Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Systematic Literature Review

Multi-bioluminescence based dynamic imaging of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced hepatic inflammation process

Bacterial infections are a major cause of death worldwide. However, it is difficult to track the in vivo dynamics of pathogenic bacteria and the expression of inflammatory factors in infected animals throughout the infection process. This work used Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an infection model and utilised genetically bioluminescence-labeled P. aeruginosa and hydrodynamic transfection technology to construct a liver-visual NF-κB, IL-6, TNF-α inflammation model, thereby enabling the tracking of the dynamic spread of P. aeruginosa in infected animals and the transient activation of the liver inflammation response. The results showed that P. aeruginosa introduced via the tail vein initially accumulates in the liver and gradually activates NF-κB, IL-6, and TNF-α. Subsequently, the P. aeruginosa infection gradually spreads to the lungs and small intestine, and final proliferation leads to septic death in mice. During the infection process, we observed a strictly negative correlation between platelet activation and bacterial proliferation; the higher the degree of platelet activation, the stronger the inhibitory effect on bacterial proliferation and liver inflammation. In conclusion, this bioluminescence-based in vivo imaging technique offers new opportunities to investigate the innate immune response in controlling pathogenic infections.

Harnessing advances in mechanisms, detection, and strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global health crisis, threatening the effectiveness of antibiotics and other antimicrobial agents, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and economic burdens. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis of AMR, beginning with a timeline of antibiotics discovery and the year of first observed resistance. Main mechanisms of AMR in bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites are summarized, and the main mechanisms of bacteria are given in detail. Additionally, we discussed in detail methods for detecting AMR, including phenotypic, genotypic, and advanced methods, which are crucial for identifying and monitoring AMR. In addressing AMR mitigation, we explore innovative interventions such as CRISPR-Cas systems, nanotechnology, antibody therapy, artificial intelligence (AI), and the One Health approach. Moreover, we discussed both finished and ongoing clinical trials for AMR. This review emphasizes the urgent need for global action and highlights promising technologies that could shape the future of AMR surveillance and treatment. By integrating interdisciplinary research and emerging clinical insights, this study aims to guide individuals toward impactful solutions in the battle against AMR.

Clinical and Microbiological characteristics of patients with ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae has emerged, typically due to mutations in the blaKPC gene. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with CZA-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae, with a focus on comparing strains with KPC variants to those with wild-type KPC.

METHODS

Unique adult patients with CZA-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae were identified at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between February 2019 and June 2024. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were recorded, and KPC variants were detected using polymerase chain reaction followed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 60 cases of CZA-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae were included. The 14-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 20% and 41.7%, respectively. Thirty-six strains (60%) harbored KPC variants, with 22 different types identified. KPC-33 (n = 12) was the most common variant. Previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and prior exposure to CZA were more common in the KPC variant group than in the wild-type KPC group. Strains producing KPC variants showed a higher proportion of CZA minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 64 µg/mL (80.6% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001) and restored meropenem susceptibility (MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL) (72.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) compared to those producing wild-type KPC. Additionally, the 14-day mortality rate was lower in patients infected with KPC variant strains compared to those with wild-type KPC strains (11.5% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

CZA-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae is associated with high mortality. Strains producing KPC variants are more likely to exhibit restored meropenem susceptibility and higher levels of CZA resistance.

Treatment with Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by the Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Intensive Care Unit

Purpose

Ceftazidime avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is recommended for treating severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). However, there are few real-world studies on the use of CAZ-AVI to treat lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) caused by MDR-GNBs in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with LRTIs caused by MDR-GNB who were treated with CAZ-AVI in the ICU, and to investigate the independent risk factors for mortality.

Patients and Methods

This single-center retrospective study included patients with LRTIs treated with CAZ-AVI in the respiratory ICU of a tertiary hospital in Anhui Province between December 2022 and November 2024. The primary outcomes were 28-day survival and independent risk factors for all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 71 patients were enrolled in the study and 56.3% (40/71) had 28-day survival outcomes. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (odds ratio [OR]: 1.144, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012-1.293, p=0.032), coinfection with Aspergillus (OR: 42.753, 95% CI: 2.324-786.555, p=0.011), and days of CAZ-AVI (OR: 0.851, 95% CI: 0.734-0.986, p=0.032) were independent risk factors for 28-day all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated prolonged CAZ-AVI therapy (>10 days) improved survival (p<0.001), APACHE II scores >24 correlated with increased 28-day mortality (p=0.0048), and Aspergillus coinfection significantly reduced survival rates (p=0.001). We also constructed a nomogram for predicting the risk of death in ICU patients treated with CAZ-AVI for LRTIs, with good discrimination and calibration.

Conclusion

CAZ-AVI can be used to treat LRTIs caused by MDR-GNB in the ICU. Higher APACHE II scores and coinfection with Aspergillus were associated with 28-day mortality, whereas a longer course of therapy was a protective factor. The nomogram can help clinicians predict CAZ-AVI outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with metronidazole in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection: A phase 3, multicentre, open-label study

BACKGROUND

This phase 3 open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).

METHODS

Hospitalised adults with cIAI received ceftazidime-avibactam + metronidazole for 5-14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the clinically evaluable (CE) analysis set. Efficacy was evaluated against a pre-defined point estimate criterion of ≥78 %. Microbiological responses, safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed as secondary objectives.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled at 27 Japanese study sites; 59 (mean age 57 years, 42 % female) were included in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis set. The most common baseline pathogens (microbiological MITT analysis set; n = 42) were Escherichia coli (n = 31; 74 %), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 6; 14 %) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5; 12 %); all were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. In the CE analysis set (n = 40), 36 patients (90.0 %; 95 % confidence interval: 76.3, 97.2) achieved clinical cure at TOC. Favourable per-pathogen microbiological responses at TOC were >90 % for common Gram-negative pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Adverse events were generally mild; the most common were constipation (12 %), diarrhoea (12 %), and insomnia (10 %). Pharmacokinetic observations of ceftazidime and avibactam were consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC was greater than the pre-defined threshold of 78.0 %. These findings in Japanese patients are consistent with multi-regional phase 3 non-inferiority trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in patients with cIAIs.

CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04927312.

Real-world use, effectiveness, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam: Results of the French cohort OZAVIE

BACKGROUND

While difficult-to-treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections increase over time, the real-world effectiveness, use, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) for treating hospitalized patients was assessed in 41 French centers.

PROCEDURES

OZAVIE was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted between March 2019 and November 2021. Hospitalized adult patients having initiated CAZ-AVI for infections within 14 days before enrolment were eligible. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic data were collected. Outcome was categorized as "failure" if the patient died from the initial infection, or if the infections persisted and required another antibiotic or surgery, or if CAZ-AVI was discontinued due to intolerance, and as "global success" otherwise. Patients whose outcome was not "failure", did not die and required no other antibiotics during the index hospitalization were categorized as "therapeutic success".

RESULTS

257 patients were enrolled: 76 females/181 males, mean age 58.4 years, with diabetes (30.0 %), chronic renal failure (25.7 %), end-stage liver disease (9.3 %) and/or immunocompromised (31.1 %). CAZ-AVI was prescribed for nosocomial pneumonia (34.2 %), complicated urinary tract infections (17.5 %), complicated intra-abdominal infections (14.8 %) and other specified sites (27.6 %). The main pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (52.4 %), Klebsiella spp. (34.9 %), Enterobacter spp. (18.4 %). Global and therapeutic successes were observed in 79.0 % and 63.4 % of patients, respectively, and 28-day mortality was 20.2 %. Overall, adverse events possibly related to CAZ-AVI were reported in 17.4 % of patients, including serious AEs in 6.2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI is effective and well tolerated for treating various infections - including difficult-to-treat infection sites - and for treating various infections strains, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.

Experience in Ceftazidime-Avibactam for treatment of MDR BGN infection in Oncologic Children

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) plays a key role in the treatment of Multidrug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli (MDR-GNB) infections. In pediatrics, CAZ-AVI is clinically approved for treatment of urinary tract or intra-abdominal infection. However, there is limited data available about its use in children with cancer who have complicated infections caused by MDR-GNB.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe our experience in using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of MDR GNB infections in children with cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Pediatric Oncology Institute (IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP), including pediatric oncologic patients who received CAZ-AVI for the treatment of infections caused by GNB.

RESULTS

From Jan/2021 to Jun/2022, 11 patients with 13 episodes were included in the analysis. Among them, 45 % were female, with a median age of 7 years. Three patients had Acute lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), three had Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), two had Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Additionally, there was one case each of medulloblastoma, fibrosarcoma, and craniopharyngioma. All patients presented significant risk factors for MDR-GNB, such as neutropenia and two were submitted to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). The infection episodes included six Bloodstream Infections (BSI), two Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), two tracheobronchitis cases, along with one case each of necrotizing pneumonia, ventriculitis, and endocarditis. The identified pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacter cloacae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The primary reason for prescribing CAZ-AVI was either Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria (MDR-GNB) infection or clinical worsening after initial therapy. Combination therapy was prescribed in eight episodes with a median prescription length of nine days. Microbiological sterilization was achieved in 92 % of episodes, and the 30-day survival rate was 84 %. Notably, no deaths were associated with treatment failure, and no adverse events associated with CAZ-AVI use were observed.

CONCLUSION

CAZ-AVI could be used for treating GNB infections in oncologic pediatric patients.

Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is a major global concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been identified as a potential treatment option for complicated infections.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the global resistance proportions of GNB to CAZ-AVI comprehensively.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE (until September 2024), and statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 20.0).

RESULTS

CAZ-AVI resistance proportions were determined in 136 studies, with 25.8% (95% CI 22.2-29.7) for non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli and 6.1% (95% CI 4.9-7.4) for Enterobacterales. The CAZ-AVI resistance proportion significantly increased from 5.6% (95% CI 4.1-7.6) of 221,278 GNB isolates in 2015-2020 to 13.2% (95% CI 11.4-15.2) of 285,978 GNB isolates in 2021-2024. Regionally, CAZ-AVI resistance was highest in Asia 19.3% (95% CI 15.7-24.23.4), followed by Africa 13.6% (95% CI 5.6-29.2), Europe 11% (95% CI 7.8-15.2), South America 6.1% (95% CI 3.2-11.5) and North America 5.3% (95% CI 4.2-6.7). Among GNB resistance profiles, colistin-resistant isolates and XDR isolates exhibited the highest resistance proportions (37.1%, 95% CI 14-68 and 32.1%, 95% CI 18.5-49.6), respectively), followed by carbapenem-resistant isolates and MDR isolates [(25.8%, 95% CI 22.6-29.3) and (13%, 95% CI 9.6, 17.3)].

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of GNB isolates from urinary tract infections remained susceptible to CAZ-AVI, indicating its potential as a suitable treatment option. However, the increasing resistance trends among GNB are concerning and warrant continuous monitoring to maintain CAZ-AVI's effectiveness against GNB infections.

Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in HSCT recipients and acute leukemia patients post induction chemotherapy

Febrile neutropenia is a major complication in patients with acute leukemia or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Understanding patient characteristics and susceptibility patterns in febrile neutropenia is essential for appropriate antimicrobial therapy. First-line agents should have Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage, but with the increase in multi-drug resistant organisms, ceftazidime-avibactam has emerged as a new therapeutic option. This retrospective case-control study included 300 admissions (143 patients) between January 2009 and December 2022. Patients with hematologic neoplasms and patients that underwent HSCT, satisfying the criteria of febrile neutropenia and treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZAVI) were included and compared to controls who received the best available therapy (BAT). A bivariate regression model explored independent predictors of septic shock and mortality. Patients who received CAZAVI were more likely to have a microbiologically documented infection (59.0% vs. 28.3%). Complications were significantly more frequent in the CAZAVI group, with sepsis being the most common (59.0%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that receiving CAZAVI was an independent risk factor for both sepsis and mortality (aOR 6.33 [95% CI 2.81-14.30] and 7.82 [2.63-23.26], respectively). Knowing common organisms and patterns of resistance, with an understanding of risk factors for morbidity and mortality, is crucial for the antimicrobial management of febrile neutropenia. Further studies on the effectiveness of CAZAVI in this population are needed.

Safety evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam based on FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

To explore adverse event (AE) signals of Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

AE reports primarily associated with CZA were retrieved from the FAERS database from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2023. Signal detection was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) methods.

RESULTS

A total of 750 AEs reports with CZA as the preferred suspected drug were obtained, identifying 66 preferred terms (PTs) involving 24 system organ classes (SOCs). Besides, the AEs already mentioned in the drug label, this study also revealed some new, clinically valuable potential AEsignals, such as Cholestasis (n = 14, ROR 29.39, PRR 29.15, IC 3.34, EBGM 29.11), Drug-induced liver injury (n = 8, ROR 9.05, PRR 9.01, IC 2.25, EBGM 9.01), Hepatocellular injury (n = 7, ROR 13.90, PRR 13.84, IC 2.41, EBGM 13.63), Haemolytic anaemia (n = 5, ROR 24.29, PRR 24.22, IC 2.42, EBGM 40.53), etc. Additionally, AE signals with higher intensity were identified, such as Hypernatraemia (n = 5, ROR 40.73, PRR 40.61, IC 2.31, EBGM 24.19), Toxic epidermal necrolysis (n = 4, ROR 11.58, PRR 11.55, IC 1.89, EBGM 11.54). Therefore, special vigilance for these potential AEs is warranted when using CZA clinically.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the potential AEs and risks associated with the clinical use of CZA, particularly the risks related to Cholestasis, Drug-induced liver injury, Haemolytic anaemia, Hypernatraemia, and Toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Aztreonam-avibactam: The dynamic duo against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens

Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant public health challenge, particularly with the rise of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections resistant to carbapenems. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a promising new combination therapy designed to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, including those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Aztreonam, a monobactam antibiotic, is resistant to hydrolysis by MBLs but can be degraded by other β-lactamases. Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, effectively neutralizes extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases, restoring aztreonam's efficacy against resistant pathogens. This review covers the chemistry, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of ATM-AVI. ATM-AVI combination has shown efficacy against a wide range of resistant Enterobacterales and other gram-negative bacteria in both in vitro and clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrate that ATM-AVI maintains effective drug concentrations in the body, with dose adjustments recommended for patients with renal impairment. Clinical trials, including the REVISIT and ASSEMBLE studies, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ATM-AVI in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by MDR gram-negative pathogens. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved ATM-AVI for these indications, and further research is ongoing to optimize dosing regimens and expand its clinical use. This combination represents a critical advancement in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, offering a new therapeutic option for treating severe infections caused by MDR gram-negative, including MBL-producing, bacteria.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus other antimicrobial agents for treatment of Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) is a life-threatening infection with limited treatment options. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) with other antimicrobial agents in treating MDR-PA infections.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library have been systematically reviewed, for publications in the English language, from database inception to July 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies comparing CAZ-AVI outcomes with other antimicrobial agents were included. In-hospital mortality & 30-day mortality were assessed as the main outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Literature screening, data extraction, and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.4 was employed for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included four retrospective studies, enrolling 1934 patients. The CAZ-AVI group demonstrated significantly lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.60, 95% CI:0.37-0.97, I2 = 74%, p = 0.04) in three studies with 1444 patients and lower 30-day mortality, in 438 patients from three studies (RR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.28-1.05, I2 = 67%, p = 0.07). No significant difference in clinical success, microbiological success, length of hospital, and ICU stay was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that CAZ-AVI treatment significantly lowered in-hospital mortality compared with other antimicrobial agents in MDR-PA infections. However, the analysis only included a few observational studies and high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate further the scope of CAZ-AVI in MDR-PA  infections.

Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Mortality of Patients with Post-Neurosurgical Meningitis-A 900-Cases Cohort Study

Aim

To express the clinical characteristics of patients with post-neurosurgical meningitis (PNM) and launch a survival analysis to screen mortality predictors.

Methods

A cohort analysis containing more than 70000 patients was evaluated, and all of them received neurosurgical procedure. Clinical and microbial epidemiology, therapy and mortality of PNM patients were reviewed. Multi-variable Cox proportional hazard models were applied to achieve survival analysis.

Results

About 900 PNM patients from 3244 cases were selected for characteristics and survival analysis, the mean age of them was 41 (27-54) years, 516 (57.3%) were men and 384 (42.7%) were women. The 28-day mortality was 12.4% (112 of 900) in patients with PNM. Hypertension, external ventricular drainage (EVD), and lumbar drainage (LD) are mortality predictors for PNM, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.641 (95% C.I. 1.563-4.464, P<0.001), 2.196 (95% C.I. 1.317-3.662, P=0.003), and 1.818 (95% C.I. 1.126-2.936, P=0.014). In treatment, the outcome of patients receiving three or more antibiotic combinations is better than that of patients receiving dual-drug combinations.

Conclusion

The mortality of patients with PNM was relatively high, and the risk factors related to 28-days mortality were hypertension, EVD and LD and treatment with three or more antibiotics are much better.

The Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-An Observational Prospective Study

Background/objectives: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are progressively increasing in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). Its treatment is challenging due to the lack of pediatric trials. CRE infections are associated with significantly poor outcomes, but ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been reported to be successful in their treatment. This study aimed to describe the use and outcome of CAZ-AVI in a PICU. Results: Ten patients were included, with 12 episodes of clinical suspicion or confirmed multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections treated with CAZ-AVI for surgical prophylaxis, suspicion of sepsis, pneumonia, and surgical wound infection. Of these patients, 80% received empirical treatment because of previous MDR bacterial colonization, and 60% were administrated combination therapy with aztreonam for Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBL)strains. No bacteria were resistant to CAZ-AVI. The average duration of the treatment was 3 days when cultures turned negative and 7 days when MDR bacteria were isolated. Methods: This was an observational prospective study of children treated with CAZ-AVI in the PICU of a tertiary hospital in 2022. Epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, and outcome data were collected. Conclusions: The most frequent use of CAZ-AVI in our PICU was the short-term empirical treatment for patients with previous MDR bacterial colonization and clinical suspicion of bacteremia or sepsis. Furthermore, the combination of CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam could be more effective for CRE infections, especially type Ambler class B as MBL strains.

Impact of Antimicrobial Therapy on Mortality and Readmission in Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Infections: A Retrospective Study at Dammam Medical Complex

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa presents a significant treatment challenge, necessitating effective antimicrobial options. This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted at Dammam Medical Complex and aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T), and meropenem and colistin in treating MDR P. aeruginosa infections. The study included 250 patients (n = 250, 100%) admitted between January 2022 and November 2024, who were treated with one of the three antimicrobials. The primary outcomes assessed were clinical cure, 30-day mortality, and all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included readmission rates within 30 days and the rate of uncontrolled infection by day 14 (n = 40, 16%). The patient cohort consisted of a mix of ICU admissions (n = 138, 55.2%), mechanically ventilated patients (n = 140, 56%), and those requiring vasopressors (n = 100, 40%). Most patients were elderly with multiple pre-existing medical conditions, such as diabetes (n = 175, 70%), hypertension (n = 88, 35.2%), and chronic kidney disease (n = 63, 25.2%). Results demonstrated that ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with a statistically significant higher clinical cure rate (n = 180, 72%) compared to ceftolozane-tazobactam (n = 44, 59%) and meropenem and colistin (n = 24, 48%) (P < 0.05). Similarly, patients treated with CAZ-AVI had significantly lower readmission rates within 30 days compared to those on C-T or meropenem and colistin. The overall in-hospital mortality was highest among patients treated with meropenem and colistin (n = 19, 38%), followed by C-T (n = 24, 32%), and lowest with CAZ-AVI (n = 30, 24%) (P < 0.05). The findings suggest that ceftazidime-avibactam is more effective in achieving clinical cure and reducing readmission rates compared to ceftolozane-tazobactam and meropenem and colistin in patients with MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Meropenem and colistin were primarily used when supply constraints limited the availability of other agents, highlighting the need for improved access to preferred antimicrobials. These results underscore the importance of optimized antimicrobial stewardship in the management of MDR P. aeruginosa to improve patient outcomes.

Bacterial Infection Features in Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis: Review of a 2016-2021 Cohort

Background/Objectives: Bacterial infections (BI) are a major cause of mortality in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH); however, only a few studies have investigated BI in AH in the last decade. Therefore, we aimed to assess the features and outcomes of BI in patients with AH. Methods: This observational descriptive study included patients with AH admitted to a tertiary academic hospital between 2016 and 2021. Clinical and complete microbiological data were recorded and complications, including acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), and mortality over 90-days were compared between infected and noninfected patients. Results: Overall, 115 patients with AH were recruited and 75 had severe AH; among them, 66 started corticosteroid treatment. We identified 69 cases of BI in 44 patients; the incidence of BI upon hospital discharge was 32.2%, which reached 38.2% at 90 days. The predominant infection site was the chest (35%). Among the identified bacteria (52.1%), half were gram positive and half gram negative. A low rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria (14%) was also noted. Infected patients during hospitalization (n = 37) exhibited higher rates of hepatic decompensation and ACLF (p = 0.001) and lower survival (81.8% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.015) than did noninfected patients (n = 78). In-hospital infected patients (n = 22) exhibited worse survival (72.7%) than did those infected upon admission (93.3%) or noninfected patients (94.9%) (p = 0.009). Corticosteroid-treated patients displayed a nonsignificant increase in the total number of BI; however, without greater mortality. Conclusions: BI were common in our cohort of patients with AH. Patients with in-hospital infections commonly experienced serious complications, including high ACLF and death rates. Infections diagnosed upon admission were treated without affecting survival.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included.

RESULTS

The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Real-world utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam among inpatients in the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections are challenging to treat due to underlying patient conditions, pathogen characteristics, and high antibiotic resistance rates. As newer antibiotic therapies come to market, limited data exist about their real-world utilization.

METHODS

This was a national retrospective cohort study of ceftazidime/avibactam (approved in 2015) utilization among inpatients from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, from 2015 through 2021. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate time trends in utilization.

RESULTS

Ceftazidime/avibactam use increased by 52.3% each year (days of therapy per 1,000 bed days; 95% confidence interval, 12.4%-106.4%). We identified 1,048 unique predominantly male (98.3%) and white (66.2%; Black, 27.7%) patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam, with a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (11.9) years. The most commonly isolated organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.3%; carbapenem resistant, 80.6%; MDR, 65.0%) and Klebsiella species (34.1%; carbapenem resistant, 78.4%; extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant, 90.7%). Common comorbid conditions included hypertension (74.8%), nervous system disorders (60.2%), diabetes mellitus (48.7%), and cancer (45.1%). Median time to ceftazidime/avibactam initiation from admission was 6 days, with a median of 3 changes in therapy before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation and a subsequent median length of inpatient stay of 14 days (median of 8 days of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy). Treatment heterogeneity was high, both before ceftazidime/avibactam initiation (89.6%) and during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment (85.6%), and common concomitant antibiotics included vancomycin (41.4%), meropenem (24.1%), cefepime (15.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (15.2%). The inpatient mortality rate was 23.6%, and 20.8% of patients had a subsequent admission with ceftazidime/avibactam treatment.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of ceftazidime/avibactam increased from 2015 to 2021 in the national VA Healthcare System. Ceftazidime/avibactam was utilized in complex, difficult-to-treat patients, with substantial treatment heterogeneity and variation in the causative organism and culture sites.

Molecular characterization and descriptive analysis of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative rod infections in Bogota, Colombia

In this study, the genetic differences and clinical impact of the carbapenemase-encoding genes among the community and healthcare-acquired infections were assessed. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted in Colombia and included patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods between 2017 and 2021. Carbapenem resistance was identified by Vitek, and carbapenemase-encoding genes were identified by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to classify the alleles and sequence types (STs). Descriptive statistics were used to determine the association of any pathogen or gene with clinical outcomes. A total of 248 patients were included, of which only 0.8% (2/248) had community-acquired infections. Regarding the identified bacteria, the most prevalent pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. In the WGS analysis, 228 isolates passed all the quality criteria and were analyzed. The principal carbapenemase-encoding gene was blaKPC, specifically blaKPC-2 [38.6% (88/228)] and blaKPC-3 [36.4% (83/228)]. These were frequently detected in co-concurrence with blaVIM-2 and blaNDM-1 in healthcare-acquired infections. Notably, the only identified allele among community-acquired infections was blaKPC-3 [50.0% (1/2)]. In reference to the STs, 78 were identified, of which Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST111 was mainly related to blaKPC-3. Klebsiella pneumoniae ST512, ST258, ST14, and ST1082 were exclusively associated with blaKPC-3. Finally, no particular carbapenemase-encoding gene was associated with worse clinical outcomes. The most identified genes in carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative rods were blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3, both related to gene co-occurrence and diverse STs in the healthcare environment. Patients had several systemic complications and poor clinical outcomes that were not associated with a particular gene.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial resistance is a pandemic and a worldwide public health problem, especially carbapenem resistance in low- and middle-income countries. Limited data regarding the molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients infected with these bacteria are available. Thus, our study described the carbapenemase-encoding genes among community- and healthcare-acquired infections. Notably, the co-occurrence of carbapenemase-encoding genes was frequently identified. We also found 78 distinct sequence types, of which two were novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which could represent challenges in treating these infections. Our study shows that in low and middle-income countries, such as Colombia, the burden of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative rods is a concern for public health, and regardless of the allele, these infections are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Thus, studies assessing local epidemiology, prevention strategies (including trials), and underpinning genetic mechanisms are urgently needed, especially in low and middle-income countries.

Hidden threats in the plastisphere: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales colonizing microplastics in river water

Carbapenem resistance poses a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Microplastics (MPs) have emerged as potential contributors to antibiotic resistance spread in the environment. However, the link between MPs and carbapenem resistance remains unexplored. We investigated the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria colonizing MPs placed in a river. Three replicates of a mixture of polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and of PET alone were placed both upstream and downstream a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) were further characterized by phenotypic tests and whole-genome sequencing. The abundance of carbapenem-resistant bacteria on MPs increased significantly downstream the WWTP. Their prevalence was higher in the MPs mixture compared to PET alone. CRE strains colonizing MPs included Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 3), Klebsiella quasipneumoniae (n = 3), Raoultella ornithinolytica (n = 2), Enterobacter kobei (n = 1) and Citrobacter freundii (n = 1), most (n = 8) recovered after the WWTP discharge. All strains exhibited at least one of the tested virulence traits (biofilm formation at 37 °C, haemolytic activity and siderophore production), were multi-drug resistant and carried carbapenemase-encoding genes [blaKPC-3 (n = 5), blaGES-5 (n = 2) or blaKPC-3 + blaGES-5 (n = 3)]. Uncommon phenotypes of resistance to imipenem/relebactam (n = 3) and ceftazidime/avibactam (n = 2) were observed. Two blaKPC-3-positive K. pneumoniae successfully transfer this gene trough conjugation. Genome analysis predicted all strains as human pathogens. The blaKPC-3 was associated with the Tn4401d transposon on a pBK30683-like plasmid in most of the isolates (n = 7). The blaGES-5 was mostly linked to class 3 integrons. A K. pneumoniae strain belonging to the outbreak-causing high-risk clone ST15 carried both blaKPC-3 and blaCTX-M-15. Two K. quasipneumoniae isolates carried the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-9. Our results underscore the role of MPs as vectors for CRE dissemination, particularly following WWTPs discharges. MPs may act as carriers, facilitating the dissemination of carbapenemase-encoding genes and potentially contributing to increased CRE incidence in the environment.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of Klebsiella pneumoniae meningitis in adults

Background

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a causative agent of bacterial meningitis in adults. However, there is little information regarding this infection. Therefore, this study comprehensively analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of Klebsiella pneumoniae meningitis (KPM) patients.

Methods

The clinical data of adult hospitalized patients with KPM were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2022. The clinical characteristics and antibiotic resistance of KPM were evaluated. Meanwhile, a set of logistic regression models was constructed to identify prognostic factors for death. These prognostic factors were subsequently combined to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality in individual patients. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibrate plot were utilized to verify the performance of the nomogram.

Results

This study included 80 adult patients with KPM, 58 (72.5%) of whom were males. The mortality rate was 45%. Among them, 74 (92.5%) were diagnosed with healthcare-associated meningitis. Thirty-seven carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) strains were susceptible to tigecycline, polymyxin, and ceftazidime/avibactam. CRKP (OR = 9.825, 95%CI = 2.757-35.011, P < 0.001), length of stay (OR = 0.953, 95%CI = 0.921-0.986, P = 0.005), and C-reactive protein-to-prealbumin ratio (CRP/PA, OR = 3.053, 95%CI = 1.329-7.016, P = 0.009) were identified as predictive factors for mortality using multivariate logistic regression. Finally, a nomogram for death prediction was established. The area under the curve of this nomogram was 0.900 (95% CI = 0.828-0.971).

Conclusions

KPM is a fatal disease associated with high incidence of healthcare-associated infections and carbapenem resistance. Moreover, CRKP, length of stay, and CRP/PA were found to be independent predictors of mortality.

The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime/avibactam for central nervous system infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negatives: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of ceftazidime/avibactam in critically ill patients with CNS infections.

METHODS

A prospective study of critically ill patients with CNS infections who were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam and the steady-state concentration (Css) of ceftazidime/avibactam in serum and/or CSF was conducted between August 2020 and May 2023. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam was evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven patients were finally included. The ceftazidime/avibactam target attainment in plasma was optimal for three, quasi-optimal for one and suboptimal for three. In three patients with CSF drug concentrations measured, ceftazidime/avibactam target attainment in CSF was 100% (3/3), which was optimal. The AUCCSF/serum values were 0.59, 0.44 and 0.35 for ceftazidime and 0.57, 0.53 and 0.51 for avibactam. Of the seven patients, 100% (7/7) were treated effectively, 71.4% (5/7) achieved microbiological eradication, 85.7% (6/7) survived and 14.3% (1/7) did not survive.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited clinical data suggest that ceftazidime/avibactam is effective in the treatment of CNS infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB), can achieve the ideal drug concentration of CSF, and has good blood-brain barrier penetration.

Dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, including adjustments for renal impairment, for Phase IIa and Phase III evaluation

PURPOSE

A series of iterative population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses based on emerging data supported dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, an investigational combination antibiotic for serious Gram-negative bacterial infections.

METHODS

Two iterations of PK models built from avibactam data in infected patients and aztreonam data in healthy subjects with "patient-like" assumptions were used in joint PTA analyses (primary target: aztreonam 60% fT > 8 mg/L, avibactam 50% fT > 2.5 mg/L) exploring patient variability, infusion durations, and adjustments for moderate (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCL] > 30 to ≤ 50 mL/min) and severe renal impairment (> 15 to ≤ 30 mL/min). Achievement of > 90% joint PTA and the impact of differential renal clearance were considerations in dose selection.

RESULTS

Iteration 1 simulations for Phase I/IIa dose selection/modification demonstrated that 3-h and continuous infusions provide comparable PTA; avibactam dose drives joint PTA within clinically relevant exposure targets; and loading doses support more rapid joint target attainment. An aztreonam/avibactam 500/137 mg 30-min loading dose and 1500/410 mg 3-h maintenance infusions q6h were selected for further evaluation. Iteration 2 simulations using expanded PK models supported an alteration to the regimen (500/167 mg loading; 1500/500 mg q6h maintenance 3-h infusions for CrCL > 50 mL/min) and selection of doses for renal impairment for Phase IIa/III clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose plus 3-h maintenance infusions of aztreonam-avibactam in a 3:1 fixed ratio q6h optimizes joint PTA. These analyses supported dose selection for the aztreonam-avibactam Phase III clinical program.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01689207; NCT02655419; NCT03329092; NCT03580044.

The Clinical Efficacy of Adding Ceftazidime/Avibactam to Standard Therapy in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumonia with blaOXA-48-like Genes

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is FDA-approved for managing infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacilli, particularly infections via carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pathogens. The clinical data are still limited, particularly those in Saudi Arabia. The present study is a retrospective cohort study that was carried out at the Armed Forces Hospital in the southern region of Saudi Arabia to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes for CAZ-AVI-treated patients as monotherapy and as an add-on to standard therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) OXA-48 infections to those treated with standard drugs. The study included CRKP OXA-48-like infected patients who were administered antibiotics for more than seven days from 1 August 2018 to May 2023. Patients' baseline characteristics and demography were extracted from the clinical records, and their clinical/microbiology efficiencies were assessed as per the corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify the potential independent variable for CAZ-AVI efficiency. A total of 114 patient files were included for the evaluation. Among these patients, 64 used CAZ-AVI combined with standard therapy and were included in the intervention group, and 50 of them used standard therapy and were included in the comparative group. Following analysis, CAZ-AVI's clinical success was 42.2% (p = 0.028), while the intervention versus comparative groups showed decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 70.0%; p = 0.036) and infection recurrence (7.8% versus 24.0%; p = 0.019), as well as substantially increased rates of microbial eradication (68.8% versus 42.0%; p = 0.007). CAZ-AVI add-on therapy rather than monotherapy showed statistically significant favored clinical and microbial outcomes over the standard therapy. Furthermore, sex (female %), ICU admission, and fever were negatively associated with patients' 30-day all-cause mortality, serving as independent negative factors. Only fever, CRP bio levels, inotropes, and ICU admissions were significant predictors influencing the CAZ-AVI's clinical efficiency. The duration of CAZ-AVI therapy positively influenced CAZ-AVI's microbial eradication, while both WBC counts and fever experiences were negative predictors. This study shows the effective usage of CAZ-AVI against CRKP OXA-48-like infections. The influencing independent variables depicted here should recommend that clinicians individualize the CAZ-AVI dose based on co-existing risk factors to achieve optimal survival and efficacy. Prospective multicenter and randomized control studies are recommended, with individualized CAZ-AVI precision administration implemented based on patients' characteristics.

Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance conferred by CMY-185

β-Lactamases can accumulate stepwise mutations that increase their resistance profiles to the latest β-lactam agents. CMY-185 is a CMY-2-like β-lactamase and was identified in an Escherichia coli clinical strain isolated from a patient who underwent treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam. CMY-185, possessing four amino acid substitutions of A114E, Q120K, V211S, and N346Y relative to CMY-2, confers high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and accumulation of the substitutions incrementally enhances the level of resistance to this agent. However, the functional role of each substitution and their interplay in enabling ceftazidime-avibactam resistance remains unknown. Through biochemical and structural analysis, we present the molecular basis for the enhanced ceftazidime hydrolysis and impaired avibactam inhibition conferred by CMY-185. The substituted Y346 residue is a major driver of the functional evolution as it rejects primary avibactam binding due to the steric hindrance and augments oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis through a drastic structural change, rotating the side chain of Y346 and then disrupting the H-10 helix structure. The other substituted residues E114 and K120 incrementally contribute to rejection of avibactam inhibition, while S211 stimulates the turnover rate of the oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis. These findings indicate that the N346Y substitution is capable of simultaneously expanding the spectrum of activity against some of the latest β-lactam agents with altered bulky side chains and rejecting the binding of β-lactamase inhibitors. However, substitution of additional residues may be required for CMY enzymes to achieve enhanced affinity or turnover rate of the β-lactam agents leading to clinically relevant levels of resistance.IMPORTANCECeftazidime-avibactam has a broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales including strains with or without production of serine carbapenemases. After its launch, emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains that produce mutated β-lactamases capable of efficiently hydrolyzing ceftazidime or impairing avibactam inhibition are increasingly reported. Furthermore, cross-resistance towards cefiderocol, the latest cephalosporin in clinical use, has been observed in some instances. Here, we clearly demonstrate the functional role of the substituted residues in CMY-185, a four amino-acid variant of CMY-2 identified in a patient treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, for high-level resistance to this agent and low-level resistance to cefiderocol. These findings provide structural insights into how β-lactamases may incrementally alter their structures to escape multiple advanced β-lactam agents.

How to tailor recommendations on the treatment of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections at country level integrating antibiotic stewardship principles within the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT framework

Promoting the optimal use of antibiotics through evidence-based recommendations should be regarded as a crucial step in the global fight against antimicrobial resistance. Within this scope, several guidelines and guidance documents for antibiotic therapy have been published in recent years. All documents underline the limitations of existing evidence and remark on the need for tailoring recommendations at the national level, based on local epidemiology, availability of diagnostics and drugs, and antimicrobial stewardship principles. The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT methodology is an evidence-based methodology that allows the adoption, adaptation, and update of existing recommendations to specific settings without performing de novo systematic reviews and grading of the evidence. However, procedures to integrate this evidence with stewardship principles, countries' surveillance data, and capacity in terms of diagnostics and antibiotics' availability have never been defined. This Personal View provides the first example of a country's calibration of international evidence-based guidance documents on treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. A panel of experts convened by the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) used the GRADE methodology for systematically extracting and evaluating 100 recommendations on the treatment of infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from 11 guidance documents and 24 systematic reviews. The ADOLOPMENT procedure was used to calibrate the existing recommendations to the national context, leading to the adoption of 64, the adaptation of 27, and the rejection of nine recommendations. We discuss the technical details of the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT application, the calibration process, and the human resources required to support such an effort. This Personal View also covers the challenges of integrating antibiotic stewardship principles in evidence-based recommendations for treating infections with very limited therapeutic and diagnostic options. The details presented here could support the easy transferability of the methodology to other countries and settings, particularly where the incidence of antibiotic-resistant infections is high.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance

To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a 2 h infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). A retrospective review of all critically ill patients with ARC who were treated with CAZ-AVI between August 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients whose 12-h creatinine clearance prior to CAZ-AVI treatment and steady-state concentration (Css) of CAZ-AVI were both monitored were enrolled. The free fraction (fCss) of CAZ-AVI was calculated from Css. The joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI were considered optimal when a Css/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio for CAZ ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT > 4 MIC) and a Css/CT ratio of AVI >1 (equivalent to 100% fT > CT 4.0 mg/L) were reached simultaneously, quasioptimal when only one of the two targets was reached, and suboptimal when neither target was reached. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was evaluated. Four patients were included. Only one patient achieved optimal joint PK/PD targets, while the other three reached suboptimal targets. The patient with optimal PK/PD targets achieved microbiological eradication, while the other three patients did not, but all four patients achieved good clinical efficacy. Standard dosages may not enable most critically ill patients with ARC to reach the optimal joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI. Optimal drug dose adjustment of CAZ-AVI in ARC patients requires dynamic drug concentration monitoring.

Sepsis Stewardship: The Puzzle of Antibiotic Therapy in the Context of Individualization of Decision Making

The main recent change observed in the field of critical patient infection has been universal awareness of the need to make better use of antimicrobials, especially for the most serious cases, beyond the application of simple and effective formulas or rigid protocols. The increase in resistant microorganisms, the quantitative increase in major surgeries and interventional procedures in the highest risk patients, and the appearance of a significant number of new antibiotics in recent years (some very specifically directed against certain mechanisms of resistance and others with a broader spectrum of applications) have led us to shift our questions from "what to deal with" to "how to treat". There has been controversy about how best to approach antibiotic treatment of complex cases of sepsis. The individualized and adjusted dosage, the moment of its administration, the objective, and the selection of the regimen are pointed out as factors of special relevance in a critically ill patient where the frequency of resistant microorganisms, especially among the Enterobacterales group, and the emergence of multiple and diverse antibiotic treatment alternatives have made the appropriate choice of antibiotic treatment more complex, requiring a constant updating of knowledge and the creation of multidisciplinary teams to confront new infections that are difficult to treat. In this article, we have reviewed the phenomenon of the emergence of resistance to antibacterials and we have tried to share some of the ideas, such as stewardship, sparing carbapenems, and organizational, microbiological, pharmacological, and knowledge tools, that we have considered most useful and effective for individualized decision making that takes into account the current context of multidrug resistance. The greatest challenge, therefore, of decision making in this context lies in determining an effective, optimal, and balanced empirical antibiotic treatment.

Real-world in vitro activity of newer antibiotics against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant isolates: a multicenter analysis

IMPORTANCE

Newer antibiotics against Gram-negative pathogens provide important treatment options, especially for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, but little is known about their use during routine clinical care. To use these agents appropriately, clinicians need to have access to timely susceptibility data. We evaluated 27,531 facility-reported susceptibility results from the BD Insights Research Database to gain a better understanding of real-world testing practices and susceptibility rates for six newer antibiotics. Escherichia coli was the most frequently tested potential pathogen, and ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam had the greatest numbers of susceptibility results. For cefiderocol, eravacycline, imipenem-relabactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, susceptibility data were available for fewer than 2% of isolates. Susceptibility comparisons should be considered with caution. Ceftazidime-avibactam had the highest susceptibility rates for Enterobacterales while cefiderocol had the highest susceptibility rates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. New antibiotics have the potential to improve the management of Gram-negative infections, but their use may be hampered by the absence of susceptibility data.

High-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in Escherichia coli conferred by the novel plasmid-mediated β-lactamase CMY-185 variant

OBJECTIVES

To characterize a blaCMY variant associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance from a serially collected Escherichia coli isolate.

METHODS

A patient with an intra-abdominal infection due to recurrent E. coli was treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. On Day 48 of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy, E. coli with a ceftazidime/avibactam MIC of >256 mg/L was identified from abdominal drainage. Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies WGS was performed on serial isolates to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Site-directed mutants of CMY β-lactamase were constructed to identify amino acid residues responsible for ceftazidime/avibactam resistance.

RESULTS

WGS revealed that all three isolates were E. coli ST410. The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strain uniquely acquired a novel CMY β-lactamase gene, herein called blaCMY-185, harboured on an IncI-γ/K1 conjugative plasmid. The CMY-185 enzyme possessed four amino acid substitutions relative to CMY-2, including A114E, Q120K, V211S and N346Y, and conferred high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance with an MIC of 32 mg/L. Single CMY-2 mutants did not confer reduced ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility. However, double and triple mutants containing N346Y previously associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in other AmpC enzymes, conferred ceftazidime/avibactam MICs ranging between 4 and 32 mg/L as well as reduced susceptibility to the newly developed cephalosporin, cefiderocol. Molecular modelling suggested that the N346Y substitution confers the reduction of avibactam inhibition due to steric hindrance between the side chain of Y346 and the sulphate group of avibactam.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in E. coli associated with a novel CMY variant. Unlike other AmpC enzymes, CMY-185 appears to require an additional substitution on top of N346Y to confer ceftazidime/avibactam resistance.

Exploring the views of infection consultants in England on a novel delinked funding model for antimicrobials: the SMASH study

Objectives

A novel 'subscription-type' funding model was launched in England in July 2022 for ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. We explored the views of infection consultants on important aspects of the delinked antimicrobial funding model.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all infection consultants in NHS acute hospitals in England.

Results

The response rate was 31.2% (235/753). Most consultants agreed the model is a welcome development (69.8%, 164/235), will improve treatment of drug-resistant infections (68.5%, 161/235) and will stimulate research and development of new antimicrobials (57.9%, 136/235). Consultants disagreed that the model would lead to reduced carbapenem use and reported increased use of cefiderocol post-implementation. The presence of an antimicrobial pharmacy team, requirement for preauthorization by infection specialists, antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds and education of infection specialists were considered the most effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Under the new model, 42.1% (99/235) of consultants would use these antimicrobials empirically, if risk factors for antimicrobial resistance were present (previous infection, colonization, treatment failure with carbapenems, ward outbreak, recent admission to a high-prevalence setting).Significantly higher insurance and diversity values were given to model antimicrobials compared with established treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections, while meropenem recorded the highest enablement value. Use of both 'subscription-type' model drugs for a wide range of infection sites was reported. Respondents prioritized ceftazidime/avibactam for infections by bacteria producing OXA-48 and KPC and cefiderocol for those producing MBLs and infections with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter spp. and Burkholderia cepacia.

Conclusions

The 'subscription-type' model was viewed favourably by infection consultants in England.

Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Treating Gram-Negative Severe Infections in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not enough data exist to inform the optimal duration and type of antimicrobial therapy against GN infections in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a literature search through PubMed and Cochrane using the following keywords: "multi-drug resistant (MDR)", "extensively drug resistant (XDR)", "pan-drug-resistant (PDR)", "difficult-to-treat (DTR) Gram-negative infection," "antibiotic duration therapy", "antibiotic combination therapy" "antibiotic monotherapy" "Gram-negative bacteremia", "Gram-negative pneumonia", and "Gram-negative intra-abdominal infection".

RESULTS

Current literature data suggest adopting longer (≥10-14 days) courses of synergistic combination therapy due to the high global prevalence of ESBL-producing (45-50%), MDR (35%), XDR (15-20%), PDR (5.9-6.2%), and carbapenemases (CP)/metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing (12.5-20%) Gram-negative (GN) microorganisms (i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii). On the other hand, shorter courses (≤5-7 days) of monotherapy should be limited to treating infections caused by GN with higher (≥3 antibiotic classes) antibiotic susceptibility. A general approach should be based on (i) third or further generation cephalosporins ± quinolones/aminoglycosides in the case of MDR-GN; (ii) carbapenems ± fosfomycin/aminoglycosides for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); and (iii) the association of old drugs with new expanded-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors for XDR, PDR, and CP microorganisms. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in combination with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic antibiotics, and the presence of resistance risk predictors (linked to patient, antibiotic, and microorganism) should represent variables affecting the antimicrobial strategies for treating GN infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strategies of therapy described in the results, clinicians must remember that all treatment decisions are dynamic, requiring frequent reassessments depending on both the clinical and microbiological responses of the patient.

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel for Detection and Classification of Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a serious public health threat due to their resistance to most antibiotics. Rapid and correct detection of carbapenemase producing organisms (CPOs) can help inform clinician decision making on antibiotic therapy. The BD Phoenix™ CPO detect panel, as part of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), detects carbapenemase activity (P/N) and categorizes CPOs according to Ambler classes. We evaluated a CPO detect panel against 109 carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) clinical isolates from Korea. The panel correctly detected carbapenemases production in 98.2% (n = 107/109) isolates and identified 78.8% (n = 26/33) class A, 65.9% (n = 29/44) class B, and 56.3% (n = 18/32) class D carbapenemase producers as harboring their corresponding Ambler classes. Specifically, the panel correctly classified 81.3% (n = 13/16) of K. pneumoniae KPC isolates to class A. However, the panel failed to classify 40.0% (n = 4/10) IMP and 63.6% (n = 7/11) VIM isolates to class B. Despite 27.5% (n = 30/109) CPE not being assigned Ambler classes, all of them tested carbapenemase positive. Our results demonstrate that the CPO detect panel is a sensitive test for detecting CPE and classifying KPC as class A, helping with antibiotics selection, but one-third of CPE remained unclassified for Ambler classes.

Global emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae co-carrying multiple carbapenemases

The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) co-carrying multiple carbapenemases is complicating clinical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the global dissemination trends of CRKP strains that co-carry multiple carbapenemases. The CRKP isolate KP424 co-carrying bla_NDM-1 and bla_KPC-2, recovered from a stool specimen, was identified by the NG-Test Carba 5 test, and the genome sequence was further determined by using Nanopore MinION and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 technologies. The genome sequences of the CRKP strains carrying multiple carbapenemase genes were further retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database. Thirteen antimicrobial resistance genes, including bla_NDM-1 and bla_KPC-2, have been identified in KP424, with bla_NDM-1 and bla_KPC-2 located on different plasmids. In total, 832 genome sequences of CRKP strains co-carrying two carbapenemase genes were retrieved from the NCBI database. Strains carrying both bla_NDM and bla_OXA-48-like accounted for 665 (79.9 %) of the total strains, ranking first, and those carrying both bla_KPC and bla_NDM accounted for 103 (12.4 %), ranking second. The prevalence of CRKP strains co-carrying two carbapenemase genes increased significantly over time, from 0.40 % in 2010 to 9.67 % in 2021. The proportion of strains carrying both bla_KPC and bla_NDM has also increased, from 0.00 % in 2010 to 4.40 % in 2021. The strains carrying both bla_KPC and bla_NDM had the highest prevalence (66.7 %, 52/78) in China, while those carrying both bla_NDM and bla_OXA-48-like had the highest prevalence worldwide. Multiple-carbapenemase producers pose a great threat to public health; further research on the mechanisms underlying multiple carbapenemase gene occurrence is required to prevent their global dissemination.

The place of new antibiotics for Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care: report of a consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

New beta-lactams, associated or not with beta-lactamase inhibitors (NBs/BIs), can respond to the spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriales and nonfermenting carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The risk of emergence of resistance to these NBs/BIs makes guidelines necessary. The SRLF organized a consensus conference in December 2022.

METHODS

An ad hoc committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject identified the molecules (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol); defined 6 generic questions; drew up a list of subquestions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model; and reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Seven experts in the field proposed their own answers to the questions in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 10 critical-care physicians without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Due to the frequent lack of powerful studies that have used clinically important criteria of judgment, the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions as often as necessary.

RESULTS

The jury provided 17 statements answering 6 questions: (1) Is there a place in the ICU for the probabilistic use of new NBs/IBs active against Gram-negative bacteria? (2) In the context of documented infections with sensitivity to several of these molecules, are there pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, ecological or medico-economic elements for prioritization? (3) What are the possible combinations with these molecules and in what context? (4) Should we integrate these new molecules into a carbapenem-sparing strategy? (5) What pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available to optimize their mode of administration in critically ill patients? (6) What are the dosage adaptations in cases of renal insufficiency, hepatocellular insufficiency or obesity?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of NBs/BIs in ICU patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections: A Retrospective, Observational, 2-Center Clinical Study

Background

Recently, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) with resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA-R) has been described, including KPC variants that restore carbapenem susceptibility. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of infections caused by CZA-R KPC-Kp.

Methods

From 2019 to 2021, a retrospective 2-center study including patients with infections due to CZA-R KPC-Kp hospitalized at 2 academic hospitals in Rome was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Principal outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata-IC17 software.

Results

Overall, 59 patients were included (mean age, 64.4 ± 14.6 years; mean Charlson comorbidity index score, 4.5 ± 2.7). Thirty-four patients (57.6%) had infections caused by CZA-R and meropenem (MEM)-susceptible strains. A previous CZA therapy was observed in 40 patients (67.8%), mostly in patients with MEM-susceptible KPC variant (79.4% vs 52%, P = .026). Primary bacteremia was observed in 28.8%, followed by urinary tract infections and pneumonia. At infection onset, septic shock was present in 15 subjects (25.4%). After adjustment for confounders, only the presence of septic shock was independently associated with mortality (P = .006).

Conclusions

Infections due to CZA-R KPC-Kp often occur in patients who had previously received CZA, especially in the presence of strains susceptible to MEM. Nevertheless, one-third of patients had never received CZA before KPC-Kp CZA-R. Since the major driver for mortality was infection severity, understanding the optimal therapy in patients with KPC-Kp CZA-R infections is of crucial importance.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Survey on the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections With Innovative Antibiotics: Focus on Ceftazidime-Avibactam

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health dilemma and a chief health concern globally. The rising incidence of resistance against carbapenems, which are considered most effective against gram-negative bacteria, has added to the concern and has limited the number of available treatment options. Newer antibiotic options may be required to tackle the mounting concern of antibiotic resistance. However, only a few antimicrobials are in the pipeline for managing infections instigated by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria. This justifies the prudent application of already available antibiotics. Among newer antibiotics available to healthcare professionals (HCPs), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has shown good efficacy in the management of MDR gram-negative infections.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey on the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) among HCPs was carried out using a questionnaire comprising 21 parameters related to AMR patterns on the need for innovative antibiotics to manage MDR gram-negative infections and the usage of CAZ-AVI by HCPs while managing such infections. The KAP scores were calculated to rank respondents' KAP levels.

RESULT

Out of the 204 study respondents, the majority (~80%) (n=160) believed that renewed efforts should be made to seek antimicrobial agents that will add to the armamentarium of treatment options for MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI is an important treatment alternative for managing MDR gram-negative infections (n=90, 45%). Further, it can be the first choice of definitive therapy for oxacillinases (OXA)-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (n=84, 42%). HCPs also believed that the use of CAZ-AVI in clinical practice will require high levels of antimicrobial stewardship (n=100, 49%).

CONCLUSION

Novel and innovative antibiotics are the need of the hour in the management of MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI has established its effectiveness in treating these infections; however, the molecule must be utilized prudently while keeping stewardship principles in mind.

Efficacy and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections: A retrospective multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVES

Limited data on clinical and microbiological efficacy, patient mortality, and other associated factors are available for ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-based regimens for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). This study aimed to assess these issues retrospectively using multicenter data.

METHODS

This multicenter study included CR-GNB infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based regimens for more than three days. Patient characteristics, bacterial culture reports, drug-sensitivity test results, and antibiotic use, including CAZ/AVI use, were extracted from the patient's clinical records. The clinical and microbiological efficacy of the combined drug regimen and patient mortality were evaluated according to corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the efficacy and mortality-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with CR-GNB infection were considered for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the treatment of CAZ/AVI-based regimens, the clinical efficacy was 75.4 %. The 7-day microbial efficacy and clearance rate after treatment were 43.7 % and 66.0 %, respectively. Moreover, 30-day all-cause and in-hospital mortality were 11.5 % and 14.2 %, respectively. Harboring renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate (CCR) of<20 mL/min), cardiovascular diseases, and digestive system diseases were independent risk factors for poor clinical efficacy of CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Bloodstream infection (BSI), patients with the adjusted doses of CAZ/AVI, and CAZ/AVI co-administration with carbapenem were independently associated factors of bacterial clearance by CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Age, total hospital stays, use of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative CAZ/AVI dose were independent factors associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI was an effective drug in treating CR-GNB infection. CAZ/AVI that is mostly excreted by the kidney and is accumulated in renal impairment should be renally adjusted. Renal dysfunction and the adjusted dose of CAZ/AVI were associated with efficacy. Clinicians should individualize CAZ/AVI regimen and dose by the level of renal function to achieve optimal efficacy and survival. The efficacy of CAZ/AVI in the treatment of CR-GNB infection, as well as the implementation of individualized precision drug administration of CAZ/AVI according to patients' different infection sites, renal function, bacterial types, bacterial resistance mechanisms, blood concentration monitoring and other conditions need to be further studied in multicenter.

Clinical Management of a Pandrug-Resistant OXA-48 Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is one of the serious forms of health care-associated infection. Pan-drug resistant (PDR) CRKP infections can cause severe infections. Mortality and treatment costs in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are high. This study aims to share our experience regarding the treatment of oxacillinase (OXA)-48-positive PDR-CRKP infection in our 20-bed tertiary PICU with isolated rooms and 1 nurse for every 2-3 patients. Methods: Patient demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, previous infections, source of infection PDR-CRKP, treatment modalities, measures used, and outcomes were recorded. Findings: Eleven patients (eight men and three women) were found to have PDR OXA-48-positive CRKP. Because of the simultaneous detection of PDR-CRKP in three patients and the rapid spread of the disease, it was classified as a clinical outbreak, and strict infection control measures were taken. Combination therapy with double carbapenemase (meropenem and imipenem), amikacin, colistin, and tigecycline was used for treatment. The mean duration of treatment and isolation was 15.7 and 65.4 days, respectively. No treatment-related complication was observed, only one patient died, and the mortality rate was 9%. Conclusions: This severe clinical outbreak can be successfully treated with effective treatment with combined antibiotics and strict adherence to infection control measures. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: 28/01/2022 - 1/5.

The Use and Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Real-World Clinical Practice: EZTEAM Study

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam has proven activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in clinical trials and real-world studies. This study was conducted to describe the patterns of use of ceftazidime-avibactam (including indications and associated antibiotics), and the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This non-interventional medical chart review study was conducted in 11 countries across the European and Latin American (LATAM) regions. Consecutive patients treated in clinical practice with at least one dose of ceftazidime-avibactam for an approved indication per country label since 01 January 2018 (or launch date in the country if posterior) were enrolled. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 h.

RESULTS

Of the 569 eligible patients enrolled, 516 (90.7%) were treated for at least 72 h (354 patients from Europe and 162 patients from LATAM); 390 patients (75.7%) had switched from another antibiotic line for Gram-negative coverage. Infection sources were intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory, bloodstream infections, and other infections (approximately 20% each). K. pneumoniae was the most common microorganism identified in the latest microbiological evaluation before starting ceftazidime-avibactam (59.3%). Two-thirds of microorganisms tested for susceptibility were MDR, of which 89.3% were carbapenem-resistant. The common MDR mechanisms for K. pneumoniae were carbapenemase (33.9%), oxacillinase 48 (25.2%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (21.5%), or metallo-beta-lactamase (14.2%) production. Without prior patient exposure, 17 isolates (mostly K. pneumoniae) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Treatment success was achieved in 77.3% of patients overall (88.3% among patients with urinary infection), regardless of first or second treatment line. In-hospital mortality rate was 23.1%. Adverse events were reported for six of the 569 patients enrolled.

CONCLUSION

This study provides important real-world evidence on treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice through its recruitment in the European and LATAM regions. Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the antibiotics to consider for treatment of MDR bacteria.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03923426.

Risk Factors for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Clinical Treatment Failure

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categorized carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections as an "urgent" health care threat requiring public attention and research. Certain patients with CRE infections may be at higher risk for poor clinical outcomes than others. Evidence on risk or protective factors for CRE infections are warranted in order to determine the most at-risk populations, especially with newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics available to treat CRE. We aimed to identify specific variables involved in CRE treatment that are associated with clinical failure (either 30-day mortality, 30-day microbiologic recurrence, or clinical worsening/failure to improve throughout antibiotic treatment). We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized patients with CRE infection sampled from 2010 to 2020 at two medical systems in Detroit, Michigan. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and culture positive for an organism in the Enterobacterales order causing clinical infection with in vitro resistance by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints to at least one carbapenem. Overall, there were 140 confirmed CRE infections of which 39% had clinical failure. The most common infection sources were respiratory (38%), urinary (20%), intra-abdominal (16%), and primary bacteremia (14%). A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to identify statistically significant associated predictors with clinical failure, and they included Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.32), chronic dialysis (aOR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.51-22.7), and Klebsiella pneumoniae in index culture (aOR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.28 to 7.47). Further research on CRE infections is needed to identify best practices to promote treatment success. IMPORTANCE This work compares carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections using patient, clinical, and treatment variables to understand which characteristics are associated with the highest risk of clinical failure. Knowing which risk factors are associated with CRE infection failure can provide clinicians better prognostic and targeted interventions. Research can also further investigate why certain risk factors cause more clinical failure and can help develop treatment strategies to mitigate associated risk factors.

High-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Escherichia coli conferred by the novel plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase CMY-185 variant

Objectives

To characterize a bla CMY variant associated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance from a serially collected Escherichia coli isolate.

Methods

A patient with an intra-abdominal infection due to recurrent E. coli was treated with CZA. On day 48 of CZA therapy, E. coli with a CZA MIC of >256 mg/L was identified from abdominal drainage. Illumina WGS was performed on all isolates to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Site-directed mutants of CMY β-lactamase were constructed to identify amino acid residues responsible for CZA resistance.

Results

WGS revealed that all three isolates were E. coli ST410. The CZA-resistant strain uniquely acquired a novel CMY β-lactamase gene, herein called bla CMY-185 , harbored on an IncIγ-type conjugative plasmid. The CMY-185 enzyme possessed four amino acid substitutions relative to CMY-2 including A114E, Q120K, V211S, and N346Y and conferred high-level CZA resistance with an MIC of 32 mg/L. Single CMY-2 mutants did not confer reduced CZA susceptibility. However, double and triple mutants containing N346Y previously associated with CZA resistance in other AmpC enzymes, conferred CZA MICs ranging between 4 and 32 mg/L as well as reduced susceptibility to the newly developed cephalosporin, cefiderocol. Molecular modelling suggested that the N346Y substitution confers the reduction of avibactam inhibition due to the steric hindrance between the side chain of Y346 and the sulfate group of avibactam.

Conclusion

We identified CZA resistance in E. coli associated with a novel CMY variant. Unlike other AmpC enzymes, CMY-185 appears to require an additional substitution on top of N346Y to confer CZA resistance.

Benefits and Safety of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Active Against KPC-K. pneumoniae in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Acute Leukemia Who are Colonized with KPC-K. pneumoniae. A 7-Years Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Purpose

To evaluate the benefits and safety of the empiric antibiotic treatment (EAT) active against KPC-K. pneumoniae in febrile neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia (AL) who are colonised by KPC-K. pneumoniae.

Patients and Methods

A 7-year (2013-2019) retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Haematology, Sapienza Rome University (Italy) on 94 febrile neutropenia episodes (FNE) in AL patients KPC-K. pneumoniae carriers treated with active EAT.

Results

Eighty-two (87%) FNE were empirically treated with antibiotic combinations [38 colistin-based and 44 ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZAVI)-based], 12 with CAZAVI monotherapy. Successful outcomes were observed in 88/94 (94%) FNE, 46/49 (94%) microbiologically documented infections, and 24/27 (89%) gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI). Mortality due to infective causes was 4.2% (2.1% within 1 week). KPC-K. pneumoniae infections caused 28/94 FNE (30%) and KPC-K. pneumoniae-BSI was documented in 22 FNE (23.4%) (85% of GNB-BSI), in all cases patients received active EAT, and 21 survived. KPC-K.pneumoniae-BSI mortality rate was 4.5%. CAZAVI-based EAT showed better results than colistin-based EAT (55/56 vs 33/38, p = 0.037), overall and without EAT modification (41/56 vs 20/38, p = 0.02). Empirical combinations including CAZAVI were successful in 98% of cases (43/44 vs 33/38 for colistin-based EAT, p = 0.01), without modifications in 82% (36/44 vs 20/28, p = 0.02). All deaths occurred in patients treated with colistin-based EAT (4/38 vs 0/56, p = 0.02). CAZAVI-containing EAT was the only independent factor for an overall successful response (HR 0.058, CI 0.013-1.072, p = 0.058). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 3(8%) patients undergoing colistin-based EAT (none in those undergoing CAZAVI-based EAT, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

KPC-K. pneumoniae infections are frequent in colonised AL patients with FNE. EAT with active antibiotics, mainly CAZAVI-based combinations, was effective, safe, and associated with low overall and KPC-K. pneumoniae-BSI-related mortality.

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, Sequence Types, Virulence and Carbapenemase Genes of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Zunyi, China

Purpose

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has seriously threatened public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial resistance patterns, sequence types (STs), virulence and carbapenemase genes of CRKP isolates from patients in Zunyi, China.

Methods

CRKP isolates were collected from the First People's Hospital of Zunyi between January 2018 and December 2020. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using a VITEK^®2 analyzer and confirmed using either the broth dilution method, Kirby-Bauer method, or E-test assays. Carbapenemase production was examined using a modified carbapenem inactivation method. STs of the studied isolates were determined by multilocus sequence typing, and the presence of carbapenemase and virulence genes was examined using polymerase chain reaction assays.

Results

In total, 94 CRKP isolates were collected. All studied isolates produced carbapenemase, and the most common carbapenemase gene was New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM; 72.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC; 24.5%), and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM; 3.2%). Of the studied isolates, 74.3% exhibited multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype, and 25.7% were either pandrug-resistant (PDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. The most prevalent sequence type was ST2407 (37.2%), followed by ST76 (21.3%) and ST11 (11.7%). The NDM gene was present in 97.1% of ST2407 isolates and 90.0% of ST76 isolates, whereas the KPC gene was present in 90.9% of ST11 isolates. The majority of the isolates carried wabG, uge, and fimH virulence genes, with prevalence rates of 94.7%, 92.6%, and 94.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

This study describes NDM-producing ST2407 and ST76, as well as KPC-producing ST11, as the major clonal types of CRKP isolates in Zunyi, China. All CRKP isolates were resistant to multiple types of antibiotics, and the majority of isolates carried carbapenemase and virulence genes. Clonal spread of NDM-producing CRKP ST2407 and ST76, and KPC-producing CRKP ST11 should be strictly monitored.

Rejuvenating the Activity of Usual Antibiotics on Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Recent Issues and Perspectives

Antibiotic resistance continues to evolve and spread beyond all boundaries, resulting in an increase in morbidity and mortality for non-curable infectious diseases. Due to the failure of conventional antimicrobial therapy and the lack of introduction of a novel class of antibiotics, novel strategies have recently emerged to combat these multidrug-resistant infectious microorganisms. In this review, we highlight the development of effective antibiotic combinations and of antibiotics with non-antibiotic activity-enhancing compounds to address the widespread emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Experience of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection in recipients after lung transplantation (LT) is relatively limited.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on lung transplant recipients receiving CAZ/AVI therapy for CRPA infection. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure.

Results

Among 183 LT recipients, a total of 15 recipients with CRPA infection who received CAZ/AVI therapy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of recipients was 54 years and 73.3% of recipients were male. The median time from infection onset to initiation of CAZ/AVI treatment was 4 days (IQR, 3-7) and the mean duration of CAZ/AVI therapy was 10 days. CAZ/AVI was mainly administered as monotherapy in LT recipients (80%). Among these eligible recipients, 14-day and 30-day mortality were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 53.3% and 60%, respectively. Three recipients (20%) experienced recurrent infection. In addition, the mean lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay were 24 days and 35 days, respectively, among LT recipients.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI may be an alternative and promising regimen for CRPA eradiation in lung transplant recipients.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of critically ill renal patients treated for documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bloodstream infections and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behaviour of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome in a case series of critically ill renal patients treated for documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CR-GN) bloodstream infections (BSI) and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

Critically ill patients with different degrees of renal function who were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for documented CR-GN infections, and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring from April 2021 to March 2022, were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were determined at steady-state, and the free fraction (fC_ss) was calculated. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was considered as optimal when both C_ss/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100%fT>_4xMIC) and C_ss/C_T ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% fT>C_T of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two was achieved, and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). The relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

Ten patients with documented CR-GN infections (5 BSIs, 4 VAP, 1 BSI+VAP) were retrieved. The joint PK/PD targets of ceftazidime-avibactam were optimal and quasi-optimal in eight and two cases, respectively. Microbiological failure occurred in two patients (one with VAP, one with BSI+VAP), one of whom developed ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Both underwent renal replacement therapy, and failed despite attaining optimal joint PK/PD target and receiving fosfomycin co-treatment.

CONCLUSION

CI administration may enable optimal joint PK/PD targets of ceftazidime-avibactam to be achieved in most critical renal patients with CR-GN infections, and may help to minimize the risk of microbiological failure.

Alternatives Therapeutic Approaches to Conventional Antibiotics: Advantages, Limitations and Potential Application in Medicine

Resistance to antimicrobials and particularly multidrug resistance is one of the greatest challenges in the health system nowadays. The continual increase in the rates of antimicrobial resistance worldwide boosted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic poses a major public health threat. Different approaches have been employed to minimize the effect of resistance and control this threat, but the question still lingers as to their safety and efficiency. In this context, new anti-infectious approaches against multidrug resistance are being examined. Use of new antibiotics and their combination with new β-lactamase inhibitors, phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, and antisense antimicrobial therapeutics are considered as one such promising approach for overcoming bacterial resistance. In this review, we provide insights into these emerging alternative therapies that are currently being evaluated and which may be developed in the future to break the progression of antimicrobial resistance. We focus on their advantages and limitations and potential application in medicine. We further highlight the importance of the combination therapy approach, wherein two or more therapies are used in combination in order to more effectively combat infectious disease and increasing access to quality healthcare. These advances could give an alternate solution to overcome antimicrobial drug resistance. We eventually hope to provide useful information for clinicians who are seeking solutions to the problems caused by antimicrobial resistance.

Investigation of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria

BACKGROUND

Our study investigated the susceptibility rate of ceftazidime-avibactam and the risk factors associated with its resistance by analyzing gram-negative bacteria isolated from various patient samples.

METHODS

Between March and November 2020, 1119 gram-negative bacteria strains were isolated from patient samples in Acıbadem Healthcare Group hospitals; ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility results were evaluated using a 10/4µg (Oxoid, UK) disc and evaluated according to Eucast 2020 recommendations. Patient and isolate characteristics that could be risk factors were retrospectively investigated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0.

RESULTS

Male patients made up 52% (n = 581) of the study's total patient population, and they averaged 55.5 ± 24.9 years old. Of 1119 gram-negative strains culture and antibiogram, 1023 (91.4%) were sensitive to ceftazidime-avibactam. An increased risk of resistance was observed with female gender (OR = 2.29; CI 95% [1.45-3.61]; p < 0.05), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR = 1.67, CI 95% [1.03-2.7]; p < 0.05), the presence of multidrug-resistance (MDR) (OR = 4.07, CI 95% [2.47-6.7]; p < 0.05) pandrug-resistance (PDR) (OR = 12, (CI) 95% [9.9-14.7] ]; p < 0.05) and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) (OR = 1.89, CI 95% [1.22-2.93]; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The resistance rate of ceftazidime-avibactam was found to be 8.6%, and it was thought that resistant strains produced metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL) type carbapenemase. Risk factors were female gender, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MDR, PDR, and admission to ICU. Therefore, studying the ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility test together with gram-negative bacteria identification, especially in groups at risk for resistance, is one of the important factors that can positively affect the success of treatment.

Antibiotics in development for multiresistant gram-negative bacilli

The rapid increase in antibiotic(ATB) resistance among Gram-negative bacilli(BGN), especially in strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with high resistance patterns (XDR), poses a huge threat to health systems worldwide. In the last decade, different ATBs have been developed against XDR, some of which combine a lactam β along with a β-lactamase inhibitor, while others use non-β-lactam inhibitors. Most of them have adequate "in vitro" activity on several β-lactamases of class A, C and D of Ambler. However, combinations such as Ceftazidime/avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Meropenem/vaborbactam have no activity against metallo-β-lactamases(MβL). New combinations such as Aztreonan/AVI, Cefepime/Zidebactam, or new cephalosporins such as Cefiderocol, have efficacy against MβL enzymes. Although some of these combinations are already approved and in the commercialization phase, many of them have yet to define their place within the treatment of microorganisms with high resistance through clinical studies.