Efficacy and safety of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children aged 6–35 months: A global, multiseasonal, controlled, randomized Phase III study

Effectiveness of interventions to improve vaccine efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is a crucial public health intervention that has significantly reduced the incidence of infectious diseases. Vaccine-related interventions refer to strategies implemented to enhance vaccination uptake, coverage, and effectiveness, like modes of delivery, types or dosages. Despite extensive research on vaccine efficacy, a comprehensive analysis of the variability in vaccine effectiveness across different interventions, settings, and populations is limited. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of various Vaccine-Related Interventions (VRIs).

METHODS

This review included 139 randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control studies evaluating VRIs from January 2015 to December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-2 and ROBINS-E tools. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate overall effect sizes, infection rates, and heterogeneity and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 139 studies reviewed, 97 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising approximately 1.4 million participants. Populations across various settings were analyzed, with median vaccinated population sizes for the 1st dose (4598, IQR = 15,749), 2nd dose (6214, IQR = 13,817), and 3rd dose (3508, IQR = 5546). The overall total vaccinated population had a median of 4370 and an IQR of 16,475. The interventions showed a significant positive effect on vaccine efficacy, with an estimated effect size of 0.6432 (95% CI 0.4049 to 0.8815). Heterogeneity was negligible, with Tau2 = 0, I2 = 0.00%, and H2 = 1.00. The Galbraith plot suggested minimal variability. The study utilized ROB-2 and ROBINS-E tools to evaluate bias, with Egger's test (t = - 0.9941, p = 0.3227) confirming no significant publication bias. The funnel plot indicated minimal bias in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

The study supports the effectiveness of vaccine-related interventions in enhancing vaccine efficacy. The negligible heterogeneity and consistent effect sizes across diverse populations and settings provide a robust basis for implementing public health strategies aimed at improving vaccination outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024543608.

The Safety and Immunogenicity of a Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Children Aged 6-35 Months: A Randomized, Blinded and Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial

Background: Influenza is a serious contagious disease caused by influenza virus. It is particularly dangerous for children, potentially leading to severe and even fatal complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two candidate quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines in children aged 6-35 months. Methods: The subjects were randomly divided into three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio and received the corresponding vaccines: QIV-Sub-HD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, High Dose), QIV-Sub-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, Low Dose) and QIV-Split-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Split-Virion Vaccine, Low Dose). Adverse events were recorded at 30 min, 0-7 days and 8-28 and 30 days after each dose of immunization. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported within 6 months after the full vaccination. Blood samples were collected before the first dose and on 28 days, 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination for antibody detection to evaluate the immunogenicity and duration of immune responses. Results: The results showed that the relative and absolute criteria met the goals set by the clinical trial protocol, indicating that both vaccines are immunogenic. From the first dose to 30 days after full vaccination, the total incidence of adverse reactions in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups was 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. The main symptoms were fever, cough, diarrhea and vomiting. No new safety concerns were identified. Conclusions: The quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines candidate, manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS., are safe and immunogenic in children aged 6-35 months.

Optimizing influenza vaccine allocation by age using cost-effectiveness analysis: A comparison of 6720 vaccination program scenarios in children and adults in Belgium

BACKGROUND

Many European countries prioritize groups for annual influenza vaccination based on risk of severe disease and death. This has resulted in relatively high influenza vaccination coverage in older adults in Belgium. However, coverage is much lower in younger adults and negligible in children. Children and young adults are known to play a major role in the transmission dynamics of influenza. Thus, an important policy question is how influenza vaccines can be optimally allocated across age groups, taking indirect effects into account.

METHODS

We adapted a dynamic transmission model to reproduce influenza seasonality in Belgium comparing 6720 mutually exclusive vaccination options, including current practice. Vaccination options were defined by different combinations of coverage level changes in nine age groups. We performed an economic evaluation comparing all options from a healthcare payer perspective. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were the primary health outcome. We expressed parametric uncertainty using the Incremental Net Monetary Benefits (INMB) approach.

RESULTS

Of all the vaccination options considered, over 90 % dominated the current Belgian vaccination strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness. Children were estimated to contribute a substantial indirect protective effect to the overall population. The most cost-effective program increases vaccination coverage rates for children to 90 %, 50-64 years old to 48 %, and 65-74 years old to 75 %.

DISCUSSION

Overall QALY gains can be maximized in seasonal influenza vaccination programs at acceptable costs by achieving high vaccination coverage in childhood age groups. Programmatic and ethical concerns towards such an implementation in the Belgian context need to be separately considered.

A prospective, randomized, parallel, active controlled, phase III Indian study of immunogenicity and safety of two inactivated influenza vaccines - Vaxiflu-4 and Fluarix tetra in children aged 6 months to 35 months

Influenza is highly prevalent in children under five years, particularly those under two, accounting for 5-10% of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in India. This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of two tetravalent inactivated influenza vaccines in healthy children aged 6-35 months. The dose recommendation for this group increased from 0.25 mL to 0.5 mL to ensure adequate immune response, as per the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This Phase III, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study was conducted from May to October 2022 across five centers in India. A total of 346 subjects were randomized to receive two doses of either the test vaccine (Vaxiflu-4, Zydus Lifesciences Limited; n = 174) or the reference vaccine (Fluarix Tetra, GlaxoSmithKline; n = 172). The primary objective was to compare immunogenicity using seroprotection rate, seroconversion rate, and geometric mean titers (GMTs) against four vaccine strains. Safety profiles were also compared. Both vaccines demonstrated non-inferiority, with seroprotection rates over 95%, seroconversion rates above 90%, and significant GMT increases. Adverse events (AEs) were similar for both vaccines, including pain at the injection site, erythema, swelling, and pyrexia. The test vaccine, Vaxiflu-4, showed non-inferiority in terms of immunogenicity and safety when compared with reference vaccine, Fluarix Tetra (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2022/05/042514).

Recent advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape: a comprehensive overview of technologies and trials

SUMMARYIn the United Kingdom (UK) in 2022/23, influenza virus infections returned to the levels recorded before the COVID-19 pandemic, exerting a substantial burden on an already stretched National Health Service (NHS) through increased primary and emergency care visits and subsequent hospitalizations. Population groups ≤4 years and ≥65 years of age, and those with underlying health conditions, are at the greatest risk of influenza-related hospitalization. Recent advances in influenza virus vaccine technologies may help to mitigate this burden. This review aims to summarize advances in the influenza virus vaccine landscape by describing the different technologies that are currently in use in the UK and more widely. The review also describes vaccine technologies that are under development, including mRNA, and universal influenza virus vaccines which aim to provide broader or increased protection. This is an exciting and important era for influenza virus vaccinations, and advances are critical to protect against a disease that still exerts a substantial burden across all populations and disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable, despite it being over 80 years since the first influenza virus vaccines were deployed.

Influvac Tetra: clinical experience on safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity

INTRODUCTION

This paper summarizes the safety and immunogenicity data of Influvac Tetra across all age groups starting from 6 months of age, obtained during its clinical development program.

AREAS COVERED

The article covers the clinical development program of Influvac Tetra based on five registration studies that included different age groups, different comparators, and participants from Europe and Asia. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed in all studies and in one study, the efficacy of Influvac Tetra was assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

Seasonal influenza is a vaccine-preventable disease that can cause serious complications. Several types of influenza vaccines are available, including egg-based (standard dose, high dose, and adjuvanted), cell-based, and recombinant. The COVID-19 pandemic has stimulated innovation in the development such as mRNA vaccines. However, these vaccines are still in development and the true value still has to be proven. Regardless of the type of vaccine, it is also important to increase overall vaccination coverage. ECDC recommends that EU Member States implement action plans and policies aimed at reaching 75% coverage in at-risk groups and healthcare workers. Even so, vaccine coverage is still far from recommended.

Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Evidence of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months has been emerging. To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months in a systematic review and meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included 12 studies with 6722 participants receiving QIV, 3575 participants receiving TIV, 4249 participants receiving full-dose QIV (F-QIV), and 3722 participants receiving half-dose QIV (H-QIV). Among children aged 6 to 35 months, QIV produces a better Immunogenicity against influenza B vaccine strains not contained in TIV. However, injection site reaction was more common for QIV, F-QIV showed superior efficacy for the B lineage, but fever and injection site pain was more frequently reported for F-QIV than H-QIV. These data support the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among children aged 6 to 35 months.

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (VaxigripTetra) in Children Aged 6 to 35 Months in South Korea

INTRODUCTION

The quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (QIV; VaxigripTetra^®) was initially licensed in South Korea in 2017 for immunization against seasonal influenza in those aged ≥ 3 years, with the indicated age subsequently lowered to include those aged ≥ 6 months in 2018. Here, to comply with South Korean licensure requirements, we undertook a post-marketing surveillance study to assess the safety of QIV in children aged 6-35 months (i.e., extension of the previous age indication to include these young children) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A multicenter, observational, active safety surveillance of children aged 6-35 months who received a single dose of QIV during a routine healthcare visit was undertaken in South Korea from 15 June 2018 to 14 June 2022. Solicited adverse events (AEs) and unsolicited non-serious AEs were recorded in diary cards, with serious adverse events (SAEs) notified to study investigators.

RESULTS

This safety analysis included 676 participants. No AEs led to study termination, and no SAEs were reported. The most frequent solicited injection site reaction was pain in both the ≤ 23-month (12.2% [55/450]) and ≥ 24-month (15.5% [35/226]) age groups. The most frequent solicited systemic reactions were pyrexia and somnolence in the ≤ 23-month age group (6.0% [27/450] each), and malaise (10.6% [24/226]) in the ≥ 24-month age group. Overall, 208 (30.8%) participants experienced 339 unsolicited non-serious AEs, with nasopharyngitis the most common (14.1% [95/676]), and nearly all events (98.8% [335/339]) were considered unrelated to QIV. Grade 3 solicited reactions and unsolicited non-serious AEs were reported in five (0.7%) and three (0.4%) participants, respectively, all of whom recovered by day 7 after vaccination.

CONCLUSION

This active safety surveillance study confirms that QIV is well tolerated in children aged 6-35 months in routine clinical practice in South Korea. There were no safety concerns observed in these young children.

Structure-based drug design, molecular dynamics simulation, ADMET, and quantum chemical studies of some thiazolinones targeting influenza neuraminidase

The genetic mutability of the influenza virus leads to the existence of drug-resistant strains which is dangerous, particularly with the lingering coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This necessitated the need for the search and discovery of more potential anti-influenza agents to avert future outbreaks. In furtherance of our previous in-silico studies on 5-benzyl-4-thiazolinones as anti-influenza neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, molecule 11 was selected as the template scaffold for the structure-based drug design due to its good binding, pharmacokinetic profiling, and better NA inhibitory activity. As such, eighteen (18) new molecules (11a-r) were designed with better MolDock scores as compared with the template scaffold and the zanamivir reference drug. However, the dynamic stability of molecule 11a in the binding cavity of the NA target (3TI5) showed water-mediated hydrogen and hydrophobic bondings with the active residues such as Arg118, Ile149, Arg152, Ile222, Trp403, and Ile427 after the MD simulation for 100 ns. The drug-likeness and ADMET assessment of all designed molecules predicted non-violation of the stipulated thresholds of Lipinski's rule and good pharmacokinetic properties respectively. In addition, the quantum chemical calculations also suggested the significant chemical reactivity of molecules with their smaller band energy gap, high electrophilicity, high softness, and low hardness. The results obtained in this study proposed a reliable in-silico viewpoint for anti-influenza drug discovery and development.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

A Comparison of Etiology, Pathogenesis, Vaccinal and Antiviral Drug Development between Influenza and COVID-19

Influenza virus and coronavirus, two kinds of pathogens that exist widely in nature, are common emerging pathogens that cause respiratory tract infections in humans. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 emerged, causing a severe respiratory infection named COVID-19 in humans, and raising a global pandemic which has persisted in the world for almost three years. Influenza virus, a seasonally circulating respiratory pathogen, has caused four global pandemics in humans since 1918 by the emergence of novel variants. Studies have shown that there are certain similarities in transmission mode and pathogenesis between influenza and COVID-19, and vaccination and antiviral drugs are considered to have positive roles as well as several limitations in the prevention and control of both diseases. Comparative understandings would be helpful to the prevention and control of these diseases. Here, we review the study progress in the etiology, pathogenesis, vaccine and antiviral drug development for the two diseases.

Enhancing the protection of influenza virus vaccines with BECC TLR4 adjuvant in aged mice

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a leading cause of respiratory disease worldwide often resulting in severe morbidity and mortality. We have previously shown that the Bacterial Enzymatic Combinatorial Chemistry (BECC) adjuvants, BECC438 and BECC470, formulated with an influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein vaccine, offer greater protection from influenza virus challenge in mouse respiratory models using adult mice than standard HA:adjuvant combinations. In this study, we determined that immunization with HA + BECC adjuvants also significantly broadened the epitopes targeted on HA as compared with other adjuvants, resulting in increased titers of antibodies directed against the highly conserved HA stalk domain. Importantly, we demonstrate that BECC470 combined with an influenza virus HA protein antigen in a prime-only immunization regimen was able to achieve complete protection from challenge in a ~ 12-month-old mouse aged model. Together, this demonstrates the heightened protection provided by the BECC470 adjuvant in an influenza virus vaccine model and shows the enhanced immune response, as compared to other adjuvants elicited by the formulation of HA with BECC470.

Enhanced passive safety surveillance of Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra: Results from seven consecutive seasons

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) set out requirements for an enhanced safety surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines. This paper presents data from the yearly Enhanced Passive Safety Surveillance (EPSS) implemented for Influvac® since season 2014/15 and continued for Influvac® Tetra from season 2018/19 onwards.

METHODS

In seven consecutive seasons, an EPSS, aiming for at least 1,000 vaccinees (additional target of 100 vaccinees per five predefined age groups), was conducted in Germany, where market characteristics were expected to allow for a quick generation of representative data. Reactogenicity data in terms of reporting rates, severity and duration of pre-specified local and systemic adverse events of interest (AEI) were collected using response cards, which were completed by vaccinees and returned seven days after vaccination via regular mail. In addition, response cards contained a call center number to enhance reporting of other than pre-specified adverse events.

RESULTS

The primary target of at least 1,000 vaccinees was surpassed in all seasons, as was the additional target of 100 adults and elderly. Reactogenicity data were in line with known safety profile of Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra. In children, the target was mostly met in seasons when the EPSS was conducted for Influvac®, but not in seasons when it was conducted for Influvac® Tetra. Although the data for Influvac® Tetra are based on a low number of paediatric vaccinees, they do not indicate a different reactogenicity profile of Influvac® Tetra compared with Influvac®. No signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

The EPSS set up for Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra proved a robust and effective methodology to comply with the objectives of EMÁ's guidance on enhanced safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines. Safety data from seven consecutive seasons confirmed the favourable safety profile of both vaccines.

Immunogenicity and safety of seasonal influenza vaccines in children under 3 years of age

INTRODUCTION

Despite children aged 6-35 months developing more severe influenza infections, not all countries include influenza vaccines in their national immunization programs.

AREAS COVERED

This literature review examines the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) and quadrivalent influenzae vaccines (QIVs) in children 6-35 months old to determine if greater valency promotes greater protection while maintaining a similar safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

TIVs and QIVs are safe for children under 3 years old. TIVs and QIVs provided good seroprotection, and immunogenicity (GMT, SCR, and SPR) meeting recommended levels set by CHMP (European) and CBER (USA). However, as QIVs carry two influenza B strains and TIVs only one, QIVs has an overall higher seroprotection against particularly influenza B. Vaccines containing adjuncts had better immunogenicity, particularly after the first dose. Seroprotection of all vaccines lasted 12 months. Increasing the dosage from 0.25 mL to 0.5 mL did not cause more systemic or local side-effects. Further comparisons of efficacy, and wider promotion of influenza vaccines in general are required in preschool children.