Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays

Temporal analyses of germ cell mutations using the MutaMouse model support the recommended design in OECD test guideline 488

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline (TG) 488 uses transgenic rodent models to assess in vivo mutagenesis. TG 488 recommends 28 consecutive days of exposure with sampling of germ cells from seminiferous tubules 28 days post-exposure (i.e., 28 + 28d). We analyzed mutant frequencies (MF) in male germ cells up to 70 days post-exposure to determine whether designs other than 28 + 28d are necessary for assessing germ cell mutagenicity. Adult MutaMouse males received various doses of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), isopropyl methanesulfonate (iPMS), or procarbazine (PRC) alongside vehicle controls for 28 days orally. Germ cells were collected from seminiferous tubules at + 3d, + 28d, + 42d, or + 70d post-exposure and MF quantified using the lacZ assay. Significant increases in lacZ MF were observed for all four chemicals at 28 + 28d. No further increases occurred at later sampling times. There was no significant effect with BaP at 28 + 3d, and a significantly stronger response with ENU and BaP at 28 + 28d compared to 28 + 3d. PRC produced the strongest response at 28 + 3d, while there was no impact of different sampling times for iPMS. Both these chemicals significantly reduced testis weight at 28 + 3d and 28 + 28d. Finally, benchmark dose modeling generated overlapping confidence intervals among the four sampling times for ENU, iPMS, and PRC. However, for BaP, the confidence interval was significantly greater at 28 + 3d than at the other sampling times. These results support the use of the 28 + 28d design as the recommended experimental design for germ cells in TG 488 and that later sampling times are not necessary.

Tale of Three N-Nitrosamines and the Variables Needed to Assess Their Carcinogenicity In Silico Incorporated into a Single Workflow

N-Nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceuticals present a considerable challenge for regulators and industry alike, where the absence of carcinogenic-potency studies has left a gap that must be adequately filled to protect public health. In the interim, this means balancing risk assessment with the necessity to continue research, development, and supply of pharmaceuticals. In the long term, we need a cost-effective solution that optimizes both. As if beholden to Newton's Third Law, every crisis breeds an opportunity of equal magnitude. Consequently, cross-industry consortia have been racing to find a solution by advancing our current science. Recent spotlight has been on in silico tools, as a fast and increasingly reliable alternative to in vivo and in vitro testing. Because N-nitrosamine bioactivation lends itself uniquely to quantum mechanics (QM) approaches, the integration of electronic-structure considerations has emerged as the dominant in silico approach. This signifies a considerable leap in predictive toxicology, which has, for much of its existence, relied on atomistic (quantitative) structure-activity relationships, i.e., (Q)SARs. Here we present a validation of an integrated docking-QM approach within the CADRE program and demonstrate its utility on three different impurities, N-nitroso-7-monomethylamino-6-deoxytetracycline, N-nitroso-dabigatran etexilate, and 1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine. We show that a combined in silico strategy, which considers bioavailability, transport, cytochrome P450 binding, and reactivity, can be leveraged to supplement the overly conservative Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach (CPCA) in setting the daily acceptable intake (AI) using defensible, highly mechanistic, and quantitative drivers of N-nitrosamine metabolism. To that end, we argue that while N-nitroso-7-monomethylamino-6-deoxytetracycline and 1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine are cohort-of-concern impurities, N-nitroso-dabigatran etexilate is not a potent carcinogen (TD50 > 1.5 mg/kg/day), contrasting the CPCA-derived AI. Lastly, we discuss how the CADRE tool can be integrated with the broader landscape of QM methods and the CPCA into a single harmonized in silico strategy for carcinogenicity assessment of N-nitrosamine impurities.

Duplex sequencing identifies unique characteristics of ENU-induced mutations in male mouse germ cells†

Germ cell mutagenicity testing is increasingly required for chemical risk assessment. Duplex sequencing is rapidly gaining acceptance as a method to assess in vivo mutagenesis, and as a valid alternative to transgenic rodent mutation models such as the MutaMouse. We used a duplex sequencing panel of 20 genomic targets and the transgenic rodent assay to measure mutations in the germ cells of MutaMouse males exposed to 0, 1, 2, or 5 mg/kg N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea for 28 days. Germ cells from the seminiferous tubules were collected 28 days post-exposure. The transgenic rodent assay showed a significant increase in mutant frequencies at the high (P < 0.001) and medium (P = 0.01) N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea doses relative to controls, while duplex sequencing revealed a significant increase (P < 0.001) in N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mutations only at the high dose. Duplex sequencing mutation frequencies were lower in genic than in intergenic targets, suggesting a protective role for transcription-coupled repair. Interestingly, we observed several unique germ cell characteristics with respect to duplex sequencing data from rodent somatic tissues: 1) larger inter-animal variability in clonally expanded mutations that affects the ability to detect significant increases in mutation frequency; 2) a target on chromosome 2 showing much higher susceptibility to spontaneous and chemical-induced mutagenesis than other targets; and 3) a mutation spectrum consistent with that observed in the offspring of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-treated males but not with the spectrum in bone marrow of directly-exposed males. These results suggest that duplex sequencing is a promising approach for characterizing germ cell mutagenesis and that mutagenic mechanisms operating in germ cells differ from those in somatic tissues.

Nitrosamine Drug Substance-Related Impurities (NDSRIs) in Pharmaceuticals: Formation, Mitigation Strategies, and Emphasis on Mutagenicity Risks

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the formation, detection, mutagenicity, and control strategies of nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) in pharmaceutical formulations, emphasizing regulatory compliance, risk mitigation, and the establishment of acceptable intake (AI) limits for enhanced drug safety.

METHODS

This study reviews the NDSRI formation and mutagenicity assessment methods, including in silico, in vitro, and in vivo assays. It also explores mitigation strategies and approaches for determining AI limits.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that NDSRIs are primarily formed through the nitrosation of APIs containing amine groups, with key risk factors including reactive functional groups and interactions between drugs and excipients. Mutagenicity evaluation revealed that while in silico and in vitro assays provide initial insights, in vivo assays offer more comprehensive and biologically relevant data by capturing complex metabolic processes and systemic interactions. Effective mitigation strategies, such as optimizing the manufacturing conditions and using nitrosation inhibitors, are crucial in reducing NDSRI formation. Approaches like the carcinogenic potency categorization (CPCA) and read-across methods are proposed for determining AI limits, facilitating safer exposure thresholds and supporting regulatory compliance.

CONCLUSION

A multifaceted approach is vital for managing NDSRIs in pharmaceuticals. Comprehensive mutagenicity testing, especially in vivo assays, provides biologically relevant insights into NDSRI-associated risks. Implementing control strategies and, determining AI limits are key to minimizing exposure. Strengthening regulatory frameworks and industry practices improves drug safety, quality, and public health protection.

Benchmark Response (BMR) Values for In Vivo Mutagenicity Endpoints

The benchmark dose (BMD) approach constitutes the most effective and pragmatic strategy for the derivation of a point of departure (PoD) for comparative potency analysis, risk assessment, and regulatory decision-making. There is considerable controversy regarding the most appropriate benchmark response (BMR) for genotoxicity endpoints. This work employed the Slob (2017) Effect Size (ES) theory to define robust BMR values for the in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) and Pig-a mutagenicity endpoints. An extensive database of dose-response data was prepared and curated; BMD analyses were used to determine endpoint-specific maxima (i.e., parameter c) and within-group variance (i.e., var). Detailed analyses investigated the dependence of var on experimental factors such as tissue, administration route, treatment duration, and post-exposure tissue sampling time. The overall lack of influence of these experimental factors on var permitted the determination of typical values for the endpoints investigated. Typical var for the TGR endpoint is 0.19; the value for the Pig-a endpoint is 0.29. Endpoint-specific var values were used to calculate endpoint-specific BMR values; the values are 47% for TGR and 60% for Pig-a. Endpoint-specific BMR values were also calculated using the trimmed distribution of study-specific standard deviation (SD) values for concurrent controls. Those analyses yielded endpoint-specific BMR values for the TGR and Pig-a endpoints of 33% and 58%, respectively. Considering the results obtained, and the in vivo genetic toxicity BMR values noted in the literature, we recommend a BMR of 50% for in vivo mutagenicity endpoints. The value can be employed to interpret mutagenicity dose-response data in a risk assessment context.

Re-Evaluating Acceptable Intake: A Comparative Study of N-Nitrosomorpholine and N-Nitroso Reboxetine Potency

Establishing regulatory limits for Drug Substance-Related Impurities (NDSRIs) is challenging due to the limited genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data available for many of these impurities, often leading to conservative approaches. In this study, we evaluated the genotoxic potential of two structurally related nitrosamines: N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR) and N-nitroso reboxetine. Compared to the well-studied NMOR, there is little toxicological information available for N-nitroso reboxetine. Currently, both compounds have an acceptable intake value of 127 ng/day, based on a read-across using the available carcinogenicity data of NMOR. While both compounds tested positive in a series of in vitro and in vivo assays, we found that the mutagenic potential of N-nitroso reboxetine was significantly lower than that of NMOR. The benchmark dose (BMD) analysis of in vivo mutagenicity data supports an acceptable intake of 24,000 ng/day for N-nitroso reboxetine. Computational studies, carried out using the quantum-mechanical CADRE program, were consistent with in vitro and in vivo outcomes, suggesting an acceptable intake at or above 1500 ng/day for N-nitroso reboxetine. In comparison to NMOR, this prediction is supported by lower computed reactivity in the hydroxylation step, greater steric hindrance of the alpha carbons, and more facile proton transfer in the heterolysis toward the aldehyde metabolite. The data presented in this work can be used to refine and improve the Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach (CPCA). It also underscores the importance of collaboration between regulatory authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, and scientific researchers to address potential risks while avoiding overestimation of the acceptable intake limits for certain NDSRIs.

The transgenic MutaMouse hepatocyte mutation assay in vitro: Mutagenicity and mutation spectra of six substances with different mutagenic mechanisms

Mutagenicity testing is a component of the hazard assessment of industrial chemicals, biocides, and pesticides. Mutations induced by test substances can be detected by in vitro and in vivo methods that have been adopted as OECD Test Guidelines. One of these in vivo methods is the Transgenic Rodent Assay (TGRA), OECD test guideline no. 488. An analogous in vitro TGRA has been described, but experience with this test method is limited. In this study, six in vivo TGRA positive mutagens were tested in the in vitro TGRA based on primary MutaMouse hepatocytes. In addition to the functional read-out of the lacZ reporter gene, induced mutations were analysed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Five of the six in vivo TGRA positive mutagens (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), mitomycin C (MMC), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), and azathioprine (AZA), but not cyproterone acetate) mutated the lacZ gene in vitro. NGS identified mutations which matched the mutagenic mechanisms described in the literature. The alkylating agent ENU induced a greater proportion of A:T to T:A transversions than did the other alkylating agent, EMS, whereas EMS increased smaller deletions (1-4 bp). G:C to T:A transversions accounted for the majority of mutations identified after treatments with MMC and B[a]P, both of which form monoadducts at the guanine N2 position. AZA induced mainly G:C to A:T transitions, explained by the structural similarity of one of its metabolites to guanine. An increased proportion of mid-size changes (0.3-2.5 kb) was detected only for the crosslinking mutagen MMC. The in vitro TGRA based on primary MutaMouse hepatocytes is a promising in vitro assay for the assessment of mutation induction, reflecting many aspects of the corresponding in vivo TGRA and allowing for mutation spectra analysis to evaluate the induced mutations.

Comprehensive genotoxicity and carcinogenicity assessment of molnupiravir

Molnupiravir is registered or authorized in several countries as a 5-d oral coronavirus disease 2019 treatment for adults. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of the antiviral ribonucleoside β-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) that distributes into cells, where it is phosphorylated to its pharmacologically active ribonucleoside triphosphate (NHC-TP) form. NHC-TP incorporates into severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, resulting in an accumulation of errors in the viral genome, leading to inhibition of viral replication and loss of infectivity. The potential of molnupiravir to induce genomic mutations and DNA damage was comprehensively assessed in several in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays and a carcinogenicity study, in accordance with international guideline recommendations and expert opinion. Molnupiravir and NHC induced mutations in vitro in bacteria and mammalian cells but did not induce chromosome damage in in vitro or in vivo assays. The in vivo mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of molnupiravir was tested in a series of in vivo mutagenicity studies in somatic and germ cells (Pig-a Assay and Big Blue® TGR Mutation Assay) and in a carcinogenicity study (transgenic rasH2-Tg mouse), using durations of exposure and doses exceeding those used in clinical therapy. In vitro genotoxicity results are superseded by robustly conducted in vivo studies. Molnupiravir did not increase mutations in somatic or germ cells in the in vivo animal studies and was negative in the carcinogenicity study. The interpretation criteria for each study followed established regulatory guidelines. Taken together, these data indicate that molnupiravir use does not present a genotoxicity or carcinogenicity risk for patients.

Power analyses to inform Duplex Sequencing study designs for MutaMouse liver and bone marrow

Regulatory genetic toxicology testing is essential for identifying potentially mutagenic hazards. Duplex Sequencing (DS) is an error-corrected next-generation sequencing technology that provides substantial advantages for mutation analysis over conventional mutagenicity assays including: improved accuracy of mutation detection, ability to measure changes in mutation spectrum, and applicability across diverse biological models. To apply DS for regulatory toxicology testing, power analyses are required to determine suitable sample sizes and study designs. In this study, we explored study designs to achieve sufficient power for various effect sizes in chemical mutagenicity assessment. We collected data from MutaMouse bone marrow and liver samples that were analyzed by DS using TwinStrand's Mouse Mutagenesis Panel. Average duplex reads achieved in two separates studies on liver and bone marrow were 8.4 × 108 (± 7.4 × 107) and 9.5 × 108 (± 1.0 × 108), respectively. Baseline mean mutation frequencies (MF) were 4.6 × 10-8 (± 6.7 × 10-9) and 4.6 × 10-8 (± 1.1 × 10-8), with estimated standard deviations for the animal-to-animal random effect of 0.15 and 0.20, for liver and bone marrow, respectively. We conducted simulation analyses based on these empirically derived parameters. We found that a sample size of four animals per group is sufficient to obtain over 80% power to detect a two-fold change in MF relative to baseline. In addition, we estimated the minimal total number of informative duplex bases sequenced with different sample sizes required to retain power for various effect sizes. Our work provides foundational data for establishing suitable study designs for mutagenicity testing using DS.

AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to cataracts

Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.

N-nitrosamine impurity risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Utilizing In vivo mutation relative potency comparison to establish an acceptable intake for NTTP

The finding of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in marketed drugs has led to implementation of risk assessment processes intended to limit exposures to the entire class of N-nitrosamines. A critical component of the risk assessment process is establishing exposure limits that are protective of human health. One approach to establishing exposure limits for novel N-nitrosamines is to conduct an in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation study. Existing regulatory guidance on N-nitrosamines provides decision making criteria based on interpreting in vivo TGR mutation studies as an overall positive or negative. However, point of departure metrics, such as benchmark dose (BMD), can be used to define potency and provide an opportunity to establish relevant exposure limits. This can be achieved through relative potency comparison of novel N-nitrosamines with model N-nitrosamines possessing robust in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. The current work adds to the dataset of model N-nitrosamines by providing in vivo TGR mutation data for N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). In vivo TGR mutation data was also generated for a novel N-nitrosamine impurity identified in sitagliptin-containing products, 7-nitroso-3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo-[4,3-a]pyrazine (NTTP). Using the relative potency comparison approach, we have demonstrated the safety of NTTP exposures at or above levels of 1500 ng/day.

Confirmation of Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-induced micronuclei by repeated dose liver micronucleus assay: focus on evaluation of liver micronucleus assay in young rats

BACKGROUND

Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is a plasticizer commonly used in a wide variety of products, including medical devices. It is rapidly metabolized in the liver into various metabolites upon absorption through oral ingestion, dermal absorption, and inhalation. DEHP is classified as a non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogen in rodents, as its chronic exposure has been associated with the development of liver cancer in these animals, but most genotoxicity studies have been negative. Epidemiologic studies in humans suggest that long-term high intakes of DEHP may be a risk factor for liver dysfunction. The repeated-dose liver micronucleus (RDLMN) assay is a well-established method for assessing chromosomal changes caused by hepatic genotoxins and/or carcinogens. It is particularly valuable for detecting substances that undergo metabolic activation, especially when the metabolite has a short half-life or does not reach the bone marrow effectively. Therefore, we investigated whether the RDLMN assay could detect DEHP-induced micronucleus formation in the liver following a 14 or 28-day treatment.

RESULTS

We report that the RDLMN assay demonstrated an increased frequency of hepatic micronuclei in rats exposed to DEHP for 14 or 28 days. The increases in micronuclei correlated with hepatomegaly, an established response to phthalates in the liver. Conversely, no such increases were observed in the micronucleus assay using bone marrow from these rats.

CONCLUSION

The detection of DEHP-induced micronuclei by the RDLMN assay suggests that this assay could detect the potential genotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenicity of DEHP. It also demonstrated the utility of the RDLMN assay in identifying metabolically activated hepatic carcinogens.

Assessing the genotoxicity of N-nitrosodiethylamine with three in vivo endpoints in male Big Blue® transgenic and wild-type C57BL/6N mice

The detection of N-nitrosamines in drug products has raised global regulatory interest in recent years due to the carcinogenic potential of some nitrosamines in animals and a need to identify a testing strategy has emerged. Ideally, methods used would allow for the use of quantitative analysis of dose-response data from in vivo genotoxicity assays to determine a compound-specific acceptable intake for novel nitrosamines without sufficient carcinogenicity data. In a previous study we compared the dose-response relationships of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) in three in vivo genotoxicity endpoints in rats. Here we report a comparison of NDEA's genotoxicity profile in mice. Big Blue® mice were administered NDEA at doses of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 3 mg/kg/day by oral gavage for 28 days followed by 3 days of expression. Statistically significant increases in the NDEA induced mutations were detected by both the transgenic rodent mutation assay (TGR) using the cII endpoint and by duplex sequencing in the liver but not bone marrow of mice. In addition, administration of NDEA for two consecutive days in male C57BL/6N mice caused elevated DNA damage levels in the liver as measured by % tail DNA in comet assay. The benchmark dose (BMD) analysis shows a BMDL50 of 0.03, 0.04 and 0.72 mg/kg/day for TGR, duplex sequencing and comet endpoints, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrated a similar genotoxicity profile of NDEA between mice and rats and provides a reference that can be used to compare the potential potency of other novel nitrosamines for the induction of gene mutations.

Effect of radiation dose rates and cisplatin on cytogenetic damage in rats receiving head-neck radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate effect of radiotherapy (RT) applications with different dose rates on cytogenetic damages, which focused on micronucleus (MN) formation, and evaluate how this damage varies by cisplatin in rats receiving head-neck RT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six Sprague Dawley rats were divided into five groups. The first and second groups were irradiated at a dose rate of 300 monitor unit/minute (MU/min) and 600 MU/min, respectively. The third group was irradiated at a dose rate of 300 MU/min and given cisplatin. The fourth group was irradiated at a dose rate of 600 MU/min and given cisplatin. The fifth group received neither irradiation nor cisplatin (control group). One thousand polychromatic erythrocytes were scored, and MN frequency in polychromatic erythrocytes was determined for each rat.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference among five groups in terms of the number of MN (p: 0.001). The number of MN was significantly higher in the 600 MU/min + cisplatin group (fourth group) compared to the control group [9.5 (1.0-23.0) vs. 1.5 (1.0-2.0), respectively]. It was also significantly higher in 600 MU/min + cisplatin group (fourth group) compared to 300 MU/min group (first group) [9.5 (1.0-23.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-3.0), respectively]. On the other hand, there was no significant difference among other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that RT given at a higher dose rate causes more cytogenetic damage, and this damage is increased by concurrent administration of cisplatin.

Evaluation of the nitrosamine impurities of ACE inhibitors using computational, in vitro, and in vivo methods demonstrate no genotoxic potential

Evaluation and mitigation of the potential carcinogenic risks associated with nitrosamines in marketed pharmaceutical products are areas of interest for pharmaceutical companies and health authorities alike. Significant progress has been made to establish acceptable intake (AI) levels for N-nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) using SAR, however some compounds require experimental data to support derivation of a recommended AI. Many angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, identified by the suffix "pril," have secondary amines that can potentially react to form nitrosamines. Here we consider a structural assessment and metabolism data, coupled with comprehensive in vitro and in vivo (mouse) genotoxicity testing to evaluate this particular class of nitrosamines. N-nitroso ramipril and N-nitroso quinapril, both of which are predicted to have inhibited nitrosamine bioactivation due to steric hinderance and branching at the α-position were non-genotoxic in the in vivo liver comet assay and non-mutagenic in the in vivo Big Blue® mutation and duplex sequencing assays. Predicted metabolism along with in vitro metabolism data and quantum chemical calculations related to DNA interactions offer a molecular basis for the negative results observed in both in vitro and in vivo testing. These nitrosamines are concluded to be non-mutagenic and non-carcinogenic; therefore, they should be controlled according to ICH Q3B guidance. Furthermore, these results for N-nitroso ramipril and N-nitroso quinapril should be considered when evaluating the appropriate AI and control strategy for other structurally similar "pril" NDSRIs.

Severity of effect considerations regarding the use of mutation as a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment: A report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)

Exposure levels without appreciable human health risk may be determined by dividing a point of departure on a dose-response curve (e.g., benchmark dose) by a composite adjustment factor (AF). An "effect severity" AF (ESAF) is employed in some regulatory contexts. An ESAF of 10 may be incorporated in the derivation of a health-based guidance value (HBGV) when a "severe" toxicological endpoint, such as teratogenicity, irreversible reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, or cancer was observed in the reference study. Although mutation data have been used historically for hazard identification, this endpoint is suitable for quantitative dose-response modeling and risk assessment. As part of the 8th International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing, a sub-group of the Quantitative Analysis Work Group (WG) explored how the concept of effect severity could be applied to mutation. To approach this question, the WG reviewed the prevailing regulatory guidance on how an ESAF is incorporated into risk assessments, evaluated current knowledge of associations between germline or somatic mutation and severe disease risk, and mined available data on the fraction of human germline mutations expected to cause severe disease. Based on this review and given that mutations are irreversible and some cause severe human disease, in regulatory settings where an ESAF is used, a majority of the WG recommends applying an ESAF value between 2 and 10 when deriving a HBGV from mutation data. This recommendation may need to be revisited in the future if direct measurement of disease-causing mutations by error-corrected next generation sequencing clarifies selection of ESAF values.

Assessment of the three-test genetic toxicology battery for groundwater metabolites

The two-test in vitro battery for genotoxicity testing (Ames and micronucleus) has in the majority of cases replaced the three-test battery (as two-test plus mammalian cell gene mutation assay) for the routine testing of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and agrochemical metabolites originating from food and feed as well as from water treatment. The guidance for testing agrochemical groundwater metabolites, however, still relies on the three-test battery. Data collated in this study from 18 plant protection and related materials highlights the disparity between the often negative Ames and in vitro chromosome aberration data and frequently positive in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assays. Sixteen of the 18 collated materials with complete datasets were Ames negative, and overall had negative outcomes in in vitro chromosome damage tests (weight of evidence from multiple tests). Mammalian cell gene mutation assays (HPRT and/or mouse lymphoma assay (MLA)) were positive in at least one test for every material with this data. Where both MLA and HPRT tests were performed on the same material, the HPRT seemed to give fewer positive responses. In vivo follow-up tests included combinations of comet assays, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and transgenic rodent gene mutation assays, all gave negative outcomes. The inclusion of mammalian cell gene mutation assays in a three-test battery for groundwater metabolites is therefore not justified and leads to unnecessary in vivo follow-up testing.

Application of duplex sequencing to evaluate mutagenicity of aristolochic acid and methapyrilene in Fisher 344 rats

Duplex sequencing (DS) is an error-corrected next-generation sequencing (NGS) method that can overcome notorious high error rate from the process of NGS and detect ultralow-frequency mutations. In this study, we evaluated the mutagenicity of aristolochic acid, a known genotoxic carcinogen, and methapyrilene, a known nongenotoxic carcinogen using DS. Four male Fisher 344 rats were treated with aristolochic acid, methapyrilene, or the vehicle control for 6 weeks, liver tissues were collected one day after the treatment, and the DNA was isolated for analysis. The mutation frequency for the aristolochic acid-treated group was significantly increased over the vehicle control (44-fold), whereas no significant difference in the mutation frequency was observed between the methapyrilene-treated and the control groups. The primary type of mutation induced by aristolochic acid was A:T > T:A transversion, which occurred frequently at ApT sites, whereas the major type of mutation in the control and methapyrilene-treated groups was G:C > A:T transition, which occurred frequently at CpG sites. These findings are consistent with previously published data obtained with other in vivo mutation assays. Thus, our results suggest that the DS mutation assay is a promising technology for assessing mutagenicity of chemicals in vivo.

Interpretation of in vitro concentration-response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting

Quantitative risk assessments of chemicals are routinely performed using in vivo data from rodents; however, there is growing recognition that non-animal approaches can be human-relevant alternatives. There is an urgent need to build confidence in non-animal alternatives given the international support to reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing where possible. In order for scientists and risk assessors to prepare for this paradigm shift in toxicity assessment, standardization and consensus on in vitro testing strategies and data interpretation will need to be established. To address this issue, an Expert Working Group (EWG) of the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) evaluated the utility of quantitative in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data for risk assessment. The EWG first evaluated available in vitro methodologies and then examined the variability and maximal response of in vitro tests to estimate biologically relevant values for the critical effect sizes considered adverse or unacceptable. Next, the EWG reviewed the approaches and computational models employed to provide human-relevant dose context to in vitro data. Lastly, the EWG evaluated risk assessment applications for which in vitro data are ready for use and applications where further work is required. The EWG concluded that in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data can be interpreted in a risk assessment context. However, prior to routine use in regulatory settings, further research will be required to address the remaining uncertainties and limitations.

The functional mutational landscape of the lacZ gene

The lacZ gene of Escherichia coli encodes β-galactosidase (β-gal), a lactose metabolism enzyme of the lactose operon. Previous chemical modification or site-directed mutagenesis experiments have identified 21 amino acids that are essential for β-gal catalytic activity. We have assembled over 10,000 lacZ mutations from published studies that were collected using a positive selection assay to identify mutations in lacZ that disrupted β-gal function. We analyzed 6,465 independent lacZ mutations that resulted in 2,732 missense mutations that impaired β-gal function. Those mutations affected 492 of the 1,023 lacZ codons, including most of the 21 previously known residues critical for catalytic activity. Most missense mutations occurred near the catalytic site and in regions important for subunit tetramerization. Overall, our work provides a comprehensive and detailed map of the amino acid residues affecting the structure and catalytic activity of the β-gal enzyme.

Carcinogenic risk of food additive AF-2 banned in Japan: a case study on reassessment of genotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Carcinogenic risk assessment studies have been repeatedly improved and are still being debated to find a goal. Evaluation might be changed if new approaches would be applied to some chemicals which means that new approaches may change the final assessment. In this paper, the risk assessment of a chemical, in particular the proper carcinogenicity, is examined using the long-banned food additive, 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-acrylamide, AF-2, as a case study.

RESULTS

First, Ames tests were carried out using strains TA1535, TA100, TA1538, and TA98 and their nitroreductase-deficient strains YG7127, YG7128, YG7129, and YG7130. The results showed that mutagenic activity was reduced by about 50% in the nitroreductase-deficient strains, indicating that part of the mutagenic activity shown in Ames test was due to bacterial metabolism. Second, in vivo genotoxicity tests were conducted, including the one that had not been developed in 1970's. Both a micronucleus test and a gene mutation assay using transgenic mice were negative. Third, assuming it is a genotoxic carcinogen, the virtual safety dose of 550 μg/day was calculated from the TD50 in rats with a probability of 10-5.

CONCLUSION

AF-2 has been shown to be carcinogenic to rodents and has previously been indicated to be genotoxic in vitro. However, the present in vivo genotoxicity study, it was negative in the forestomach, a target organ for cancer, particularly in the gene mutation assay in transgenic mice. Considering the daily intake of AF-2 in the 1970s and its virtually safety dose, the carcinogenic risk of AF-2 could be considered acceptable.

Genome-wide direct quantification of in vivo mutagenesis using high-accuracy paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing

Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) is an emerging technology for accurately measuring somatic mutations. Here, we report paired-end and complementary consensus sequencing (PECC-Seq), a high-accuracy ecNGS approach for genome-wide somatic mutation detection. We characterize a novel 2-aminoimidazolone lesion besides 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine and the resulting end-repair artifacts originating from NGS library preparation that obscure the sequencing accuracy of NGS. We modify library preparation protocol for the enzymatic removal of end-repair artifacts and improve the accuracy of our previously developed duplex consensus sequencing method. Optimized PECC-Seq shows an error rate of <5 × 10-8 with consensus bases compressed from approximately 25 Gb of raw sequencing data, enabling the accurate detection of low-abundance somatic mutations. We apply PECC-Seq to the quantification of in vivo mutagenesis. Compared with the classic gpt gene mutation assay using gpt delta transgenic mice, PECC-Seq exhibits high sensitivity in quantitatively measuring dose-dependent mutagenesis induced by Aristolochic acid I (AAI). Moreover, PECC-Seq specifically characterizes the distinct genome-wide mutational signatures of AAI, Benzo[a]pyrene, N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea and N-nitrosodiethylamine and reveals the mutational signature of Quinoline in common mouse models. Overall, our findings demonstrate that high-accuracy PECC-Seq is a promising tool for genome-wide somatic mutagenesis quantification and for in vivo mutagenicity testing.

Adopting duplex sequencing technology for genetic toxicity testing: A proof-of-concept mutagenesis experiment with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-exposed rats

Duplex sequencing (DS) is an error-corrected next-generation sequencing method in which molecular barcodes informatically link PCR-copies back to their source DNA strands, enabling computational removal of errors in consensus sequences. The resulting background of less than one artifactual mutation per 107 nucleotides allows for direct detection of somatic mutations. TwinStrand Biosciences, Inc. has developed a DS-based mutagenesis assay to sample the rat genome, which can be applied to genetic toxicity testing. To evaluate this assay for early detection of mutagenesis, a time-course study was conducted using male Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats (3 per group) administered a single dose of 40 mg/kg N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) via gavage, with mutation frequency (MF) and spectrum analyzed in stomach, bone marrow, blood, and liver tissues at 3 h, 24 h, 7 d, and 28 d post-exposure. Significant increases in MF were observed in ENU-exposed rats as early as 24 h for stomach (site of contact) and bone marrow (a highly proliferative tissue) and at 7 d for liver and blood. The canonical, mutational signature of ENU was established by 7 d post-exposure in all four tissues. Interlaboratory analysis of a subset of samples from different tissues and time points demonstrated remarkable reproducibility for both MF and spectrum. These results demonstrate that MF and spectrum can be evaluated successfully by directly sequencing targeted regions of DNA obtained from various tissues⁠, a considerable advancement compared to currently used in vivo gene mutation assays.

Whole-genome high-fidelity sequencing: A novel approach to detecting and characterization of mutagenicity in vivo

Direct DNA sequencing can be used for characterizing mutagenicity in simple and complex biological models. Recently we described a method of whole-genome sequencing for detecting mutations in simple models of cultured bacteria, mammalian cells, and nematode. In the current proof-of-concept study, we expand and improve our method for evaluating a more complex mammalian biological model in outbred mice. We detail the method by applying it to a small set of animals treated with a mutagen with known mutagenicity profiles, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), for consistency with the known data. Whole-genome high-fidelity sequencing (HiFi Sequencing) showed frequencies and spectra of background mutations in tissues of untreated mice that were consistent with normal ageing and characterized by spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of 5-methylcytosine. In mice treated with a single 40 mg/kg dose of ENU, the frequency of mutations in the genomic DNA of solid tissues increased up to 7-fold, with the greatest increase observed in the spleen and the smallest increase in the liver. The most common mutations detected in ENU-treated mice were T > A transitions and T > C transversions, consistent with the types of mutations caused by alkylating agents. The data suggest that HiFi Sequencing may be useful for characterizing mutagenicity of novel compounds in various biological models.

Comparison of the transgenic rodent mutation assay, error corrected next generation duplex sequencing, and the alkaline comet assay to detect dose-related mutations following exposure to N-nitrosodiethylamine

N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), a well-studied N-nitrosamine, was tested in rats to compare the dose-response relationship of three genotoxicity endpoints. Mutant / mutation frequencies were determined using the transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assay and error corrected next generation sequencing (ecNGS) (i.e., duplex sequencing (DS)), and genetic damage was detected by the alkaline comet assay. Big Blue® (cII Locus) animals (n = 6 per dose group) were administered doses of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 3 mg/kg/day NDEA by oral gavage. Samples were collected for cII mutation and DS analyses following 28-days of exposure and 3 days recovery. In a separate study, male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (n = 6 per dose group) were administered the same doses by oral gavage for two consecutive days and then samples collected for the alkaline comet assay. A dose-related increase in mutant / mutation frequencies of the liver but not duodenum was observed using the TGR assay and DS with DS resulting in a slightly more sensitive response, with a lower benchmark dose (BMD). In addition, a dose-related increase in percent tail DNA was observed in the liver using the alkaline comet assay. Therefore, DS and comet assays showed good utility for hazard identification and dose-response analysis of a representative N-nitrosamine comparable to the TGR gene mutation assay.

Assessment of the in vivo genotoxic potential of three smoke flavoring primary product mixtures

Smoke flavorings are mixtures generated from wood pyrolysis that are filtered to remove tar and are often considered healthier alternatives to conventional smoking processes. While the latter is mostly unregulated, smoke-flavoring primary products (SFPPs) are undergoing the 10-year required re-evaluation in the European Union (EU). To comply with recent smoke flavor guidance, in vivo micronucleus studies in rats and transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation assays in Muta™Mice were conducted on three SFPPs. For most studies, typical limit doses were exceeded to comply with regulatory requests. Exposure to SFPPs by oral gavage did not result in significant increases in bone marrow micronucleus formation. Except for one group, exposure to SFPPs via feed for 28 days did not result in significant increases in mutant frequency (MF) in the glandular stomach or liver. One group exposed to a maximal feasible dietary dose of 50,000 ppm (>10,000 mg/kg bodyweight per day) exhibited a statistically significant increase in liver MF; however, the MF in all mice in this group were within the historical vehicle control 95% quantile confidence intervals and therefore not considered biologically relevant. Based on estimates of human dietary exposure to each SFPP, the margin of exposure (MOE) values in the TGR assays exceed 10,000. The MOE for one unintentionally present constituent, 2,5(H)-furanone, also exceeds 10,000. Collectively, these data indicate that these SFPPs pose no genotoxic risk and are safe alternatives to conventional smoking.

Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose-response data

Genotoxicity data are mainly interpreted in a qualitative way, which typically results in a binary classification of chemical entities. For more than a decade, there has been a discussion about the need for a paradigm shift in this regard. Here, we review current opportunities, challenges and perspectives for a more quantitative approach to genotoxicity assessment. Currently discussed opportunities mainly include the determination of a reference point (e.g., a benchmark dose) from genetic toxicity dose-response data, followed by calculation of a margin of exposure (MOE) or derivation of a health-based guidance value (HBGV). In addition to new opportunities, major challenges emerge with the quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data. These are mainly rooted in the limited capability of standard in vivo genotoxicity testing methods to detect different types of genetic damage in multiple target tissues and the unknown quantitative relationships between measurable genotoxic effects and the probability of experiencing an adverse health outcome. In addition, with respect to DNA-reactive mutagens, the question arises whether the widely accepted assumption of a non-threshold dose-response relationship is at all compatible with the derivation of a HBGV. Therefore, at present, any quantitative genotoxicity assessment approach remains to be evaluated case-by-case. The quantitative interpretation of in vivo genotoxicity data for prioritization purposes, e.g., in connection with the MOE approach, could be seen as a promising opportunity for routine application. However, additional research is needed to assess whether it is possible to define a genotoxicity-derived MOE that can be considered indicative of a low level of concern. To further advance quantitative genotoxicity assessment, priority should be given to the development of new experimental methods to provide a deeper mechanistic understanding and a more comprehensive basis for the analysis of dose-response relationships.

Next Generation Sequencing Workshop at the Royal Society of Medicine (London, May 2022): how genomics is on the path to modernizing genetic toxicology

The use of error-corrected Next Generation Sequencing (ecNG) to determine mutagenicity has been a subject of growing interest and potentially a disruptive technology that could supplement, and in time, replace current testing paradigms in preclinical safety assessment. Considering this, a Next Generation Sequencing Workshop was held at the Royal Society of Medicine in London in May 2022, supported by the United Kingdom Environmental Mutagen Society (UKEMS) and TwinStrand Biosciences (WA, USA), to discuss progress and future applications of this technology. In this meeting report, the invited speakers provide an overview of the Workshop topics covered and identify future directions for research. In the area of somatic mutagenesis, several speakers reviewed recent progress made with correlating ecNGS to classic in vivo transgenic rodent mutation assays as well as exploring the use of this technology directly in humans and animals, and in complex organoid models. Additionally, ecNGS has been used for detecting off-target effects of gene editing tools and emerging data suggest ecNGS potential to measure clonal expansion of cells carrying mutations in cancer driver genes as an early marker of carcinogenic potential and for direct human biomonitoring. As such, the workshop demonstrated the importance of raising awareness and support for advancing the science of ecNGS for mutagenesis, gene editing, and carcinogenesis research. Furthermore, the potential of this new technology to contribute to advances in drug and product development and improve safety assessment was extensively explored.

Duplex sequencing provides detailed characterization of mutation frequencies and spectra in the bone marrow of MutaMouse males exposed to procarbazine hydrochloride

Mutagenicity testing is an essential component of health safety assessment. Duplex Sequencing (DS), an emerging high-accuracy DNA sequencing technology, may provide substantial advantages over conventional mutagenicity assays. DS could be used to eliminate reliance on standalone reporter assays and provide mechanistic information alongside mutation frequency (MF) data. However, the performance of DS must be thoroughly assessed before it can be routinely implemented for standard testing. We used DS to study spontaneous and procarbazine (PRC)-induced mutations in the bone marrow (BM) of MutaMouse males across a panel of 20 diverse genomic targets. Mice were exposed to 0, 6.25, 12.5, or 25 mg/kg-bw/day for 28 days by oral gavage and BM sampled 42 days post-exposure. Results were compared with those obtained using the conventional lacZ viral plaque assay on the same samples. DS detected significant increases in mutation frequencies and changes to mutation spectra at all PRC doses. Low intra-group variability within DS samples allowed for detection of increases at lower doses than the lacZ assay. While the lacZ assay initially yielded a higher fold-change in mutant frequency than DS, inclusion of clonal mutations in DS mutation frequencies reduced this discrepancy. Power analyses suggested that three animals per dose group and 500 million duplex base pairs per sample is sufficient to detect a 1.5-fold increase in mutations with > 80% power. Overall, we demonstrate several advantages of DS over classical mutagenicity assays and provide data to support efforts to identify optimal study designs for the application of DS as a regulatory test.

Error-corrected next generation sequencing - Promises and challenges for genotoxicity and cancer risk assessment

Error-corrected Next Generation Sequencing (ecNGS) is rapidly emerging as a valuable, highly sensitive and accurate method for detecting and characterizing mutations in any cell type, tissue or organism from which DNA can be isolated. Recent mutagenicity and carcinogenicity studies have used ecNGS to quantify drug-/chemical-induced mutations and mutational spectra associated with cancer risk. ecNGS has potential applications in genotoxicity assessment as a new readout for traditional models, for mutagenesis studies in 3D organotypic cultures, and for detecting off-target effects of gene editing tools. Additionally, early data suggest that ecNGS can measure clonal expansion of mutations as a mechanism-agnostic early marker of carcinogenic potential and can evaluate mutational load directly in human biomonitoring studies. In this review, we discuss promising applications, challenges, limitations, and key data initiatives needed to enable regulatory testing and adoption of ecNGS - including for advancing safety assessment, augmenting weight-of-evidence for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity mechanisms, identifying early biomarkers of cancer risk, and managing human health risk from chemical exposures.

International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT): Origins, achievements and ambitions

Over the past thirty years, the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) became one of the leading groups in the field of regulatory genotoxicology, not only due to the diversity of participants with respect to geography and professional affiliation, but also due to the unique setup of recurring IWGT meetings every four years. The hallmarks of the IWGT process have been diligent initial planning approaches of the working groups, collection of data so as to stimulate data-driven discussions and debate, and striving to reach consensus recommendations. The scientific quality of the Working Groups (WGs) has been exceptional due to the selection of highly regarded experts on each topic. As a result, the IWGT working group reports have become important documents. The deliberations and publications have provided guidance on test systems and testing protocols that have influenced the development or revision of test guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), guidance by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), and strategic testing or data analysis approaches in general. This article summarizes the history of the IWGT, identifies some of its major achievements, and provides an outlook for the future.

Adopting Duplex Sequencing™ Technology for Genetic Toxicity Testing: A Proof-of-Concept Mutagenesis Experiment with N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosourea (ENU)-Exposed Rats

Duplex sequencing (DuplexSeq) is an error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) method in which molecular barcodes informatically link PCR-copies back to their source DNA strands, enabling computational removal of errors by comparing grouped strand sequencing reads. The resulting background of less than one artifactual mutation per 10 7 nucleotides allows for direct detection of somatic mutations. TwinStrand Biosciences, Inc. has developed a DuplexSeq-based mutagenesis assay to sample the rat genome, which can be applied to genetic toxicity testing. To evaluate this assay for early detection of mutagenesis, a time-course study was conducted using male Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats (3 per group) administered a single dose of 40 mg/kg N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) via gavage, with mutation frequency (MF) and spectrum analyzed in stomach, bone marrow, blood, and liver tissues at 3 h, 24 h, 7 d, and 28 d post-exposure. Significant increases in MF were observed in ENU-exposed rats as early as 24 h for stomach (site of contact) and bone marrow (a highly proliferative tissue) and at 7 d for liver and blood. The canonical, mutational signature of ENU was established by 7 d post-exposure in all four tissues. Interlaboratory analysis of a subset of samples from different tissues and time points demonstrated remarkable reproducibility for both MF and spectrum. These results demonstrate that MF and spectrum can be evaluated successfully by directly sequencing targeted regions of DNA obtained from various tissues, a considerable advancement compared to currently used in vivo gene mutation assays.

HIGHLIGHTS

DuplexSeq is an ultra-accurate NGS technology that directly quantifies mutationsENU-dependent mutagenesis was detected 24 h post-exposure in proliferative tissuesMultiple tissues exhibited the canonical ENU mutation spectrum 7 d after exposureResults obtained with DuplexSeq were highly concordant between laboratoriesThe Rat-50 Mutagenesis Assay is promising for applications in genetic toxicology.

The State of Research and Weight of Evidence on the Epigenetic Effects of Bisphenol A

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a high-production-volume chemical with numerous industrial and consumer applications. BPA is extensively used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. The widespread utilities of BPA include its use as internal coating for food and beverage cans, bottles, and food-packaging materials, and as a building block for countless goods of common use. BPA can be released into the environment and enter the human body at any stage during its production, or in the process of manufacture, use, or disposal of materials made from this chemical. While the general population is predominantly exposed to BPA through contaminated food and drinking water, non-dietary exposures through the respiratory system, integumentary system, and vertical transmission, as well as other routes of exposure, also exist. BPA is often classified as an endocrine-disrupting chemical as it can act as a xenoestrogen. Exposure to BPA has been associated with developmental, reproductive, cardiovascular, neurological, metabolic, or immune effects, as well as oncogenic effects. BPA can disrupt the synthesis or clearance of hormones by binding and interfering with biological receptors. BPA can also interact with key transcription factors to modulate regulation of gene expression. Over the past 17 years, an epigenetic mechanism of action for BPA has emerged. This article summarizes the current state of research on the epigenetic effects of BPA by analyzing the findings from various studies in model systems and human populations. It evaluates the weight of evidence on the ability of BPA to alter the epigenome, while also discussing the direction of future research.

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel), Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman JK, del Mazo J, Hogstrand C, (Ron) Hoogenboom L, Leblanc J, Nebbia CS, Nielsen E, Ntzani E, Petersen A, Sand S, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Wallace H, Romualdo B, Cristina F, Stephen H, Marco I, Mosbach‐Schulz O, Riolo F, Christodoulidou A, Grasl‐Kraupp B. Risk assessment of N-nitrosamines in food

EFSA was asked for a scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of N-nitrosamines (N-NAs) in food. The risk assessment was confined to those 10 carcinogenic N-NAs occurring in food (TCNAs), i.e. NDMA, NMEA, NDEA, NDPA, NDBA, NMA, NSAR, NMOR, NPIP and NPYR. N-NAs are genotoxic and induce liver tumours in rodents. The in vivo data available to derive potency factors are limited, and therefore, equal potency of TCNAs was assumed. The lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose at 10% (BMDL10) was 10 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day, derived from the incidence of rat liver tumours (benign and malignant) induced by NDEA and used in a margin of exposure (MOE) approach. Analytical results on the occurrence of N-NAs were extracted from the EFSA occurrence database (n = 2,817) and the literature (n = 4,003). Occurrence data were available for five food categories across TCNAs. Dietary exposure was assessed for two scenarios, excluding (scenario 1) and including (scenario 2) cooked unprocessed meat and fish. TCNAs exposure ranged from 0 to 208.9 ng/kg bw per day across surveys, age groups and scenarios. 'Meat and meat products' is the main food category contributing to TCNA exposure. MOEs ranged from 3,337 to 48 at the P95 exposure excluding some infant surveys with P95 exposure equal to zero. Two major uncertainties were (i) the high number of left censored data and (ii) the lack of data on important food categories. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the MOE for TCNAs at the P95 exposure is highly likely (98-100% certain) to be less than 10,000 for all age groups, which raises a health concern.

Establishing a quantitative framework for regulatory interpretation of genetic toxicity dose-response data: Margin of exposure case study of 48 compounds with both in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity dose-response data

Quantitative relationships between carcinogenic potency and mutagenic potency have been previously examined using a benchmark dose (BMD)-based approach. We extended those analyses by using human exposure data for 48 compounds to calculate carcinogenicity-derived and genotoxicity-derived margin of exposure values (MOEs) that can be used to prioritize substances for risk management. MOEs for 16 of the 48 compounds were below 10,000, and consequently highlighted for regulatory concern. Of these, 15 were highlighted using genotoxicity-derived (micronucleus [MN] dose-response data) MOEs. A total of 13 compounds were highlighted using carcinogenicity-derived MOEs; 12 compounds were overlapping. MOEs were also calculated using transgenic rodent (TGR) mutagenicity data. For 10 of the 12 compounds examined using TGR data, the results similarly revealed that mutagenicity-derived MOEs yield regulatory decisions that correspond with those based on carcinogenicity-derived MOEs. The effect of benchmark response (BMR) on MOE determination was also examined. Reinterpretation of the analyses using a BMR of 50% indicated that four out of 15 compounds prioritized using MN-derived MOEs based on a default BMR of 5% would have been missed. The results indicate that regulatory decisions based on in vivo genotoxicity dose-response data would be consistent with those based on carcinogenicity dose-response data; in some cases, genotoxicity-based decisions would be more conservative. Going forward, and in the absence of carcinogenicity data, in vivo genotoxicity assays (MN and TGR) can be used to effectively prioritize substances for regulatory action. Routine use of the MOE approach necessitates the availability of reliable human exposure estimates, and consensus regarding appropriate BMRs for genotoxicity endpoints.

Considerations for carcinogenesis countermeasure development using mouse models

Activities in space will expose humans to profoundly new environments, challenging human performance and will require innovative supportive technologies. Among these environmental variables, exposure to ionizing radiation is a major concern for astronauts, as the long-term effects of exposure on diverse tissues are poorly understood. This need however creates opportunities for novel approaches, particularly in the development of countermeasures against the effects of ionizing radiation exposure. Carcinogenesis presents a unique challenge as a disease process, due to the inherent complexities of the process and the challenges of obtaining a large volume of clinical evidence. Thus, developing the countermeasures to address potential effects of ionizing radiation exposure will require understanding biological underpinnings to design countermeasures effectively in conjunction with highly robust modeling approaches to test and examine in vivo. This review will highlight specific considerations for accelerated development of space radiation countermeasures against carcinogenesis.

Genotoxicity evaluation of a valsartan-related complex N-nitroso-impurity

Recently, the formation of genotoxic and carcinogenic N-nitrosamines impurities during drug manufacturing of tetrazole-containing angiotensin-II blockers has been described. However, drug-related (complex) nitrosamines may also be generated under certain conditions, i.e., through nitrosation of vulnerable amines in drug substances in the presence of nitrite. An investigation of valsartan drug substance showed that a complex API-related N-nitrosamine chemically designated as (S)-2-(((2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)(nitroso)amino)-3-methylbutanoic acid (named 181-14) may be generated. 181-14 was shown to be devoid of a mutagenic potential in the Non-GLP Ames test. According to ICH M7 (R1) (2018), impurities that are not mutagenic in the Ames test would be considered Class 5 impurities and limited according to ICH Q3A (R2) and B (R2) (2006) guidelines. However, certain regulatory authorities raised the concern that the Ames test may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect a mutagenic potential of nitrosamines and requested a confirmatory in vivo study using a transgenic animal genotoxicity model. Our data show that 181-14 was not mutagenic in the transgenic gene mutation assay in Muta^TMMice. The data support the conclusion that the Ames test is an adequate and sensitive test system to assess a mutagenic potential of nitrosamines.

Search for the optimal genotoxicity assay for routine testing of chemicals: Sensitivity and specificity of conventional and new test systems

Many conventional in vitro tests that are currently widely used for routine screening of chemicals have a sensitivity/specificity in the range between 60 % and 80 % for the detection of carcinogens. Most procedures were developed 30-40 years ago. In the last decades several assays became available which are based on the use of metabolically competent cell lines, improvement of the cultivation conditions and development of new endpoints. Validation studies indicate that some of these models may be more reliable for the detection of genotoxicants (i.e. many of them have sensitivity and specificity values between 80 % and 95 %). Therefore, they could replace conventional tests in the future. The bone marrow micronucleus (MN) assay with rodents is at present the most widely used in vivo test. The majority of studies indicate that it detects only 5-6 out of 10 carcinogens while experiments with transgenic rodents and comet assays seem to have a higher predictive value and detect genotoxic carcinogens that are negative in MN experiments. Alternatives to rodent experiments could be MN experiments with hen eggs or their replacement by combinations of new in vitro tests. Examples for promising candidates are ToxTracker, TGx-DDI, multiplex flow cytometry, γH2AX experiments, measurement of p53 activation and MN experiments with metabolically competent human derived liver cells. However, the realization of multicentric collaborative validation studies is mandatory to identify the most reliable tests.

Duplex sequencing identifies genomic features that determine susceptibility to benzo(a)pyrene-induced in vivo mutations

Exposure to environmental mutagens increases the risk of cancer and genetic disorders. We used Duplex Sequencing (DS), a high-accuracy error-corrected sequencing technology, to analyze mutation induction across twenty 2.4 kb intergenic and genic targets in the bone marrow of MutaMouse males exposed to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), a widespread environmental pollutant. DS revealed a linear dose-related induction of mutations across all targets with low intra-group variability. Heterochromatic and intergenic regions exhibited the highest mutation frequencies (MF). C:G > A:T transversions at CCA, CCC and GCC trinucleotides were enriched in BaP-exposed mice consistent with the known etiology of BaP mutagenesis. However, GC-content had no effect on mutation susceptibility. A positive correlation was observed between DS and the “gold-standard” transgenic rodent gene mutation assay. Overall, we demonstrate that DS is a promising approach to study in vivo mutagenesis and yields critical insight into the genomic features governing mutation susceptibility, spectrum, and variability across the genome.

Myristicin and Elemicin: Potentially Toxic Alkenylbenzenes in Food

Alkenylbenzenes represent a group of naturally occurring substances that are synthesized as secondary metabolites in various plants, including nutmeg and basil. Many of the alkenylbenzene-containing plants are common spice plants and preparations thereof are used for flavoring purposes. However, many alkenylbenzenes are known toxicants. For example, safrole and methyleugenol were classified as genotoxic carcinogens based on extensive toxicological evidence. In contrast, reliable toxicological data, in particular regarding genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity is missing for several other structurally closely related alkenylbenzenes, such as myristicin and elemicin. Moreover, existing data on the occurrence of these substances in various foods suffer from several limitations. Together, the existing data gaps regarding exposure and toxicity cause difficulty in evaluating health risks for humans. This review gives an overview on available occurrence data of myristicin, elemicin, and other selected alkenylbenzenes in certain foods. Moreover, the current knowledge on the toxicity of myristicin and elemicin in comparison to their structurally related and well-characterized derivatives safrole and methyleugenol, especially with respect to their genotoxic and carcinogenic potential, is discussed. Finally, this article focuses on existing data gaps regarding exposure and toxicity currently impeding the evaluation of adverse health effects potentially caused by myristicin and elemicin.

o-Aminoazotoluene, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, which are mutagenic but not carcinogenic in the colon, rapidly induce colonic tumors in mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis

BACKGROUND

Several rodent models with chemically induced colon cancer have been developed. Among these models, dextran sulfate sodium (DSS), a colitis inducer, combined with azoxymethane as a colon mutagenic carcinogen, is commonly used. We previously reported that although benzo [a] pyrene (BP) is mutagenic but not carcinogenic in the colon, it rapidly develops colon tumors at a high incidence/multiplicity after treatment with DSS. In the present study, we examined whether other colon-mutagenic non-carcinogens (CMNCs) induced colon tumors after treatment with DSS.

RESULTS

o-Aminoazotoluene, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea were selected as CMNCs. Male CD2F1 mice were orally administered CMNC for 5 consecutive days. After a 9-day dose-free period, mice were treated with 4% DSS in drinking water for 1 week. Three months after DSS treatment, colon samples were collected for histopathology and β-catenin immunohistochemistry analyses. All CMNCs in combination with DSS induced colonic adenocarcinomas at a high incidence/multiplicity in the distal and middle parts of the colon, coinciding with the location of colitis. Unlike in normal cells where β-catenin is exclusively located on the cell membrane, in adenocarcinoma cells, it was translocated to both the nucleus and cytoplasm or only to cytoplasm. The translocation of β-catenin is closely associated with colon carcinogenesis in rodents and humans. No colonic tumors or dysplastic lesions were found after exposure to either CMNC or DSS alone.

CONCLUSION

We provided further evidence clearly showing that CMNCs can rapidly induce colonic tumors in mice with DSS-induced colitis, even if they are not colonic carcinogens.

AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for oxidative DNA damage leading to mutations and chromosomal aberrations

The Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee (GTTC) of the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) is developing adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) that describe modes of action leading to potentially heritable genomic damage. The goal was to enhance the use of mechanistic information in genotoxicity assessment by building empirical support for the relationships between relevant molecular initiating events (MIEs) and regulatory endpoints in genetic toxicology. Herein, we present an AOP network that links oxidative DNA damage to two adverse outcomes (AOs): mutations and chromosomal aberrations. We collected empirical evidence from the literature to evaluate the key event relationships between the MIE and the AOs, and assessed the weight of evidence using the modified Bradford-Hill criteria for causality. Oxidative DNA damage is constantly induced and repaired in cells given the ubiquitous presence of reactive oxygen species and free radicals. However, xenobiotic exposures may increase damage above baseline levels through a variety of mechanisms and overwhelm DNA repair and endogenous antioxidant capacity. Unrepaired oxidative DNA base damage can lead to base substitutions during replication and, along with repair intermediates, can also cause DNA strand breaks that can lead to mutations and chromosomal aberrations if not repaired adequately. This AOP network identifies knowledge gaps that could be filled by targeted studies designed to better define the quantitative relationships between key events, which could be leveraged for quantitative chemical safety assessment. We anticipate that this AOP network will provide the building blocks for additional genotoxicity-associated AOPs and aid in designing novel integrated testing approaches for genotoxicity.

Crypt and Villus Transcriptomic Responses in Mouse Small Intestine Following Oral Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium

Oral exposure to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) induces tumors in the mouse duodenum. Previous microarray-based transcriptomic analyses of homogenized mouse duodenal tissue have demonstrated Cr(VI)-induced alterations in various cellular pathways and processes. However, X-ray fluorescence microscopy indicates that chromium localizes primarily to the duodenal villi following exposure to Cr(VI), suggesting that previous transcriptomic analyses of homogenized tissue provide an incomplete picture of transcriptomic responses in the duodenum. Herein, transcriptomic analyses were conducted separately on crypt and villus tissue from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded transverse duodenal sections from the same study in which microarray-based analyses were previously conducted. A total of 28 groups (7 doses × 2 timepoints × 2 tissue compartments) were analyzed for differential gene expression, dose-response, and gene set enrichment. Tissue compartment isolation was confirmed by differences in expression of typical markers of crypt and villus compartments. Fewer than 21 genes were altered in the crypt compartment of mice exposed to 0.1-5 ppm Cr(VI) for 7 or 90 days, which increased to hundreds or thousands of genes at ≥20 ppm Cr(VI). Consistent with histological evidence for crypt proliferation, a significant, dose-dependent increase in genes that regulate mitotic cell cycle was prominent in the crypt, while subtle in the villus, when compared with samples from time-matched controls. Minimal transcriptomic evidence of DNA damage response in either the crypts or the villi is consistent with published in vivo genotoxicity data. These results are also discussed in the context of modes of action that have been proposed for Cr(VI)-induced small intestine tumors in mice.

Comparison of the in vivo genotoxicity of electronic and conventional cigarettes aerosols after subacute, subchronic and chronic exposures

Tobacco smoking is classified as a human carcinogen. A wide variety of new products, in particular electronic cigarettes (e-cigs), have recently appeared on the market as an alternative to smoking. Although the in vitro toxicity of e-cigs is relatively well known, there is currently a lack of data on their long-term health effects. In this context, the aim of our study was to compare, on a mouse model and using a nose-only exposure system, the in vivo genotoxic and mutagenic potential of e-cig aerosols tested at two power settings (18 W and 30 W) and conventional cigarette (3R4F) smoke. The standard comet assay, micronucleus test and Pig-a gene mutation assay were performed after subacute (4 days), subchronic (3 months) and chronic (6 months) exposure. The generation of oxidative stress was also assessed by measuring the 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine and by using the hOGG1-modified comet assay. Our results show that only the high-power e-cig and the 3R4F cigarette induced oxidative DNA damage in the lung and the liver of exposed mice. In return, no significant increase in chromosomal aberrations or gene mutations were noted whatever the type of product. This study demonstrates that e-cigs, at high-power setting, should be considered, contrary to popular belief, as hazardous products in terms of genotoxicity in mouse model.

Human genetic risk of treatment with antiviral nucleoside analog drugs that induce lethal mutagenesis: The special case of molnupiravir

This review considers antiviral nucleoside analog drugs, including ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, which induce genome error catastrophe in SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 via lethal mutagenesis as a mode of action. In vitro data indicate that molnupiravir may be 100 times more potent as an antiviral agent than ribavirin or favipiravir. Molnupiravir has recently demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial. Because of its anticipated global use, its relative potency, and the reported in vitro "host" cell mutagenicity of its active principle, β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, we have reviewed the development of molnupiravir and its genotoxicity safety evaluation, as well as the genotoxicity profiles of three congeners, that is, ribavirin, favipiravir, and 5-(2-chloroethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine. We consider the potential genetic risks of molnupiravir on the basis of all available information and focus on the need for additional human genotoxicity data and follow-up in patients treated with molnupiravir and similar drugs. Such human data are especially relevant for antiviral NAs that have the potential of permanently modifying the genomes of treated patients and/or causing human teratogenicity or embryotoxicity. We conclude that the results of preclinical genotoxicity studies and phase 1 human clinical safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics are critical components of drug safety assessments and sentinels of unanticipated adverse health effects. We provide our rationale for performing more thorough genotoxicity testing prior to and within phase 1 clinical trials, including human PIG-A and error corrected next generation sequencing (duplex sequencing) studies in DNA and mitochondrial DNA of patients treated with antiviral NAs that induce genome error catastrophe via lethal mutagenesis.

Utility of a next-generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the pharmaceutical drug candidate etoposide

We present a hypothetical case study to examine the use of a next-generation framework developed by the Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee of the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute for assessing the potential risk of genetic damage from a pharmaceutical perspective. We used etoposide, a genotoxic carcinogen, as a representative pharmaceutical for the purposes of this case study. Using the framework as guidance, we formulated a hypothetical scenario for the use of etoposide to illustrate the application of the framework to pharmaceuticals. We collected available data on etoposide considered relevant for assessment of genetic toxicity risk. From the data collected, we conducted a quantitative analysis to estimate margins of exposure (MOEs) to characterize the risk of genetic damage that could be used for decision-making regarding the predefined hypothetical use. We found the framework useful for guiding the selection of appropriate tests and selecting relevant endpoints that reflected the potential for genetic damage in patients. The risk characterization, presented as MOEs, allows decision makers to discern how much benefit is critical to balance any adverse effect(s) that may be induced by the pharmaceutical. Interestingly, pharmaceutical development already incorporates several aspects of the framework per regulations and health authority expectations. Moreover, we observed that quality dose response data can be obtained with carefully planned but routinely conducted genetic toxicity testing. This case study demonstrates the utility of the next-generation framework to quantitatively model human risk based on genetic damage, as applicable to pharmaceuticals.

Overall lack of genotoxic activity among five common low- and no-calorie sweeteners: A contemporary review of the collective evidence

Low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) are food additives that have been widely consumed for many decades. Their safety has been well established by authoritative bodies globally and is re-evaluated periodically. The objective herein was to survey and summarize the genotoxicity potential of five commonly utilized LNCS: acesulfame potassium (Ace-K), aspartame, saccharin, steviol glycosides and sucralose. Data from peer-reviewed literature and the ToxCast/Tox21 database were evaluated and integrated with the most recent weight-of-evidence evaluations from authoritative sources. Emphasis was placed on assays most frequently considered for hazard identification and risk assessment: mutation, clastogenicity and/or aneugenicity, and indirect DNA damage, such as changes in DNA repair mechanisms or gene expression data. These five sweeteners have been collectively evaluated in hundreds of in vivo or in vitro studies that employ numerous testing models, many of which have been conducted according to specific testing guidelines. The weight-of-evidence demonstrates overall negative findings across assay types for each sweetener when considering the totality of study design, reliability and reporting quality, as well as the lack of carcinogenic responses (or lack of responses relevant to humans) in animal cancer bioassays as well as observational studies in humans. This conclusion is consistent with the opinions of authoritative sources that have consistently determined that these sweeteners lack mutagenic and genotoxic potential.