Efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin extended-release delivery system: a pooled analysis

Whole exome sequencing for non-selective pediatric patients with hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia is a group of conditions with abnormally elevated levels of any or all lipids or lipoproteins in the blood. It is highly heterogeneous both genetically and clinically, which contributes to diagnostic challenges and results in many patients to be underdiagnosed and undertreated in China. Precise diagnosis and early management are critical to reduce the incidence of potential coronary artery disease and cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

We performed a single center study to demonstrate the clinical utility of the genome-first approach by whole exome sequencing (WES) for 12 pediatric patients with abnormal lipids or lipoproteins levels. In vitro experiments were performed in COS-7 cells to further evaluate the biological function of the novel variants. We identified ten pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants and three of them were novel. Molecular cause was uncovered in five (41.7%) patients including three lipoprotein lipase deficiency patients, one hypercholesterolemia patient and one sitosterolemia patient. We also found three patients with rare variants of uncertain significance. Copy number variant (CNV) analysis with WES data did not reveal any potential hyperlipidemia related CNVs in all patients.

CONCLUSION

We expanded the mutation and phenotype spectra of familial hyperlipidemia. Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of genome-first approach for evaluation pediatric hyperlipidemia patients and showed that WES can be used as the first-tier test for patients with suspected Mendelian hyperlipidemia disorder.

Mutation spectrum and polygenic score in German patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Autosomal-dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by increased plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and a substantial risk to develop cardiovascular disease. Causative mutations in three major genes are known: the LDL receptor gene (LDLR), the apolipoprotein B gene (APOB) and the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 gene (PCSK9). We clinically characterized 336 patients suspected to have FH and screened them for disease causing mutations in LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9. We genotyped six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to calculate a polygenic risk score for the patients and 1985 controls. The 117 patients had a causative variant in one of the analyzed genes. Most variants were found in the LDLR gene (84.9%) with 11 novel mutations. The mean polygenic risk score was significantly higher in FH mutation negative subjects than in FH mutation positive patients (P < .05) and healthy controls (P < .001), whereas the score of the two latter groups did not differ significantly. However, the score explained only about 3% of the baseline LDL-C variance. We verified the previously described clinical and genetic variability of FH for German hypercholesterolemic patients. Evaluation of a six-SNP polygenic score recently proposed for clinical use suggests that it is not a reliable tool to classify hypercholesterolemic patients.

LDL-cholesterol: The lower the better

The reduction of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-chol) has been associated with a decrease in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It has been demonstrated that there is no value of LDL-chol below which there ceases to be a preventive benefit with its reduction, and neither has it been observed that there is a higher incidence of secondary effects associated with lower concentrations of LDL-chol. Although there is a wide range of lipid-lowering drugs available, a high percentage of patients do not achieve the desired LDL-chol levels. The high-potency statins reduce the LDL-chol by 15-30%, and can double the percentage of patients that reach their desired level. This combination has shown to be safe and effective in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Another option is the combination of statins with exchange resins, although this requires a more complex management. The inhibition of PCSK9 protein with monoclonal antibodies reduces the LDL-chol by more than 60%, and is effective in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, due to its cost, its use is restricted to patients with ischaemia or familial hypercholesterolaemia that do not achieve the desired levels with conventional drugs. The evidence base as regards the benefit and safety of achieving the desired levels of LDL-chol is very wide and is still increasing. In the next few years, it may be necessary to adjust the intensity of the hypercholesterolaemia treatment to the level of vascular risk of the patients, and to the level of reduction necessary to achieve the therapeutic targets. This will result in a more effective cardiovascular prevention and in a better quality of life, particularly in the large group of patients at higher vascular risk.

Clinical characterization and mutation spectrum of German patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autosomal-dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and a dramatically increased risk to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD). Mutations in three major genes have been associated with FH: the LDL receptor gene (LDLR), the apolipoprotein B gene (APOB), and the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 gene (PCSK9). Here we investigated the frequency and the spectrum of FH causing mutations in Germany.

METHODS

We screened 206 hypercholesterolemic patients, of whom 192 were apparently unrelated, for mutations in the coding region of the genes LDLR, PCSK9 and the APOB [c.10580G > A (p.Arg3527Gln)]. We also categorized the patients according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (DLCNC) in order to allow a comparison between the mutations identified and the clinical phenotypes observed. Including data from previous studies on German FH patients enabled us to analyse data from 479 individuals.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight FH causing variants were found in 92 patients (nine in related patients and 6 patients with two variants and likely two affected alleles), of which 90 were located in the LDLR gene and eight mutations were identified in the APOB gene (c.10580G > A). No mutation was found in the PCSK9 gene. While 48 of the LDLR mutations were previously described as disease causing, we found 9 new LDLR variants which were rated as "pathogenic" or "likely pathogenic" based on the predicted effect on the corresponding protein. The proportions of different types of LDLR mutations and their localization within the gene was similar in the group of patients screened for mutations here and in the combined analysis of 479 patients (current study/cases from the literature) and also to other studies on the LDLR mutation spectrum, with about half of the variants being of the missense type and clustering of mutations in exons 4, 5 and 9. The mutation detection rate in the 35 definite and 45 probable FH patients (according to DLCNC) was 77.1% and 68.9%, respectively. The data show a similar discriminatory power between the DLCNC score (AUC = 0.789 (95% CI 0.721-0,857)) and baseline LDL-C levels (AUC = 0.799 (95% CI = 0.732-0.866)).

CONCLUSIONS

This study further substantiates the mutation spectrum for FH in German patients and confirms the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of the disease.

Genetic Testing in Hyperlipidemia

Hereditary dyslipidemias are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, yet with significant health implications, most importantly causing preventable premature cardiovascular diseases. The commonly used clinical criteria to diagnose hereditary lipid disorders are specific but are not very sensitive. Genetic testing may be of value in making accurate diagnosis and improving cascade screening of family members, and potentially, in risk assessment and choice of therapy. This review focuses on using genetic testing in the clinical setting for lipid disorders, particularly familial hypercholesterolemia.

Improvement of fluvastatin bioavailability by loading on nanostructured lipid carriers

The aim of this study is to prepare fluvastatin nanostructured lipid carriers (FLV-NLCs) in order to find an innovative way to alleviate FLV-associated disadvantages. The limitations include poor solubility and extensive first-pass metabolism, resulting in low (30%) bioavailability and short elimination half-life (1–3 hours). FLV-NLCs were prepared by hot emulsification–ultrasonication method. Ten runs were created by three-level factorial design (32) to optimize FLV-NLCs formulation process. In this study, two factors, four responses, and three-level factorial design were endorsed. The studied variables were lipid:oil ratio (X₁) and sonication time (X₂). However, the responses parameter determined the particle size (Y₁, nm), entrapment efficiency percent (EE%, Y₂), particles zeta potential (Y₃), and 80% of the drug release after 24 hours (X₄). Furthermore, stability and in vivo pharmacokinetics were studied in rats. The optimized consisted formula had an average particle size of 165 nm with 75.32% entrapment efficiency and 85.32% of drug released after 24 hours, demonstrating a sustaining drug release over 24 hours. An in vivo pharmacokinetic study revealed enhanced bioavailability by >2.64-fold, and the mean residence time was longer than that of FLV. We concluded that NLCs could be promising carriers for sustained/prolonged FLV release with enhanced oral bioavailability.

Effect of Clopidogrel on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Fluvastatin

This study assessed the effects of clopidogrel, a CYP 2C9 inhibitor, on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. The effects of combined clopidogrel-fluvastatin treatment on platelet function were also determined. Subjects received 80 mg fluvastatin (extended-release formulation) alone on days 1 through 9, 80 mg fluvastatin and 300 mg clopidogrel (loading dose) on day 10, and 80 mg fluvastatin and 75 mg clopidogrel (maintenance dose) on days 11 through 19. Compared to treatment with fluvastatin alone, fluvastatin AUC was similar and C(max) increased marginally (15.7%) with concomitant treatment with clopidogrel. Platelet aggregation was inhibited by clopidogrel by 33% two hours after the loading dose and by 47% at steady state, similar to that reported for clopidogrel alone treatment. The authors conclude that coadministration of fluvastatin and clopidogrel has no clinically relevant effect on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics or on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

The difference in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between extended-release fluvastatin and immediate-release fluvastatin in healthy Chinese subjects

The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between extended-release (ER) fluvastatin tablet and its immediate-release (IR) capsule in Chinese healthy subjects. This was an open-label, single/multiple-dose, two-period, two-treatment, crossover, randomized trial with a minimum washout period of 7 days. Twenty healthy male adult subjects were given fluvastatin ER tablet 80 mg QD by oral administration or fluvastatin IR capsule 40 mg BID for seven days. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing on day 1 and day 7. Serum concentrations of fluvastatin were determined by LC-MS/MS. For fluvastatin ER tablet 80 mg QD, C_max was 61.0 ± 39.0 and 63.9 ± 29.7 ng/mL, and AUC_0−24 h was 242 ± 156 and 253 ± 91.1 ng·h/mL on day 1 and 7, respectively. For fluvastatin IR capsule 40 mg BID, C_max was 283 ± 271 and 382 ± 255 ng/mL, and AUC_0−24 h was 720 ± 776 and 917 ± 994 ng·h/mL on day 1 and day 7, respectively. The relative bioavailability of fluvastatin ER tablet 80 mg QD to fluvastatin IR capsule 40 mg BID is (45.3 ± 23.9)% and (43.3 ± 24.1)% on day 1 and day 7, respectively. T_max for fluvastatin ER tablet was 2.50 and 2.60 h and for capsule was 0.78 and 0.88 h on day 1 and day 7, respectively. In the first period, compared to baseline, cholesterol decreased 15.3% in fluvastatin ER tablet 80 mg QD and 16.9% in fluvastatin IR capsule 40 mg BID. Triglyceride decreased 3.7% in fluvastatin ER tablet 80 mg QD and 19.1% in fluvastatin IR capsule 40 mg BID. The difference has no statistical significance at P > 0.05 in reduction percent of cholesterol and triglyceride between the two groups. No adverse events were recorded. The results indicated that C_max of fluvastatin ER tablet is reduced and T_max is prolonged compared with IR capsule. There is no accumulation for ER formulation after multiple doses.

Preparation of lovastatin matrix sustained-release pellets by extrusion-spheronization combined with microcrystal dispersion technique

The poorly water-soluble drug lovastatin (LVA) is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme A reductase and has a slow dissolution rate. In this study, a microcrystal dispersion (MCD) technique was used in the preparation of LVA to increase its dissolution rate and then combining with an extrusion-spheronization method, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) matrix sustained-release pellets containing LVA-MCD were developed and characterized in vitro. Photomicrographs indicated that LVA-MCD existed as fine crystals, of which the mean particle size was reduced from 65.75 μm to 3.97 μm and the dried LVA-MCD powders released completely within 2 hours. SEM results during the release process showed that pellets possessed a matrix structure and after the dissolution test, this matrix structure became loose and porous. The release of LVA was fast and complete, and accumulated release by the optimal formulation was: 0.5 h (20.23 ± 3.40%), 2 h (56.87 ± 2.85%), 4 h (78.71 ± 3.42%), and 8 h (96.81 ± 3.30%). The 3 months accelerating test at 40°C and 75% RH demonstrated that drug release of pellets was not changed and drug degradation was less than 1%. Thus, a novel MCD process with MCC matrix was feasible and effective to get complete release without a lag time for the poorly water soluble drug, LVA, with high stability.

Statins therapy: a review on conventional and novel formulation approaches

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High levels of cholesterol lead to atherosclerosis, a factor predisposing to the development of coronary artery disease. Statin drugs, i.e. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, have been known since the end of the last century for their benefits against cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases and are widely used clinically. This review aims at compiling the research inputs being made for developing therapeutically efficacious dosage forms that have the potential to surmount the limitations of conventional dosage forms of statins.

KEY FINDINGS

Statin drugs can reduce the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and prevent the onset and development of atherosclerosis, and are therefore used as an effective treatment against primary hypercholesterolemia. At present, statin drugs are most often administered orally, on a daily basis. After administration, the bioavailability and the general circulation of statin drugs is fairly low due to the first-pass metabolism in the liver and clearance by the digestive system. Extensive pharmaceutical research in understanding the causes of low oral bioavailability has led to the development of novel technologies to address these challenges.

SUMMARY

These technologies vary from conventional dosage forms to nanoparticulate drug-delivery systems, and have the potential to cause improvements in bioavailability and consequently therapeutic efficacy.

Novel biodegradable polyester poly(propylene succinate): synthesis and application in the preparation of solid dispersions and nanoparticles of a water-soluble drug

Poly(propylene succinate) (PPSu) polymers of average molecular weights from 2,800 to 13,100 g/mol were synthesized and characterized with regard to crystallinity, thermal properties, and cytocompatibility. Higher molecular weight samples exhibited lower degree of crystallinity and melted at lower temperatures. Melting of the polymer appeared to begin at 38 degrees C. PPSu cytocompatibility was investigated based on human umbilical vein endothelial cells viability in the presence of increasing concentrations of polymer, and it was found that PPSu exhibited comparable cytocompatibility with poly(DL-lactide). The feasibility of applying PPSu as a drug carrier was shown for the first time, as solid dispersions and nanoparticles of sodium fluvastatin based in PPSu were prepared. Drug release rates decreased with increasing the molecular weight of PPSu in both solid dispersions and nanoparticles. For dispersions prepared from PPSu of the same molecular weight, drug release rates increased with drug loading. It appears that PPSu applicability as a drug carrier warrants further consideration.

Treating mixed dyslipidemias: why and how

Patients with only mildly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values but low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and/or high triglyceride levels are at high risk for cardiovascular disease. 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (also known as statins) have been shown to slow coronary heart disease (CHD) progression, reduce CHD events in patients with low HDL-C levels, and raise HDL-C concentrations in patients with mixed dyslipidemias. Some, but not all trials of fibrates have shown benefit in patients with low HDL-C levels. Combination therapy with a statin plus either a fibrate or niacin is effective in improving the entire lipid profile, but may increase cost and side effects.

Newer HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapies

Although most patients can achieve their National Cholesterol Education Program goal with a reduction of < or =30% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels available with all statins, some patients need greater LDL-C lowering. Furthermore, new study data suggest that greater clinical event reduction may be obtained with more aggressive LDL-C lowering and/or with treatment of factors beyond LDL-C. New formulations of statins. including extended-release preparations, are achieving greater reductions in LDL-C levels as well as favorable modification of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations while maintaining an excellent safety profile.

The use of fluvastatin in cardiovascular risk management

BACKGROUND

Fluvastatin was the first synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) to be developed and is used in the management of dyslipidaemia in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the properties of fluvastatin and experience accrued through its use in clinical practice and clinical trials.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified through the PubMed database and product information held by the US Federal Drug Administration was also reviewed.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' opinion, fluvastatin exhibits a favourable safety profile in comparison to other statins, with a low incidence of adverse effects and a reduced propensity for interactions with other drugs. However, fluvastatin is a less potent cholesterol-lowering agent than newer statins on the market and its future predominant use is likely to be in niche patient groups at risk of side effects or drug interactions with other agents.

Lipid management in ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVES

In-hospital initiation and maintaining of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after discharge is recommended for dyslipidemic stroke patients. However, little is known about actual adherence to treatment in Taiwan. This study aims to describe the current practice of lipid testing and LLT and to identify predictors for patient to receive LLT.

METHODS

Between February 2001 and December 2002, a total of 1105 consecutive ischemic stroke patients were prospectively registered. Dyslipidemic ischemic stroke patients were recruited and followed over a 6 months period.

RESULTS

In-hospital lipid testing was performed in 91% of all patients and LLT was initiated in 74% (350/476) of dyslipidemic patients. During the 6 months follow-up period, lipid testing was performed in 77% (266/345) and LLT was maintained in 45% (154/345) of patients. However, the target LDL cholesterol level (<100mg/dL) was achieved in only 30% (78/255) of patients. Older patients had a lower chance to receive LLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-hospital initiation of LLT and lipid testing was considered adequate as compared to other studies. However, after discharge from the hospital, many patients, especially older patients remained untreated. Efforts to close treatment gaps in lipid management require sustained quality improvement efforts. More awareness in this area is needed.

Efficacy and safety of extended-release fluvastatin in Turkish patients with hypercholesterolaemia: TULIPS (Turkish Lipid Study)

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of extended-release fluvastatin (fluvastatin XL), 80 mg once daily, was assessed in Turkish patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 3.37-5.70 mmol/l and triglyceride (TG) < 4.52 mmol/l).

RESEARCH DESIGN

In this open-label, prospective, multi-centre study, 154 patients were given fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily and lipid levels were assessed after 2 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily significantly reduced LDL-C levels by 38.8 and 38.1% at weeks 2 (n = 140) and 12 (n = 116), respectively (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Treatment with fluvastatin XL for 2 and 12 weeks significantly reduced total cholesterol levels by 30.2 and 27.4%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and reduced TG levels by 14.9 and 7.5%, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Following stratification by risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, 87.3% of patients with > or = 2 risk factors, and 67.4% of patients with existing CHD or CHD risk equivalents achieved target LDL-C levels (< 3.37 mmol/l and < 2.59 mmol/l, respectively) with fluvastatin XL. Fluvastatin XL reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 8.9 and 4.7% at weeks 2 and 12 weeks, respectively. fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily was generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This open-label study indicates fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily is an effective and well-tolerated lipid-lowering therapy for the reduction of CHD risk in Turkish patients.

The cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin in Hungary following successful percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS) showed substantial gains in health outcomes from statins following PCI. That study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 77 centres, predominantly in Europe, of patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia who had undergone their first PCI. The evidence on cost-effectiveness has been established for the UK, USA and the Netherlands, but due to different health system cost structures, the results may not be applicable to other European countries. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin used following first PCI in Hungary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A deterministic Markov model was used to estimate the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained, with cost data drawn from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund. Effectiveness data on fluvastatin was derived directly from LIPS and utility weights from previous studies on heart disease. Sensitivity analyses were conducted around key parameters and analyses were conducted for subgroups identified in LIPS.

RESULTS

Treatment with fluvastatin cost an additional 1,704 euro and resulted in an additional 0.107 QALYs per patient discounted over 10-years compared with controls. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was 15,910 euro. The key determinants of cost-effectiveness were the effectiveness of fluvastatin, utility weights, cost of fluvastatin, and the time horizon evaluated. Fluvastatin was substantially more cost-effective in patients with diabetes, renal disease, multi-vessel disease or LDL-cholesterol >3.4 mmol/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin is an economically efficient pharmaceutical for reducing heart disease in Hungary and other European countries in patients following PCI.

Management of dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome: recommendations of the Spanish HDL-Forum

In order to characterize the metabolic syndrome it becomes necessary to establish a number of diagnostic criteria. Because of its impact on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality, considerable attention has been focussed on the dyslipidemia accompanying the metabolic syndrome. The aim of this review is to highlight the fundamental aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the treatment of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia with recommendations to clinicians. The clinical expression of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). In addition, metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is associated with high levels of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100-rich particles of a particularly atherogenic phenotype (small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]. High levels of triglyceride-rich particles (very low-density lipoprotein) are also evident both at baseline and in overload situations (postprandial hyperlipidemia). Overall, the 'quantitative' dyslipidemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of HDL-C and the 'qualitative' dyslipidemia characterized by high levels of apo B-100- and triglyceride-rich particles, together with insulin resistance, constitute an atherogenic triad in patients with the metabolic syndrome. The therapeutic management of the metabolic syndrome, regardless of the control of the bodyweight, BP, hyperglycemia or overt diabetes mellitus, aims at maintaining optimum plasma lipid levels. Therapeutic goals are similar to those for high-risk situations because of the coexistence of multiple risk factors. The primary goal in treatment should be achieving an LDL-C level of <100 mg/dL (or <70 mg/dL in cases with established ischemic heart disease or risk equivalents). A further goal is increasing the HDL-C level to >or=40 mg/dL in men or 50 mg/dL in women. A non-HDL-C goal of 130 mg/dL should also be aimed at in cases of hypertriglyceridemia. Lifestyle interventions, such as maintaining an adequate diet, and a physical activity program, constitute an essential part of management. Nevertheless, when pharmacologic therapy becomes necessary, fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the most effective drugs in controlling the metabolic syndrome hyperlipidemia, and are thus the drugs of first choice. Fibrates are effective in lowering triglycerides and increasing HDL-C levels, the two most frequent abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome, and statins are effective in lowering LDL-C levels, even though hypercholesterolemia occurs less frequently. In addition, the combination of fibrates and statins is highly effective in controlling abnormalities of the lipid profile in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Efficacy and Safety of Fluvastatin-Extended Release in Hypercholesterolemic Patients: Morning Administration Is Equivalent to Evening Administration

BACKGROUND

Flexibility in the time of administration of statin therapy is likely to improve patient compliance. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of morning and evening administration of the extended-release formulation of fluvastatin (fluvastatin XL).

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, multicenter, multiple dose study, 236 patients with type IIa/b hypercholesterolemia were randomized to receive fluvastatin XL, 80 mg, in the morning or evening for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

At 8 weeks, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were reduced by 34.5 and 35.0% in the morning and evening treatment groups, respectively (p = 0.0118 for non-inferiority of morning administration). There were no statistically significant differences between the morning and evening treatment groups in the changes in total cholesterol (p = 0.56), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.21), triglycerides (p = 0.13), apolipoprotein B (p = 0.66) and apolipoprotein AI (p = 0.88) at 8 weeks. The frequency of adverse events was slightly lower in the morning treatment group compared with the evening treatment group (27.4 vs. 35.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety profiles of fluvastatin XL are equivalent for morning and evening administration.

Efficacy and safety of fluvastatin in children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

AIM

To assess whether early initiation of statin therapy for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia favourably affects lipid profiles or vascular morphological changes.

METHODS

Children and adolescents aged 10-16 y with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia were administered fluvastatin (80 mg/d) for 2 y in a single-arm two-centre study. Carotid B-mode intima-media thickness (IMT) and M-mode arterial wall stiffness (beta) were recorded. Eighty of the 85 enrolled subjects completed the trial.

RESULTS

The median decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline at last study visit was 33.9%; median decreases in total cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B were 27.1%, 5.3% and 24.2%, respectively; the median increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was 5.3%. Changes in carotid arterial wall thickness and stiffness versus baseline were fractional and statistically non-significant (delta IMT -0.005 mm, 95% CI -0.018 to +0.007 mm, n=83; and delta beta = 0.017, 95% CI -0.219 to +0.253, n=79). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported by 58 subjects (68.2%); four were suspected to be drug-related. Change in hormone levels and sexual maturation were appropriate for this age group.

CONCLUSION

Fluvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels effectively over a prolonged period in children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Carotid IMT and wall stiffness remained largely unchanged.

Effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on angiotensin II sensitivity: a randomized trial with fluvastatin

Increased angiotensin II (Ang II) sensitivity predisposes to hypertension and plaque instability. Raised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) may increase Ang II sensitivity, but evidence in humans for this effect of LDL-c is limited. In 28, healthy, nonsmoking subjects, aged 30+/-8 years, with familial hypercholesterolemia, we determined the difference in infusion rate of Ang II and norepinephrine required to increase systolic blood pressure by 20 mm Hg (Pd-20) after 4 weeks of placebo and fluvastatin 80 mg daily in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Before infusions were started, fasting blood samples were taken to measure lipids. After 4 weeks of placebo, the mean LDL-c concentration was 6.3+/-1.4 mmol/L. The average decrease of LDL-c was 1.7+/-0.7 mmol/L after 4 weeks of fluvastatin (P<0.001). The mean Pd-20 for Ang II increased by 1.28 ng/kg per minute (95% CI, 2.05 to 0.50; P=0.002) on fluvastatin, corresponding with a 26% decrease in Ang II sensitivity. Ang II sensitivity, however, remained increased compared with normocholesterolemic controls. The Pd-20 values for norepinephrine were unaffected by fluvastatin. The present study in healthy, young subjects with isolated hypercholesterolemia shows an increased sensitivity to Ang II that partly can be restored by LDL-c-lowering therapy. These findings indicate that LDL-c levels directly influence Ang II sensitivity.

Effects of fluvastatin treatment on lipid profile, C-reactive protein trend, and renal function in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effects of fluvastatin on the lipid pro-file and on renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure. In this 8-month prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial, 130 patients (70 men and 60 women), after a 2-month washout period following previous lipid-lowering treatments, were randomly assigned to fluvastatin XL 80 mg given once daily (80 patients) or to standard treatment (50 patients). Mean total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride values after 3 and 6 months of treatment with fluvastatin showed statistically significant improvement compared with standard treatment. Improved renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, was observed at the end of the 6-month treatment period in approximately 65% of patients treated with fluvastatin. The increase in creatinine clearance consistently reached 10% to 15% of baseline values. A statistically significant reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) over baseline values was observed in approximately 75% of patients treated with fluvastatin. Furthermore, mean values of CRP for the fluvastatin standard treatment groups, respectively, were 6.78 and 10.19 at 3 months and 4.47 and 11 at 6 months. Both treatments were well tolerated. No major adverse events were noted. Results of this study suggest that fluvastatin treatment in patients with chronic renal failure is effective in improving the lipid profile, and it demonstrates good safety and tolerability. Furthermore, fluvastatin may contribute to improved nephroprotection in this patient population.

Fluvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney failure and renal transplantation

Premature atherosclerotic coronary heart disease driven by multiple risk factors is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among the 6 million patients in the United States with chronic renal failure. Consensus is that kidney failure and renal transplantation patients should be treated aggressively for dyslipidemia. Major medical literature databases were searched for published information about fluvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, used in patients with impaired renal function. This article characterizes the dyslipidemia observed in these clinical settings and reviews the clinical experience with fluvastatin.

Treatment of dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected persons

Accumulating evidence suggests that HIV-infected individuals have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This risk seems to be at least partially mediated by dyslipidaemia, which is related to the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). As HIV-infected individuals live longer due to HAART, their cardiovascular risk will invariably increase. Because HAART is likely to be used indefinitely, HAART-related dyslipidaemia has emerged as a major cardiovascular concern. This article summarises the evaluation of dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected individuals, the potential pathophysiological and genetic mechanisms involved in HAART-related dyslipidaemia and the current treatment approaches. In general, dyslipidaemia is evaluated and treated as in HIV-negative persons. The first step is cardiovascular risk assessment and the determination of target lipid levels. A healthier lifestyle and, in particular, smoking cessation should be promoted. Lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (or, in the setting of significant hypertriglyceridaemia, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) is the primary target of intervention. Switching HAART to a more lipid-favourable regimen should be considered if this does not jeopardise virological control. Many patients will need lipid-lowering drug therapy. Appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target levels may be more difficult to reach than in the HIV-negative population, and the potential for drug interactions when using lipid-lowering agents together with HAART needs to be considered. The identification of HAART strategies with no or minimal metabolic toxicity, and the identification of the safest and most efficacious lipid-lowering therapies for HIV-infected individuals with dyslipidaemia are important research goals.

Efficacy and safety of slow-release fluvastatin 80 mg daily in Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Before this study, the efficacy and safety of doubling the dosage of fluvastatin from 40 mg/day to 80 mg/day in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia remained to be determined.

METHODS

In this open-label, active-controlled randomized 2-center study, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized to treatment with immediate-release fluvastatin 40 mg/day (n = 30) or slow-release fluvastatin 80 mg/day (n = 31) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was percent change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level from baseline. Secondary efficacy variables were percent changes in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and the percent of patients achieving LDL cholesterol goals of the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) II.

RESULTS

Both fluvastatin dosages (40 mg/day vs 80 mg/day) effectively reduced LDL cholesterol (-22.5% vs -29.9%; p = 0.087), total cholesterol (-17.3% vs -22.5%; p = 0.140), and triglyceride levels (-14.0% vs -12.3%; p = 0.813) (all p < 0.0001 for comparison with baseline), and slightly increased HDL cholesterol levels (+5.2% vs +5.6%; p = 0.917), after 12 weeks of treatment. The percent of patients achieving LDL cholesterol goals of the NCEP ATP II was 37% versus 65% (p < 0.05). The adverse event profiles for the 2 fluvastatin dosages were similar.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, doubling the dosage of fluvastatin from 40 to 80 mg once daily was effective and safe regarding reduction of LDL cholesterol level, and allowed more patients to achieve LDL cholesterol goals of the NCEP ATP II.

Fluvastatin and lifestyle modification for reduction of carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass progression in drug-treated hypertensives

OBJECTIVES

The Hypertension High Risk Management trial (HYRIM) investigated the effect of fluvastatin treatment and lifestyle intervention on development of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in drug-treated hypertensive patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HYRIM was a placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial trial in which 568 drug-treated hypertensive men aged 40-74 years with total cholesterol 4.5-8.0 mmol/L, triglycerides <4.5 mmol/L, body mass index 25-35 kg/m2, and a sedentary lifestyle were randomized to receive either fluvastatin, 40 mg daily, or placebo, and either intensive lifestyle intervention (physical activity and diet) or usual care (treatment of hypertension and other disorders by own private physician). Carotid IMT was assessed by B-mode ultrasound vasculography and left ventricular (LV) mass was calculated from ultrasound recordings of the heart. Fluvastatin alone reduced the primary study endpoint of 4-year development of IMT in the common carotid artery (CCA) compared with placebo (p=0.0297). Carotid bulb IMT progression over 4 years was also significantly (p=0.0214) reduced by fluvastatin compared with placebo. Fluvastatin significantly lowered LDL-C levels (mean net difference through 4 years, 0.6 mmol/L; p<0.0001), and reduced the 2-year development of LV mass (p=0.0144) compared with placebo. Lifestyle intervention had no significant effect on LDL-C, carotid IMT or LV mass, and did not increase the effects of fluvastatin.

CONCLUSIONS

In drug-treated hypertensive patients in a usual care setting, fluvastatin treatment reduces progression of carotid IMT and LV mass.

Cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

In the LIPS (Lescol Intervention Prevention Study), fluvastatin 80 mg/day reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by 22% versus placebo (p = 0.01) following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia. The cost-effectiveness of such therapy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin following successful first PCI from a US healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

We used a Markov model to estimate expected outcomes and costs of 2 alternative treatment strategies following successful first PCI in patients with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia: (1) diet/lifestyle counseling plus immediate fluvastatin 80 mg/day; and (2) diet/lifestyle counseling only, with initiation of fluvastatin 80 mg/day following occurrence of future nonfatal MACE. The model was estimated with data from LIPS and other published sources. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the ratio of the difference in expected medical-care costs to the expected difference in life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) alternatively.

RESULTS

Treatment with fluvastatin following successful first PCI was found to increase life expectancy by 0.78 years (QALYs 0.68). Cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin following successful first PCI is 13 505 dollars per LY (15 454 dollar per QALY) saved. Ratios are lower for patients with diabetes (9396 dollar per LY; 10 718 dollar per QALY) and those with multivessel disease (9662 dollar per LY; 11 076 dollar per QALY). Findings were robust with respect to changes in key model parameters and assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin therapy following PCI is cost-effective compared with other generally accepted medical interventions.

Fluvastatin and fluvastatin extended release: a clinical and safety profile

Cardiovascular diseases due to atherosclerosis are the leading causes of mortality in the Western world. Cholesterol-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme Areductase inhibitors (statins) has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diverse populations. Fluvastatin (Lescol, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was the first totally synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on the market and has recently become available in an extended-release formulation (Lescol XL, Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Data from several clinical outcome trials have shown substantial benefits from fluvastatin treatment in diverse populations. Fluvastatin exists primarily in its acid form and as inactive metabolites in vivo, while active metabolites as well as the lactone form are only present in small amounts. The demonstration of the safe use of fluvastatin in a wide range of patients may be associated with the predominant acid form of the drug in vivo, as well as its predominant metabolism via the cytochrome P450 2C9 pathway.

Fluvastatin: clinical and safety profile

Therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) has been shown to significantly reduce major coronary events and death in a wide range of individuals at risk for these events. In addition, recent observations suggest that some of the clinical benefits associated with statin therapy may be pleiotropic; that is, independent of their cholesterol-inhibiting action. It is clear that the clinical benefits associated with statin therapy far outweigh the risks; however, there may be important clinical differences among agents within the class, related to both benefits and drug safety. Evaluation of the benefit-to-risk profile for each available statin should include considering the results of randomised clinical outcome trials, the safety record of each agent, effect on lipoproteins and evidence of beneficial pleiotropic properties.Recently, data from several clinical outcome trials have shown that substantial benefits are associated with treatment with fluvastatin in diverse populations. In particular, data from two large, randomised clinical trials have demonstrated that fluvastatin is effective for secondary prevention of cardiac events in patients following coronary intervention procedures, and for primary prevention of cardiac events in renal transplant recipients. Pleiotropic benefits for fluvastatin have been shown in experimental and clinical studies as well. Fluvastatin was the first statin available as an extended-release product (fluvastatin XL 80mg); both formulations have demonstrated efficacy and safety in a wide range of patients. Taken together, these clinical outcomes and safety data suggest a strong benefit-to-risk profile for fluvastatin.

The use of statins in optimising reduction of cardiovascular risk: focus on fluvastatin

Patients with widely differing degrees of cardiovascular risk can derive benefit from effective lipid-lowering therapy with statins, including patients with normal or low cholesterol levels. Clinical trials with fluvastatin have shown that it is effective in patients across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The lipid-lowering effects of fluvastatin are smaller than some statins, but major clinical outcome studies have consistently demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefits with reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of <30%. As treatment with statins is generally life-long and patients often receive multiple concomitant medications, optimal statin therapy should be well tolerated and serious consideration should be given to the avoidance of drug interactions. Although serious side-effects of statins are very rare, it is important that fluvastatin is less susceptible to drug interactions than other statins, because serious side-effects of statin therapy are generally associated with concomitant medications affecting statin metabolism. In addition, an extended-release formulation of fluvastatin has been developed to provide liver selectivity with a sustained exposure to the drug, thus improving its efficacy, and safety and tolerability profiles.

A retrospective analysis of the effect of noncompliance on time to first major adverse cardiac event in LIPS

BACKGROUND

In the main publication for LIPS (Lescol Intervention Prevention Study), a 22% relative risk (RR) reduction for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was found among those who used fluvastatin after a successful first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of clinical studies generally provides an observed treatment effect that is likely to underestimate what the treatment effect would be if compliance were perfect, because compliance in a clinical trial is invariably <100% during long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between compliance and treatment effect in LIPS.

METHODS

In LIPS, patients who had undergone a successful first PCI were randomized to receive fluvastatin 40 mg BID or placebo BID for 3 to 5 years. The primary end point was survival time free of MACE (ie, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or reintervention procedure), and a Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-dependent covariates was used to predict the effect that fluvastatin would have had if trial medication had been continued. Logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing discontinuation of trial medication.

RESULTS

A total of 1677 patients were enrolled in LIPS: 844 in the fluvastatin group and 833 in the placebo group. In the fluvastatin group, 294 patients (34.8%) discontinued taking trial medication and 73 (8.6%) switched to another lipid-lowering medication, compared with 353 (42.4%) and 187 (22.4%) patients in the placebo group, respectively. The risk factor-adjusted RR of MACE with fluvastatin treatment was 0.74 (P = 0.004; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91). When also adjusted for noncompliance, the RR for fluvastatin versus placebo was 0.68 (P = 0.002; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86). Discontinuing fluvastatin without switching to another lipid-lowering medication increased the risk of MACE compared with that of patients who stayed on fluvastatin (RR = 2.27; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 1.60-3.23) and the increase in the risk of MACE was greater than that associated with discontinuing placebo (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found a 32% RR reduction for experiencing MACE during fluvastatin treatment after a successful PCI in LIPS, when analysis allowed for noncompliance. This suggests that the ITT analysis discussed in the main LIPS publication underestimated the benefit of fluvastatin treatment. Our survival model also provided tentative evidence that discontinuing lipid-lowering medication might lead to a potentially harmful rebound effect in this patient group.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering ability of lovastatin 10, 20, and 40 mg/d with fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg/d

BACKGROUND

The available statin drugs have similar pharmacodynamic properties but are not equal in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lovastatin and fluvastatin in lowering LDL-C.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of patients aged >20 years with primary hypercholesterolemia conducted at 44 clinical sites across the United States. After a 6-week National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I diet lead-in period in patients taking lipid-lowering drugs at screening, patients were randomized to receive lovastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/d or fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/d (the doses available at the time the study was conducted) for 6 weeks. Patients not taking lipid-lowering drugs at screening and who had been following the Step I diet for at least 6 weeks proceeded to the treatment phase. All patients received instruction for a Step I diet, which they followed throughout the treatment phase. After the treatment period, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-C, and triglycerides were measured, and TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 838 patients (476 men, 362 women; mean [SD] age, 59 [12] years) were included in the study. Lovastatin 20 and 40 mg/d significantly reduced mean LDL-C compared with the same dosages of fluvastatin. TC and the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio decreased more with lovastatin than with fluvastatin at a given dose level. Approximately 50% of patients treated with lovastatin 20 and 40 mg/d compared with approximately 25% treated with fluvastatin 20 and 40 mg/d reached NCEP Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goals.

CONCLUSION

In this small study population of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia taking lipid-lowering drugs, short-term (6-week) treatment with lovastatin was more efficacious than fluvastatin in lowering cholesterol levels and reaching LDL-C treatment goals.

Short-term efficacy and safety of extended-release fluvastatin in a large cohort of elderly patients

The efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in elderly individuals have not been extensively assessed. This population generally takes more drugs concurrently than middle-aged patients, and are therefore at higher risk of drug-drug interactions. This large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of extended-release (XL) fluvastatin 80 mg once daily for up to 1 year in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. A total of 1229 patients (mean age, 75.5 years) were randomized. After 2 months of treatment, fluvastatin XL 80 mg significantly decreased plasma lipid levels from baseline compared with placebo; fluvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 25% compared with a decrease of 2.5% in the placebo group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was -33% vs. -2.5%, respectively, and triglycerides were -13.3% vs. 2.9%, respectively (p<0.00001). The safety profile of fluvastatin XL was similar to that of placebo. Fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily was well tolerated and effectively managed plasma lipid profiles in a large cohort of elderly patients. These findings are consistent with data obtained previously in younger recipients of fluvastatin XL 80 mg, and reinforce the safety of fluvastatin in a population at high risk of drug-drug interactions.

Lovastatin extended release: a review of its use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia

Lovastatin extended release (ER) provides a new form of delivery for lovastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Lovastatin ER delivers the drug in a more sustained fashion, as shown by a smoother plasma concentration-time profile, a lower maximum plasma concentration and a prolonged half-life compared with that of lovastatin immediate release (IR). At dosages of 10-60 mg/day, lovastatin ER significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides, and increased levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia in a randomised, double-blind study of 12 weeks' duration. These effects were maintained in a 6-month extension study in which patients received lovastatin 40 or 60 mg/day. In a randomised 4-week study in 24 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia, the reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol levels was significantly greater with lovastatin ER 40 mg/day than with the IR formulation administered at the same dosage. Lovastatin ER was well tolerated in all studies and adverse events were usually mild to moderate and transient. The tolerability profile of lovastatin ER was similar to that of lovastatin IR. There were no reports of clinically relevant elevations in liver transaminases or creatine phosphokinase attributed to the drug in recipients of lovastatin ER.

CONCLUSION

The ER formulation of lovastatin provides smooth and sustained delivery of this established and well-tolerated agent over the dosage interval, significantly reducing LDL-cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. If, as expected, the beneficial changes in lipid levels are maintained during long-term treatment and further clinical experience confirms the greater efficacy of the lovastatin ER formulation than the IR formulation, then lovastatin ER is likely to supplant lovastatin IR and provide a useful option in the management of patients with dyslipidaemia and prevention of coronary heart disease.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the action of orlistat, fluvastatin, or both an anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, and lipid profile in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia prescribed a standardized diet

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess obese patients with hypercholesterolemia whom were prescribed a standardized diet, comparing the action of orlistat, fluvastatin, orlistat with fluvastatin, and placebo on anthropometric measurements, blood pressure (BP), and lipid profile.

METHODS

This was a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients were prescribed a controlled-energy diet and were randomly allocated to receive placebo, orlistat 120 mg TID (O group), fluvastatin 80 mg/d (F group), or olistat 120 mg TID with fluvastatin 80 mg/d (OF group). Clinical measurements (body weight, body mass index [BMI], waist circumference, and BP) and lipid profile assessment (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], and triglycerides [TGs]) were performed at baseline and after 6 months and 1 year of treatment.

RESULTS

The study included 99 obese patients with hypercholesterolemia (48 men and 51 women; mean [SD] age, 51 [9] years). There were no significant differences between groups in baseline demographic, BP, or plasma lipid values. Three patients dropped out (2 women in the O group and 1 man in the OF group) due to adverse events related to orlistat treatment, including gastrointestinal events (oily spotting and fecal urgency). Ninety-six patients completed the study. There were significant differences from baseline (mean [SD]) in BMI, waist circumference reduction (WCR), and body weight loss (BWL) at 6 months in the OF group (29.9 [1.1] kg/m(2), 2.7 [0.8] cm, and 7.4 [0.9] kg, respectively; all P < 0.05), and BMI, WCR, and BWL at 1 year in the O group (29.0 [1.0] kg/m(2), 3.0 [1.0] cm, and 8.6 [1.0] kg, respectively; all P < 0.02), the F group (29.3 [1.6] kg/m(2), 2.4 [1.0] cm, and 8/0 [1.0] kg, respectively; all P < 0.05), and the OF group (28.4 [0.6] kg/m(2), 4.0 [0.6] cm, and 11.4 [1.0] kg, respectively; all P < 0.01). Significant reductions from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP were observed at 1 year in the O and F groups (all P < 0.05) and the OF group (both P < 0.01). At 6 months, there were significant reductions from baseline in TC and LDL-C in the F group (both P < 0.05) and in TC, LDL-C, and TGs in the OF group (P < 0.02, P < 0.02, and P < 0.05, respectively), as well as a significant increase in HDL-C in the OF group (P < 0.02). At 1 year, there were significant reduction from baseline in TC in the O, F, and OF groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), LDL-C (P < 0.05, P < 0.02, and P < 0.01, respectively), and TGs (P < 0.02, P < 0.05, and P < 0.02, respectively). Also at 1 year, HDL-C was significantly higher than baseline in the F and OF groups (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Improvements in clinical and lipid-profile parameters were found at 1 year with all 3 treatments.

[Pharmacological interactions of statins]

OBJECTIVE

To determine in primary care the frequency of pharmacological interactions of statins.

DESIGN

Transversal observational study.Setting. Urban health centre.Participants. 384 patients taking statins who were chosen by systematic sampling based on long-treatment cards (95% CI, accuracy 5% and expected proportion of possible interactions unknown).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Consumption of statins, the accompanying medication taken, presence of interactions according to the technical details of statins (Spanish Medication Agency, Ministry of Health and Consumption) and social and demographic variables.

RESULTS

In 55 patients (14.3%) (95% CI, 10.8%-17.8%) one of the statin interactions with the other drugs was checked, especially with acenocoumarol, digoxin and anti-acid drugs. In patients with some interaction, the mean number of other drugs was significantly higher (4.51.5 vs 3.31.9 SD; P<.001). 19.1% of men and 10.8% of women showed interactions, the difference being statistically significant (P=.02). By means of logistic regression, both masculine gender (OR=1.8) and taking of other medication in quantities of 5 or more (OR=2.7) appeared as variables associated with the presence of interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential pharmacological interactions of statins reach 14.3% of patients with hypercholesterolaemia who take medication long-term. The possibility of reaching high plasma concentrations of statins and/or of modifying the therapeutic effect of various drugs enables a more appropriate use of statins to be recommended, with prescription of those statins that metabolise less through the P450 cytochrome.

Comparison of treatment with fluvastatin extended-release 80-mg tablets and immediate-release 40-mg capsules in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines, hypercholesterolemic patients with greater risk for cardiovascular heart disease require more aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Numerous studies have demonstrated that despite these guidelines, patients often do not reach their target levels, and that physicians frequently do not titrate the drug beyond the starting dose. For these patients, it may be more suitable to initiate treatment with a higher starting dose of statin. With the immediate-release (IR) formulation of fluvastatin, the maximal dose of 80 mg is recommended to be administered in divided doses (40 mg BID). An extended-release (ER) formulation of fluvastatin at a higher dose (fluvastatin ER 80 mg) was designed to provide greater LDL-C lowering with QD dosing. Use of this formulation should bring more patients into compliance with target LDL-C levels.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD and fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD in lowering total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A-I levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia over a 12-week treatment period.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who qualified for lipid-lowering drug therapy based on NCEP ATP II guidelines were randomized to fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD or fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD, and treated for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were randomized to treatment: 86 to the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group and 87 to the fluvastatin IR 40-mg group. Compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, fluvastatin ER 80 mg produced greater mean reductions in LDL-C (32% vs 22%, respectively; P < 0.001). For each of the 3 coronary heart disease (CHD) risk groups (defined by the NCEP), as well as for the total population studied, more patients from the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group than the IR 40 group achieved NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels (79% vs 47%, respectively [P = NS], for patients with < 2 risk factors; 58% vs 15%, respectively [P < 0.001], for patients with > or = 2 risk factors; and 40% vs 14%, respectively [P = 0.012], for patients with CHD). The 80-mg ER dose of fluvastatin provided 9.1% greater LDL-C lowering than the 40-mg IR dose. The incidence of elevations in transaminase levels was low and similar for both doses, with 1 patient in each of the treatment groups being discontinued due to repeated elevation of transaminases > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN). Clinically relevant elevations in creatine kinase (ie, > or = 10x ULN) were not observed with either dose. Nine patients (5 in the fluvastatin ER group and 4 in the fluvastatin IR group) discontinued because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with fluvastatin ER 80 mg resulted in greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and apo B levels compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, with clinically equivalent reduction in triglyceride levels and elevation of HDL-C levels. Furthermore, there were few tolerability concerns of clinical relevance with either formulation and no clinically meaningful difference in the tolerability parameters between the 2 formulations. For patients with higher baseline LDL-C levels, and for patients who require greater LDL-C lowering, it may be appropriate to initiate therapy with fluvastatin ER 80 mg. Use of the higher starting dose likely would bring a greater proportion of high-risk patients into compliance with NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels and would provide LDL-C lowering that is in the same range that has been proved in clinical trials to be associated with reductions in CHD event rates.

Fluvastatin prevents renal dysfunction and vascular NO deficit in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of fluvastatin on atherosclerosis, systemic and regional hemodynamics, and vascular reactivity in apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE(-/-)) mice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hemodynamics (fluospheres) and vasomotor responses of thoracic aorta and carotid artery were evaluated in male wild-type (WT) and untreated (ApoE(-/-) Control) or fluvastatin-treated (50 mg/kg per day for 20 weeks) ApoE(-/-) mice, all fed a Western-type diet. Plasma cholesterol and aortic root atherosclerotic lesions (ALs) were greater in ApoE(-/-) Control mice (19+/-1 mmol/L and 63,0176+/-38,785 micro m(2), respectively) than in WT mice (2+/-1 mmol/L and 1+/-1 micro m(2), respectively, P<0.01). Fluvastatin significantly decreased plasma cholesterol (-53%) but failed to limit ALs. Renal blood flow was significantly reduced in ApoE(-/-) Control versus WT (-25%, P<0.05) mice. This reduction was prevented by fluvastatin. Aortic and carotid endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine were not altered in ApoE(-/-) Control versus WT mice. In carotid arteries from WT mice, these responses were abolished after nitro-L-arginine (L-NA), whereas those from ApoE(-/-) Control were only partially inhibited after L-NA but fully abolished after L-NA+diclofenac. Thus, in carotid arteries from ApoE(-/-) mice, vasodilating prostanoids compensate the deficit in NO availability. Fluvastatin prevented this carotid NO deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

In ApoE(-/-) mice, chronic fluvastatin treatment preserved renal perfusion and vascular NO availability independently from atherosclerotic lesion prevention.

Safety considerations for statins

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors or statins offer important benefits for the large populations of individuals at high risk for coronary heart disease. These drugs have a good safety profile. Nevertheless, differences in physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties between statins may translate into significant differences in long-term safety. This review focuses on long-term adverse effects related to statin use, namely hepatotoxicity and myopathy. Moreover, the most common drugs used in combination with statins in long-term therapies are analyzed in terms of possible drug/drug interactions affecting the safety of statins.

RECENT FINDINGS

The withdrawal of cerivastatin from the global market in 2001, because of severe cases of rhabdomyolysis, highlighted concerns regarding the safety of the entire class. Afterwards, the role of statins and their interactions with other drugs in precipitating this condition have been carefully reviewed. In approximately 60% of the total number of cases, statin-related rhabdomyolysis was found to be related to drug/drug interactions. Recently, all cases of fatal rhabdomyolysis associated with statin use have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. This has shown that fatal rhabdomyolysis among statin users is a rare event, the reporting rates being much less than one death per million prescriptions in the case of all statins except cerivastatin.

SUMMARY

The safety and tolerability of the available statins support their use as the first-line treatment of patients at high risk for coronary heart disease, since the clinical benefits greatly outweigh the small risk of myopathy. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of the adverse effects possibly related to statin therapy, particularly in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease and requiring long-term multiple-drug therapies.

Lack of therapeutic interchangeability of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To review relevant literature and provide an opinion on the class effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins).

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1990-July 2002).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Editorials, studies, and review articles related to the class effect or therapeutic interchangeability of statins were reviewed. Also included was information that is relevant to this topic.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although statins share common main actions, they may have clinically important differences in terms of efficacy and safety. At fixed or allowable dosages, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin produced greater low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects compared with other statins. Some statins have shown reduction in either cardiovascular and/or total mortality. Statins also differ in their structure, pharmacokinetics, potency, and rate of metabolism, any or all of which may have clinical significance. Although inconclusive, subtle differences in nonlipid effects of some statins may have contributed to positive benefits observed in clinical studies. As a result of drug-related deaths, cerivastatin was withdrawn voluntarily from the market, which may raise the question whether there is therapeutic interchangeability (due to class effect) among statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the competition for market share and strategies attempting to identify differences in therapeutic value, few head-to-head comparisons between statins have been performed. The limited, available data suggest that statins are not therapeutically interchangeable.

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the role of statins

Low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are currently considered to be a major risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Deficiencies in the HDL metabolic pathway promote atherosclerosis and contribute to CAD. Low HDL-C levels are included in the Framingham 10-year risk assessment for CAD although they are not yet targeted for therapy. Recent clinical trials have shown benefits from raising HDL-C, particularly in patients with lower baseline levels. The statin class of drugs, used primarily to lower the level of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, may be able to raise the HDL-C level as well. Statins could potentially affect HDL-C by different modes of action, most importantly by altering reverse cholesterol transport. Among the currently available statins, simvastatin has demonstrated the most consistent ability to raise HDL-C level, but further large-scale studies at an early stage will be needed to prove the antiatherogenic effects of this class of drugs.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and rhabdomyolysis: considerations in the renal failure patient

An intense debate has developed as to the risk-benefit ratio of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) following the withdrawal of cerivastatin. The development of rhabdomyolysis in cerivastatin-treated patients should have surprised few since myotoxicity is an accepted class effect of statins. What has sprung from the cerivastatin experience though is a concern for other members of this class. Such misgivings, although understandable, are ill advised. Without question, differences exist in the risk of rhabdomyolysis occurrence amongst the various statins. In this regard, pravastatin and fluvastatin are least likely to produce rhabdomyolysis, which, in part, relates to the fact they are not metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway. When muscle damage occurs with statins it is most often the result of a drug-drug interaction rather than a specific adverse response to statin monotherapy. Such drug-drug interactions increase plasma concentrations of a statin and thereby increase the risk of myotoxicity. A growing consensus exists which supports an expanded use of statins in a range of patient groups including the renal failure patient. Polypharmacy and altered drug metabolism increase the risk of myotoxicity, albeit to an ill-defined degree, in this population. Many factors should enter into the choice of a statin in the multiply medicated renal failure patient.