1
|
Dongre DS, Saha UB, Saroj SD. Exploring the role of gut microbiota in antibiotic resistance and prevention. Ann Med 2025; 57:2478317. [PMID: 40096354 PMCID: PMC11915737 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2478317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the evolution of multiple drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is of grave public health concern. To combat the pandemic of AMR, it is necessary to focus on novel alternatives for drug development. Within the host, the interaction of the pathogen with the microbiome plays a pivotal role in determining the outcome of pathogenesis. Therefore, microbiome-pathogen interaction is one of the potential targets to be explored for novel antimicrobials. MAIN BODY This review focuses on how the gut microbiome has evolved as a significant component of the resistome as a source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Antibiotics alter the composition of the native microbiota of the host by favouring resistant bacteria that can manifest as opportunistic infections. Furthermore, gut dysbiosis has also been linked to low-dosage antibiotic ingestion or subtherapeutic antibiotic treatment (STAT) from food and the environment. DISCUSSION Colonization by MDR bacteria is potentially acquired and maintained in the gut microbiota. Therefore, it is pivotal to understand microbial diversity and its role in adapting pathogens to AMR. Implementing several strategies to prevent or treat dysbiosis is necessary, including faecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics and prebiotics, phage therapy, drug delivery models, and antimicrobial stewardship regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devyani S Dongre
- Symbiosis School of Biological Sciences (SSBS), Symbiosis International (Deemed University) (SIU), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ujjayni B Saha
- Symbiosis School of Biological Sciences (SSBS), Symbiosis International (Deemed University) (SIU), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sunil D Saroj
- Symbiosis School of Biological Sciences (SSBS), Symbiosis International (Deemed University) (SIU), Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamath S, Joyce P. A critical need for 'gut neutrality': mitigating adverse drug-microbiome interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2025; 21:1-4. [PMID: 39297867 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2407616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Kamath
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Paul Joyce
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dalile B, Boyle NB, Ruiz FT, Chakrabarti A, Respondek F, Dodd GF, Kadosh KC, Hepsomali P, Brummer RJ, McArthur S, Dam V, Zanzer YC, Vermeiren Y, Schellekens H. Targeting Cognitive Resilience through Prebiotics: A Focused Perspective. Adv Nutr 2025; 16:100343. [PMID: 39551433 PMCID: PMC11663957 DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 10/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This perspective article is a product of the work of an expert group within the Prebiotic Task Force convened by the International Life Sciences Institute Europe, a non-profit organization that brings together experts from academia, industry, and public service to catalyze nutrition science for public benefit. An expert group was conceived in October 2023 to discuss the evidence base on the use of prebiotics to promote cognitive functioning, with a focus on highlighting knowledge gaps and proposing a list of recommendations to guide this specific area of research forward. To address this, we evaluated existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human intervention studies that examine the effects of prebiotics on cognitive functioning. These are predominantly conducted in healthy participants under basal conditions and have, to date, revealed limited effects. In this perspective, we propose that prebiotics should be investigated as agents to promote cognitive resilience by testing their effects on cognitive performance under certain cognition-taxing factors that individuals encounter across their lifespan. These include stress, poor sleep outcomes, sedentary behavior, and unhealthy dietary patterns, all of which have been shown to be associated with altered microbiome and impact global cognition or specific cognitive domains. In addition, we recommend identifying vulnerable populations that are either subclinical or that struggle chronically or periodically with 1 or more cognition-taxing factors, to better uncover the boundary conditions for prebiotic effectiveness. By broadening the scope of research to include diverse populations and challenging conditions in daily life or experimental settings, we can expand our understanding of the role of prebiotics not only in cognitive health or impairment, but also as potential preventative agents that may promote cognitive resilience during aging and in response to various lifestyle-related challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boushra Dalile
- Brain Research on Affective Mechanisms (BRAMLab), Laboratory of Biological Psychology, Research Unit Brain & Cognition, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Neil B Boyle
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Franco T Ruiz
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorder (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Piril Hepsomali
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J Brummer
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Simon McArthur
- Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Veerle Dam
- Sensus B.V., Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yannick Vermeiren
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Chair Group Nutritional Biology, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harriet Schellekens
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kamath S, Sokolenko E, Collins K, Chan NSL, Mills N, Clark SR, Marques FZ, Joyce P. IUPHAR themed review: The gut microbiome in schizophrenia. Pharmacol Res 2025; 211:107561. [PMID: 39732352 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Revised: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/23/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024]
Abstract
Gut microbial dysbiosis or altered gut microbial consortium, in schizophrenia suggests a pathogenic role through the gut-brain axis, influencing neuroinflammatory and neurotransmitter pathways critical to psychotic, affective, and cognitive symptoms. Paradoxically, conventional psychotropic interventions may exacerbate this dysbiosis, with antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine, demonstrating profound effects on microbial architecture through disruption of bacterial phyla ratios, diminished taxonomic diversity, and attenuated short-chain fatty acid synthesis. To address these challenges, novel therapeutic strategies targeting the gut microbiome, encompassing probiotic supplementation, prebiotic compounds, faecal microbiota transplantation, and rationalised co-pharmacotherapy, show promise in attenuating antipsychotic-induced metabolic disruptions while enhancing therapeutic efficacy. Harnessing such insights, precision medicine approaches promise to transform antipsychotic prescribing practices by identifying patients at risk of metabolic side effects based on their microbial profiles. This IUPHAR review collates the current literature landscape of the gut-brain axis and its intricate relationship with schizophrenia while advocating for integrating microbiome assessments and therapeutic management. Such a fundamental shift in proposing microbiome-informed psychotropic prescriptions to optimise therapeutic efficacy and reduce adverse metabolic impacts would align antipsychotic treatments with microbiome safety, prioritising 'gut-neutral' or gut-favourable drugs to safeguard long-term patient outcomes in schizophrenia therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Kamath
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Elysia Sokolenko
- Discipline of Anatomy and Pathology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| | - Kate Collins
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Nicole S L Chan
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Natalie Mills
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Scott R Clark
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Francine Z Marques
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Hypertension Research Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences and Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Joyce
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Đanić M, Marković N, Ostojić T, Kojić M, Lazarević S, Mikov M, Pavlović N. Intestinal microbiota, probiotics and their interactions with drugs: knowledge, attitudes and practices of health science students in Serbia. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:1381. [PMID: 39605036 PMCID: PMC11600795 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06249-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquiring sufficient knowledge and understanding the importance of intestinal microbiota and probiotics in health and disease, as well as their potential for interactions with concurrently administered drugs, can significantly influence future pharmacotherapeutic practices among health science students. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the knowledge, factors influencing knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding intestinal microbiota and probiotics and their interactions with drugs among students of the Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad. MATERIALS AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in the form of an anonymous questionnaire among first- and final-year medical and pharmacy students. Predictors of knowledge scores were analyzed using a negative binomial regression model. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 263 medical and pharmacy students (44.58% first-year and 55.5% final-year students). Approximately half of the students (53.2%) demonstrated fair knowledge, 34.2% had poor knowledge, and only 12.5% had good knowledge about the intestinal microbiota and probiotics. Study year and self-assessment of knowledge were statistically significant predictors of knowledge scores, while the presence of chronic diseases, previous education, and lifestyle were not. The most common indications for probiotic use among respondents were antibiotic use (75.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (69.9%). A large number of respondents reported not paying attention to the concurrent use of probiotics with drugs or food, nor to the choice of specific probiotic strains. Most students expressed that they receive insufficient information on this topic at the university. CONCLUSION Most students demonstrate inadequate knowledge about the gut microbiota and probiotics, which affects their practical use of these supplements. The primary reasons for this are insufficient information and unreliable sources of information. Therefore, enhancing education on this topic could significantly improve the knowledge and pharmacotherapeutic practices of future healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Đanić
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia.
| | - Nikolija Marković
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Tijana Ostojić
- Department of Fundamental Sciences, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Milena Kojić
- Institute of Economic Science, University of Novi Sad, Zmaj Jovina 12, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Slavica Lazarević
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Momir Mikov
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Nebojša Pavlović
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kamath S, Hunter A, Collins K, Wignall A, Joyce P. The atypical antipsychotics lurasidone and olanzapine exert contrasting effects on the gut microbiome and metabolic function of rats. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:4531-4545. [PMID: 39075330 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Antipsychotics such as olanzapine are associated with significant metabolic dysfunction, attributed to gut microbiome dysbiosis. A recent notion that most psychotropics are detrimental to the gut microbiome has arisen from consistent findings of metabolic adverse effects. However, unlike olanzapine, the metabolic effects of lurasidone are conflicting. Thus, this study investigates the contrasting effects of olanzapine and lurasidone on the gut microbiome to explore the hypothesis of 'gut neutrality' for lurasidone exposure. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Using Sprague-Dawley rats, the effects of olanzapine and lurasidone on the gut microbiome were explored. Faecal and blood samples were collected weekly over a 21-day period to analyse changes to the gut microbiome and related metabolic markers. KEY RESULTS Lurasidone triggered no significant weight gain or metabolic alterations, instead positively modulating the gut microbiome through increases in mean operational taxonomical units (OTUs) and alpha diversity. This novel finding suggests an underlying mechanism for lurasidone's metabolic inertia. In contrast, olanzapine triggered a statistically significant decrease in mean OTUs, substantial compositional variation and a depletion in short-chain fatty acid abundance. Microbiome depletion correlated with metabolic dysfunction, producing a 30% increase in weight gain, increased pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, and increased blood glycaemic and triglyceride levels. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Our results challenge the notion that all antipsychotics disrupt the gut microbiome similarly and highlights the potential benefits of gut-neutral antipsychotics, such as lurasidone, in managing metabolic side effects. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in humans to guide personalised pharmacological treatment regimens for schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Kamath
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alexander Hunter
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Collins
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony Wignall
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul Joyce
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meola TR, Kamath S, Elz AS, Prestidge CA, Wignall A, Joyce P. Contrasting the pharmacokinetic performance and gut microbiota effects of an amorphous solid dispersion and lipid nanoemulsion for a poorly water-soluble anti-psychotic. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2024; 203:114453. [PMID: 39134099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
Increasing attention is being afforded to understanding the bidirectional relationship that exists between oral drugs and the gut microbiota. Often overlooked, however, is the impact that pharmaceutical excipients exert on the gut microbiota. Subsequently, in this study, we contrasted the pharmacokinetic performance and gut microbiota interactions between two commonly employed formulations for poorly soluble compounds, namely 1) an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) stabilised by poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) K-30, and 2) a lipid nanoemulsion (LNE) comprised of medium chain glycerides and lecithin. The poorly soluble antipsychotic, lurasidone, was formulated with ASD and LNE due to its rate-limiting dissolution, poor oral bioavailability, and significant food effect. Both the ASD and LNE were shown to facilitate lurasidone supersaturation within in vitro dissolution studies simulating the gastrointestinal environment. This translated into profound improvements in oral pharmacokinetics in rats, with the ASD and LNE exerting comparable ∼ 2.5-fold improvements in lurasidone bioavailability, compared to the pure drug. The oral formulations imparted contrasting effects on the gut microbiota, with the LNE depleting the richness and abundance of the microbial ecosystem, as evidenced through reductions in alpha diversity (Chao1 index) and operational taxonomical units (OTUs). In contrast, the ASD exerted a 'gut neutral' effect, whereby a mild enrichment of alpha diversity and OTUs was observed. Importantly, this suggests that ASDs are effective solubility-enhancing formulations that can be used without comprising the integrity of the gut microbiota - an integral consideration in the treatment of mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia, due to the role of the gut microbiota in regulating mood and cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahlia R Meola
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Srinivas Kamath
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Aurelia S Elz
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia; Translational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Clive A Prestidge
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Anthony Wignall
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Paul Joyce
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kerstens R, Joyce P. The Gut Microbiome as a Catalyst and Emerging Therapeutic Target for Parkinson's Disease: A Comprehensive Update. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1738. [PMID: 39200203 PMCID: PMC11352163 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease is the second most prevalent neurological disorder globally, and its cause is still largely unknown. Likewise, there is no cure, and existing treatments do little more than subdue symptoms before becoming ineffective. It is increasingly important to understand the factors contributing to Parkinson's Disease aetiology so that new and more effective pharmacotherapies can be established. In recent years, there has been an emergence of research linking gut dysbiosis to Parkinson's Disease via the gut-brain axis. Advancements in microbial profiling have led to characterisation of a Parkinson's-specific microbial signature, where novel treatments that leverage and correct gut dysbiosis are beginning to emerge for the safe and effective treatment of Parkinson's Disease. Preliminary clinical studies investigating microbiome-targeted therapeutics for Parkinson's Disease have revealed promising outcomes, and as such, the aim of this review is to provide a timely and comprehensive update of the most recent advances in this field. Faecal microbiota transplantation has emerged as a novel and potential frontrunner for microbial-based therapies due to their efficacy in alleviating Parkinson's Disease symptomology through modulation of the gut-brain axis. However, more rigorous clinical investigation, along with technological advancements in diagnostic and in vitro testing tools, are critically required to facilitate the widespread clinical translation of microbiome-targeting Parkinson's Disease therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Joyce
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stringer AM, Hargreaves BM, Mendes RA, Blijlevens NMA, Bruno JS, Joyce P, Kamath S, Laheij AMGA, Ottaviani G, Secombe KR, Tonkaboni A, Zadik Y, Bossi P, Wardill HR. Updated perspectives on the contribution of the microbiome to the pathogenesis of mucositis using the MASCC/ISOO framework. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:558. [PMID: 39080025 PMCID: PMC11289053 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08752-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Advances in the treatment of cancer have significantly improved mortality rates; however, this has come at a cost, with many treatments still limited by their toxic side effects. Mucositis in both the mouth and gastrointestinal tract is common following many anti-cancer agents, manifesting as ulcerative lesions and associated symptoms throughout the alimentary tract. The pathogenesis of mucositis was first defined in 2004 by Sonis, and almost 20 years on, the model continues to be updated reflecting ongoing research initiatives and more sophisticated analytical techniques. The most recent update, published by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO), highlights the numerous co-occurring events that underpin mucositis development. Most notably, a role for the ecosystem of microorganisms that reside throughout the alimentary tract (the oral and gut microbiota) was explored, building on initial concepts proposed by Sonis. However, many questions remain regarding the true causal contribution of the microbiota and associated metabolome. This review aims to provide an overview of this rapidly evolving area, synthesizing current evidence on the microbiota's contribution to mucositis development and progression, highlighting (i) components of the 5-phase model where the microbiome may be involved, (ii) methodological challenges that have hindered advances in this area, and (iii) opportunities for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Stringer
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - Benjamin M Hargreaves
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - Rui Amaral Mendes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto/CINTESIS@RISE, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7401, USA
| | - Nicole M A Blijlevens
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia S Bruno
- Molecular Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paul Joyce
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - Srinivas Kamath
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - Alexa M G A Laheij
- Department of Oral Medicine, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giulia Ottaviani
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Kate R Secombe
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia
| | - Arghavan Tonkaboni
- Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Yehuda Zadik
- Department of Military Medicine and "Tzameret", Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Oral Medicine, Sedation and Imaging, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Hannah R Wardill
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Level 5S, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garbati P, Picco C, Magrassi R, Signorello P, Cacopardo L, Dalla Serra M, Faticato MG, De Luca M, Balestra F, Scavo MP, Viti F. Targeting the Gut: A Systematic Review of Specific Drug Nanocarriers. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:431. [PMID: 38543324 PMCID: PMC10974668 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16030431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/05/2025] Open
Abstract
The intestine is essential for the modulation of nutrient absorption and the removal of waste. Gut pathologies, such as cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and celiac disease, which extensively impact gut functions, are thus critical for human health. Targeted drug delivery is essential to tackle these diseases, improve therapy efficacy, and minimize side effects. Recent strategies have taken advantage of both active and passive nanocarriers, which are designed to protect the drug until it reaches the correct delivery site and to modulate drug release via the use of different physical-chemical strategies. In this systematic review, we present a literature overview of the different nanocarriers used for drug delivery in a set of chronic intestinal pathologies, highlighting the rationale behind the controlled release of intestinal therapies. The overall aim is to provide the reader with useful information on the current approaches for gut targeting in novel therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Garbati
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy; (P.G.); (C.P.); (R.M.); (M.D.S.)
| | - Cristiana Picco
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy; (P.G.); (C.P.); (R.M.); (M.D.S.)
| | - Raffaella Magrassi
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy; (P.G.); (C.P.); (R.M.); (M.D.S.)
| | - Paolo Signorello
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Via Girolamo Caruso 16, 56122 Pisa, Italy; (P.S.); (L.C.)
- Research Center ‘E. Piaggio’, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy
- Centro 3R: Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research, 56122 Pisa, Italy
| | - Ludovica Cacopardo
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Via Girolamo Caruso 16, 56122 Pisa, Italy; (P.S.); (L.C.)
- Research Center ‘E. Piaggio’, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy
- Centro 3R: Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research, 56122 Pisa, Italy
| | - Mauro Dalla Serra
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy; (P.G.); (C.P.); (R.M.); (M.D.S.)
| | - Maria Grazia Faticato
- Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova, Italy;
| | - Maria De Luca
- National Institute of Gastroenterology, IRCCS de Bellis, Via Turi 27, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy; (M.D.L.); (F.B.); (M.P.S.)
| | - Francesco Balestra
- National Institute of Gastroenterology, IRCCS de Bellis, Via Turi 27, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy; (M.D.L.); (F.B.); (M.P.S.)
| | - Maria Principia Scavo
- National Institute of Gastroenterology, IRCCS de Bellis, Via Turi 27, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy; (M.D.L.); (F.B.); (M.P.S.)
| | - Federica Viti
- Institute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy; (P.G.); (C.P.); (R.M.); (M.D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang S, Ju D, Zeng X. Mechanisms and Clinical Implications of Human Gut Microbiota-Drug Interactions in the Precision Medicine Era. Biomedicines 2024; 12:194. [PMID: 38255298 PMCID: PMC10813426 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The human gut microbiota, comprising trillions of microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal tract, has emerged as a pivotal player in modulating various aspects of human health and disease. Recent research has shed light on the intricate relationship between the gut microbiota and pharmaceuticals, uncovering profound implications for drug metabolism, efficacy, and safety. This review depicted the landscape of molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of dynamic human gut Microbiota-Drug Interactions (MDI), with an emphasis on the impact of MDI on drug responses and individual variations. This review also discussed the therapeutic potential of modulating the gut microbiota or harnessing its metabolic capabilities to optimize clinical treatments and advance personalized medicine, as well as the challenges and future directions in this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dianwen Ju
- Department of Biological Medicines & Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Immunotherapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China;
| | - Xian Zeng
- Department of Biological Medicines & Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Immunotherapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Subramaniam S, Elz A, Wignall A, Kamath S, Ariaee A, Hunter A, Newblack T, Wardill HR, Prestidge CA, Joyce P. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) disrupt the gut microbiota and trigger an intestinal inflammatory response in rats. Int J Pharm 2023; 648:123614. [PMID: 37979632 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (i.e. SEDDS, SMEDDS and SNEDDS) are widely employed as solubility and bioavailability enhancing formulation strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Despite the capacity for SEDDS to effectively facilitate oral drug absorption, tolerability concerns exist due to the capacity for high concentrations of surfactants (typically present within SEDDS) to induce gastrointestinal toxicity and mucosal irritation. With new knowledge surrounding the role of the gut microbiota in modulating intestinal inflammation and mucosal injury, there is a clear need to determine the impact of SEDDS on the gut microbiota. The current study is the first of its kind to demonstrate the detrimental impact of SEDDS on the gut microbiota of Sprague-Dawley rats, following daily oral administration (100 mg/kg) for 21 days. SEDDS comprising a lipid phase (i.e. Type I, II and III formulations according to the Lipid Formulation Classification Scheme) induced significant changes to the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota, evidenced through a reduction in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and alpha diversity (Shannon's index), along with statistically significant shifts in beta diversity (according to PERMANOVA of multi-dimensional Bray-Curtis plots). Key signatures of gut microbiota dysbiosis correlated with the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the jejunum, while mucosal injury was characterised by significant reductions in plasma citrulline levels, a validated biomarker of enterocyte mass and mucosal barrier integrity. These findings have potential clinical ramifications for chronically administered drugs that are formulated with SEDDS and stresses the need for further studies that investigate dose-dependent effects of SEDDS on the gastrointestinal microenvironment in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santhni Subramaniam
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Aurelia Elz
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony Wignall
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Srinivas Kamath
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Amin Ariaee
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alexander Hunter
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tahlia Newblack
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hannah R Wardill
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine (Theme), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Clive A Prestidge
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul Joyce
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhao Q, Chen Y, Huang W, Zhou H, Zhang W. Drug-microbiota interactions: an emerging priority for precision medicine. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:386. [PMID: 37806986 PMCID: PMC10560686 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01619-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Individual variability in drug response (IVDR) can be a major cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and prolonged therapy, resulting in a substantial health and economic burden. Despite extensive research in pharmacogenomics regarding the impact of individual genetic background on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), genetic diversity explains only a limited proportion of IVDR. The role of gut microbiota, also known as the second genome, and its metabolites in modulating therapeutic outcomes in human diseases have been highlighted by recent studies. Consequently, the burgeoning field of pharmacomicrobiomics aims to explore the correlation between microbiota variation and IVDR or ADRs. This review presents an up-to-date overview of the intricate interactions between gut microbiota and classical therapeutic agents for human systemic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), endocrine diseases, and others. We summarise how microbiota, directly and indirectly, modify the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of drugs. Conversely, drugs can also modulate the composition and function of gut microbiota, leading to changes in microbial metabolism and immune response. We also discuss the practical challenges, strategies, and opportunities in this field, emphasizing the critical need to develop an innovative approach to multi-omics, integrate various data types, including human and microbiota genomic data, as well as translate lab data into clinical practice. To sum up, pharmacomicrobiomics represents a promising avenue to address IVDR and improve patient outcomes, and further research in this field is imperative to unlock its full potential for precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
| | - Yao Chen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
| | - Weihua Huang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
| | - Honghao Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, PR China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, PR China.
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, PR China.
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080, PR China.
- Central Laboratory of Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, 283 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|