Stepwise process for the development of entecavir resistance in a chronic hepatitis B virus infected patient

Synthesis of Fluorinated Nucleosides/Nucleotides and Their Antiviral Properties

The FDA has approved several drugs based on the fluorinated nucleoside pharmacophore, and numerous drugs are currently in clinical trials. Fluorine-containing nucleos(t)ides offer significant antiviral and anticancer activity. The insertion of a fluorine atom, either in the base or sugar of nucleos(t)ides, alters its electronic and steric parameters and transforms the lipophilicity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of these moieties. The fluorine atom restricts the oxidative metabolism of drugs and provides enzymatic metabolic stability towards the glycosidic bond of the nucleos(t)ide. The incorporation of fluorine also demonstrates additional hydrogen bonding interactions in receptors with enhanced biological profiles. The present article discusses the synthetic methodology and antiviral activities of FDA-approved drugs and ongoing fluoro-containing nucleos(t)ide drug candidates in clinical trials.

Whole genome analysis of hepatitis B virus before and during long-term therapy in chronic infected patients: Molecular characterization, impact on treatment and liver disease progression

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a serious public health concern worldwide despite the availability of an efficient vaccine and the major improvements in antiviral treatments. The aim of the present study is to analyze the mutational profile of the HBV whole genome in ETV non-responder chronic HBV patients, in order to investigate antiviral drug resistance, immune escape, and liver disease progression to Liver Cirrhosis (LC) or Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Blood samples were collected from five chronic hepatitis B patients. For each patient, two plasma samples were collected, before and during the treatment. Whole genome sequencing was performed using Sanger technology. Phylogenetic analysis comparing the studied sequences with reference ones was used for genotyping. The mutational profile was analyzed by comparison with the reference sequence M32138. Genotyping showed that the studied strains belong to subgenotypes D1, D7, and D8. The mutational analysis showed high genetic variability. In the RT region of the polymerase gene, 28 amino acid (aa) mutations were detected. The most significant mutations were the pattern rtL180M + rtS202G + rtM204V, which confer treatment resistance. In the S gene, 35 mutations were detected namely sP120T, sT126S, sG130R, sY134F, sS193L, sI195M, and sL216stop were previously described to lead to vaccine, immunotherapy, and/or diagnosis escape. In the C gene, 34 mutations were found. In particular, cG1764A, cC1766G/T, cT1768A, and cC1773T in the BCP; cG1896A and cG1899A in the precore region and cT12S, cE64D, cA80T, and cP130Q in the core region were associated with disease progression to LC and/or HCC. Other mutations were associated with viral replication increase including cT1753V, cG1764A/T, cC1766G/T, cT1768A, and cC1788G in the BCP as well as cG1896A and cG1899A in the precore region. In the X gene, 30 aa substitutions were detected, of which substitutions xT36D, xP46S, xA47T, xI88F, xA102V, xI127T, xK130M, xV131I, and xF132Y were previously described to lead to LC and/or HCC disease progression. In conclusion, our results show high genetic variability in the long-term treatment of chronic HBV patients causing several effects. This could contribute to guiding national efforts to optimize relevant HBV treatment management in order to achieve the global hepatitis elimination goal by 2030.

Genomic Variability of Hepatitis B Virus Circulating in Brazilian Western Amazon

The emergence of clinically relevant mutations in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome has been a matter of great debate because of the possibility of escape from the host’s immune system, the potential to cause more severe progression of liver diseases and the emergence of treatment-resistant variants. Here we characterized the circulating variants of HBV in Rondônia State, in the north of Brazil. Serum samples of 62 chronic HBV carriers were subjected to PCR assays and clinical data were collected. Mutations and genotypes were characterized through direct sequencing. The findings show the presence of subgenotypes A1 (54.83%, 34/62), D3 (16.13%, 10/62), F2 (16.13%, 10/62), A2 (4.84%, 3/62), D2 (3.23%, 2/62), D1 (1.61%, 1/62), D4 (1.61%, 1/62) and F4 (1.61%, 1/62). Deletions in the pre-S2 region were found in 13.79% (8/58) of the samples, mutations in the S gene in 59.68% (37/62) and RT mutations in 48.39% (30/62). We found a variable genotypic distribution in different locations and important mutations related to immune escape and drug resistance in Western Amazonia, which contributed to genetic surveillance and provided important information to help control the disease.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antiviral regimens for entecavir-resistant hepatitis B: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term treatment. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness on antiviral regimens in CHB patients with ETV-resistance.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment [including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapies, adefovir (ADV)-based rescue therapies and double-dose ETV therapy] in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. The network meta-analysis was conducted for 1-year complete virological response (CVR) and biological response (BR) rates using GeMTC and ADDIS. A cost-effective analysis was conducted to select an economic and effective treatment regimen based on the 1-year CVR rate.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were finally included in this analysis. The antiviral efficacy was estimated. On network meta-analysis, the 1-year CVR rate in ETV-TDF [odds ratio (OR)  = 22.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.78-241.93], LAM-TDF (OR  = 70.67; 95 % CI: 5.16-1307.45) and TDF (OR  = 16.90; 95 % CI: 2.28-186.30) groups were significantly higher than that in the ETV double-dose group; the 1-year CVR rate in the LAM-TDF group (OR  = 14.82; 95 % CI: 1.03-220.31) was significantly higher than that in the LAM/LdT-ADV group. The 1-year BR rate of ETV-TDF (OR = 28.68; 95 % CI: 1.70-1505.08) and TDF (OR = 21.79; 95 % CI: 1.43-1070.09) therapies were significantly higher than that of ETV double-dose therapy. TDF-based therapies had the highest possibility to achieve the CVR and BR at 1 year, in which LAM-TDF combined therapy was the most effective regimen. The ratio of cost/effectiveness for 1-year treatment was 8 526, 17 649, 20 651 Yuan in the TDF group, TDF-ETV group, and ETV-ADV group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-based combined therapies such as ETV-TDF and LAM-TDF therapies were the first-line treatment if financial condition is allowed.

Revisiting HBV resistance to entecavir with a phenotypic approach

Treatment adaptation after hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment failure relies on genotypic resistance testing. However, the results of such tests are not always consistent with treatment response. These discrepancies may be due to differences in resistance levels between isolates with the same genotypic resistance testing profiles. We explored this hypothesis by investigating six cases of entecavir treatment failure with an integrative strategy combining genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing, medical record review and therapeutic drug monitoring. Among isolates with genotypic reduced susceptibility to entecavir, one displayed a higher level of resistance to entecavir (mean fold change in entecavir IC₅₀ of 1 508 ± 531 vs. 318 ± 53, p = 0.008). This isolate harbored a substitution (rt250L) at a position reported to be associated with resistance (rt250V). Reversion to wild-type amino acid at this position partially restored susceptibility to entecavir, confirming that the rt250L mutation was responsible for the high level of resistance to entecavir. This is the first description of entecavir treatment failure associated with selection of the rt250L mutation without other entecavir resistance mutations. One isolate with genotypic resistance to entecavir, harboring the rt173L mutation, displayed a lower level of resistance than the other, harboring the rt202G mutation (mean fold change of 323 ± 124 vs. 6 036 ± 2 100, p = 0.20). These results suggest that isolates harboring the rt250L mutations should be considered resistant to entecavir, whereas isolates harboring the rt173L mutations should be considered to display reduced susceptibility to entecavir. An integrative approach to antiviral drug resistance in HBV would provide a more accurate assessment of entecavir treatment failures and help to improve the accuracy of genotypic testing algorithms.

Entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus decreases surface antigenicity: A full genome and functional characterization

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Since polymerase and surface genes overlap in hepatitis B virus (HBV), an antiviral-induced mutation in the polymerase gene may alter the surface antigenicity in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but this possibility has not been clearly confirmed. This study aimed to determine the drug susceptibility and surface antigenicity of the patient-derived mutants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Full-length HBV genomes isolated from four entecavir-resistant CHB patients were cloned and sequenced. Around 10 clones of full-length HBV obtained from each patient were analysed and registered in the NCBI GenBank. Representative clones were further characterized by in vitro drug susceptibility and surface antigenicity assays.

RESULTS

The rtL180M + rtM204V mutations were common among all the clones analysed. Additionally, the ETV resistance mutations rtT184A/L, rtS202G and rtM250V were found among three patients. Most of the ETV-resistant mutants had amino acid alterations within the known epitopes recognized by T- and B-cells in the HBV surface and core antigens. The in vitro drug susceptibility assay showed that all tested clones were resistant to ETV treatment. However, they were all susceptible to ADV and TDF. More importantly, the rtI169T mutation in the RT domain, led to the sF161L mutation in the overlapping S gene, which decreased in surface antigenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The ETV resistance mutations can affect the antigenicity of the HBsAg proteins due to changes in the overlapping sequence of this surface antigen. Thus, the apparent decline or disappearance of HBsAg needs to be interpreted cautiously in patients with previous or current antiviral resistance mutations.

Coevolution analysis of amino-acids reveals diversified drug-resistance solutions in viral sequences: a case study of hepatitis B virus

The study of mutational landscapes of viral proteins is fundamental for the understanding of the mechanisms of cross-resistance to drugs and the design of effective therapeutic strategies based on several drugs. Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues targeting the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase protein (Pol) can inhibit disease progression by suppression of HBV replication and makes it an important case study. In HBV, treatment may fail due to the emergence of drug-resistant mutants. Primary and compensatory mutations have been associated with lamivudine resistance, whereas more complex mutational patterns are responsible for resistance to other HBV antiviral drugs. So far, all known drug-resistance mutations are located in one of the four Pol domains, called reverse transcriptase. We demonstrate that sequence covariation identifies drug-resistance mutations in viral sequences. A new algorithmic strategy, BIS2TreeAnalyzer, is designed to apply the coevolution analysis method BIS2, successfully used in the past on small sets of conserved sequences, to large sets of evolutionary related sequences. When applied to HBV, BIS2TreeAnalyzer highlights diversified viral solutions by discovering thirty-seven positions coevolving with residues known to be associated with drug resistance and located on the four Pol domains. These results suggest a sequential mechanism of emergence for some mutational patterns. They reveal complex combinations of positions involved in HBV drug resistance and contribute with new information to the landscape of HBV evolutionary solutions. The computational approach is general and can be applied to other viral sequences when compensatory mutations are presumed.

Characterization of the molecular events of covalently closed circular DNA synthesis in de novo Hepatitis B virus infection of human hepatoma cells

Despite the utmost importance of cccDNA in HBV biology, the mechanism by which cccDNA synthesis is regulated is not completely understood. Here we explored HepG2-NTCP cell line and performed a time-course HBV infection experiment (up to 30 days) to follow the conversion of the input viral DNA into cccDNA. We found that a protein-free RC DNA (PF-RC DNA) become detectable as early as 12 h post infection (hpi) prior to the detection of cccDNA, which become evident only at 2-3 dpi. Intriguingly, the PF-RC DNA detected at 12 hpi was abundantly located in the cytoplasm, implicating that the protein-removal from the input viral DNA takes place in the cytoplasm, perhaps inside the nucleocapsid. Notably, during the early time points of HBV infection, the PF-RC DNA accumulated at significantly higher levels and appeared in a peak followed by a plateau at late time points with dramatically lower levels, implicating the presence of two distinct populations of the PF-RC DNA. Importantly, the PF-RC DNA at earlier peak is entecavir (ETV)-resistant, whereas the PF-RC DNA at posterior days is ETV-sensitive. An interpretation is that the PF-RC DNA at earlier peak represents "input viral DNA" derived from HBV inoculum, whereas the PF-RC DNA at late time points represents the de novo product of the viral reverse transcription. The existence of two populations of the PF-RC DNA having a distinct kinetic profile and ETV-sensitivity implicated that intracellular amplification via the viral reverse transcription greatly contributes to the maintenance of cccDNA pool during HBV infection. As such, we concluded that the cccDNA level is stably maintained by continuing replenishment of cccDNA primarily through intracellular amplification in the HepG2-NTCP cell line.

Development of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate resistance after complete viral suppression in a patient with treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B: A case report and review of the literature

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent nucleotide analogue that is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. The results of a longitudinal study of TDF treatment demonstrated no development of resistance. We observed one treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patient who developed TDF resistance after complete viral suppression during long-term TDF treatment. A 37-year-old HBeAg-positive man received TDF 300 mg/d for 43 mo. The hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer was 8 log₁₀ copies/mL at baseline and became undetectable at 16 mo after treatment. However, the HBV DNA titer rebounded to 7.5 log₁₀ copies/mL at 43 mo after treatment. We performed full sequencing to find mutation sites associated with virologic breakthrough. The results showed 9 mutation sites, most of which had not been well-known as mutation sites. We changed the therapy from tenofovir to entecavir with a regimen of 0.5 mg once daily. After 4 mo, the HBV DNA titer decreased to 267 copies/mL, and the liver enzyme levels were normalized.

Trends in hepatitis B virus resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues in North China from 2009-2016: A retrospective study

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are widely used in anti-hepatitis B virus (anti-HBV) therapy for effective inhibition of HBV replication. However, HBV resistance to NAs has emerged, resulting in virus reactivation and disease recurrence. Data on the current dynamics of HBV resistance are still rare in China. This study analysed 4491 plasma samples with HBV primary genotypic resistance mutations representative of the general HBV resistance situation in northern China from 2009-2016. We found that entecavir (ETV), representing 57.6% (12 713/22 060) of NA users in North China in 2016, has become the major NA for treating Chinese patients infected with HBV. Despite >50% of M204I/V±L180M among all HBV resistance cases annually and extensive exposure of patients to lamivudine (LAM), telbivudine (LdT) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), ETV resistance also showed a dramatically increased incidence, which rose to 17.1% in 2016. Moreover, A181T/V, ETV resistance mutations and multidrug resistance mutations were found more frequently in HBV genotype C compared with genotype B (21.2% vs. 8.5%, 12.4% vs. 7.9% and 5.9% vs. 3.0%, respectively), whereas M204I and N236T were more predominant in genotype B than genotype C (40.3% vs. 20.8% and 11.3% vs. 1.8%, respectively). In conclusion, we report the dynamic changes of HBV NA resistance mutation patterns and the current NA usage profile for anti-HBV treatment in North China over the past 8 years. These data provide valuable information on HBV NA resistance that is an important reference for clinicians to devise more effective treatment regimens for individual patients.

Efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients with resistance to lamivudine and entecavir

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy for 48 weeks provided a virological response comparable to that of TDF and entecavir (ETV) combination therapy in patients infected with ETV-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). Little long-term data in routine clinical practice are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients with ETV-resistant HBV.

METHODS

We investigated the long-term antiviral efficacy of combination therapy of TDF+lamivudine (LAM) or TDF+ETV compared to that of TDF monotherapy in 73 patients with resistance to both LAM and ETV.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with TDF monotherapy (n=12), TDF+LAM (n=19), or TDF+ETV (n=42) for more than 6 months. The median duration of TDF-based rescue therapy was 37 months. Virologic response (VR) was found in 63 patients (86.3%). The rates of VR among the three groups (TDF monotherapy, TDF+LAM, and TDF+ETV) were not statistically different (log-rank P=0.200) at 12 months (59.3%, 78.9%, and 51.8%, respectively) or at 24 months (88.4%, 94.7%, and 84.2%). In addition, treatment efficacy of TDF-based combination or TDF monotherapy was not statistically different with ETV-resistant strains or exposure to other antiviral agents. In multivariate analysis, only lower baseline HBV DNA level was an independent predictor for VR (hazard ratio, 0.723; 95% confidence interval, 0.627-0.834; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy was as effective as combination therapy of TDF+LAM or TDF+ETV in maintaining long-term viral suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients with resistance to both LAM and ETV. HBV DNA level at the start of TDF rescue therapy was the only independent predictor of subsequent VR.

Management of Antiviral Resistance in Chronic Hepatitis B

The primary goal of therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to prevent liver disease progression. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance or seroconversion is regarded as an optimal endpoint to discontinue treatment. However, HBsAg seroclearance occurs very rarely with nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) treatment, and long-term, almost indefinite, NUC treatment is required for the majority of patients. In patients with drug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV), a combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), which is currently regarded as the strongest combination therapy against HBV, would be potentially safe to prevent the emergence of additional HBV resistance mutations. However, long-term tolerance data are lacking, and cost may be an issue for combination therapies. Several recent, well-designed, randomized controlled trials have shown that TDF monotherapy provides similar antiviral efficacy compared with the combination of TDF and ETV. Furthermore, no additional HBV resistance mutations emerged during TDF monotherapy for up to 96 weeks. Considering a comparable antiviral efficacy, extremely low risk of TDF-resistance, lower cost, and better safety potential, TDF monotherapy would be a reasonable choice for the treatment of drug-resistant patients with CHB.

Lamivudine-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V are persistently dominant during combination rescue therapy with entecavir and adefovir for hepatitis B

Adefovir (ADV) sequential monotherapy was included in the 2005 Asia-Pacific guidelines for the management of patients with lamivudine (LAM) resistance. However, following the development of ADV resistance, the proportion of resistant variants during combined rescue therapy with ADV and entecavir (ETV) were unknown. The present study characterized the dynamics of resistant variants in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and LAM-resistant variants during antiviral therapy consisting of ADV monotherapy followed by ADV-ETV combination therapy. A total of 3 patients were selected from a cohort of 55 patients with CHB due to developing ADV resistance. The patients had been previously treated with LAM (100 mg daily) for 21-24 months. At the initiation of sequential monotherapy with ADV, LAM-resistant variants (rtM204V/I and rtL180M) were detected in the three patients. These patients developed ADV resistance during 19-30 months of ADV sequential monotherapy, and then switched their antiviral regimen to ADV-ETV combination therapy. During ADV monotherapy and ADV-ETV combination therapy, the patients were monitored every 3 months for the first year of therapy, and then every 6 months thereafter. A total of 30 serum samples were collected from the patients throughout the monitoring period. In total, 10 mutants that were associated with commonly-used antiviral drugs were detected by pyrosequencing. During ADV sequential monotherapy, LAM-resistant variants were gradually decreased, whereas ADV-resistant rtA181V/T and rtN236T variants gradually increased in the viral population. During 30-41 months of ADV-ETV combination therapy, viral load reduction was 2.59-3.28 log10 copies/ml; ADV-resistant variants rtA181T/V and rtN236T were undetectable following 11-24 months of combination therapy; and rtL180M and rtM204I/V remained dominant in the viral population. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that, in patients with LAM and ADV-resistant variants that developed during LAM-ADV sequential monotherapy, ETV-ADV combination therapy may partially inhibit the replication of HBV DNA; however, LAM-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V variants remained predominant following 30-41 months combination therapy.

Prediction of virologic response to tenofovir mono-rescue therapy for multidrug resistant chronic hepatitis B

Most guidelines suggest combination therapy including nucleoside and nucleotide analogues for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with multidrug resistance (MD-R). However, long-term combination treatment can evoke high costs and safety problems. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) mono-rescue therapy for viral suppression in patients with CHB exhibiting MD-R. We reviewed patients with CHB exhibiting antiviral drug resistance treated by TDF mono-rescue therapy from December 2012 to June 2014. The patients were categorized into three groups: lamivudine-resistance (LAM-R) group (n = 290), and LAM-R + adefovir-resistance (ADV-R) group (n = 43), and LAM-R + entecavir-resistance (ETV-R) group (n = 113). We compared the virologic response rate according to the multiplicity of resistance and investigated the predictive factors of a virologic response. For a median of 15 months (range, 6-24 months) of TDF mono-rescue therapy, the cumulative virologic response rates were 82.8, 81.4, and 84.1% in the LAM-R, LAM-R + ADV-R, and LAM-R + ETV-R groups, respectively (P = 0.239). Multivariate analysis revealed that multiplicity of resistance did not influence the achievement of a virologic response (P = 0.218). However, the baseline HBV DNA level significantly influenced the achievement of a virologic response for the treatment of CHB with MD-R (P < 0.001). TDF mono-rescue therapy is an appropriate treatment for CHB with MD-R, and the baseline HBV DNA level is a significant predictive factor for a virologic response. These factors should be considered before treating CHB with MD-R.

Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy in patients with entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with multiple drug failure: results of a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

Little clinical data are available regarding the optimal treatment of patients who harbour entecavir (ETV)-resistant HBV.

DESIGN

In this multicentre randomised trial, patients who had HBV with ETV resistance-associated mutations and serum HBV DNA concentrations >60 IU/mL were randomised to receive tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, 300 mg/day) monotherapy (n=45) or TDF and ETV (1 mg/day) combination therapy (n=45) for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, including HBV DNA levels (median, 4.02 log10 IU/mL) and hepatitis B e antigen-positivity (89%). All patients had at least one ETV-resistance mutation: rtT184A/C/F/G/I/L/S (n=49), rtS202G (n=43) and rtM250L/V (n=7), in addition to rtM204V/I (n=90). All except one patient in the TDF group completed 48 weeks of treatment. At week 48, the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <15 IU/mL, the primary efficacy endpoint, was not significantly different between the TDF and TDF+ETV groups (71% vs. 73%; p>0.99). The mean change in HBV DNA levels from baseline was not significantly different between groups (-3.66 vs. -3.74 log10 IU/mL; p=0.81). Virological breakthrough occurred in one patient on TDF, which was attributed to poor drug adherence. At week 48, six and three patients in the TDF and TDF+ETV groups, respectively, retained their baseline resistance mutations (p>0.99). None developed additional resistance mutations. Safety profiles were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy for 48 weeks provided a virological response comparable to that of TDF and ETV combination therapy in patients infected with ETV-resistant HBV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01639092.

Genetic variation of hepatitis B virus and its significance for pathogenesis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has a worldwide distribution and is endemic in many populations. Due to its unique life cycle which requires an error-prone reverse transcriptase for replication, it constantly evolves, resulting in tremendous genetic variation in the form of genotypes, sub-genotypes, and mutations. In recent years, there has been considerable research on the relationship between HBV genetic variation and HBV-related pathogenesis, which has profound implications in the natural history of HBV infection, viral detection, immune prevention, drug treatment and prognosis. In this review, we attempted to provide a brief account of the influence of HBV genotype on the pathogenesis of HBV infection and summarize our current knowledge on the effects of HBV mutations in different regions on HBV-associated pathogenesis, with an emphasis on mutations in the preS/S proteins in immune evasion, occult HBV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mutations in polymerase in relation to drug resistance, mutations in HBV core and e antigen in immune evasion, chronicalization of infection and hepatitis B-related acute-on-chronic liver failure, and finally mutations in HBV x proteins in HCC.

Evolution of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus during entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy

The emergence of entecavir (ETV) resistance is rare, particularly in a longitudinal study. The aim of the present study was to characterize the evolution of ETV-resistant variants during antiviral therapy using entecavir monotherapy followed by ETV-adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy. The study included a prospective cohort of 53 consecutive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. During the 60-month period of ETV therapy, 2 patients exhibited ETV resistance and their medical records were comprehensively reviewed. A total of 25 consecutive serum samples were regularly collected from the 2 patients. All the samples were used to characterize the evolution of the polymerase gene mutations using pyrosequencing. The linkage of the variants was analyzed from 87 reverse transcriptase sequences of 3 selective samples using clone sequencing. The 2 patients presented with viral breakthrough during ETV monotherapy. In patient A, the rtL180M, rtS202G and rtM204V mutant variants were detected using pyrosequencing prior to virological breakthrough. Although the viral load declined following the administration of ADV, the ETV-resistant variants were persistently dominant in the viral populations. In patient B, the rtL180M, rtM204I and rtM204V mutants were present in ~70, 30 and 10% of the viral populations, respectively, at the time of study entry. In addition, rtT184F was present in ~20% of the viral population during virological breakthrough, at month 24. The rtL180M, rtT184F and rtM204V were predominant during the combination treatment. Clonal analysis further revealed that the rtS202G or rtT184F was in all cases co-localized with rtL180M and rtM204V in any single virus isolate clone. The results of the present study indicate that the addition of ADV therapy with ETV for treating ETV-resistant mutation may not inhibit the replication of ETV-resistant variants that developed previously in lamivudine-treated CHB patients.

A novel method for nucleos(t)ide analogues susceptibility assay of hepatitis B virus by viral polymerase transcomplementation

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) susceptibility assay is important for the study of hepatitis B virus (HBV) drug resistance. The purpose of susceptibility assay is to test the sensitivity of a specific HBV variant to NUCs in vitro, by which assesses if and to what extent the mutant virus is resistant to a specific NUC. Among the existing susceptibility assay methods, stable cell line expressing the specific variant is one of the commonly used assessment systems based on its high repeatability. However, establishment of stable cell lines expressing individual variant is laborious and time-consuming. In the present study, we developed a novel strategy for rapidly establishing HBV replicating stable cell lines. We first established an acceptor cell line stably transfected with a polymerase-null HBV 1.1mer genome DNA, then lentiviruses expressing different mutant HBV polymerases were transduced into the acceptor cell line respectively. Stable cell lines replicating HBV DNA with the trans-complemented HBV polymerases were established by antibiotics selection. Lamivudine and entecavir susceptibility data from these polymerase-complementing cell lines were validated by comparing with other assays. Taken together, this transcomplementation strategy for establishment of stable cell lines replicating HBV DNA with clinically isolated HBV polymerase provides a new tool for NUC susceptibility assay of HBV.

Tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients who had failed treatment with lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In the past decade, many chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients have undergone sequential treatment with lamivudine (LAM), adefovir (ADV), and entecavir (ETV) to manage antiviral resistance or insufficient suppression of HBV-DNA. Very limited data are available on the efficacy of tenofovir (TDF) rescue regimens in patients with multidrug resistance (MDR).

METHODS

We investigated the antiviral efficacy of TDF/LAM combination therapy versus TDF/ETV combination therapy in 52 patients who failed three previous antiviral therapies.

RESULTS

The study subjects were treated with TDF/LAM combination therapy (n = 25) or TDF/ETV combination therapy (n = 27) for more than six months. Virologic response (VR) occurred in 39 (75%) patients (19 patients belonged to the TDF/LAM group and 20 patients belonged to the TDF/ETV group). The VR rates were not different between the TDF/LAM and TDF/ETV groups (56.0% vs 51.9% at month 12, and 72.0% vs 78.8% at month 18; log rank P = 0.515). In addition, treatment efficacy of TDF/LAM combination or TDF/ETV combination was not statistically different according to types of MDR. In multivariate analysis, absolute HBV-DNA level at the start of TDF rescue treatment (P < 0.001; OR, 0.452; 95% CI, 0.306-0.666) was only significantly associated with VR.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF/ETV combination therapy was not associated with higher rate of VR compared with TDF/LAM combination therapy in MDR CHB patients. These results raise the suspicion about the superiority of the combination therapy over TDF monotherapy. The lower HBV-DNA levels at the start of TDF-based rescue therapy were associated with higher VR.

Monotherapy for hepatitis B infection: a review of treatment options

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a global health problem, causing liver failure, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. CHB treatment aims to prevent liver-related complication. The treatment of CHB infection includes monotherapy with either interferons (IFNs) or nucleos(t)ide (NUC) analogs. IFNs have moderate antiviral effects, and their use is limited by side effects. With the availability of NUCs, IFN-intolerant and decompensated cirrhotic patients began to be treated. Lamivudine and telbivudine, nucleoside analogs, have low genetic barrier to resistance. Adefovir, a nucleotide analog, has moderate potency and potential nephrotoxicity. Entecavir and tenofovir, with their high potency, high genetic barrier to resistance and favorable safety profile are the standard of care in CHB treatment. Long-term use of NUCs with maintained viral suppression results in a decrease in liver-related complications.

Characterization of novel entecavir resistance mutations

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Entecavir (ETV) is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, but the virus can acquire resistance to the drug. This requires lamivudine resistance mutations (LAMr) and at least one additional mutation. Here, we characterized two novel mutations, rtI163V and rtA186T, associated with viral breakthrough (VBT) in an ETV-refractory patient.

METHODS

HBV from an ETV-refractory patient was sequenced, and newly identified mutations were inserted into a replication-competent clone by mutagenesis. Clones were analyzed for replication efficacy and susceptibility to ETV in vitro. Chimeric mice with human hepatocytes were inoculated with the patient's serum at VBT, and monitored for viral mutation pattern using a next-generation sequencing approach.

RESULTS

RtI163V and rtA186T mutations were detected together with LAMr (rtL180M and rtM204V) at VBT. RtA186T plus LAMr reduced susceptibility to ETV more than 111.1-fold compared with the wild-type clone, while rtI163V plus LAMr resulted in a 20.4-fold reduction. RtA186T significantly reduced viral replication efficacy, while the rtI163V mutation rescued it. Interestingly, the viral mutation pattern in the chimeric mice indicated dominant (or selective) proliferation of a clone containing rtI163V and rtA186T mutations plus LAMr under ETV treatment. Three-dimensional docking simulation indicated that rtA186T reduced the binding affinity of the HBV polymerase to ETV.

CONCLUSIONS

VBT in this ETV-refractory patient is attributable to the novel ETV resistance mutations rtI163V and rtA186T. RtA186T was apparently responsible for ETV resistance but the selection of a clone with the double mutation plus LAMr suggests that rtI163V is required to sustain viral fitness.

Antiviral therapies and prospects for a cure of chronic hepatitis B

Current therapies of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain limited to either pegylated interferon-α (Peg-IFN-α), or one of the five approved nucleoside analog (NA) treatments. Although viral suppression can be achieved in the majority of patients with high-barrier-to-resistance new-generation NAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir), HBsAg loss is achieved in only 10% of patients with both classes of drugs after a follow-up of 5 years. Attempts to improve the response by administering two different NAs or a combination of NA and Peg-IFN-α have been unsuccessful. Therefore, there is a renewed interest to investigate a number of steps in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication cycle and specific virus-host cell interactions as potential targets for new antivirals. Novel targets and compounds could readily be evaluated using both relevant in vitro and newly developed in vivo models of HBV infection. The addition of one or several new drugs to current regimens should offer the prospect of markedly improving the response to therapy, thus reducing the burden of drug resistance, as well as the incidence of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Tenofovir rescue regimen following prior suboptimal response to entecavir and adefovir combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients exposed to multiple treatment failures

In clinical practice, establishing a subsequent optimum treatment for chronic hepatitis B patients with a history of multiple NAs treatment failures, including a suboptimal response to a final therapy with combined ETV and ADV, is a complicated but crucial challenge. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a tenofovir rescue regimen in these patients. A total of six eligible patients were enrolled and were switched to a tenofovir rescue regimen. At baseline, the genotypes and genotypic mutations of the reverse transcriptase and surface gene were determined by ultra-deep pyrosequencing, and further clonal analyses of the reverse transcriptase domain were performed to identify multidrug-resistant HBV strains. In addition, HBV DNA levels, serology, and biochemistry parameters were monitored at baseline and every 3 months, and abdominal ultrasonography was performed at baseline and every 6 months. All patients were confirmed to harbor LAM-related resistant HBV strains. After switching to the tenofovir rescue treatment, all patients had an undetectable level of HBV DNA within 6 months and achieved normalization of the ALT level within 9 months. These virological and biochemical responses persisted until the end of the observation period. None of the patients developed clinical deterioration or any adverse events related to the tenofovir therapy during the median 16.5-month follow-up. In conclusion, the tenofovir rescue regimen can be employed confidently as a highly effective and safe treatment choice following a suboptimal response to ETV plus ADV therapy for a subset of chronic hepatitis B patients with a history of multiple unsuccessful antiviral treatments.

Entecavir allows an unexpectedly high residual replication of HBV mutants resistant to lamivudine

BACKGROUND

Entecavir is an efficient inhibitor of HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) and widely used for therapy of chronic hepatitis B. Entecavir treatment of HBV patients with lamivudine-resistant viral strains, however, often fails, but the mechanism of cross-resistance development is not fully understood.

METHODS

Using non-linear regression models, dose-response curves of cloned HBV strains from patients pre-treated with RT inhibitors were established in human hepatoma cell lines after transfection with HBV genomes containing HBV polymerase genes from patient isolates. 50% and 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC50 and IC90) and corresponding antiviral resistance factors (RF50 and RF90) were calculated.

RESULTS

The entecavir dose-response curve of lamivudine-resistant HBV RT mutants rtM204 for the replication of HBV decreased less than expected with increasing drug dose. Remarkably, due to the flat dose-response curves, RF90 values against entecavir of samples with rtM204 substitutions were up to 30× higher than their RF50 values.

CONCLUSIONS

The unexpectedly high IC90 indicates a strong residual replication capacity of lamivudine-resistant HBV rtM204 variants under entecavir therapy, although IC50 values are initially within the therapeutic range of entecavir. This characteristic favours rapid selection of additional mutants with overt resistance against entecavir. Thus, the current phenotypic resistance assays should include determination of IC90.

Long-term outcomes of two rescue therapies in lamivudine-refractory patients with chronic hepatitis B: combined lamivudine and adefovir, and 1-mg entecavir

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Adefovir (ADV) and lamivudine (LAM) combination therapy (ADV+LAM) has been a useful option for patients with LAM-resistant (LAM-r) chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the long-term outcomes of LAM+ADV and 1-mg entecavir (ETV) rescue therapies have still been limited. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of these two rescue therapies.

METHODS

Sixty patients with LAM-r CHB underwent rescue therapy with LAM+ADV (n=36) or 1-mg ETV (n=24). We determined the duration of rescue therapy, timing and type of mutation, undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by PCR (lower limitation of detection, < 140 copies/mL), biochemical response (alanine aminotransferase < 40 IU/mL), and the incidence of hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and virologic breakthrough.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two therapy groups. The duration of rescue therapy was 56 months (range, 14-100 months) in the ADV+LAM group and 42 months (range, 12-73 months) in the ETV group (P=0.036). The cumulative rates of HBV DNA undetectability and HBeAg seroconversion up to 6 years were 88.6% and 43.0%, respectively, in the ADV+LAM group, and 45.8% and 31.8% in the ETV group. The rate of virologic breakthrough and resistance was 14.4% in the ADV+LAM group and 71.9% in the ETV group (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of LAM and ADV therapy for up to 6 years achieved modest rates of virological suppression and resistance. ETV is not an optimal therapy because the risk of viral breakthrough to ETV increases over time.

Management of antiviral drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B

Rescue antiviral treatment for patients with resistance to preexisting nucleos(t)ide analogues remains a clinical challenge. The correct choice of a first-line treatment of high potency and with a high genetic barrier to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and the emergence of drug resistance. The management of treatment failure and drug resistance requires a precise and accurate clinical and virologic monitoring. Combination treatment with antiviral drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of developing resistance to rescue drugs. To guarantee better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without a cross resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. Long-term surveillance for treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance should be continued to prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.

The Molecular and Structural Basis of HBV-resistance to Nucleos(t)ide Analogs

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a worldwide health problem. Chronic hepatitis B can lead to fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Management of the latter two conditions often requires liver transplantation. Treatment with conventional interferon or pegylated interferon alpha can clear the virus, but the rates are very low. The likelihood, however, of viral resistance to interferon is minimal. The main problems with this therapy are the frequency and severity of side effects. In contrast, nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) have significantly lower side effects, but require long term treatment as sustained virological response rates are extremely low. However, long term treatment with NAs increases the risk for the development of anti-viral drug resistance. Only by understanding the molecular basis of resistance and using agents with multiple sites of action can drugs be designed to optimally prevent the occurrence of HBV antiviral resistance.

Screening and identification of a novel adefovir dipivoxil resistance associated mutation, rtN236V, of HBV from a large cohort of HBV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to clarify whether rtN236V mutation of HBV derived from adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-refractory patients was associated with drug resistance.

METHODS

A total of 18,419 patients from Beijing 302 Hospital were investigated. HBV complete reverse transcriptase region of polymerase was screened by direct sequencing and verified by clonal sequencing if necessary. Replication-competent wild-type and mutant HBV genomic amplicons were constructed, transfected into HepG2 cells and cultured in the presence or absence of serially diluted nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. Intracellular HBV replicative intermediates were quantitated for calculating the 50% effective concentration of drug.

RESULTS

rtN236V was detected in six ADV-refractory patients; signature ADV-resistant mutations rtA181V and rtN236T were detected in 1,311 patients. rtN236V mutants emerged predominantly with virological breakthrough in the clinical course of the six patients. Phenotypic analysis of the mutants from two patients was performed. rtN236V mutants from patient 1 and patient 2 exhibited 3.90-fold and 3.10-fold decreased susceptibility to ADV, respectively, compared to the wild-type virus; by contrast, rtN236T mutants from the patients had 4.50-fold and 4.75-fold decreased susceptibility, respectively. Both mutants had a relatively lower viral replication capacity compared to wild-type virus in the absence of antivirals and remained susceptible to lamivudine, entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In clinical practice, switching to entecavir rescue therapy suppressed HBV DNA to an undetectable level and normalized alanine aminotransferase level for both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

rtN236V was a novel infrequently occurring ADV-resistance-associated mutation. It conferred a moderate resistance to ADV with relatively lower natural replication capacity.

Mutation profiling of the hepatitis B virus strains circulating in North Indian population

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the genomic mutations in the circulating Hepatitis B virus strains causing infection in the Indian population. Further, we wanted to analyze the biological significance of these mutations in HBV mediated disease.

METHODS

222 HBsAg positive patients were enrolled in the study. The genotype and mutation profile was determined for the infecting HBV isolate by sequencing overlapping fragments. These sequences were analyzed by using different tools and compared with previously available HBV sequence information. Mutation Frequency Index (MFI) for the Genes and Diagnosis group was also calculated.

RESULTS

HBV Genotype D was found in 55% (n = 121) of the patient group and genotype A was found in 30% (n = 66) of samples. The majority (52%) of the HBV-infected individuals in the present study were HBeAg-negative in all the age groups studied. Spontaneous drug associated mutations implicated in resistance to antiviral therapy were also identified in about quarter of our patients, which is of therapeutic concern. The MFI approach used in the study indicated that Core peptide was the most conserved region in both genotypes and Surface peptide had highest mutation frequency. Few mutations in X gene (T36A and G50R) showed high frequency of association with HCC. A rare recombinant strain of HBV genotype A and D was also identified in the patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV genotype D was found out to be most prevalent. More than half of the patients studied had HBeAg negative disease. Core region was found to be most conserved. Drug Associated mutations were detected in 22% of the patient group and T36A and G50R mutations in X gene were found to be associated with HCC.

Adefovir and Lamivudine Combination Therapy in Patients with Entecavir-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B: Antiviral Responses and Evolution of Mutations

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the antiviral responses and evolution of resistance mutations during adefovir (ADV) plus lamivudine (LMV) therapy in patients with entecavir (ETV)-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had been receiving ETV for more than 6 months and developed virologic breakthrough due to ETV resistance were consecutively enrolled. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients received ADV plus LMV therapy for 12 months. The baseline mean serum HBV DNA level was 5.59 ± 1.28 log₁₀ IU/ml. The rtT184L/I/A/F (50%), rtS202G (25%) and mixed ETV-resistant mutations (25%) were detected at enrollment. The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to 12 months was -2.3 ± 1.06 log₁₀ IU/ml (p<i> <</i> 0.001). Seventeen patients were followed up for the full 12 months, and complete virologic response (HBV DNA <20 IU/ml) was observed in 4 patients (23.5%). Among the remaining 13 patients who still had detectable HBV DNA, 7 patients showed disappearance of ETV-resistant mutations or reduction of the proportion of ETV-resistant mutants. An ADV- and LMV-resistant mutant (rtA181T) emerged in 2 patients (11.7%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ADV plus LMV combination therapy suppresses ETV-resistant mutants in the viral population and significantly reduces serum HBV DNA levels in ETV-resistant CHB patients.

Efficacy of adefovir-based combination therapy for patients with Lamivudine- and entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Treatment strategies for entecavir (ETV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are not yet well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall antiviral efficacy and to compare the efficacy of combination therapy with adefovir (ADV) plus nucleoside analogues (lamivudine [LAM], telbivudine [LdT], or ETV) in patients infected with LAM- and ETV-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants. Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses during combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues were assessed. Propensity score analysis was used to select a matched group of patients for the comparison of rescue therapy regimens. A total of 67 consecutive patients were analyzed. Complete virologic suppression was achieved in 27 patients. The overall cumulative incidence of complete virologic suppression at month 24 was 47.4%: 44.3% in the LAM or LdT plus ADV group and 51.4% in the group given ETV and ADV. There was no significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.234). The cumulative incidences of complete virologic suppression were still comparable between the two groups selected and matched using the propensity score model (P = 0.419). Virologic breakthrough was observed in 9 patients, and rtA181V substitution was newly detected in one patient. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity and lower baseline HBV DNA level were associated with complete virologic suppression in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, lower baseline HBV DNA level remained an independent predictor. In conclusion, combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues fails to show sufficient antiviral efficacy in CHB patients with resistance to both LAM and ETV. Further study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of a more potent tenofovir-based regimen in such patients.

Efficacy of adefovir-based combination therapy for patients with Lamivudine- and entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Treatment strategies for entecavir (ETV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are not yet well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall antiviral efficacy and to compare the efficacy of combination therapy with adefovir (ADV) plus nucleoside analogues (lamivudine [LAM], telbivudine [LdT], or ETV) in patients infected with LAM- and ETV-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants. Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses during combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues were assessed. Propensity score analysis was used to select a matched group of patients for the comparison of rescue therapy regimens. A total of 67 consecutive patients were analyzed. Complete virologic suppression was achieved in 27 patients. The overall cumulative incidence of complete virologic suppression at month 24 was 47.4%: 44.3% in the LAM or LdT plus ADV group and 51.4% in the group given ETV and ADV. There was no significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.234). The cumulative incidences of complete virologic suppression were still comparable between the two groups selected and matched using the propensity score model (P = 0.419). Virologic breakthrough was observed in 9 patients, and rtA181V substitution was newly detected in one patient. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity and lower baseline HBV DNA level were associated with complete virologic suppression in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, lower baseline HBV DNA level remained an independent predictor. In conclusion, combination therapy with ADV plus nucleoside analogues fails to show sufficient antiviral efficacy in CHB patients with resistance to both LAM and ETV. Further study is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of a more potent tenofovir-based regimen in such patients.

High incidence of treatment-induced and vaccine-escape hepatitis B virus mutants among human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis B-infected patients

Anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleos(t)ides analogs (NA) exert selective pressures on polymerase (pol) and surface (S) genes, inducing treatment resistance and increasing the risk of vaccine escape mutants. The rate of emergence for these mutations is largely unknown in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV undergoing dual-active therapy. In a 3-year, repeat-sampling, prospective cohort study, HBV viral genome sequences of 171 HIV-HBV coinfected patients, presenting with HBV viremia for at least one visit, were analyzed every 12 months via DNA chip. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk factors specifically for S gene mutations at baseline and during follow-up, respectively. HBV-DNA levels >190 IU/mL substantially decreased from 91.8% at inclusion to 40.3% at month 36 (P < 0.001), while lamivudine (LAM) or emtricitabine (FTC) use remained steady (71.9%) and tenofovir (TDF) use expanded (month 0, 17.5%; month 36, 66.7%; P < 0.001). The largest increase of any mutation class was observed in l-nucleoside-associated pol gene/antiviral-associated S gene mutations (cumulative incidence at the end of follow-up, 17.5%) followed by alkyl phosphonate-associated pol-gene (7.4%), immune-associated S gene (specifically any amino acid change at positions s120/s145, 6.4%), and d-cyclopentane-associated pol-gene mutations (2.4%). Incidence of l-nucleoside-associated pol-gene/antiviral-associated S gene mutations was significantly associated with concomitant LAM therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 4.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-15.56), but inversely associated with TDF use (adjusted HR/month, 0.94; 95% CI,0.89-0.98). Cumulative duration of TDF was significantly associated with a reduction in the occurrence of immune-associated S gene mutations (HR/month, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98). No major liver-related complications (e.g., fulminant hepatitis, decompensated liver, and hepatocellular carcinoma) were observed in patients with incident mutations.

CONCLUSION

Vaccine escape mutants selected by NA exposure were frequent and steadily increasing during follow-up. Although the high antiviral potency of TDF can mitigate incident mutations, other antiviral options are limited in this respect. The public health implications of their transmission need to be addressed.

Wenshenfang without decoction combined with lamivudine for treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with kidney- and spleen-YANG deficiency syndrome: Relationship between duration and effect

AIM: To observe the relation between time and curative effect of Wenshenfang without Decoction in combination with lamivudine in the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with syndrome of deficiency of kidney- and spleen-YANG to find optimal therapy time.

METHODS: Sixty-four HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B patients with syndrome of deficiency of kidney- and spleen-YANG were equally and randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group. The control group was treated with lamivudine only, while the treatment group was treated with Wenshenfang without decoction in combination with lamivudine. Therapeutic effect was observed 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after treatment. The changes in HBeAg and anti-HbeAg were monitored.

RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the HBeAg conversion rate at 6 mo was significantly increased in the treatment group (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION: Wenshenfang without decoction in combination with lamivudine could significantly increase the HBeAg conversion rate. The optimal therapy time is 6 mo.

Evidence of associations of APOBEC3B gene deletion with susceptibility to persistent HBV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma

APOBEC3s are a family of cytidine deaminases involved in innate cellular immunity against virus including hepatitis B virus (HBV). A germline deletion across APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B (A3B) genes results in complete removal of the A3B coding region and destroys A3B expression. To determine whether this deletion affects susceptibility to HBV infection and HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), A3B genotypes were analyzed in 1124 individuals with HCC, 510 individuals with persistent HBV infection and 826 healthy controls and the association was estimated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) computed by logistic regression. We also examined the effects of A3B on HBV genome hypermutation and replication in HCC cells. We observed a significantly higher frequency of the A3B deletion allele in persistent HBV carriers (33.3%; P = 0.0015) and HCC patients (37.9%; P = 1.28 × 10(-11)) compared with that in controls (27.5%). An increased risk for persistent HBV infection (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.77) and HCC development (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.58-2.28) was associated with at least one A3B deletion allele (+/- or -/- genotype) compared with the +/+ genotype. Transfection of A3B in HepG2 cells caused a substantial reduction of HBV RNA levels and G → A hypermutation in the HBV genome. Interestingly, a cytidine deaminase null mutant of A3B (E255A) also inhibited HBV RNA production although it was unable to edit HBV. These results suggest that the deletion of A3B attenuates HBV clearance, which in turn may result in persistent HBV infection and increased risk for developing HCC. Further studies are needed to verify our findings.

Treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B: interferon or nucleoside analogues

Interferon alpha has restricted efficacy in as much as only a proportion of patients show a response. However, in appropriately selected HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, sustained suppression of viral replication can be achieved, and HBeAg or even HBsAg seroconversion can be attained. Thus, finite course of interferon alpha can be successful, and offer an advantage to patient. Interferon (IFN) remains a benchmark therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The main advantages of IFN-α over nucleoside analogues are the absence of resistance and the possibility of immune-mediated clearance of hepatitis B. Unfortunately, side effects preclude the use of interferon alpha in substantial proportions of patients, and prolonged maintenance therapy to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) is not feasible. Nucleoside analogues are given by mouth, once per day, and the safety, potency and efficacy have improved and facilitated treatment. However, maintenance of long-term suppression is required for the majority of patients. In general, treatment of chronic hepatitis B should target patients with active disease and viral replication, preferably before the signs and symptoms of cirrhosis or significant injury has occurred. Current EASL guidelines suggest that treatment be based on the evaluation of three criteria: Serum aminotransferase levels, serum HBV DNA levels and histological grade and stage. Many questions remain unanswered on the optimal treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B with a nucleoside vs interferon alpha. Both forms of treatment have benefits and the choice should be selected and tailored. Stopping or futility rules can be implemented in patients who fail interferon. Recent data suggest the safety and efficacy of nucleoside analogues in the third trimester of pregnancy to reduce the risk of transmission from mothers to their children.

Treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of rescue therapies in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infections including: (1) adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) monotherapy, (2) ADV plus LAM combination therapy and (3) entecavir (ETV) 1.0 mg monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors designed a multicenter-retrospective study. Eight institutions participated in the study from Korea.

RESULTS

A total of 343 LAM-resistant CHB patients were enrolled. The proportion of patients with undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels at month 24 after the initiation of rescue therapy was higher in the ADV plus LAM combination therapy group (39/64, 60.9%) than in the ADV monotherapy (50/126, 39.7%) and ETV 1.0 mg monotherapy (19/48, 39.6%) groups (p = 0.014). Mean serum HBV DNA levels at 24 months were 2.07 ± 1.21 log(10) IU/ml in the ADV plus LAM combination therapy group, 2.74 ± 1.74 log(10) IU/ml in the ADV monotherapy group and 3.08 ± 1.97 log(10) IU/ml in the ETV 1.0 mg monotherapy group (p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, a finding of undetectable serum HBV DNA level at 6 months and ADV plus LAM combination therapy (vs. ADV) was an independent factor for predicting undetectable serum HBV DNA at month 24 (odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 1.000-1.006; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

ADV plus LAM combination therapy is more effective in reducing viral load than switching to ADV or ETV 1.0 mg in patients with LAM-resistant CHB.

Optimal management of chronic hepatitis B patients with treatment failure and antiviral drug resistance

The management of treatment failure in patients with chronic hepatitis B, remains a clinical concern. Incomplete viral suppression and the emergence of drug resistance are key determinants of treatment failure. The correct choice of a potent first-line therapy to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and drug resistance. Clinical studies have demonstrated that drugs with a high barrier to resistance have significantly lower rates of resistance compared with those with a low barrier to resistance. Management of treatment failure requires precise clinical and virological monitoring as well as early treatment intervention with appropriate noncross-resistant antivirals. Long-term surveillance of treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance is necessary in patients who have been sequentially treated with multiple antivirals. The identification of novel treatment targets remains a major research goal to improve the efficacy of current antiviral therapy through combination therapy regimens.

2'-Fluoro-6'-methylene-carbocyclic adenosine phosphoramidate (FMCAP) prodrug: in vitro anti-HBV activity against the lamivudine-entecavir resistant triple mutant and its mechanism of action

Novel 2'-fluoro-6'-methylene-carbocyclic adenosine (FMCA) monophosphate prodrug (FMCAP) was synthesized and evaluated for its in vitro anti-HBV potency against a lamivudine-entecavir resistant clone (L180M+M204V+S202G). FMCA demonstrated significant antiviral activity against wild-type as well as lamivudine-entecavir resistant triple mutant (L180M+M204V+S202G). The monophosphate prodrug (FMCAP) demonstrated greater than 12-fold (12×) increase in anti-HBV activity without increased cellular toxicity. Mitochondrial and cellular toxicity studies of FMCA indicated that there is no significant toxicity up to 100 μM. Mode of action studies by molecular modeling indicate that the 2'-fluoro moiety by hydrogen bond as well as the Van der Waals interaction of the carbocyclic ring with the phenylalanine moiety of the polymerase promote the positive binding, even in the drug-resistant mutants.

Virologic responses to add-on adefovir dipivoxil treatment versus entecavir monotherapy in children with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare the virologic response to adefovir (ADV) add-on therapy with switching to entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who have developed lamivudine (LAM) resistance during LAM treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with CHB who had developed LAM resistance during LAM treatment were included. Of these 27 patients, 8 patients were treated with the addition of ADV to ongoing LAM and 8 patients were treated by switching to ETV monotherapy and each of these 16 patients were compared with the 11 patients who were treated by switching to ADV alone, as a historical control. Therapeutic responses to treatment were evaluated at 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks from the initiation of therapy by measuring the decrement of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA titers.

RESULTS

The therapeutic period for HBV-DNA titer decrement (>2  log(10) IU/mL) was significantly shorter in both the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group than in the ADV group (P = 0.008); however, there was no significant difference between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group. The rate of virologic response, defined as decrement in HBV-DNA titer to undetectable levels at 24 weeks, was significantly higher in both the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group than in the ADV group (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy exhibited significantly more effective virologic responses compared to the ADV monotherapy in children and adolescents with LAM-resistant CHB, although there was no significant difference between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group.

Multidrug-resistant hepatitis B virus resulting from sequential monotherapy with lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir: clonal evolution during lamivudine plus adefovir therapy

Whether multidrug-resistant (MDR) hepatitis B virus (HBV) harbors mutations co-located in the same HBV clones that confer reduced sensitivity to antiviral therapy remains uncertain. This study investigated the evolution of MDR HBV strains developed from sequential monotherapy with lamivudine (LAM), adefovir (ADV), and entecavir (ETV) during LAM plus ADV salvage therapy. Sera were obtained from six patients who had developed sequential resistance to LAM, ADV, and ETV before and during LAM plus ADV therapy. The HBV genomes from each patient were amplified, cloned, and sequenced. Among 6 sets of 20 clones obtained before salvage therapy, all clones harbored the rtM204V mutation, and ETV-resistant mutations were detected with the rtM204V in 108 clones. The rtA181 mutation was not detected at baseline, but emerged in five patients during therapy. Among 9 sets of 20 clones obtained during salvage therapy, 39 clones harbored rtA181T/V ± rtN236T mutations, which were detected in the absence of rtM204 and ETV-resistant mutations in 37 clones (94.9%). Only two clones (5.1%) harbored both rtA181T/V and ETV-resistant mutations. The rtA181T/V mutation emerged after reversion from ETV-resistant mutants to wild-type HBV. Five patients achieved a partial virologic response to LAM plus ADV therapy. In conclusion, the majority of MDR mutations existed in different genomes. Suboptimal response to LAM plus ADV therapy may not result from the co-localization of MDR HBV mutations in the same genome, but instead the low antiviral potency of these drugs. Thus, more potent antiviral drug combinations may be an effective salvage therapy for patients infected with MDR HBV.

The perils of relying on anti-hepatitis B total core antibody in screening individuals infected with HIV

Co-infection with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) has serious long-term consequences. We describe a case of an HIV-infected heterosexual black African man with a delayed diagnosis of HBV infection. Baseline HBV screening was performed using a sequential testing algorithm starting with a total core antibody (anti-HBc) test, which was negative. He had no evidence of immunity against HBV and subsequently received three unsuccessful courses of HBV vaccination. He had mild but persistent elevation of liver enzymes over a five-year period despite maintaining full suppression of HIV replication on efavirenz, lamivudine and zidovudine; the latter was changed to abacavir due to lipoatrophy. Further testing revealed e-antibody positive chronic HBV infection with undetectable anti-HBc reactivity. High-grade HBV viraemia associated with L180M and M240V drug-resistance mutations was confirmed. He was subsequently switched to a tenofovir-based regimen, which achieved HBV suppression. Adopting effective HBV screening strategies in HIV-infected patients is recommended.