Relationship between corticosteroid exposure and plasma lipid levels in heart transplant recipients

Assessing cumulative exposure to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: Metrics, outcomes, and implications for transplant patients

Immunosuppressive drugs are used in the management of transplant patients to prevent organ rejection. However, immunosuppression can be associated with adverse effects such as infections and cancers. This study aimed to characterize the measures of cumulative immunosuppressive drug exposure (CIDE) used in the literature and their associated outcomes in transplant patients. A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using search terms related to maintenance immunosuppressants and CIDE. Study risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Thirty-one articles were included in this qualitative synthesis. Sixteen articles (52 %) calculated the total dose of immunosuppression over the treatment period, while eight (26 %) used area-under-the-curve of trough level concentrations to quantify CIDE. Five (16 %) articles investigated time-weighted metrics of calcineurin inhibitors and four (13 %) used other metrics that could not be categorized into the previous groups. Most studies investigated CIDE with calcineurin inhibitors and used additive dosing methods. This approach was also popular with corticosteroids and multi-drug exposures. The variety of metrics used in the literature reveals a lack of standardization in the evaluation of CIDE and long-term outcomes. Future studies should validate these metrics for clinical application, especially pertaining to infectious outcomes.

Metabolic Disorders in Liver Transplant Recipients: The State of the Art

Liver transplantation represents a chief therapeutic approach for acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite witnessing advancements in short- and medium-term survival over recent decades, attributed to refinements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols, long-term mortality remains impervious to modification. Notably, cardiovascular disease emerges as a predominant cause of mortality among liver transplant recipients. This trend is accentuated by the increasing prominence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis as an indication for liver transplantation. Moreover, the administration of immunosuppressive agents is intricately linked to the degradation of the metabolic profile in liver transplant recipients, thereby contributing to the initiation or exacerbation of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. In addition, the post-liver transplantation period is marked by a decline in lifestyle quality and a failure to acknowledge the psychological distress experienced by patients throughout the transplant process. These factors can precipitate a deterioration in the patient's metabolic profile, exacerbated by suboptimal therapeutic compliance. This narrative review aims to comprehensively address the principal metabolic disorders intricately associated with liver transplantation.

Immunosuppression in solid organ-transplant recipients and impact on nutrition support

A key component to nutrition support is to consider immunosuppressive agents, the interaction with nutrients, and how the side effects of the medications influence nutrition support. The immunosuppression of the solid organ-transplant recipient involves the individualized titration of multiple therapeutic agents to prevent allorecognition and, thus, rejection of the transplanted organ. Induction immunosuppression includes the agents used at the time of transplant to prevent early rejection. Maintenance immunosuppression typically consists of oral medications taken for life. Regular therapeutic monitoring of immunosuppression is necessary to balance the risk of rejection with that of infections and malignancy. In the acute-care setting, multidisciplinary collaboration, including pharmacy and nutrition, is needed to optimize the route of administration, titration, and side effects of immunosuppression. Long-term nutrition management after transplant is also vital to prevent exacerbating adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapies, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and bone loss. This review summarizes common immunosuppressive agents currently utilized in solid organ-transplant recipients and factors that may influence decisions on nutrition support.

Dyslipidemia in Transplant Patients: Which Therapy?

Cardiovascular disease is the most important cause of death worldwide in recent years; an increasing trend is also shown in organ transplant patients subjected to immunosuppressive therapies, in which cardiovascular diseases represent one of the most frequent causes of long-term mortality. This is also linked to immunosuppressant-induced dyslipidemia, which occurs in 27 to 71% of organ transplant recipients. The aim of this review is to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying dyslipidemia in patients treated with immunosuppressants to identify immunosuppressive therapies which do not cause dyslipidemia or therapeutic pathways effective in reducing hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, or both, without further adverse events.

Secondary dyslipidemia: its treatments and association with atherosclerosis

Dyslipidemia is classified into primary and secondary types. Primary dyslipidemia is basically inherited and caused by single or multiple gene mutations that result in either overproduction or defective clearance of triglycerides and cholesterol. Secondary dyslipidemia is caused by unhealthy lifestyle factors and acquired medical conditions, including underlying diseases and applied drugs. Secondary dyslipidemia accounts for approximately 30-40% of all dyslipidemia. Secondary dyslipidemia should be treated by finding and addressing its causative diseases or drugs. For example, treatment of secondary dyslipidemia, such as hyperlipidemia due to hypothyroidism, by using statin without controlling hypothyroidism, may lead to myopathy and serious adverse events such as rhabdomyolysis. Differential diagnosis of secondary dyslipidemia is very important for safe and effective treatment. Here, we describe an overview about diseases and drugs that interfere with lipid metabolism leading to secondary dyslipidemia. Further, we show the association of each secondary dyslipidemia with atherosclerosis and the treatments for such dyslipidemia.

Evolocumab and lipoprotein apheresis combination therapy may have synergic effects to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A case report

A 49 years old woman (weight 68 kg, BMI 27.3 kg/m² ) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and multiple statin intolerance with muscle aches and creatine kinase elevation, presented at the Outpatient Lipid Clinic of Verona University Hospital in May 2015. Hypercholesterolemia was firstly diagnosed during adolescence, followed in adulthood by a diagnosis of Cogan's syndrome, a rheumatologic disorder characterized by corneal and inner ear inflammation. No xanthomas, corneal arcus, or vascular bruits were detectable at physical examination. Screening for macrovascular complications did not reveal relevant damages. Ongoing medical therapy included salicylic acid, methylprednisolone, methotrexate, and protonic-pump inhibitor. In the absence of specific lipid-lowering therapy, plasma lipid levels at first visit were: total-cholesterol = 522 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol = 434 mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol = 84 mg/dL, triglycerides = 120 mg/dL, Lp(a) = 13 mg/dL. On December 2015, evolocumab 140 mg sc every 2 weeks was initiated. After a 24-week treatment, the LDL-cholesterol levels decreased by an average of 21.2% to 342 ± 22 mg/dL (mean ± SD). On May 2016, LDL-apheresis (H.E.L.P.system) was started as add-on therapy. Compared to the average levels obtained during the evolocumab monotherapy period, the LDL-cholesterol was reduced by 49.4%, thus reaching an inter-apheresis level (mean ± SD) of 173 ± 37 mg/dL. This report suggests that a combination therapy with evolocumab and lipoprotein-apheresis may have synergic effects on circulating lipid levels. Its relevance as a highly effective treatment option for hyperlipidemia in HeFH patients warrants further investigation in larger datasets.

The role of endothelial cell adhesion molecules in the development of atherosclerosis

The vascular endothelium serves as a dynamic interface between circulating blood elements and the interstitial tissues. As such, it communicates to cells within the vessel wall as well as to the surrounding tissue, sensing its environment and responding accordingly. The vasculature must maintain a delicate balance when initiating a functional response by producing both proinflammatory and antiinflammatory mediators, vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, growth stimulators and inhibitors, and prothrombogenic and antithrombogenic factors. Any response to injurious agents could lead to pathology. Confounding this complex interplay is the fact that the very response to injury that may have developed to undo the damage may itself be even more deleterious. One response to injury by the endothelium is the new or increased expression of surface receptors for immune elements. In atherosclerosis, the adhesion of monocytes (and T cells) to the endothelium is a key event triggered by some form of insult. Subsequent events include monocytic infiltration of the vessel wall, alterations in lipid metabolism, and the activation of these cells into foam cells. The presence of large numbers of foam cells in the intima may produce a high concentration of cytokines and growth factors within a localized area, extracellular matrix perturbations, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and ultimately platelet aggregation at the site of stenosis. Endothelial cells themselves will not only elaborate factors after the initial injury to the vessel wall but also in response to the factors produced by foam cells within the plaque. These endothelial cell factors include MCP-1, a chemoattractant for monocytes (179,180), IL-1 (63,64), IL-6 (interleukin-6) (65-67), IL-8 (interleukin 8) (181), and PDGF, a potent smooth muscle mitogen (4,72) (Fig. 3). Endothelial cells will propagate an inflammatory response long after the initial insult to the arterial vessel. A chronic cycle of endothelial cell activation and leukocyte infiltration is constitutively activated. Thus, all of the cellular elements of the vessel wall, as well as the atherosclerotic plaque itself, elaborate cytokines and growth factors that amplify and propagate the pathological process.

The safety of low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases: results from observational studies

Glucocorticoids (GC) remain the most commonly used agents for managing inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The adverse effects (AEs) associated with high-dose GCs are well established, but there is a widespread misconception that AEs of high-dose GC therapy (>30 mg of prednisone or equivalent daily) are similar in low-dose therapy (≤7.5 mg of prednisone equivalent a day). Although high-quality evidence on AEs of low-dose GC therapy is still incomplete, risks and safety of low-dose GC therapy in rheumatic diseases are reviewed based on current evidence by category, including musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, infectious, gastrointestinal, neuropsychiatric, endocrine and metabolic, dermatologic, and ophthalmologic AEs. Recommendations concerning monitoring AEs with low-dose GC therapy are provided for each category of AEs on the basis of our literature review and clinical experience. There is emerging evidence that low-dose GCs are associated with a much lower level of AEs, which would allow their use over long periods in patients with rheumatic disease who gain clinical effectiveness and well-being from their use. Nonetheless, knowledge and understanding of AEs from low-dose GCs is vital to maximize benefits and minimize risks to patients.

Distribution of low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein subclasses in patients with sarcoidosis

CONTEXT

Systemic inflammatory diseases are associated with proatherogenic lipoprotein profile, but there is a lack of information regarding overall distributions of lipoprotein subclasses in sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether patients with sarcoidosis have altered distributions of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles.

DESIGN

Seventy-seven patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis (29 with acute and 48 with chronic sarcoidosis) treated with corticosteroids and 77 age- and sex-matched controls were included in the study. Low-density lipoprotein and HDL subclasses were determined by gradient gel electrophoresis, while inflammatory markers and lipid parameters were measured by standard laboratory methods.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, patients had fewer LDL I subclasses (P < .001), but more LDL II and III (P < .001) subclasses. This pattern was evident in both acute and chronic disease groups. Patients also had smaller HDL size (P < .001) and higher proportions of HDL 2a (P = .006) and 3a particles (P = .004). Patients with chronic sarcoidosis had smaller LDL size than those with acute disease (P = .02) and higher proportions of HDL 3a subclasses (P = .04) than controls. In acute sarcoidosis, relative proportions of LDL and HDL particles were associated with levels of inflammatory markers, whereas in chronic disease an association with concentrations of serum lipid parameters was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained results demonstrate adverse lipoprotein subfraction profile in sarcoidosis with sustained alterations during disease course. Evaluation of LDL and HDL particles may be helpful in identifying patients with higher cardiovascular risk, at least for prolonged corticosteroid therapy due to chronic disease course.

Steroid withdrawal and reduction of cyclosporine A under mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation

Survival and quality of life after heart transplantation are limited by a significant incidence of cardiovascular complications. Side effects of immunosuppressives contribute unfavorably. Aim of this study was to determine (1) whether withdrawal of corticosteroids and dose reduction of cyclosporine A can be performed safely under immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and (2) if this is beneficial for renal function and cardiovascular risk reduction. Long term heart transplant recipients on steroids and cyclosporine A were examined in a monocentric, prospective, single-arm cohort study. Steroids were withdrawn, mycophenolate mofetil introduced and cyclosporine A dose reduced (target level 50-90 ng/ml). Follow up was 24 months. 23 patients were analyzed: Renal parameters (creatinine, urea, uric acid) improved significantly (p<0.01), as did cardiovascular parameters (heart rate [p<0.05], systolic and diastolic blood pressure [p<0.01]), HbA1c (p<0.05) and triglycerides (p<0.05). In contrast, the self-percepted state of health (SF36™) decreased. Drop outs occurred mostly due to steroid withdrawal syndrome [n=7]. The incidence of adverse events reflected the usual course after heart transplantation. We conclude that CS free immunosuppression comprising reduced cyclosporine levels and addition of MMF in long term heart transplant recipients is safe and improves the cardiovascular risk profile, carbohydrate metabolism and renal function.

Preparation of heparin-immobilized PVA and its adsorption for low-density lipoprotein from hyperlipemia plasma

In this study, heparin was covalently coupled by glutaraldehyde to Poly(vinyl alcohol) [PVA] in solid-liquid two-phase reaction system by two-step synthesis method to prepare a LDL-selective adsorbent. The parameters (the material ratio, reaction time and dosage of catalyzer) were investigated to evaluate their effect upon the immobilized amount of heparin onto the surface of PVA, IR was used to verify the covalent immobilization result and the heparin-modified PVA was also undergone the evaluation of its adsorption capability for low-density lipoprotein from hyperlipemia plasma, and its hemocompatibility was preliminarily evaluated by platelet adhesion test. Results showed: (1) under optimized reaction conditions the highest immobilization amount of heparin onto PVA surface within the experiments of this study has been obtained; (2) the optimized reaction conditions were: (i) at the refluxing temperature 78 degrees C; (ii) the material ratio of "PVA(g): 50% glutaraldehyde (ml)" was about "1:3"; (iii) the reaction time was about 5 h; and (iv) the amount of catalyzer (concentrated HCL) was about 1% of the 50% glutaraldehyde; (3) within the experiments of this study the highest immobilization amount would be up to 25 microg heparin on the surface of per g PVA granules; (4) the heparin-modified PVA granules showed significant adsorption for LDL under faintly alkaline environment (pH=7.2-9.5) ; (5) The result of platelet adhesion test showed no platelet adhered to its surface. Therefore, immobilization of heparin onto the surface of a support is one approach to prepare a kind of LDL adsorbent for blood purification.

Corticosteroid-induced adverse events in adults: frequency, screening and prevention

Corticosteroids represent the most important and frequently used class of anti-inflammatory drugs and are the reference therapy for numerous neoplastic, immunological and allergic diseases. However, their substantial efficacy is often counter-balanced by multiple adverse events. These corticosteroid-induced adverse events represent a broad clinical and biological spectrum from mild irritability to severe and life-threatening adrenal insufficiency or cardiovascular events. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the available data regarding the frequency, screening and prevention of the adverse events observed in adults during systemic corticosteroid therapy (topically administered corticosteroids are outside the remit of this review). These include clinical (i.e. adipose tissue redistribution, hypertension, cardiovascular risk, osteoporosis, myopathy, peptic ulcer, adrenal insufficiency, infections, mood disorders, ophthalmological disorders, skin disorders, menstrual disorders, aseptic necrosis, pancreatitis) and biological (i.e. electrolytes homeostasis, diabetogenesis, dyslipidaemia) events. Lastly, data about the prescription of corticosteroids during pregnancy are provided. This review underscores the absence of data on many of these adverse events (e.g. lipodystrophy, dyslipidaemia). Our intent is to present to practitioners data that can be used in a practical way to both screen and prevent most of the adverse events observed during systemic corticosteroid therapy.

Update on cardiac transplantation pathology

CONTEXT

The endomyocardial biopsy is the mainstay for monitoring acute allograft rejection in heart transplantation. Objective and accurate assessment of cellular and humoral types of rejection is important to optimize immunosuppressive therapy, avoid therapeutic complications, and improve patient outcome. The grading system for evaluation of heart transplant biopsies published in 1990 was revised in 2004 after more than a decade of implementation.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we focus on a practical approach to the evaluation of human heart transplant biopsies as diagnostic surgical pathologic specimens. We discuss the revised International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed pertinent literature, incorporating ideas and vast experience of participants in various work groups that led to the revision of the 1990 grading system.

CONCLUSIONS

The grading system for cellular rejection is presented with detailed light microscopic morphology and comparison of the 1990 and 2004 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulations. We show how the pathologic recognition of cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection has evolved. We emphasize the interpretation of immunostains for complement components C4d and C3d in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. Evidence of regulation of complement activation in human heart transplant biopsies is presented in this context. We also discuss the pitfalls, caveats, and artifacts in the interpretation of allograft endomyocardial biopsies. Lastly, we discuss the pathology of human cardiac allograft vasculopathy in practical detail.

Oral corticosteroid use and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Given the limited efficacy of oral corticosteroids in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the possible cardiac side effects of oral corticosteroids are of particular concern in an elderly population. The impact of the use of oral corticosteroids on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a cohort of patients with COPD was studied.

METHODS

The Saskatchewan health services databases were used to form a population-based cohort of 5648 patients aged 55 years or older who received a first treatment for COPD between 1990 and 1997. A nested case-control analysis was conducted: 371 cases presenting with a first myocardial infarction were matched with 1864 controls according to the length of follow-up, the date of cohort entry and age. Conditional logistic regression was used to adjust for sex, severity of COPD, systemic hypertension, diabetes and prior cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Only the current use of corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of AMI (adjusted RR=2.01 [95% CI 1.13 to 3.58]), particularly when the current dose was larger than 25 mg/day of prednisone or the equivalent (adjusted RR=3.22 [95% CI 1.42 to 7.34]). This observed increase in risk rapidly returned to baseline after the cessation of the medication, suggesting that the use of such high doses reflected the treatment of acute exacerbations of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

An association was found between the current use of oral corticosteroids and the occurrence of an AMI, suggesting that acute exacerbations of COPD are associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndromes.

Use of oral corticosteroids and the risk of acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

A few epidemiological studies suggested an increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk with high doses of oral corticosteroids.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study with nested case-control analysis to estimate the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with the use of oral corticosteroids by dose and duration. We followed-up 404,183 persons, 50-84 years old, without cancer from the general UK population. After validation of a random sample (confirmation rate of 96%), we included 4795 hospitalised cases of AMI or CHD deaths. We randomly sampled 20,000 controls, frequency matched by sex, age and calendar year. Relative risks were estimated using unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The adjusted OR for AMI in current users of oral corticosteroids compared to non-users was 1.42 (95% CI: 1.17-1.72). The risk during the first 30 days of use (OR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.56-3.20) was greater than with longer duration (OR=1.22; 95% CI 0.98-1.52). The risk was more pronounced (OR=2.15; 95% CI 1.45-3.14) among users of prednisolone equivalent doses >10mg/day. The dose effect was observed both among patients with and without CHD or COPD/asthma.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a small increased risk of AMI with oral corticosteroid use with a greater risk observed among users of high corticosteroid dose.

Safety of low dose glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: published evidence and prospective trial data

Adverse effects of glucocorticoids have been abundantly reported. Published reports on low dose glucocorticoid treatment show that few of the commonly held beliefs about their incidence, prevalence, and impact are supported by clear scientific evidence. Safety data from recent randomised controlled clinical trials of low dose glucocorticoid treatment in RA suggest that adverse effects associated with this drug are modest, and often not statistically different from those of placebo.

Effect of age on lipid profiles in pediatric heart transplant recipients

This study's objectives were to determine if pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients over all ages develop hyperlipidemia and, secondarily, to identify the effects of immunosuppressive agents and statins on lipid profiles in these patients. Retrospective chart review was performed for pediatric patients transplanted between January 1987 and June 2002. Of the 100 OHTs performed, 50 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and were grouped by age at OHT as follows: group 1 (n = 16): 0-4 yr; group 2 (n = 10): 5-9 yr; group 3 (n = 15): 10-14 yr; group 4 (n = 9): 15-18 yr. There were 2789 lipid levels recorded, and each patient had an average of 14 post-OHT lipoprotein panels measured. Post-OHT total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were significantly greater than those of the general population for the entire follow-up period in all age groups, except for LDL levels in group 2. Cyclosporin level and prednisone dose were positively associated with total cholesterol and LDL levels (p < 0.03). Statins significantly decreased total cholesterol and LDL levels (p < 0.001). Hyperlipidemia affects OHT patients of all ages. Even the youngest patients may benefit from immunosuppression using an alternative to cyclosporin, such as tacrolimus, and steroid-free regimens, which may improve lipid profiles. Once safety and efficacy data are available, all age groups may benefit from statins.

Developments in Glucocorticoid Therapy

Recent evidence for a disease-modifying potential of low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has renewed the debate on the risk benefit ratio with this therapy. Two recent developments are described that might have a positive influence on these risk benefit ratios. One is the improvement in new GC compounds--designer GCs, alterations in bioactivity, and alterations in formulations. The other is a better understanding and management of the toxicity of GCs.

Management of hyperlipidaemia associated with heart transplantation

The past 20 years have seen considerable advances in the field of organ transplantation that have together led to a notable increase in survival rates and a reduction in postoperative morbidity of transplant recipients. However, these advances have been accompanied by the appearance of other complications of transplantation, such as post-transplant hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and graft coronary vasculopathy (GCV). GCV is an accelerated form of atherosclerosis in transplanted hearts that has proven to be one of the most important late complications of heart transplantation and is the single most limiting factor for long-term survival. The most important factors favouring the development of hyperlipidaemia after heart transplantation are inappropriate diet in combination with reduced physical activity, adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapy (ciclosporin [cyclosporin], corticosteroids) and polygenic hypercholesterolaemia in combination with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The treatment of hyperlipidaemia in heart transplant recipients results in a variety of complications and side effects. In particular, interactions between lipid-lowering drugs and immunosuppressive therapy have been observed. Early attempts at treatment with bile acid binding agents and nicotinic acid derivatives often proved insufficiently effective, and led to unacceptable adverse effects and significant disturbances of ciclosporin metabolism. Fibric acid derivatives provided moderate reductions in triglyceride and total cholesterol levels that were mostly--with the exception of gemfibrozil--accompanied by significant impairment of renal function. Probucol achieved only an unsatisfactory reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Omega-3 fatty acids lower cholesterol levels and improve endothelial function in heart transplant recipients; however, the significance of these effects is still under discussion. As in the general patient population, use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) achieved significant reductions in cholesterol levels. Use of these substances has resulted in significantly extended long-term survival times, significantly less GCV and fewer severe graft rejections. Selective cholesterol absorption inhibitors, administered with or without statins, could provide another treatment option for heart transplant patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In severe familial hypercholesterolaemia, which is rarely observed in heart transplant recipients, treatment with statins can be combined with extracorporeal cholesterol elimination procedures such as heparin induced extracorporeal LDL cholesterol precipitation (HELP). HELP enables total cholesterol levels to be kept within any desired target range, and has been used successfully and without adverse effects in heart transplant recipients.

Strategies for minimizing hyperlipidemia after cardiac transplantation

Allograft coronary artery disease represents a major limitation to long-term survival after cardiac transplantation. Hyperlipidemias have been linked to the development of native coronary atherosclerosis, and hyperlipidemic states have correlated with the severity of allograft coronary artery disease. Heart transplant recipients typically manifest increases in plasma levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides within the first 3-12 months following transplantation. Factors known to promote post-transplant hyperlipidemia include the use of corticosteroids, cyclosporine (interference with clearance and increased oxidizability of LDL), sirolimus (hypertriglyceridemia), and patient-specific causes of hyperlipidemia which contributed to their underlying heart disease. Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are the foundation of antilipid therapy following cardiac transplantation. Pravastatin is effective in lowering plasma cholesterol levels and is associated with a decreased incidence and progression of allograft coronary artery disease. All HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors except pravastatin are metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system which metabolizes cyclosporine, increasing the risk of myostitis when they are used in large dosages with cyclosporine. Simvastatin, atorvastatin and fluvastatin have been studied in heart transplant recipients. Gemfibrozil has proved effective in transplant recipients when there is isolated marked elevation of plasma triglyceride levels. When hyperlipidemia persists despite therapy, some benefit may result with conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. Although a definitive link between hyperlipidemia and allograft coronary disease has yet to be proven, available evidence points to abnormal lipid metabolism as part of the complex etiologic machinery driving the process of 'chronic rejection'. Consensus exists within the transplant community that a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor such as pravastatin, should be part of the routine post-transplant drug regimen, and persistent hyperlipidemia should be aggressively treated.

Hypercholesterolemia is common after pediatric heart transplantation: initial experience with pravastatin

BACKGROUND

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a progressive complication after cardiac transplantation and limits survival. Hyperlipidemia is a known risk factor for CAV, and pravastatin is effective in decreasing cholesterol levels in adults after transplantation. However, few data exist regarding lipid profiles and statin use after pediatric heart transplantation. We evaluated the prevalence of hyperlipidemia in pediatric heart transplant recipients and assessed the efficacy and safety of pravastatin therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of lipid profiles > or =1 year after surgery in 50 pediatric cardiac transplant recipients to assess the incidence of hyperlipidemia. Twenty of these patients received pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. Their primary immunosuppression therapy was cyclosporine/prednisone plus either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. We reviewed serial lipid profiles, creatinine phosphokinase, and liver enzymes.

RESULTS

Overall, 36% of the patients (n = 50) had total cholesterol (TC) concentrations > 200 mg/dl and 52% had low-density lipoprotein (LDL) >110 mg/dL beyond 1 year after transplantation. Of the 20 treated with pravastatin, TC (236 +/- 51 vs 174 +/- 33 mg/dl) and LDL levels (151 +/- 32 vs 99 +/- 21 mg/dl) decreased significantly with therapy (p <.0001). We found no symptoms; however, 1 patient had increased creatinine phosphokinase. Liver enzyme concentrations remained normal in all.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercholesterolemia is prevalent in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients. Pravastatin therapy is effective in decreasing TC and LDL levels, seems to be safe, and is tolerated well. Further studies are necessary to determine whether pravastatin treatment is beneficial in decreasing CAV.

Are Cardiovascular Disease and Osteoporosis Directly Linked?

For years, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease were thought to be two independent consequences of aging; however, mounting evidence supports an association between these diseases. Recently, a widespread class of cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins have demonstrated (in rodents and cell cultures) the ability to induce bone formation. This finding is significant since current therapies are limited to the prevention or slowing down of bone loss rather than (enhancing/improving) bone formation. In humans, the ability of statins to generate new bone has not been consistent; however, several investigations have demonstrated a dramatic decrease in fracture risk. Although it has been proposed that statins induce new bone via increased bone morphogenetic protein-2, other conditions affected by statins such as dyslipidaemia, vascular calcification, endothelial dysfunction and impaired nitric oxide expression, may also contribute to the cardiovascular and bone health paradigm. Furthermore, the role of physical activity and its influence on cardiovascular and bone health, especially in postmenopausal women, may contribute to the discrepancy of findings in human data. In summary, it remains to be determined if statins contribute to bone health via improvements in vascular health or by pleiotropic properties unique to their pharmacology. This review provides information on our current understanding of the bone and cardiovascular association, as well as on novel areas of research to further our current understanding of these conditions.

Drug immunosuppression therapy for adult heart transplantation. Part 2: clinical applications and results

This review describes the clinical application of classical immunosuppressive drugs as well as that of more recent drugs. All current immunosuppressive drugs target T-cell activation, and cytokine production and clonal expansion, or both. Immunosuppressive protocols can be broadly divided into induction therapy, maintenance immunosuppression, and treatment of acute rejection episodes.

Steroid withdrawal after pediatric liver transplantation: a long-term follow-up study in 109 recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroids remain an important component of maintenance immunosuppression in liver transplantation, but when administered for a long period they may be associated with multiple severe side effects, particularly growth suppression in children. This study was conducted to clarify the balance of potential benefits and risks of steroid withdrawal (SW) in pediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

Between April 1984 and July 2000, 109 pediatric recipients with SW and at least 12 months of follow-up after SW were retrospectively reviewed and divided into three groups according to the type of anticalcineurin at SW: group I (cyclosporine, n=25), group II (cyclosporine microemulsion, n=25), and group III (tacrolimus, n=59). Steroids were withdrawn after a three-step reduction of steroid dosage (taper down to the substitution dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day, switch to alternate-day therapy, progressive SW). Patients were regularly followed up for clinical and biochemical monitoring.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8.1 (range, 1.6-16.8) years. After SW, neither chronic rejection nor graft nor patient loss occurred. A trend toward lower anticalcineurin trough levels was observed in all groups. Glomerular filtration rate and fasting cholesterol were significantly better in group III (P<0.05). Median height z-score in all patients was -1.1 SD on alternate-day steroids versus -0.2 SD at the time of SW. Height z-score was slightly better in group III (NS). Early SW within 2 years after transplantation allowed a slightly better gain in growth.

CONCLUSIONS

SW in pediatric liver transplantation is safe and may be beneficial to height outcome. Tacrolimus seems to offer several advantages in the long-term outcome.

The apo A-I gene promoter region polymorphism determines the severity of hyperlipidemia after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

To study whether the Apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) promoter region gene polymorphism produces changes in the lipid profile of heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

One hundred and three heart transplant recipients (93 men and 10 women, with a mean age of 47 +/- 13 yr) receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy were submitted to a genetic study of the apo A-I gene promoter region. Anthropometric and analytical data, including lipid profile, arterial blood pressure, were collected prior to transplantation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

Sixty-three subjects had the GG genotype and 40 the GA genotype. Carriers of the GA genotype had higher triglyceride levels at 6 months and 2 yr (2.50 +/- 1.20 versus 1.93 +/- 0.98 mmol/L and 2.46 +/- 1.58 versus 1.60 +/- 0.68 mmol/L, respectively, p < 0.001), and a greater rise in LDL-cholesterol at 1 yr than the GG subjects (4.57 +/- 1.16 versus 4.16 +/- 1.18 mmol/L, p < 0.05). Multiple regression analyses showed that genetic variants at the apo A-I promoter region are responsible for 11% of the variability in triglyceride levels at 6 months (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The GA genotype of the apo A-I promoter region produces a greater rise in plasma triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol levels in heart transplant patients.

Cardiovascular toxicities of immunosuppressive agents

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation. Many of the current immunosuppressive drugs are associated with an increase of one or more risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis. This review compares the mechanism by which individual immunosuppressive agents may impact on these risk factors and the differential contribution of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, azathioprine, and Rapamycin to these individual risk factors. Attention to the potential cardiovascular toxicities of individual immunosuppressive agents may help design strategies for maintenance of immunosuppression tailored to individual patients.

Cardiovascular risk profile of antirheumatic agents in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Several new drugs have become available for the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These agents include selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, leflunomide and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists. COX-2 inhibitors have a more favourable gastrointestinal adverse effect profile than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, the COX-2 inhibitors are also associated with hypertension, oedema and congestive heart failure, the well-known adverse effects of conventional NSAIDs. Patients with treated hypertension should be monitored regularly when conventional NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors are administered. At present, there is a considerable debate regarding the risk of cardiovascular events with the COX-2 inhibitors. The available literature gives no unequivocal answers. This matter can only be solved by an appropriate trial assessing the cardiovascular risk of these agents. Patients with RA appear to have an enhanced cardiovascular risk which might be related to an unfavourable lipid profile. Corticosteroids induce hypercholesterolaemia in patients other than those with RA. It was recently shown that total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were low in patients with RA who had a high disease activity. Contrary to the expectation, combination therapy with prednisolone rapidly improved the atherogenic index (total/HDL cholesterol). Ongoing studies investigating this topic are underway. It is not known to what extent corticosteroids induce hypertension in patients with RA. Hence, we advocate blood pressure control for these patients. A small percentage of patients with RA develop hypertension when taking leflunomide, and no other serious cardiovascular adverse effects have been reported in the literature. Blood pressure monitoring is recommended especially in the first months of treatment. TNFalpha antagonists are contraindicated in patients with RA who have congestive heart failure. No specific cardiovascular adverse effects have been reported with the use of these agents in the non-cardiovascular compromised patient. TNFalpha antagonists are the most powerful anti-inflammatory drugs presently available. As inflammation plays an important role in RA as well as in cardiovascular disease and, in view of the increased cardiovascular risk in RA, it is tempting to expect that suppression of inflammation ultimately will lower the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with RA.

The effect of fluvastatin of hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients: a prospective, placebo-controlled study

Posttransplant hyperlipidemia is a common complication which may affect long term cardiovascular mortality. In this prospective, placebo-controlled study, 19 renal transplant recipients (11 male 8 female, mean age 31.2 +/- 8.4 years) with good allograft function (serum creatinine <2 mg/dl) more than 6 months after transplantation were included. All the patients had hyperlipidemia (serum cholesterol >230 mg/dl and/or LDL-cholesterol >130 mg/dl) despite dietary interventions. The patients were treated with a triple immunosuppressive regimen. After a 8-week period of placebo plus diet regimen, the patients were put on fluvastatin plus diet for another 8 weeks. The patients were followed for its effect on lipid parameters and side effects. After convertion to fluvastatin, serum cholesterol (263.0 +/- 31.6 vs 223.2 +/- 31.6 mg/dl, p = 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (174.4 +/- 28.3 vs 136.4 +/- 28.5 mg/dl, p = 0.002), Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 (131.1 +/- 16.9 vs 114.7 +/- 18.4 mg/dl, p = 0.001) and Apo B (109.0 +/- 29.8 vs 97.3 +/- 31.5 mg/dl, p = 0.02) levels decreased significantly. Serum levels of triglycerides, VLDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol levels did not vary under fluvastatin. Serum lipoprotein (a) levels were also unchanged during the whole study period (24.9 +/- 19.4 vs 23.1 +/- 19.8 mg/dl, p > 0.05). We concluded that fluvastatin effectively decreased atherogenic lipoproteins such as serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, Apo B in posttransplant hyperlipidemia, however fluvastatin had no effect on another independent risk factor of atherogenesis, serum lipoprotein (a) levels.

Risk factors for the development and progression of dyslipidemia after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is an important complication after organ transplantation and contributes to the development of posttransplant accelerated coronary artery diseases.

METHODS

We have retrospectively evaluated the relative contribution of various risk factors associated with the development and progression of hyperlipidemia in 194 heart transplant recipients by the use of mixed effects multiple linear regression analysis. The demographic characteristics evaluated were primary diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD), gender, and age. Postoperative characteristics included number of treated rejections, dosage of cyclosporine (CYA), tacrolimus (TAC), prednisolone and azathioprine, and concentration of serum creatinine and glucose. The effects of administration of antihypertensive agents, diuretics, and lipid lowering agents were also studied.

RESULTS

The total cholesterol concentration increased significantly in the first 3 months posttransplant but gradually decreased thereafter. Total cholesterol and the ratio of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C) increased to a greater extent in patients with IHD although female transplant recipients had a greater increase in the total cholesterol concentration. Each episode of rejection increased serum cholesterol by 0.306 mmol/liter (0.258, 0.355) [mean (95% C.I.)] and serum triglyceride by 0.164 mmol/liter (0.12, 0.209) although switching to TAC improved total cholesterol and LDL-C/HDL-C. Administration of frusemide, increased the total cholesterol and LDL-C/HDL-C whereas administration of bumetanide or metolazone increased the concentration of serum triglyceride. Serum glucose was associated with hypertriglyceridemia whereas serum creatinine was associated with increases in the total cholesterol, LDL-C/HDL-C and triglyceride.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified demographic and postoperative covariables that predispose heart transplant recipients to hyperlipidemia. Some of these risk factors, such as the effect of diuretics, have not been identified before in this group of patients and may be amenable to modification or closer control. TAC rather than CYA may be the immunosuppressive of choice for patients who are at greater risk of developing hyperlipidemia.

Safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy for the prevention of hyperlipidemia in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is common after cardiac transplantation and it is a risk factor for post-transplantation coronary artery disease. Immunosuppression with corticosteroids and cyclosporine has been associated with hyperlipidemia. Pravastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective and safe for cholesterol reduction in adult heart transplant recipients. To our knowledge the safety and efficacy of pravastatin therapy in pediatric and adolescent heart transplant populations have not been previously analyzed. Therefore, we evaluated lipid profiles, liver transaminases, rejection data, and possible side effects in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients treated with pravastatin.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 40 cardiac transplant recipients 10 to 21 years old (mean age 16.9 years). Twenty-two patients received pravastatin in addition to an immunosuppressive regimen of either cyclosporine or tacrolimus, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Serial determinations of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides were available for all pravastatin-treated patients. Pre-treatment lipid values and hepatic transaminases were compared with those measured after therapy with pravastatin. Comparison of pravastatin-induced lipid reduction between groups treated with cyclosporine vs tacrolimus was also made.

RESULTS

Patients receiving pravastatin experienced a mean 32 mg/dl decrease in TC (p < 0.005) and a mean 31 mg/dl decrease in LDL (p < 0.005), regardless of their immunosuppressive regimen. No statistical differences occurred in the magnitude of mean lipid reduction induced by pravastatin between the groups treated with cyclosporine vs tacrolimus. No significant changes in hepatic transaminase levels were noted, and no clinical evidence of pravastatin-induced myositis occurred in any subjects.

CONCLUSION

Pravastatin therapy is effective and safe when used in pediatric and adolescent cardiac transplant recipients. Although the pravastatin-induced reduction in TC and LDL was more pronounced in patients receiving cyclosporine, the reduction was not statistically different from that in the tacrolimus group. No evidence of hepatic dysfunction or rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with pravastatin was noted. Long-term studies are required to evaluate the effect of pravastatin therapy on the incidence of accelerated coronary atherosclerosis in this population.

Tacrolimus conversion improves hyperlipidemic states in stable liver transplant recipients

With improvements in surgical technique and the advent of new and more effective immunosuppressive agents, survival rates in liver transplant recipients have dramatically improved. However, hyperlipidemia frequently develops in patients administered cyclosporine-based immunosuppression long-term, although it appears to occur less often with newer, tacrolimus-based regimens. We sought to determine whether an isolated change in the baseline immunosuppressive regimen (cyclosporine to tacrolimus) would improve hyperlipidemic states in these patients. Twenty-one long-term stable liver transplant recipients with hyperlipidemia, manifested by elevated cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels, were offered conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine A therapy. Lipid profiles were monitored at baseline (while on cyclosporine therapy) and at 1 and 3 months after conversion to tacrolimus therapy. There were no other medication manipulations. After conversion to tacrolimus therapy, mean cholesterol levels decreased from 251 to 202 mg/dL at 1 month (P <.001) and 194 mg/dL at 3 months (P <.001). Similarly, triglyceride levels decreased from 300 to 207 mg/dL by 1 month (P =.011) and 203 mg/dL by 3 months (P <.001). There was also a statistically significant decrease for very low-density lipoprotein levels at 3 months (P =.005) and low-density lipoprotein levels at 1 and 3 months (P =.013 and P =.014, respectively). High-density lipoprotein levels did not significantly change after conversion to tacrolimus therapy. Conversion was not accompanied by adverse side effects, and patients tolerated the change well. In conclusion, simple conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression therapy is safe and improves posttransplantation hyperlipidemia in a subgroup of liver transplant recipients.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac transplantation has emerged as a valuable therapy for various end-stage cardiac disorders. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), an unusually accelerated and diffuse form of obliterative coronary arteriosclerosis, determines long-term function of the transplanted heart. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a complicated interplay between immunologic and nonimmunologic factors resulting in repetitive vascular injury and a localized sustained inflammatory response. Dyslipidemia, oxidant stress, immunosuppressive drugs, and viral infection appear to be important contributors to disease development. Endothelial dysfunction is an early feature of CAV and progresses over time after transplantation. Early identification of CAV is essential if long-term prognosis is to be improved. Annual coronary angiography is performed for diagnostic and surveillance purposes. Intravascular ultrasound is a more sensitive diagnostic tool for early disease stages and has revealed that progressive luminal narrowing in CAV is in part due to negative vascular remodeling. Because of the diffuse nature of CAV, percutaneous and surgical revascularization procedures have a limited role. Prevention of CAV progression is a primary therapeutic goal.

Genetic variations of the apolipoprotein E gene determine the plasma triglyceride levels after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To study whether the presence of the polymorphism in the apolipoprotein E (apo E) gene influences the lipid profile in heart-transplant recipients.

METHODS

A cohort of 103 recipients of heart transplant (93 men and 10 women, with a mean age of 47 +/- 13 years) under triple immunosuppressive therapy were submitted to a genetic study of the apo E gene region. Anthropometric and analytical data, including lipid profile and arterial blood pressure were collected prior to transplantation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after it.

RESULTS

65 subjects present the genotype E3E3, 27 the genotype E3E4, 6 the genotype E2E3, and 5 the genotype E2E4. Carriers of the E2 allele (that is, genotypes E3E2 and E4E2) had higher total plasma triglyceride (TG) levels after 3 months (3.47 +/- 1.88 mmol/liter p < 0.001) and after 1 year of transplantation (3.13 +/- 1.77 mmol/liter p < 0.05) than the other genotypes. There were no differences in the plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the apoprotein E gene polymorphism determines 5% (p = 0.0425) and age 8.7% (p < 0.009) of the variants in TG levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the E2 allele in heart-transplant recipients produces a greater rise in total TG plasma levels than the other genotypes.

Tacrolimus-based triple-drug immunosuppression minimizes serum lipid elevations in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression with corticosteroids and cyclosporine has been associated with hyperlipidemia, a risk factor for post-transplant coronary artery disease. The recent development of tacrolimus has created an alternative to cyclosporine-based triple drug immunotherapy. One potential benefit that has been reported in patients receiving tacrolimus is a minimization of elevation of both total and LDL cholesterol, compared to those increases observed in patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. It is unclear in previous studies whether this beneficial effect is related to tacrolimus directly or to its corticosteroid sparing potential. To study this relationship, we compared lipid profiles from pediatric cardiac transplant recipients treated with corticosteroids, and either cyclosporine or tacrolimus.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 23 patients (mean age = 12.3 years) with pre-transplant and serial post-transplant determinations of total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides. Patients were separated into 4 study groups, defined by immunosuppressive regimen (cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus) and prednisone dose (>0.10 mg/kg/day vs. < or =0.10 mg/kg/day).

RESULTS

Patients who received cyclosporine and higher doses of prednisone experienced a mean 74 mg/dl increase from baseline in total cholesterol (p = .0001). None of the other 3 treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant elevation. Similar trends were observed in LDL and triglyceride alterations between the 4 study groups. Interestingly, patients treated with tacrolimus and higher doses of prednisone demonstrated a significant rise in HDL from baseline (p = .0001), although those who received cyclosporine and higher dose prednisone failed to exhibit this rise.

CONCLUSION

The minimal degree of lipid alteration seen in patients receiving tacrolimus and higher doses of prednisone indicates that this effect was not solely based upon the steroid-sparing properties of tacrolimus therapy. The data also suggests a possible synergistic effect between cyclosporine and higher doses of prednisone on hyperlipidemia. Therefore, in pediatric patients requiring higher corticosteroid doses late after transplantation, use of tacrolimus rather than cyclosporine may lead to more favorable lipid profiles and help minimize the risk of post-transplant coronary arteriopathy.

Relationship between coronary function by positron emission tomography and temporal changes in morphology by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Transplant coronary vasculopathy is one of the major causes of graft failure and death in cardiac transplant recipients. A non-invasive test of coronary function to predict the course of this disease would be desirable.

METHODS

To determine whether the degree of abnormalities in endothelial dependent coronary vasomotion (cold pressor testing) or endothelial independent vasodilatory capacity (intravenous dipyridamole) as determined by positron emission tomography (PET) one to two years after heart transplantation is correlated with the course of transplant vasculopathy. Nineteen patients had baseline PET and intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS) at 18 +/- 6 months after cardiac transplantation and a follow up IVUS study 15 +/- 5 months later.

RESULTS

Myocardial blood flow was higher in patients than in healthy controls (p < 0.002) but increased during cold pressor testing only in controls (p < 0.005). Myocardial blood flow normalized to the rate pressure product declined in patients (p < 0.001). Dipyridamole-induced hyperemic blood flow and the flow reserve normalized to the resting rate pressure product were lower in patients than in controls (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). The normalized flow reserve was correlated with changes in total vessel area (r = 0.55; p = 0.02) and lumen diameter (r = 0.52; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the degree of abnormalities in endothelial independent myocardial flow as detected by PET one to two years after transplantation is associated with morphological indices of disease progression by IVUS.

Review of immunosuppressive usage in pancreas transplantation

Throughout 1997, nearly 10,000 pancreas transplants have been performed worldwide, with 88% being simultaneous kidney transplants (SKPT). The current 1 yr patient survival rate exceeds 90% and pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) rate exceeds 80% for SKPT, 70% for sequential pancreas after kidney transplant (PAKT), and 65% for pancreas transplant alone (PTA). According to registry data, rejection accounts for 32% of graft failures in the first year after pancreas transplantation. However, improvements are expected to continue with the evolution of treatment protocols. Most pancreas transplant centers employ quadruple drug immunosuppression with anti-lymphocyte induction with either a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody agent. In recent years, there has been an overall decline in the use of antibody induction therapy from 90% during the period 1987-1993 to 83% of pancreas transplants performed during 1994-1997. Maintenance immunosuppression is triple therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), corticosteroids, and an anti-metabolite (AZA or MMF). Prior to 1995, nearly all pancreas transplant recipients were managed with Sandimmune. In the last 2 yr, tacrolimus-based therapy has been used in approximately 20% of cases and a new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) has replaced Sandimmune in contemporary post-transplant immunosuppression. In addition, MMF is replacing AZA as part of the standard immunosuppressive regimen after pancreas transplantation. At present, a number of centers are conducting various trials with new drug combinations including either Neoral or tacrolimus in combination with steroids and MMF with or without antibody induction therapy. From 1994 to 1997, the 1 yr rates of immunologic graft loss have decreased to 2% after SKPT, 9% after PAKT, and 16% after PTA. The current array of new immunosuppressive agents are providing more effective control of rejection and permitting solitary pancreas transplantation to become an accepted treatment option in diabetic patients without advanced complications. The apparent potency of new drug combinations has also resulted in a resurgence of interest in steroid withdrawal. Immunosuppressive strategies will continue to evolve in order to achieve effective control of rejection while minimizing injury to the allograft and risk to the patient. In addition, new regimens must not only address the issue of specific drug toxicities but also long-term economic, metabolic, and quality of life outcomes. Pancreas transplantation will remain an important alternative in the treatment of diabetic patients until other strategies are developed that can provide equal glycemic control with less immunosuppression and overall morbidity.

Heart allograft vascular disease: an obliterative vascular disease in transplanted hearts

More than 30 years have passed since the first human heart transplantation was performed. Since then, short-term survival after heart transplantation has been markedly improved, but this development has not been paralleled with a similar improvement in long-term survival. One of the major reasons for this is the subsequent development of heart allograft vascular disease, an obliterative disease in the coronary arteries of the transplanted heart. The dubious effect of re-vascularization in this disease, the less favorable outcome after repeat heart transplantation, and the low donor supply have called for intensified research for new and efficient prophylactic therapies against heart allograft vascular disease. This research has lead to improved knowledge about diagnosis, etiology, pathogenesis, prophylaxis, and treatment possibilities. The most important among these seem to be: (i) the introduction of intravascular ultrasound for early detection of the disease; (ii) evidence to suggest that hyperlipidemia, insufficient immunosuppressive therapy, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatch, and infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) all may promote allografts vascular disease; and (iii) the introduction of at least two promising prophylactic therapies in humans namely 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and calcium entry blockers, and others potentially promising e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors, angiopeptin, mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin. This review summarizes present knowledge on the possibilities of inhibiting or treating heart allograft vascular disease incorporating evidence from both human and experimental studies.

Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) inhibitors are the most effective drugs to lower cholesterol in transplant patients. However, immunosuppressants and several other drugs used after organ transplantation are cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A, EC 1.14.14.1) substrates. Pharmacokinetic interaction with some of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, specifically lovastatin and simvastatin, leads to an increased incidence of muscle skeletal toxicity in transplant patients. It is our objective to review the role of drug metabolism and drug interactions of lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. In the treatment of transplant patients, from a drug interaction perspective, pravastatin, which is not significantly metabolized by CYP enzymes, and fluvastatin, presumably a CYP2C9 substrate, compare favorably with the other statins for which the major metabolic pathways are catalyzed by CYP3A.

Obesity and hypercholesterolemia following heart transplantation

Successful strategies for avoiding obesity and hypercholesterolemia are difficult to validate because of imprecise problem identification. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, severity, and onset of obesity and hypercholesterolemia among heart transplant recipients and identify relationships between demographic variables and weight or cholesterol levels during the first year following transplantation. Data were collected from retrospective chart review. Forty-two patients were randomly selected from 224 patients who were undergoing heart transplantation at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between July 1983 and December 1995. Significant differences were found in weight and cholesterol level during the first 12 months. Patients with ideal body weight less than 110%, compared with greater than 110%, survived longer. Relationships were identified between prednisone dose and weight, cumulative prednisone dose and weight, and weight change and change in total cholesterol level 1 year following transplantation. Multivariate analysis showed cumulative prednisone as an independent predictor of weight. Obesity and hypercholesterolemia were significant problems within 3 months of transplantation. Although prednisone dosage should be adjusted to the lowest possible dose, dietary and lifestyle changes remain the foundation of effective management of these posttransplant complications.

Drugs causing dyslipoproteinemia

Diuretics and beta-blockers have a strong tendency to affect serum lipids adversely, whereas the peripherally acting alpha-blocking agents consistently result in beneficial effects. Most of the other antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and drugs that act centrally) are lipid neutral. The effect of steroid hormones varies with the drug, dose, and route of administration. In general, androgens lower HDL-C and have a variable effect on LDL-C. The effects of progestins vary greatly depending on their androgenicity, and estrogens are beneficial except when hypertriglyceridemia occurs with oral estrogens. Glucocorticoids raise HDL-C and may also increase triglycerides and LDL-C. Retinoids increase triglycerides and LDL-C and also reduce HDL-C. Interferons can cause hypertriglyceridemia. Following organ transplantation, a dyslipidemia often ensues. This is caused in part by the medications used to prevent rejection (glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, and FK-506) and requires close attention and, in some patients, drug therapy to prevent coronary artery disease.

Cytolytic induction therapy in heart and lung transplantation: the protagonist opinion

From the studies analysed as well as based on our own experience, induction therapy mainly with polyclonal cytolytic agents represents a helpful tool in the individualised immunosuppressive approach, whereas monoclonal induction therapies have to be discussed carefully. Although transplantation is also feasible without cytolytic agents, certain patients at risk will further encourage the need for this valuable therapy also in the future, where new immunosuppressants are available. However, it is anticipated that the application should be conducted on an individual patient basis to achieve optimal individual benefit.

Lipoprotein changes in children after liver transplantation: mild hypertriglyceridemia and a decrease in HDL3/HDL2 ratio

Hyperlipidemia is frequently observed in patients who undergo renal, cardiac, bone marrow, or liver transplantation, and its contribution to the long-term morbidity and survival of patients with organ transplants may be substantial. In the few studies that have focused on the pediatric age group, findings have been inconsistent. The lipoprotein profile of 10 children after liver transplantation was characterized and compared with those in normal population controls and 10 healthy siblings. Plasma triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations were determined, lipoprotein fractions (very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], and high-density lipoproteins [HDL2 and HDL3]) were isolated, their chemical compositions were analyzed (protein, phospholipids, triglycerides, free cholesterol, and cholesteryl ester), and the percent relative weight composition of the particles was calculated. Plasma triglyceride and VLDL cholesterol levels were higher post-liver transplantation (P < .05): triglycerides (mean +/- SD), 115.1 +/- 58.7 mg% versus 76.6 +/- 20.9 mg% in siblings and 60.0 +/- 25.0 mg% in normal population controls; very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), 23.0 +/- 11.7 mg% versus 15.3 +/- 4.7 mg% and 13.0 +/- 8.0 mg%, respectively. Plasma triglyceride levels did not correlate with the length of the period after liver transplantation. Levels of LDL-C and total HDL-C and the relative weight composition of VLDL, LDL, HDL2, and HDL3 particles did not differ between post-liver transplantation children and controls. Posttransplantation, levels of HDL3, the normally predominant HDL subfraction, were decreased relative to HDL2 levels (HDL3, 1.3; HDL2, 2.3). Because this observed relative increase in larger cholesteryl ester-rich HDL particles (HDL2) may result from inhibition of cholesteryl ester-triglyceride transfer processes, cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity was assayed. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity did not differ between patients and controls. Thus, the lipoprotein changes observed in children post-liver transplantation are mild hypertriglyceridemia and a significant increase in HDL2 relative to HDL3. Because HDL2 is regarded as protective against atherosclerosis, this may be of clinical relevance.

Post-transplant hyperlipidaemia: low-dose lovastatin lowers atherogenic lipids without plasma accumulation of lovastatin

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was twofold. First, to determine the frequency of hyperlipidaemia after heart transplantation (Tx) in relation to values obtained before Tx. Secondly, to examine the effect of low-dose lovastatin on possible antiatherogenic mechanisms and test the hypothesis that the side-effects are dose-dependent.

SUBJECTS AND DESIGN

Retrospective study of the frequency of hyperlipidaemia disturbances in heart transplant patients. In addition, in a prospective study, the safety and efficacy of incremental low doses of lovastatin up to 20 mg day-1 were studied, with measurements of its plasma concentration in 24 cyclosporin A treated heart (n = 14) and kidney (n = 10) recipients with total cholesterol > 7.5 mmol L-1.

RESULTS

Cholesterol increased markedly after heart transplantation from a pretransplant value of 5.3 (5.0,5.6) mmol L-1 to 6.7 (6.4,7.0) mmol L-1 after 1 year and then remained constant, but this increase was largely due to a 'normalization' since cholesterol decreased significantly during increasing heart failure before transplantation. Treatment with lovastatin decreased total cholesterol by 19% (P < 0.001), primarily by an effect on LDL cholesterol. HDL cholesterol increased by 15% (P < 0.05), whereas triglycerides remained unchanged. Lovastatin also caused a significant reduction in apolipoprotein B of 16%, and lipid peroxidation of 40%, whereas apolipoprotein A-I, fibrinogen, and glycerol were unchanged. Plasma concentration of lovastatin was significantly higher in transplant recipients compared with controls, but there was no accumulation during incremental dosing of lovastatin. The drug was well tolerated without significant symptoms or evidence of myopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperlipidaemia is common after cardiac transplantation. Treatment with low dose lovastatin is well tolerated and has a favourable effect on atherogenic lipids.

Management of the cardiac transplant recipient: roles of the transplant cardiologist and primary care physician

Cardiac transplantation has become an accepted treatment for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite a successful transplant, denervated transplanted hearts respond differently to cardiac drugs than nontransplanted hearts. The treatments for bradycardia, tachycardia, and hypotension are different than for nontransplanted hearts. Despite the improvement in long-term survival, a number of complications may occur posttransplantation. These complications include, allograft rejection, infection, allograft coronary artery disease, and malignancy. Additionally, posttransplant patients may have complications from the immunosuppressive agents cyclosporine, prednisione, and azathioprine. Such complications include drug interactions with commonly prescribed medications, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, and gastrointestinal complications. The purpose of this article is to discuss the management of the cardiac transplant recipient as it relates to the aforementioned complications. Management of the cardiac transplantation patient by the primary care physician will also be discussed, including indications for consultation by the primary care physician with the transplant center.