Clinical and biomarker analyses of sintilimab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized, open-label phase 2 study (ORIENT-2)

The predicting role of albumin to derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients aged 60 years and above

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical significance of albumin(Alb) to the derive(d) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) aged 60 years and above.

METHODS

328 patients with ESCC at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this study. The dNLR was calculated using the following formula: neutrophil count / (leukocyte count - neutrophil count). Alb to dNLR or the Alb/dNLR ratio was calculated by dividing the Alb level by the dNLR level.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff values for Alb to dNLR.

RESULTS

ROC analysis displayed that the cut-off value of Alb to dNLR was defined to be 20.28 U/mL. The AlbtodNLR was not related to clinical features but to survival status (all P > 0.05). ESCC patients aged 60 years and above with a high AlbtodNLR had better survival than those with a low Alb-to-dNLR (P = 0.005). Similar results were observed in male patients with ESCC (P = 0.001), subgroups with upper and middle locations (P = 0.013 and 0.017), tobacco consumption (P = 0.004), non-drinkers (P = 0.029), well and moderate differentiation (P = 0.014), lymph node involvement (P < 0.001), advanced T stage (P = 0.014), and advanced TNM staging (P = 0.001). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that tumor grade, T staging, lymph node metastasis(LNM), TNM staging, and Alb to dNLR ratio were predictors of death from ESCC. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a lower AlbtodNLR levels, and advanced T stage were associated with an increased risk of ESCC-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, Alb to dNLR were inversely associated with outcome and were regarded as an independent influencing factor for ESCC subpopulation aged 60 years and above.

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems: opportunities and challenges in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance cancer therapy efficacy by improving drug targeting, reducing toxicity, and enabling multifunctional applications. This review highlights some key types of nanoparticles, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles, dendrimers, and quantum dots, which could effectively improve the delivery of various drugs used in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, offering more precise and effective treatment options. With the ability to improve drug stability and overcome biological barriers, nanoparticle-based systems represent a transformative strategy for ESCC treatment. Despite some challenges, such as biocompatibility and scalability, the future of nanoparticle-based drug delivery holds great promise, particularly in the development of personalized nanomedicine and novel therapeutic approaches targeting the tumor microenvironment. With ongoing advancements, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems hold immense potential to revolutionize ESCC treatment and improve patient outcomes.

NOTCH1 Mutation and Survival Analysis of Tislelizumab in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Biomarker Analysis From the Randomized, Phase III, RATIONALE-302 Trial

PURPOSE

Although multiple agents targeting PD-1 have been approved as second-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), only a fraction of patients derive long-term survival. Hence, reliable predictive biomarkers are urgently needed.

METHODS

Comprehensive tumor genomic profiling and transcriptome sequencing were performed on samples from the RATIONALE-302 study. We also conducted single-cell RNA sequencing analysis on Notch1 knockdown ESCC murine models to further explore the potential molecular mechanisms underlying anti-PD-1 benefit.

RESULTS

We identified NOTCH1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker for longer overall survival (OS) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (18.4 months v 5.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71]). At the transcriptional level, type I IFN (IFN-I)/toll-like receptor expression signatures were positively associated with OS benefit of tislelizumab, whereas B-cell and neutrophil signatures predicted unfavorable OS. Exploratory analyses showed that the presence of NOTCH1 mutation correlated with enrichment of IFN-I signatures and reduced infiltration of B cells and neutrophils. In murine models, comparative single-cell transcriptome analyses further revealed that Notch1 deficiency facilitated a more immunologically activated tumor microenvironment which potentiated anti-PD-1 treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide novel insights for anti-PD-1 treatment selection using NOTCH1 mutations and may provide a rationale for combination therapy in ESCC.

Investigating the synergistic effects of immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with chemotherapy have been approved for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), it remains unclear whether immunochemotherapy (ICT) offers advantages over the simple addition of individual monotherapies. This study aimed to investigate whether ICT exhibits a synergistic effect in patients with advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Reconstructed individual patient data of 3330 patients were electronically extracted from the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of eight randomized-controlled trials (ATTRACTION-3, CheckMate648, KEYNOTE-181, KEYNOTE-590, RATIONALE-302, RATIONALE-306, ESCORT, and ESCORT-1st). The observed progression-free survival (PFS) curve of each constituent monotherapies was used to estimate simulated PFS curves expected under a model of independent drug action. If the observed curve demonstrated significantly better PFS than the simulated curve, the combination of ICI and chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect, implying a superior outcome compared to simply adding the component monotherapy.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 2-year, and median PFS of the observed and simulated KM curves were 26.3% vs. 24.8%, 14.6% vs. 12.0%, and 6.9 vs. 6.4 months, respectively. The one-sample log-rank test showed no significant differences between the observed and simulated KM curves (p = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed PFS with ICT was comparable to the simulated PFS estimated from the data for each monotherapy. Although it is unclear whether potential synergies exist for ICT, these findings suggest that the benefits of ICI and chemotherapy do not interfere with each other, thereby providing theoretical support for the efficacy of ICT.

A machine learning model utilizing CT radiomics features and peripheral blood inflammatory markers predicts the prognosis of patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing PD-1 inhibitor combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Objective: To investigate the value of a machine learning model that integrates radiomics features and peripheral blood inflammatory markers in predicting the prognosis of patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving PD-1 inhibitor combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: A retrospective collection was conducted involving 105 patients with unresectable ESSC who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from January 2020 to August 2023. These patients were randomly divided into a training set (n=74) and a validation set (n=31). Radiomics features were extracted from arterial phase CT images obtained before initial treatment, with feature selection performed using Pearson Correlation and LASSO-COX methods. Baseline clinical characteristics were analyzed, and hematological parameters were collected before the start of immunotherapy and within 4-6 weeks post-treatment to calculate inflammatory markers. Subsequently, independent radiomics features influencing patient prognosis were identified using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, and these features were incorporated into a clinical feature-based multivariate Cox model to derive independent prognostic factors combining radiomics and clinical characteristics. Nomograms were constructed to predict the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of patients based on the results of COX analysis involving clinical characteristics, radiomic features, and combined indicators. The models were evaluated and assessed using ROC curves and calibration curves. Results: In the training cohort, the AUC was 0.705 for the clinical model, 0.573 for the radiomics model, and 0.834 for the combined model. In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.784 for the clinical model, 0.775 for the radiomics model, and 0.872 for the combined model. Conclusion: The combined model integrating the radiomic feature NGTDM-busyness, the inflammatory marker ΔNLR, and the clinical characteristic M stage offers the optimal predictive value for the 2-year PFS in patients.

Current Advances in Immunotherapy Management of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common and deadliest cancers worldwide. Rates of esophageal cancer worldwide have been steadily rising over the past decade due to higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Current therapies include surgical resection, chemotherapy, and limited targeted therapies. One obstacle to care is tumor cells' ability to evade immune surveillance, which can render certain therapeutics ineffective. Immunotherapy provides a new paradigm to cancer treatment, which has proven to be effective in evasive tumors. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 and CLTA-4 inhibitors have been used as frontline treatment and have shown to be extremely effective in the treatment of hard-to-treat tumors. Here, we aim to analyze the current literature regarding current therapeutics along with emerging techniques and future receptor targets for immunotherapy.

Immune repertoire sequencing reveals differences in treatment response to camrelizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ESCC

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (taxanes [T] or fluorouracil agents [F] plus platinum [P] drugs) as the first-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), using immune repertoire sequencing (IRS) to explore treatment response mechanism. In this multi-center, prospective cohort study, 88 patients received camrelizumab plus TP or FP, achieving a 1-year progression-free survival of 56.8% and overall survival of 68.2%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 64.8%, with a disease control rate of 91.1%. While most treatment-related adverse events were mild, 12.5% of patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicities. IRS showed significant differences in T-cell receptor (TCR) β-chain and immunoglobulin heavy chain between patients with (ORR group) or without ORR (non-ORR group), particularly in the distribution and expression of some genes. Specifically, we found the significant differences in the amino acid composition of complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) polypeptide sequences in TCR and B-cell receptor (BCR) between the ORR and non-ORR groups. For TCR, we observed substantial oligoclonal enrichment and differences in the abundance of specific V and J genes. Similarly, for BCR, we detected differences in the clonotype abundance of CDR3 polypeptide segments and identified several differential V genes. Camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is effective and well-tolerated as the first-line treatment for ESCC, and IRS may reveal mechanism influencing treatment response.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center observational study, we collected medical records of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC who received either camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment between July 1, 2019, and May 31, 2023. We evaluated short-term efficacy, including overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as well as survival outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was also assessed. Additionally, factors influencing OS in ESCC patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were included, with 30 receiving camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and 30 receiving chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR (33.33% vs. 13.33%) and DCR (73.33% vs. 56.67%) between the combination therapy and chemotherapy-alone groups (P > 0.05). However, the median PFS was significantly longer in the combination therapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (4.7 months vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.048). Additionally, the median OS was significantly improved in the combination therapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (11.7 months vs. 6.5 months, P = 0.003). Age and history of radical surgery were significantly associated with OS in patients receiving camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Second-line treatment with camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy is well-tolerated and associated with favorable oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Furthermore, younger patients and those who have undergone radical surgery may derive greater benefit from camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma in China

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of the Chinese health service system.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was constructed to simulate quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a patient's lifetime based on a phase III clinical trial.

RESULTS

Sintilimab plus chemotherapy increased by 0.316 QALY and 0.285 QALY with the additional cost of $5692 and $5269, which led to the ICER of $18000/QALY and $18519/QALY gained in the overall population and the patients with CPS ≥ 10, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab may be a cost-effective first-line treatment choice for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC.

Major pathologic response as a prognostic surrogate in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy: A multi-center cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic and survival surrogate value of major pathologic response (MPR) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy(nCT/nICT) and surgery.

METHOD

A retrospective multi-center study cohort study enrolled 305 ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival(L-RFS), distant metastasis-free survival(D-MFS), and recurrence patterns. The Cox regression analysis and Harrell's C-index were used to analyze survival differences and surrogate endpoints. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the subgroup analysis in two subgroups(the patients receiving nICT and patients receiving nCT) and the prognostic value analysis of adjuvant therapy in non-MPR and MPR patients.

RESULT

Of the 305 patients, 105 achieved MPR, demonstrating a significantly improved RFS (P value < 0.001), L-RFS (P value < 0.001), and D-MFS (P value = 0.003). MPR was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS(HR:0.415, 95%CI:[0.227, 0.759], P value = 0.004) and demonstrated equal predictive capacity to be a surrogate of survival endpoints with T stage and N stage(Harrell's C-index: 0.613). In subgroup analysis, patients with MPR showed better survival outcomes in subgroups that received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (P value = 0.012) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy(P value < 0.001). Additionally, adjuvant therapy did not confer additional survival benefits to both MPR and non-MPR patients. Compared with patients who achieved MPR, non-MPR patients exhibited a higher recurrence rate, although the recurrence sites were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

MPR can serve as an independent prognostic factor and a surrogate of survival endpoints in ESCC patients undergoing nCT/nICT. Besides, as a potential indicator for postoperative management, MPR can provide reference basis and evidence support in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors as second-line treatment for advanced squamous esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a focus on PD-L1 expression levels

Background

PD-1 inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in enhancing OS and AEs as second-line therapies for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there remains no clear consensus on which PD-1 inhibitor provides the best balance between efficacy and safety. To address this key issue in the second-line treatment of ESCC, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) with a focus on OS benefits, particularly in patients with different levels of PD-L1 expression.

Methods

A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted in Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, covering publications from the inception of these database to June 2024. The evaluated endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), AEs, and Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and safety of various immunotherapy regimens in patients with advanced ESCC. To ensure transparency, novelty, and reliability, this study was prospectively registered in the systematic review registry (CRD42024540581).

Results

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 2,078 patients and six treatment regimens, were included in this study. Among advanced ESCC patients not selected based on PD-L1 expression, Sintilimab demonstrated the greatest OS benefit (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98). Camrelizumab showed the most favorable improvement in PFS compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.87) and also achieved the best ORR benefit (OR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.98-6.99). In terms of safety, Nivolumab (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05-0.19) and Tislelizumab (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33) exhibited significant safety advantages over chemotherapy concerning AEs. Moreover, Nivolumab (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20) was associated with a markedly lower risk of Grade ≥ 3 AEs compared to chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed that Tislelizumab (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37-0.76) offered the greatest OS benefit for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 10%, while Camrelizumab (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.89) was the most likely regimen to provide an OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 < 10%.

Conclusion

Compared to chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors may provide improved survival outcomes for patients with advanced ESCC. Among patients not selected based on PD-L1 expression, Sintilimab is most likely to deliver the best survival benefit. For patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 10%, Tislelizumab is expected to offer the greatest efficacy, while Camrelizumab appears to be the most effective for those with PD-L1 < 10%.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024540581.

The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with sintilimab followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus sintilimab sequencing maintaining with sintilimab for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (sintilimab) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus sintilimab, and subsequent maintenance with sintilimab (IC-ICCRT-IO) for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a retrospective study.

METHODS

Data from patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, inoperable ESCC who received IC-ICCRT-IO were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment effects were evaluated after 2 cycles of induction therapy and after CCRT by contrast-enhanced CT scans and esophagograms, followed by subsequent evaluations every 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months. Secondary endpoints involved overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The influence of the expression level of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) as well as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on efficacy of the IC-ICCRT-IO was analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 29 eligible patients were enrolled and analyzed. The median follow-up time was 20.5 months. The median PFS was not reached; the 6-, 12-, and 18-month PFS rates were 100.0%, 93.1%, and 82.8%, respectively. The median OS was not reached, and the 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS rates were all 100.0%. The ORR and DCR were 89.7% and 100.0%. Adverse events (AEs) were manageable, with grade 3 or higher AEs observed in 48.2% of patients, primarily nonimmune-related and clinically manageable. Hematologic toxicity was predominant. Two patients developed grade 3 immune-related rash, and two patients developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, all of whom were managed with appropriate symptomatic treatment. No significant differences in survival outcomes were observed with respect to PD-L1 and NLR.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that the IC-ICCRT-IO regimen for unresectable locally advanced ESCC provided a survival benefit with manageable safety profile. More prospective clinical studies should be warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

2024-04-22, No. QYFY WZLL 28,684, retrospectively registered.

S-1-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus nimotuzumab in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who failed neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world prospective study

PURPOSE

This prospective study in a real-world setting investigated the feasibility and safety of S-1 plus nimotuzumab (S-1-Nimo) based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) patients who failed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

LA-ESCC patients who failed to converse to resectable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled to receive the 4-week S-1-Nimo regimen of radiotherapy (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 days per week), S-1 chemotherapy, and nimotuzumab. Then, after surgical assessments, patients evaluated as resectable disease received surgery; patients with unresectable disease continued to receive definitive radiotherapy (50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, 5 days per week) concurrently with S-1-Nimo. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median follow-up time was 23.2 months. Median EFS was 9.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.0) months, with an estimated 2-year EFS rate of 24.2%. The median overall survival (OS) and the estimated OS rate at 2 years were 13.4 (95% CI, 10.3-17.5) months and 31.2%, respectively. Twelve underwent surgery, with a surgical conversion rate of 18.8% and an R0 resection rate of 100.0%. Subgroup analysis identified the significantly prolonged EFS and OS in patients who experienced radical surgery (median EFS, not reached vs. 8.7 months; p = .0117. median OS, 24.9 vs. 10.6 months; p = .0205) as compared to those treated with CCRT. Of 64 patients, grade 3 adverse events mainly included radiation esophagitis (4.7%), anemia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the reasonable efficacy and promising safety of the S-1-Nimo-based CCRT in LA-ESCC patients with failure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

Genomic landscape of circulating tumor DNA in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer

The large population of HER2-low breast cancer patients necessitates further research to provide enhanced clinical guidance. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 1071 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to investigate clinicopathological and genetic alterations of HER2-low MBC patients. The effect of HER2-low status on different treatment modalities was explored in two prospective clinical trials (NCT03412383, NCT01917279) and a retrospective study. Our findings suggest TP53, PIK3CA, and ESR1 are frequently mutated genes in HER2-low MBC. Compared to the HER2-0 group, mutations observed in the HER2-low group are more closely associated with metabolic pathway alterations. Additionally, among patients with ERBB2 mutations and treated with pyrotinib, the HER2-low group may experience superior prognosis when compared to the HER2-0 group. Notably, we did not find any statistically significant disparity in the response to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy between HER2-0 and HER2-low breast cancer patients. Interestingly, within the subgroup of individuals with metabolic pathway-related gene mutations, we found that HER2-low group exhibited a more favorable response to these treatments compared to HER2-0 group. Additionally, dynamic analysis showed the HER2-low MBC patients whose molecular tumor burden index decreased or achieved early clearance of ctDNA after the initial two treatment cycles, exhibited prolonged survival. Moreover, we classified HER2-low MBC into three clusters, providing a reference for subsequent treatment with enhanced precision. Our study offers valuable insights into the biology of HER2-low MBC and may provide reference for personalized treatment strategies.

EVA1B facilitates esophageal squamous carcinoma progression and recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment

Eva-1 Homolog B (EVA1B) has been preliminarily found to be associated with prognostic outcomes and immune microenvironment in several human cancer types, but the implications of EVA1B in ESCC remain unclear. Human ESCC and paracancerous tissues were gathered in this study, and EVA1B expression was measured via immunoblotting. EC109 and KYSE-180 ESCC cells were stably infected by sh-EVA1B lentivirus, and functional experiments were subsequently implemented. Syngeneic mouse models were built, and the expansion and recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were then evaluated. The results showed that EVA1B presented the notable up-regulation in clinical ESCC tissues versus controls, and was connected to more advanced stages and the abundance of MDSCs. Silencing EVA1B notably attenuated proliferation of ESCC cells and tumor growth in syngeneic mouse models. Moreover, EVA1B suppression resulted in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, and impaired ESCC cell aggressiveness. Among ESCC patients, EVA1B was strongly correlated to EMT pathway activity. Targeted suppression of EVA1B mitigated the expression of Wnt3a, β-catenin and LRP6 in ESCC cells and tumor xenografts. Additionally, inhibition of EVA1B attenuated the expansion and recruitment of MDSCs within the immune microenvironment based upon the reduction in the percentage of CD11b+Gr-1+ immunosuppressive MDSCs as well as the expression of MDSC expansion stimulators (S100A8, S100A9, Arg-1, and VEGF). Collectively, our findings unveiled the contribution of high expression of EVA1B to ESCC progression and MDSCs expansion and recruitment, indicating that targeted suppression of EVA1B may be a potential treatment choice for ESCC patients.

Sintilimab plus HPV vaccine for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/m CC) presents limited treatment options for patients failed or progressed quickly following first-line therapy. This study investigated the potential of sintilimab with a prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine as a second-line treatment for r/m CC.

METHODS

In this phase 2 clinical trial, patients with r/m CC previously unresponsive or intolerant to standard treatments for metastatic or recurrent lesions were enrolled. Participants received sintilimab (3 mg/kg for body weight <60 kg; 200 mg for ≥60 kg) every 3 weeks until 24 months or 35 cycles and 3 doses of the HPV quadrivalent vaccine (initial dose prior to sintilimab initiation, with subsequent doses at 2 and 6 months). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). A Simon two-stage optimal design was used.

RESULTS

From October 2019 to October 2022, 13 patients with r/m CC were enrolled. ORR achieved 53.8% (95% CI 25.1% to 80.8%), and the disease control rate was 76.9% (95% CI 46.2% to 95.0%). Median follow-up duration was 16.07 months (range: 3.64-48.2 months), and median progressive free survival was 7.16 months (95% CI 1.91 -not applicable (NA)). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI 9.89 -NA). Hypothyroidism (15.6%) was the most common treatment-related adverse event (AE). No grade 3 or above AEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the combination of sintilimab plus prophylactic HPV vaccine offers a potentially promising therapeutic strategy for patients with r/m CC unresponsive or intolerant to standard therapies.Trial registration numberNCT04096911.

Efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus camrelizumab versus anlotinib plus S-1 as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study

Background

No data exist on the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus camrelizumab doublet as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although anlotinib and the programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor camrelizumab are used as treatments for ESCC, the combined use of anlotinib and camrelizumab as a second-line therapy has not been reported. Therefore, this study explored the efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus camrelizumab as second-line therapy for advanced ESCC.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with advanced ESCC undergoing second-line therapy, either with anlotinib plus camrelizumab or anlotinib plus S-1, were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed at Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and assessment of toxicity.

Results

In patients with advanced ESCC, the anlotinib plus camrelizumab group (N = 32) exhibited longer PFS (8.00 vs. 4.53 months, P < 0.001), higher ORR (28.1 vs. 19.2%, P = 0.431), and higher DCR (87.5 vs. 65.4%, P = 0.045) than those in the anlotinib plus S-1 group (N = 26). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were predominantly grade 1/2 in both groups, with a higher incidence of grade 1/2 skin toxicity in patients treated with anlotinib plus camrelizumab (P = 0.033). Two patients (6.3%) developed grade 1/2 immune-related pneumonia. The incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that the drug regimen (P < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P = 0.008), and differentiation grade (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusions

Anlotinib plus camrelizumab exhibited promising antitumor efficacy and manageable toxicity when used as a second-line treatment for advanced ESCC.

Prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy in esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC), a common type of malignant tumor, ranks as the sixth highest contributor to cancer-related mortality worldwide. Due to the condition that most patients with EC are diagnosed at advanced or metastatic status, the efficacy of conventional treatments including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy is limited, resulting in a dismal 5-year overall survival rate. In recent years, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has presented a novel therapeutic avenue for EC patients. Both ICIs monotherapy and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have demonstrated marked benefits for patients with advanced EC. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy incorporating immunotherapy has also demonstrated promising prospects in the context of perioperative treatment. Nonetheless, due to the variable response observed among patients undergoing immunotherapy, it is of vital importance to identify predictive biomarkers for patient stratification, to facilitate identification of subgroups who may derive greater benefits from immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize validated or potential biomarkers for immunotherapy in EC in three dimensions: tumor-cell-associated biomarkers, tumor-immune microenvironment (TIME)-associated factors, and host-associated biomarkers, so as to provide a theoretical foundation to inform tailored therapy for individuals diagnosed with EC.

Recent developments in immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tract cancers

The past few decades have witnessed the rise of immunotherapy for Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand-1 antibodies, has become increasingly pivotal in the treatment of advanced and perioperative GI tract cancers. Currently, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy is considered as first-line regimen for unselected advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJC), mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), and advanced esophageal cancer (EC). In addition, the encouraging performance of claudin18.2-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in later-line GI tract cancers brings new hope for cell therapy in solid tumour treatment. Nevertheless, immunotherapy for GI tumour remains yet precise, and researchers are dedicated to further maximising and optimising the efficacy. This review summarises the important research, latest progress, and future directions of immunotherapy for GI tract cancers including EC, G/GEJC, and CRC.

Advancements in immunotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current strategies and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC), particularly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), is characterized by high incidence and poor prognosis worldwide, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches like immunotherapy. This review explores the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on ESCC, especially focusing on PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Our literature search, conducted across databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, from January 2010 to December 2023, aimed at identifying advancements, challenges, and future directions in the use of immunotherapy for ESCC.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a detailed analysis of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of ICIs as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy for locally advanced ESCC. Our findings highlight the significant survival benefits offered by ICIs, albeit with varying efficacy across patient populations, emphasizing the need for precise biomarkers to tailor treatment strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The integration of immunotherapy into the ESCC treatment paradigm represents a significant shift, improving survival outcomes. Future research should focus on optimizing combination therapies and novel immunotherapeutic agents, incorporating genetic and tumor microenvironment analyses to enhance patient selection and treatment efficacy.

Inflammatory markers as prognostic markers in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), have been linked to the effectiveness of immunotherapy in multiple types of malignancies. We investigated how these inflammatory markers affect the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving immunotherapy.

Methods

The databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched up until March 26, 2024, to identify relevant literature. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from the eligible studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager and STATA 17.0 software to assess the impact of each indicator on prognosis. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity in the data.

Results

The analysis included sixteen studies with 1316 patients. A higher baseline NLR was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (pooled HR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.14-2.11, P=0.006) and progression-free survival (PFS) (pooled HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.21-2.10, P<0.05). Furthermore, a high NLR after immunotherapy was strongly correlated with poor OS (pooled HR: 5.43, 95% CI: 3.63-8.12, P<0.01). Additionally, higher baseline C-reactive CAR was significantly associated with worse OS (pooled HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.96-3.40, P<0.01).

Conclusion

The inflammatory markers NLR and CAR serve as effective prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy in patients with HNSCC. However, the practical application of clinical detection requires further validation through large-scale prospective studies to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.

Clinical Efficacy of Taxol Plus Platinum (TP) Chemotherapy Combined with Delayed Administration of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients with Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have become the first-line standard treatment for locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The evidence also demonstrates improved synergistic effects of chemotherapy when combined with delayed administration of ICIs. In this study, we conducted a retrospective investigation into the treatment efficacy of taxol plus platinum (TP) chemotherapy combined with delayed administration of PD-1 inhibitors for ESCC patients.

Patients and Methods

Clinical data of ESCC patients who received PD-1 inhibitors 3-5 days after TP chemotherapy as first-line treatment was retrospectively reviewed between January 2019 and April 2023. Clinical outcomes and treatment safety were analyzed. The potential roles of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were investigated.

Results

A total of 34 locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients received PD-1 inhibitors 3-5 days following TP chemotherapy were included. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 85.3% and 97.1% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13.2 and 19.1 month respectively. Seven patients received radical surgery, 1 patient achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) and 3 patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR). Among the 27 patients without surgery, the median PFS and OS were 9.7 and 19.1 month respectively. A more favorable prognosis was correlated with NLR less than 3 at the 3rd and 4th cycle of immunochemotherapy. No significant correlations between other parameters (PLR, MLR and PIV) and prognosis were observed. A total of 22 patients developed grade 3-4 toxicity events.

Conclusion

The optimized sequence of PD-1 inhibitors administered 3-5 days after TP chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ESCC demonstrated favorable treatment efficacy. Pretreatment NLR of less than 3 at the 3rd and 4th cycle of immunochemotherapy is associated with a better prognosis.

Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects

With one of the highest mortality rates of all malignancies, the 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is under 20%. Depending on the stage and extent of the disease, the current standard of care treatment paradigm includes chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical esophagogastrectomy, with consideration for adjuvant immunotherapy for residual disease. This regimen has high morbidity, due to anatomic changes inherent in surgery, the acuity of surgical complications, and off-target effects of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We begin with a review of current treatments, then discuss new and emerging targets for therapies and advanced drug delivery systems. Recent and ongoing preclinical and early clinical studies are evaluating traditional tumor targets (e.g., human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), as well as promising new targets such as Yes-associated protein 1 or mammalian target of rapamycin to develop new treatments for this disease. Due the function and location of the esophagus, opportunities also exist to pair these treatments with a drug delivery strategy to increase tumor targeting, bioavailability, and intratumor concentrations, with the two most common delivery platforms being stents and nanoparticles. Finally, early results with antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigenic receptor T cells show promise as upcoming therapies. This review discusses these innovations in therapeutics and drug delivery in the context of their successes and failures, with the goal of identifying those solutions that demonstrate the most promise to shift the paradigm in treating this deadly disease.

Progress in second-line antibody therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor. Although cytotoxic drugs have been widely used in advanced ESCC, several antibody agents have recently been reported to be effective.

AREAS COVERED

Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that improve immunosuppression by binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1), leading to an antitumor effect. Randomized phase III trials have found these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to be effective as second-line treatment. ATTRACTION-3, which compared nivolumab monotherapy with taxane monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced ESCC, reported prolonged overall survival in the nivolumab group. KEYNOTE-181 found that overall survival was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive ESCC who received second-line treatment with pembrolizumab than in those who received chemotherapy. Sym004 and amivantamab are antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of other tumors in recent phase I studies. Furthermore, clinical trials on antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin and DS-7300 for solid tumors are currently ongoing.

EXPERT OPINION

The standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC contain ICIs. Therefore, drugs with different mechanisms of action that can overcome resistance to ICIs are needed as second-line or later-line treatments to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Study on the predictive value of pretreatment peripheral blood inflammatory markers regarding immunotherapy in patients with inoperable advanced or locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of pretreatment peripheral blood panimmune-inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the efficacy and prognostic value of immunotherapy in patients with inoperable advanced or locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Clinical data of 107 inoperable advanced or locally advanced ESCC patients were retrospectively analysed between May 2019 and August 2023, the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of PIV, SII, NLR, and PLR in patients prior to immunotherapy were plotted, and their optimal cutoff values were determined. The risk factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses in groups based on the optimal cut-off values.

RESULTS

Peripheral blood PIV, SII and PLR before immunotherapy had predictive value for the optimal efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with inoperable advanced or locally advanced ESCC; patients with PIV ≥415.885, SII ≥834.295 and NLR ≥3.740 had a low objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), a short progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after immunotherapy (p < 0.05). Patient tumour stage, distant lymph node metastasis, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, PIV, SII, and NLR were risk factors affecting PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Tumour stage and SII were independent risk factors affecting PFS and OS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with inoperable advanced or locally advanced ESCC, peripheral blood PIV, SII, and NLR have predictive value for immunotherapy outcome, SII is an independent risk factor affecting the survival prognosis, and SII ≥834.295 suggests a poor prognosis from immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in prolonging overall survival (OS) as the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and were recommended by the guidelines. However, it remains uncertain which ICI is the most cost-effective. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ICIs as the second-line treatment for ESCC based on the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to obtain the Hazard ratios (HRs) for indirect comparisons. A three-state Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness. The state transition probabilities were calculated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves data from clinical trial and HRs from the NMA. Utilities and costs were derived from local charges or previously published studies. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to examine model robustness. The results were assessed based on the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Five clinical trials (ATTRACTION-3, ESCORT, KEYNOTE-181, ORIENT-2, RATIONALE-302) with a total of 1797 patients were included in the NMA. The NMA showed that both camrelizumab and tislelizumab received relatively high rankings for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Compared with sintilimab, treatment with tislelizumab and camrelizumab gained 0.018 and 0.034 additional QALYs, resulting in incremental ICERs of $75,472.65/QALY and $175,681.9/QALY, respectively. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab produced lower QALYs and greater costs, suggesting that both were dominated in comparison to sintilimab. HRs and health state utilities were the most influential parameters in most univariate sensitivity analyses of paired comparisons. PSA results suggested that sintilimab had an 84.4% chance of being the most cost-effective treatment regimen at the WTP threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. In the scenario analysis, sintilimab would no longer be cost-effective, if the price of camrelizumab was assumed to decrease by 64.6% or the price of tislelizumab was assumed to decrease by 16.9%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among the five potential competing ICIs, sintilimab was likely to be the most cost-effective regimen as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

Tumor niche network-defined subtypes predict immunotherapy response of esophageal squamous cell cancer

Despite the promising outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), resistance to ICI presents a new challenge. Therefore, selecting patients for specific ICI applications is crucial for maximizing therapeutic efficacy. Herein, we curated 69 human esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients' tumor microenvironment (TME) single-cell transcriptomic datasets to subtype ESCC. Integrative analyses of the cellular network and transcriptional signatures of T cells and myeloid cells define distinct ESCC subtypes characterized by T cell exhaustion, and interleukin (IL) and interferon (IFN) signaling. Furthermore, this approach classifies ESCC patients into ICI responders and non-responders, as validated by whole tumor transcriptomes and liquid biopsy-based single-cell transcriptomes of anti-PD-1 ICI responders and non-responders. Our study stratifies ESCC patients based on TME transcriptional network, providing novel insights into tumor niche remodeling and potentially predicting ICI responses in ESCC patients.

The risk of endocrine immune-related adverse events induced by PD-1 inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Endocrinopathies are the most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) observed during therapy with PD-1 inhibitors. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of immune-related endocrinopathies in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Methods

We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving PD-1 inhibitors, spanning from their inception to November 24, 2023. The comparative analysis encompassed patients undergoing chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or receiving placebo as control treatments. This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023488303).

Results

A total of 48 clinical trials comprising 24,514 patients were included. Compared with control groups, patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors showed an increased risk of immune-related adverse events, including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, diabetes mellitus, and adrenal insufficiency. Pembrolizumab was associated with an increased risk of all aforementioned endocrinopathies (hypothyroidism: RR=4.76, 95%CI: 3.55-6.39; hyperthyroidism: RR=9.69, 95%CI: 6.95-13.52; hypophysitis: RR=5.47, 95%CI: 2.73-10.97; thyroiditis: RR=5.95, 95%CI: 3.02-11.72; diabetes mellitus: RR=3.60, 95%CI: 1.65-7.88; adrenal insufficiency: RR=4.80, 95%CI: 2.60-8.88). Nivolumab was associated with an increased risk of hypothyroidism (RR=7.67, 95%CI: 5.00-11.75) and hyperthyroidism (RR=9.22, 95%CI: 4.71-18.04). Tislelizumab and sintilimab were associated with an increased risk of hypothyroidism (RR=19.07, 95%CI: 5.46-66.69 for tislelizumab and RR=18.36, 95%CI: 3.58-94.21 for sintilimab). For different tumor types, both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism were at high risks. Besides, patients with non-small cell lung cancer were at a higher risk of thyroiditis and adrenal insufficiency. Patients with melanoma were at a higher risk of hypophysitis and diabetes mellitus. Both low- and high-dose group increased risks of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism.

Conclusion

Risk of endocrine irAEs may vary in different PD-1 inhibitors and different tumor types. Increased awareness and understanding of the risk features of endocrine irAEs associated with PD-1 inhibitors is critical for clinicians.

Systematic review registration

crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023488303).

Case report: Robust response to sintilimab in advanced distal cholangiocarcinoma with PD-L1 expression and DNA damage repair

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly heterogeneous tumor that occurs in the bile duct epithelium; adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare pathological subtype of CCA. The clinical treatment of patients with metastatic distal CCA poses significant challenges. We report a 53-year-old female diagnosed with a stage III adenosquamous carcinomas of distal CCA. Metastasis occurred 4 months postoperatively and she was diagnosed with stage IV disease. The patient was treated with Gemcitabine + Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) and Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin (CAPEOX), followed by sintilimab monotherapy. After two cycles of treatment, the patient achieved partial response (PR) and the lesion continued to shrink. After 37 months of follow-up, the patient's liver metastasis had almost completely disappeared, and complete response (CR) was achieved. Moreover, she had more than 46 months of disease progression-free survival (PFS). Immunohistochemical testing showed high expression of PD-L1, and next-generation sequencing revealed the presence of mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the successful treatment of metastatic distal adenosquamous CCA with sintilimab alone. Remarkably, patients of CCA with high PD-L1 expression and DDR pathway gene mutations may benefit from sintilimab treatment.

Circulating tumor DNA serial monitoring of relapse and responses to tislelizumab immunotherapy as second‑line monotherapy for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study

Anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-monotherapy has become the second-line standard treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. However, new biomarkers are still needed to identify patients at risk of tumor progression and to select patients with advanced ESCC who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy. A total of 12 patients with advanced ESCC treated with tislelizumab were prospectively enrolled and endoscopic biopsy samples were collected. Plasma was obtained prior to and after every 2-3 treatment cycles with tislelizumab and when disease progression occurred. Targeted sequencing of 425 genes from plasma cell-free DNA, DNA from leukocytes and fixed esophageal tumor biopsies was performed. The patients underwent imaging analyses every 6-8 weeks until disease progression. The association between status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or changes in ctDNA following tislelizumab immunotherapy and response, tumor progression and survival was determined. All patients had evaluable next-generation sequencing results at the time of analysis. The results showed that patients with ESCC with liver metastasis had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (mPFS: 1.4 vs. 11.7 months; P=0.037). TSC complex subunit 2 [11.7 months vs. not reached (NR); P=0.004] and zinc finger protein 217 (11.7 months vs. NR; P=0.022) gene mutations were the independent and negative prognostic factors for median overall survival (OS), respectively. Of note, ctDNA dynamic changes expressed as ∆ mutant molecules per milliliter of plasma (∆MMPM; MMPM detected at the first monitoring time-point after the first infusion of tislelizumab as baseline MMPM) predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and OS more accurately compared to the ctDNA change of an individual gene. ∆MMPM <20% was an independent predictor of PFS (2.8 vs. 14.6 months; P=0.029), although there was no significant difference for OS (16.7 vs. 17.6 months; P=0.830). In conclusion, changes in ctDNA levels were associated with anti-tumor effects, progression and disease-specific survival. ctDNA sequencing is promising for predicting response and progression after tislelizumab immunotherapy as second-line monotherapy for advanced ESCC [the present study was part of the RATIONALE-302 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03430843; 29.01.2018)].

Risk and Incidence of Endocrine Immune-Related Adverse Effects Under Checkpoint Inhibitor Mono- or Combination Therapy in Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

CONTEXT

Few meta-analyses on incidence of endocrine immune-related adverse effects (eirAEs) have been published and many trials have been published since.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis with updated literature to assess risk and incidence of eirAEs of any grade and grade 3 to 5 by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or combination therapy in solid tumors.

METHODS

An electronic search using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) assessing eirAEs under ICI monotherapy or ICI combination therapy were selected. Stata software (v17) was used for statistical analyses and risk of bias was evaluated using Review Manager version 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 69 RCTs with 80 independent reports, involving 42 886 patients, were included in the study. Meta-analysis revealed the following pooled estimates for risk ratio and incidence, respectively: for any grade hypothyroidism 7.81 (95% CI, 5.68-10.74, P < .0001) and 7.64% (95% CI, 6.23-9.17, P < .0001); significantly increased also for hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis/hypopituitarism, and adrenal insufficiency; and for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus 1.52 (95% CI, 1.07-2.18, P = .02), and 0.087% (95% CI, 0.019-0.189, P = .0006), respectively. Meta-regression showed that combination of ICIs (nivolumab plus ipilimumab; durvalumab plus tremelimumab) is an independent risk factor for any grade hypophysitis/hypopituitarism, and that ICI agent is an independent factor of risk for adrenal insufficiency, but that cancer type is not an independent risk factor for eirAEs.

CONCLUSION

We showed that risk, independent from cancer type, and incidence of eirAEs are substantially increased with ICI therapy. Combination of ICIs increases risk for eirAEs, especially for hypophysitis/hypopituitarism.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by a rapid breath test

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy combination has shown remarkable advances in the management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the identification of a reliable biomarker for predicting the response to this chemo-immunotherapy regimen remains elusive. While computed tomography (CT) is widely utilized for response evaluation, its inherent limitations in terms of accuracy are well recognized. Therefore, in this study, we present a novel technique to predict the response of ESCC patients before receiving chemo-immunotherapy by testing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath.

METHODS

This study employed a prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation design. Patients' baseline breath samples were collected and analyzed using high-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS). Subsequently, patients were categorized as responders or non-responders based on the evaluation of therapeutic response using pathology (for patients who underwent surgery) or CT images (for patients who did not receive surgery).

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were included in this study, with 91 responders who achieved either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), and 42 non-responders who had stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). Among 83 participants who underwent both evaluations with CT and pathology, the paired t-test revealed significant differences between the two methods (p < 0.05). For the breath test prediction model using breath test data from all participants, the validation set demonstrated mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 ± 0.06. For 83 patients with pathological reports, the breath test achieved mean AUC of 0.845 ± 0.123.

CONCLUSIONS

Since CT has inherent weakness in hollow organ assessment and no other ideal biomarker has been found, our study provided a noninvasive, feasible, and inexpensive tool that could precisely predict ESCC patients' response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy combination using breath test based on HPPI-TOFMS.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Background

Recently, several novel programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been approved for second-line treating advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), including camrelizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab and tislelizumab. However, the optimal treatment regimen remained ambiguous.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety and economy of available PD-1 inhibitors to determine the optimal treatment from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.

Design

A systematic review and economic evaluation.

Data sources and methods

A systematic review was undertaken utilizing PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus databases to identify eligible studies until 31 August 2023. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). We also developed a partitioned survival model at 3-week intervals based on five clinical trials to predict long-term costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for various treatment options. Direct medical costs and utility values were obtained from public drug bidding databases, clinical trials or published literature. The parameter uncertainties within the model were determined via one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials involving 2837 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with other treatments examined, camrelizumab provided the best PFS benefits [hazard ratio (HR): 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.86], and pembrolizumab provided the best OS benefits (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37-0.82). Nivolumab caused a relatively lower incidence of treatment-related AEs (HR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05-0.20) and grade 3-5 AEs (HR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.08-0.21) than other immunotherapy regimens. In the economic evaluation, average 10-year costs ranged from $5,433.86 (chemotherapy) to $50,617.95 (nivolumab) and mean QALYs ranged from 0.55 (chemotherapy) to 0.82 (camrelizumab). Pembrolizumab was eliminated because of dominance. Of the remaining strategies, when the willingness-to-pay thresholds were 1, 2 and 3 times GDP per capita in 2022, sintilimab, tislelizumab and camrelizumab were the most cost-effective treatment options, respectively.

Conclusion

Sintilimab might be the optimal treatment alternative for second-line therapy of advanced OSCC in China, followed by tislelizumab and camrelizumab.

Trial registration

This study has been registered on the PROSPERO database with the registration number CRD42023495204.

Combined score based on plasma fibrinogen and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence has showed that inflammatory biomarkers, including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and fibrinogen can be used as predictors in the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study was to explore prognostic value of these biomarkers and evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of combined score based on plasma fibrinogen and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (F-PLR score).

METHODS

A total of 506 patients with ESCC were enrolled in this study. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of these markers and evaluate their prognostic significance. The relationship between factors with survival rates (including overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]) was explored by Kaplan-Meier curve, univariate analysis and multivariate cox hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Our result indicated that high F-PLR score was significantly associated with longer tumor length and deeper depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.01). The result of Cox multivariable analysis showed that F-PLR score was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.002) and DFS (p = 0.003). In addition, F-PLR score presented the greater c-index values for OS and DFS compared with NLR, PLR and fibrinogen level. Our result also showed that the c-index values for OS and DFS were both greater in TNM + F-PLR than those in TNM stage alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, F-PLR score is a predictive biomarker for prognosis in patients with ESCC.

Current state of the art: immunotherapy in esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer

Esophageal cancers have a high mortality rate and limited treatment options especially in the advanced/metastatic setting. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma are two distinct types of esophageal cancer. Esophageal SCC is more common in nonindustrialized countries with risk factors including smoking, alcohol use, and achalasia. Adenocarcinoma is the predominant esophageal cancer in developed nations, and risk factors include chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, and smoking. Chemotherapy has been the mainstay of therapy for decades until immunotherapy made its debut in the past few years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been tested in many studies now and are becoming an essential component of esophageal cancer treatment. Monoclonal antibodies that selectively inhibit programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) activity such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have become standard of care in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Several other anti-PD-1 antibodies like camrelizumab, toripalimab, sintilimab, trislelizumab are under investigation in different stages of clinical trials. Here we provide a comprehensive review of extant literature as well as ongoing trials with various combinations of chemotherapy or other targeted therapy with a focus on different histological subgroups of esophageal cancer and in different clinical settings.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China

Background

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, while maintaining an acceptable level of safety. But it's still unclear which strategy is the most cost-effective. The objective of the study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) versus chemotherapy alone.

Methods

A partitioned survival model with three states was constructed based on the RATIONALE-306 trial. The model's time horizon was ten years, and its cycle was three weeks. Only direct medical costs were considered from the healthcare perspective in China. Calculations were performed on total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to determine the uncertainty regarding model parameters.

Results

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy provided 1.35 QALYs for $26,450.77, while chemotherapy alone provided 0.89 QALY for $16,687.15. Compared to chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab had an ICER of $21,062.09/QALY. At the threshold of three times the Chinese GDP per capita ($38,253/QALY), the PSA indicated that tislelizumab had a 96.4% likelihood of being designated cost-effective. At the threshold of 1.5 times the Chinese GDP per capita ($19,126.5/QALY), the PSA indicated that tislelizumab had a probability of 48.7% of being designated cost-effective.

Conclusion

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC may be a cost-effective option compared to chemotherapy alone at 3 times Chinese GDP per capita.

Combine radiotherapy and immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) have improved the survival of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Radiotherapy is one of the common therapies to treat esophageal cancer. However, whether combination radiation therapy can increase the efficacy of immunotherapy is still up for debate. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy has proven to be a reliable and effective treatment for tumors, and it can work in combination with immunotherapy to achieve better anti-tumor effects. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to treat ESCC by stages as well as the optimum radiotherapy dose and target volume, with a summary of clinical trials in ESCC.

Deciphering transcriptomic determinants of the divergent link between PD-L1 and immunotherapy efficacy

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains the most widely used biomarker for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but its predictiveness varies considerably. Identification of factors accounting for the varying PD-L1 performance is urgently needed. Here, using data from three independent trials comprising 1239 patients, we have identified subsets of cancer with distinct PD-L1 predictiveness based on tumor transcriptome. In the Predictiveness-High (PH) group, PD-L1+ tumors show better overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with ICI than PD-L1- tumors across three trials. However, the Predictiveness-Low (PL) group demonstrates an opposite trend towards better outcomes for PD-L1- tumors. PD-L1+ tumors from the PH group demonstrate the superiority of ICI over chemotherapy, whereas PD-L1+ tumors from the PL group show comparable efficacy between two treatments or exhibit an opposite trend favoring chemotherapy. This observation of context-dependent predictiveness remains strong regardless of immune subtype (Immune-Enriched or Non-Immune), PD-L1 regulation mechanism (adaptative or constitutive), tumor mutation burden, or neoantigen load. This work illuminates avenues for optimizing the use of PD-L1 expression in clinical decision-making and trial design, although this exploratory concept should be further confirmed in large trials.

Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common aggressive malignant tumors in the digestive system with a severe epidemiological situation and poor prognosis. The early diagnostic rate of EC is low, and most EC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multiple multimodality treatments have gradually evolved into the main treatment for advanced EC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. And the emergence of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the survival of EC patients. This review highlights the latest advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for EC, discusses the efficacy and safety of relevant drugs, summarizes related important clinical trials, and tries to provide references for therapeutic strategy of EC.

The efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy is a new treatment option for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, no study has investigated the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) and platinum as first-line treatment for metastatic ESCC. In this retrospective study, eligible patients with metastatic ESCC were administered sintilimab plus Nab-PTX, cisplatin, or nedaplatin for up to 4 to 6 cycles. Subsequently, patients without progressive disease (PD) continued to receive sintilimab every 3 weeks as maintenance treatment until unacceptable toxicity, PD, withdrawal of consent, or for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. A total of 22 patients diagnosed with metastatic ESCC were enrolled, 1 patient reached a complete response (CR), 15 patients achieved a partial response (PR), 4 patients had stable disease, and 2 had PD. The ORR was 72.7% (16/22) and the DCR was 90.9% (20/22). The time to response was 1.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.7-2.2 months). The median PFS was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-10.7 months), and the median OS was 19.0 months. Exploratory biomarker analysis revealed that lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) was a potential marker for OS, and patients with high LDH levels had shorter mOS (13.0 months, 95% CI:7.5-18.5 months). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 21 patients (95.5%), most of which were grade 1 or 2. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. The results of this study suggested that sintilimab combined with Nab-PTX and platinum in patients with metastatic ESCC had a significantly high ORR and encouraging mPFS and mOS. LDH was a potential marker for OS, and the safety profile was manageable.

Developing a novel necroptosis-related signature to evaluate the prognostic and therapeutic characteristics of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic assessment and therapeutic interventions of esophageal cancer (ESCA) require novel molecular targets. The prognostic value of necroptosis, a specific mode of programmed cell death strongly linked to cancer progression, remains largely unexplored in ESCA. The primary goal of this research is to develop a necroptosis-based prognostic signature, which will represent the microenvironmental characteristics and prognosis of individuals diagnosed with ESCA.

METHODS

Transcriptome data of ESCA samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas were utilized to screen for necroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (NR-lncRNAs) and genes (NRGs). The research employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and univariate Cox regression analysis to identify prognostic candidates. Based on these analyses, a signature was developed in the training set and subsequently verified in the testing and entire sets. A clinicopathologic relevance assessment was carried out, after which a nomogram was established. The features of the immune microenvironment, functional pathways, mutational burden, checkpoint expression, and stemness of tumors were analyzed. Moreover, the sensitivity of individuals to immunotherapy and chemotherapy was compared for therapeutic guidance.

RESULTS

A necroptosis-associated signature comprising two genes and eleven lncRNAs was constructed. High-risk patients showed worse prognosis and clinicopathologic features, with more tumor-infiltrating naïve B cells, CD4+ memory resting T cells, and regulatory T cells. Furthermore, stromal and ESTIMATE scores were decreased along with increased stemness scores and tumor mutational burden in high-risk individuals. For the quantitative prediction of the outcomes of individuals, a nomogram was established. High-risk individuals showed greater sensitivity to immunotherapy while low-risk individuals benefited more from conventional chemotherapeutic or targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

A necroptosis-related prognostic signature was developed to study the tumor microenvironment, mutational burden, clinical features, and the treatment response of ESCA patients. This may contribute to precision medicine for ESCA.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: where are we and where are we going?

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a kind of malignant tumour with high invasiveness and a poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is a rapidly growing therapeutic method that activates and enhances anti-tumour immunity to treat patients with malignancy. Several clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of ICIs in the treatment of ESCC. ICIs have been approved for the treatment of patients with ESCC. However, only a subset of patients can obtain excellent benefits from ICI therapy. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response. In this review, we highlighted the predictive biomarkers for the prognosis of ESCC patients treated with ICIs and pointed out the existing problems and the direction of future research in this field.

HDS screening with patient-derived primary cells guided individualized therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-in vivo and vitro

Objective

To analyze and evaluate the role of the High-throughput Drug Sensitivity (HDS) screening strategy in identifying highly sensitive drugs against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A total of 80 patients with progressive ESCC were randomly divided into the observation (40 cases) and the control groups (40 cases). In the observation group, primary ESCC cells were isolated from the tumor tissues with a gastroscope, and drug sensitivity screening was performed on cells derived from the 40 ESCC cases using the HDS method, followed by verification in a patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) mouse model. Finally, the differences in the therapeutic efficacy (levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCCA after chemotherapy and the rates of overall survival, local progression, and distant metastasis at 12 months and 18 months time points after chemotherapy) were compared between the observation group (Screened drug-treated) and the control group (Paclitaxel combined with cisplatin regimen-treated).

Results

Forty ESCC patients were screened for nine different high-sensitive chemotherapeutics, with the majority showing sensitivity to Bortezomib. Experiments on animal models revealed that the tumor tissue mass of PDX mice treated with the HDS-screened drug was significantly lower than that of the Paclitaxel-treated mice (p < 0.05), and the therapeutic efficacy of the observation group was better than the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

HDS screening technology can be beneficial in screening high-efficacy anticancer drugs for advanced-stage ESCC patients, thereby minimizing adverse drug toxicity in critically ill patients. Moreover, this study provides a new avenue for treating advanced ESCC patients with improved outcomes.

Neoadjuvant adebrelimab in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 1b trial

Overall survival (OS) benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy remain elusive in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). Here, we reported the results of a phase 1b trial of neoadjuvant PD-L1 blockade with adebrelimab in resectable ESCC. Patients received two neoadjuvant doses of adebrelimab followed by surgery. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility; secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR) and OS. Our data showed the primary endpoints of safety and feasibility had been met. Common treatment-related adverse events were anorexia (32%) and fatigue (16%), without grade 3 or more adverse events. Of the 30 patients enrolled in the trial, 25 underwent successful resection without surgery delay and 24% had major pathologic responses including a pCR rate of 8%. The 2-year OS was 92%. Responsive patients had an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment phenotype, whereas nonresponsive patients had greater infiltration of cancer-associated fibroblasts at baseline. Clonotypic dynamics of pre-existing intratumoral T cells was a hallmark of responsive patients. These findings provide a rational for neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 monotherapy as a therapeutic strategy for patients with resectable ESCC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04215471 .

A combined immune prognostic index in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy

Background

Only a fraction of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) show tumor responses to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. The predictive value of single biomarkers for prognosis is limited, and a more comprehensive approach that incorporates multiple factors may improve the prognostic prediction. Here, we conducted a retrospective study to develop a combined immune prognostic index (CIPI) for predicting clinical outcomes of ESCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.

Design and methods

We performed a pooled analysis of two multicenter clinical trials comparing immunotherapy versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment in ESCC patients. The discovery cohort comprised patients who received anti-PD-1 inhibitors (N = 322) and the control cohort comprised patients who received chemotherapy (N = 307). The validation cohort included patients with pan-cancers treated with PD-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors, except for ESCC (N = 110). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the prediction value of variables on survival.

Results

In the discovery cohort, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, serum albumin, and liver metastasis were independently associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We integrated the three variables into CIPI and found that CIPI could categorize patients into four subgroups (CIPI 0 to CIPI 3) with distinct OS, PFS, and tumor responses. The CIPI was also predictive of clinical outcomes in the validation cohort, but not in the control cohort. Furthermore, patients with CIPI 0, CIPI 1, and CIPI 2 were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy than chemotherapy, while patients with CIPI 3 did not benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy over chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The CIPI score was a robust biomarker for prognostic prediction in ESCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy and was immunotherapy specific. The CIPI score may also be applicable for prognostic prediction in pan-cancers.

Sintilimab as maintenance treatment for local/regional recurrent esophageal squamous carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-arm Ib/II phase study

Background

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract that is usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), and/or surgery, according to disease status. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic strategies, local recurrence is frequently observed. However, there is no standard treatment or promising therapeutic approach for local recurrence or metastatic esophageal carcinoma after the RT. This study tended to investigate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for local/regional recurrent esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Methods

This study was a single-arm, phase Ib/II trial conducted in a single site in China. Patients previously radically treated (surgery or CCRT), histologically confirmed, local or regional recurrence esophageal squamous carcinoma, qualified for the study design, were treated with 25-28 times radiotherapy plus raltitrexed once every 3 weeks for up to two cycles. Patients who have not progressed after CCRT received sintilimab as maintenance once every 3 weeks up to 1 year. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR).

Results

Between September 2019 and March 2022, in a total of 36 enrolled patients, 34 pts completed CCRT. Three patients excluded due to violation of the exclusion criteria (1 pt) and consent withdrawal (2 pts). Finally, 33 pts were included in the final analysis, in which 3 pts had disease progression, and the remaining 30 entered maintenance therapy with sintilimab. The median follow-up time was 12.3 months. Median OS was 20.6 months (95%CI 10.5-NA) and the 1-year OS rate was 64%. Median PFS was 11.5 months (95%CI 5.29-21.3) and the 1-year PFS rate was 43.6%. The ORR was 63.6% (95%CI 44.6-77.8), including 2 cases of CR and 19 cases of PR. The DCR was 19.9%, the median DOR was 19.5 months, and the median TTR was 2.4 months. The rate of any grade TRAEs was 96.7%; ≥Grade 3 TRAE was 23.4%. The incidence of immune-related AE was 60%, most of which were grade 1-2, and only one case of thyroid-stimulating hormone increased was irAE with grade 3 or above.

Conclusion

Sintilimab has shown promising clinical efficacy and a manageable safety profile as maintenance therapy after CCRT for local/regional recurrent esophageal squamous carcinoma. In addition, further confirmation from a large-scale real-world study is still needed.

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced gastroesophageal cancer based on characteristics: a meta-analysis

Objective: Evaluate the potency of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients with different clinical features. Methods: Randomized, controlled trials comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy in individuals with gastroesophageal cancer were retrieved. Results: 15 trials involving 9194 individuals were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival (OS) but not progression-free survival. Significantly improved OS was observed in PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1, primary esophageal cancer, primary gastric cancer and Asian patients. Subgroup analysis revealed significant OS benefit achieved for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but not for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors improved OS in advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma, especially in patients with esophageal cancer. Race, primary tumor sites and PD-L1 combined positive score can be used to predict the potency of immune checkpoint inhibitors.