Insulinoma-associated protein 1 is a sensitive and specific marker for lung neuroendocrine tumors in cytologic and surgical specimens

Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM-1) is a useful diagnostic marker for the evaluation of primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 27 cases

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) immunohistochemistry has been established as a sensitive and reliable immunohistochemical marker for detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in tumors across various organ systems. However, this marker has not been adequately investigated in primary thymic neuroendocrine tumors. We have studied a series of 27 cases of primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus, including 3 typical carcinoids, 18 atypical carcinoids, 4 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 2 small cell carcinomas. Immunostaining on whole tissue sections for INSM-1 was evaluated. Results of immunostaining for chromogranin and synaptophysin were also evaluated. 26/27 tumors (96%) demonstrated nuclear positivity for INSM1. 18 tumors (67%) showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining (3 +), 3 tumors (11%) moderate (2 +) nuclear staining, and 5 tumors (19%) showed weak (1 +) nuclear staining. The average percentage of tumor cells positive for INSM1 was 76%. Only one tumor, a small cell carcinoma, was negative. All tumors were positive for synaptophysin, and 26/27 (96%) were positive for chromogranin A. This study confirms that INSM1 immunohistochemistry is a sensitive marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms and demonstrates similar performance characteristics compared to other organ systems. The nuclear staining with this marker offers the advantage of eliminating some of the ambiguity in the interpretation sometimes encountered with other markers. An added advantage is the consistent staining across the entire spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors of this organ.

Pulmonary Cytopathology: Current and Future Impact of Microscopy and Immunohistochemistry

With the advancement of tissue procurement techniques, in-depth knowledge of morphology is crucial for cytopathologists to diagnose neoplastic and nonneoplastic lung diseases optimally. Cytopathologists must also be well versed in immunohistochemistry/immunocytochemistry markers and their interpretation for an accurate diagnosis.

The Significance of Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 in the Pathological Diagnosis of Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Biopsy Specimens

Objective: Our purpose was to investigate the clinicopathological diagnostic value of immunohistochemical antibody for insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) in biopsy specimens of SCLC. Methods: Biopsy specimens of SCLC diagnosed at the pathology department of Tangshan Gongren Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were selected. INSM1 expression was detected and compared with conventional neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A (CHGA), and CD56 regarding expression sensitivity and specificity. Results: The sensitivity of INSM1 expression was significantly higher than that of CHGA (95% vs 50%, P = .000), but there was no statistically significant difference in the specificity of INSM1, SYP, CHGA, and CD56 expression (100% vs 94% vs 98% vs 92%, respectively, P = .241, 1.000, .126). Conclusions: INSM1 antibody shows high sensitivity and specificity in the expression of SCLC and serves as a reliable immunohistochemical marker in the clinicopathological diagnosis of SCLC in biopsy specimens.

INSM1 expression in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms at distinct locations

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported as a valuable marker for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The aims of this study were to evaluate any change in INSM1 expression between primary and metastatic NENs in distinct locations, as well as the expression of INSM1 at different differentiation levels. Furthermore, we would also investigate the significance of INSM1 expression in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (non-NENs).

METHODS

We collected 78 cases with primary NENs and 16 cases with metastatic NENs. An addition 7 cases of non-NENs with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and 84 cases of other non-NENs, respectively, were included as controls.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 82% of primary NENs and 88% of metastatic NENs expressed INSM1 with no difference between them. There was no difference in the expression of INSM1 in the lung and digestive system, and its staining pattern was independent of tumor differentiation or location. The proportion of INSM1 -positive in non-NENs with NE differentiation was significantly higher than that in other non-NENs. INSM1 sensitivity for primary NENs (82%) was comparable to Chromogranin A (82%), less than that of Synaptophysin (96%) and CD56 (94%); specificity was higher (96% vs 94%, 82%, and 89%, respectively). The sensitivity of INSM1 for well differentiated NENs was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated NENs (100% vs 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 is a useful neuroendocrine marker in primary and metastatic NENs, helping to identify primary NENs with different degrees of differentiation. The expression of INSM1 was independent of tumor location. It should be with caution to interpret the expression of INSM1 in non-NENs that morphologically resemble NENs.

Mimickers of neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate material: Need for caution

Cytologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors can be straightforward on cytologic preparations, given the classical neuroendocrine morphology and expression of neuroendocrine markers confirmed by immunohistochemistry. However, overreliance on neuroendocrine markers can lead to misdiagnosis even if individual cell features suggest a neuroendocrine tumor. We present three unusual cases, two of which were initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumors and the third one carried preliminary diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates. These cases subsequently turned out to be cholangioblastic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic melanoma, and gastric glomus tumor, respectively. We suggest approaches that could have pointed us towards the correct diagnosis at the outset and discuss potential pitfalls.

Disorientation effects, circulating small ribonucleic acid, and genetic susceptibility on static postural stability

Background

Motion Sickness increases risk of performance deficits and safety of flight concerns. The etiology of motion sickness is poorly understood. Here, we attempted to quantify the physiological effects of motion sickness on static balance and determine the genetic predictors associated with these effects.

Methods

16 subjects underwent a disorientation stimulus to induce motion sickness. Motion sickness susceptibility was identified using the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire. Postural balance outcomes were measured using two tasks, and small ribonucleic acid profiles were assessed with blood draws before motion sickness stimulus. Differences in postural sway before and after the stimulus as well as effect modification of susceptibility were assessed. A random forest followed by regression tree analysis was constructed for each postural sway variable to determine top genetic and covariate predictors.

Findings

Significant differences existed in mean postural balance responses between before and after stimulus. Individuals with longer stimulus survival experienced a greater (but insignificant) perception of sway, even if not displaying increased sway for all conditions. Circulation small ribonucleic acids were differentially expressed between individuals with long and short stimulus survival, many of these microRNA have purported targets in genes related to vestibular disorders.

Interpretation

We found motion sickness produces transient motor dysfunction in a healthy military population. Small ribonucleic acids were differentially expressed between subjects with long and short stimulus survival times.

Optimal Combination of Neuroendocrine Markers for the Detection of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Sinonasal Tract and Lung

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Identification of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation is critical to the classification of head and neck (HN) and lung tumors. In combination with tumor morphology, immunohistochemical (IHC) documentation of NE differentiation is necessary for the diagnosis of NE tumors. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity and concordance of two novel NE markers (mASH1, INSM1) across a group of high-grade NE tumors of the sinonasal tract and lung, and to compare their expression with the current widespread use of conventional NE markers, synaptophysin (SYN) and chromogranin A (CGA). In addition, expression of PARP1 is examined as a potential novel therapeutic target.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-nine high-grade NE tumors, 23 of the HN and 16 of the lung, were reevaluated by two subspecialized HN and thoracic pathologists, and subsequently stained with mASH1, INSM1, and PARP1. Sensitivity and degree of concordance of all possible combinations of markers were assessed. Sensitivities (standard error) were as follows: mASH1 41% (0.08), INSM1 44% (0.08), SYN 56% (0.08), and CGA 42% (0.09); combination of all four NE markers: 73% (0.08). Sensitivity and standard error for PARP1 was 90% and 0.05, respectively. Highest sensitivity to detect NE differentiation in high-grade NE tumors of the HN and thoracic region was achieved with a combination of four NE markers. Moderate concordance was found with combinations of mASH1 and INSM1 and traditional NE markers, respectively. Consistent overexpression of PARP1 in high-grade tumors with NE differentiation in the HN and lung opens eligibility for PARP1 inhibitor trials.

Small Biopsy and Cytology of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Brief Overview of Classification, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular Profiles, and World Health Organization Updates

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms comprise ~20% of all lung tumors. Typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small cell carcinoma, and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma represent the 4 major distinct subtypes recognized on resections. This review provides a brief overview of the cytomorphologic features and the 2021 World Health Organization classification of these tumor types on small biopsy and cytology specimens. Also discussed are the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and molecular signatures of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.

Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: a study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3

INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3 are novel transcription factors involved in neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation of neoplasms in several organs, but data on their expression in breast carcinomas (BCs) are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the expression of these markers in a series of 97 BCs (58 with NE morphology and 39 with otherwise uncommon morphology) tested prospectively using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nuclear staining in >50% of the cells was used as the positive cut-off. Thirty-two of the 97 BCs (33%) were INSM1-positive. INSM1-positivity correlated significantly with histologic type and presence of stromal mucin. INSM1 also correlated with synaptophysin and chromogranin, established markers of NE differentiation (P < .0001 and P = .0023, respectively). In BC with NE morphology, the expression of INSM1 supported NE differentiation, and INSM1 was more specific than synaptophysin and more sensitive and specific than chromogranin. INSM1 was the most expressed NE marker in 17 BCs. INSM1-positive BCs included 56% of solid papillary BCs, 88% of BCs with solid papillary features, and 75% of high-grade NE carcinomas. Of 35 BCs tested for POU2F3 and ASCL1, only 1 and 4 cases were positive, respectively. Our results show that INSM1 is a sensitive marker of NE differentiation in BC and should be included with synaptophysin and chromogranin in the IHC panel used to evaluate NE differentiation in BC with NE morphology. ASCL1 and POU2F3 are uncommon in BC and their routine assessment is not warranted.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Use in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is an aggressive and difficult to treat cancer. Although immunohistochemistry is not mandatory for a SCLC diagnosis, it might be required, especially in small samples. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is expressed in endocrine and nervous tissues during embryogenesis, generally absent in adults and re-expressed in SCLC and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Its high specificity propelled its use as diagnostic biomarker and an attractive therapeutic target. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic and critical review on the use of INSM1 for diagnosis, prognostication and the treatment of SCLC. An extensive bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed® focusing on articles published since 2015. According to the literature, INSM1 is a highly sensitive (75–100%) and specific (82–100%) neuroendocrine immunohistochemical marker for SCLC diagnosis. It can be used in histological and cytological samples. Although advantageous, its standalone use is currently not recommended. Studies correlating INSM1 expression and prognosis have disclosed contrasting results, although the expression seemed to entail a worse survival. Targeting INSM1 effectively suppressed SCLC growth either as a suicide gene therapy regulator or as an indirect target of molecular-targeted therapy. INSM1 represents a valuable biomarker for a SCLC diagnosis that additionally offers vast opportunities for the development of new prognostic and therapeutic strategies.

Exploration of INSM1 and hASH1 as additional markers in lung cytology samples of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma with indeterminate neuroendocrine differentiation

BACKGROUND

Traditional neuroendocrine (NE) markers synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 play an integral role in affirming the diagnosis of high-grade lung NE carcinoma, however promising markers, INSM1, and hASH1, have been identified. We investigated the utility of these markers in pulmonary cytology specimens, particularly in cases where results of traditional NE markers were equivocal.

METHODS

A retrospective search of cytology cases obtained via endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided FNA revealed 26 cases of high-grade lung carcinoma where an indeterminate diagnosis of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) was based on equivocal IHC staining with traditional NE markers. A separate cohort of 23 cases positive for all traditional markers with a definitive diagnosis of SCLC was also selected. Cytology cellblock sections were immunostained with INSM1 and hASH1 and analyzed using H-score methodology (score range 0-300). A score of ≥95 was considered "positive."

RESULTS

INSM1 was positive in 19/24 (79.2%) of cases of high-grade lung carcinoma with indeterminate NE differentiation, while hASH1 was positive in 6/24 (25.0%). Chromogranin was seen only focally positive (<10% of cells) in 4/24 (16.7%), synaptophysin positive in 16/24 (66.7%), and CD56 positive in 14/21 (66.7%). Among unambiguous cases, INSM1 was positive in all cases with an average score of 233.9, while hASH1 was positive in 21/23 (91.3%) with an average score of 196.3.

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional NE stains and to hASH1, INSM1 was expressed in a higher number of cases of high-grade lung NE carcinomas in cytology cellblock specimens, making it a superior, more sensitive NE marker.

SOX11 is a sensitive and specific marker for pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Synaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin A (CGA), CD56 and insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) are proposed neuroendocrine (NE) markers used for diagnosis of pulmonary NE tumors. These NE markers have been identified in subsets of non-NE tumors requiring differential diagnosis, thus we sought to explore new NE markers.

METHODS

We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of SOX11, a transcription factor involved in neurogenesis, in pulmonary NE tumors and large cell carcinomas (LCCs).

RESULTS

We found that SOX11 showed a sensitivity similar to INSM1 and CGA, and less than SYN and CD56 in small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs). While SOX11 is more specific than the other four markers for diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HG-NECs) because 1) None of LCCs (0/63), the most challenging non-NE tumor type for differential diagnosis due to overlapped morphology with LCNECs displayed SOX11 positivity. While expression of at least one of SYN, CGA, CD56 or INSM1 was identified in approximately 60% (18/30) of LCCs. 2) SOX11 was only expressed in 1 of 37 carcinoid tumors in contrast to diffuse expression of SYN, CGA, CD56 and INSM1. In HG-NECs, we noticed that SOX11 was a good complementary marker for SCLC diagnosis as it was positive in 7 of 18 SYN^-/CGA^-/CD56^- SCLCs and 3 of 8 SYN^-/CGA^-/CD56^-/INSM1^- SCLCs, and SOX11 positivity in 4 of 6 SYN^-/CGA^-/CD56^- cases previously diagnosed as LCCs with NE morphology provides additional evidence of NE differentiation for reclassification into LCNECs, which was further confirmed by electromicroscopical identification of neurosecretory granules. We also found SOX11 expression cannot predict the prognosis in patients with HG-NECs.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, SOX11 is a useful complementary transcriptional NE marker for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SCLC and LCNEC.

INSM1 Expression in Breast Neoplasms with Neuroedocrine Features

According to the 2019 WHO classification of breast tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into well-differentiated NE tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated NE carcinomas (NEC), while other breast cancers (BCs) of special and no special type with neuroendocrine (NE) features are not incorporated in this scheme anymore. We aimed to assess whether INSM1, a novel NE marker, could have a role in breast NEN subtyping. We selected 63 BCs operated from 2003 to 2018, classified as BCs with NE features, with available clinico-pathological data. Following 2019 WHO criteria, this cohort was reclassified into 37 NETs/NECs, the remaining 26 tumors representing solid-papillary (7), mucinous (7), and mixed type (12) carcinomas with NE differentiation. Chromogranin A (CGA) and synaptophysin (SYN) immunostains were reviewed, and INSM1 was tested by immunohistochemistry. Thirty CGA- and SYN-negative no special type BCs served as negative control. INSM1 was expressed in 52/63 cases of the whole cohort (82.54%). INSM1 positive and negative cases had no significantly different clinico-pathological characteristics. INSM1 expression was not significantly different between the newly reclassified NET/NEC group and other BCs with NE features. No immunoexpression was observed in control BCs. The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the NE phenotype was 82.5% and 100%, respectively, compared to 61.9% and 100% for CGA, and 95.2 and 100% for SYN. In conclusion, INSM1 is as accurate as traditional NE biomarkers to identify NE differentiation in BC. In analogy to standard NE markers, INSM1 could not distinguish NET and NEC from the other BC histotypes with NE differentiation.

INSM1, a Novel Biomarker for Detection of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Cytopathologists’ View

Background: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been considered as a novel immunostain for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and is hypothesized to be more reliable than first-generation NET biomarkers, such as CGA (chromogranin A), SYP (synaptophysin) and CD56 (neural cell adhesion molecule). In this review, we summarize existing literature on INSM1′s reliability as an immunostain for detection of various NETs, its results in comparison to first-generation NET biomarkers, and its expression in both non-NETs and benign tissues/cells on cytology specimens (cell blocks/smears).

Molecular Pathology of Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Novel Concepts and Treatments

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an aggressive neoplasm with poor prognosis. Histologic diagnosis of LCNEC is not always straightforward. In particular, it is challenging to distinguish small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) or poorly differentiated carcinoma from LCNEC. However, histological classification for LCNEC as well as their therapeutic management has not changed much for decades. Recently, genomic and transcriptomic analyses have revealed different molecular subtypes raising hopes for more personalized treatment. Two main molecular subtypes of LCNEC have been identified by studies using next generation sequencing, namely type I with TP53 and STK11/KEAP1 alterations, alternatively called as non-SCLC type, and type II with TP53 and RB1 alterations, alternatively called as SCLC type. However, there is still no easy way to classify LCNEC subtypes at the actual clinical level. In this review, we have discussed histological diagnosis along with the genomic studies and molecular-based treatment for LCNEC.

Diagnostic Utility of INSM1 in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine differentiation. However, the diagnostic utility of INSM1 in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has not yet been extensively investigated. INSM1 staining was performed on 21 MTCs, 7 MTC mimickers (including 3 papillary carcinomas, 2 poorly differentiated carcinomas, 1 follicular adenoma, and 1 nodular plasma cell hyperplasia), and 3 cases of C-cell hyperplasia. INSM1 staining of these cases was compared with the traditional MTC markers including calcitonin (CT), monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), chromogranin A (CgA), and synaptophysin (Syn). The H-score was generated using the QuPath program, an open-source image analysis software. All 21 MTC cases and 3 C-cell hyperplasia cases were positive for all markers. The MTC mimickers were entirely negative for INSM1. INSM1 and Syn displayed, more consistently, high expression with minimal variability than CgA that showed a wide range of expression with significant variability. mCEA and CT exhibited mostly a high expression with some variability. Being a nuclear stain, interpretation was easier with INSM1 compared to other cytoplasmic markers. INSM1 is an excellent marker for neuroendocrine differentiation, entirely applicable in the diagnosis of MTC and C-cell hyperplasia with high sensitivity and specificity. In comparison with the traditional MTC markers, INSM1 is unique in the crisp nuclear staining pattern with a consistent, diffuse, and strong expression. INSM1 can be potentially combined with CT or mCEA as a dual stain, especially when the lesional tissue is limited for a panel of immunostains.

INSM1 Is Less Sensitive But More Specific Than Synaptophysin in Gynecologic High-grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: An Immunohistochemical Study of 75 Cases With Specificity Test and Literature Review

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a promising diagnostic marker for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs); however, it is controversial whether INSM1 is more sensitive than conventional markers chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Here, we investigated immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 75 gynecologic HGNECs using full tissue sections (30 small-cell carcinomas [SmCCs], 34 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas [LCNECs], and 11 mixed SmCC and LCNEC), with specificity analysis in 422 gynecologic non-neuroendocrine tumors (410 in tissue microarrays and 12 full sections) and comparison with conventional neuroendocrine markers for their sensitivity and specificity. Positive INSM1 staining was seen in 69 (92%) HGNECs, whereas chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 staining was seen in 61 (81%), 72 (96%), and 44 (69%) tumors, respectively (INSM1 vs. chromogranin, P=0.09; INSM1 vs. synaptophysin, P=0.4942; and INSM1 vs. CD56, P<0.001). The mean percentage of INSM1-positive tumor cells was 54% (median: 60%, range: 0% to 100%), similar to chromogranin (58%, P=0.2903) and higher than CD56 (30%, P=0.00001) but significantly lower than synaptophysin (89%, P<0.00001). INSM1 showed no staining difference among SmCCs, LCNECs, and mixed SmCC-LCNECs. Among the 422 non-neuroendocrine tumors, positive staining was seen in 5% tumors for INSM1, 18% for chromogranin, 19% for synaptophysin, and 25% for CD56. Our study indicates that INSM1 is a highly specific marker (95% specificity) for gynecologic HGNECs with high sensitivity (92%), but it is less sensitive than synaptophysin (96% sensitivity). INSM1 is more specific than chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 for gynecologic HGNECs. Our literature review reveals that INSM1 has consistently (the same antibody clone A8 used for all reported studies) shown higher or similar sensitivity to chromogranin (for all 3 chromogranin antibody clones LK2H10, DAK-A3, DAKO polyclonal); however, whether INSM1 is more or less sensitive than synaptophysin or CD56 for HGNECs is highly dependent on the antibody clones used for synaptophysin (clones MRQ-40 and SNP88 showing higher sensitivity than clones 27G12 and DAK-SYNAP) or CD56 (clones CD564, MRQ-42, and MRQ-54 showing higher sensitivity than clones 123C3D5, 1B6, and Leu243).

The panel of syntaxin 1 and insulinoma-associated protein 1 outperforms classic neuroendocrine markers in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms

Syntaxin-1 (STX1) is a recently described highly sensitive and specific neuroendocrine marker. We evaluated the applicability of STX1 as an immunohistochemical marker in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). We compared STX1 with established neuroendocrine markers, including insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1). Typical carcinoids (n = 33), atypical carcinoids (n = 7), small cell lung carcinomas ([SCLCs] n = 30), and large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas (n = 17) were immunostained using tissue microarray for STX1, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56, and INSM1. Eighty-four of eighty-seven (96.5%) NENs showed STX1 positivity. Carcinoids and LCNECs typically presented a combined strong membranous and weak cytoplasmic staining pattern; cytoplasmic expression was predominately observed in SCLCs. The sensitivity of STX1 was 90% in SCLCs and 100% in typical carcinoids, atypical carcinoids, and large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas. The overall sensitivity of STX1 in pulmonary NENs was 96.6%, and the sensitivity of the other markers was as follows: chromogranin A (85.2%), synaptophysin (85.2%), CD56 (92.9%), and INSM1 (97.7%). STX1 was found to be an excellent neuroendocrine marker of pulmonary NENs, with sensitivity and specificity surpassing that of classic markers. We propose a panel of STX1 and INSM1 for the routine immunohistochemical workup of pulmonary NENs.

Clinical implications of lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung (Lung NENs) encompass NE tumors (NETs), which are in turn split into typical and atypical carcinoids, and NE carcinomas (NECs), which group together small-cell carcinoma and large-cell NE carcinoma. This classification is the current basis for orienting the daily practice of these patients, with diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive inferences.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical implications of lung NEN classification are addressed according to three converging perspectives, which were dissected through an extensive literature overview: (1) how to put intratumor heterogeneity into the context of the current classification; (2) how to contextualize immunohistochemistry markers to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy prediction; and (3) how to use immuno-oncology strategies for life-threatening NECs, which still account for 90% or more of lung NENs.

EXPERT OPINION

We provide practical insights to account for intratumor heterogeneity, practice the choice of immunohistochemistry markers, and emphasize once again the added value of immuno-oncology in the setting of personalized medicine of lung NENs.

Long Non-coding RNAs in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into low-grade neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). There are significant differences in therapeutic strategies of the different NEN subtypes, and therefore, precise classification of pulmonary NENs is critical. However, challenges in pulmonary NEN classification include overlap of diagnostic histological features among the subtypes and reduced or negative expression of neuroendocrine markers in poorly differentiated pulmonary NECs. Recently, transcription factor insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) was identified as a sensitive marker of neuroendocrine and neuroepithelial differentiation. In this study, INSM1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in greater than 94% of pulmonary NENs, indicating that it is a highly sensitive marker of pulmonary NENs and is useful to detect poorly differentiated pulmonary NECs. Although there are well-established morphological and immunohistologic criteria to diagnose pulmonary NENs, there is no universal consensus regarding prognostic markers of pulmonary NENs. Studies have shown that non-small cell lung cancers express long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which regulate gene expression, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and carcinogenesis. We characterized expression and function of lncRNAs, including HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR), maternally expressed 3 (MEG3), and prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) in pulmonary NENs, including typical carcinoid tumors, atypical carcinoid tumors, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC/NEC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC/NEC). In situ hybridization and real-time polymerase chain reaction studies showed higher expression (p < 0.01) of all lncRNAs in SCLC/NEC. Small interfering RNA studies indicated a role for MEG3 and PCA3 in tumor proliferation. Therefore, these lncRNAs may serve as prognostic indicators of pulmonary NEN aggressiveness and as possible therapeutic targets.

INSM1 expression in a subset of thoracic malignancies and small round cell tumors: rare potential pitfalls for small cell carcinoma

INSM1 is a diagnostic marker for neuroendocrine tumors originating in multiple anatomic sites. In the lung, INSM1 shows 76-97% sensitivity for neuroendocrine tumors overall. Our aim was to characterize INSM1 as a diagnostic marker for small cell carcinoma in the context of its epithelial, lymphoid, and mesenchymal morphologic mimics. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 231 tumors, including lung neuroendocrine tumors, nonneuroendocrine carcinomas of the thoracic cavity, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, and small round cell sarcomas, using an anti-INSM1 mouse monoclonal antibody. Extent (0-100%) and intensity (1-3+) of nuclear INSM1 staining was multiplied in each case to calculate an H-score. Demographic and clinical information was obtained from the medical record. INSM1 had an overall sensitivity and specificity of 81.5% and 82.7% for small cell carcinoma, respectively, using a threshold established with a receiver operating characteristic curve. 40/48 (82.7%) small cell carcinomas were positive for INSM1, including 19/24 (79%) small cell carcinomas that were negative for chromogranin and synaptophysin. 5/5 carcinoids and 21/28 (75%) large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas showed INSM1 expression. Among nonneuroendocrine tumors, 7/38 (18%) lung adenocarcinomas, 2/17 (12%) lung squamous cell carcinomas, 4/10 (40%) thymic carcinomas, 4/12 (33%) adenoid cystic carcinomas, 1/19 (5%) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, 4/11 (36%) alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, and 4/23 (17%) Ewing sarcomas were positive for INSM1. No synovial sarcomas or desmoplastic small round cell tumors were positive. Weak, focal INSM1 expression alone is insufficient as a diagnostic marker for small cell carcinoma, but is sensitive and specific, easy to interpret in small biopsies, and makes a valuable addition to a diagnostic panel.

Multiple faces of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: update with a focus on practical approach to diagnosis

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that is strongly linked to smoking and notoriously difficult to diagnose and treat. Recent molecular data reveal that it represents a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors, characterized by morphologic and genomic diversity that straddles small cell and non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), and in a minority of cases atypical carcinoids. This review provides an update on recent molecular and clinical developments in LCNEC with the main focus on practical approach to pathologic diagnosis using illustrative examples of the main differential diagnostic considerations.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM-1) expression in medullary thyroid carcinoma FNA: a multi-institutional study

INTRODUCTION

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM-1) is expressed in both normal tissues and neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation such as small cell lung carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the INSM-1 expression in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) in the aspirated material and its preoperative diagnostic value.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MTC cases with available cytological material from 5 institutions were retrospectively identified. INSM-1 expression was analyzed in 48 cell blocks prepared from fine-needle aspiration samples from histologically confirmed cases of MTC. Twenty-nine samples were aspirates from primary thyroid lesions and 19 from secondary lesions lymph node or liver lesions. INSM-1 immunostain was done using the Ventana Automatic System (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). The control group consisted of 20 samples from histologically confirmed cases of papillary, follicular, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas and secondary thyroid malignancies (squamous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma).

RESULTS

The male to female (M:F) ratio in MTC group was 1:1.5 and the average age was 55.6 years (range: 24-84 years). INSM-1 nuclear staining in at least 5% of cells was considered positive. Forty-five (93.75%) MTC samples were positive including all primary tumor aspirates. All control samples were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

INSM-1 nuclear positivity is a reliable marker of MTC neuroendocrine differentiation on cytology material from both primary tumor and metastases. INSM-1 can also discriminate MTC from other primary and secondary thyroid carcinomas when there are cytomorphologic overlaps.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a robust marker for identifying and grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) is a diagnostic challenge with limited samples in not only identification but grading. Prior studies have shown insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) to be a robust marker in identifying PNETs from other solid pancreatic tumors on resection specimens. In this study, we investigated the utility of INSM1 not only for identifying PNETs but also for grading in cell blocks (CBs) and surgical resections (SRs).

METHODS

A search for PNET cases between 2000 and 2019 identified 55 samples (26 CBs and 29 SRs) that were further separated into high (2 CBs, 3 SRs), intermediate (4 CBs, 7 SRs), and low (20 CBs, 19 SRs) grades based on their final pathology report and Ki-67 level. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for INSM1 (C-8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology [1:100]) was performed and quantified using an H score of 0 to 300. Non-PNET solid pancreatic tumors were compared and included acinar cell carcinoma, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

All 55 cases of PNET demonstrated nuclear INSM1 staining. The average H scores for INSM1 staining of PNET were 254 and 252 in CB and SR, respectively. The H scores decreased with increasing tumor grade, with low-grade (G1), intermediate-grade (G2), and high-grade (G3) tumors showing average INSM1 H scores of 229 and 253, 266 and 253, and 30 and 33 in both CB and SR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

IHC with INSM1 plays a role in identifying and potentially grading PNETs.