heavily polarized cells form a monolayer around the developing enamel tissue and move as a single forming front in specified directions as they lay down a proteinaceous matrix that serves as a template for crystal growth. Ameloblasts maintain intercellular connections creating a semi-permeable barrier that at one end (basal/proximal) receives nutrients and ions from blood vessels, and at the opposite end (secretory/apical/distal) forms extracellular crystals within specified pH conditions. In this unique environment, ameloblasts orchestrate crystal growth via multiple cellular activities including modulating the transport of minerals and ions, pH regulation, proteolysis, and endocytosis. In many vertebrates, the bulk of the enamel tissue volume is first formed and subsequently mineralized by these same cells as they retransform their morphology and function. Cell death by apoptosis and regression are the fates of many ameloblasts following enamel maturation, and what cells remain of the enamel organ are shed during tooth eruption, or are incorporated into the tooth's epithelial attachment to the oral gingiva. In this review, we examine key aspects of dental enamel formation, from its developmental genesis to the ever-increasing wealth of data on the mechanisms mediating ionic transport, as well as the clinical outcomes resulting from abnormal ameloblast function.

Enamel ribbons, surface nodules, and octacalcium phosphate in C57BL/6 Amelx-/- mice and Amelx+/- lyonization

BACKGROUND

Amelogenin is required for normal enamel formation and is the most abundant protein in developing enamel.

METHODS

Amelx^+/+, Amelx^+/- , and Amelx^-/- molars and incisors from C57BL/6 mice were characterized using RT-PCR, Western blotting, dissecting and light microscopy, immunohistochemistry (IHC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), backscattered SEM (bSEM), nanohardness testing, and X-ray diffraction.

RESULTS

No amelogenin protein was detected by Western blot analyses of enamel extracts from Amelx^-/- mice. Amelx^-/- incisor enamel averaged 20.3 ± 3.3 μm in thickness, or only 1/6th that of the wild type (122.3 ± 7.9 μm). Amelx^-/- incisor enamel nanohardness was 1.6 Gpa, less than half that of wild-type enamel (3.6 Gpa). Amelx^+/- incisors and molars showed vertical banding patterns unique to each tooth. IHC detected no amelogenin in Amelx^-/- enamel and varied levels of amelogenin in Amelx^+/- incisors, which correlated positively with enamel thickness, strongly supporting lyonization as the cause of the variations in enamel thickness. TEM analyses showed characteristic mineral ribbons in Amelx^+/+ and Amelx^-/- enamel extending from mineralized dentin collagen to the ameloblast. The Amelx^-/- enamel ribbons were not well separated by matrix and appeared to fuse together, forming plates. X-ray diffraction determined that the predominant mineral in Amelx^-/- enamel is octacalcium phosphate (not calcium hydroxyapatite). Amelx^-/- ameloblasts were similar to wild-type ameloblasts except no Tomes' processes extended into the thin enamel. Amelx^-/- and Amelx^+/- molars both showed calcified nodules on their occlusal surfaces. Histology of D5 and D11 developing molars showed nodules forming during the maturation stage.

CONCLUSION

Amelogenin forms a resorbable matrix that separates and supports, but does not shape early secretory-stage enamel ribbons. Amelogenin may facilitate the conversion of enamel ribbons into hydroxyapatite by inhibiting the formation of octacalcium phosphate. Amelogenin is necessary for thickening the enamel layer, which helps maintain ribbon organization and development and maintenance of the Tomes' process.

Amelogenin Exon4 Forms a Novel miRNA That Directs Ameloblast and Osteoblast Differentiation

Amelogenins constitute the major portion of secretory enamel matrix proteins and are known to be highly alternative spliced. Of all the alternatively spliced forms of amelogenins, exon4 is most commonly spliced out. Our analyses of the exon4 sequence led us to hypothesize that when spliced out, exon4 may generate a novel mature miRNA. To explore this possibility, we used in vivo mouse models (wild-type and Amel knockout mice) and in vitro cell culture to investigate the presence and function of a mature miRNA derived from exon4 (miR-exon4). When ameloblast-like cells (LS8) were transfected with an amelogenin minigene to increase amelogenin synthesis, the transfected cells synthesized miR-exon4. Introduction of a mutation in the conserved CNNC sequence required for primary miRNA recognition, downstream of the mature miR-exon4 sequence, resulted in a significantly reduced production of miR-exon4 in the transfected cells. In vivo, miR-exon4 was most highly amplified from wild-type mouse enamel organs at the secretory stage. In Amel knockout mice, an in vivo model for reduced amelogenin synthesis, we found reduced miR-exon4, with no changes in expression of enamel matrix-related genes. However, expression of Runx2 and its downstream genes Odam and Amtn were significantly downregulated. Transfection of miR-exon4 mimic to the LS8 cells also significantly upregulated Runx2. The mature miR-exon4 as well as Runx2 was also present in mouse osteoblasts with no apparent change in expression level between wild-type and Amel knockout mice. However, transfecting miR-exon4 inhibitor to the MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells resulted in a significant downregulation of Runx2 expression. These data indicate that when exon4 is spliced out, as occurs most of the time during alternative splicing of amelogenin pre-mRNA, a novel mature miRNA is generated from exon4. This miR-exon4 may contribute to the differentiation of ameloblasts and osteoblasts through regulation of Runx2 expression.

Identification and characterization of the cDNA sequence encoding amelogenin in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

Amelogenins, the most abundant proteins in tooth enamel extracellular matrix (ECM), are essential for tooth amelogenesis. The nucleotide sequence of amelogenin gene (AMEL) for rabbit, as an important member of mammals and good continuously growing incisor model, is important for comparative and evolutional study. Previous studies about rabbit amelogenin proteins got no consensus yet even as to their existence or size. In this study, with combined usage of in silico and molecular cloning technologies, we identified sequences of two transcripts of rabbit amelogenin, resulting from the alternative splicing of the 45-bp exon 4. The coding regions of the two transcripts are of 567- and 522-bp, encoding 188 and 173 amino acids including a 17-residue signal peptide, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed that rabbit amelogenin features in extremely high GC-content in nucleotide sequence and Alanine content in protein sequence. Detailed comparison of amino acid sequence with other mammals showed that the rabbit amelogenin protein is conserved in the sites and regions important for protein functions. Overall, our results uncovered the mysteries about rabbit amelogenin and revealed its sequence peculiarities.

Tracking endogenous amelogenin and ameloblastin in vivo

Research on enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) is centered on understanding their role in enamel biomineralization and their bioactivity for tissue engineering. While therapeutic application of EMPs has been widely documented, their expression and biological function in non-enamel tissues is unclear. Our first aim was to screen for amelogenin (AMELX) and ameloblastin (AMBN) gene expression in mandibular bones and soft tissues isolated from adult mice (15 weeks old). Using RT-PCR, we showed mRNA expression of AMELX and AMBN in mandibular alveolar and basal bones and, at low levels, in several soft tissues; eyes and ovaries were RNA-positive for AMELX and eyes, tongues and testicles for AMBN. Moreover, in mandibular tissues AMELX and AMBN mRNA levels varied according to two parameters: 1) ontogenic stage (decreasing with age), and 2) tissue-type (e.g. higher level in dental epithelial cells and alveolar bone when compared to basal bone and dental mesenchymal cells in 1 week old mice). In situ hybridization and immunohistodetection were performed in mandibular tissues using AMELX KO mice as controls. We identified AMELX-producing (RNA-positive) cells lining the adjacent alveolar bone and AMBN and AMELX proteins in the microenvironment surrounding EMPs-producing cells. Western blotting of proteins extracted by non-dissociative means revealed that AMELX and AMBN are not exclusive to mineralized matrix; they are present to some degree in a solubilized state in mandibular bone and presumably have some capacity to diffuse. Our data support the notion that AMELX and AMBN may function as growth factor-like molecules solubilized in the aqueous microenvironment. In jaws, they might play some role in bone physiology through autocrine/paracrine pathways, particularly during development and stress-induced remodeling.

M180 amelogenin processed by MMP20 is sufficient for decussating murine enamel

Amelogenin (AMELX) and matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP20) are essential for proper enamel development. Amelx and Mmp20 mutations cause amelogenesis imperfecta. MMP20, a protease secreted by ameloblasts, is responsible for processing enamel proteins, including AMELX, during the secretory stage of enamel formation. Of at least 16 different amelogenin splice products, the most abundant isoform found in murine ameloblasts and developing enamel is the M180 protein. To understand the role of MMP20 processing of M180 AMELX, we generated AmelxKO/Mmp20KO (DKO) mice with an amelogenin (M180Tg) transgene. We analyzed the enamel phenotype by SEM to determine enamel structure and thickness, µCT, and by nanoindentation to quantify enamel mechanical properties. M180Tg/DKO mouse enamel had 37% of the hardness of M180Tg/AmelxKO teeth and demonstrated a complete lack of normal prismatic architecture. Although molar enamel of M180Tg/AmelxKO mice was thinner than WT, it had similar mechanical properties and decussating enamel prisms, which were abolished by the loss of MMP20 in the M180Tg/DKO mice. Retention of the C-terminus or complete lack of this domain is unable to rescue amelogenin null enamel. We conclude that among amelogenins, M180 alone is sufficient for normal enamel mechanical properties and prism patterns, but that additional amelogenin splice products are required to restore enamel thickness.

Alternative Splicing of the Amelogenin Gene in a Caudate Amphibian, Plethodon cinereus

As the major enamel matrix protein contributing to tooth development, amelogenin has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in tooth enamel formation. Previous studies have revealed amelogenin alternative splicing as a mechanism for amelogenin heterogeneous expression in mammals. While amelogenin and its splicing forms in mammalian vertebrates have been characterized, splicing variants of amelogenin gene still remains largely unknown in non-mammalian species. Here, using PCR and sequence analysis we discovered two novel amelogenin transcript variants in tooth organ extracts from a caudate amphibian, the salamander Plethodoncinereus. The one was shorter -S- (416 nucleotides including untranslated regions, 5 exons) and the other larger -L- (851 nt, 7 exons) than the previously published “normal” gene in this species -M- (812 nucleotides, 6 exons). This is the first report demonstrating the amelogenin alternative splicing in amphibian, revealing a unique exon 2b and two novel amelogenin gene transcripts in Plethodoncinereus.

Leucine rich amelogenin peptide alters ameloblast differentiation in vivo

Highly mineralized tooth enamel develops from an extracellular matrix chiefly comprised of amelogenins formed by splicing of 7 (human) or 9 (rodent) exons secreted from specialized epithelial cells known as ameloblasts. Here we examined the role of the 59 amino acid alternatively spliced amelogenin known as leucine rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP) on enamel formation, using transgenic murine models in which LRAP overexpression is driven by an amelogenin promoter (TgLRAP). Beginning in the secretory stage of mouse amelogenesis, we found a reduced thickness of enamel matrix and a loss of Tomes' processes, followed by upregulated amelogenin mRNA expression, inhibited amelogenin secretion and loss of cell polarity. In the presecretory stage (P0) amelogenin m180 mRNA expression was increased 58 fold along with a 203 fold increase in MMP-20 expression and 3.5 and 3.2 fold increased in respectively enamelin and ameloblastin. When LRAP was overexpressed on an amelogenin knockout mouse model, the ameloblasts were not affected. Further, expression of the global chromatin organizer and transcription factor SATB1 was reduced in secretory stage TgLRAP ameloblasts. These findings identify a cellular role for LRAP in enamel formation that is not directly related to directing enamel crystal formation as is reported to be the primary function of full length amelogenins. The effect of LRAP overexpression in upregulating amelogenins, MMP-20 and SATB1, suggests a role in protein regulation critical to ameloblast secretion and matrix processing, to form a mineralized enamel matrix.

Amelogenesis imperfecta in two families with defined AMELX deletions in ARHGAP6

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of inherited conditions featuring isolated enamel malformations. About 5% of AI cases show an X-linked pattern of inheritance, which are caused by mutations in AMELX. In humans there are two, non-allelic amelogenin genes: AMELX (Xp22.3) and AMELY (Yp11.2). About 90% of amelogenin expression is from AMELX, which is nested within intron 1 of the gene encoding Rho GTPase activating protein 6 (ARHGAP6). We recruited two AI families and determined that their disease-causing mutations were partial deletions in ARHGAP6 that completely deleted AMELX. Affected males in both families had a distinctive enamel phenotype resembling "snow-capped" teeth. The 96,240 bp deletion in family 1 was confined to intron 1 of ARHGAP6 (g.302534_398773del96240), but removed alternative ARHGAP6 promoters 1c and 1d. Analyses of developing teeth in mice showed that ARHGAP6 is not expressed from these promoters in ameloblasts. The 52,654 bp deletion in family 2 (g.363924_416577del52654insA) removed ARHGAP6 promoter 1d and exon 2, precluding normal expression of ARHGAP6. The male proband of family 2 had slightly thinner enamel with greater surface roughness, but exhibited the same pattern of enamel malformations characteristic of males in family 1, which themselves showed minor variations in their enamel phenotypes. We conclude that the enamel defects in both families were caused by amelogenin insufficiency, that deletion of AMELX results in males with a characteristic snow-capped enamel phenotype, and failed ARHGAP6 expression did not appreciably alter the severity of enamel defects when AMELX was absent.

Reflections on my journey in biomedical research: the art, science, and politics of advocacy

Scientific Discovery often reflects the art, science, and advocacy for biomedical research. Here the author reflects on selected highlights of discovery that contributed to several aspects of our understanding of craniofacial biology and craniofacial diseases and disorders.

Identification of a novel splicing form of amelogenin gene in a reptile, Ctenosaura similis

Amelogenin, the major enamel matrix protein in tooth development, has been demonstrated to play a significant role in tooth enamel formation. Previous studies have identified the alternative splicing of amelogenin in many mammalian vertebrates as one mechanism for amelogenin heterogeneous expression in teeth. While amelogenin and its splicing forms in mammalian vertebrates have been cloned and sequenced, the amelogenin gene, especially its splicing forms in non-mammalian species, remains largely unknown. To better understand the mechanism underlying amelogenin evolution, we previously cloned and characterized an amelogenin gene sequence from a squamate, the green iguana. In this study, we employed RT-PCR to amplify the amelogenin gene from the black spiny-tailed iguana Ctenosaura similis teeth, and discovered a novel splicing form of the amelogenin gene. The transcript of the newly identified iguana amelogenin gene (named C. Similis-T2L) is 873 nucleotides long encoding an expected polypeptide of 206 amino acids. The C. Similis-T2L contains a unique exon denominated exon X, which is located between exon 5 and exon 6. The C. Similis-T2L contains 7 exons including exon 1, 2, 3, 5, X, 6, and 7. Analysis of the secondary and tertiary structures of T2L amelogenin protein demonstrated that exon X has a dramatic effect on the amelogenin structures. This is the first report to provide definitive evidence for the amelogenin alternative splicing in non-mammalian vertebrates, revealing a unique exon X and the splicing form of the amelogenin gene transcript in Ctenosaura similis.

Rescue of the murine amelogenin null phenotype with two amelogenin transgenes

The amelogenin proteins are required for normal enamel development, and the most abundant amelogenins expressed from alternatively spliced mRNAs are M180 and leucine-rich amelogenin protein (LRAP). The X-Chromosomal Amelogenin (Amelx) null [knockout (KO)] mouse has an enamel defect similar to human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. The disorganized enamel layer in KO mice is 10-20% of the thickness of wild-type (WT) enamel and lacks prismatic structures. When the KO mice were mated with mice that express the transgene M180-87, (TgM180-87) partial rescue of the phenotype was observed such that enamel thickness, volume, and density increased. A second transgene was introduced by mating TgM180 KO mice with TgLRAP mice, and male offspring were characterized for genotype and tooth phenotype was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The molar enamel thickness of TgM180-LRAP KO mice was further increased, and the structure was improved, with a more defined decussation pattern compared with singly rescued mice. We conclude that TgM180 provides significant rescue of the KO phenotype. Although the effectiveness of the LRAP transgene, alone, to rescue is less obvious, the addition of the LRAP transgene to the M180 transgene in KO enamel leads to an added improvement in both amount and structure and thus these transgenes function in a complementary manner. Together, the two most abundant amelogenins lead to the formation of obvious enamel decussation patterns.

Enamel matrix derivative: a review of cellular effects in vitro and a model of molecular arrangement and functioning

BACKGROUND

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD), the active component of Emdogain®, is a viable option in the treatment of periodontal disease owing to its ability to regenerate lost tissue. It is believed to mimic odontogenesis, though the details of its functioning remain the focus of current research.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review all relevant literature reporting on the composition/characterization of EMD as well as the effects of EMD, and its components amelogenin and ameloblastin, on the behavior of various cell types in vitro. In this way, insight into the underlying mechanism of regeneration will be garnered and utilized to propose a model for the molecular arrangement and functioning of EMD.

METHODS

A review of in vitro studies of EMD, or components of EMD, was performed using key words "enamel matrix proteins" OR "EMD" OR "Emdogain" OR "amelogenin" OR "ameloblastin" OR "sheath proteins" AND "cells." Results of this analysis, together with current knowledge on the molecular composition of EMD and the structure and regulation of its components, are then used to present a model of EMD functioning.

RESULTS

Characterization of the molecular composition of EMD confirmed that amelogenin proteins, including their enzymatically cleaved and alternatively spliced fragments, dominate the protein complex (>90%). A small presence of ameloblastin has also been reported. Analysis of the effects of EMD indicated that gene expression, protein production, proliferation, and differentiation of various cell types are affected and often enhanced by EMD, particularly for periodontal ligament and osteoblastic cell types. EMD also stimulated angiogenesis. In contrast, EMD had a cytostatic effect on epithelial cells. Full-length amelogenin elicited similar effects to EMD, though to a lesser extent. Both the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide and the ameloblastin peptides demonstrated osteogenic effects. A model for molecular structure and functioning of EMD involving nanosphere formation, aggregation, and dissolution is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

EMD elicits a regenerative response in periodontal tissues that is only partly replicated by amelogenin or ameloblastin components. A synergistic effect among the various proteins and with the cells, as well as a temporal effect, may prove important aspects of the EMD response in vivo.

Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of the influence of fluoride excess on the development of rat incisor tooth buds

Little information is available on the pathogenesis of fluorosis during the fetal and initial postnatal period. In the present study, female rats received 0 (control), 7 or 100 ppm of sodium fluoride in drinking water, one week before breeding and throughout gestation and nursing periods. The hemimandibles of the offspring were collected at 0, 7 and 14 days of postnatal life (n = 5) and processed for morphological analyses by light and electron microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis for amelogenin and morphometric study of enamel matrix and ameloblasts of incisors. The results showed a decrease in matrix production at the secretory phase at all study periods for the 100 ppm group. In this same group, the secretory ameloblasts showed reduction of enamel matrix secretion, disorganization of mitochondrial crests, large vacuoles at the apical portion of the cytoplasm, retention of intracisternal material and dilatation of some cisterns in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. In the groups of animals aged 7 and 14 days, analysis of variance showed significant reduction (p<0.05) in cytoplasmic volume of 23.80% and 24.75%, respectively, in relation to the control group. The smooth-ended maturation ameloblasts exhibited a large number of vacuoles with electron-dense endocytic matrix, suggesting a delay in the resorption process. Immunohistochemical analysis showed no difference in the intensity and labeling pattern of the enamel matrix in any study group. Interestingly, in offspring at the age of 14 days for the 7 ppm group, there was an increase in the matrix length at the secretory phase. Therefore, part of the excessive dose of sodium fluoride given to the mother in drinking water can reach the offspring through the placenta and mother’s milk, causing morphological changes in ameloblasts and suggesting a reduction in secretion and a delay in matrix resorption.

In vivo application of amelogenin suppresses root resorption

Amelogenin is recognized as an enamel protein associated with enamel formation. Besides this well-known function, remarkable root resorption has been seen in amelogenin-null mutant mice. Moreover, in vitro culture studies showed that amelogenin suppressed osteoclast differentiation. These studies raised the hypothesis that amelogenin can inhibit root resorption by reducing odontoclast number. To examine this hypothesis, we applied porcine amelogenins in a rat root resorption model, in which maxillary first molars were replanted after being air-dried. Compared with untreated and carrier-treated tooth roots, the application dramatically reduced the odontoclast number on root surfaces and inhibited cementum and root dentin resorption. Amelogenin significantly reduced the number of human odontoclastic cells in culture. It also inhibited RANKL expression in mouse bone marrow cell cultures. All these findings support our hypothesis that amelogenin application suppresses root resorption by inhibiting odontoclast number, and suggest that this is mediated by the regulation of RANKL expression.

Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration

During tooth development, ectoderm-derived ameloblast cells create enamel by synthesizing a complex protein mixture serving to control cell to matrix interactions and the habit of hydroxyapatite crystallites. Using an in vitro cell and organ culture system, we studied the effect of artificial bioactive nanostructures on ameloblasts with the long-term goal of developing cell-based strategies for tooth regeneration. We used branched peptide amphiphile molecules containing the peptide motif Arg-Gly-Asp, or "RGD" (abbreviated BRGD-PA), known to self-assemble in physiologic environments into nanofibers that display on their surfaces high densities of this biological signal. Ameloblast-like cells (line LS8) and primary enamel organ epithelial (EOE) cells were cultured within PA hydrogels, and the PA was injected into the enamel organ epithelia of mouse embryonic incisors. The expression of amelogenin, ameloblastin, integrin alpha 5, and integrin alpha 6 was detected by quantitative real-time PCR and immunodetection techniques. We performed cell proliferation assay using BrdU labeling and a biomineralization assay using Alizarin red S staining with quantitative Ca(2+) measurements. In the cell culture model, ameloblast-like cells (LS8) and primary EOE cells responded to the BRGD-PA nanostructures with enhanced proliferation and greater amelogenin, ameloblastin, and integrin expression levels. At the site of injection of the BRGD-PA in the organ culture model, we observed EOE cell proliferation with differentiation into ameloblasts as evidenced by their expression of enamel specific proteins. Ultrastructural analysis showed the nanofibers within the forming extracellular matrix, in contact with the EOE cells engaged in enamel formation and regeneration. This study shows that BRGD-PA nanofibers present with enamel proteins participate in integrin-mediated cell binding to the matrix with delivery of instructive signals for enamel formation.

The effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3 on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein

We previously demonstrated that the uptake of M180 amelogenin protein in dental epithelial cells (HAT-7) results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization. To determine the processes involved in the uptake of extracellular M180 amelogenin by cells and in amelogenin intracellular trafficking in the amelogenin protein-mediated amelogenin mRNA expression pathway, we investigated the effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3, which are candidate M180 amelogenin receptors, on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, using anti-LAMP-1 and anti-LAMP-3 antibodies and siRNA analysis. The results indicate that LAMP3 blocking by anti-LAMP-3 decreases M180 amelogenin uptake, but does not affect amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, suggesting that LAMP3 is related to amelogenin degradation. Down-regulation by siRNA of LAMP1, which is the receptor for small amelogenin protein (LRAP), does not affect M180 amelogenin uptake, localization or amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein. Thus, while LAMP1 is the specific receptor for LRAP, it is not a receptor for M180 amelogenin. These findings will aid further research into the understanding of M180 amelogenin function and expression.

Functions of KLK4 and MMP-20 in dental enamel formation

Two proteases are secreted into the enamel matrix of developing teeth. The early protease is enamelysin (MMP-20). The late protease is kallikrein 4 (KLK4). Mutations in MMP20 and KLK4 both cause autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfecta, a condition featuring soft, porous enamel containing residual protein. MMP-20 is secreted along with enamel proteins by secretory-stage ameloblasts. Enamel protein-cleavage products accumulate in the space between the crystal ribbons, helping to support them. MMP-20 steadily cleaves accumulated enamel proteins, so their concentration decreases with depth. KLK4 is secreted by transition- and maturation-stage ameloblasts. KLK4 aggressively degrades the retained organic matrix following the termination of enamel protein secretion. The principle functions of MMP-20 and KLK4 in dental enamel formation are to facilitate the orderly replacement of organic matrix with mineral, generating an enamel layer that is harder, less porous, and unstained by retained enamel proteins.

Determination of protein regions responsible for interactions of amelogenin with CD63 and LAMP1

The enamel matrix protein amelogenin is secreted by ameloblasts into the extracellular space to guide the formation of highly ordered hydroxyapatite mineral crystallites, and, subsequently, is almost completely removed during mineral maturation. Amelogenin interacts with the transmembrane proteins CD63 and LAMP (lysosome-associated membrane protein) 1, which are involved in endocytosis. Exogenously added amelogenin has been observed to move rapidly into CD63/LAMP1-positive vesicles in cultured cells. In the present study, we demonstrate the protein region defined by amino acid residues 103-205 for CD63 interacts not only with amelogenin, but also with other enamel matrix proteins (ameloblastin and enamelin). A detailed characterization of binding regions in amelogenin, CD63 and LAMP1 reveals that the amelogenin region defined by residues PLSPILPELPLEAW is responsible for the interaction with CD63 through residues 165-205, with LAMP1 through residues 226-251, and with the related LAMP2 protein through residues 227-259. We predict that the amelogenin binding region is: (i) hydrophobic; (ii) largely disordered; and (iii) accessible to the external environment. In contrast, the binding region of CD63 is likely to be organized in a '7' shape within the mushroom-like structure of CD63 EC2 (extracellular domain 2). In vivo, the protein interactions between the secreted enamel matrix proteins with the membrane-bound proteins are likely to occur at the specialized secretory surfaces of ameloblast cells called Tomes' processes. Such protein-protein interactions may be required to establish short-term order of the forming matrix and/or to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of ameloblasts and/or to remove matrix protein debris during enamel biomineralization.

Enamel formation in vitro in mouse molar explants exposed to amelogenin polypeptides ATMP and LRAP on enamel development

OBJECTIVE

The enamel matrix contains amelogenin, leucine-rich amelogenin-polypeptide (LRAP), resulting from alternative splicing of the primary amelogenin-RNA transcript and tyrosine-rich amelogenin-polypeptide (TRAP), a proteolytic product of amelogenin. Presence of amelogenin-trityrosyl-motif peptide (ATMP) distinguishes TRAP from LRAP. The roles of these polypeptides in the formation of enamel remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

The mouse in vitro molar tooth-organ developed from bud stage (E16) was exposed to LRAP, ATMP, and mutated ATMP (T-ATMP, third proline replaced by threonine). The histology and morphometry of the explants on day-12 in culture was examined using Mallory's stain. Guanidine-HCl soluble protein concentrations of explants were compared.

RESULTS

The enamel width and protein solubility indicate that the explant on day-12 is comparable to postnatal molar on day-3 in vivo. The enamel of both untreated explants as well as that in vivo is fuchinophilic (acid fuchsin, AF+). ATMP reduced the ameloblast-height, accumulated AF+ spherules at the apical end of ameloblasts, and disrupted enamel-dentin bonding. T-ATMP abrogated deposition of AF+ material on the aniline blue positive (AB+) enamel matrix. LRAP reduced ameloblast-height, increased the enamel-width without disruption (at 17.25 nmol) and increased the density of AF+ dentinal tubules. AF+ substance from the tubules is released onto the surface of the dentin. The Guanidine-HCl-soluble protein is elevated in ATMP-treated explants but decreased in LRAP-treated explants.

CONCLUSION

Exogenous ATMP, T-ATMP and LRAP have divergent effects on developing enamel. Exogenous ATMP, but not LRAP, abrogates enamel-dentin bonding at 17.25 nmol. LRAP may play a role in the differentiation of ameloblasts, growth of enamel and formation of dentinal tubules.

Amelogenins in human developing and mature dental pulp

Amelogenins are a group of heterogenous proteins first identified in developing tooth enamel and reported to be present in odontoblasts. The objective of this study was to elucidate the expression and function of amelogenins in the human dentin-pulp complex. Developing human tooth buds were immunostained for amelogenin, and mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization. The effects of recombinant amelogenins on pulp and papilla cell proliferation were measured by Brd U immunoassay, and differentiation was monitored by alkaline phosphatase expression. Amelogenin protein was found in the forming dentin matrix, and amelogenin mRNA was localized in the dentin, presumably in the odontoblast processes. Proliferation of papilla cells was enhanced by recombinant human amelogenin rH72 (LRAP+ exon 4), while pulp cells responded to both rH72 and rH58 (LRAP), with no effect by rH174. These studies suggest that odontoblasts actively synthesize and secrete amelogenin protein during human tooth development, and that low-molecular-weight amelogenins can enhance pulp cell proliferation.

The molecular etiologies and associated phenotypes of amelogenesis imperfecta

The amelogenesis imperfectas (AIs) are a clinically and genetically diverse group of conditions that are caused by mutations in a variety of genes that are critical for normal enamel formation. To date, mutations have been identified in four genes (AMELX, ENAM, KLK4, MMP20) known to be involved in enamel formation. Additional yet to be identified genes also are implicated in the etiology of AI based on linkage studies. The diverse and often unique phenotypes resulting from the different allelic and non-allelic mutations in these genes provide an opportunity to better understand the role of these genes and their related proteins in enamel formation. Understanding the AI phenotypes also provides an aid to clinicians in directing molecular studies aimed at delineating the genetic basis underlying these diverse clinical conditions. Our current knowledge of the known mutations and associated phenotypes of the different AI subtypes are reviewed.

Identification and characterization of a squamate reptilian amelogenin gene: Iguana iguana

As the principal components of the developing tooth enamel matrix, amelogenins play a significant role in tooth enamel formation and organization. In order to elucidate the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, we have selected the Iguana iguana as a squamate model organism. Here we report the first complete squamate amelogenin sequence available as of yet and document unique features of Iguana amelogenins and enamel. Transmission electron microscopy documented randomly oriented Iguana enamel crystals during the elongation phase compared with organized enamel crystal patterns at comparable stages in mammals. Sequencing of PCR amplified products revealed a full-length I. iguana amelogenin cDNA containing 877 nucleotides with a 564 nucleotide coding sequence encoding 187 amino acids. The homologies of the newly discovered I. iguana amelogenin amino acid sequence with the published mouse, caiman (Palaeosuchus), and snake (Elaphe) amelogenin were 41.3%, 53.5%, and 55.5%, respectively. On Western blots one major protein with a molecular weight of 24 kDa, and two minor proteins with molecular weights of 28 and 13.5 kDa, respectively, were detected based on the cross-reactivity of antisera against recombinant Rana pipiens amelogenin proteins. Sequence analysis revealed a moderate sequence homology between mammalian and reptilian amelogenin genes. A significant alteration was the deletion of the hydrophilic GSP sequence from exon 3 in the mouse sequence resulting in a conversion to a hydrophobic region in Iguana. Together, these findings identified a novel amelogenin cDNA sequence in the squamate reptilian I. iguana and functional implications for the evolution of amelogenins and enamel in squamates.

The exon 6ABC region of amelogenin mRNA contribute to increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through amelogenin protein-enhanced mRNA stabilization

We recently demonstrated that the reuptake of full-length amelogenin protein results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization (Xu, L., Harada, H., Tamaki, T. Y., Matsumoto, S., Tanaka, J., and Taniguchi, A. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2257-2262). Here, we examined the molecular mechanism of enhanced amelogenin mRNA stabilization. To identify the cis-regulatory region within amelogenin mRNA, we tested various reporter systems using a deletion series of reporter plasmids. A deletion at exon 6ABC of amelogenin mRNA resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in the amelogenin mRNA expression level when compared with that of full-length mRNA, indicating that a cis-element exists in exon 6ABC of amelogenin mRNA. Furthermore, Northwestern analysis demonstrated that amelogenin protein binds directly to its mRNA in vitro, suggesting that amelogenin protein acts as a trans-acting protein that specifically binds to this cis-element. Moreover, recombinant mouse amelogenin protein extended the half-life of full-length amelogenin mRNA but did not significantly alter the half-life of exon 6ABC-deletion mutant mRNA. The splice products produced by deletion of exon 6ABC are known as leucine-rich amelogenin peptides and have signaling effects on cells. Our findings also suggest that the regulation of full-length amelogenin protein expression differs from the regulation of leucine-rich amelogenin peptide expression.

Evidence for direct amelogenin-target cell interactions using dynamic force spectroscopy

Increasing evidence suggests that amelogenin, long held to be a structural protein of developing enamel matrix, may also have cell signaling functions. However, a mechanism for amelogenin cell signaling has yet to be described. The aim of the present study was to use dynamic chemical force spectroscopy to measure amelogenin interactions with possible target cells. Full-length amelogenin (rM179) was covalently attached to silicon nitride AFM tips. Synthetic RGD peptides and unmodified AFM tips were used as controls. Amelogenin-RGD cell binding force measurements were carried out using human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPDF) from primary explants and a commercially available osteoblast-like human sarcoma cell line as the targets. Results indicated a linear logarithmic dependence between loading rate and unbinding force for amelogenin-RGD target cells across the range of loading rates used. For RGD controls, binding events measured at 5.5 nN s-1 force loading rate resulted in a mean force of 60 pN. Values for amelogenin-fibroblast and amelogenin-osteoblast-like cell unbinding forces, measured at similar loading rates, were 50 and 55 pN, respectively. These data suggest that amelogenin interacts with potential target cells with forces characteristic of specific ligand-receptor binding, suggesting a direct effect for amelogenin at target cell membranes.

Histidine tag fusion increases expression levels of active recombinant amelogenin in Escherichia coli

Amelogenin is a dental enamel matrix protein involved in formation of dental enamel. In this study, we have expressed two different recombinant murine amelogenins in Escherichia coli: the untagged rM179, and the histidine tagged rp(H)M180, identical to rM179 except that it carries the additional N-terminal sequence MRGSHHHHHHGS. The effects of the histidine tag on expression levels, and on growth properties of the amelogenin expressing cells were studied. Purification of a crude protein extract containing rp(H)M180 was also carried out using IMAC and reverse-phase HPLC. The results of this study showed clearly that both growth properties and amelogenin expression levels were improved for E. coli cells expressing the histidine tagged amelogenin rp(H)M180, compared to cells expressing the untagged amelogenin rM179. The positive effect of the histidine tag on amelogenin expression is proposed to be due to the hydrophilic nature of the histidine tag, generating a more hydrophilic amelogenin, which is more compatible with the host cell. Human osteoblasts treated with the purified rp(H)M180 showed increased levels of secreted osteocalcin, compared to untreated cells. This response was similar to cells treated with enamel matrix derivate, mainly composed by amelogenin, suggesting that the recombinant protein is biologically active. Thus, the histidine tag favors expression and purification of biologically active recombinant amelogenin.

The use of animal models to explore amelogenin variants in amelogenesis imperfecta

Amelogenin proteins are secreted by ameloblast cells during tooth development. Because of extensive alternative splicing of the amelogenin primary RNA transcript, and because systematic proteolysis results in many additional peptides during enamel maturation, it has been difficult to assign function to individual amelogenins. Targeted deletions and transgenic mice have been generated in order to better understand amelogenin protein function in vivo. From these murine models, we have determined that amelogenins are responsible for normal enamel thickness and structure, but not for initiation of enamel mineral formation at the dentin-enamel junction. Although it is now clear that the amelogenin (AmelX) gene exists in a nested orientation and that AmelX is expressed at a low level in various developing tissues, the significance of these findings is incompletely understood. Future studies are expected to answer remaining questions concerning structure/function relationships among these 'enamel proteins'.

Identification of temporal and spatial expression patterns of amelogenin isoforms during mouse molar development

Amelogenin synthesis is initiated in a restricted time frame during odontogenesis. Polypeptides translated from several alternatively spliced isoforms of amelogenin mRNA have been identified in ameloblasts and odontoblasts. Recent studies suggest that the isoforms deleting exons 6a, 6b, and 6c produce polypeptides that might exert regulatory functions governing the late stages of ameloblast and odontoblast differentiation. Herein, the spatial and temporal expression of mouse amelogenin mRNA isoforms M194, M180, M73, and M59 have been determined around the perinatal development period using splice form-specific probes. Expression levels and distribution patterns varied with developmental stage and cell location. Amelogenin mRNA expression was most prominent within the enamel organ at boundaries between cell layers, beginning at the newborn stage (PN0.5). Odontoblasts supported the expression of M73 and M59 mRNA from developmental stages PN0.5 to PN1.5 (1 d of age). In contrast, ameloblasts expressed predominantly the M180 mRNA isoform with full exon 6 but devoid of exon 4. In the enamel organ, the stratum intermediun cells supported expression of the full-length isoform, M194, including the full exon 6 and exon 4 sequences, and strikingly, expression of M180 message was inhibited. In conclusion, ameloblasts, odontoblasts, and stratum intermedium cells demonstrate selective alternative splicing patterns of the amelogenin pre-mRNA transcript.

An Amelogenin Minigene to Study Alternative Splicing

Diversity in gene expression is commonly observed as a result of alternative splicing of RNA transcripts. This is true in the case of amelogenin, one of the enamel matrix proteins. Our hypothesis is that additional amelogenin mRNA transcripts are generated in vivo, but these transcripts have yet to be observed because of the limitations of currently used detection methodologies. For this study our objective was to create an amelogenin minigene to study amelogenin RNA splicing events in cell lines of diverse character. Mouse genomic DNA was used as a PCR template to amplify the amelogenin DNA sequence spanning exons 2-7. The resulting PCR-generated DNA was subcloned in an expression vector. This resulting amelogenin minigene was shown to be functionally active by transfection into multiple cell lines. We have successfully cloned an amelogenin minigene, and as a result we describe and discuss novel amelogenin alternatively spliced transcripts.

Reuptake of extracellular amelogenin by dental epithelial cells results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization

Amelogenin is an extracellular matrix protein secreted by ameloblasts and is a major component of enamel matrix. Recently, in addition to their role in enamel formation, the biological activity of enamel proteins in the process of cell differentiation has recently become widely appreciated. In this study, we examined the biological activity of amelogenin on ameloblast differentiation. Recombinant mouse amelogenin (rm-amelogenin) enhanced the expression of endogenous amelogenin mRNA in a cultured dental epithelial cell line (HAT-7), despite a lack of increased amelogenin promoter activity. To solve this discrepancy, we analyzed the effects of rm-amelogenin on the stability of amelogenin mRNA. The half-life of amelogenin mRNA is extremely short, but in the presence of rm-amelogenin its half-life was extended three times longer than the control. Furthermore, we showed the entry of exogenous fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rm-amelogenin into the cytoplasm of HAT-7 cells. It follows from our results that exogenous amelogenin increases amelogenin mRNA levels through stabilization of mRNA in the cytoplasm of HAT-7 cells. Here we speculated that during differentiation, dental epithelial cells utilize a unique mechanism for increasing the production of amelogenin, the reuptake of secreted amelogenin.

Molecular evolution of amelogenin in mammals

An evolutionary analysis of mammalian amelogenin, the major protein of forming enamel, was conducted by comparison of 26 sequences (including 14 new ones) representative of the main mammalian lineages. Amelogenin shows highly conserved residues in the hydrophilic N- and C-terminal regions. The central hydrophobic region (most of exon 6) is more variable, but it has conserved a high amount of proline and glutamine located in triplets, PXQ, indicating that these residues play an important role. This region evolves more rapidly, and is less constrained, than the other well-conserved regions, which are subjected to strong constraints. The comparison of the substitution rates in relation to the CpG richness confirmed that the highly conserved regions are subjected to strong selective pressures. The amino acids located at important sites and the residues known to lead to amelogenesis imperfecta when substituted were present in all sequences examined. Evolutionary analysis of the variable region of exon 6 points to a particular zone, rich in either amino acid insertion or deletion. We consider this region a hot spot of mutation for the mammalian amelogenin. In this region, numerous triplet repeats (PXQ) have been inserted recently and independently in five lineages, while most of the hydrophobic exon 6 region probably had its origin in several rounds of triplet insertions, early in vertebrate evolution. The putative ancestral DNA sequence of the mammalian amelogenin was calculated using a maximum likelihood approach. The putative ancestral protein was composed of 177 residues. It already contained all important amino acid positions known to date, its hydrophobic variable region was rich in proline and glutamine, and it contained triplet repeats PXQ as in the modern sequences.

The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand-mediated osteoclastogenic pathway is elevated in amelogenin-null mice

Amelogenins, major components of developing enamel, are predominantly involved in the formation of tooth enamel. Although amelogenins are also implicated in cementogenesis, their precise spatial expression pattern and molecular role are not clearly understood. Here, we report for the first time the expression of two alternate splice forms of amelogenins, M180 and the leucine-rich amelogenin peptide (LRAP), in the periodontal region of mouse tooth roots. Lack of M180 and LRAP mRNA expression correlated with cementum defects observed in the amelogenin-null mice. The cementum defects were characterized by an increased presence of multinucleated cells, osteoclasts, and cementicles. These defects were associated with an increased expression of the receptor activator of the nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), a critical regulator of osteoclastogenesis. These findings indicate that the amelogenin splice variants, M180 and LRAP, are critical in preventing abnormal resorption of cementum.

Polypeptides translated from alternatively spliced transcripts of the amelogenin gene, devoid of the exon 6a, b, c region, have specific effects on tooth germ development in culture

Recombinant proteins have been produced from cDNAs corresponding to alternatively spliced transcripts comprised from exons 2,3,4,5,6d,7 and 2,3,5,6d,7 of the rat amelogenin gene. These peptides, designated as [A + 4] and [A - 4], respectively, induce embryonic muscle fibroblasts in culture in vitro to express proteins characteristic of the chondrogenic and osteogenic phenotypes, and in matrix-supported implants into rat muscle, in vivo, induce typical bone matrix proteins. The aim of the present work was to examine the potential role of these proteins on the development of odontogenic tissue. The lower first molars were collected from Charles River CD-1 mice at postnatal days 1 and 2 and were grown on semisolid, serum-free medium supplemented with ascorbic and retinoic acids and transferin. The peptides were added to the serum-free media at 10 ng/ml. As controls, the medium was either 20% fetal bovine serum or the supplemented serum-free medium without either amelogenin peptide. The tooth germs were cultured for 6 days, then fixed and paraffin embedded by standard procedures. The tissue blocks were serially sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), or antibodies to collagen 1 (Col1), phosphophoryn (DMP2), or cementum attachment protein (CAP). CAP, DMP2, and Col1 expression was enhanced by the addition of the amelogenin peptides, as compared to the 0% fetal bovine serum (FBS) controls, but the peptides showed different effects. Expression of DMP2, characteristic of dentin matrix, was upregulated by [A + 4], whereas CAP, characteristic of cementum, was upregulated by [A - 4]. Since the recombinant peptides are active, their corresponding tissue forms may be important in the stimulation of mesenchymal tissue differentiation. Thus, these specific amelogenin proteins may be involved in tooth morphogenesis.

Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases

Proteinases serve two important functions during dental enamel formation: They (a) process and (b) degrade enamel proteins. Different enzymes carry out these functions. Enamelysin (MMP-20) is the foremost enamel matrix-processing enzyme. Its expression initiates prior to the onset of dentin mineralization and continues throughout the secretory stage of amelogenesis. In vitro, enamelysin catalyzes all of the amelogenin cleavages that are known to occur during the secretory stage in vivo, and it is probably the enzyme responsible for the processing of all enamel proteins. There is evidence suggesting that enamelysin activity is critical for proper enamel formation. Uncleaved and processed enamel proteins often segregate into different compartments within the developing enamel layer, suggesting that they may have different functions. Intact ameloblastin and its C-terminal cleavage products localize in the superficial rod and interrod enamel, while its N-terminal cleavage products congregate in the sheath space. Intact enamelin is only present at the mineralization front within a micrometer of the enamel surface, while its cleavage products concentrate in the rod and interrod enamel. Processed enamel proteins accumulate during the secretory stage, but disappear early in the maturation stage. Enamel matrix serine proteinase 1 (EMSP1), now officially designated kallikrein 4 (KLK4), is believed to be the predominant degradative enzyme that clears enamel proteins from the matrix during maturation. KLK4 expression initiates during the transition stage and continues throughout maturation. KLK4 concentrates at the enamel surface when the enamel matrix disappears, and aggressively degrades amelogenin in vitro. During tooth development, proteinases are secreted by ameloblasts into the extracellular space, where they cleave enamel proteins by catalyzing the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. Enamel proteinases are present in low abundance and are not likely to participate directly in the mineralization process. Two major enamel proteinases have been identified: enamelysin (MMP20) and kallikrein 4 (KLK4). These proteinases are expressed at different times and have different functions. Their roles are to modify and/or to eliminate enamel matrix proteins, which affects the way enamel proteins interact with each other and with the developing enamel crystallites. A brief review of dental enamel formation is presented, followed by a more detailed analysis of enamelysin and KLK4 expression, structure, and function.

Pig amelogenin gene expresses a unique exon 4

The pig amelogenin gene was isolated from a Lambda genomic library, and a 6.3 kb SalI/XbaI restriction fragment, inclusive of exons 3 through 7, was subcloned into a plasmid vector. DNA sequencing revealed two putative exon 4 sequences. The derived amino acid sequence of exon 4a, KSGRWGARLTAFVSSVQ, had previously been identified in a 190-amino-acid amelogenin isoform by protein sequencing. Exon 4b encoded the peptide DLYLEAIRIDRTAF, which is homologous to exon 4-encoded segments reported for human, mouse, and rat. Oligonucleotides from both of these exons were used to amplify cDNA generated from developing teeth. Amplification products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, cloned, and characterized by DNA sequencing. Exon 4a was found in transcripts encoding amelogenin isoforms having 190 and 73 amino acids. Exon 4b was found only in apparent splicing intermediates that retained intron 3, but was not detected in any final mRNA transcripts. Pig amelogenin having apparent molecular mass of 23 kD were isolated from the enamel matrix and characterized by mass spectrometry. Two mass values, 18,512.5, and 18,571.2 Da, were measured that match the values predicted for the 162-amino-acid cleavage product of the 173-amino-acid amelogenin, and the 165-amino-acid cleavage product of the 190-amino-acid amelogenin, which includes 17 amino acids encoded by exon 4a. We conclude that the pig amelogenin gene expresses a unique exon 4 that is not homologous to, or evolved from, the exon 4 segment expressed in humans and rodents.

Expression of alternatively spliced RNA transcripts of amelogenin gene exons 8 and 9 and its end products in the rat incisor

In addition to seven known exons of the amelogenin gene, recent studies have identified two exons downstream of amelogenin exon 7 in genomic DNA of mouse and rat. Here the spatial and temporal expression of mRNAs and of the translated proteins derived from alternative splicing of the amelogenin gene ending with exon 8 and exon 9 were examined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RNA signals for exons 8 and 9 were expressed in the ameloblast layer extending from early presecretory to postsecretory transitional stages of amelogenesis. IHC of amelogenin proteins that include sequences encoded by these exons demonstrated identical localization of these proteins in the ameloblast layer corresponding to RNA signals identified by ISH. There was intense immunostaining of the enamel matrix secreted by these cells. Western blotting analysis of rat enamel proteins revealed three distinct protein bands with sequences encoded by the new exons. These data confirmed the existence of the transcripts of alternatively spliced mRNAs coding for exons 8 and 9 of the amelogenin gene in rat tooth germs and suggest that the translated proteins contribute to the heterogeneity of amelogenins and have some significant roles in enamel formation and mineralization.

Peptide dendrimers: applications and synthesis

Peptide dendrimers are radial or wedge-like branched macromolecules consisting of a peptidyl branching core and/or covalently attached surface functional units. The multimeric nature of these constructs, the unambiguous composition and ease of production make this type of dendrimer well suited to various biotechnological and biochemical applications. Applications include use as biomedical diagnostic reagents, protein mimetics, anticancer and antiviral agents, vaccines and drug and gene delivery vehicles. This review focuses on the different types of peptide dendrimers currently in use and the synthetic methods commonly employed to generate peptide dendrimers ranging from stepwise solid-phase synthesis to chemoselective and orthogonal ligation.

Model system for evaluation of alternative splicing: exon skipping

Alternative splicing of the primary RNA transcript is a common mechanism for generating protein diversity. A model system was developed to study this process in vitro that is useful for evaluation of splicing of transcripts expressed in cells that do not grow well in culture. The system was used to analyze skipping of exon 4 of the amelogenin message, normally expressed in ameloblast cells for a short interval during tooth enamel development. Amelogenins are highly conserved proteins resulting from extensive alternative splicing, with domains involved in a range of functions, including mineral formation and intercellular signaling. In the bovine gene, the very short intron 4 was predicted to inhibit inclusion of exon 4, because in murine ameloblasts, exon 4 is detectably included in mRNA, and intron 4 is longer than the bovine counterpart. Bovine intron 4 was lengthened, and this size increase enhanced exon 4 inclusion sixfold to eightfold, although splice site selection was inaccurate. Intron length, therefore, is not the sole determinant controlling amelogenin exon 4 inclusion, and cis-acting inhibitory elements may also be involved in exon skipping. This vector system allows evaluation of splicing of a tissue-specific RNA by focusing on exons of interest through transfection of heterologous cultured cells without complications attributable to background transcription of the gene being evaluated.

Amelogenin-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype

Dental enamel is the hardest tissue in the body and cannot be replaced or repaired, because the enamel secreting cells are lost at tooth eruption. X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (MIM 301200), a phenotypically diverse hereditary disorder affecting enamel development, is caused by deletions or point mutations in the human X-chromosomal amelogenin gene. Although the precise functions of the amelogenin proteins in enamel formation are not well defined, these proteins constitute 90% of the enamel organic matrix. We have disrupted the amelogenin locus to generate amelogenin null mice, which display distinctly abnormal teeth as early as 2 weeks of age with chalky-white discoloration. Microradiography revealed broken tips of incisors and molars and scanning electron microscopy analysis indicated disorganized hypoplastic enamel. The amelogenin null phenotype reveals that the amelogenins are apparently not required for initiation of mineral crystal formation but rather for the organization of crystal pattern and regulation of enamel thickness. These null mice will be useful for understanding the functions of amelogenin proteins during enamel formation and for developing therapeutic approaches for treating this developmental defect that affects the enamel.

Induction of amelogenin and ameloblastin by insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) during embryonic mouse tooth development in vitro

Insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) are considered pleiotropic, acting as both mitogen and differentiation factors. Several investigators have demonstrated the expression of insulin, IGFs, their cognate receptors and IGF binding proteins during tooth morphogenesis. Previous work done in our laboratory indicated that exogenous insulin and IGFs induce the accumulation of enamel extracellular matrix on mouse mandibular molars cultured in a serumless, chemically defined medium. In order to determine the level of control of these factors in the induction of enamel biomineralization, we designed experiments to quantitate mRNAs for enamel specific-gene products. Mandibular first molars (MI) obtained from E15 Swiss Webster mice were placed in organ culture in the presence of insulin (1,000 ng/ml), IGF-I (100 ng/ml) or IGF-II (100 ng/ml) for 6, 12 and 18-days. At termination date, the RNA was extracted and the concentration of mRNAs for amelogenin, tuftelin and ameloblastin were determined using a quantitative competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique (PCR mimic). Our results showed that after 6-days in culture; treatment with insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II increased the synthesis of amelogenin and ameloblastin. In contrast, the expression of tuftelin mRNA was not affected by either factor. In conclusion, our studies showed that the increase in enamel matrix formation by overexpression of IGFs is the result of transcriptional regulation of enamel specific proteins like amelogenin and ameloblastin but not tuftelin. These studies also suggest that the regulatory mechanisms controlling tuftelin gene expression are different than the mechanisms regulating ameloblastin and amelogenin transcription.

The pH dependent amelogenin solubility and its biological significance

Amelogenins are a group of extracellular enamel matrix proteins which are believed to be involved in the regulation of the size and habit of enamel crystals. The aim of this study was to compare the solubility properties of several amelogenins in various pH (4.0-9.0) solutions with an ionic strength (IS) of 0.15 M using the Micro BCA protein assay at 25 degrees C or 37 degrees C. The solubility of the recombinant amelogenin rM179 was lowest (0.7 mg/ml) close to its isoelectric point and it increased below and above this point. The solubility of the recombinant amelogenin rM166 remained almost the same (1-2 mg/ml) as the pH rose from 6.0 to 9.0 and it increased as the solution became more acidic. Synthetic "tyrosine-rich amelogenin polypeptide" (TRAP) was extremely insoluble (<0.2 mg/ml) in the pH range studied while synthetic "leucine-rich amelogenin polypeptide" (LRAP) was readily soluble (>3.3 mg/ml). The native porcine amelogenin with apparent molecular weight 25 kDa shared similar solubility behavior to rM179. The porcine 23 kDa amelogenin was only sparingly soluble (0.3-0.8 mg/ml) over a wide range of pH. Interestingly, the porcine 20 kDa amelogenin was remarkably soluble in the pH range of 4.0 to 6.0 (approximately 12 mg/ml), but the solubility dropped strikingly to only approximately 0.2 mg/ml at pH larger than approximately 7.0. The strong dependence of amelogenin solubility on solution pH may be involved in the regulation of aggregation, enzymatic degradation and the binding properties of amelogenins, thus playing an important role in enamel biomineralization.

Molecular cloning and characterization of the bovine and human tuftelin genes

The bovine tuftelin gene was cloned and its structure determined by DNA sequence analysis and comparison to bovine tuftelin cDNA. The analyses demonstrated that the cDNA contains a 1014 bp open reading frame encoding a protein of 338 residues with a calculated molecular weight of 38,630 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.85. Although similar, these results differ from those previously published [Deutsch et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 16021-16028] which contained a different conceptual amino acid sequence for the carboxy terminal region and identification of a different termination codon because of the absence of a single guanine residue in the published sequence. The protein does not appear to share homology or domain motifs with any other known protein. The bovine gene consists of 13 exons ranging in size from 66 to 1531 bp, the latter containing the encoded carboxy terminal and 3' untranslated regions. These exons are embedded in greater than 28 kbp of genomic DNA and codons are generally not divided at exon/intron borders. Sequence analysis of the cDNA and products produced by reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that exons 2, 5 and 6 are alternatively spliced. The 3' portion of the human gene was also isolated and characterized by DNA sequencing, which demonstrated agreement between the bovine and human sequences in the segment in question. The difference between the presently reported sequence and that of the previously published one suggests the possibility of an unusual type of polymorphism which would result in markedly different amino acid sequences at the carboxy terminal region of the protein. The human tuftelin gene was localized to chromosome 1q21 by in situ hybridization.