Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Bevacizumab-Insights from EudraVigilance Database on the Assessments of the Safety Profile of Monoclonal Antibodies Used as Targeted Cancer Treatment

Background/Objectives: Worldwide, colon cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality, with an increasing incidence influenced by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Despite advances in diagnosis and personalized treatments, challenges remain in improving patient prognosis, particularly in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody, is widely used in colorectal cancer treatment. This study aimed to analyze adverse events associated with BEV compared with other therapies based on data from the EudraVigilance (EV) database. Methods: A descriptive and disproportionality analysis was conducted on signals reported in the EV database related to BEV. The study included comparisons with other antineoplastic treatments, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Patient demographics, severity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and distribution patterns were analyzed to assess the safety profile of BEV in colorectal cancer treatment. Results: The majority of the signals for BEV were from patients aged 18-64 years (39.42%) and 65-85 years (34.08%). Hypertension, thromboembolism, proteinuria, and gastrointestinal disorders have been the most frequently reported. Serious ADRs, including gastrointestinal perforations, hemorrhage, and arterial thromboembolism, were observed in 93.74% of Individual Case Safety Reports. BEV was associated with a higher likelihood of vascular and endocrine disorders compared with chemotherapy and other targeted therapies. Immunotherapy was linked to increased immunological ADRs, while BEV demonstrated fewer immune-related toxicities. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring is necessary to optimize patient management, particularly in elderly patients or those with cardiovascular comorbidities. Understanding BEV's safety profile allows for better personalization of treatment strategies, minimizing risks while enhancing therapeutic outcomes.

Clinical characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pancreatic injury with pancreatitis in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy can cause immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pancreatic injury (ICI-PI). This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of ICI-PI and explore treatment approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with malignancies treated with ICIs at Nagoya University Hospital between September 2014 and June 2023. ICI-PI and pancreatitis were identified and classified using the Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver.5.0, and the patients with ICI-PI with/without pancreatitis were analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included data from 930 patients treated with ICIs. Of these, eight (0.85 %) and 10 (1.08 %) patients were diagnosed with ICI-PI without and with pancreatitis, respectively. Five of the 10 patients received standard pancreatitis treatment, while three received additional glucocorticoid therapy. One patient experienced recurrent pancreatitis and developed a pancreatic pseudocyst, which improved after high-dose glucocorticoid treatment. ICI rechallenge was pursued in five patients. Two patients received ICIs without an interval.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI-PI with pancreatitis is rare but has become more prevalent with the increasing use of ICIs. Future prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings and develop standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Changes in fecal microbiota of dairy cows with and without endometritis

BACKGROUND

Endometritis is a uterine infection caused by bacterial pathogens and has detrimental effects on productive and reproductive performance in dairy cows. A large number of studies have demonstrated the association of gut microbiota with infectious diseases. However, the role of gut microbiota in dairy cows with endometritis is still poorly understood.

RESULTS

In the present study, we characterized the fecal microbial populations in the dairy cows suffering from metritis (n = 10) and healthy cows (n = 9) using the 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Results revealed an increased abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the affected cows indicating the potential role of these two bacterial taxa in the pathogenesis of endometritis. The Ruminococcaceae_UCG-005 was the predominant genus while Olsenella and Succinivibrio were the most abundant genera in the cows affected with metritis. Further, the association of specific genera from Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes indicated three co-occurrence groups indicating the potential interaction of these genera in modulating the immune response, dysbiosis and inflammatory reaction. In addition, a significantly higher abundance of genes involved in the excretory system was observed in affected cows.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide evidence of changes in gut microbiota composition in cows suffering from metritis and advocate the need to explore the effect of commensal gut bacteria specifically co-occurring taxa in uterine inflammation and infection.

Clinical Manifestations and Risk Factors of Liver Injury Induced by PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients with Malignancies: A Case-Control Study

Background

Hepatic injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) is an inevitable challenge in the era of innovative anti-tumor therapies. However, studies on immune-related liver injury are relatively insufficient, and the associated risk factors are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical manifestations of immunotherapy-related liver injury.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted involving patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors at Weifang People's Hospital, a tertiary general hospital in China, from January 1, 2021 and July 31, 2024. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the potential risk factors. Then, the predictive value of these risk factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

In total, 300 patients were included. Among these patients, 52 patients experienced liver injury. The mean time from the initiation of immunotherapy to the onset of liver injury was 28.4 days, with a range from 2 to 219 days. 71.15% of patients developed liver injury within the first 30 days. 82.69% presented with mild cases (grade 1), 13.46% with moderate cases (grade 2), and 3.84% with severe cases (grades 3-4). The overall incidence of PD-1 inhibitors-related liver injury was 0.34%. Specifically, nivolumab exhibited the highest incidence at 2.86%, followed by sintilimab at 0.41%. Both toripalimab and camrelizumab exhibited an incidence of 0.34%, while tislelizumab had the lowest at 0.28%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GGT and AST were independent risk factors for liver injury. ROC curve analysis revealed that patients with baseline ALT≥19.5 U/L, AST≥19.5 U/L, and GGT≥28.5 U/L were at increased risk of developing liver injury.

Conclusion

In clinical therapy, close monitoring of liver function is recommended, especially for patients with baseline ALT≥19.5 U/L, AST≥19.5 U/L, and GGT≥28.5 U/L during immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors.

Adverse reactions of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with Proton pump inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Combining immune checkpoint and proton pump inhibitors is widely used in cancer treatment. However, the drug-drug interactions of these substances are currently unknown. This study aimed to explore drug-drug interactions associated with concomitant immune checkpoint and proton pump inhibitors.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2014 to 2023. Disproportionality analysis was used for data mining by calculating the reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%Cls). The adjusted RORs (RORadj) were then analysed using logistic regression analysis, considering age, sex, and reporting year. Drug-drug interactions occur when a combination treatment enhances the frequency of an event. Further confirmation of the robustness of the findings was achieved using additive and multiplicative models, which are the two statistical methodologies for signal detection of DDIs using spontaneous reporting system.

RESULTS

The total number of reports on immune checkpoint combined with proton pump inhibitors was 4,276. Median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-74 years). Significant interaction signals were observed for congenital, familial and genetic disorders (RORadj = 2.66, 95%CI, 1.38-5.14, additive models = 0.7322, multiplicative models = 3.5142), hepatobiliary disorders (RORcrude = 6.64, 95%CI, 5.82-7.58, RORadj = 7.10, 95%CI, 6.16-8.18, additive models = 2.0525, multiplicative models = 1.1622), metabolism and nutrition disorders (RORcrude = 3.27, 95%CI, 2.90-3.69, RORadj = 2.66, 95%CI, 2.30-3.08, additive models = 0.6194), and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (RORcrude = 1.41, 95%CI, 1.26-1.58, RORadj = 1.53, 95%CI, 1.34-1.75, additive models = 0.6927, multiplicative models = 5.3599). Subset data analysis showed that programmed death-1 combined with proton pump inhibitors was associated with congenital, familial, and genetic disorders; hepatobiliary disorders; and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Programmed death ligand-1 combined with proton pump inhibitors was associated with adverse reactions of metabolism and nutrition disorders. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 combined with proton pump inhibitors was associated with congenital, familial, and genetic disorders, and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world data, four Standardized MedDRA Query System Organ Class toxicities were identified as drug-drug interactions associated with combining immune checkpoint and proton pump inhibitors. Clinicians should be cautious when administering these drugs concomitantly. Preclinical trials and robust clinical studies are required to explore the mechanisms and relationships underlying interactions, thus improving understanding of drug-drug interactions associated with this combination therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis, a rising issue in targeted cancer therapy era: A literature review

Research advances in the oncology treatment field have led to the widespread use of immunotherapy. The usage of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has improved the survival of cancer patients with metastases. This has also led to the rapidly expanding indications for ICI use. However, ICI usage may lead to toxicity, which may be immune-related, in different organ-specific targets. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICI may lead to increased morbidity, decreased quality of life, and early termination of ICI. The clinical manifestations of irAEs in the gastrointestinal system are variable, ranging from self-limited to life-threatening or fatal events. In this review article, we would like to focus on discussing ICI-induced colitis, which is one of the most common ICI irAEs in the gastrointestinal tract.

The risk of endocrine immune-related adverse events induced by PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Endocrinopathies are the most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) observed during therapy with PD-1 inhibitors. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of immune-related endocrinopathies in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Methods

We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving PD-1 inhibitors, spanning from their inception to November 24, 2023. The comparative analysis encompassed patients undergoing chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or receiving placebo as control treatments. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023488303).

Results

A total of 48 clinical trials comprising 24,514 patients were included. Compared with control groups, patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors showed an increased risk of immune-related adverse events, including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, diabetes mellitus, and adrenal insufficiency. Pembrolizumab was associated with an increased risk of all aforementioned endocrinopathies (hypothyroidism: RR=4.76, 95%CI: 3.55-6.39; hyperthyroidism: RR=9.69, 95%CI: 6.95-13.52; hypophysitis: RR=5.47, 95%CI: 2.73-10.97; thyroiditis: RR=5.95, 95%CI: 3.02-11.72; diabetes mellitus: RR=3.60, 95%CI: 1.65-7.88; adrenal insufficiency: RR=4.80, 95%CI: 2.60-8.88). Nivolumab was associated with an increased risk of hypothyroidism (RR=7.67, 95%CI: 5.00-11.75) and hyperthyroidism (RR=9.22, 95%CI: 4.71-18.04). Tislelizumab and sintilimab were associated with an increased risk of hypothyroidism (RR=19.07, 95%CI: 5.46-66.69 for tislelizumab and RR=18.36, 95%CI: 3.58-94.21 for sintilimab). For different tumor types, both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism were at high risks. Besides, patients with non-small cell lung cancer were at a higher risk of thyroiditis and adrenal insufficiency. Patients with melanoma were at a higher risk of hypophysitis and diabetes mellitus. Both low- and high-dose group increased risks of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.

Conclusion

Risk of endocrine irAEs may vary in different PD-1 inhibitors and different tumor types. Increased awareness and understanding of the risk features of endocrine irAEs associated with PD-1 inhibitors is critical for clinicians.

Systematic review registration

crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023488303).

Complications of immuno-oncology care: what urologist should know

OBJECTIVES

To provide a practical review of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that may be encountered in uro-oncology patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature review of studies reporting irAEs including articles published through September 2023 for uro-oncology patients and the potential relevancy for the practicing urologist.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy has revolutionised cancer treatment, extending its impact to urological malignancies including for patients with urothelial, kidney, and prostate cancers. Immuno-oncology (IO) compounds have achieved measurable and durable responses in these cancers. Urologists, choosing to administer or co-manage IO patient care, should be prepared to understand, evaluate, and treat irAEs. This review discusses the spectrum of irAEs that can be encountered. Ongoing trials are exploring the use of immunotherapy at earlier stages of uro-oncological diseases, thus underscoring the evolving landscape of urological cancer treatment. Paradoxically, some data suggests that the occurrence of irAEs is associated with improved oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune-related AEs, while manageable, may be life-threatening and require lifelong therapy. A thorough understanding of AEs and toxicity of a novel drug class is imperative.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Inhibitor of PD-1/PD-L1: a new approach may be beneficial for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a globally prevalent, progressive disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Because of its irreversible disease progression, IPF affects the quality and length of life of patients and imposes a significant burden on their families and social healthcare services. The use of the antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib can slow the progression of the disease to some extent, but it does not have a reverse effect on the prognosis. The option of lung transplantion is also limited owing to contraindications to transplantation, possible complications after transplantation, and the risk of death. Therefore, the discovery of new, effective treatment methods is an urgent need. Over recent years, various studies have been undertaken to investigate the relationship between interstitial pneumonia and lung cancer, suggesting that some immune checkpoints in IPF are similar to those in tumors. Immune checkpoints are a class of immunosuppressive molecules that are essential for maintaining autoimmune tolerance and regulating the duration and magnitude of immune responses in peripheral tissues. They can prevent normal tissues from being damaged and destroyed by the immune response. While current studies have focused on PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1 may be the only effective immune checkpoint IPF treatment. This review discusses the application of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint in IPF, with the aim of finding a new direction for IPF treatment.

The role of intestinal flora on tumor immunotherapy: recent progress and treatment implications

Immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, has emerged as a promising approach for treating malignant tumors. The gut, housing approximately 70 % of the body's immune cells, is abundantly populated with gut bacteria that actively interact with the host's immune system. Different bacterial species within the intestinal flora are in a delicate equilibrium and mutually regulate each other. However, when this balance is disrupted, pathogenic microorganisms can dominate, adversely affecting the host's metabolism and immunity, ultimately promoting the development of disease. Emerging researches highlight the potential of interventions such as fecal microflora transplantation (FMT) to improve antitumor immune response and reduce the toxicity of immunotherapy. These remarkable findings suggest the major role of intestinal flora in the development of cancer immunotherapy and led us to the hypothesis that intestinal flora transplantation may be a new breakthrough in modifying immunotherapy side effects.

Adverse reactions of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance analysis of drug-drug interactions

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) is widely used in cancer treatment; however, drug-drug reactions (DDIs) remain unknown. We aimed to identify interaction signals for the concomitant use of ICIs and AGIs. Data were obtained from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. Disproportionality analysis was used for data mining by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Adjusted RORs were analysed using logistic regression analysis, considering age, sex and reporting year. Further confirmation was assessed via additive and multiplicative models. We identified 75,936 reports on ICIs combined with AGIs. Significant interaction signals were observed for hepatobiliary disorders (RORcrude: 5.25, 95% CI: 5.07-5.44, RORadj: 5.01, 95% CI: 4.82-5.22, additive models: 0.2323), investigations (RORcrude: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.62-1.70, RORadj: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.58-1.67, additive models: 0.2187, multiplicative models: 1.1265), renal and urinary disorders (RORcrude: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95, RORadj: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.64-1.79, additive models: 0.3239, multiplicative models: 1.1799) and vascular disorders (RORcrude: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.87-2.02, RORadj: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95, additive models: 0.5823, multiplicative models: 1.5676). Subset data analysis showed positive interaction signals for PDL-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors + AGI in hepatobiliary disorders, PD-1 inhibitors + AGI in investigations, or PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors + AGI in renal and urinary/ vascular disorders. Based on FAERS data, four systemic disorders were identified as having DDIs related to the combined use of ICIs and AGIs. Pre-clinical trials are required to explore the mechanisms underlying these interactions.

The changes of gut microbiota and metabolites in different drug-induced liver injuries

The increasing incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become a major concern. Gut microbiota, as another organ of the human body, has been studied in various tumors, cardiovascular metabolic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and human immunity. The studies mentioned above have confirmed its important impact on the occurrence and development of DILI. The gut-liver axis explains the close relationship between the gut and the liver, and it may be a pathway by which gut microbes contribute to DILI. In addition, the interaction between drugs and gut microbes affects both separately, which in turn may have positive or negative effects on the body, including DILI. There are both common and specific changes in liver injury caused by different drugs. The alteration of metabolites in DILI is also a new direction of therapeutic exploration. The application of microbiomics, metabolomics and other multi-omics to DILI has also explored new ideas for DILI. In this review, we conclude the alterations of gut microbes and metabolites under different DILI, and the significance of applying gut microbiome-metabolomics to DILI, so as to explore the metabolic characteristics of DILI and possible novel metabolic biomarkers.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced (Type 3) Autoimmune Pancreatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer care and work primarily by blocking CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), and/or PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and/or PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), thereby providing highly efficacious anti-tumor activity. However, this unmitigated immune response can also trigger immune related adverse events (irAEs) in multiple organs, with pancreatic irAEs (now referred to as type 3 Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) being infrequent.

RECENT FINDINGS

Type 3 AIP is a drug-induced, immune mediated progressive inflammatory disease of the pancreas that may have variable clinical presentations viz., an asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, incidental imaging evidence of pancreatitis, painful pancreatitis, or any combination of these subtypes. Management is largely supportive with intravenous fluid hydration, pain control and holding the inciting medication. Steroids have not been shown to demonstrate a clear benefit in acute management. A rapid development pancreatic atrophy is observed on imaging as early as 1 year post initial injury. Type 3 AIP is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas that though predominantly asymptomatic and mild in severity can lead to rapid organ volume loss regardless of type of clinical presentation and despite steroid therapy.

The Influence of the Microbiome on Immunotherapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer

Immunotherapy has shown promise as a treatment option for gastroesophageal cancer, but its effectiveness is limited in many patients due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) commonly found in gastrointestinal tumors. This paper explores the impact of the microbiome on the TME and immunotherapy outcomes in gastroesophageal cancer. The microbiome, comprising microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract, as well as within malignant tissue, plays a crucial role in modulating immune responses and tumor development. Dysbiosis and reduced microbial diversity are associated with poor response rates and treatment resistance, while specific microbial profiles correlate with improved outcomes. Understanding the complex interactions between the microbiome, tumor biology, and immunotherapy is crucial for developing targeted interventions. Microbiome-based biomarkers may enable personalized treatment approaches and prediction of patient response. Interventions targeting the microbiome, such as microbiota-based therapeutics and dietary modifications, offer the potential for reshaping the gut microbiota and creating a favorable TME that enhances immunotherapy efficacy. Further research is needed to reveal the underlying mechanisms, and large-scale clinical trials will be required to validate the efficacy of microbiome-targeted interventions.

Rituximab in steroid-refractory immune-related pancreatitis: a case report

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating several types of cancer is increasing, but they may be associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Pancreatitis is a rare irAE, mostly responsive to steroid treatment. There are no published data on the management of steroid-refractory ICI-induced pancreatitis. Rituximab has shown efficacy in the setting of relapsing non-ICI-induced autoimmune pancreatitis. However, its use has not been tested for treating immunotherapy-related pancreatitis. Here, we present the case of a patient with steroid-refractory immune-related pancreatitis successfully treated with rituximab as a potential strategy for irAE management.

Pancreatic involvement due to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a proposed classification

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) is uncommon and pancreatic involvement due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in published reports relied on the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE definition of AP differs from the revised Atlanta classification diagnostic criteria. This study aims to classify the spectrum of pancreatic involvement in patients receiving ICI therapy into categories built on the revised Atlanta classification.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of cancer patients receiving cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors between 2011 and 2020. Pancreas-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were categorized into AP and pancreatic injury.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients on ICI therapy met selection criteria. Twenty patients (43%) had AP, while 27 (57%) had pancreatic injury. Fifteen patients (75%) developed mild AP. Five patients progressed to pancreatic atrophy, and two patients (4%) developed exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. In both groups, most patients received nivolumab therapy (70% vs. 67%, p = 0.08) with no difference in mean number of nivolumab doses (9 vs. 10, p = 0.69). There was no correlation between the mean number of nivolumab or pembrolizumab doses and AP events (OR 0.94, p = 0.26, and OR 0.98, p = 0.86), but the duration of ICI therapy was significantly related to pancreatic atrophy (OR 1.01, p = 0.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.02).

CONCLUSION

Based on the novel classification, majority of pancreatic irAEs were classified as asymptomatic pancreatic injury but with some risk of pancreatic atrophy. This classification can help in assessing patterns of pancreatic involvement, pathogenesis, and treatment decisions.

Immune-related adverse events correlate with the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy in advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Whether irAEs can predict the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has not been assessed. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the correlation between irAEs and the therapeutic effect of PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy in patients with advanced CCA.

Methods

All patients with CCA who were consecutively admitted to the inpatient unit of our hospital and received PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy between September 2020 and April 2022 were screened. In total, 106 patients with CCA were screened out. We then followed up these patients until October 2022. Due to perioperative use (n=28), less than 2 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor therapy (n=9), incomplete data (n=8) and no pathological report (n=2), 59 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into the irAEs cohort and the non-irAEs cohort according to whether they experienced irAEs or not. The Log-Rank test was performed to compare the difference in survival time between these two cohorts. We then applied multivariate COX regression analysis to investigate whether irAEs were independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced CCA.

Results

Finally, 32 patients were included in the irAEs cohort and 27 patients in the non-irAEs cohort. A total of 32 patients (54.2%) had any-grade irAEs, of which 4 patients (6.8%) had grade 3-4 irAEs. The most common irAEs were thyroid toxicity (30.5%) and dermatologic toxicity (30.5%). There were no notable differences in demographics and clinical characteristics between the irAEs and non-irAEs cohorts, except for total bilirubin level (P=0.026) and relapse (P=0.016). The disease control rate (DCR) in the irAEs cohort was higher than in the non-irAEs cohort (90.6% vs 70.4%, P=0.047). Median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were better in the irAEs cohort than in the non-irAEs cohort (OS: 21.2 vs 10.0 months, P<0.001; PFS: 9.0 vs 4.4 months, P=0.003). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that irAEs were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS (OS: HR=0.133, 95% CI: 0.039-0.452, P=0.001; PFS: HR=0.435, 95% CI: 0.202-0.934, P=0.033).

Conclusion

IrAEs correlated with improved DCR, OS, and PFS in advanced CCA patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy.

Fasting and fasting mimicking diets in cancer prevention and therapy

Fasting mimicking diets (FMDs) are emerging as effective dietary interventions with the potential to improve healthspan and decrease the incidence of cancer and other age-related diseases. Unlike chronic dietary restrictions or water-only fasting, FMDs represent safer and less challenging options for cancer patients. FMD cycles increase protection in healthy cells while sensitizing cancer cells to various therapies, partly by generating complex environments that promote differential stress resistance (DSR) and differential stress sensitization (DSS), respectively. More recent data indicate that FMD cycles enhance the efficacy of a range of drugs targeting different cancers in mice by stimulating antitumor immunity. Here, we report on the effects of FMD cycles on cancer prevention and treatment and the mechanisms implicated in these effects.

The effects of traditional Chinese medicine and dietary compounds on digestive cancer immunotherapy and gut microbiota modulation: A review

Digestive tract-related cancers account for four of the top ten high-risk cancers worldwide. In recent years, cancer immunotherapy, which exploits the innate immune system to attack tumors, has led to a paradigm shifts in cancer treatment. Gut microbiota modification has been widely used to regulate cancer immunotherapy. Dietary compounds and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can alter the gut microbiota and its influence on toxic metabolite production, such as the effect of iprindole on lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and involvement in various metabolic pathways that are closely associated with immune reactions. Therefore, it is an effective strategy to explore new immunotherapies for gastrointestinal cancer to clarify the immunoregulatory effects of different dietary compounds/TCMs on intestinal microbiota. In this review, we have summarized recent progress regarding the effects of dietary compounds/TCMs on gut microbiota and their metabolites, as well as the relationship between digestive cancer immunotherapy and gut microbiota. We hope that this review will act as reference, providing a theoretical basis for the clinical immunotherapy of digestive cancer via gut microbiota modulation.

Metabolic landscape dysregulation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal adverse event resulting from immunotherapy in patients with malignant tumors. However, the pathogenesis of CIP remains poorly understood.

METHODS

We collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from cohorts of patients with CIP, new-onset lung cancer (LC), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Non-targeted metabolomics analysis was conducted to analyze metabolic signatures. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate immune cell subsets.

RESULTS

Lymphocytes were predominant in the BALF of patients with CIP. A total of 903 metabolites were identified, among which lipid compounds were the most abundant. In a comparison between patients with CIP and LC, enrichment analysis of the altered metabolites showed suppressed amino sugar metabolism, and spermidine and spermine biosynthesis in the CIP group. Metabolism of alpha linolenic acid, linoleic acid, and their fatty acid derivatives was enriched in the CIP group relative to the IPF group. The twelve metabolites found to be enriched in the CIP group were positively correlated with the proportion of CD8⁺ T cells. One cluster of BALF metabolites, 57.14% of which were lipid molecules, was inversely correlated with the proportion of natural killer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the metabolomic landscape of BALF in patients with CIP was determined. We elucidated suppressed tumor metabolic signatures, enhanced pulmonary inflammatory signaling, and the characteristics of responsible immune cells, which helps to understand the pathogenesis of CIP.

Immunomodulatory Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Recent Advances and Clinical Prospects

The immune system plays a significant role in the development, invasion, progression, and metastasis of head and neck cancer. Over the last decade, the emergence of immunotherapy has irreversibly altered the paradigm of cancer treatment. The current treatment modalities for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) include surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy which has failed to provide satisfactory clinical outcomes. To encounter this, there is a need for a novel or targeted therapy such as immunological targets along with conventional treatment strategy for optimal therapeutic outcomes. The immune system can contribute to promoting metastasis, angiogenesis, and growth by exploiting the tumor's influence on the microenvironment. Immunological targets have been found effective in recent clinical studies and have shown promising results. This review outlines the important immunological targets and the medications acting on them that have already been explored, are currently under clinical trials and are further being targeted.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cholangiopathy: Novel clinicopathological description of a multi-centre cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cholestatic liver dysfunction is common in immune-related hepatitis (irH) during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) for malignancy. We investigated the spectrum of bile duct injury and associated natural history in this cohort.

METHOD

Clinical, laboratory, radiological and histopathological data in patients with evidence of bile duct injury during CPI treatment from 2018 to 2020 was collected in three tertiary hospitals.

RESULTS

In this study, ten patients with confirmed bile duct disease were identified. Pembrolizumab was most commonly implicated (8/10). Median CPI cycles prior to bile duct injury was 6. Median alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase were 225 U/L and 1549 U/L respectively. Clinical jaundice was seen in 6/10 and radiological evidence of bile duct pathology in 8/10. Of five patients, who had liver biopsy, three cases (including two cases with normal MRCP) showed primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) like changes with periductal fibrosis. All patients were treated first-line with prednisolone following cessation of CPI, three with mycophenolate mofetil and one with tacrolimus, with clinical response in four patients. Five patients died after a mean follow-up of 27 weeks; cause of death was primarily related to progression of malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Within this heterogeneous cohort, we identified that CPI-related cholangiopathy responded poorly to immunosuppression and potentially progressed to bile duct loss. Thorough radiological and histological assessment is recommended, as identification of the cholangiopathy-associated phenotype may permit more informed advice regarding prognosis. Further data is required to determine detailed immunological characterisation in order to identify individuals at an increased risk of developing cholangiopathy.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Multimodality Pictorial Review

Cancer immunotherapies are drugs that modulate the body's own immune system as an anticancer strategy. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies interfere with cell surface binding proteins that function to promote self-recognition and tolerance, ultimately leading to upregulation of the immune response. Given the striking success of these agents in early trials in melanoma and lung cancer, they have now been studied in many types of cancer and have become a pillar of anticancer therapy for many tumor types. However, abundant upregulation results in a new class of side effects, known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). It is critical for the practicing radiologist to be able to recognize these events to best contribute to care for patients on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive system-based review of immune-related adverse events and associated imaging findings. Further, we detail the best imaging modalities for each as well as describe problem solving modalities. Given that IRAEs can be subclinical before becoming clinically apparent, radiologists may be the first provider to recognize them, providing an opportunity for early treatment. Awareness of IRAEs and how to best image them will prepare radiologists to make a meaningful contribution to patient care as part of the clinical team.

Composition of the Gut Microbiota Associated with the Response to Immunotherapy in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Chinese Real-World Pilot Study

Background: The composition of the gut microbiota is associated with the response to immunotherapy for different cancers. However, the majority of previous studies have focused on a single cancer and a single immune checkpoint inhibitor. Here, we investigated the relationship between the gut microbiota and the clinical response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy in patients with advanced cancers. Method: In this comprehensive study, 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on the gut microbiota of pre-immunotherapy and post-immunotherapy, of 72 advanced cancer patients in China. Results: At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the main components of the microbiota in the 72 advanced cancer patients. At the genus level, Bacteroides and Prevotella were the dominant microbiota among these 72 patients. The PD_whole_tree, Chao1, Observed_species and Shannon indices of R.0 and R.T were higher than those of NR.0 and NR.T. The results of LEfSe showed that Archaea, Lentisphaerae, Victivallaceae, Victivallales, Lentisphaeria, Methanobacteriaceae, Methanobacteria, Euryarchaeota, Methanobrevibacter, and Methanobacteriales were significantly enriched in the response group before immunotherapy (R.0), and the Clostridiaceae was significantly enriched in the non-response group before immunotherapy (NR.0) (p < 0.05). Lachnospiraceae and Thermus were significantly enriched in the response group after immunotherapy (R.T), and Leuconostoc was significantly enriched in R.0 (p < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that the microbiota of R.T (AUC = 0.70) had obvious diagnostic value in differentiating Chinese cancer patients based on their response to immunotherapy. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the gut microbiota was associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in cancer patients. Taxonomic signatures enriched in responders were effective biomarkers to predict the clinical response. Our findings provide a new strategy to improve the efficiency of responses to immunotherapy among cancer patients.

Relationships among microbiota, gastric cancer, and immunotherapy

Currently, conventional neoadjuvant therapy or postoperative adjuvant therapy, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can only bring limited survival benefits to gastric cancer (GC). Median survival after palliative chemotherapy is also low, at about 8-10 months. Immunotargeting is a new option for the treatment of GC, but has not been widely replicated. The highly immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment (TME) discounts the efficacy of immunotherapy for GC. Therefore, new strategies are needed to enhance the immune response of the TME. This paper reviewed the relationship between microorganisms and GC, potential links between microorganisms and immunotherapy and research of microorganisms combined immunotherapy.

Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case Series of Patients Needing Hospital Admission in a Spanish Oncology Referral Center and Review of the Literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. Although several studies have shown that ICIs have a better safety profile than chemotherapy, some patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which require specialized and multidisciplinary management. Since ICI indications are rapidly increasing, it is crucial that clinicians involved in cancer care learn to identify irAEs and manage them properly. Here, we report a case series of 23 patients with severe irAEs requiring hospitalization over a period of 12 months and seize the opportunity to review and update different general features related to irAEs along with the management of the most frequent severe irAEs in our series.

Adverse events induced by nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab monotherapy among cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to examine treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for combination of nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) compared to NIVO monotherapy among cancer patients. We searched several databases to identify relevant RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. In fourteen RCTs included in the study, we found that compared to NIVO monotherapy, combination NIVO + IPI increased the risk of any grade (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.11), and grade 3 or 4 (RR =1.95) TRAEs. Compared to NIVO, NIVO + IPI had higher risk for any grade colitis (RR =4.52), pneumonitis (RR =3.06), and diarrhea (RR =1.68).

Case Report: Exacerbation of varices following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A case series and literature review

Recently, a combined regimen of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (AB) treatment has been approved as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), contributing to prolonged survival. However, we often encounter cases where treatment must be discontinued due to the occurrence of adverse events. One of these events, which is often fatal, is gastrointestinal bleeding. To clarify the clinical effects of gastrointestinal bleeding after AB treatment, we evaluated patients with HCC who were treated with AB at our institution. Of the 105 patients, five treated with AB developed gastrointestinal bleeding, necessitating treatment discontinuation. Additionally, we encountered two cases where exacerbation of varicose veins was observed, and AB therapy could be continued by preventive treatment of varices. In conclusion, an appropriate follow-up is required during treatment with AB to prevent possible exacerbation of varicose veins.

Clinical Characteristics of ICI-Related Pancreatitis and Cholangitis Including Radiographic and Endoscopic Findings

The indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have expanded to include carcinomas of various organs. However, as ICI therapy expands, the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has become a problem. ICI-related pancreatitis and cholangitis are relatively rare irAEs. Although some patients with ICI-related pancreatitis and cholangitis are asymptomatic and do not require treatment, there have been reports of patients who did not respond to immunosuppressive therapy and died. Thus, the pathogenesis of ICI-related pancreatitis and cholangitis should be clarified immediately. Currently, the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic and biliary duct diseases is becoming increasingly important. In this review, we summarize clinical characteristics as well as radiographic and endoscopic findings of ICI-related pancreatitis and cholangitis.

Can Immune-related adverse events serve as clinical biomarkers of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in Pan-Cancer Patients?

Although PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are widely used as first-line treatment for patients with advanced tumors or as adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage tumors, their efficacy is only 15-60%. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression levels, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutation burden may assist in predicting the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, their clinical application value is limited, and there is currently a dearth of specific clinical markers to monitor or predict the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Recently, studies have exposed that the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is positively correlated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), suggesting that the latter may effectively predict anti-tumor efficacy. While there are controversies, a systematic understanding of the reasons and influencing factors of its correlation is still lacking. Therefore, this review aimed to introduce and discuss the latest research on the correlation between the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and irAEs. We identified that this positive correlation might be related to adipose tissue, T cells, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and antigen spread. In addition, the severity of irAEs, the duration of the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the comprehensive evaluation method of the severity of irAEs, and the genetic determinants are potentially the most significant bias factors when evaluating this correlation.

Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Treatment Induced Hypophysitis and Immune-Mediated Liver Injury in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment in malignancies because of the impact on reactivating the immune cells to kill tumor cells. Because anti-CTLA-4 antibody and anti-PD-1 antibody (or anti-PD-L1 antibody) work in different ways, they have synergistic effects when used in combination in many cancers. However, it has been found that a strong immune response may lead to more serious and multi-system immune-related adverse events (irAE). We describe an advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab resulting in hypophysitis and immune-mediated liver injury. He was enrolled into a CheckMate 648 global, multicenter, randomized phase 3 Clinical Trial (CTR20171227) investigating the combined potency of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the treatment of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and admitted to our center (site 0200). The patient developed hypophysitis and immune-related hepatitis rapidly after ICIs therapy, leading to the interruption of anti-tumor therapy. Then the patient developed Herpes zoster and recurrence of tuberculosis after treatment of irAEs with glucocorticoids. We report this case in the hope that doctors need to have sufficient knowledge and attention to the occurrence of irAE during the anti-immune combination therapy and actively intervene as soon as possible to obtain better anti-tumor effects and less harm to patients.

Acute Liver Failure following a Single Dose of Atezolizumab, as Assessed for Causality Using the Updated RUCAM

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become major therapeutic agents in oncology over the last few years. However, they are associated with a variety of potentially severe autoimmune phenomena. We present a patient with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung, who presented with acute liver injury two weeks following his first treatment with atezolizumab, rapidly deteriorating to fulminant liver failure. A thorough evaluation of infectious, vascular, metabolic, and autoimmune etiologies did not yield any results. Liver pathology was nonspecific. Using RUCAM as a causality assessment method indicated probable connection between atezolizumab and liver damage. To our knowledge, this is the first documented report of a patient developing acute liver failure shortly after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation.

The microbiome and precision oncology: an emerging paradigm in anticancer therapy

Understanding the host-microbiome interactions has emerged as an essential factor in improving human health and disease. Recent advances in understanding the intimate relationship of microbes with the host have uncovered various previously unknown underlying causes of disease development, progression, and treatment failure. The dynamic behaviour of the microbiome confers the heterogeneity in treatment response by modulating the immune response and inflammation in various diseases, including cancer. The growing insights into the microbial modulation of cancer through immunoregulation, xenometabolism, and increase in toxicity open a new era of personalised medicine. In the current review, we discuss the essential roles played by the microbiome in modulating the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer therapies (immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy). We also outline the current state of personalised medicine in the context of cancer and microbiome modulation. The knowledge about the role of cancer-microbiome communication will lead to designing other precise microbial modulation strategies for cancer treatment through enhanced efficacy and decreased toxicity.

Immunotherapy toxicity: identification and management

The widespread adoption of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of various cancer types, including metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which has long been associated with poor prognostic outcomes. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target and inhibit programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have shown promising results in the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC. However, while manipulating the immune system to induce antitumor response, ICIs can also lead to a unique set of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), which differ from standard chemotherapy toxicities due to their immune-based origin. These toxicities require highly specific management, including guidance from multidisciplinary specialists. The primary treatment strategy against IRAEs is systemic corticosteroid use, but additional treatment approaches may also involve supportive care, additional immunosuppression, and concurrent treatment delay or discontinuation. Given the rising prevalence of ICI therapy, it is essential to educate clinicians on the presentation and management of these potentially life-threatening events so that they are identified early and treated appropriately. Using data from recent clinical trials, this review will focus on known IRAEs, particularly those seen in patients with breast cancer, and will summarize their prevalence, severity, and outcomes. We will discuss optimal strategies for early recognition and management, as well as approaches toward cautious retreatment following resolution of IRAEs.

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Adverse Events

The expanded approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of multiple cancer types has offered patients more opportunities in treatment selection and survival.Hepatotoxicity is a well-recognized immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with treatment with ICI. It is considered a type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Depending on the specific ICI and whether the patient receives single- or dual-drug therapy, the incidence of hepatotoxicity in general could be as high as 30%. As more patients receive treatment with ICI, more cases of hepatotoxicity are expected to occur. Clinicians must exercise close pharmacovigilance to recognize liver-related irAEs early.ICI-mediated hepatobiliary toxicity (or "IMH") generally presents as asymptomatic elevations of alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase, with or without alkaline phosphatase elevation. Some patients may present with jaundice, fever, or malaise. Rarely, it may cause liver failure and death. The diagnosis of IMH is made after careful exclusion of other causes of acute hepatitis based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, imaging, and liver histological findings. In clinically significant cases of IMH, the management involves discontinuation of ICI followed by close monitoring and the initiation of immunosuppression. Current society guidelines, which are not based on robust evidence, specify treatment recommendations depending on the grade of liver injury, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. However, our clinical experience suggests possible alternatives, including lower corticosteroid dosing with adjunct therapies. Whereas current guidelines endorse permanent cessation of future ICI treatment in patients diagnosed with grades 3-4 IMH, published clinical experience suggests potential for flexibility when assessing for candidacy of resuming ICI.Because histologic bile duct injury has been observed in cases ascribed to IMH, ICI-mediated cholangiopathic disease probably exists on a spectrum within IMH. Even extrahepatic bile duct involvement has been observed. This phenotype warrants special considerations in treatment and surveillance.ICI-related cholecystitis has been rarely reported in the literature. Management follows current standards of care for typical cases of cholecystitis. No relationship with ICI-mediated cholangiopathic disease has been observed.Assessing for and managing ICI-associated pancreatic injury remain challenging to the clinician. Many cases of asymptomatic serum lipase elevation are detected on routine labs without clinical signs or symptoms of typical acute pancreatitis. However, symptomatic patients should be initially managed like traditional cases of acute pancreatitis requiring hospitalization for evaluation and inpatient management.

Adverse Effects and Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors For Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) occupies a high incidence among all the genitourinary malignancies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as alternative treatments of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), have been applied in the treatment of mUC after chemotherapy failure, with comparable efficacy and safety. ICIs can enhance anti-tumor T cell reactivity and promote immune control over the cancerous cells by blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or the combination of PD-1 and PD-L1. In the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, ICIs show obvious advantage and can enhance survival rates. However, their adverse effects are gradually manifested with increasing clinical applications. Therefore, we review the adverse effects and toxicity of ICIs in patients with UC, aiming to provide sound theoretical references and therapeutic strategies for their clinical application.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to update the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 through 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 175 studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review and were pertinent to the development of the recommendations. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to the organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, except for some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert ≤ grade 1. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids. Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4-6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, except for endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity: The Opinion of a Gastroenterologist

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently an important component of the standard first-line treatment for many neoplasms. Some guidelines recommend ICIs as adjuvant treatment. With their increased use, the incidence of associated immune-mediated adverse reactions will also increase. A significant proportion of these reactions is represented by immune-mediated diarrhea or colitis, hepatitis, and immune-mediated pancreatic damage. The present review aims to highlight the new trends related to the diagnosis and treatment of these adverse effects depending on their degree, from the perspective of the gastroenterologist. To accomplish this, a literature search was performed, and 30 publications were considered relevant (according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study [PICOS] criteria). The information about each of the three toxicities in this paper was structured in two categories such as differential diagnosis and treatment. This review aims not only to increase awareness of these side effects in the gastroenterology community but also to promote the development of new treatment guidelines with contributions from gastroenterologists.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis Presenting As Lymphocytic Colitis

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a new class of drugs that have changed the treatment and prognosis of several malignancies, even in their advanced stages. These drugs have increased patient survival rates. CPIs stimulate the immune system and include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab), programmed cell death inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and avelumab, and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 inhibitors such as atezolizumab. Herein, we present a case of CPI-induced colitis in a 45-year-old woman with a history of melanoma. The melanoma was BRAF-positive with a V600 mutation. She had metastasis to the brain and the right 10th rib, which underwent surgery and radiation treatment, respectively. She was treated with nivolumab and denosumab. The patient presented with chronic watery diarrhea. Biopsy revealed lymphocytic colitis-like changes in the colon and terminal ileum. Thus, given the history of CPIs, a diagnosis of CPIS-induced colitis was made.

The Gut Microbiome and Cancer Immunotherapy: Can We Use the Gut Microbiome as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Response in Cancer Immunotherapy?

Simple Summary

The current review assessed the effects of the gut microbiome on clinical outcomes of immunotherapy and related adverse events (AEs) in cancer patients. Studies (n = 10) consistently reported that the gut microbiome prior to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was associated with enhanced efficacy of ICIs and reduced AEs. Recent fecal microbiome transplant (FMT) studies demonstrated the modulatory effects of FMT on the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome in patients with refractory cancers and the potential to improve the efficacy of ICIs.

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota influences the clinical response to immunotherapy. This review of clinical studies examines the relationship between gut microbiota and immunotherapy outcomes. Method: A literature search was conducted in electronic databases Medline, PubMed and ScienceDirect, with searches for “cancer” and “immunotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibitor” and “microbiome/microbiota” and/or “fecal microbiome transplant FMT”. The relevant literature was selected for this article. Results: Ten studies examined patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic melanoma (n = 6), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 2), non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) (n = 1) and one study examined combination both NSCLC and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n = 1). These studies consistently reported that the gut microbiome profile prior to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was related to clinical response as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Two studies reported that a low abundance of Bacteroidetes was associated with colitis. Two studies showed that patients with anti-PD-1 refractory metastatic melanoma experienced improved response rates and no added toxicity when receiving fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from patients with anti-PD-1 responsive disease. Conclusions: Overall, significant differences in the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome were identified in ICIs responders and non-responders. Our findings provide new insights into the value of assessing the gut microbiome in immunotherapy. Further robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the modulatory effects of the gut microbiome and FMT on ICIs in patients not responding to immunotherapy are warranted.

Real-world data analyses unveiled the immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors across cancer types

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant survival benefits in treating many types of cancers. However, their immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have not been systematically evaluated across cancer types in large-scale real-world populations. To address this gap, we conducted real-world data analyses using nationwide insurance claims data with 85.97 million enrollees across 8 years. We identified a significantly increased risk of developing irAEs among patients receiving immunotherapy agents in all seven cancer types commonly treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. By six months after treatment initialization, those receiving immunotherapy were 1.50-4.00 times (95% CI, lower bound from 1.15 to 2.16, upper bound from 1.69 to 20.36) more likely to develop irAEs in the first 6 months of treatment, compared to matched chemotherapy or targeted therapy groups, with a total of 92,858 patients. The risk of developing irAEs among patients using nivolumab is higher compared to those using pembrolizumab. These results confirmed the need for clinicians to assess irAEs among cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy as part of management. Our methods are extensible to characterizing the effectiveness and adverse effects of novel treatments in large populations in an efficient and economical fashion.

The Role of Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Cancer and Cancer Treatment: Chance or Curse?

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is home to a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, comprising bacteria, archaea, viruses, yeast, and fungi. It is widely accepted that human health is shaped by these microbes and their collective microbial genome. This so-called second genome plays an important role in normal functioning of the host, contributing to processes involved in metabolism and immune modulation. Furthermore, the gut microbiota also is capable of generating energy and nutrients (eg, short-chain fatty acids and vitamins) that are otherwise inaccessible to the host and are essential for mucosal barrier homeostasis. In recent years, numerous studies have pointed toward microbial dysbiosis as a key driver in many GI conditions, including cancers. However, comprehensive mechanistic insights on how collectively gut microbes influence carcinogenesis remain limited. In addition to their role in carcinogenesis, the gut microbiota now has been shown to play a key role in influencing clinical outcomes to cancer immunotherapy, making them valuable targets in the treatment of cancer. It also is becoming apparent that, besides the gut microbiota's impact on therapeutic outcomes, cancer treatment may in turn influence GI microbiota composition. This review provides a comprehensive overview of microbial dysbiosis in GI cancers, specifically esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers, potential mechanisms of microbiota in carcinogenesis, and their implications in diagnostics and cancer treatment.

Drug-Induced Colitis

Drug-induced colitis encompasses a wide spectrum of colon disorders that can manifest microscopically or macroscopically. Patients present with new-onset colitis or exacerbations of inflammatory bowel diseases; in some cases, colitis resolves with discontinuation of medication. Mucosal injury can be focal or extensive, involving the entire colonic mucosa, and sometimes involves other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. It has been a challenge to determine the proportion of new-onset colitis caused by medication and there are few data on the overall prevalence. We review the drugs that have been linked with development of drug-induced colitis and strategies for physicians who believe their patients have this disorder-usually discontinuation of the drug believed to cause colitis and treatment with steroids or immune-modulating therapies. Physicians must be aware of medications that can cause colitis.

Apoptotic Gastritis in Melanoma Patients Treated With PD-1-Based Immune Checkpoint Inhibition - Clinical and Histopathological Findings Including the Diagnostic Value of Anti-Caspase-3 Immunohistochemistry

Background

Gastritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) is a rare but severe drug-related side effect. The reference standard for confirming CPI-associated gastritis (CPI-assGastritis) is histopathological assessment; however, the histopathological features of CPI-assGastritis are not yet adequately defined.

Materials and Methods

Gastric biopsies of melanoma patients with histopathologically suspected CPI-assGastritis were compared with gastric biopsies of patients with inflammation free gastric mucosa (IFGM), type A, B, and C gastritis with respect to apoptosis count and predominant histopathological features. Immunohistochemical anti-caspase-3 staining was performed to identify apoptosis. Quantification was performed by manually counting the number of apoptotic events per 10 high-power fields (HPF). Clinical symptoms, treatment, and follow-up data of patients with CPI-assGastritis were examined. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used for statistical testing.

Results

Five melanoma patients (three women, two men; median age: 45 years) were treated with PD-1-based CPI. The patients reported epigastric pain, weight loss, nausea, and vomiting. Histologically, the patients with CPI-assGastritis showed a partly lymphocytic, partly granulocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Manual counting of apoptotic cells in biopsy tissue slides stained against caspase 3 revealed a median of 6 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 2.75-17.30) in the patients with CPI-assGastritis. Results for the comparison cohort (patients n = 21) were a median of 1 apoptotic event/10 HPF (95% CI, 0.5–4.5) for type-A gastritis (six patients), a median of 2 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 0–4.5) for type-B gastritis (five patients), and no apoptosis for IFGM and type-C gastritis (five patients). Patients with CPI-assGastritis had a significantly higher apoptosis count than patients with IFGM (p<0.01), type A (p<0.05), B (p<0.05), and C gastritis (p<0.01). None of the CPI-assGastritis biopsies showed evidence of Helicobacter pylori. All CPI-assGastritis patients responded to systemic treatment with corticosteroids.

Conclusion

CPI-assGastritis manifests with nonspecific symptoms but histologically shows a high number of apoptotic events, which can best be visualized by anti-caspase-3 immunohistochemistry. This histopathological feature may help to histologically differentiate CPI-assGastritis from other forms of gastritis and inform decision-making regarding its optimal management.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oral Mucositis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents.

RESULTS

We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1-2 mucositis, and 78% received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti-PD-1/L1-based therapy, anti-CTLA-4-based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.

Gut and Endometrial Microbiome Dysbiosis: A New Emergent Risk Factor for Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynaecological malignancies worldwide. Histologically, two types of endometrial cancer with morphological and molecular differences and also therapeutic implications have been identified. Type I endometrial cancer has an endometrioid morphology and is estrogen-dependent, while Type II appears with non-endometrioid differentiation and follows an estrogen-unrelated pathway. Understanding the molecular biology and genetics of endometrial cancer is crucial for its prognosis and the development of novel therapies for its treatment. However, until now, scant attention has been paid to environmental components like the microbiome. Recently, due to emerging evidence that the uterus is not a sterile cavity, some studies have begun to investigate the composition of the endometrial microbiome and its role in endometrial cancer. In this review, we summarize the current state of this line of investigation, focusing on the relationship between gut and endometrial microbiome and inflammation, estrogen metabolism, and different endometrial cancer therapies.

Inhibitors of immune checkpoints-PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4-new opportunities for cancer patients and a new challenge for internists and general practitioners

The treatment of cancer patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, combined therapy anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with anti-CTLA-4) has without doubt been a significant breakthrough in the field of oncology in recent years and constitutes a major step forward as a novel type of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. ICIs have contributed to a significant improvement in the outcome of treatment and prognosis of patients with different types of malignancy. With the expansion of the use of ICIs, it is expected that caregivers will face new challenges, namely, they will have to manage the adverse side effects associated with the use of these drugs. New treatment options pose new challenges not only for oncologists but also for specialists in other clinical fields, including general practitioners (GPs). They also endorse the need for taking a holistic approach to the patient, which is a principle widely recognized in oncology and especially relevant in the case of the expanding use of ICIs, which may give rise to a wide variety of organ complications resulting from treatment. Knowledge and awareness of the spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) will allow doctors to qualify patients for treatment more appropriately, prevent complications, correctly recognize, and ultimately treat them. Additionally, patients with more non-specific symptoms would be expected, in the first instance, to consult their general practitioners, as complications may appear even after the termination of treatment and do not always proceed in line with disease progression. Dealing with any iatrogenic complications, will not only be the remit of oncologists but because of the likelihood that specific organs may be affected, is likely to extend also to specialists in various fields of internal medicine. These specialists, e.g., endocrinologists, dermatologists, pulmonologists, and gastroenterologists, are likely to receive referrals for patients suffering from specific types of adverse events or will be asked to provide care in cases requiring hospitalization of patients with complications in their field of expertise. In view of these considerations, we believe that there is an urgent need for multidisciplinary teamwork in the treatment of cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy and suffering the consequent adverse reactions to treatment.