Differential MUC 1 expression in normal and neoplastic human pancreatic tissue. An immunohistochemical study of 60 samples

Overexpression of microRNA-345 Affects the Invasive Capacity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines by Suppressing MUC1 and TJP2 Expression

The majority of pancreatic carcinomas are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), and the presence of non-invasive pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, as an associated lesion, is considered important. These microscopic hyperplastic or grossly papillomatous lesions exhibit varying degrees of morphological atypia and may develop into invasive carcinomas. In this study, we investigated whether mucin-1 (MUC1) is involved in the progression of pancreatic carcinoma and examined the mechanisms by which microRNAs regulate MUC1 expression in vitro. In PDAC cell lines, suppression of MUC1 expression reduced cell proliferation and invasion; PDAC cell lines transfected with an miR-345 precursor suppressed the expression of MUC1, and reduced cell proliferation and invasion. Tight junction protein 2 (TJP2), a putative target of miR-345, is regulated by MUC1. The suppression of TJP2 expression reduced cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis. These results suggest that MUC1 and TJP2, the putative target molecules of miR-345, are critical in maintaining the invasive potential of pancreatic carcinoma cells, and regulating their expression may prevent the progression of non-invasive pancreatic intraductal lesions to invasive carcinomas. This study provides new insights for the development of novel molecular targeted therapies for pancreatic carcinomas.

Ectopic Splenic Adenocarcinoma in a Dog

A 10-year-old spayed female Border Collie developed a ductal adenocarcinoma in the spleen. Clinically, the spleen was enlarged and a small liver nodule was present but there were no other abnormalities. Most of the splenic parenchyma was diffusely infiltrated by variably shaped atypical neoplastic cells that formed small clusters or larger nests, arranged as duct or duct-like structures within a fibrous matrix. There was acinar differentiation in a few portions of the tumour with a sheet-like solid growth pattern and occasional squamous metaplasia or exocrine acinus-like structures. Mitotic figures were frequent. Neoplastic cells with ductal differentiation were diffusely immunoreactive for AE1/AE3, CAM5.2 and CK7 cytokeratins but negative for CK20, while cells with acinar differentiation were immunolabelled only for AE1/AE3 cytokeratins and were also immunopositive for mucin-1 and trypsin. A few regions of tumour with ductal or acinar differentiation were immunopositive for pancreatic lipase. All neoplastic cells were negative for mucin-2, vimentin, smooth muscle actin, chromogranin A, CD31, hepatocyte paraffin 1 and thyroglobulin antigens. Because of the formation of exocrine acinus-like structures and an immunolabelling pattern consistent with exocrine pancreas tissue, an adenocarcinoma of ectopic exocrine pancreas within the spleen was diagnosed.

Association of MUC1 5640G>A and PSCA 5057C>T polymorphisms with the risk of gastric cancer in Northern Iran

Background

Gastric cancer is one of the four most common cancer that causing death worldwide. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have shown that genetic diversities MUC1 (Mucin 1) and PSCA (Prostate Stem Cell Antigen) genes are involved in gastric cancer. The aim of this study was avaluating the association of rs4072037G > A polymorphism in MUC1 and rs2294008 C > T in PSCA gene with risk of gastric cancer in northern Iran.

Methods

DNA was extracted from 99 formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of gastric cancer and 96 peripheral blood samples from healthy individuals (sex matched) as controls. Two desired polymorphisms, 5640G > A and 5057C > T for MUC1 and PSCA genes were genotyped using PCR-RFLP method.

Results

The G allele at rs4072037 of MUC1 gene was associated with a significant decreased gastric cancer risk (OR = 0.507, 95% CI: 0.322–0.799, p = 0.003). A significant decreased risk of gastric cancer was observed in people with either AG vs. AA, AG + AA vs. GG and AA+GG vs. AG genotypes of MUC1 polymorphism (OR = 4.296, 95% CI: 1.190–15.517, p = 0.026), (OR = 3.726, 95% CI: 2.033–6.830, p = 0.0001) and (OR = 0.223, 95% CI: 0.120–0.413, p = 0.0001) respectively. Finally, there was no significant association between the PSCA 5057C > T polymorphism and risk of gastric cancer in all genetic models.

Conclusion

Results indicated that the MUC1 5640G > A polymorphism may have protective effect for gastric cancer in the Northern Iran population and could be considered as a potential molecular marker in gastric cancer.

CD73 expression in normal and pathological human hepatobiliopancreatic tissues

BACKGROUND

The tumor-expressed CD73 ectonucleotidase generates immune tolerance and promotes invasiveness via adenosine production from degradation of AMP. While anti-CD73 blockade treatment is a promising tool in cancer immunotherapy, a characterization of CD73 expression in human hepatobiliopancreatic system is lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CD73 expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry in a variety of non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions of the liver, pancreas, and biliary tract.

RESULTS

CD73 was expressed in normal hepatobiliopancreatic tissues with subcellular-specific patterns of staining: canalicular in hepatocytes, and apical in cholangiocytes and pancreatic ducts. CD73 was present in all hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in all pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and in the majority of intra and extrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas, whereas it was detected only in a subset of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and almost absent in acinar cell carcinoma. In addition to the canonical pattern of staining, an aberrant membranous and/or cytoplasmic expression was observed in invasive lesions, especially in HCC and PDAC. These two entities were also characterized by a higher extent and intensity of staining as compared to other hepatobiliopancreatic neoplasms. In PDAC, aberrant CD73 expression was inversely correlated with differentiation (p < 0.01) and was helpful to identify isolated discohesive tumor cells. In addition, increased CD73 expression was associated with reduced overall survival (HR 1.013) and loss of E-Cadherin.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent CD73 expression supports the rationale for testing anti-CD73 therapies in patients with hepatobiliopancreatic malignancies. Specific patterns of expression could also be of help in the routine diagnostic workup.

MUC1-C nuclear localization drives invasiveness of renal cancer cells through a sheddase/gamma secretase dependent pathway

MUC1 is a membrane-anchored mucin and its cytoplasmic tail (CT) can interact with many signaling pathways and act as a co-transcription factor to activate genes involved in tumor progression and metastasis. MUC1 is overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma with correlation to prognosis and has been implicated in the hypoxic pathway, the main renal carcinogenetic pathway. In this context, we assessed the effects of MUC1 overexpression on renal cancer cells properties. Using shRNA strategy and/or different MUC1 constructs, we found that MUC1-extracellular domain and MUC1-CT are involved in increase of migration, cell viability, resistance to anoikis and in decrease of cell aggregation in cancer cells. Invasiveness depends only on MUC1-CT. Then, by using siRNA strategy and/or pharmacological inhibitors or peptides, we showed that sheddases ADAM10, ADAM17 and gamma-secretase are necessary for MUC1 C-terminal subunit (MUC1-C) nuclear location and in increase of invasion property. Finally, MUC1 overexpression increases ADAM10/17 protein expression suggesting a positive regulatory loop. In conclusion, we report that MUC1 acts in renal cancer progression and MUC1-C nuclear localization drives invasiveness of cancer cells through a sheddase/gamma secretase dependent pathway. MUC1 appears as a therapeutic target by blocking MUC1 cleavage or nuclear translocation by using pharmacological approach and peptide strategies.

Prognostic significance of membrane-associated mucins 1 and 4 in gastric adenocarcinoma

Aberrant expression of mucins is likely associated with cancer biology as alterations in the expression and/or glycosylation patterns of various mucins have been noted. Expression of the mucin family in gastric cancers has been reported in numerous studies, but the results are conflicting. Therefore, we investigated the potential use of mucin (MUC)1 and 4 as prognostic markers in gastric cancer according to histological subtype. Three-hundred and sixty-five gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection were selected for this study. Among the 365 gastric cancer samples tested here, 34% consisted of early gastric cancer and 66% were advanced. In terms of location, 68.7% of the cohort had intestinal-type cancer and 30.7% had diffuse-type. We constructed tissue microarrays with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of gastric cancer and these micro-arrays were evaluated for phenotypic expression of MUC1/4 using monoclonal antibodies. Two-hundred and ninety-two patients (92.7%) were positive for MUC1 and 216 (60.5%) were positive for MUC4. MUC1 expression was not correlated with any other clinicopathological variables such as age, gender, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, Lauren classification or recurrence. However, loss of MUC4 expression was significantly correlated with recurrence (p=0.033). MUC4 expression was also significantly correlated with better disease-free survival (p=0.049) and particularly in the intestinal-type (p=0.018). Our present findings demonstrated that loss of MUC4 expression can be used as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Loss of MUC4 expression is a prognostic indicator of increased recurrence and poor disease-free survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Determining the site of origin of mucinous adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 175 cases

Mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAs) of various origins may have a similar histologic appearance and frequently metastasize to distant sites, which often causes diagnostic problems in surgical pathology practice. The immunohistochemical profiles of MAs of various origins have not been well studied. We investigated the expression of 10 immunohistochemical markers (CK7, CK20, CDX-2, β-catenin, MUC-1, MUC-2, MUC-6, ER, WT-1, and PAX-8) in 175 cases of MA, including 69 cases from the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, 41 from the upper GI tract, 27 from gynecologic organs, 4 from the urinary bladder, 18 from the breast, and 16 from the lung. We found that lower GI MAs (colon, rectum, and anus) frequently expressed CDX-2 (42 of 42, 100%; 33 of 42 with homogenous positivity, 79%), MUC-2 (42 of 42; 100%), CK20 (41 of 42; 98%), and β-catenin (nuclear) (27 of 42; 64%) and rarely expressed MUC-6 (2 of 42; 5%) and CK7 (8 of 42; 19%). Most of the CK7-positive cases were from the rectum and anus (7 of 8; 88%). The expression of these markers in appendiceal MAs was similar to that of low GI tract MAs, except for a lower percentage of homogenous CDX-2 (3 of 27; 11%) and nuclear β-catenin (3 of 27; 11%) expression. Unlike their lower GI tract counterparts, the upper GI tract MAs (ampulla, pancreas/biliary tree, and stomach/esophagus) frequently expressed CK7 (38 of 41; 93%) and MUC-6 (31 of 41; 76%) and were rarely homogenously positive for CDX-2 (4 of 41; 10%) and nuclear positive for β-catenin (8 of 41; 19%). Breast MAs were frequently positive for CK7 (18 of 18; 100%), MUC-1 (18 of 18; 100%), MUC-2 (18 of 18; 100%), ER (16 of 18; 89%), MUC-6 (9 of 18; 50%), and WT-1 (9 of 18; 50%). Lung MAs were frequently positive for CK7 (16 of 16; 100%) and MUC-1 (15 of 16; 94%). Gynecologic MAs were positive for CK7 (25 of 27; 93%) and PAX-8 (13 of 27; 48%). We conclude that homogenous CDX-2 and nuclear β-catenin expressions are commonly seen in lower GI tract MAs. In contrast, appendiceal MAs are usually heterogenously positive for CDX-2 and show cytoplasmic positivity for β-catenin. Unlike lower GI tract MAs, upper GI tract MAs are frequently positive for CK7 and MUC-6. As is the case in appendiceal MAs, the upper GI tract MAs may also be heterogenously positive for CDX-2. Breast MAs are positive for ER and WT-1, whereas gynecologic MAs are positive for PAX-8 and negative for WT-1.

The molecular and cellular heterogeneity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Current standard therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have failed to attenuate the aggressiveness of this disease or confer notable improvements in survival. Previous molecular research into pancreatic cancers, along with advances in sequencing technologies, have identified many altered genes in patients with pancreatic cancer and revealed the marked genetic heterogeneity of individual tumors. Thus, the lack of success of conventional empiric therapy can be partly attributed to the underlying heterogeneity of pancreatic tumors. The genetic alterations that have been detected in pancreatic cancer range from simple mutations at the level of base pairs to complex chromosomal structural changes and rearrangements. The identification of molecular changes that are unique to an individual patient's tumors, and the subsequent development of strategies to target the tumors in a personalized approach to therapeutics, is a necessary advance to improve therapy for patients with this disease.

Galectin-3 regulates MUC1 and EGFR cellular distribution and EGFR downstream pathways in pancreatic cancer cells

MUC1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein which is typically expressed at the apical membrane of normal epithelial cells. In cancer cells, the over-expression of MUC1 and its aberrant localization around the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm favours its interaction with different protein partners such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and can promote tumour proliferation through the activation of oncogenic signalling pathways. Our aims were to study the mechanisms inducing MUC1 cytoplasmic localization in pancreatic cancer cells, and to decipher their impact on EGFR cellular localization and activation. Our results showed that galectin-3, an endogenous lectin, is co-expressed with MUC1 in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and that it favours the endocytosis of MUC1 and EGFR. Depletion of galectin-3 by RNA interference increased the interaction between MUC1 and EGFR, EGFR and ERK-1,2 phosphorylation, and translocation of EGFR to the nucleus. On the contrary, silencing of galectin-3 led to a decrease of cyclin-D1 levels and of cell proliferation. The galectin-3-dependent regulation of MUC1/EGFR functions may represent an interesting mechanism modulating the EGFR-stimulated cell growth of pancreatic cancer cells.

Proteases present in some pancreatic cyst fluids may affect mucin immunoassay by degrading antibodies and antigens

OBJECTIVES

Biomarker detection in pancreatic cyst fluids is of importance to improve the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenoma, a precancerous lesion. However, assay protocols are generally established for serum testing.

METHODS

Immunoradiometric assay of gastric M1/MUC5AC mucin was performed on pancreatic cyst fluids with well-characterized monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

Among 1466 pancreatic cyst fluids tested, about 10% to 15% of samples presented abnormal behaviors: (i) radioactivity measured after immunoradiometric assay much lower than the blank of the assay and (ii) increasing dilution of the fluids leading to apparent increase of M1/MUC5AC concentration. In contrast, none of the 109 hepatic cyst fluids tested presented interference.We demonstrate that some (n = 54) interfering fluids cause mucin degradation as well as antibody degradation. Western blot analysis showed that the C-terminal part of the M1/MUC5AC apomucin is most sensitive to degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of proteases that degrade antibodies as well as mucin may explain the pitfalls observed in 3.6% of the samples. To detect this interference, each fluid has to be systematically tested at 1:100 dilution in the presence of a saturating concentration of M1/MUC5AC mucin standard and in the absence of antiprotease reagents. Detection of interference could prevent false results caused by mucin degradation in situ.

Mucins and CD56 as markers of tumour invasion and prognosis in periampullary cancer

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the association of mucins and cluster of differentiation (CD) 56 with vascular and perineural invasion and survival in patients with periampullary cancer.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed pancreatic tissue microarrays (cancer, chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreatic tissue) constructed from 126 pancreatic resections (cancer, 104; chronic pancreatitis, 22). Mucin (MUC) 1, MUC4 and MUC5AC expression was quantified using the immunohistochemical score (range 0-300), MUC3 expression was described as membranous or cytoplasmic, and expression of CD56, MUC2 and MUC6 as present or absent.

RESULTS

In cancers, vascular invasion correlated with overexpression (immunohistochemical score of 100 or more) of MUC1 (P = 0.003) and presence of MUC6 (P = 0.024), and perineural invasion correlated with overexpression of MUC5AC (P = 0.015). Reduced survival was observed with overexpression of MUC4 (P = 0.032) and MUC5AC (P = 0.048), membranous expression of MUC3 (P = 0.048), and presence of CD56 (P = 0.041). Perineural invasion also correlated with CD56 expression (P = 0.001). Overexpression of MUC4 and MUC5AC correlated with tumour recurrence (P = 0.001 and P = 0.034 respectively). Multivariable analysis identified membranous expression of MUC3 (P = 0.023), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.015) and perineural invasion (P = 0.004) as independent predictors of poor survival.

CONCLUSION

Mucins and CD56 may be markers of prognosis in patients with periampullary cancer.

MUC1, a new hypoxia inducible factor target gene, is an actor in clear renal cell carcinoma tumor progression

The hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) signaling pathway is known as the main renal carcinogenetic pathway. MUC1, an O-glycoprotein membrane-bound mucin, is overexpressed in clear renal cell carcinomas (cRCC) with correlation to two major prognostic factors: tumor-node-metastasis stage and nuclear Fürhman grade. We questioned whether there is a direct link between the HIF pathway and MUC1 overexpression in renal tumors. Interestingly, we observed concomitant increase of HIF-1alpha and MUC1 in metastatic cRCC group versus nonmetastatic cRCC group. Using different renal cell models and small interfering RNA assays targeting either HIF-1alpha or YC-1, a HIF-1 pharmacologic inhibitor, we showed induction of MUC1 expression under hypoxia by a HIF-dependent mechanism. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed a direct binding of HIF-1alpha at the MUC1 promoter. In addition, combined site-directed mutagenesis and gel shift assay allowed the identification of two functional putative hypoxia responsive elements at -1488/-1485 and at -1510/-1507 in the promoter. Using a rat kidney model of ischemia/reperfusion, we confirmed in vivo that clamping renal pedicle for 1 hour followed by 2 hours of reperfusion induced increased MUC1 expression. Furthermore, MUC1 knockdown induced significant reduction of invasive and migration properties of renal cancer cells under hypoxia. Altogether, these results show that MUC1 is directly regulated by HIF-1alpha and affects the invasive and migration properties of renal cancer cells. Thus, MUC1 could serve as a potential therapeutic target in cRCC.

An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms

CONTEXT

The pancreas gives rise to an array of distinct neoplasms that can be solid, cystic, or intraductal and can recapitulate the various lines of differentiation present in the normal gland.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms that simplifies their pathologic evaluation.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed literature related to the classification of pancreatic neoplasms on the basis of their gross, histologic, and immunohistochemical features.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a series of dichotomous decisions, the differential diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm can be narrowed, and in cases of the more common neoplasms, accurate classification can be achieved. Uncommon neoplasms not accounted for by this approach are also discussed, and the additional diagnostic information needed for complete pathologic reporting is presented.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update on the surgical pathology of carcinomas of ductal origin and PanINs

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the US. Most pancreatic cancers are infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas. The careful application of well-defined morphologic criteria can be used to differentiate between infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma and reactive glands. While most pancreatic cancers are ductal adenocarcinomas, a number of histologically defined variants have been described. These are important to recognize because they have distinct clinical pathologic features. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) is the presumed precursor lesion to infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma, and PanIN lesions can mimic infiltrating cancer.

[MUC1 (EMA): A key molecule of carcinogenesis?]

MUC1 is a large trans-membrane highly glycosylated mucin which is expressed at the apical pole of normal cells in glandular epithelia. MUC1 is implicated in many physiological mechanisms such as adhesion, development and differentiation. Also, MUC1 is frequently deregulated and over-expressed with a membrane circumferential and/or cytoplasmic expression. The intracellular tail of MUC1 is phosphorylated and can interact with many signalling proteins and transcriptional factors. Indeed, MUC1 can interact with B-catenin competitively for E-cadherin, thus destabilizing intercellular junctions and favouring metastatic dissemination. In carcinomas, the overexpression and membrane delocalization of MUC1 is associated with a worse prognosis and a shorter survival in breast, colon, kidney, prostate or gastro-intestinal cancers. MUC1 appears to be a novel therapeutic target for immunotherapy or anti-tumour vaccines.

Diagnostic utility of mucin profile in fine-needle aspiration specimens of the pancreas: an immunohistochemical study with surgical pathology correlation

BACKGROUND

The cytologic differentiation between neoplastic and reactive/reparative processes in the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations (EUS-FNA) of the pancreas can be difficult. Malignant transformation of the pancreatic ductal epithelium changes the expression of apomucins. The goal of the current study was to determine an optimal immunohistochemical panel of mucin (MUC) antibodies that would allow the cytomorphologic distinction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its differentiation from reactive/reparative processes and inadvertently sampled gastric and duodenal mucosa.

METHODS

Pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens performed on 351 patients were reviewed. Expression profiles of MUC1, 2, 5AC, and 6 were examined on 56 cell block sections and 26 follow-up pancreatectomy specimens.

RESULTS

MUC1 and 6 expression was found in nonneoplastic pancreatic samples, whereas there was an absence of expression of MUC2 and 5AC. MUC2 was detected in mucosal goblets cells of the duodenum, MUC6 in Brunner glands, and MUC5AC in gastric foveolar cells. MUC5AC expression in differentiating ductal adenocarcinomas from benign conditions demonstrated better operating characteristics than either MUC1 or MUC6. The apomucin expression pattern both in cytology and follow-up surgical pathology specimens was similar. In surgical pathology specimens, the panel of 3 antibodies, MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC+, was noted in 15 of 17 ductal carcinomas (88.2%). In nonneoplastic pancreatic tissue, the expression panel MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC- was observed in 14 of 17 (82.4%) cases. In cytology specimens, the combination of MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC+ was noted in 21 of 30 ductal carcinoma cases (70.0%), 3 of 6 atypical cases (50%), and 1 of 1 suspicious for malignancy cases (100%). The combination MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC+ was not observed in any of the negative for malignancy or reactive cases (0 of 6).

CONCLUSIONS

The most optimal panel for the diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma in both the EUS-FNA specimens is a panel including MUC1/MUC2/MUC5AC, whereas a panel of all 4 antibodies (MUC1, 2, 5AC, and 6) will in addition aid in differentiating inadvertently sampled normal/reactive duodenal and gastric epithelium from neoplastic pancreatic tissue.

Mucin core polypeptide expression in the progression of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

We have previously demonstrated a specific pattern of mucin (MUC) core polypeptide expression in Barrett's esophagus (BE) characterized by MUC1 and MUC6 positivity in goblet cells in a proportion of cases. The aim of this study was to determine the pattern of MUC expression associated with the development and progression of dysplasia in BE. Endoscopic mucosal biopsies from 35 patients with BE (10 with no dysplasia, 6 with indefinite for dysplasia, 12 with low-grade dysplasia [LGD], and 7 biopsies with high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) were immunostained (ABC method) with antibodies against MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6. The extent and pattern of staining for each marker was evaluated in intestinalized Barrett's epithelium and in the various grades of dysplasia. For cases with dysplasia, staining was evaluated separately in nondysplastic epithelium adjacent to (<1 cm) and distant from (>2 cm) areas of dysplasia. In nondysplastic BE, MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 stained 40%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 90% of cases, respectively, in goblet or nongoblet columnar epithelium. With the progression of dysplasia (from metaplasia to indefinite, LGD and HGD), there was a significant decrease in expression of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC3, and alterations in the staining patterns of MUC5 and MUC6. In fact, MUC1 and MUC3 were entirely absent from all cases of HGD. Interestingly, BE-associated adenocarcinomas showed an MUC phenotype distinct from that of HGD, with expression of MUC1 and MUC3 in 47% and 67% of cases, and expression of MUC1 in a membranous pattern. There was no significant difference in MUC staining in nondysplastic BE between patients with and without dysplasia. Alterations in MUC expression occur in the progression of dysplasia in BE. However, none of these markers helps identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for neoplasia.

Quantitative analysis of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic juice is a promising type of diagnostic sample for pancreatic cancer, and members of the mucin (MUC) family are diagnostic candidates. To evaluate the utility of MUC family members as diagnostic markers, we measured MUC mRNA expression in pancreatic tissues and pancreatic juice obtained from patients with different pancreatic diseases as well as in pancreatic cancer cell lines by real-time PCR. Furthermore, to support the possibility of early diagnosis by quantification of MUC1 and MUC5AC, immunohistochemistry and microdissection-based quantitative analysis of mRNA were carried out. There was no significant correlation between MUC1 and MUC5AC expression in cell lines. When beta-actin was used as a reference gene, median MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA expression levels were remarkably greater in tumoral tissues than in non-tumoral tissues, but median MUC4 and MUC6 mRNA expression levels were not. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that quantitative analysis of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice is better diagnostic modality than that of MUC4 and MUC6 mRNA. Immunohistochemistry showed that MUC1 and MUC5AC were highly expressed in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and moderately expressed in high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN); no staining was observed in normal ducts. Analysis of cells isolated by microdissection showed stepwise upregulation of MUC1 and MUC5AC in the development of high-grade PanIN to IDC. Our results suggest that MUC1 and MUC5AC are upregulated stepwise in pancreatic carcinogenesis and that quantitative assessment of MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA in pancreatic juice has high potential for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Intercalated duct cell is starting point in development of pancreatic ductal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Although it is well known that the pancreatic ductal carcinoma may develop having a relationship to the mucous gland hyperplasia (MGH) with atypia (PanIN-1B by PanIN system), the starting point of this atypical MGH is unclear. To know it, we examined the pancreas tissue using many methods described below.

METHODS

1. Twenty-seven surgically resected pancreas tissue specimens, including pancreatic ductal carcinomas (PDC), chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreas, were investigated using immunohistochemical stainings for MUC1, MUC6, 45M1, Ki67 and p53. 2. DNA extraction and analysis of K-ras mutation at codon 12 using microdissection method: The paraffin blocks with 16 regions including the intercalated duct cell (IC) adjacent to the atypical MGH were prepared for DNA extraction. Mutation of K-ras codon 12 was analyzed and compared in enriched polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked mini sequence assay (PCR-ELMA).

RESULTS

1. In the normal pancreas, although no positive cell was seen in 45M1, p53, Ki67, the cytoplasm of IC were always positive for MUC1 and sometimes positive for MUC6. In the pancreas with fibrosis or inflammation, MGH was positive for MUC6 and 45M1. And atypical MGH was positive for MUC1, MUC6 and 45M1. Some IC adjacent to the atypical MGH was positive for Ki67 as well as atypical MGH. The carcinoma cells in all cases of PDC were diffusely positive for MUC1, 45M1, p53 and Ki67, and focally positive for MUC6. 2. In K-ras mutation, we examined the regions including IC adjacent to the atypical MGH, because the immunohistochemical apomucin stainings of these regions resembled those of PDC as described above. And K-ras mutation was confirmed in 12 of 16 regions (75%). All mutations were a single mutation, in 6 regions GTT was detected, in 4 regions GAT was detected and in 2 region AGT was detected.

CONCLUSION

Some intercalated duct cell may be the starting point of the pancreatic ductal carcinoma, because the exhibitions of mucin expressions, Ki67, p53 and K-ras mutation in some intercalated duct cell resembled those of mucous gland hyperplasia or pancreatic ductal carcinoma.

Expression of Membrane-Bound Mucins (MUC1 and MUC4) and Secreted Mucins (MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6 and MUC7) in Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas of Salivary Glands

Mucins are glycoproteins normally synthesized by a variety of secretory epithelial cells. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUCB, MUC6, MUC7) in mucoepidermoid carcinomas, the most frequent malignant tumor of salivary glands. Forty mucoepidermoid carcinomas and twenty-two normal salivary glands were studied for these mucins by immunohistochemistry from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded material. Normal salivary glands frequently expressed MUC1 and MUC4, mainly in ductal cells; MUC5B and MUC7 stained mucous and serous acini respectively of submandibular and minor salivary glands; and MUC5AC and MUC2 were poorly detected in excretory ducts. All mucoepidermoid carcinomas expressed MUC1, and 38/40 tumors expressed MUC4. Both membrane-bound mucins stained membranes and cytoplasm of all cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, mucous, clear and columnar). MUC5AC and MUC5B stained glandular differentiated cells in most tumors (29/40 and 33/40 cases, respectively). MUC6 was positive in 13/40 tumors, and both MUC2 and MUC7 in only 2/40 tumors. The high expression of MUC1 was related to high histologic grades, high recurrence and metastasis rates and a shorter disease-free interval (P < 0.05). Conversely, MUC4 high expression was mainly related to low-grade tumors, lower recurrence rates and a longer disease-free interval (P < 0.05). In conclusion, mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands usually express MUC1, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC5B; less frequently MUC6; and rarely MUC2 and MUC7. This mucin expression pattern can be useful for diagnostic purposes. Therefore, MUC1 expression is related to tumor progression and worse prognosis, whereas MUC4 expression is related to a better prognosis.

Intraductal tubular neoplasms of the pancreas: histogenesis and differentiation

OBJECTIVES

Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas are generally referred to as intraductal papillary mucin-producing neoplasms (IPMNs), according to the WHO classification system. Herein, we report that morphologic and immunohistochemical features of intraductal tubular carcinoma (ITC) are quite different from those of intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC).

METHODS

We analyzed histogenesis and differentiation of ITC by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Histologically, ITC was characterized as an intraductal nodular appearances with a monotonous tubular growth pattern without papillary projection. ITC showed de novo-like appearance without sequential progression usually observed in IPMC, suggesting that ITC is a homogeneous neoplasm. Cuboidal tumor cells in ITC resembled normal pancreatic duct epithelia, and the characteristic growth pattern of ITC replaced that of normal pancreatic duct epithelium. Immunohistochemically, ITC cells were positive for MUC-1 on the apical side of the cell membrane. In contrast to ITC cells, IPMC cells were negative for MUC-1, and ductal adenocarcinoma cells were strongly positive for MUC-1, as was the stroma around the cancer. The immunohistochemical staining pattern of DUPAN-2 resembled that of MUC-1. Interestingly, localization of MUC-1 and DUPAN-2 staining in ITC cells was similar to that in normal pancreatic ductules. ITC cells were negative for MUC-2 and MUC-5AC. In contrast, most IPMC cells were positive for MUC-2 and MUC-5AC.

CONCLUSION

Based on our histologic and immunohistochemical findings, the intraductal pancreatic neoplasm (IPN) can be classified into 2 groups: IPN with gastrointestinal differentiation and IPN with pancreatic duct differentiation. Our present data indicated that ITC cells may arise directly from duct epithelia without progression and possessed pancreatic duct differentiation. On the basis of our data, we suggest that classification of pancreatic neoplasms in the WHO and The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) systems should be reconsidered.

Assessment of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The benefits provided by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in pancreatic ductular adenocarcinoma (PDA) are still controversial. However, in most reports from referral centers, improvement in local control and survival appears to be provided in selected patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the radiation-induced pathologic effects of preoperative CRT in patients with resectable PDA and determine the precise long-term outcome of the responding patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1996 and October 2003, 61 patients underwent preoperative CRT for resectable PDA. The tumor location was the pancreatic head in 49 patients and pancreatic body in 12 patients. Of the 61 patients, 21 (34.5%) did not undergo surgery because of disease progression and 40 (65.5%) underwent pancreatic resection, including pancreaticoduodenectomy in 32 (80%) and distal pancreatectomy in 8 (20%).

RESULTS

A major pathologic response was noted in 9 patients, including three complete responses, and was found only in patients with tumor of the pancreatic head. The local control rate was similar in patients with and without a major pathologic response. Survival in patients with a major response was significantly greater than in those without a response or with a minor response.

CONCLUSION

Major tumor downstaging can be provided by preoperative CRT in patients with resectable cephalic PDA. Survival appears to be significantly improved in selected patients.

MUC1 and MUC2 in pancreatic neoplasia

MUCs are glycoproteins with various roles in homeostasis and carcinogenesis. Among other actions, MUC1 may inhibit cell-cell and cell-stroma interactions and function as a signal transducer, participating in cancer progression. In contrast, MUC2 is normally found only in goblet cells, where it contributes to the protective barrier function of these cells. Recently, a tumour suppressor role has been demonstrated for MUC2, and both MUC1 and MUC2 appear to have important roles in pancreatic neoplasia. MUC1 appears to be a marker of aggressive phenotype and may facilitate the vascular spread of carcinoma cells. In contrast, MUC2 is rarely detectable in aggressive pancreatic tumours, but is commonly expressed in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), which are rare, indolent tumours, in intestinal IPMNs, and in indolent colloid carcinomas. MUC2 appears to be not only a marker of this indolent pathway, but also partly responsible for its less aggressive nature. Thus, in pancreatic neoplasia, MUC1 and MUC2 have potential diagnostic and prognostic value as markers of aggressive and indolent phenotypes, respectively, and have potential as therapeutic targets.

MUC1 and MUC2 expression in pancreatic ductal carcinoma obtained by fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND

Mucins are high molecular weight glycoproteins that are produced by various epithelial cells including those found in the pancreas. MUC1 and MUC2 are two well characterized mucin antigens. The objective of the current study was to examine the pattern of phenotypic expression of MUC1 and MUC2 in pancreatic lesions obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) and to determine the utility of MUC1 and MUC2 as markers for pancreatic ductal carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-nine cell blocks of pancreatic FNA obtained under endoscopic ultrasound guidance were retrieved from the archives and immunostained with a monoclonal antibody directed against MUC1 and MUC2. These cell blocks were taken from 39 patients (16 females and 23 males) who had a median age of 64 years. Eleven FNAs were taken from patients with reactive/inflammatory conditions. The remaining 28 FNAs included 24 ductal carcinomas, 2 neuroendocrine tumors, 1 lymphoma sample, and 1 sarcoma sample. The presence of immunoreactivity, irrespective of the level of intensity or the percentage of cells, was considered as positive for MUC1 and MUC2 expression. Follow-up included correlation with pathology materials obtained at surgery and review of medical records.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 24 pancreatic ductal carcinomas (96%) demonstrated positive staining with MUC1. Twenty-one positive cases demonstrated either apical or diffuse membranous staining with variable cytoplasmic staining. The remaining two positive cases showed only cytoplasmic staining. One of the 11 cases of chronic pancreatitis and benign conditions demonstrated weak apical membranous MUC1 staining in the acinic cells. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001, using the Fisher exact test). Three pancreatic ductal carcinomas and one chronic pancreatitis specimen demonstrated cytoplasmic staining with MUC2; the difference between the two groups was not found to be statistically significant. None of the nonductal neoplasms demonstrated expression of either MUC1 or MUC2. The sensitivity and specificity of MUC1 as a marker for pancreatic ductal carcinomas were 96% and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC1 is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal carcinoma with a predominantly membranous and variable cytoplasmic staining pattern. The results of the current study suggest that the phenotypic expression of MUC1 can be used as an ancillary marker for diagnosing pancreatic ductal carcinoma in cytologic preparations. Conversely, MUC2 does not appear to be a useful marker for recognizing pancreatic ductal carcinoma in FNA specimens.

Drug development in pancreatic cancer: finally, biology begets therapy

Pancreatic cancer is rarely curable, and only 5% of patients achieve long-term survival. The vast majority of patients present with metastatic or unresectable disease. Standard chemotherapy with gemcitabine provides clinical benefit to only a small minority of patients. Thus, the development and investigation of new therapies is clearly needed. As knowledge of the underlying biology of pancreatic cancer has increased, targeted therapies based upon preclinical laboratory work have been developed, and are entering clinical trials. Some of these agents lack traditional dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at biologically active doses, and therefore clinical evaluation may not follow traditional guidelines for cytotoxic drug development. This article focuses on targeted therapies currently undergoing clinical evaluation in pancreatic cancer. Classes of therapeutics reviewed include those targeting tumor-microenvironment interactions (matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth-factor blockade), signal transduction (e.g., farnesyltransferase inhibitors), growth-factor receptors (epidermal growth-factor receptor blockade, Her-2/neu, gastrin), and vaccine approaches. Currently, there is a renewed optimism that the clinical application of biologic understanding will lead to an improved outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Differential expression of mucins 1-6 in papillary thyroid carcinoma: evidence for transformation-dependent post-translational modifications of MUC1 in situ

Mucins are primary glycoproteins of epithelia that are known to undergo major changes in their post-translational processing during neoplastic transformation. This study has examined the expression pattern of seven primary mucins, ie mucin (MUC) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5AC, 5B and 6, in normal, hyperplastic, benign neoplastic, and papillary-type carcinoma (PTC) tissues of the thyroid. MUC1 and MUC5B were the only mucins to be widely transcribed in both benign and malignant tissues. In contrast, MUC4 transcripts were undetectable in normal thyroids, and were present in only 40% of the hyperplastic and malignant thyroid tissues. In PTC, MUC1 was identified as a single mRNA transcript, rejecting the idea that this mucin may undergo transformation-dependent alternative splicing in thyroid tumours. The tissue distribution of MUC1 and MUC4 proteins was highly heterogeneous: this largely paralleled their mRNA expression profiles and supported the conclusion that whereas MUC1 was ubiquitously expressed in PTC, MUC4 was detectable in less than 20% of the cases analysed. In order to determine whether post-translational modifications of MUC1, putatively associated with malignancy, also occurred in the mucin produced by PTC, immunohistochemistry was performed with a panel of well-characterized anti-MUC1 antibodies in conjunction with digestion of the tissue sections with deglycosylating enzymes. These experiments, which were supported by immunochemical analyses of the MUC1 and MUC4 glycoforms extracted from tissues, collectively demonstrated markedly divergent MUC1 glycosylation profiles in normal and benign thyroid tissues when compared with PTC. Characteristically, these latter neoplastic cells produced mucin molecules carrying complex poly-N-lactosamine-type glycans capped with fucose and neuraminic acid residues. The present study also found evidence in PTC for the potential presence of proteolytically processed MUC1 isoforms which differ in their post-translational traits depending on whether they are retained on the cell surface or secreted into the extracellular space. It is proposed that the observed differences in the glycosylation properties of normal and neoplastic MUC1 may be exploitable as an ancillary tool in the diagnosis of PTC.

The MUC gene family: their role in diagnosis and early detection of pancreatic cancer

The early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, as well as distinguishing between chronic pancreatitis and malignant pancreatic disease, remains still a clinical problem. Presently, there is no specific tumor marker for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Mucin-associated marker like CA 19-9 are the most widely available pancreatic cancer tumor marker, but its value as a screening marker is limited by its reduced specificity.

Mucins (MUCs) are heavily glycosylated, high molecular weight glycoproteins with an aberrant expression profile in various malignancies.

This review considers briefly the potential use of the mucin expression pattern in diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm. The overview will point out the present knowledge about changes in the mucin gene expression in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) as precursor lesions and in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, compared to normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis and the potential role for differentiating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Furthermore, the potential use of MUCs in the diagnosis and differentiation of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm's (IPMNs) will be discussed.

Mucin gene expression in intraductal papillary-mucinous pancreatic tumours and related lesions

Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours (IPMTs) of the pancreas are heterogeneous proliferations characterized by a malignant potential. The molecular mechanisms underlying the tumourigenesis process are not well understood. Recently, it has been shown that IPMTs secreting the mucin antigen MUC2 have a better prognosis, but the complete pattern of MUC gene expression has not yet been established. The aims of this study were to evaluate the mucin gene expression in 57 IPMTs and eight related lesions surgically resected and to relate MUC gene expression to the histological diagnosis. In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed in 28 cases with probes specific for the MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6, and MUC7 genes. An immunohistochemical analysis was carried in all 65 cases and in 90 conventional ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas using MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC antibodies. IPMTs of adenoma (dysplasia) type exhibited high expression of MUC2 (93%), MUC5AC (97%), and, to a lesser extent, of MUC4 (71%), all of which were also observed in colloid carcinomas associated with IPMTs. In contrast, IPMTs with simple hyperplasia, intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, and pyloric glandular adenomas exhibited little or no expression of MUC2. The mucin expression profile supports the existence of two types of invasive tumour associated with IPMTs: a colloid and an ordinary form. The latter shows a pattern similar to the conventional ductal adenocarcinomas with a loss of MUC2 and a gain of MUC1 and has a greater tendency to metastasize. In conclusion, the altered expression of mucin, characteristic of IPMT of adenoma type and of colloid carcinomas, may contribute to the better clinical outcome of these neoplasms, compared to conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

A phase II single institutional experience with preoperative radiochemotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a limited impact on survival. We hypothesized that delivering preoperative radiochemotherapy (RTCT) might enhance local control of the cancer and improve survival.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with localized pancreatic cancer (14 head and 5 body) were treated during the past 4 years with an intramural protocol consisting of continuous infusion of fluorouracile (5-FU: 650 mg/m(2)/D1-D5 and D21-D25 and Cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)/bolus D2 and D22 with preoperative external beam radiotherapy (RT) (30Gy split course RT or 45 Gy standard fractionation RT).

RESULTS

Four patients did not have surgical resection: Three patients were noted to have liver metastases and 1 patient developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. The remaining 15 patients had potentially curative resection (12 Whipple procedure and 3 distal subtotal pancreatectomy). There was no postoperative death. Pathologic findings showed five major responses including 2 patients with complete pathologic response. The overall median survival for the 19 study patients was 20 months. The median disease free and 2-year overall survival for the group with resection were 30 months and 52.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative RTCT followed by resection is well-tolerated and safe for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Major histological response occurred for 25% of patients. This approach could offer improvement in patient survival.

Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: current concepts

Despite advances in chemotherapy and surgical technique, patients with pancreatic cancer often succumb to local recurrence or metastatic spread. The need for new therapeutic strategies for this disease coupled with a better understanding of basic immunology have led to the development of novel anti-tumor vaccines. This review focuses on the historical development of tumor vaccines emphasizing the identification of potential pancreatic tumor antigens. The role of both B-cell and T-cell responses in tumor rejection will be reviewed. Methods for antigen presentation, including peptides, recombinant viral and bacterial vectors, dendritic cells, and whole cell approaches will be discussed. The use of immune adjuvants and improved methods of vaccine delivery will also be explored. The full potential for the immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer awaits the results of early phase clinical trials. The development of pancreatic cancer vaccines represents a useful paradigm for the translation of basic research into the clinical arena.

Expression of epithelial mucins Muc1, Muc2, and Muc3 in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Epithelial mucins are glycoproteins secreted by epithelial cells and their carcinomas. At least nine mucin genes have been identified, and their products (MUC1-MUC9) are expressed in various epithelia. MUC1 is a mucin expressed in breast epithelial cells, whereas MUC2 and MUC3 are primarily intestinal mucins. Although MUC1 and MUC2 expression has been documented in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, mucin expression in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been investigated. Sixty-one of 105 cases of DCIS without coexisting infiltrating carcinoma diagnosed during a 30-month period were selected as having sufficient tissue for study. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained using immunohistochemical techniques with mouse monoclonal anti-MUC1, anti-MUC2, and rabbit-specific polyclonal anti-MUC3 antibodies. Immunoreactive epitopes of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC3 were expressed in DCIS in 61, 19, and 16 of 61 cases, respectively. MUC2 and MUC3 staining intensity in DCIS was markedly less than that observed for MUC1. Luminal and/or cytoplasmic patterns of staining were observed for MUC1. MUC2 and MUC3 showed only cytoplasmic staining. Cytoplasmic-only staining of MUC1 was associated with a higher grade of DCIS. Any MUC2 staining was also associated with a higher grade of DCIS. Coexpression of MUC2 and MUC3 was present in only 6 of 61 cases, and MUC3 staining was unrelated to the grade of DCIS. Cytoplasmic expression of MUC1 and MUC2 appears to be associated with a higher grade of DCIS. MUC3 expression appears to be independent of grade and expression of MUC1 and MUC2. The relationship of mucin expression and grade warrants further study.

The immunohistochemical mucin expression pattern distinguishes different types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and determines their relationship to mucinous noncystic carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma

Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas seem to comprise various types, whose relationship to ductal adenocarcinoma and mucinous noncystic carcinoma is unclear. We analyzed the mucin immunophenotype and the DPC4/SMAD4 expression in intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms, ductal carcinomas, and mucinous noncystic carcinomas to define features that may help to distinguish between different types of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and to establish their relationship to other neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. A series of 51 intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms, three mucinous noncystic carcinomas (two with an intraductal component), and 35 ductal adenocarcinomas were screened immunohistochemically for their expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5, and DPC4/SMAD4. All intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and mucinous noncystic carcinomas were positive for MUC5. Thirty-two intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and three mucinous noncystic carcinomas abundantly expressed MUC2 but no (or only little) MUC1. The remaining intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms showed either mainly MUC1 expression or focal MUC1 and MUC2 expression. All ductal carcinomas but one were MUC2 negative and MUC1 and MUC5 positive. DPC4 was not expressed in two intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms that showed a tubular invasion pattern. Twelve of 23 ductal adenocarcinomas were DPC4 positive. Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms can be divided into at least three different mucin immunophenotypes. The first and largest group of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms and mucinous noncystic carcinomas is MUC1 negative and MUC2 positive and probably forms one tumor entity. The second group seems to be related to ductal carcinoma because of its MUC1 positivity in the absence or very weak MUC2 staining. The third group shows focal MUC1/MUC2 expression and is characterized by oncocytic histology.

Innovative treatments for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States with little or no impact from conventional treatment options. Significant advances in understanding basic immunology have renewed interest in using immunotherapy to treat pancreatic cancer. Cancer immunotherapy, including humanized MAbs, cytokines, and potent vaccine strategies, has been successful in animal models and is being evaluated in clinical trials. Gene therapy is also being explored using methods to inactivate oncogenes, replace defective tumor suppressor genes, confer enhanced chemosensitivity to tumor cells, and increase immunogenicity of tumor cells. Angiogenesis, an essential step in the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer, has been targeted by many antiangiogenic agents. Several clinical trials have been initiated to evaluate the role of these innovative strategies in patients with pancreatic cancer with increasingly sophisticated correlative studies to learn more about the mechanisms of tumor rejection with these agents. The rapid translation of basic science discoveries to clinical trials should result in the development of new effective treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer.