Oral insulin immunotherapy in children at risk for type 1 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial

Type 1 Diabetes: A Guide to Autoimmune Mechanisms for Clinicians

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the destruction of pancreatic beta cells by autoreactive T lymphocytes, leading to insulin deficiency and lifelong insulin dependence. It develops in genetically predisposed individuals, triggered by environmental or immunological factors. Although the exact causes of T1D remain unknown, the autoimmune pathogenesis of the disease is clearly indicated by the genetic risk conferred by allelic human leukocyte antigens (HLA), the almost obligatory presence of islet cell autoantibodies (AAbs) and immune cell infiltration of pancreatic islets from patients. At the same time, epidemiological data point to a role of environmental factors, notably enteroviral infections, in the disease, although precise causative links between specific pathogens and T1D have been difficult to establish. Studies of human pancreas organs from patients made available through repositories and the advent of high-dimensional high-throughput technologies for genomic and proteomic studies have significantly elucidated our understanding of the disease in recent years and provided mechanistic insights that can be exploited for innovative targeted therapeutic approaches. This short overview will summarise current salient knowledge on immune cell and beta cell dysfunction in T1D pathogenesis. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disease where the body's own immune system attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. This leads to a lack of insulin, a hormone essential for regulating blood sugar, which means people with T1D need insulin for life. The disease can develop at any age but is most diagnosed in children and young adults. Despite advances in treatment, T1D still significantly reduces life expectancy, especially in countries with fewer healthcare resources. T1D develops in people with a genetic predisposition, often triggered by environmental factors such as viral infections or changes in the gut microbiome. The disease progresses silently through three stages: Stage 1: Autoantibodies to beta cell components appear, signalling the immune system is reacting against the pancreas, but there are no symptoms; Stage 2: Beta cell function starts to decline, but fasting blood sugar is still normal; Stage 3: Enough beta cells are destroyed that fasting blood sugar rises, and symptoms of diabetes appear. The risk of progressing from stage 1 to full-blown diabetes is about 35-50% within five years, and even higher from stage 2. Over 60 genes are linked to T1D risk, most of which affect how the immune system works. The strongest genetic risk comes from specific versions of histocompatibility genes, which help the immune system distinguish between the body's own cells and invaders. Some types of these genes make it easier for the immune system to mistakenly attack beta cells. However, 90% of people diagnosed with T1D have no family member with T1D, showing that genetics is only part of the story. Environmental factors also play a big role. For example, certain viral infections, especially with viruses infecting the intestine, are associated with a higher risk of developing T1D. The gut microbiome - the community of bacteria living in our intestines - also influences risk, with healthier, more diverse microbiomes appearing to offer some protection. In T1D, immune cells - especially so-called T lymphocytes - mistake beta cells in the pancreas for threats and destroy them. This process is called autoimmunity. The attack is often reflected by the presence of autoantibodies against proteins found in beta cells. Over time, as more beta cells are lost, the body can no longer produce enough insulin, leading to the symptoms of diabetes. Interestingly, not all people with T1D have the same pattern of disease. For example, children diagnosed before age 7 often have more aggressive disease, more autoantibodies, and stronger genetic risk factors than those diagnosed later. Much of our understanding of T1D has come from studying animal models, but new technologies now allow researchers to study human pancreas tissue and blood immune cells in greater detail. Scientists are also exploring how the gut microbiome, diet, and environmental exposures contribute to T1D risk and progression. Treatment currently focuses on replacing insulin, but researchers are working on therapies that target the immune system or aim to protect or replace beta cells. Strategies include immunotherapy, gene therapy, and even modifying the gut microbiome. The goal is to prevent or reverse the disease, not just manage its symptoms. In summary, T1D is a complex autoimmune disease influenced by both genes and the environment. It progresses silently before symptoms appear, and while insulin therapy is life-saving, new research is paving the way for treatments that could one day halt or even prevent the disease.

Genetic protection from type 1 diabetes resulting from accelerated insulin mRNA decay

Insulin gene (INS) variation and beta-cell stress are associated with the risk of development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and autoimmunity against insulin. The unfolded protein response alleviating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress involves activation of inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) that impedes translation by mRNA decay. We discover that the IRE1α digestion motif is present in insulin mRNA carrying SNP rs3842752 (G>A). This SNP in the 3' untranslated region of INS associates with protection from T1D (INSP). ER stress in beta cells with INSP led to accelerated insulin mRNA decay compared with the susceptible INS variant (INSS). Human islets with INSP showed improved vitality and function and reversed diabetes more rapidly when transplanted into diabetic mice than islets carrying INSS only. Surrogate beta cells with INSP expressed less ER stress and INS-DRiP neoantigen. This explanation for genetic protection from T1D may act instead of or in concert with the previously proposed mechanism attributed to INS promoter polymorphism.

Fabrication of phospholipid polymer-modified alginate hydrogels for bioartificial pancreas

The bioartificial pancreas, composed of a semi-permeable hydrogel encapsulating insulin-secreting cells, has attracted attention as a treatment for type 1 diabetes. In this study, we developed phospholipid polymer-modified alginate hydrogel beads that encapsulated spheroids of the pancreatic beta cell line MIN6. The hydrogel beads were composed of methacrylated alginic acid, which enabled both ionic and covalent cross-linking, resulting in a hydrogel that was more stable than conventional alginate hydrogels. Furthermore, modification of biocompatible 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymers suppressed protein adsorption to the hydrogel beads. Hydrogel beads encapsulating MIN6 spheroids maintained the cell viability and insulin secretion ability in response to glucose levels in vitro. Allogenic transplantation of gel beads lowered blood glucose levels in diabetic mice for 30 days, whereas gel beads without MPC polymer modification failed to regulate blood glucose levels. These results indicate that MPC polymer modification of hydrogels provides a new strategy for the fabrication of functional bioartificial pancreas and transplantable biomaterials for cell therapies.

Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes: An Early Approach Appraisal for Spain by the AGORA Diabetes Collaborative Group

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta-cells, leading to lifelong insulin dependence. This review explores the current understanding of T1D pathogenesis, clinical progression, and emerging therapeutic approaches. We examined the complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental factors that could trigger the autoimmune response as well as the immunological mechanisms involved in beta-cell destruction. The clinical phases of T1D are discussed from the preclinical stage through diagnosis and long-term management, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention. Recent advancements in treatment strategies are presented, including immunomodulatory therapies and potential cell-based treatments aimed at preserving or restoring beta-cell function. Additionally, this review critically evaluates the feasibility and potential benefits of implementing a population-wide screening program for T1D in Spain. The epidemiological, economic, and ethical implications of such an initiative were considered by the national expert panel, focusing on the potential of early diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes in the face of the challenges of large-scale implementation. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers with valuable insights into the current landscape of T1D management and prospects for enhanced prevention and treatment strategies in the Spanish context.

Immunotherapy for Type 1 Diabetes: Mechanistic Insights and Impact of Delivery Systems

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells, leading to hyperglycemia and various complications. Despite insulin replacement therapy, there is a need for therapies targeting the underlying autoimmune response. This review aims to explore the mechanistic insights into T1D pathogenesis and the impact of delivery systems on immunotherapy. Genetic predisposition and environmental factors contribute to T1D development, triggering an immune-mediated attack on β-cells. T cells, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, play a central role in β-cell destruction. Antigen- specific immunotherapy is a unique way to modify the immune system by targeting specific antigens (substances that trigger the immune system) for immunotherapy. It aims to restore immune tolerance by targeting autoantigens associated with T1D. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems offer precise antigen delivery, promoting immune tolerance induction. Various studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nanoparticle-mediated delivery of autoantigens and immunomodulatory agents in preclinical models, and several patents have been made in T1D. Combining antigen-specific immunotherapy with β-cell regeneration strategies presents a promising approach for T1D treatment. However, challenges remain in optimizing delivery systems for targeted immune modulation while ensuring safety and efficacy.

Therapy concepts in type 1 diabetes mellitus treatment: disease modifying versus curative approaches

For many autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), efforts have been made to modify the disease process through pharmacotherapy. The ultimate goal must be to develop therapies with curative potential by achieving an organ without signs of parenchymal cell destruction and without signs of immune cell infiltration. In the case of the pancreas, this means regenerated and well-preserved beta cells in the islets without activated infiltrating immune cells. Recent research has opened up the prospect of successful antibody combination therapy for autoimmune diabetes with curative potential. This goal cannot be achieved with monotherapies. The requirements for the implementation of such a therapy with curative potential for the benefit of patients with T1DM and LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) are considered.

Predicting autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review of classic biomarkers and advances in artificial intelligence

Autoimmune diseases comprise a spectrum of disorders characterized by the dysregulation of immune tolerance, resulting in tissue or organ damage and inflammation. Their prevalence has been on the rise, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and escalating healthcare costs. Consequently, the prediction of autoimmune diseases has recently garnered substantial interest among researchers. Despite their wide heterogeneity, many autoimmune diseases exhibit a consistent pattern of paraclinical findings that hold predictive value. From serum biomarkers to various machine learning approaches, the array of available methods has been continuously expanding. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) presents an exciting new range of possibilities, with notable advancements already underway. The ultimate objective should revolve around disease prevention across all levels. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the most recent data pertaining to the prediction of diverse autoimmune diseases and encompasses both traditional biomarkers and the latest innovations in AI.

A Review of Stage 0 Biomarkers in Type 1 Diabetes: The Holy Grail of Early Detection and Prevention?

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an incurable autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic islet cells, resulting in lifelong dependency on insulin treatment. There is an abundance of review articles addressing the prediction of T1D; however, most focus on the presymptomatic phases, specifically stages 1 and 2. These stages occur after seroconversion, where therapeutic interventions primarily aim to delay the onset of T1D rather than prevent it. This raises a critical question: what happens before stage 1 in individuals who will eventually develop T1D? Is there a "stage 0" of the disease, and if so, how can we detect it to increase our chances of truly preventing T1D? In pursuit of answers to these questions, this narrative review aimed to highlight recent research in the field of early detection and prediction of T1D, specifically focusing on biomarkers that can predict T1D before the onset of islet autoimmunity. Here, we have compiled influential research from the fields of epigenetics, omics, and microbiota. These studies have identified candidate biomarkers capable of predicting seroconversion from very early stages to several months prior, suggesting that the prophylactic window begins at birth. As the therapeutic landscape evolves from treatment to delay, and ideally from delay to prevention, it is crucial to both identify and validate such "stage 0" biomarkers predictive of islet autoimmunity. In the era of precision medicine, this knowledge will enable early intervention with the potential for delaying, modifying, or completely preventing autoimmunity and T1D in at-risk children.

Factors Governing B Cell Recognition of Autoantigen and Function in Type 1 Diabetes

Islet autoantibodies predict type 1 diabetes (T1D) but can be transient in murine and human T1D and are not thought to be directly pathogenic. Rather, these autoantibodies signal B cell activity as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that present islet autoantigen to diabetogenic T cells to promote T1D pathogenesis. Disrupting B cell APC function prevents T1D in mouse models and has shown promise in clinical trials. Autoantigen-specific B cells thus hold potential as sophisticated T1D biomarkers and therapeutic targets. B cell receptor (BCR) somatic hypermutation is a mechanism by which B cells increase affinity for islet autoantigen. High-affinity B and T cell responses are selected in protective immune responses, but immune tolerance mechanisms are known to censor highly autoreactive clones in autoimmunity, including T1D. Thus, different selection rules often apply to autoimmune disease settings (as opposed to protective host immunity), where different autoantigen affinity ceilings are tolerated based on variations in host genetics and environment. This review will explore what is currently known regarding B cell signaling, selection, and interaction with T cells to promote T1D pathogenesis.

Early-childhood body mass index and its association with the COVID-19 pandemic, containment measures and islet autoimmunity in children with increased risk for type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to determine whether BMI in early childhood was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures, and whether it was associated with the risk for islet autoimmunity.

METHODS

Between February 2018 and May 2023, data on BMI and islet autoimmunity were collected from 1050 children enrolled in the Primary Oral Insulin Trial, aged from 4.0 months to 5.5 years of age. The start of the COVID-19 pandemic was defined as 18 March 2020, and a stringency index was used to assess the stringency of containment measures. Islet autoimmunity was defined as either the development of persistent confirmed multiple islet autoantibodies, or the development of one or more islet autoantibodies and type 1 diabetes. Multivariate linear mixed-effect, linear and logistic regression methods were applied to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the stringency index on early-childhood BMI measurements (BMI as a time-varying variable, BMI at 9 months of age and overweight risk at 9 months of age), and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of BMI measurements on islet autoimmunity risk.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased time-varying BMI (β = 0.39; 95% CI 0.30, 0.47) and overweight risk at 9 months (β = 0.44; 95% CI 0.03, 0.84). During the COVID-19 pandemic, a higher stringency index was positively associated with time-varying BMI (β = 0.02; 95% CI 0.00, 0.04 per 10 units increase), BMI at 9 months (β = 0.13; 95% CI 0.01, 0.25) and overweight risk at 9 months (β = 0.23; 95% CI 0.03, 0.43). A higher age-corrected BMI and overweight risk at 9 months were associated with increased risk for developing islet autoimmunity up to 5.5 years of age (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.01, 1.32 and HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.00, 2.82, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Early-childhood BMI increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and was influenced by the level of restrictions during the pandemic. Controlling for the COVID-19 pandemic, elevated BMI during early childhood was associated with increased risk for childhood islet autoimmunity in children with genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.

Implementation of type 1 diabetes genetic risk screening in children in diverse communities: the Virginia PrIMeD project

BACKGROUND

Population screening for risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been proposed to identify those with islet autoimmunity (presence of islet autoantibodies). As islet autoantibodies can be transient, screening with a genetic risk score has been proposed as an entry into autoantibody testing.

METHODS

Children were recruited from eight general pediatric and specialty clinics across Virginia with diverse community settings. Recruiters in each clinic obtained informed consent/assent, a medical history, and a saliva sample for DNA extraction in children with and without a history of T1D. A custom genotyping panel was used to define T1D genetic risk based upon associated SNPs in European- and African-genetic ancestry. Subjects at "high genetic risk" were offered a separate blood collection for screening four islet autoantibodies. A follow-up contact (email, mail, and telephone) in one half of the participants determined interest and occurrence of subsequent T1D.

RESULTS

A total of 3818 children aged 2-16 years were recruited, with 14.2% (n = 542) having a "high genetic risk." Of children with "high genetic risk" and without pre-existing T1D (n = 494), 7.0% (34/494) consented for autoantibody screening; 82.4% (28/34) who consented also completed the blood collection, and 7.1% (2/28) of them tested positive for multiple autoantibodies. Among children with pre-existing T1D (n = 91), 52% (n = 48) had a "high genetic risk." In the sample of children with existing T1D, there was no relationship between genetic risk and age at T1D onset. A major factor in obtaining islet autoantibody testing was concern over SARS-CoV-2 exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive saliva sampling implemented using a genetic risk score can identify children at genetic risk of T1D. Consent for autoantibody screening, however, was limited largely due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and need for blood collection.

Tracking DNA-based antigen-specific T cell receptors during progression to type 1 diabetes

T cells targeting self-proteins are important mediators in autoimmune diseases. T cells express unique cell-surface receptors (TCRs) that recognize peptides presented by major histocompatibility molecules. TCRs have been identified from blood and pancreatic islets of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Here, we tracked ~1700 known antigen-specific TCR sequences, islet antigen or viral reactive, in bulk TCRβ sequencing from longitudinal blood DNA samples in at-risk cases who progressed to T1D, age/sex/human leukocyte antigen-matched controls, and a new-onset T1D cohort. Shared and frequent antigen-specific TCRβ sequences were identified in all three cohorts, and viral sequences were present across all ages. Islet sequences had different patterns of accumulation based upon antigen specificity in the at-risk cases. Furthermore, 73 islet-antigen TCRβ sequences were present in higher frequencies and numbers in T1D samples relative to controls. The total number of these disease-associated TCRβ sequences inversely correlated with age at clinical diagnosis, indicating the potential to use disease-relevant TCR sequences as biomarkers in autoimmune disorders.

Screening and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes: Where Are We?

A diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and the subsequent requirement for exogenous insulin treatment is associated with considerable acute and chronic morbidity and a substantial effect on patient quality of life. Importantly, a large body of work suggests that early identification of presymptomatic T1D can accurately predict clinical disease, and when paired with education and monitoring, can yield improved health outcomes. Furthermore, a growing cadre of effective disease-modifying therapies provides the potential to alter the natural history of early stages of T1D. In this mini review, we highlight prior work that has led to the current landscape of T1D screening and prevention, as well as challenges and next steps moving into the future of these rapidly evolving areas of patient care.

Teplizumab in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Review

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune condition characterized by the irreversible destruction of the β cells of the pancreas, which leads to a lifelong dependency on exogenous insulin. Despite the advancements in insulin delivery methods, the suboptimal outcomes of these methods have triggered the search for therapies that may prevent or reverse the disease. Given the autoimmune aetiology of T1DM, therapies counteracting the immune-mediated destruction of the β-cells are the obvious target. Although several treatment strategies have been attempted to target cellular, humoral and innate immunity, very few have had a clinically meaningful impact. Of all the available immunomodulatory agents, cluster of differentiation (CD) 3 antibodies have exhibited the most promising preclinical and clinical results. Muromonab-CD3, which also happened to be a murine CD3 antibody, was the first monoclonal antibody approved for clinical use and was primarily indicated for graft rejection. The adverse effects associated with muromonab-CD3 led to its withdrawal. Teplizumab, a newer CD3 antibody, has a better side-effect profile because of its humanized nature and non-Fc-receptor-binding domain. In November 2022, teplizumab became the first immunomodulatory agent to be licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration for delaying the onset of T1DM in high-risk adults and children over 8 years old. The mechanism seems to be enhancing regulatory T-cell activity and promoting immune tolerance. This article reviews the mechanism of action and the clinical trials of teplizumab in individuals with T1DM or at risk of developing the disease.

Preclinical models for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - A practical approach for research

Numerous preclinical models have been developed to advance biomedical research in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). They are essential for improving our knowledge of T1DM development and progression, allowing researchers to identify potential therapeutic targets and evaluate the effectiveness of new medications. A deeper comprehension of these models themselves is critical not only to determine the optimal strategies for their utilization but also to fully unlock their potential applications in both basic and translational research. Here, we will comprehensively summarize and discuss the applications, advantages, and limitations of the commonly used animal models for human T1DM and also overview the up-to-date human tissue bioengineering models for the investigation of T1DM. By combining these models with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of T1DM, we can enhance our insights into disease initiation and development, ultimately leading to improved therapeutic responses and outcomes.

Helical-Like Assembly of Nateglinide as Coating for Oral Delivery of Insulin and Their Synergistic Prevention of Diabetes Mellitus

Oral delivery of antidiabetic active components promises to free millions of people from daily suffering who require routine injections. However, oral insulin (Ins) and other short-acting compounds such as nateglinide (NG) in harsh gastrointestinal tract still face great challenging, including low bioavailability, and rapid elimination. In this study, inspired by the self-assembly of phenylalanine-based peptides in nature, it is showed that NG a small phenylalanine derivative, assembles into left-handed helical nanofibers in the presence of Ca2+ . These helical NG nanofibers functioned as a coating layer on the surface of Ca2+ -linked alginate (Alg) microgels for the effective encapsulation of Ins. As expected, the sustained release and prolonged circulation of Ins and NG from the Ins-loading Alg/NG microgels (Ins@Alg/NG) in the intestinal tract synergistically maintain a relatively normal blood glucose level in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice after oral administration of Ins@Alg/NG. This further confirms that Ins@Alg/NG ameliorated Ins resistance mainly through activating Insreceptor substrate 1 (IRS1), protein kinase B (AKT), and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as by repressing glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). The strategy of using the assembly of NG as a coating achieves the oral delivery of insulin and showcases a potential for the treatment of diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic disease caused by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells. Individuals with type 1 diabetes are reliant on insulin for survival. Despite enhanced knowledge related to the pathophysiology of the disease, including interactions between genetic, immune, and environmental contributions, and major strides in treatment and management, disease burden remains high. Studies aimed at blocking the immune attack on β cells in people at risk or individuals with very early onset type 1 diabetes show promise in preserving endogenous insulin production. This Seminar will review the field of type 1 diabetes, highlighting recent progress within the past 5 years, challenges to clinical care, and future directions in research, including strategies to prevent, manage, and cure the disease.

Monitoring immunomodulation strategies in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease. Short-term treatment with agents targeting T cells, B cells and inflammatory cytokines to modify the disease course resulted in a short-term pause in disease activity. Lessons learnt from these trials will be discussed in this review. It is expected that effective disease-modifying agents will become available for use in earlier stages of T1D. Progress has been made to analyze antigen-specific T cells with standardization of T cell assay and discovery of antigen epitopes but there are many challenges. High-dimensional profiling of gene, protein and TCR expression at single cell level with innovative computational tools should lead to novel biomarker discovery. With this, assays to detect, quantify and characterize the phenotype and function of antigen-specific T cells will continuously evolve. An improved understanding of T cell responses will help researchers and clinicians to better predict disease onset, and progression, and the therapeutic efficacy of interventions to prevent or arrest T1D.

The countdown to type 1 diabetes: when, how and why does the clock start?

'The clock to type 1 diabetes has started when islet antibodies are first detected', commented George Eisenbarth with regard to the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. This review focuses on 'starting the clock', i.e. the initiation of pre-symptomatic islet autoimmunity/the first appearance of islet autoantibodies. In particular, this review addresses why susceptibility to developing islet autoimmunity is greatest in the first 2 years of life and why beta cells are a frequent target of the immune system during this fertile period. A concept for the development of beta cell autoimmunity in childhood is discussed and three factors are highlighted that contribute to this early predisposition: (1) high beta cell activity and potential vulnerability to stress; (2) high rates of and first exposures to infection; and (3) a heightened immune response, with a propensity for T helper type 1 (Th1) immunity. Arguments are presented that beta cell injury, accompanied by activation of an inflammatory immune response, precedes the initiation of autoimmunity. Finally, the implications for strategies aimed at primary prevention for a world without type 1 diabetes are discussed.

Lessons and Gaps in the Prediction and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a serious chronic autoimmune condition. Even though the root cause of T1D development has yet to be determined, enough is known about the natural history of T1D pathogenesis to allow study of interventions that may delay or even prevent the onset of hyperglycemia and clinical T1D. Primary prevention aims to prevent the onset of beta cell autoimmunity in asymptomatic people at high genetic risk for T1D. Secondary prevention strategies aim to preserve functional beta cells once autoimmunity is present, and tertiary prevention aims to initiate and extend partial remission of beta cell destruction after the clinical onset of T1D. The approval of teplizumab in the United States to delay the onset of clinical T1D marks an impressive milestone in diabetes care. This treatment opens the door to a paradigm shift in T1D care. People with T1D risk need to be identified early by measuring T1D related islet autoantibodies. Identifying people with T1D before they have symptoms will facilitate better understanding of pre-symptomatic T1D progression and T1D prevention strategies that may be effective.

Elevations in blood glucose before and after the appearance of islet autoantibodies in children

The etiology of type 1 diabetes has polygenic and environmental determinants that lead to autoimmune responses against pancreatic β cells and promote β cell death. The autoimmunity is considered silent without metabolic consequences until late preclinical stages,and it remains unknown how early in the disease process the pancreatic β cell is compromised. To address this, we investigated preprandial nonfasting and postprandial blood glucose concentrations and islet autoantibody development in 1,050 children with high genetic risk of type 1 diabetes. Pre- and postprandial blood glucose decreased between 4 and 18 months of age and gradually increased until the final measurements at 3.6 years of age. Determinants of blood glucose trajectories in the first year of life included sex, body mass index, glucose-related genetic risk scores, and the type 1 diabetes-susceptible INS gene. Children who developed islet autoantibodies had early elevations in blood glucose concentrations. A sharp and sustained rise in postprandial blood glucose was observed at around 2 months prior to autoantibody seroconversion, with further increases in postprandial and, subsequently, preprandial values after seroconversion. These findings show heterogeneity in blood glucose control in infancy and early childhood and suggest that islet autoimmunity is concurrent or subsequent to insults on the pancreatic islets.

Antigen-specific immunotherapies in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease caused by the destruction of pancreatic beta cells, in which immune system disorder plays an important role. Finding a cure for T1DM and restoring beta cell function has been a long-standing goal. Research has shown that immune regulation with pancreatic islet auto-antigens may be the most specific and safe treatment for T1DM. Immunological intervention using diabetogenic auto-antigens as a target can help identify T1DM in high-risk individuals by early screening of autoantibodies (AAbs) before the loss of pancreatic islet function and thus achieve primary prevention of T1DM. However, induction of self-tolerance in patients with pre-diabetes can also slow down the attack of autoimmunity, and achieve secondary prevention. Antigen-based immune therapy opens up new avenues for the prevention and treatment of T1DM. The zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) protein, presents in the serum of pre-diabetic and diabetic patients, is immunogenic and can cause T1D autoimmune responses. ZnT8 has become a potential target of humoral autoimmunity; it is of great significance for the early diagnosis of T1D. ZnT8-specific CD8⁺ T cells can be detected in most T1DM patients, and play a key role in the progression of T1D. As an immunotherapy target, it can improve the dysfunction of beta cells in T1DM and provide new ideas for the treatment of T1D. In this review, we summarize research surrounding antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASI) over the past 10 years and the ZnT8 antigen as an autoimmune target to induce self-tolerance for T1DM.

Preventing type 1 diabetes development and preserving beta-cell function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most common chronic disease of childhood presenting a significant burden, both in terms of day-to-day medical management and lifelong care. Studies aligned with diverse strategies to prevent or modify the course of T1D are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of T1D precedes the classic clinical presentation when insulin dependence develops. With an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of the autoimmune process leading to T1D, treatment strategies to prevent the development of autoimmunity and/or modify the immune response have been trialed in persons at risk for developing the disease. Interventions prior to insulin dependence or very early after clinical diagnosis show some promise both in preventing disease onset and prolonging beta-cell insulin production.

SUMMARY

Significant progress has been made in the treatment of T1D. However, suboptimal glycemic control remains a challenge impacting overall health and quality of life for patients with this chronic disease. Although physicians and basic sciences investigators continue to pursue the prevention of the autoimmune process, the advent of disease-modifying agents is a promising strategy. Further studies are needed to ensure that insulin preservation can be achieved longer term.

Personalized Immunotherapies for Type 1 Diabetes: Who, What, When, and How?

Our understanding of the immunopathological features of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has greatly improved over the past two decades and has shed light on disease heterogeneity dictated by multiple immune, metabolic, and clinical parameters. This may explain the limited effects of immunotherapies tested so far to durably revert or prevent T1D, for which life-long insulin replacement remains the only therapeutic option. In the era of omics and precision medicine, offering personalized treatment could contribute to turning this tide. Here, we discuss how to structure the selection of the right patient at the right time for the right treatment. This individualized therapeutic approach involves enrolling patients at a defined disease stage depending on the target and mode of action of the selected drug, and better stratifying patients based on their T1D endotype, reflecting intrinsic disease aggressiveness and immune context. To this end, biomarker screening will be critical, not only to help stratify patients and disease stage, but also to select the best predicted responders ahead of treatment and at early time points during clinical trials. This strategy could contribute to increase therapeutic efficacy, notably through the selection of drugs with complementary effects, and to further develop precision multi-hit medicine.

Self-Antigens Targeted by Regulatory T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes

While progress has been made toward understanding mechanisms that lead to the development of autoimmunity, there is less knowledge regarding protective mechanisms from developing such diseases. For example, in type 1 diabetes (T1D), the immune-mediated form of diabetes, the role of pathogenic T cells in the destruction of pancreatic islets is well characterized, but immune-mediated mechanisms that contribute to T1D protection have not been fully elucidated. One potential protective mechanism includes the suppression of immune responses by regulatory CD4 T cells (Tregs) that recognize self-peptides from islets presented by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules. In this review, we summarize what is known about the antigenic self-peptides recognized by Tregs in the context of T1D.

Preventing type 1 diabetes in late-stage pre-diabetic NOD mice with insulin: A central role for alum as adjuvant

BACKGROUND

Restoration of immune tolerance to disease-relevant antigens is an appealing approach to prevent or arrest an organ-specific autoimmune disease like type 1 diabetes (T1D). Numerous studies have identified insulin as a key antigen of interest to use in such strategies, but to date, the success of these interventions in humans has been inconsistent. The efficacy of antigen-specific immunotherapy may be enhanced by optimising the dose, timing, and route of administration, and perhaps by the inclusion of adjuvants like alum. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of an insulin peptide vaccine formulated with alum to prevent T1D development in female non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice when administered during late-stage pre-diabetes.

METHODS

Starting at 10 weeks of age, female NOD mice received four weekly subcutaneous injections of an insulin B:8-24 (InsB:8-24) peptide with (Ins+alum) or without Imject^® alum (Ins) as adjuvant. Diabetes incidence was assessed for up to 30 weeks of age. Insulin autoantibodies and C-peptide concentrations were measured in plasma and flow cytometric analysis was performed on pancreatic-draining lymph nodes (PLN) and pancreas using an InsB:12-20-reactive tetramer.

RESULTS

InsB:8-24 peptide formulated in alum reduced diabetes incidence (39%), compared to mice receiving the InsB:8-24 peptide without alum (71%, P < 0.05), mice receiving alum alone (76%, P < 0.01), or mice left untreated (70%, P < 0.01). This was accompanied by reduced insulitis severity, and preservation of C-peptide. Ins+alum was associated with reduced frequencies of pathogenic effector memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in the pancreas and increased frequencies of insulin-reactive FoxP3⁺ Tregs in the PLN. Of interest, insulin-reactive Tregs were enriched amongst populations of Tregs expressing markers indicative of stable FoxP3 expression and enhanced suppressive function.

CONCLUSION

An InsB:8-24 peptide vaccine prevented the onset of T1D in late-stage pre-diabetic NOD mice, but only when formulated in alum. These findings support the use of alum as adjuvant to optimise the efficacy of antigen-specific immunotherapy in future trials.

Potential Therapeutic Application of Regulatory T Cells in Diabetes Mellitus Type 1

The autoimmune reaction against the beta cells of the pancreatic islets in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients is active in prediabetes and during the development of the clinical manifestation of T1DM, but it decreases within a few years of the clinical manifestation of this disease. A key role in the pathogenesis of T1DM is played by regulatory T cell (Treg) deficiency or dysfunction. Immune interventions, such as potential therapeutic applications or the induction of the Treg-cell population in T1DM, will be important in the development of new types of treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate innovative immune interventions as treatments for T1DM. After an evaluation of full-length papers from the PubMed database from 2010 to 2021, 20 trials were included for the final analysis. The analysis led to the following conclusions: Treg cells play an important role in the limitation of the development of T1DM, the activation or application of Tregs may be more effective in the early stages of T1DM development, and the therapeutic use of Treg cells in T1DM is promising but requires long-term observation in a large group of patients.

The Evolution of Insulin Administration in Type 1 Diabetes

Insulin has been utilized in the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) for 100 years. While there is still no cure for T1D, insulin administration has undergone a remarkable evolution which has contributed to improvements in quality of life and life expectancy in individuals with T1D. The advent of faster-acting and longer-acting insulins allowed for the implementation of insulin regimens more closely resembling normal insulin physiology. These improvements afforded better glycemic control, which is crucial for limiting microvascular complications and improving T1D outcomes. Suspension of insulin delivery in response to actual and forecasted hypoglycemia has improved quality of life and mitigated hypoglycemia without compromising glycemic control. Advances in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pumps, efforts to model glucose and insulin kinetics, and the application of control theory to T1D have made the automation of insulin delivery a reality. This review will summarize the past, present, and future of insulin administration in T1D.

100 Years of Insulin: Lifesaver, immune target, and potential remedy for prevention

In this review, we bring our personal experiences to showcase insulin from its breakthrough discovery as a life-saving drug 100 years ago to its uncovering as the autoantigen and potential cause of type 1 diabetes and eventually as an opportunity to prevent autoimmune diabetes. The work covers the birth of insulin to treat patients, which is now 100 years ago, the development of human insulin, insulin analogues, devices, and the way into automated insulin delivery, the realization that insulin is the primary autoimmune target of type 1 diabetes in children, novel approaches of immunotherapy using insulin for immune tolerance induction, the possible limitations of insulin immunotherapy, and an outlook how modern vaccines could remove the need for another 100 years of insulin therapy.

Insights From Single Cell RNA Sequencing Into the Immunology of Type 1 Diabetes- Cell Phenotypes and Antigen Specificity

In the past few years, huge advances have been made in techniques to analyse cells at an individual level using RNA sequencing, and many of these have precipitated exciting discoveries in the immunology of type 1 diabetes (T1D). This review will cover the first papers to use scRNAseq to characterise human lymphocyte phenotypes in T1D in the peripheral blood, pancreatic lymph nodes and islets. These have revealed specific genes such as IL-32 that are differentially expressed in islet -specific T cells in T1D. scRNAseq has also revealed wider gene expression patterns that are involved in T1D and can predict its development even predating autoantibody production. Single cell sequencing of TCRs has revealed V genes and CDR3 motifs that are commonly used to target islet autoantigens, although truly public TCRs remain elusive. Little is known about BCR repertoires in T1D, but scRNAseq approaches have revealed that insulin binding BCRs commonly use specific J genes, share motifs between donors and frequently demonstrate poly-reactivity. This review will also summarise new developments in scRNAseq technology, the insights they have given into other diseases and how they could be leveraged to advance research in the type 1 diabetes field to identify novel biomarkers and targets for immunotherapy.

Insulin immunotherapy for pretype 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Loss of tolerance to insulin likely contributes to the immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Several large clinical trials and smaller mechanistic studies have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of insulin antigen therapy. The growing awareness of the heterogeneity of T1D likely affects the response to various immune therapies including insulin. Identification of biomarkers of clinical response will provide further insight into mechanisms leading to the disease and classify responders in the quest for personalized therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several biomarkers have identified subpopulations in posthoc analyses that showed benefit from oral insulin even though the placebo-controlled study was as a whole unsuccessful. High insulin autoantibody titer, low first phase insulin response, and high Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Risk Score identify at-risk relatives more likely to benefit from oral insulin. Future incorporation of human leukocyte antigen and the variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism located in the insulin gene promoter (INS VNTR) is of interest for both primary and secondary prevention studies.

SUMMARY

Although primary and secondary prevention trials using oral insulin are ongoing, those completed have been largely unsuccessful. However, we believe that oral insulin should be considered in future trials as part of combination therapies as prerandomization biomarker testing is refined.

The dark side of insulin: A primary autoantigen and instrument of self-destruction in type 1 diabetes

Background

Since its discovery 100 years ago, insulin, as the ‘cure’ for type 1 diabetes, has rescued the lives of countless individuals. As the century unfolded and the autoimmune nature of type 1 diabetes was recognised, a darker side of insulin emerged. Autoimmunity to insulin was found to be an early marker of risk for type 1 diabetes in young children. In humans, it remains unclear if autoimmunity to insulin is primarily due to a defect in the beta cell itself or to dysregulated immune activation. Conversely, it may be secondary to beta-cell damage from an environmental agent (e.g., virus). Nevertheless, direct, interventional studies in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse models of type 1 diabetes point to a critical role for (pro)insulin as a primary autoantigen that drives beta cell pathology.

Scope of review

Modelled on Koch's postulates for the pathogenicity of an infectious agent, evidence for a pathogenic role of (pro)insulin as an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes, particularly applicable to the NOD mouse model, is reviewed. Evidence in humans remains circumstantial. Additionally, as (pro)insulin is a target of autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes, its application as a therapeutic tool to elicit antigen-specific immune tolerance is assessed.

Major conclusions

Paradoxically, insulin is both a ‘cure’ and a potential ‘cause’ of type 1 diabetes, actively participating as an autoantigen to drive autoimmune destruction of beta cells - the instrument of its own destruction.

Precision Medicine and Public Health: New Challenges for Effective and Sustainable Health

The development of high-throughput omics technologies represents an unmissable opportunity for evidence-based prevention of adverse effects on human health. However, the applicability and access to multi-omics tests are limited. In Italy, this is due to the rapid increase of knowledge and the high levels of skill and economic investment initially necessary. The fields of human genetics and public health have highlighted the relevance of an implementation strategy at a national level in Italy, including integration in sanitary regulations and governance instruments. In this review, the emerging field of public health genomics is discussed, including the polygenic scores approach, epigenetic modulation, nutrigenomics, and microbiomes implications. Moreover, the Italian state of implementation is presented. The omics sciences have important implications for the prevention of both communicable and noncommunicable diseases, especially because they can be used to assess the health status during the whole course of life. An effective population health gain is possible if omics tools are implemented for each person after a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in the medium to long term.