Pregnant women's knowledge and attitude to maternal vaccination including group B streptococcus and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines

A qualitative exploration of Australian women's vaccination experiences and information needs for routine, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in pregnancy

PROBLEM

New maternal vaccine introduction may affect pregnant women's information needs and decision-making processes.

BACKGROUND

The number of vaccines available to pregnant women in Australia has doubled with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic and recent approval of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine.

AIM

This study explored the maternal vaccine experiences and evolving information needs of Australian pregnant women during and since the pandemic.

METHODS

This qualitative study recruited participants through social media and a Melbourne public antenatal clinic. Eligible women were either pregnant mid-pandemic (gave birth May 2021-April 2022) or pregnant post-pandemic during the study period (June 2023-March 2024). Online interviews exploring information-seeking and decision-making practices for influenza, pertussis, COVID-19, and maternal RSV vaccines were inductively thematically analysed.

FINDINGS

We interviewed twenty-two women with different levels of vaccine acceptance, identifying four themes: (i) "Full mother mode" to protect the baby - perceived disease risk influenced vaccine decision-making; (ii) "Fear of the unknown and comfort of the familiar" - testing and safety data on known vaccines provided confidence. More information was needed for the new RSV vaccine due to less familiarity; (iii) Whatever the provider says, "she's the professional" - providers' recommendations and personal vaccine decisions provided reassurance; (iv) "I want time to learn about it" - women preferred consistent information early in pregnancy for unhurried decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Information about new maternal vaccines like RSV should be provided early in pregnancy, emphasising vaccine testing rigour, effectiveness and safety for the baby. Consistent recommendations across providers are essential.

Respiratory syncytial virus preventives for children in Australia: current landscape and future directions

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections, and a leading cause of hospitalisation in children under 6 months of age. Previously, palivizumab, a costly, short-acting monoclonal antibody, was the primary preventive option. The recent introductions of nirsevimab (Beyfortus), a long-acting monoclonal antibody, and Abrysvo, a maternal RSV vaccine, have brought about significant advances in RSV prevention for children. Western Australia, Queensland and New South Wales launched state-managed nirsevimab programs targeting infants and high risk groups for the 2024 RSV season. International data support nirsevimab's effectiveness in reducing RSV-related hospitalisations and severity of disease in real-world settings. In 2025, Australia's national RSV prevention program includes free maternal vaccination with Abrysvo and targeted infant protection with nirsevimab for high risk or newborns whose mothers did not receive Abrysvo at least 2 weeks before delivery, funded by individual jurisdictions. Real-world efficacy data derived from Australian states and territories and the national prevention program will be pivotal in evaluating and refining the integration of maternal immunisation with Abrysvo and infant passive immunisation with nirsevimab. Key logistical considerations include ensuring timely access and equitable distribution, particularly for First Nations populations who face increased risk from RSV infection. Coordinated efforts are essential to overcome health care disparities and deliver effective prevention strategies to these prioritised groups.

Factors influencing acceptance of RSV immunization for newborns among pregnant individuals: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory infections and hospitalizations in Canadian infants. Recently, Health Canada approved two novel immunizing products: a vaccine given during pregnancy and a monoclonal antibody for infants. This study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and intentions regarding RSV and its prevention among pregnant individuals.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted in Quebec from October to December 2023. Pregnant individuals were recruited through targeted Facebook advertisements. Data were collected in two phases: Phase 1 involved an online survey to assess knowledge of RSV, attitudes toward immunization, and intentions regarding both immunization products, followed by qualitative interviews in Phase 2 to explore factors impacting decision-making and preferences for RSV prevention. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; interview data were analyzed through thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Among survey participants (n = 803), 68.4 % reported some knowledge of RSV. Intention for both immunization products was high, with 88.1 % of participants willing to receive the RSV vaccine during pregnancy and 92 %, to administer monoclonal antibodies to their infants. A majority (69 %) of participants preferred vaccination during pregnancy over monoclonal antibodies. The desire to protect their infant from severe RSV complications was a key motivating factor of acceptance of new RSV immunizing products. Other key determinants included vaccine safety, efficacy, and recommendations by healthcare providers. Qualitative interviews (n = 25) highlighted safety concerns of expectant parents about these new products. The importance of clear and evidence-based recommendations by healthcare providers was also emphasized.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant individuals demonstrated a high level of interest in RSV immunization for infants, whether with vaccination during pregnancy or with monoclonal antibodies. Recommendations by healthcare providers and availability of information on the safety and efficacy of these new products will be key to move from intention to action.

Pregnant persons perceptions and uptake of prenatal RSV vaccine - Minnesota, 2023-2024

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine was recommended for use during pregnancy in September 2023.

OBJECTIVE

To assess pregnant persons' intentions to receive and evaluate factors associated with RSV vaccine intentions and uptake.

STUDY DESIGN

We invited 1999 pregnant persons ≥18 years, between 12 and 30 weeks gestation who had received prenatal care at HealthPartners to complete an online survey during September-November 2023. Our primary outcome was intention to receive RSV vaccine. We also asked respondents about reasons to or not to receive RSV vaccine and intentions to receive other vaccines during pregnancy. We assessed RSV vaccine uptake for patients 32-36 weeks gestation between 10/12/23 (first RSV vaccine in study population) and 2/1/24. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) between responses and intention to receive RSV vaccination and, for those eligible to receive RSV vaccine, adjusted rate ratios (aRR) and 95 % CIs for RSV vaccine uptake. We adjusted aPRs and aRRs for age, race, ethnicity, Medicaid, living with children ≤5 years, and work in healthcare and weighted by inverse probability of survey participation using Poisson regression with robust variance.

RESULTS

455 patients participated (23 % response), 26 % were non-white and/or Hispanic, 46 % lived with children ≤5 years, and 30 % work in healthcare; 65 % intended to receive RSV vaccine during pregnancy. Among 427 eligible respondents, 51 % received RSV vaccine. Factors associated with RSV vaccination intention and uptake included perceived vaccine effectiveness (aPR: 19.47, 95 % CI: 5.82, 65.12; aRR 3.06, 95 % CI: 1.70, 5.51) and a provider recommendation (aPR: 8.04, 95 % CI: 4.23, 15.29; aRR 3.30, 95 % CI: 1.99, 5.48). Among those not planning to receive RSV vaccine, responses suggested safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

Strong recommendations for receiving RSV vaccine during pregnancy from a healthcare provider incorporating information about RSV vaccine safety and effectiveness may increase vaccine uptake.

Pregnant women's choices for preventing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infants and can lead to severe respiratory distress, especially in very young infants. No specific treatments exist for RSV. However, new preventative strategies have become available including RSV vaccine for pregnant women and monoclonal antibody for infants. This study aimed to identify and understand barriers and facilitators to the uptake of a new RSV vaccine in pregnant women and determine their underlying choices for a maternal RSV immunisation program. Additionally, the study investigated choice for maternal vaccination or administration of a long-lasting monoclonal antibody to infants.

METHODS

Eligible participants were pregnant women residing in Australia and aged 18 years or older. Focus group discussions and individual online interviews were conducted and data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

A total of 34 pregnant women participated in online focus group discussions or interviews, with an average age of 34 years. The identified themes were categorised into four overarching domains: 1) motivators for vaccinating during pregnancy to safeguard their babies and prevent severe diseases, 2) barriers to vaccination including vaccine safety concerns, uncertainties regarding vaccine effectiveness, and vaccine hesitancy arising from COVID-19 vaccination experiences, 3) preferred vaccination promotion strategies, including constant reminders/prompts, personalised messages, campaign focusing on serious outcomes and using diverse/lay languages, recommendations from local obstetricians and health authorities, 4) clear vaccine recommendation policies and a preference for maternal immunisation over infant immunisation.

CONCLUSIONS

The maternal RSV vaccination was generally welcomed and preferred by pregnant women in our study comparing to other strategies. Preferences for RSV program promotion included diversity in languages, "nudge" reminders, and recommendations from healthcare providers.

Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prevention: A Systematic Review

Background: New strategies for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention are available and are in development, but their acceptance is crucial to their effectiveness. Objectives: This systematic review aims to summarize current quantitative and qualitative evidence regarding knowledge and attitudes relating to RSV prevention. Methods: Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, APA PsycArticles; APA PsycInfo; CINAHL Complete; Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection) and two preprint repositories (medRxiv and Preprints) were searched up until 23 December 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024602351). Results: Sixty-one articles were included, focusing on vaccination for the elderly and adults at risk (n = 10) or pregnant people (n = 24, of which 8 also examined preferences for maternal vs. infant immunization) and infant immunization (n = 27, of which 16 focused on palivizumab, with 6 focusing on adherence to its monthly administration). Eighteen articles assessed attitudes in healthcare professionals. Overall, findings showed limited knowledge and awareness of RSV but generally positive attitudes towards prevention strategies and moderate to high intentions and uptake rates. Protection against the disease and perceived severity promoted acceptance, whereas concerns about side effects hindered it. Maternal vaccination was more acceptable than infant immunization. Conclusions: Attitudes towards RSV prevention options were generally favorable. Should more options become available, preferences may depend on which options are available, their characteristics, and how they are framed and presented. These insights highlight the importance of education on RSV grounded in decision-making literature, while recognizing the likely favorable reception of preventive measures across target age-populations.

Protecting Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus: An Online Questionnaire Study Exploring UK Parents' Acceptability of Vaccination in Pregnancy or Monoclonal Antibody Administration for Infants

BACKGROUND

Maternal vaccination and infant monoclonal antibodies are promising avenues to protect young infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. Successful inclusion into the UK immunization schedule depends on parental acceptability, among other factors.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey from August to September 2023 exploring the likelihood of accepting, and preference for, either method of RSV prophylaxis, and reasons given for these. A questionnaire was distributed via social media networks to UK participants with a child under the age of 2 years and/or pregnant.

RESULTS

A total of 1620 participants completed the survey. Participants' median age was 33 years [interquartile range (IQR), 31-36], 92% were of White ethnicity. Acceptability was high, but higher for a maternal vaccine than an infant monoclonal antibody (P < 0.0001). Concerns about safety, need for more information and number of vaccines given to infants already were common reasons for hesitancy. Lacking knowledge about RSV was associated with a lower likelihood of accepting either option [maternal vaccine: odds ratio (OR): 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.68, P = 0.002; infant monoclonal antibody: OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19-0.68, P = 0.002], as was identifying as Black, Black British, African or Caribbean ethnic group, or having declined the routinely recommended antenatal vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

While most parents would accept a maternal vaccine or infant monoclonal antibody to protect their infant against RSV, understanding preferences, influencing factors and concerns is essential to optimize immunization programs. This study highlights the information parents require to make an informed choice about RSV protection.

Perception of a Novel Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Among Pregnant and Lactating Individuals

BACKGROUND

Multivalent conjugate Group B streptococcus (GBS) vaccines are in development for use in pregnancy. We aimed to understand perceptions of a novel GBS vaccine among pregnant and lactating persons following the COVID vaccine experience.

METHODS

As part of an ongoing survey-based prospective cohort study, we conducted a follow-up survey with questions about GBS knowledge and acceptability of clinical trial participation for a novel GBS vaccine. Participants in this Institutional Review Board-exempt study completed surveys via REDCap survey online.

RESULTS

Among 14,903 participants who completed the follow-up survey, 1785 were pregnant, 6661 were lactating and 6457 were either recently pregnant or lactating or planning for pregnancy. Pregnant individuals were less likely to report that they would likely or extremely likely participate in a clinical trial for a GBS vaccine during pregnancy compared with people who were neither pregnant nor lactating (P < 0.001). In contrast, lactating individuals were more likely to report that they would likely or extremely likely participate in a clinical trial for a novel GBS vaccine in lactation compared with people who were neither pregnant nor lactating (P < 0.001). Most participants preferred protein-based (n = 10,214, 70.5%) and mRNA-based (n = 10354, 71.5%) vaccine platforms for GBS vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our participants expressed a good understanding of GBS. There is a mixed acceptability of participation in a novel GBS vaccine clinical trial during pregnancy with a greater acceptability during lactation. The perspective of pregnant and lactating people is critically relevant as new vaccines are developed.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: Perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of infant respiratory disease. Recent approval of preventive measures like a long-acting monoclonal antibody and a maternal vaccine signals a potential shift in early-life RSV infection control. However, success hinges on acceptance.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women and partners in the Netherlands, recruited via healthcare professionals, social media platforms, and the 9-Months Fair. The survey assessed willingness and motivation for maternal RSV vaccination and neonatal RSV immunization, including strategy preferences and informational needs.

RESULTS

In total 1001 pregnant women (mean age: 31.1 years) and their partners (mean age: 33.2 years) completed the survey. On average, they were 24 weeks pregnant at the time, and 54.6 % had no other children yet. The majority was Dutch-born (95.2 % of women); with 68.3 % of women having completed higher education and with overall strong pro-vaccination attitudes (93.9 % of partners intended to vaccinate their expected newborn). The overall acceptability to vaccination and immunization was high, with 87 % of respondents indicating they would (likely) accept both strategies. A positive attitude towards both methods was associated with previous experience with severity of RSV, intention to vaccinate the newborn and parental vaccination status during childhood and current pregnancy. When the choice was given, the majority of participants, in particular those with children and the intention to breastfeed, favoured maternal vaccination over passive immunization of infants (75.3 % of the pregnant and 71.6 % of the partners). A majority of the respondents cited optimal protection for the child and knowledge of RSV as important factors for accepting RSV prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

While most participants would accept both strategies for RSV protection of their infant, a majority, especially those with other children, favoured maternal vaccination, due to concerns about infant safety and awareness of RSV severity.

Prospective Attitudes Towards Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine in Pregnant Women in Greece

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common respiratory pathogen with high morbidity and mortality, especially in children under two years of age. Severe RSV infection poses a significant threat to healthcare systems, making vaccination an utmost need. In August 2023, the U.S. FDA approved an RSV maternal vaccine to prevent lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in infants throughout their first six months of life. This cross-sectional survey was designed to evaluate pregnant women's willingness to receive the vaccine during pregnancy. An anonymous survey was administered from April 2023 to December 2023 to pregnant women aged above 16 years old attending gynecology wards of randomly selected public and private hospitals in Crete. The primary outcome was the intention to receive the vaccine. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with the intention to get vaccinated. Questionnaires were distributed to a sample of 335 pregnant females who agreed to participate in this study. The intention to get vaccinated against RSV was positively associated with educational level, the presence of school-age children, RSV infection awareness, intention to get routine pregnancy vaccines according to the National Immunization Program (NIP), and previous vaccination against COVID-19. The majority of pregnant females were not familiar with the term RSV and the upcoming vaccine. An educational campaign regarding RSV infection and its vaccine is required to improve women's perceptions and to support healthcare workers in promoting it upon its availability in Greece.

Exploring parental perspectives: Maternal RSV vaccination versus infant RSV monoclonal antibody

Respiratory Syncytial Virus poses a significant global public health threat, particularly affecting infants aged less than one year of age. Recently, two forms of passive immunization against infant RSV have been developed and brought to market; nirsevimab a long-acting monoclonal antibody (mAb) and RSV-PreF, a maternal RSV vaccine. The acceptability and uptake of these products will play a pivotal role in determining the success of any national immunization strategy aimed at safeguarding infants from RSV. It is crucial at this time to reflect on the factors that influence parental decisions surrounding immunization to facilitate more informed discussions, enhance healthcare communication, and contribute to the design of effective RSV prevention strategies that resonate with the concerns and aspirations of parents worldwide.

"Why has this new vaccine come and for what reasons?" key antecedents and questions for acceptance of a future maternal GBS vaccine: Perspectives of pregnant women, lactating women, and community members in Kenya

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading global cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis, stillbirth, and puerperal sepsis. While intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is a currently available GBS disease prevention strategy, IAP is programmatically complex to implement, precluding use in low- and middle-income countries. In Kenya, 2% of stillbirths are attributable to GBS infection. Two maternal GBS vaccines are in late-stage clinical development. However, licensure of a maternal GBS vaccine does not translate into reduction of disease. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews with pregnant people, lactating people, and community members across two counties in Kenya to better understand the attitudes and informational needs of primary vaccine beneficiaries. We identified two emerging themes from the data. The first focused on antecedents to maternal GBS vaccine acceptability. The most common antecedents focused on the vaccine's ability to protect the baby and/or the mother, followed by community sensitization before the vaccine was available. The second key theme focused on questions that would need to be addressed before someone could accept a maternal GBS vaccine. Three key categories of questions were identified, including vaccine safety compared to vaccine benefits, who gets the vaccine, and how the vaccine works. Realizing the potential benefits of a future GBS maternal vaccine will require a multifactorial approach, including ensuring that communities are aware of GBS-related harms as well as the safety and effectiveness of a maternal GBS vaccine. Our study contributes to informing this multifactorial approach by elucidating the attitudes and concerns of key populations.

The acceptability of implementation of group B Streptococcus testing: Perspectives from women and health professionals in the GBS3 trial: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the acceptability of different methods of routine testing for group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonisation to pregnant women and health care professionals (HCPs), and to examine barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

DESIGN

Qualitative study, embedded in a cluster randomised trial SETTING: Four NHS maternity units participating in the GBS3 Trial: two conducting routine antenatal enriched culture medium (ECM) testing; and two using routine rapid intrapartum testing. Sample 39 women and 25 HCPs purposively sampled to ensure representation of women with various birthing experiences and different professions. Methods Women were interviewed approximately 12 weeks postpartum by telephone or online video call, using a semi-structured topic guide. HCPs were interviewed during the testing period of the trial. Interviews were transcribed for thematic analysis and summarised using the framework method.

RESULTS

Four categories of interest emerged: (1) views of routine testing; (2) acceptability of the testing procedure; (3) preferences on the types of test; (4) improving the testing procedure. Routine GBS testing was well received by both women and HCPs. Most participants found the procedure acceptable and were willing to receive the offer of testing in the future. Preferences for different testing methods varied, with participants emphasising the importance of evidence and informed choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine GBS testing is acceptable to most women and HCPs. Areas for consideration and the practicalities of implementing testing in maternity services are highlighted.

Attitudes of pregnant women in the Dominican Republic towards a future maternal Group B Streptococcus vaccine

INTRODUCTION

Current protocols aim to prevent some infant GBS infection through screening and peripartum antibiotics, however such strategies cannot be widely implemented in resource-limited settings. On the other hand, maternal vaccines in development against Group B Streptococcus (GBS) can provide a feasible universal approach. The success of any vaccine will depend on uptake in the population. Rates of maternal GBS colonization in the Dominican Republic (DR) and Caribbean region are among the highest in the world, but little is known about attitudes towards maternal vaccines in this region.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicenter, mixed-methodology survey evaluated facilitators and barriers to maternal immunization and acceptability of a hypothetical Group B Streptococcus vaccine among pregnant women in three hospitals in the DR.

RESULTS

Six-hundred and fifty women completed the survey of whom 85 % had never heard of GBS. Following receipt of information about GBS and a vaccine, 94 % of women stated that they would be likely or very likely to receive a vaccine. Being 18 years or younger was associated with a lower likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.14-0.69). Being born in the DR was associated with a higher likelihood of GBS vaccine receipt (AOR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.25-5.97). Among women who were unlikely to receive the vaccine, uncertainty about potential harm from a novel vaccine was the prominent theme elicited from free text responses.

CONCLUSION

There was a high level of acceptance of a future GBS vaccine among this sample of pregnant women in the DR. However, knowledge of vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases was low, and most women had concerns about the safety of new vaccines. Interventions that strengthen existing maternal immunisation infrastructures, including increasing education of pregnant women about vaccines, will aid the successful implementation of a future GBS vaccine.

The acceptability of group B streptococcal bacteria (GBS) testing to women, including self-swabbing procedures: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a bacterium carried by 20-25 % of pregnant women in the UK, which can be transmitted from pregnant women to their babies at the time of birth. Women can be tested for GBS in pregnancy using a vaginal-rectal swab, however, this testing is currently not routinely offered in the UK. A large clinical trial is underway to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of routine testing (ISRCTN reference number ISRCTN49639731). A crucial part of understanding whether this type of test should be implemented is women's views on the acceptability of being offered GBS tests, their preferences towards testing procedures and their willingness to receive these tests.

AIM

To explore women's views on the acceptability of different methods of Group B streptococcal bacteria (GBS) testing in pregnancy, including self-swabbing procedures.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 19 women (5 pregnant and 14 postpartum) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using systematic thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Findings show that many of the women interviewed were not concerned about being offered a GBS test, were willing to provide a sample and felt positive towards samples being taken to detect GBS. Women varied in their preferences on the best time for sampling. Some thought being approached during pregnancy gave them time to understand the purpose of testing, prepare for what may happen next and ask questions about potential treatment if needed. Others thought labour was a good time to provide accurate results on GBS carriage at birth and reduce unnecessary worry during pregnancy. However, women were concerned that they may be unable to make an informed decision in labour due to time, pain and the prospect of birthing quickly. Women perceived clinician swabbing as more accurate than self-sampling; however, many thought clinician swabbing might be embarrassing so self-swabs should be available to increase uptake for some women.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, women thought both pregnancy and labour were acceptable times to test for GBS. The majority found both clinician and self-swabbing procedures acceptable; however, many had a preferred swabbing option and thought women should be given the choice of the swabbing procedure most acceptable to them. It is important that women are given information about GBS testing and its procedures in pregnancy regardless of when the GBS swabbing is performed.

Acceptance of New Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine among Pregnant Women in Nepal for Future Routine Immunization: A Descriptive Crosssectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Children are at greatest risk for severe illness from Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The aim of the study was to find out the knowledge of RSV, practice and knowledge about vaccination during pregnancy and the willingness to accept vaccines against RSV during pregnancy in the future among mothers needs to be understood which would add up information for stakeholder and policy makers.

METHODS

A preformed Performa was used for face-to-face interview was conducted among 340 pregnant women who visited the Antenatal clinic from 15-Oct-2023 to 30-Nov-2023 in their second and third trimester. Socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge and the attitude concerning antenatal vaccination affecting the acceptance of RSV vaccine were evaluated from the interview.

RESULTS

The mean age was 28.4 years, with 310 (91.18%) already having at least one child. Six (1.76%) participants had previously heard about RSV, and 325 (95.59%) were aware of the problem caused by RSV after they were briefly explained about it in their local language. A total of 246 (72.35%) of the mothers expressed willingness to be vaccinated themselves rather than vaccinating their children if such an option existed. Only 2 (0.59%) participants were familiar with nasal vaccines, and only 18 (5.29%) believed in such vaccines being effective. Despite this, almost all participants 339 (99.71%) in the study demonstrated willingness to receive additional antenatal vaccines if approved for use in future.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed a limited understanding of RSV in children among pregnant women in Nepal. However, they are aware of the impact of bronchiolitis and expressed a strong willingness to undergo maternal vaccination against RSV.

Respiratory Syncytial Vaccination: Parents' Willingness to Vaccinate Their Children

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess parents' willingness to vaccinate their children with the RSV vaccine and the key predictors of this intention among parents in Italy.

METHODS

Data were collected using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire from April to November 2023, targeting parents in public kindergartens and nursery schools in southern Italy. The survey assessed parents' socio-demographic characteristics, health-related details, their child's health status, attitudes toward RSV infection and its vaccine, and their source(s) of information.

RESULTS

A total of 404 parents agreed to participate in the study. Only 18.2% of participants were very concerned that their children could get infected by RSV, and this concern was more likely among parents whose child had been diagnosed with bronchiolitis, those who received information from HCWs, those who had heard of RSV, and those who needed additional information. Almost half (51.3%) were willing to vaccinate their child, and this inclination was more likely among fathers, employed parents, those with daughters, those who had heard of RSV, those who received information from HCWs, and those who needed additional information.

CONCLUSIONS

An educational campaign regarding a future RSV vaccine, especially about its safety and efficacy, is needed in order to improve parents' willingness.

Parental awareness and attitudes towards prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in infants and young children in Australia

AIM

To assess parental awareness of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and the level of acceptance of future RSV prevention strategies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was implemented targeting "future" and "current" parents of children aged ≤5 years in Australia.

RESULTS

From 1992 eligible participants, two non-mutually exclusive subgroups were formed: "current" parents (N = 1931) and "pregnant/planning" parents (N = 464: 403 also "current" parents and 61 "future" parents). Participants were predominantly (86.6%) aged 25-39 years and 68.5% with university education. The majority (89.6% current; 78.7% future) had heard of RSV. Of those, 64.2% (current) and 50.0% (future) were aware that pneumonia is associated with RSV; 71.8% (current) and 52.1% (future) were aware that bronchiolitis is associated with RSV. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, Australian-born parents (aOR = 2.47 [95% CI: 1.48-4.12]), living in the eastern states (e.g., New South Wales: aOR = 6.15 [95% CI:2.10-18.04]), with a university-level education (aOR = 2.61 [95% CI:1.38-4.94]) and being a current parent (aOR = 12.26 [95% CI:2.82-53.28]) were associated with higher RSV awareness. There was a high level of acceptance for maternal vaccines (future: 79.3%) and infant immunisation (all: 81.7%).

CONCLUSION

While RSV awareness and immunisation acceptance were high, there was limited knowledge of severity of RSV, especially in future parents. Education campaigns need to be developed to increase RSV knowledge.

Maternal awareness, acceptability and willingness towards respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination during pregnancy in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the world's leading cause of viral acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) in infants. WHO has identified maternal RSV vaccination a priority and candidate vaccines are in development; however, vaccine hesitancy remains an impediment to successful implementation of maternal immunization. This study, the largest antenatal survey conducted to-date, aimed to examine maternal RSV awareness, likely acceptance of RSV vaccination in pregnancy, and attitudes to maternal vaccination.

METHODS

Pregnant women of all gestations attending antenatal clinic of a university maternity hospital in Ireland were invited to participate. An information leaflet provided, consent obtained, and survey administered examining RSV awareness, willingness to avail of antenatal RSV vaccination, factors influencing acceptability and preferred sources of assistance. Research Ethics Committee (REC) approval obtained, and general data protection regulation (GDPR) guidelines followed.

RESULTS

528 women completed the survey. A large proportion (75.6%) had never heard of RSV, yet 48.5% would still avail of a vaccine, 45.8% were undecided and only 5.3% would not. The main factor making vaccination acceptable to women (76.4%) was that it protects their infant from illness (p < .001, CV 0.336 for association with acceptance) and general practitioner (GP) was the preferred guidance source in decision-making (57.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite low levels of maternal awareness of RSV, pregnant women in Ireland are open to availing of antenatal vaccination. Maternal immunization strategies need to focus on infant's protection from RSV-associated ALRI along with vaccine safety, and build on an interdisciplinary collaboration of maternal, neonatal, primary care and public health services.

Preferences of pregnant women toward a future maternal Group B Streptococcus vaccine in China: A cross-sectional survey with a discrete choice experiment

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of neonatal death worldwide. A GBS vaccine for pregnant women is under development and is expected to be available in the near future. The perceptions and preferences of pregnant women in China of GBS vaccines has not been investigated, and this study aimed to investigate pregnant women's awareness of GBS and their potential preferences for the GBS vaccine. A discrete choice experiment was conducted among pregnant women in hospitals from Shaanxi, Hunan, and Zhejiang provinces located in Western, Central, and Eastern China, respectively. A conditional logit model was used to analyze the data and calculate willingness to pay values and choice probabilities of different GBS vaccine programs. A total of 354 pregnant women were included in the final analysis, 45.8% of whom were willing to receive a GBS vaccine if it were licensed. Vaccine safety was the most important attribute of a future vaccine, while cost was the least important attribute. Compared with no vaccination, pregnant women had a strong preference for future GBS vaccination (ASC = 1.267, p < .001). Pregnant women's decisions were highly influenced by those of other pregnant women. Improving the safety, efficacy, and vaccination rate of the GBS vaccine in China is of great significance for future GBS vaccine development and vaccination. Compared to other variable options, the cost of a GBS vaccine was of the least importance among pregnant women in mainland China. These findings can inform public health policy decisions related to GBS vaccination in China.

Respiratory syncytial virus in children: epidemiology and clinical impact post-COVID-19

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. RSV seasonality was disrupted by COVID-19-associated nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). We review RSV seasonality, molecular epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and community awareness to inform future prevention strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

An initial reduction of RSV disease observed with NPIs, and subsequent global resurgence was associated with a collapse in genetic diversity. A lack of immunity is suggested to have contributed to the resurgence of RSV cases experienced post COVID-19. The median age of children admitted with RSV increased during the resurgence, likely secondary to the expanded cohort of RSV-immune naive children. The pandemic also played a role in increased community awareness, which can be utilized as part of a coordinated public health effort to introduce prevention strategies. Further education on signs and symptoms of RSV is still required.

SUMMARY

mAbs and maternal vaccines targeting RSV have the potential to reduce paediatric morbidity, however this new era of RSV prevention will require ongoing research to facilitate community awareness and engagement, and better respiratory surveillance. Tackling the global burden of RSV will require a coordinated effort and measures to ensure access and affordability of new prevention strategies.

Evaluation of intentions to get vaccinated against influenza, COVID 19, pertussis and to get a future vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus in pregnant women

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women (PW) are at increased risk of complications due to seasonal influenza and Covid-19. Immunization during pregnancy against pertussis and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) protects newborns from severe diseases. Our aim was to assess intentions to get vaccinated against seasonal influenza, COVID-19, pertussis and RSV in PW and to identify factors associated with intentions.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey in PW followed at a University Hospital in France assessing their knowledge, and attitudes toward vaccination against influenza, Covid-19, and RSV during pregnancy. Primary outcome was intention to receive each vaccine or potential vaccine. Univariable and multivariable analysis were carried out to identify factors associated with intentions to get vaccinated for each vaccine.

RESULTS

Among the 1199 PW followed during the study period, 310 completed the questionnaire. Intentions to get vaccinated were respectively 43.9 %, 36.8 %, 36.1 % and 39.4 % against influenza, Covid-19, pertussis and RSV. Overall confidence in vaccines using 5C-model, recommendation by a healthcare professional (HCP), good knowledge about diseases and vaccines and previous influenza vaccination were associated with flu vaccine acceptance with respective adjusted odds ratios and 95 % Confidence Intervals (aOR) 1.69 (1.09-2.61) by one-point increase in confidence score, 4.89 (2.24-10.7), 1.56 by one-point increase in knowledge score (1.26-1.93), 13.5 and (5.3-34.3). Confidence was also associated with Covid-19 and RSV vaccine acceptance with respective aOR and 95 % CI 2.63 (1.7-4.07) and 1.92 (1.3-2.84). For pertussis, previous flu vaccination or pertussis vaccination in the last 5 years were predictors of pertussis vaccine acceptance during the pregnancy with respective aOR and 95 % CI 1.97 (1.1-3.84) and 2.9 (1.6-5.18).

CONCLUSION

Confidence is associated with seasonal influenza, COVID-19 and RSV vaccines acceptance in pregnant women. Receiving a recommendation from a HCP was strongly associated with acceptance of influenza vaccine. Recent vaccination against pertussis was not a barrier to pertussis vaccine acceptance during pregnancy.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Willingness towards a Future Vaccine among Pregnant Women in Italy

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional survey was designed to evaluate pregnant women's awareness regarding Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infection and willingness to receive the vaccine during pregnancy and to vaccinate their newborn against RSV.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was administered from 20 April to 30 June 2023, to pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years attending gynecology wards of randomly selected public hospitals in southern Italy. A minimum sample size of 427 participants was calculated. The survey assessed women's socio-demographic characteristics, health-related information, their source(s) of information, and attitudes regarding RSV.

RESULTS

A total of 490 women participated. Those who were married/cohabiting, with a high-school degree compared to those who had a university degree, and those who needed additional information were more concerned that the newborn could acquire the RSV infection. The perceived utility of a future RSV vaccine administered during pregnancy was higher among those who were married/cohabiting, with a university degree, those with very good perceived health status, those who received information from healthcare workers, and those who needed additional information. Only 45.9% were willing to be vaccinated during pregnancy, and this was more likely among those with a university degree, with a very good perceived health status, who had received information from healthcare workers, and who needed more information. Finally, almost two-thirds (61.1%) were willing to vaccinate their newborn, and this was more likely among women with a university degree, with a very good perceived health status, and who needed additional information.

CONCLUSIONS

An education campaign regarding RSV infection and its vaccine is needed in order to improve women's perception and to support healthcare workers in promoting it when it will be available.

RSV awareness, risk perception, causes, and terms: Perspectives of pregnant and lactating women in Kenya to inform demand generation efforts for maternal RSV vaccines

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a substantial proportion of acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) among infants. In low- and middle-income countries, RSV may be responsible for approximately 40% of all hospital admissions of infants less than one year. A safe and immunogenic RSV vaccine, given to pregnant persons, is imminent. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand factors that could inform maternal vaccine decision-making to inform future demand generation strategies in Kenya. We conducted in-depth interviews with 24 pregnant and lactating persons from two counties, with two communities in each county. Four key themes emerged, including terms used for RSV, awareness of and risk perception related to RSV, causes of RSV, and questions about future maternal RSV vaccines. Regarding terms, no participant used the term RSV to describe the disease. Most participants associated RSV with cold things such as cold weather and cold food/drink. Most participants believed that RSV was caused by the cold or an unclean environment. Finally, key questions related to a maternal RSV vaccine were related to vaccine safety, and more specifically side effects. Questions arose related to vaccine effectiveness as well as timing of administration and dosing. A maternal RSV vaccine is on the horizon. However, vaccines do not save lives; vaccination does. As such, it is critical to develop and implement demand generation approaches to ensure that once a maternal RSV vaccine is available, communities are sensitized and willing to accept it.

Women's knowledge of and attitudes towards group B streptococcus (GBS) testing in pregnancy: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

20-25% pregnant women in the UK carry group B streptococcus (GBS) which, if left undetected, is transmitted from pregnant mothers to their babies during birth in 36% of cases. This transmission leads to early onset GBS infection (EOGBS) in 1% of babies which is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in newborns. The literature available suggests women's knowledge of GBS is low, with many women unaware of the GBS bacterium. In addition, attitudes towards GBS testing have not been widely examined, with research mostly focusing on attitudes towards potential GBS vaccination.

AIM

To examine women's knowledge of GBS in pregnancy and their attitudes towards GBS testing.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 19 women (5 pregnant and 14 postpartum). Interviews were transcribed and analysed using systematic thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four main theme categories were identified. Participants had varying levels of awareness of GBS, with the information provided by health professionals not being clearly explained or the importance of GBS being downplayed. Participants wanted more information and to feel informed. Overall, the majority had positive attitudes towards being offered and taking up GBS testing, and this study identified some of the key factors influencing their decision. These included: seeing GBS testing as just another routine procedure during pregnancy; that it would lower the risk of their baby becoming unwell; provide reassurance; and allow them to prepare; and provide informed choices. Participants also expressed a few common concerns about GBS testing: questioning the invasiveness of the procedure; risks to themselves and the baby; and the risk of receiving antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Women need clear, detailed information about GBS and GBS testing, and women's concerns are important to address if routine GBS testing is implemented. The efficacy of implementing routine universal testing in the UK is currently being investigated in a large multi-centre clinical trial; the GBS3trial, further qualitative research is needed to look at the acceptability of different methods of GBS testing, as well as the acceptability of GBS testing to women in specific groups, such as those planning a home birth or those from different ethnic backgrounds.

Maternity care provider acceptance of a future Group B Streptococcus vaccine - A qualitative study in three countries

INTRODUCTION

There are vaccines in clinical trials that target the bacterium Group B Streptococcus (GBS). When approved, GBS vaccines will be intended for administration to pregnant women to prevent infection in their infants. The success of any vaccine will depend on its' uptake in the population. Experience with prior maternal vaccines, e.g. influenza, Tdap and COVID-19 vaccines, teaches us that acceptance of vaccines, especially if novel, is challenging for pregnant women, and that provider recommendation is a key driver of vaccine uptake.

METHODS

This study investigated attitudes of maternity care providers towards the introduction of a GBS vaccine in three countries (the United States (US), Ireland, and the Dominican Republic (DR)) with different GBS prevalence and prevention practices. Semi-structured interviews with maternity care providers were transcribed and coded for themes. The constant comparative method, and inductive theory building were used to develop conclusions.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight obstetricians, 18 general practitioners and 14 midwives participated. There was variability in provider attitudes towards a hypothetical GBS vaccine. Responses ranged from enthusiasm to doubts over the need for a vaccine. Attitudes were influenced by perceived additional benefits of a vaccine over current strategy and confidence in the safety of vaccines during pregnancy. Knowledge, experience and approaches to GBS prevention differed geographically and according to provider type, and influenced how participants assessed the risks and benefits of a GBS vaccine.

CONCLUSION

Maternity care providers are engaged in the topic of GBS management and there is opportunity to leverage attitudes and beliefs that will support a strong recommendation for a GBS vaccine. However, knowledge of GBS, and of the limitations of current prevention strategies vary among providers in different regions, and between different provider types. Targeted educational efforts with antenatal providers should focus on highlighting safety data the potential benefits of vaccination over current strategies.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention through Monoclonal Antibodies: A Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Italian Pediatricians

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a leading cause of morbidity and hospitalization in all infants. Many RSV vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are currently under development to protect all infants, but to date preventive options are available only for preterms. In this study, we assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards RSV and the preventive use of mAb in a sample of Italian Pediatricians. An internet survey was administered through an internet discussion group, with a response rate of 4.4% over the potential respondents (No. 389 out of 8842, mean age 40.1 ± 9.1 years). The association of individual factors, knowledge, and risk perception status with the attitude towards mAb was initially inquired by means of a chi squared test, and all variables associated with mAb with p < 0.05 were included in a multivariable model calculating correspondent adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Of the participants, 41.9% had managed RSV cases in the previous 5 years, 34.4% had diagnosed RSV cases, and 32.6% required a subsequent hospitalization. However, only 14.4% had previously required mAb as immunoprophylaxis for RSV. Knowledge status was substantially inappropriate (actual estimate 54.0% ± 14.2, potential range 0-100), while the majority of participants acknowledged RSV as a substantial health threat for all infants (84.8%). In multivariable analysis, all these factors were characterized as positive effectors for having prescribed mAb (aOR 6.560, 95%CI 2.904-14.822 for higher knowledge score; aOR 6.579, 95%CI 2.919-14.827 for having a hospital background, and a OR 13.440, 95%CI 3.989; 45.287 for living in Italian Major Islands). In other words, reporting less knowledge gaps, having worked in settings with a higher risk of interaction with more severe cases, and being from Italian Major Islands, were identified as positive effectors for a higher reliance on mAb. However, the significant extent of knowledge gaps highlights the importance of appropriate medical education on RSV, its potential health consequences, and the investigational preventive interventions.

Group B Streptococcus and Pregnancy: Critical Concepts and Management Nuances

Importance

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a common pathogen with an effective treatment. However, it remains a significant cause of neonatal sepsis, morbidity, and mortality. The screening and management of this infection are some of the first concepts learned during medical training in obstetrics. However, effective screening and evidence-based management of GBS are nuanced with many critical caveats.

Objective

The objectives of this review are to discuss the essential aspects of GBS screening and management and to highlight recent changes to recommendations and guidelines.

Evidence Acquisition

Original research articles, review articles, and guidelines on GBS were reviewed.

Results

The following recommendations are based on review of the evidence and professional society guidelines. Screening for GBS should occur between 36 weeks and the end of the 37th week. The culture swab should go 2 cm into the vagina and 1 cm into the anus. Patients can perform their own swabs as well. Penicillin allergy testing has been shown to be safe in pregnancy. Patients with GBS in the urine should be treated at term with antibiotic prophylaxis, independent of the colony count of the culture. Patients who are GBS-positive with preterm and prelabor rupture of membranes after 34 weeks are not candidates for expectant management, as this population has higher rates of neonatal infectious complications. Patients with a history of GBS colonization in prior pregnancy who are GBS-unknown in this current pregnancy and present with labor should receive intrapartum prophylaxis. Work on the GBS vaccine continues.

Conclusions

Although all of the efforts and focus on neonatal early-onset GBS infection have led to lower rates of disease, GBS still remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality requiring continued vigilance from obstetric providers.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus: An Uncommon Cause of Febrile Seizures-Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a highly contagious viral pathogen. In infants, it is usually listed among the main causes of medical referrals and hospitalizations, particularly among newborns, and a considerable base of evidence associates RSV infections and bronchiolitis with long-term neurological sequelae. We specifically performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to ascertain whether RSV infections may be associated with an increased risk for febrile seizures (FS) in infected infants. According to the PRISMA statement, Pubmed, Embase, and pre-print archive medRxiv.og were searched for eligible observational studies published up to 1 July 2022. Raw data included the incidence of FS among children admitted for influenza-like illness (ILI) and/or bronchiolitis, with a confirmed diagnosis of RSV or seasonal influenza virus (SIV) infection. Data were then pooled in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 measure, while reporting bias was assessed by means of funnel plots and regression analysis. A total of 11 studies including 6847 cases of RSV infections were retrieved, with a pooled prevalence of 29.975 cases of FS per 1000 RSV cases (I2 = 88.5%). The prevalence was not substantially greater in studies performed in pediatric intensive care units (53.817 per 1000 RSV cases vs. 23.552, p = 0.12). Higher occurrence of FS was reported from studies performed after 2010 (Risk Ratio [RR] 1.429, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 1.049-1.948), and in China (RR 2.105, 95%CI 1.356-3.266) and South Africa (RR 1.722, 95%CI 1.060-2.824) than in Europe, while a lower occurrence was reported form the USA (RR 0.414, 95%CI 0.265-0.649). Eventually, FS were less likely reported from RSV cases compared to subjects affected by seasonal influenza (RR 0.402; 95%CI 0.228-0.708). Although RSV is often associated with high risk of neurological complications, substantially less cases of FS are reported than in SIV infections. However, the paucity of available studies recommends a cautious appraisal of aforementioned results.

Non-COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among migrant populations worldwide: a scoping review of the literature, 2000-2020

INTRODUCTION

Migration can be linked to the transmission of vaccine-preventable diseases. Hence, monitoring migrants' vaccination-related concerns can inform needed interventions to support vaccine acceptance.

AREAS COVERED

Along with Google and Google Scholar, we searched 13 bibliographic databases between 1 January 2000 and 10 October 2020, to identify published studies of vaccine hesitancy among migrant populations. From a total of 8,915 records, we screened 745 abstracts and included 112 eligible articles. We summarized extracted data using figures, tables, and narrations. Of the 112 articles, 109 were original quantitative (48%), qualitative (45%), and mixed-methods (7%) research, originating mainly from the United States (US) (68%), the United Kingdom (UK) (12%), and Scandinavia (6%). Most articles addressed human papillomavirus (63%), measles (13%), and influenzas (9%) vaccinations, and the leading sponsor of funded research was the US National Institutes of Health (50%). Discernable migrant groups with vaccine-specific concerns included Somali diasporas, UK-based Poles and Romanians, and US-based Haitians and Koreans. Among US-based Latina/Latino immigrants, lower vaccine uptake frequency was mostly associated with awareness levels, knowledge gaps, and uninsured status.

EXPERT OPINION

Migrants' vaccine-related apprehensions may cascade well beyond their proximate social connections and influence vaccine attitudes and behaviors in their countries-of-origin.

RSV disease in infants and young children: Can we see a brighter future?

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a highly contagious seasonal virus and the leading cause of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI), including pneumonia and bronchiolitis in children. RSV-related LRTI cause approximately 3 million hospitalizations and 120,000 deaths annually among children <5 years of age. The majority of the burden of RSV occurs in previously healthy infants. Only a monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been approved against RSV infections in a restricted group, leaving an urgent unmet need for a large number of children potentially benefiting from preventive measures. Approaches under development include maternal vaccines to protect newborns, extended half-life monoclonal antibodies to provide rapid long-lasting protection, and pediatric vaccines. RSV has been identified as a major global priority but a solution to tackle this unmet need for all children has yet to be implemented. New technologies represent the avenue for effectively addressing the leading-cause of hospitalization in children <1 years old.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a highly contagious viral pathogen. In infants, it is usually listed among the main causes of medical referrals and hospitalizations, particularly among newborns. While waiting for the results of early randomized controlled trials on maternal vaccination against RSV, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collect available evidence on maternal RSV infections. According to the PRISMA statement, Pubmed, Embase, and pre-print archive medRxiv.og were searched for eligible studies published up to 1 April 2022. Raw data included the incidence of RSV infection among sampled pregnant women, and the occurrence of complications. Data were then pooled in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 measure, while reporting bias was assessed by means of funnel plots and regression analysis. A total of 5 studies for 282,918 pregnancies were retrieved, with a pooled prevalence of 0.2 per 100 pregnancies and 2.5 per 100 pregnancies with respiratory tract infections. Neither maternal deaths nor miscarriages were reported. Even though detailed data were available only for 6309 pregnancies and 33 RSV cases, infant outcomes such as low birth weight and preterm delivery were rare (in both cases 0.04%), but up to 9.1% in cases where RSV diagnosis was confirmed. No substantially increased risk for preterm delivery (RR 1.395; 95%CI 0.566 to 3.434) and giving birth to a low-birth-weight infant (RR 0.509; 95%CI 0.134 to 1.924) was eventually identified. Conclusions. Although RSV is uncommonly detected among pregnant women, incident cases were associated with a relatively high share of complications. However, heterogeneous design and the quality of retrieved reports stress the need for specifically designed studies.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs of General Practitioners from North-Eastern Italy (2021)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a lead cause of morbidity and hospitalizations in infants. RSV vaccines are currently under development, and preventive options are limited to monoclonal antibodies (mAb). We assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices for RSV in a sample of general practitioners (GPs) from north-eastern Italy (2021), focusing on the risk perception for infants (age < 8 years) and its potential effectors. We administered an internet survey to 543 GPs, with a response rate of 28.9%. Knowledge status was unsatisfactory, with substantial knowledge gaps found on the epidemiology of RSV and its prevention through mAb. The main effectors of risk perception were identified as having a background in pediatrics (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 55.398 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.796−451.604), being favorable towards RSV vaccines when available (aOR: 4.728, 95% CI: 1.999−11.187), while having previously managed an RSV case (aOR: 0.114, 95% CI: 0.024−0.552) and previously recommended hospitalization for cases (aOR: 0.240, 95% CI: 0.066−0.869) were identified as negative effectors. In summary, the significant extent of knowledge gaps and the erratic risk perception, associated with the increasing occurrence in RSV infections, collectively stress the importance of appropriate information campaigns among primary care providers.

Disease burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in the pediatric population in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most common causes of lower respiratory tract infections in children aged <5 years and is associated with long-term respiratory morbidities such as recurrent wheezing and asthma, decreased lung function, and allergic sensitization. The objective of this review was to evaluate the epidemiology and burden of RSV infection in the pediatric population in Japan.

METHODS

Studies indexed in PubMed and ICHUSHI databases during January 2010-December 2020 were manually reviewed. Data on proportion of RSV infections, seasonality, length of stay (LoS), mortality, medical expenses, and palivizumab use were extracted from the selected articles.

RESULTS

Ninety-three articles were included (PubMed, 64; ICHUSHI, 29). The proportion of patients/samples with an RSV infection was 5.5%-66.7%, and 6.0%-29.9% in the inpatient and outpatient departments, respectively. RSV infections generally occurred during autumn/winter; however, recently the peak has shifted to summer. The LoS was variable and depended on factors such as age, infection severity, wheezing, and RSV subgroups. Mortality rates varied from <1% to 19% depending on the infection severity. The average daily hospitalization and intensive care unit cost was JPY 34,548 while intensive care unit incurred an additional cost of JPY 541,293. Palivizumab was indicated for high-risk infants and 0%-3% of patients required hospitalization despite palivizumab use.

CONCLUSIONS

RSV imposes a significant burden on the Japanese healthcare system, suggesting a need to create awareness among caregivers of children, pregnant women and healthcare professionals to ensure early recognition of infection and adequate treatment or prophylaxis.

Stakeholder perceptions about Group B Streptococcus disease and potential for maternal vaccination in low and middle-income countries

Background

To inform the World Health Organization’s full value of vaccine assessment for group B Streptococcus (GBS) vaccines, a rapid literature appraisal was conducted to inform the operationalization of maternal GBS vaccination. We found limited published information on stakeholder perceptions of the public health importance of GBS disease and vaccination, and we therefore undertook a multicountry survey.

Methods

An online survey was conducted in late 2019 to collect information on stakeholders’ awareness of GBS disease and the priority accorded to vaccination. The survey was distributed by email to 395 representatives of national pediatric, gynecology, and obstetrics associations, national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs), national regulatory agencies, academia, and United Nations organizations.

Results

Among 101 survey respondents from 66 countries, 36% were pediatricians, 25% obstetricians/gynecologists, 21% immunization specialists, and 18% other public health specialists. More than half (58%) of respondents reported being familiar with GBS disease as a public health problem; familiarity decreased by country income level. Knowledge of GBS disease was greatest in the Americas (68%) and Europe (66%) and lowest in Asia (13%–38%). Perception of GBS disease as a public health problem was highest among pediatricians (71%) and lowest among public health policy makers and NITAG members (30%) across country groupings. Approximately half of respondents (49%) considered the introduction of a GBS vaccine as a priority.

Conclusions

The information obtained will inform the appropriate packaging and presentation of information to address stakeholder perceptions and promote evidence-based decision making on GBS vaccination.

Relationship between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and group B streptococcal colonization dynamics in Japanese mother-neonate pairs

INTRODUCTION

In Japan, universal screening for group B streptococcal (GBS) colonization in pregnant women and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) are recommended to prevent neonatal GBS infection. However, the dynamics of GBS colonization in Japanese mother/neonate pairs have not been adequately studied.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted from July 2018 to March 2019. Rectovaginal samples were collected from pregnant women (33-37 gestation weeks) once. In neonates, nasopharyngeal and rectal samples were collected at three time points: after birth, 1 week after birth, and 1 month after birth. All samples were analyzed for GBS using real-time PCR testing and culture methods. Capsular typing was performed for all GBS isolates and GBS-positive samples using real-time PCR testing.

RESULTS

The overall maternal and neonatal GBS-positivity rates were 22.7% (57/251) and 8.8% (22/251), respectively. IAP for GBS-positive mothers (96.5%) was highly administered. Eleven (19.3%) neonates born to GBS-positive mothers were GBS-positive, which was significantly higher than the 11 (5.7%) neonates born to GBS-negative mothers. The rate of GBS-positivity in neonates increased with an increased number of GBS colonies in mothers. More neonates were GBS-positive 1 month after birth than 1 week after birth, and there was a higher rate of GBS-positive rectal swabs than nasopharyngeal swabs. Capsular types of GBS that were isolated from each mother and neonate pair were the same, namely, Ib, III, V, and VI.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the efficacy of IAP in preventing GBS transmission to neonates might be limited to within a few weeks after birth.

FIGO Statement: Vaccination in pregnancy

Pregnant women and their fetuses are among the vulnerable populations that can be severely affected by communicable diseases. As such, some vaccines such as the influenza and the Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis) vaccines are strongly recommended in each pregnancy, with generally safe profiles. Other vaccines can be offered based on risk factors, and only when the benefits of receiving them outweigh the risks. Development of vaccines against group B streptococcus infection and respiratory syncytial virus infection are of great importance. In this paper, the recommendations for administration of each vaccine during pregnancy are discussed. The FIGO Committee for Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee endorses the recommendations to vaccinate all pregnant women against influenza during the influenza season at any time during the pregnancy and against Tdap preferably between the 27th and 36th weeks of pregnancy in each pregnancy.