Food Allergen Immunotherapy in Preschool Children: Do We Have the Evidence?

Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management

Food allergies pose significant challenges including the risk for severe allergic reactions. This review article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the historic standard management approach-avoidance and carrying epinephrine in case of accidental ingestion-and argues, based on accumulating evidence, that oral immunotherapy (OIT) should play a key role in preschool food allergy management. Firstly, our review will highlight pitfalls with the 'wait-and-see' approach to natural resolution of food allergies, with recent data pointing to lower resolution than previously thought. For those who do not outgrow their allergies, waiting until school age to offer OIT means missing the window of opportunity where OIT is safest, and prolongs unnecessary dietary restrictions. For those who do outgrow their allergies, research indicates they may not reintroduce the food due to fear and aversion and can become re-sensitised, putting them at risk of severe reactions. Secondly, the risks associated with allergen avoidance are higher than previously believed. Allergen avoidance is imperfect and carries an increased risk of severe reactions when compared with the risk of severe reactions while on OIT, particularly in preschoolers. Although an allergic reaction can be stressful, it is preferable to have this occur during OIT where caregivers are vigilant following a scheduled dose, rather than having this occur at a potentially unexpected time following an accidental exposure. Lastly, there is a growing body of evidence supporting favourable safety and effectiveness of OIT in preschoolers, and preliminary data suggesting higher likelihood of remission in infants. OIT has the potential to significantly improve quality of life, and future research is needed to answer this important question in preschoolers. In summary, while ongoing research will further clarify cost-effectiveness, long-term adherence and psychosocial impacts of OIT, this review suggests that OIT should play a key role in preschool food allergy management.

Treatment of Food Allergy: Immunotherapy, Omalizumab, or Both

Food allergy is a common disease that has substantial impacts on the quality of life of patients and their families, and all reactions have the potential for causing life-threatening anaphylaxis. Food-allergic individuals currently have 2 Food and Drug Administration- approved therapeutic options available to them aside from life-long allergen avoidance: oral immunotherapy (OIT) and omalizumab. OIT for food allergy has been extensively studied in clinical trials and currently provides the greatest level of protection; however, it also has a high burden of treatment. Studies suggest that more successful OIT outcomes may be attained with earlier intervention; however, early OIT presents its own challenges. Omalizumab, recently Food and Drug Administration-approved, is a biologic targeting IgE, a major driver of allergic reactions. In contrast to OIT, omalizumab monotherapy offers a low treatment burden therapeutic option that provides a safety net against reactions to accidental ingestion of multiple allergens. In addition, omalizumab has been investigated as an adjunct to OIT, improving the speed and safety of single-allergen or multiallergen OIT. Here, we discuss the clinical use of these therapeutic options and provide a guide for shared decision making between patients and physicians about what therapeutic option might be more appropriate.

Infant and Toddler Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Initiation Before Age 2 Increases Ad Libitum Peanut Consumption

BACKGROUND

Peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) has promising potential of disease modification, but there are no studies to date evaluating high-dose POIT, leading to ad libitum (ad lib) consumption of peanut products, especially in children 6 months to 4 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To report real-world outcomes of high-dose POIT in children 6 months to 4 years of age, including adverse events, achievement of ad lib consumption, and the impact of age on these outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients 6 months to 4 years of age with a diagnosis of peanut allergy were enrolled in a POIT protocol with a goal dose of 3000 mg. Demographics along with POIT and clinical outcomes 6 months after POIT are reported.

RESULTS

Sixty children, with a median age of 16 months, started POIT. Three (5%) were lost to follow-up, and 6 (10%) discontinued POIT because of recurrent adverse events or the inability to consume daily peanut protein. Fifty-one (85%) children completed POIT in a median of 7 months and were consuming ad lib peanut products for a duration of 6 months after completion of the POIT protocol. Sixteen (26.7%) children experienced a total of 22 adverse reactions during POIT. Initiating POIT before 24 months of age increased the likelihood of ad lib peanut consumption by an odds ratio of 11.69 (1.19-114.31, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that high-dose POIT in infants and toddlers is well tolerated and can lead to ad lib introduction of dietary peanut products into the diet, especially if initiated before 2 years of age.

Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Immunotherapy for Egg Allergy According to Age of Therapy Commencement

BACKGROUND

Egg oral immunotherapy (OIT) can induce desensitization or remission of egg allergy in children.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of OIT for raw egg allergy in school-age children compared with egg avoidance, and the most cost-effective age at which to commence treatment.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model estimated the health and cost outcomes of 1,000 children aged 4 years with egg allergy, comparing different ages of OIT commencement (ages 4-12, inclusive) versus ongoing egg avoidance. Years lived with egg allergy, egg tolerance or remission (natural and OIT-induced), and desensitization to egg were captured, with rates of allergic reactions and utility values assigned to each health state. Treatment effects were derived from published randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the Australian health care payer perspective (costs in Australian dollars per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained), with a 20-year time horizon, 5% annual discounting, and an AU $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.

RESULTS

Without OIT, 858 children attained natural resolution before age 24. Under conservative assumptions, with OIT-induced remission set at zero and 84% achieving desensitization, ICERs were below the WTP threshold for treatment commencement at age 8 or older, with the smallest ICER observed at age 12 (AU $43,233/QALY; 95% CI, 32,025-73,350). However, the cost-effectiveness of OIT was achieved at all ages (ICER less than the WTP threshold) when OIT-induced remission increased to ∼40% of treated children.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current published evidence, the cost-effectiveness of egg OIT improves with increased age of treatment commencement. Cost-effectiveness increases when the proportion of children achieving OIT-induced remission increases.

Allergen-Specific IgE is a Stronger Predictor of Remission Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Than Age in Children Aged 1-10 Years

BACKGROUND

Remission is the desired outcome following OIT as it allows individuals to discontinue treatment and eat the allergen freely. Early initiation of OIT in infants and toddlers has been embraced as an approach to increase the likelihood of remission. However, there is no high-quality evidence supporting younger age as an independent factor driving remission; available studies are limited by small samples of younger subjects and lack of adjustment for confounding covariates, particularly peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) levels which is closely correlated with age.

METHODS

This study examined relationships between peanut sIgE and age at baseline and remission, in children aged 1-10 who completed 18 months of OIT in the PPOIT-003 RCT (n = 162). Remission was defined as absence of clinical reactivity to peanut after 8 weeks of allergen avoidance/treatment discontinuation. Age and sIgE were examined as continuous variables in univariate and multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Higher peanut sIgE was consistently predictive of lower likelihood of remission, independent of age. In contrast, there was no independent association between age and remission after adjusting for baseline sIgE (OR 0.94 [0.79-1.12], p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings do not support age as an independent predictor of remission following OIT. Additional studies examining safety and efficacy of OIT in infants and younger children are urgently needed, ahead of widespread adoption of early intervention.

Safety and Feasibility of Peanut, Tree Nut, and Sesame Oral Immunotherapy in Infants and Toddlers in a Real-World Setting

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) for food allergy has been largely studied in older children within the context of clinical trials, and its availability has historically been limited for younger patients with food allergy. Data have shown that the most impact may actually be seen with the use of OIT in younger infants and toddlers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of OIT in subjects 24 months and younger in a real-world setting using commercially available food products.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of subjects 24 months and younger initiated on OIT for peanut, tree nut, or sesame allergy within the Scripps Clinic allergy department. Medical records were reviewed for data regarding initial oral food challenges, OIT, and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-two subjects 24 months and younger were initiated on OIT. Most subjects (84.6%) were on single-food OIT, and some (15.4%) were on multifood OIT. No increased adverse outcomes were observed on multifood OIT. Of the 59 initial oral food challenges, objective reactions occurred during 42 challenges, most being low-grade reactions. During initial oral food challenges, 86.1% of peanut-allergic children tolerated 1/8 of 1 Bamba stick with no reaction. Most subjects (73.1%) updosed at home, and most (51.9%) had no reactions while updosing. Some had low-grade cutaneous reactions, none requiring epinephrine or emergency evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

OIT in infants is safe and feasible to perform in a real-world setting using commercially available food products with at-home updosing, thus increasing the availability of OIT for patients.

Successful Introduction of Peanut in Sensitized Infants With Reported Reactions at Home

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown efficacy of early introduction of peanut to prevent peanut allergy. It is currently unknown which diagnostic pathway is optimal after parental-reported reactions to peanut at home after early introduction.

METHODS

The PeanutNL cohort study included high-risk infants who were referred for early introduction of peanut. A subgroup of 186 infants with reactions to peanut at home underwent peanut skin prick tests and a supervised open oral food challenge (OFC) at a median age of 8 months. After a negative OFC, peanut was introduced at home.

RESULTS

Sensitization to peanut was detected in 69% of 186 infants, of whom 80% had >4 mm wheals in skin prick tests. An OFC with a cumulative dose of 4.4 g of peanut protein was performed in 163 infants with Sampson severity score grade I-III reactions at home; 120 challenges were negative. Peanut was subsequently introduced at home in infants with a negative challenge outcome. After 6 months, 96% were still eating peanut and 81% ate single portions of 3.0 g of peanut protein. One patient was considered to be peanut allergic after reintroduction of peanut at home.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that 65% of infants with reported reactions to peanut at home have negative OFCs. In those children, peanut could be introduced safely, and 96% were able to consume peanut regularly without reactions. Challenging infants younger than 12 months prevents the misdiagnosis of peanut allergy and enables safe continued exposure to peanut and the induction of long-term tolerance.

Omalizumab Implementation in Practice: Lessons Learned From the OUtMATCH Study

In February 2024, omalizumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of food allergy, based on data from the landmark phase 3 clinical trial, Omalizumab as Monotherapy and as Adjunct Therapy in Children and Adults (OUtMATCH). In this Rostrum, OUtMATCH investigators share their perspectives on the trial results, the implications for translation into daily practice, and on remaining gaps in the field. The study met its primary and key secondary end points, demonstrating a large effect size in multiallergen desensitization compared with placebo; yet there were some participants who did not respond, and the percentage of responders tolerating all 3 food allergens was lower than that for single foods. Clinicians are likely to have many questions about appropriate patient selection, monitoring for treatment responsiveness, and how to manage off-label considerations such as dietary incorporation or cotreatment with oral immunotherapy. Additional research is needed to answer these remaining questions and ensure that the translation of omalizumab in real-world practice leads to high-quality outcomes.

Two-year post-treatment outcomes following peanut oral immunotherapy in the Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 Long-Term (PPOIT-003LT) study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined long-term outcomes following oral immunotherapy (OIT); none have examined long-term risks and benefits associated with distinct clinical outcomes (desensitization, remission).

METHODS

Participants completing the probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) -003 randomized trial were enrolled in a follow-on study, PPOIT-003LT. Peanut ingestion, reactions, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were monitored prospectively. Outcomes at 1-year and 2-years post-treatment were examined by treatment group and by post-OIT clinical outcome (remission, desensitization without remission [DWR], allergic).

RESULTS

86% (151/176) of eligible children enrolled. Post-treatment peanut ingestion at 2-years post-treatment were similar for PPOIT (86.7%) and OIT (78.7%) groups, both higher than placebo (10.3%). Reactions reduced over time for all treatment and clinical outcome groups (PPOIT 31.7% to 23.3%, OIT 37.7% to 19.7%, placebo 13.8% to 6.9%; remission 27.5% to 15.9%; DWR 57.9% to 36.8%; allergic 11.6% to 7%). At 2-years post-treatment, similar proportions of remission and allergic participants reported reactions (RD 0.09 (95%CI -0.03, 0.20), p = .127), whereas more DWR participants reported reactions than remission (remission vs DWR: RD -0.21 (95%CI -0.39; -0.03), p = .02) and allergic (DWR vs allergic: RD 0.30 (95%CI 0.13, 0.47), p = .001) participants. At 2-years post-treatment, 0% remission versus 5.3% DWR versus 2.3% allergic participants reported adrenaline injector usage. Remission participants had significantly greater HRQOL improvement (adjusted for baseline) compared with both DWR (MD -0.54 (95%CI -0.99, -0.10), p = .017) and allergic (MD -0.82 (95%CI -1.25, -0.38), p < .001).

CONCLUSION

By 2-years post-treatment, remission participants reported fewer reactions, less severe reactions and greater HRQOL improvement compared with DWR and allergic participants, indicating that remission is the patient-preferred treatment outcome over desensitization or remaining allergic.

Simulated use of thresholds for precautionary allergen labeling: Impact on prevalence and risk

Heterogeneity and overuse of precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) in prepackaged foods have eroded its risk communication efficacy. Experts recommend applying PAL based on allergen concentration thresholds, but adoption remains limited. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the potential impact of this approach using Monte Carlo risk simulations. Four allergens and 9 food categories were considered in 2 scenarios: (1) consumption of products currently carrying PAL in Canada where individuals with food allergy (FA) are assumed to consume them, and (2) consumption of products without PAL, in a hypothetical context where PAL is applied based on thresholds that would protect 99 % (ED01) and 95 % (ED05) of individuals with FA, and individuals with FA systematically avoid products with PAL. In scenario (1), although several cases studied would cause <10 reactions/10 000 eating occasions (e.o.), there were also many that would cause >20 reactions/10 000 e.o. Cross-contact milk posed the highest risk (max. 1120 reactions/10 000 e.o.), and peanut, the least (max. 10 reactions/10 000 e.o.). In scenario (2), consumption of products without PAL, when using thresholds for PAL based on ED01, could lead to a maximum of 15 reactions/10 000 e. o. for all studied cases, and based on ED05, to 57 (if excluding dark chocolate with milk PAL). In most cases, the estimated number of reactions per 10 000 e.o. attributed to products with PAL currently on the market would be higher (p < 0.05) than that attributed to products without PAL, if PAL is applied based on the simulated thresholds. Thus, a threshold driven approach to adopt PAL on prepackaged foods, while advising consumers to avoid these products, could be beneficial for individuals with FA in Canada, as products without PAL would result in very few and generally mild adverse reactions.

Longitudinal peanut and Ara h 2 specific-IgE, -IgG4, and -IgG4/-IgE ratios are associated with the natural resolution of peanut allergy in childhood

BACKGROUND

There are no studies of longitudinal immunoglobulin measurements in a population-based cohort alongside challenge-confirmed peanut allergy outcomes. Little is known about biomarkers for identifying naturally resolving peanut allergy during childhood.

OBJECTIVES

To measure longitudinal trends in whole peanut and component Ara h 2 sIgE and sIgG4 in the first 10 years of life, in a population cohort of children with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy, and to determine whether peanut-specific immunoglobulin levels or trends are associated with peanut allergy persistence or resolution by 10 years of age.

METHODS

One-year-old infants with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy (n = 156) from the HealthNuts study (n = 5276) were prospectively followed at ages 4, 6, and 10 years with questionnaires, skin prick tests, oral food challenges, and plasma total-IgE, sIgE and sIgG4 to peanut and Ara h 2.

RESULTS

Peanut allergy resolved in 33.9% (95% CI = 25.3%, 43.3%) of children by 10 years old with most resolving (97.4%, 95% CI = 86.5%, 99.9%) by 6 years old. Decreasing Ara h 2 sIgE (p = .01) and increasing peanut sIgG4 (p < .001), Ara h 2 sIgG4 (p = .01), peanut sIgG4/sIgE (p < .001) and Ara h 2 sIgG4/sIgE (p < .001) from 1 to 10 years of age were associated with peanut allergy resolution. Peanut sIgE measured at 1 year old had the greatest prognostic value (AUC = 0.75 [95% CI = 0.66, 0.82]); however, no single threshold produced both high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

One third of infant peanut allergy resolved by 10 years of age. Decreasing sIgE and sIgG4 to peanut and Ara h 2 over time were associated with natural resolution of peanut allergy. However, biomarker levels at diagnosis were not strongly associated with the natural history of peanut allergy.

Differences in the Course, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Food Allergies Depending on Age-Comparison of Children and Adults

Food allergy (FA) has become a common global public health issue, with a growing prevalence in the modern world and a significant impact on the lives of patients, their families, and caregivers. It affects every area of life and is associated with elevated costs. Food allergy is an adverse immune reaction that occurs in response to a given food. The symptoms vary from mild to severe and can lead to anaphylaxis. This is why it is important to focus on the factors influencing the occurrence of food allergies, specific diagnostic methods, effective therapies, and especially prevention. Recently, many guidelines have emphasized the impact of introducing specific foods into a child's diet at an early age in order to prevent food allergies. Childhood allergies vary with age. In infants, the most common allergy is to cow's milk. Later in life, peanut allergy is more frequently diagnosed. Numerous common childhood allergies can be outgrown by adulthood. Adults can also develop new IgE-mediated FA. The gold standard for diagnosis is the oral provocation test. Skin prick tests, specific IgE measurements, and component-resolved diagnostic techniques are helpful in the diagnosis. Multiple different approaches are being tried as possible treatments, such as immunotherapy or monoclonal antibodies. This article focuses on the prevention and quality of life of allergic patients. This article aims to systematize the latest knowledge and highlight the differences between food allergies in pediatric and adult populations.

Preventive allergen immunotherapy with inhalant allergens in children

The efficacy and safety of preventive allergen immunotherapy (pAIT) in children are currently under investigation. Here, we provide an overview of pAIT with respiratory allergens concerning the prevention of new sensitizations, allergic disease onset and progression as well as further immunomodulatory effects. Three databases were searched for clinical pAIT studies in children. Selected publications were reviewed for preventive outcomes according to prevention level (primary, secondary, and tertiary), allergen type, administration route, dose, and treatment duration. The primary prevention approach appears safe but showed no allergen-specific effect on new sensitizations. Secondary prevention seems feasible and may induce regulatory T cell-mediated immunotolerance. The number of studies at these prevention levels is limited. Tertiary prevention with grass and/or tree pollen-based pAIT has shown efficacy in preventing disease progression from allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis to asthma. Data on tertiary pAIT with house dust mites and other allergen types are inconclusive. Subcutaneous and sublingual routes appear similarly effective, but head-to-head comparative paediatric studies are scarce. Additionally, there are fewer placebo-controlled studies. Nevertheless, immunomodulatory outcomes of pAIT are encouraging. Currently, limited but favourably suggestive evidence is available for preventing respiratory allergic diseases in children by pAIT. Primary and secondary prevention have potential and warrant further investigation through well-designed studies.

Interaction Between Baseline Participant Factors and Treatment Effects Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

The Probiotic Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 multicenter randomized trial found that both probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) and peanut OIT alone (OIT) were effective compared with placebo in inducing clinical remission after 18 months of treatment, and improving health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 12 months after treatment. Understanding treatment effect modifiers can optimize outcomes through precision care.

OBJECTIVES

This post hoc study examined baseline clinical and demographic participant factors that modified treatment effects.

METHODS

The study sample included 201 children (aged 1-10 years) with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy. Exposure variables were baseline clinical and demographic factors. Outcomes were remission (double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, cumulative 4,950-mg peanut protein at 8 weeks after treatment) and HRQL (change in Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire-Parent Form score). Interactions between baseline factors and treatment effects on remission and HRQL were explored with regression models.

RESULTS

A higher degree of peanut sensitivity (large peanut skin prick test, high peanut specific IgE, and low reaction-eliciting dose at study entry challenge) and other concurrent allergic conditions (multiple food allergies, asthma, or wheeze) were associated with the decreased likelihood of attaining remission after both PPOIT and OIT treatment. History of anaphylaxis was associated with the reduced likelihood of remission after PPOIT compared with OIT. For the HRQL outcome, there was evidence that sex, history of anaphylaxis, and age modified treatment effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline participant factors modify PPOIT and OIT effects on remission and HRQL. Considering modifiers of treatment effect during participant selection may optimize treatment success and clinical trial design toward specific outcomes, such as the achievement of remission.

Optimising the management of peanut allergy by targeting immune plasticity

Randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of oral tolerance induction to peanut have enabled detailed comparison of their clinical and immunological success. They have demonstrated that the regular consumption of peanut for at least 2 years by babies who are not allergic enables protection from developing peanut allergy. The LEAP study intervention tested the impact of regular peanut consumption for 4 years and demonstrated a sustained protection against the development of peanut allergy even after 12 months of peanut avoidance from 5 to 6 years of age. The PreventADALL trial introduced multiple allergens into babies' diets from early infancy and reduced the prevalence of food allergy at 3 years, especially by protecting against peanut allergy. Immunological studies from the LEAP cohort demonstrated that regular peanut consumption was associated with a prompt induction of peanut-specific IgG4 and reduced manufacture of peanut and Ara h 2-specific IgE. Even after stopping peanut consumption for 5 years, there continued to be a significant fall in peanut-specific Ara h 2 IgE in the consumption group from 5 to 6 years of age (p < .01). Children who developed peanut allergy by 5 years started to develop increasing sensitisation to linear sequential peanut epitopes from 2.5 years of age, suggesting that putative disease-modifying interventions should commence before 3 years. Data comparing clinical outcomes between children undergoing peanut immunotherapy from infancy suggest that younger children can consume higher portions of peanut without reaction on challenge whilst taking immunotherapy, have fewer side effects and are more likely to enjoy remission of PA. Peanut oral immunotherapy modulates T-cell populations in order to bring about hypo-responsiveness of allergy effector cells. Studies are now needed to characterise and compare different states of immunological tolerance. This will accelerate the design of interventions which can promote primary, secondary and tertiary levels of PA prevention across a range of age groups.

Oral immunotherapy as a curative treatment for food-allergic preschool children: Current evidence and potential underlying mechanisms

The worldwide rising prevalence of food allergy is a major public health concern. Standard care consists of allergen avoidance and rescue medication upon accidental exposure. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is increasingly being studied as a treatment option. Although desensitization (an increased reaction threshold) is often achieved during OIT, sustained unresponsiveness (SU; clinical nonreactivity after finishing OIT) is not achieved in most patients. A few studies have investigated the effectiveness of OIT in children younger than 4 years of age (early = e-OIT) and have shown a much more favorable outcome in terms of SU development. Together with food allergy prevention studies, which have demonstrated high efficacy of early oral allergen exposure, the outcomes of e-OIT studies indicate an early-life window of opportunity to achieve SU, allowing unrestricted dietary intake. However, the underlying mechanism of the high effectiveness of e-OIT is not understood yet. Both cohort and OIT studies indicate early-life immune plasticity. An immature food-allergic response in the first years of life seems to be a major driver of this immune plasticity, along with a higher tolerogenic immunological state. Allergy maturation can likely be disrupted effectively by early intervention, preventing the development of persistent food allergy. Upcoming studies will provide important additional data on the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of e-OIT. Combined with immune mechanistic studies, this should inform the implementation of e-OIT.

Early peanut introduction: To test or not to test?

OBJECTIVE

To review recent evidence and international guidelines on early peanut introduction for preventing peanut allergy and provide an update on the status of the debate around testing before early peanut introduction.

DATA SOURCES

Review of published literature documenting: infant feeding guidelines; impact of early peanut introduction on peanut allergy; risk factors for peanut allergy; and impact of early peanut introduction guidelines on infant feeding practices and allergy.

STUDY SELECTION

We used a narrative approach and present both pro and con arguments for testing before peanut introduction. Data from randomized controlled trials and post-hoc analyses of these trials and observational studies were included.

RESULTS

Allergy prevention guidelines around the world now consistently recommend introducing peanut into an infant's diet before 12 months of age for countries with high peanut allergy prevalence. In the US, guidelines recently shifted away from recommending allergy testing before introduction for those at risk of peanut allergy. There is evidence primarily from Australia that recommending early introduction without prior testing is safe and effective in increasing early peanut introduction for both high and low-risk infants, although the subsequent reduction in peanut allergy prevalence at the population level was less than expected.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence supports recommending early peanut introduction without routinely testing for peanut allergy. If testing is offered, this should be based on shared decision making between families and practitioners and only be undertaken where there is provision for rapid access to definitive diagnosis including oral food challenges.