Long term persistence of anti-HBs protective levels in young patients with type 1 diabetes after recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine elicits robust virus-specific antibodies but poor cross-protective CD8+ memory T cell responses in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have demonstrated 95 % efficacy in the general population. However, their immunogenicity in adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), who exhibit weaken immune responses, remains insufficiently explored.

METHODS

Longitudinal analysis of innate immune responses following PRR-agonists and BNT162b2 vaccine stimulations, along with S-specific antibody responses, memory T cell recall responses, and RNA-sequencing were assessed in eight T1D adolescents and 16 healthy controls at six different timepoints.

RESULTS

After BNT162b2 vaccination, T1D adolescents produced SARS-CoV-2-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) comparable to healthy controls. Lower pre-vaccination blood HbA1c level correlated with higher antibody responses among T1D adolescents. However, they exhibited impaired TLR9-induced B cells and the first vaccine-induced monocyte activation. These differences were supported by transcriptomic analysis, which revealed the impairment in innate immune-related signatures both before and after vaccination. One year post-second vaccination, T1D adolescents demonstrated compromised cross-protection of T cell against BA.1 compared to healthy controls, which correlated with impaired innate immune responses identified in this study.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that while T1D adolescents vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine develop robust S-specific antibodies, their cross-protective T cell responses are suboptimal.

How does diabetes type 1 affects immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in pediatric population? Evaluation of a booster dose in unresponsive subjects with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine reduced the incidence of Hepatitis B worldwide. Genetic variability, by the presence of specific haplotypes of HLA system (HLA-DR3, HLA-DR4), influences the response to the vaccination. Subjects affected by type 1 diabetes (T1D), contrary to non-diabetics, have a high prevalence of Hepatitis B.

METHODS

The objective of the study was to evaluate anti-HBs antigen (anti-HBsAg) antibody (Ab) in a group of 201 children (age range: 2-18 years), regularly vaccinated against HBV according to the national vaccination schedule. Patients with anti-HBs Ab≥10 mIU/mL have been defined "responders" and those with anti-HBs Ab<10mIU/mL have been defined "non-responders." The possible association between the T1D and a low immune response to the vaccine has been subsequently valued. Besides the presence of T1D, other possible influential variables have been studied: sex, age, presence of celiac disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis, intervening years from the diagnosis of diabetes and presence/absence of diabetic ketoacidosis at time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 201 subjects with T1D, 90 (44.8%) were responders, while 111 (55.2%) were non-responders; among the 145 subjects without T1D, 86 (59.3%) were responders and 59 (40.7%) non-responders. We invited "Subjects with T1D non-responders" to undergo a booster dose of the same vaccine. Of these, 21 refused the booster, reducing the sample to 90 patients. After 4 weeks from the booster dose 81 patients showed seroconversion ("false non-responders"), and 9 did not ("true non-responders").

CONCLUSIONS

After the booster dose, immune response in our cross-section has been similar to general population. Given the high frequency of "false non-responders" anti-HBsAg Ab should be tested in T1D patients and a booster dose should be administrated in non-responders.

Correlation between COVID-19 vaccination and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the current global public health threats and vaccination is the most effective tool to reduce the spread and decrease the severity of COVID-19. Diabetes is one of the important chronic diseases threatening human health and is a common comorbidity of COVID-19. What is the impact of diabetes on the immunization effect of COVID-19 vaccination? Conversely, does vaccination against COVID-19 exacerbate the severity of pre-existing diseases in patients with diabetes? There are limited and conflicting data on the interrelationship between diabetes and COVID-19 vaccination.

AIM

To explore the clinical factors and possible mechanisms underlying the interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com) online databases, and medRxiv and bioRxiv gray literature using the keywords "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", "vaccine", "vaccination", "antibody", and "diabetes" individually or in combination, with a cut-off date of December 2, 2022. We followed inclusion and exclusion criteria and after excluding duplicate publications, studies with quantifiable evidence were included in the full-text review, plus three manually searched publications, resulting in 54 studies being included in this review.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies were included, from 17 countries. There were no randomized controlled studies. The largest sample size was 350963. The youngest of the included samples was 5 years old and the oldest was 98 years old. The included population included the general population and also some special populations with pediatric diabetes, hemodialysis, solid organ transplantation, and autoimmune diseases. The earliest study began in November 2020. Thirty studies discussed the effect of diabetes on vaccination, with the majority indicating that diabetes reduces the response to COVID-19 vaccination. The other 24 studies were on the effect of vaccination on diabetes, which included 18 case reports/series. Most of the studies concluded that COVID-19 vaccination had a risk of causing elevated blood glucose. A total of 12 of the 54 included studies indicated a "no effect" relationship between diabetes and vaccination.

CONCLUSION

There is a complex relationship between vaccination and diabetes with a bidirectional effect. Vaccination may contribute to the risk of worsening blood glucose in diabetic patients and diabetic patients may have a lower antibody response after vaccination than the general population.

Antibody response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

DM patients' antibody response after the COVID-19 vaccine is still unknown amid the COVID-19 vaccination rollout. This study aimed to explore the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response or seropositivity among DM patients following the COVID-19 vaccine administration.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature consisting of observational or cross-sectional studies, which reported the antibody serology or seropositivity among DM patients by following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 64468 patients were identified, and 5156 (7.9%) of them had diabetes. Most studies showed that antibody response and seropositivity in DM patients were lower than healthy population after one until four weeks following full COVID-19 vaccination dose.

CONCLUSION

The antibody response and seropositivity after the COVID-19 vaccine in DM patients were lower than in healthy subjects. Therefore, DM patients are expected to receive vaccines according to the dose and schedule appropriately and might be prioritized to receive vaccine boosters.

Childhood Vaccinations and Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most common paediatric endocrine disease, and its frequency has been found to increase worldwide. Similar to all conditions associated with poorly regulated glucose metabolism, T1D carries an increased risk of infection. Consequently, careful compliance by T1D children with schedules officially approved for child immunization is strongly recommended. However, because patients with T1D show persistent and profound limitations in immune function, vaccines may evoke a less efficient immune response, with corresponding lower protection. Moreover, T1D is an autoimmune condition that develops in genetically susceptible individuals and some data regarding T1D triggering factors appear to indicate that infections, mainly those due to viruses, play a major role. Accordingly, the use of viral live attenuated vaccines is being debated. In this narrative review, we discussed the most effective and safe use of vaccines in patients at risk of or with overt T1D. Literature analysis showed that several problems related to the use of vaccines in children with T1D have not been completely resolved. There are few studies regarding the immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines in T1D children, and the need for different immunization schedules has not been precisely established. Fortunately, the previous presumed relationship between vaccine administration and T1D appears to have been debunked, though some doubts regarding rotavirus vaccines remain. Further studies are needed to completely resolve the problems related to vaccine administration in T1D patients. In the meantime, the use of vaccines remains extensively recommended in children with this disease.

Diabetes mellitus as a vaccine-effect modifier: a review

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a highly prevalent, chronic condition in adults worldwide. Little is known about the potential role of diabetes as an effect modifier of vaccine protective responses.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature review of the immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness of immunization in individuals, in studies that compared subjects with DM (DM+) and without DM (DM-). We found few published studies, which were only for vaccines against hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcal disease, or varicela zoster. Except for a consistent attenuation of the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine among DM+ individuals, we found little other consistent evidence for DM as an effect modifier of vaccine responses.

EXPERT OPINION

There are substantial gaps in our knowledge of the impact of DM on the immune response to immunization or effect of vaccination.

Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination

There is substantial variation between individuals in the immune response to vaccination. In this review, we provide an overview of the plethora of studies that have investigated factors that influence humoral and cellular vaccine responses in humans. These include intrinsic host factors (such as age, sex, genetics, and comorbidities), perinatal factors (such as gestational age, birth weight, feeding method, and maternal factors), and extrinsic factors (such as preexisting immunity, microbiota, infections, and antibiotics). Further, environmental factors (such as geographic location, season, family size, and toxins), behavioral factors (such as smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, and sleep), and nutritional factors (such as body mass index, micronutrients, and enteropathy) also influence how individuals respond to vaccines. Moreover, vaccine factors (such as vaccine type, product, adjuvant, and dose) and administration factors (schedule, site, route, time of vaccination, and coadministered vaccines and other drugs) are also important. An understanding of all these factors and their impacts in the design of vaccine studies and decisions on vaccination schedules offers ways to improve vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy.

Seroprotection status of hepatitis B and measles vaccines in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is speculated to have an impaired immunological response to vaccines. This paper aimed to investigate the presence of specific antibodies against hepatitis B virus (HBV) and measles in diabetic children who had been immunized according to the standard national calendar of immunization.

METHODS

Two hundred and one diabetic children and 140 healthy controls were prospectively evaluated. Antibodies against hepatitis B (anti-HBs) and measles were detected in all individuals who completed the vaccination schedule. We noted onset of T1DM, duration of the disease, diabetes-related autoantibodies and mean HbA1c levels.

RESULTS

Some 72.6% of diabetics and 82.1% of controls had anti-HBs (+) (p=0.04). We found a reduced efficacy of measles vaccination in anti-HBs (-) diabetic children (p=0.009), even though there was no significant difference between the study and control groups. Onset of the disease was earlier in anti-HBs (-) diabetics than in controls (p=0.038). No difference with respect to other parameters was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed a reduced seroprotection rate for HBV vaccination in diabetic children and for measles with anti-HBs (-) diabetics. Larger studies should be encouraged to confirm the vaccine efficacy in diabetic children and to elucidate possible pathogenic mechanisms.

Antibody levels against hepatitis B virus after hepatitis B vaccination in Egyptian diabetic children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

The remarkable effectiveness of universal infantile hepatitis B (HB) vaccination is well documented in many countries. Nevertheless, the influence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) on the sero-protective level of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) after HB vaccination has not been investigated in Egyptian children. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term anti-HBs sero-protective levels after infantile HB vaccination in Egyptian IDDM children.

RESULTS

The mean age of the healthy children was 10.86 ± 1.21 y (range, 5.5-15 y); 49 (45.8%) were boys and 58 (54.2%) were girls. The mean age of the IDDM children was 10.29 ± 3.04 y (range, 4-17 y); 32 (50.8%) were boys and 31 (49.2%) were girls. There were no significant differences between the healthy and IDDM children with respect to age and sex (p>0.05). Among the 107 healthy children, 43 (40%) did not have a protective anti-HBs level (anti-HBs<10 IU/L) and 64 (60%) had a protective level (anti-HBs ≥ 10 IU/L). In contrast, among the IDDM children, 44 (69.8%) and 19 (30.2%) did not and did have protective anti-HBs levels, respectively. This difference in anti-HBs concentration between healthy and diabetic children was highly significant (p<0.001). None of the vaccinated healthy or IDDM children was reactive to HBsAg or total anti-HBc.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 170 children (81 boys, 89 girls) who had been routinely vaccinated against HB were included. Their mean age was 10 ± 2.1 y. The enrolled children were divided into healthy (n = 107) and IDDM (n = 63) cohorts. Body Mass Index and levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), total antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and anti-HBs were evaluated in all children. In addition, the duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured in IDDM children.

CONCLUSION

Our results are alarming. It appears that the majority of Egyptian diabetic children vaccinated against HB may not have sufficient anti-HBs levels to protect them from HB. Moreover, this study emphasizes the need for a population-based strategy for the management of patients without an anti-HBs protective level after HB vaccination and justifies the need to elucidate the heritability of those children.

Diagnosis and management of infection in the diabetic foot

Foot infections are common in persons with diabetes mellitus. Most diabetic foot infections occur in a foot ulcer, which serves as a point of entry for pathogens. Unchecked, infection can spread contiguously to involve underlying tissues, including bone. A diabetic foot infection is often the pivotal event leading to lower extremity amputation, which account for about 60% of all amputations in developed countries. Given the crucial role infections play in the cascade toward amputation, all clinicians who see diabetic patients should have at least a basic understanding of how to diagnose and treat this problem.

Hepatitis B vaccination failure in children with diabetes mellitus? The debate continues

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of specific antibodies against HBsAg in diabetic children (IDDM) previously vaccinated against hepatitis B virus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

110 diabetic children were retrospectively studied and 100 healthy controls were recruited. In all patients surface antigen, HBV core IgG, antibodies against HBV "e" antigen and quantitative HBV surface antibodies were detected. In 45 patients molecular typing of HLA alleles was performed. Metabolic control was evaluated as mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and all patients were compliant to insulin therapy.

RESULTS

46 of 110 diabetic children (41.8%) and 16 of 100 healthy controls (16%) were found to have not anti-HBs antibodies (p < 0.0001). The mean antibody titer was found significantly-lower (p < 0.0001) in IDDM children than healthy controls. No correlation was found between antibody titer, age, duration of disease and HbA1c. We did not find any difference of gender, age, years of onset of the disease and metabolic control, between diabetics with anti-HBs antibodies and those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the reduced seroprotection rate for HBV vaccination in diabetics. However it remains poorly clarify the real clinical significance of this result. In our study no diabetic children showed markers of HBV infection.

Immune response of single dose vaccination against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the Taiwanese elderly

We conducted a multi-center, randomized and laboratory-blinded clinical trial with subgroup analyses, involving adults aged greater than 60 years old (range 61-86 years old), to investigate the immunogenicity and the potential factors affecting the immune response of a monovalent, unadjuvanted, inactivated, split-virus vaccine. A total of 107 subjects were randomized to receive 15 and 30 microg of hemagglutinin antigen in a 1:1 ratio. The immunogenicity was detected through hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) test of serum obtained before and 3 weeks after vaccination. By 3 weeks after vaccination, HAI titer >or=1:40 was observed in 75.5% and 81.1% of participants receiving 15 and 30 microg of hemagglutinin antigen, respectively. Positive seroconversion was observed in 71.7% and 81.1% of recipients of the 15 and the 30 microg, respectively. The GMTs increased by a factor of 10.7 and 17.4 in the groups of 15 and 30 microg, respectively. This study indicated that one dose of 15 microg hemagglutinin antigen without adjuvant induced protective immune response in the majority of elderly. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that gender, age and diabetes were statistically significant factors affecting the seroprotection rate (p=0.04, 0.01 and 0.01, respectively) and seroconversion rate (p=0.01, 0.01 and 0.01, respectively).

Common infections in diabetes: pathogenesis, management and relationship to glycaemic control

Specific defects in innate and adaptive immune function have been identified in diabetic patients in a range of in vitro studies. However, the relevance of these findings to the integrated response to infection in vivo remains unclear, especially in patients with good glycaemic control. Vaccine efficacy seems adequate in most diabetic patients, but those with type 1 diabetes and high glycosylated haemoglobin levels are most likely to exhibit hypo-responsiveness. While particular infections are closely associated with diabetes, this is usually in the context of extreme metabolic disturbances such as ketoacidosis. The link between glycaemic control and the risk of common community-acquired infections is less well established but could be clarified if infection data from large community-based observational or intervention studies were available. The relationship between hospital-acquired infections and diabetes is well recognized, particularly among post-operative cardiac and critically ill surgical patients in whom intensive insulin therapy improves clinical outcome independent of glycaemia. Nevertheless, further research is needed to improve our understanding of the role of diabetes and glycaemic control in the pathogenesis and management of community- and hospital-acquired infections.

No evidence of autoimmunity in 6-year-old children immunized at birth with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

OBJECTIVES

Taking into account that genetic predisposition, marked by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II genes, augments the probability of developing an autoimmune disorder after a triggering vaccination, as largely debated, we investigated the frequency of autoantibody production after recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (rHBv) in 6-year-old children immunized at birth to evaluate an association between autoimmune disorders and hepatitis B virus vaccination.

METHODS

We investigated the presence of autoantibodies in 210 6-year-old children who were immunized at birth with rHBv: 200 showed anti-hepatitis B surface antigen concentrations > or =10 mUI/mL at seroconversion (responders), and 10 were nonresponders. Data were compared with those obtained in 109 unvaccinated children. All participants were screened for the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), anti-DNA, antimitochondrial, anti-liver/kidney microsomal, antireticulin, anti-smooth muscle (SMA), and antiribosomal antibodies. All participants were also screened for the presence of antithyroid antibodies, such as antithyroglobulin and antiperoxidase, and for antibodies found in type 1 diabetes, such as tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2A) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA). HLA typing was extended to all 10 nonresponders.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies were found in 16 of the 200 responders: ANAs were found in 12 (6%), smooth muscle antibodies were found in 4 (2.0%), and antireticulin antibodies and endomysial antibodies were found in 1 girl with ANAs. Antithyroid antibodies, IA-2A, and GADA were not present in any of the participants. No significant difference was found in the frequency of autoantibodies between vaccinated and control children. Three of the 10 nonresponder children were SMA-positive (30% vs 2% of responders); they also carried the supratype HLA-C4AQ0,DRB1*0301,DQB1*02. A family history for autoimmune disorders was present in 3 (18%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0%-45.6%) of the 16 responder infants with autoantibodies, in 15 (8.4%; 95% CI: 4.6%-13.1%) of responder children without autoantibodies, and in 1 (10%) of the 10 nonsreponder children.

CONCLUSIONS

From our data, vaccination with rHBv given during the neonatal period does not seem to increase autoantibody production in a 6-year-old children. Autoantibodies, referred to as natural autoantibodies, can be found in healthy participants, but their significance is unclear. These autoantibodies often cross-react with bacteria or tumor antigens, suggesting their importance in innate immunity. It has been demonstrated in an animal model that self-antigen can promote B-cell accumulation, and that a significant proportion of natural autoantibodies is the product of this self-antigen- dependent process. Consequently, it has been speculated that self-antigens play a positive role in recruiting B cells as a part of innate immunity, but this process carries a potential risk for unregulated growth. Spreading of the immune response is a common theme in organ-specific and systemis autoimmune diseases, and this could be initiated by exogenous agents, in genetically susceptible hosts, owing to molecular mimicry of natural antigen. Moreover, 3 (18%) of the 16 children who had autoantibodies had a family history of autoimmume diseases. Thus, it is apparent that susceptibility to autoimmunity is determined by genetic factors rather than by vaccine challenge. Among all the children considered, only 1 girl (0.5%) developed celiac disease, reflecting the prevalence described in the literature. GADA and IA-2A were not found in our children; this observation is in agreement with data showing that type 1 diabetes risk may not be altered by vaccinations administered during childhood. On the contrary, a high frequency (30%) of autoantibodies, in particular SMA, was observed in the nonresponder children. The 3 SMA-positive children carried the HLA-C4Q0,DRB1*0301,DQB1*02 haplotype, a well-known predisposing factor for autoimmune disorders. On the other hand, the presence of autoantibodies to smooth muscle is known to be common in hepatitis B infection, and, it has been shown that cross-reactive immunity targeting homologous self-protein may partly account for autoantibody production. Although hepatitis B vaccination given during the neonatal period does not increase autoantibody production in 6-year-old immunized children, we deem useful a more prolonged follow-up for these nonresponder children carrying certain HLA haplotypes (such as C4AQ0,DRB1*0301,DQB1*02), particularly because most autoimmune diseases do not develop until later in life.

Anti-HBs response to standard hepatitis B vaccination in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus

Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus are expected to respond poorly to hepatitis B (HB) vaccination. In this study we tested this hypothesis for the standard vaccination schedule. Ninety-nine patients (age 10.8 +/- 3.5 years) were vaccinated against HB (10 pg/dose at 0, 1, and 6 months) using a vaccine containing no pre-S2 antigen (Engerix Bs). The sero-conversion and -protection rates after the completion of three doses, the relation of anti-HBs titers to clinical parameters, and comparison with those of healthy counterparts (51 children, aged 9.7 +/- 4.4 years) were analyzed. The vaccine used was pre-S2 antigen containing (Genhevac B) in 23 and Engerix B in 28; both types yielded a similar response. The geometric mean of the anti-HBs titer was 322.9 vs 1476.8 IU/l (non-significant), sero-convertion rate 96.9% vs 100%, and seroprotection rate 93.9% vs 99% in the diabetic and control groups, respectively. In the diabetic group, there was no correlation between anti-HBs titer and clinical characteristics except for age. We concluded that the standard vaccination schedule is less effective but still effective enough in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.