1
|
Yoon JH. Response to "2025 Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology Recommendations on Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening Warrant Further Investigation and Clarification". Korean J Radiol 2025; 26:516-517. [PMID: 40169499 PMCID: PMC12055274 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2025.0216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/03/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bojan A, Pricop C, Vladeanu MC, Bararu-Bojan I, Halitchi CO, Giusca SE, Badulescu OV, Ciocoiu M, Iliescu-Halitchi D, Foia LG. The Predictive Roles of Tumour Markers, Hemostasis Assessment, and Inflammation in the Early Detection and Prognosis of Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma and Metaplasia: A Clinical Study. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:3665. [PMID: 40332145 PMCID: PMC12027584 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26083665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2025] [Revised: 04/03/2025] [Accepted: 04/10/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies of the biliary tract, often originating from chronic inflammation associated with gallstones and cholecystitis. Persistent inflammation plays a pivotal role in the development of preneoplastic changes, such as metaplasia, which may progress to malignancy. Despite its relatively low incidence, GBC is characterized by a poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis, highlighting the urgent need for improved early detection strategies. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic significance of CA 19-9 and CEA levels in patients with gallbladder lesions, while also evaluating systemic inflammation and hemostatic dysregulation. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with gallbladder lesions, with histopathological confirmation of adenocarcinoma and metaplasia. Laboratory assessments included serum levels of tumour markers, inflammatory markers such as CRP, and key hemostatic parameters, including thrombocyte count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen levels. A predictive scoring model was developed using the cutoff values of CA 19-9 and CEA to assess their combined diagnostic potential. Among the patients studied, 48.9% had an initial diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis, while 32.2% presented with acute cholecystitis. Adenocarcinoma was identified in 6.7% of cases after histopathological examination, predominantly in females over 65 years old with acute cholecystitis. Metaplasia was detected in 7.8% of cases, primarily in elderly females with chronic cholecystitis. Laboratory findings revealed significantly elevated levels of CA 19-9, CEA, AFP, and CA-125 in patients with adenocarcinoma. Additionally, abnormalities in hemostatic parameters, including increased fibrinogen levels and alterations in thrombocyte count, were observed in patients with malignancy. A combined predictive score using CA 19-9 and CEA demonstrated strong potential for detecting adenocarcinoma and metaplasia, improving diagnostic accuracy. Our findings emphasize the clinical importance of integrating tumour markers, inflammatory biomarkers, and hemostatic parameters in the evaluation of gallbladder lesions associated with chronic inflammation. The combined assessment of these factors enhances early detection, facilitates malignancy risk stratification, and improves prognostic evaluation, particularly in patients with metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Bojan
- Department of Surgical Specialties I, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania; (A.B.)
| | - Catalin Pricop
- Department of Surgical Specialties I, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania; (A.B.)
| | - Maria-Cristina Vladeanu
- Department of Morpho Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania (M.C.)
| | - Iris Bararu-Bojan
- Department of Morpho Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania (M.C.)
| | - Codruta Olimpiada Halitchi
- Department of Pediatry, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania
| | - Simona Eliza Giusca
- Department of Morpho Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania (M.C.)
| | - Oana Viola Badulescu
- Department of Morpho Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania (M.C.)
| | - Manuela Ciocoiu
- Department of Morpho Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania (M.C.)
| | - Dan Iliescu-Halitchi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania
| | - Liliana Georgeta Foia
- Discipline of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dou C, Han Y, Lin L, Wen J, Zhao W, Yang Y, Guan S, Li X, Gao M, Lu J. Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Risk Prediction Model for Polypoid Lesions of the Gallbladder. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2025; 52:e70028. [PMID: 39929712 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.70028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 01/03/2025] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025]
Abstract
Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (PLG) represent localised protrusions of the gallbladder wall, which can be either benign or malignant. Although malignant PLG is relatively rare, its prognosis is adverse. Cholecystectomy is the most efficacious treatment for malignant PLG; however, its suitability varies among PLG patients, and its indications remain controversial. To offer guidance for clinical diagnosis and treatment of PLG, 461 patients were included and classified into three subgroups based on postoperative pathological results. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors for PLG (the number of lesions, gallbladder wall thickness, gallbladder stones, and clinical symptoms), malignant PLG (age, polyp size, colour Doppler blood flow signal, gallbladder volume, and cholecystitis), and adenomatous PLG (CA199, the number of lesions, and gallbladder wall thickness). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to construct clinical prediction models for PLG (model A, containing the number of lesions, gallbladder wall thickness, gallbladder stones, and clinical symptoms), malignant PLG (model B, containing age, polyp size, CA199, and gallbladder volume), and adenomatous PLG (model C, containing CA199, the number of lesions, and gallbladder wall thickness). Subsequently, corresponding nomograms were developed. The AUC values of all models exceeded 0.7, indicating excellent predictive efficacy. Calibration curves and DCA curves affirmed the models' reliability and validity. In conclusion, the models derived from this study demonstrate significant predictive efficacy for PLG, malignant PLG, and adenomatous PLG, respectively. They are anticipated to offer guidance for the diagnosis of PLG and provide a reliable foundation for subsequent treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunxu Dou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongguan TungWah Hospital, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanzhi Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Lu Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Jiancheng Wen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Wang Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Shaoting Guan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Xiaofeng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Minzhao Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Jing Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu X, Zhang P, Wang T, Li Q, Li M, Zhao Z, Yu R, Tan Y, Yao C. MiR-33 as a novel diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps: a case-control study. Hereditas 2025; 162:37. [PMID: 40087680 PMCID: PMC11907919 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-025-00407-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025] Open
Abstract
Cholecystectomy is often excessively utilized in the management of gallbladder polyps. It is crucial to effectively differentiate between adenomatous and cholesterol polyps to reduce unnecessary cholecystectomies. This study aimed to investigate the potential of miR-33 as a novel diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps. Gallbladder specimens were retrospectively collected from gallbladder polyp patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Second Department of General Surgery, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, between June 2021 and December 2021. Pathological analysis categorized the specimens into two groups: the cholesterol polyp group (n = 13) and the adenomatous polyp group (n = 12). The expression levels of miR-33a and miR-33b in both groups were assessed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). MiR-33a level and the miR-33a/miR-33b ratio were significantly lower in cholesterol polyps than in adenomatous polyps (p < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between miR-33a and miR-33b (r = 0.956, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that decreased miR-33b and elevated miR-33a/miR-33b ratio are independent risk factors for cholesterol polyps (p < 0.05). A predictive model was constructed, with the model's AUC for diagnosing adenomatous polyps being 0.885 (95% CI: 0.753-1.000, p = 0.001), exhibiting a notable specificity of 84.62% and a sensitivity of 83.33% at a cut-off of 0.424. MiR-33 could serve as a novel diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Hu
- The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Tong Wang
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Quanzhi Li
- The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Minjia Li
- The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Zhuohan Zhao
- The First Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Rui Yu
- School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100105, China
| | - Yan Tan
- School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 East Beisanhuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100105, China.
| | - Chengli Yao
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.5 Haiyuncang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He Z, Yang S, Cao J, Gao H, Peng C. Predicting Neoplastic Polyp in Patients With Gallbladder Polyps Using Interpretable Machine Learning Models: Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancer Med 2025; 14:e70739. [PMID: 40052528 PMCID: PMC11886608 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/10/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are increasingly prevalent, with the majority being benign; however, neoplastic polyps carry a risk of malignant transformation, highlighting the importance of accurate differentiation. This study aimed to develop and validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models to accurately predict neoplastic GBPs in a retrospective cohort, identifying key features and providing model explanations using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. METHODS A total of 924 patients with GBPs who underwent cholecystectomy between January 2013 and December 2023 at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included. The patient characteristics, laboratory results, preoperative ultrasound findings, and postoperative pathological results were collected. The dataset was randomly split, with 80% used for model training and the remaining 20% used for model testing. This study employed nine ML algorithms to construct predictive models. Subsequently, model performance was evaluated and compared using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Feature importance was ranked, and model interpretability was enhanced by the SHAP method. RESULTS K-nearest neighbors, C5.0 decision tree algorithm, and gradient boosting machine models showed the highest performance, with the highest predictive efficacy for neoplastic polyps. The SHAP method revealed the top five predictors of neoplastic polyps according to the importance ranking. The polyp size was recognized as the most important predictor variable, indicating that lesions ≥ 18 mm should prompt heightened clinical surveillance and timely intervention. CONCLUSIONS Our interpretable ML models accurately predict neoplastic polyps in GBP patients, providing guidance for treatment planning and resource allocation. The model's transparency fosters trust and understanding, empowering physicians to confidently use its predictions for improved patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaobin He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General SurgeryQilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityJinanShandongP.R. China
| | - Shengbiao Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General SurgeryQilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityJinanShandongP.R. China
| | - Jianqiang Cao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General SurgeryQilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityJinanShandongP.R. China
| | - Huijie Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General SurgeryQilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityJinanShandongP.R. China
| | - Cheng Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General SurgeryQilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityJinanShandongP.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shao H, Zeng D, Zhu Y, Liu L, Zhao S, Zou H. Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting gallbladder adenoma. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:1749-1760. [PMID: 39808305 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11480-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cholesterol polyp (GCP) and gallbladder adenoma (GA) are easily confused in clinical diagnosis. This study aims to establish a nomogram prediction model for preoperative prediction of the risk of GA patients. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively collected clinical data of GCP or GA patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between January 2020 and April 2023. We compared and analyzed the differences between the GCP group and the GA group. The data were divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors were determined using LASSO and Logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was established. The model was comprehensively validated and evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS This study ultimately included 497 patients. The independent predictors of the nomogram model include blood type (O-type blood, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02-3.94; P = 0.046), number of lesions (solitary, OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.12; P = 0.033), sessile polyp (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.06-3.92; P = 0.033), age (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.20; P < 0.001), diameter (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.17-1.45; P < 0.001). For the training and validation set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.843 and 0.837, respectively, and the P-value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.056 and 0.300, respectively. In addition, the calibration curve and DCA curve indicate that the model has accurate predictive ability and reliable clinical practicality. CONCLUSIONS The blood type, number of lesions, sessile polyp, age and diameter are significant risk factors for GA. This nomogram model can use simple and readily available clinical data to predict the risk of having GA and can assist in guiding surgical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanrui Shao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 374 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Di Zeng
- Department of Pathology, Baoji Central Hospital, 8 Jiangtan Road, Weibin District, Baoji, 721008, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Ya Zhu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 374 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixin Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 374 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Songling Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 374 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Zou
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 374 Dianmian Avenue, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Hao J, Wang P, Xu S, Zhou X, Wang J, Huang X. Development and Validation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2025; 86:1-15. [PMID: 39998148 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2025]
Abstract
Aims/Background The primary goal in evaluating gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs) is to identify neoplastic polyps (NP). Numerous studies have investigated risk factors for NP. This study aimed to develop a practical preoperative prediction model for NP using simple and easily accessible clinical variables. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients with GPLs who underwent cholecystectomy at Lanzhou University Second Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. A total of 621 cases were included and randomly assigned into a training set (70%) and an internal validation set (30%). An external validation set was established using data from 117 patients treated at other centers between January and December 2023. Univariate logistic analyses were performed, followed by backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables with p< 0.2 to identify significant variables associated with NP. These predictors were included in the final logistic regression model and visualized as a nomogram model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated. Results Age (odd ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.09, p= 0.0001), polyp size (OR = 19.01, 95% CI = 6.48-55.79, p < 0.0001), polyp number (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12-0.56, p = 0.0006), gallbladder wall thickness (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.02-2.41, p= 0.0385), and polyp echo characteristics (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85, p = 0.0169) were identified as independent influencing factors for NP. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets were 0.886 (95% CI, 0.841-0.930), 0.836 (95% CI, 0.753-0.919), and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.743-0.978), respectively. Calibration curves for the three datasets showed Brier scores of 0.079, 0.092, and 0.070, all below 0.25, indicating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis suggested that a threshold probability of 0.6 provided the most significant clinical benefit. Conclusion This prediction model, incorporating easily accessible variables, demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of NP and contributed to clinical decision-making in GPL management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanning Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Jinyong Hao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Pengfei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Shaoce Xu
- Department of Pathology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xiong Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dingxi People's Hospital, Dingxi, Gansu, China
| | - Jingzhe Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuwei People's Hospital, Wuwei, Gansu, China
| | - Xiaojun Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fei X, Cheng Z, Zhu L, Han P, Li N, Jiao Z, Liang S, Jiang B, Li M, Li H, Lv W. A practical contrast-enhanced ultrasound risk prediction of gallbladder polyp: differentiation of adenoma from cholesterol polyp lesion. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:747-756. [PMID: 39254706 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04566-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Fei
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihao Cheng
- Institute of Reproductive and Child Health/National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Lianhua Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Han
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyu Jiao
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuyuan Liang
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Jiang
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Miao Li
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongtian Li
- Institute of Reproductive and Child Health/National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Wenping Lv
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang W, Lee S, Kim YY, Park JY, Jeon SK, Lee JE, Yoo J, Han S, Park SH, Kim JH, Park HJ, Yoon JH. Interpretation, Reporting, Imaging-Based Workups, and Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening: 2025 Recommendations From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2025; 26:102-134. [PMID: 39898393 PMCID: PMC11794292 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Revised: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Chang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeun-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Young Park
- Department of Radiology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeongin Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungchul Han
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So Hyun Park
- Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jo IH, Paik CN, Ahn HG, You DD, Han JH, Kim HA. Predicting Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps: The Role of Current Surgical Indications and Preoperative Images. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2025; 85:52-63. [PMID: 39849812 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2024.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2025]
Abstract
Background/Aims Cholecystectomy for gallbladder (GB) polyps is performed primarily based on preoperative images. This study examined the accuracy of surgical indications commonly used in clinical practice for detecting neoplastic polyps and investigated further clues for predicting neoplastic polyps. Methods This retrospective study included 385 patients who underwent a cholecystectomy for GB polyps. The predictive performances of seven surgical indications were compared by fitting the receiver operating characteristic curves. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the candidate variables associated with predicting neoplastic polyps. Results Neoplastic polyps were identified in 18.9% (n=62) of the 385 patients assessed. The neoplastic group contained more females than males, larger polyps, more frequent solitary lesions, and lower platelet counts than the non-neoplastic group. Current surgical indications revealed an unsatisfactory prediction for neoplastic polyps. The optimal cutoff polyp size for neoplastic polyps by ultrasound (US) was larger than by computed tomography (CT) (12 mm vs. 10 mm). The proportion of pathologic neoplastic polyps was higher when both US and CT images were used than that predicted using a single test. Logistic regression analysis revealed larger polyps, increasing age, female sex, and lower platelet count to be associated with neoplastic polyps. Conclusions The current indications for cholecystectomy in GB polyps have a low predictive value for neoplastic lesions that can lead to overtreatment. Combining the polyp size from US and CT images may reduce unnecessary surgery. In addition, knowledge of the patient's age, sex, and platelet count could help make more selective surgical decisions for neoplastic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ik Hyun Jo
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Nyol Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Geun Ahn
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Do You
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Han
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun A Kim
- Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pesce A, Sani V, Gaban A, Fabbri N, Tilli M, Gafa R, Feo CV. Intracholecystic Papillary-tubular Neoplasm (ICPN) of the Gallbladder: A Case Report Focusing on an Unexpected Pathological Finding. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2025; 20:131-135. [PMID: 37885107 DOI: 10.2174/0115748928256837231012151452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracholecystic papillary neoplasms (ICPNs) represent a rare benign entity characterized by intraluminal polypoid lesions in the gallbladder. The incidence of ICPNs ranges from 0.4% to 0.61% in all gallbladder specimens. CASE PRESENTATION In this report, we present a case of a young Caucasian woman who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to gallbladder polyps. The histological examination revealed the presence of an intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) with a tubulopapillary growth pattern, exhibiting gastric morphology and displaying both low and high-grade dysplasia. A thorough review of the existing literature was conducted, with a specific focus on the histological features. CONCLUSION A comprehensive understanding of neoplastic polyps of the gallbladder is still limited. Pathological examination of these lesions is crucial for identifying key features that can influence patient outcomes and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Pesce
- Section of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Via Valle Oppio 2, 44023, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| | - Valentina Sani
- Section of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Via Valle Oppio 2, 44023, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| | - Alba Gaban
- Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara and S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Nicolo Fabbri
- Section of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Via Valle Oppio 2, 44023, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| | - Massimo Tilli
- Department of Radiology, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Via Valle Oppio 2, 44023, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| | - Roberta Gafa
- Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara and S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Carlo Vittorio Feo
- Section of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Azienda USL of Ferrara, Via Valle Oppio 2, 44023, Lagosanto (FE), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chai JL, Baranov E, Licaros AR, Frates MC. Sonographic Characteristics of ≥7 mm Gallbladder Polyps: A Retrospective Analysis. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2025; 44:57-66. [PMID: 39282690 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the sonographic characteristics of gallbladder polyps measuring ≥7 mm focusing on echogenicity, correlate with surgical pathology when available, and assess stability in size over time. METHODS This retrospective study used a natural language processing application to screen ultrasound (US) reports between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, that contained the words "gallbladder polyp" or "polyps." Reports were reviewed to identify polyps ≥7 mm. The most hyperechoic components of the polyps were compared to the adjacent inner wall of the gallbladder and categorized as more echogenic, isoechoic, and less echogenic. Other sonographic characteristics such as heterogeneity, sessile configuration, vascularity, multiplicity, presence of gallstones, and wall thickening were recorded. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed when available. Polyps in nonsurgical patients with ≥48-month US follow-up and ≤1 mm/year growth rate were characterized as benign. Clinical outcomes were followed until December 31, 2023. RESULTS Review of 4897 reports yielded 550 reports in 450 patients with polyps ≥7 mm. Surgical pathology reports were available in 22.0% (99/450) of patients; 96 (97%) had non-neoplastic etiologies and 3 (3.0%) neoplastic. There were no malignancies. All of the neoplastic polyps and 56.1% (87/155) of non-neoplastic polyps had components more echogenic than the adjacent inner wall. There were no deaths related to the polyps. CONCLUSIONS The vast majority of gallbladder polyps are benign. In our large series of gallbladder polyps, we found that increased echogenicity is a nonspecific feature, found in slightly more than half of benign but also in all neoplastic polyps. Our findings support current Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie L Chai
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Esther Baranov
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andro Reginald Licaros
- Division of Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary C Frates
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yuan K, Zhang X, Yang Q, Deng X, Deng Z, Liao X, Si W. Risk prediction and analysis of gallbladder polyps with deep neural network. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2024; 29:2331774. [PMID: 38520294 DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2024.2331774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the risk factors associated with the development of adenomatous and malignant polyps in the gallbladder. Adenomatous polyps of the gallbladder are considered precancerous and have a high likelihood of progressing into malignancy. Preoperatively, distinguishing between benign gallbladder polyps, adenomatous polyps, and malignant polyps is challenging. Therefore, the objective is to develop a neural network model that utilizes these risk factors to accurately predict the nature of polyps. This predictive model can be employed to differentiate the nature of polyps before surgery, enhancing diagnostic accuracy. A retrospective study was done on patients who had cholecystectomy surgeries at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen between January 2017 and December 2022. The patients' clinical characteristics, lab results, and ultrasonographic indices were examined. Using risk variables for the growth of adenomatous and malignant polyps in the gallbladder, a neural network model for predicting the kind of polyps will be created. A normalized confusion matrix, PR, and ROC curve were used to evaluate the performance of the model. In this comprehensive study, we meticulously analyzed a total of 287 cases of benign gallbladder polyps, 15 cases of adenomatous polyps, and 27 cases of malignant polyps. The data analysis revealed several significant findings. Specifically, hepatitis B core antibody (95% CI -0.237 to 0.061, p < 0.001), number of polyps (95% CI -0.214 to -0.052, p = 0.001), polyp size (95% CI 0.038 to 0.051, p < 0.001), wall thickness (95% CI 0.042 to 0.081, p < 0.001), and gallbladder size (95% CI 0.185 to 0.367, p < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors for gallbladder adenomatous polyps and malignant polyps. Based on these significant findings, we developed a predictive classification model for gallbladder polyps, represented as follows, Predictive classification model for GBPs = -0.149 * core antibody - 0.033 * number of polyps + 0.045 * polyp size + 0.061 * wall thickness + 0.276 * gallbladder size - 4.313. To assess the predictive efficiency of the model, we employed precision-recall (PR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction model was 0.945 and 0.930, respectively, indicating excellent predictive capability. We determined that a polyp size of 10 mm served as the optimal cutoff value for diagnosing gallbladder adenoma, with a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 60.0%. For the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.5% and 92.5%, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of our predictive model and provide valuable insights into accurate diagnosis and risk assessment for gallbladder polyps. We identified several risk factors associated with the development of adenomatous and malignant polyps in the gallbladder, including hepatitis B core antibodies, polyp number, polyp size, wall thickness, and gallbladder size. To address the need for accurate prediction, we introduced a novel neural network learning algorithm. This algorithm utilizes the aforementioned risk factors to predict the nature of gallbladder polyps. By accurately identifying the nature of these polyps, our model can assist patients in making informed decisions regarding their treatment and management strategies. This innovative approach aims to improve patient outcomes and enhance the overall effectiveness of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerong Yuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhang
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, P.R. China
| | - Qian Yang
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Xuesong Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Zhe Deng
- Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Xiangyun Liao
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| | - Weixin Si
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deqing LC, Zhang JW, Yang J. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma in minimally invasive era: New needs, new models. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:4333-4337. [PMID: 39554749 PMCID: PMC11551627 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare and lethal malignancy; however, it represents the most common type of biliary tract cancer. Patients with GBC are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thus, unfortunately, losing the opportunity for curative surgical intervention. This situation leads to lower quality of life and higher mortality rates. In recent years, the rapid development of endoscopic equipment and techniques has provided new avenues and possibilities for the early and minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of GBC. This editorial comments on the article by Pavlidis et al. Building upon their work, we explore the new needs and corresponding models for managing GBC from the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- La-Cuo Deqing
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changdu People’s Hospital of Xizang, Changdu 854000, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
| | - Jun-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kozakai F, Ogawa T, Sakai T, Koshita S, Kanno Y, Kusunose H, Yonamine K, Miyamoto K, Okano H, Matsuoka Y, Hosokawa K, Sumiya H, Sugita R, Ito K. Plain Computed Tomography for Differentiating Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Pedunculated Gallbladder Polyps. Intern Med 2024; 63:3025-3030. [PMID: 38569912 PMCID: PMC11637784 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2760-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Surgery is recommended for large pedunculated gallbladder polyps (PGPs), which measure 10 mm or more in size, because they tend to be neoplastic polyps (NPs), such as adenomas and adenocarcinomas. However, after resection, they are often found to be non-neoplastic polyps (non-NPs). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of plain computed tomography (CT) in distinguishing NPs from non-NPs. Methods Of the 80 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for PGPs ≥10 mm between January 2008 and February 2021, 46 who underwent plain and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) before resection were included in this study. We retrospectively assessed the polyp detection rate (PDR) using CT and calculated the difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile. Results Twenty-one patients had NPs (12 adenomas, 5 carcinomas in adenoma, and 4 adenocarcinomas). The others were non-NPs (24 cholesterol polyps and one hyperplastic polyp). The PDR using plain CT was significantly higher in the NP group than in the non-NP group (38% (8/21) vs. 0% (0/25), p <0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of NPs were 38%, 100%, 100%, 66%, and 72%, respectively. The difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile was significantly larger in the NP group than in the non-NP group (14.12 ± 11.38 HU, 5.04 ± 6.15 HU, p <0.01). Conclusions PGPs detected using plain CT had a high probability of being NPs. Plain CT is therefore considered to be useful for differentiating NPs from non-NPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumisato Kozakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Takahisa Ogawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Koshita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Yoshihide Kanno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kusunose
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yonamine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Haruka Okano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Yuto Matsuoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Kento Hosokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Hidehito Sumiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Reiji Sugita
- Department of Radiology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| | - Kei Ito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deqing LC, Zhang JW, Yang J. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma in minimally invasive era: New needs, new models. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:4333-4337. [PMID: 39554749 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4333if:] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare and lethal malignancy; however, it represents the most common type of biliary tract cancer. Patients with GBC are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thus, unfortunately, losing the opportunity for curative surgical intervention. This situation leads to lower quality of life and higher mortality rates. In recent years, the rapid development of endoscopic equipment and techniques has provided new avenues and possibilities for the early and minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of GBC. This editorial comments on the article by Pavlidis et al. Building upon their work, we explore the new needs and corresponding models for managing GBC from the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- La-Cuo Deqing
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changdu People's Hospital of Xizang, Changdu 854000, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
| | - Jun-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cho IR, Lee SH, Choi JH, Chun JW, Lee MW, Lee MH, Kim J, Lee TS, Paik WH, Ryu JK, Kim YT. Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided elastography for differential diagnosis of gallbladder polyp. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100:449-456.e1. [PMID: 38431102 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS It is difficult to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps before surgery. EUS-guided elastography (EUS-EG) is a noninvasive complementary diagnostic method. The utility of EUS-EG in the differential diagnosis of GB polyps has not been investigated. We investigated the diagnostic performance of EUS-EG for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps. METHODS Patients with GB polyps were prospectively enrolled from June 2020 until November 2022. EUS-EG and semiquantitative evaluation of the strain ratio (SR) were performed for differential diagnosis of GB polyps. Fifty-three eligible patients were divided into 2 groups based on the final diagnosis after surgery. Patient demographics, EUS characteristics, and SR values were compared. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff SR value that discriminates between neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps. RESULTS The median SR value for neoplastic polyps (32.93 [interquartile range {IQR}, 22.37-69.02]) was significantly higher than for non-neoplastic polyps (5.40 [IQR, 2.36-14.44], P < .001). Significant differences were found in SR values between non-neoplastic, benign neoplastic (23.38 [IQR, 13.62-39.04]), and malignant polyps (49.25 [IQR, 27.90-82.00]). The optimal cutoff SR value to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps was 18.4. In multivariable logistic regression, SR value >18.4 (odds ratio, 33.604; 95% confidence interval, 2.588-436.292) was an independent predictor of neoplastic polyps. CONCLUSIONS EUS-EG and SR values can be used as a supplementary method for evaluating GB polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04416763.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Rae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Won Chun
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Woo Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong Hwan Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Junyeol Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Seung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Kon Ryu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Tae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang K, Xu Q, Xia L, Sun J, Shen K, Liu H, Xu L, Li R. Gallbladder polypoid lesions: Current practices and future prospects. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024; 137:1674-1683. [PMID: 38420780 PMCID: PMC11268823 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs) refer to any elevated lesion of the mucosal surface of the gallbladder wall, and the prevalence is estimated to be between 0.9% and 12.1%. GPLs include benign polyps and malignant polyps. Benign polyps are further classified as non-neoplastic polyps and neoplastic polyps. Cholesterol polyps are the most common benign polyps and adenocarcinoma is the main type of malignant polyp. Hepatitis B virus infection, liver function abnormalities, dyslipidemia, and obesity are the main risk factors for GPLs. Studies of biological mechanisms have focused on malignant gallbladder polyps, the development of which is regulated by hormone levels in vivo , gut microbiota, inflammation, oxidative stress, Salmonella typhimurium , and related molecules. Diagnostic modalities include chemical examination and imaging examination, with imaging examination currently being the mainstay. Treatment of patients with GPLs is based on the presence or absence of symptoms, age, size of the polyps, tendency of the polyp to increase, and risk factors for symptomatic malignancy to determine whether surgery should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Qingpeng Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Lu Xia
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Jianing Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Kanger Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Haoran Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Linning Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee KC, Kim JK, Kim DK. Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography. Tomography 2024; 10:1031-1041. [PMID: 39058049 PMCID: PMC11281002 DOI: 10.3390/tomography10070077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). AIM To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. METHODS From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. RESULTS Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers. CONCLUSIONS GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Chong Lee
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73 Geryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Kyem Kim
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
| | - Dong-Kyu Kim
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea; (K.-C.L.); (J.-K.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li Q, Dou M, Liu H, Jia P, Wang X, Geng X, Zhang Y, Yang R, Li J, Yang W, Yao C, Zhang X, Lei D, Yang C, Hao Q, Liu Y, Guo Z, Geng Z, Zhang D. Prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps in patients with different age level based on preoperative ultrasound: a multi-center retrospective real-world study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:146. [PMID: 38689244 PMCID: PMC11059696 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03240-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of neoplastic polyps in gallbladder polyps (GPs) increases sharply with age and is associated with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). This study aims to predict neoplastic polyps and provide appropriate treatment strategies based on preoperative ultrasound features in patients with different age level. METHODS According to the age classification of WHO, 1523 patients with GPs who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2015 to December 2019 at 11 tertiary hospitals in China were divided into young adults group (n=622), middle-aged group (n=665) and elderly group (n=236). Linear scoring models were established based on independent risk variables screened by the Logistic regression model in different age groups. The area under ROC (AUC) to evaluate the predictive ability of linear scoring models, long- and short- diameter of GPs. RESULTS Independent risk factors for neoplastic polyps included the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and fundus in the young adults and elderly groups, while the number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), and polyp size (short diameter) in the middle-aged groups. In different age groups, the AUCs of its linear scoring model were higher than the AUCs of the long- and short- diameter of GPs for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (all P<0.05), and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test showed that the prediction accuracy of the linear scoring models was higher than the long- and short- diameter of GPs (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION The linear scoring models of the young adults, middle-aged and elderly groups can effectively distinguish neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps based on preoperative ultrasound features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Minghui Dou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Hengchao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Pengbo Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xintuan Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xilin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710068, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710068, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Hanzhong City, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, 723000, China
| | - Junhui Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Wenbin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Chunhe Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Xiaodi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Da Lei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Chenglin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Ankang City, Ankang, Shaanxi, 725000, China
| | - Qiwei Hao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin, Shaanxi, 719000, China
| | - Yimin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, Shaanxi, 721000, China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ohki K, Igarashi T, Yakabe H, Shiraishi M, Suzuki T, Woo J, Ojiri H. Differentiating gallbladder cancer from polyps using non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol 2024; 89:e106-e114. [PMID: 38510547 PMCID: PMC10953508 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2024.135730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This retrospective cohort study assessed the efficiency of non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating gallbladder cancer (GBC) from gallbladder polyps (GBPs) measuring ≥ 10 mm. Material and methods Patients diagnosed with GBCs or GBPs ≥ 10 mm and GBC ≤ T2 stage were eligible for inclusion. Two independent blinded readers assessed the continuity of the mucosal and muscular layers (CMML; present or absent) and normalised signal intensity ratio (NIR) on the apparent diffusion coefficient map (NIR-ADC), T1-weighted image (NIR-T1WI), and T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo image. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and interobserver agreement analyses were performed to detect predictive variables differentiating GBCs from GBPs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic performance. A reproducibility test was performed to verify the predictive variables. Results Multivariate analysis showed significant differences in CMML, NIR-ADC, and NIR-T1WI (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity of the absence of CMML were approximately 100%. The CMML showed the best specificity, accuracy, and PPV in the reproducibility study. The sensitivity of CMML alone was approximately 50%, whereas it increased to approximately 70% when combined with NIR-ADC. The diagnostic performance of the combination, including sensitivity, was almost like that of tumour size. The combined tumour size and CMML assessment showed higher diagnostic performance than tumour size alone. Conclusions The absence of CMML and NIR-ADC ≤ 1.86 helped in differentiating GBCs from GBPs. Evaluation of the absence of CMML and measurement of tumour size could better aid in determining between the two than measurement of tumour size alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jun Woo
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroya Ojiri
- The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu H, Lu Y, Shen K, Zhou M, Mao X, Li R. Advances in the management of gallbladder polyps: establishment of predictive models and the rise of gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:7. [PMID: 38166603 PMCID: PMC10759486 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03094-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder polyps are a common biliary tract disease whose treatment options have yet to be fully established. The indication of "polyps ≥ 10 mm in diameter" for cholecystectomy increases the possibility of gallbladder excision due to benign polyps. Compared to enumeration of risk factors in clinical guidelines, predictive models based on statistical methods and artificial intelligence provide a more intuitive representation of the malignancy degree of gallbladder polyps. Minimally invasive gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures, as a combination of checking and therapeutic approaches that allow for eradication of lesions and preservation of a functional gallbladder at the same time, have been shown to maximize the benefits to patients with benign polyps. Despite the reported good outcomes of predictive models and gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures, the studies were associated with various limitations, including small sample sizes, insufficient data types, and unknown long-term efficacy, thereby enhancing the need for multicenter and large-scale clinical studies. In conclusion, the emergence of predictive models and minimally invasive gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures has signaled an ever increasing attention to the role of the gallbladder and clinical management of gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongda Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Kanger Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ming Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaozhe Mao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tang C, Geng Z, Wen J, Wang L, You Q, Jin Y, Wang W, Xu H, Yu Q, Yuan H. Risk stratification model for incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: A multicentre study. Eur J Radiol 2024; 170:111244. [PMID: 38043381 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to develop a 4-level risk stratification model using a scoring system based on conventional ultrasound to improve the diagnosis of gallbladder polyp. METHOD Patients with histopathologically confirmed gallbladder polyps were consecutively recruited from three medical centres. Conventional ultrasound findings and clinical characteristics were acquired prior to cholecystectomy. Risk factors for neoplastic and malignant polyps were used to build a risk stratification system via interobserver agreement and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model was retrospectively trained using 264 pre-surgical samples and prospectively validated using 106 pre-surgical samples. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and malignant polyp rate. RESULTS In total, 370 patients (mean age, 51.68 ± 14.41 years, 156 men) were enrolled in this study. Size (≥12 mm), shape (oblate or round), single, vascularity, gallbladder stone or sludge were considered risk factors for neoplastic polyps. Size (≥14 mm), shape (oblate), single, disrupted gallbladder wall, and gallbladder stone or sludge were risk factors for malignant polyps (all p < 0.05). In the scoring system, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of score ≥ 9 in diagnosing neoplastic polyps were 0.766, 0.788, and 0.876 respectively; and the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of score ≥ 15 in diagnosing malignant polyps were 0.844, 0.926, and 0.949 respectively. In our model, the malignancy rates at the four levels were 0 % (0/24), 1.28 % (2/156), 9.26 % (5/54), and 70.37 % (38/54), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The 4-level risk stratification model based on conventional ultrasound imaging showed excellent performance in classifying gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Congyu Tang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital(Xiamen), Fudan University, China; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China
| | - Zhidan Geng
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China
| | - Jiexian Wen
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China
| | - Lifan Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China; Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, China
| | - Qiqin You
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (Qingpu Branch), China
| | - Yunjie Jin
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China
| | - Wenping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China
| | - Huixiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital(Xiamen), Fudan University, China; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital(Minhang Meilong), Fudan University (Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center), China
| | - Qing Yu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China.
| | - Haixia Yuan
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, China; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (Qingpu Branch), China; Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital(Minhang Meilong), Fudan University (Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center), China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Choi JH, Lee J, Lee SH, Lee S, Moon AS, Cho SH, Kim JS, Cho IR, Paik WH, Ryu JK, Kim YT. Analysis of ultrasonographic images using a deep learning-based model as ancillary diagnostic tool for diagnosing gallbladder polyps. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1705-1711. [PMID: 37407319 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurately diagnosing gallbladder polyps (GBPs) is important to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy of a deep learning model and the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis by physicians for diagnosing GBPs. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2006 to September 2021, and 3,754 images from 263 patients were analyzed. The outcome of this study was the efficacy of the developed deep learning model in discriminating neoplastic GBPs (NGBPs) from non-NGBPs and to evaluate the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis with that made by physicians. RESULTS The efficacy of discriminating NGBPs from non- NGBPs using deep learning was 0.944 (accuracy, 0.858; sensitivity, 0.856; specificity, 0.861). The accuracy of an unassisted diagnosis of GBP was 0.634, and that of a computer-aided diagnosis was 0.785 (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis between experienced (0.835) and inexperienced (0.772) physicians (p = 0.251). A computer-aided diagnosis significantly assisted inexperienced physicians (0.772 vs. 0.614; p < 0.001) but not experienced physicians. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning-based models discriminate NGBPs from non- NGBPs with excellent accuracy. As ancillary diagnostic tools, they may assist inexperienced physicians in improving their diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ho Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaesung Lee
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, 221, Heukseok-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Sanghyuk Lee
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, 221, Heukseok-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - A-Seong Moon
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, 221, Heukseok-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Hyun Cho
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, 221, Heukseok-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Seong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - In Rae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Kon Ryu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Tae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Seguin CL, Davidi B, Peters MLB, Eckel A, Harisinghani MG, Goiffon RJ, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Ultrasound Surveillance of Small, Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Projected Benefits by Sex, Age, and Comorbidity Level. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:1031-1041. [PMID: 37406750 PMCID: PMC10777737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps are commonly encountered when performing upper abdominal ultrasound. Our purpose was to estimate the life expectancy (LE) benefit of ultrasound-based gallbladder surveillance in patients with small (6-7 to <10 mm), incidentally detected gallbladder polyps, accounting for patient sex, age, and comorbidity level. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate hypothetical cohorts of women and men with small gallbladder polyps, with varying age (66-80 years) and comorbidity level (none, mild, moderate, severe). Drawing from current evidence, in the base case, we assumed no increased risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with small gallbladder polyps. To estimate maximal possible LE gains from surveillance, we assumed perfect cancer control consequent to 5 years of surveillance. We varied key assumptions including cancer risk and test performance characteristics in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Projected LE gains from surveillance were <3 days across most cohorts and scenarios evaluated. For 66- and 80-year-olds with no comorbidities, LE gains were 1.46 and 1.45 days, respectively, for women, and 0.67 and 0.75 days for men. With 10 years of surveillance, LE gains increased to 2.94 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 1.35 days). If we assumed a 10% increase in gallbladder cancer risk among individuals with polyps, LE gains increased slightly to 1.60 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 0.74 days). Results were sensitive to test performance and surgical mortality. DISCUSSION Even under unrealistic, optimistic assumptions of cancer control, ultrasound surveillance of incidentally detected small gallbladder polyps provided limited benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia L Seguin
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barak Davidi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Linton B Peters
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mukesh G Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Director of Abdominal MRI, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reece J Goiffon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy B Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Chair of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and Chief of Radiology Services for the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhu L, Han P, Jiang B, Zhu Y, Li N, Fei X. Value of Micro Flow Imaging in the Prediction of Adenomatous Polyps. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2023; 49:1586-1594. [PMID: 37012096 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the value of micro flow imaging (MFI) in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps. METHODS A total of 143 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps were retrospectively analyzed. B-mode ultrasound (BUS), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), MFI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were performed before cholecystectomy. The weighted kappa consistency test was used to evaluate the agreement of vascular morphology among CDFI, MFI and CEUS. Ultrasound image characteristics, including BUS, CDFI and MFI images, were compared between adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps. The independent risk factors for adenomatous polyps were selected. The diagnostic performance of MFI combined with BUS in determining adenomatous polyps was compared with CDFI combined with BUS. RESULTS Of the 143 patients, 113 cases were cholesterol polyps, and 30 cases were adenomatous polyps. The vascular morphology of gallbladder polyps was more clearly depicted by MFI than CDFI, and it had better agreement with CEUS. Differences in maximum size, height/width ratio, hyperechoic spot and vascular intensity on CDFI and MFI images were significant between adenomatous polyps and cholesterol polyps (p < 0.05). The maximum size, height/width ratio, and vascular intensity on MFI images were independent risk factors for adenomatous polyps. For MFI combined with BUS, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 90.00%, 94.69% and 93.70%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of MFI combined with BUS was significantly higher than that of CDFI combined with BUS (AUC = 0.923 vs. 0.784). CONCLUSION Compared with CDFI combined with BUS, MFI combined with BUS had higher diagnostic performance in determining adenomatous polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianhua Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Han
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Jiang
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yaqiong Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Fei
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li Q, Dou M, Zhang J, Jia P, Wang X, Lei D, Li J, Yang W, Yang R, Yang C, Zhang X, Hao Q, Geng X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Guo Z, Yao C, Cai Z, Si S, Geng Z, Zhang D. A Bayesian network model to predict neoplastic risk for patients with gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm based on preoperative ultrasound features. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10056-3. [PMID: 37041283 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10056-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polyp size of 10 mm is insufficient to discriminate neoplastic and non-neoplastic risk in patients with gallbladder polyps (GPs). The aim of the study is to develop a Bayesian network (BN) prediction model to identify neoplastic polyps and create more precise criteria for surgical indications in patients with GPs lager than 10 mm based on preoperative ultrasound features. METHODS A BN prediction model was established and validated based on the independent risk variables using data from 759 patients with GPs who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2015 to August 2022 at 11 tertiary hospitals in China. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the BN model and current guidelines, and Delong test was used to compare the AUCs. RESULTS The mean values of polyp cross-sectional area (CSA), long, and short diameter of neoplastic polyps were higher than those of non-neoplastic polyps (P < 0.0001). Independent neoplastic risk factors for GPs included single polyp, polyp CSA ≥ 85 mm 2, fundus with broad base, and medium echogenicity. The accuracy of the BN model established based on the above independent variables was 81.88% and 82.35% in the training and testing sets, respectively. Delong test also showed that the AUCs of the BN model was better than that of JSHBPS, ESGAR, US-reported, and CCBS in training and testing sets, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION A Bayesian network model was accurate and practical for predicting neoplastic risk in patients with gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm based on preoperative ultrasound features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Minghui Dou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jingwei Zhang
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, China
| | - Pengbo Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xintuan Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Da Lei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, 721000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Junhui Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wenbin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Hanzhong City, Hanzhong, 723000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chenglin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Ankang City, Ankang, 725000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaodi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qiwei Hao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin, 719000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xilin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yimin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, 721000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, 721000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Chunhe Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhiqiang Cai
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shubin Si
- Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Riddell ZC, Corallo C, Albazaz R, Foley KG. Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220115. [PMID: 35731858 PMCID: PMC9975534 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zena C Riddell
- National Imaging Academy of Wales (NIAW), Bridgend, United Kingdom
| | - Carmelo Corallo
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, England
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, England
| | - Kieran G Foley
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li Q, Xu S, Yuan Z, Zhang Y, Lu Q, Qian L, Xu J, Song Y, Zhao L, Chen T. Combining polyp diameter and polyp-to-bile ratio by dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scanning can improve the diagnostic specificity of gallbladder neoplastic polyps. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022. [PMID: 36528866 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to distinguish between cholesterol and neoplastic gallbladder polyps using dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. METHODS The dataset retrospectively comprised 222 cases, including 106 cases of cholesterol polyps and 116 cases of neoplastic polyps (59 adenoma and 57 adenocarcinoma). The perception and Hounsfield units of the polyps and gallbladder bile were assessed by contrast-enhanced CT, and the polyp-to-bile ratio (PBR) was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve analyses were used to assess the diagnostic value of the diameter and PBR for neoplastic polyps. RESULTS The diameter of cholesterol polyps was significantly smaller than that of neoplastic polyps. The proportion of perceived cholesterol polyps in the plain and arterial phases of CT were significantly lower than those of neoplastic polyps (p < .001). On the contrary, the CT values of gallbladder bile of cholesterol polyps were always significantly higher than those of neoplastic polyps (p < .001). The median PBR values of cholesterol polyps were significantly lower than those of neoplastic polyps (p ≤ .001). ROC analysis showed that diameter and a plain phase PRB had better diagnostic value for neoplastic polyps. Polyp diameter ≥ 11.95 mm and the plain phase PBR ≥1.48 were the optimal cut-off values for diagnosis of neoplastic polyps. Combining a diameter ≥ 12 mm and a PBR in the plain phase ≥1.48 further improved neoplastic polyp diagnostic specificity and positive likelihood ratio (10.453). CONCLUSIONS Polyp-to-bile ratio in contrast-enhanced CT scanning is a new and convenient index for identifying cholesterol and neoplastic gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Li
- Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sunwang Xu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiqing Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunhe Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University of School Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijun Qian
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianrong Xu
- Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanyan Song
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jenssen C, Lorentzen T, Dietrich CF, Lee JY, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Rosenberg J, Gutt C, Nolsøe CP. Incidental Findings of Gallbladder and Bile Ducts-Management Strategies: General Aspects, Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening-A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Position Paper. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2022; 48:2355-2378. [PMID: 36058799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings with a series of position papers to give advice on characterization and management. The biliary system (gallbladder and biliary tree) is the third most frequent site for incidental findings. This first part of the position paper on incidental findings of the biliary system is related to general aspects, gallbladder polyps and other incidental findings of the gallbladder wall. Available evidence on prevalence, diagnostic work-up, malignancy risk, follow-up and treatment is summarized with a special focus on ultrasound techniques. Multiparametric ultrasound features of gallbladder polyps and other incidentally detected gallbladder wall pathologies are described, and their inclusion in assessment of malignancy risk and decision- making on further management is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany; Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS) at Medical University Brandenburg "Theodor Fontane", Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Torben Lorentzen
- Ultrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Jae Young Lee
- Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nitin Chaubal
- Thane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Buyng Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Carsten Gutt
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany
| | - Christian P Nolsøe
- Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhu L, Han P, Jiang B, Li N, Jiao Z, Zhu Y, Tang W, Fei X. Value of Conventional Ultrasound-based Scoring System in Distinguishing Adenomatous Polyps From Cholesterol Polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:895-901. [PMID: 34907919 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Ultrasound has increased the detection of gallbladder polyps, but it has limitations in evaluating the nature of gallbladder polyps, especially the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm. We assessed the value of ultrasound scoring system based on independent predictive parameters in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps with the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled 163 patients with gallbladder polyps (1.0 to 1.5 cm) who underwent ultrasonography and cholecystectomy. Ultrasound image characteristics were compared between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort from April 2018 to January 2020. An ultrasound scoring system was constructed in the training cohort, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated in the validation cohort from February 2020 to February 2021. RESULTS Maximum size, height/width ratio, stone or sludge, vascularity, and hyperechoic spot were significantly different between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort ( P <0.05). The independent predictive parameters for adenomatous polyps were lower height/width ratio, presence of vascularity and absence of hyperechoic spot. The total score was as follows: (height/width ratio, <0.9=4, ≥0.9=0) + (vascularity, present=3, absent=0) + (hyperechoic spot, absent=2, present=0). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound scoring system ≥5 for diagnosis of adenomatous polyps in the validation cohort were 73.33%, 80.49%, and 78.57%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The ultrasound scoring system aids in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps, and effectively decreasing unnecessary cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nan Li
- Departments of Ultrasound
| | | | | | - Wenbo Tang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu J, Qian Y, Yang F, Huang S, Chen G, Yu J, Jiang S, Huang G. Value of prediction model in distinguishing gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyp. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1893-1900. [PMID: 35750491 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Gallbladder adenomatous polyp is a pre-cancerous neoplasm, and it is difficult to classify from cholesterol polyps before cholecystectomy. The study aimed to clarify the risk characteristics of gallbladder adenomas and establish a prediction model to differentiate gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyp lesions. METHODS From May 2019 to December 2021, the patients underwent cholecystectomy in the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. According to the permanent pathology test, the patients were divided into adenomas and cholesterol polyps groups. All the included cases received ultrasound equipment examinations before cholecystectomy and their clinical information were completely recorded. Then the patients' baseline characteristics and ultrasound imaging variables were analyzed by logistic regression. Finally, a predictive model for gallbladder adenomas will be established and assessed based on the independent risk factors. RESULTS A total of 423 cases including 296 cholesterol polyps and 127 gallbladder adenomas were analyzed in detail. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that solitary polyp lesion (OR = 2.954, 95% CI 1.759-4.960, P < 0.001), the maximal diameter of lesions (OR = 1.244, 95% CI 1.169-1.324, P < 0.001), and irregular shape of polyp lesions (OR = 5.549, 95% CI 1.979-15.560, P = 0.001) were the independent predictive factors of gallbladder adenomas. According to the results, regression equation of logit(P) = -3.828 + 1.083*number of gallbladder polyps lesions (GPLs) + 0.218*diameter of GPLs + 1.714*shape of GPLs was established. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.828 (95% CI 0.782-0.874, P < 0.001). When logit P > 0.204, the sensitivity of estimating adenoma was 79.5%, the specificity of recognizing adenoma was 70.6%, and the whole correct ratio was 73.3%. While the AUC of diameter (10 mm) being a predictive factor in this study was only 0.790 (95% CI 0.741-0.839, P < 0.001). And the sensitivity and specificity of 10 mm as the optimal diagnostic cutoff value to diagnose adenomas were 74.8% and 65.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The risk factors of solitary polyp lesion, larger diameter, and irregular morphology feature of polyp lesions were significantly related to gallbladder adenomas. And the predictive model established in the study can effectively identify adenomas from cholesterol polyps and help patients to select the optimal treatment protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiandong Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Youwen Qian
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Sunhua Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Foley KG, Riddell Z, Coles B, Roberts SA, Willis BH. Risk of developing gallbladder cancer in patients with gallbladder polyps detected on transabdominal ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220152. [PMID: 35819918 PMCID: PMC10996949 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the risk of malignancy in gallbladder polyps of incremental sizes detected during transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS). METHODS We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies recording the polyp size from which gallbladder malignancy developed, confirmed following cholecystectomy, or by subsequent follow-up. Primary outcome was the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with polyps. Secondary outcome was the effect of polyp size as a prognostic factor for cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool. Bayesian meta-analysis estimated the median cancer risk according to polyp size. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020223629). RESULTS 82 studies published since 1990 reported primary data for 67,837 patients. 67,774 gallbladder polyps and 889 cancers were reported. The cumulative median cancer risk of a polyp measuring 10 mm or less was 0.60% (99% credible range 0.30-1.16%). Substantial heterogeneity existed between studies (I2 = 99.95%, 95% credible interval 99.86-99.98%). Risk of bias was generally high and overall confidence in evidence was low. 13 studies (15.6%) were graded with very low certainty, 56 studies (68.3%) with low certainty, and 13 studies (15.6%) with moderate certainty. In studies considered moderate quality, TAUS monitoring detected 4.6 cancers per 10,000 patients with polyps less than 10 mm. CONCLUSION Malignant risk in gallbladder polyps is low, particularly in polyps less than 10 mm, however the data are heterogenous and generally low quality. International guidelines, which have not previously modelled size data, should be informed by these findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This large systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the mean cumulative risk of small gallbladder polyps is low, but heterogeneity and missing data in larger polyp sizes (>10 mm) means the risk is uncertain and may be higher than estimated.Studies considered to have better methodological quality suggest that previous estimates of risk are likely to be inflated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran G Foley
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff
University, Cardiff,
UK
| | - Zena Riddell
- National Imaging Academy of Wales (NIAW),
Pencoed, UK
| | - Bernadette Coles
- Velindre University NHS Trust Library & Knowledge
Service, Cardiff,
UK
| | - S Ashley Roberts
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of
Wales, Cardiff,
UK
| | - Brian H Willis
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham,
UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abdelal H, Chatterjee D. The Clinical and Pathologic Features of Intracholecystic Papillary-Tubular Neoplasms of the Gallbladder. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:565-577. [PMID: 36049837 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasm denotes a discrete mucosal-based neoplastic proliferation into the gallbladder lumen. It is diagnosed incidentally during cholecystectomy or radiologically during a workup for abdominal pain. The majority of polypoid lesions in the gallbladder are non-neoplastic; therefore, pathologic examination is the gold standard to establish this diagnosis. Intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasm is considered as premalignant, although associated invasive carcinomas may be present in the specimen. Invasive carcinoma arising from intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasm have a better prognosis than de novo gallbladder carcinomas. The pathology of intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasm, including the challenges involved in the diagnosis of this entity, is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Abdelal
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kamaya A, Fung C, Szpakowski JL, Fetzer DT, Walsh AJ, Alimi Y, Bingham DB, Corwin MT, Dahiya N, Gabriel H, Park WG, Porembka MR, Rodgers SK, Tublin ME, Yuan X, Zhang Y, Middleton WD. Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations. Radiology 2022; 305:277-289. [PMID: 35787200 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.213079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Kamaya
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Christopher Fung
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Jean-Luc Szpakowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - David T Fetzer
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Andrew J Walsh
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Yewande Alimi
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - David B Bingham
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Michael T Corwin
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Nirvikar Dahiya
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Helena Gabriel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Walter G Park
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Matthew R Porembka
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Shuchi K Rodgers
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Mitchell E Tublin
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Xin Yuan
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - Yang Zhang
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| | - William D Middleton
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K.), Pathology (D.B.B.), Medicine (W.G.P.), and Ultrasound (X.Y.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300 Pasteur Dr, H1307, Stanford, CA 94305; Department of Radiology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (C.F., A.J.W.); Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Calif (J.L.S.); Departments of Radiology (D.T.F.) and Surgical Oncology (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex; Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Y.A.); Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif (M.T.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Ariz (N.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (M.E.T.); Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (Y.Z.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (W.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
朱 连, 韩 鹏, 姜 波, 李 楠, 费 翔. [Differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions by micro-flow imaging]. NAN FANG YI KE DA XUE XUE BAO = JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2022; 42:922-928. [PMID: 35790444 PMCID: PMC9257369 DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.06.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the value of micro-flow imaging (MFI) in evaluating blood flow characteristics and differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and ultrasound images of 73 patients with gallbladder polypoid lesions, including 24 patients with pathologically confirmed neoplastic polyps (n=24) and 49 with non-neoplastic polyps (n=49). All the patients underwent conventional ultrasound, MFI and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) before cholecystectomy. The blood flow characteristics of the lesions in color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and MFI were compared, and the consistency of the findings by these two modalities with those of CEUS were evaluated by weighted Kappa consistency test. The diagnostic performance of MFI for gallbladder polypoid lesions was assessed. RESULTS There were significant differences between MFI and CDFI in the evaluation of blood flow characteristics of gallbladder polypoid lesions (χ2=37.684, P < 0.001). MFI showed better performance than CDFI in displaying the blood flow characteristics of the polyps. The consistency in the findings was 0.118 between CDFI and CEUS and 0.816 between MFI and CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MFI in distinguishing neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps were 75.00%, 93.88% and 87.67%, respectively. CONCLUSION MFI has a good consistency with CEUS in displaying the blood flow characteristics of gallbladder polypoid lesions and can accurately distinguish neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps, thus providing new ultrasound diagnostic evidence to support clinical decisions on optimal treatments of gallbladder polypoid lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 连华 朱
- />解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 鹏 韩
- />解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 波 姜
- />解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 楠 李
- />解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 翔 费
- />解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sasaki T, Kajiwara M, Ishii F, Hamada Y, Hasegawa S. Gallbladder Intramucosal Carcinoma Arising in a Cholesterol Polyp: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e22898. [PMID: 35399405 PMCID: PMC8983120 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholesterol polyp is the most common benign disease of gallbladder polyps, and is considered not to be the origin of malignancy. Herein, we report a rare case of a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in a gallbladder cholesterol polyp. A pedunculated mulberry-like gallbladder polyp diagnosed with a cholesterol polyp preoperatively consisted of two distinct components macroscopically: a yellow-whitish lobulated lesion and a brownish irregular lesion. Microscopically, the former revealed to be a cholesterol polyp, but the latter demonstrated a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Even if imaging findings suggest a gallbladder cholesterol polyp, it is important to keep in mind that carcinoma can coexist like our case.
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang X, Zhu JA, Liu YJ, Liu YQ, Che DD, Niu SH, Gao S, Chen DB. Conventional Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cholesterol and Adenomatous Polyps (1-2 cm). JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2022; 41:617-626. [PMID: 33938029 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine ultrasonic image characteristics that enable differentiation between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps and to assess the diagnostic efficacy of combining conventional ultrasound (CUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS Eighty-nine patients with gallbladder polyps of 1-2 cm in diameter were enrolled and examined by CUS and CEUS before cholecystectomy. The appearances on CUS and CEUS were recorded and analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal size threshold for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify diagnostic variables. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the size, the independent variables, and the combined factors. RESULTS There were differences in size, number, vascularity on CUS and intralesional vascular shape, wash-out, and area under the curve on CEUS between the two groups (P < .05). ROC analysis indicated that a maximum diameter of 1.45 cm was the optimal threshold for the prediction of adenomatous polyps. The logistic regression analysis proved that the single polyp, presence of vascularity, and intralesional linear vessels were associated with adenomatous polyps (P < .05). ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the combination of the three independent variables were 0.858, 87.3%, and 67.6%. The number combined with intralesional vascular shape had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 91.2%. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CUS and CEUS demonstrated great significance in the differential diagnosis of cholesterol and adenomatous polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-An Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Jie Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi-Qun Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dong-Dong Che
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Si-Hua Niu
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Gao
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ding-Bao Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Foley KG, Lahaye MJ, Thoeni RF, Soltes M, Dewhurst C, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Arvanitakis M, Perinel J, Wiles R, Roberts SA. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:3358-3368. [PMID: 34918177 PMCID: PMC9038818 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Main recommendations Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.
Source and scope These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Key Point • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran G Foley
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruedi F Thoeni
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marek Soltes
- 1st Department of Surgery LF UPJS a UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Catherine Dewhurst
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- 4th Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Clinics of Surgery, Department General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Goslar, Germany
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Cancer Centre, Vejle Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Rebecca Wiles
- Department of Radiology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jang SI, Kim YJ, Kim EJ, Kang H, Shon SJ, Seol YJ, Lee DK, Kim KG, Cho JH. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of gallbladder polypoid lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:3548-3555. [PMID: 34431545 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most accurate diagnostic modality for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (GB), but is limited by subjective interpretation. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are under development. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI in differentiating polypoid lesions using EUS images. METHODS The diagnostic performance of the EUS-AI system with ResNet50 architecture was evaluated via three processes: training, internal validation, and testing using an AI development cohort of 1039 EUS images (836 GB polyps and 203 gallstones). The diagnostic performance was verified using an external validation cohort of 83 patients and compared with the performance of EUS endoscopists. RESULTS In the AI development cohort, we developed an EUS-AI algorithm and evaluated the diagnostic performance of the EUS-AI including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. For the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps, these values for EUS-AI were 57.9%, 96.5%, 77.8%, 91.6%, and 89.8%, respectively. In the external validation cohort, we compared diagnostic performances between EUS-AI and endoscopists. For the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps, the sensitivity and specificity were 33.3% and 96.1% for EUS-AI; they were 74.2% and 44.9%, respectively, for the endoscopists. Besides, the accuracy of the EUS-AI was between the accuracies of mid-level (66.7%) and expert EUS endoscopists (77.5%). CONCLUSIONS This newly developed EUS-AI system showed favorable performance for the diagnosis of neoplastic GB polyps, with a performance comparable to that of EUS endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Ill Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Jae Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Health Science, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Eui Joo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Huapyong Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Seung Jin Shon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yu Jin Seol
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Health Science, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Dong Ki Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang Gi Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Health Science, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bao W, Xu A, Ni S, Wang B, Urmi H, Zhao B, You Y, Hu H. Is there a role for growth status in distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps? - A retrospective study based on 520 cholecystectomy patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1450-1455. [PMID: 34461797 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1970220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder adenomas have cancerous potential and occur in 4-8.9% of gallbladder polyps. The growth status (size progression and growth rate during follow-up) of polyps and their effectiveness for predicting adenomas are poorly defined. Herein, we compared adenomas and cholesterol polyps based on the growth status and evaluated the reported risk factors in predicting neoplasm. METHODS We enrolled 520 patients who underwent preoperative ultrasonic follow-up more than 6 months with post-cholecystectomy pathologically confirmed gallbladder polyps. The patients were classified into adenoma and cholesterol polyp groups. Growth status, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, ultrasonic findings were reviewed and compared between the groups. RESULTS Seventy-nine adenomas and 441 cholesterol polyps were analyzed. The mean diameter of adenomas (cholesterol polyps) was 7.24 ± 4.36 mm (6.23 ± 2.88 mm) in the initial and 12.06 ± 4.61 mm (10.05 ± 2.95 mm) in the preoperative examination. The median size progression (range) of polyps in the cholesterol polyps [3 (0, 22)] mm was smaller than that in adenomas [4 (0, 21)] mm (p = .075). The mean growth rate of adenomas (1.07 ± 1.33 mm/6 months) was slightly faster than in cholesterol polyps (0.83 ± 1.04 mm/6 months) (p = .338). The indicators significantly associated with adenomas were age >49.5 years, lack of gallbladder polyps/cholelithiasis family history, polyp size >11.5 mm and solitary polyp (p = .005, p = .027, p = .001, and p = .021, respectively). CONCLUSION Growth status was not a valuable modality to distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps. Risk factors such as age, polyp size, and solitary polyp were effective in predicting adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenqing Bao
- Tongji University School of Medicine, Gallbladder Diseases Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Anan Xu
- Gallbladder Disease Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shubin Ni
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Gallbladder Disease Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Humaira Urmi
- Gallbladder Disease Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongmei You
- Gallbladder Disease Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai Hu
- Gallbladder Disease Center, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gallbladder Polyp Classification in Ultrasound Images Using an Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network Model. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163585. [PMID: 34441881 PMCID: PMC8396835 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Differential diagnosis of true gallbladder polyps remains a challenging task. This study aimed to differentiate true polyps in ultrasound images using deep learning, especially gallbladder polyps less than 20 mm in size, where clinical distinction is necessary. A total of 501 patients with gallbladder polyp pathology confirmed through cholecystectomy were enrolled from two tertiary hospitals. Abdominal ultrasound images of gallbladder polyps from these patients were analyzed using an ensemble model combining three convolutional neural network (CNN) models and a 5-fold cross-validation. True polyp diagnosis with the ensemble model that learned only using ultrasonography images achieved an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8960 and accuracy of 83.63%. After adding patient age and polyp size information, the diagnostic performance of the ensemble model improved, with a high specificity of 88.35%, AUC of 0.9082, and accuracy of 87.61%, outperforming the individual CNN models constituting the ensemble model. In the subgroup analysis, the ensemble model showed the best performance with AUC of 0.9131 for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our proposed ensemble model that combines three CNN models classifies gallbladder polyps of less than 20 mm in ultrasonography images with high accuracy and can be useful for avoiding unnecessary cholecystectomy with high specificity.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ma NQ, Lv HY, Bi J, Yu FX, Huang XM. Scoring system for gallbladder polyps based on the cross-sectional area and patient characteristics. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:332-338. [PMID: 34147329 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current management guidelines for gallbladder polyps (GBPs) focus on a diameter more than 1 cm as an indication for cholecystectomy. Since most GBPs are not malignant, unnecessary cholecystectomies can lead to unnecessary complications and costs. We developed a score to identify true polyps focusing on their cross-sectional area (CSA). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and sonographic characteristics of 522 patients with GBPs who had undergone cholecystectomy at our hospital between January 2010 and July 2020 (reference group). We used univariate analysis to compare these parameters between 88 true polyps and 434 pseudopolyps and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify parameters to include in our scoring model. Receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve were used to identify cut-off values. The model was tested on a validation group of 98 patients. RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, a CSA >123 mm2, positive blood flow signal, age >55.5 years, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 50 U/L, and an ALT/aspartate aminotransferase ratio > 0.77 were significantly associated with true polyps (odds ratio 6.528, 2.377, 2.617, 2.445, and -0.372, respectively). A prediction model based on cut-off values was used to distinguish a low-risk and high-risk GBP group; true polyps accounted for 6.54% and 58.72%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the low-risk and high-risk validation groups, true polyps comprised 12.35% and 82.35%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our scoring system shows high accuracy and specificity in identifying true polyps and helps determine the need for surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Qing Ma
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hao-Yang Lv
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiayang Bi
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fu-Xiang Yu
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Xia-Ming Huang
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Muscarella P. Invited commentary on "Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for long diameter 10- to 15-mm gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency". Surgery 2021; 170:673-674. [PMID: 34099316 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
45
|
Zhang D, Li Q, Zhang X, Jia P, Wang X, Geng X, Zhang Y, Li J, Yao C, Liu Y, Guo Z, Yang R, Lei D, Yang C, Hao Q, Yang W, Geng Z. Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for long diameter 10-15 mm gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency. Surgery 2021; 170:664-672. [PMID: 34090677 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical indications for the treatment of gallbladder polyps are controversial. Evaluation of gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency and indications for cholecystectomy in patients with long diameter polyps of 10 to 15 mm require further analysis and discussion. In this study, our objective was to re-evaluate indications for the surgical resection of gallbladder polyps and construct a nomogram model for the prediction of gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency. METHODS Clinicopathologic data of 2,272 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps were collected from 11 medical centers in China. Risk factor analyses and nomogram prediction model for gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency were conducted. RESULTS Excluding 311 patients with cholelithiasis and 488 patients with long diameter polyps ≤5 and >15 mm, factors that differed significantly among patients with gallbladder polyps having a long diameter of 6 to 9 mm (885 cases) and 10 to 15 mm (588 cases) were polyp detection time, CEA and CA19-9 levels, number of polyps, fundus, echogenicity, gallbladder wall thickness and postoperative pathologic features (P < .05). Among 588 patients with gallbladder polyps with a long diameter of 10 of 15 mm, multivariate analysis indicated the following independent risk factors of gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency: single polyps (OR = 0.286/P < .001), polyps with broad base (OR = 2.644/P = .001), polyps with medium/low echogenicity (OR = 2.387/P = .003), and polyps with short diameter of 7 to 9 or 10 to 15 mm (OR = 3.820/P = .005; OR = 2.220/P = .048, respectively). The C-index of the nomogram model and internal validation were .778 and .768, respectively. In addition, a sample online calculator for the nomogram prediction model had been created (https://docliqi.shinyapps.io/dynnom/). CONCLUSION Indications for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder polyps with a long diameter of 10 to 15 mm should be assessed by combining the information on short diameter, number of polyps, fundus, and echogenicity. The nomogram model can be used to predict the risk for the development of gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaodi Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, No.215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry, Xianyang, China
| | - Pengbo Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, China
| | - Xintuan Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Xianyang City, Xianyang, China
| | - Xilin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Junhui Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chunhe Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University, Xianyang, China
| | - Yimin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, China
| | - Zhihua Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Hanzhong City, Hanzhong, China
| | - Da Lei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Central Hospital of Baoji City, Baoji, China
| | - Chenglin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Ankang City, Ankang, China
| | - Qiwei Hao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin, China
| | - Wenbin Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhimin Geng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Björk D, Bartholomä W, Hasselgren K, Edholm D, Björnsson B, Lundgren L. Malignancy in elective cholecystectomy due to gallbladder polyps or thickened gallbladder wall: a single-centre experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:458-462. [PMID: 33590795 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1884895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder cancer is a rare but aggressive malignancy. Surgical resection is recommended for gallbladder polyps ≥10 mm. For gallbladder wall thickening, resection is recommended if malignancy cannot be excluded. The incidence of gallbladder malignancy after cholecystectomy with indications of polyps or wall thickening in the Swedish population is not known. MATERIAL/METHODS A retrospective study was performed at Linköping University Hospital and included patients who underwent cholecystectomy 2010 - 2018. All cholecystectomies performed due to gallbladder polyps or gallbladder wall thickening without other preoperative malignant signs were identified. Preoperative radiological examinations were re-analysed by a single radiologist. Medical records and histopathology reports were analysed. RESULTS In all, 102 patients were included, of whom 65 were diagnosed with gallbladder polyps and 37 with gallbladder wall thickening. In each group, one patient (1.5% and 2.7% in each group) had gallbladder malignancy ≥ pT1b.Two (3.1%) and three (8.1%) patients with gallbladder malignancy < T1b were identified in each group. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION This study indicates that the incidence of malignancy is low without other malignant signs beyond gallbladder polyps and/or gallbladder wall thickening. We propose that these patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumour board. If the polyp is 10-15 mm or if the gallbladder wall is thickened but no other malignant signs are observed, cholecystectomy can be safely performed by an experienced general surgeon at a general surgery unit. If the histopathology indicates ≥ pT1b, the patient should be referred immediately to a hepatobiliary centre for liver and lymph node resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Björk
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Wolf Bartholomä
- Department of Radiology in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - David Edholm
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Linda Lundgren
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu K, Lin N, You Y, Zhao D, Wu J, Wang S, Lu Y. Risk factors to discriminate neoplastic polypoid lesions of gallbladder: A large scale, case-series study. Asian J Surg 2021; 44:1515-1519. [PMID: 33771426 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypoid lesion of gallbladder (PLG) size larger than 10 mm is considered to be one of the surgical indications, but the final pathological results are mostly non-neoplastic polyps. The aim of the study was to define the risk factors to discriminate neoplastic PLG and create more precise criteria for surgical indications. METHODS A large scale, case-series study based on 2704 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for PLG was designed. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was adopted to identify risk factors and the optimal size criteria for predicting neoplastic PLG. RESULTS Patients in the neoplastic group were significantly older than those in the non-neoplastic group and the average PLG size is much larger in the neoplastic group (18.5 ± 4.7 mm vs 12.6 ± 3.6 mm). Neoplastic PLGs are prone to be single and non-neoplastic polyps are usually multiple. On Multivariate logistic regression analysis, PLG size larger than 15 mm and age older than 43 years were found to be the independent risk factors to discriminate neoplastic PLG (Odds ratio 3.546 and 2.77 respectively). The ROC curve showed that 12 mm might be the more reasonable PLG size threshold for the surgical suggestion. CONCLUSIONS Considering its moderate diagnostic accuracy, the size of gallbladder polyp larger than 10 mm is insufficient to indicate surgical therapy for PLG and 12 mm should be the more optimal polyp's size threshold. Patients older than 43 years have a higher risk of having neoplastic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; Department of General Surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Nan Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yanqin You
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Dong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Juanhua Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shutong Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yi Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Onuchina EV. [Gallbladder polyps: modern approaches to diagnostics and treatment]. TERAPEVT ARKH 2021; 93:100-107. [PMID: 33720634 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.01.200544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Gallbladder polyps are an elevation of the mucous membrane that protrudes into the lumen of the gallbladder cavity. Their prevalence in the general population varies from 0.3 to 13.8%. According to the modern classification, polyps of the gallbladder are divided into benign non-tumor, benign tumor and malignant tumor polyps. A review of modern literature presents cohort and randomized controlled trials, including those summarized in meta-analyzes and systematic reviews, suggesting that the dominant form of polypoid formations of the gallbladder are cholesterol pseudo-polyps with no malignant potential associated with impaired cholesterol metabolism, often combined with gallbladder cholesterosis, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular morbidity. Evidence is building up on the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid for controlling components of the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risks. Ursodeoxycholic acid preparations may become promising for the management of cholesterol polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E V Onuchina
- Irkutsk State Academy of Postgraduate Education - a branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wennmacker SZ, de Savornin Lohman EAJ, de Reuver PR, Drenth JPH, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID, Hermans JJ, van Laarhoven CJHM. Imaging based flowchart for gallbladder polyp evaluation. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2021; 52:68-78. [PMID: 33422451 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic gallbladder polyps, and the subsequent indication for cholecystectomy remains a clinical dilemma. The current 1 cm size threshold for neoplasia is unspecific. The aim of this study was to improve diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps using sonographic and MRI characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. METHODS A prospective, exploratory study including patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyp(s) was conducted. Patients underwent targeted transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and MRI. Outcomes were sensitivity and specificity for polyp diagnosis, and the radiological characteristics of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyp types. Histopathology after cholecystectomy was used as reference standard. RESULTS Histopathology demonstrated gallbladder polyps in 20/27 patients (74%): 14 cholesterol polyps, three adenomyomatosis, two adenomas and one gastric heterotopia. Sensitivity of polyp identification were 72% (routine TAUS) and 86% (targeted TAUS and MRI). Both adenomas were identified as neoplastic on targeted TAUS and MRI. Sonographic presentation as multiple, pedunculated polyps, either heterogeneous or with hyperechoic foci, or as single polyps containing cysts were limited to nonneoplastic polyps. On MRI hyperintense polyps on T1-weighted image were cholesterol polyps. An adenoma with high-grade dysplasia showed foci of decreased ADC values. We propose a checklist for polyp evaluation by targeted TAUS and a flowchart for radiological work-up of gallbladder polyps. CONCLUSIONS The presented checklist and flowchart could aid diagnostic work-up for gallbladder polyps compared to current routine ultrasound, by elimination of nonneoplastic polyps and ultimately improve treatment decision for patients with gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Z Wennmacker
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | | | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Taskin OC, Basturk O, Reid MD, Dursun N, Bagci P, Saka B, Balci S, Memis B, Bellolio E, Araya JC, Roa JC, Tapia O, Losada H, Sarmiento J, Jang KT, Jang JY, Pehlivanoglu B, Erkan M, Adsay V. Gallbladder polyps: Correlation of size and clinicopathologic characteristics based on updated definitions. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237979. [PMID: 32915805 PMCID: PMC7485812 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different perspectives exist regarding the clinicopathologic characteristics, biology and management of gallbladder polyps. Size is often used as the surrogate evidence of polyp behavior and size of ≥1cm is widely used as cholecystectomy indication. Most studies on this issue are based on the pathologic correlation of polyps clinically selected for resection, whereas, the data regarding the nature of polypoid lesions from pathology perspective -regardless of the cholecystectomy indication- is highly limited. METHODS In this study, 4231 gallbladders -606 of which had gallbladder carcinoma- were reviewed carefully pathologically by the authors for polyps (defined as ≥2 mm). Separately, the cases that were diagnosed as "gallbladder polyps" in the surgical pathology databases were retrieved. RESULTS 643 polyps identified accordingly were re-evaluated histopathologically. Mean age of all patients was 55 years (range: 20-94); mean polyp size was 9 mm. Among these 643 polyps, 223 (34.6%) were neoplastic: I. Non-neoplastic polyps (n = 420; 65.4%) were smaller (mean: 4.1 mm), occurred in younger patients (mean: 52 years). This group consisted of fibromyoglandular polyps (n = 196) per the updated classification, cholesterol polyps (n = 166), polypoid pyloric gland metaplasia (n = 41) and inflammatory polyps (n = 17). II. Neoplastic polyps were larger (mean: 21 mm), detected in older patients (mean: 61 years) and consisted of intra-cholecystic neoplasms (WHO's "adenomas" and "intracholecystic papillary neoplasms", ≥1 cm; n = 120), their "incipient" version (<1 cm) (n = 44), polypoid invasive carcinomas (n = 26) and non-neoplastic polyps with incidental dysplastic changes (n = 33). In terms of size cut-off correlations, overall, only 27% of polyps were ≥1 cm, 90% of which were neoplastic. All (except for one) ≥2 cm were neoplastic. However, 14% of polyps <1 cm were also neoplastic. Positive predictive value of ≥1 cm cut-off -which is widely used for cholecystectomy indication-, was 94.3% and negative predictive value was 85%. CONCLUSIONS Approximately a third of polypoid lesions in the cholecystectomies (regardless of the indication) prove to be neoplastic. The vast majority of (90%) of polyps ≥1 cm and virtually all of those ≥2 cm are neoplastic confirming the current impression that polyps ≥1 cm ought to be removed. However, this study also illustrates that 30% of the neoplastic polyps are <1 cm and therefore small polyps should also be closely watched, especially in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orhun C. Taskin
- Department of Pathology and Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Olca Basturk
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Michelle D. Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Nevra Dursun
- Department of Pathology, Istanbul Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pelin Bagci
- Department of Pathology, Marmara University Pendik Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burcu Saka
- Department of Pathology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serdar Balci
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Bahar Memis
- Department of Pathology, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Enrique Bellolio
- Anatomic Pathology Department, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Juan Carlos Araya
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Dr. Hernan Henriquez Aravena, Temuco, Chile
| | - Juan Carlos Roa
- Department of Pathology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Oscar Tapia
- Department of Pathology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hector Losada
- Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Juan Sarmiento
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Burcin Pehlivanoglu
- Department of Pathology, Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
| | - Mert Erkan
- Department of Surgery and Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology and Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|