1
|
Ewig CLY, Wang Y, Smolinski NE, Thai TN, Rasmussen SA, Winterstein AG. Use of Biologics During Pregnancy Among Patients With Autoimmune Conditions. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e2510504. [PMID: 40372753 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Continuation of biologics in patients with an autoimmune condition who become pregnant involves weighing consequences of pregnancy-related changes in disease severity and potential teratogenic effects of medications. Characterization of biologic treatment patterns during pregnancy may provide insight into maternal and fetal risks and benefits. Objective To describe the utilization pattern of biologics in pregnant individuals with autoimmune conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from Merative MarketScan Research Databases, which contain administrative claims of commercially insured individuals in the US. Pregnant patients aged 16 to 55 years with an autoimmune condition and biologic use 6 months before conception between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, were included. The data were analyzed between October 15, 2024, and February 28, 2025. Exposure Use of biologics for autoimmune disease after conception. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of patients who used biologics for Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis was assessed, and the association between underlying autoimmune disease and use of biologics during pregnancy was measured using multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 6131 pregnant patients (median [IQR] age, 32 [29-36] years) with an autoimmune condition were included. The most prevalent conditions were Crohn disease (1372 patients [25.6%]) and rheumatoid arthritis (1295 patients [24.1%]). Of all patients, 4393 (71.6%; 95% CI, 70.5%-72.8%) used biologics at least once during pregnancy. Among pregnancies with live birth outcomes, biologic use declined throughout gestation, with 2981 patients (68.6% [95% CI, 67.2%-70.0%]), 2555 patients (58.8% [95% CI, 57.3%-60.3%]), and 2113 patients (48.6% [95% CI, 47.1%-50.1%]) using biologics during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively, and 3350 patients (77.1% [95% CI, 75.8%-78.3%]) using them post partum. Compared with pregnant patients with rheumatoid arthritis, those with Crohn disease (odds ratio [OR], 7.88 [95% CI, 5.93-10.47]) and ulcerative colitis (OR, 5.35 [95% CI, 3.73-7.66]) were more likely to use biologics, while those with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.80]) were less likely. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, a decline in the use of biologics for autoimmune disease was observed during the pregnancy period that rebounded only partially thereafter. Notable variations in use across autoimmune conditions suggest that indication-specific risk-benefit assessments of biologic use are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste L Y Ewig
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Yanning Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Nicole E Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Thuy Nhu Thai
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Almut G Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rowe SL, Sullivan SG, Muñoz FM, Coates MM, Agnew B, Arah OA, Regan AK. COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy and Major Structural Birth Defects. Pediatrics 2025; 155:e2024069778. [PMID: 40081452 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-069778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES COVID-19 vaccination is recommended during pregnancy; however, evidence on the prevalence of major structural birth defects born to people vaccinated early in pregnancy (≤20 weeks of gestation) is limited. We compared the prevalence of major structural birth defects by COVID-19 vaccination status and key strata: insurance provider, clinically diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, and concomitant administration of other maternal vaccines. We also compared, head-to-head, the prevalence of birth defects by brand (Moderna mRNA-1273 vs Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2). METHODS A claims-based cohort study captured pregnancies ending in a live birth among people with an estimated last menstrual period between August 15, 2021, and December 24, 2021. Prevalence ratios comparing birth defects by exposure to COVID-19 vaccines were estimated using binomial regression with inverse probability treatment weights. RESULTS Among 78 052 pregnancies, we identified 1248 major structural birth defects (1049 [160.6 per 10 000 live births] among unvaccinated people and 199 [156.4 per 10 000 live births] among vaccinated people). No differences in the prevalence of major structural birth defects were observed given COVID-19 vaccination (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.13). Findings were unchanged by insurance provider, SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, and concomitant of other maternal vaccines. No differences in the prevalence of birth defects were observed among vaccinated people by brand (aPR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77-1.37). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination during early pregnancy is not associated with an increased prevalence of major structural birth defects in infants. These results support the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Rowe
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Flor M Muñoz
- Departments of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew M Coates
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
| | - Brianna Agnew
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Onyebuchi A Arah
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette K Regan
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Regan AK, Rowe SL, Sullivan SG, Coates MM, Muñoz FM, Arah OA. COVID-19 Antiviral Medication Use Among Pregnant and Recently Pregnant US Outpatients. Clin Infect Dis 2025; 80:512-519. [PMID: 39907453 PMCID: PMC11912976 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant people are at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated complications. While withholding treatment from pregnant patients is not recommended, little is known about the frequency of antiviral medication use during pregnancy. METHODS Using Medicaid and commercial insurance databases, we constructed a national claims-based cohort study of pregnant, recently pregnant, and nonpregnant female patients 18-49 years old with an outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 between 21 December 2021 and 30 September 2022. Outpatient treatment with a recommended antiviral medication was identified within 5 days of diagnosis, using national drug codes in outpatient prescription drug claims. Propensity score-matched prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare antiviral treatment by pregnancy status. RESULTS A total of 412 755 publicly and privately insured patients with COVID-19 were identified, including 33 855 currently pregnant, 2460 recently pregnant, and 376 440 nonpregnant female patients; 6.8% had a record of antiviral medication use, including 1.3% of pregnant, 5.4% of recently pregnant, and 7.3% of nonpregnant women. Most commonly ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir was administered. The prevalence of antiviral medication use was 67% lower among pregnant patients compared with nonpregnant patients (PR, 0.33 [95% confidence interval, .30-.36]), even among patients with ≥1 high-risk medical condition (0.29 [.25-.33]). Antiviral medication use was slightly lower among recently pregnant women with ≥1 high-risk medical condition than among nonpregnant women with similar conditions (PR, 0.57; [95% confidence interval, .44-.72]). CONCLUSIONS Despite US clinical guidelines, we observed low rates of outpatient treatment for COVID-19 among pregnant patients, indicating possible missed opportunities to treat COVID-19 illness during pregnancy and lactation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K Regan
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena California, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles California, USA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco California, USA
| | - Stacey L Rowe
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles California, USA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco California, USA
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles California, USA
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew M Coates
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles California, USA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Flor M Muñoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas, USA
| | - Onyebuchi A Arah
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles California, USA
- Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Statistics & Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rowe SL, Sullivan SG, Munoz FM, Coates MM, Arah OA, Regan AK. Uptake of Recommended Vaccines During Pregnancy Among Publicly and Privately Insured People in the United States, December 2020-September 2022. Am J Public Health 2025; 115:354-363. [PMID: 39847749 PMCID: PMC11845822 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2024.307899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2025]
Abstract
Objectives. To estimate maternal COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy by insurance type and identify factors characterizing those vaccinated and unvaccinated. Methods. We conducted a US cohort study of pregnant individuals (for pregnancies ending December 11, 2020-September 30, 2022) using insurance claims data. We calculated vaccination probability using Kaplan-Meier methods and identified factors associated with vaccination through binomial regression with inverse probability weights. Results. Among 695 887 pregnant individuals (median age = 32 years for privately and 27 years for publicly insured), the cumulative probability of COVID-19 vaccination was 43.0% (privately insured) and 11.8% (publicly insured). We observed marked disparities between influenza (33.2% vs 14.2%) and pertussis (70.3% vs 42.8%) vaccination. Only 6.8% (privately insured) and 1.1% (publicly insured) received all 3 vaccines. COVID-19 and influenza vaccination odds were lower among drug and tobacco users. People with high-risk medical conditions, particularly the publicly insured, commonly were vaccinated. Conclusions. Marked vaccine uptake disparities exist between privately and publicly insured pregnant people. Understanding structural barriers, particularly for Medicaid enrollees, is critical to improving maternal vaccine access. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(3):354-363. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307899).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey L Rowe
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| | - Matthew M Coates
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| | - Onyebuchi A Arah
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| | - Annette K Regan
- Stacey L. Rowe is with the School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Sheena G. Sullivan is with the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Flor M. Munoz is with the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Matthew M. Coates and Onyebuchi A. Arah are with the Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annette K. Regan is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim Y, Marić I, Kashiwagi CM, Han L, Chung P, Reiss JD, Butcher LD, Caoili KJ, Berson E, Xue L, Espinosa C, James T, Shome S, Xie F, Ghanem M, Seong D, Chang AL, Reincke SM, Mataraso S, Shu CH, De Francesco D, Becker M, Kumar WM, Wong R, Gaudilliere B, Angst MS, Shaw GM, Bateman BT, Stevenson DK, Prince LS, Aghaeepour N. PregMedNet: Multifaceted Maternal Medication Impacts on Neonatal Complications. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2025.02.13.25322242. [PMID: 39990567 PMCID: PMC11844599 DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.13.25322242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
While medication intake is common among pregnant women, medication safety remains underexplored, leading to unclear guidance for patients and healthcare professionals. PregMedNet addresses this gap by providing a multifaceted maternal medication safety framework based on systematic analysis of 1.19 million mother-baby dyads from U.S. claims databases. A novel confounding adjustment pipeline was applied to systematically control confounders for multiple medication-disease pairs, robustly identifying both known and novel maternal medication effects. Notably, one of the newly discovered associations was experimentally validated, demonstrating the reliability of claims data and machine learning for perinatal medication safety studies. Additionally, potential biological mechanisms of newly identified associations were generated using a graph learning method. These findings highlight PregMedNet's value in promoting safer medication use during pregnancy and maternal-neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeasul Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Ivana Marić
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Chloe M Kashiwagi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lichy Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Philip Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Eloïse Berson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lei Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Camilo Espinosa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tomin James
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Sayane Shome
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Marc Ghanem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - David Seong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alan L Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - S Momsen Reincke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Samson Mataraso
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Chi-Hung Shu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Davide De Francesco
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
| | - Martin Becker
- Institute for Visual and Analytic Computing, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Wasan M Kumar
- Medical Doctor Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Graduate School of Business, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ron Wong
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Brice Gaudilliere
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Martin S Angst
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Gary M Shaw
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
| | - Brian T Bateman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Nima Aghaeepour
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Winterstein AG, Ewig CLY, Wang Y, Smolinski NE, Toyserkani GA, LaCivita C, Lackey L, Eggers S, Zhou EH, Diaby V, Sarayani A, Thai T, Maro JC, Rasmussen SA. Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM): Study Protocol for the Development of a Decision Support Tool to Prioritize Medications for Risk Mitigation. Drug Saf 2025; 48:107-117. [PMID: 39499480 PMCID: PMC11785626 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01488-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preventing prenatal exposure to teratogenic medications is an important goal of regulatory risk mitigation efforts. In the USA, as of March 2024, 11 teratogenic medications have a required Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. It is unclear whether these programs target those medications with the most significant impact on public health and adverse pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVES This study aims to develop an innovative decision support tool that uses explicit, quantifiable criteria to facilitate prioritization of teratogenic medications for risk mitigation strategies. METHODS The Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM) decision support tool will be developed by a national panel via a modified Delphi approach to define measurable criteria, and a multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate criteria weights within a discrete choice experiment. The TRIM scores will then be calculated for 12 teratogenic drugs with active or eliminated REMS programs and for 12 teratogenic drugs without REMS. These drugs will be identified based on highest prenatal exposure prevalence in claims data of privately and publicly insured individuals. Data for the TRIM criteria levels for these 24 drugs will be identified from evidence searches and ad hoc analyses of the same claims data. CONCLUSIONS Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation is intended to inform regulatory decision making about the need for risk mitigation programs for teratogenic medications by providing explicit, quantifiable, evidence-based criteria. The TRIM scores of 24 teratogenic drugs may provide benchmarks for considering REMS for marketed and new teratogenic medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut G Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Celeste L Y Ewig
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yanning Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Nicole E Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gita A Toyserkani
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Cynthia LaCivita
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Leila Lackey
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sara Eggers
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Esther H Zhou
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Vakaramoko Diaby
- Health Economics and Value Evidence Partnership, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development Corporation Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amir Sarayani
- Janssen Research and Development, Johnson & Johnson, Brisbane, CA, USA
| | - Thuy Thai
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judith C Maro
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abernathy A, Rodriguez MI, Swartz JJ. Measuring abortion in claims data: What is the state of the science? Contraception 2025; 142:110750. [PMID: 39551368 PMCID: PMC11725440 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Health care insurance claims are an increasingly common data source for health outcomes research. While researchers have successfully used several claims data sources for many obstetric and gynecologic questions, the use of claims data for abortion and contraception research poses a number of challenges. In this update on the state of the science in identifying abortion in claims data, we review claims data generally, describe commonly used claims data sources, and detail specific reasons why abortion may be underestimated in claims even when employing best practices. We provide examples of successful approaches for identifying abortion in claims and importantly, spell out limitations when making comparisons across site of care, states, and policy contexts. As increased attention is turned to identifying abortion across diverse settings, it is critical best practices are applied so that the most appropriate inferences regarding abortion incidence across contexts over time are drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Abernathy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Maria I Rodriguez
- Center for Reproductive Health Equity, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Jonas J Swartz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States; Duke Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jung YS, Song YJ, Lee HJ, Kim E, Cho SK, Sung YK, Jung SY. Utilisation patterns of immunomodulators and pregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: Insights from Korean national data. Lupus 2025; 34:140-148. [PMID: 39754559 DOI: 10.1177/09612033241310087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the trends in immunomodulator use and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a condition requiring medication to maintain disease activity. METHODS This descriptive study used data from the National Health Information Database in Korea from 2002 to 2018. We included 5,044 pregnancies initiated between 2005 and 2017 in 3,120 SLE patients. Annual trends in SLE therapy, drug utilisation patterns during the preconception and pregnancy periods, and pregnancy outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Pregnancy compatible immunosuppressant (PC-IS) and hydroxychloroquine use during the first trimester were 10.7% and 41.4%, respectively. Most SLE medications exhibited a decline in usage from the preconception period to the first trimester. A prescription rate of 0.9% for pregnancy incompatible immunosuppressants (PIC-IS) was observed during the first trimester, and the incidence of live births, stillbirths, and abortions remained consistent from 2005 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS Insufficient usage of hydroxychloroquine and PC-IS, along with a reduction in PIC-IS usage primarily during early pregnancy rather than before conception, highlights the unmet need for preconceptional family planning with appropriate medication management strategies in SLE pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Seon Jung
- College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeo-Jin Song
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Ji Lee
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunji Kim
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo-Kyung Cho
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jung
- College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lim MY, Sivaloganathan V, Rodgers GM, Simonsen SE. Development and validation of an algorithm to better identify pregnant women with inherited bleeding disorders within electronic health records. Thromb Res 2025; 246:109253. [PMID: 39787817 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Revised: 12/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When using electronic health records (EHRs) to conduct population-based studies on inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs), using diagnosis codes alone results in a high number of false positive identifications. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm that uses multiple data elements of EHRs to identify pregnant women with IBDs. METHODS The population included pregnant women who had at least one live birth or fetal death (>20 weeks gestation) at our institution from 2016 to 2023. We iteratively developed the algorithm using a composite criteria of encounter diagnosis codes, laboratory and medications data. We assessed the performance of the algorithm for sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) using our local registry and manual chart review. RESULTS Using the source population between 2016 and 2020, the initial algorithm identified 25 pregnant women with IBDs. Eight women with a known diagnosis of an IBD were missed resulting in a sensitivity of 75.8 % and a PPV of 100 %. We revised the algorithm to remove certain IBD diagnosis codes that resulted in contamination and added additional criteria to improve the sensitivity. The revised algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.0 % and a PPV of 91.4 %. The revised algorithm was validated using the source population between 2021 and 2023 and had a sensitivity of 97.1 % and a PPV of 91.7 %. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the utility of an algorithm to better identify pregnant women with specific types of IBD, mainly hemophilia and hemophilia carriers, and von Willebrand disease, within EHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Y Lim
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, United States of America.
| | | | - George M Rodgers
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, United States of America
| | - Sara E Simonsen
- University of Utah College of Nursing, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blood AJ, Saag H, Chesler A, Ameripour D, Gutierrez M, Nguyen V, Richardson C, Fields C, Clair J, Yao A, Moodley S. Integrating Ambulatory Care Pharmacists Into Value-Based Primary Care: A Scalable Solution to Chronic Disease. J Prim Care Community Health 2025; 16:21501319241312041. [PMID: 39772862 PMCID: PMC11713977 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241312041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Revised: 12/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Patients living with chronic diseases require more medical attention, including more visits to primary care. However, primary care providers are overburdened, and this specialty is attracting fewer new providers than before. Clinical pharmacists can augment these efforts by improving disease state control. In this cohort study, we aimed to demonstrate a retail pharmacy hired and trained clinical pharmacist within a value-based primary care clinic network can improve hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) control. METHODS In this cohort study, a pharmacist, enabled by a collaborative drug therapy management agreement, prescribed and titrated therapies for HTN and T2DM. Primary outcomes were pre- to post-index changes in hemoglobinA1c, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure (BP) measures. RESULTS The HTN cohort consisted of 43 patients and the T2DM cohort consisted of 125 patients. The difference-in-differences (β) in the HTN group was -10.2 mmHg (P < .01) for systolic BP and -2.0 mmHg (P = .42) for diastolic BP. The β in the T2DM group was -1.16% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Statistically significant reductions in systolic BP and hemoglobinA1c were observed in the pharmacist-managed group compared with matched controls. These results demonstrate that pharmacist integration into a value based primary care clinic may improve measures of chronic disease associated with morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
11
|
Burns S, Mueller A, Smith M, Houle T, Farber MK, Hossain T, Manjourides J. Evaluating an ICD-10 Based Proxy for Date of Birth in Electronic Health Record Data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2025; 34:e70083. [PMID: 39778046 DOI: 10.1002/pds.70083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 12/10/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, many real-world data providers mask a patient's date of birth by supplying only year of birth to data users. The lack of granularity around patient age is a challenge when using RWD, especially for pediatric research studies. In this study, a proxy for patient date of birth is evaluated using electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS This validation study leverages a retrospective cohort of EHR data from Mass General Brigham (MGB) patients born between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, to assess the use of the date of a patient's first observed International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) day-of birth code (Z37* or Z38*) as a proxy for date of birth. Alternative proxy measures such as date of first other infancy-related ICD-10-CM code and date of first clinical activity were also assessed. RESULTS Of 82 398 patients born during the five-year study period, 58 047 (70.4%) had an ICD-10-CM birth code and were included in the primary analysis. The mean difference between true date of birth and first observed birth code was 0.3 days with a standard deviation of 15.0 days. The first observed birth code occurred within 30 days of the true date of birth in 99.9% of cases. CONCLUSION Results from this study suggest that the date of the first day-of ICD-10-CM birth code can be used as a proxy for true patient date of birth in pediatric RWD studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Burns
- Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ariel Mueller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy Houle
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michaela K Farber
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tanzeema Hossain
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Justin Manjourides
- Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rincón-Guevara O, Wallace B, Kompaniyets L, Barrett CE, Bull-Otterson L. Association Between SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes: A Claims-based Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 79:1386-1393. [PMID: 39162200 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); however, evidence is limited by sample sizes and lack of control groups. METHODS To assess the GDM risk after COVID-19 in pregnancy, we constructed a retrospective cohort of pregnancies ending March 2020-October 2022 using medical claims. People with COVID-19 diagnosis claims from conception to 21 gestational weeks (n = 57 675) were matched 1:2 to those without COVID-19 during pregnancy (n = 115 350) by age range, pregnancy start month, and encounter year-month. GDM (claim ≥23 gestational weeks) relative risk and risk difference overall, by race and ethnicity, and variant period were estimated using log-binomial models. RESULTS GDM risk was higher among those with COVID-19 during pregnancy compared to those without (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.15). GDM risk was significantly associated with COVID-19 in non-Hispanic White (aRR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14), non-Hispanic Black (aRR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24), and Hispanic (aRR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24) groups. GDM risk was significantly higher during pre-Delta (aRR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24) compared to Omicron (aRR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13) periods, but neither differed from the Delta period (aRR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17). The adjusted risk difference was 0%-2% for all models. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 during pregnancy was modestly associated with GDM in claims-based data, especially during earlier SARS-CoV-2 variant periods. Because these associations are based on COVID-19 in claims data, studies employing systematic testing are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Rincón-Guevara
- Inform and Disseminate Division, Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Bailey Wallace
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lyudmyla Kompaniyets
- Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Catherine E Barrett
- Office of the Director, Office of Medicine and Science, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lara Bull-Otterson
- Division of Infectious Disease Readiness and Innovation, National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Regan AK, Sullivan SG, Arah OA. Maternal influenza vaccination and associated risk of fetal loss: A claims-based prospective cohort study. Vaccine 2024; 42:126256. [PMID: 39260053 PMCID: PMC11911014 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although numerous studies support the safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, fewer studies have evaluated the risk of miscarriage or considered the effect of prior immunization. METHODS Using national de-identified administrative claims data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, we conducted a claims-based cohort study of 117,626 pregnancies between January 2009 and December 2018. We identified pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 and seasonal influenza vaccinations using CPT codes. Fetal loss was defined as miscarriage, medical termination, or stillbirth as identified by ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. Cox proportional hazard models treating influenza vaccination as a time-varying exposure, weighted for loss-to-follow-up and stratified by baseline probability of vaccination, were used to model the risk of fetal loss by exposure to influenza vaccine. RESULTS About 31.4 % of the cohort had a record of influenza vaccination; 10.0 % were vaccinated before pregnancy only, 17.8 % during pregnancy only, and 3.6 % before and during pregnancy. The risk of miscarriage was 39 % lower among those vaccinated during pregnancy compared to unvaccinated (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.61; 95 % CI 0.50, 0.74) and was similar for medical termination or stillbirth (HR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.45, 1.03 and aHR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.76, 1.30, respectively). Similar results were observed for women who received the vaccine before and during pregnancy. We observed little to no association between vaccination before pregnancy and risk of miscarriage (HR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.76, 1.26), medical termination (HR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.46, 2.24), or stillbirth (HR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.77, 1.69). DISCUSSION Influenza vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of fetal loss. These results support the safety of influenza vaccine administration even when administered before or early during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K Regan
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Onyebuchi A Arah
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Statistics and Data Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Public Health, Research Unit for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thai TN, Brown J, Schmidt S, Maro J, Rasmussen SA, Winterstein AG. Use of Prescription Antiemetics Among US Commercially Insured Pregnant Patients, 2005-2019. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2440414. [PMID: 39436650 PMCID: PMC11581608 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024] Open
Abstract
This cohort study investigates prescription antiemetic treatment patterns considering monotherapy, switching, and combination therapy during the first trimester of pregnancy and evaluates factors associated with ondansetron use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy N. Thai
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Joshua Brown
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Stephan Schmidt
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Judith Maro
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Almut G. Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lyons JG, Shinde MU, Maro JC, Petrone A, Cosgrove A, Kempner ME, Andrade SE, Mwidau J, Stojanovic D, Hernández-Muñoz JJ, Toh S. Use of the Sentinel System to Examine Medical Product Use and Outcomes During Pregnancy. Drug Saf 2024; 47:931-940. [PMID: 38940904 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
While many pregnant individuals use prescription medications, evidence supporting product safety during pregnancy is often inadequate. Existing electronic healthcare data sources provide large, diverse samples of health plan members to allow for the study of medical product utilization during pregnancy, as well as pregnancy, maternal, and infant outcomes. The Sentinel System is a national medical product surveillance system that includes administrative claims and electronic health record databases from large national and regional health insurers. In addition to these data sources, Sentinel develops and maintains a sizeable selection of analytic tools to facilitate epidemiologic analyses in a way that protects patient privacy and health system autonomy. In this article, we provide an overview of Sentinel System infrastructure, including the Mother-Infant Linkage Table, parameterizable analytic tools, and algorithms to estimate gestational age and identify pregnancy outcomes. We also describe past and future Sentinel work that contributes to our understanding of the way medical products are used and the safety of these products during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer G Lyons
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Mayura U Shinde
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Judith C Maro
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Andrew Petrone
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Austin Cosgrove
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Maria E Kempner
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Susan E Andrade
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jamila Mwidau
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Danijela Stojanovic
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - José J Hernández-Muñoz
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sengwee Toh
- Division of Therapeutics Research and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu C, Jiao Y, Su L, Liu W, Zhang H, Nie S, Gong M. Effective Privacy Protection Strategies for Pregnancy and Gestation Information From Electronic Medical Records: Retrospective Study in a National Health Care Data Network in China. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e46455. [PMID: 39163593 PMCID: PMC11372317 DOI: 10.2196/46455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy and gestation information is routinely recorded in electronic medical record (EMR) systems across China in various data sets. The combination of data on the number of pregnancies and gestations can imply occurrences of abortions and other pregnancy-related issues, which is important for clinical decision-making and personal privacy protection. However, the distribution of this information inside EMR is variable due to inconsistent IT structures across different EMR systems. A large-scale quantitative evaluation of the potential exposure of this sensitive information has not been previously performed, ensuring the protection of personal information is a priority, as emphasized in Chinese laws and regulations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to perform the first nationwide quantitative analysis of the identification sites and exposure frequency of sensitive pregnancy and gestation information. The goal is to propose strategies for effective information extraction and privacy protection related to women's health. METHODS This study was conducted in a national health care data network. Rule-based protocols for extracting pregnancy and gestation information were developed by a committee of experts. A total of 6 different sub-data sets of EMRs were used as schemas for data analysis and strategy proposal. The identification sites and frequencies of identification in different sub-data sets were calculated. Manual quality inspections of the extraction process were performed by 2 independent groups of reviewers on 1000 randomly selected records. Based on these statistics, strategies for effective information extraction and privacy protection were proposed. RESULTS The data network covered hospitalized patients from 19 hospitals in 10 provinces of China, encompassing 15,245,055 patients over an 11-year period (January 1, 2010-December 12, 2020). Among women aged 14-50 years, 70% were randomly selected from each hospital, resulting in a total of 1,110,053 patients. Of these, 688,268 female patients with sensitive reproductive information were identified. The frequencies of identification were variable, with the marriage history in admission medical records being the most frequent at 63.24%. Notably, more than 50% of female patients were identified with pregnancy and gestation history in nursing records, which is not generally considered a sub-data set rich in reproductive information. During the manual curation and review process, 1000 cases were randomly selected, and the precision and recall rates of the information extraction method both exceeded 99.5%. The privacy-protection strategies were designed with clear technical directions. CONCLUSIONS Significant amounts of critical information related to women's health are recorded in Chinese routine EMR systems and are distributed in various parts of the records with different frequencies. This requires a comprehensive protocol for extracting and protecting the information, which has been demonstrated to be technically feasible. Implementing a data-based strategy will enhance the protection of women's privacy and improve the accessibility of health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Liu
- Digital Health China Technologies Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanshi Jiao
- Digital Health China Technologies Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Licong Su
- Department of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenna Liu
- Digital Health China Technologies Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Haiping Zhang
- Digital Health China Technologies Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Sheng Nie
- Department of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengchun Gong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chiu YH, Huybrechts KF, Zhu Y, Straub L, Bateman BT, Logan R, Hernández-Díaz S. Internal validation of gestational age estimation algorithms in health-care databases using pregnancies conceived through fertility procedures. Am J Epidemiol 2024; 193:1168-1175. [PMID: 38583933 PMCID: PMC11299027 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Fertility procedures recorded in health-care databases can be used to estimate the start of pregnancy, which can serve as a reference standard to validate gestational age estimates based on International Classification of Diseases codes. In a cohort of 17 398 US MarketScan pregnancies (2011-2020) in which conception was achieved via fertility procedures, we estimated gestational age at the end of pregnancy using algorithms based on (1) time (days) since the fertility procedure (the reference standard); (2) International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)/International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) (before/after October 2015) codes indicating gestational length recorded at the end of pregnancy (method A); and (3) ICD-10 end-of-pregnancy codes enhanced with Z3A codes denoting specific gestation weeks recorded at prenatal visits (method B). We calculated the proportion of pregnancies with an estimated gestational age falling within 14 days ($\pm$14 days) of the reference standard. Method A accuracy was similar for ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. After 2015, method B was more accurate than method A: For term births, within-14-day agreement was 90.8% for method A and 98.7% for method B. Corresponding estimates were 70.1% and 95.6% for preterm births; 35.3% and 92.6% for stillbirths; 54.3% and 64.2% for spontaneous abortions; and 16.7% and 84.6% for elective terminations. ICD-10-based algorithms that incorporate Z3A codes improve the accuracy of gestational age estimation in health-care databases, especially for preterm births and non-live births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Han Chiu
- CAUSALab and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Krista F Huybrechts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, United States
| | - Yanmin Zhu
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, United States
| | - Loreen Straub
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, United States
| | - Brian T Bateman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Roger Logan
- CAUSALab and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Sonia Hernández-Díaz
- CAUSALab and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bove R, Applebee A, Bawden K, Fine C, Shah A, Avila RL, Belviso N, Branco F, Fong K, Lewin JB, Liu J, England SM, Vignos M. Patterns of disease-modifying therapy utilization before, during, and after pregnancy and postpartum relapses in women with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 88:105738. [PMID: 38959591 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy is a common consideration for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS); MS onset is typically between 20 and 45 years of age, during potential child-bearing years. Pregnancy and postpartum care are a significant factor influencing disease-modifying therapy (DMT) selection for many pwMS. To date, few DMTs are considered safe to continue during pregnancy and real-world treatment patterns before, during, and after pregnancy remain uncharacterized. Evolving guidance is needed regarding how to optimize management of the pregnancy and postpartum periods considering the changing DMT landscape. This analysis in two large claims databases describes DMT utilization for the treatment of MS before, during, and after pregnancy and relapse patterns during pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS In this retrospective, observational study, the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid claims database was assessed for female patients aged 18-55 years with ≥1 insurance claim submitted under the diagnosis code of MS from 01 January 2016-30 April 2021 and continuous enrollment eligibility from ≥6 months prior to pregnancy date (preconception) through 6 months of follow-up following delivery (postpartum period). Comorbid conditions were examined preconception and postpartum, including anxiety and depression. Moderate/severe relapse was defined as MS-related hospitalization, or an outpatient visit and one claim within 7 days of the visit with steroids or total plasma exchange. RESULTS A total of 944 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 32.4 [5.0] years) were eligible; 688 (73%) were commercially insured and 256 (27%) received Medicaid. Compared with commercially-insured patients, use of DMTs was lower among Medicaid patients at 6 months preconception (25.4% vs 40.4%; p < 0.001), with similar patterns observed both during pregnancy and postpartum. Overall, prevalence of DMT use declined sharply during pregnancy, from 36.3% of patients in the 6 months preconception to 17.9%, 5.3%, and 5.8% in trimesters 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Postpartum DMT utilization increased to 20.9% at 0-3 months and 24.4% at 4-6 months. Of all patients in the preconception period, the most frequently used DMTs were glatiramer acetate (14.3%), dimethyl fumarate (6.0%), interferon (5.2%), and natalizumab (4.9%). Due to small sample size, information was limited for anti-CD20s and alemtuzumab. The proportion of patients with any moderate/severe relapse declined over pregnancy (preconception, n = 82 [8.7%]; pregnancy, n = 25 [2.6%]), but increased postpartum (n = 94 [10.0%]). Of the 889 patients who stopped DMT during pregnancy, the risk of postpartum relapses was lower in the patients who resumed DMT postpartum (10/192) than in patients who did not (76/697) (5.2% vs 10.9%; odds ratio, 0.455 [95% confidence interval 0.216-0.860], p = 0.018). Cases of postpartum depression and anxiety were significantly lower in commercially-insured patients vs Medicaid patients (postpartum depression, 13.7% vs 27.0%, p < 0.01; postpartum anxiety, 16.3% vs 30.5%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION DMT utilization declined sharply during pregnancy; it gradually increased postpartum but remained below pre-pregnancy use. The proportion of pwMS experiencing a moderate/severe relapse and number of relapses declined over pregnancy but increased postpartum. Reinitiation of DMT during the postpartum period was associated with lower risk of relapses, supporting a role for early reinitiation of DMT postpartum. STUDY SUPPORTED BY Biogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley Bove
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Angela Applebee
- Department of Neurology, St. Peter's Multiple Sclerosis and Headache Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Katrina Bawden
- Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Clinic and Research Group, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Anna Shah
- Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang Y, Smolinski NE, Ewig C, Thai TN, Wen TS, Winterstein AG. Antihypertensive utilization patterns among pregnant persons with pre-existing hypertension in the US: A population-based study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0306547. [PMID: 38959230 PMCID: PMC11221741 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension among persons with childbearing potential is on the rise. Maintaining proper blood pressure during pregnancy is vital to prevent maternal and neonatal complications. Yet, limited evidence on the risk-benefit of various antihypertensives presents challenges for informed decision-making during this critical period. This study aimed to examine the utilization patterns of different classes of antihypertensives among persons with pre-existing hypertension before, during, and after pregnancy. METHODS We used MarketScan® Commercial Database 2011-2020 to analyze antihypertensive utilization among pregnant persons aged 12 to 55 identified via a validated algorithm. Pre-existing hypertension was defined as ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient encounters for hypertension within the 180 days preceding the LMP. Antihypertensive utilization was described during target periods: 0-3 months (0-3M) before pregnancy, 1st/2nd/3rd trimester (T1/2/3), 0-3M, and 4-6M after pregnancy. RESULTS We identified 1,950,292 pregnancies, of which 20,576 (12,978 live and 7,598 non-live) had pre-existing hypertension. Both groups had similar antihypertensive use (80.1% and 81.0%, respectively) during the 6 months before pregnancy (baseline). For live-birth pregnancies, 13.9% of baseline users discontinued treatment during pregnancy, while 28.9% of non-users initiated antihypertensives during pregnancy, and 17.2% started postpartum. Before pregnancy, the predominant antihypertensives included thiazide diuretics (21.9%), combined α- and β-blockers (18.4%), and dihydropyridines (16.2%). During pregnancy, thiazide diuretics, cardioselective β-blockers, and ACE inhibitors declined (T3: 3.0%, 4.2%, and 0.8%). Dihydropyridine use was steady during pregnancy, but preference shifted from amlodipine to nifedipine in T3 (2.2.% vs.10.8%). Central α2-agonists increased during pregnancy (up to 15.2% in T3) compared to both pre- (9.8%) and post-pregnancy (5.7%). ARBs mirrored ACE inhibitors, with less than 1% utilization in later trimesters. Combination agents dropped from 10.8% pre-pregnancy to 0.8% in T3, then rebounded to 7.3% post-pregnancy. CONCLUSION Research is warranted to evaluate the choice of antihypertensives and optimal timing to switch to safer alternatives, considering maternal and fetal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanning Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Nicole E. Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Celeste Ewig
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Thuy Nhu Thai
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Tony S. Wen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Almut G. Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lewis KN, Zhang D, Corrales G, Eswaran H, Hayes CJ, Gressler LE. Telehealth Utilization for Opioid Use Disorder: A Nationwide Analysis Before and After the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Declaration. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:e1980-e1989. [PMID: 38621153 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid and widespread adoption of telehealth services. Telehealth may aid in bridging gaps in access to care. The specific impact of telehealth on opioid use disorder (OUD) and its treatment remains uncertain. Methods: A retrospective review of commercial insurance claim records within the United States was conducted to investigate the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the rates of(a) OUD treatments with and without telehealth support and (b) prescriptions for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with and without telehealth support among individuals diagnosed with OUD. Results: In a study population of 1,340,506 individuals, OUD diagnosis rates were 5 per 1,000 in-person and 1 per 1,000 via telehealth. COVID-19 decreased in-person OUD diagnoses by 0.89 per 1,000, while telehealth diagnoses increased by 0.83 per 1,000. In-person MOUD treatment rates increased by 0.07 per 1,000 during COVID-19, while telehealth rates remained low. The onset of COVID-19 saw a 1.13 per 1,000 higher increase in telehealth-supported MOUD treatment compared to solely in-person treatment. Conclusions: A retrospective review of commercial insurance claim records within the United States was conducted to investigate the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the rates of (a) OUD treatments with and without telehealth support and (b) prescriptions for MOUD with and without telehealth support among individuals diagnosed with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanna N Lewis
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
- Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - German Corrales
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Hari Eswaran
- Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Corey J Hayes
- Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
- Center for Mental Health care and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Health care System, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Laura E Gressler
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Khosla K, Jin Y, Espinoza J, Kent M, Gencay M, Kunz LH, Mueller A, Xiao Y, Frank Peacock W, Neath SX, Stuart JJ, Woelkers D, Harris JM, Rana S. Signs or symptoms of suspected preeclampsia - A retrospective national database study of prevalence, costs, and outcomes. Pregnancy Hypertens 2024; 36:101124. [PMID: 38608393 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with signs or symptoms (s/s) of suspected preeclampsia are not diagnosed with preeclampsia. We sought to determine and compare the prevalence of s/s, pregnancy outcomes, and costs between patients with and without diagnosed preeclampsia. METHODS This retrospective cohort study analyzed a large insurance research database. Pregnancies with s/s of preeclampsia versus a confirmed preeclampsia diagnosis were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. S/s include hypertension, proteinuria, headache, visual symptoms, edema, abdominal pain, and nausea/vomiting. Pregnancies were classed as 1) s/s of preeclampsia without a confirmed preeclampsia diagnosis (suspicion only), 2) s/s with a confirmed diagnosis (preeclampsia with suspicion), 3) diagnosed preeclampsia without s/s recorded (preeclampsia only), and 4) no s/s, nor preeclampsia diagnosis (control). RESULTS Of 1,324,424 pregnancies, 29.2 % had ≥1 documented s/s of suspected preeclampsia, and 14.2 % received a preeclampsia diagnosis. Hypertension and headache were the most common s/s, leading 20.2 % and 9.2 % pregnancies developed to preeclampsia diagnosis, respectively. Preeclampsia, with or without suspicion, had the highest rates of hypertension-related severe maternal morbidity (HR [95 % CI]: 3.0 [2.7, 3.2] and 3.6 [3.3, 4.0], respectively) versus controls. A similar trend was seen in neonatal outcomes such as preterm delivery and low birth weight. Cases in which preeclampsia was suspected but not confirmed had the highest average total maternal care costs ($6096 [95 % CI: 602, 6170] over control). CONCLUSION There is a high prevalence but poor selectivity of traditional s/s of preeclampsia, highlighting a clinical need for improved screening method and cost-effectiveness disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavia Khosla
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yue Jin
- Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jimmy Espinoza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Fetal Intervention, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, and UT Physicians, The Fetal Center, Affiliated with Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Kent
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Genesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA
| | | | - Liza H Kunz
- Roche Diagnostics Systems, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Ariel Mueller
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yan Xiao
- Roche Diagnostics Systems, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - W Frank Peacock
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean-Xavier Neath
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer J Stuart
- Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas Woelkers
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Sarosh Rana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Smolinski NE, Sarayani A, Thai TN, Jugl S, Ewig CLY, Winterstein AG. Prenatal Exposure to Valproic Acid Across Various Indications for Use. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2412680. [PMID: 38776082 PMCID: PMC11112441 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Teratogenic outcomes associated with valproic acid use represent a substantial concern for persons of childbearing age. Regulatory agencies worldwide have enhanced warnings or implemented risk minimization programs to reduce exposure during pregnancy. Objectives To determine pregnancy rates during valproic acid use and concomitant contraception use across indications. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the Merative MarketScan commercial claims databases from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2020, to identify female patients aged 12 to 44 years who initiated valproic acid treatment and had continuous insurance enrollment 6 months before initiation and 9 months after treatment end. A treatment episode included consecutive prescription fills that occurred within 7 days from the end of the days' supply of the previous dispensing. Data were analyzed from March 1 to September 10, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Treatment episodes were categorized by inferred indication using diagnoses preceding treatment initiation, including epilepsy, migraine or headache, mood disorders, and unknown or off-label uses. Pregnancy incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated and were adjusted for age and calendar year. Contraceptive use (prescription contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and implants) during treatment was examined. Results The cohort included 165 772 valproic acid treatment episodes among 69 390 women (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [10.0] years). Mood disorders (42.5%) were the most common indication, followed by migraine or headache (20.1%), with epilepsy playing a minor role (14.9%). Pregnancy incidence rates during valproic acid use remained unchanged, with a rate of 1.74 (95% CI, 1.14-2.53) per 100 person-years in 2005 and a rate of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.16-3.12) per 100 person-years in 2019. Compared with epilepsy, pregnancy rates were more than double for mood disorder (IRR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.93-2.42]) and migraine or headache (IRR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.92-2.09]). Few treatment episodes coincided with contraceptive use (37 012 [22.3%]), and oral dosage forms were the most common (27 069 [73.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients of childbearing age who used valproic acid, pregnancy rates during valproic acid use did not decrease despite enhanced US Food and Drug Administration safety communications, and contraception use remained low. Patients with migraine and mood disorders accounted for the largest proportion of valproic acid use and had the highest pregnancy rates, while patients with epilepsy had the lowest. These findings suggest a need to enhance efforts to mitigate prenatal exposure to valproic acid, especially for indications where the risk of use during pregnancy outweighs the benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E. Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Amir Sarayani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Now with Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey
| | - Thuy N. Thai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Faculty of Pharmacy, HUTECH University (Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Sebastian Jugl
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Celeste L. Y. Ewig
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Almut G. Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Agarwal A, Duan R, Sobhani NC, Sabanayagam A, Marcus GM, Gurvitz M. Health Service Use and Costs During Pregnancy Among Privately Insured Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2410763. [PMID: 38739390 PMCID: PMC11091763 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) are increasingly reaching childbearing age, are more prone to adverse pregnancy events, and uncommonly undergo recommended cardiac evaluations. Data to better understand resource allocation and financial planning are lacking. Objective To examine health care use and costs for patients with CHD during pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was performed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, using Merative MarketScan commercial insurance data. Participants included patients with CHD and those without CHD matched 1:1 by age, sex, and insurance enrollment year. Pregnancy claims were identified for all participants. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to March 2024. Exposures Baseline characteristics (age, US region, delivery year, insurance type) and pregnancy-related events (obstetric, cardiac, and noncardiac conditions; birth outcomes; and cesarean delivery). Main Outcomes and Measures Health service use (outpatient physician, nonphysician, emergency department, prescription drugs, and admissions) and costs (total and out-of-pocket costs adjusted for inflation to represent 2024 US dollars). Results A total of 11 703 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 31.5 [5.4] years) were studied, with 2267 pregnancies in 1785 patients with CHD (492 pregnancies in patients with severe CHD and 1775 in patients with nonsevere CHD) and 9436 pregnancies in 7720 patients without CHD. Compared with patients without CHD, pregnancies in patients with CHD were associated with significantly higher health care use (standardized mean difference [SMD] range, 0.16-1.46) and cost (SMD range, 0.14-0.55) except for out-of-pocket inpatient and ED costs. After adjustment for covariates, having CHD was independently associated with higher total (adjusted cost ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.57-1.84) and out-of-pocket (adjusted cost ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.22-1.58) costs. The adjusted mean total costs per pregnancy were $15 971 (95% CI, $15 480-$16 461) for patients without CHD, $24 290 (95% CI, $22 773-$25 806) for patients with any CHD, $26 308 (95% CI, $22 788-$29 828) for patients with severe CHD, and $23 750 (95% CI, $22 110-$25 390) for patients with nonsevere CHD. Patients with vs without CHD incurred $8319 and $700 higher total and out-of-pocket costs per pregnancy, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides novel, clinically relevant estimates for the cardio-obstetric team, patients with CHD, payers, and policymakers regarding health care and financial planning. These estimates can be used to carefully plan for and advocate for the comprehensive resources needed to care for patients with CHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anushree Agarwal
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Rong Duan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nasim C. Sobhani
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Aarthi Sabanayagam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Gregory M. Marcus
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Michelle Gurvitz
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Adult Congenital Heart Service, Boston Children’s Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Winterstein AG, Wang Y, Smolinski NE, Thai TN, Ewig C, Rasmussen SA. Prenatal Care Initiation and Exposure to Teratogenic Medications. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2354298. [PMID: 38300617 PMCID: PMC10835507 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance With new legal abortion restrictions, timing of prenatal care initiation is critical to allow for discussion of reproductive options among pregnancies exposed to teratogenic medications. Objective To investigate the prevalence of prenatal exposure to teratogenic medications and prenatal care initiation across gestational weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants This descriptive, population-based cross-sectional study used health encounter data from a national sample of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance. A validated algorithm identified pregnancies among persons identifying as female that ended with a live or nonlive outcome between January 2017 and December 2019. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023. Exposures Prenatal exposure to any of 137 teratogenic medications, measured via pharmacy and medical claims. Measurement of prenatal care initiation was adapted from the Children's Health Care Quality Measures. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of prenatal exposure to teratogens and prenatal care initiation by gestational week. Timing of prenatal teratogenic exposure was compared with timing of prenatal care initiation and legal abortion cutoffs. Results Among 639 994 pregnancies, 472 472 (73.8%; 95% CI, 73.7%-73.9%) had a live delivery (mean [SD] age, 30.9 [5.4] years) and 167 522 (26.2%; 95% CI, 26.1%-26.3%) had a nonlive outcome (mean [SD] age, 31.6 [6.4] years). Of pregnancies with live deliveries, 5.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-5.8%) were exposed to teratogenic medications compared with 3.1% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.2%) with nonlive outcomes. Median time to prenatal care was 56 days (IQR, 44-70 days). By 6 weeks' gestation, 8186 pregnancies had been exposed to teratogenic medications (25.2% [95% CI, 24.7%-25.7%] of pregnancies exposed at any time during gestation; 1.3% [95% CI, 1.3%-1.3%] of all pregnancies); in 6877 (84.0%; 95% CI, 83.2%-84.8%), prenatal care was initiated after 6 weeks or not at all. By 15 weeks, teratogenic exposures had occurred for 48.9% (95% CI, 48.4%-49.5%) of all teratogen-exposed pregnancies (2.5% [2.4-2.5] of all pregnancies); prenatal care initiation occurred after 15 weeks for 1810 (16.8%; 95% CI, 16.1%-17.5%) with live deliveries and 2975 (58.3%; 95% CI, 56.9%-59.6%) with nonlive outcomes. Teratogenic medications most used within the first 15 gestational weeks among live deliveries included antiinfectives (eg, fluconazole), anticonvulsants (eg, valproate), antihypertensives (eg, lisinopril), and immunomodulators (eg, mycophenolate). For nonlive deliveries, most antihypertensives were replaced by vitamin A derivatives. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, most exposures to teratogenic medications occurred in early pregnancy and before prenatal care initiation, precluding prenatal risk-benefit assessments. Prenatal care commonly occurred after strict legal abortion cutoffs, prohibiting consideration of pregnancy termination if concerns about teratogenic effects arose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut G. Winterstein
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Yanning Wang
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Nicole E. Smolinski
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Thuy N. Thai
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Faculty of Pharmacy, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Celeste Ewig
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Herndon JB, Ojha D, Amundson C. Measuring quality of dental care during pregnancy. J Am Dent Assoc 2024; 155:167-176. [PMID: 38180426 DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors aimed to develop and validate 2 Dental Quality Alliance measures of dental care access during pregnancy (Utilization of Services During Pregnancy, Oral Evaluation During Pregnancy) using claims and enrollment data and to report performance on these measures for a sample of Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program beneficiaries. METHODS The authors used Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System enrollment and claims data for 7,767,806 people enrolled in 5 state Medicaid programs and Children's Health Insurance Programs during 2018. The authors used split-half reliability testing to assess measure reliability. The authors calculated 95% CIs to assess statistically significant variation in performance between programs. RESULTS The intraclass correlation coefficient used to assess agreement between the split samples was 0.992 (95% CI, 0.941 to 0.999; P < .0001) for Utilization of Services During Pregnancy and 0.983 (95% CI, 0.879 to 0.998; P < .0001) for Oral Evaluation During Pregnancy. Performance scores ranged from 20% through 34% of beneficiaries receiving any dental service during pregnancy (Utilization of Services During Pregnancy) and from 14% through 23% of beneficiaries receiving a periodic or comprehensive oral evaluation during pregnancy (Oral Evaluation During Pregnancy), with statistically significant differences between programs. CONCLUSIONS The measures reliably assessed access to dental services and can distinguish performance between programs. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS These measures can be used to advance population health by means of supporting national efforts to improve access to dental care during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Maharjan S, Goswami S, Rong Y, Kirby T, Smith D, Brett CX, Pittman EL, Bhattacharya K. Risk Factors for Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Women Enrolled in Mississippi Medicaid. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2350750. [PMID: 38190184 PMCID: PMC10774990 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Mississippi has one of the highest rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in the US, and SMMs have been reported to be more frequent among Medicaid-insured women. A substantial proportion of pregnant women in Mississippi are covered by Medicaid; hence, there is a need to identify potential risk factors for SMM in this population. Objective To examine the associations of health care access and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics with SMM events among Mississippi Medicaid-enrolled women who had a live birth. Design, Setting, and Participants A nested case-control study was conducted using 2018 to 2021 Mississippi Medicaid administrative claims database. The study included Medicaid beneficiaries aged 12 to 55 years who had a live birth and were continuously enrolled throughout their pregnancy period and 12 months after delivery. Individuals in the case group had SMM events and were matched to controls on their delivery date using incidence density sampling. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2022. Exposure Risk factors examined in the study included sociodemographic factors (age and race), health care access (distance from delivery center, social vulnerability index, and level of maternity care), and clinical factors (maternal comorbidity index, first-trimester pregnancy-related visits, and postpartum care). Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome of the study was an SMM event. Adjusted odds ratio (aORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Results Among 13 485 Mississippi Medicaid-enrolled women (mean [SD] age, 25.0 [5.6] years; 8601 [63.8%] Black; 4419 [32.8%] White; 465 [3.4%] other race [American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, multiracial, and unknown]) who had a live birth, 410 (3.0%) were in the case group (mean [SD] age, 26.8 [6.4] years; 289 [70.5%] Black; 112 [27.3%] White; 9 [2.2%] other race) and 820 were in the matched control group (mean [SD] age, 24.9 [5.7] years; 518 [63.2%] Black; 282 [34.4%] White; 20 [2.4%] other race). Black individuals (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.93) and those with higher maternal comorbidity index (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40) had higher odds of experiencing SMM compared with White individuals and those with lower maternal comorbidity index, respectively. Likewise, an increase of 100 miles (160 km) in distance between beneficiaries' residence to the delivery center was associated with higher odds of experiencing SMM (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20). Conclusions and Relevance The study findings hold substantial implications for identifying high-risk individuals within Medicaid programs and call for the development of targeted multicomponent, multilevel interventions for improving maternal health outcomes in this highly vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shishir Maharjan
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
| | - Swarnali Goswami
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Now with Complete Health Economics and Outcomes Solutions, LLC, Chalfont, Pennsylvania
| | - Yiran Rong
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Now with MedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Eric L. Pittman
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
| | - Kaustuv Bhattacharya
- Department of Pharmacy Administration, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
- Center for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang Y, Smolinski NE, Thai TN, Sarayani A, Ewig C, Rasmussen SA, Winterstein AG. Common teratogenic medication exposures-a population-based study of pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6:101245. [PMID: 38061552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk mitigation for most teratogenic medications relies on risk communication via drug label, and prenatal exposures remain common. Information on the types of and risk factors for prenatal exposures to medications with teratogenic risk can guide strategies to reduce exposure. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify medications with known or potential teratogenic risk commonly used during pregnancy among privately insured persons. STUDY DESIGN We used the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database to identify pregnancies with live or nonlive (ectopic pregnancies, spontaneous and elective abortions, stillbirths) outcomes among persons aged 12 to 55 years from 2011 to 2018. Start/end dates of medication exposure and pregnancy outcomes were identified via an adapted algorithm based on validation studies. We required continuous health plan enrollment from 90 days before conception until 30 days after the pregnancy end date. Medications with known or potential teratogenic risk were selected from TERIS (Teratogen Information System) and drug monographs based on the level of risk and quality of evidence (138 with known and 60 with potential risk). We defined prenatal exposure on the basis of ≥1 outpatient pharmacy claim or medical encounter for medication administration during target pregnancy periods considering medication risk profiles (eg, risk only in the first trimester or at a certain dose threshold). Sex hormones and hormone analogs, and abortion and postpartum/abortion hemorrhage treatments were not considered as teratogenic medications because of challenges in separating pregnancy-related indications, nor were opioids (because of complex risk-benefit considerations) or antiobesity medications if their only teratogenic mechanism was weight loss. RESULTS Among all pregnancies, the 10 medications with known teratogenic risk and the highest prenatal exposures were sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1988 per 100,000 pregnancy-years), high-dose fluconazole (1248), topiramate (351), lisinopril (144), warfarin (57), losartan (56), carbamazepine (50), valproate (49), vedolizumab (28 since 2015), and valsartan (25). Prevalence of exposure to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim decreased from 2346 to 1453 per 100,000 pregnancy-years from 2011 to 2018, but prevalence of exposure to vedolizumab increased 6-fold since its approval in 2015. Prenatal exposures in the first trimester were higher among nonlive pregnancies than among live-birth pregnancies, with the largest difference observed for warfarin (nonlive 370 vs live birth 78), followed by valproate (258 vs 86) and topiramate (1728 vs 674). Prenatal exposures to medications with potential teratogenic risk were most prevalent for low-dose fluconazole (6495), metoprolol (1325), and atenolol (448). The largest first-trimester exposure differences between nonlive and live-birth pregnancies were observed for lithium (242 vs 89), gabapentin (1639 vs 653), and duloxetine (1914 vs 860). Steady increases in hydralazine and gabapentin exposures were observed during the study years, whereas atenolol exposure decreased (561 to 280). CONCLUSION Several medications with teratogenic risk for which there are potentially safer alternatives continue to be used during pregnancy. The fluctuating rates of prenatal exposure observed for select teratogenic medications suggest that regular reevaluation of risk mitigation strategies is needed. Future research focusing on understanding the clinical context of medication use is necessary to develop effective strategies for reducing exposures to medications with teratogenic risk during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanning Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein); Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang)
| | - Nicole E Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein)
| | - Thuy Nhu Thai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein); Faculty of Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (Dr Thai)
| | - Amir Sarayani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein)
| | - Celeste Ewig
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein)
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Rasmussen)
| | - Almut G Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Ms Wang and Drs Smolinski, Thai, Sarayani, Ewig, and Winterstein); Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Dr Winterstein); Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (Dr Winterstein).
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jung YS, Song YJ, Keum J, Lee JW, Jang EJ, Cho SK, Sung YK, Jung SY. Identifying pregnancy episodes and estimating the last menstrual period using an administrative database in Korea: an application to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Epidemiol Health 2023; 46:e2024012. [PMID: 38476014 PMCID: PMC11040213 DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2024012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study developed an algorithm for identifying pregnancy episodes and estimating the last menstrual period (LMP) in an administrative claims database and applied it to investigate the use of pregnancy-incompatible immunosuppressants among pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS An algorithm was developed and applied to a nationwide claims database in Korea. Pregnancy episodes were identified using a hierarchy of pregnancy outcomes and clinically plausible periods for subsequent episodes. The LMP was estimated using preterm delivery, sonography, and abortion procedure codes. Otherwise, outcome-specific estimates were applied, assigning a fixed gestational age to the corresponding pregnancy outcome. The algorithm was used to examine the prevalence of pregnancies and utilization of pregnancy-incompatible immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide [CYC]/mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]/methotrexate [MTX]) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during pregnancy in SLE patients. RESULTS The pregnancy outcomes identified in SLE patients included live births (67%), stillbirths (2%), and abortions (31%). The LMP was mostly estimated with outcome-specific estimates for full-term births (92.3%) and using sonography procedure codes (54.7%) and preterm delivery diagnosis codes (37.9%) for preterm births. The use of CYC/MMF/MTX decreased from 7.6% during preconception to 0.2% at the end of pregnancy. CYC/MMF/MTX use was observed in 3.6% of women within 3 months preconception and 2.5% during 0-7 weeks of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the first pregnancy algorithm using a Korean administrative claims database. Although further validation is necessary, this study provides a foundation for evaluating the safety of medications during pregnancy using secondary databases in Korea, especially for rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Seon Jung
- Chung-Ang University College of Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeo-Jin Song
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihyun Keum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Won Lee
- Chung-Ang University College of Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jin Jang
- Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University, Andong, Korea
| | - Soo-Kyung Cho
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jung
- Chung-Ang University College of Pharmacy, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Law AW, Judy J, Atwell JE, Willis S, Shea KM. Maternal Tdap and influenza vaccination uptake 2017-2021 in the United States: Implications for maternal RSV vaccine uptake in the future. Vaccine 2023; 41:7632-7640. [PMID: 37993354 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of maternal vaccine coverage is important for understanding and quantifying the impact of currently recommended vaccines as well as modeling the potential impact of future vaccines. However, existing data lack detail regarding uptake according to week of gestational age (wGA). Such granularity is valuable for more accurate estimation of vaccine impact. OBJECTIVE To summarize contemporary maternal Tdap vaccination uptake, overall, yearly, and by wGA, and maternal influenza vaccination uptake, overall, by influenza observation year, immunization month, and delivery month, in the US. METHODS Female patients 18-49 years of age with a pregnancy resulting in a live born infant (i.e., delivery) between 2017 and 2021 were selected from the Optum electronic health records (EHRs) database. Recently published gestational age algorithms were utilized to estimate wGA. RESULTS Of 1,021,260 deliveries among 886,660 women between 2017-2021, 55.1% had Tdap vaccination during pregnancy; vaccine coverage varied slightly by year (2017: 56.6%; 2018: 55.2%; 2019: 55.2%; 2020: 54.7%; 2021: 52.1%). Most (64.4%) maternal Tdap vaccinations occurred 27-32 wGA; 79.5% occurred during the entire 10-week recommended vaccination window (27-36 wGA). In the evaluation of influenza vaccination uptake (n=798,113 deliveries; 714,841 women), 33.5% of deliveries had influenza vaccination during influenza observation years 2017-2021, most (73.0%) of which occurred during influenza peak activity months (October-January) with approximately one-quarter (27.0%) of vaccinations having occurred during the off-peak months, mostly in September. CONCLUSIONS In this large contemporary analysis of EHR data, uptake of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy was consistent with previously published estimates; notably, most vaccination occurred early in the recommended 27-36 wGA window. Maternal influenza vaccination uptake largely correlated with peak influenza activity months and not gestational age. These study findings may have important implications for estimating the potential uptake and impact of future maternal vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy W Law
- Pfizer, Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, United States.
| | - Jennifer Judy
- Pfizer, Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, United States
| | - Jessica E Atwell
- Pfizer, Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, United States
| | - Sarah Willis
- Pfizer, Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, United States
| | - Kimberly M Shea
- Pfizer, Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ryckman KK, Holdefer PJ, Sileo E, Carlson C, Weathers N, Jasper EA, Cho H, Oltman SP, Dagle JM, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Rogers EE. The validity of hospital diagnostic and procedure codes reflecting morbidity in preterm neonates born <32 weeks gestation. J Perinatol 2023; 43:1374-1378. [PMID: 37138163 PMCID: PMC10860645 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01685-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the validity of diagnostic hospital billing codes for complications of prematurity in neonates <32 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort data from discharge summaries and clinical notes (n = 160) were reviewed by trained, blinded abstractors for the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grades 3 or 4, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), stage 3 or higher, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and surgery for NEC or ROP. Data were compared to diagnostic billing codes from the neonatal electronic health record. RESULTS IVH, PVL, ROP and ROP surgery had strong positive predictive values (PPV > 75%) and excellent negative predictive values (NPV > 95%). The PPVs for NEC (66.7%) and NEC surgery (37.1%) were low. CONCLUSION Diagnostic hospital billing codes were observed to be a valid metric to evaluate preterm neonatal morbidities and surgeries except in the instance of more ambiguous diagnoses such as NEC and NEC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli K Ryckman
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Paul J Holdefer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Eva Sileo
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Claire Carlson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nancy Weathers
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Jasper
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Precision Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Hyunkeun Cho
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Scott P Oltman
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John M Dagle
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth E Rogers
- UCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shridharmurthy D, Lapane KL, Nunes AP, Baek J, Weisman MH, Kay J, Liu SH. Postpartum Depression in Reproductive-Age Women With and Without Rheumatic Disease: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1287-1295. [PMID: 37399461 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine postpartum depression (PPD) among women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with a matched population without rheumatic disease (RD). METHODS A retrospective analysis using the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database was conducted. Pregnant women with axSpA, PsA, or RA were identified, and the delivery date was used as the index date. We restricted the sample to women ≤ 55 years with continuous enrollment ≥ 6 months before date of last menstrual period and throughout pregnancy. Each patient was matched with 4 individuals without RD on: (1) maternal age at delivery, (2) prior history of depression, and (3) duration of depression before delivery. Cox frailty proportional hazards models estimated the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CI of incident postpartum depression within 1 year among women with axSpA, PsA, or RA (axSpA/PsA/RA cohort) compared to the matched non-RD comparison group. RESULTS Overall, 2667 women with axSpA, PsA, or RA and 10,668 patients without any RD were included. The median follow-up time in days was 256 (IQR 93-366) and 265 (IQR 99-366) for the axSpA/PsA/RA cohort and matched non-RD comparison group, respectively. Development of PPD was more common in the axSpA/PsA/RA cohort relative to the matched non-RD comparison group (axSpA/PsA/RA cohort: 17.2%; matched non-RD comparison group: 12.8%; aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36). CONCLUSION Postpartum depression is significantly higher in women of reproductive age with axSpA/PsA/RA when compared to those without RD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Shridharmurthy
- D. Shridharmurthy, MMBS, MPH, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, and Clinical and Population Health Research Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Kate L Lapane
- K.L. Lapane, PhD, A.P. Nunes, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony P Nunes
- K.L. Lapane, PhD, A.P. Nunes, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jonggyu Baek
- J. Baek, PhD, Division of Biostatistics and Health Services Research, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Michael H Weisman
- M.H. Weisman, MD, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jonathan Kay
- J. Kay, MD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, and Division of Rheumatology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Shao-Hsien Liu
- S.H. Liu, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jones SE, Bradwell KR, Chan LE, McMurry JA, Olson-Chen C, Tarleton J, Wilkins KJ, Ly V, Ljazouli S, Qin Q, Faherty EG, Lau YK, Xie C, Kao YH, Liebman MN, Mariona F, Challa AP, Li L, Ratcliffe SJ, Haendel MA, Patel RC, Hill EL. Who is pregnant? Defining real-world data-based pregnancy episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). JAMIA Open 2023; 6:ooad067. [PMID: 37600074 PMCID: PMC10432357 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To define pregnancy episodes and estimate gestational age within electronic health record (EHR) data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Materials and Methods We developed a comprehensive approach, named Hierarchy and rule-based pregnancy episode Inference integrated with Pregnancy Progression Signatures (HIPPS), and applied it to EHR data in the N3C (January 1, 2018-April 7, 2022). HIPPS combines: (1) an extension of a previously published pregnancy episode algorithm, (2) a novel algorithm to detect gestational age-specific signatures of a progressing pregnancy for further episode support, and (3) pregnancy start date inference. Clinicians performed validation of HIPPS on a subset of episodes. We then generated pregnancy cohorts based on gestational age precision and pregnancy outcomes for assessment of accuracy and comparison of COVID-19 and other characteristics. Results We identified 628 165 pregnant persons with 816 471 pregnancy episodes, of which 52.3% were live births, 24.4% were other outcomes (stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, abortions), and 23.3% had unknown outcomes. Clinician validation agreed 98.8% with HIPPS-identified episodes. We were able to estimate start dates within 1 week of precision for 475 433 (58.2%) episodes. 62 540 (7.7%) episodes had incident COVID-19 during pregnancy. Discussion HIPPS provides measures of support for pregnancy-related variables such as gestational age and pregnancy outcomes based on N3C data. Gestational age precision allows researchers to find time to events with reasonable confidence. Conclusion We have developed a novel and robust approach for inferring pregnancy episodes and gestational age that addresses data inconsistency and missingness in EHR data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E Jones
- Office of Data Science and Emerging Technologies, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, United States
| | | | - Lauren E Chan
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
| | - Julie A McMurry
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14620, United States
| | - Jessica Tarleton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
| | - Kenneth J Wilkins
- Biostatistics Program, Office of the Director, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Victoria Ly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14620, United States
| | - Saad Ljazouli
- Palantir Technologies, Denver, CO 80202, United States
| | - Qiuyuan Qin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14618, United States
| | - Emily Groene Faherty
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
| | | | - Catherine Xie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14618, United States
| | - Yu-Han Kao
- Sema4, Stamford, CT 06902, United States
| | | | - Federico Mariona
- Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn, MI 48124, United States
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Anup P Challa
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, United States
| | - Li Li
- Sema4, Stamford, CT 06902, United States
| | - Sarah J Ratcliffe
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States
| | - Melissa A Haendel
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
| | - Rena C Patel
- Department of Medicine and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
| | - Elaine L Hill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14620, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14618, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Davies HG, Bowman C, Watson G, Dodd C, Jones CE, Munoz FM, Heath PT, Cutland CL, Le Doare K. Standardizing case definitions for monitoring the safety of maternal vaccines globally: GAIA definitions, a review of progress to date. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 162:29-38. [PMID: 37194339 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
In 2014, the Global Alignment on Immunization safety Assessment in pregnancy consortium (GAIA) was formed, with the goal of developing a harmonized, globally-concerted approach to actively monitor the safety of vaccines in pregnancy. A total of 26 standardized definitions for the classification of adverse events have been developed. The aim of this review was to identify and describe studies undertaken to assess the performance of these definitions. A literature search was undertaken to identify published studies assessing the performance of the definitions, and reference lists were snowballed. Data were abstracted by two investigators and a narrative review of the results is presented. Four studies that have evaluated 13 GAIA case definitions (50%) were identified. Five case definitions have been assessed in high-income settings only. Recommendations have been made by the investigators to improve the performance of the definitions. These include ensuring consistency across definitions, removal of the potential for ambiguity or variations in interpretation and ensuring that higher-level criteria are acceptable at lower levels of confidence. Future research should prioritize the key case definitions that have not been assessed in low- and middle-income settings, as well as the 13 that have not undergone any validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah G Davies
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Makerere University Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Conor Bowman
- Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gabriella Watson
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Caitlin Dodd
- Julius Global Health, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Christine E Jones
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Clare L Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Makerere University Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nduaguba SO, Smolinski NE, Thai TN, Bird ST, Rasmussen SA, Winterstein AG. Validation of an ICD-9-Based Algorithm to Identify Stillbirth Episodes from Medicaid Claims Data. Drug Saf 2023; 46:457-465. [PMID: 37043168 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01287-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In administrative data, accurate timing of exposure relative to gestation is critical for determining the effect of potential teratogen exposure on pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE To develop an algorithm for identifying stillbirth episodes in the ICD-9-CM era using national Medicaid claims data (1999-2014). METHODS Unique stillbirth episodes were identified from clusters of medical claims using a hierarchy that identified the encounter with the highest potential of including the actual stillbirth delivery and that delineated subsequent pregnancy episodes. Each episode was validated using clinical detail on retrieved medical records as the gold standard. RESULTS Among 220 retrieved records, 197 were usable for validation of 1417 stillbirth episodes identified by the algorithm. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 64.0% (57.3-70.7%) overall, 80.4% (73.8-87.1%) for inpatient episodes, 28.2% (14.1-42.3%) for outpatient-only episodes, and 20.0% (2.5-37.5%) for outpatient episodes with overlapping hospitalizations. The absolute difference between the dates of the algorithm-specified stillbirth delivery and the medical record-based event was 4.2 ± 24.3 days overall, 1.7 ± 7.7 days for inpatient episodes, 14.3 ± 51.4 days for outpatient-only episodes, and 1.0 ± 2.0 days for outpatient episodes that overlapped with a hospitalization. Excluding all outpatient episodes, as well as pregnancies involving multiple births, the PPV increased to 82.7% (76.8-89.8%). CONCLUSIONS Our algorithm to identify stillbirths from administrative claims data had a moderately high PPV. Positive predictive value was substantially increased by restricting the setting to inpatient episodes and using only input diagnostic codes for singleton stillbirths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina O Nduaguba
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, College of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Nicole E Smolinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Thuy N Thai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Steven T Bird
- Division of Epidemiology, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professionals and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Almut G Winterstein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professionals and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhu Y, Bateman BT, Hernandez-Diaz S, Gray KJ, Straub L, Reimers RM, Manning-Geist B, Yoselevsky E, Taylor LG, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, Ma Y, Qiang Y, Hua W, Huybrechts KF. Validation of claims-based algorithms to identify non-live birth outcomes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023; 32:468-474. [PMID: 36420643 PMCID: PMC10906136 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perinatal epidemiology studies using healthcare utilization databases are often restricted to live births, largely due to the lack of established algorithms to identify non-live births. The study objective was to develop and validate claims-based algorithms for the ascertainment of non-live births. METHODS Using the Mass General Brigham Research Patient Data Registry 2000-2014, we assembled a cohort of women enrolled in Medicaid with a non-live birth. Based on ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient diagnosis/procedure codes, we identified and randomly sampled 100 potential stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, and termination cases each. For the secondary definitions, we excluded cases with codes for other pregnancy outcomes within ±5 days of the outcome of interest and relaxed the definitions for spontaneous abortion and termination by allowing cases with one outpatient diagnosis only. Cases were adjudicated based on medical chart review. We estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) for each outcome. RESULTS The PPV was 71.0% (95% CI, 61.1-79.6) for stillbirth; 79.0% (69.7-86.5) for spontaneous abortion, and 93.0% (86.1-97.1) for termination. When excluding cases with adjacent codes for other pregnancy outcomes and further relaxing the definition, the PPV increased to 80.6% (69.5-88.9) for stillbirth, 86.6% (80.5-91.3) for spontaneous abortion and 94.9% (91.1-97.4) for termination. The PPV for the composite outcome using the relaxed definition was 94.4% (92.3-96.1). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest non-live birth outcomes can be identified in a valid manner in epidemiological studies based on healthcare utilization databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanmin Zhu
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian T. Bateman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn J. Gray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Loreen Straub
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca M. Reimers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth Yoselevsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lockwood G. Taylor
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yong Ma
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yandong Qiang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Hua
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Krista F. Huybrechts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Gelder MMHJ, Lupattelli A, Nordeng HME. Risk of spontaneous abortion after periconceptional medication use: Time to tackle the methodological challenges. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2023; 37:188-190. [PMID: 36869817 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Lupattelli
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hedvig M E Nordeng
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chomistek AK, Phiri K, Doherty MC, Calderbank JF, Chiuve SE, McIlroy BH, Snabes MC, Enger C, Seeger JD. Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes. Drug Saf 2023; 46:209-222. [PMID: 36656445 PMCID: PMC9981491 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01261-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Validation studies of algorithms for pregnancy outcomes based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes are important for conducting drug safety research using administrative claims databases. To facilitate the conduct of pregnancy safety studies, this exploratory study aimed to develop and validate ICD-10-CM-based claims algorithms for date of last menstrual period (LMP) and pregnancy outcomes using medical records. METHODS Using a mother-infant-linked claims database, the study included women with a pregnancy between 2016-2017 and their infants. Claims-based algorithms for LMP date utilized codes for gestational age (Z3A codes). The primary outcomes were major congenital malformations (MCMs) and spontaneous abortion; additional secondary outcomes were also evaluated. Each pregnancy outcome was identified using a claims-based simple algorithm, defined as presence of ≥ 1 claim for the outcome. Positive predictive values (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 586 medical records were sought and 365 (62.3%) were adjudicated, including 125 records each for MCMs and spontaneous abortion. Last menstrual period date was validated among maternal charts procured for pregnancy outcomes and fewer charts were adjudicated for the secondary outcomes. The median difference in days between LMP date based on Z3A codes and adjudicated LMP date was 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.0-10.0). The PPV of the simple algorithm for spontaneous abortion was 84.7% (95% CI 78.3, 91.2). The PPV for the MCM algorithm was < 70%. The algorithms for the secondary outcomes pre-eclampsia, premature delivery, and low birthweight performed well, with PPVs > 70%. CONCLUSIONS The ICD-10-CM claims-based algorithm for spontaneous abortion performed well and may be used in pregnancy studies. Further algorithm refinement for MCMs is needed. The algorithms for LMP date and the secondary outcomes would benefit from additional validation in a larger sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelesitse Phiri
- Optum, 1325 Boylston Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cheryl Enger
- Optum, 1325 Boylston Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - John D Seeger
- Optum, 1325 Boylston Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liu N, Ray JG. Short-Term Adverse Outcomes After Mifepristone-Misoprostol Versus Procedural Induced Abortion : A Population-Based Propensity-Weighted Study. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:145-153. [PMID: 36592459 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies comparing first-trimester pharmaceutical induced abortion (IA) with procedural IA were prone to selection bias, were underpowered to assess serious adverse events (SAEs), and did not account for confounding by indication. Starting in 2017, mifepristone-misoprostol was dispensed at no cost in outpatient pharmacies across Ontario, Canada. OBJECTIVE To compare short-term risk for adverse outcomes after early IA by mifepristone-misoprostol versus by procedural IA. DESIGN Population-based cohort study. SETTING Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS All women who had first-trimester IA. MEASUREMENTS A total of 39 856 women dispensed mifepristone-misoprostol as outpatients were compared with 65 176 women undergoing procedural IA at 14 weeks' gestation or earlier within nonhospital outpatient clinics (comparison 1). A total of 39 856 women prescribed mifepristone-misoprostol were compared with 8861 women undergoing ambulatory hospital-based procedural IA at an estimated 9 weeks' gestation or less (comparison 2). The primary composite outcome was any SAE within 42 days after IA, including severe maternal morbidity, end-organ damage, intensive care unit admission, or death. A coprimary broader outcome comprised any SAE, hemorrhage, retained products of conception, infection, or transfusion. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting accounted for confounding between exposure groups. RESULTS Mean age at IA was about 29 years (SD, 7); 33% were primigravidae. Six percent resided in rural areas, and 25% resided in low-income neighborhoods. In comparison 1, SAEs occurred among 133 women after mifepristone-misoprostol IA (3.3 per 1000) versus 114 after procedural IA (1.8 per 1000) (relative risk [RR], 1.87 [95% CI, 1.44 to 2.43]; absolute risk difference [ARD], 1.5 per 1000 [CI, 0.9 to 2.2]). The respective rates of any adverse event were 28.9 versus 12.4 per 1000 (RR, 2.33 [CI, 2.11 to 2.57]; ARD, 16.5 per 1000 [CI, 14.5 to 18.4]). In comparison 2, SAEs occurred among 133 (3.4 per 1000) and 27 (3.3 per 1000) women, respectively (RR, 1.04 [CI, 0.61 to 1.78]). The respective rates of any adverse event were 31.2 versus 24.9 per 1000 (RR, 1.25 [CI, 1.04 to 1.51]). LIMITATION A woman prescribed mifepristone-misoprostol may not have taken the medication, and the exact gestational age at IA was not always known. CONCLUSION Although rare, short-term adverse events are more likely after mifepristone-misoprostol IA than procedural IA, especially for less serious adverse outcomes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Liu
- ICES and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (N.L.)
| | - Joel G Ray
- Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, ICES, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.G.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Meinhofer A, Martinez ML, Palmsten K. Patterns in Prescription Opioids, Benzodiazepines, and Stimulants Filled by Pregnant Medicaid Beneficiaries. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:210-213. [PMID: 36574236 PMCID: PMC9857806 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
This study analyzes patterns in prescriptions filled by pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries for opioids, benzodiazepines, and stimulants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angélica Meinhofer
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vance A, Bell S, Tilea A, Beck D, Tabb K, Zivin K. Identifying neonatal intensive care (NICU) admissions using administrative claims data. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2023; 16:709-716. [PMID: 38073398 PMCID: PMC10916318 DOI: 10.3233/npm-230014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To define a method for identifying neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions using administrative claims data. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using claims from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM) from 2016 -2020. We developed a definition to identify NICU admissions using a list of codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and revenue codes frequently associated with NICU admissions. We compared agreement between codes using Kappa statistics and calculated positive predictive values (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS On average, revenue codes (3.3%) alone identified more NICU hospitalizations compared to CPT codes alone (1.5%), whereas the use of CPT and revenue (8.9%) and CPT or revenue codes (13.7%) captured the most NICU hospitalizations, which aligns with rates of preterm birth. Gestational age alone (4.2%) and birthweight codes alone (2.0%) identified the least number of potential NICU hospitalizations. Setting CPT codes as the standard and revenue codes as the "test,", revenue codes resulted in identifying 86% of NICU admissions (sensitivity) and 97% of non-NICU admissions (specificity). CONCLUSIONS Using administrative data, we developed a robust definition for identifying neonatal admissions. The identified definition of NICU codes is easily adaptable, repeatable, and flexible for use in other datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.J. Vance
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - S. Bell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - A. Tilea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - D. Beck
- UCLA School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - K.M. Tabb
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - K. Zivin
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shridharmurthy D, Lapane KL, Baek J, Nunes A, Kay J, Liu SH. Comanagement with rheumatology and prescription biologics filled during pregnancy in women with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective analysis of US administrative claims data. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065189. [PMID: 36549721 PMCID: PMC9791456 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate comanagement with rheumatology and biological prescriptions filled during pregnancy among women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to examine factors associated with receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy. DESIGN A retrospective analysis of US claims data. SETTING Commercially insured enrollees using data from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. PARTICIPANTS We identified 4131 pregnant women aged ≤55 years from the 2013-2018 IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database with an International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision/10th Revision codes for RA, axSpA or PsA, with continuous enrolment at ≥3 months before the date of the last menstrual period (LMP) (index date) and throughout pregnancy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES Filled biologics (prescriptions and infusions) claims were categorised by 90 days before the LMP and trimester, as were primary care, obstetrician and rheumatological claims. RESULTS The prevalence of axSpA, RA and PsA was 0.7%, 0.2% and 0.04% among reproductive age women. The average maternal age was 32.7 years (SD 5.7). During pregnancy, 9.1% of those with axSpA (n=2,410) and 56.4% of those with RA/PsA (n=1,721) had a rheumatological claim. Biologics claims were less common among those with axSpA (90 days before LMP: 1.6%, during pregnancy: 1.1%) than those with RA/PsA (90 days before LMP: 11.9%, during pregnancy: 6.9%). Medications during pregnancy included corticosteroids (axSpA: 0.3%, RA/PsA: 2.2%), non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.7%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 1.3%) and opioids (axSpA: 0.2%, RA/PsA: 0.6%). Established rheumatological care and biologics claims during the 90 days before LMP showed good prediction accuracy for receiving comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy (axSpA: area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) 0.73, RA/PsA: AUC 0.70). CONCLUSION Comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy occurs infrequently, especially for women with axSpA. Biologics claims during pregnancy may not align with published guidelines. Future research is warranted to improve comanagement with rheumatology during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Shridharmurthy
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
- Clinical and Population Health Research Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kate L Lapane
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonggyu Baek
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anthony Nunes
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shao-Hsien Liu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tajima K, Ishikawa T, Noda A, Matsuzaki F, Morishita K, Inoue R, Iwama N, Nishigori H, Sugawara J, Saito M, Obara T, Mano N. Development and validation of claims-based algorithms to identify pregnancy based on data from a university hospital in Japan. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1651-1654. [PMID: 35833671 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2101817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When using administrative data, validation is essential since these data are not collected for research purposes and misclassification can occur. Thus, this study aimed to develop algorithms identifying pregnancy and to evaluate the validity of administrative claims data in Japan. METHODS All females who visited the Tohoku University Hospital Department of Obstetrics in 2018 were included. The diagnosis, medical procedure, medication, and medical service addition fee data were utilized to identify pregnancy, with the electronic medical records set as the gold standard. Combination algorithms were developed using predefined pregnancy-related claims data with a positive predictive value (PPV) ≥80%. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for these combination algorithms. RESULTS This study included 1757 females with a mean age of 32.8 (standard deviation: 5.9) years. In general, the individual claims data were able to identify pregnancy with a PPV ≥80%; however, the number of pregnancies identified using a single claims data was limited. Based on the combination algorithm with all of the categories, including diagnosis, medical procedure, medication, and medical service addition, the calculated SE, SP, PPV, and NPV were 73.4% (95% CI: 71.2%-75.4%), 96.9% (95% CI: 89.3%-99.6%), 99.8%,(95% CI: 99.4%-100.0%), and 12.3% (95% CI: 9.6%-15.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The combination algorithm to identify pregnancy demonstrated a high PPV and moderate SE. The algorithm validated in this study is expected to accelerate future studies that aim to identify pregnancies and evaluate pregnancy outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Tajima
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tomofumi Ishikawa
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan
| | - Aoi Noda
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Fumiko Matsuzaki
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kei Morishita
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Inoue
- Department of Medical Informatics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Iwama
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Nishigori
- Fukushima Medical Center for Children and Women, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Junichi Sugawara
- Division of Community Medical Supports, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Feto-Maternal Medical Science, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Saito
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Taku Obara
- Division of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, Environment and Genome Research Center, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Nariyasu Mano
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones S, Bradwell KR, Chan LE, Olson-Chen C, Tarleton J, Wilkins KJ, Qin Q, Faherty EG, Lau YK, Xie C, Kao YH, Liebman MN, Mariona F, Challa A, Li L, Ratcliffe SJ, McMurry JA, Haendel MA, Patel RC, Hill EL. Who is pregnant? defining real-world data-based pregnancy episodes in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.08.04.22278439. [PMID: 35982668 PMCID: PMC9387155 DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.04.22278439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective To define pregnancy episodes and estimate gestational aging within electronic health record (EHR) data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Materials and Methods We developed a comprehensive approach, named H ierarchy and rule-based pregnancy episode I nference integrated with P regnancy P rogression S ignatures (HIPPS) and applied it to EHR data in the N3C from 1 January 2018 to 7 April 2022. HIPPS combines: 1) an extension of a previously published pregnancy episode algorithm, 2) a novel algorithm to detect gestational aging-specific signatures of a progressing pregnancy for further episode support, and 3) pregnancy start date inference. Clinicians performed validation of HIPPS on a subset of episodes. We then generated three types of pregnancy cohorts based on the level of precision for gestational aging and pregnancy outcomes for comparison of COVID-19 and other characteristics. Results We identified 628,165 pregnant persons with 816,471 pregnancy episodes, of which 52.3% were live births, 24.4% were other outcomes (stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortions), and 23.3% had unknown outcomes. We were able to estimate start dates within one week of precision for 431,173 (52.8%) episodes. 66,019 (8.1%) episodes had incident COVID-19 during pregnancy. Across varying COVID-19 cohorts, patient characteristics were generally similar though pregnancy outcomes differed. Discussion HIPPS provides support for pregnancy-related variables based on EHR data for researchers to define pregnancy cohorts. Our approach performed well based on clinician validation. Conclusion We have developed a novel and robust approach for inferring pregnancy episodes and gestational aging that addresses data inconsistency and missingness in EHR data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jones
- Office of Data Science and Emerging Technologies, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Lauren E Chan
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jessica Tarleton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Kenneth J Wilkins
- Biostatistics Program, Office of the Director, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Qiuyuan Qin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Catherine Xie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Federico Mariona
- Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn, MI
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | - Anup Challa
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Sarah J Ratcliffe
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Julie A McMurry
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Melissa A Haendel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Rena C Patel
- Department of Medicine and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Elaine L Hill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Validity of Administrative Data for Identifying Birth-Related Outcomes with the End Date of Pregnancy in a Japanese University Hospital. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19084864. [PMID: 35457731 PMCID: PMC9025717 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate claims-based algorithms for identifying live birth, fetal death, and cesarean section by utilizing administrative data from a university hospital in Japan. We included women who visited the Department of Obstetrics at a university hospital in 2018. The diagnosis, medical procedures, and medication data were used to identify potential cases of live birth, fetal death, and cesarean section. By reviewing electronic medical records, we evaluated the positive predictive values (PPVs) and the accuracy of the end date of pregnancy for each claims datum. “Selected algorithm 1” based on PPVs and “selected algorithm 2” based on both the PPVs and the accuracy of the end date of pregnancy were developed. A total of 1757 women were included, and the mean age was 32.8 years. The PPVs of “selected algorithm 1” and “selected algorithm 2” were both 98.1% for live birth, 99.0% and 98.9% for fetal death, and 99.7% and 100.0% for cesarean section, respectively. These findings suggest that the developed algorithms are useful for future studies for evaluating live birth, fetal death, and cesarean section with an accurate end date of pregnancy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Santillan DA, Santillan MK, Davis HA, Crooks M, Flanagan PJ, Ortman CE, Faro EZ, Hunter SK, Knosp BK. Implementation of a Maternal Child Knowledgebase. AMIA ... ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS. AMIA SYMPOSIUM 2022; 2022:432-438. [PMID: 35854751 PMCID: PMC9285168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
To advance the application of clinical data to address maternal health we developed and implemented a Maternal Child Knowledgebase (MCK). The MCK integrates data from every pregnancy that received care at the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics (UIHC) and links information from the pregnancy episode to the delivery episode and between the mother and child. This knowledgebase contains integrated information regarding diagnoses, medications, mother and child vitals, hospital admissions, depression screenings, laboratory value results, and procedure information. It also collates information from the electronic health record (EPIC), the Social Security Death Index, and the Medication Administration Record into one knowledgebase. To enhance usability, we designed a custom viewer with several pre-designed queries and reports that eliminates the need for users to be proficient in SQL coding. The recent implementation of the MCK has supported multiple projects and reduced the number of Obstetrics-related data queries to the Biomedical Informatics group.
Collapse
|