Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Management of In-transit Disease: Regional Therapies, Intralesional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

In-transit (IT) melanoma represents a distinct, heterogeneous pattern of disease that arises as superficial tumors along the track between the primary site and the draining regional lymph node basin. Many therapies have been explored for treatment of this disease with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicities. These include regional chemotherapies, intralesional injections, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and vaccines in various combinations or as monotherapy. Here, we review the general managemnt of patients with ITmelanoma, the range of currently available treatment options, and recommendations for specific therapies for individual patients.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: What Surgeons Need to Know

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) have transformed the care of patients with stage IV melanoma, now with 5-year overall survival rates around 50%. Surgeons should be acquainted with these drugs, the multidisciplinary considerations of their use, and the unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs) they can cause. In this review, we discuss systemic therapies for cutaneous melanoma, including the biology of immune checkpoint inhibition, treatment indications, and toxicities. We also explain how these irAEs and other toxicities can impact surgical planning and perioperative management.

Recent Advances in Molecular Research and Treatment for Melanoma in Asian Populations

Melanoma treatment comprised a few treatment choices with insufficient efficacy before the emergence of molecularly targeted medication and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which dramatically improved patient outcomes. B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (BRAF) and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Kinase (MEK) inhibitors significantly improved survival in BRAF-mutant melanoma and immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agents, established new standards of care. Challenges remain, however, including the existence of resistance mechanisms and the reduced efficacy of immune-based therapies in Asian populations, particularly for acral and mucosal subtypes. This review highlights historical and current therapeutic advancements, discusses regional considerations, and explores emerging strategies aiming at globally optimizing melanoma management.

Update on Liquid Biopsy

Liquid biopsy helps detect cells and cell-derived metabolites, proteins, nucleic acids, and vesicles that are shed into body fluids by tumors. This diagnostic test requires only approximately 10 mL of blood or urine. It has received considerable attention as a minimally invasive tool for whole-body tumor interrogation for use in patients with cancer. It poses an attractive and potentially cost-effective alternative to invasive tissue sampling through tissue biopsies, especially serial assessments, such as for treatment response evaluation and mutations that occur during cancer treatment. Cell-free and circulating tumor DNA are the most frequently tested liquid biopsy analytes, and have shown promise for cancer screening, assessment of residual disease after treatment, and clinical outcome prediction and prognostication. Whereas liquid biopsy is less sensitive than imaging in early tumor stages, it is more specific and may help detect treatment response earlier than the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, or RECIST. Aimed primarily at radiologists, this review article provides an update on recent developments in the use of liquid biopsy, including findings from landmark clinical trials and U.S. regulatory approvals as companion diagnostic tests for clinical use, particularly in four malignancies: lymphoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and melanoma. Finally, current challenges for the clinical implementation of liquid biopsy are discussed.

Metabolic parameters on baseline and early [18F]FDG PET/CT as a predictive biomarker for resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition in advanced cutaneous BRAFV600-mutated melanoma

BACKGROUND

[18F]FDG PET/CT plays a crucial role in evaluating cancer patients and assessing treatment response, including in BRAF-mutated melanoma. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) have emerged as promising alternatives to standardized uptake value (SUV)-based measures for tumor assessment. This study evaluates the predictive value of SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in a multi-center trial and treated with vemurafenib/cobimetinib. [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans were performed at baseline, week-2, and week-7. Imaging analysis included SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG of summed metastases, as well as percentage changes over time (∆). Baseline median PET-parameters were SUVpeak 12.59 (range 3.13-50.59), MTV 159mL (range 0-1897 mL), and TLG 1013 (range 1-13162). Baseline MTV was the strongest predictor (AUCT=6 months=0.714), while early changes in MTV, TLG, and especially week-7 ΔSUVpeak% showed similar or improved performance (P = 0.017 vs. baseline SUVpeak). Patients with TLG below the median had significantly prolonged PFS (15.4 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.024). MTV above optimal cutoff (45.3 mL) was associated with an increased risk of progression/death, even after adjusting for LDH, ECOG status, and metastatic sites (HR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.17-7.52, P = 0.022). At week-2, ∆SUVpeak% was not predictive in a multivariable analysis, but became predictive at week-7 (median ∆SUVpeak%: 64), with a more than three-fold hazard of progression for patients with ∆SUVpeak% below 64% (P = 0.0014); PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-NA) for patients below the median versus 14.7 months (95% CI: 9.2-20.2) for those above or with non-quantifiable scans (P = 0.0002). Median ∆MTV was 95.5% at week-2 and 97.6% at week-7, with significant PFS differences at both time points (week-2: P = 0.020, week-7: P < 0.001). As expected, TLG mirrored MTV. Patients with MTV increases at week-7 after an initial response at week-2 had a median PFS of 5.3 vs. 12.6 months for those with stable or declining MTV (P = 0.0023). Intra-patient metabolic heterogeneity was also associated with outcome, with early reductions in SUVpeak variation between lesions correlating with better PFS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of MTV and TLG as robust predictive markers for PFS in advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK-inhibitors. Monitoring early PET parameters changes can provide valuable insights into therapeutic response and disease progression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02414750. Registered 10 April 2015, retrospectively registered.

Feasibility of multiomics tumor profiling for guiding treatment of melanoma

There is limited evidence supporting the feasibility of using omics and functional technologies to inform treatment decisions. Here we present results from a cohort of 116 melanoma patients in the prospective, multicentric observational Tumor Profiler (TuPro) precision oncology project. Nine independent technologies, mostly at single-cell level, were used to analyze 126 patient samples, generating up to 500 Gb of data per sample (40,000 potential markers) within 4 weeks. Among established and experimental markers, the molecular tumor board selected 54 to inform its treatment recommendations. In 75% of cases, TuPro-based data were judged to be useful in informing recommendations. Patients received either standard of care (SOC) treatments or highly individualized, polybiomarker-driven treatments (beyond SOC). The objective response rate in difficult-to-treat palliative, beyond SOC patients (n = 37) was 38%, with a disease control rate of 54%. Progression-free survival of patients with TuPro-informed therapy decisions was 6.04 months, (95% confidence interval, 3.75-12.06) and 5.35 months (95% confidence interval, 2.89-12.06) in ≥third therapy lines. The proof-of-concept TuPro project demonstrated the feasibility and relevance of omics-based tumor profiling to support data-guided clinical decision-making. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06463509 .

Imaging Proliferation of Stage IV Cutaneous Melanoma With 18F-FLT PET/CT: A Potential Noninvasive Tool for Predicting Treatment Resistance to Targeted Therapy?

BACKGROUND

18F-FLT PET/CT visualizes cellular proliferation and may correlate more directly with tumor aggressiveness and treatment response than 18F-FDG PET/CT in melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. We aimed to assess whether 18F-FLT PET/CT can predict early resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors in addition to current clinical tools in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This explorative side study of the phase II multicenter REPOSIT trial included 19 patients with stage IV BRAF V600E/K-mutated cutaneous melanoma who underwent optional 18F-FLT PET/CT. 18F-FLT PET/CT was performed at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment to evaluate baseline uptake and early changes in metabolic activity. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed at baseline for comparison. Ki67 expression was assessed in metastatic tissue samples. Analyses included: (1) visual comparison of baseline 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake, (2) correlation of 18F-FLT uptake with Ki-67, (3) semiquantitative analysis of baseline 18F-FLT uptake, and (4) evaluation of percentage change in 18F-FLT uptake after 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients with consistently lower 18F-FLT than 18F-FDG uptake in metastases had longer progression-free survival (PFS; median 9.6 months, range: 3.4 to 32.3) compared with those with equal/higher or heterogeneous 18F-FLT uptake (3.5 to 5.3 mo). Baseline 18F-FLT SULpeak did not correlate with Ki67 expression (P = 0.601), nor was Ki67 associated with PFS (P= 0.39). No significant PFS difference was observed between patients with baseline 18F-FLT SULpeak below or above the median (P= 0.601). However, a greater percentage decrease in 18F-FLT uptake at 2 weeks was associated with longer PFS (median: 13.9 vs 4.3 mo, P= 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline 18F-FLT uptake patterns relative to 18F-FDG, and early changes in 18F-FLT uptake, were associated with PFS in patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. These explorative findings suggest that 18F-FLT PET/CT may have predictive value, warranting confirmation in larger prospective studies.

The 2024 revised clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery

The Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery published the first edition of the "Clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors" in 2010 and the revised edition in 2018. The guideline presented herein is the English translation of the revised third edition, issued in 2024. The aim is to enhance health outcomes for patients suffering from thyroid tumors by facilitating evidence-based shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, as well as standardizing the management of thyroid tumors. The focus is on adult patients with thyroid tumors, addressing clinically significant issues categorized into areas such as an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules, treatment strategies by histological type, radioactive iodine therapy, treatment of advanced differentiated carcinoma, pharmacotherapy, and complications and safety management associated with thyroid surgery. Thirty-two clinical questions were established in these areas. Following a comprehensive search of the literature and systematic review to evaluate the overall evidence, we aimed to present optimal recommendations by considering the balance of benefits and harms from the patient's perspective. We integrated evidence and clinical experience to determine the "Certainty of evidence" and "Strength of recommendations". Based on these, we illustrated overall flows of care as "Clinical algorithms". Necessary background knowledge of diseases and established clinical procedures for understanding the recommendations are presented in "Notes", while information that may be clinically useful but for which evidence remains insufficient is included in "Columns", based on the current state of evidence. Finally, future challenges for the next revision are presented as "Future research questions".

BRAF Targeting Across Solid Tumors: Molecular Aspects and Clinical Applications

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer's tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

Optimizing targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma: a combination of encorafenib and trametinib beyond standard protocols

Only three combinations of BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitor (MEKi) targeted therapies are marketed for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. The use of these combinations can be limited by the occurrence of severe adverse events (AEs) that may lead to discontinuation of treatment or contraindication. We present the case of a 45-year-old male diagnosed with stage III melanoma of the left thigh, as classified by the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), exhibiting rapid recurrence of inguinal lymph node metastasis following complete surgical resection. Molecular biology revealed a mutated BRAFV600E status, indicating treatment associated with BRAFi/MEKi. First-line treatments were introduced successively with dabrafenib-trametinib and then encorafenib-binimetinib, both stopped for fever and severe digestive AEs. After the failure of a third line with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, a new rechallenge of targeted therapy (TT) was introduced with encorafenib-trametinib to increase tolerance. This unusual and innovative combination allowed a spectacular tolerance and complete oncological response for 39 months after the failure of the usual combinations. This is the first case in the literature to show the potential efficacy of a non-standard combination of encorafenib and trametinib, which are commercialized in two different market combinations. A pharmacological evidence-based analysis was performed to understand these good clinical results.

Cardiotoxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors: a real-world analysis of incidence, risk factors, and reversibility

BACKGROUND

BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) improve outcome in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma but are associated with cardiotoxicity, leading to a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timeline, risk factors, and reversibility of BRAFi/MEKi-induced cardiotoxicity in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic melanoma (n = 170) treated with Encorafenib/Binimetinib, Vemurafenib/Cobimetinib, or Dabrafenib/Trametinib at Aarhus and Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from 2015 to 2023 were included. Cardiac function was assessed at baseline and every 3 months during treatment with either echocardiograms or multigated acquisition scans. Cardiotoxicity was defined as a reduction of LVEF by ≥10 percentage points (pp) to an LVEF < 50% (Major cardiotoxicity) or a reduction of LVEF by ≥15 pp but remaining > 50% (Minor cardiotoxicity).

RESULTS

Cardiotoxicity occurred in 21% of patients, with 14% experiencing major cardiotoxicity. The mean time to LVEF decline was 187 days, with 92% of major cardiotoxicity cases occurring within the first year. Cardiotoxicity was reversible in 79% of patients following dose reduction, treatment pauses, heart failure therapy, or continued treatment with monitoring. Baseline atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 13.67, p = 0.008) was identified as a risk factor for major cardiotoxicity.

INTERPRETATION

BRAFi/MEKi-induced cardiotoxicity is a significant but manageable complication, often reversible with timely interventions. Routine LVEF monitoring is recommended. The majority (92%) of major cardiac events were diagnosed within the first year of treatment, which might warrant a discontinuation of routine LVEF monitoring after 1 year of BRAFi/MEKi treatment.

A Phase Ia/b study of MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in patients with RAS mutant advanced colorectal cancer (MErCuRIC)

BACKGROUND

Targeting RAS mutant (MT) colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a difficult challenge, mainly due to the pervasiveness of RAS/MEK-mediated feedback loops. Preclinical studies identified MET/STAT3 as an important mediator of resistance to KRAS-MEK1/2 blockade in RASMT CRC. This dose escalation/expansion study assessed safety and initial efficacy of the MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib with MET inhibitor crizotinib in RASMT advanced CRC patients.

METHODS

In the dose escalation phase, patients with advanced solid tumours received binimetinib with crizotinib, using a rolling- 6 design to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and safety/tolerability. A subsequent dose expansion in RASMT CRC patients assessed treatment response. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics, MET biomarker and ctDNA analyses, and skin/tumour biopsies for pharmacodynamics, c-MET immunohistochemistry (IHC), MET in situ hybridisation (ISH) and MET DNA-ISH analyses were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were recruited in 3 cohorts in the dose escalation. The MTD was binimetinib 30 mg B.D, days 1-21 every 28 days, with crizotinib 250 mg O.D continuously. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade ≥ 3 transaminitis, creatinine phosphokinase increases and fatigue. Thirty-six RASMT metastatic CRC patients were enrolled in the dose expansion. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters showed evidence of target engagement. Across the entire study, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TR-AE) were rash (80.4%), fatigue (53.4%) and diarrhoea (51.8%) with grade ≥ 3 TR-AE occurring in 44.6%. Best clinical response within the RASMT CRC cohort was stable disease in seven patients (24%). Tumour MET super-expression (IHC H-score > 180 and MET ISH + 3) was observed in 7 patients (24.1%), with MET-amplification only present in 1 of these patients. This patient discontinued treatment early during cycle 1 due to toxicity. Patients with high baseline RASMT allele frequency had a significant shorter median overall survival compared with that seen for patients with low baseline KRASMT allele frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination binimetinib/crizotinib showed a poor tolerability with no objective responses observed in RASMT advanced CRC patients. EudraCT-Number: 2014-000463 - 40 (20/06/2014: A Sequential Phase I study of MEK1/2 inhibitors PD- 0325901 or Binimetinib combined with cMET inhibitor Crizotinib in RAS Mutant and RAS Wild Type with aberrant c-MET).

Post-marketing surveillance of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in Japanese patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma

BACKGROUND

A BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with a MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, was approved in Japan in early 2019 for the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant, unresectable malignant melanoma based on results of the global phase III trial, COLUMBUS, conducted in various countries including Japan. This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) assessed the combination in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, multicentre, 12-month PMS of the safety and effectiveness of encorafenib plus binimetinib for radically unresectable, BRAF-mutant malignant melanoma in Japan.

RESULTS

Among 174 survey forms collected from 85 centres between February 2019 and August 2020, 172 were included for safety and effectiveness analysis. Patients (male [52.3%], median age 62.0 years) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1 (91.8%) and comorbidities (55.2%). Respective encorafenib and binimetinib median dosages were 450 mg/day and 90 mg/day; median treatment duration, 24.1 and 24.2 weeks, and discontinuation, 71.5% for each, primarily for disease progression (56.9%) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs, 38.2%). Safety assessment ADRs occurred in 99 patients (57.6%), including eye disorders (40.7%), hepatic dysfunction (20.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.7%), haemorrhage (2.3%), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (1.7%), and hypertension (1.7%); 19.8% were grade ≥ 3, none were grade 5, most resolved with/without treatment modification. At 12 months, the objective response rate was 48.8% (95% CI 41.2, 56.6; complete [19.2%], partial [29.7%]), overall survival was 40.1%.

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness of encorafenib plus binimetinib in Japanese patients with BRAF-mutant malignant melanoma were similar to data reported in COLUMBUS; no new safety concerns were identified.

Neurologic adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy in patients with malignant melanoma: a disproportionality analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BRAF and MEK inhibitor (BRAFi + MEKi) therapy has improved the treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutation. However, their neurologic adverse events (nAEs) have been largely unexplored. This study aimed to provide clinicians with more updated knowledge on nAEs associated with BRAFi + MEKi therapy in patients with malignant melanoma compared with nonmelanoma cancers. The United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System was queried from 2011 to 2022 to capture nAEs reported for the BRAFi + MEKi therapies, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (V + C), dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T), and encorafenib plus binimetinib (E + B). A disproportionality analysis was performed to calculate their reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a control group of antineoplastic medications. There were 2881 BRAFi + MEKi therapy-associated nAE cases, the majority of which listed malignant melanoma as the reason for use (87.5, 66.7, and 62.0% for V + C, D + T, and E + B, respectively). Several novel associations were identified; including epidural lipomatosis (ROR: 320.07, 95% CI: 123.76-827.77 for V + C), peripheral nerve lesion (ROR: 185.64, 95% CI: 73.95-466.03 for V + C), Guillain-Barre syndrome (RORs: 8.80, 2.94, and 11.79, 95% CIs: 3.65-21.22, 1.40-6.19, and 5.87-23.66 for V + C, D + T, and E + B), demyelinating polyneuropathy (RORs: 24.72 and 78.98, 95% CI: 8.16-74.86 and 24.84-251.13 for D + T and E + B), and multiple sclerosis (ROR: 5.90, 95% CI: 3.06-11.40 for D + T) in melanoma patients. nAEs in the setting of BRAFi + MEKi therapy should be a safety consideration when utilizing these medications.

A comprehensive review of targeting RAF kinase in cancer

RAF kinases, particularly the BRAF isoform, play a crucial role in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, regulating key cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway often caused by mutations in the BRAF gene or alterations in upstream regulators like Ras and receptor tyrosine kinases contributes significantly to cancer development. Mutations, such as BRAF-V600E, are present in a variety of malignancies, with the highest prevalence in melanoma. Targeted therapies against RAF kinases have achieved substantial success, especially in BRAF-V600E-mutant melanomas, where inhibitors like vemurafenib and dabrafenib have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved patient outcomes. These inhibitors have also shown clinical benefits in cancers such as thyroid and colorectal carcinoma, although to a lesser extent. Despite these successes, therapeutic resistance remains a major hurdle. Resistance mechanisms, including RAF dimerization, feedback reactivation of the MAPK pathway, and paradoxical activation of ERK signaling, often lead to diminished efficacy over time, resulting in disease progression or even secondary malignancies. In response, current research is focusing on novel therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that target multiple components of the pathway simultaneously, such as MEK inhibitors used in tandem with RAF inhibitors. Additionally, next-generation RAF inhibitors are being developed to address resistance and enhance therapeutic specificity. This review discusses the clinical advancements in RAF-targeted therapies, with a focus on ongoing efforts to overcome therapeutic resistance and enhance outcomes for cancer patients. It also underscores the persistent challenges in effectively targeting RAF kinase in oncology.

Response and outcome of patients with melanoma skin metastases and immune checkpoint inhibition

It is known, that different metastatic organ systems respond differently to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent to which skin/subcutaneous metastases respond to ICI or targeted therapies (TTs) and whether the response rate differs from that of distant metastases in the same patient. Patients with melanoma diagnosed between January 2021 and September 2023 with at least one skin/subcutaneous metastasis who had received therapy with ICI or TT in an advanced setting were included in the analysis. Best overall response (BOR) was classified according to the revised response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The BOR of skin metastases and visceral metastases to ICI and TT was compared using the chi-square test. Skin metastases treated with ICI a first-line setting showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.1%. In contrast, visceral metastases had a higher ORR of 51.1%. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .77). Regarding TT, the ORR for skin metastases was 57.1%, compared to 38.5% for visceral metastases (p = .59). Interestingly, the ORR for skin/subcutaneous metastases was notably lower with ICI compared to visceral metastases, in contrast to patients who underwent TT. Skin metastases showed a poorer response to ICI than visceral metastases. Therefore, careful monitoring is recommended to detect non-response early in patients with skin metastases as skin metastases may have a worse response than TT. A larger cohort is needed for a comprehensive analysis and confirmation of our results.

Actionable Gene Alterations Identified in Patients With Malignant Melanoma by Targeted Sequencing in Japan

PURPOSE

Precision medicine plays an important role in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. Despite its high incidence in White patients, advanced melanoma is rare in Asian countries, hampering prospective clinical trials targeting the Asian population. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the real-world molecular diagnoses and outcomes of Japanese patients with melanoma using comprehensive genome profiling (CGP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with melanoma who completed standard anticancer medical treatments (including those expected to complete the treatments) underwent CGP, which is covered by the National Health Insurance. We analyzed the results and clinical annotations of 569 patients registered before August 2023 in a national database.

RESULTS

Skin, mucosal, and uveal melanomas accounted for 64%, 28%, and 7% of cases, respectively. Patients with BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and KIT variants represented 25%, 20%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. Eighty-two percent of BRAF, 97% of NRAS, 69% of NF1, and 54% of KIT were actionable alterations (ie, BRAF classes I, II, and III, NRAS Q61, G12, G13, NF1 loss-of-function, KIT gain-of-function variants). BRAF V600E/K variants occurred in 22% of skin and 2% of mucosal melanomas, but not in uveal melanomas. The mean tumor mutation burden in cutaneous melanomas was 4.2 variants/Mb. Patients previously treated with BRAF-targeted therapy harbored amplifications of BRAF and cell cycle genes more frequently than therapy-naive patients. Thirty-six patients (6.3%) were treated following the molecular tumor board (MTB) recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Actionable gene alterations in BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and KIT are common in Japanese patients with melanoma. However, few patients were treated according to the MTB recommendations, suggesting that there is an unmet need to increase accessibility to gene-matched clinical trials in Japan.

Cutaneous adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

Cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) after treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with melanoma remain incompletely characterized. To determine the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment with CAEs in patients with melanoma compared with BRAF inhibitor alone.

Method

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for BRAF and MEK inhibitors from database inception through 10 May 2024. Randomized clinical trials reporting on CAEs in patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors compared with patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy were selected. Pooled Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were determined using random-effects analyses. The selected end points were alopecia, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, hyperkeratosis, keratoacanthoma, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, rash, photosensitivity reaction, and skin papilloma. All-grade and high-grade (≥3) CAEs were recorded.

Results

Comparing with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, treatment with BRAF inhibitors alone was associated with an increased risk of rash (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; p = 0.039; I2 = 88%), alopecia (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 76%), hyperkeratosis (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 56%), palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.47; P < 0.001; I2 = 81%), palmoplantar keratoderma (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.57; P < 0.001; I2 = 29%), Skin papilloma (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52; P < 0.001; I2 = 77%), cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; P < 0.001; I2 = 50%), and keratoacanthoma (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

Therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of CAEs, especially rash, alopecia, hyperkeratosis, palmoplantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, palmoplantar keratoderma, skin papilloma, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, and keratoacanthoma, compared with BRAF inhibitor alone. The risks of photosensitivity reaction was similar between the assessed groups. The findings may help to balance between beneficial melanoma treatment and cutaneous morbidity and mortality.

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered.

The Role of Radiation, Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cutaneous Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Skin cancer impacts a significant proportion of the population. While surgical management is often the mainstay of treatment, advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies require additional local and/or systemic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed studying the use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies.

RESULTS

A summary of the present literature on the management of locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous malignancies is presented across cutaneous head and neck basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. The addition of multidisciplinary therapies to resection is often associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The management of cutaneous head and neck malignancies requires an approach integrating multiple specialties, to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities.

Navigating the complexity of BRAF mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: current insights and future prospects

There are many challenges that are faced in the treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) due to the complexities associated with the tumor. Association of different types of mutations are one of the major complexities. Among these mutations, BRAF mutations are significantly gathering more attention due to their impact on disease progression and therapeutic response. This review provides an analysis of the current understanding of BRAF mutations in NSCLC, focusing on the molecular intricacies, clinical implications, and therapeutic advancements. The article explores the diverse spectrum of BRAF mutations, highlighting the prevalence of specific mutations such as V600E and non-V600E alterations. The review also highlights the intricate signalling pathways influenced by BRAF mutations, shedding light on their role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Therapeutically, we critically evaluate the existing targeted therapies tailored for BRAF-mutant NSCLC, addressing their efficacy, limitations, and emerging resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, we outline ongoing clinical trials and promising investigational agents that hold potential for reshaping the treatment of NSCLC. This review provides comprehensive current information about the role of BRAF mutations in NSCLC. Understanding the molecular diversity, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies associated with BRAF-mutant NSCLC is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and steering the direction of future research in this evolving field.

The evolution of BRAF-targeted therapies in melanoma: overcoming hurdles and unleashing novel strategies

Melanoma, a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, poses a significant global health burden, with 331,647 new cases and 58,645 deaths reported in 2022. The development of melanoma is influenced by various factors, including sunlight exposure and BRAFV600 mutations that activate the MAPK/ERK pathway. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment landscape for melanoma patients. However, innate and acquired therapeutic resistance remains a significant challenge. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of BRAF-targeted therapies in melanoma, highlighting the efficacy and limitations of FDA-approved combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and cobimetinib. The review also explores the off-target effects of BRAF inhibitors on endothelial cells, emphasizing the need for more selective therapies to minimize vascular complications and metastatic potential. The article also discusses potential druggable targets, including ERK5, CD73, ALDH1A1, PLA1A, and DMKN, which are promising in addressing diagnostic hurdles and guiding personalized therapeutic decisions. Recent studies on regorafenib, ERK5 signaling, and CD73 inhibition are highlighted as novel strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment outcomes. The review also delves into the role of advanced therapeutic tools, such as mRNA vaccines and CRISPR-Cas9, in revolutionizing personalized oncology by targeting specific genetic mutations and enhancing immune responses against melanoma. The ongoing synergy between advancing research, targeted interventions, strategic treatment combinations, and cost-effectiveness evaluations offers a promising pathway to elevate patient outcomes in the persistent battle against melanoma significantly.

The Molecular Evolution of Melanoma Distant Metastases

The evolution of primary melanoma to lymph node and distant metastasis is incompletely understood. We examined the genomic diversity in melanoma progression in matched primary melanomas and lymph node and distant metastases from 17 patients. FISH analysis revealed cancer cell fractions with monotonic copy number alterations, including PHIP gain and PTEN loss, in the metastatic cascade. By contrast, the cancer cell fraction with copy number alterations for BPTF and MITF was reduced in lymph node metastases but increased in distant metastases. Separately, the cancer cell fraction with NCOA3 copy number alteration was comparable between primary tumors and lymph node metastases yet increased in distant metastases. These results suggest enrichment of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and MITF pathways in the transition through the metastatic cascade. By contrast, next-generation sequencing analysis did not identify a consistent pattern of changes in variant allele frequency while revealing several intriguing findings, including decreased variant allele frequency in distant metastases and distinct drivers in lymph node versus distant metastases. These results provide evidence that distant melanoma metastasis does not always emanate from lymph node metastasis. These results enhance our understanding of clonal patterns of melanoma metastasis, with possible implications for targeted therapy and metastasis competency.

Molecular and functional landscape of malignant serous effusions for precision oncology

Personalized treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors critically depends on the deep characterization of tumor cells from patient biopsies. Here, we comprehensively characterize a pan-cancer cohort of 150 malignant serous effusion (MSE) samples at the cellular, molecular, and functional level. We find that MSE-derived cancer cells retain the genomic and transcriptomic profiles of their corresponding primary tumors, validating their use as a patient-relevant model system for solid tumor biology. Integrative analyses reveal that baseline gene expression patterns relate to global ex vivo drug sensitivity, while high-throughput drug-induced transcriptional changes in MSE samples are indicative of drug mode of action and acquired treatment resistance. A case study exemplifies the added value of multi-modal MSE profiling for patients who lack genetically stratified treatment options. In summary, our study provides a functional multi-omics view on a pan-cancer solid tumor cohort and underlines the feasibility and utility of MSE-based precision oncology.

Targeted Therapy Innovations for Melanoma

Melanoma, a malignant tumor of melanocytes, poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and high potential for metastasis. The advent of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of melanoma, particularly for tumors harboring specific genetic alterations such as BRAF V600E mutations. Despite the initial success of targeted agents, resistance inevitably arises, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This review explores the latest advances in targeted therapy for melanoma, focusing on new molecular targets, combination therapies, and strategies to overcome resistance.

The Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in Different Therapy Lines for Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Study

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) combination therapy is highly effective in treating advanced melanoma, but serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are prevalent. The overall response rate (ORR) of the BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) combination therapy for BRAFV600-mutant advanced melanoma surpasses that of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the OS and PFS of BRAFi/MEKi combination therapy are inferior to those of ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 22 melanoma patients treated with nivo/ipi therapy and 13 patients treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (enco/bini) between November 2018 and July 2023. Results: The ORR of nivo/ipi for metastatic melanoma patients was significantly higher in the first-line cohort [60.0% (95% CI: 31.2-83.3%)] than in the second-line or beyond cohort [8.3% (95% CI: 0-37.5%)], whereas the ORR of enco/bini was comparable between the first-line cohort [75.0% (95% CI: 28.9-96.6%)] and the second-line or beyond cohort [77.8% (95% CI: 44.3-94.7%)]. The median PFS of nivo/ipi significantly improved in the first-line cohort [7.7 months (95% CI: 2.0-11.9)] compared to the second-line or beyond cohort [2.3 months (95% CI: 0.5-6.0)] (p = 0.0109). In addition to efficacy, the incidence of grade 3 or greater AEs was comparable in the first-line and second-line or beyond cohorts. Conclusions: Although our present data are based on a small number of cases, they suggest that nivo/ipi should be administered as the first-line therapy for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, rather than enco/bini, aligning with findings from previous clinical trials.

Therapeutic implications of the metabolic changes associated with BRAF inhibition in melanoma

Melanoma metabolism can be reprogrammed by activating BRAF mutations. These mutations are present in up to 50% of cutaneous melanomas, with the most common being V600E. BRAF mutations augment glycolysis to promote macromolecular synthesis and proliferation. Prior to the development of targeted anti-BRAF therapies, these mutations were associated with accelerated clinical disease in the metastatic setting. Combination BRAF and MEK inhibition is a first line treatment option for locally advanced or metastatic melanoma harboring targetable BRAF mutations. This therapy shows excellent response rates but these responses are not durable, with almost all patients developing resistance. When BRAF mutated melanoma cells are inhibited with targeted therapies the metabolism of those cells also changes. These cells rely less on glycolysis for energy production, and instead shift to a mitochondrial phenotype with upregulated TCA cycle activity and oxidative phosphorylation. An increased dependence on glutamine utilization is exhibited to support TCA cycle substrates in this metabolic rewiring of BRAF mutated melanoma. Herein we describe the relevant core metabolic pathways modulated by BRAF inhibition. These adaptive pathways represent vulnerabilities that could be targeted to overcome resistance to BRAF inhibitors. This review evaluates current and future therapeutic strategies that target metabolic reprogramming in melanoma cells, particularly in response to BRAF inhibition.

Real-World Cardiotoxicity in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Encorafenib and Binimetinib

Modern therapies targeting the BRAF gene mutation in advanced melanoma have significantly improved patient outcomes but pose cardiovascular risks. This retrospective study in Eastern Denmark (2019-2022) assessed 108 melanoma patients treated with encorafenib and binimetinib. Patients were monitored for heart function using multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans. The study defined major cardiotoxicity as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by more than 10 percentage points to below 50%, and minor cardiotoxicity as a decrease in LVEF by more than 15 points but remaining above 50%. Results showed that 19 patients (18%) developed minor cardiotoxicity and were asymptomatic, while 7 (6%) experienced major cardiotoxicity, with two requiring intervention. Notably, no significant declines in LVEF were observed after six months of treatment. The study concluded that significant cardiotoxicity occurred in 6% of cases, mostly asymptomatic and reversible, and suggests that monitoring LVEF could potentially be reduced after 6-9 months if no early signs of cardiotoxicity are detected. This provides valuable insights into the cardiac safety of these treatments in real-world settings.

Cutaneous Melanoma: An Overview of Physiological and Therapeutic Aspects and Biotechnological Use of Serine Protease Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Metastatic melanoma stands out as the most lethal form of skin cancer because of its high propensity to spread and its remarkable resistance to treatment methods.

METHODS

In this review article, we address the incidence of melanoma worldwide and its staging phases. We thoroughly investigate the different melanomas and their associated risk factors. In addition, we underscore the principal therapeutic goals and pharmacological methods that are currently used in the treatment of melanoma.

RESULTS

The implementation of targeted therapies has contributed to improving the approach to patients. However, because of the emergence of resistance early in treatment, overall survival and progression-free periods continue to be limited.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide new insights into plant serine protease inhibitor therapeutics, supporting high-throughput drug screening soon, and seeking a complementary approach to explain crucial mechanisms associated with melanoma.

Gold nanostructures in melanoma: Advances in treatment, diagnosis, and theranostic applications

Melanoma, a lethal form of skin cancer, poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its aggressive nature and high mortality rates. Gold nanostructures, including gold nanoparticles (GNPs), offer myriad opportunities in melanoma therapy and imaging due to their facile synthesis and functionalization, robust stability, tunable physicochemical and optical properties, and biocompatibility. This review explores the emerging role of gold nanostructures and their composites in revolutionizing melanoma treatment paradigms, bridging the gap between nanotechnology and clinical oncology, and offering insights for researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders. It begins by elucidating the potential of nanotechnology-driven approaches in cancer therapy, highlighting the unique physicochemical properties and versatility of GNPs in biomedical applications. Various therapeutic modalities, including photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, targeted drug delivery, gene delivery, and nanovaccines, are discussed in detail, along with insights from ongoing clinical trials. In addition, the utility of GNPs in melanoma imaging and theranostics is explored, showcasing their potential in diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and personalized medicine. Furthermore, safety considerations and potential toxicities associated with GNPs are addressed, underscoring the importance of comprehensive risk assessment in clinical translation. Finally, the review concludes by discussing current challenges and future directions, emphasizing the need for innovative strategies to maximize the clinical impact of GNPs in melanoma therapy.

Identification of the Clinical Candidate (), a Highly Potent and Brain Penetrant BRAF Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer

Mutant BRAFV600E is one of the most common oncogenic drivers in metastatic melanoma. While first generation BRAFV600E inhibitors are capable of controlling tumors systemically, they are unable to adequately treat tumors that have metastasized to the brain due to insufficient penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Through a combination of structure-based drug design (SBDD) and the optimization of physiochemical properties to enhance BBB penetration, we herein report the discovery of the brain-penetrant BRAFV600E inhibitor PF-07284890 (ARRY-461). In mice studies, ARRY-461 proved to be highly brain-penetrant and was able to drive regressions of A375 BRAFV600E tumors implanted both subcutaneously and intracranially. Based on compelling preclinical safety and efficacy studies, ARRY-461 was progressed into a Phase 1 A/B clinical trial (NCT04543188).

Advancements in Melanoma Therapies: From Surgery to Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Melanoma is defined as the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer. The treatment of melanoma depends on the disease stage, tumor location, and extent of its spread from its point of origin. Melanoma treatment has made significant advances, notably in the context of targeted and immunotherapies. Surgical resection is the main therapeutic option for earlystage melanoma, and it provides favourable outcomes. With disease metastasis, systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy become increasingly important. The identification of mutations that lead to melanoma has influenced treatment strategies. Targeted therapies focusing on these mutations offer improved response rates and fewer toxicities than conventional chemotherapy. Furthermore, developing immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies, has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in effectively combating cancer cells. These therapeutic agents demonstrate superior effectiveness and a more tolerable side-effect profile, improving the quality of life for patients receiving treatment. The future of melanoma treatment may involve a multimodal approach consisting of a combination of surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy adapted to each patient's profile. This approach may improve survival rates and health outcomes.

Multiple Options: How to Choose Therapy in Frontline Metastatic Melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the rapid development of multiple targeted and immune therapies for patients with advanced melanoma, it can be challenging to select a therapy based on currently available data. This review aims to provide an overview of frontline options for metastatic melanoma, with practical guidance for selecting a treatment regimen.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently reported data from randomized trials suggests that the majority of patients with unresectable melanoma should receive a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor as part of their first line therapy, irrespective of BRAF mutation status. Additional data also suggests that combination immunotherapies result in improved outcomes compared to single agent, albeit at the cost of increased toxicity, though to date no biomarker exists to help guide treatment selection. As the number therapeutic options continue to grow for patients with advanced melanoma, there is likely to be a continued focus on combination strategies. Defining the optimal treatment approach in order to maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity remains an area of active investigation.

Personalized therapy in oncology: melanoma as a paradigm for molecular-targeted treatment approaches

In recent decades, the field of systemic cancer treatment has seen remarkable changes due to advancements in the understanding of cancer's biology, immunology, and genetic makeup. As a result, individuals with late-stage cancers are now achieving survival rates that were previously unattainable. The goal of personalized cancer therapy is to enhance clinical outcomes by customizing drug treatments to suit the unique genetic and/or epigenetic profiles of each patient's tumor. This approach aims to reduce the side effects commonly associated with ineffective treatments. Advances in genetic sequencing and molecular cytogenetics have been instrumental in identifying cancer-driving mutations and epigenetic irregularities, leading to the development of specific molecular therapies. This review article highlights the progress and success of targeted molecular therapies in treating malignant melanoma, illustrating the concept of personalized cancer treatment.

The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer, accounting for a significant proportion of global cancer cases and deaths, poses a considerable health burden. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options due to late-stage diagnosis and drug resistance. Dysregulated of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which is implicated in NSCLC pathogenesis, underscores the potential of MEK inhibitors such as binimetinib. Despite promising results in other cancers, comprehensive studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of binimetinib in lung cancer are lacking. This systematic review aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until September 2023. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of binimetinib for lung cancer treatment were included. Studies were excluded if they included individuals with conditions unrelated to lung cancer, investigated other treatments, or had different types of designs. The quality assessment was conducted utilizing the National Institutes of Health tool.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 228 participants overall were included. Four had good quality judgments, and three had fair quality judgments. The majority of patients experienced all-cause adverse events, with diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea being the most commonly reported adverse events of any grade. The objective response rate (ORR) was up to 75%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was up to 9.3 months. The disease control rate after 24 weeks varied from 41% to 64%. Overall survival (OS) ranged between 3.0 and 18.8 months. Notably, treatment-related adverse events were observed in more than 50% of patients, including serious adverse events such as colitis, febrile neutropenia, and pulmonary infection. Some adverse events led to dose limitation and drug discontinuation in five studies. Additionally, five studies reported cases of death, mostly due to disease progression. The median duration of treatment ranged from 14.8 weeks to 8.4 months. The most common dosage of binimetinib was 30 mg or 45 mg twice daily, sometimes used in combination with other agents like encorafenib or hydroxychloroquine.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few studies have shown binimetinib to be effective, in terms of improving OS, PFS, and ORR, while most of the studies found nonsignificant efficacy with increased toxicity for binimetinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended.

BRAFV600E Metastatic Melanoma Journey: A Perspective from a Patient and his Oncologist

BACKGROUND

This article is co-authored by a patient with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma and his treating oncologist.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient describes how he coped with his diagnosis and treatment. He details the pathway of his melanoma treatment, which has spanned over 10 years, including surgical interventions, medical treatment, and participation in clinical trials. He relates his experience of living with the disease-and the adverse effects of treatment-in the long term. The clinical perspective of his treating oncologist reviews the diagnostic process and explains how the therapeutic options were selected for and with the patient. The oncologist also addresses the integration of the patient into clinical trials involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Challenges related to the adverse effects that occurred and the personalised treatment of the patient are also discussed. Finally, the article evaluates current advances in treatment and future therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the challenges of identifying which therapeutic options are most appropriate for individual patients with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma.

Successful treatment of pediatric patients with high-grade gliomas featuring leptomeningeal metastases by targeting BRAF V600E mutations with dabrafenib plus trametinib: two illustrative cases

A combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is reported to be effective for gliomas with the BRAF V600E mutation; however, its efficacy in gliomas with leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) is still unknown. In this report, we describe two pediatric patients with high-grade glioma featuring the BRAF V600E mutation who were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for LMM. Both 2 cases underwent craniotomy for primary intracranial lesions and were diagnosed as a high-grade glioma with BRAF V600E mutation; one case was consistent with anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastorocytoma, the other was epithelioid glioblastoma. They received standard treatment for the lesions but subsequently were found to have new lesions including multiple spinal dissemination. We started administering dabrafenib and trametinib. Within a few days of starting treatment, the symptoms improved dramatically and MRI performed one month after the prescription of the two drugs demonstrated remission of both brain and spinal lesions. This report shows that dabrafenib and trametinib are effective not only for recurrent lesions but also for LMM in pediatric patients.

Clinical Pharmacy Initiatives Contribute to the Excellent Efficacy of the Dabrafenib/Trametinib Combination for Iodine-Refractory Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report

A 76-year-old female patient presented with an iodine-refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), diagnosed eight years earlier, with several lymph node recurrences requiring successive surgeries. Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging revealed a new unresectable loco-regional recurrence. The patient was diagnosed with a somatic BRAF V600E mutation. Therefore, dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy was introduced and closely monitored by a dedicated multidisciplinary team, involving pharmaceutical consultations. As early as six weeks after treatment initiation, the patient reported multiple adverse events (AEs) to the clinical pharmacy team, who provided advice on resolving AEs or improving tolerance. Close interprofessional collaboration among healthcare workers involved in the care pathway allowed for the identification of the most opportune times for temporary suspension of treatment (four suspensions over seven months) or dose reduction (two reductions over 3.5 months). This resulted in a total treatment duration (one year) longer than the average times reported in the literature. The patient showed a rapid and excellent response to treatment immediately after initiation, culminating in a complete metabolic response assessed by [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging at nine months. Twenty-five months after treatment discontinuation, the disease remained controlled. Overall, dabrafenib and trametinib combination could offer excellent outcomes in selected patients with refractory BRAF-mutated PTC, with additional clinical pharmacy initiatives allowing for the optimized management of AEs and prolonged treatment periods.

Cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with binimetinib in unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with binimetinib (EncoBini) as compared to other targeted double combination therapies, namely dabrafenib with trametinib (DabraTrame) and vemurafenib with cobimetinib (VemuCobi), for the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM) from the French payer perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was developed considering a lifetime horizon. The model structure simulated the clinical pathway of patients with BRAF V600-mutant MM. Clinical effectiveness and safety inputs were sourced from the COLUMBUS trial, a network meta-analysis and published literature. Costs, resource use, and the quality of life inputs were obtained from the literature and appropriate French sources.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, EncoBini was associated, on average, with reduced costs and increased quality adjusted life years (QALYs), dominating both targeted double combination therapies. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of €90,000 per QALY, the probability of EncoBini being cost-effective against either comparator remained above 80%. The most influential model parameters were the hazard ratios for the overall survival of EncoBini vs DabraTrame and VemuCobi, the pre- and post-progression utility values, as well as treatment dosages and the relative dose intensity of all interventions.

CONCLUSION

EncoBini is associated with reduced costs and increased QALYs, dominating other targeted double combination therapies (DabraTrame, VemuCobi) for patients with BRAF V600-mutant MM in France. EncoBini is a highly cost-effective intervention in MM.

Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant therapies

BACKGROUND

Both immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) are used as adjuvant (adj) treatment for stage III melanoma, however, data describing real-world outcomes are limited. In addition, a significant proportion of patients relapse, for whom best management is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, and safety of adj anti-PD1 IO and TT in a real-world cohort of patients with resected stage III melanoma, and further delineate patterns of recurrence and treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 130 patients who received adj therapy (100 anti-PD1 IO and 30 TT).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 30 months, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 24.6 (95% CI, 17-not reached [NR]) versus 64 (95% CI, 29.5-NR) months for the TT and IO groups, respectively (p = 0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for either subgroup. At data cutoff, 77% and 82% of patients in TT and IO arms were alive. A higher number of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in the IO group (11% vs. 3%), however, a higher proportion of patients permanently discontinued adj therapy in the TT group (43% vs. 11%) due to toxicity. Strategies at relapse and outcomes were variable based on location and timing of recurrence. A significant number of patients who relapsed after adj IO received a second round of IO. Among them, patients who were off adj IO at relapse had superior second median RFS (mRFS2), compared to those who relapsed while on adj IO; mRFS2 was NR versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR), respectively, p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

In summary, both TT and IO yielded prolonged RFS in a real-world setting, however, longer follow-up is needed to determine any potential OS benefit. Adj therapy, particularly TT, may not be as well tolerated as suggested in clinical trials, with lower completion rates (59% vs. 74%) in a real-life setting. Overall, patients who relapse during adj therapy have poor outcomes, while patients who relapse after discontinuation of adj IO therapy appear to benefit from IO re-treatment.

Curing Stage IV Melanoma: Where Have We Been and Where Are We?

Little more than 10 years ago, metastatic melanoma was considered to have one of the poorest cancer outcomes, associated with a median overall survival of 6-8 months. Cytotoxic chemotherapy offered modest response rates of 20%-30%, but no clear survival benefit. Patients were routinely enrolled in clinical trials as their first-line therapy in the search for effective novel therapeutics. Remarkable developments in molecular biology, cancer genomics, immunology, and drug discovery have dominated the early part of the 21st century, and nowhere have the benefits been better realized than in the transformation of outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma: since 2011, 14 new agents have been approved that significantly increase survival, with long-term remissions and, possibly now, potential for cure. Even so, there is still much work to be done, given that most treated patients still die of their disease. Although most survival gains have so far been realized for cutaneous melanoma, improving treatment options for those 10% of patients with rarer, noncutaneous melanomas is a high priority. Key novel therapeutic approaches aimed at improving outcomes with potential for curing patients with melanoma are considered.

COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib and encorafenib monotherapy is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We report results from the 7-year analysis of COLUMBUS part 1 (NCT01909453) at 99.7 months (median duration between randomization and data cutoff).

METHODS

577 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who were treatment-naive or progressed after first-line immunotherapy were randomized 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily (QD) plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 192), vemurafenib 960 mg BID (n = 191), or encorafenib monotherapy 300 mg QD (n = 194). No prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor was allowed.

RESULTS

Seven-year PFS and OS rates (95 % CI) were 21.2 % (14.7-28.4 %) and 27.4 % (21.2-33.9%) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 6.4 % (2.1-14.0 %) and 18.2 % (12.8-24.3 %) in the vemurafenib arm, respectively. Median melanoma-specific survival (95 % CI) was 36.8 months (27.7-51.5 months) in the encorafenib plus binimetinib arm and 19.3 months (14.8-25.9 months) in the vemurafenib arm. Thirty-four long-term responders (complete/partial response ongoing at 7 years) were identified across arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the longest follow-up from a phase III trial of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. Safety results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Results support the long-term efficacy and known safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this population and provide new insights on long-term responders. Interactive data visualization is available at the COLUMBUS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/columbus7/).

Neratinib, a pan ERBB/HER inhibitor, restores sensitivity of PTEN-null, BRAFV600E melanoma to BRAF/MEK inhibition

Introduction

Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor an activating BRAFV600E mutation. Standard of care involves a combination of inhibitors targeting mutant BRAF and MEK1/2, the substrate for BRAF in the MAPK pathway. PTEN loss-of-function mutations occur in ~40% of BRAFV600E melanomas, resulting in increased PI3K/AKT activity that enhances resistance to BRAF/MEK combination inhibitor therapy.

Methods

To compare the response of PTEN null to PTEN wild-type cells in an isogenic background, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knock out PTEN in a melanoma cell line that harbors a BRAFV600E mutation. RNA sequencing, functional kinome analysis, and drug synergy screening were employed in the context of BRAF/MEK inhibition.

Results

RNA sequencing and functional kinome analysis revealed that the loss of PTEN led to an induction of FOXD3 and an increase in expression of the FOXD3 target gene, ERBB3/HER3. Inhibition of BRAF and MEK1/2 in PTEN null, BRAFV600E cells dramatically induced the expression of ERBB3/HER3 relative to wild-type cells. A synergy screen of epigenetic modifiers and kinase inhibitors in combination with BRAFi/MEKi revealed that the pan ERBB/HER inhibitor, neratinib, could reverse the resistance observed in PTEN null, BRAFV600E cells.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that PTEN null BRAFV600E melanoma exhibits increased reliance on ERBB/HER signaling when treated with clinically approved BRAFi/MEKi combinations. Future studies are warranted to test neratinib reversal of BRAFi/MEKi resistance in patient melanomas expressing ERBB3/HER3 in combination with its dimerization partner ERBB2/HER2.

Current State of Melanoma Therapy and Next Steps: Battling Therapeutic Resistance

Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer due to its high propensity to metastasize to distant organs. Significant progress has been made in the last few decades in melanoma therapeutics, most notably in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. These approaches have greatly improved treatment response outcomes; however, they remain limited in their abilities to hinder disease progression due, in part, to the onset of acquired resistance. In parallel, intrinsic resistance to therapy remains an issue to be resolved. In this review, we summarize currently available therapeutic options for melanoma treatment and focus on possible mechanisms that drive therapeutic resistance. A better understanding of therapy resistance will provide improved rational strategies to overcome these obstacles.

A Phase 2 Study of Encorafenib in Combination with Binimetinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Thyroid Cancer in Japan

Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4-19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2-75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4-5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018.

BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations induce potent molecular and immunological effects in NRAS-mutant melanoma cells: Insights into mode of action and resistance mechanisms

About 25% of melanoma harbor activating NRAS mutations, which are associated with aggressive disease therefore requiring a rapid antitumor intervention. However, no efficient targeted therapy options are currently available for patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. MEK inhibitors (MEKi) appear to display a moderate antitumor activity and also immunological effects in NRAS-mutant melanoma, providing an ideal backbone for combination treatments. In our study, the MEKi binimetinib, cobimetinib and trametinib combined with the BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) encorafenib, vemurafenib and dabrafenib were investigated for their ability to inhibit proliferation, induce apoptosis and alter the expression of immune modulatory molecules in sensitive NRAS-mutant melanoma cells using two- and three-dimensional cell culture models as well as RNA sequencing analyses. Furthermore, NRAS-mutant melanoma cells resistant to the three BRAFi/MEKi combinations were established to characterize the mechanisms contributing to their resistance. All BRAFi induced a stress response in the sensitive NRAS-mutant melanoma cells thereby significantly enhancing the antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of the MEKi analyzed. Furthermore, BRAFi/MEKi combinations upregulated immune relevant molecules, such as ICOS-L, components of antigen-presenting machinery and the "don't eat me signal" molecule CD47 in the melanoma cells. The BRAFi/MEKi-resistant, NRAS-mutant melanoma cells counteracted the molecular and immunological effects of BRAFi/MEKi by upregulating downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway molecules, inhibiting apoptosis and promoting immune escape mechanisms. Together, our study reveals potent molecular and immunological effects of BRAFi/MEKi in sensitive NRAS-mutant melanoma cells that may be exploited in new combinational treatment strategies for patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Single agent vs combination immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a review of the evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit.

SUMMARY

These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.

Long-term survival with systemic therapy in the last decade: Can melanoma be cured?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to prolong survival of patients with several types of cancer, and the finding was first established in melanoma. Previously, systemic therapy for advanced melanoma aimed only at tumor control and palliation of symptoms. However, in recent years, some patients who received systemic therapy have achieved a complete response and survived without continuous treatment for more than several years. This review discusses the long-term survival rates achieved with currently used systemic therapies and their future perspectives. Long-term survival is currently most likely to be achieved with the use of the standard-dose combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab, however, this regimen is associated with a high frequency of serious or persistent immune-related adverse events. Several new anti-PD-1-based combination therapies with a better risk-benefit balance are currently under development. Although the acral and mucosal subtypes tend to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1-based combination therapy should continue to be investigated for these subtypes owing to its potential for better long-term survival. With the development of efficacious immunotherapy and targeted therapy, it is important to determine the optimal duration of systemic therapy to avoid unnecessary health and financial burdens as well as to improve efforts to support long-term cancer survivors. As the goal of systemic therapy shifts from tumor control to long-term survival, in future clinical trials, long-term clinical outcomes should be evaluated to assess the benefits of novel agents.

The Predictive Value of FDG PET/CT for Determining Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Stage III-IV BRAF -Mutated Melanoma Patients Treated With Targeted Therapy-What Can Be Learned From Progression?

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to investigate whether (early) PERCIST response monitoring with 18 F-FDG PET/CT is predictive for progression-free survival (PFS) in unresectable stage III or IV melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor (MEKi) and to define dissemination patterns at progression with a lesion-based evaluation in direct comparison to baseline to improve our understanding of 18 F-FDG PET/CT during BRAF/MEKi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter single-arm study included 70 patients with unresectable stage III/IV BRAF -mutated melanoma who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 2 and 7 weeks during treatment with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib and at progression if possible. Tumor response assessment was done with RECIST1.1 and PERCIST. Follow-up PET/CT scans were visually compared with baseline to assess dissemination patterns.

RESULTS

Using RECIST1.1, PFS was not significantly different between the response groups ( P = 0.26). At 2 weeks, PERCIST median PFS was 15.7 months for patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) versus 8.3 months for non-CMR ( P = 0.035). The hazards ratio (HR) for progression/death in non-CMR versus CMR was 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-3.84; P = 0.040) and 1.77 (95% CI, 0.91-3.43; P = 0.0935) when adjusting for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). At 7 weeks, median PFS for PERCIST CMR was 16.7 months versus 8.5 months for non-CMR ( P = 0.0003). The HR for progression/death in the non-CMR group was significantly increased (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.60-5.40; P = 0.0005), even when adjusting for LDH (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.43-4.91; P = 0.0020). At week 7, 18 F-FDG PET/CT was false-positive in all 4 (6%) patients with new FDG-avid lesions but CMR of known metastases. When 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed at progressive disease, 18/22 (82%) patients had progression of known metastases with or without new 18 F-FDG-avid lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that PERCIST response assessment at week 7 is predictive for PFS, regardless of LDH. At 2 weeks, patients with CMR have longer PFS than patients with non-CMR, but different PET parameters should be investigated to further evaluate the added value of early 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Disease progression on PET/CT is predominated by progression of known metastases, and new 18 F-FDG-avid lesions during BRAF/MEKi are not automatically a sign of recurrent disease.

Metabolic Profiling to Assess Response to Targeted and Immune Therapy in Melanoma

There is currently no consensus to determine which advanced melanoma patients will benefit from targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both, highlighting the critical need to identify early-response biomarkers to advanced melanoma therapy. The goal of this review is to provide scientific rationale to highlight the potential role of metabolic imaging to assess response to targeted and/or immune therapy in melanoma cancer. For that purpose, a brief overview of current melanoma treatments is provided. Then, current knowledge with respect to melanoma metabolism is described with an emphasis on major crosstalks between melanoma cell metabolism and signaling pathways involved in BRAF-targeted therapy as well as in immune checkpoint inhibition therapies. Finally, preclinical and clinical studies using metabolic imaging and/or profiling to assess response to melanoma treatment are summarized with a particular focus on PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging and 13C-MRS (Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy) methods.