Therapeutic enhancement in mice by clinically relevant dose and fractionation schedules of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) and irradiation

Assessment of Swallowing Function in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in High vs. Low Dose Cisplatin

Cisplatin-based therapies are standard-of-care for advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Treatment regimens include 3 weeks of high-dose bolus cisplatin or 6-7 weeks of low-dose weekly cisplatin, both with concurrent radiation. The effects of cisplatin dosage on swallowing function warrant further study. A 237-patient cohort treated for HNSCC at a single center were studied retrospectively. Gastrostomy tube dependence served as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included weight changes, esophageal stricture, and lymphedema. The primary/secondary outcomes were not statistically significant; however, ototoxicity and renal toxicity were significantly higher in the high-dose group. These findings add insight into cisplatin dose-based functional outcomes.

Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer

In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.

Radiotherapy Alone or with Concomitant Daily Low-Dose Carboplatin in Locally Advanced, Unresectable Head and Neck Cancer: Definitive Results of a Phase III Study with a Follow-Up Period of up to Ten Years

Aim and background

Radiotherapy is the conventional treatment for locally advanced inoperable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the poor therapeutic results justify the development of radiochemotherapy combinations. In an attempt to improve local control and survival in patients with stage III and IV unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and based on the results of our previous dose escalation study, we undertook a prospective multicentric randomized trial.

Materials and methods

From November 1992 through December 1995, a total of 164 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone (arm I) or combined (arm II) with daily low-dose carboplatin.

Results

The 3, 5 and 10-year local-regional recurrence-free survival rates were better in arm II(21.7%, 15.1% and 15.1%, respectively) than in arm I (15%, 10.7% and 10.7%), but without statistical significance (P = 0.11). The 3, 5 and 10-year disease-free survival rates showed the same positive trend for arm II (16%, 6.8% and 6.8% vs 9%, 5.5% and 5.5%, in arm I, respectively), again without statistical significance (P = 0.09). Instead, a statistical advantage was found in overall survival rates at 3, 5 and 10-years (28.9%, 9% and 5.5% in arm II and 11.1%, 6.9% and 6.9% in arm I, respectively) (P = 0.02). The 3, 5 and 10-year local-regional recurrence-free survival rates in stage IV disease were statistically better in arm II (21.5%, 15.9% and 15.9%) than in arm I (12.8%, 7.7% and 7.7%, respectively) (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Long-term results in both treatment arms of the trial appear less positive than most published series. However, our findings do not exclude that carboplatin may be beneficial, but the benefit in local control must be lower than the 15% assumed to dimension the trial.

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m² given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m² given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m² given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m² resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m², and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

Weekly Low-Dose Versus Three-Weekly High-Dose Cisplatin for Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-Nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Data

BACKGROUND

Three-weekly high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m²) is considered the standard systemic regimen given concurrently with postoperative or definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, due to unsatisfactory patient tolerance, various weekly low-dose schedules have been increasingly used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and compliance between these two approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched literature for prospective trials of patients with LA-SCCHN who received postoperative or definitive conventionally fractionated concurrent chemoradiation. Radiation doses were usually 60-66 gray (Gy) in the postoperative setting and 66-70 Gy in the definitive setting. Standard, three-weekly high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m², 3 doses) was compared with the weekly low-dose protocol (≤50 mg/m², ≥6 doses). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary outcomes comprised response rate, acute and late adverse events, and treatment compliance.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies with 4,209 patients were included in two separate meta-analyses according to the two clinical settings. There was no difference in treatment efficacy as measured by overall survival or response rate between the chemoradiation settings with low-dose weekly and high-dose three-weekly cisplatin regimens. In the definitive treatment setting, the weekly regimen was more compliant and significantly less toxic with respect to severe (grade 3-4) myelosuppression (leukopenia p = .0083; neutropenia p = .0024), severe nausea and/or vomiting (p < .0001), and severe nephrotoxicity (p = .0099). Although in the postoperative setting the two approaches were more equal in compliance and with clearly less differences in the cisplatin-induced toxicities, the weekly approach induced more grade 3-4 dysphagia (p = .0026) and weight loss (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In LA-SCCHN, current evidence is insufficient to demonstrate a meaningful survival difference between the two dosing regimens. Prior to its adoption into routine clinical practice, the low-dose weekly approach needs to be prospectively compared with the standard three-weekly high-dose schedule.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Given concurrently with conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer, high-dose three-weekly cisplatin has often been replaced with weekly low-dose infusions to increase compliance and decrease toxicity. The present meta-analysis suggests that both approaches might be equal in efficacy, both in the definitive and postoperative settings, but differ in toxicity. However, some toxicity data can be influenced by unbalanced representation, and the conclusions are not based on adequately sized prospective randomized studies. Therefore, low-dose weekly cisplatin should not be used outside clinical trials but first prospectively studied in adequately sized phase III trials versus the high-dose three-weekly approach.

BAY 87-2243, a novel inhibitor of hypoxia-induced gene activation, improves local tumor control after fractionated irradiation in a schedule-dependent manner in head and neck human xenografts

Background

The transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) pathway plays an important role in tumor response to cytotoxic treatments. We investigated the effects of a novel small molecule inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I and hypoxia-induced HIF-1 activity BAY-87-2243, on tumor microenvironment and response of human squamous cell carcinoma (hSCC) to clinically relevant fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with and without concomitant chemotherapy.

Methods

When UT-SCC-5 hSCC xenografts in nude mice reached 6 mm in diameter BAY-87-2243 or carrier was administered before and/or during RT or radiochemotherapy with concomitant cisplatin (RCT). Local tumor control was evaluated 150 days after irradiation and the doses to control 50% of tumors (TCD₅₀) were compared between treatment arms. Tumors were excised at different time points during BAY-87-2243 or carrier treatment for western blot and immunohistological investigations.

Results

BAY-87-2243 markedly decreased nuclear HIF-1α expression and pimonidazole hypoxic fraction already after 3 days of drug treatment. BAY-87-2243 prior to RT significantly reduced TCD₅₀ from 123 to 100 Gy (p=0.037). Additional BAY-87-2243 application during RT did not decrease TCD₅₀. BAY-87-2243 before and during radiochemotherapy did not improve local tumor control.

Conclusions

Pronounced reduction of tumor hypoxia by application of BAY-87-2243 prior to RT improved local tumor control. The results demonstrate that radiosensitizing effect importantly depends on treatment schedule. The data support further investigations of HIF-1 pathway inhibitors for radiotherapy and of predictive tests to select patients who will benefit from this combined treatment.

Prognostic parameters for acute esophagus toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to correlate clinical and dosimetric variables with acute esophageal toxicity (AET) following Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, timeline of AET was reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

153 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fractions of radiotherapy and concurrent daily low dose cisplatin were selected. Medical records and treatments of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum AET grade ≥2 and maximum grade 3 were the endpoints of this study. Dates for onset, maximum and recovery (to baseline) of AET were reported. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to correlate clinical, tumor, dosimetric and chemotherapy dose variables to AET grade ≥2 and grade 3.

RESULTS

AET grade 2 occurred in 37% and grade 3 in 20% of the patients. The median onset of AET was around day 15 for all grades. The median onset of the maximum grade was day 30 for both grades 2 and 3. The median duration was 43 days for grade 1, 50 days for grade 2 and >80 days for grade 3. Of the grade 3 AET patients, 48% recovered within 3 months. Esophagus V50, ethnic background, and the number of cisplatin administrations were significantly correlated with grade 3 AET.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT A higher number of cisplatin administrations, non-Caucasian background and higher V50oes were associated with grade 3 AET. The median onset of AET grade 3 is 15 days after the start of treatment, maximized at day 30, with a median duration of >80 days.

From Cisplatin-Containing Sequential Radiochemotherapy towards Concurrent Treatment for Patients with Inoperable Locoregional Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Still Unanswered Questions

Radiotherapy has been the mainstay of the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In the early nineties, combined treatment with chemotherapy was introduced. In 1995, a meta-analysis showed improved treatment outcome of the sequential use of radiochemotherapy (RCT) compared to radiotherapy alone, provided cisplatin was part of the chemotherapy course. Concurrent RCT compared to radiotherapy only yielded the same improvements of 4% in the 2-year and 2% in the 5-year overall survival rates. Just recently, two meta-analyses demonstrated that concurrent RCT is definitely superior to sequential RCT in terms of local control and 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival. However, several unanswered questions remain concerning the optimal chemotherapy regimen and radiotherapy doses and techniques in terms of treatment outcome and toxicity profile. Arguments supporting a daily low-dose cisplatin scheme are presented because of comparable radiosensitizing characteristics and favourable side effects. Increasing radiotherapy doses applied according to up-to-date techniques and combinations with new biologicals might lead to further treatment improvements.

Modulation of radiosensitivity in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts by cisplatin

The effects of cisplatin exposure time, concentration, and irradiation sequence on the sensitivity of Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) to gamma-ray exposure were examined. Based on clonogenic cell survival, the cisplatin concentrations corresponding to 50% cell survival (EC(50)) for exposure times of 1 h to 7 days followed a 2-phase exponential decay and ranged from 28.26 +/- 3.32 to 1.53 +/- 0.24 micromol/L, respectively. When cells were treated at EC(50) for exposures of less than 4 h and irradiated immediately, cisplatin inhibited the effect of radiation. Exposures of 4-6 h did not affect radiosensitivity. For exposures of 8-12 h, radiosensitization was observed, which disappeared at 14 h and reappeared for much longer cisplatin treatments. At the lowest achievable EC(50) (1.53 micromol/L), radiosensitization was observed if irradiation was delayed for 1-8 h. This enhancement in radiosensitivity disappeared for irradiation delays of 10-12 h, but reappeared when irradiation was delayed for 14-18 h. These data demonstrate that the mode of interaction between cisplatin and gamma-irradiation depends on the concentration and exposure time of cisplatin, as well as on the timing of irradiation after cisplatin administration. Consideration of changes in cell cycle kinetics may contribute to the improvement of treatment outcomes in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy involving cisplatin.

Combining radiation with oxaliplatin: a review of experimental results

Oxaliplatin is integrated in treatment strategies against a variety of cancers including chemoradiation protocols against gastrointestinal, especially rectal cancers. Solid biological data with respect to radiosensitizing activity of oxaliplatin are still rare. This review is based on in vitro and experimental in vivo data concerning the combination of oxaliplatin and radiation published until July 2007. Taking either cell viability or clonogenic survival as an endpoint all reported on oxaliplatin-induced radiosensitization, and enhancement ratios ranged from 1.1 to 2.2. In vivo, enhanced tumor growth delay after combined oxaliplatin and radiation treatment was also reported. Therefore, oxaliplatin should be considered a potent radiosensitizer, although the mechanisms causing radiosensitizing properties of oxaliplatin have not been studied in detail. Herein, they are discussed with respect to apoptosis induction, p53-related signalling, cell cycle control, and DNA-repair.

Effect of treatment schedule on the interaction of Cisplatin and radiation in human lung cancer cells

This study was designed to determine the effects of the treatment schedule on the interaction between cisplatin and radiation. Cells of a human squamous cell lung cancer cell line were treated with cisplatin and radiation using three treatment protocols: 1-h exposure to cisplatin immediately followed by irradiation (A), 4-day continuous exposure to cisplatin immediately followed by irradiation (B), and 1-h exposure to cisplatin followed by irradiation after a 4-day interval (C). The interactions were assessed by isobologram, cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. The combination resulted in a additive effect in every protocol. Cell cycle accumulation at G(2)/M phase before irradiation was observed in Protocols B and C, whereas no cell cycle shift in the limited time course was noted in Protocol A. Although a 4-day continuous exposure to cisplatin and a 1-h exposure to cisplatin followed by a 4-day interval before irradiation caused significantly increased apoptosis, an additional increase in apoptosis after irradiation was not observed in Protocols B and C, whereas Protocol A showed an additional increase. Despite a cell cycle shift favoring radiation sensitivity, the drug-radiation interactions in Protocols B and C were additive, possibly because of negative effects including induction of a durable G(2)/M-phase arrest and suppression of apoptosis by cisplatin.

Cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiation: lack of correlation between normal tissues and primary tumor

Purpose

In this study, the formation of cisplatin-DNA adducts after concurrent cisplatin-radiation and the relationship between adduct-formation in primary tumor tissue and normal tissue were investigated.

Methods

Three intravenous cisplatin-regimens, given concurrently with radiation, were studied: daily low-dose (6 mg/m²) cisplatin, weekly 40 mg/m², three-weekly 100 mg/m². A ³²P-postlabeling technique was used to quantify adducts in normal tissue [white blood cells (WBC) and buccal cells] and tumor.

Results

Normal tissue samples for adduct determination were obtained from 63 patients and tumor biopsies from 23 of these patients. Linear relationships and high correlations were observed between the levels of two guanosine- and adenosine–guanosine-adducts in normal and tumor tissue. Adduct levels in tumors were two to five times higher than those in WBC (P < 0.001). No significant correlations were found between adduct levels in normal tissues and primary tumor biopsies, nor between WBC and buccal cells.

Conclusions

In concurrent chemoradiotherapy schedules, cisplatin adduct levels in tumors were significantly higher than in normal tissues (WBC). No evidence of a correlation was found between adduct levels in normal tissues and primary tumor biopsies. This lack of correlation may, to some extent, explain the inconsistencies in the literature regarding whether or not cisplatin-DNA adducts can be used as a predictive test in anticancer platinum therapy.

Acceleration of Telomere Loss by Chemotherapy Is Greater in Older Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Chronic viral infection and combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs have been reported to accelerate telomere erosion. Here, we asked if chemoradiotherapy, using the single agent cisplatin, would accelerate telomere loss in head and neck cancer patients, and whether loss was linked to smoking status, age, gender, or stage of disease at diagnosis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Blood samples were collected from 20 patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck before, during, and after chemoradiotherapy. Following DNA isolation from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, telomere length was measured by terminal restriction fragment analysis.

RESULTS

Chemoradiotherapy increased the rate of telomere erosion>100-fold. Telomere length before treatment in chemoradiotherapy patients was similar to age-matched controls. Although smokers began with significantly shorter telomeres, smoking status did not affect chemoradiotherapy-induced attrition, nor did gender or stage of disease. We also make the novel observation that a significantly greater telomere loss occurred in response to treatment in older patients, with those younger than 55 years losing an average of 400 bp of telomeric DNA compared with the 880 bp lost by those over 55 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of telomere length difference before treatment suggests that shortened telomeres may not be a risk factor for development of head and neck cancer in the age range we examined. Chemoradiotherapy caused a severe telomere length reduction in all patients. The significant difference seen in the elderly (P=0.018) suggests that chemoradiotherapy may have more severe effects on the replicative capacity of blood cells in older patients.

Scheduling cisplatin and radiotherapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: a modelling approach

The aim of the present work was to implement the kinetics of cisplatin into a previously developed tumour growth model and to simulate the combined cisplatin-radiotherapy treatment with the emphasis on time sequencing and scheduling of drug and radiation. An investigation into whether the effect of cisplatin-radiation is determined by independent cell kill or by cisplatin-produced radiosensitization was also undertaken. It was shown that cisplatin administered before radiation conferred similar tumour control to the post-radiation sequencing of the drug. The killing effect of the combined modality treatment on tumour increased with the increase in cell recruitment. Furthermore, the individual cell kill produced by the two cytotoxins led to an additive only tumour response when the treatments were given concurrently, suggesting that for a synergistic effect, cisplatin must potentiate the effect of radiation, through the radiosensitizing mechanisms addressed in the literature. It was concluded that the optimal timing of cisplatin should be close to radiation. The model showed that daily administration of cisplatin led to a 35% improvement of tumour control as compared to radiation alone, while weekly cisplatin has improved radiotherapy by only 6%.

Prediction of treatment outcome by cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in patients with stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treated by concurrent cisplatin-radiation (RADPLAT)

The purpose of our study was to test the predictive value of cisplatin-DNA adduct levels in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with cisplatin-radiation. Patients with advanced-stage HNSCC were treated within a randomized trial, investigating the optimal route of cisplatin administration, concurrently with radiation. Cisplatin was administered intra-arterially (IA, 150 mg/m2, with systemic rescue by sodium thiosulfate) or intravenously (IV, 100 mg/m2). In a subgroup, adducts were quantified in normal tissue and tumor. 32P-postlabeling was used to quantify intrastrand guanosine-guanosine adducts (GG-adducts) and adenosine-guanosine adducts (AG-adducts). Adduct levels were correlated with treatment outcome. Thirty-five patients were included (21 IV and 14 IA). At median follow-up of 27 months, locoregional (LR) control was 75% at 1 and 70% at 2 years. Adduct levels in tumor were 4-5-fold higher than in white blood cells (WBC) for both IA and IV treatment (p = 0.01). Adduct formation in WBC and buccal cells was higher in IV treated patients compared with IA infusion (p = 0.049 and 0.005 for GG-adducts in WBC and buccal cells, respectively). Adducts in tumors after IA infusion were not statistically different from those after IV. A strong correlation was observed between GG- and AG-adduct formation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Patients with higher GG adduct levels (>median) in primary tumor had significantly better disease free survival (DFS) than patients with lower (< or = median) adduct levels (p = 0.02). For overall survival (OS), a nonsignificant trend was observed, again in favor of patients with higher adduct levels (p = 0.06). In conclusion, cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in primary tumor appears to be predictive for DFS in HNSCC. No differences were observed in intratumoral adduct levels between IA and IV treatments, despite selective infusion of high-dose cisplatin with the IA procedure. However, systemic adduct levels (WBC and buccal cells) from IV patients were higher than in IA patients, consistent with less systemic exposure after IA administration.

A randomised clinical trial of radiotherapy plus cisplatin versus radiotherapy alone in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

This study was designed to compare high-dose fractionated radiotherapy alone versus the same radiotherapy plus cisplatin in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We randomly assigned 176 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer to one of two treatments; fractionated radiotherapy alone at dose of 64 Gy for 6-7 weeks (2 Gy given 32 times, in five fractions a week) or radiotherapy in the same schedule, combined with 20mg/m2 cisplatin 1 h before radiotherapy, given on days 1-5 of the second and sixth treatment weeks. The frequency of loco-regional progression was 68% among the patients who received radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 86% among those who received radiotherapy alone (P = 0.0001). The probability of survival free of disease after 3 years was 10% among the patients assigned to radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 0% among those treated only with radiotherapy (P = 0.0006). Overall survival at 3 years was 10% among those given radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 2% among those who received radiotherapy alone (P = 0.00001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiotherapy plus cisplatin significantly improved loco-regional progression-free survival and overall survival, irrespective of radiation dose. The addition of cisplatin to fractionated radiotherapy prolongs loco-regional progression-free interval and survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Factors Predictive of Local Disease Control after Intra-arterial Concomitant Chemoradiation (RADPLAT)

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative risk of prognostic factors for local disease control following RADPLAT.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study, academic medical center.

METHODS

Analyses of nine categories of risk factors among 240 patients with Stage II-IV carcinoma consecutively treated with RADPLAT (cisplatin 150 mg/m IA and sodium thiosulfate 9 g/m IV, weekly x4; radiotherapy 2 Gy/fraction/d, 5x weekly, 68-74 Gy over 6 to 7 weeks). Median follow-up: 58 months (range, 12-96 mo).

RESULTS

The percentage of patients who had local disease control was 87.5%. Univariant analysis showed T classification (P =.01), laterality of neck disease (P =.026), number of neck levels involved (P =.008), total dose of radiation greater versus less than 60 Gy (P =.027), and presence of pathologically positive lymph nodes following chemoradiation (P =.01) to be significant. Logistic regression analysis showed total dose of radiation (P =.03) and the presence of pathologically positive lymph nodes following chemoradiation (P =.05) to be significant. For Kaplan-Meier estimates of local disease control at 5 years, T classification (P =.038), number of levels with nodal disease (P =.006), and total dose of radiation therapy (P =.0001) were significant. The log-rank test identified as significant the total dose of radiation therapy (P <.0001), the presence of pathologically positive lymph nodes following chemoradiation (P =.005), and the number of neck levels with positive nodes (P =.006). The Cox regression model showed significance for the total dose of radiation (P =.001), the presence of pathologically positive lymph nodes following chemoradiation (P =.007), and the T classification (P =.029).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors significantly associated with local disease control after RADPLAT appears to differ from more traditional therapy and is suggestive of a paradigm shift.

Concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy in a conventional and modified fractionation schedule in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomised phase II EORTC trial

A randomised phase II trial was initiated to explore the feasibility of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy with conventional fractionation (CF) or multiple fractions per day (MFD) for patients with locally advanced head and neck malignancies. The MFD schedule was designed to achieve higher tumour concentrations of cisplatin at the time of irradiation by reducing the number of radiation treatment weeks from 7 to 3, allowing recovery from side-effects of both irradiation and cystostatic drugs during the rest periods, while keeping the same total dose and overall treatment time. Patients were randomised between a conventional fractionation scheme (CF) of 70 Gy in 7 weeks with 2 Gy per fraction with a daily dose of 6 mg/m(2) cisplatin and a modified fractionation scheme (MFD) delivering three fractions of 1.6 Gy per day, in weeks 1, 4 and 7, keeping the same overall treatment time and total dose. In the modified treatment regime, a daily dose of 10 mg/m(2) cisplatin was administered. 53 patients were entered in this trial and radiotherapy was given according to the schedule to all patients in both treatment arms. Cisplatin was given during the whole course of radiotherapy to only one quarter of the patients in the CF arm, stopping mostly after 5-6 weeks due to bone marrow depression and kidney toxicity, while patients in the MFD arm received it according to schedule. No difference was observed in acute and late toxicity in both treatment arms, while a similar or even better tumour response was obtained with MFD. A 67% higher daily dose of cisplatin concomitant with irradiation could be given in a 3-week multiple fractionation per day schedule, as opposed to the cisplatin given in the conventional daily fractionation schedule of 7 weeks with the same total radiation dose. Similar acute and late toxicities were seen in both treatment arms.

The combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of solid tumours

Several clinical trials carried out during the last decade clearly show that concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improves local control in a variety of advanced solid tumours. In most of these trials, cisplatin alone or in combination with other drugs has been used. This has led to improved survival rates in head and neck, lung and cervical cancer. The interaction of radiotherapy with chemotherapy for these solid tumours appears to be schedule-dependent, as no such an improvement was observed with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in eight out of nine clinical trials in cervical cancer. A major advantage of this combined modality treatment is organ preservation possible for patients with advanced larynx or anal cancer. Major further improvement can be expected from the design and exploration of drugs that influence the pathways leading to cell death after irradiation. Examples include topoisomerase 1 (topo1) inhibitors, alkyl-lysophospholipids, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) receptor inhibitors.

Lack of effectiveness of radiotherapy combined with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin has been reported to enhance the cell-killing effect of radiation. The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with pancreatic carcinoma that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external beam radiation (50.4 grays [Gy] in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and daily cisplatin (5 mg/m(2)/day as a 30-minute infusion just before each radiation fraction). Maintenance 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500 mg/m(2)) given once weekly was initiated 1 week after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients, 31 (76%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The median survival time was 7.7 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 36%. The median progression free survival time was 5.8 months. The first site of failure was distant metastases in 25 patients, locoregional recurrence in 6 patients, and both sites in 1 patient. The major toxicity was leukocytopenia and nausea/emesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy with daily cisplatin appears to be inferior to conventional chemoradiotherapy using 5-FU in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

From translational research to improved local control and survival: the Gilbert Fletcher Award Lecture, Lugano, March 2000

Recent clinical trials have shown us that it is possible to improve local control and survival by the concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in a large variety of solid tumors, such as head and neck, lung, cervical, and anal cancer. The selection of drugs for this combined treatment, however, has been based on a rather empiric approach. Further research combining the clinical and laboratory expertise now offers the possibility of predicting and improving treatment efficacy for radiotherapy and systemic treatment, given alone or in combination. New methods, such as chromosome and gene expression profiling of individual tumors, are now becoming available with the comparative genomic hybridization assay and microchip DNA arrays. These assays will hopefully be of help in selecting patients for their optimal treatment regimen in the near future. Detailed knowledge of the mechanisms of action of these two treatment modalities will also lead to the development of new and more effective drugs, to be used concomitantly. It is the challenge of translational research to implement its opportunities into daily clinical practice. In analogy to the results obtained with concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, this will lead to improved local control and survival rates in cancer patients.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m(2)) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65).

RESULTS

Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P =.0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P =.0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P =.041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P =.0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients.

CONCLUSION

As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

A phase I/II study of carboplatin combined with hyperfractionated radiotherapy for brainstem gliomas

BACKGROUND

Brainstem gliomas often respond to radiotherapy but long term disease control is exceptional. The concomitant administration of a chemotherapy agent with radiosensitizing properties such as carboplatin may increase the efficacy of radiotherapy.

METHODS

A dose escalation schedule of carboplatin was devised to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous carboplatin when given on a twice-weekly schedule during a course of hyperfractionated, involved field radiotherapy (100 centigrays [cGy] twice daily to 7200 cGy). The starting dose was 20 mg/m(2) and the dose was increased by 15 mg/m(2) after every 3 patients provided no Grade 3 or 4 (according to the National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria) toxicity occurred. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (brain and spine) were obtained before treatment and at the time of disease progression. Clinical entry criteria included an MRI scan demonstrating a diffuse intrinsic pontine tumor and a typical 2-3-month history of evolving cranial neuropathies and a gait disorder. Biopsy-confirmed evidence of a high grade glioma was required for nonpontine brain stem tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 7.8 years (range, 3.6-15.4 years) and the median prodrome duration was 1.5 months (range, 0.25-36 months). The MTD was 110 mg/m(2) or a total cumulative dose of 1540 mg/m(2) over 7 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic. The median progression free survival was 8 months (range, 0-104+ months) and the overall survival was 12 months (range, 5-104+ months). At last follow-up there were 5 long term survivors (15%) who remained in continuous remission after a mean follow-up period of 79 months (range, 46-104 months). Fifteen of the 29 patients (52%) with recurrence and or disease progression developed leptomeningeal/intraaxial tumor spread beyond the local radiation field.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative MTD for carboplatin is 1540 mg/m(2) when administered concomitantly with involved field, hyperfractionated radiotherapy in a twice-weekly schedule for 7 weeks. Subsequent Phase II and III clinical trials can be conducted safely at this level.

Towards prediction and modulation of treatment response

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate new predictive assays and their potential to modulate treatment response. Their impact is presented in the context of three EORTC clinical trials in head and neck, lung and breast cancer, showing an improvement in survival by accelerated fractionation, concomitant use of cisplatin and radiotherapy and adjuvant hormonal treatment, respectively. Assays have been developed to predict the response to treatment by measuring tumor characteristics, such as the growth potential by the labeling index after i.v. injection of IdUrd, the extent of radiation-induced stable and unstable chromosome aberrations and the induction of apoptosis. These assays could guide us in the adaptation of the individual radiation doses and fractionation schedules. The measurement of the effect of cisplatin on DNA has become feasible with the development of antibodies against DNA adducts. In a recently completed phase II dose escalation trial with concomitant radiotherapy and daily cisplatin in lung cancer, we found that patients with high DNA adduct levels measured in the buccal mucosa, had a much better survival rate than patients with a low or undetectable amount of cisplatin DNA adducts. A better understanding of the signal transduction pathways involved in radiation-induced apoptosis may help to design studies aimed at modulating the apoptotic response. We and others have recently shown that alkylphospholipids, which inhibit mitogenic signaling, induce apoptosis in a variety of tumor cell lines. In combination with ionizing radiation, these compounds cause an enhancement of apoptotic cell kill. This type of signaling-based intervention study may form the basis for new therapeutic strategies. Pretreatment levels of apoptosis may be helpful in predicting treatment outcome, although the data so far show inconsistent results. The importance of evaluating other tumor-biological parameters, including cell kinetics should be stressed. Based on assays predicting reliably the response to hormonal therapy, a more appropriate choice can be made for therapeutic intervention with hormonal therapy and for selecting the appropriate adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. The development of a functional estrogen receptor assay (ER-FASAY), based on a yeast growth-assay, provides a way of estimating abnormal function of the receptor in tumors with a positive estrogen receptor score as measured by a classical immuno-histochemistry assay. This yeast assay can also detect different DNA mutations of the estrogen receptor existing in an individual tumor specimen.

Radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Cure of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is uncommon with radiotherapy alone. The desire for organ preservation in advanced resectable SCCHN and the need for better local therapy for unresectable disease have led to the development of treatment using radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy (RT/CCT). RT/CCT is an attractive strategy because the appropriate drug(s) may enhance radiation effects and independently contribute to local cytotoxicity. Concurrent treatment may combat tumor repopulation and provide the earliest possible treatment of distant micrometastases. RT/CCT may be integrated in synchronous or alternating schemes. Most randomized trials of RT/CCT versus radiation alone show superior local control, disease-free survival, and survival with combined modality treatment. Improved efficacy with RT/CCT is accompanied by increased acute toxicity, which necessitates compromises in the treatment design of most programs. Consequently the most effective RT/CCT regimen has not been defined. Chemical modifiers of toxicity are now under investigation in clinical trials and may allow for improved integration of RT/CCT.

Radiation therapy alone or with concurrent low-dose daily either cisplatin or carboplatin in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a prospective randomized trial

Between January 1988 and December 1991, 159 patients with Stage III/IV (M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive standard fraction RT (70 Gy) (group I) or the same RT plus either 6 mg/m2 of cisplatin (CDPP) (group II) or 25 mg/ m2 of carboplatin (CBDCA) both given daily during RT (group III). Patients in groups II and III had significantly higher overall response rates then those in group I (P = 0.011 and P = 0.0025, respectively) with no difference between groups II and III (P = 0.60). They also had significantly longer median survival time (MST) and higher 5-year survival rates than those in group I (MST, 32 months (32%) and 30 months (29%) versus 16 months (15%), respectively; P = 0.011 and P = 0.019, respectively), with no difference between the two RT/CHT groups. Median time to local recurrence (MTLR) and 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were significantly higher for both RT/CHT when compared to RT alone (MTLR, not attained yet and 30 months versus 10 months, respectively; 5-year LRFS, 51% and 48% versus 27%, respectively; P = 0.018 and P = 0.040, respectively) with no difference between the two RT/CHT groups. There was no difference between the three treatment groups regarding regional lymph node and distant metastasis control. Apart from acute high grade (> or =3) hematological toxicity that was significantly more frequent in the two RT/CHT groups and no different between the two RT/CHT groups, other acute high grade toxicity was similar between the three treatment groups. Late high grade toxicity was infrequent and similar between the three treatment groups.

Combined modality treatment of the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat: tumor and normal tissue response after cisplatin and conventional or accelerated irradiation treatment

PURPOSE

To test the importance of the sequence of cisplatin and irradiation, either conventional or accelerated fractionated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

30 fractions of 2 Gy were given in 6 or 3 weeks preceded or followed by (time interval between cisplatin and radiotherapy: 3 days) a single IP dose of 5 mg/kg cisplatin in the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat. Survival curves were generated, and comparisons were made by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

After 60 Gy in 6 weeks, no local tumor controls were observed. If cisplatin was injected 3 days before start of 60 Gy/6 weeks, 11 +/- 10% (mean +/- SE) of the tumors were controlled. Cisplatin after radiotherapy resulted in 50 +/- 14% local controls. The difference was significant (p = 0.01) for cisplatin after radiotherapy in comparison to radiotherapy alone where no local controls were observed. After accelerated fractionation, 57 +/- 19% of the animals were cured with or without cisplatin before radiotherapy. If the drug was injected after end of 60 Gy/3 weeks, 86 +/- 13% survived recurrence free. The difference to accelerated radiotherapy alone was not significant. Accelerated radiotherapy produced significantly higher control rates than conventional radiotherapy (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated radiotherapy resulted in higher local tumor control rates as compared to conventional fractionated irradiation. Cisplatin combined with radiotherapy showed significantly better results if given after but not before irradiation, either conventional or accelerated fractionated.

Simultaneous cisplatin and radiation in endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines

The effects of concomitantly administered cisplatin and radiation were evaluated in four recently established endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines. We used the 96-well clonogenic assay to obtain survival data which were fitted to the linear quadratic model. The area under the survival curve (AUC) was obtained by numerical integration. It turned out that there was only a systematic additive cytotoxic effect and no supra-additive, true radiosensitising effect could be found. The results were not affected by the cisplatin dose used, the intrinsic radiosensitivity of the cell lines or the sensitivity of the cells to cisplatin.

Selective intra-arterial infusion of high-dose cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer results in high tumor platinum concentrations and cisplatin-DNA adduct formation

A group of 23 patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with highly selective intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin 150 mg/m2 delivered rapidly through microcatheters. The systemic effects of cisplatin were neutralized by concurrent administration of sodium thiosulfate. Two-to-threefold higher tumor platinum contents were detected in tumor biopsies after selective IA cisplatin administration compared to historical controls (treated with 100 mg/m2 IA). Cisplatin-induced DNA modification in human tumor biopsies was quantitated using the antiserum NKI-A59. High levels of cisplatin DNA adducts were detected which correlated linearly with the tumor platinum content (r2 = 0.62). The addition of radiotherapy to this high dose intensity cisplatin treatment resulted in a 92% complete response (CR) rate (12 of 13 patients achieved a CR). Since no difference in tumor platinum content was detected between patients receiving or not receiving radiotherapy (13 and 10 patients, respectively), but the response rate was substantially different (12 CR and 1 partial response with radiotherapy versus 6 partial and 4 non-responders without radiotherapy), these data suggest that the high platinum levels achieved by selective IA infusion were sufficient to produce enough interaction with radiotherapy to cause a 92% CR rate. Whether this interaction is additive or synergistic is as yet unclear.

Concurrent irradiation and intratumoral chemotherapy with cisplatin: a pilot study in dogs with spontaneous tumors

PURPOSE

A preliminary study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of a collagen gel in the formulation of cisplatin for intratumoral administration of cisplatin affected platinum plasma concentrations. A second study was undertaken to determine the local effects of intratumoral administration of cisplatin mixed with collagen given concurrently with irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twelve dogs with advanced stage tumors were administered a dose of 0.25 mg of cisplatin per kg of body weight intratumorally with or without collagen using a two-period crossover design. Twelve additional dogs received concurrent irradiation (48 Gy) delivered in 12 fractions over 4 weeks and intratumoral cisplatin chemotherapy given the first day of each week at a dose of 0.5 mg of cisplatin per cm3 of tissue.

RESULTS

The cumulative cisplatin plasma concentrations varied over time from dog to dog, but the use of collagen in the formulation significantly reduced the systemic exposure of cisplatin. For the dogs given intratumoral cisplatin and irradiation, complete responses were observed in 10 dogs. Seven dogs had local recurrence. One dog had tumor recurrence in the radiochemotherapy field and six dogs had recurrence at the margin of the radiochemotherapy field, but within the irradiation field. Normal tissue reactions were similar in the radiochemotherapy field and in the margin treated with radiation only. Cumulative effect of repeated intratumoral administration on plasma concentration of cisplatin was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide support for an extended investigation of this combined regimen. The lack of systemic toxicity associated with intratumoral administration of cisplatin mixed with collagen may allow a safe clinical evaluation of the interaction between cisplatin and radiation.

Improvement of combined modality therapy with cisplatin and radiation using intratumoral drug administration in murine tumors

The aim of these studies was to increase the therapeutic ratio by achieving higher tumor concentrations of cisplatin during the course of a fractionated irradiation treatment. Specific goals were to test, firstly, whether multiple drug injections could be replaced by a single slow release implant of cisplatin, and secondly, whether the therapeutic potential of the combined treatment could be increased by administering the drug intratumorally. Drug administration routes tested were intraperitoneal (i.p.) of drug in solution, intratumoral (i.t.) of drug in solution, and intratumoral of drug in a slow release formulation. The latter consisted of a hydrogel polymer formulated into rods which were implanted into the center of subcutaneous tumors. For drug alone, both i.t. routes (solution or polymer) produced higher therapeutic gains than i.p. administration, as judged by tumor growth delay for a given weight loss. When combined with radiation, dose response curves were always shifted to lower doses and were steeper than for radiation or drug alone, although isobologram analysis indicated additivity. In a first series, drug enhancement ratios ranged from 1.6 to 2.6, and were highest for the i.t. groups. In a second series, X-ray enhancement ratios ranged from 1.1 to 1.7, with overlap between results from the different routes. Therapeutic ratios, however, were highest for the i.t. groups in both series. Slow release rods produced the highest therapeutic gains in the first series, while i.t. administration of drug in solution was approximately as effective in the second series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Platinum drug delivery and radiation for locally advanced prostate cancer

Combined therapies of cisplatin and radiation have resulted in clinical reports of apparent efficacious control of locoregional cancer and enhanced survival. Mechanisms of interaction between platinum and radiation that may explain these clinical observations all have in common the prediction that higher concentrations of platinum in all tumor cells close in time to irradiation should lead to greater potentiation of radiation-induced killing of those cells. Cisplatin is thus viewed as providing some radiation-equivalent, or a radiation dose-effect factor, for sterilization of tumors. One disease site that has not been well investigated for response to cisplatin plus radiation therapy, but that could benefit from it, is locally advanced prostate cancer. A body of literature now supports the view that local control of stage C (T3, N0, M0) prostate cancer is correlated with disease-free survival. This correlation makes prostate cancer a candidate for potentially achieving improved cure rates following local tumor sterilization by combining cisplatin with radiation therapy. The need and approaches to optimize delivery of cisplatin within tumor tissue is explored. Increasing cisplatin concentration to all the cells of a tumor, i.e., homogeneously delivering systemic high-dose cisplatin, should benefit the efficacious response otherwise expected for cisplatin combined with radiation. Strategies to increase the homogeneity of cisplatin delivery to a tumor are considered to be those that increase perfusion to that tumor. Vasoactive agents used in anticancer protocols are especially considered for their potential value in serving to increase tumor perfusion. These protocol-inclusive agents include certain cytokines and L-arginine antagonists, and should be better managed and accepted in practice compared to other vasoactive agents that need to be developed as specific additives to protocol designs.

The importance of schedule and drug dose intensity in combinations of modalities

PURPOSE

To review a series of laboratory experiments that have been conducted to investigate the degree to which therapeutic effectiveness is a function of the scheduling of two or more therapeutic agents.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The therapeutic effectiveness of a few combinations of modalities (fractionated irradiation + cis-DDP alone and with 5FU, cyclophosphamide, or etoposide) has been evaluated systematically for a large number of schedules. For every such schedule, therapeutic gain factors were calculated as the ratio of effectiveness for tumor growth inhibition to each of three normal tissue endpoints in laboratory mice: duodenal crypt cell survival, pneumonitis (breathing rate at 5 months after treatment), and pulmonary fibrosis (breathing rate at 10 months).

RESULTS

For every combination tested, at least one schedule was distinctly therapeutically superior to the others. Most often, the greatest therapeutic gain was achieved with divided doses of cis-DDP administered simultaneously with five daily x-ray dose fractions. Even greater gain was found when cyclophosphamide was administered as a single bolus 1 day before fractionated cis-DDP/irradiation. Still greater therapeutic gain was achieved by protecting against normal tissue toxicity by administering the cytokine, interleukin 1, prior to chemotherapy-radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Performing experiments of the type described in this paper can be of great value in the optimization of treatment with combinations of agents or modalities.

Concomitant radiotherapy and daily low-dose carboplatin in locally advanced, unresectable head and neck cancer. Definitive results of a phase I-II study

The combination of daily low-dose carboplatin and radiotherapy was studied in 55 patients with inoperable head and neck cancer. All patients were planned to receive 70 Gy plus carboplatin i.v. daily, 45-60 min before radiotherapy. A starting schedule of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5, weeks 1, 3, 5 and 7 was administered to 17 patients; an escalating daily dose, up to 55 mg/m2, was given to 38 additional patients. Up to a daily dose of 45 mg/m2, only 4.4% of the patients developed grade 3 leukopenia; on the contrary, grade 3 and 4 leukopenia was seen in 62.5% of patients receiving 50 mg/m2 or more. Mucositis was the major nonhaematologic toxicity and seemed to be dose-dependent. At the end of the loco-regional treatment there were 33 (61.1%) CR and 17 PR; the most effective total carboplatin dose seemed to be 40-45 mg/m2. After surgical salvage the number of CRs increased to 37 (68.5%). One- and 2-year loco-regional control rates were 64% and 53% respectively. One- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 71% and 53% respectively; the corresponding rates of disease-free survival were 60% and 43%. There was a strong correlation nodal status and both survival and disease-free survival.

A phase I/II trial of twice daily irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

This study was designed to test the toxicity and efficacy of a regimen of twice daily irradiation and concurrent multiagent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a prospective Phase I/II trial. Patients received 125 cGy b.i.d. to 7000 cGy with a 6 hr interfraction interval. Chemotherapy was given during weeks 1 and 6 of irradiation and consisted of a 5 day infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/M2/day and 5 daily injections of cisplatin at 12 mg/M2/day. Two additional cycles of chemotherapy were given after the completion of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were evaluable: 28 had technically unresectable disease and 18 had resectable tumors. All had Stage III or IV disease: 84% had T3 or T4 primaries while 53% had > or = N2 neck disease. The primary acute toxicity, confluent mucositis, was seen in 74% of patients. Late side effects occurred in four patients. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 25-44 months). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival are 65% and 73%, respectively, while 2-year local regional control and distant disease-free survival are 72% and 88%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that resectability and receiving > 2 cycles of chemotherapy significantly influenced local regional control while age < 60 significantly influenced disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This form of treatment can be delivered safely. The encouraging results have led to the initiation of a Phase III trial comparing this regimen with b.i.d. radiation alone.

Weekly cisplatin plus external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

Prospective, single arm, Phase I/II trial performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the concomitant use of weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1988 and April 1991, 50 previously untreated patients with bulky, locally advanced, squamous cell carcinoma entered the study. All patients were evaluated by a gynecologist and a radiation oncologist and were submitted to standard pre-treatment staging procedures. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was as follows: IIA three patients, IIB seventeen, IIIA two, IIIB 25, and IVA three. Radiotherapy consisted of 46 Gy external beam irradiation plus three high dose rate intracavitary treatments given on a weekly basis to a total dose of 30 Gy to point A. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 was also given weekly starting on day 1 of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 27 months, complete response was seen in 88% (44/50) of the patients. The actuarial survival rate at 44 months was 65%. Total pelvic failure rate was 26% (13/50). Of the 44 patients who achieved a complete remission, only seven have failed in the pelvis. Distant disease was observed in 24% of the cases. Treatments were well tolerated with no patient requiring an interruption in the radiotherapy. However, the incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was high, with 10 patients developing a rectal ulcer (four colostomies for severe bleeding), two patients a small bowel obstruction, and two patients a recto-vaginal fistula. Moreover, gastrointestinal complications appeared sooner than expected, at a median follow-up time of 11 months after completion of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combination of weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy appears to be a very effective regimen for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix, but resulted in a relatively high frequency of late gastrointestinal complications.

Combined modality treatment of the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat: influence of sequence of cisplatin and fractionated irradiation

The effect of irradiation with 30 fractions of 2 Gy in 6 weeks combined with a single dose of 5mg/kg cisplatin was studied in the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat and tumor response and normal tissue toxicity were assessed for various combinations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Cisplatin was given 3 days before, during (after the 5th and after the 10th fraction), or 3 and 17 days after radiotherapy. Five of the 12 tumors treated with cisplatin injected 3 days after radiotherapy were locally controlled (42%; 95% confidence intervals: 14-70%) as compared to 0/10 for radiotherapy alone (0%; 0-21%; p < 0.02). A similar trend was found for cisplatin injected 17 days after irradiation (2/6 local controls; 33%; 0-71%). With cisplatin given 3 days before radiotherapy 1/13 local controls were observed (8%; 0-22%; p < 0.05 when tested vs. cisplatin 3 days after radiotherapy). Tumor cure was dependent upon tumor size at time of cisplatin administration with 7/9 small tumors (< 2 mm3) cured versus only 2/35 cures of larger tumors (> 2 mm3). By contrast, net growth delay and skin damage were the same for combined modality treatment and for irradiation alone. General toxicity as assessed by body weight change was significantly higher for animals treated with cisplatin before or after radiotherapy, whereas cisplatin during radiotherapy showed equal effects as compared to radiotherapy alone. Although for the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat the combined modality treatment was shown to be more effective than radiotherapy alone when cisplatin was applied after radiotherapy, general toxicity was also higher for this mode of treatment.

Influence of cisplatinum on intestinal tolerance to photon and neutron irradiation in mice

The hypothesis that cisplatinum (c-DDP) interacts with radiation by inhibiting the cellular repair capacities, was tested by comparing the interaction of c-DDP with low-LET (60Co gamma-rays) and high-LET radiation (d(50) + Be neutrons) in mice. The biological endpoint was lethality, 6 days after total body irradiation (early intestinal tolerance). The dose modifying factor was 1.80 +/- 0.25 for c-DDP plus 60Co gamma-rays, and 1.97 +/- 0.3 for c-DDP plus neutrons. As less repairable damage is induced by fast neutrons than by photons, this suggests that, in this system, the interaction between radiation and c-DDP is not explained by repair inhibition but is purely additive.

Early and late changes in the normal mouse bladder reservoir function due to irradiation and cis-DDP

Early and late changes in the reservoir function of the mouse bladder were investigated after radiation alone or a combination of radiation and cisplatinum (cis-DDP). Bladder function was investigated by repeated cystometries. Treatments consisted of either single fraction radiation (5-10-15-25-30 Gy) or 20 Gy in combination with cis-DDP (6 mg kg-1; i.p.) administered at various time intervals from 14 days before until 14 days after radiation. At two selected time intervals (15 min and 4 h before) radiation was given at different dose levels (5-10-15-20 Gy). Within 30 days after irradiation a dose-dependent early response was noticed both in the radiation alone group and the group where cis-DDP was administered 15 min before radiation. The dose-response curve showed a slight but non-significant shift to the left in the combined treatment group (dose effect factor (DEF) = 1.18). Investigation of the early change in bladder reservoir function in the animals treated with 20 Gy alone or a combination of 20 Gy plus cis-DDP at various intervals in relation to irradiation demonstrated a significant increase in response when cis-DDP was administered 24 h and 15 min before and 4 h, 72 h and 336 h after 20 Gy (P less than 0.05). The reversible nature of the early damage was demonstrated. Late response was irreversible and significantly increased in most groups were cis-DDP was administered from 168 h before until 72 h after compared to radiation alone. Comparing groups treated with radiation alone with groups where cis-DDP was administered 15 min and 4 h before radiation revealed DEF values up to 1.45 (P less than 0.05), reflecting the significantly larger response in combined treatment groups. Survival was significantly decreased in all combined treatment groups compared to groups treated with radiation only and likewise survival was decreased in the group treated by cis-DDP alone compared to control (no treatment at all).

Radiotherapy enhanced by cis-platinum in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

From January 1984 to December 1986, 94 patients with unresectable, locally advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated to assess both the efficacy and the toxicity of a combined modality treatment including radiation therapy (45 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) and daily low dose cDDP (6 mg/m2). The overall response rate for the 90 evaluable patients was 54.3% with 16.6% of complete responses. At a minimum follow-up of 4 years, the overall median survival time was 12 months. Provided adequate hydration is ensured, the cDDP regimen chosen as a radiosensitizer can be safely combined with radiation therapy.

Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum) has been reported to enhance the cell-killing effect of radiation, an effect whose intensity varies with the schedule of administration. We randomly assigned 331 patients with nonmetastatic inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer to one of three treatments: radiotherapy for two weeks (3 Gy given 10 times, in five fractions a week), followed by a three-week rest period and then radiotherapy for two more weeks (2.5 Gy given 10 times, five fractions a week); radiotherapy on the same schedule, combined with 30 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area, given on the first day of each treatment week; or radiotherapy on the same schedule, combined with 6 mg of cisplatin per square meter, given daily before radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Survival was significantly improved in the radiotherapy-daily-cisplatin group as compared with the radiotherapy group (P = 0.009): survival in the radiotherapy-daily-cisplatin group was 54 percent at one year, 26 percent at two years, and 16 percent at three years, as compared with 46 percent, 13 percent, and 2 percent, respectively, in the radiotherapy group. Survival in the radiotherapy-weekly-cisplatin group was intermediate (44 percent, 19 percent, and 13 percent) and not significantly different from survival in either of the other two groups. The survival benefit of daily combined treatment was due to improved control of local disease (P = 0.003). Survival without local recurrence was 59 percent at one year and 31 percent at two years in the radiotherapy-daily-cisplatin group; 42 percent and 30 percent, respectively, in the radiotherapy-weekly-cisplatin group; and 41 percent and 19 percent, respectively, in the radiotherapy group. Cisplatin induced nausea and vomiting in 86 percent of the patients given it weekly and in 78 percent of those given it daily; these effects were severe in 26 percent and 28 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin, given daily in combination with the radiotherapy described here to patients with nonmetastatic but inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer, improved rates of survival and control of local disease at the price of substantial side effects.

Concurrent radiation and weekly cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer--a phase I/II study

A total of 20 patients with loco-regional non-small-cell lung carcinoma were entered into a study of irradiation (3.0 Gy x 15 doses to a total dose of 45 Gy given in 4 fractions per week on days 1, 2, 4 and 5 of each week) and cisplatin given at a dose of 40 mg/m2 on day 3 of each week for a total of three infusions. One patient who had stage 1 disease showed a complete response to therapy and is alive and clear of disease at 35 months. In 19 patients with stage 3 disease, the complete response rate was 16% and the partial response rate was 42%. The rate of 1-year survival was 42% and the rate of 2-year survival was 11%; the median survival of these patients was 11 months. Relapse occurred, mostly at metastatic sites, in 10 of the 11 patients who responded to therapy. Acute toxicity was modest and tolerable by our patients. No severe late toxicity was encountered, and none of the patients developed grade 3 dyspnoea (an inability to walk 100 yards because of breathlessness) while clear of recurrent disease. Changes in lung function observed at follow-up examinations were similar to those seen after irradiation alone. Weekly administration of cisplatin is therefore feasible in patients receiving a continuous course of irradiation. The high relapse rate observed in responding patients indicates the need for evaluation of the efficacy of combination chemotherapy in the adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting.