New Insights on CMV Management in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Prevention, Treatment, and Management of Resistant/Refractory Disease

Dynamics and Evolution of Donor-derived Cytomegalovirus Infection in 3 Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With the Same Multiorgan Donor

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant risk to immunosuppressed transplant recipients, manifesting through primary infection, reinfection, or reactivation.

METHODS

We analyzed the emergence of drug resistance in CMV infection in 3 patients who were later found to have received an allograft from a shared, deceased donor. The seronegative transplant recipients developed symptomatic CMV infections after bowel/pancreas, kidney, or lung transplantation. Prospective Sanger sequencing was used to identify mutations in the viral DNA polymerase (DP) and protein kinase (PK). DP and PK variants were retrospectively quantified by targeted next-generation sequencing. The impact of the novel DP-A505G substitution on drug susceptibility was assessed using a recombinant virus. Whole-genome sequencing of clinical CMV samples was enabled through target DNA enrichment.

RESULTS

The DP-A505G substitution was found in all patient samples and could be associated with a natural polymorphism. A subsequent review of the patients' clinical histories revealed that they had all received organs from a single donor. The CMV infection exhibited divergent evolution among the patients: patient 1 developed resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet because of 2 DP mutations (V715M and V781I), patient 2 showed no genotypic resistance, and patient 3 developed ganciclovir (PK-L595S) and maribavir resistance (PK-T409M). Interpatient variation across the entire CMV genome was minimal, with viral samples clustering in phylogenetic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 transplant recipients were infected with the same donor-derived CMV strain and readily developed different drug susceptibility profiles. This underscores the importance of judicious antiviral drug use and surveillance in preventing antiviral resistance emergence.

Letermovir should be first-line cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients

Universal cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for at-risk lung transplant recipients. Valganciclovir (VGCV) is currently the preferred first-line agent. VGCV-related myelosuppression, however, can lead to drug discontinuation or reduction in antimetabolite immunosuppression. Variable VGCV pharmacokinetics in the setting of renal injury are also associated with development of resistant CMV. Letermovir, a newer anti-CMV agent, is an attractive alternative for first-line prophylaxis in many lung transplant recipients. Initially investigated in bone marrow transplant, there are now multiple retrospective studies of lung transplant recipients who were switched from VGCV to letermovir because of tolerability, dosing, or resistance. These studies have reaffirmed the safety and efficacy of letermovir in the lung transplant population. Despite this, letermovir continues to be recommended as second-line prophylaxis with use limited to those who fail VGCV. We argue that there are now sufficient data to support letermovir use in lung transplant recipients at high risk of VGCV toxicity. This includes patients with renal insufficiency, of advanced age, and with cytolytic immunosuppression, high risk of rejection, and telomere biology disorders, among other conditions. First-line letermovir would reduce the risk of VGCV-related myelosuppression and attendant reduction in immunosuppression, as well as development of CMV resistance due to variable renal function and VGCV pharmacokinetics.

Transplant centers' prophylaxis and monitoring strategies: a key determinant of current herpes and polyomavirus incidences - results from the DZIF kidney transplant cohort

BACKGROUND

Herpes- and polyomaviruses are major opportunistic pathogens after renal transplantation. Despite established guidelines, there is limited data on transplant centers' prophylaxis and monitoring strategies and centers' adherence to these guidelines and their impact on infection rates and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study, conducted by the German Center for Infection Research, included 1035 kidney transplant recipients from five centers (01/2014-02/2021), focusing on herpes- and polyomavirus viremia within the first year and adherence to prophylaxis strategies.

RESULTS

Among 1035 recipients, 26.6% developed herpes- or polyomavirus viremia, predominantly Cytomegalovirus (CMV, 14.3%) and BK-virus (BKV, 13.2%). BKV monitoring frequency was below guideline recommendations. Deviations from guidelines were most common in CMV D-/R- (34.6% with prophylaxis) and D-/R + groups (37.3% without prophylaxis), doubling CMV-incidence in D-/R+ (28.9% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.01). In D+/R - group, six-month-prophylaxis reduced CMV-incidence compared to three months (22.5% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.01). Breakthrough-viremia was most commonly observed in D+/R - recipients who received a six-month-prophylaxis. Overall, viremia was associated with higher incidence of acute rejection (31.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.01), with most CMV-viremias occurring after rejection. CMV-viremia was associated with a higher risk of bacterial infection (HR = 1.77, [1.03;3.02]). Other herpesviruses were associated with a quadrupled risk for fungal infection (HR = 4.34, [1.03;18.30]) and the non-administration of CMV-prophylaxis (HR = 0.22, [0.11;0.47]). Graft survival and mortality were unaffected within the first year.

CONCLUSION

Clinical variability in guideline implementation drives high herpes- and polyomavirus infection rates with suboptimal outcomes. Future guidelines should focus on differentiated risk stratification to address breakthrough, post-prophylaxis, and post-rejection CMV, and include protocols for the early detection of secondary infections.

Impact of prophylactic cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin on cytomegalovirus viremia and graft function in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant risk to kidney transplant recipients. CMV immunoglobulin shows promising prophylactic effect, particularly in the context of ABO-incompatible transplants. However, its efficacy in preventing CMV viremia remains underexplored.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients who underwent ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation between May 2021 and September 2023. Prophylactic CMV immunoglobulin was administered at 100 mg/kg weekly for one month in the combined prophylaxis group, while no prophylactic medication was applied in the preemptive therapy group. The primary outcome was measured as the incidence of clinically relevant CMV viremia (CMV DNA >10,000 copies/mL) within one year after transplantation. Both groups received standard preemptive therapy with ganciclovir or valganciclovir after diagnosed with clinically relevant CMV viremia.

Results

Prophylactic CMV immunoglobulin significantly reduced clinically relevant viremia incidence compared to preemptive therapy group (16.0% vs. 34.0%, P = 0.04). At the end of the follow-up, the combined prophylaxis group showed higher eGFR (56.40 ± 14.19 vs. 47.30 ± 13.01 mL/min/1.73m², P = 0.0014) and lower serum creatinine (146.5 ± 57.07 vs. 171.2 ± 51.48 µmol/L, P = 0.0274). However, no significant differences in renal function were observed between the groups at1,3, or 6 months post-transplantation.

Conclusion

CMV immunoglobulin represents a promising prophylactic option for reducing clinically relevant CMV viremia incidence and delaying infection onset in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

Interplay of Belatacept Immunosuppression and Maribavir Antiviral Activity in Recurrent CMV Viremia: Clinical Implications and Literature Review

Belatacept is a recombinant fusion protein used in renal transplant recipients, particularly when side effects from standard immunosuppressants occur. It offers a superior renal safety profile and is associated with better long-term renal graft outcomes. However, belatacept has been linked to atypical presentations of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, characterized by a prolonged and unpredictable course of viremia. We report a case involving a middle-aged African American female who developed acute kidney injury while on tacrolimus and was subsequently switched to belatacept. During treatment with belatacept, she experienced persistent and erratic CMV viremia lasting 58 weeks. The viremia showed an incomplete response to first-line antiviral therapy with valganciclovir, and the use of the novel antiviral agent maribavir also failed to achieve long-lasting viremic clearance. The resolution of the viremia was ultimately achieved only after discontinuing belatacept while continuing maribavir therapy. This case and literature review underscores the need for clinicians to remain vigilant for atypical CMV infections in renal transplant recipients treated with belatacept. If the complete clearance of viremia cannot be achieved despite the use of different antiviral agents, consideration should be given to modifying immunosuppressive therapy.

[Pathophysiology and treatment of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus keratitis]

Herpetic keratitis (HK) caused by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is the major cause of infection-related blindness in developed countries. Current treatment is based on curative and preventive use of antiherpetic acyclic nucleoside analogues (ANAs), namely acyclovir (ACV) or other molecules with the same mechanism of action. The frequency of HK caused by acyclovir-resistant viruses is steadily increasing. Virological proof of resistance is obtained from an ocular sample sent to a specialized laboratory. Genotypic characterization by DNA sequencing of the viral enzymes targeted by antivirals allows adaptation of treatment according to the mutation identified. Mutations of the viral thymidine kinase (TK) are the most frequent and leave few viable alternatives for long-term prophylactic treatment among currently available drugs. Amenamevir (AMNV), a new drug targeting the viral helicase-primase (HP) enzyme complex, with proven efficacy for treatment of herpetic infections of other sites, has recently shown value in the management of ACV-resistant HK. Its TK-independent mechanism allows it to retain its antiviral activity even in cases of patient resistance to ACV.

Dual Resistance to Maribavir and Ganciclovir in Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important pathogen, especially for immunocompromised patients such as solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Viral genomic mutations conferring drug resistance are an important impediment to effective CMV management and frequently lead to use of alternative antiviral drugs to treat CMV disease.

METHODS

Results from 1459 de-identified patient samples with both UL54 and UL97 sequencing results were analyzed for ganciclovir (GCV) and maribavir (MBV) resistance mutations. Genomic sequencing was performed by the Sanger method and resistance mutations were identified by comparison to CMV reference strain AD169.

RESULTS

Ganciclovir resistance was identified in 379 of 1459 (25.98%) of the samples tested, with most resistance-conferring mutations present in viral gene UL97. A total of 121 of 1459 (8.29%) samples had MBV resistance mutations, and 84 (69.42%) of the 121 samples with MBV resistance also had GCV resistance mutations. Of the 84 samples with resistance to both MBV and GCV, 35 (41.67%) had a single UL97 mutation conferring resistance to both drugs, either C480F or F342Y. The overall prevalence of C480F was increased relative to an earlier analysis of samples from this reference laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a high prevalence of CMV resistance mutations was identified, this must be taken in the context of healthcare providers submitting samples from patients with suspected CMV resistance. Most MBV-resistant samples were also resistant to GCV, suggesting that use of MBV as an alternative to GCV may benefit from genotypic resistance testing to achieve the effective control of CMV disease.

Risk of Cytomegalovirus Viremia Following Transplantation of Hepatitis C-Viremic Donor Kidneys Into Uninfected Recipients: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia among Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-uninfected recipients of kidney transplants from HCV-RNA+ deceased donors (HCV D+/R-), but these studies featured small sample sizes and limited ability to address confounding variables.

METHODS

We assembled a retrospective cohort of adult kidney transplant recipients at five US centers between 4/1/2015 and 12/31/2020 to determine the association between HCV D+/R- transplants and the outcomes of CMV viremia (> 1000 IU/mL), death-censored graft failure, and mortality in the first posttransplant year compared to HCV D-/R- transplants. We generated highly similar matched cohorts of HCV D+/R- and HCV D-/R- recipients based on attributes that affect the risk of CMV viremia. We matched exactly on center, CMV donor/recipient serostatus, and antibody induction therapy.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 275 HCV D+/R- recipients with a mean age of 52.5 years (SD = 10.7); 19% were CMV D+/R-, and 74% received anti-thymocyte globulin induction. With variable ratio matching, 267 HCV D+/R- recipients were matched to 996 HCV D-/R- recipients. CMV viremia occurred in 15% of HCV D+/R- and 11% of HCV D-R- recipients. In Cox regression, transplantation with an HCV-RNA+ donor kidney was not associated with a significantly higher risk of CMV viremia (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.89-1.92) or death-censored graft loss (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.31-1.2).

CONCLUSION

The risk of CMV viremia was not significantly increased among HCV D+/R- kidney recipients. Future studies should examine associations between donor-derived HCV infection and clinical outcomes of CMV syndrome and disease.

CMV management of patients with leukopenia after CMV high-risk kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

For CMV high-risk constellations, guidelines recommend 3-6 months of prophylaxis with valganciclovir (VGCV). Management in preventing CMV primary infection in patients developing VGCV-associated leukopenia remains challenging.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the development of leukopenia during VGCV prophylaxis in 57 seronegative kidney recipients of a CMV-seropositive donor between 2008 and 2021. We analyzed CMV risk and development of CMV-specific T cells in the first post-transplant year depending on leukopenia during VGCV prophylaxis and management with CMV-IVIg.

RESULTS

Leukopenia developed in 19/57 patients, with a significant difference in leukocyte counts occurring after 10 weeks of VGCV prophylaxis compared to patients without leukopenia (p = 0.0003). VGCV discontinuation led to leukocyte reconstitution, which tended to be faster in patients receiving additional prophylaxis with CMV-IVIg after VGCV discontinuation (n = 11, p = 0.083). In the first post-transplant year, patients with leukopenia had no higher risk for severe CMV events. Interestingly, patients receiving CMV-IVIg prophylaxis showed a significantly lower peak CMV-load during primary infection (p = 0.040), with no difference in CMV-specific T-cell levels compared to patients without leukopenia or patients with additional CMV-IVIg prophylaxis (p = 0.972). Patients developing adequate CMV-specific T-cell responses less frequently underwent CMV reactivation 50 days following primary infection.

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia developed late during VGCV prophylaxis and did not result in an increased risk for CMV primary infections or severe disease. Leukopenic patients receiving CMV-IVIg tended to have a faster leukocyte reconstitution and had lower peak DNAemia, which did not adversely affect CMV-specific T-cell induction. CMV-IVIg may therefore be considered as an alternative prophylactic strategy in patients with VGCV-associated leukopenia.

Prevention and management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in kidney transplant: A consensus statement of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan

Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. A strategy for mitigating the risk of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. The Transplantation Society of Taiwan aimed to develop a consensus by expert opinion on the prevention and management of CMV infection. Based on the results of Consensus Conference, we suggested low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg once daily) for kidney transplant recipients. The prophylaxis duration was ≥6 months for high-risk (D+/R-) patients and 3 months for moderate-risk (R+) patients. Even for low-risk (D-/R-) patients, prophylaxis for at least 3 months is recommended because of the high seroprevalence of CMV in Taiwan. CMV prophylaxis was suggested after anti-thymocyte globulin treatment but not after methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Routine surveillance after prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis after CMV disease treatment, and mTOR inhibitors for primary CMV prophylaxis were not recommended. Letermovir and marabavir are emerging CMV agents used for prophylaxis and refractory CMV disease. CMV immunoglobulins have been used to treat refractory CMV disease in Taiwan. We hope this consensus will help professionals manage patients with CMV in Taiwan to improve the quality of care.

Ganciclovir Resistance-Linked Mutations in the HCMV UL97 Gene: Sanger Sequencing Analysis in Samples from Transplant Recipients at a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Brazil

Background/Objectives: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNAemia remains a significant concern for transplant recipients, largely due to mutations in the viral genome that may lead to antiviral-resistant strains. Mutations in the UL97 gene are frequently associated with resistance to ganciclovir (GCV), highlighting the importance of early mutation detection to effectively manage viremia. This study aimed to optimize a Sanger sequencing protocol for analyzing GCV resistance-linked mutations in the HCMV UL97 gene from plasma samples of transplant patients treated at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methods: A nested-PCR approach combined with a touchdown PCR method was employed to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the sequencing analysis. Results: The study sample included various transplants, encompassing solid organ and bone marrow recipients. Among 16 sequenced samples, 8 exhibited nucleotide substitutions resulting in amino acid changes. Notably, the A594V and C603W mutations, associated with GCV resistance, were identified in four samples. Additionally, three mutations with unknown phenotypic impact (P509L, A628T, and H662Y) and two viral polymorphisms (N510S and D605E) were detected. Furthermore, double peaks in the Sanger electropherograms, indicative of mixed viral populations of HCMV were observed in seven samples. Conclusions: The optimized Sanger sequencing protocol provides a cost-effective solution for detecting GCV resistance mutations in HCMV UL97 among transplant recipients. This approach could improve the understanding of HCMV strain dynamics and serve as a valuable tool for long-term patient monitoring, particularly within resource-constrained settings such as the public health systems of middle-income countries.

A vaccine against cytomegalovirus: how close are we?

The pursuit of a vaccine against the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been ongoing for more than 50 years. HCMV is the leading infectious cause of birth defects, including damage to the brain, and is a common cause of complications in organ transplantation. The complex biology of HCMV has made vaccine development difficult, but a recent meeting sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in September of 2023 brought together experts from academia, industry, and federal agencies to discuss progress in the field. The meeting reviewed the status of candidate HCMV vaccines under study and the challenges in clinical trial design in demonstrating efficacy against congenital CMV infection or the reduction of HCMV disease following solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Discussion in the meeting revealed that, with the numerous candidate vaccines that are under study, it is clear that a safe and effective HCMV vaccine is within reach. Meeting attendees achieved a consensus opinion that even a partially effective vaccine would have a major effect on the global health consequences of HCMV infection.

High-risk Cytomegalovirus in Heart Transplant: How Can We Improve?

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with worse outcomes after heart transplant (HT). CMV mismatch (donor positive, recipient negative serology, D+/R-) increases the risk of infection. Guidelines recommend 3 to 6 months of antiviral prophylaxis in these patients. An increase in primary CMV infections at our center prompted us to analyses this population in search of improvement.

METHODS

From 185 adult HT receptors in 10 years, we selected those with CMV D+/R-. Patients were followed until October 2023. We evaluated the patterns of transmission of CMV in accordance with current recommendations.

RESULTS

We assessed 35 HT recipients with CMV mismatch (median age of 48.8 ± 13.8 years, 71% men). Median follow-up was 5.5 years [1.9-7.4]. Median duration of CMV prophylaxis was 3.7 (±2.1) months post-HT. CMV infection occurred in 74% of patients (96% within the first 6 months after ending prophylaxis) and CMV disease in 26%. Half of them required hospital admission. One third had concomitant infections by other microorganisms. There were no significant differences in the duration of prophylaxis between patients with and without CMV infection. Survival on follow-up was 77%. 2 patients died during CMV infection due to other infection.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV infection rate in D+/R- HT receptors remains high even after the prophylactic period recommended by current guidelines. A better knowledge of CMV-transmitted infection, coupled with the pursuit of a suitable equilibrium between the prevention of infection and rejection, have the potential to enhance the outcomes of this high-risk population through tailored protocols.

What intensivists need to know about cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompromised ICU patients

PURPOSE

Advances in therapeutic care are leading to an increase in the number of patients living with overt immunosuppression. These patients are at risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease that can lead to or develop during ICU admission. This manuscript aims to describe the clinical presentation, risk factors, and management of CMV infection and disease in this patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed up to April 2024, focusing on CMV infection and disease in patients with overt immunosuppression (hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation, solid or hematologic malignancies, HIV infection, immunosuppressive drugs, including corticosteroids, and primary immunodeficiencies) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). As there is limited ICU-specific data on CMV in immunosuppressed patients, many of the findings were extrapolated from the general literature.

RESULTS

CMV infection and disease in immunocompromised critically ill patients is associated with increased mortality and presents significant management challenges. Clinical manifestations are diverse, shaped by the underlying immune deficiency and primary disease. Pneumonia and encephalitis are among the most severe CMV end-organ diseases. CMV infection may also increase the risk of secondary infections and induce life-threatening conditions, such as thrombotic microangiopathy. Importantly, CMV reactivation is not synonymous with CMV disease, and qPCR testing of body fluids cannot reliably differentiate between viral shedding and tissue-invasive infection, which requires histopathological confirmation. Ganciclovir is commonly the first-line anti-viral, though maribavir shows potential for patients unresponsive to other antivirals. Identifying patients who require prophylactic or preemptive antiviral therapy is essential.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV infection and disease in critically ill immunocompromised patients pose a unique challenge for intensivists. The broad spectrum of clinical presentations and the difficulty in distinguishing CMV-related symptoms from other causes require a high level of clinical suspicion. Accurate interpretation of nucleic acid load levels and careful evaluation of CMV's pathogenic role when it is found are critical. Further studies focusing specifically on CMV infection and disease in critically ill immunocompromised patients are needed to optimize management strategies.

Real-World Comparison of Maribavir to Foscarnet for the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients may increase the risk of rejection or allograft dysfunction, other infection(s), and morbidity and mortality. Treatment can be challenging due to medication-associated toxicities. Maribavir (MBV) is a promising option for the treatment of resistant or refractory (R/R) CMV infection in lieu of foscarnet (FOS), which has long been the recommended therapy for (val)ganciclovir-resistant infection. This was a single-center retrospective study of clinical outcomes of patients who received MBV compared to a control group who received FOS for an episode of CMV infection. Each cohort consisted of 27 episodes of CMV infection. Twenty patients in the MBV cohort and from the FOS cohort cleared the infection, with five and three patients developing MBV or FOS resistance, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in failure of therapy as evidenced by persistent DNAemia (p = 0.56) or development of antiviral resistance (p = 0.24). In conclusion, MBV was as effective as FOS for the treatment of R/R CMV infection and was better tolerated without increased risk of antiviral resistance.

Management of cytomegalovirus in adult solid organ transplant patients: GESITRA-IC-SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant challenge in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The last international consensus guidelines on the management of CMV in SOT were published in 2018, highlighting the need for revision to incorporate recent advances, notably in cell-mediated immunity monitoring, which could alter the current standard of care. A working group including members from the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplantation and the Immunocompromised Host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), developed consensus-based recommendations for managing CMV infection in SOT recipients. Recommendations were classified based on evidence strength and quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Fiztasovimab (NPC-21) for Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection (LionHeart21)

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) has dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, the incidence of opportunistic infections has also increased because of immunosuppression. A common infection after KT is cytomegalovirus (CMV). In KT recipients, we assessed the efficacy and safety of fiztasovimab (NPC-21), an anti-CMV monoclonal antibody.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study of NPC-21 for KT recipients with CMV donor-positive (D+)/recipient-negative (R-) serostatus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive monthly 6 or 12 mg/kg NPC-21, or placebo, in a 4:1:4 ratio. The primary efficacy endpoint was CMV infection by week 16.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven KT recipients were randomized; 38, 11, and 38 received 6 mg/kg of NPC-21, 12 mg/kg of NPC-21, or placebo, respectively. CMV infections occurred in 29 of 38 (76.3%), 9 of 11 (81.8%), and 26 of 38 (68.4%) patients in the 6 mg/kg NPC-21, 12 mg/kg NPC-21, and placebo groups, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. CMV disease occurred in 2 of 49 (4.1%) versus 5 of 38 (13.2%) patients in the 6 and 12 mg/kg combined NPC-21 group versus the placebo group. The absolute difference (95% confidence interval) was -9.1 (-23.9 to 2.8). No significant adverse events were observed after NPC-21 administration.

CONCLUSIONS

NPC-21 was safe, but no significant efficacy difference was found between NPC-21 and placebo. Severe CMV infection was less likely in the NPC-21 group versus the placebo group. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of NPC-21 in the prevention of CMV.

Cytomegalovirus Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation: An Update on Current Approaches

OBJECTIVE

The article reviews the safety and efficacy of treatments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Clinicaltrials.gov from database inception through January 2024, using terms CMV, therapy, and solid organ transplantation.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, case reports, and guidelines were included. Letters to the editor, reviews, and commentaries were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

After abstract screening and full-text review of 728 citations for eligibility, 53 were included. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir are drugs of choice for CMV management and, until recently, the availability of alternative options has been restricted due to toxicity. For instance, foscarnet and cidofovir serve as second-line agents due to potential bone marrow and renal toxicity. In patients with refractory or resistant CMV, maribavir, a novel oral agent, has proven efficacy and a lower adverse effect profile. However, in refractory or resistant CMV, foscarnet and cidofovir are preferred in invasive disease (CMV gastritis, CMV retinitis, and CMV encephalitis), high viral loads, and inability to tolerate oral preparations.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Consensus guidelines have not been revised since approval of novel antivirals in solid organ transplantation. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir remain drugs of choice for initial CMV therapy. Foscarnet, cidofovir, and maribavir are treatments for refractory or resistant-CMV.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of CMV antiviral treatment should be determined by patient-specific factors, including severity of illness, resistant or refractory disease, dose-limiting adverse effects, and the preferred route of administration.

Management of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation (LT). Based on current worldwide guidelines, the most effective strategies for avoiding post-transplant CMV infection are antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment. CMV- IgG serology is the established technique for pretransplant screening of both donors and recipients. The clinical presentation of CMV infection and disease exhibits variability, prompting clinicians to consistently consider this possibility, particularly within the first year post-transplantation or subsequent to heightened immunosuppression. At annual symposia to discuss CMV prevention and how treatment outcomes can be improved, evidence on the incorporation of immune functional tests into clinical practice is presented, and the results of studies with new antiviral treatments are evaluated. Although there are ongoing studies on the use of letermovir and maribavir in solid organ transplantation, a consensus reflected in the guidelines has not been formed. Determining the most appropriate strategy at the individual level appears to be the key to enhancing outcomes. Although prevention strategies reduce the risk of CMV disease, the disease can still occur in up to 50% of high-risk patients. A balance between the risk of infection and disease development and the use of immunosuppressants must be considered when talking about the proper management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to establish a comprehensive framework for the management of CMV in patients who have had LT.

Cytomegalovirus Retinitis: Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis and Treatment

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is the most common eye disease associated with CMV infection in immunocompromised individuals. The CMVR may initially be asymptomatic; however, relatively mild vitreous inflammation at the onset may be an important differential point from other diseases in HIV patients. Fundus photography, CD4 T-cell count, and telemedicine could be used to screen and monitor the high-risk population, particularly in resource-limited regions. Retinitis generally starts in the peripheral retina and advances toward the posterior pole, which could develop to the characteristic "pizza pie" appearance marked by central retinal necrosis and intraretinal hemorrhage. CMVR causes vision loss if left untreated, and early antiviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of vision loss. Alongside traditional antiviral treatments, immunotherapies including CMV-specific adoptive T-cell therapy and CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) are emerging as promising treatment options due to their favorable tolerability and reduced mortality. This review comprehensively examines CMV retinitis, encompassing the clinical features, differential diagnosis, laboratory tests, and updated treatment strategies to inform clinical management.

Virus-specific T cell therapy to treat refractory viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients require ongoing immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection, which puts them at risk of opportunistic infections. Viral infections are particularly challenging to prevent and treat as many establish latency and thus cannot be eliminated, whereas targets for small molecule antiviral medications are limited. Resistance to antivirals and unacceptable toxicity also complicate treatment. Virus-specific T cell therapies aim to restore host-specific immunity to opportunistic viruses that is lacking due to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy. This minireview will provide a state-of-the-art update of the current virus-specific T cell pipeline and translational research that is likely to lead to further treatment options for viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

Real-World Experience With Maribavir for Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection in High-Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We evaluated use of maribavir (MBV) for treatment of 15 episodes of refractory/resistant cytomegalovirus infection in 13 solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment failure due to treatment-emergent MBV resistance or early virological recurrence after MBV discontinuation occurred in 7 (47%) episodes. Sustained viral clearance was achieved in 6 (40%) episodes.

Engineered HCMV-infected APCs enable the identification of new immunodominant HLA-restricted epitopes of anti-HCMV T-cell immunity

Complications due to HCMV infection or reactivation remain a challenging clinical problem in immunocompromised patients, mainly due to insufficient or absent T-cell functionality. Knowledge of viral targets is crucial to improve monitoring of high-risk patients and optimise antiviral T-cell therapy. To expand the epitope spectrum, genetically-engineered dendritic cells (DCs) and fibroblasts were designed to secrete soluble (s)HLA-A*11:01 and infected with an HCMV mutant lacking immune evasion molecules (US2-6 + 11). More than 700 HLA-A*11:01-restricted epitopes, including more than 50 epitopes derived from a broad range of HCMV open-reading-frames (ORFs) were identified by mass spectrometry and screened for HLA-A*11:01-binding using established prediction tools. The immunogenicity of the 24 highest scoring new candidates was evaluated in vitro in healthy HLA-A*11:01+/HCMV+ donors. Thus, four subdominant epitopes and one immunodominant epitope, derived from the anti-apoptotic protein UL36 and ORFL101C (A11SAL), were identified. Their HLA-A*11:01 complex stability was verified in vitro. In depth analyses revealed highly proliferative and cytotoxic memory T-cell responses against A11SAL, with T-cell responses comparable to the immunodominant HLA-A*02:01-restricted HCMVpp65NLV epitope. A11SAL-specific T cells were also detectable in vivo in immunosuppressed transplant patients and shown to be effective in an in vitro HCMV-infection model, suggesting their crucial role in inhibiting viral replication and improvement of patient's outcome. The developed in vitro pipeline is the first to utilise genetically-engineered DCs to identify naturally presented immunodominant HCMV-derived epitopes. It therefore offers advantages over in silico predictions, is transferable to other HLA alleles, and will significantly expand the repertoire of viral targets to improve therapeutic options.

Bridging the gap: assessing CMV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients with previous solid organ transplants

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant threat to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and can lead to various complications and adverse outcomes. In an effort to prevent CMV infection, it is common to utilize prophylactic strategies, including antiviral medications such as valganciclovir, especially for high-risk patients. Risk factors for CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) include CMV mismatch between donor and recipient (i.e., donor positive, recipient negative), and intensity of immunosuppression, such as the use of T-cell depleting agents. However, little attention has been given to KTRs with a history of prior SOTs, despite their prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive regimens. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to investigate the incidence and implications of CMV DNAemia in KTRs with prior SOTs. The study included 97 KTRs with prior SOTs and 154 KTRs with no prior transplants as a control group. In the study group, the most common SOT before the current kidney transplantation (KT), was a previous KT. Patients in the KTR group with prior SOTs were more sensitized than those in the control group [calculated panel-reactive antibody > 30%: 49 (50.5%) vs. 30 (19.45%) patients, p = 0.001]. There was a 39.2% incidence of CMV DNAemia in the previous SOT group compared to 48.7% in the control group [non-significant (NS)]. Patients with prior SOTs demonstrated a shorter post-transplant time to CMV DNAemia [median time 1.6 months (interquartile range, IQR 0.7-5.8) in the KTRs with prior SOTs vs. 2.6 months (IQR 1.5-8.1) in the control group (p = 0.001)]. Although the study highlights the need for tailored prophylaxis strategies and vigilant monitoring in KTRs with prior SOTs, its limitations, such as its retrospective nature and single-center design, call for further multicenter research to establish comprehensive guidelines for managing CMV DNAemia in this unique patient population. Despite these limitations, this study underscores the importance of recognizing the heightened risk of CMV infection or reactivation in KTRs overall and the potential benefits of proactive intervention to mitigate associated morbidity and mortality.

What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.

Comparative Analysis of Cytomegalovirus Gastrointestinal Disease in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) gastrointestinal (GI) diseases impact both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals, yet comprehensive studies highlighting the differences between these groups are lacking.

METHODS

In this retrospective study (January 2000 to July 2022) of 401 patients with confirmed CMV GI diseases, we categorized them based on immunological status and compared manifestations, treatments, outcomes, and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The immunocompromised patients (n = 193) showed older age, severe illnesses, and higher comorbidity rates. GI bleeding, the predominant manifestation, occurred more in the immunocompetent group (92.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.009). Despite longer antiviral therapy, the immunocompromised patients had higher in-hospital (32.2% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.034) and overall mortality rates (91.1% vs. 43.4%, p < 0.001). The independent factors influencing in-hospital mortality in the immunocompromised patients included GI bleeding (OR 5.782, 95% CI 1.257-26.599, p = 0.024) and antiviral therapy ≥ 14 days (OR 0.232, 95% CI 0.059-0.911, p = 0.036). In the immunocompetent patients, age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.006-1.159, p = 0.032), GI bleeding (OR 10.036, 95% CI 1.183-85.133, p = 0.035), and time to diagnosis (OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.004-1.055, p = 0.021) were significant prognostic factors, with the age and diagnosis time cut-offs for survival being 70 years and 31.5 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GI bleeding is the most common manifestation and prognostic factor in both groups. Early diagnosis and effective antiviral therapy can significantly reduce in-hospital mortality.

Viral meningoencephalitis in pediatric solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach

Neurologic complications, both infectious and non-infectious, are frequent among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Up to 46% of HCT and 50% of SOT recipients experience a neurological complication, including cerebrovascular accidents, drug toxicities, as well as infections. Defects in innate, adaptive, and humoral immune function among transplant recipients predispose to opportunistic infections, including central nervous system (CNS) disease. CNS infections remain uncommon overall amongst HCT and SOT recipients, compromising approximately 1% of total cases among adult patients. Given the relatively lower number of pediatric transplant recipients, the incidence of CNS disease amongst in this population remains unknown. Although infections comprise a small percentage of the neurological complications that occur post-transplant, the associated morbidity and mortality in an immunosuppressed state makes it imperative to promptly evaluate and aggressively treat a pediatric transplant patient with suspicion for viral meningoencephalitis. This manuscript guides the reader through a broad infectious and non-infectious diagnostic differential in a transplant recipient presenting with altered mentation and fever and thereafter, elaborates on diagnostics and management of viral meningoencephalitis. Hypothetical SOT and HCT patient cases have also been constructed to illustrate the diagnostic and management process in select viral etiologies. Given the unique risk for various opportunistic viral infections resulting in CNS disease among transplant recipients, the manuscript will provide a contemporary review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of viral meningoencephalitis in these patients.

Diagnosis of Human Cytomegalovirus Drug Resistance Mutations in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Review

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection may be asymptomatic in healthy individuals but can cause severe complications in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. Breakthrough and drug-resistant HCMV infections in such patients are major concerns. Clinicians are first challenged to accurately diagnose HCMV infection and then to identify the most effective antiviral drug and determine when to initiate therapy, alter drug dosage, or switch medication. This review critically examines HCMV diagnostics approaches, particularly for immunocompromised patients, and the development of genotypic techniques to rapidly diagnose drug resistance mutations. The current standard method to identify prevalent and well-known resistance mutations involves polymerase chain reaction amplification of UL97, UL54, and UL56 gene regions, followed by Sanger sequencing. This method can confirm clinical suspicion of drug resistance as well as determine the level of drug resistance and range of cross-resistance with other drugs. Despite the effectiveness of this approach, there remains an urgent need for more rapid and point-of-care HCMV diagnosis, allowing for timely lifesaving intervention.

Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges

Advancement in solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplant continues to improve the health outcomes of patients and widens the number of eligible patients who can benefit from the medical progress. Preserving the effectiveness of antimicrobials remains crucial, as otherwise transplant surgeries would be unsafe due to surgical site infections, and the risk of sepsis with neutropenia would preclude stem cell transplant. In this review, we provide updates on three previously discussed stewardship challenges: febrile neutropenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and asymptomatic bacteriuria. We also offer insight into four new stewardship challenges: the applicability of the "shorter is better" paradigm shift to antimicrobial duration; antibiotic allergy delabeling and desensitization; colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms; and management of cytomegalovirus infections. Specifically, data are accumulating for "shorter is better" and antibiotic allergy delabeling in transplant patients, following successes in the general population. Unique to transplant patients are the impact of multidrug-resistant organism colonization on clinical decision-making of antibiotic prophylaxis in transplant procedure and the need for antiviral stewardship in cytomegalovirus. We highlighted the expansion of antimicrobial stewardship interventions as potential solutions for these challenges, as well as gaps in knowledge and opportunities for further research.

Letermovir Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Refractory/Resistant CMV Disease

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R-) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16-39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6-20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8-10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance.

Isolation, synthesis and identification of degraded impurities in Letermovir

Letermovir is a cytomegalovirus inhibitor for cytomegalovirus infection a hematopoietic-cell transplantation. In the degradation test of Letermovir, five new impurities were detected at levels of ND ∼ 2.21 % (by oxide, thermal or photolytic). These impurities were synthesized directly, characterized and identified by HRMS NMR spectra and X-ray crystallography. Then co-injected with commercial products to confirm their retention times in HPLC. The possible formation pathways and synthetic methods of these impurities were discussed in details. Furthermore, the toxicological properties of impurities were evaluated by ACD/Percepta 14.52.0 (Build 3525) software.

New Treatment Options for Refractory/Resistant CMV Infection

Despite advances in monitoring and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). CMV infection may fail to respond to standard first- and second-line antiviral therapies with or without the presence of antiviral resistance to these therapies. This failure to respond after 14 days of appropriate treatment is referred to as "resistant/refractory CMV." Limited data on refractory CMV without antiviral resistance are available. Reported rates of resistant CMV are up to 18% in SOT recipients treated for CMV. Therapeutic options for treating these infections are limited due to the toxicity of the agent used or transplant-related complications. This is often the challenge with conventional agents such as ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir. Recent introduction of new CMV agents including maribavir and letermovir as well as the use of adoptive T cell therapy may improve the outcome of these difficult-to-treat infections in SOT recipients. In this expert review, we focus on new treatment options for resistant/refractory CMV infection and disease in SOT recipients, with an emphasis on maribavir, letermovir, and adoptive T cell therapy.

Cytomegalovirus Disease as a Risk Factor for Invasive Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients under Targeted Antiviral and Antimycotic Prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common opportunistic infection that occurs following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In addition to the direct infection-related symptoms, it also triggers an immunological response that may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes. CMV disease has been described as a predictor of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) but its role under an antiviral prophylaxis regimen is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 214 adult liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Universal antiviral prophylaxis was utilized in recipients with CMV mismatch; intermediate- and low-risk patients received pre-emptive treatment.

RESULTS

Six percent of patients developed CMV disease independent of their serostatus. The occurrence of CMV disease was associated with elevated virus load and increased incidence of leucopenia and IFIs. Furthermore, CMV disease was associated with higher one-year mortality and increased relapse rates within the first year of OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease causes significant morbidity and mortality in LTRs, directly affecting transplant outcomes. Due to the increased risk of IFIs, antifungal prophylaxis for CMV disease may be appropriate. Postoperative CMV monitoring should be considered after massive transfusion, even in low-risk serostatus constellations. In case of biliary complications, biliary CMV monitoring may be appropriate in the case of CMV-DNA blood-negative patients.

Prevalence of cytomegalovirus antiviral drug resistance in transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant human pathogen, especially for immunocompromised patients, often treated with one or more antiviral drugs. Although the prevalence of resistance is low, the impact of drug resistant CMV infections on patient outcomes is high and genotypic testing is recommended when resistance is suspected. To assess the prevalence of CMV drug resistance mutations among samples submitted for genotypic testing, 2750 patient sample results were analyzed. Testing was performed by sequencing for ganciclovir (GCV), cidofovir (CDV), foscarnet (FOS), maribavir (MBV) and/or letermovir (LMV) resistance conferring mutations. Of the 2750 patient samples, 826 (30.04%) had resistance to one or more anti-CMV drug. Resistance mutations were most common in UL97, with 27.64% and 9.96% of samples having GCV and MBV mutations, respectively. Resistance mutations in UL54 were less common, with 6.11%, 5.98% and 1.76% of samples having GCV, CDV and FOS mutations, respectively. For LMV, resistance mutations in UL56 were present in 7.17% of samples, with mutations at codon 325 representing 80.95% of the observed LMV resistance mutations. Resistance to two drugs was identified in 215 samples and to 3 or more drugs in 35 samples. While a high prevalence of CMV resistance mutations was identified, this must be taken in the context of healthcare providers submitting samples from patients with suspected resistant CMV strains. For these patients, rapid monitoring for resistance allows treatment modifications based on objective results rather than empiric drug selection, which is particularly relevant given the presence of mutations conferring resistance to more than one drug.

IgG4-Related Oesophageal Disease with Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Case Report

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibrous inflammatory process related to immunomodulation. The involvement of the pancreato-biliary tract, retroperitoneum/aorta, head and neck, and salivary glands are the most frequently observed disease phenotypes, differing in their epidemiological features, serological findings, and prognostic outcomes. IgG4-RD was combined with oesophageal ulcers, and the patients were infected with cytomegalovirus at the time of the examination. This constituted a huge challenge in the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal ulcers. We report the case of a 53-year-old male who experienced nausea, vomiting, and anaemia recurrently for many years. According to his medical records, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an oesophageal ulcer, and he had had numerous hospital visits for anaemia but with no definitive diagnosis, and he had responded poorly to therapy. However, with persistent symptoms, he came to our hospital and, according to the results of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, a serum IgG4 test, and histopathological and immunohistochemical staining, he was finally diagnosed with IgG4-related oesophageal disease combined with a cytomegalovirus infection. We hope that through this case, we can learn more about IgG4-RD and, at the same time, give clinicians a better understanding of IgG4-RD combined with oesophageal ulceration, a new understanding of cytomegalovirus infections, and improved clinical knowledge.