The AAHKS Best Podium Presentation Research Award: Comparing the Efficacy of Irrigation Solutions on Staphylococcal Biofilm Formed on Arthroplasty Surfaces

On the effectiveness of electrical characterization of mature Staphylococcal Biofilm

In this paper, the authors describe an experimental study carried out on biological samples consisting of a 96-h mature Methicillin-Resistant-Staphylococcus-Aureus biofilm. The initial objective was to electrically characterize the biofilm using impedance spectroscopy, by scanning a wide range of frequencies [1 Hz ÷ 10 MHz]. Concurrently, confocal microscopy observations, XTT assays, crystal violet staining method and colony-forming unit assay were performed to characterize the biological activity. The experimental investigation unexpectedly demonstrated that the reproducibility of measurement data was significantly affected by the destructive interaction between the electric field and the biofilm. This interaction was found to be strongly dependent on both the amplitude of the field and the exposure time. Moreover, a significative reduction of total biomass of the biofilm was found in a specific frequency range [10 kHz ÷ 100 kHz]. The results suggest several limitations of impedance spectroscopy as a tool for biofilm identification, since the "sample under test" must not be altered during the measurement process. Conversely, they demonstrate the deleterious impact of the electric field on the biofilm, thereby unveiling a potentially efficacious therapeutic paradigm for biofilm treatment. We expect that the open issues highlighted in this paper will be a source of inspiration for further understanding of the mechanism of interaction between the electric field and biofilm, both in terms of treatment and diagnosis.

Not All Antiseptic Solutions Are Equivalent in Removing Biofilm: A Comparison Across Different Orthopaedic Surfaces

BACKGROUND

Antiseptic solutions are commonly utilized during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to prevent and treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to investigate which antiseptic solution is most effective against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Escherichia coli biofilms established in vitro on orthopaedic surfaces commonly utilized in total knee arthroplasty: cobalt-chromium (CC), oxidized zirconium (OxZr), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

METHODS

MSSA and E. coli biofilms were grown on CC, OxZr, and PMMA discs for 24 and 72 hours. Biofilm-coated discs were treated with control or various antiseptic solutions for 3 minutes. Solutions included 10% povidone-iodine, a 1:1 mixture of 10% povidone-iodine plus 3% hydrogen peroxide, diluted povidone-iodine, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, and a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and water. Following treatment, discs were sonicated to quantify adherent bacteria or underwent imaging with scanning electron microscopy to identify biofilm. Antiseptic solutions were considered efficacious if they produced a 3-log (1,000-fold) reduction in colony-forming units compared with controls.

RESULTS

On both OxZr and CC, 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide eradicated all MSSA, and it achieved clinical efficacy on PMMA at both 24-hour MSSA biofilm (p < 0.0002) and 72-hour MSSA biofilm (p = 0.002). On 72-hour MSSA biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine eradicated all bacteria on OxZr and CC, and it achieved clinical efficacy on PMMA (p = 0.04). On 24-hour MSSA biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine achieved efficacy on all surfaces (all p < 0.01). The surfactant-based formulation only achieved clinical efficacy on 72-hour MSSA biofilms on CC (p = 0.04) and OxZr (p = 0.07). On 72-hour E. coli biofilm, 10% povidone-iodine with or without hydrogen peroxide achieved clinical efficacy on all surfaces. No other solution achieved clinical efficacy on either MSSA or E. coli.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiseptic solutions vary considerably in efficacy against bacterial biofilm. The 10% povidone-iodine solution with or without hydrogen peroxide consistently removed MSSA and E. coli biofilms on multiple orthopaedic surfaces and should be considered for clinical use.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians should be aware of the differences in the efficacy of antiseptic solutions on different orthopaedic surfaces when treating MSSA or E. coli biofilms.

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate are equally effective in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm grown on a titanium surface: an in-vitro analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the irrigation solution and concentration that should be used when performing a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery.

AIM

To determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of five antibacterial solutions and to compare their efficacies in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm embedded on a titanium surface.

METHODS

Meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ATCC standard strains were grown over porous Ti-6Al-4V acetabular screw-caps. Antibacterial solutions were povidone-iodine, rifampicin, silver nitrate, copper sulphate, and chlorhexidine. MBEC values were calculated for MSSA and MRSA. After 24 h, screw-caps were exposed for 3 min to each solution. Bacterial separation from each specimen was performed with vortex agitation and footprint on agar plate in triplicate. Colony forming units (cfu) were counted pre- and post-agitation, and the delta of cfu/mL was calculated for each solution. A threefold log reduction in cfu was considered a measure of solution efficacy. Comparison between groups was made with Fisher's test.

FINDINGS

MBEC values for MSSA and MRSA, respectively, were as follows: 8000 μg/mL and 16,000 μg/mL for povidone-iodine; 64 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL for rifampicin; 10,000 μg/mL and 5120 μg/mL for silver nitrate; 900 μg/mL and 900 μg/mL for copper sulphate; 16 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL for chlorhexidine. Rifampicin, copper sulphate and chlorhexidine were ineffective against MSSA and MRSA biofilm compared with povidone-iodine (P<0.01) and silver nitrate (P=0.015) that had a delta cfu reduction >8 log. Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate showed negative footprints without visible MSSA (P=0.005) and MRSA (P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate were the only irrigating solutions capable of eradicating at least 99.9% of 24-h biofilm.

Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study

Background: Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. In an in vitro study, our group recently demonstrated that sequential combination debridement (SCD) with 3% acetic acid (AA) followed by 10% povidone iodine (PI) and 5 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was the best strategy for reducing bacterial load. The present study aimed to validate these findings in an in vivo model. Results: The median (IQR) log CFU/mL was lower in the group of mice treated with SCD (2.85 [0.00-3.72]) than in the Bactisure™ group (4.02 [3.41-4.72], p = 0.02). While this reduction was also greater than in the PI group (3.99 [1.11-4.33]), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). Cell viability assays showed no differences between treatments. S. aureus bacteremia was detected in 10% of mice treated with SCD, compared to 30% in the PI group and 10% in the Bactisure™ group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.36). Conclusion: Our findings confirm that SCD significantly reduced bacterial load in an in vivo S. aureus PJI model, showing superior anti-biofilm activity compared to Bactisure™ and comparable performance to PI alone. These results highlight SCD's potential to serve as a standardized chemical debridement protocol, combining enhanced efficacy with clinical applicability. Methods: We tested SCD with 3% AA for 3 min, 10% PI for 3 min, and H2O2 for 3 min in a 7-day Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC29213)-based murine femur PJI model and compared the results with single treatments of 10% PI for 3 min or Bactisure™ solution for 3 min. A sterile steel implant with local administration of saline solution for 3 min was used as a non-infected control. After completing irrigation procedures, under anesthesia, mice were euthanized, and implants were analyzed for CFU/mL counts and cell viability rates. Blood cultures were obtained pre-euthanasia to detect bacteremia.

Effects of antiseptic irrigation solutions on osseointegration in a cementless tibial implantation mouse model

Despite the success of standard antiseptic irrigation solutions in reducing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates, there is still a need for more effective solutions. Synergistic use of povidone-iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has shown promising results; however, the optimal solution concentration balancing bactericidal activity and osseointegration remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the impact of these antiseptic irrigation solutions on osseointegration and the bone-implant interface strength in vivo. Forty C57BL/6 mice underwent bilateral tibial implantation surgery and were randomly allocated into three groups receiving 0.3% PI, 10% PI mixed with 3% H2O2, or saline as irrigation solutions intraoperatively. Assessments were performed on postoperative Days 1 and 28, including plain radiographs, microcomputed tomography (microCT) evaluation, histological analysis, immunohistochemistry, and biomechanical pull-out testing. No wound complications were observed. MicroCT scans revealed no differences in peri-implant trabecular bone parameters. Biomechanical pull-out testing showed no differences in the bone-implant interface strength across groups. Histological analysis indicated no differences in bone and bone marrow percentage areas among treatment groups. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated no differences among groups in peri-implant osteocalcin, osterix, or endomucin-positive cells. In conclusion, using either antiseptic irrigation solution showed no differences in osseointegration parameters compared to the control group, demonstrating safety and the absence of toxicity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dilute 0.3% povidone-iodine and a 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine mixed with 3% hydrogen peroxide can be safely used during primary and revision total joint arthroplasty without compromising osseointegration or causing wound complications.

Efficacy of the preformulated irrigation solution Bactisure® in acute periprosthetic joint infection debridement surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite significant progress in orthopaedic surgery, the prevalence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains persistent, and future increases are expected due to the increasing number of joint arthroplasties. PJIs are intricately connected to biofilm-producing bacteria, which encase infected prostheses, impairing the effectiveness of antibiotics and the immune system. Acute PJIs with immature biofilms are traditionally managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). However, to date, there has not been a conclusive direct clinical comparison (in vivo) demonstrating the superiority of one irrigation solution over others. Recently, there has been a growing interest in irrigation solutions with antibiofilm properties demonstrated in in vitro studies, exemplified by the preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution, which contains ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and sterile water. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness (infection cure rate) of preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution in vivo compared with saline solution in a control group of patients with acute knee and/or hip periprosthetic infections treated with DAIR.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial involving patients with acute haematogenous PJI who received standard DAIR surgery from December 2022 to December 2024. The type of irrigation solution used during surgery will include two groups allocated at a 1:1 ratio: a control group (n = 25) with saline solution and an experimental group (n = 25) receiving the Bactisure® preformulated solution. The sample size was calculated based on an expected reduction in reinfection rates from 45% in the control group to 10% in the experimental group. Data on baseline patient characteristics, clinical and radiological information, and healthcare questionnaires will be recorded. All patients will be followed for minimum of 12 months. The infection cure rate at 1 year will be the primary outcome.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to compare the effectiveness of preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution with that of saline solution in real clinical practice (in vivo) in patients with acute knee and/or hip periprosthetic infections treated with DAIR. Our main hypothesis is that, compared with saline solution, Bactisure® provides a better infection cure rate at 1 year post-DAIR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10873696 . Registered on December 19, 2023.

The Mark Coventry Award: PhotothermAA Gel Combined With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Significantly Decreases Implant Biofilm Burden and Soft-Tissue Infection in a Rabbit Model of Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of total joint arthroplasty. The underlying pathogenesis often involves the formation of bacterial biofilm that protects the pathogen from both host immune responses and antibiotics. The gold standard treatment requires implant removal, a procedure that carries associated morbidity and mortality risks. Strategies to preserve the implant while treating PJI are desperately needed. Our group has developed an anti-biofilm treatment, PhotothermAA gel, which has shown complete eradication of 2-week-old mature biofilm in vitro. In this study, we tested the anti-biofilm efficacy and safety of PhotothermAA in vivo when combined with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in a rabbit model of knee PJI.

METHODS

New Zealand white rabbits (n = 21) underwent knee joint arthrotomy, titanium tibial implant insertion, and inoculation with Xen36 (bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus) after capsule closure. At 2 weeks, rabbits underwent sham surgery (n = 6), DAIR (n = 6), or PhotothermAA with DAIR (n = 9) and were sacrificed 2 weeks later to measure implant biofilm burden, soft-tissue infection, and tissue necrosis.

RESULTS

The combination of anti-biofilm PhotothermAA with DAIR significantly decreased implant biofilm coverage via scanning electron microscopy compared to DAIR alone (1.8 versus 81.0%; P < .0001). Periprosthetic soft-tissue cultures were significantly decreased in the PhotothermAA with DAIR treatment group (log reduction: Sham 1.6, DAIR 2.0, combination 5.6; P < .0001). Treatment-associated necrosis was absent via gross histology of tissue adjacent to the treatment area (P = .715).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of an anti-biofilm solution like PhotothermAA as a supplement to current treatments that allow implant retention may prove useful in PJI treatment.

The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?

BACKGROUND

Polypropylene (PPE) mesh is commonly utilized to reconstruct catastrophic extensor mechanism disruptions in revision total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these procedures are associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection. The purpose of the current study was to: 1) visualize and quantify the progression of bacterial biofilm growth on PPE-mesh; and 2) determine which antiseptic solutions effectively remove viable bacteria.

METHODS

Knitted PPE mesh samples were cultured with either methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) for 7 days, with regular quantification of colony forming units (CFUs) and visualization using scanning electron microscopy to identify maturity. Immature (24 hour) and mature (72 hour) biofilm was treated with one of 5 commercial antiseptics for 3 minutes. A 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), undiluted (10%) povidone-iodine, and 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine and 3% hydrogen peroxide. A 3-log reduction in CFUs compared to saline was considered clinically meaningful.

RESULTS

The CFU counts plateaued, indicating maturity, at 72 hours for both MSSA and E. coli. The scanning electron microscopy confirmed confluent biofilm formation after 72 hours. The 10% povidone-iodine was clinically effective against all MSSA biofilms and immature E. coli biofilms. The 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide was effective in all conditions. Only 10% povidone iodine formulations produced significantly (P < .0083) reduced CFU counts against mature biofilms.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteria rapidly form biofilm on PPE mesh. Mesh contamination can be catastrophic, and clinicians should consider utilizing an antiseptic solution at the conclusion of mesh implantation. Undiluted povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide should be considered when attempting to salvage infected PPE mesh.

Antiseptics' Concentration, Combination, and Exposure Time on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilm Eradication

Background

This study aims to assess the activity of solutions containing povidone-iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) alone or combined on the biofilm of microbial species in the contest of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

Different antiseptic solutions were tested on 2-day-old biofilms of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi at 1 and 3 minutes of exposure. The efficacy of these solutions was evaluated by measuring the biofilm metabolic activity by methoxynitrosulfophenyl-tetrazolium carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay. The anti-biofilm effect of 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 was tested on a 5-day-old biofilm using colony-forming unit counts and an XTT reduction assay.

Results

PI and H2O2 solutions showed concentration-dependent anti-biofilm activity except for E. faecalis. PI at 5% was the most active solution against the 2-day-old biofilm of all test microorganisms. The 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ solution had a significant effect only at 3 minutes. The 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ effect was evaluated on 5-day-old biofilms. PI at 5% produced a significant reduction in metabolic activity at both 1 and 3 minutes; 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ caused a significant activity against all Gram-positive strains after 3 minutes, with a greater metabolic activity reduction than 5% PI.

Conclusions

In the case of PJI caused by Gram-positive bacteria, 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ could be used for wound irrigation for 3 minutes of exposure. In the case of PJI with a different etiological agent or PJI with an unknown etiology, it is advisable to use 5% PI for 1 minute of exposure.

Enhanced antibiofilm potential of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine in a rat model of periprosthetic joint infection

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

A total of 56 male Sprague-Dawley rats were established in acute PJI models by intra-articular injection of bacteria. The rats were divided into four groups: a Control group, a 0.35% PI group, a LIPUS and saline group, and a LIPUS and 0.35% PI group. All rats underwent DAIR, except for Control, which underwent a sham procedure. General status, serum biochemical markers, weightbearing analysis, radiographs, micro-CT analysis, scanning electron microscopy of the prostheses, microbiological analysis, macroscope, and histopathology evaluation were performed 14 days after DAIR.

Results

The group with LIPUS and 0.35% PI exhibited decreased levels of serum biochemical markers, improved weightbearing scores, reduced reactive bone changes, absence of viable bacteria, and decreased inflammation compared to the Control group. Despite the greater antibiofilm activity observed in the PI group compared to the LIPUS and saline group, none of the monotherapies were successful in preventing reactive bone changes or eliminating the infection.

Conclusion

In the rat model of PJI treated with DAIR, LIPUS combined with 0.35% PI demonstrated stronger antibiofilm potential than monotherapy, without impairing any local soft-tissue.

Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study

PURPOSE

Bacterial biofilms create a challenge in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and failure to eradicate biofilms is often implicated in the high rates of recurrence. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of a novel nanoparticle ultrasonication technology on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm eradication compared to commonly used orthopedic irrigation solutions.

METHODS

Twenty-four sterile, titanium alloy discs were inoculated with a standardized concentration of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and cultured for seven days to allow for biofilm formation. Discs were then treated with either ultrasonicated nanoparticle therapy or irrigation with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine or normal saline. The remaining bacteria on each surface was subsequently plated for colony-forming units of S. aureus. Bacterial eradication was reported as a decrease in CFUs relative to the control group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare between groups.

RESULTS

Treatment with ultrasonicated nanoparticles resulted in a significant mean decrease in CFUs of 99.3% compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Irrigation with povidone-iodine also resulted in a significant 77.5% reduction in CFUs compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Comparisons between ultrasonicated nanoparticles and povidone-iodine demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in bacterial CFUs in the nanoparticle group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonicated nanoparticle were superior to commonly used bactericidal irrigation solutions in the eradication of S. aureus from a titanium surface. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this ultrsonication technology in the treatment of PJI.

Pathogens in FRI - Do bugs matter? - An analysis of FRI studies to assess your enemy

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a devasting complication for both patients and their treating Orthopaedic surgeon that can lead to loss of limb function or even amputation. The unique and unpredictable features of FRI make its diagnosis and treatment a significant challenge. It has substantial morbidity and financial implications for patients, their families and healthcare providers. In this article, we perform an in-depth and comprehensive review of FRI through recent and seminal literature to highlight evolving definitions, diagnostic and treatment approaches, focusing on common pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, polymicrobial infections and multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Furthermore, multiple resistance mechanisms and adaptations for microbial survival are discussed, as well as modern evidence-based medical and surgical advancements in treatment strategies in combating FRI.

Impact of a Novel Antiseptic Lavage Solution on Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a challenge following hip or knee arthroplasty, demanding immediate intervention to prevent implant failure and systemic issues. Bacterial biofilm development on orthopedic devices worsens PJI severity, resulting in recurrent hospitalizations and significant economic burdens. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the efficacy of this novel antiseptic solution, never previously evaluated in vivo, in managing early post-operative or acute hematogenous PJI following primary hip and knee joint replacements. Methods: The inclusion criteria consist of patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or knee arthroplasty diagnosed with acute PJI through preoperative and intraoperative investigations, in accordance with the MSIS ICM 2018 criteria. The minimum required follow-up was 12 months from the cessation of antibiotic therapy. This novel antiseptic lavage solution is composed of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride and water. Data included demographic characteristics, diagnostic criteria, surgical techniques, post-operative treatment and follow-up outcomes. Results: A total of 39 patients treated with Debridement, Antibiotics Pearls and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) procedures using this solution between May 2021 and April 2023 were analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 6.4 months, infection recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2%, with no local allergic reactions or relevant systemic adverse effects detected. Persistent PJI necessitated two-stage revision surgery. Conclusions: This novel antiseptic lavage solution shows promise as an adjunctive tool in the treatment of PJI, demonstrating support in infection control while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Biofilm and How It Relates to Prosthetic Joint Infection

Prosthetic joint infection following total joint arthroplasty is a devastating complication, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality for the patient. The formation of a biofilm on implanted hardware contributes to the difficulty in successful identification and eradication of the infection. Antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention are necessary for addressing this condition; we present a discussion on different treatment options, including those that are not yet routinely utilized in the clinical setting or are under investigation, to highlight the present and future of PJI management.

Detrimental Effects of Chlorhexidine on Articular Cartilage Viability, Matrix, and Mechanics

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) solution is commonly used as an antiseptic irrigation for bacterial decontamination during orthopaedic surgery. Although the chondrotoxicity of CHG on articular cartilage has been reported, the full extent of CHG-related chondrotoxicity and its effects on the extracellular matrix and mechanical properties are unknown.

PURPOSE

To investigate the in vitro effects of a single 1-minute CHG exposure on the viability, biochemical content, and mechanics of native articular cartilage explants.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Articular cartilage explants (6 per group) were harvested from femoral condyles of the porcine stifle and sectioned at tidemark. Explants were bathed in CHG solution (0.05% CHG in sterile water) at varying concentrations (0% control, 0.01% CHG, and 0.05% CHG) for 1 minute, followed by complete phosphate-buffered saline wash and culture in chondrogenic medium. At 7 days after CHG exposure, cell viability, matrix content (collagen and glycosaminoglycan [GAG]), and compressive mechanical properties (creep indentation testing) were assessed.

RESULTS

One-minute CHG exposure was chondrotoxic to explants, with both 0.05% CHG (2.6% ± 4.1%) and 0.01% CHG (76.3% ± 8.6%) causing a decrease in chondrocyte viability compared with controls (97.5% ± 0.6%; P < .001 for both). CHG exposure at either concentration had no significant effect on collagen content, while 0.05% CHG exposure led to a significant decrease in mean GAG per wet weight compared with the control group (2.6% ± 1.7% vs 5.2% ± 1.9%; P = .029). There was a corresponding weakening of mechanical properties in explants treated with 0.05% CHG compared with controls, with decreases in mean aggregate modulus (177.8 ± 90.1 kPa vs 280.8 ± 19.8 kPa; P < .029) and shear modulus (102.6 ± 56.5 kPa vs 167.9 ± 16.2 kPa; P < .020).

CONCLUSION

One-minute exposure to CHG for articular cartilage explants led to dose-dependent decreases in chondrocyte viability, GAG content, and compressive mechanical properties. This raises concern for the risk of mechanical failure of the cartilage tissue after CHG exposure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians should be judicious regarding the use of CHG irrigation at these concentrations in the presence of native articular cartilage.

Non-inferiority and Safety of Increased Povidone-Iodine (Betadine) Concentration for Irrigation Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA)

Introduction Diluted Betadine (Purdue Pharma, Stamford, Conn) irrigation following primary total joint arthroplasty (pTJA) may reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A recent in vitro study found a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.63% Povidone-iodine (Betadine) for several bacterial isolates. This study reports outcomes of patients undergoing TJA using 0.54% Betadine irrigation compared to a historical cohort using 0.3% Betadine irrigation. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent pTJA from September 2017 to December 2020. 0.3% Betadine was used in a historical cohort and 0.54% Betadine in the experimental group. Patient demographics, intra-operative data, all-cause revision, and infection data were collected for the three-month post-operative period. Outcome frequencies between groups were compared using Fisher-Exact tests. Results Six hundred sixty-one patients underwent pTJA: 308 total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 353 total hip arthroplasty (THA). 0.3% Betadine group had seven (3.1%) revisions: five (2.2%) underwent a revision for non-infectious reasons, and two (0.9%) for PJI. 0.54% Betadine group had 11 (2.5%) revisions: nine (2.1%) underwent revision for non-infectious reasons, two (0.4%) for PJI. No significant difference was found for rates of all-cause revision or infection between groups. No adverse intra-operative events occurred with the higher Betadine concentration. Conclusion This study demonstrated no difference in rates of all-cause revision or PJI when using 0.3% Betadine versus 0.54% Betadine for irrigation following pTJA. No adverse intraoperative events occurred with 0.54% Betadine irrigation. Given recent in vitro data supporting increased Betadine MIC, our results showed safety and non-inferiority with respect to three-month post-operative complication rates. Further investigation through a large powered randomized controlled study is needed to determine the optimal Betadine irrigation concentration for PJI prevention is required.

Influence of antiseptic lavage during tibial plateau leveling osteotomies on surgical site infection in 1422 dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of preclosure antiseptic versus saline lavage on surgical site infections (SSI) in dogs following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO).

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Dogs treated with TPLO (n = 1422) between December 2019 and October 2021.

METHODS

The medical records of dogs treated with TPLO were reviewed for preclosure antiseptic lavage or saline irrigation. Additional collected data included signalment, unilateral or bilateral TPLO, postoperative administration of antimicrobial medications, antibiotic agent, surgeon, and development of SSI within 90 postoperative days. Eleven factors were analyzed for association with SSI using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Data were collected from the records of 519 dogs treated with antiseptic lavage and 903 dogs treated with saline lavage during TPLO. Surgical site infections were diagnosed more frequently in dogs that received preclosure antiseptic lavage (77/519, 14.84%) than those with saline irrigation (80/903, 8.86%) (p = .001). Single session bilateral TPLO increased the odds of SSI by 2.5x (p = .004). The odds of SSI increased by 11% (p = .001) for every 5 kg increase in bodyweight. Postoperative administration of antimicrobials decreased the risk of SSI (p = .008).

CONCLUSION

The preclosure antiseptic lavage tested here did not decrease the incidence of SSI after TPLO.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study do not provide evidence to support preclosure antiseptic lavage during TPLOs.

The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Irrigation on the Efficacy of Antibiotic Cement In Vitro

Povidone-iodine is a common antiseptic demonstrating success in reducing infection rates in primary arthroplasty; however, recent data suggest that its use in revision arthroplasty may increase infection rates. This study evaluated the effect of povidone-iodine solution on antibiotic cement and investigated the connection between povidone-iodine and increased infection rates in revision arthroplasty. Sixty antibiotic cement samples (ACSs) were formed using gentamicin-impregnated cement. The ACSs were divided into three groups: group A (n=20) was subject to a 3-minute povidone-iodine soak followed by a saline rinse; group B (n=20) underwent a 3-minute saline soak; and group C (n=20) underwent only a saline rinse. The antimicrobial activity of the samples was tested using a Kirby-Bauer-like assay using Staphylococcus epidermidis. The zone of inhibition (ZOI) was measured every 24 hours for 7 days. All groups possessed the greatest antimicrobial activity at 24 hours. Group C displayed a mass-corrected ZOI of 395.2 mm/g, which was statistically greater than the group B ZOI (313.2 mm/g, P<.05) but not the group A ZOI (346.5 mm/g, P>.05). All groups demonstrated a decrease in antimicrobial activity at 48 through 96 hours, with no significant difference at any time point. Prolonged soaking of antibiotic cement in a povidone-iodine or saline solution results in elution of the antibiotic into the irrigation solution, blunting initial antibiotic concentration. When using antibiotic cement, antiseptic soaks or irrigation should be focused prior to cementation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):10-14.].

An In Vitro Study to Assess the Best Strategy for the Chemical Debridement of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Irrigation and debridement using an irrigation solution is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. Therefore, it is necessary to determine which solution or combination of solutions is most efficacious against biofilm, as well as the optimal irrigation time. We conducted an experimental in vitro model by inoculating stainless steel discs with ATCC strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and a clinical strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. The discs were all irrigated with commonly used antiseptic solutions (10% and 3% povidone iodine, hydrogen peroxide, 3% acetic acid, and Bactisure™) for 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min and their combinations for 9 min (3 min each) vs. sterile saline as a positive control. We evaluated the reduction in biofilm based on colony-forming unit (cfu) counts and in combination assays, also based on cell viability and scanning electron microscopy. All antiseptics alone reduced more than 90% of cfu counts after 1 min of irrigation; the worst results were for hydrogen peroxide and 3% acetic acid. When solutions were sequentially combined, the best results were observed for all those starting with acetic acid, in terms of both reduction of log cfu/mL counts and viable cells. We consider that a combination of antiseptic solutions, particularly that comprising the sequence acetic acid + povidone iodine + hydrogen peroxide, would be the best option for chemical debridement during PJI surgery.

Comparison of the efficacy of physical and chemical strategies for the inactivation of biofilm cells of foodborne pathogens

Biofilm formation is a strategy in which microorganisms generate a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances to increase survival under harsh conditions. The efficacy of sanitization processes is lowered when biofilms form, in particular on industrial devices. While various traditional and emerging technologies have been explored for the eradication of biofilms, cell resistance under a range of environmental conditions renders evaluation of the efficacy of control challenging. This review aimed to: (1) classify biofilm control measures into chemical, physical, and combination methods, (2) discuss mechanisms underlying inactivation by each method, and (3) summarize the reduction of biofilm cells after each treatment. The review is expected to be useful for future experimental studies and help to guide the establishment of biofilm control strategies in the food industry.

Combining povidone-iodine with vancomycin can be beneficial in reducing early biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus on titanium surface

There is controversial clinical evidence regarding the added antibacterial benefit of locally administering antiseptic solutions or antibiotics to the infected joint space. The objectives of this in vitro study were to test the efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) and vancomycin in treating premature and developed Staphylococcus aureus biofilms grown on titanium implant surfaces. PVP-I and vancomycin were used to treat immature and developed biofilms formed by two clinical strains of S. aureus (BP043-MRSA, PB011-MSSA). S. aureus strains were grown as immature (3 h-old) or developed (24 h-old) biofilm. These biofilms were grown on titanium plasma sprayed discs. The treatment regimens tested were: 0.8% PVP-I, 500 μg/ml vancomycin as well as a combination of vancomycin and PVP-I. PVP-I was tested at 3 min, as per current clinical practice, versus 1 min treatment times. In addition, the cytotoxicity of the PVP-I and vancomycin was tested using fresh skeletal muscle tissue cores harvested from the rat's abdominal muscles using alamarBlue assay. The combination of PVP-I (3 min) and vancomycin (24 h.) showed synergistic interaction and the best efficacy against immature biofilms formed by both clinical strains. This degree of eradication was statistically significant compared to the untreated control, p < .0001. However, this combination therapy had limited efficiency against developed biofilms. Also, PVP-I alone was more effective when exposure time was 3 min instead of 1 min against immature biofilm for MRSA, p = .02, and MSSA, p = .01. PVP-I and vancomycin were not effective against developed biofilm regardless of exposure time. Also, combining PVP-I and vancomycin was not cytotoxic to muscle tissue. Combining PVP-I with vancomycin is superior in reducing viable S. aureus cells in immature biofilms grown on titanium surface without causing significant cytotoxicity to muscle tissue. Exposure times and biofilm maturity play a role in dictating the efficacy of using local antiseptics and antibiotics to treat biofilms on implant surfaces.

Stability analysis of tranexamic acid in the presence of various antiseptic solutions

Tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively reduces blood loss and transfusion risk during total joint arthroplasty. Additionally, intraoperative irrigation with various antiseptic solutions is often utilized for the management and prevention of surgical site infection. However, interactions between various antiseptic solutions and TXA have not been investigated. The purpose of this in vitro study is to evaluate the stability of TXA in the presence of common orthopedic antiseptic solutions. Five antiseptic solutions-0.1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gluconate, 10% povidone-iodine (BTD), 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's), 3% hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ), and 1.5% H₂ O₂ -and a 0.9% normal saline (NS) control were obtained. A stock 100 mg/ml TXA solution was diluted in each antiseptic solution to a concentration of 10.0 mg/ml to generate reference standard and stability samples. TXA stability in each solution was measured using high performance liquid chromatography at t = 0 and t = 120 min and reported as mean percent of theoretical concentration (MPT) with associated relative standard deviation (RSD). All experiments were performed in triplicate at room temperature. At t = 0 min, TXA remained stable when mixed with 0.9% NS, 0.1% CHX, 10% BTD, 3% H₂ O₂ , and 1.5% H₂ O₂ (MPT range: 102.0%-105.0%, RSD range: 0.80%-2.92%). Only 0.5% Dakin's led to significant degradation of TXA at t = 0 min (MPT: 14.3%, RSD:1.28%). At t = 120 min, TXA stability persisted for all compounds except Dakin's 0.5% (MPT: 18.4%, RSD: 28.7%). TXA efficacy may be significantly diminished when 0.5% Dakin's is used as an intraoperative irrigation solution. CHX, BTD, and H₂ O₂ do not degrade TXA.

Establishment of a Novel Rat Model of Gram-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Gram-negative periprosthetic joint infections (GN-PJIs) present unique challenges. Our aim was to establish a clinically representative GN-PJI model that recapitulates biofilm formation in vivo. We also hypothesized that biofilm formation on the implant surface would affect its ability to osseointegrate.

METHODS

Three-dimensionally-printed medical-grade titanium hip implants were used to replace the femoral heads of male Sprague-Dawley rats. GN-PJI was induced using 2 bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: a reference strain (PA14-lux) and a mutant biofilm-defective strain (ΔflgK-lux). Infection was monitored in real time using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bacterial loads were quantified utilizing the viable colony count. Biofilm formation at the bone-implant interface was visualized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Implant stability, as an outcome, was directly assessed by quantifying osseointegration using microcomputed tomography, and indirectly assessed by identifying gait-pattern changes.

RESULTS

Bioluminescence detected by the IVIS was focused on the hip region and demonstrated localized infection, with greater ability of PA14-lux to persist in the model compared with the ΔflgK-lux strain, which is defective in biofilm formation. This was corroborated by MRI, as PA14-lux induced relatively larger implant-related abscesses. Biofilm formation at the bone-implant interface induced by PA14-lux was visualized using FE-SEM versus defective-biofilm formation by ΔflgK-lux. Quantitatively, the average viable colony count of the sonicated implants, in colony-forming units/mL, was 3.77 × 108 for PA14-lux versus 3.65 × 103 for ΔflgK-lux, with a 95% confidence interval around the difference of 1.45 × 108 to 6.08 × 108 (p = 0.0025). This difference in the ability to persist in the model was reflected significantly on implant osseointegration, with a mean intersection surface of 4.1 × 106 ± 1.99 × 106 μm2 for PA14-lux versus 6.44 × 106 ± 2.53 × 106 μm2 for ΔflgK-lux and 7.08 × 106 ± 1.55 × 106 μm2 for the noninfected control (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this proposed, novel in vivo biofilm-based model is the most clinically representative for GN-PJI to date, since animals can bear weight on the implant, poor osseointegration was associated with biofilm formation, and localized PJI was assessed by various modalities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This model will allow for more reliable testing of novel biofilm-targeting therapeutics.

Engineered peptide PLG0206 overcomes limitations of a challenging antimicrobial drug class

The absence of novel antibiotics for drug-resistant and biofilm-associated infections is a global public health crisis. Antimicrobial peptides explored to address this need have encountered significant development challenges associated with size, toxicity, safety profile, and pharmacokinetics. We designed PLG0206, an engineered antimicrobial peptide, to address these limitations. PLG0206 has broad-spectrum activity against >1,200 multidrug-resistant (MDR) ESKAPEE clinical isolates, is rapidly bactericidal, and displays potent anti-biofilm activity against diverse MDR pathogens. PLG0206 displays activity in diverse animal infection models following both systemic (urinary tract infection) and local (prosthetic joint infection) administration. These findings support continuing clinical development of PLG0206 and validate use of rational design for peptide therapeutics to overcome limitations associated with difficult-to-drug pharmaceutical targets.

Cell Toxicity Study of Antiseptic Solutions Containing Povidone–Iodine and Hydrogen Peroxide

The increasing incidence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) has led to a growing interest in developing strategies to prevent and treat this severe complication. The surgical site’s application of antiseptic solutions to eliminate contaminating bacteria and eradicate the bacterial biofilm has been increasing over time. Even though it has been proven that combining antimicrobials could enhance their activities and help overcome acquired microbial resistance related to the topical use of antibiotics, the toxicity of integrated solutions is not well described. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of solutions containing povidone–iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), alone or in combination, after 1.3 and 5 min of exposure. Chondrocytes, tenocytes, and fibroblast-like synoviocytes were used for cytotoxicity analysis. Trypan blue stain (0.4% in PBS) was applied to evaluate the dead cells. All solutions tested showed a progressive increase in toxicity as exposure time increased except for PI at 0.3%, which exhibited the lowest toxicity. The combined solutions reported a reduced cellular killing at 3 and 5 min than H2O2 at equal concentrations, similar results to PI solutions.

Preclinical evaluation of a commercially available biofilm disrupting wound lavage for musculoskeletal trauma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of open fractures remains a significant challenge in trauma care as these fractures are accompanied by extensive soft tissue damage, exposing the wound site to contaminants and increasing infection risk. Formation of biofilm, a capsule-like environment that acts as a barrier to treatment, is a primary mode by which infecting pathogens persist at the wound site. Therefore, a pressing need exists to identify irrigation methods that can disrupt biofilm and expose pathogens to treatment. This study aims to evaluate the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, in comparison with saline for care of severe musculoskeletal wounds and elucidate potential effects on antibiotic treatment success.

METHODS

UAMS-1 Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were formed in vitro and treated with Bactisure™ wound lavage or sterile normal saline, alone, or in combination with sub-biofilm inhibitory levels of vancomycin. Characterization methods included quantification of biofilm biomass, quantification of viable biofilm bacteria, and biofilm matrix imaging. For in vivo assessment, a delayed treatment model of contaminated open fracture was used wherein a critical-sized defect was created in a rat femur and wound site inoculated with UAMS-1. Following a 6 h delay, wounds were debrided, irrigated with lavage of interest, and antibiotic treatments administered. Bacterial enumeration was performed on bone and hardware samples after two weeks.

RESULTS

An immediate reduction in biofilm biomass was observed in vitro following antibiofilm lavage treatment, with a subsequent 2- to 3- log reduction in viable bacteria achieved after 24 h. Furthermore, biofilms treated with antibiofilm lavage in combination with vancomycin exhibited a minor, but statistically significant, decrease in viable bacteria compared to irrigation alone. In vivo, a minor, not statistically significant, decrease in median bioburden was observed for the antibiofilm lavage compared to saline when used in combination with antibiotics. However, the percentage of bone and hardware samples with detectable bacteria was reduced from 50 to 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, may hold promise in mitigating infection in contaminated musculoskeletal wounds and warrants further investigation. Here, we proposed multiple mechanisms in vitro by which this antibiofilm lavage may help mitigate infection, and demonstrate this treatment slightly outperforms saline in controlling bioburden in vivo.

A Novel Irrigant to Eliminate Planktonic Bacteria and Eradicate Biofilm Superstructure With Persistent Effect During Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have examined the use of topical and irrigation-related adjuvants to decrease the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty. Many issues related to their use remain to be investigated. These include cost, antibiotic stewardship, bactericidal effect on planktonic bacteria, host cytotoxicity, necessity to irrigate/dilute potentially cytotoxic agents after their application, and impact on biofilm.

METHODS

Bacterial strains of microorganisms were grown in optimal medium. After the growth phase, the organisms were exposed to the novel irrigation solution (XPerience) or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) for 5 minutes before a neutralizing broth was added. The colony-forming units per milliliter and the log reduction in colony-forming units in the treated sample vs the control were then determined. Subsequently, biofilms of microorganisms were grown on hydroxyapatite-coated glass slides. Each slide was then exposed to irrigation solutions for various contact times. Biofilm quantification was performed and the log10 density of each organism was obtained.

RESULTS

In vitro testing of the irrigant demonstrated 6-log reductions in planktonic bacteria in 5 minutes, and 4-log to 8-log reductions in biofilms. Laboratory tissue testing has demonstrated minimal cytotoxic effects to host tissue allowing for solution to remain in contact with the host without need for subsequent irrigation, creating a barrier to biofilm for up to 5 hours after its application.

CONCLUSION

This novel irrigant demonstrates high efficacy against both planktonic bacteria and bacterial biofilms in laboratory testing. Large series in vivo data are necessary to further establish its efficacy in reducing primary and recurrent surgical site infections.

Topical Antibiofilm Agents With Potential Utility in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Narrative Review

The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic and recalcitrant diseases is widely appreciated, and the treatment of biofilm infection is an increasingly important area of research. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex disease associated with sinonasal dysbiosis and the presence of bacterial biofilms. While most biofilm-related diseases are associated with highly persistent but relatively less severe inflammation, the presence of biofilms in CRS is associated with greater severity of inflammation and recalcitrance despite appropriate treatment. Oral antibiotics are commonly used to treat CRS but they are often ineffective, due to poor penetration of the sinonasal mucosa and the inherently antibiotic resistant nature of bacteria in biofilms. Topical non-antibiotic antibiofilm agents may prove more effective, but few such agents are available for sinonasal application. We review compounds with antibiofilm activity that may be useful for treating biofilm-associated CRS, including halogen-based compounds, quaternary ammonium compounds and derivatives, biguanides, antimicrobial peptides, chelating agents and natural products. These include preparations that are currently available and those still in development. For each compound, antibiofilm efficacy, mechanism of action, and toxicity as it relates to sinonasal application are summarised. We highlight the antibiofilm agents that we believe hold the greatest promise for the treatment of biofilm-associated CRS in order to inform future research on the management of this difficult condition.

Efficacy of Surgical/Wound Washes against Bacteria: Effect of Different In Vitro Models

Topical antiseptics are often used to treat chronic wounds with biofilm infections and during salvage of biofilm contaminated implants, but their antibacterial efficacy is frequently only tested against non-aggregated planktonic or free-swimming organisms. This study evaluated the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of four commercial surgical washes Bactisure, TorrenTX, minimally invasive lavage (MIS), and Betadine against six bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli, which are commonly isolated from surgical site infections and chronic wound infections using different in vitro models. We determined minimum planktonic inhibitory and eradication concentration and minimum 1-day-old biofilm inhibition and eradication concentration of antiseptics in 96-well plates format with 24 h contact time. We also tested the efficacy of antiseptics at in-use concentration and contact time in the presence of biological soil against 3-day-old biofilm grown on coupons with shear in a bioreactor, such that the results are more applicable to the clinical biofilm situations. In the 96-well plate model, the minimum concentration required to inhibit or kill planktonic and biofilm bacteria was lower for Bactisure and TorrenTX than for MIS and Betadine. However, Betadine and Bactisure showed better antibiofilm efficacy than TorrenTX and MIS in the 3-day-old biofilm bioreactor model at in-use concentration. The minimal concentration of surgical washes required to inhibit or kill planktonic bacterial cells and biofilms varies, suggesting the need for the development and use of biofilm-based assays to assess antimicrobial therapies, such as topical antiseptics and their effective concentrations. The antibiofilm efficacy of surgical washes against different bacterial species also varies, highlighting the importance of testing against various bacterial species to achieve a thorough understanding of their efficacy.

Antiseptic Irrigation Solutions Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review

»

There are limited data that directly compare the efficacy of antiseptic irrigation solutions used for the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections in orthopaedic procedures; there is a notable lack of prospective data.

»

For prevention of periprosthetic joint infections, the strongest evidence supports the use of low-pressure povidone-iodine.

»

For the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections, delivering multiple solutions sequentially may be beneficial.

What Is the Duration of Irrigation? An In Vitro Study of the Minimum Exposure Time to Eradicate Bacteria With Irrigation Solutions

BACKGROUND

Antiseptic irrigation solutions are commonly used by arthroplasty surgeons to reduce intraoperative bacterial colonization with the goal of reducing postoperative infections in the setting of primary total joint arthroplasty. Currently, the minimum irrigation time to eliminate common microbes implicated in periprosthetic joint infection is unknown. We sought to determine the minimum effective exposure time required to prevent growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Cutibacterium acnes with common antiseptic solutions.

METHODS

S aureus, S epidermidis, and C acnes cultures were treated with povidone-iodine (0.35%), chlorhexidine (0.05%), sodium hypochlorite (0.5%), polyhexamethylene biguanide, and an acetic acid-based solution for 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds in triplicate. Bacterial growth was quantified using the drop plate method. Failure to eliminate all bacteria was considered "not effective" at that time point.

RESULTS

Povidone-iodine 0.35% (Betadine), sodium hypochlorite 0.5% (HySept), and acetic acid (Bactisure) eradicated all bacterial growth after 90 seconds of treatment, and as low as 15 seconds in S aureus and C acnes (Betadine) or S epidermidis (Bactisure). Polyhexamethylene biguanide (Prontosan) required 90 seconds for elimination of S aureus and S epidermidis, and 120 seconds for C acnes. Chlorhexidine 0.05% (Irrisept) did eliminate S epidermidis at 120 seconds but did not effectively eradicate S aureus or C acnes.

CONCLUSION

All tested antiseptic solutions demonstrated successful eradication of all bacterial growth in under 2 minutes of treatment time except chlorhexidine. Povidone-iodine may require the shortest duration of treatment time to successfully eradicate common bacteria.

Irrigation and Debridement With Implant Retention: Does Chronicity of Symptoms Matter?

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a rare, yet devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chronic infection is generally considered a contraindication to debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); however, outcomes stratified by chronicity have not been well documented.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all DAIR cases performed at a single institution from 2008 to 2015 was performed. Chronicity of PJI was categorized as acute postoperative, chronic, or acute hematogenous. Failure after DAIR, defined as re-revision for infection recurrence with the same organism, was evaluated between the 3 chronicity groups at 90 days as well as at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 248 patients undergoing DAIR for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty PJI were included. Categorization of PJI was acute (acute postoperative) in 59 cases (24%), chronic in 54 (22%), and acute hematogenous in 135 (54%). DAIR survivorship was 47% (range 0.3-10 years). Overall, there were 118 (47.6%) treatment failures after DAIR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. There was no difference in failure rate between total hip or total knee arthroplasty patients (P = .07). Patients infected with Staphylococcus conferred a higher risk of failure for all DAIR procedures regardless of chronicity category.

CONCLUSION

Identification of microbial species prior to undertaking DAIR may be more clinically relevant than stratification according to chronicity category when considering treatment options.