Clinical correlates in acromegalic patients with pituitary tumors expressing GSP oncogenes

Activated AMP-protein kinase (pAMPK) is overexpressed in human somatotroph pituitary adenomas

INTRODUCTION

AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) is an enzyme that acts as a metabolic sensor and regulates multiple pathways via phosphorylating proteins in metabolic and proliferative pathways. The aim of this work was to study the activated cellular AMPK (phosphorylated-AMPK at Thr172, pAMPK) levels in pituitary tumor samples from patients with sporadic and familial acromegaly, as well as in samples from normal human pituitary gland.

METHODS

We studied pituitary adenoma tissue from patients with sporadic somatotroph adenomas, familial acromegaly with heterozygote germline variants in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene (p.Q164*, p.R304* and p.F269_H275dup) and autopsy from normal pituitary glands without structural alterations.

RESULTS

Cellular levels of pAMPK were significantly higher in patients with sporadic acromegaly compared to normal pituitary glands (p < 0.0001). Tissues samples from patients with germline AIP mutations also showed higher cellular levels of pAMPK compared to normal pituitary glands. We did not observe a significant difference in cellular levels of pAMPK according to the cytokeratin (CAM5.2) pattern (sparsely or densely granulated) for tumor samples of sporadic acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

Our data show, for the first time in human cells, an increase of cellular levels of pAMPK in sporadic somatotropinomas, regardless of cytokeratin pattern, as well as in GH-secreting adenomas from patients with germline AIP mutations.

Genetic diagnosis in acromegaly and gigantism: From research to clinical practice

It is usually considered that only 5% of all pituitary neuroendocrine tumours are due to inheritable causes. Since this estimate was reported, however, multiple genetic defects driving syndromic and nonsyndromic somatotrophinomas have been unveiled. This heterogeneous genetic background results in overlapping phenotypes of GH excess. Genetic tests should be part of the approach to patients with acromegaly and gigantism because they can refine the clinical diagnoses, opening the possibility to tailor the clinical conduct to each patient. Even more, genetic testing and clinical screening of at-risk individuals have a positive impact on disease outcomes, by allowing for the timely detection and treatment of somatotrophinomas at early stages. Future research should focus on determining the actual frequency of novel genetic drivers of somatotrophinomas in the general population, developing up-to-date disease-specific multi-gene panels for clinical use, and finding strategies to improve access to modern genetic testing worldwide.

Aggressive PitNETs and Potential Target Therapies: A Systematic Review of Molecular and Genetic Pathways

Recently, advances in molecular biology and bioinformatics have allowed a more thorough understanding of tumorigenesis in aggressive PitNETs (pituitary neuroendocrine tumors) through the identification of specific essential genes, crucial molecular pathways, regulators, and effects of the tumoral microenvironment. Target therapies have been developed to cure oncology patients refractory to traditional treatments, introducing the concept of precision medicine. Preliminary data on PitNETs are derived from preclinical studies conducted on cell cultures, animal models, and a few case reports or small case series. This study comprehensively reviews the principal pathways involved in aggressive PitNETs, describing the potential target therapies. A search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English papers published between 1 January 2004, and 15 June 2023. 254 were selected, and the topics related to aggressive PitNETs were recorded and discussed in detail: epigenetic aspects, membrane proteins and receptors, metalloprotease, molecular pathways, PPRK, and the immune microenvironment. A comprehensive comprehension of the molecular mechanisms linked to PitNETs' aggressiveness and invasiveness is crucial. Despite promising preliminary findings, additional research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm the indications and effectiveness of target therapies for PitNETs.

DNA damage and growth hormone hypersecretion in pituitary somatotroph adenomas

Drivers of sporadic benign pituitary adenoma growth are largely unknown. Whole-exome sequencing of 159 prospectively resected pituitary adenomas showed that somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) rather than mutation is a hallmark of hormone-secreting adenomas and that SCNAs correlate with adenoma phenotype. Using single-gene SCNA pathway analysis, we observed that both cAMP and Fanconi anemia DNA damage repair pathways were affected by SCNAs in growth hormone-secreting (GH-secreting) somatotroph adenomas. As somatotroph differentiation and GH secretion are dependent on cAMP activation and we previously showed DNA damage, aneuploidy, and senescence in somatotroph adenomas, we studied links between cAMP signaling and DNA damage. Stimulation of cAMP in C57BL/6 mouse primary pituitary cultures using forskolin or a long-acting GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) analog increased GH production and DNA damage measured by H2AX phosphorylation and a comet assay. Octreotide, a somatostatin receptor ligand that targets somatotroph adenoma GH secretion in patients with acromegaly, inhibited cAMP and GH and reversed DNA damage induction. In vivo long-acting GHRH treatment also induced pituitary DNA damage in mice. We conclude that cAMP, which induces somatotroph proliferation and GH secretion, may concomitantly induce DNA damage, potentially linking hormone hypersecretion to SCNA and genome instability. These results elucidating somatotroph adenoma pathophysiology identify pathways for targeted treatment.

Novel Insights into Pituitary Tumorigenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms

Substantial advances have been made recently in the pathobiology of pituitary tumors. Similar to many other endocrine tumors, over the last few years we have recognized the role of germline and somatic mutations in a number of syndromic or nonsyndromic conditions with pituitary tumor predisposition. These include the identification of novel germline variants in patients with familial or simplex pituitary tumors and establishment of novel somatic variants identified through next generation sequencing. Advanced techniques have allowed the exploration of epigenetic mechanisms mediated through DNA methylation, histone modifications and noncoding RNAs, such as microRNA, long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs. These mechanisms can influence tumor formation, growth, and invasion. While genetic and epigenetic mechanisms often disrupt similar pathways, such as cell cycle regulation, in pituitary tumors there is little overlap between genes altered by germline, somatic, and epigenetic mechanisms. The interplay between these complex mechanisms driving tumorigenesis are best studied in the emerging multiomics studies. Here, we summarize insights from the recent developments in the regulation of pituitary tumorigenesis.

Potential markers of disease behavior in acromegaly and gigantism

Introduction: Acromegaly and gigantism entail increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated, due to the systemic effects of chronic GH and IGF-1 excess. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GH excess are well established; however, the presentation, clinical behavior and response to treatment greatly vary among patients. Numerous markers of disease behavior are routinely used in medical practice, but additional biomarkers have been recently identified as a result of basic and clinical research studies.Areas covered: This review focuses on genetic, molecular and genomic features of patients with GH excess that have recently been linked to disease progression and response to treatment. A PubMed search was conducted to identify markers of disease behavior in acromegaly and gigantism. Markers already considered as part of routine studies in clinical care guidelines were excluded. Literature search was expanded for each marker identified. Novel markers not included or only partially covered in previously published reviews on the subject were prioritized.Expert opinion: Recognizing the most relevant markers of disease behavior may help the medical team tailoring the strategies for approaching each case of acromegaly and gigantism. This customized plan should make the evaluation, treatment and follow up process more efficient, greatly improving the patients' outcomes.

Genetic and Epigenetic Causes of Pituitary Adenomas

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) can be classified as non-secreting adenomas, somatotroph adenomas, corticotroph adenomas, lactotroph adenomas, and thyrotroph adenomas. Substantial advances have been made in our knowledge of the pathobiology of PAs. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular biological characteristics of different types of PAs, we reviewed the important advances that have been made involving genetic and epigenetic variation, comprising genetic mutations, chromosome number variations, DNA methylation, microRNA regulation, and transcription factor regulation. Classical tumor predisposition syndromes include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4) syndromes, Carney complex, and X-LAG syndromes. PAs have also been described in association with succinate dehydrogenase-related familial PA, neurofibromatosis type 1, and von Hippel-Lindau, DICER1, and Lynch syndromes. Patients with aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations often present with pituitary gigantism, either in familial or sporadic adenomas. In contrast, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit alpha (GNAS) and G protein-coupled receptor 101 (GPR101) mutations can lead to excess growth hormone. Moreover, the deubiquitinase gene USP8, USP48, and BRAF mutations are associated with adrenocorticotropic hormone production. In this review, we describe the genetic and epigenetic landscape of PAs and summarize novel insights into the regulation of pituitary tumorigenesis.

Genetics of Pituitary Tumours

Pituitary tumours are relatively common in the general population. Most often they occur sporadically, with somatic mutations accounting for a significant minority of somatotroph and corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary tumours can also develop secondary to germline mutations as part of a complex syndrome or as familial isolated pituitary adenomas. Tumours occurring in a familial setting may present at a younger age and can behave more aggressively with resistance to treatment. This chapter will focus on the genetics and molecular pathogenesis of pituitary tumours.

GH/PRL-secreting pituitary macroadenoma associated with GNAS p.Gln227Leu mutation: pediatric case report and review

GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHomas) are rare in the pediatric population. Guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha stimulating (GNAS) somatic mutations are often found in patients with GHoma. Here, we report an 8-year-old girl with GH-secreting pituitary adenoma successfully treated by operative tumor resection and postoperative treatment with octreotide long-acting release (LAR). Tumor DNA sequence analysis revealed a somatic heterozygous c.680A>T (p.Gln227Leu) mutation in GNAS. We reviewed 1,084 cases of GHomas, 409 (37.7%) of which harbored GNAS mutations. In pediatrics cases, aged 15 years or younger, 11 harbored a GNAS mutation, and GNAS p.Arg201Cys was identified in five cases. No other cases of codon 227 mutation were detected. These cases suggest that, in pediatric patients, the clinical features of GHoma may differ from those observed in adults. This is possibly related to octreotide or dopamine agonist resistance. Of six patients with surgical resistance, only one was reactive when treated with octreotide. Our case shows that octreotide LAR is an effective choice for treating GNAS-induced GHoma. This is the first report detailing the effectiveness of octreotide LAR in a GNAS codon 227 mutation-induced GHoma in a pediatric case. Examination of the relationship between genetic variation and clinical features in pediatric patients will enable us to assess the long-term effects of surgical and medical treatment of GHomas.

Hypermethylator Phenotype and Ectopic GIP Receptor in GNAS Mutation-Negative Somatotropinomas

CONTEXT

Besides GNAS gene mutations, the molecular pathogenesis of somatotroph adenomas responsible for gigantism and acromegaly remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate alternative driver events in somatotroph tumorigenesis, focusing on a subgroup of acromegalic patients with a paradoxical increase in growth hormone (GH) secretion after oral glucose, resulting from ectopic glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) expression in their somatotropinomas.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

We performed combined molecular analyses, including array-comparative genomic hybridization, RNA/DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, and RRBS DNA methylation analysis on 41 somatotropinoma samples from 38 patients with acromegaly and three sporadic giants. Ten patients displayed paradoxical GH responses to oral glucose.

RESULTS

GIPR expression was detected in 13 samples (32%), including all 10 samples from patients with paradoxical GH responses. All GIPR-expressing somatotropinomas were negative for GNAS mutations. GIPR expression occurred through transcriptional activation of a single allele of the GIPR gene in all GIPR-expressing samples, except in two tetraploid samples, where expression occurred from two alleles per nucleus. In addition to extensive 19q duplications, we detected in four samples GIPR locus microamplifications in a certain proportion of nuclei. We identified an overall hypermethylator phenotype in GIPR-expressing samples compared with GNAS-mutated adenomas. In particular, we observed hypermethylation in the GIPR gene body, likely driving its ectopic expression.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a distinct molecular subclass of somatotropinomas, clinically revealed by a paradoxical increase of GH to oral glucose related to pituitary GIPR expression. This ectopic GIPR expression occurred through hypomorphic transcriptional activation and is likely driven by GIPR gene microamplifications and DNA methylation abnormalities.

MEG3 is associated with gsp oncogene regulation of growth hormone hypersecretion, proliferation and invasiveness of human GH-secreting adenomas

Overactivation of the Gs-mediated pathway by mutations of the G-protein α subunit (Gsα), a gsp oncogene, results in increased growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion and reduced tumor volume in patients with GH-secreting pituitary tumors. However, the mechanism underlying the clinical characteristics of gsp oncogene requires further investigation. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate-responsive element binding (CREB), as a downstream target gene of gsp oncogene, is implicated in activating maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3). The present study proposes that gsp oncogene mediates MEG3-regulating GH hypersecretion, resulting in the small tumor size of GH-secreting tumors. Therefore, the present study detected Gsα mutations by polymerase chain reaction in GH-secreting tumors, and revealed that Gsα mutations were observed in 7/25 (28%) GH-secreting tumors. Gsp-positive tumors indicated significantly increased levels of phosphorylated p-CREB (P<0.0001) and MEG3 (P=0.039), compared with gsp-negative tumors. The results indicated that MEG3 levels were positively correlated with GH and IGF-1 levels, and negatively correlated with the tumor volume of GH-secreting tumors. The group with gsp-positive or with high MEG3 expression indicated a significantly reduced proportion of invasiveness and lower Ki-67 index, compared with the gsp-negative or low MEG3 expression group. In conclusion, gsp oncogene may mediate MEG3 by promoting GH hypersecretion, resulting in smaller tumors, as well as suppressing proliferation and invasiveness of GH-secreting pituitary tumors.

Paradoxical GH Increase During OGTT Is Associated With First-Generation Somatostatin Analog Responsiveness in Acromegaly

CONTEXT

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is considered the most useful method for diagnosing active acromegaly and for patient follow-up after neurosurgery. Despite its widespread use, only a few small studies have so far focused on patients' clinical features associated with different GH responsiveness to OGTT.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association between glucose-induced GH response and endocrine profiles, clinical manifestations, and response to therapy in a large cohort of patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS

According to GH response to OGTT, patients were grouped as paradoxical (GH-Par) or nonparadoxical (GH-NPar), and their clinical and pathological features were compared in terms of pituitary tumor size, invasiveness, biochemical profiles, and response to therapy.

RESULTS

The study concerned 496 patients with acromegaly. At diagnosis, those with GH-Par (n = 184) were older than those with GH-NPar (n = 312) (mean ± SD, 44.1 ± 13.7 years vs 40.5 ± 12.7 years; P < 0.01) and had smaller tumors (0.82 vs 1.57 cm3; P < 0.01) that less frequently invaded the cavernous sinus (15% vs 27%; P < 0.01). The GH-Par group also had a higher basal GH per volume ratio (14.3 vs 10.5 μg/L ⋅ cm3; P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of hyperprolactinemia (17% vs 30%; P < 0.01) than the GH-NPar group. Importantly, the GH-Par group had a higher rate of remission in response to somatostatin analogues (52% vs 26%; P < 0.01) and a more marked drop in IGF-1 and GH after 6 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strongly suggest that serum GH responsiveness to oral glucose challenge reflects some important biological features of pituitary tumors and that the OGTT may have some prognostic value.

Growth Hormone Response to Oral Glucose Load: From Normal to Pathological Conditions

The exact physiological basis of acute growth hormone (GH) suppression by oral glucose is not fully understood. Glucose-mediated increase in hypothalamic somatostatin seems to be the most plausible explanation. Attempts to better understand its underlying mechanisms are compromised by species disparities in the response of GH to glucose load. While in humans, glucose inhibits GH release, the acute elevation of circulating glucose levels in rats has either no effect on GH secretion or may be stimulatory. Likewise, chronic hyperglycemia alters GH release in both humans and rats nonetheless in opposite directions. Several factors influence nadir GH concentrations including, age, gender, body mass index, pubertal age, and the type of assay used. Besides the classical suppressive effects of glucose on GH release, a paradoxical GH increase to oral glucose may be observed in around one third of patients with acromegaly as well as in various other disorders. Though its pathophysiology is poorly characterized, an altered interplay between somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone has been suggested and a link with pituitary ectopic expression of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor has been recently demonstrated. A better understanding of the dynamics mediating GH response to glucose may allow a more optimal use of the OGTT as a diagnostic tool in various conditions, especially acromegaly.

Study of major genetic factors involved in pituitary tumorigenesis and their impact on clinical and biological characteristics of sporadic somatotropinomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas

Genetic and functional aberrations of guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha stimulating (GNAS), aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), and pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG) are among the most prominent events in pituitary tumorigenesis. A cohort of Brazilian patients with somatotropinomas (n=41) and non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA, n=21) from a single tertiary-referral center were evaluated for GNAS and AIP mutations and gene expression of AIP and PTTG. Results were compared to the clinical and biological (Ki67 and p53 expression) characteristics of tumors and their response to therapy, if applicable. Genetic analysis revealed that 27% of somatotropinomas and 4.8% of NFPA harbored GNAS mutations (P=0.05). However, no differences were observed in clinical characteristics, tumor extension, response to somatostatin analog therapy, hormonal/surgical remission rates, Ki67 index, and p53 expression between mutated and non-mutated somatotropinomas patients. PTTG overexpression (RQ mean=10.6, min=4.39, max=11.9) and AIP underexpression (RQ mean=0.56, min=0.46-max=0.92) were found in virtually all cases without a statistically significant relationship with clinical and biological tumor features. No patients exhibited somatic or germline pathogenic AIP mutations. In conclusion, mutations in GNAS and abnormal PTTG and AIP expression had no impact on tumor features and treatment outcomes in this cohort. Our data support some previous studies and point to the need for further investigations, probably involving epigenetic and transcriptome analysis, to improve our understanding of pituitary tumor behavior.

The curious case of Gαs gain-of-function in neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Mutations activating the α subunit of heterotrimeric Gs protein are associated with a number of highly specific pathological molecular phenotypes. One of the best characterized is the McCune Albright syndrome. The disease presents with an increased incidence of neoplasias in specific tissues.

MAIN BODY

A similar repertoire of neoplasms can develop whether mutations occur spontaneously in somatic tissues during fetal development or after birth. Glands are the most "permissive" tissues, recently found to include the entire gastrointestinal tract. High frequency of activating Gαs mutations is associated with precise diagnoses (e.g., IPMN, Pyloric gland adenoma, pituitary toxic adenoma). Typically, most neoplastic lesions, from thyroid to pancreas, remain well differentiated but may be a precursor to aggressive cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we propose the possibility that gain-of-function mutations of Gαs interfere with signals in the microenvironment of permissive tissues and lead to a transversal neoplastic phenotype.

Cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling in the anterior pituitary gland in health and disease

The cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was the first among the so-called "second messengers" to be described. It is conserved in most organisms and functions as a signal transducer by mediating the intracellular effects of multiple hormones and neurotransmitters. In this review, we first delineate how different members of the cAMP pathway ensure its correct compartmentalization and activity, mediate the terminal intracellular effects, and allow the crosstalk with other signaling pathways. We then focus on the pituitary gland, where cAMP exerts a crucial function by controlling the responsiveness of the cells to hypothalamic hormones, neurotransmitters and peripheral factors. We discuss the most relevant physiological functions mediated by cAMP in the different pituitary cell types, and summarize the defects affecting this pathway that have been reported in the literature. We finally discuss how a deregulated cAMP pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of pituitary disorders and how it affects the response to therapy.

The GIP/GIPR axis is functionally linked to GH-secretion increase in a significant proportion of gsp- somatotropinomas

OBJECTIVE

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) overexpression has been recently described in a proportion of gsp^- somatotropinomas and suggested to be associated with the paradoxical increase of GH (GH-PI) during an oral glucose load.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was aimed at linking the GIP/GIPR pathway to GH secretion in 25 somatotropinomas-derived primary cultures and correlating molecular with clinical features in acromegalic patients. Given the impairment of the GIP/GIPR axis in acromegaly, an additional aim was to assess the effect of GH/IGF-1 stimulation on GIP expression in the enteroendocrine cell line STC-1.

RESULTS

Nearly 80% of GIPR-expressing somatotropinomas, all of them negative for gsp mutations, show increased GH secretion upon GIP stimulation, higher sensitivity to Forskolin but not to somatostatin analogs. Besides increased frequency of GH-PI, GIPR overexpression does not appear to affect acromegalic patients' clinical features. In STC-1 cells transfected with GIP promoter-driven luciferase vector, IGF-1 but not GH induced dose-dependent increase in luciferase activity.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that GIPR mediates the GH-PI in a significant proportion of gsp^- acromegalic patients. In these cases, the stimulatory effect of IGF-1 on GIP promoter support the hypothesis of a functional GH/IGF-1/GIP axis. Further studies based on larger cohorts and the development of a stable transgenic model with inducible GIPR overexpression targeted to pituitary somatotroph lineage will be mandatory to establish the real role of GIPR in the pathogenesis of somatotropinomas.

The genetic background of acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by a somatotropinoma in the vast majority of the cases. These are monoclonal tumors that can occur sporadically or rarely in a familial setting. In the last few years, novel familial syndromes have been described and recent studies explored the landscape of somatic mutations in sporadic somatotropinomas. This short review concentrates on the current knowledge of the genetic basis of both familial and sporadic acromegaly.

MEN1, MEN4, and Carney Complex: Pathology and Molecular Genetics

Pituitary adenomas are a common feature of a subset of endocrine neoplasia syndromes, which have otherwise highly variable disease manifestations. We provide here a review of the clinical features and human molecular genetics of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1 and 4 (MEN1 and MEN4, respectively) and Carney complex (CNC). MEN1, MEN4, and CNC are hereditary autosomal dominant syndromes that can present with pituitary adenomas. MEN1 is caused by inactivating mutations in the MEN1 gene, whose product menin is involved in multiple intracellular pathways contributing to transcriptional control and cell proliferation. MEN1 clinical features include primary hyperparathyroidism, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and prolactinomas as well as other pituitary adenomas. A subset of patients with pituitary adenomas and other MEN1 features have mutations in the CDKN1B gene; their disease has been called MEN4. Inactivating mutations in the type 1α regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA; the PRKAR1A gene), that lead to dysregulation and activation of the PKA pathway, are the main genetic cause of CNC, which is clinically characterised by primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, spotty skin pigmentation (lentigines), cardiac and other myxomas and acromegaly due to somatotropinomas or somatotrope hyperplasia.

Impact of gsp mutations in somatotroph pituitary adenomas on growth hormone response to somatostatin analogs: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Somatic mutations in the GNAS1 gene, which encodes the alpha-subunit of G stimulatory proteins (gsp), are frequently detected in somatotroph pituitary tumors and have been associated to specific clinical and histopathological characteristics. However, the question whether the presence of a somatic gsp mutation affects the response to somatostatin analog treatment remains unresolved.

DESIGN

Following a literature search, we performed a meta-analysis, including 8 eligible studies, in order to estimate the effect of gsp mutation on the percent reduction of growth hormone (GH) levels during an acute octreotide suppression test (OST). A total of 310 patients with acromegaly [126 gsp (+) and 184 gsp (-)] were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The presence of the gsp mutation was related with a greater reduction in GH levels on OST [Weighted Mean Difference (WMD): 9.08 % (95 % CI, 2.73, 15.42); p = 0.005; random effects model]. There was significant heterogeneity for this effect estimate (I(2) = 58 %, p value for heterogeneity = 0.02). A sensitivity analysis after exclusion of a study with different methodology of OST provided similar estimates [WMD: 6.93 % (95 % CI, 1.40, 12.46); p = 0.01], albeit with no significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 35 %, p value for heterogeneity = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggests a role for gsp mutation as a prognostic factor of treatment response to somatostatin analogs.

Landscape of Familial Isolated and Young-Onset Pituitary Adenomas: Prospective Diagnosis in AIP Mutation Carriers

CONTEXT

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) due to aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene mutations is an autosomal dominant disease with incomplete penetrance. Clinical screening of apparently unaffected AIP mutation (AIPmut) carriers could identify previously unrecognized disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the AIP mutational status of FIPA and young pituitary adenoma patients, analyzing their clinical characteristics, and to perform clinical screening of apparently unaffected AIPmut carrier family members.

DESIGN

This was an observational, longitudinal study conducted over 7 years.

SETTING

International collaborative study conducted at referral centers for pituitary diseases.

PARTICIPANTS

FIPA families (n 216) and sporadic young-onset (30 y) pituitary adenoma patients (n 404) participated in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed genetic screening of patients for AIPmuts, clinical assessment of their family members, and genetic screening for somatic GNAS1 mutations and the germline FGFR4 p.G388R variant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We assessed clinical disease in mutation carriers, comparison of characteristics of AIPmut positive and negative patients, results of GNAS1, and FGFR4 analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven FIPA families and 34 sporadic patients had AIPmuts. Patients with truncating AIPmuts had a younger age at disease onset and diagnosis, compared with patients with nontruncating AIPmuts. Somatic GNAS1 mutations were absent in tumors from AIPmut-positive patients, and the studied FGFR4 variant did not modify the disease behavior or penetrance in AIPmut-positive individuals. A total of 164 AIPmut-positive unaffected family members were identified; pituitary disease was detected in 18 of those who underwent clinical screening.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of the AIPmut carriers screened were diagnosed with pituitary disease, justifying this screening and suggesting a variable clinical course for AIPmut-positive pituitary adenomas.

cAMP signalling in the normal and tumorigenic pituitary gland

cAMP signalling plays a key role in the normal physiology of the pituitary gland, regulating cellular growth and proliferation, hormone production and release. Deregulation of the cAMP signalling pathway has been reported to be a common occurrence in pituitary tumorigenesis. Several mechanisms have been implicated including somatic mutations, gene-gene interactions and gene-environmental interactions. Somatic mutations in G-proteins and protein kinases directly alter cAMP signalling, while malfunctioning of other signalling pathways such as the Raf/MAPK/ERK, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Wnt pathways which normally interact with the cAMP pathway may mediate indirect effects on cAMP and varying downstream effectors. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling pathway has been implicated in pituitary tumorigenesis and we review its role in general and specifically in relation to cAMP de-regulation.

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor is overexpressed amongst GNAS1 mutation-negative somatotropinomas and drives growth hormone (GH)-promoter activity in GH3 cells

Somatic mutations in the GNAS1 gene, encoding the α-subunit of the heterotrimeric stimulatory G protein (Gαs), occur in approximately 40% of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumours. By altering the adenylate cyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway, they unequivocally give somatotroph cells a growth advantage. Hence, the pathogenesis of somatotropinomas could be linked to anomalies in receptors coupled to the cAMP second-messenger cascade. Among them, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is already known to play a primary role in the impaired cAMP-dependent cortisol secretion in patients affected by food-dependent Cushing's syndrome. In the present study, 43 somatotropinomas and 12 normal pituitary glands were investigated for GIPR expression by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Tumoural specimens were also evaluated for GNAS1 mutational status. The effect of GIPR overexpression on cAMP levels and GH transcription was evaluated in an in vitro model of somatotropinomas, the GH-secreting pituitary cell line GH3. GIPR was expressed at higher levels compared to normal pituitaries in 13 GNAS1 mutation-negative somatotropinomas. GIP stimulated adenylyl cyclase and GH-promoter activity in GIPR-transfected GH3 cells, confirming a correct coupling of GIPR to Gαs. In a proportion of acromegalic patients, GIPR overexpression appeared to be associated with a paradoxical increase in GH after an oral glucose tolerance test. Whether GIPR overexpression in acromegalic patients may be associated with this paradoxical response or more generally involved in the pathogenesis of acromegaly, as suggested by the mutually exclusive high GIPR levels and GNAS1 mutations, remains an open question.

Impact of gsp oncogene on the mRNA content for somatostatin and dopamine receptors in human somatotropinomas

INTRODUCTION

It has been reported in some series that gsp+ somatotropinomas are more sensitive to somatostatin analogues (SA) and dopamine's actions which may be related to their somatostatin receptor (SSTR) and dopamine receptor (DR) profile. No previous studies have been undertaken to evaluate the SSTR and DR profile related with the gsp status in somatotropinomas.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if (1) gsp status is correlated with response to octreotide LAR (LAR) and tumor expression patterns of SSTR1-5 and DR1-5 and (2) cAMP level can directly modulate SSTR and DR mRNA levels.

METHODS

Response to SA was evaluated by GH and IGF-I percent reduction after 3 and 6 months of treatment with LAR. Conventional PCR and sequencing were used to identify gsp+ tumors. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine SSTR and DR tumor expression. Primary pituitary cell cultures of primates were used to study whether SSTR and DR expression is regulated by forskolin.

RESULTS

The response to LAR did not significantly differ between patients with gsp+ and gsp- tumors; however, gsp+ tumors expressed higher levels of SSTR1, SSTR2, DR2 and a lower level of SSTR3. Forskolin increased SSTR1, SSTR2, DR1 and DR2 expression in cell cultures.

CONCLUSION

Elevated SSTR1, SSTR2, and DR2 tumor expression may help improve responsiveness to SA and DA therapy; however, this study may not have been appropriately powered to observe significant effects in the clinical response. Elevated cAMP levels could be directly responsible for the upregulation in SSTR1, SSTR2 and DR2 mRNA levels observed in gsp+ patients.

Relationship between cytokeratin staining patterns and clinico-pathological features in somatotropinomae

OBJECTIVE

Somatotropinomae are classified as densely and sparsely granulated adenomae, which typically exhibit a perinuclear pattern (PP) and a dot pattern (DP) in cytokeratin (CK) immunostaining respectively. Some exhibit a mixed pattern (MP). We studied the relationship between these somatotropinoma subtypes and their clinico-pathological features.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 141 Japanese acromegalic patients. We evaluated their clinical presentation and their response to provocation tests with TRH and LHRH and to suppression (octreotide) test. Tumour tissues were subjected to immunostaining for CAM-5.2, MIB-1, CD34, E-cadherin (CDH1) and p53 (TP53). In 43 cases (30 non-DP and 13 DP), we analysed gsp mutations (constitutively activating mutations of the G(s)α protein that is encoded by GNAS gene).

RESULTS

The 141 adenomae were categorised into three subtypes based on their CK staining patterns; 30 (21.3%) exhibited DP, 83 (58.9%) exhibited PP, and 28 (19.9%) exhibited MP. Compared with the other subtypes, DP adenomae were significantly larger, and their E-cadherin expression and response to TRH, LHRH and octreotide challenge were lower. The postoperative cure rate tended to be lower in DP adenomae. gsp mutations were detected in 25 of 43 cases examined (58.1%); 20 of the 30 non-DP (66.7%) and 5 of the 13 DP tumours (38.5%) were affected by the mutation.

CONCLUSION

DP somatotropinomae exhibit characteristic features. Compared with the non-DP subtypes, DP adenomae manifested a larger tumour size, a lower incidence of abnormal responses to TRH and LHRH challenge, a poor response to octreotide test and a lower expression of E-cadherin. gsp mutation was not exclusive for non-DP somatotropinomae.

Signalling pathway alterations in pituitary adenomas: involvement of Gsalpha, cAMP and mitogen-activated protein kinases

Despite extensive research on sporadic pituitary adenomas, it is not yet possible to assign one protein alteration to one specific type of pituitary adenomas. Nevertheless, alterations of the cAMP pathway appear to be molecular hallmarks of most growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas. However, these alterations do not confer specific phenotypes to patients carrying these alterations. In this review, we summarise the literature regarding signalling alterations observed in GH-secreting adenomas. We focus on Gsalpha alterations and their possible cross-talk with the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway. In the light of results obtained on human somatotroph adenoma cells in primary culture and on models of murine somatotroph cell lines, we postulate a crucial role for ERK1/2 in GH-secreting adenomas downstream of cAMP pathway alterations that might impact the tumoural phenotype.

Prevalence of gsp oncogene in somatotropinomas and clinically non-functioning pituitary adenomas: our experience

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the prevalence of the gsp oncogene in Brazilian patients harboring somatotropinomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA). Patients and methods Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from 54 somatotropinomas and 14 NFPA. Exons 8 and 9 (including codons 201 and 227, respectively) of the GNAS gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR products were then purified and sequenced using the same primers. Results The gsp oncogene was found in nine tumors (eight somatotropinomas). The prevalence among somatotropinomas was 15% and among NFPA was 7%. The mutation was found in codon 201 in eight tumors and in codon 227 in one tumor (a somatotropinoma). No differences were found in age, sex, GH, and IGF-I levels or tumor volume at diagnosis between gsp+ and gsp- patients. Conclusion We found a lower than expected prevalence of gsp mutations in somatotropinomas and a similar prevalence in NFPA compared to previous studies from other countries.

Expression of pituitary tumour-derived, N-terminally truncated isoform of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (ptd-FGFR4) correlates with tumour invasiveness but not with G-protein alpha subunit (gsp) mutation in human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

Apart from the constitutively activating mutation of the G-protein alpha subunit (Gsalpha) (gsp mutation), factors involved in tumorigenesis or those in tumour behaviour remain elusive in sporadic GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Recently, the N-terminally truncated form of fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 (ptd-FGFR4) was identified in pituitary adenomas. This aberrant receptor has transforming activity, and causes pituitary adenomas in transgenic mice. The clinical relevance of this receptor warrants investigation. Our objective was twofold: first, to examine how the expression of ptd-FGFR4 relates to gsp mutations; and second, to see whether patients with this receptor have unique clinical characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

mRNA was extracted from excised adenomas of 45 Japanese acromegalic patients. ptd-FGFR4 expression and gsp mutations were determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and direct sequencing. Preoperative clinical data were collected by reviewing medical charts and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

RESULTS

ptd-FGFR4 mRNA expression was detected in 19 out of 45 tumours (42.2%) while gsp mutations were detected in 25 out of 45 tumours (55.6%). The prevalence of ptd-FGFR4 expression did not differ between gsp-positive (44.0%) and gsp-negative (40.0%) tumours (P = 1.00). ptd-FGFR4-positive tumours invaded the cavernous sinus more frequently (P = 0.0098) than did the ptd-FGFR4-negative tumours. Tumour size was not statistically different between ptd-FGFR4-positive and -negative tumours (P = 0.198). The presence of ptd-FGFR4 did not correlate with age at operation, sex, preoperative serum GH or IGF-1 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that ptd-FGFR4 expression and gsp mutations occur independently of each other, and that ptd-FGFR4 expression is associated with more invasive tumours in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Conditional overexpression of the wild-type Gs alpha as the gsp oncogene initiates chronic extracellularly regulated kinase 1/2 activation and hormone hypersecretion in pituitary cell lines

In pituitary cells, activation of the cAMP pathway by specific G protein-coupled receptors controls differentiative functions and proliferation. Constitutively active forms of the alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G(s) protein resulting from mutations at codon 201 or 227 (gsp oncogene) were first identified in 30-40% of human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. This rate of occurrence suggests that the gsp oncogene is not responsible for initiating the majority of these tumors. Moreover, there is a large overlap between the clinical phenotypes observed in patients with tumors bearing the gsp oncogene and those devoid of this oncogene. To explore the role of G(s)alpha in GH-secreting adenomas, we obtained somatolactotroph GH4C1 cell lines by performing doxycycline-dependent conditional overexpression of the wild-type G(s)alpha protein and expression of the gsp oncogene. Although the resulting adenylyl cyclase and cAMP levels were 10-fold lower in the wild-type G(s)alpha-overexpressing cell line, a sustained MAPK ERK1/2 activation was observed in both cell lines. Overexpression of the wild-type G(s)alpha protein as the gsp oncogene initiated chronic activation of endogenous prolactin synthesis and release, as well as chronic activation of ERK1/2-sensitive human prolactin and GH promoters.

Analysis of GNAS mutations in 60 growth hormone secreting pituitary tumors: correlation with clinical and pathological characteristics and surgical outcome based on highly sensitive GH and IGF-I criteria for remission

Although the molecular mechanisms underlying GH secreting pituitary tumor formation are not well understood, mutations in the alpha-subunit of the stimulatory G gene, GNAS, have been identified in up to 40%. As these mutations could play a role in tumor growth, we screened 60 GH secreting tumors for GNAS mutations and assessed whether mutation status correlated with their clinical and pathological characteristics. Tumor specimens obtained at surgery were snap frozen. Tumor DNA was extracted, and PCR was used to amplify regions containing 2 sites of recurrent activating somatic mutations in codons 201 and 227 in GNAS. Amplicons were bi-directionally sequenced and analyzed. GNAS mutations were present in 24/60 (40%) of tumors; these were arg201cys(n = 15), arg201ser(n = 2), arg201his(n = 2), gln227leu(n = 4), gln227arg(n = 1). Preoperative IGF-I levels (age-adjusted) were higher (p = 0.01), but GH levels were slightly higher (p = 0.18) in mutation positive vs. negative groups. Mutation positive tumors were somewhat smaller than negative tumors (p = 0.07). The proportion of tumors >2 cm was somewhat less among positive (8.3%) vs. negative tumors (25%) (p = 0.10). Neither mib proliferation index, the proportion of invasive tumors nor surgical remission rates differed in the groups. IGF-I normalization rate with somatostatin analog therapy was similar in positive (3 of 6) vs. negative (3 of 7) patients. GH secreting tumors harboring GNAS mutations had higher preoperative IGF-I levels, somewhat higher preoperative GH levels and tended to be smaller than tumors without mutations. Presence of a GNAS mutation did not predict a difference in a proliferation marker, surgical remission or response to somatostatin analog therapy.

Does the prevalence of gsp mutations in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas differ geographically or racially? Prevalence of gsp mutations in Japanese patients revisited

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of gsp mutations in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas was thought to differ geographically or racially, given its exceptionally lower incidence among Japanese patients (4.4-9.3%) compared to other regions (30-50%). However, this notion is now being challenged after a recent paper reported a 53.3% incidence among Japanese with acromegaly. We have since re-evaluated the prevalence of gsp mutations on a larger scale.

PATIENTS

One hundred Japanese acromegaly patients with surgically confirmed GH-secreting pituitary adenomas were enrolled.

METHODS

mRNAs from primary cultured adenomas were used for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing of the Gsalpha subunit. Patient data were reviewed from medical charts.

RESULTS

There were 53 gsp mutations (53%), consisting of 42 Arg201Cys, one Arg201His, one Arg201Ser, 8 Gln227Leu, and one Gln227Arg mutation. Age at operation, sex ratio, basal serum GH and IGF-I levels were no different with or without the mutations. In contrast, patients responded differently to most dynamic tests with statistical significance: serum GH levels in gsp-positive patients had blunted response to GHRH, were well suppressed by bromocriptine, and had higher rates of paradoxical response to TRH. Notably, paradoxical response to LHRH was observed exclusively in gsp-negative patients. Octreotide suppressed GH levels strongly regardless of gsp status. These clinical characteristics are similar to those of Caucasian patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the prevalence of gsp mutations in Japanese acromegaly patients is comparable to those of other reports from various regions. Therefore, Japanese patients do not stand as an example for geographical or racial difference in the prevalence of gsp mutations in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

GSPalpha mutations in Mexican patients with acromegaly: potential impact on long term prognosis

OBJECTIVE

The frequency of activating mutations of the GSPalpha gene as the etiology of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas has been the subject of important ethnogenetic variability. Whereas up to 40% of Caucasian patients with acromegaly have tumors which harbor these somatic mutations, their prevalence among Asian populations is much lower. The correlation between the presence of these mutations and the clinical and biological behavior of these tumors has also been a matter of controversy. In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of GSPalpha mutations in GH-secreting tumors obtained from a genetically homogenous population of Mexican patients with acromegaly. We also sought to establish whether or not the presence of these mutations correlates in any way with the clinical or biochemical characteristics of the disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty eight GH-secreting pituitary adenomas were examined for the presence of point mutations in either codon 201 or 227 of the GSPalpha gene, using PCR and direct sequencing of DNA extracted from either fresh or paraffin-embedded tissues. Patients were prospectively followed clinically and biochemically for up to nine years after pituitary surgery.

RESULTS

Heterozygous point mutations in exon 8 (codon 201) were found in 11 patients (19%), and no molecular alterations were evident in exon 9. The frequency and severity of the different clinical features of acromegaly did not differ between patients with and without GSPalpha mutations. Patients with and without mutations had pre-operative GH and IGF-I elevations of similar magnitude, and although microadenomas appeared to be more frequent among patients with GSPalpha mutations, this did not reach statistical significance. Upon short-term follow-up, biochemical cure (normal age- and gender-adjusted IGF-I and post-glucose GH below 1 ng/mL) was similarly achieved in both groups. After 3-9 years of post-operative follow up however, a significantly greater proportion of patients with the mutation achieved a "safe" basal GH value (100% vs 33%, p=0.001) as well a lower nadir post-glucose GH (0.53+/-0.5 vs 2.9+/-6.2 ng/mL, p=0.04) although the rate of IGF-1 normalization did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the prevalence of GSPalpha mutations in Mexican patients with acromegaly is intermediate between that found in Asian and Caucasian populations. In this well-defined genetic population the presence of codon 201 mutations appeared to be associated with a greater probability of achieving a "safe" GH value upon long-term follow-up.