Phase 1 Clinical Results for NP10679, a pH-sensitive GluN2B-selective N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Inhibitor

NP10679 is a context-dependent and subunit-selective negative allosteric modulator of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. It is a more potent inhibitor of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors at the acidic levels of extracellular pH (eg, 6.9) found in the penumbral regions associated with cerebral ischemia than at physiological pH. This property allows NP10679 to act selectively in ischemic tissue while minimizing the nonselective blockade of NMDA receptors in healthy brain, thereby reducing on-target adverse effects. We report the results of a first-in-human pharmacokinetic and safety phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers receiving single or multiple doses of NP10679 (NCT04007263). We found that NP10679 was well-tolerated and with a half-life of 20 hours, which is amenable to once per day dosing. The only notable side effect in this clinical trial was modest somnolence at higher doses, atypical in that the subject could easily be aroused. The overall results suggest that NP10679 is a candidate for further development for use in acute brain injury, such as ischemic stroke or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, as well as for use in neuropsychiatric indications.

Pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine following single-dose intravenous and oral administration in non-fasted adult horses

Diphenhydramine is an H1 receptor antagonist used to control urticaria and other allergic signs caused by type I hypersensitivity reactions in horses (Equus caballus). Limited studies have been conducted on pharmacokinetics of this drug in horses, with no studies involving oral formulations. Our study investigated pharmacokinetics of an oral diphenhydramine formulation compared to intravenous administration in non-fasted adult horses. Six healthy horses underwent a single administration of three different doses of diphenhydramine (1 mg/kg intravenously, 1 mg/kg intragastrically, and 5 mg/kg intragastrically) with a two-week washout period between doses. Bioavailability of intragastric diphenhydramine was less than one percent and six percent for 1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg intragastric doses, respectively. This poor bioavailability is similar to what is reported in dogs. Two of six horses experienced transient side effects after intravenous diphenhydramine administration, emphasizing the need for determining therapeutic plasma levels in efforts to determine the lowest effective dose minimizing risk of adverse effects. The main conclusion of our study was that oral diphenhydramine at doses up to 5 mg/kg are unlikely to achieve therapeutic plasma levels in adult horses.

In Vivo Receptor Visualization and Evaluation of Receptor Occupancy with Positron Emission Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is useful for noninvasive in vivo visualization of disease-related receptors, for evaluation of receptor occupancy to determine an appropriate drug dosage, and for proof-of-concept of drug candidates in translational research. For these purposes, the specificity of the PET tracer for the target receptor is critical. Here, we review work in this area, focusing on the chemical structures of reported PET tracers, their K_i/K_d values, and the physical properties relevant to target receptor selectivity. Among these physical properties, such as cLogP, cLogD, molecular weight, topological polar surface area, number of hydrogen bond donors, and pK_a, we focus especially on LogD and LogP as important physical properties that can be easily compared across a range of studies. We discuss the success of PET tracers in evaluating receptor occupancy and consider likely future developments in the field.

Role of histamine H1-receptor on behavioral states and wake maintenance during deficiency of a brain activating system: A study using a knockout mouse model

Using knockout (KO) mice lacking the histamine (HA)-synthesizing enzyme (histidine decarboxylase, HDC), we have previously shown the importance of histaminergic neurons in maintaining wakefulness (W) under behavioral challenges. Since the central actions of HA are mediated by several receptor subtypes, it remains to be determined which one(s) could be responsible for such a role. We have therefore compared the cortical-EEG, sleep and W under baseline conditions or behavioral/pharmacological stimuli in littermate wild-type (WT) and H1-receptor KO (H1-/-) mice. We found that H1-/- mice shared several characteristics with HDC KO mice, i.e. 1) a decrease in W after lights-off despite its normal baseline daily amount; 2) a decreased EEG slow wave sleep (SWS)/W power ratio; 3) inability to maintain W in response to behavioral challenges demonstrated by a decreased sleep latency when facing various stimuli. These effects were mediated by central H1-receptors. Indeed, in WT mice, injection of triprolidine, a brain-penetrating H1-receptor antagonist increased SWS, whereas ciproxifan (H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist) elicited W; all these injections had no effect in H1-/- mice. Finally, H1-/- mice showed markedly greater changes in EEG power (notably in the 0.8-5 Hz band) and sleep-wake cycle than in WT mice after application of a cholinergic antagonist or an indirect agonist, i.e., scopolamine or physostigmine. Hence, the role of HA in wake-promotion is largely ensured by H1-receptors. An upregulated cholinergic system may account for a quasi-normal daily amount of W in HDC or H1-receptor KO mice and likely constitutes a major compensatory mechanism when the brain is facing deficiency of an activating system. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Histamine Receptors'.

Histamine H1 receptor antagonist cetirizine impairs working memory processing speed, but not episodic memory

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The histaminergic neurotransmitter system is currently under investigation as a target for drug treatment of cognitive deficits in clinical disorders. The therapeutic potential of new drugs may initially be screened using a model of histaminergic dysfunction, for example, as associated with the use of centrally active antihistamines. Of the selective second generation antihistamines, cetirizine has been found to have central nervous system effects. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cetirizine can be used as a tool to model cognitive deficits associated with histaminergic hypofunction.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The study was conducted according to a three-way, double-blind, cross-over design. Treatments were single oral doses of cetirizine 10 and 20 mg and placebo. Effects on cognition were assessed using tests of word learning, memory scanning, vigilance, divided attention, tracking and visual information processing speed.

KEY RESULTS

Cetirizine 10 mg impaired tracking performance and both doses impaired memory scanning speed. None of the other measures indicated impaired performance.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Cetirizine affects information processing speed, but these effects were not sufficient to serve as a model for cognitive deficits in clinical disorders.

Transporter-mediated Efflux Influences CNS Side Effects: ABCB1, from Antitarget to Target

We examined the relationship between sedation and orthostatic hypotension, two central side effects and ABCB1 transporter-mediated efflux for a set of 64 launched drugs that are documented as histamine H1 receptor antagonists. This relationship was placed in the context of passive diffusion (estimated using LogP, the octanol/water partition coefficient), receptor affinity, and the adjusted therapeutic daily dose, in order to account for side effect variability. Within this set, CNS permeability was not dependent on passive diffusion, as no significant differences were found for LogP and its pH-corrected equivalent, LogD(74). Sedation and orthostatic hypotension can be explained within the framework of ABCB1-mediated efflux and adjusted dose, while target potency has less influence. ABCB1, an antitarget for anti-cancer agents, acts in fact as a drug target for non-sedating antihistamines. An empirical set of rules, based on the incidence of these two side-effects, target affinity and dose was used to predict efflux effects for a number of drugs. Among them, azelastine and mizolastine are predicted to be effluxed via ABCB1-mediated transport, whereas aripiprazole, clozapine, cyproheptadine, iloperidone, olanzapine, and ziprasidone are likely to be non-effluxed.

Dose dependency of brain histamine H(1) receptor occupancy following oral administration of cetirizine hydrochloride measured using PET with [11C]doxepin

AIMS

The strength of sedation due to antihistamines can be evaluated using positron emission tomography (PET). The purpose of the present study is to measure histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) occupancy following oral administration of cetirizine (10 and 20 mg) in order to examine dose dependency.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy male volunteers (age range, 20-35 years) were divided into 3 subgroups and were studied following single oral administration of cetirizine at 10 mg (n = 5) and 20 mg (n = 5) or hydroxyzine at 30 mg (n = 5) using PET with 11C-doxepin. Each subject was scanned also following the administration of placebo. Binding potential and H(1)RO values were calculated in the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Subjective sleepiness was also measured, and the correlation to H(1)RO was examined for each antihistamine.

RESULTS

The averaged H(1)ROs of cetirizine 10 mg, 20 mg, and hydroxyzine 30 mg in the prefrontal and cingulate cortices was 12.6%, 25.2%, and 67.6%, respectively. The H(1)RO of hydroxyzine 30 mg correlated well with subjective sleepiness (p < 0.001); however, those of cetirizine 10 and 20 mg showed no correlation with subjective sleepiness.

CONCLUSION

It was demonstrated that the brain penetration of orally administered cetirizine was dose-dependent. Cetirizine 10 mg, with its low H(1)RO and thus minimal sedation, could be more safely used than cetirizine 20 mg for the treatment of various allergic disorders.

Increased brain histamine H1 receptor binding in patients with anorexia nervosa

BACKGROUND

The central histaminergic neuron system modulates various brain functions, including eating behavior. We hypothesized that women have higher density of histamine H1 receptor (H1R) in the limbic system than men and that the density of central H1R is increased in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN).

METHODS

Subjects were 12 female AN patients, 12 healthy female subjects, and 11 healthy male subjects. Positron emission tomography with H1R radioligand [(11)C]doxepin was performed on all subjects and regions of interest based analysis was conducted to evaluate brain H1R binding potential (BP). Abnormal eating behavior, depression, and anxiety of subjects were evaluated using the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), respectively.

RESULTS

Binding potential of [(11)C]doxepin in female subjects was significantly higher than that in male subjects at the following brain sites: amygdala, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and temporal cortex. Anorexia nervosa patients showed significantly higher BP of [(11)C]doxepin in the amygdala and lentiform nucleus than the control female subjects. In AN patients, BP of [(11)C]doxepin in the amygdala and thalamus negatively correlated with EAT-26 scores. There was a significant negative correlation between BP of [(11)C]doxepin and SDS or STAI scores in the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex of AN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the hypothesis that women have higher H1R density in the limbic system than men and suggest that AN patients may have higher expression of H1R in the limbic brain, particularly in the amygdala.

Evaluation of efficacy and sedative profiles of H(1) antihistamines by large-scale surveillance using the visual analogue scale (VAS)

BACKGROUND

H(1) antihistamines are widely used as therapeutics for allergic diseases. Sedation is a well-known side effect of H(1) antihistamines and sometimes it is life-threatening for patients. Thus it is important to evaluate the sedative properties of H(1) antihistamines to avoid side effects. For this purpose, histamine H(1) receptor (H1R) occupancy and proportional impairment ratios (PIR) are now being used. However, it is not easy to obtain these parameters. Here, we sought to evaluate the sedative properties of H(1) antihistamines by means of a large-scale surveillance at health insurance pharmacies.

METHODS

The survey was conducted at 37 health insurance pharmacies. The therapeutic efficacy and the degree of sleepiness were quantified through a questionnaire using the visual analog scale (VAS) directly from 1742 patients who received H(1) antihistamines.

RESULTS

The degree of sleepiness caused by the first-generation antihistamines was significantly higher than that of the second-generation antihistamines. The high VAS score in case of efficacy was found in d-chlorpheniramine, olopatadine, and ebastine. Among the mean values of efficacy, all second-generation antihistamines except for loratadine, bepotastine, and mequitazine were significantly higher than that of clemastine. Regarding the degree of sleepiness, clemastine scored the highest VAS score, and significantly lower scores were obtained in all second-generation antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONS

The sedative properties of the H(1) antihistamines obtained from VAS analysis were very similar to those of H1R occupancy from positron emission tomography (PET) studies and PIR from meta-analysis. Our results indicate that large-scale surveillance using VAS might be useful to evaluate the profiles of H(1) antihistamines.

Cardiotoxic effects of antihistamines: from basics to clinics (...and back)

Drug-induced arrhythmias, particularly those caused by a prolonged QT interval, have become a critical safety issue for compound selection during development by pharmaceutical companies and for health care regulators. The last two decades have witnessed enormous progress in the definition of the clinical conditions that facilitate the occurrence of such serious adverse effects, of its molecular basis, and in the preclinical strategies aimed at early identification of the cardiotoxic liability of compounds undergoing investigation or already used in the clinic. Moreover, despite the fact that acquired factors play an obvious role in drug-induced arrhythmias, it has become evident that the disease is often manifested upon the interaction of strong environmental stressors with specific genetic determinants of the affected individuals; in that sense, few examples can illustrate the existing interaction between acquired and genetic factors in disease manifestation better than drug-induced arrhythmogenesis. Progress in this field has been mainly driven by a strong interaction among various disciplines, including medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, electrophysiology, molecular genetics, and clinical cardiology; such an interdisciplinary approach has often generated unexpected discoveries of great clinical value, allowing clinicians to drive drug selection toward compounds of proven efficacy and safety. Historically, studies on antihistamines have paved the way for much of our current understanding of the mechanisms and problems associated with QT prolongation and drug-induced arrhythmogenesis; therefore, in this perspective, we will attempt to summarize how basic research studies have helped the interpretation of clinically relevant phenomena (from basics to clinics...) and how this information has prompted new emphasis in preclinical studies aimed at predicting the cardiotoxic potential of compounds (...and back). The current availability of several strategies provided with great predictive potential, together with an increased awareness of physicians, pharmaceutical industries, and health care regulators to this potentially serious cardiovascular side effect, has significantly decreased the risk associated with drug-induced arrhythmias caused by drugs newly introduced into the market; nevertheless, given the large number of cases of QT prolongation still occurring during treatment with a wide variety of congeners, it seems appropriate to review the issue of the cardiotoxic actions of antihistamines, as a better comprehension of the underlying mechanisms and risk factors is likely to contribute to the improvement of the risk/benefit ratio for pharmacological treatment in several therapeutic areas.

Effects of a sedative antihistamine, D-chlorpheniramine, on regional cerebral perfusion and performance during simulated car driving

OBJECTIVES

The sedative side effects of antihistamines have been recognized to be potentially dangerous in car driving, but the mechanism underlying these effects has not yet been elucidated to date. The aim of the present study is to examine regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) responses during a simulated car-driving task following oral administration of D-chlorpheniramine using positron emission tomography (PET) and [15O]H2O, based on a single-blind cross-over study-design.

METHODS

Right-handed, healthy male volunteers (n = 14) drove a car in a simulated environment following oral administration of D-chlorpheniramine repetab 6 mg or placebo. Their rCBF was measured using PET with [15O]H2O in the following three conditions: (1) resting, (2) active driving, and (3) passive driving. All 'in-car' views during the simulated driving were videotaped and used for rating driving performance.

RESULTS

Performance evaluation revealed that the number of lane deviations significantly increased in the D-chlorpheniramine condition compared with the placebo condition (p < 0.01). Subjective sleepiness was not significantly different between the two drug conditions. The regions of diminished brain responses following D-chlorpheniramine treatment were detected in the parietal, temporal and visual cortices, and in the cerebellum. The regions of augmented rCBF responses were found in the orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellar vermis.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that D-chlorpheniramine tends to suppress visuo-spatial cognition and visuo-motor coordinating functions rather than attention and motor functions during car driving.

Effects of sedative and non-sedative H1 antagonists on cognitive tasks: behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) examinations

RATIONALE

It is well known that the newer H1-receptor antagonists elicit better performance of working memory and selective attention relative to the first generation drugs in this class. However, the neural correlates of the poorer performance associated with first-generation H1-receptor antagonists remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the effects of first- and second-generation H1-receptor antagonists on neural correlates of cognitive tasks using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a novel method of brain imaging suitable for psychological experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured the NIRS responses of 12 healthy volunteer subjects during the performance of working memory, selective attention, and visual perception tasks, 3 h after taking a first-generation antagonist (ketotifen), second-generation antagonist (epinastine), or placebo. We also measured subjective sleepiness by visual analogue scale (VAS) test.

RESULTS

Cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal region increased during the performance of working memory and selective attention tasks in subjects receiving epinastine and placebo but not in those who took ketotifen. No significant difference was observed at the occipital region in the visual perception task among the three drug groups. VAS score and the behavioral performance during working memory and visual perception tasks indicated sedative effects of ketotifen consistent with the findings of previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the neural response for working memory and selective attention task was impaired by the administration of ketotifen in comparison with that of epinastine and placebo. The sedative effect in the neural response was not observed after epinastine administration.

Peripheral and central H1 histamine receptor occupancy by levocetirizine, a non-sedating antihistamine; a time course study in the guinea pig

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The H(1) receptor occupancy (H1RO) in brain is an indicator of central side effects of antihistamines. Here, we determined the kinetics of central and peripheral H1RO by levocetirizine in relation to its brain and plasma concentration, and investigated the role of the blood-brain barrier in any delay in brain H1RO.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Concentration-time profiles in plasma and brain were obtained after 0.1 and 1 mg kg(-1) oral doses of levocetirizine in guinea pigs. H1RO in brain was measured ex vivo using [3H]-mepyramine and, in the periphery, by measuring the degree of inhibition of histamine-induced contractions of isolated guinea pig ileum.

KEY RESULTS

The concentration-time profile of levocetirizine indicated lower levels (partition coefficient, K(p)=0.06-0.08), higher t(max) (2-4 h vs 1-1.5 h) and longer terminal half-life (4-5.6 h vs 2.1-2.8 h) in brain than plasma. The H1RO at 0.1 and 1 mg kg(-1) were 75% and 97%, respectively, at 1 hr in the periphery and, in the brain, were <20% and 28-67% respectively, at all time points studied. Brain H1RO vs plasma concentrations profile showed a delay, but not when compared to brain concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrates an effective peripheral antihistamine effect of levocetirizine without central adverse effects at the dose close to human therapeutic dose. The slow increase in H1RO in the brain with time was caused by slow blood-brain barrier transport of levocetirizine. This demonstrates the importance of measuring time course of brain H1RO in relation to brain concentrations of drugs.

Histamine H1 receptor involvement in prepulse inhibition and memory function: relevance for the antipsychotic actions of clozapine

Histamine H(1) blockade is one of the more prominent actions of the multi-receptor acting antipsychotic clozapine. It is currently not known how much this H(1) antagonism of clozapine contributes to the therapeutic or adverse side effects of clozapine. The current studies with Sprague-Dawley rats were conducted to determine the participation of histaminergic H(1) receptor subtype in sensorimotor plasticity and memory function affected by clozapine using tests of prepulse inhibition (PPI) and radial-arm maze choice accuracy. The PPI impairment caused by the glutamate antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) was significantly attenuated by clozapine. In the current project, we found that the selective H(1) antagonist pyrilamine also reversed the dizocilpine-induced impairment in PPI of tactile startle with an auditory prepulse. In the radial-arm maze (RAM), pyrilamine, like clozapine, impaired working memory and caused a significant dose-related slowing of response. Pyrilamine, however, decreased the number of reference memory errors. We have previously shown that nicotine effectively attenuates the clozapine-induced working memory impairment, but in the current study, nicotine did not significantly alter the effects of pyrilamine on the RAM. In summary, the therapeutic effect of clozapine in reversing PPI impairment was mimicked by the H(1) antagonist pyrilamine, while pyrilamine had a mixed effect on cognition. Pyrilamine impaired working memory but improved reference memory in rats. Thus, H(1) antagonism seems to play a role in part of the beneficial actions of antipsychotics, such as clozapine.

The physiological and pathophysiological roles of neuronal histamine: an insight from human positron emission tomography studies

Histamine neurons are exclusively located in the posterior hypothalamus, and project their fibers to almost all regions of the human brain. Although a significant amount of research has been done to clarify the functions of the histaminergic neuron system in animals, a few studies have been reported on the roles of this system in the human brain. In past studies, we have been able to clarify some of the functions of histamine neurons using different methods, such as histamine-related gene knockout mice or human positron emission tomography (PET). The histaminergic neuron system is known to modulate wakefulness, the sleep-wake cycle, appetite control, learning, memory and emotion. Accordingly we have proposed that histamine neurons have a dual effect on the CNS, with both stimulatory and suppressive actions. As a stimulator, neuronal histamine is one of the most important systems that stimulate and maintain wakefulness. Brain histamine also functions as a suppressor in bioprotection against various noxious and unfavorable stimuli of convulsion, drug sensitization, denervation supersensitivity, ischemic lesions and stress susceptibility. This review summarizes our works on the functions of histamine neurons using human PET studies, including the development of radiolabeled tracers for histamine H1 receptors (H1R: (11)C-doxepin and (11)C-pyrilamine), PET measurements of H1R in depression, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and studies on the sedative effects of antihistamines using H(2)(15)O and H1R occupancy in the human brain. These molecular and functional PET studies in humans are useful for drug development in this millennium.

Brain histamine H receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines measured by positron emission tomography with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design in healthy subjects: a comparison of olopatadine and ketotifen

AIMS

The strength of sedation due to antihistamines can be evaluated by using positron emission tomography (PET). The purpose of the present study is to measure histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) occupancy due to olopatadine, a new second-generation antihistamine and to compare it with that of ketotifen.

METHODS

Eight healthy males (mean age 23.5 years-old) were studied following single oral administration of olopatadine 5 mg or ketotifen 1 mg using PET with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design. Binding potential ratio and H(1)R occupancy were calculated and were compared between olopatadine and ketotifen in the medial prefrontal (MPFC), dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), anterior cingulate (ACC), insular (IC), temporal (TC), parietal (PC), occipital cortices (OC). Plasma drug concentration was measured, and correlation of AUC to H(1)R occupancy was examined.

RESULTS

H(1)R occupancy after olopatadine treatment was significantly lower than that after ketotifen treatment in the all cortical regions (P < 0.001). Mean H(1)R occupancies for olopatadine and ketotifen were, respectively: MPFC, 16.7 vs. 77.7; DLPFC, 14.1 vs. 85.9; ACC, 14.7 vs. 76.1; IC, 12.8 vs. 69.7; TC, 12.5 vs. 66.5; PC, 13.9 vs. 65.8; and OC, 19.5 vs. 60.6. Overall cortical mean H(1)R occupancy of olopatadine and ketotifen were 15% and 72%, respectively. H(1)R occupancy of both drugs correlated well with their respective drug plasma concentrations (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that 5 mg oral olopatadine, with its low H(1)R occupancy and thus minimal sedation, could safely be used an antiallergic treatment for various allergic disorders. Abbreviations histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R), histamine H(1) receptor occupancy (H(1)RO), dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R), positron emission tomography (PET), blood-brain barrier (BBB), binding potential ratio (BPR), distribution volume (DV).

EFFECT OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN ON INTESTINAL ABSORPTION AND BRAIN PENETRATION OF ANTIALLERGIC AGENT BEPOTASTINE BESILATE

The antiallergic agent bepotastine besilate is a nonsedating, second-generation H1-antagonist with high oral absorption and negligible distribution into brain. To clarify the role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the pharmacokinetics of bepotastine, intestinal absorption and brain penetration studies were performed. [(14)C]Bepotastine transport in P-gp-overexpressed LLC-PK1 cells indicated that bepotastine was a substrate of P-gp. The affinity of bepotastine to P-gp estimated by ATPase activity assay was low, with a K(m) value of 1.25 mM. After i.v. administration, the brain/plasma free concentration ratio in mdr1-knockout mice was 3 times higher than that in wild-type mice. The in situ intestinal absorption studies of [(14)C]bepotastine in rats showed a clear regional difference, showing highest permeability at the upper part of small intestine with a decreasing permeability in the descending part of small intestine. The apparent absorption rate constant (ka) of [(14)C]bepotastine in the small intestine was greatly increased by cyclosporin A and verapamil, especially in the distal portion, and the site-specific absorption of [(14)C]bepotastine disappeared. The concentration dependence of ka of [(14)C]bepotastine was observed with a higher ka at higher concentration (20 mM) compared with that at lower concentration (1 microM). In conclusion, bepotastine is a substrate for P-gp, and P-gp clearly limited the brain distribution of bepotastine, whereas the effect of P-gp on intestinal absorption of bepotastine was minimal, presumably because of high membrane permeability at the upper region of small intestine where P-gp is less expressed. Such intestinal absorption property of bepotastine is distinctly different from the low membrane-permeable P-gp substrate fexofenadine.

Effects of fexofenadine and hydroxyzine on brake reaction time during car-driving with cellular phone use

Antihistamines are a mainstay treatment for allergic rhinitis; however, many older agents cause adverse events, including sedation and central nervous system (CNS) impairment. Research has shown sedating effects of antihistamines on driving; currently, no known study has examined whether cellular phone usage while driving further compounds impairment in individuals administered antihistamines. The aim of this study was to examine this endpoint. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study, healthy volunteers received fexofenadine HCl 120 mg, hydroxyzine HCl 30 mg and placebo. Brake reaction time (BRT) was used to examine driving performance across four conditions: driving only; driving while completing simple calculations; complex calculations; and conversing on a cellular phone. Subjective sedation assessments were also conducted. Brake reaction time with and without cellular phone usage in fexofenadine-treated subjects did not differ significantly from placebo in any condition. In contrast, hydroxyzine-treated subjects were significantly more sedated and had slower BRTs, suggesting slower hazard recognition and brake application, compared with the fexofenadine and placebo groups in all conditions. Importantly, cellular phone operation was an additive factor, increasing BRTs in hydroxyzine-treated volunteers. Fexofenadine did not impair CNS function in subjects involved in a divided attention task of driving and cellular phone operation.

Use of reference tissue models for quantification of histamine H1 receptors in human brain by using positron emission tomography and [11C]doxepin

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the validity of the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) and of Logan graphical analysis with reference tissue (LGAR) for quantification of histamine H1 receptors (H1Rs) by using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]doxepin. These model-based analytic methods (SRTM and LGAR) are compared to Logan graphical analysis (LGA) and to the one-tissue model (1TM), using complete datasets obtained from 5 healthy volunteers. Since HIR concentration in the cerebellum can be regarded as negligibly small, the cerebellum was selected as the reference tissue in the present study. The comparison of binding potential (BP) values estimated by LGAR and 1TM showed good agreement; on the other hand, SRTM turned out to be unstable concerning parameter estimation in several regions of the brain. By including the results of noise analysis, LGAR became a reliable method for parameter estimation of [11C]doxepin data in the cortical regions.

Central effects of fexofenadine and cetirizine: measurement of psychomotor performance, subjective sleepiness, and brain histamine H1-receptor occupancy using 11C-doxepin positron emission tomography

Histamine H1-receptor (H1R) antagonists, or antihistamines, often induce sedative side effects when used for the treatment of allergic disorders. This study compared the sedative profiles of the second-generation antihistamines, fexofenadine and cetirizine, using 3 different criteria: subjective sleepiness evaluated by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale, objective psychomotor tests (simple and choice reaction time tests and visual discrimination tests at 4 different exposure durations), and measurement of histamine H1-receptor occupancy (H1RO) in the brain. Subjective sleepiness and psychomotor performance were measured in 20 healthy Japanese volunteers at baseline and 90 min after administration of fexofenadine 120 mg or cetirizine 20 mg in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Hydroxyzine 30 mg was included as a positive control. H1RO was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) with (11)C-doxepin in 12 of the 20 subjects, and a further 11 volunteers were recruited to act as controls. In psychomotor tests, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo and significantly less impairing than cetirizine on some tasks, as well as significantly less impairing than hydroxyzine on all tasks. For subjective sleepiness, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo, whereas cetirizine showed a trend toward increased sleepiness compared with fexofenadine and placebo. H1RO was negligible with fexofenadine (-0.1%) but moderately high with cetirizine (26.0%). In conclusion, fexofenadine 120 mg is distinguishable from cetirizine 20 mg, as assessed by H1RO and psychomotor testing.

Identification of human p450 isoforms involved in the metabolism of the antiallergic drug, oxatomide, and its inhibitory effect on enzyme activity

Oxatomide is an antiallergic drug used for the treatment of diseases mediated by type I allergy. Recently, it has been reported that terfenadine and astemizole, which have antiallergic actions similar to those of oxatomide, show side effects on the cardiovascular system, such as QT prolongation, ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest. This might be because concomitant drugs such as itraconazole inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), the enzyme responsible for degradation of terfenadine and astemizole, and thus the blood concentrations of the drugs are abnormally increased. On the other hand, isoforms of P450 involved in the metabolism of oxatomide have not been clarified. Therefore, we attempted to identify these isoforms using microsome preparations of in vitro expression systems derived from a human lymphoblastoid cell line. Oxatomide was metabolized by CYP2D6-Val and CYP3A4, but not by CYP1A2, CYP2C9-Arg, CYP2C9-Cys or CYP2C19. We also examined whether oxatomide showed inhibitory effects on metabolic activity of individual P450 isozymes using model substrates for each isozyme. Oxatomide did not inhibit the metabolism of the model substrates for CYP1A2, CYP2C9-Arg, CYP2C9-Cys and CYP2C19, but inhibited the degradation of those for CYP2D6-Val and CYP3A4. It was found that oxatomide is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes, and simultaneously acts as an inhibitor for these isoforms, responsible for the metabolism of the drug itself.

Transporter-mediated drug delivery: recent progress and experimental approaches

A comprehensive list of drug transporters has recently become available as a result of extensive genome analysis, as well as membrane physiology and molecular biology studies. This review covers recent progress in identification and characterization of drug transporters, illustrative cases of successful drug delivery to, or exclusion from, target organs via transporters, and novel experimental approaches to therapeutics using heterologously transduced transporters in tissues. We aim to provide clues that could lead to efficient strategies for the use of transporters to deliver drugs and/or to optimize lead compounds.

Evaluation of in vivo selective binding of [11C]doxepin to histamine H1 receptors in five animal species

The specific binding of [(11)C]doxepin, which has been used as a radioligand for mapping histamine H(1) receptors in human brain by positron emission tomography, was evaluated in five animal species. In mice the [(11)C]doxepin uptake was reduced by treatment with cold doxepin and two H(1) receptor antagonists, but not with H(2)/H(3) antagonists. The specific binding evaluated with treatment with (+)-chlorpheniramine (H(1) antagonist) was in the range of 10-30% in mouse, rat, rabbit, and monkey, but was not detected in guinea pig.

A dose-ranging study of the effects of mequitazine on actual driving, memory and psychomotor performance as compared to dexchlorpheniramine, cetirizine and placebo

BACKGROUND

Mequitazine is a so-called 'non-sedative' second-generation antihistamine even though it has never been firmly established that this drug's sedative potential actually differs from that of the 'sedative' first-generation antihistamines.

OBJECTIVE

The present study compares the sedative effects of three doses of mequitazine on actual driving, psychomotor performance and memory with those of a first- and a second-generation antihistamine.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers received on separate days a single dose of 5, 10 and 15 mg mequitazine, 10 mg cetirizine, 6 mg dexchlorpheniramine and placebo. Drug effects were assessed using two actual driving tests (highway-driving test and car-following test), cognitive and psychometric tests (tracking, divided attention, memory, reasoning and critical flicker fusion), pupil size and questionnaires.

RESULTS

Highway-driving data revealed an overall effect of Treatment on the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Dexchlorpheniramine impaired driving performance as indicated by a significant rise in SDLP. Mequitazine significantly increased SDLP in a dose-related manner, but the separate dose effects failed to reach statistical significance. Divided attention performance was also affected by Treatment. Reaction time (RT) during mequitazine treatments increased in a dose-related manner and significantly differed from placebo at the highest dose. Subjects reported to be less alert after treatment with dexchlorpheniramine. Cetirizine did not affect performance in any of the tasks.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that mequitazine is mildly sedating. The effects of mequitazine are comparable to those of other second-generation antihistamines, in that it causes mild driving impairment, particularly at higher doses.

Waking selective neurons in the posterior hypothalamus and their response to histamine H3-receptor ligands: an electrophysiological study in freely moving cats

Neurons which discharge selectively during waking (waking selective) have been found in the tuberomamillary nucleus (TM) and adjacent areas of the posterior hypothalamus. Although they share some electrophysiological properties with aminergic neurons, there is no direct evidence that they are histaminergic. We have recorded from posterior hypothalamic neurons during the sleep-wake cycle in freely moving cats, and investigated the effects on waking selective neurons of specific ligands of histaminergic H3-receptors, which autoregulate the activity of histaminergic neurons. Two types of neurons were seen. Waking selective neurons, termed "waking-on (W-on)," were located exclusively within the TM and adjacent areas, and discharged at a low regular rate during waking (1.71-2.97 Hz), decreased firing during light slow wave sleep (SWS), became silent during deep SWS and paradoxical sleep (PS) and resumed their activity on, or a few seconds before, awakening. "Waking-related" neurons, located in an area dorsal to the TM, displayed a similar, although less regular, low rate of firing (1.74-5.41 Hz) and a similar discharge profile during the sleep-wake cycle; however, unlike "W-on" neurons, they did not completely stop firing during deep SWS and PS. Intramuscular (i.m.) injection of ciproxifan (an H3-receptor antagonist, 1mg/kg), significantly increased the discharge rate of W-on neurons and induced c-fos expression in histamine-immunoreactive neurons, whereas i.m. injection of imetit (an H3-receptor agonist, 1mg/kg) or microinjection of alpha-methylhistamine (another H3-receptor agonist, 0.025-0.1 microg/0.2 microl) in the vicinity of these cells significantly decreased their discharge rate. Moreover, the effect of the antagonist was reversed by the agonists and vice versa. In contrast, "waking-related" neurons were unaffected by these H3-receptor ligands. These data provide evidence for the histaminergic nature of "W-on" neurons and their role in cortical desynchronization during waking, and highlight the heterogeneity of posterior hypothalamic neuronal populations, which might serve different functions during the wakefulness.

Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in patients with an unsatisfactory response to loratadine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of azelastine nasal spray, desloratadine, and the combination of azelastine nasal spray plus loratadine compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis who had an unsatisfactory response to loratadine.

METHODS

This was a 2-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study in patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Following a 1-week, open-label lead-in period, during which the patients received loratadine 10 mg daily, those patients who met the symptom qualification criteria (<25% to 33% improvement taking loratadine) were randomized to treatment with azelastine nasal spray 2 sprays per nostril, twice daily, azelastine nasal spray 2 sprays per nostril, twice daily, plus loratadine 10 mg daily, desloratadine 5 mg daily plus placebo (saline) nasal spray, or placebo (saline) nasal spray/placebo capsules. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to day 14 in the total nasal symptom score, consisting of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestion symptom scores recorded twice daily (AM and PM) in patient diary cards.

RESULTS

A total of 428 patients with an unsatisfactory response to loratadine completed the double-blind treatment period. After 2 weeks of treatment, azelastine nasal spray (P < 0.001), azelastine nasal spray plus loratadine (P < 0.001), and desloratadine (P = 0.039) significantly improved the total nasal symptom score compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Azelastine nasal spray is an effective treatment for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis who do not respond to loratadine and is an alternative to switching to another oral antihistamine or to using multiple antihistamines.

P-glycoprotein limits the brain penetration of nonsedating but not sedating H1-antagonists

The present study evaluates the impact of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on plasma-brain disposition and transepithelial transport of sedating versus nonsedating H1-antagonists using multidrug-resistant (mdr) gene 1a and 1b (mdr1a/b) knockout (KO) mice and human MDR1-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Three nonsedating (cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine) and three sedating (diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine, and triprolidine) H1-antagonists were tested. Each compound was administered to KO and wild-type (WT) mice intravenously at 5 mg/kg. Plasma and brain drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters (CL, V(ss), and t(1/2)) were obtained using WinNonlin. In addition, certirizine, desloratadine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine (2 microM) were tested as substrates for MDR1 using MDR1-MDCK cells. The bidirectional apparent permeability was determined by measuring the amount of compound at the receiving side at 5 h. The brain-to-plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratio was 4-, 2-, and >14-fold higher in KO compared with WT mice for cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine, respectively. In contrast, the brain-to-plasma AUC ratio between KO and WT was comparable for hydroxyzine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine. Likewise, the efflux ratio between basolateral to apical and apical to basolateral was 4.6- and 6.6-fold higher in MDR1-MDCK than the parental MDCK for certirizine and desloratadine, respectively, whereas it was approximately 1 for diphenhydramine and triprolidine. Our results demonstrate that sedating H1-antagonists hydroxyzine, diphenhydramine, and triprolidine are not P-gp substrates. In contrast, nonsedating H1-antagonists cetirizine, loratadine, and desloratadine are P-gp substrates. Affinity for P-gp at BBB may explain the lack of central nervous system side effects of modern H1-antagonists.

Roles of histamine in regulation of arousal and cognition: functional neuroimaging of histamine H1 receptors in human brain

Brain histamine is involved in a wide range of physiological functions such as regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, arousal, cognition, and memory mainly through interactions with histamine H1 receptors (H1Rs). Neurons producing histamine, histaminergic neurons, are exclusively located in the posterior hypothalamus and transmit histamine to almost all regions of the brain. Histamine H1 antagonists, or antihistamines, often prescribed for treatment of allergic disorders, sometimes induce sleepiness and cognitive deficits. It is understood that the mechanism of such CNS side effects is that antihistamine blocks H1Rs in the brain. The purpose of the present study was to compare the CNS side effects of different antihistamines. Subjective sleepiness was measured using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and psychomotor performance was examined by a tachistoscope testing system in healthy, young, Japanese volunteers (16 males, 20-28 yrs.) before and after oral administration of antihistamines such as fexofenadine (FEX) and cetirizine (CET). Additionally, H1R occupancy by antihistamines was examined by PET with 11C-doxepin in 8 volunteers. The results of SSS and psychomotor tests demonstrated that FEX tended to be less sedative than CET though the difference was not statistically significant. PET measurements revealed that no H1Rs in the cerebral cortex were occupied by FEX while about 30% of H1Rs were occupied by CET. In summary, it was confirmed that histamine and H1Rs are involved in maintaining arousal and cognition in humans, and that the severity of clinical symptoms is correlated to the amount of antihistamine that penetrated into the brain.

Yawning/cortical activation induced by microinjection of histamine into the paraventricular nucleus of the rat

The effects of microinjection of histamine into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus on yawning responses were investigated in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing rats. Yawning responses were evaluated by monitoring the intercostal electromyogram (EMG) as an index of inspiratory activity and digastric EMG as an indicator of mouth opening. We also recorded the electrocorticogram (ECoG) to determine the arousal response during yawning. Autonomic function was evaluated by measuring blood pressure and heart rate. Microinjection of histamine into the medial parvocellular subdivision (mp) of the PVN elicited a yawning response, i.e. a single large inspiration with mouth opening, and an arousal shift in ECoG to lower voltage and faster rhythms. Microinjection of HTMT dimaleate, an H1 receptor agonist, into the PVN also caused the yawning/arousal response. Pretreatment with pyrilamine, an H1 receptor antagonist, inhibited the histamine induced yawning behavior. These data demonstrate that a histamine receptive site for triggering yawning/arousal responses exists in the PVN, and suggest that these responses are mediated by activation of H1 receptor within the PVN.

Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration

AIMS

It has been widely recognized that classical antihistamines induce sedation as an adverse effect, while second-generation antihistamines have few if any sedative effects. In order to evaluate the sedative properties of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, its effect on cognitive performance in healthy subjects was compared with placebo and (+)-chlorpheniramine.

METHODS

Twelve healthy male subjects were instructed to perform six types of attention-demanding cognitive tasks, and objective measurements of reaction times and accuracy was made before and after drug administration. Their sleepiness levels were also monitored. Test drugs were ebastine 10 mg, placebo and two doses of (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg and 6 mg, as positive controls. Plasma drug concentrations at the end of the study were analysed.

RESULTS

After treatments with (+)-chlorpheniramine, the reaction times of the tasks were significantly prolonged (e.g. ratios of after/before dosing: placebo (0.998 +/- 0.113) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (1.103 +/- 0.083; P<0.05) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (1.170 +/- 0.139; P<0.001) in a 7 ms visual discrimination time task) and the accuracy was significantly decreased (e.g. ratios: placebo (1.038 +/- 0.158) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (0.792 +/- 0.202; P<0.01) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (0.837 +/- 0.222; P<0.05) in a 7 ms task). On the other hand, performance was not affected by ebastine or placebo treatment (e.g. ebastine 10 mg (reaction time ratio; 1.014 +/- 0.067 and accuracy ratio; 0.990 +/- 0.146) in a 7 ms task). Subjective sleepiness was also not affected by ebastine but (+)-chlorpheniramine significantly increased sedation. With respect to the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and task performance, the latter deteriorated with an increase in plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration (e.g. r=0.439 (P=0.007) in a 5 ms and r = 0.352 (P=0.039) in a 7 ms task), but it did not correlate with the plasma concentration of carebastine, an active metabolite of ebastine.

CONCLUSIONS

Ebastine 10 mg did not cause any cognitive impairment or subjective sleepiness. On the other hand, (+)-chlorpheniramine impaired cognitive function and induced sleepiness even at 2 mg, the recommended dose in over-the-counter medication. In addition, impaired CNS performance was significantly correlated with plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration.

Neuroimaging of histamine H1-receptor occupancy in human brain by positron emission tomography (PET): a comparative study of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, and (+)-chlorpheniramine, a classical antihistamine

AIMS

Sedation induced by antihistamines is widely recognized to be caused by their penetration through the blood-brain-barrier and the consequent occupation of brain histamine H1-receptors. We previously studied the mechanism of sedation caused by antihistamines using positron emission tomography (PET). Recently, we revealed the nonsedative characteristic of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, with cognitive performance tests. In the present study, H1-receptor occupation by ebastine was examined in the human brain using PET.

METHODS

Ebastine 10 mg and (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 or 6 mg were orally given to healthy male volunteers. PET scans with [11C]-doxepin, a potent H1-receptor antagonist, were conducted near tmax of respective drugs. Other volunteers in the control group also received PET scans. The binding potential of doxepin (BP = Bmax/Kd) for available brain H1-receptors was imaged on a voxel-by-voxel basis through graphical analysis. By setting regions of interest, the H1-receptor occupancy of drugs was calculated in several H1-receptor rich regions.

RESULTS

Brain distribution of radioactivity after ebastine treatment was similar to that without any drugs. However, after the oral administration of 2 mg (+)-chlorpheniramine, the level was lower than after ebastine and nondrug treatments. Graphical analysis followed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM96) revealed that H1-receptor rich regions such as cortices, cingulate gyrus and thalamus were regions where the BPs after ebastine were significantly higher than after (+)-chlorpheniramine (2 mg). H1-receptor occupancies in cortex were approximately 10% by ebastine and > or = 50% by either dose of (+)-chlorpheniramine (95% confidence interval for difference in the mean receptor occupancies: 27%, 54% for 2 mg and 35%, 62% for 6 mg vs ebastine, respectively). Receptor occupancies increased with increasing plasma concentration of (+)-chlorpheniramine, but not with concentration of carebastine, an active metabolite of ebastine.

CONCLUSIONS

Ebastine (10 mg orally) causes brain histamine H1-receptor occupation of approximately 10%, consistent with its lower incidence of sedative effect, whereas (+)-chlorpheniramine occupied about 50% of brain H1-receptors even at a low but sedative dose of 2 mg; occupancy of (+)-chlorpheniramine was correlated with plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration.

[Studies on histamine with L-histidine decarboxylase, a histamine-forming enzyme, as a probe: from purification to gene knockout]

I have been studying the functions of the histaminergic neuron system in the brain, the location and distribution of which we elucidated with antibody raised against L-histidine decarboxylase (a histamine-forming enzyme) as a marker in 1984. For this purpose, we used two methods employing (1) pharmacological agents like alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, an HDC inhibitor, and agonists and antagonists of H1, H2 and H3 receptors and (2) knockout mice of the HDC- and H1- and H2-receptor genes. In some cases, we used positron emission tomography (PET) of H1 receptors in living human brains. It turned out that histamine neurons are involved in many brain functions, and particularly, histamine is one of the neuron systems to keep awakefulness. Histamine also plays important roles in bioprotection against various noxious or unfavorable stimuli (convulsion, nociception, drug sensitization, ischemic lesions, stress and so on). Finally, I briefly described interesting phenotypes found in peripheral tissues of HDC-KO mice; the most striking finding is that mast cells in HDC-KO mice are fewer in number, smaller in size and less dense in granule density than those of wild type mice, indicating that histamine is related to the proliferation and differentiation of mast cells. In conclusion, histamine is important not only in the central and peripheral systems as studied so far but also may be related to some new functions that are now under investigation in our laboratories.

Inhibition of synovial plasma extravasation by preemptive administration of an antiinflammatory irrigation solution in the rat knee

Inflammation and hyperalgesia during surgical procedures are caused by the local release of multiple inflammatory mediators. We used a rat knee joint model of acute inflammation (synovial plasma extravasation) to determine whether preemptive intraarticular irrigation of the antiinflammatory drugs ketoprofen, amitriptyline, or oxymetazoline, alone or in combination, can reduce inflammatory soup-induced plasma extravasation. These three drugs were selected because of their abilities to collectively inhibit the inflammatory effects of biogenic amines, eicosanoid production, and the release of neuropeptides from C-fiber terminals. Synovial perfusion of each one of the three drugs 10 min before, and then in combination with, the inflammatory soup (bradykinin, 5-hydroxytryptamine, and mustard oil) did not reduce plasma extravasation. Similarly, two-drug combinations did not significantly reduce inflammatory soup-induced plasma extravasation. The combination of all three drugs (amitriptyline, ketoprofen, and oxymetazoline) produced a dramatic inhibition of plasma extravasation and was more effective than any of the two-drug combinations. A comparison between the preemptive (10 min before inflammatory soup perfusion) and postinflammatory administration (10 min after inflammatory soup perfusion) showed that the postinflammatory administration of the three-drug solution lost all ability to inhibit inflammatory soup-induced plasma extravasation. We conclude that acute synovial inflammation, which is induced and maintained by multiple mediators, can be substantially inhibited only by the preemptive administration of a drug combination that targets multiple inflammatory mediators.

IMPLICATIONS

Preemptive, intraarticular irrigation of a combination of multiple antiinflammatory drugs is a novel and potentially effective method for reducing the synovial inflammatory response, such as that during arthroscopy. In this study, a three-drug combination infusion was statistically superior to one- or two-drug infusions in a rat model.