Development of a Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) Using a Nationwide Database and Its Association with Inpatient Morbidity, Mortality, and Length of Stay After Spine Surgery

Preoperative prediction of postoperative needs after spinal tumor surgery

INTRODUCTION

Spinal oncology care is challenging and resource-intensive. Unfortunately, there are few validated preoperative clinical tools to accurately predict postoperative healthcare needs. The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) assesses current walking capacity, use of gait aids, home support, and reliance on community support. We aim to assess the utility of the RAPT in predicting discharge disposition for patients undergoing spinal tumor surgery.

METHODS

RAPT was administered preoperatively to consecutive patients (n = 389) undergoing spinal tumor resection from 2017 to 2024 at an academic medical center. Logistic regression analysis was used to associate the total RAPT score, and its subcomponents, with non-home discharge. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, length of stay, 30- and 90-day Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality.

RESULTS

A higher RAPT score was associated with significantly increased odds of home discharge (p < 0.0001, OR=1.484) and reduced risk of 30-day ED visits (p = 0.0151, OR=0.834). There was no correlation between preoperative RAPT score and intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, or reoperation. Improved RAPT subscore for baseline walking ability was able to predict home discharge (p = 0.0001, OR=2.865), fewer 30-day ED visits (p = 0.0422, OR=0.622), and reduced 90-day mortality (p = 0.0008, OR= 0.456). Furthermore, preoperative ambulation without gait assistance was also correlated with increased home discharge (p = 0.0001, OR=2.778) and decreased 30-day ED visits (p = 0.0291, OR=0.622).

CONCLUSION

RAPT score and its subcomponents are highly predictive and specific tools for discharge disposition in the spinal oncology population. Implementation of this simple questionnaire can help surgeons identify high-risk patients preoperatively and design risk mitigation strategies.

Frailty Influence on Postoperative Surgical Site Infections After Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disease and Adult Spine Deformity. Can a Frailty Index be a Valuable Summary Risk Indicator? A Systematic Review and Metanalysis of the Current Literature

STUDY DESIGN

Metanalysis.

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infections (SSI) is one of the commonest postoperative adverse events after spine surgery. Frailty has been described as a valuable summary risk indicator for SSI in spine surgery. The aim of this metanalysis is to evaluate the influence of frailty on postoperative SSI in this cohort and provide hints on which index can predict the risk of SSI.

METHODS

Papers describing the postoperative SSI rate in adult degenerative spine disease or adult spine deformity patients with varying degrees of frailty were included in the analysis. The SSI rate in different grades of frailty was considered for outcome measure. Meta-analysis was performed on studies in whom data regarding patients with different levels of frailty and occurrence of postoperative SSI could be pooled. P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

16 studies were included. The frailty prevalence measured using mFI-11 ranged from 3% to 17.9%, these values were inferior to those measured with mFI-5. Significant difference was found between frail and non-frail patients in postoperative SSI rate at metanalysis (z = 5.9547, P < .0001 for mFI-5 and z = 3.8334, P = .0001 for mFI-11).

CONCLUSION

This is the first meta-analysis to specifically investigate the impact of frailty, on occurrence of SSI. We found a relevant statistical difference between frail and non-frail patients in SSI occurrence rate. This is a relevant finding, as the ageing of population increases alongside with spine surgery procedures, a better understanding of risk factors may advance our ability to treat patients while minimizing the occurrence of SSI.

Analysis of Early Post-Radiation Surgical Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors

Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy is one of the various treatment options for patients with metastatic spinal tumors (MST). However, it is difficult to say that this is definitely an optimal treatment for MST, and there are several patients who need surgical treatment because pain or neurologic deficits occur even after radiotherapy. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze which patients received early operative treatment after radiotherapy. Methods: We included 81 patients who underwent decompression and fusion surgery after radiotherapy for MST. Patients who underwent surgery within 6 months after radiotherapy were classified as the early operation group (group E, n = 47), while surgery cases after 6 months after radiotherapy were assigned to the late operation group (group L, n = 34). Risk factor analysis using multivariate regression analysis for early operative treatment after radiotherapy was performed. Also, we analyzed the period from radiotherapy to surgery according to the Bilsky grade. Results: In multivariate analysis, pathologic fractures and semirigid (thoracic) lesions were more frequent in group E than group L (adjusted odds ratio, 4.282, 10.524; p = 0.001, 0.039). In subgroup analysis, there was a difference in the period from radiotherapy to surgery in Bilsky grades above 2 than Bilsky grade 1 (grade 1, 13.6 ± 11.4 months, grade 2, 6.9 ± 6.8 months, grade 3, 6.6 ± 7.5 months; grade 1 vs. 2, p = 0.049, grade 1 vs. 3, p = 0.047). Conclusions: Although the information in this study may only be limited to patients who underwent surgery, early operative treatment after radiotherapy is highly likely for patients with MST accompanied by a Bilsky grade above 2, pathologic fracture and thoracic lesion. In these patients, surgical treatment could be considered as the primary treatment.

Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs

STUDY DESIGN

cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate AO Spine members' practices and comfort in managing metastatic and primary spine tumors, explore the use of decision-support and patient assessment tools, and identify knowledge gaps and future needs in spine oncology.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to AO Spine members to query comfort levels with key decisions in spinal oncology management, utilization of decision frameworks and spine oncology-specific instruments, and educational material preferences.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 381 members across 82 countries. Most respondents were orthopedic spine surgeons (62%) or neurosurgeons (36%), with 42% performing 100-200 spine surgeries per year. Extradural primary and metastatic tumors were managed by 84% and 95% of respondents, respectively, with survival and frailty assessment tools used for both. While most surgeons felt comfortable determining when emergency surgery was needed (81% for primary and 82% for metastatic tumors), nuanced decisions about surgical timing were more challenging. Surgeons also noted challenges in tailoring the oncologic surgical plan to what the patient could safely tolerate. There was a strong desire for guidelines on tumor-related spinal pain (85%), treatment timing (85%), stabilization (85%), and glucocorticoid use for symptomatic extradural metastatic tumors (77%). Interest was high for classification systems for spine tumor pain (65%) and stabilization decisions (80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional support is needed in decision-making regarding surgical timing, patient selection, and tailoring treatment invasiveness to life expectancy and frailty. Surgeons seek further guidance to prevent neurologic deterioration and optimize recovery. Guidelines and classification systems were highly coveted for daily practice.

Assessing a revised-risk analysis index for morbidity and mortality after spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors

BACKGROUND

Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has been increasingly used to assess surgical frailty in various procedures, but its effectiveness in predicting mortality or in-patient hospital outcomes for spine surgery in metastatic disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive values of the revised RAI (RAI-rev), the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), and advanced age for extended length of stay, 30-day readmission, complications, and mortality among patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2022 ACS NSQIP database to identify adult patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI-rev, mFI-5, and greater patient age with extended length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, hospital readmission, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,796 patients were identified, of which 1,116 (62.1%) were male and 1,008 (70.7%) were non-Hispanic White. RAI-rev identified 1,291 (71.9%) frail and 208 (11.6%) very frail patients, while mFI-5 identified 272 (15.1%) frail and 49 (2.7%) very frail patients. In the ROC analysis for extended LOS, both RAI-rev and mFI-5 showed modest predictive capabilities with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.5477 and 0.5329, respectively, and no significant difference in their predictive abilities (p = 0.446). When compared to age, RAI-rev demonstrated superior prediction (p = 0.015). With respect to predicting 30-day readmission, no significant difference was observed between RAI-rev and mFI-5 (AUC 0.5394 l respectively, p = 0.354). However, RAI-rev outperformed age (p = 0.001). When assessing the risk of 30-day complications, RAI-rev significantly outperformed mFI-5 (AUC: 0.6016 and 0.5542 respectively, p = 0.022) but not age. Notably, RAI-rev demonstrated superior ability for predicting 30-day mortality compared to mFI-5 and age (AUC: 0.6541, 0.5652, and 0.5515 respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed RAI-rev as a significant predictor of extended LOS [aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13-3.38, p = 0.016] and 30-day mortality [aOR: 5.27, 95% CI: 1.73-16.06, p = 0.003] for very frail patients. Similarly, the RAI-rev significantly predicted 30-day complications for frail [aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.21-5.72, p = 0.015] and very frail [aOR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.60-8.51, p = 0.002] patients. However, the RAI did not significantly predict 30-day readmission [Very Frail aOR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.75-3.07, p = 0.245; Frail aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.79-2.68, p = 0.225].

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the utility of RAI-rev in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Particularly, the superiority that RAI-rev has in predicting 30-day mortality may have significant implications in multidisciplinary decision making.

Overview of Molecular Prognostication for Common Solid Tumor Histologies - What the Surgeon Should Know

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a general overview of important molecular markers and targeted therapies for the most common neoplasms (lung, breast, prostate and melanoma) that metastasize to the spine and offer guidance on how to best incorporate them in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline databases, as well as the histology-specific National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to identify relevant articles limited to the English language. Relevant articles were reviewed for commonly described molecular mutations or targeted therapeutics, as well as associated clinical outcomes, and surgery-related risks.

RESULTS

Molecular markers and targeted therapies have dramatically improved the survival of cancer patients. The increasing importance of prognostic molecular markers and targeted therapies provides rationale for their incorporation into clinical decision-making for patients diagnosed with metastatic spine disease. In this review, we discuss the molecular markers/mutations and targeted therapies associated with the most common malignancies that metastasize to the spine and provide a framework that the surgeon can utilize when evaluating patients for potential intervention. Finally, we provide case examples that highlight the importance of molecular prognostication and therapies in surgical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

An integrated understanding of the implications of surgery, radiation, molecular markers and targeted therapies that guide prognostication and treatment is warranted in order to achieve the most favorable outcomes for patients with metastatic spine disease.

A Critical Appraisal of the Application of Frailty and Sarcopenia in the Spinal Oncology Population

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and clinimetric analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Frailty and sarcopenia predict worse surgical outcomes among spinal degenerative and deformity-related populations; this association is less clear in the context of spinal oncology. Here, we sought to identify frailty and sarcopenia tools applied in spinal oncology and appraise their clinimetric properties.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted from January 1st, 2000, until June 2022. Study characteristics, frailty tools, and measures of sarcopenia were recorded. Component domains, individual items, cut-off values, and measurement techniques were collected. Clinimetric assessment was performed according to Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included (42 514 patients). Seventeen studies utilized 6 frailty tools; the three most employed were the Metastatic Spine tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI), Modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11), and the mFI-5. Eight studies utilized measures of sarcopenia; the three most common were the L3-Total Psoas Area (TPA)/Vertebral Body Area (VBA), L3-TPA/Height2, and L3-Spinal Muscle Index (L3-Cross-Sectional Muscle Area/Height2). Frailty and sarcopenia measures lacked or had uncertain content and construct validity. Frailty measures were objective except the Johns-Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups. All tools were feasible except the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Positive predictive validity was observed for the HFRS and in select studies employing the mFI-5, MSTFI, and L3-TPA/VBA. All frailty tools had floor or ceiling effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing tools for evaluating frailty and sarcopenia among patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors have poor clinimetric properties. Here, we provide a pragmatic approach to utilizing existing frailty and sarcopenia tools, until more clinimetrically robust instruments are developed.

Malnutrition in Spine Oncology: Where Are We and What Are We Measuring?

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify which markers are used as surrogates for malnutrition in metastatic spine disease and which are the most studied outcomes associated with it.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed by searching the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to July 2022. We searched for articles exploring markers of malnutrition in spine oncology patients including but not limited to albumin, body weight, weight loss, and nutrition indices. A narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 articles reporting on 31,385 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 13 different surrogate markers of nutrition, with the most common being albumin in 67% of studies (n = 41), body weight/BMI in 34% (n = 21), and muscle mass in 28% (n = 17). The most common studied outcomes were survival in 82% (n = 50), complications in 28% (n = 17), and length of stay in 10% (n = 6) of studies. Quality of life and functional outcomes were assessed in 2% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 2) of studies, respectively. Out of 61 studies, 18% (n = 11) found no association between the examined markers and outcome.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of nutritional status in patients with spinal metastases is fundamental. However, there is lack of a comprehensive and consistent way of assessing malnutrition in oncologic spine patients and therefore inconsistency in its relationship with outcomes. A consensus agreement on the assessment and definition of malnutrition in spine tumor patients is needed.

Racial Disparities in Patients with Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in access and delivery of care have been shown to disproportionately affect certain racial groups. Studies have been conducted to assess these disparities within the spinal metastasis population, but the extent of their effects in the setting of other socioeconomic measures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to understand the effect of racial disparities on outcomes in patients with metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed, where a comprehensive online search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct using MeSH terms related to metastatic spine tumor surgery and racial disparities up to February 2023. Two independent reviewers screened and analyzed articles to include studies assessing the following primary outcomes: clinical presentation, treatment type, postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, survival and/or mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and advance care planning.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included in final analysis; 12 were retrospective cohort studies (Level of evidence III) and 1 was a prospective study (Level of evidence II). Postoperative complications were the most studied outcome in 46% of studies (6 of 13), followed by survival in 31% (4 of 13), and treatment type also in 31% (4 of 13). Overall, race was found to be significantly associated with at least one evaluated outcome in 69% of studies (9 of 13). Racial disparities were found in the incidence of cord compression, non-routine discharge, and treatment type in patients with metastatic spine disease. No differences were found on rates of post-operative ambulation, advance care planning, readmission, or survival; inconsistent results were seen for postoperative complications and length of stay. Nine studies (69%) included at least one other measure of socioeconomic status in multivariate analysis, with the two most common being insurance type and income.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some studies suggest race to be associated with presenting characteristics, treatment type and outcome of patients with spinal metastases, there was significant variability in the inclusion of measures of socioeconomic status in study analyses. As such, the association between race and outcomes in oncologic spine surgery remains unclear.

Application of the NSE score (Neurology-Stability-Epidural compression assessment) to establish the need for surgery in spinal metastases of elderly patients: a multicenter investigation

PURPOSE

This retropective multicentric study aims to investigate the clinical applicability of the NSE score in the elderly, to verify the role of this tool as an easy help for decision making also for this class of patients.

METHODS

All elderly patients (> 65 years) suffering from spinal metastases undergoing surgical or non-surgical treatment at the authors' Institutions between 2015 and 2022 were recruited. An agreement group (AG) and non-agreement group (NAG) were identified accordingly to the agreement between the NSE score indication and the performed treatment. Neurological status and axial pain were evaluated for both groups at follow-up (3 and 6 months). The same analysis was conducted specifically grouping patients older than 75 years.

RESULTS

A strong association with improvement or preservation of clinical status (p < 0.001) at follow-up was obtained in AG. The association was not statistically significant in NAG at the 3-month follow-up (p 1.00 and 0.07 respectively) and at 6 months (p 0.293 and 0.09 respectively). The group of patients over 75 years old showed similar results in terms of statistical association between the agreement group and better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Far from the need or the aim to build dogmatic algorithms, the goal of preserving a proper performance status plays a key role in a modern oncological management: functional outcomes of the multicentric study group showed that the NSE score represents a reliable tool to establish the need for surgery also for elderly patients.

The Role of Frailty and Sarcopenia in Predicting Major Adverse Events, Length of Stay and Reoperation Following En Bloc Resection of Primary Tumours of the Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

En bloc resection for primary tumours of the spine is associated with a high rate of adverse events (AEs). The objective was to explore the relationship between frailty/sarcopenia and major perioperative AEs, length of stay (LOS), and unplanned reoperation following en bloc resection of primary spinal tumours.

METHODS

This is a unicentre study consisting of adult patients undergoing en bloc resection for a primary spine tumor. Frailty was calculated with the modified frailty index (mFI) and spine tumour frailty index (STFI). Sarcopenia was quantified with the total psoas area/vertebral body area ratio (TPA/VB) at L3 and L4. Univariable regression analysis was used to quantify the association between frailty/sarcopenia and major perioperative AEs, LOS and unplanned reoperation.

RESULTS

95 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mFI and STFI identified a frailty prevalence of 3% and 18%. Mean CT TPA/VB ratios were 1.47 (SD ± .05) and 1.83 (SD ± .06) at L3 and L4. Inter-observer reliability was .93 and .99 for CT and MRI L3 and L4 TPA/VB ratios. Unadjusted analysis demonstrated sarcopenia and mFI did not predict perioperative AEs, LOS or unplanned reoperation. Frailty defined by an STFI score ≥2 predicted unplanned reoperation for surgical site infection (SSI) (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The STFI was only associated with unplanned reoperation for SSI on unadjusted analysis, while the mFI and sarcopenia were not predictive of any outcome. Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between frailty, sarcopenia and perioperative outcomes following en bloc resection of primary spinal tumors.

Hospital frailty risk score predicts high-value care outcomes following brain metastasis resection

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases (BM) are the most common adult intracranial tumors, representing a significant source of morbidity in patients with systemic malignancy. Frailty indices, including 11- and 5-factor modified frailty indices (mFI-11 and mFI-5), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), have recently demonstrated an important role in predicting high-value care outcomes in neurosurgery. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the newly developed Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) on postoperative outcomes in BM patients.

METHODS

Adult patients with BM treated surgically at a single institution were identified (2017-2019). HFRS was calculated using ICD-10 codes, and patients were subsequently separated into low (<5), intermediate (5-15), and high (>15) HFRS cohorts. Multivariate logistic regressions were utilized to identify associations between HFRS and complications, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and discharge disposition. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients (mean age: 61.81±11.63 years; 50.6 % female) were included. The mean±SD for HFRS, mFI-11, mFI-5, ASA, and CCI were 6.46±5.73, 1.31±1.24, 0.95±0.86, 2.94±0.48, and 8.69±2.07, respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher HFRS was significantly associated with greater complication rate (OR=1.10, p<0.001), extended LOS (OR=1.13, p<0.001), high hospital charges (OR=1.14, p<0.001), and nonroutine discharge disposition (OR=1.12, p<0.001), and comparing the ROC curves of mFI-11, mFI-5, ASA,and CCI, the predictive accuracy of HFRS was the most superior for all four outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

The predictive ability of HFRS on BM resection outcomes may be superior than other frailty indices, offering a new avenue for routine preoperative frailty assessment and for managing postoperative expectations.

Role of frailty in predicting prognosis of older patients with lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is a syndrome affecting primarily older adults that can impact disease course, treatment, and outcomes in patients with lung cancer (LC). We systematically reviewed current data on the correlation between frailty and overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the risk of complications in older patients with LC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for observational cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies involving participants aged 18 years or older diagnosed with LC. Eligible studies were required to perform frailty assessments and have non-frail participants as a comparator group. Random-effects models were used for analysis, and the reported effect sizes were represented as hazards ratio (HR) or odds ratios (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included, most with a retrospective cohort design (n = 16) and patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Older patients with LC and frailty had lower OS (HR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.39, 2.07) and RFS (HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.02, 6.12), compared to non-frail subjects. Frail subjects also had increased risk of complications (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.53).

DISCUSSION

The observed association between frailty and OS, RFS, and an increased susceptibility to complications emphasizes the potential significance of frailty status as a substantial prognostic indicator. Our results underscore the vital role of including frailty assessment as an integral element within the management plan for patients dealing with lung cancer.

Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Many tools have been used to assess frailty in the perioperative setting. However, no single scale has been shown to be the most effective in predicting postoperative complications. We evaluated the relationship between several frailty scales and the occurrence of complications following different non-cardiac surgeries.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023473401). The search strategy included PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase, covering manuscripts published from January 2000 to July 2023. We included prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated frailty using specific scales and tracked patients postoperatively. Studies on cardiac, neurosurgical, and thoracic surgery were excluded because of the impact of underlying diseases on patients' functional status. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, and articles lacking a comprehensive definition of frailty were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 2204 articles identified, 145 were included in the review: 7 on non-cardiac surgery, 36 on general and digestive surgery, 19 on urology, 22 on vascular surgery, 36 on spinal surgery, and 25 on orthopedic/trauma surgery. The reviewed manuscripts confirmed that various frailty scales had been used to predict postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay across these surgical disciplines.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences among surgical populations, preoperative frailty assessment consistently predicts postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgeries.

Impact of perioperative hemoglobin-related parameters on clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases: identifying key markers for blood management

PURPOSE

Patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgical treatment face challenges related to preoperative anemia, intraoperative blood loss, and frailty, emphasizing the significance of perioperative blood management. This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the correlation between hemoglobin-related parameters and outcomes, identifying key markers to aid in blood management.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases. Hb-related parameters, including baseline Hb, postoperative nadir Hb, predischarge Hb, postoperative nadir Hb drift, and predischarge Hb drift (both in absolute values and percentages) were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. These analyses were conducted in conjunction with other established variables to identify independent markers predicting patient outcomes. The outcomes of interest were postoperative short-term (6-week) mortality, long-term (1-year) mortality, and postoperative 30-day morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were included. Our study demonstrated that predischarge Hb (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.88, P = 0.007) was an independent prognostic factor of short-term mortality, while baseline Hb (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P < 0.001) was identified as an independent prognostic factor of long-term mortality. Additionally, nadir Hb drift (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.97, P = 0.023) was found to be an independent prognostic factor for postoperative 30-day morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that predischarge Hb, baseline Hb, and nadir Hb drift are prognostic factors for outcomes. These findings provide a foundation for precise blood management strategies. It is crucial to consider Hb-related parameters appropriately, and prospective intervention studies addressing these markers should be conducted in the future.

The Evolution of Risk Assessment in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment is critically important in elective and high-risk interventions, particularly spine surgery. This narrative review describes the evolution of risk assessment from the earliest instruments focused on general surgical risk stratification, to more accurate and spine-specific risk calculators that quantified risk, to the current era of big data.

METHODS

The PubMed and SCOPUS databases were queried on October 11, 2023 using search terms to identify risk assessment tools (RATs) in spine surgery. A total of 108 manuscripts were included after screening with full-text review using the following inclusion criteria: 1) study population of adult spine surgical patients, 2) studies describing validation and subsequent performance of preoperative RATs, and 3) studies published in English.

RESULTS

Early RATs provided stratified patients into broad categories and allowed for improved communication between physicians. Subsequent risk calculators attempted to quantify risk by estimating general outcomes such as mortality, but then evolved to estimate spine-specific surgical complications. The integration of novel concepts such as invasiveness, frailty, genetic biomarkers, and sarcopenia led to the development of more sophisticated predictive models that estimate the risk of spine-specific complications and long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RATs have undergone a transformative shift from generalized risk stratification to quantitative predictive models. The next generation of tools will likely involve integration of radiographic and genetic biomarkers, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of these models and better inform patients, surgeons, and payers.

Predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV or Grade V Complications after Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: An Analysis of Sociodemographic, Socioeconomic, Clinical, Oncologic, and Operative Parameters

The rate of major complications and 30-day mortality after surgery for metastatic spinal tumors is relatively high. While most studies have focused on baseline comorbid conditions and operative parameters as risk factors, there is limited data on the influence of other parameters such as sociodemographic or socioeconomic data on outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed data from 165 patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between 2012-2023. The primary outcome was development of major complications (i.e., Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV complications), and the secondary outcome was 30-day mortality (i.e., Clavien-Dindo Grade V complications). An exploratory data analysis that included sociodemographic, socioeconomic, clinical, oncologic, and operative parameters was performed. Following multivariable analysis, independent predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV complications were Frankel Grade A-C, lower modified Bauer score, and lower Prognostic Nutritional Index. Independent predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade V complications) were lung primary cancer, lower modified Bauer score, lower Prognostic Nutritional Index, and use of internal fixation. No sociodemographic or socioeconomic factor was associated with either outcome. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors did not impact short-term surgical outcomes for metastatic spinal tumor patients in this study. Optimization of modifiable factors like nutritional status may be more important in improving outcomes in this complex patient population.

Advances in Surgery for Metastatic Disease of the Spine: An Update for Oncologists

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic spine disease is an increasingly common clinical challenge that requires individualised multidisciplinary care from spine surgeons and oncologists. In this article, the authors describe the recent surgical advances in patients presenting with spinal metastases.

METHODS

We present an overview of the presentation, assessment, and management of spinal metastases from the perspective of the spine surgeon, highlighting advances in surgical technology and techniques, to facilitate multidisciplinary care for this complex patient group. Neither institutional review board approval nor patient consent was needed for this review.

RESULTS

Advances in radiotherapy delivery and systemic therapy (including immunotherapy and targeted therapy) have refined operative indications for decompression of neural structures and spinal stabilisation, while advances in surgical technology and technique enable these goals to be achieved with reduced morbidity. Formulating individualised management strategies that optimise outcome, while meeting patient goals and expectations, requires a comprehensive understanding of the factors important to patient management.

CONCLUSION

Spinal metastases require prompt diagnosis and expert management by a multidisciplinary team. Improvements in systemic, radiation, and surgical therapies have broadened operative indications and increased operative candidacy, and future advances are likely to continue this trend.

External Validation of an Online Wound Infection and Wound Reoperation Risk Calculator After Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-institutional retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Wound infections are common following spine metastasis surgery and can result in unplanned reoperations. A recent study published an online wound complication risk calculator but has not yet undergone external validation. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of this risk calculator in predicting 30-day wound infections and 30-day wound reoperations using our operative spine metastasis population.

METHODS

An internal operative database was used to identify patients between 2012 and 2022. The primary outcomes were 1) any surgical site infection and 2) wound-related revision surgery within 30 days following surgery. Patient details were manually collected from electronic medical records and entered into the calculator to determine predicted complication risk percentages. Predicted risks were compared to observed outcomes using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with areas under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included. The observed 30-day postoperative wound infection incidence was 5% while the predicted wound infection incidence was 6%. In ROC analysis, good discrimination was found for the wound infection model (AUC = 0.737; P = 0.024). The observed wound reoperation rate was 5% and the predicted wound reoperation rate was 6%. ROC analysis demonstrated poor discrimination for wound reoperations (AUC = 0.559; P = 0.597).

CONCLUSIONS

The online wound-related risk calculator was found to accurately predict wound infections but not wound reoperations within our metastatic spine surgery cohort. We suggest that the model may be clinically useful despite underlying population differences, but further work must be done to generate and validate accurate prediction tools.

Utilization of Machine Learning to Model Important Features of 30-day Readmissions following Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Column Tumors: The Influence of Frailty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the relative importance and predicative power of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) on unplanned 30-day readmission after surgical intervention for metastatic spinal column tumors.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal column tumor were identified in the Nationwide Readmission Database from the years 2016 to 2018. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on the criteria of the HFRS: Low(<5), Intermediate(5-14.9), and High(≥ 15). Random Forest (RF) classification was used to construct predictive models for 30-day patient readmission. Model performance was examined using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and the Mean Decrease Gini (MDG) metric was used to quantify and rank features by relative importance.

RESULTS

There were 4346 patients included. The proportion of patients who required any readmission were higher among the Intermediate and High frailty cohorts when compared to the Low frailty cohort (Low:33.9% vs. Intermediate:39.3% vs. High:39.2%, P < .001). An RF classifier was trained to predict 30-day readmission on all features (AUC = .60) and architecturally equivalent model trained using only ten features with highest MDG (AUC = .59). Both models found frailty to have the highest importance in predicting risk of readmission. On multivariate regression analysis, Intermediate frailty [OR:1.32, CI(1.06,1.64), P = .012] was found to be an independent predictor of unplanned 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSION

Our study utilizes machine learning approaches and predictive modeling to identify frailty as a significant risk-factor that contributes to unplanned 30-day readmission after spine surgery for metastatic spinal column metastases.

Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.

Frailty: Implications for Neuroanesthesia

Frailty is increasingly prevalent in the aging neurosurgical population and is an important component of perioperative risk stratification and optimization to reduce complications. Frailty is measured using the phenotypic or deficit accumulation models, with simplified tools most commonly used in studies of neurosurgical patients. There are a limited number of frailty measurement tools that have been validated for individuals with neurological disease, and those that exist are mainly focused on spine pathology. Increasing frailty consistently predicts worse outcomes for patients across a range of neurosurgical procedures, including early complications, disability, non-home discharge, and mortality. Evidence for interventions to improve outcomes for frail neurosurgical patients is limited, and the role of bundled care pathways, prehabilitation, and multidisciplinary involvement requires further investigation. Surgery itself may be an intervention to improve frailty in selected patients, and future research should focus on identifying effective interventions to improve both short-term complications and long-term outcomes.

Development of a clinical prediction score for perioperative complications following metastatic spinal surgery (PERCOM) score

Background

Spinal metastases can impair mobility, worsening the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Surgery for spinal metastases has the potential to improve KPS and extend prognosis, but it is crucial to recognize the elevated risk of perioperative complications. Therefore, the development of a new scoring system to accurately predict perioperative complications in spinal metastatic surgery is essential.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study with 86 patients who underwent surgical intervention for spinal metastases. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of perioperative complications within 14 days after surgery. Various factors related to perioperative complications were assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses. We established a clinical prognostic scoring system called the Perioperative Complications following Metastatic Spinal Surgery (PERCOM) score and evaluated its precision using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Five variables (age, KPS, primary prostate cancer, Albumin, and Hemoglobin) identified in the univariate analysis were assigned binary values of 0 or 1. The PERCOM score was then calculated for each patient by summing the individual points, ranging from 0 to 5. The optimal threshold determined by ROC curve analysis for the PERCOM score was 2 points, with a sensitivity of 86 % and a specificity of 56 %.

Conclusions

The composite PERCOM score effectively predicted perioperative complications in spinal metastasis surgery. To further validate its precision, a prospective multicenter study is needed.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is independently associated with 90-day and 12-month mortality after metastatic spinal tumor surgery

INTRODUCTION

Estimated postoperative survival is an important consideration during the decision-making process for patients with spinal metastases. Nutritional status has been associated with poor outcomes and limited survival in the general cancer population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for postoperative mortality after spinal metastasis surgery.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients who underwent oncologic surgery for spinal metastases between April 2012 and August 2022 and had a minimum 90-day follow-up were included. PNI was calculated using preoperative serum albumin and total lymphocyte count, with PNI < 40 defined as low. The mean PNI of our cohort was 43 (standard deviation: 7.7). The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 12-month mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The 90-day mortality was 27% (37/139), and the 12-month mortality was 56% (51/91). After controlling for age, ECOG performance status, total psoas muscle cross-sectional area (TPA), and primary cancer site, the PNI was associated with 90-day mortality [odds ratio 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.94); p = 0.001]. After controlling for ECOG performance status and primary cancer site, the PNI was associated with 12-month mortality [OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97); p = 0.008]. Patients with a low PNI had a 50% mortality rate at 90 days and an 84% mortality rate at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The PNI was independently associated with 90-day and 12-month mortality after metastatic spinal tumor surgery, independent of performance status, TPA, and primary cancer site.

Is perioperative blood transfusion associated with postoperative thromboembolism or infection after metastatic spinal tumor surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with metastatic spine disease who undergo surgical intervention have a high risk of requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Perioperative transfusion has been independently associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) and infectious complications following orthopedic procedures and degenerative spinal intervention; however, literature within spine oncology is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between perioperative RBC transfusion and postoperative VTE or infection following spinal tumor surgery.

METHODS

A total of 153 patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between April 2012 and April 2022 were included. Medical records were reviewed to identify RBC transfusion administered either intraoperatively or within 96 h following surgery. The primary endpoints were: 1) development of any VTE or 2) development of any infection within 30 days following surgery. Any VTE was defined as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and any infection was defined as pneumonia, meningitis, Clostridium difficile infection, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, or sepsis. Logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 153 patients included in the study, 43 % received a perioperative RBC transfusion. The overall incidence of postoperative VTE and infection was 15 % and 22 %, respectively. In univariate analysis, perioperative transfusion was not associated with postoperative VTE (odds ratio [OR] 2.41; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.97-6.00; p = 0.058) but was associated with infection (OR 3.02; 95 % CI 1.36-6.73; p = 0.007). After adjusting for confounders such as performance status, operative time, and surgical extent, transfusion was not associated with both VTE (OR 1.25; 95 % CI 0.36-4.32; p = 0.727) or infection (OR 1.86; 95 % CI 0.70-4.92; p = 0.210). While not statistically significant, sub-analyses demonstrated a trend towards increased VTE incidence in patients requiring transfusion earlier (within 24 h) as opposed to later postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that perioperative transfusion was not an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative VTE or infection in patients undergoing metastatic spinal surgery. Further exploration of time-dependent transfusion outcomes is warranted.

Frailty indices in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases: a systematic review

Brain metastases are a relatively common occurrence in patients with primary malignancies, with an incidence ranging from 9 to 17%. Their prevalence has increased due to treatment advancements that have led to improved survival in cancer patients. Frailty has demonstrated the ability to outperform greater patient age in surgical decision-making by predicting postoperative adverse events that include mortality, extended length of hospital stay, non-routine discharge disposition, and postoperative complications. Although predictive models based on frailty have been increasingly utilized in literature, their generalizability remains questionable due to inadequacies in model development and validation. Our systematic review describes development and validation cohorts of frailty indices used in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases and serves as a guide to their incorporation in the outpatient clinical setting. A systematic review of literature was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles that reported outcomes using frailty indices in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases were included. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess for risk of bias across individual studies. Studies with NOS > 5 were considered high quality. We identified 238 articles through our search strategy. After a title and abstract screen, followed by a full text review, 9 articles met criteria for inclusion. The 5- and 11-factor modified frailty indices were most frequently utilized (n = 4). Five studies utilized single-hospital databases, and four utilized nationwide databases. Six studies were considered high-quality based on the NOS. Although frailty indices have demonstrated the ability to predict outcomes in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases, further validation of these indices is necessary prior to their incorporation in clinical practice.

Frailty Indexes in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Narrative Review

Quantification of preoperative frailty is an important prognostic tool in neurosurgical decision making. Metastatic spine tumor patients undergoing surgery are frail and have unfavorable outcomes that include an increased length of stay, unfavorable discharge disposition, and increased readmission rates. These undesirable outcomes result in higher treatment costs. A heterogeneous mixture of various frailty indexes is available with marked variance in their validation, leading to disparate clinical utility. The lack of a universally accepted definition for frailty, let alone in the method of creation or elements required in the formation of a frailty index, has resulted in a body of frailty literature lacking precision for predicting neurosurgical outcomes. In this review, we examine the role of reported frailty indexes in predicting postoperative outcomes after resection of metastatic spine tumors and aim to assist as a frailty guide for helping clinical decision making.

Life-threatening perioperative complications among older adults with spinal metastases: An analysis based on a nationwide inpatient sample of the US

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the prognostic determinants of life-threatening and fatal complications in patients <80 and ≥ 20 years of age and those ≥80 years who were undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on data between 2005 and 2018 extracted from National Inpatient Sample as the largest longitudinal hospital inpatient databases in the United States, statistical analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors (age, sex, household income, insurance status, major comorbidities, primary site of malignancy, types of surgery, surgical approaches, types of hospital admission, and hospital-related characteristics) for major and fatal perioperative complications among older adult patients.

RESULTS

A total of 31,925 patients aged ≥ 20y who were undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis were identified (< 80 y: n = 28,448; ≥ 80 y: n = 35,37). After adjustment, age ≥80 y was significantly associated with greater risk of perioperative cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.73) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07-1.41) but lower risk of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) (aOR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96) than <80y. Factors predicting life-threatening complications among patients ≥ 80y were: male sex (<80 y: aOR = 1.14; ≥ 80 y: aOR = 1.35), higher score on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (80 y, aOR = 1.21-2.67; ≥ 80 y: aOR = 1.25-2.55), open surgery (<80 y: aOR = 1.24; ≥ 80 y: aOR = 1.35), and greater Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) (<80 y: aOR = 2.48-10.03; ≥ 80 y: aOR = 2.69-11.21). Among patients <80y, factors predicting life-threatening complications were: male sex, Black race, greater CCI score, primary tumor at kidney, hematologic cancer, other/unspecified primary site, certain surgical procedures, open surgery, greater MSTFI, emergent admission, and low hospital volume.

DISCUSSION

This study identifies a list of independent risk factors for the presence of life-threatening complications among patients <80 and ≥ 80y who were undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis. The findings contribute to the development of clinical strategies for the surgical management of spinal metastasis, especially for octogenarians, and lower the risk of unfavorable inpatient outcomes.

Prospective application of the risk analysis index to measure preoperative frailty in spinal tumor surgery: A single center outcomes analysis

Introduction

Surgeons are frequently faced with challenging clinical dilemmas evaluating whether the benefits of surgery outweigh the substantial risks routinely encountered with spinal tumor surgery. The Clinical Risk Analysis Index (RAI-C) is a robust frailty tool administered via a patient-friendly questionnaire that strives to augment preoperative risk stratification. The objective of the study was to prospectively measure frailty with RAI-C and track postoperative outcomes after spinal tumor surgery.

Methods

Patients surgically treated for spinal tumors were followed prospectively from 7/2020-7/2022 at a single tertiary center. RAI-C was ascertained during preoperative visits and verified by the provider. The RAI-C scores were assessed in relation to postoperative functional status (measured by modified Rankin Scale score [mRS]) at the last follow-up visit.

Results

Of 39 patients, 47% were robust (RAI 0-20), 26% normal (21-30), 16% frail (31-40), and 11% severely frail (RAI 41+).). Pathology included primary (59%) and metastatic (41%) tumors with corresponding mRS>2 rates of 17% and 38%, respectively. Tumors were classified as extradural (49%), intradural extramedullary (46%), or intradural intramedullary (5.4%) with mRS>2 rates of 28%, 24%, and 50%, respectively. RAI-C had a positive association with mRS>2 ​at follow-up: 16% for robust, 20% for normal, 43% for frail, and 67% for severely frail. The two deaths in the series had the highest RAI-C scores (45 and 46) and were patients with metastatic cancer. The RAI-C was a robust and diagnostically accurate predictor of mRS>2 in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (C-statistic: 0.70, 95 CI: 0.49-0.90).

Conclusions

The findings exemplify the clinical utility of RAI-C frailty scoring for prediction of outcomes after spinal tumor surgery and it has potential to help in the surgical decision-making process as well as surgical consent. As a preliminary case series, the authors intend to provide additional data with a larger sample size and longer follow-up duration in a future study.

Predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for metastatic disease of the spine: the H2-FAILS score

PURPOSE

Scoring systems for metastatic spine disease focus on predicting long- to medium-term mortality or a combination of perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, accurate prediction of perioperative mortality alone may be the most important factor when considering surgical intervention. We aimed to develop and evaluate a new tool, the H2-FAILS score, to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified 1195 adults who underwent surgery for metastatic spine disease from 2010 to 2018. Incidence of 30-day mortality was 8.7% (n = 104). Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were used to derive the H2-FAILS score. H2-FAILS is an acronym for: Heart failure (2 points), Functional dependence, Albumin deficiency, International normalized ratio elevation, Leukocytosis, and Smoking (1 point each). Discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The H2-FAILS score was compared with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA Class), the 5-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), and the New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS). Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping. Alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Predicted 30-day mortality was 1.8% for an H2-FAILS score of 0 and 78% for a score of 6. AUC of the H2-FAILS was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.81), which was higher than the mFI-5 (AUC 0.58, p < 0.001), ASA Class (AUC 0.63, p < 0.001), and NESMS (AUC 0.70, p = 0.004). Internal validation showed an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

The H2-FAILS score accurately predicts 30-day mortality after surgery for spinal metastasis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III.

Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Disease in Octogenarians and Above: Analysis of 78 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

Octogenarians living with spinal metastases are a challenging population to treat. Our objective was to identify the rate, types, management, and predictors of complications and survival in octogenarians following surgery for spinal metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients aged 80 years or older who underwent surgery for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between 2008 and 2019 were included. Demographic, intraoperative, complications, and postoperative follow-up data was collected. Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression were used to associate variables with overall survival and postoperative complications, respectively.

RESULTS

78 patients (mean 83.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Average operative time and blood loss were 157 minutes and 615 mL, respectively. The median length of stay was 7 days. The overall complication rate was 31% (N = 24), with 21% considered major and 7% considered life-threatening or fatal. Blood loss was significantly associated with postoperative complications (OR = 1.002; P = 0.02) and mortality (HR = 1.0007; P = 0.04). Significant associations of increased risk of death were also noted with surgeries with decompression, and cervical/cervicothoracic index level of disease. For deceased patients, median time to death was 4.5 months. For living patients, median follow-up was 14.5 months. The Kaplan-Meier based median overall survival for the cohort was 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.2-19.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarians undergoing surgery with instrumentation for spinal metastases, the median overall survival is 11.6 months. There is an increased complication rate, but only 7% are life-threatening or fatal. Patients are at increased risk for complications and mortality particularly when performing decompression with stabilization, with increasing intraoperative blood loss, and with cervical/cervicothoracic tumors.

Assessment of the impact of frailty on adverse surgical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial tumors using modified frailty index: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Modified frailty index (MFI) is an emerging quantitative measure of frailty; however, the quantified risk of adverse outcomes in surgeries for intracranial tumors associated with increasing MFI scores has not been thoroughly reviewed in a comprehensive manner.

METHODS

MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to identify observational studies on the association between 5 and 11 item-modified frailty index (MFI) and perioperative outcomes for neurosurgical procedures including complications, mortality, readmission, and reoperation rate. Primary analysis pooled all comparisons with MFI scores greater than or equal to 1 versus non-frail participants using mixed-effects multilevel model for each outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 24 studies were included in the review and 19 studies with 114,707 surgical operations were included in the meta-analysis. While increasing MFI scores were associated with worse prognosis for all included outcomes, reoperation rate was only significantly higher in patients with MFI ≥ 3. Among surgical pathologies, glioblastoma was influenced by a greater extent to the impact of frailty on complications and mortality that most other etiologies. In agreement with qualitative evaluation of the included studies, meta-regression did not reveal association between mean age of the comparisons and complications rate.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis provides quantitative risk assessment of adverse outcomes in neuro-oncological surgeries with increased frailty. The majority of literature suggests that MFI is a superior and independent predictor of adverse outcomes compared to age.

Racial Disparities in Perioperative Morbidity Following Oncological Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of race on complications following spinal tumor surgery.

METHODS

Adults with cancer who underwent spine tumor surgery were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2012 to 2016. Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (minor complications) and Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V (major complications including 30-day mortality) complications were compared between non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) and Black patients. A multivariable analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

Of 1,226 identified patients, 85.9% were NHW (n = 1,053) and 14.1% were Black (n = 173). The overall rate of Grade I-II complications was 16.2%; 15.1% for NHW patients and 23.1% for Black patients (P = .008). On multivariable analysis, Black patients had significantly higher odds of having a minor complication (OR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.16-3.01; P = .010). On the other hand, the overall rate of Grade III-V complications was 13.3%; 12.5% for NHW patients and 16.2% for Black patients (P = .187). On multivariable analysis, Black race was not independently associated with major complications (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.71-2.23; P = .430). Median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 5-13) for NHW patients and 10 days (IQR 6-15) for Black patients (P = .011).

CONCLUSION

Black patients who underwent metastatic spinal tumor surgery were at a significantly increased risk of perioperative morbidity compared to NHW patients independent of baseline and operative characteristics. Major complications did not differ between groups. Race should be further studied in the context of metastatic spine disease to improve our understanding of these disparities.

Prevalence and Influence of Frailty on Hospital Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Spinal Meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

Frailty has been shown to affect patient outcomes after medical and surgical interventions. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a growing metric used to assess patient frailty using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of frailty, assessed by HFRS, on health care resource utilization and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for spinal meningiomas.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients with benign or malignant spinal meningiomas, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, were stratified by HFRS: low frailty (HFRS <5) and intermediate-high frailty (HFRS ≥5). Patient demographics, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, procedural variables, adverse events, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and cost of admission were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of increased LOS, discharge disposition, and cost.

RESULTS

Of the 3345 patients, 530 (15.8%) had intermediate-high frailty. The intermediate-high cohort was significantly older (P < 0.001). More patients in the intermediate-high cohort had ≥3 comorbidities (P < 0.001). In addition, a greater proportion of patients in the intermediate-high cohort experienced ≥1 perioperative adverse events (P < 0.001). Intermediate-high patients experienced greater mean LOS (P < 0.001) and accrued greater costs (P < 0.001). A greater proportion of intermediate-high patients had nonroutine discharges (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increased HFRS (≥5) was independently associated with extended LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.04; P < 0.001), nonroutine discharge (aOR, 1.98; P = 0.006), and increased costs (aOR, 2.39; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty may be associated with increased health care resource utilization in patients undergoing surgery for spinal meningiomas.

Preoperative anemia and deep vein thrombosis in patients with perioperative bone trauma: a cohort study

Background

In current active prevention (including physical and drug prevention), the incidence of perioperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities remains high in patients with bone trauma. Risk factors need to be further optimized, and high-risk patients must be identified early. Preoperative comorbidities, especially preoperative anemia, and DVT in patients with perioperative bone trauma are not clear. The purpose of this study was to explore the causal relationship between preoperative anemia and DVT in patients with perioperative bone trauma, and further reduce the incidence of DVT in patients with bone trauma.

Objectives

To analyze the relationship between preoperative anemia and perioperative DVT in patients with femoral and pelvic fractures and provide a reference for the optimization of risk factors for DVT.

Methods

The clinical data of 1049 patients with femoral and pelvic fractures who received surgical treatment from May 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for the covariates of DVT. Modified Poisson regression was used to analyze the relationship between preoperative anemia and DVT.

Results

After matching 1:1 propensity scores in 1049 patients included in this study, there were 258 patients in the anemic and non-anemic groups. Preoperative anemia was statistically significant for the formation of DVT in patients with perioperative bone trauma (P = 0.000, RR = 1.567 [95% CI 1.217–2.017]). This conclusion remained true after PSM (P = 0.009, RR = 1.500 [95% CI 1.105–2.036]). Preoperative anemia has some predictive value for perioperative DVT, with DVT-associated preoperative anemia thresholds of 125 g/L and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.5877 (95% CI 0.5345 to 0.6408). On this basis, sensitivity and specificity were 89.2 and 30.3%, respectively, with a Youden index of 0.195. In addition, we conducted an E-value determination of the propensity score; the E-value analysis showed robustness to unmeasured confounding.

Conclusions

Preoperative anemia is highly correlated with perioperative DVT in patients with bone trauma, which is the cause of perioperative DVT in these patients.

Osteopenia and Sarcopenia as Potential Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a feared complication in spinal surgery, that leads to lower outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Among its risk factors, sarcopenia and osteopenia have recently attracted particular interest. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the influence of sarcopenia and osteopenia on the postoperative infection rate in patients treated with posterior fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. This retrospective study included data from 308 patients. Charts were reviewed and central sarcopenia and osteopenia were evaluated through magnetic resonance images (MRI), measuring the psoas to lumbar vertebral index (PLVI) and the M score. Multivariate linear regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for infection. The postoperative SSI rate was 8.4%. Patients with low PLVI scores were not more likely to experience postoperative SSI (p = 0.68), while low M-score patients were at higher risk of developing SSI (p = 0.04). However, they did not generally show low PLVI values (p = 0.5) and were homogeneously distributed between low and high PLVI (p = 0.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed a low M score to be an independent risk factor for SSI (p = 0.01). Our results suggest that osteopenia could have significant impact on spinal surgery, and prospective studies are needed to better investigate its role.

The measurements of frailty and their possible application to spinal conditions: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty is associated with an increased risk of postoperative adverse events (AEs) within the surgical spine population. Multiple frailty tools have been reported in the surgical spine literature. However, the applicability of these tools remains unclear.

PURPOSE

Primary objective is to appraise the construct, feasibility, objectivity, and clinimetric properties of frailty tools reported in the surgical spine literature. Secondary objectives included determining the applicability and the most sensitive surgical spine population for each tool.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Studies reporting the use of a clinical frailty tool with a defined methodology in the adult surgical population (age ≥18 years).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative adverse events (AEs) including mortality, major and minor morbidity, length of stay (LOS), unplanned readmission and reoperation, admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and adverse discharge disposition; postoperative patient-reported outcomes (health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional, cognitive, and symptomatic); radiographic outcomes; and postoperative frailty trajectory.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019109045. Publications from January 1950 to December 2020 were identified by a comprehensive search of PubMed, Ovid, and Embase, supplemented by manual screening. Studies reporting and validating a frailty tool in the surgical spine population with a measurable outcome were included. Each tool and its clinimetric properties were evaluated using validated criteria and definitions. The applicability of each tool and its most sensitive surgical spine population was determined by panel consensus. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

47 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. A total of 14 separate frailty tools were identified, in which 9 tools assessed frailty according to the cumulative deficit definition, while 4 instruments utilized phenotypic or weighted frailty models. One instrument assessed frailty according to the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) model. Twelve measures were validated as risk stratification tools for predicting postoperative AEs, while 1 tool investigated the effect of spine surgery on postoperative frailty trajectory. The modified frailty index (mFI), 5-item mFI, adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI), FRAIL Scale, and CGA had the most positive ratings for clinimetric properties assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of frailty is important in the surgical decision-making process. Cumulative deficit and weighted frailty instruments are appropriate risk stratification tools. Phenotypic tools are sensitive for capturing the relationship between spinal pathology, spine surgery, and prehabilitation on frailty trajectory. CGA instruments are appropriate screening tools for identifying health deficits susceptible to improvement and guiding optimization strategies. Studies are needed to determine whether spine surgery and prehabilitation are effective interventions to reverse frailty.

Evaluating frailty, mortality, and complications associated with metastatic spine tumor surgery using machine learning-derived body composition analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients with spinal metastases may undergo surgery without clear assessments of prognosis, thereby impacting the optimal palliative strategy. Because the morbidity of surgery may adversely impact recovery and initiation of adjuvant therapies, evaluation of risk factors associated with mortality risk and complications is critical. Evaluation of body composition of cancer patients as a surrogate for frailty is an emerging area of study for improving preoperative risk stratification.

METHODS

To examine the associations of muscle characteristics and adiposity with postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality in patients with spinal metastases, the authors designed an observational study of 484 cancer patients who received surgical treatment for spinal metastases between 2010 and 2019. Sarcopenia, muscle radiodensity, visceral adiposity, and subcutaneous adiposity were assessed on routinely available 3-month preoperative CT images by using a validated deep learning methodology. The authors used k-means clustering analysis to identify patients with similar body composition characteristics. Regression models were used to examine the associations of sarcopenia, frailty, and clusters with the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Of 484 patients enrolled, 303 had evaluable CT data on muscle and adiposity (mean age 62.00 ± 11.91 years; 57.8% male). The authors identified 2 clusters with significantly different body composition characteristics and mortality risks after spine metastases surgery. Patients in cluster 2 (high-risk cluster) had lower muscle mass index (mean ± SD 41.16 ± 7.99 vs 50.13 ± 10.45 cm2/m2), lower subcutaneous fat area (147.62 ± 57.80 vs 289.83 ± 109.31 cm2), lower visceral fat area (82.28 ± 48.96 vs 239.26 ± 98.40 cm2), higher muscle radiodensity (35.67 ± 9.94 vs 31.13 ± 9.07 Hounsfield units [HU]), and significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-2.01, p = 0.02) than individuals in cluster 1 (low-risk cluster). Decreased muscle mass, muscle radiodensity, and adiposity were not associated with a higher rate of complications after surgery. Prolonged length of stay (> 7 days) was associated with low muscle radiodensity (mean 30.87 vs 35.23 HU, 95% CI 1.98-6.73, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Body composition analysis shows promise for better risk stratification of patients with spinal metastases under consideration for surgery. Those with lower muscle mass and subcutaneous and visceral adiposity are at greater risk for inferior outcomes.

Which frailty scales for patients with adult spinal deformity are feasible and adequate? A systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty as a concept is not yet fully understood, and is not the same as comorbidity. It is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after surgery, which makes its preoperative assessment significant. Despite its relevance, it still remains unclear which scales are appropriate for use in patients with spinal pathology.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and measurement properties of frailty scales for spine patients, specifically with adult spinal deformity (ASD), and to propose adequate scales for primary triage to prevent surgery in too frail patients and for preoperative assessment to modify patients' condition and surgical plans.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

METHODS

Systematic search was performed between 2010 and 2021 including terms relating to spinal disorders, frailty scales, and methodological quality. Characteristics of the studies and frailty scales and data describing relation to treatment outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias was determined with the QAREL score.

RESULTS

Of the 1993 references found, 88 original studies were included and 23 scales were identified. No prospective interventional study was found where the preoperative frailty assessment was implemented. Predictive value of scales for surgical outcomes varied, dependent on spinal disorders, type of surgeries, patients' age and frailty at baseline, and outcomes. Seventeen studies reported measurement properties of eight scales but these studies were not free of bias. In 30 ASD studies, ASD-Frailty Index (ASD-FI, n=14) and 11-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-11, n=11) were most frequently used. These scales were mainly studied in registry studies including young adult population, and carry a risk of sample bias and make their validity in elderly population unclear. ASD-FI covers multidisciplinary concepts of frailty with 40 items but its feasibility in clinical practice is questionable due to its length. The Risk Analysis Index, another multidisciplinary scale with 14 items, has been implemented for preoperative assessment in other surgical domains and was proven to be feasible and effective in interventional prospective studies. The FRAIL is a simple questionnaire with five items and its predictive value was confirmed in prospective cohort studies in which only elderly patients were included.

CONCLUSIONS

No adequate scale was identified in terms of methodological quality and feasibility for daily practice. Careful attention should be paid when choosing an adequate scale, which depends on the setting of interest (eg triage or preoperative work-up). We recommend to further study a simple and predictive scale such as FRAIL for primary triage and a comprehensive and feasible scale such as Risk Analysis Index for preoperative assessment for patients undergoing spine surgery, as their adequacy has been shown in other medical domains.

Systemic considerations for the surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease: a scoping literature review

Systemic assessment is a pillar in the neurological, oncological, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision-making framework for the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic disease. Despite this importance, emerging evidence relating systemic considerations to clinical outcomes following surgery for spinal metastatic disease has not been comprehensively summarised. We aimed to conduct a scoping literature review of this broad topic. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from Jan 1, 2000, to July 31, 2021. 61 articles were included, accounting for a total of 22 335 patients. Preoperative systemic variables negatively associated with postoperative clinical outcomes included demographics (eg, older age [>60 years], Black race, male sex, low or elevated body-mass index, and smoking status), medical comorbidities (eg, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine, vascular, and rheumatological), biochemical abnormalities (eg, hypoalbuminaemia, atypical blood cell counts, and elevated C-reactive protein concentration), low muscle mass, generalised motor weakness (American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and Frankel grade) and poor ambulation, reduced performance status, and systemic disease burden. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to broadly summarise emerging evidence relevant to the systemic assessment component of the widely used NOMS framework for spinal metastatic disease decision making. Medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists can consider these findings when prognosticating spinal metastatic disease-related surgical outcomes on the basis of patients' systemic condition. These factors might inform a shared decision-making approach with patients and their families.

Assessment of Frailty Indices and Charlson Comorbidity Index for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spine Metastases: A National Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive ability of Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) and the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) on adverse outcomes, compared with the known Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019. All adult patients undergoing various procedures for extradural spinal metastases were identified. Patients were stratified into frail and nonfrail cohorts based on CCI, mFI-5, and MSTFI scores. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of prolonged length of stay, nonroutine discharge, adverse events, and unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

Of the 1613 patients included in this study, 21.4% had a CCI >0, 56.6% had an mFI-5 >0, and 76.7% of patients had an MSTFI >0. On multivariate analysis, all 3 indices were found to be predictive of nonroutine discharge (CCI: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.41 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.37 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.5) and adverse events (CCI: aOR, 1.53 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.23 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.43). High CCI (adjusted relative risk, 1.67) and MSTFI (adjusted relative risk, 1.14), but not mFI-5, were also associated with a prolonged length of stay, whereas MSTFI was found to be the only significant predictor of unplanned readmission (aOR, 1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that MSTFI frailty index may be more sensitive than both CCI and mFI-5 in identifying adverse outcomes after spine surgery for metastases.

The impact of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the impact of patient frailty status on postoperative complications in those undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was retrospectively queried between 2016 and 2017 for patients receiving multi-level lumbar fusion surgery. Demographics, frailty status, and relevant complications were queried at index admission and readmission intervals. Primary outcome measures included perioperative complications and 30-, 90-, and 180-day complication and readmission rates. Perioperative complications of interest were infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), and posthemorrhagic anemia. Secondary outcome measures included inpatient length of stay (LOS), adjusted all-payer costs, and discharge disposition. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching for demographics was implemented to identify non-frail patients with similar diagnoses and procedures. Subgroup analysis of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery within frail and non-frail cohorts was conducted to evaluate differences in surgical and medical complication rates. The analysis used nonparametric Mann-Whitney U testing and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Frail patients encountered higher rates perioperative complications including posthemorrhagic anemia (OR: 1.73, 95%CI 1.50-2.00, p < 0.0001), infection (OR: 2.94, 95%CI 2.04-4.36, p < 0.0001), UTI (OR: 2.57, 95%CI 2.04-3.26, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of non-routine discharge (OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.80-2.38, p < 0.0001). Frail patients had significantly greater LOS and total all-payer inpatient costs compared to non-frail patients (p < 0.0001). Frailty was associated with significantly higher rates of 90- (OR: 1.43, 95%CI 1.18-1.74, p = 0.0003) and 180-day (OR: 1.28, 95%CI 1.03-1.60, p = 0.02) readmissions along with higher rates of wound dehiscence (OR: 2.21, 95%CI 1.17-4.44, p = 0.02) at 90 days. Subgroup analysis revealed that frail patients were at significantly higher risk for surgical complications with open surgery (16%) compared to MIS (0%, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between surgical approaches with respect to medical complications in both cohorts, nor surgical complications in non-frail patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was associated with higher odds of all perioperative complications, LOS, and all-payer costs following multi-level lumbar fusion. Frail patients had significantly higher rates of 90 and 180-day readmission and higher rates of wound disruption at 90-days. On subgroup analysis, MIS was associated with significantly reduced rates of surgical complications specifically in frail patients. Our results suggest frailty status to be an important predictor of perioperative complications and long-term readmissions in geriatric patients receiving multi-level lumbar fusions. Frail patients should undergo surgery utilizing minimally invasive techniques to minimize risk of surgical complications. Future studies should explore the utility of implementing frailty in risk stratification assessments for patients undergoing spine surgery.

Comparison of frailty metrics and the Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for spine metastases

OBJECTIVE

Frailty-the state defined by decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to physiological stress-is exceedingly common in oncology patients. Given the palliative nature of spine metastasis surgery, it is imperative that patients be healthy enough to tolerate the physical insult of surgery. In the present study, the authors compared the association of two frailty metrics and the widely used Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with postoperative morbidity in spine metastasis patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent operations for spinal metastases at a comprehensive cancer center were identified. Data on patient demographic characteristics, disease state, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Frailty was measured with the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) and metastatic spinal tumor frailty index (MSTFI). Outcomes of interest were length of stay (LOS) greater than the 75th percentile of the cohort, nonroutine discharge, and the occurrence of ≥ 1 postoperative complication.

RESULTS

In total, 322 patients were included (mean age 59.5 ± 12 years; 56.9% of patients were male). The mean ± SD LOS was 11.2 ± 9.9 days, 44.5% of patients had nonroutine discharge, and 24.0% experienced ≥ 1 postoperative complication. On multivariable analysis, increased frailty on mFI-5 and MSTFI was independently predictive of all three outcomes: prolonged LOS (OR 1.67 per point, 95% CI 1.06-2.63, p = 0.03; and OR 1.63 per point, 95% CI 1.29-2.05, p < 0.01, respectively), nonroutine discharge (OR 2.65 per point, 95% CI 1.74-4.04, p < 0.01; and OR 1.69 per point, 95% CI 1.36-2.11, p < 0.01), and ≥ 1 complication (OR 1.95 per point, 95% CI 1.23-3.09, p = 0.01; and OR 1.41 per point, 95% CI 1.12-1.77, p < 0.01). CCI was found to be independently predictive of only the occurrence of ≥ 1 postoperative complication (OR 1.45 per point, 95% CI 1.22-1.72, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty measured with either mFI-5 or MSTFI scores was a more robust independent predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes than the more widely used CCI. Both mFI-5 and MSTFI were significantly associated with prolonged LOS, higher complication rates, and nonroutine discharge. Further investigation in a prospective multicenter cohort is merited.

The performance of frailty in predictive modeling of short-term outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic tumors to the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The concept of frailty has become increasingly recognized, and while patients with cancer are at increased risk for frailty, its influence on perioperative outcomes in metastatic spine tumors is uncertain. Furthermore, the impact of frailty can be confounded by comorbidities or metastatic disease burden.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of frailty and comorbidities on adverse outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic spine disease.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective analysis of a nationwide database to include patients undergoing spinal fusion for metastatic spine disease.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 1,974 frail patients who received spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, and 1,975 propensity score matched non-frail patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes analyzed included mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharges and costs.

METHODS

A validated binary frailty index (Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups) was used to identify frail and non-frail groups, and propensity score-matched analysis (including demographics, comorbidities, surgical and tumor characteristics) was performed. Sub-group analysis of levels involved was performed for cervical, thoracic, lumbar and junctional spine. Multivariable-regression techniques were used to develop predictive models for outcomes using frailty and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).

RESULTS

7,772 patients underwent spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, of which 1,974 (25.4%) patients were identified as frail. Following propensity score matching for frail (n=1,974) and not-frail (n=1,975) groups, frailty demonstrated significantly greater medical complications (OR=1.58; 95% CI 1.33-1.86), surgical complications (OR=1.46; 95% CI 1.15-1.85), LOS (OR=2.65; 95% CI 2.09-3.37), nonroutine discharges (OR=1.79; 95% CI 1.46-2.20) and costs (OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.32-2.14). Differences in mortality were only observed in subgroup analysis and were greater in frail junctional and lumbar spine subgroups. Models using ECI alone (AUC=0.636-0.788) demonstrated greater predictive ability compared to those using frailty alone (AUC=0.633-0.752). However, frailty combined with ECI improved the prediction of increased LOS (AUC=0.811), cost (AUC=0.768), medical complications (AUC=0.723) and nonroutine discharges (AUC=0.718). Predictive modeling of frailty in subgroups demonstrated the greatest performance for mortality (AUC=0.750) in the lumbar spine, otherwise performed similarly for LOS, costs, complications, and discharge across subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of frailty existed in the current patient cohort. Frailty contributed to worse short-term adverse outcomes and could be more influential in the lumbar and junctional spine due to higher risk of deconditioning in the postoperative period. Predictions for short term outcomes can be improved by adding frailty to comorbidity indices, suggesting a more comprehensive preoperative risk stratification should include frailty.

Differences in Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Column Tumors in Patients with a Concurrent Affective Disorder in the United States

BACKGROUND

Affective disorders, such as depression and anxiety, are exceedingly common among patients with metastatic cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between affective disorders and healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing surgery for a spinal column metastasis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2018 National Inpatient Sample database. All adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing surgery for a metastatic spinal tumor were identified using the ICD-10-CM coding systems. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: No Affective Disorder (No-AD) and Affective Disorder (AD). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events (AEs), LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospital admission were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of increased cost, non-routine discharge, and prolonged LOS.

RESULTS

Of the 8,360 patients identified, 1,710 (20.5%) had a diagnosis of AD. While no difference was observed in the rates of postoperative AEs between the cohorts (p=0.912), the AD cohort had a significantly longer mean LOS (No-AD:10.1±8.3 days vs AD:11.6±9.8 days, p=0.012) and greater total cost (No-AD:$53,165±35,512 vs AD:$59,282±36,917, p=0.011). No significant differences in non-routine discharge were observed between the cohorts (p=0.265). On multivariate regression analysis, having an affective disorder was a significant predictor of increased costs [OR:1.45, CI(1.03,2.05), p=0.034] and non-routine discharge [OR:1.40, CI(1.06,1.85), p=0.017], but not prolonged LOS (p=0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that affective disorders were significantly associated with greater hospital expenditures and non-routine discharge, but not prolonged LOS, for patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.

PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH SPINE TUMOR OPERATED IN A SOUTH AMERICAN REFERENCE SERVICE. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective was to conduct an analytical epidemiological study to understand the profile, treatment, and outcome of patients with spinal tumors in a Brazilian Quaternary Hospital of the SUS. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of data from the last five years was performed. It was described qualitative characteristics evaluated by absolute and relative frequencies and quantitative characteristics by sintetized measures. Associations between characteristics were verified using chi-square tests or exact tests. Results: 92 patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 56.1 years (±14.7), with 48 men (52.2%) and 44 women (47.8%). The types of tumors organized in the three proposed groups had 19 multiple myelomas (20.7%), 62 metastases (67.3%), and 11 other tumors (12%). The neurological status measured through the ASIA score was A: 5.4%, B: 22.8%, C: 26.1%, D: 35.9%, E: 9.8%. Karnofsky was prevalent in the 50-70 range with 65.2%. The total hospitalization period had a mean of 22.8±18 days, preoperatively 11.9±9.2 days, and postoperatively 10.9±14 days. Karnofsky presented lower values according to the worst ASIA (p < 0.001). A total of 12 patients (13%) died during hospitalization. The total and postoperative length of stay was longer in patients who died (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides epidemiological data that allow an understanding of the profile of patients with spinal tumors in the Brazilian Public Health System. The severity of the patients is higher when compared to most of the series cases in the literature. The patients with longer hospitalization stay died. Level of evidence IV; Case series.

Comparison of three predictive scoring systems for morbidity in oncological spine surgery

Estimating complications in oncological spine surgery is challenging. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of three scoring systems for predicting perioperative morbidity after surgery for spinal metastases. One-hundred and five patients who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2019 were included in this study. All patients had scores retrospectively calculated using the New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS), Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI), and Anzuategui scoring systems. The main outcome measure was development of a medical complication (minor or major) within 30 days of surgery. The predictive ability for each system was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculations of the area under the curve (AUC). The average age for all patients was 61 years and 61/105 patients (58.1%) were male. The most common primary tumor origins were hematologic (23.8%), prostate (16.2%), breast (14.3%), and lung (13.3%). The overall 30-day complication rate was 36.2% and the rate of major complications was 21.9%. Among all patients who underwent oncological spine surgery, the NESMS score had the highest AUC for 30-day overall (AUC 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 - 0.75) and major morbidity (AUC 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54- 0.81) in our population. However, the accuracy did not meet the threshold for clinical utility. Future prospective validation of these systems in other populations is encouraged.

Perioperative Care of Patients Undergoing Major Complex Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Clinical Practice Guidelines From the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care

Evidence-based standardization of the perioperative management of patients undergoing complex spine surgery can improve outcomes such as enhanced patient satisfaction, reduced intensive care and hospital length of stay, and reduced costs. The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) tasked an expert group to review existing evidence and generate recommendations for the perioperative management of patients undergoing complex spine surgery, defined as surgery on 2 or more thoracic and/or lumbar spine levels. Institutional clinical management protocols can be constructed based on the elements included in these clinical practice guidelines, and the evidence presented.