Prolactin-induced proliferation of Nb2 cells involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the prolactin receptor and its associated tyrosine kinase JAK2

The prolactin receptor: A cross-species comparison of gene structure, transcriptional regulation, tissue-specificity, and genetic variation

The conserved and multifaceted functions of prolactin (PRL) are coordinated through varied distribution and expression of its cell-surface receptor (PRLR) across a range of tissues and physiological states. The resultant heterogeneous expression of PRLR mRNA and protein across different organs and cell types supports a wide range of PRL-regulated processes including reproduction, lactation, development, and homeostasis. Genetic variation within the PRLR gene also accounts for several phenotypes impacting agricultural production and human pathology. The goal of this review is to highlight the many elements that control differential expression of the PRLR across tissues, and the various phenotypes that exist across species due to variation in the PRLR gene.

Co-aggregation and secondary nucleation in the life cycle of human prolactin/galanin functional amyloids

Synergistic-aggregation and cross-seeding by two different proteins/peptides in the amyloid aggregation are well evident in various neurological disorders including Alzheimer’s disease. Here, we show co-storage of human Prolactin (PRL), which is associated with lactation in mammals, and neuropeptide galanin (GAL) as functional amyloids in secretory granules (SGs) of the female rat. Using a wide variety of biophysical studies, we show that irrespective of the difference in sequence and structure, both hormones facilitate their synergic aggregation to amyloid fibrils. Although each hormone possesses homotypic seeding ability, a unidirectional cross-seeding of GAL aggregation by PRL seeds and the inability of cross seeding by mixed fibrils suggest tight regulation of functional amyloid formation by these hormones for their efficient storage in SGs. Further, the faster release of functional hormones from mixed fibrils compared to the corresponding individual amyloid, suggests a novel mechanism of heterologous amyloid formation in functional amyloids of SGs in the pituitary.

The formation of plaques of proteins called ‘amyloids’ in the brain is one of the hallmark characteristics of both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, but amyloids can form in many tissues and organs, often disrupting normal activity. A lot of the research into amyloids has focused on their role in disease, but it turns out that amyloids can also appear in healthy tissues. For example, some protein hormones form amyloids that act as storage depots, helping cells to release the hormone when it is needed.

Normally, amyloids are made mostly of a single type of protein or protein fragment associated with a particular disease like Alzheimer's. Often, this type of amyloid promotes plaque formation in other proteins, which aggravates other diseases (for example, the amyloids that form in Alzheimer’s can lead to Parkinson’s disease or type II diabetes getting worse).The plaques start growing from small amyloid fragments called seeds. In mixed amyloids – amyloids made of two types of proteins – seeds made of one protein can trigger the formation of amyloids of the other protein. This raises the question, is this true for hormones? The body often releases more than one hormone at a time from the same tissue; for example, the pituitary gland releases prolactin and galanin simultaneously. However, these hormones have completely different structures, so whether they can form a mixed amyloid is unclear.

To answer this question, Chatterjee et al. first determined that, within the pituitary gland of female rats, prolactin and galanin could be found together in the same cells, forming mixed amyloids. To understand out how this happens, Chatterjee et al. tried seeding new amyloids using either prolactin or galanin. This revealed that only prolactin seeds were able to trigger the formation of galanin amyloids. Chatterjee et al. also found that the mixed amyloids could release the hormones faster than amyloids made from either protein alone. Together, these results suggest that the collaboration between these two proteins may help maintain hormone balance in the body.

Problems with hormone storage and release lead to various human diseases, including prolactinoma. Understanding amyloid storage depots could reveal new ways to control hormone levels. Further research could also help to explain more about well-studied diseases linked to amyloids, like Alzheimer's.

Prolactin Drives a Dynamic STAT5A/HDAC6/HMGN2 Cis-Regulatory Landscape Exploitable in ER+ Breast Cancer

The hormone prolactin has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis and regulates chromatin engagement by the transcription factor, STAT5A. STAT5A is known to inducibly bind promoters and cis-regulatory elements genome-wide, though the mechanisms by which it exerts specificity and regulation of target gene expression remain enigmatic. We previously identified HDAC6 and HMGN2 as cofactors that facilitate prolactin-induced, STAT5A-mediated gene expression. Here, multicondition STAT5A, HDAC6, and HMGN2 chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing with parallel condition RNA-seq are utilized to reveal the cis-regulatory landscape and cofactor dynamics underlying prolactin-stimulated gene expression in breast cancer. We find that prolactin-regulated genes are significantly enriched for cis-regulatory elements bound by HDAC6 and HMGN2, and that inducible STAT5A binding at enhancers, rather than promoters, conveys specificity for prolactin-regulated genes. The selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-241, blocks prolactin-induced STAT5A chromatin engagement at cis-regulatory elements as well as a significant proportion of prolactin-stimulated gene expression. We identify functional pathways known to contribute to the development and/or progression of breast cancer that are activated by prolactin and inhibited by ACY-241. Additionally, we find that the DNA sequences underlying shared STAT5A and HDAC6 binding sites at enhancers are differentially enriched for estrogen response elements (ESR1 and ESR2 motifs) relative to enhancers bound by STAT5A alone. Gene set enrichment analysis identifies significant overlap of ERα-regulated genes with genes regulated by prolactin, particularly prolactin-regulated genes with promoters or enhancers co-occupied by both STAT5A and HDAC6. Lastly, the therapeutic efficacy of ACY-241 is demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo breast cancer models, where we identify synergistic ACY-241 drug combinations and observe differential sensitivity of ER+ models relative to ER- models.

Classical and novel GH receptor signaling pathways

In this review, I summarize historical and recent features of the classical pathways activated by growth hormone (GH) through the cell surface GH receptor (GHR). GHR is a cytokine receptor superfamily member that signals by activating the non-receptor tyrosine kinase, JAK2, and members of the Src family kinases. Activation of the GHR engages STATs, PI3K, and ERK pathways, among others, and details of these now-classical pathways are presented. Modulating elements, including the SOCS proteins, phosphatases, and regulated GHR metalloproteolysis, are discussed. In addition, a novel physical and functional interaction of GHR with IGF-1R is summarized and discussed in terms of its mechanisms, consequences, and physiological and therapeutic implications.

Serum Prolactin Contributes to Enhancing Prolactin Receptor and pJAK2 in Type I Endometrial Cancer Cells in Young Women Without Insulin Resistance

Elevated levels of serum prolactin and a high expression of prolactin receptor (PRLR) in cancer cells was recently identified in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). However, the impact of prolactin on EC remains unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical and immunohistochemical characteristics of hyperprolactinemic patients with EC according to the pathogenetic types, type I and type II. EC patients were retrospectively divided into a high prolactin (HP) group and a low prolactin (LP) group by a serum prolactin level of 20 ng/mL and were compared between 2 groups. The expression of PRLR, phosphorylated Janus-kinase 2 (pJAK2), estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and PTEN in cancer tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Ninety-nine patients were identified. In the type I group, HP group was significantly younger (45.2 vs. 52.2, P=0.028) and their insulin resistance was significantly lower (1.6 vs. 2.5, P=0.033) than those in LP group, and the expression of PRLR and pJAK2 in the HP group was significantly higher than that in the LP group (immunoreactive score: 6.8 vs. 3.9, P=0.003; 5.7 vs. 2.6, P<0.001, respectively). In the type 2 group, there were no differences between all the term. In the type I group, the rate of loss of PTEN in the HP group was significantly lower than the LP group (25.0% vs. 60.7%, P=0.024). Prolactin-PRLR signaling may play a crucial role for the progression of type I EC without involving the PTEN mutation in young hyperprolactinemic women without insulin resistance.

Changes in prolactin receptor homodimer availability may cause late feathering in chickens

Chicken early (EF) and late feathering (LF) are sex-linked phenotypes conferred by wild-type k⁺ and dominant K alleles on chromosome Z, respectively. Besides prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLR) and sperm flagellar 2 (SPEF2) genes, the K allele contains a fusion gene in which partially duplicated PRLR (dPRLR) and SPEF2 (dSPEF2) genes are linked in a tail-to-tail manner. The causative dPRLR gene encodes a C-terminal truncated receptor. LF chickens have short or no primaries at hatching; however, their feather growth rate is higher than that of EF chickens. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular basis of the K allele's biphasic effect on feather development. By 3'RACE and RT-PCR analyses, we demonstrated that dSPEF2 gene transcription occurred beyond all coding exons of the dPRLR gene on the opposite strand and that dPRLR mRNA was less abundant than PRLR mRNA. In addition, a 5'UTR splice variant (SPV) of PRL receptor mRNAs was increased in LF chickens. In vitro expression analysis of 5'UTR linked to the luciferase reporter gene revealed higher translation efficiency of SPV. RT-qPCR showed that the dPRLR mRNA level was higher in embryos; conversely, SPV was higher in hatched chickens, as was dSPEF2 mRNA. These findings suggest that the K allele inhibits feather development at the fetal stage by expressing dPRLR to attenuate PRLR function and promotes feather growth after hatching by increasing PRLR through dSPEF2 mRNA expression. Increased SPV may cause greater feather growth than that in EF chickens by increasing the availability of PRLR homodimers and enhancing PRL signaling.

The Growth Hormone Receptor: Mechanism of Receptor Activation, Cell Signaling, and Physiological Aspects

The growth hormone receptor (GHR), although most well known for regulating growth, has many other important biological functions including regulating metabolism and controlling physiological processes related to the hepatobiliary, cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, and reproductive systems. In addition, growth hormone signaling is an important regulator of aging and plays a significant role in cancer development. Growth hormone activates the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, and recent studies have provided a new understanding of the mechanism of JAK2 activation by growth hormone binding to its receptor. JAK2 activation is required for growth hormone-mediated activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5, and the negative regulation of JAK-STAT signaling comprises an important step in the control of this signaling pathway. The GHR also activates the Src family kinase signaling pathway independent of JAK2. This review covers the molecular mechanisms of GHR activation and signal transduction as well as the physiological consequences of growth hormone signaling.

Role of Phospholipid Flux during Milk Secretion in the Mammary Gland

Lipids are a complex group of chemical compounds that are a significant component of the human diet and are one of the main constituents of milk. In mammals, lipids are produced in the milk-secreting cells in the form of milk fat globules. The chemical properties of these compounds necessitate developing separate processes for effective management of non-polar substances in the polar environment of the cell, not only during their biosynthesis and accumulation in the cell interior and secretion of intracytoplasmic lipid droplets outside the cell, but also during digestion in the offspring. Phospholipids play an important role in these processes. Their characteristic properties make them indispensable for the secretion of milk fat as well as other milk components. This review investigates how these processes depend on the coordinated flux and availability of phospholipids and how the relationship between the surface area (phospholipids) and volume (neutral lipids) of the cytoplasmic lipid droplets must be in biosynthetic balance. The structure formed as a result (i.e. a milk fat globule) is therefore a result of specified structural limitations inside the cell, whose overcoming enables the coordinated secretion of milk components. This structure and its composition also reflects the nutritional demands of the developing infant organism as a result of evolutionary adaptation.

Histone H1 and Chromosomal Protein HMGN2 Regulate Prolactin-induced STAT5 Transcription Factor Recruitment and Function in Breast Cancer Cells

The hormone prolactin (PRL) contributes to breast cancer pathogenesis through various signaling pathways, one of the most notable being the JAK2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) pathway. PRL-induced activation of the transcription factor STAT5 results in the up-regulation of numerous genes implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis. However, the molecular mechanisms that enable STAT5 to access the promoters of these genes are not well understood. Here, we show that PRL signaling induces chromatin decompaction at promoter DNA, corresponding with STAT5 binding. The chromatin-modifying protein high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 (HMGN2) specifically promotes STAT5 accessibility at promoter DNA by facilitating the dissociation of the linker histone H1 in response to PRL. Knockdown of H1 rescues the decrease in PRL-induced transcription following HMGN2 knockdown, and it does so by allowing increased STAT5 recruitment. Moreover, H1 and STAT5 are shown to function antagonistically in regulating PRL-induced transcription as well as breast cancer cell biology. While reduced STAT5 activation results in decreased PRL-induced transcription and cell proliferation, knockdown of H1 rescues both of these effects. Taken together, we elucidate a novel mechanism whereby the linker histone H1 prevents STAT5 binding at promoter DNA, and the PRL-induced dissociation of H1 mediated by HMGN2 is necessary to allow full STAT5 recruitment and promote the biological effects of PRL signaling.

The Integrin-Mediated ILK-Parvin-αPix Signaling Axis Controls Differentiation in Mammary Epithelial Cells

Epithelial cell adhesion to the surrounding extracellular matrix is necessary for their proper behavior and function. During pregnancy and lactation, mammary epithelial cells (MECs) receive signals from their interaction with laminin via β1‐integrin (β1‐itg) to establish apico‐basal polarity and to differentiate in response to prolactin. Downstream of β1‐itg, the scaffold protein Integrin Linked Kinase (ILK) has been identified as the key signal transducer that is required for both lactational differentiation and the establishment of apico‐basal polarity. ILK is an adaptor protein that forms the IPP complex with PINCH and Parvins, which are central to its adaptor functions. However, it is not known how ILK and its interacting partners control tissue‐specific gene expression. Expression of ILK mutants, which weaken the interaction between ILK and Parvin, revealed that Parvins have a role in mammary epithelial differentiation. This conclusion was supported by shRNA‐mediated knockdown of the Parvins. In addition, shRNA knockdown of the Parvin‐binding guanine nucleotide exchange factor αPix prevented prolactin‐induced differentiation. αPix depletion did not disrupt focal adhesions, MEC proliferation, or polarity. This suggests that αPix represents a differentiation‐specific bifurcation point in β1‐itg‐ILK adhesive signaling. In summary, this study has identified a new role for Parvin and αPix downstream of the integrin‐ILK signaling axis for MEC differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 2408–2417, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Recovery of bioactive protein from bacterial inclusion bodies using trifluoroethanol as solubilization agent

Background

Formation of inclusion bodies poses a major hurdle in recovery of bioactive recombinant protein from Escherichia coli. Urea and guanidine hydrochloride have routinely been used to solubilize inclusion body proteins, but many times result in poor recovery of bioactive protein. High pH buffers, detergents and organic solvents like n-propanol have been successfully used as mild solubilization agents for high throughput recovery of bioactive protein from bacterial inclusion bodies. These mild solubilization agents preserve native-like secondary structures of proteins in inclusion body aggregates and result in improved recovery of bioactive protein as compared to conventional solubilization agents. Here we demonstrate solubilization of human growth hormone inclusion body aggregates using 30 % trifluoroethanol in presence of 3 M urea and its refolding into bioactive form.

Results

Human growth hormone was expressed in E. coli M15 (pREP) cells in the form of inclusion bodies. Different concentrations of trifluoroethanol with or without addition of low concentration (3 M) of urea were used for solubilization of inclusion body aggregates. Thirty percent trifluoroethanol in combination with 3 M urea was found to be suitable for efficient solubilization of human growth hormone inclusion bodies. Solubilized protein was refolded by dilution and purified by anion exchange and size exclusion chromatography. Purified protein was analyzed for secondary and tertiary structure using different spectroscopic tools and was found to be bioactive by cell proliferation assay. To understand the mechanism of action of trifluoroethanol, secondary and tertiary structure of human growth hormone in trifluoroethanol was compared to that in presence of other denaturants like urea and guanidine hydrochloride. Trifluoroethanol was found to be stabilizing the secondary structure and destabilizing the tertiary structure of protein. Finally, it was observed that trifluoroethanol can be used to solubilize inclusion bodies of a number of proteins.

Conclusions

Trifluoroethanol was found to be a suitable mild solubilization agent for bacterial inclusion bodies. Fully functional, bioactive human growth hormone was recovered in high yield from inclusion bodies using trifluoroethanol based solubilization buffer. It was also observed that trifluoroethanol has potential to solubilize inclusion bodies of different proteins.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12934-016-0504-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Novel Nectin-mediated Cell Adhesion Apparatus That Is Implicated in Prolactin Receptor Signaling for Mammary Gland Development

Mammary gland development is induced by the actions of various hormones to form a structure consisting of collecting ducts and milk-secreting alveoli, which comprise two types of epithelial cells known as luminal and basal cells. These cells adhere to each other by cell adhesion apparatuses whose roles in hormone-dependent mammary gland development remain largely unknown. Here we identified a novel cell adhesion apparatus at the boundary between the luminal and basal cells in addition to desmosomes. This apparatus was formed by the trans-interaction between the cell adhesion molecules nectin-4 and nectin-1, which were expressed in the luminal and basal cells, respectively. Nectin-4 of this apparatus further cis-interacted with the prolactin receptor in the luminal cells to enhance the prolactin-induced prolactin receptor signaling for alveolar development with lactogenic differentiation. Thus, a novel nectin-mediated cell adhesion apparatus regulates the prolactin receptor signaling for mammary gland development.

Lactogenic hormones regulate mammary protein synthesis in bovine mammary epithelial cells via the mTOR and JAK–STAT signal pathways

The expression of CSN3, hormone receptor, the expression of genes regulating the mTOR, JAK–STAT signal pathways, and the relative content of к-casein as well as total casein were determined in the present study to explore the mechanism of the effect of lactogenic hormones on milk-protein synthesis in bovine mammary epithelial cells. The results showed that apoptosis of the cells was increased by inhibitor LY294002, while the expressions of genes encoding PKB, Rheb, PRAS40 and S6K1 in the mTOR signal pathway, JAK2, STAT5A in the JAK–STAT signal pathway, and genes encoding INSR, PRLR, NR3C1 and CSN3 were all downregulated, and the relative contents of κ-casein and total casein were decreased in the mammary epithelial cells compared with those in the control group. Comparatively, the inhibitory effects of AG-490 were more profound than those of LY294002, and the double block using both inhibitors had a greater effect than the single block. The CSN3 gene expression was downregulated and the content of milk casein was decreased by the inhibitors. In addition, the expression of the hormone receptor genes was downregulated. Our results suggest that lactogenic hormones, via their receptors in the membrane, regulated the JAK–STAT and m-TOR signal pathways, and affected cell proliferation and apoptosis, leading to changes in milk-protein synthesis.

Different intracellular signalling pathways triggered by an anti-prolactin receptor (PRLR) antibody: Implication for a signal-specific PRLR agonist

In this work, we prepared a panel of monoclonal antibodies directed against prolactin receptor (PRLR) using the hybridoma technique. Of these monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), the Mab designated B6 was chosen for further characterization based on its biological activity. We first demonstrated that B6 can specifically bind to the prolactin receptor (PRLR) expressed on target cells by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting analysis. Subsequently, epitope mapping studies using a competitive receptor-binding assay indicated that B6 epitopes partially overlapped with those of prolactin (PRL). We then examined the resulting signal transduction pathways activated by this antibody in T-47D and CHO-PRLR cells and found that B6 induced different intracellular signalling compared with prolactin, which activates serine-threonine kinase (AKT), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), signal transducer and activator of transcription1 (STAT1) and STAT3 but not STAT5. The present study suggests that: (a) B6 may be a signal-specific prolactin receptor (PRLR) agonist; (b) B6 may be a biological reagent that can be used to explore the mechanism of PRLR-mediated intracellular signalling. In addition, this work also implies a strategy for preparing signal-specific cytokine agonists.

New insights in prolactin: pathological implications

Prolactin is a hormone that is mainly secreted by lactotroph cells of the anterior pituitary gland, and is involved in many biological processes including lactation and reproduction. Animal models have provided insights into the biology of prolactin proteins and offer compelling evidence that the different prolactin isoforms each have independent biological functions. The major isoform, 23 kDa prolactin, acts via its membrane receptor, the prolactin receptor (PRL-R), which is a member of the haematopoietic cytokine superfamily and for which the mechanism of activation has been deciphered. The 16 kDa prolactin isoform is a cleavage product derived from native prolactin, which has received particular attention as a result of its newly described inhibitory effects on angiogenesis and tumorigenesis. The discovery of multiple extrapituitary sites of prolactin secretion also increases the range of known functions of this hormone. This Review summarizes current knowledge of the biology of prolactin and its receptor, as well as its physiological and pathological roles. We focus on the role of prolactin in human pathophysiology, particularly the discovery of the mechanism underlying infertility associated with hyperprolactinaemia and the identification of the first mutation in human PRLR.

A Residue Quartet in the Extracellular Domain of the Prolactin Receptor Selectively Controls Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling

Cytokine receptors elicit several signaling pathways, but it is poorly understood how they select and discriminate between them. We have scrutinized the prolactin receptor as an archetype model of homodimeric cytokine receptors to address the role of the extracellular membrane proximal domain in signal transfer and pathway selection. Structure-guided manipulation of residues involved in the receptor dimerization interface identified one residue (position 170) that in cell-based assays profoundly altered pathway selectivity and species-specific bio-characteristics. Subsequent in vitro spectroscopic and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses revealed that this residue was part of a residue quartet responsible for specific local structural changes underlying these effects. This included alteration of a novel aromatic T-stack within the membrane proximal domain, which promoted selective signaling affecting primarily the MAPK (ERK1/2) pathway. Importantly, activation of the MAPK pathway correlated with in vitro stabilities of ternary ligand·receptor complexes, suggesting a threshold mean lifetime of the complex necessary to achieve maximal activation. No such dependence was observed for STAT5 signaling. Thus, this study establishes a residue quartet in the extracellular membrane proximal domain of homodimeric cytokine receptors as a key regulator of intracellular signaling discrimination.

A positive feedback loop between prolactin and STAT5 promotes angiogenesis

The signal transduction events that orchestrate cellular activities required for angiogenesis remain incompletely understood. We and others recently described that proangiogenic mediators such as fibroblast growth factors can activate members of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family. STAT5 activation is necessary and sufficient to induce migration, invasion and tube formation of endothelial cells. STAT5 effects on endothelial cells require the secretion of the prolactin (PRL) family member proliferin-1 (PLF1) in mice and PRL in humans. In human endothelial cells, PRL activates the PRL receptor (PRLR) resulting in MAPK and STAT5 activation, thus closing a positive feedback loop. In vivo, endothelial cell-derived PRL is expected to combine with PRL of tumor cell and pituitary origin to raise the concentration of this polypeptide hormone in the tumor microenvironment. Thus, PRL may stimulate tumor angiogenesis via autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine pathways. The disruption of tumor angiogenesis by interfering with PRL signaling may offer an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.

The role of the JAK-STAT pathway in neural stem cells, neural progenitor cells and reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury

Patients with spinal cord injuries can develop severe neurological damage and dysfunction, which is not only induced by primary but also by secondary injuries. As an evolutionarily conserved pathway of eukaryotes, the JAK-STAT pathway is associated with cell growth, survival, development and differentiation; activation of the JAK-STAT pathway has been previously reported in central nervous system injury. The JAK-STAT pathway is directly associated with neurogenesis and glia scar formation in the injury region. Following injury of the axon, the overexpression and activation of STAT3 is exhibited specifically in protecting neurons. To investigate the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in neuroprotection, we summarized the effect of JAK-STAT pathway in the following three sections: Firstly, the modulation of JAK-STAT pathway in proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells is discussed; secondly, the time-dependent effect of JAK-STAT pathway in reactive astrocytes to reveal their capability of neuroprotection is revealed and lastly, we focus on how the astrocyte-secretory polypeptides (astrocyte-derived cytokines and trophic factors) accomplish neuroprotection via the JAK-STAT pathway.

TIDAL WAVES: Network mechanisms in the neuroendocrine control of prolactin release

Neuroendocrine tuberoinfundibular dopamine (TIDA) neurons tonically inhibit pituitary release of the hormone, prolactin. Through the powerful actions of prolactin in promoting lactation and maternal behaviour while suppressing sexual drive and fertility, TIDA neurons play a key role in reproduction. We summarize insights from recent in vitro studies into the membrane properties and network behaviour of TIDA neurons including the observations that TIDA neurons exhibit a robust oscillation that is synchronized between cells and depends on intact gap junction communication. Comparisons are made with phasic firing patterns in other neuronal populations. Modulators involved in the control of lactation - including serotonin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone and prolactin itself - have been shown to change the electrical behaviour of TIDA cells. We propose that TIDA discharge mode may play a central role in tuning the amount of dopamine delivered to the pituitary and hence circulating prolactin concentrations in different reproductive states and pathological conditions.

Tyrosyl phosphorylated PAK1 regulates breast cancer cell motility in response to prolactin through filamin A

The p21-activated serine-threonine kinase (PAK1) is activated by small GTPase-dependent and -independent mechanisms and regulates cell motility. Both PAK1 and the hormone prolactin (PRL) have been implicated in breast cancer by numerous studies. We have previously shown that the PRL-activated tyrosine kinase JAK2 (Janus tyrosine kinase 2) phosphorylates PAK1 in vivo and identified tyrosines (Tyr) 153, 201, and 285 in the PAK1 molecule as sites of JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation. Here, we have used human breast cancer T47D cells stably overexpressing PAK1 wild type or PAK1 Y3F mutant in which Tyr(s) 153, 201, and 285 were mutated to phenylalanines to demonstrate that phosphorylation of these three tyrosines are required for maximal PRL-dependent ruffling. In addition, phosphorylation of these three tyrosines is required for increased migration of T47D cells in response to PRL as assessed by two independent motility assays. Finally, we show that PAK1 phosphorylates serine (Ser) 2152 of the actin-binding protein filamin A to a greater extent when PAK1 is tyrosyl phosphorylated by JAK2. Down-regulation of PAK1 or filamin A abolishes the effect of PRL on cell migration. Thus, our data presented here bring some insight into the mechanism of PRL-stimulated motility of breast cancer cells.

The Dual Role of TGFβ in Human Cancer: From Tumor Suppression to Cancer Metastasis

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) superfamily encompasses widespread and evolutionarily conserved polypeptide growth factors that regulate and orchestrate growth and differentiation in all cell types and tissues. While they regulate asymmetric cell division and cell fate determination during early development and embryogenesis, TGFβ family members play a major regulatory role in hormonal and immune responses, cell growth, cell death and cell immortalization, bone formation, tissue remodeling and repair, and erythropoiesis throughout adult life. The biological and physiological functions of TGFβ, the founding member of this family, and its receptors are of central importance to human diseases, particularly cancer. By regulating cell growth, death, and immortalization, TGFβ signaling pathways exert tumor suppressor effects in normal cells and early carcinomas. Thus, it is not surprising that a high number of human tumors arise due to mutations or deletions in the genes coding for the various TGFβ signaling components. As tumors develop and progress, these protective and cytostatic effects of TGFβ are often lost. TGFβ signaling then switches to promote cancer progression, invasion, and tumor metastasis. The molecular mechanisms underlying this dual role of TGFβ in human cancer will be discussed in depth in this paper, and it will highlight the challenge and importance of developing novel therapeutic strategies specifically aimed at blocking the prometastatic arm of the TGFβ signaling pathway without affecting its tumor suppressive effects.

Interplay between progesterone and prolactin in mammary development and implications for breast cancer

Progesterone and prolactin remodel mammary morphology during pregnancy by acting on the mammary epithelial cell hierarchy. The roles of each hormone in mammary development have been well studied, but evidence of signalling cross-talk between progesterone and prolactin is still emerging. Factors such as receptor activator of NFkB ligand (RANKL) may integrate signals from both hormones to orchestrate their joint actions on the epithelial cell hierarchy. Common targets of progesterone and prolactin signalling are also likely to integrate their pro-proliferative actions in breast cancer. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the interplay between progesterone and prolactin in mammary development may reveal therapeutic targets for breast cancer. This review summarises our understanding of Pg and PRL action in mammary gland development before focusing on molecular mechanisms of signalling cross-talk and the implications for breast cancer.

HMGN2 inducibly binds a novel transactivation domain in nuclear PRLr to coordinate Stat5a-mediated transcription

The direct actions of transmembrane receptors within the nucleus remain enigmatic. In this report, we demonstrate that the prolactin receptor (PRLr) localizes to the nucleus where it functions as a coactivator through its interactions with the latent transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a (Stat5a) and the high-mobility group N2 protein (HMGN2). We identify a novel transactivation domain within the PRLr that is activated by ligand-induced phosphorylation, an event coupled to HMGN2 binding. The association of the PRLr with HMGN2 enables Stat5a-responsive promoter binding, thus facilitating transcriptional activation and promoting anchorage-independent growth. We propose that HMGN2 serves as a critical regulatory factor in Stat5a-driven gene expression by facilitating the assembly of PRLr/Stat5a onto chromatin and that these events may serve to promote biological events that contribute to a tumorigenic phenotype. Our data imply that phosphorylation may be the molecular switch that activates a cell surface receptor transactivation domain, enabling it to tether chromatin-modifying factors, such as HMGN2, to target promoter regions in a sequence-specific manner.

Functional impact of manipulation on the relative orientation of human prolactin receptor domains

Hormone binding creates active receptor dimers for class 1 cytokine receptors; however, the detailed molecular mechanism by which these receptors are activated by their ligands is not well characterized, and it is unknown if these receptors share common mechanisms. A rotation model has been proposed for the activation of human erythropoietin receptor and human growth hormone receptor and is supported by evidence showing that additions of alanine at the junction of the transmembrane (TM) and intracellular (IC) domains and/or within the TM domain influenced receptor activities. This evidence suggests that alanine additions changed the relative orientations of the IC domains and their subsequent activation. We wished to determine if a similar mechanism was at play with human prolactin receptor (hPRLr). Up to four alanines were added between the TM and either the IC or extracellular (EC) domains to extend the TM helix and to rotate the IC or EC domains. Also, up to four glycines were placed between the TM and IC domains to provide increased flexibility between these two domains. Wild-type hPRLr or various mutant receptors were expressed in human embryonic kidney 293T cells that express endogenous Janus kinase 2. In the absence of human prolactin (hPRL), none of the alanine or glycine additions increased the level of receptor phosphorylation above that of wild-type hPRLr. In the presence of hPRL, both wild-type hPRLr and each of the mutant receptors were successfully phosphorylated. These data do not support a rotation mechanism for hPRLr activation or a requirement of a fixed spatial relationship between the TM and IC domains for hPRLr activation. In a second set of experiments, both wild-type hPRLr and either alanine- or glycine-extended receptors were coexpressed in 293T cells. In the absence of hPRL, there was no detectable phosphorylation of hPRLr. Such data do not support a piston movement between the hPRLr pair in their activation.

Adapter protein SH2B1beta binds filamin A to regulate prolactin-dependent cytoskeletal reorganization and cell motility

Prolactin (PRL) regulates cytoskeletal rearrangement and cell motility. PRL-activated Janus tyrosine kinase 2 (JAK2) phosphorylates the p21-activated serine-threonine kinase (PAK)1 and the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing adapter protein SH2B1β. SH2B1β is an actin-binding protein that cross-links actin filaments, whereas PAK1 regulates the actin cytoskeleton by different mechanisms, including direct phosphorylation of the actin-binding protein filamin A (FLNa). Here, we have used a FLNa-deficient human melanoma cell line (M2) and its derivative line (A7) that stably expresses FLNa to demonstrate that SH2B1β and FLNa are required for maximal PRL-dependent cell ruffling. We have found that in addition to two actin-binding domains, SH2B1β has a FLNa-binding domain (amino acids 200-260) that binds directly to repeats 17-23 of FLNa. The SH2B1β-FLNa interaction participates in PRL-dependent actin rearrangement. We also show that phosphorylation of the three tyrosines of PAK1 by JAK2, as well as the presence of FLNa, play a role in PRL-dependent cell ruffling. Finally, we show that the actin- and FLNa-binding-deficient mutant of SH2B1β (SH2B1β 3Δ) abolished PRL-dependent ruffling and PRL-dependent cell migration when expressed along with PAK1 Y3F (JAK2 tyrosyl-phosphorylation-deficient mutant). Together, these data provide insight into a novel mechanism of PRL-stimulated regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell motility via JAK2 signaling through FLNa, PAK1, and SH2B1β. We propose a model for PRL-dependent regulation of the actin cytoskeleton that integrates our findings with previous studies.

How integrins control mammary epithelial differentiation: a possible role for the ILK-PINCH-Parvin complex

Differentiation into tissue-specific cell types occurs in response to numerous external signals. Integrins impart signals from the extracellular matrix microenvironment that are required for cell differentiation. However, the precise cytoplasmic transducers of these signals are yet to be understood properly. In lactating mammary epithelial cells, integrin-linked kinase has been identified as an indispensable integrin-signalling adaptor that enables the activation of Rac1, which is necessary for prolactin-induced milk protein expression. Here we use examples from various tissues to summarise possible mechanisms by which ILK and its binding partners PINCH and Parvin (ILK-PINCH-Parvin complex) could be required for Rac activation and mammary epithelial differentiation.

Obligate ordered binding of human lactogenic cytokines

Class 1 cytokines bind two receptors to create an active heterotrimeric complex. It has been argued that ligand binding to their receptors is an ordered process, but a structural mechanism describing this process has not been determined. We have previously described an obligate ordered binding mechanism for the human prolactin/prolactin receptor heterotrimeric complex. In this work we expand this conceptual understanding of ordered binding to include three human lactogenic hormones: prolactin, growth hormone, and placental lactogen. We independently blocked either of the two receptor binding sites of each hormone and used surface plasmon resonance to measure human prolactin receptor binding kinetics and stoichiometries to the remaining binding surface. When site 1 of any of the three hormones was blocked, site 2 could not bind the receptor. But blocking site 2 did not affect receptor binding at site 1, indicating a requirement for receptor binding to site 1 before site 2 binding. In addition we noted variable responses to the presence of zinc in hormone-receptor interaction. Finally, we performed Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analyses where receptor binding at subsaturating stoichiometries induced changes in FRET signaling, indicative of binding-induced changes in hormone conformation, whereas at receptor:hormone ratios in excess of 2:1 no additional changes in FRET signaling were observed. These results strongly support a conformationally mediated obligate-ordered receptor binding for each of the three lactogenic hormones.

A non-catalytic function of the Src family tyrosine kinases controls prolactin-induced Jak2 signaling

The cytokine prolactin (PRL) plays important roles in the proliferation and differentiation of the mammary gland and it has been implicated in tumorigenesis. The prolactin receptor (PRLR) is devoid of catalytic activity and its mitogenic response is controlled by cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases of the Src (SFK) and Jak families. How PRLR uses these kinases for signaling is not well understood. Previous studies indicated that PRLR-induced Jak2 activation does not require SFK catalytic activity in favor of separate signaling operating on this cellular response. Here we show that, nevertheless, PRLR requires Src-SH2 and -SH3 domains for Jak2 signaling. In W53 lymphoid cells, conditional expression of two c-Src non-catalytic mutants, either SrcK295M/Y527F or SrcK, whose SH3 and SH2 domains are exposed, controls Jak2/Stat5 activation by recruiting Jak2, avoiding its activation by endogenous active SFK. In contrast, the kinase inactive SrcK295M mutant, with inaccessible SH3 and SH2 domains, does not. Furthermore, all three mutants attenuate PRLR-induced Akt and p70S6K activation. Accordingly, PRLR-induced Jak2/Stat5 signaling is inhibited in MCF7 breast cancer cells by Src depletion, expression of SrcK295M/Y527F or active Src harboring an inactive SH2 (SrcR175L) or SH3 domain (SrcW118A). Finally, Jak2/Stat5 pathway is also reduced in Src-/- mice mammary glands. We thus conclude that, in addition to Akt and p70S6K, SFK regulate PRLR-induced Jak2 signaling through a kinase-independent mechanism.

STAT5 activity in pancreatic β-cells

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)5A and -5B are latent transcription factors activated by cytokines and hormones of the cytokine family. In pancreatic insulin-secreting β-cells, STAT5A and -5B are activated primarily by prolactin and growth hormone stimulation and are important mediators of the potent stimulation of proliferation and insulin production caused by these hormones. STAT5A and -5B are both expressed in β-cells and control the expression of a number of mRNAs implicated in cell replication control, insulin biosynthesis and secretion. In addition to STAT5A and -5B being transcriptional activators, they may also repress gene transcription. By these means, STAT5 proteins increase the levels of anti-apoptotic transcripts in β-cells and repress expression of pro-apoptotic genes. This review focuses on the anti-apoptotic role of STAT5 signaling, providing a mechanism for β-cell resistance to pro-apoptotic cytokines, Type 1 diabetes mellitus and obesity-associated β-cell stress. It is clear from studies of STAT5 signaling in pancreatic β-cells that STAT5 is important for postnatal β-cell compensatory growth (as in pregnancy or obesity) and in the defense against β-cell stress factors.

Prolactin regulation of mammary gland development

Mammary morphogenesis is orchestrated with other reproductive events by pituitary-driven changes to the systemic hormone environment, initiating the formation of a mammary ductal network during puberty and the addition of secretory alveoli during pregnancy. Prolactin is the major driver of development during pregnancy via regulation of ovarian progesterone production (in many species) and direct effects on mammary epithelial cells (in all species). Together these hormones regulate two aspects of development that are the subject of intense interest: (1) a genomic regulatory network that integrates many additional spatial and temporal cues to control gene expression and (2), the activity of a stem and progenitor cell hierarchy. Amalgamation of these two aspects will increase our understanding of cell proliferation and differentiation within the mammary gland, with clear application to our attempts to control breast cancer. Here we focus on providing an over-view of prolactin action during development of the model murine mammary gland.

What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans?

Prolactin (PRL) is a 23-kDa protein hormone that binds to a single-span membrane receptor, a member of the cytokine receptor superfamily, and exerts its action via several interacting signaling pathways. PRL is a multifunctional hormone that affects multiple reproductive and metabolic functions and is also involved in tumorigenicity. In addition to being a classical pituitary hormone, PRL in humans is produced by many tissues throughout the body where it acts as a cytokine. The objective of this review is to compare and contrast multiple aspects of PRL, from structure to regulation, and from physiology to pathology in rats, mice, and humans. At each juncture, questions are raised whether, or to what extent, data from rodents are relevant to PRL homeostasis in humans. Most current knowledge on PRL has been obtained from studies with rats and, more recently, from the use of transgenic mice. Although this information is indispensable for understanding PRL in human health and disease, there is sufficient disparity in the control of the production, distribution, and physiological functions of PRL among these species to warrant careful and judicial extrapolation to humans.

Coactivation of janus tyrosine kinase (Jak)1 positively modulates prolactin-Jak2 signaling in breast cancer: recruitment of ERK and signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)3 and enhancement of Akt and Stat5a/b pathways

Prolactin (PRL) receptors (PRLRs) have been considered selective activators of Janus tyrosine kinase (Jak)2 but not Jak1, Jak3, or Tyk2. We now report marked PRL-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak1, in addition to Jak2, in a series of human breast cancer cell lines, including T47D, MCF7, and SKBR3. In contrast, PRL did not activate Jak1 in immortalized, noncancerous breast epithelial lines HC11, MCF10A, ME16C, and HBL-100, or in CWR22Rv1 prostate cancer cells or MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. However, introduction of exogenous PRLR into MCF10A, ME16C, or MDA-MB-231 cells reconstituted both PRL-Jak1 and PRL-Jak2 signals. In vitro kinase assays verified that PRL stimulated enzymatic activity of Jak1 in T47D cells, and PRL activated Jak1 and Jak2 with indistinguishable time and dose kinetics. Relative Jak2 deficiency did not cause PRLR activation of Jak1, because overexpression of Jak2 did not interfere with PRL activation of Jak1. Instead, PRL activated Jak1 through a Jak2-dependent mechanism, based on disruption of PRL activation of Jak1 after Jak2 suppression by 1) lentiviral delivery of Jak2 short hairpin RNA, 2) adenoviral delivery of dominant-negative Jak2, and 3) AG490 pharmacological inhibition. Finally, suppression of Jak1 by lentiviral delivery of Jak1 short hairpin RNA blocked PRL activation of ERK and signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)3 and suppressed PRL activation of Jak2, Stat5a, Stat5b, and Akt, as well as tyrosine phosphorylation of PRLR. The data suggest that PRL activation of Jak1 represents a novel, Jak2-dependent mechanism that may serve as a regulatory switch leading to PRL activation of ERK and Stat3 pathways, while also serving to enhance PRL-induced Stat5a/b and Akt signaling.

Regulation and functional relevance of milk fat globules and their components in the mammary gland

Mammary gland and epithelial cells are unique to mammals and are under the control of lactogenic hormones such as prolactin. Recent findings indicated that major components of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) are under the control of lactogenic hormones, and that the major components butyrophilin and xanthine oxidoreductase are indispensable for milk fat secretion. Further, prolactin signaling is negatively controlled by two highly related protein tyrosine phosphatases, PTP1B and TC-PTP. Milk fat globule EGF factor 8 (MFG-E8) is one of the major components of MFGM and is upregulated during lactation. MFG-E8 is further upregulated in the involuting mammary gland. MFG-E8 on exosome-like membrane vesicles in the milk recovered from post-weaning but not lactating mammary glands exhibits higher binding activity to phosphatidylserine and apoptotic mammary epithelial cells, and serves as a link between apoptotic mammary epithelial cells and phagocytes. Recent reports using MFG-E8 deficient mice support the view that MFG-E8 is indispensable for eliminating apoptotic mammary epithelial cells during involution.

Prolactin and growth hormone signaling

Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) act by way of their receptors as either hormones (systemically) or cytokines (locally). The Jak2/Stat5 pathway is the principal route by which PRL/GH activate target genes. The availability of knockout mice for each member of this signaling cascade has provided opportunities to understand their unique interactions. Jak2 is important in alternative signal transduction schema such as the MAP kinase and PI3K/Akt pathways. The putative Jak2/RUSH pathway is based on the fact that RUSH mediates the ability of PRL to augment progesterone-dependent gene transcription. New evidence shows that suppressors, regulators, and degraders control Jak2/Stat5. This review focuses on the most recent advances in the field of PRL/GH signal transduction.

Novel association of Vav2 and Nek3 modulates signaling through the human prolactin receptor

Prolactin (PRL) receptor activation contributes to the progression and motility of human breast cancer. This event activates multimeric signaling pathways, including the activation of the Vav family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. To detect novel proteins interacting with Vav, yeast two-hybrid analysis was performed and demonstrated an interaction between the serine/threonine NIMA (never in mitosis A)-related family kinase p56Nek3 and Vav1. The PRL-dependent interaction of Nek3 with Vav1 and Vav2 was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation analysis. PRL stimulation of T47D cells induced Nek3 kinase activity and the interaction of Vav2/Nek3 with the PRL receptor. Increased Nek3 levels up-regulated Vav2 serine and tyrosine phosphorylation, whereas knockdown of Nek3 resulted in a reduction of Vav2 phosphorylation. Activation of guanosine triphosphatase Rac-1 in Chinese hamster ovary transfectants required both Nek3 and Vav2 and was inhibited by the overexpression of a kinase inactivating Nek3 mutant. However, overexpression of either Nek3 or kinase-inactive Nek3 had no effect on Vav2-potentiated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5-mediated gene expression. Overexpression of kinase inactive Nek3 in T47D cells led to a 50% increase in apoptosis vs. controls. These data suggest that the PRL-mediated activation of Nek3 contributes differentially to Vav2 signaling pathways involving Rac1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and implicates Nek3 during PRL-mediated actions in breast cancer.

Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta and matrix metalloproteinases by estrogen and prolactin in breast cancer cells

Hormones, estrogen and prolactin, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), and matrixmetalloproteinases (MMPs) may modulate breast cancer progression. The goal of this research was to examine the regulation of expression of TGF-beta and MMPs (MMP-1, 2, 9) by estrogen and prolactin, independently and in combination, at physiological doses, and at doses stimulating cancer cell (T47D) proliferation in vitro. Prolactin, and estrogen synergistically, and similarly, inhibited the expression of TGF-beta and MMPs at physiological concentrations without altering cell proliferation, indicating a beneficial role of the hormones. The growth stimulating concentration of prolactin, but not estrogen, also inhibited the TGF-beta and MMP expression.

Thyroid hormone, glucocorticoids, and prolactin at the nexus of physiology, reproduction, and toxicology

A symposium at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology brought together an expert group of endocrinologists to review how non-reproductive hormones can affect the endocrine system. This publication captures the essence of those presentations. Paul Cooke and Denise Holsberger recapitulate the evidence of how thyroid hormones affect male and female reproduction, and reproductive development. Ray Witorsch summarizes the many effects of glucocorticoids on the reproductive system. Finally, Paul Sylvester reviews the mechanism of action of prolactin, and reminds us that this ancient hormone has many functions beyond lactation.

The structural basis for biological signaling, regulation, and specificity in the growth hormone-prolactin system of hormones and receptors

The pituitary hormones growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL) and placental lactogen (PL), are members of an extensive cytokine superfamily of hormones and receptors that share many of the same general structure-function relationships in expressing their biological activities. The biology of the pituitary hormones involves a very sophisticated interplay of cross-reactivity and specificity. Biological activity is triggered via a hormone-induced receptor homodimerization process that is regulated by tertiary features of the hormone. These hormones have an asymmetric four alpha-helical bundle structure that gives rise to two receptor binding sites that have distinctly different topographies and electrostatic character. This feature plays an important role in the regulation of these systems by producing binding surfaces with dramatically different binding affinities to the receptor extracellular domains (ECD). As a consequence, the signaling complexes for systems that activate through receptor homodimerization are formed in a controlled sequential step-wise manner. Extensive biochemical and biophysical characterization of the two hormone-receptor interfaces indicate that the energetic properties of the two binding sites are fundamentally different and that the receptor shows extraordinary conformational plasticity to mate with the topographically dissimilar sites on the hormone. An unexpected finding has been that the two hormone binding sites are allosterically coupled; a certain set of mutations in the higher affinity site can produce both conformational and energetic effects in the lower affinity site. These effects are so large that at some level they must have played some role in the evolution of the molecule.

A novel SHP-1/Grb2-dependent mechanism of negative regulation of cytokine-receptor signaling: contribution of SHP-1 C-terminal tyrosines in cytokine signaling

SHP-1, an src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase, functions as a negative regulator of signaling downstream of cytokine receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor complexes of the immune system. Dephosphorylation of receptors and/or receptor-associated kinases has been described as the mechanism for the function of SHP-1. Here we demonstrate a novel mechanism by which SHP-1 down-regulates the Janus kinase-2 (Jak2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 (Stat5) pathway downstream of the prolactin receptor (PRLR) and the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) in a catalytic activity-independent manner. Structural/functional analysis of SHP-1 defined the C-terminal tyrosine residues (Y278, Y303, Y538, Y566) within growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb-2) binding motif to be responsible for delivering the inhibitory effects. Our results further indicate that these tyrosine residues, via recruitment of the adaptor protein Grb-2, are required for targeting the inhibitory protein suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1) to Jak2 kinase. Finally, loss of SOCS-1 expression in SOCS-1(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells led to attenuation in SHP-1 function to down-regulate PRL-induced Stat5 activation. All together, our results indicate that SHP-1 inhibits PRLR and EPOR signaling by recruitment and targeting of SOCS-1 to Jak2, highlighting a new mechanism of SHP-1 regulation of cytokine-receptor signaling.

SHP-2 regulates SOCS-1-mediated Janus kinase-2 ubiquitination/degradation downstream of the prolactin receptor

The protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 is an important regulator of the Janus kinase-2 (Jak2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat) pathway downstream of the cytokine/prolactin receptor family. We report that SHP-2 dephosphorylates tyrosine (Tyr-1007) of Jak2 kinase, a critical recruitment site for the ubiquitin ligase-associated inhibitory protein suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1), thereby contributing to Jak2 stability. Inactivation of SHP-2 function by blocking receptor/SHP-2 association or by using a catalytically inactive mutant of SHP-2 led to a marked increase in Jak2 ubiquitination/degradation, Jak2 phosphorylation on Tyr-1007, and Jak2/SOCS-1 association. Furthermore, functional studies indicate that modulating the interaction of Jak2/SOCS-1 by SHP-2 is essential for prolactin/Stat5-mediated signaling. Together our results provide a novel function for SHP-2 as a positive regulator of cytokine receptor signaling by regulating ubiquitination/degradation pathways.

Growth hormone action on proliferation and differentiation of cerebral cortical cells from fetal rat

To define the role of GH during central nervous system development, we performed studies in cultured rat cerebral cortical cells from 14- (E14) and 17-d-old embryos (E17). The expression of GH receptor, IGF-I receptor, and IGF-I mRNAs was confirmed. In E17, GH increased total cell number (3.9-fold), [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation (3.5-fold), proliferating cell nuclear antigen levels (2.5-fold), and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-positive cells (2.5-fold). GH action on nestin/BrdU-positive cells was increased in E14 cells at 3 d in vitro (80-fold) but not at 7 d in vitro. In E14 cells, GH increased (9.5-fold) beta-tubulin/BrdU cells. In E17 cells, GH induced neuronal differentiation, as indicated by the absence of beta-tubulin/BrdU-positive cells and the 5.9-fold increment of beta-tubulin protein, and increased glial fibrillary acidic protein/BrdU-positive cells (2.5-fold) and glial fibrillary acidic protein expression (4.5-fold). GH-induced proliferation and differentiation was blocked by IGF-I antiserum. GH increased IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), IGF-I receptor protein and its phosphorylation. This study shows that GH promotes proliferation of neural precursors, neurogenesis, and gliogenesis during brain development. These responses are mediated by locally produced IGF-I. GH-induced IGFBP-3 may also have a role in these responses. Therefore, GH is able to activate the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 system in these cerebral cells and induce a physiological action of IGF-I.

The adaptor function of SHP-2 downstream of the prolactin receptor is required for the recruitment of p29, a substrate of SHP-2

SHP-2, a cytosolic protein tyrosine phosphatase with two SH2 domains and multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites, contributes to signal transduction as an enzyme and/or adaptor molecule. Here we demonstrate that prolactin (PRL) stimulation of the PRL-responsive Nb2 cells, a rat lymphoma cell line, and T47D cells, a human breast cancer cell line, lead to the complex formation of SHP-2 and growth factor receptor-bound protein-2 (grb2). Using transient co-overexpression studies of the prolactin receptor (PRLR) and several tyrosine to phenylalanine mutants of SHP-2, we show that grb2 associates with SHP-2 through the C-terminal tyrosine residues of SHP-2, Y(546) and Y(584). Furthermore, in this study, we found a highly phosphorylated, 29-kDa protein (p29), a substrate of SHP-2. The recruitment of p29 to SHP-2 requires the carboxy-terminal tyrosine residues of SHP-2 (Y(546) and Y(584)). Together, our results indicate that SHP-2 may function as an adaptor molecule downstream of the PRLR and highlight a new recruitment mechanism of SHP-2 substrates.

The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma

The contribution of prolactin (PRL) to the pathogenesis and progression of human breast cancer at the cellular, transgenic, and epidemiological levels is increasingly appreciated. Acting at the endocrine and autocrine/paracrine levels, PRL functions to stimulate the growth and motility of human breast cancer cells. The actions of this ligand are mediated by at least six recognized PRL receptor isoforms found on, or secreted by, human breast epithelium. The PRL/PRL receptor complex associates with and activates several signaling networks that are shared with other members of the cytokine receptor superfamily. Coupled with the recently identified intranuclear function of PRL, these networks are integrated into the in vitro and in vivo actions induced by ligand. These findings indicate that antagonists of PRL/PRL receptor interaction or PRL receptor-associated signal transduction may be of considerable utility in the treatment of human breast cancer.

Prolactin induces SHP-2 association with Stat5, nuclear translocation, and binding to the beta-casein gene promoter in mammary cells

The Src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 contributes to prolactin receptor (PRLR) signal transduction to beta-casein gene promoter activation. We report for the first time that SHP-2 physically associates with the signal transducer and activator of transcription-5a (Stat5a), an important mediator of PRLR signaling to milk protein gene activation, in the mouse mammary HC11 and the human breast cancer T47D cells when stimulated with prolactin (PRL) and human growth hormone, respectively. In addition, overexpression studies indicate that the carboxyl-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 is required to maintain tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat5 and its interaction with SHP-2. Furthermore, we demonstrate by nuclear co-immunoprecipitation and indirect immunofluorescence studies that PRL stimulation of mammary cells leads to the nuclear translocation of SHP-2 as a complex with Stat5a. This process was found to involve the catalytic activity of the phosphatase. Finally, using the Stat5 GAS (gamma-activated sequence) element of the beta-casein gene promoter in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we demonstrate that PRL induces the SHP-2-Stat5a complex to bind to DNA. The presence of the phosphatase in the protein-bound DNA complex was verified by using polyclonal antisera to SHP-2. Our studies indicate a tight physical and functional interaction between SHP2 and Stat5 required for regulation and perpetuation of PRL-mediated signaling in mammary cells and suggest a potential role for SHP-2 in the nucleus.

G120K-PEG, a human GH antagonist, decreases GH signal transduction in the liver of mice

After receptor binding, growth hormone (GH) induces GH receptors (GHR) dimerization and JAK2 is activated after its association with a dimerized GHR, stimulating the tyrosyl phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), IRS-2 and Shc proteins. G120K-PEG, a GH antagonist is produced by a mutation that blocks GH action by preventing the GHR dimerization. This study shows that the inhibitory effect of G120K-PEG was maximal with a GH:G120K-PEG ratio of 1:100, as no increase in JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation was observed with this dose of GH. When the dose of GH was increased and with a GH:G120K-PEG ratio of 1:10 some tyrosyl phosphorylation of JAK2 could be observed. Additionally, GH-induced IRS-1, IRS-2 and SHC tyrosyl phosphorylation was inhibited approximately 50% at equimolar concentrations of the antagonist of GH and almost abolished with a GH:G120K-PEG ratio of 1:100. The results clearly show that G120K-PEG inhibits GH signal transduction in mouse liver.