Tucatinib versus placebo added to trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with and without brain metastases (HER2CLIMB): final overall survival analysis

Pertuzumab Retreatment for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer (PRECIOUS Study): Final Overall Survival Analysis

In the primary analysis of the open-label phase III PRECIOUS study, pertuzumab retreatment combined with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy of physician's choice (PTC) significantly improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) compared with trastuzumab plus physician's choice chemotherapy (TC) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC). Here, we report final overall survival (OS) at the median follow-up of 25.8 months. Patients who have previously received pertuzumab-containing regimens as first-/second-line treatment for LA/mBC were randomly assigned 1:1 to two groups, PTC group (n = 110) and TC group (n = 109). Median OS was longer in the PTC group (median OS 36.2 v 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [one side 95% CI upper limit, 0.97]). Updated median investigator-assessed PFS (5.5 v 4.2 months; HR, 0.81 [one side 95% CI upper limit, 1.02]) were also better in the PTC group. Median PFS by independent review did not show the difference between the two groups (4.4 v 4.4 months; HR, 1.03 [one side 95% CI upper limit, 1.36]). These findings suggest that dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab could contribute to improving OS in patients who have previously been treated with pertuzumab-containing regimens for HER2-positive LA/mBC.

GRB2 promotes brain metastasis in HER2-positive breast cancer by regulating the Ras/MAPK pathway

Brain metastasis is emerging as the most serious concern for breast cancer patients. HER2-positive breast cancer is more prone to undergo brain metastasis than other subtypes; notably, there has been little improvement in the treatment of brain metastasis .Our study confirmed the relevance of HER2 status to brain metastasis risk via clinical data analysis and revealed that exerts GRB2 tumorigenic effects by regulating the Ras/MAPK pathway in vivo and in vitro. Both an in situ injection model and a direct cerebral injection model were used to explore the ability of GRB2 to promote the brain metastasis. Results indicated that HER2- positive is a risk factor for brain metastasis according to clinical data. GRB2 enhances proliferation, migration, and invasion while suppressing apoptosis in HER2-positive breast cancer cells in vitro, primarily by regulating phosphorylation and alternative splicing of key proteins within the Ras/MAPK pathway. Notably, tumor cells were able to cross the blood‒brain barrier in both models assessed in this study. Thus, GRB2 is an oncogenic factor that contributes to the malignancy of HER2-positive breast cancer, GRB2 and HER2 can synergistically promote tumor cell penetration of the blood‒brain barrier and induce metastasis.

Diagnostic and therapeutic advances for HER2-expressing or amplified gynecologic cancers

HER2-targeting therapies are well-described in breast, gastric, and lung cancers, however accumulating data supports a role for HER2-targeted therapies in gynecologic cancers. Despite varied methodologies for HER2 testing, evidence supports that a substantial proportion of endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancers overexpress HER2. This underscores the rationale for HER2-targeted therapies in these malignancies, including the use of HER2-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and immune-stimulating antibody conjugates. Understanding mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted therapies will inform possible combinatorial strategies.

Molecular classification of hormone receptor-positive /HER2-positive breast cancer reveals potential neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies

Significant heterogeneity exists in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) breast cancer, contributing to suboptimal pathological complete response rates with conventional neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Overcoming this challenge requires precise molecular classification, which is pivotal for the development of targeted therapies. We conducted molecular typing on a cohort of 211 patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer and performed a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of various neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Our findings revealed four distinct molecular subtypes, each exhibiting unique characteristics and therapeutic implications. The HER2-enriched subtype, marked by activation of the HER2 signaling and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway, may benefit from intensified anti-HER2-targeted therapy. Estrogen receptor (ER)-activated subtype demonstrated potential sensitivity to combined therapeutic strategies targeting both ER and HER2 pathways. Characterized by high immune cell infiltration, the immunomodulatory subtype showed sensitivity to HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and promise for immune checkpoint therapy. The highly heterogeneous subtype requires a multifaceted therapeutic approach. Organoid susceptibility assays suggested phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors may be a potential treatment option. These findings underscore the importance of molecular subtyping in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, offering a framework for developing precise and personalized treatment strategies. By addressing the heterogeneity of the disease, these approaches have the potential to optimize therapeutic outcomes and improve patient care.

Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after the progression of trastuzumab therapy

INTRODUCTION

Retrospective studies have shown that the continuation use of trastuzumab in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients who progressed during treatment with trastuzumab still may have clinical benefits. However, the optimal strategy was still unknown. We conducted this study aiming to explore the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in HER2 positive MBC patients who progressed after previous trastuzumab treatment.

METHODS

This was a real-world retrospective study that enrolled HER2 positive MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab. Patients were divided into control group (pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy) and combined group (trastuzumab combined with pyrotinib and chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were included in the analysis with median follow-up time of 25.5 months (95%CI, 22.5-33.0). The median PFS was 19.1 months (95%CI 10.5-NA, P = 0.039) in combined group and 11.5 months (95%CI 8.1-15.1) in control group. The ORR was 55.6% in the combined group compared with 43.0% in the control group(P = 0.299), and the DCR was 100% compared with 87.7% respectively(P = 0.028). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhea [7(25.0%)], neutropenia [5(14.3%)] and leukopenia [4(11.4%)] in combined group and diarrhea [3(5.0%)], neutropenia [3(5.0%)] and leukopenia [3(5.0%)] in control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab combined with pyrotinib and chemotherapy showed clinical benefits and acceptable tolerance in HER2-positive MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab. Thus, these combination regimens may be potential options for such patients.

Application status and research progress of targeted therapy drugs for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor in women and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. As one of the most common subtypes of breast cancer, patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer usually experience disease progression over an extended period of time, triggering the search for therapeutic strategies other than endocrine therapy. In recent years, continuous research on various targets has led to dramatic changes in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients, resulting in prolonged clinical survival. With the redefinition of human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) expression, more precise and individualized treatment is possible. This review comprehensively reviews targeted therapies and critical clinical trials for HR+ breast cancer and tracks the latest advances. It also provides valuable insights into the future direction of targeted therapies.

Tucatinib and trastuzumab in HER2-mutated metastatic breast cancer: a phase 2 basket trial

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, also known as ERBB2) signaling promotes cell growth and differentiation, and is overexpressed in several tumor types, including breast, gastric and colorectal cancer. HER2-targeted therapies have shown clinical activity against these tumor types, resulting in regulatory approvals. However, the efficacy of HER2 therapies in tumors with HER2 mutations has not been widely investigated. SGNTUC-019 is an open-label, phase 2 basket study evaluating tucatinib, a HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with trastuzumab in patients with HER2-altered solid tumors. The study included a cohort of 31 heavily pretreated female patients with HER2-mutated metastatic breast cancer who were also HER2 negative per local testing. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients also received fulvestrant. The overall response rate (primary endpoint) was 41.9% (90% confidence interval (CI): 26.9-58.2). Secondary endpoints of duration of response and progression-free survival were 12.6 months (90% CI: 4.7 to not estimable) and 9.5 months (90% CI: 5.4-13.8), respectively. No new safety signals were detected. Responses were observed across various HER2 mutations, including mutations in the tyrosine kinase and extracellular domains. The chemotherapy-free regimen of tucatinib and trastuzumab showed clinically meaningful antitumor activity with durable responses and favorable tolerability in heavily pretreated patients with HER2 mutations. These data support further investigation of HER2-targeted therapies in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04579380 .

Drug Treatment Direction Based on the Molecular Mechanism of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Today, breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Brain metastases (BMs) are a common complication among individuals with advanced breast cancer, significantly impacting both survival rates and the overall condition of life of patients. This review systematically analyzes the innovative approaches to drug treatment for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs), with particular emphasis placed on treatments targeting molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways and drug delivery strategies targeting the blood brain barrier (BBB). The article discusses various drugs that have demonstrated effectiveness against BCBM, featuring a mix of monoclonal antibodies, nimble small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and innovative antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This study of various drugs and techniques designed to boost the permeability of the BBB sheds light on how these innovations can improve the treatment of brain metastases. This review highlights the need to develop new therapies for BCBM and to optimize existing treatment strategies. With a deeper comprehension of the intricate molecular mechanisms and advances in drug delivery technology, it is expected that more effective personalized treatment options will become available in the future for patients with BCBM.

Impact of HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugates in treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs that exert specific cytotoxicity against breast cancer. Although ADCs such as trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan have significantly improved survival for patients with breast cancer expressing HER2, there is still controversy over options after ADCs. The radiotherapy and ablation should also be used as an effective strategy for oligoprogressions. Herein, we conducted a review of ADCs, and then discussed several strategies to maximize the potential benefit to patients with HER2 expression breast cancer.

Trastuzumab Duocarmazine in Pretreated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Trial (TULIP)

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy is standard of care for HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, but most patients develop progressive disease with persistent HER2 expression. No definitive treatment guidance currently exists beyond second line. Trastuzumab duocarmazine (T-Duo) is a third-generation, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate that demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in phase I studies of heavily pretreated patients with HER2+/HER2-low breast cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, T-Duo was compared with physician's choice (PC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer with progression during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review.

RESULTS

In total, 437 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to T-Duo (n = 291) or PC (n = 146). The median age was 56.0 years (range, 24-86); most patients (93.6%) had metastatic disease. The median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to trial entry was 3.5 years; the median number of prior HER2-targeted therapies in metastatic setting was three. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.2) with T-Duo versus 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84]; P = .002) with PC. PFS benefit was maintained across most predefined subgroups. The median overall survival (first analysis) was 20.4 (T-Duo) versus 16.3 months (PC; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.09]; P = .153). Objective response rate was 27.8% (T-Duo) versus 29.5% (PC); other efficacy end points-clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and reduction in target lesion measurement-tended to favor T-Duo. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 52.8% (T-Duo) versus 48.2% (PC).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with T-Duo was manageable, but tolerability was affected by prevalent ocular toxicity, leading to a higher discontinuation rate in the T-Duo arm. T-Duo significantly reduced the risk of progression in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer who have progressed during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after T-DM1.

Adjuvant Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Versus Trastuzumab Alone in Patients Achieving Pathologic Complete Response After Chemotherapy With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

For patients who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P), the benefit of adding P to T remains uncertain. We compared survival outcomes according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in patients with pCR after chemotherapy with TP.

METHOD

Patients who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess the impact of different adjuvant therapies on RFS and DRFS.

RESULTS

In total, 386 patients were included, with 69 (17.9%) receiving adjuvant TP and 317 (82.1%) receiving adjuvant T alone. At a median follow-up of 49 months, the 3-year RFS rate was 96.1%. There was no significant difference in the 3-year RFS between groups (94.2% in TP and 95.6% in T), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.37-3.55, P = .806). In the clinical node-positive group (n = 294), there was no difference in survival between groups (HR 1.64, 95% CI, 0.58-4.65, P = .35). The multivariate analysis showed no significant predictors of recurrence or distant recurrence, including clinical tumor size, nodal status, ER/PR/HER2 status, and adjuvant radiotherapy receipt. Among 11 patients with brain metastasis after pCR, there was no difference according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pCR who responded to chemotherapy and dual HER2 blockade (TP), the 3-year RFS and brain metastasis-free survival did not differ according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.

Survival with Trastuzumab Emtansine in Residual HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic therapy have a high risk of recurrence and death. The primary analysis of KATHERINE, a phase 3, open-label trial, showed that the risk of invasive breast cancer or death was 50% lower with adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) than with trastuzumab alone.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer with residual invasive disease in the breast or axilla after neoadjuvant systemic treatment with taxane-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab to receive T-DM1 or trastuzumab for 14 cycles. Here, we report the prespecified final analysis of invasive disease-free survival and the second interim analysis of overall survival.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 8.4 years, T-DM1 sustained the improvement in invasive disease-free survival over trastuzumab (unstratified hazard ratio for invasive disease or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.66). Seven-year invasive disease-free survival was 80.8% with T-DM1 and 67.1% with trastuzumab (difference, 13.7 percentage points). T-DM1 also led to a significantly lower risk of death than trastuzumab (unstratified hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.87; P = 0.003). Seven-year overall survival was 89.1% with T-DM1 and 84.4% with trastuzumab (difference, 4.7 percentage points). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were noted in 26.1% of the patients in the T-DM1 group and 15.7% of those in the trastuzumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with trastuzumab, T-DM1 improved overall survival with sustained improvement in invasive disease-free survival among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; KATHERINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01772472.).

Strategies to enhance management of HER2-positive breast cancer in the elderly: an expert consensus perspective

Therapeutic decision-making for older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer highlights the importance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This assessment considers the functional status, comorbidities, and relevant conditions of the patient, and allows for an estimation of life expectancy, but it does not facilitate individualized treatment plans. There are also other challenges to consider related to the cardiac toxicity of the treatments and the under-representation of older patients in clinical trials. The Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, SEOM), the Spanish Group for Breast Cancer Research (Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, GEICAM) and the Spanish Group of Study, Treatment and other Experimental Strategies in Solid Tumours (Grupo Español de Estudio, Tratamiento y otras Estrategias Experimentales en Tumores Sólidos, SOLTI) have gathered an expert committee to evaluate the scientific evidence on the management of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and to establish recommendations based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature. These recommendations underscore the importance of individualizing treatment plans based on the patient's physical status and tolerability to maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Emphasis is placed on adapting neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies according to geriatric assessment and specific patient needs. A careful selection of treatment schedules for advanced stages is needed to improve survival and quality of life, assuming that scientific evidence in this age group is limited.

Expert recommendations on treatment sequencing and challenging clinical scenarios in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) metastatic breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and/or ERBB2 gene amplification occurs in approximately 15-20% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. While the introduction of HER2-targeted therapies has significantly improved survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, the incidence of brain metastases has increased due to patients living longer. Current recommendations sequence treatments by line of therapy, as well as by the status of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, in the third-line treatment setting and beyond, there is a lack of clarity of the preferred choice of therapy. In clinical practice, clinicians may also encounter challenging scenarios where the optimal therapeutic approach has not been defined by clinical studies, so there is a need for clarity in such situations. Two consensus meetings of expert oncologists (12 from Europe and one from Canada) were convened to discuss these scenarios. We subsequently developed this article to present an overview of current treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and give practical guidance on addressing challenging scenarios in a real-world setting. Based on our clinical experience, we provide a unanimous consensus concerning the treatment of elderly patients as well as those with brain-only metastases, leptomeningeal disease, oligometastatic disease, central nervous system oligo-progressive disease or ERBB2-mutant disease. We also discuss how to combine HER2-targeted therapy with endocrine therapy in patients with HER2-positive/hormone-receptor-positive disease, considerations for potential discontinuation of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with long-term remission and how to treat patients whose metastatic biopsy no longer confirms their HER2-positive status.

Clinical Implications of Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancers have different genomic architecture and show large-scale gene expression differences consistent with different cellular origins, which is reflected in the luminal (i.e., ER+) versus basal-like (i.e., ER-) molecular class nomenclature. These two major molecular subtypes have distinct epidemiological risk factors and different clinical behaviors. Luminal cancers can be subdivided further based on proliferative activity and ER signaling. Those with a high expression of proliferation-related genes and a low expression of ER-associated genes, called luminal B, have a high risk of early recurrence (i.e., within 5 years), derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, and may benefit from adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy. This subset of luminal cancers is identified as the genomic high-risk ER+ cancers by the MammaPrint, Oncotype DX Recurrence Score, EndoPredict, Prosigna, and several other molecular prognostic assays. Luminal A cancers are characterized by low proliferation and high ER-related gene expression. They tend to have excellent prognosis with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy may not improve their outcome further. These cancers correspond to the genomic low-risk categories. However, these cancers remain at risk for distant recurrence for extended periods of time, and over 50% of distant recurrences occur after 5 years. Basal-like cancers are uniformly highly proliferative and tend to recur within 3-5 years of diagnosis. In the absence of therapy, basal-like breast cancers have the worst survival, but these also include many highly chemotherapy-sensitive cancers. Basal-like cancers are often treated with preoperative chemotherapy combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor which results in 60-65% pathologic complete response rates that herald excellent long-term survival. Patients with residual cancer after neoadjuvant therapy can receive additional postoperative chemotherapy that improves their survival. Currently, there is no clinically actionable molecular subclassification for basal-like cancers, although cancers with high androgen receptor (AR)-related gene expression and those with high levels of immune infiltration have better prognosis, but currently their treatment is not different from basal-like cancers in general. A clinically important, minor subset of breast cancers are characterized by frequent HER2 gene amplification and high expression of a few dozen genes, many residing on the HER2 amplicon. This is an important subset because of the highly effective HER2 targeted therapies which are synergistic with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. The clinical behavior of HER2-enriched cancers is dominated by the underlying ER subtype. ER+/HER2-enriched cancers tend to have more indolent course and lesser chemotherapy sensitivity than their ER counterparts.

A pooled analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

This exploratory pooled analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus comparator treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with brain metastases (BMs) at baseline, categorized according to previous local treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

T-DXd data were pooled from DESTINY-Breast01/-02/-03. Comparator data, from patients receiving physician's choice therapy and trastuzumab emtansine, were pooled from DESTINY-Breast02 and -03, respectively. Baseline BM status was assessed according to US Food and Drug Administration criteria. The endpoints included intracranial objective response rate (ORR; complete or partial response in the brain) per blinded independent central review (BICR) by RECIST version 1.1, time to intracranial response, intracranial duration of response (DoR), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients who received T-DXd and 83 patients who received comparator treatment had BMs at baseline. In those treated with T-DXd, the intracranial ORR of patients with treated/stable and untreated/active BMs was 45.2% and 45.5%, respectively. The median (range) time to intracranial response was 2.8 months (1.1-13.9 months) and 1.5 months (1.2-13.7 months) in patients with treated/stable and untreated/active BMs, respectively. For those with treated/stable BMs, the median intracranial DoR was 12.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-17.9] months, and for those with untreated/active BMs, it was 17.5 months (95% CI 13.6-31.6 months). The median CNS-PFS and OS were 12.3 months (95% CI 11.1-13.8 months) and not reached (95% CI 22.1 months-not estimable) in those with treated/stable BMs, and 18.5 months (95% CI 13.6-23.3 months) and 30.2 months (95% CI 21.3 months-not estimable) in those with untreated/active BMs, respectively. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events grade ≥3 were experienced by 43.2% of patients with BMs and 46.4% without BMs with T-DXd.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd demonstrated meaningful intracranial efficacy and clinical benefit in OS, with an acceptable and manageable safety profile in patients with HER2-positive mBC with treated/stable and untreated/active BMs.

Updates in Treatment of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has exploded in the last two decades following the initial advent of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody. While the first line treatment has remained a combination of dual HER2 blockade with taxane chemotherapy, we now have several exciting options in the second line and beyond. The introduction of antibody-drug conjugates, in specific trastuzumab deruxtecan, has resulted in the best progression-free survival among patients with this subtype of breast cancer. Given the excellent outcomes of these drugs, clinical trials are now evaluating the role of ADCs in the front-line setting in previously untreated patients. In addition, there are also clinical trials evaluating the role of other targets in patients with HER2-positive cancers, including PI3KCA mutations, PD-L1 and CDK4/6. Given the predilection for brain metastases in this population, there is enthusiasm to identify the optimal combination of effective treatments. Tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab combination represent one such promising strategy. With the increasing longevity of these patients, important clinical questions include optimal treatment sequencing, the role of de-escalation of treatment in excellent responders, and the associated financial toxicity. Despite the aggressive nature of this subtype of breast cancer, the outcomes continue to improve for these patients with the evolving treatments.

HDAC6 as a Prognostic Factor and Druggable Target in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant trastuzumab is the standard of care for HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients. However, >50% of patients become resistant. This study aimed at the identification of the molecular factors associated with disease relapse and their further investigation as therapeutically exploitable targets.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of the primary tumors of relapsed (cases) and not relapsed (controls) HER2+ BC patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. The nCounter Human Breast Cancer Panel 360 was used. Logistic regression and partitioning around medoids were employed to identify the genes associated with disease recurrence. Cytotoxicity experiments using trastuzumab-resistant cell lines and a network pharmacology approach were carried out to investigate drug efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients (26 relapsed and 26 not relapsed) were analyzed. We found that a higher expression of HDAC6 was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence, with an adjusted OR of 3.20 (95% CI 1.38-9.91, p = 0.016). Then, we investigated the cytotoxic activity of the selective HDAC6 inhibitor Nexturastat A (NextA) on HER2+ cell lines, which were both sensitive and trastuzumab-resistant. A sub-cytotoxic concentration of NextA, combined with trastuzumab, showed a synergistic effect on BC cell lines. Finally, using a network pharmacology approach, we identified HSP90AA1 as the putative molecular candidate responsible for the synergism observed in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings encourage the exploration of the role of HDAC6 as a prognostic factor and the combinatorial use of HDAC6 selective inhibitors combined with trastuzumab in HER2+ BC, in particular for those patients experiencing drug resistance.

Neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine for pretreated and untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 022

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) remain limited. We previously reported central nervous system (CNS) activity for neratinib and neratinib-capecitabine. Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) when given in combination. In Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 022's cohort 4, we examined the efficacy of neratinib plus T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive BCBM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, phase II study, patients with measurable HER2-positive BCBM received neratinib 160 mg daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts [cohort 4A-previously untreated BCBM, cohorts 4B and 4C-BCBM progressing after local CNS-directed therapy without (4B) and with (4C) prior exposure to T-DM1]. Cycle 1 diarrheal prophylaxis was required. The primary endpoint was the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) by cohort. The overall survival (OS) and toxicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2021, 6, 17, and 21 patients enrolled in cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C. Enrollment was stopped prematurely for slow accrual. The CNS objective response rate in cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3% to 77.7%], 35.3% (95% CI 14.2% to 61.7%), and 28.6% (95% CI 11.3% to 52.2%), respectively; 38.1%-50% experienced stable disease for ≥6 months or response. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (22.7%). The median OS was 30.2 [cohort 4A; 95% CI 21.9-not reached (NR)], 23.3 (cohort 4B; 95% CI 17.6-NR), and 20.9 (cohort 4C; 95% CI 14.9-NR) months.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed intracranial activity for neratinib plus T-DM1, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects with neratinib. Our data provide additional evidence for neratinib-based combinations in patients with HER2-positive BCBM, even those who are heavily pretreated.

Heterogeneity of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Review

Importance

Over the past 2 decades, systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer has gradually moved from the adjuvant to the neoadjuvant setting. Administration of systemic therapy before surgery leads to potential improvements in surgical outcomes and allows for the assessment of the pathologic response to treatment. For patients with residual disease (RD), 3 adjuvant strategies have been shown to improve outcomes: (1) adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for ERBB2-positive disease, (2) adjuvant capecitabine for triple-negative disease, and (3) adjuvant olaparib for patients with germline BRCA variants. Furthermore, studies are testing novel drugs in the postneoadjuvant setting. Given the potential to tailor adjuvant therapy based on the response to preoperative systemic therapy, recognizing the complexities of response to neoadjuvant therapy and moving beyond the binary paradigm of RD vs experiencing a pathologic complete response is becoming increasingly necessary.

Observations

Novel antibody-drug conjugates, anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated as additional rescue options in phase 3 trials for patients with RD after neoadjuvant treatment. Concomitantly, the prognostic role of RD has been refined by the introduction of the residual cancer burden. In addition, the genomic landscape of RD has been found to be associated with long-term prognosis, as has the immune background of the disease evaluated via the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Lastly, the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA may allow for further improvement in prognostication by understanding which patients harbor detectable minimal RD.

Conclusions and Relevance

Escalating adjuvant treatment has led to meaningful survival improvements among patients with breast cancer and RD after neoadjuvant therapy. Uncovering the anatomic and biological intricacies of RD will allow for increased precision in postneoadjuvant treatments, moving beyond the binary paradigm of RD vs pathologic complete response, toward more tailored rescue strategies in the adjuvant setting.

A review on tyrosine kinase inhibitors for targeted breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex molecular pathogenesis. Overexpression of several tyrosine kinase receptors is associated with poor prognosis, therefore, they can be key targets in breast cancer therapy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as leading agents in targeted cancer therapy due to their effectiveness in disrupting key molecular pathways involved in tumor growth. TKIs target various tyrosine kinases, including the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-associated multi-targets, rearranged during transfection (RET), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan signal 1 (ROS1), Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK). These drugs target the tyrosine kinase domain of receptor tyrosine kinases and play a vital role in proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells. Several TKIs, including lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib, have been developed and are currently used in clinical settings, often in combination with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or other targeted agents. TKIs have demonstrated remarkable benefits in enhancing progression-free and overall survival in patients with breast cancer and have become a standard of care for this population. This review provides an overview of TKIs currently being examined in preclinical studies and clinical trials, especially in combination with drugs approved for breast cancer treatment. TKIs have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with breast cancer and hold potential for treating other breast cancer subtypes. The development of new TKIs and their integration into personalized treatment strategies will continue to shape the future of breast cancer therapy.

Pyrotinib and trastuzumab combination treatment synergistically overcomes HER2 dependency in HER2-positive breast cancer: insights from the PHILA trial

BACKGROUND

The PHILA study suggests that pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the synergistic mechanisms of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and provide further insights for the PHILA trial.

METHODS

The in vitro activity of combination treatments was assessed through cell biological and biochemical experiments. The in vivo efficacy was evaluated in cell-derived xenografts, a TUBO tumour model, and one clinical case. Next-generation sequencing was performed on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from patients in the PHILA trial.

FINDINGS

The combination of pyrotinib and trastuzumab more effectively inhibited cell growth than pyrotinib or trastuzumab alone in models of HER2-dependent breast cancer. It potentiated membrane HER2 ubiquitination and downregulation, which resulted in a comprehensive blockade of the HER2 signalling pathway. The pyrotinib-altered membrane HER2 levels had no significant effect on trastuzumab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). We further validated the synergistic mechanisms in TUBO tumours and one clinical case, rather than models of HCC1954 cells harbouring the PIK3CA H1047R mutation. Similarly, in our centre cohort of the PHILA study, patients with genetic alterations in the HER2 signalling cascade had significantly shorter median PFS than individuals with the wild-type pathway.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings underscore the robust synergy between pyrotinib and trastuzumab in overcoming HER2 dependency and provide a rationale for pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel as one of the optimal choices for patients with untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, who are dependent on the HER2 signalling cascade.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1201300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172875), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2022-I2M-2-001), and the Joint Innovative Fund of Beijing Natural Science Foundation and Changping District (L234004).

Triggering Pyroptosis by Doxorubicin-Loaded Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Combination with Decitabine for Breast Cancer Chemoimmunotherapy

Pyroptosis, a form of programmed cell death, holds great promise for breast cancer treatment. However, the downregulation of gasdermin E (GSDME) limits the effectiveness of pyroptosis. To address this challenge, we developed a folic acid-modified and glutathione/reactive oxygen species dual-responsive nanocarrier (FPSD NPs) for the targeted delivery of doxorubicin (DOX). Through the combination with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine (DAC), the GSDME protein expression was significantly increased in 4T1 cells, resulting in cell swelling and ballooning, which are characteristic features of pyroptosis. In vivo experiments further demonstrated the antitumor efficacy of DAC + DOX@FPSD NPs, and the 4T1-bearing mice treated with DAC + DOX@FPSD NPs exhibited reduced tumor volumes, minimized tumor weights, decreased Ki67-positive cells, increased TUNEL apoptosis ratios, and pronounced lesions in H&E staining. Furthermore, DAC + DOX@FPSD NP treatment could promote pyroptosis-associated antitumor immunity, as evidenced by the increased presence of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, heightened secretion of tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ, elevated high-mobility group box-1 levels, and enhanced calreticulin exposure. The FPSD nanocarrier developed in this study had favorable stability, active targeting ability, biocompatibility, and controlled release properties, and the DAC + DOX@FPSD NPs represented an approach to antitumor therapy by inducing pyroptosis, which offers a promising avenue for breast cancer treatment.

Development of graded prognostic assessment for breast Cancer brain metastasis incorporating extracranial metastatic features: a retrospective analysis of 284 patients

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is associated with poor survival outcomes and reduced quality of life. The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score model serves as a well-established tool for predicting the prognosis of BCBM. Notably, the presence of extracranial metastasis (ECM) is considered as a significant prognostic factor in the breast GPA model. This study aims to further refine other features of ECM to enhance the prognostic prediction for BCBM.

METHODS

This study included all inpatients diagnosed with BCBM at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from January 2010 to July 2021. Baseline characteristics of patients were compared based on features of ECM, including the presence, number, location, and control status of metastases. Overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify significant prognostic factors. The aforementioned ECM features were incorporated into the original Breast-GPA model to enhance its prognostic accuracy. The concordance index (C-index) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were utilized to evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of the updated and original survival models.

RESULTS

284 patients with BCBM were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested that patients without ECM when diagnosed with BCBM showed better survival (p = 0.007). In the subgroups with ECM, more than 3 organs involved, both bone and visceral metastasis and progressive ECM portended dismal OS (p = 0.003, 0.001 and <0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that molecular subtype, presence of ECM, and number of brain metastasis significantly influenced OS after BCBM. By modifying the current GPA model to include more precise characteristics of ECM, the predictive accuracy was further enhanced as indicated by the C-index and RMST curve.

CONCLUSIONS

More ECM sites, both bone and visceral invasion and uncontrolled ECM were dismal prognostic factors for survival outcomes of BCBM patients. A new Breast-GPA model with better predictive effect was constructed.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases (PERMEATE trial): overall survival results from a multicenter, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial

Background

The phase 2 PERMEATE study has shown the antitumor activity and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases. In this report, survival results were updated with extended follow-up.

Methods

Between January 29, 2019 and July 10, 2020, adult patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had radiotherapy-naïve brain metastases (cohort A, n = 59) or progressive disease after radiotherapy (cohort B, n = 19) were enrolled and received pyrotinib (400 mg once daily) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were updated, and post-hoc central nervous system (CNS)-PFS was analyzed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03691051).

Findings

As of February 2, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 30.9 months (interquartile range, 16.1-39.8). Median PFS was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-14.6) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 35.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-not reached) in cohort A and 30.6 months (95% CI, 12.6-33.3) in cohort B. Median CNS-PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-15.8) in cohort A and 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.5) in cohort B. Median OS was 34.1 months (95% CI, 21.7-not reached) for 14 patients with intracranial progression only in cohort A who restarted pyrotinib plus capecitabine after local radiotherapy.

Interpretation

These data support further validation in a randomized controlled trial for the assessment of pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine as systemic therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases.

Funding

National Cancer Center Climbing Foundation Key Project of China, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

Delayed neurotoxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer: a case series on combined SRS and T-DM1 treatment

This case series presents four instances of late neurotoxicity observed in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases following treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and subsequent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) therapy. Despite initial control of intracranial disease, patients experienced neurological deterioration months to years post-treatment. Radiological assessments revealed distinct patterns consistent with radiation necrosis, particularly in areas previously treated with SRS and subsequent T-DM1 administration. These changes, characterized by enlarging cystic masses with hemorrhagic components, emphasize the importance of vigilant monitoring in patients undergoing combined SRS and T-DM1 therapy for brain metastatic breast cancer. This report underscores the need for further investigation into the long-term effects of combining SRS with novel systemic therapies, particularly in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Understanding and mitigating late neurotoxicity are critical for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Contemporary Management: A Report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Survivor Research Group

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend against the use of routine imaging tests to detect distant metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients. However, recent advancements in effective therapeutics and diagnostic accuracy have raised the need to reassess the clinical efficacy of intensive metastasis surveillance. We report the results of a multicenter retrospective study to investigate the association between intensive imaging studies and survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 4130 patients who underwent surgery from 11 hospitals in Korea between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the intensity of metastasis imaging studies during their disease-free period. The types and intervals of the imaging studies were based on each physician's decisions.

RESULTS

High-intensive screening showed a shorter distant metastasis-free survival [p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.04], especially for patients in whom bone or lung was the first site of metastasis. With a median follow-up period of 110.0 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate was 96.5%. The high-intensity screening group showed significantly poorer BCSS compared with the low-intensity screening group (p < 0.001, HR 3.13; 95% CI 2.32-4.21). However, both multivariable analysis and propensity score matching analysis showed no significant association between the screening intensity and BCSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent imaging studies to detect distant metastasis were associated with earlier detection of distant metastasis, especially for lung and bone metastasis. However, intensive surveillance showed no apparent association with BCSS despite the use of currently available treatments.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tucatinib in Healthy Participants and Patients with Breast Cancer or Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tucatinib is a highly selective, oral, reversible, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Tucatinib is approved at a 300-mg twice-daily dose in adults in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for advanced HER2-postitive (HER2+) unresectable or metastatic breast cancer and in combination with trastuzumab for RAS wild-type HER2+ unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. This study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and assess sources of PK variability of tucatinib in healthy volunteers and in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast or colorectal cancers.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data from four healthy participant studies and three studies in patients with either HER2+ metastatic breast cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Clinically relevant covariates were evaluated to assess their impact on exposure, and overall model performance was evaluated by prediction-corrected visual predictive checks.

RESULTS

A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination and first-order absorption preceded by a lag time adequately described tucatinib pharmacokinetic profiles in 151 healthy participants and 132 patients. Tumor type was identified as a significant covariate affecting tucatinib bioavailability and clearance, resulting in a 1.2-fold and 2.1-fold increase in tucatinib steady-state exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, respectively, compared with healthy participants. No other covariates, including mild renal or hepatic impairment, had an impact on tucatinib pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of statistically significant covariates identified was not considered clinically meaningful. No tucatinib dose adjustments are required based on the covariates tested in the final population pharmacokinetic model.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03723395, NCT03914755, NCT03826602, NCT03043313, NCT01983501, NCT02025192.

Effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan rechallenge in a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a case report

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a high-payload antibody drug conjugate, has been reported to exert potent antitumor effects and has recently shown promising efficacy against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive adenocarcinoma. Despite its high efficacy, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe adverse event (AE) associated with T-DXd. This report describes a patient who was successfully treated with a dose-reduced T-DXd challenge after recovery from ILD. Little disease progression was observed during the treatment interruption period; thus, the effect of T-DXd was considered to have been maintained. T-DXd may induce ILD, and re-administration under careful observation is considered an important option for treating patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from human epidermal receptor 2 positive breast Cancer: an international, multi-center study

PURPOSE

To report patient outcomes and local tumor control rates in a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven HER-2 positive breast cancer treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).

METHODS

This international, retrospective, multicenter study, included 195 female patients with 1706 SRS-treated BM. Radiologic and clinical outcomes after SRS were determined and prognostic factors identified.

RESULTS

At SRS, median patient age was 55 years [interquartile range (IQR) 47.6-62.0], and 156 (80%) patients had KPS ≥ 80. The median tumor volume was 0.1 cm3 (IQR 0.1-0.5) and the median prescription dose was 16 Gy (IQR 16-18). Local tumor control (LTC) rate was 98%, 94%, 93%, 90%, and 88% at six-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 60-months post-SRS, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor volume (p = < 0.001) and concurrent pertuzumab (p = 0.02) improved LTC. Overall survival (OS) rates at six-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-months were 90%, 69%, 46%, 27%, 22%, and 18%, respectively. Concurrent pertuzumab improved OS (p = 0.032). In this patient subgroup, GPA scores ≥ 2.5 (p = 0.038 and p = 0.003) and rare primary tumor histologies (p = 0.01) were associated with increased and decreased OS, respectively. Asymptomatic adverse radiation events (ARE) occurred in 27 (14.0%) and symptomatic ARE in five (2.6%) patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma primary (p = 0.042) and concurrent pertuzumab (p < 0.001) conferred an increased risk for overall but not for symptomatic ARE.

CONCLUSION

SRS affords effective LTC for selected patients with BM from HER-2 positive breast cancer. Concurrent pertuzumab improved LTC and OS but at the same time increased the risk for overall, but not symptomatic, ARE.

Inetetamab-based therapy in real-world treatment patterns with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study

Background

Inetetamab is a novel antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) developed in China. Due to its optimized antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity effect compared with trastuzumab, it has shown good efficacy and safety in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC).

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combination therapy in the treatment of HER2-positive ABC in real-world clinical practice.

Design

Retrospective study.

Methods

A total of 133 patients with HER2-positive ABC who were treated with inetetamab-based regimens between March 2020 and January 2024 were retrospectively included in this study. The main endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

The study included 133 HER2-positive ABC patients, and the median age was 55 years. The mPFS was 8.0 (6.7-9.3) months. The ORR was 50.4%, while the DCR was 88.7%. The mPFS for patients receiving inetetamab-based therapy as first to second, third to fourth, and later lines of metastatic treatment were 14.0, 7.0, and 6.0 months, respectively. Patients treated with inetetamab plus pyrotinib plus chemotherapy, especially with capecitabine, had the best outcomes (mPFS = 14.0 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that prior HER2-TKI treatment was significantly associated with worse PFS (hazard ratios 2.829, 95% confidence interval 1.265-6.328, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients without visceral metastases had significantly better PFS (14.0 months vs 8.0 months, p = 0.003). The overall incidence of any grade adverse events (AEs) was 100%, with most being grades 1-2. Severe complications included neutropenia (37.6%) and leukopenia (33.1%).

Conclusions

Inetetamab-based combination therapy shows promising efficacy and good safety in patients with HER2-positive ABC. It is one of the late-line treatment options for Chinese patients with HER2-positive ABC.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer and active brain metastases: the DEBBRAH trial

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC). T-DXd has shown encouraging intracranial activity in HER2-positive ABC patients with stable or active brain metastases (BMs); however, its efficacy in patients with HER2-low ABC with BMs is not well established yet.

METHODS

DEBBRAH is a single-arm, five-cohort, phase II study evaluating T-DXd in patients with central nervous system involvement from HER2-positive and HER2-low ABC. Here, we report results from patients with heavily pretreated HER2-low ABC and active BMs, enrolled in cohorts 2 (n = 6, asymptomatic untreated BMs) and 4 (n = 6, progressing BMs after local therapy). Patients received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously once every 21 days. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) for both cohorts.

RESULTS

Intracranial objective response rate per RANO-BM was 50.0% [3/6 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8% to 88.2%] and 33.3% [2/6 patients; 95% CI 4.3% to 77.7%; P = 0.033 (one-sided)] in cohorts 2 and 4, respectively. All responders had partial responses. Median time to intracranial response was 2.3 months (range, 1.5-4.0 months) and median duration of intracranial response was 7.2 months (range, 2.8-16.8 months). Median progression-free survival per RECIST v.1.1. was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.1-10.0 months). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all patients included (16.7% grade 3). Three patients (25.0%) had grade 1 interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd demonstrated promising intracranial activity in pretreated HER2-low ABC patients with active BMs. Further studies are needed to validate these results in larger cohorts. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04420598.

Antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer: a bibliometric study and clinical trial analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) remains the most commonly malignancy among women worldwide. Although early-stage BC typically presents with curative possibilities, advanced-stage disease, especially with metastasis, is significantly limited in terms of effective therapeutic interventions, thereby establishing it as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) establish a groundbreaking class of anti-neoplastic agents characterized by high specificity and targeting precision. These agents have been significant in reshaping the therapeutic approach to breast cancer, especially those subtypes with overexpression of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2). Comprising monoclonal antibodies, cytotoxic payloads, and conjugative linkers, ADCs function by specifically targeting antigens on cancer cells, thereby facilitating the intracellular delivery of the toxic payload. The present investigation endeavors to synthesize existing primary research outcomes through rigorous bibliometric and data analytical approaches, thereby elucidating the current research landscape, delineating research foci, and identifying potential avenues for future innovation.

METHODS

For bibliometric analysis, a comprehensive data set comprising 2181 entries related to ADCs in breast cancer was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) spanning the years 1999 to 2023. This data was further filtered from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded). Analysis software tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed for multifaceted analyses such as trends of publications, contributions of countries, and burst analytics. In the dimension of clinical trials, we interrogated databases including ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) ( https://trialsearch.who.int ). A total of 239 clinical trials were initially sourced, among which, 175 were from ClinicalTrials.gov and 64 from ICTRP. After repetitive and correlation-based screening, 119 trials specifically addressing ADC therapeutic strategies in breast cancer were included. Analytical algorithms were executed using Microsoft-based software to evaluate treatment paradigms, emergent research themes, and progress.

RESULTS

Our investigations signify a growing trend of research on ADCs, with consistent advancements in scientific achievements. The analysis revealed that variables such as economic stratification of nations, healthcare investment paradigms, and disease incidence rates serve as significant determinants in shaping research output. Geographically, the United States emerged as the predominant contributor to the research corpus (36.56%), closely followed by China (21.33%). The underpinning of research accomplishments was found to be significantly bolstered by advancements in molecular biology, immunology, and genetic research. Moreover, the advent of nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic modalities has contributed saliently to the diagnostic and therapeutic management of breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the ADC research landscape through rigorous bibliometric and clinical trial evaluations. At present, the ADC arena has witnessed the successful development and FDA approval of 14 distinct agents, substantially improving the clinical outcomes for a broad spectrum of oncological patients. Future research imperatives may include the exploration of ADCs targeting mutated oncoproteins, dual-specificity ADCs, combination payload strategies, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs), and non-internalizing ADC modalities. With sustained academic and clinical focus, the ADC domain is poised for transformative advancements in targeted therapeutics across a variety of malignancies.

6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7)

This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.

"Positioning of tucatinib in the new clinical scenario of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: An Italian and Spanish consensus paper"

INTRODUCTION

Advancements in monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have notably enhanced outcomes for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Despite the expanding treatment options and clinical complexities, determining the optimal sequence of HER2-targeted therapies remains partly uncertain, influenced by various factors.

METHODS

To refine HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer management, particularly regarding tucatinib's position, a Steering Committee of leading oncologists in breast cancer care devised a panel of statements via a Delphi approach, focusing on five key topics: general clinical management, therapeutic approaches for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases, treatment sequence, and tucatinib's safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 29 statements were deliberated, with strong consensus achieved for most. However, no consensus emerged regarding the management of brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease: 48 % advocated for switching to tucatinib, while 53 % favored a stereotactic brain radiotherapy (SBRT) approach if feasible.

CONCLUSION

The unanimous consensus attained in this Delphi panel, particularly regarding tucatinib's efficacy and safety, underscores oncologists' recognition of its clinical significance based on existing trial data. These findings align closely with current literature, shedding light on areas necessitating further investigation, not thoroughly explored in prior studies. Moreover, the results underscore the scarcity of data on managing brain progression alongside stable extracranial disease, emphasizing the imperative for dedicated research to address these gaps and yield definitive insights.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with trastuzumab emtansine resistance: insights from a multicenter retrospective real-world study

The use of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has revealed significant efficacy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, optimal therapeutic strategies following T-DM1 failure remain a subject of debate in clinical practice. In this multicenter, retrospective, real-world study, we sought to examine the effectiveness and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a therapeutic strategy in HER2-positive MBC who developed T-DM1 resistance. Between September 2018 and December 2022, 66 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival of TKIs-based therapy was 10.1 months (95% CI, 4.7-15.6). Objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were 18.2 and 66.7%, respectively. TKIs-based therapy demonstrated better effectiveness in patients who had previously derived benefit from T-DM1 and featured acquired resistance to trastuzumab. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (36, 54.5%), hand-foot syndrome (31, 47.0%), and leucopenia (30, 45.5%). In conclusion, TKIs-based therapy showed promising effectiveness and safety in HER2-positive MBC patients after T-DM1 failure.

The evolving landscape of metastatic HER2-positive, hormone receptor-positive Breast Cancer

Therapeutic agents targeting Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) demonstrated to positively impact the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer. HER2-positive breast cancer can present either as hormone receptor-negative or positive, defining Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). TPBC demonstrate unique gene expression profiles, showing reduced HER2-driven gene expression, as recapitulated by a higher proportion of Luminal-type intrinsic subtypes. The different molecular landscape of TPBC dictates distinctive clinical features, including reduced chemotherapy sensitivity, different patterns of recurrence, and better overall prognosis. Cross-talk between HER2 and hormone receptor signaling seems to be critical to determine resistance to HER2-directed agents. Accordingly, superior outcomes have been achieved with the use of endocrine therapy, representing the first subtype-specific pharmacological intervention unique to this subgroup. Additional targeted agents capable to tackle resistance mechanisms to anti-HER2, hormone agents, or both might further improve the efficacy of treatments, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, particularly in a biomarker-enriched setting, and CDK4/6-inhibitors, with preliminary data suggesting a role of PAM50 subtyping to predict higher benefits in luminal tumors. Finally, the distinct biology of triple-positive tumors may yield the rationale for considering combinations within antibody-drug conjugate regimens. Accordingly, in this review, we summarized the current evidence and rationale for considering TPBC as a different entity, in which distinct therapeutical approaches leveraging on the different biological profile of TPBC may result in superior anticancer regimens and improved patient-centric outcomes.

A comprehensive clinical evaluation of HER2-TKIs in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HER2-TKIs) have been extensively utilized for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with numerous clinical trial reports available. We aim to systematically perform a comprehensive clinical evaluation on HER2-TKIs, provide a reference for the clinical rational use of drugs, and serve for the decision-making of the national drug policy. We performed comprehensive clinical evaluation in six dimensions including safety, effectiveness, economy, suitability, accessibility, and innovation through meta-analysis, literature review, drug administration websites, and other relevant medication data to analyze HER2-TKIs in treating HER2-positive MBC. For safety, the risk of ≥ grade 3 adverse events among pyrotinib, lapatinib, and neratinib is not significantly different. Furthermore, pyrotinib and neratinib were found to be higher in the risk of ≥ grade 3 diarrhea than lapatinib, however the risk could be reversed and prevented with loperamide. Regarding effectiveness and economy, pyrotinib was confirmed to have the best efficacy and cost-utility value, neratinib the second, and lapatinib the third. As regards innovation and suitability, pyrotinib showed better than other HER2-TKIs. In addition, pyrotinib received a higher recommendation than other HER2-TKIs in patients with HER2-positive MBC. The accessibility of pyrotinib was found to be the best with better urban, rural, and national affordability and lower annual treatment costs. Pyrotinib is more valuable in clinics with better safety, effectiveness, economy, suitability, accessibility, and innovation in HER2-positive MBC. This study could provide references for the clinical application of HER2-TKIs in treating HER2-positive MBC.

Emerging treatments in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: Keep raising the bar

Patients with human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are experiencing a consistent shift toward better survival across the years, thanks to tremendous advancements in treatment strategies. The consistent improvements of outcomes set a high bar for new drug development and the need to explore new ways to overcome resistance mechanisms. Emerging treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer aim to tackle the disease by acting on different targets, including not only HER2 (both at the extra- and intracellular level), but also HER3, PD-(L)1, CTLA4, NKG2A, AKT, PI3K, and, in triple-positive tumors, the estrogen receptors and the cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6. This review describes the evolving treatment landscape of HER2-positive breast cancer, from the current approved therapies to the future perspectives, with a focus on the new agents which are likely to get approved in the next future.

Mechanisms of action and resistance to anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) represents nearly 20% of all breast tumors. Historically, these patients had a high rate of relapse and dismal prognosis. The advent of HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab followed by pertuzumab had improved the prognosis of HER2-positive metastatic BC. More recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are now reshaping the treatment paradigm of solid tumors, especially breast cancer. Tratsuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was one of the first ADC developed in oncology and was approved for the management of HER2-positive metastatic BC. In a head-to-head comparison, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) defeated T-DM1 as a second-line treatment. The efficacy of ADCs is counterbalanced by the appearance of acquired resistance to these agents. In this paper, we summarize the mechanisms of action and resistance of T-DM1 and T-DXd, as well as their clinical efficacy. Additionally, we also discuss potential strategies for addressing resistance to ADC.

Update Breast Cancer 2024 Part 1 - Expert Opinion on Advanced Breast Cancer

Clinical evidence is interpreted based on clinical studies and personal experience which can lead to different interpretations of data. This makes the opinions issued by panels of experts such as the Advanced Breast Cancer Panel which convened in November 2023 for the seventh time (ABC7) particularly important. At the conference, current issues around advanced breast cancer were evaluated by an international team of experts. In 2023 the data on CDK4/6 inhibitors was so extensive that the answers to questions about the sequencing of therapy and the potential use of chemotherapy as an alternative therapy were relatively clear. Moreover, data on antibody drug conjugates which provides a good overview of their uses is available for all molecular subtypes. Some therapeutic settings, including patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease, older patients, locally advanced breast cancer and visceral crises, continue to be particularly important and were discussed in structured sessions. The scientific context of some of the topics discussed at ABC7 is presented and assessed here.

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2024

The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2024 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanised, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor cytotoxic payload (DXd). The high drug-to-antibody ratio (8:1) ensures a high DXd concentration is delivered to target tumour cells, following internalisation of T-DXd and subsequent cleavage of its tetrapeptide-based linker. DXd's membrane-permeable nature enables it to cross cell membranes and potentially exert antitumour activity on surrounding tumour cells regardless of HER2 expression. T-DXd's unique mechanism of action is reflected in its efficacy in clinical trials in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (in heavily pretreated populations and in those previously treated with a taxane and trastuzumab), as well as HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Thus, ADCs such as T-DXd have the potential to change the treatment paradigm of targeting HER2 in metastatic breast cancer, including eventually within the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.

Poziotinib treatment in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer who have received prior anti-HER2 regimens

PURPOSE

Poziotinib is an irreversible pan-inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) that has shown acceptable tolerability and antitumor activity in phase I and II trials in patients with advanced solid tumors. In the present open-label, multicenter phase II study, we demonstrate safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy data from two different dosing schedules in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had received at least two prior HER2-directed therapy lines for advanced disease, received 24 mg poziotinib on an intermittent dosing schedule (cohort 1) or 16 mg poziotinib once daily on a continuous dosing schedule (cohort 2). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints additionally included safety and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 30% in both groups (p = 0.98). DCR was 60% vs 78% (p = 0.15) and median PFS and TTP were 4.1 vs 4.9 months (both p = 0.30) for cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The most common treatment related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (88% vs 85%, p = 0.76), rash (88% vs 88%, p = 0.96), and stomatitis (64% vs 56%, p = 0.52), with grade 3-4 diarrhea occurring in 33% vs 32% of patients (p = 0.93) and grade 3-4 rash in 27% vs 35% of patients (p = 0.48) in cohort 1 vs cohort 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Poziotinib demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in patients with pre-treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, although high levels of toxicity may preclude further studies at this time.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases from the randomized DESTINY-Breast03 trial

BACKGROUND

DESTINY-Breast03 is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. A statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus T-DM1 was reported in the primary analysis. Here, we report exploratory efficacy data in patients with and without brain metastases (BMs) at baseline.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg. Patients with clinically inactive/asymptomatic BMs were eligible. Lesions were measured as per modified RECIST, version 1.1. Outcomes included PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR), objective response rate (ORR), and intracranial ORR as per BICR.

RESULTS

As of 21 May 2021, 43/261 patients randomized to T-DXd and 39/263 patients randomized to T-DM1 had BMs at baseline, as per investigator assessment. Among patients with baseline BMs, 20/43 in the T-DXd arm and 19/39 in the T-DM1 arm had not received prior local BM treatment. For patients with BMs, median PFS was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-22.2 months] for T-DXd versus 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-5.8 months) for T-DM1; hazard ratio (HR) 0.25 (95% CI 0.13-0.45). For patients without BMs, median PFS was not reached (95% CI 22.4 months-not estimable) for T-DXd versus 7.1 months (95% CI 5.6-9.7 months) for T-DM1; HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.40). Confirmed systemic ORR was 67.4% for T-DXd versus 20.5% for T-DM1 and 82.1% for T-DXd versus 36.6% for T-DM1 for patients with and without BMs, respectively. Intracranial ORR was 65.7% with T-DXd versus 34.3% with T-DM1.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HER2-positive mBC whose disease progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane achieved a substantial benefit from treatment with T-DXd compared with T-DM1, including those with baseline BMs.

Progress of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy in immune treatment for HER2-positive tumors

BACKGROUND

Patients with HER2-positive cancers often face a poor prognosis, and treatment regimens containing anti-HER2 have become the first-line treatment options for breast and gastric cancers. However, these approaches are faced with significant challenges in terms of drug resistance. Hence, it is crucial to explore precise treatment strategies aimed at improving survival outcomes.

ADVANCEMENTS IN TREATMENT

Over the past few years, there has been rapid advancement in the realm of tumor therapy, particularly with the swift progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. They exert anti-tumor effects by disrupting immune-suppressive factors within the tumor microenvironment. However, monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has several limitations. Consequently, numerous studies have explored combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies and demonstrated highly promising avenues of development.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to review the clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy for HER2-positive tumors. Additionally, it provides a summary of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these combined treatments, with the intention of furnishing valuable insights for the clinical management of HER2-positive cancer.

CONCLUSION

Combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors hold considerable promise in the treatment of HER2-positive tumors. Continued research efforts and clinical trials are warranted to elucidate optimal treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects.

Current Landscape of Cancer Immunotherapy: Harnessing the Immune Arsenal to Overcome Immune Evasion

Cancer immune evasion represents a leading hallmark of cancer, posing a significant obstacle to the development of successful anticancer therapies. However, the landscape of cancer treatment has significantly evolved, transitioning into the era of immunotherapy from conventional methods such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted drug therapy. Immunotherapy has emerged as a pivotal component in cancer treatment, harnessing the body's immune system to combat cancer and offering improved prognostic outcomes for numerous patients. The remarkable success of immunotherapy has spurred significant efforts to enhance the clinical efficacy of existing agents and strategies. Several immunotherapeutic approaches have received approval for targeted cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trials. This review explores recent progress in unraveling the mechanisms of cancer immune evasion and evaluates the clinical effectiveness of diverse immunotherapy strategies, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and antibody-based treatments. It encompasses both established treatments and those currently under investigation, providing a comprehensive overview of efforts to combat cancer through immunological approaches. Additionally, the article emphasizes the current developments, limitations, and challenges in cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, by integrating analyses of cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanisms and exploring combination strategies and personalized approaches, it offers valuable insights crucial for the development of novel anticancer immunotherapeutic strategies.

Cost of disease progression among US patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Aim: The objectives were to investigate the differences in per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who experience disease progression in 12 months compared with those who don't investigate the impact of progression timing on cumulative healthcare costs. Patients & methods: This claims-based study included patients diagnosed with mBC between 1 January 2013 and 30 April 2020 and received HER2-targeted therapy. Patients were categorized as progressed or nonprogressed. For objective one, monthly HCRU and costs were assessed for up to two lines of therapy (LOTs). Data were summarized descriptively and compared using a generalized linear model (GLM). For objective two, patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were assessed and cumulative healthcare costs were estimated in the 3 years following the start of LOT1 or LOT2 using a GLM and Kaplan-Meier weighting. Results: Among the 4113 patients in the study sample, 3406 had at least 12 months of follow-up (or less if due to death). Compared with nonprogressed patients, progressed patients had higher mean PPPM healthcare costs (LOT1: $22,014 vs $18,372, p < 0.001; LOT2: $19,643 vs $16,863, p = 0.001), and HCRU, including number of emergency room visits and inpatient stays (both p < 0.001) in the 12 months following LOT start. Progressed patients had higher 3-year mean cumulative healthcare costs than nonprogressed patients following LOT1 and LOT2 and this difference was greater for patients who progressed earlier. Conclusion: Disease progression was associated with significant increases in HCRU and costs. Delays in progression were associated with lower cumulative healthcare costs. Earlier use of more clinically effective treatments to delay progression may reduce the economic burden among these patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Brain, with First-Line Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab and Chemotherapy, in a Real-World Setting

Background

In this observational study, we analyzed the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who developed brain metastases during their disease in a 2.7 million-member public health-provider in Israel.

Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with mBC who initiated first-line treatment between January 2013 and June 2021 were identified. Time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) were assessed at a minimum of 6 months follow-up (cutoff: December 2021).

Results

We identified a total of 61 patients: 98.4% females, median age 50 years (IQR = 44-63), 85% invasive ductal tumors, 44% hormone receptor positive, 51% performance status 0-1. The median duration of follow-up was 6.2 years. All patients initiated a combination treatment of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy (TPC), and 72% moved to second-line treatment during the study follow-up period (82% ado-trastuzumab emtansine). The median ToT for first-line and second-line treatments were 16.9 months (95% CI = 13.9-27.7) and 7.9 months (95% CI = 5.6-10.9), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.5 months (95% CI = 35.4-71.2) from the initiation of first-line treatment. When considering the timing of brain metastases, the median OS was 36.3 months (95% CI = 10.0-NR) for those diagnosed upfront (n = 15, 25%), 59.1 months (95% CI = 32.5-NR) for those diagnosed while on TPC (n = 25, 41%), and 40.8 months (95% CI = 35.4-NR) for those diagnosed at a later stage (n = 21, 34%). The median OS from brain metastases diagnosis was 25.1 months (95% CI = 17.0-34.6).

Conclusion

Patients with upfront brain involvement at the time of mBC diagnosis had shorter survival compared to those who started TPC without brain metastases. Nonetheless, the overall results from this study compare favorably with previous studies and contribute to understanding the value of traditional treatment options, which will serve as a baseline for future treatment strategies in the real-world setting.

AXL/WRNIP1 Mediates Replication Stress Response and Promotes Therapy Resistance and Metachronous Metastasis in HER2+ Breast Cancer

Therapy resistance and metastatic progression are primary causes of cancer-related mortality. Disseminated tumor cells possess adaptive traits that enable them to reprogram their metabolism, maintain stemness, and resist cell death, facilitating their persistence to drive recurrence. The survival of disseminated tumor cells also depends on their ability to modulate replication stress in response to therapy while colonizing inhospitable microenvironments. In this study, we discovered that the nuclear translocation of AXL, a TAM receptor tyrosine kinase, and its interaction with WRNIP1, a DNA replication stress response factor, promotes the survival of HER2+ breast cancer cells that are resistant to HER2-targeted therapy and metastasize to the brain. In preclinical models, knocking down or pharmacologically inhibiting AXL or WRNIP1 attenuated protection of stalled replication forks. Furthermore, deficiency or inhibition of AXL and WRNIP1 also prolonged metastatic latency and delayed relapse. Together, these findings suggest that targeting the replication stress response, which is a shared adaptive mechanism in therapy-resistant and metastasis-initiating cells, could reduce metachronous metastasis and enhance the response to standard-of-care therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Nuclear AXL and WRNIP1 interact and mediate replication stress response, promote therapy resistance, and support metastatic progression, indicating that targeting the AXL/WRNIP1 axis is a potentially viable therapeutic strategy for breast cancer.