ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Real-life experiences of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

A few prospective cohort studies support the safety of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of vedolizumab during maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Real-life data on switching after intravenous induction therapy are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to obtain real-world data on subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after switching from intravenous vedolizumab induction or maintenance therapy, and to evaluate treatment persistence, safety, and changes in disease activity and serum vedolizumab concentrations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective registry-based study of inflammatory bowel disease patients who received subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy in two tertiary centres.

RESULTS

Altogether, 103 patients (26 Crohn's disease and 77 ulcerative colitis) switching from intravenous maintenance therapy (group 1) and 44 patients (14 and 30, respectively) switching from intravenous induction therapy (group 2) were included. At 6 months from baseline, 90.3% of the patients in group 1 and 90.9% of the patients in group 2 continued on subcutaneous vedolizumab. After the switch in group 1, disease activity remained stable. In group 2, clinical disease activity decreased significantly in ulcerative colitis patients ( P  = 0.002). The median serum vedolizumab concentration was 34.00 µg/ml during subcutaneous maintenance therapy in group 1, which was significantly higher than the median concentration during intravenous therapy (17.00 µg/ml, P  < 0.001), but remained unchanged in group 2 after the switch (31.50 µg/ml).

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment is well-tolerated and the treatment persistence remains high after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Vedolizumab, Ustekinumab, and Tofacitinib After Induction and Maintenance for Ulcerative Colitis: Three Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited.

METHODS

Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators.

CONCLUSION

In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

Game changer: How Janus kinase inhibitors are reshaping the landscape of ulcerative colitis management

Recent advancements in the treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) have ushered in a new era of possibilities, particularly with the introduction of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibitors. These novel agents offer a paradigm shift in UC management by targeting key signaling pathways involved in inflammatory processes. With approved JAK inhibitors (JAKis), such as tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, clinicians now have powerful tools to modulate immune responses and gene expression, potentially revolutionizing the treatment algorithm for UC. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of JAKis in inducing and maintaining remission, presenting viable options for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Real-world data support the use of JAKis not only as first-line treatments but also in subsequent lines of therapy, particularly in patients with aggressive disease phenotypes or refractory to biologic agents. The rapid onset of action and potency of JAKis have broadened the possibilities in the management strategies of UC, offering timely relief for patients with active disease and facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite safety concerns, including cardiovascular risks and infections, ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will continue to refine our understanding of the risk-benefit profile of JAKis in UC management.

Gastrointestinal Self-Adaptive and Nutrient Self-Sufficient Akkermansia muciniphila-Gelatin Porous Microgels for Synergistic Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis

To realize effective and long-term synergistic therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC) with probiotics, we developed gastrointestinal self-adaptive and nutrient self-sufficient Akkermansia muciniphila (AKK)-gelatin porous microgels (AKK@GPMGs). In AKK@GPMGs, AKK was covered with sequential layers of proanthocyanidins (PAs), mucin (MUC), and phosphatidylcholine (PC) to obtain AKK@PAs-MUC-PC (AKK@PMP), and then encapsulated within the methacrylate-modified gelatin porous microgels. AKK@GPMGs provide sufficient mucus as a nutrition source for AKK and boost resistance to stomach acid by 30.49-fold, and colonization in the intestines is enhanced by 83.46 times. The microgels can be dissociated by matrix metalloproteinase at the inflammatory sites of the intestine, and release AKK@PMP, which acts as "band-aid" that adheres to the inflamed colon for a long time and offers improved synergistic therapy for UC. Compared to uncoated AKK, AKK@GPMGs increase reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity by 26.47 times, improve the intestinal mucus layer thickness by 5.63 times, increase the goblet cells abundance by 3.93 times, reduce intestinal permeability by 5.60 times and significantly enhance beneficial gut microbiota while repressing harmful microbiota. These results indicate that AKK@GPMGs can restore mucus layer and tight junction integrity, reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, and regulate gut microbiota homeostasis to effectively treat intestinal inflammation.

The effectiveness of vedolizumab in advanced therapy-experienced ulcerative colitis patients: Real world data from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Middle East (IBD-ME) Registry group

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab is an approved ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. Multiple large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the drug's efficacy and safety. However, real-world data from Middle Eastern countries are spare. The study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy in advanced therapy experienced UC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic chart review of a cohort study of 153 moderately to severely active UC patients who failed or were intolerant to TNF antagonists and received vedolizumab from two large tertiary care centers was performed. Rates of clinical response and remission were retrospectively evaluated at 3,6, and 12 months post VDZ therapy using Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI); clinical response was defined as a decrease in P-SCCAI ≥3, and clinical remission was defined as a P-SCCAI score of ≤3 points. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response to vedolizumab.

RESULTS

A total of 153 UC patients had sufficient data for analysis. Clinical remission rates were 61.9% for patients on vedolizumab every 8 weeks and 89.3% for those receiving every 4 (Q4) weeks dosing. A significant reduction in CRP and improvement of albumin post vedolizumab treatment were observed, and corticosteroids were stopped in most patients. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, several factors were found to influence the clinical effectiveness of VDZ in inducing remission. Female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of remission [OR =3.09, 95% CI = (1.05-9.13), P = 0.04]. Conversely, a greater number of biologics used prior to VDZ treatment was associated with a lower likelihood of remission [OR =0.418, 95% CI = (0.203-0.859), P = 0.017]. Patients with extensive disease (E3) had an increased likelihood of remission [OR =3.81, 95% CI = (1.32-10.97), P = 0.0129]. Additionally, a VDZ dosing frequency of Q4 weeks was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of remission [OR =6.08, 95% CI = (1.73-21.39), P = 0.0049]. No significant safety signals were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this current real-world study, vedolizumab effectively achieved clinical response and remission in most advanced therapy experienced UC patients treated for up to 12 months. Future studies with larger sample sizes and more robust study designs should be conducted to further validate the results of this study.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of subcutaneous biologics versus intravenous biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies are commonly used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Multiple biologic medicines can now be given both intravenously and subcutaneously. The different administration routes present provide different advantages regarding dose escalation, healthcare resource utilisation, pharmacokinetics, convenience and safety. Comparator effectiveness studies between intravenous and subcutaneous administration are lacking.

AIM

Our primary outcome was to compare the effectiveness between intravenous and subcutaneous biologics in rates of clinical remission.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to include all relevant articles from MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2003 to 28 January 2024. Studies that compared intravenous and subcutaneous administration of the same biologic therapy in IBD patients and reported effectiveness outcomes were included. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023442675).

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nine vedolizumab cohort studies were meta-analysed for clinical remission and no difference was found in clinical remission rates between intravenous and subcutaneous administration (relative risk = 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.11). Six infliximab cohort studies were meta-analysed for clinical remission and no difference was found in clinical remission rates between intravenous and subcutaneous administration (relative risk = 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.77, 1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in the first meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of intravenous and subcutaneous biologic therapies in IBD suggest there is no difference in the effectiveness between these two administration routes. However, further high-quality studies, particularly head-to-head studies are needed to confirm this finding.

High serum levels of ustekinumab are associated with better clinical outcomes during maintenance treatment for inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective treatment option in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it still remains unclear if therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to guide clinicians.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between UST through levels (USTTL) and clinical outcomes in real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

Design

We performed a unicentric retrospective study including patients with IBD under UST treatment with at least one level determination.

Methods

The following variables were analyzed at the initiation of UST and at each USTTL measurement: clinical response and remission using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and the Partial Mayo Score (pMayo) for UC; biochemical response and remission using fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein, among others. Two periods were considered: P1 (time between induction and the first determination of USTTL) and P2 (time between USTTL1 and the second determination of USTTL).

Results

We included 125 patients, 117 with CD. In P1, 62.4% of patients were on subcutaneous maintenance, and the median USTTL1 was 3.1 μg/mL (1.6-5.3). In 44.8% of CD patients (48/117), clinical remission was achieved, with USTTL1 significantly higher than those who did not achieve remission (3.7 μg/mL (2.3-5.4) vs 2.3 μg/mL (1.1-5.2); p = 0.04). In the 46 patients with two determinations, statistically significant differences were found between variables in P2 versus P1: clinical remission (73.9% vs 21.7%; p = 0.001); USTTL (7.2 μg/mL (4.7-11.7) vs 3.4 μg/mL (1.9-6.4); p < 0.001), HBI (4 (4-4.3) vs 8 (4-9); p < 0.001), pMayo (1 (1-3.3) vs 4.5 (3-5); p = 0.042), and corticosteroid use (26.1% vs 41.3%; p = 0.024). Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for clinical remission in P2, with USTTL cutoff value of 6.34 μg/mL for clinical remission and a high rate of intensified patients (98%).

Conclusion

High serum levels of UST were associated with clinical remission during treatment for IBD under intensification treatment, with a cutoff point of 6.3 μg/mL.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment options for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are increasing rapidly, but the lack of comparative efficacy trials makes treatment choices a clinical challenge. This network-meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative efficacy of biologics and small molecules in achieving remission in patients with moderate to severe UC.

METHODS

The literature was searched up to May 2024. Phase 3 placebo or active comparator randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was induction and maintenance of endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES] ≤1). Secondary outcomes were the induction and maintenance of clinical remission, endoscopic (MES = 0) and histological remission. A sub-analysis was performed based on the randomized controlled trial design and previous exposure to biologic therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 36 studies that met our inclusion criteria, with 14,270 patients with UC. Upadacitinib ranked highest in inducing clinical remission (99.6%), and endoscopic improvement (99.2%), followed by risankizumab (91.4%) and (82.3%), respectively. In maintenance of endoscopic improvement, upadacitinib ranked first (98.6%) followed by filgotinib 200 mg (79.2%). Risankizumab ranked first in the induction of histological remission (89.4%), followed by guselkumab (88.3%). Upadacitinib ranked first (93.1%) in maintaining histological remission, followed by guselkumab (89.5%).

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib appears to be superior to other therapies in achieving clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and remission, and histological remission. Furthermore, novel biologics such as risankizumab and guselkumab ranked high in achieving these outcomes. This study highlights the efficacy of small molecule drugs and novel selective interleukin-23s as alternatives to other biologics.

The Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Thioguanine in Thiopurine-Naïve Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently thioguanine is solely used as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease after azathioprine and/or mercaptopurine failure. This study aimed to determine the safety, effectiveness, and 12-month drug survival of thioguanine in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in thiopurine-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with thioguanine as first thiopurine derivate. Clinical effectiveness was defined as the continuation of thioguanine without the (re)initiation of concurrent biological therapy, systemic corticosteroids, or a surgical intervention. All adverse events were categorized by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients (male 39%, Crohn's disease 53%) were included with a median treatment duration of 25 months and a median thioguanine dosage of 20 mg/d. Clinical effectiveness at 12 months was observed in 53% of patients, and 78% of these responding patients remained responsive until the end of follow-up. During the entire follow-up period, 26 patients were primary nonresponders, 8 had a secondary loss of response, and 11 patients were unable to cease therapy with systemic corticosteroids within 6 months and were therefore classified as nonresponders. After 12 months, thioguanine was still used by 86% of patients. Fifty (44%) patients developed adverse events (grade 1 or 2) and 9 (8%) patients ceased therapy due to the occurrence of adverse events. An infection was documented in 3 patients, none of them requiring hospitalization and pancytopenia occurred in 2 other patients. No signs of nodular regenerative hyperplasia or portal hypertension were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months, first-line thioguanine therapy was clinically effective in 53% of thiopurine-naïve inflammatory bowel disease patients with an acceptable safety profile.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is associated with various immune-mediated disorders including spondylarthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and uveitis. Chronic kidney disease [CKD] is defined by a reduction in kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2] and/or damage markers that are present for at least 3 months, regardless of the aetiology. Case reports and cohort studies suggest that IBD is associated with CKD. The extent and magnitude of a potential association is unknown. A comprehensive search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane database, and SCOPUS. Two separate reviewers were involved in the process of article selection and evaluation. Odds ratios were calculated in those papers with a comparison between an IBD population and a non-IBD control population, the Mantel Haenszel test was employed, using a random effect model. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO [RD42023381927]. A total of 54 articles was included in the systematic review. Of these, eight articles included data on prevalence of CKD in IBD patients [n = 102 230] vs healthy populations [n = 762 430]. Of these, diagnosis of CKD was based on International Classification of Diseases [ICD] codes in five studies vs on eGFR in three studies. The overall odds ratio of developing CKD in the IBD population is 1.59, [95% CI 1.31-1.93], without any difference between studies using diagnostic coding (odds ratio [OR] 1.70, 95% CI 1.33-2.19] vs diagnosis based on eGFR [OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.33-1.64]. IBD is associated with a clinically meaningful increased CKD prevalence. We provide recommendations on diagnostic evaluation, as well as suggestions for future research.

Should the Dermatological Assessment of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Become Standard during Qualifications for Biological Treatment? A Retrospective, Single-Center Experience from a Tertiary Center

Background: Oncological anxiety associated with biological therapy is a particular challenge in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and it has raised questions about the need for the dermatological assessment of the skin before starting biological therapy. Methods: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of dermal lesions, including cutaneous malignancies, in IBD patients. This retrospective, single-center study evaluated 805 IBD patients who qualified for biological treatment and were subjected to a dermatological assessment. Results: Dermal lesions (DLs) were found in 15.5% (125) of IBD patients. A risk factor for DLs was higher with body mass index (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.02; 1.14], p = 0.007). Surprisingly, there was no effect of thiopurines between the groups with and without DLs (90.4% vs. 84.6%, MD = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01; 0.12], p = 0.118). Moreover, cutaneous malignancies were diagnosed in 9 cases (1.1%), including 4 basal cell carcinomas, 4 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 melanoma skin cancer. Only 13.4% of patients complied with our strict policy of skin surveillance every 6-8 months. Conclusions: DLs, including cutaneous malignancies, are common in patients with IBD, making skin monitoring at the initiation of biological treatment an extremely useful tool. The lack of effect of the drugs used suggests that skin surveillance is necessary in all IBD patients. The low compliance of skin monitoring among immunosuppressed patients indicates the need for better education on the prevention of cutaneous malignancies.

Cost-Effectiveness of Vedolizumab as a First-Line Advanced Therapy Versus Adalimumab Treatment Sequences for Ulcerative Colitis in Italy

BACKGROUND

Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment sequences. Treatments in the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapeutic class, as well as vedolizumab, are widely used and endorsed as first-line options according to treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare treatment sequences involving vedolizumab and the anti-TNFα treatment adalimumab in terms of cost-effectiveness in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Italy.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model comparing treatment sequences within the Italian National Health Service in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with a lifetime horizon was developed. The analysis focused on the relative positioning of vedolizumab and adalimumab, leveraging the results of the landmark head-to-head VARSITY clinical trial as key inputs. The robustness of the results was investigated through a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

The strategy of vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy followed by adalimumab was associated with higher costs and health benefits compared with first-line adalimumab followed by vedolizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €16,146/QALY, which was found to be robust to changes to inputs associated with areas of high uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

This economic evaluation estimated a 94% probability that vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of €33,004/QALY when compared with first-line adalimumab sequences. Using clinical trial evidence to inform the efficacy of second-line treatments estimated that the effectiveness of anti-TNFα treatments is not substantially reduced by vedolizumab exposure.

Clinical settings with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis

There are aspects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, specifically tofacitinib, that distinguish them from other drugs used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), such as their oral administration, their short half-life and their lack of immunogenicity. With the available evidence, we can highlight tofacitinib's quick action and flexibility of use, and its efficacy in patients, irrespective of whether or not they have previously been exposed to TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF drugs) and other biologic agents. Moreover, their safety profile is known and manageable, with certain considerations and precautions being factored in before and during treatment. In this review, we have defined various scenarios pertaining to this drug, e.g. its use in the event of failure or intolerance to previous treatment with biologics, when a quick response is required or in patients with other concurrent immune-mediated diseases.

MMX mesalamine in ulcerative colitis: Major advantages towards classical mesalamine formulations

Medical therapy is the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis (UC) management and aims to induce and maintain remission. In case of mild-to-moderate UC, mesalamine (5-ASA) is the first-line option. 5-ASA requires local release at the level of the inflamed mucosa to exert its therapeutic action. While rectal preparations are useful in distal colitis, in cases of UC of at least rectosigmoid extent, guidelines suggest the association of oral and rectal 5-ASA. Mesalamine with Multi Matrix System® technology (MMX mesalamine) is an oral, high-strength (1.2 g/tablet), once-daily formulation of 5-ASA, designed to provide delayed and prolonged release throughout the entire colon. Clinical trials demonstrated a strong efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in active mild-to-moderate UC. The efficacy is related to specific colonic drug-delivery, to its high-dosage and once-daily administration, thus improving patients' adherence and outcomes. The specific colonic-delivery is also associated with very low rates of systemic absorption and adverse events (AEs). With this comprehensive review we aimed to summarize current knowledge on MMX mesalamine in mild-to-moderate UC, in terms of clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety, also compared to other 5-ASA products. In addition we provided an expert opinion on the topic, examining the implications on clinical practice.

Clinical Trial: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Two Patient Management Strategies in Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis-The OPTIMISE Study

Background: Current management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) involves monitoring clinical markers of disease activity, such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB), and adjusting treatment accordingly. Our aim was to assess whether targeting treatment based on faecal calprotectin (FC) levels (treat-to-target; T2T) provides greater UC disease control versus a symptom-based approach. Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised (1:1) controlled study of patients with mild-to-moderate UC (global Mayo score 2-6) treated with ≤2.4 g/day 5-aminosalicylic acid that compared the effectiveness of two management strategies with (interventional arm) and without (reference arm) FC home monitoring over 12 months of follow-up. Treatment was optimised in the interventional arm using FC values and clinical symptoms (PRO-2), while the reference arm used only PRO-2. Results: 193 patients completed the study. No significant difference was found for the primary endpoint (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] = 0 at 12 months). A numerical advantage for the interventional arm over the reference arm for the primary endpoint (37.0% vs. 33.4%, respectively) and for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was found following imputation for missing data. The composite endpoint of MES = 0, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was achieved at a significantly higher rate in the interventional arm than the reference arm (effect size [ES]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.32; p < 0.05). A similar result was obtained for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0 and SF ≤ 1 (ES: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.37; p < 0.05). Conclusions: T2T using FC monitoring was effective in patients with mild-to-moderate UC at 12 months. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm the results.

To STRIDE or not to STRIDE: a critique of "treat to target" in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

The STRIDE consensus intends to complement the clinical endpoint with an endoscopic endpoint of mucosal healing and others as treatment targets in ulcerative colitis. If these targets are not reached, STRIDE requires dose or timing adjustments or switching the medication. This narrative review provides a critique of this concept.

AREAS COVERED

We analyze and discuss the limitations of current endpoints as targets, their currently limited achievability, and the lacking evidence from controlled trials relating to 'treat to target.' The relevant publications in PubMed were identified in a literature review with the key word 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

In ulcerative colitis, the standard clinical target is measured traditionally by the MAYO-score, but in variable combinations of patient and physician reported outcomes as well as also different definitions of the endoscopic part. Only a score of 0 is more stringent than clinical remission but is only achieved by a minority of patients in first and even less in second line therapy. The concept is not based on clear evidence that patients indeed benefit from appropriate escalation of treatment. Until the STRIDE approach is proven to be superior to standard treatment focusing on clinical well-being, the field should remain reluctant.

Model-informed precision dosing: State of the art and future perspectives

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) stands as a significant development in personalized medicine to tailor drug dosing to individual patient characteristics. MIPD moves beyond traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by integrating mathematical predictions of dosing, and considering patient-specific factors (patient characteristics, drug measurements) as well as different sources of variability. For this purpose, rigorous model qualification is required for the application of MIPD in patients. This review delves into new methods in model selection and validation, also highlighting the role of machine learning in improving MIPD, the utilization of biosensors for real-time monitoring, as well as the potential of models integrating biomarkers for efficacy or toxicity for precision dosing. The clinical evidence of TDM and MIPD is discussed for various medical fields including infection medicine, oncology, transplant medicine, and inflammatory bowel diseases, thereby underscoring the role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and specific biomarkers. Further research, particularly randomized clinical trials, is warranted to corroborate the value of MIPD in enhancing patient outcomes and advancing personalized medicine.

A diagnostic dilemma: cytomegalovirus colitis as an uncommon comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease: a case report

BACKGROUND

The role of cytomegalovirus infection as an opportunistic pathogen in exacerbating ulcerative colitis and its response to treatment remain a topic of ongoing debate. Clinicians encounter numerous challenges, including the criteria for differentiating between an acute ulcerative colitis flare and true cytomegalovirus colitis, the diagnostic tests for identifying cytomegalovirus colitis, and determining the appropriate timing for initiating antiviral therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 28-year-old Syrian female with a seven-year history of pancolitis presented with worsening bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and tenesmus despite ongoing treatment with azathioprine, mesalazine, and prednisolone. She experienced a new flare of acute severe ulcerative colitis despite recently completing two induction doses of infliximab (5 mg/kg) initiated four weeks prior for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. She had no prior surgical history. Her symptoms included watery, bloody diarrhea occurring nine to ten times per day, abdominal pain, and tenesmus. Initial laboratory tests indicated anemia, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin levels, and positive CMV IgG. Stool cultures, Clostridium difficile toxin, testing for Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium, and microscopy for ova and parasites were all negative. Sigmoidoscopy revealed numerous prominent erythematous area with spontaneous bleeding. Biopsies demonstrated CMV inclusions confirmed by immunohistochemistry, although prior biopsies were negative. We tapered prednisolone and azathioprine and initiated ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg for ten days, followed by valganciclovir at 450 mg twice daily for three weeks. After one month, she showed marked improvement, with CRP and fecal calprotectin levels returning to normal. She scored one point on the partial Mayo score. The third induction dose of infliximab was administered on schedule, and azathioprine was resumed.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease presents a significant clinical challenge due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing and managing this condition is particularly difficult, especially regarding the initiation or continuation of immunosuppressive therapies.

Engineering a Novel Probiotic Toolkit in Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for Sensing and Mitigating Gut Inflammatory Diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation with no cure and limited treatment options that often have systemic side effects. In this study, we developed a target-specific system to potentially treat IBD by engineering the probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN). Our modular system comprises three components: a transcription factor-based sensor (NorR) capable of detecting the inflammation biomarker nitric oxide (NO), a type 1 hemolysin secretion system, and a therapeutic cargo consisting of a library of humanized anti-TNFα nanobodies. Despite a reduction in sensitivity, our system demonstrated a concentration-dependent response to NO, successfully secreting functional nanobodies with binding affinities comparable to the commonly used drug Adalimumab, as confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and in vitro assays. This newly validated nanobody library expands EcN therapeutic capabilities. The adopted secretion system, also characterized for the first time in EcN, can be further adapted as a platform for screening and purifying proteins of interest. Additionally, we provided a mathematical framework to assess critical parameters in engineering probiotic systems, including the production and diffusion of relevant molecules, bacterial colonization rates, and particle interactions. This integrated approach expands the synthetic biology toolbox for EcN-based therapies, providing novel parts, circuits, and a model for tunable responses at inflammatory hotspots.

Elucidating the genetic relationship between ulcerative colitis and diabetic kidney disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are chronic disorders with multifaceted pathogenesis, posing significant challenges in clinical management. While substantial efforts have been made to investigate the individual causes of these diseases, the interplay between UC and DKD is not well understood. This study aims to elucidate the genetic association between UC and DKD through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, offering new insights into common biological pathways and potential clinical implications.

Methods

We conducted a bidirectional two-sample MR study utilizing data from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for both UC and DKD. Instrumental variables (IVs) were meticulously selected according to genome-wide significance and stringent statistical criteria, ensuring robust causal inference. Various MR methodologies, including inverse variance weighting (IVW), were employed to assess the causal relationships between UC and DKD. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to validate the robustness of our findings.

Results

Our analysis revealed a significant causal relationship between genetic predisposition to UC and increased susceptibility to DKD. Specifically, individuals with a genetic susceptibility to UC exhibited a 17.3% higher risk of developing DKD. However, we found no evidence of a causal link between DKD and the risk of developing UC. Additionally, we identified shared genetic risk factors and molecular pathways linking UC and DKD, thereby highlighting potential therapeutic targets.

Discussion

This study underscores the intricate genetic interplay between UC and DKD, suggesting that individuals with UC may be at an elevated risk for developing DKD. Understanding these shared genetic pathways could facilitate the development of early detection strategies and targeted interventions for individuals at risk of DKD. Ultimately, these insights could lead to improved clinical outcomes for patients suffering from both conditions.

Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.

Insights into Probiotic Prescription among Gastroenterologists and Other Healthcare Professionals: Evidence from an Italian Survey

Background: Probiotics, which are live microorganisms that provide health benefits, have been extensively studied for their various clinical applications. However, despite their potential, high-quality data supporting their use in several gastrointestinal diseases are often lacking, and prescription behaviors can widely differ. This study aimed to assess different behaviors in probiotics knowledge and prescriptions among Italian gastroenterologists and healthcare professionals (HPs). Methods: A web-based electronic survey was distributed to all participants at the National Meeting of the Italian Young Gastroenterologist and Endoscopist Association (AGGEI) held in 2023. The survey investigated probiotic prescription practices for several gastrointestinal conditions, such as acute diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and diverticular disease. Results: Among 200 participants, 142 completed the survey, of whom 59 were gastroenterologists and 83 were HPs (surgeons, nutrition biologists, and other physicians). Significant differences were observed in the prescription of probiotics for the treatment of acute diarrhea and H. pylori. Both groups prescribed probiotics in monthly cycles for patients with IBS, although the majority prescribed multistrain formulations. Gastroenterologists were more likely to prescribe cyclic courses for IBS, while HPs tended to continue therapy by changing the probiotic strain in case of inefficacy. For ulcerative colitis, gastroenterologists prescribed probiotics more but for shorter durations. In Crohn's disease, gastroenterologists prescribed probiotics less and were less likely to prescribe multistrain formulations. Regarding SUDD, gastroenterologists tended to prescribe probiotics less frequently, although without a significant difference, with similar rates of preference for multistrain formulations. Conclusions: This survey highlights heterogeneous behaviors in probiotic prescription between gastroenterologists and HPs, with gastroenterologists more aligned with guidelines and available scientific evidence. Hence, enhancing probiotic education among healthcare professionals and gastroenterologists is crucial. Further studies are needed to better understand probiotics' role in gastrointestinal disorders through large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Benefit-Risk Trade-offs and Patient Preferences for Therapy Selection in Ulcerative Colitis: a Multicountry Preference Study

BACKGROUND

To help navigate the complex treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC), we quantified the benefit-risk trade-offs that patients were willing to make when choosing treatment.

METHODS

Patients completed an online discrete choice experiment. Eligible patients had a UC diagnosis for ≥6 months, were aged ≥18 years, and resided in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, or the UK. Patients chose between 2 hypothetical treatments set up to ensure trade-offs were made. Clinical trial data, literature review, and patient interviews identified treatment attributes. Relative attribute importance (RAI) scores and maximum acceptable risks were generated. A patient-centric benefit-risk assessment of 200 mg of filgotinib was conducted as an example to show how measured trade-offs can be used.

RESULTS

Overall, 631 patients participated; patients had a mean age of 42.2 years and were predominantly male (75.3%). Achieving and maintaining clinical remission was the most important factor for patients (RAI 32.4%); to achieve this, patients were willing to accept slightly higher risks of blood clots, serious infections, and malignancies compared with lower risk treatment profiles. Patients also valued the convenience of oral treatments, avoiding steroids, and the ability to attend school/work. The patient-centric benefit-risk assessment suggested patients are significantly more likely to prefer Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib over placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving clinical remission was the highest treatment priority for patients. To attain this, patients were willing to accept some slightly higher risk treatment profiles. Patient choices in the benefit-risk assessment suggested patients were significantly more likely to prefer filgotinib over placebo.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Onset and Disease Activity: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate?

Helicobacter pylori infection has significant epidemiological relevance due to the carcinogenic nature of this bacterium, which is potentially associated with cancer. When detected, it should ideally be eradicated using a treatment that currently involves a combination of gastric acid suppressors and multiple antibiotics. However, this treatment raises questions regarding efficacy and safety profiles in patients with specific comorbidities, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Eradication therapy for H. pylori includes components associated with adverse gastrointestinal events, such as Clostridioides difficile colitis. This necessitates quantifying this risk through dedicated studies to determine whether this antimicrobial treatment could be significantly associated with IBD relapse or exacerbation of pre-existing IBD, as well as whether it could potentially lead to the de novo onset of IBD. Although the available evidence is reassuring about the safety of eradication therapy in patients with IBD, it is limited, and there are no specific recommendations for this particular situation in the leading international IBD and H. pylori guidelines. Therefore, studies need to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of the available antimicrobial regimens for H. pylori eradication in patients with IBD, both in clinical trial settings and in real-life studies.

Patient preferences for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the GETAID

Background

Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown.

Objectives

This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator.

Design

In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale.

Methods

The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honest significant difference test.

Results

The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira® (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita® (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio® (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma® (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (p < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects.

Conclusion

In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.

The Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) aims to control inflammation through the use of immunosuppressive treatments that target various points in the inflammatory cascade. However, the efficacy of these therapies in the long term is limited, and they often are associated with severe side effects. Although the pathophysiology of the disease is not completely understood, IBD is regarded as a multifactorial disease that occurs due to an inappropriate immune response in genetically susceptible individuals. The gut microbiome is considered one of the main actors in the development of IBD. Gut dysbiosis, characterised by significant changes in the composition and functionality of the gut microbiota, often leads to a reduction in bacterial diversity and anti-inflammatory anaerobic bacteria. At the same time, bacteria with pro-inflammatory potential increase. Although changes in microbiome composition upon biological agent usage have been observed, their role as biomarkers is still unclear. While most studies on IBD focus on the intestinal bacterial population, recent studies have highlighted the importance of other microbial populations, such as viruses and fungi, in gut dysbiosis. In order to modulate the aberrant immune response in patients with IBD, researchers have developed therapies that target different players in the gut microbiome. These innovative approaches hold promise for the future of IBD treatment, although safety concerns are the main limitations, as their effects on humans remain unknown.

Sustained release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from azoreductase-responsive polymeric prodrugs for prolonged colon-targeted colitis therapy

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a challenging inflammatory gastrointestinal disorder, whose therapies encounter limitations in overcoming insufficient colonic retention and rapid systemic clearance. In this study, we report an innovative polymeric prodrug nanoformulation for targeted UC treatment through sustained 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) delivery. Amphiphilic polymer-based 13.5 nm micelles were engineered to incorporate azo-linked 5-ASA prodrug motifs, enabling cleavage via colonic azoreductases. In vitro, micelles exhibited excellent stability under gastric/intestinal conditions while demonstrating controlled 5-ASA release over 24 h in colonic fluids. Orally administered micelles revealed prolonged 24-h retention and a high accumulation within inflamed murine colonic tissue. At an approximately 60% dose reduction from those most advanced recent studies, the platform halted DSS colitis progression and outperformed standard 5-ASA therapy through a 77-97% suppression of inflammatory markers. Histological analysis confirmed intact colon morphology and restored barrier protein expression. This integrated prodrug nanoformulation addresses limitations in colon-targeted UC therapy through localized bioactivation and tailored pharmacokinetics, suggesting the potential of nanotechnology-guided precision delivery to transform disease management.

Efficacy of Vaccination and Revaccination Against Hepatitis B Virus Using 2 Different Strategies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit an increased risk for acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV), thus they should be vaccinated preferably, if not already infected or immunized. We assessed the efficacy of HBV vaccination in IBD patients and impact of different factors on the immune response. We also evaluated the success rate of 2 different revaccination strategies in the nonresponders.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study carried out in 5 tertiary centers. All patients were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. Patients tested negative and underwent the standard schedule with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months. Nonresponders (anti-HBs <10 IU/L) were offered a revaccination scheme with either 3 doses of 40 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months or an accelerated scheme with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 2 months.

RESULTS

A total of 409 patients were included, and 273 (66.7%) of those (females: 49.5%; Crohn's disease [CD]: 56.7%) responded to baseline vaccination. A total of 189 (69.2%) of 273 (females: 48.1%; CD: 60.3%) developed anti-HBs >100 IU/L. Body mass index <30 kg/m2 (P = .017) was positively associated, while diagnosis of CD (P = .013), extensive UC (P <.0001), extraintestinal manifestations (P = .001), and treatment with immunomodulators/anti-tumor necrosis factor (P < .00) negatively affected the response. Revaccination was offered to 103 patients, and 58.3% of them achieved anti-HBs >10 IU/L. Both revaccination strategies were equally effective.

CONCLUSIONS

IBD patients demonstrate lower response to HBV vaccination compared with the general population. Age, body mass index, type, disease activity, and immunosuppression negatively affect the response. Half of nonresponders may benefit from an enhanced revaccination attempt.

Therapeutic effect of Sheng Mai San, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, on inflammatory bowel disease via inhibition of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a globally emergent chronic inflammatory disease which commonly requires lifelong care. To date, there remains a pressing need for the discovery of novel anti-inflammatory therapeutic agents against this disease. Sheng Mai San (SMS) is a traditional Chinese medicine prescription with a long history of use for treating Qi and Yin deficiency and recent studies have shown that SMS exhibits anti-inflammatory potential. However, the effects of SMS on the gastrointestinal system remain poorly studied, and its therapeutic potential and underlying molecular mechanisms in IBD have yet to be discovered. In this study, we examined the therapeutic efficacy of SMS in IBD and its anti-inflammatory activity and underlying molecular mechanism, in vivo and in vitro.

Methods

The therapeutic efficacy of SMS in IBD was assessed in the DSS-induced acute colitis mouse model. Body weight, stool consistency, rectal bleeding, colon length, organ coefficient, cytokine levels in colon tissues, infiltration of immune cells, and colon pathology were evaluated. The anti-inflammatory activity of SMS and related molecular mechanisms were further examined in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophages via assessment of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and NF-κB, MAPK, STAT3, and NLRP3 signalling.

Results

SMS significantly ameliorated the severity of disease in acute colitis mice, as evidenced by an improvement in disease activity index, colon morphology, and histological damage. Additionally, SMS reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and infiltration of immune cells in colon tissues. Furthermore, in LPS-induced macrophages, we demonstrated that SMS significantly inhibited the production of cytokines and suppressed the activation of multiple pro-inflammatory signalling pathways, including NF-κB, MAPK, and STAT3. SMS also abolished NLRP3 inflammasome activation and inhibited subsequent caspase-1 activation and IL-1β secretion, suggesting a new therapeutic target for the treatment of IBD. These mechanistic findings were also confirmed in in vivo assays.

Conclusion

This study presents the anti-inflammatory activity and detailed molecular mechanism of SMS, in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, we highlight for the first time the potential of SMS as an effective therapeutic agent against IBD.

De-escalating therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from an observational study in clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) and an anti-TNF is commonly recommended in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, little is known about relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of relapse in a cohort of UC and CD patients with long-standing clinical remission after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to identify predictive factors for relapse.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with UC or CD on combination therapy and clinical remission for at least 6 months. IMM or anti-TNF was stopped upon physician decision. Primary objective was to evaluate the relapse rates after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to analyze predictors of relapse.

RESULTS

The study included 88 patients, 48 patients (54.5%) discontinued IMM and 40 (45.5%) anti-TNF. During follow-up, relapse rates were 16.7% and 52.5% in the IMM discontinuation group and anti-TNF discontinuation group, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-TNF discontinuation (HR=3.01; 95% CI=1.22-7.43) and ileal CD location (HR=2.36; 95% CI=1.02-5.47) were predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor (HR=0.32; 95% CI=0.11-0.90). Reintroduction of anti-TNF upon relapse was effective and safe.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF discontinuation led to significantly higher relapse rates compared to IMM discontinuation in UC and CD patients on combination therapy. Anti-TNF discontinuation and ileal CD location were identified as predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor. Retreatment after anti-TNF discontinuation was effective and safe.

Mirikizumab Exposure-Response Relationships in Patients with Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Randomized Phase II and III Studies

Mirikizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody being developed for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. We characterized the relationship of mirikizumab systemic exposure with efficacy and safety end points in patients with UC using phase II (NCT02589665) and III (NCT03518086, NCT03524092) trial data. Exposure-response models were developed for clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, and change in modified Mayo score following induction (50-1,000 mg i.v. every 4 weeks) and maintenance (200 mg s.c. every 4 or 12 weeks) treatment. These models evaluated observed and pharmacokinetic model-predicted mirikizumab exposures as the exposure measure. Key safety event rates were compared across mirikizumab exposure quartiles in the phase III trial. Mirikizumab efficacy in patients with UC showed an apparent positive association with systemic exposure following both induction and maintenance. However, further analysis found this relationship to be overstated by the presence of confounding factors that were not among the tested patient covariates. While prior biologic experience and baseline disease severity showed statistically significant influences on estimated placebo effect, no patient factors affected the mirikizumab effect parameters in any of the phase III exposure-response models. There was no apparent mirikizumab concentration relationship with any adverse event of special interest. When the phase II and III data and confounding are considered together, efficacy was unlikely to be strongly affected by variation in exposures across individual patients at the phase III dose. Together with the previously demonstrated mirikizumab exposure insensitivity to patient factors, these findings indicate that mirikizumab dose adjustment to patient characteristics is not required.

Oral administration of CXCL12-expressing Limosilactobacillus reuteri improves colitis by local immunomodulatory actions in preclinical models

Treatments of colitis, inflammation of the intestine, rely on induction of immune suppression associated with systemic adverse events, including recurrent infections. This treatment strategy is specifically problematic in the increasing population of patients with cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis, as immune suppression also interferes with the ICI-treatment response. Thus, there is a need for local-acting treatments that reduce inflammation and enhance intestinal healing. Here, we investigated the effect and safety of bacterial delivery of short-lived immunomodulating chemokines to the inflamed intestine in mice with colitis. Colitis was induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) alone or in combination with ICI (anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4), and Limosilactobacillus reuteri R2LC (L. reuteri R2LC) genetically modified to express the chemokine CXCL12-1α (R2LC_CXCL12, emilimogene sigulactibac) was given perorally. In addition, the pharmacology and safety of the formulated drug candidate, ILP100-Oral, were evaluated in rabbits. Peroral CXCL12-producing L. reuteri R2LC significantly improved colitis symptoms already after 2 days in mice with overt DSS and ICI-induced colitis, which in benchmarking experiments was demonstrated to be superior to treatments with anti-TNF-α, anti-α4β7, and corticosteroids. The mechanism of action involved chemokine delivery to Peyer's patches (PPs), confirmed by local CXCR4 signaling, and increased numbers of colonic, regulatory immune cells expressing IL-10 and TGF-β1. No systemic exposure or engraftment could be detected in mice, and product feasibility, pharmacology, and safety were confirmed in rabbits. In conclusion, peroral CXCL12-producing L. reuteri R2LC efficiently ameliorates colitis, enhances mucosal healing, and has a favorable safety profile.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Colitis symptoms are efficiently reduced by peroral administration of probiotic bacteria genetically modified to deliver CXCL12 locally to the inflamed intestine in several mouse models.

Combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis and tofacitinib: Multicentre and retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study including all patients with refractory UC who received GMA plus TOFA. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3). Patients were mostly receiving TOFA 10mg bid (75%), and 33% also concomitant steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 7 (IQR, 5-7), and it decreased to a median of 2 (IQR, 0-3) and 0 (IQR, 0-3) after 1 and 6 months (p=0.027 and 0.020, respectively), while no differences were found in CRP and FC. Clinical remission was achieved by 6 patients both at 1 (50%) and 6 months (67%). CF values<250mg/kg were achieved by 2 and 4 patients at 1 and 6 months (data available in 5 and 7 patients, respectively). No patient required dose-escalation of TOFA, and one patient was able to de-escalate the drug. No patient required colectomy and all patients under steroids were able to stop them.

CONCLUSION

The combination of GMA and TOFA can be effective in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.

Selective granulocyte-monocyte apheresis during induction with vedolizumab in moderate-severe ulcerative colitis: Experience in a tertiary hospital

AIM

Granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) is a potential therapeutic option when combined with various drugs for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we analyze the efficacy and safety of GMA combined with vedolizumab (VDZ) during induction in patients with moderate-severe UC and incomplete response to steroids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective review of patients receiving GMA+VDZ. Data on the disease and previous treatments were collected. Clinical response was classified as no response, response without remission, and remission. Available data on biochemical and endoscopic response were included. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 6 patients with UC who had received GMA+VDZ during induction after failure of an anti-TNF agent. The median number of GMA sessions was 5 (IQR 4-5; 3-10). All the patients received VDZ 300mg iv at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and 5 (83%) received an additional dose at week 10. During maintenance, all the patients continued VDZ iv every 8 weeks. The median follow-up was 57.6 months (IQR: 39-74). Four of the 6 patients achieved clinical remission after GMA+VDZ and continued in deep remission until the end of follow-up. A median, non-significant decrease of 1378μg/g (IQR: 924-5778μg/g) was observed for calprotectin and 42.2mg/l (IQR: 15.3-113.5) for CRP vs. baseline. No patient underwent colectomy. No treatment-related AEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

GMA+VDZ during induction can be effective and safe in selected patients with moderate-severe UC and partial response to steroids.

Safety, Effectiveness, and Treatment Persistence of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in IBD: A Multicenter Study From the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite intravenous (IV) vedolizumab being established for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the novel subcutaneous (SC) route of administration may provide numerous incentives to switch. However, large-scale real-world data regarding the long-term safety and effectiveness of this strategy are lacking.

METHODS

IBD patients on IV vedolizumab across 11 UK sites agreed to transition to SC injections or otherwise continued IV treatment. Data regarding clinical disease activity (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, partial Mayo score, and modified Harvey-Bradshaw Index), biochemical markers (C-reactive protein and calprotectin), quality of life (IBD control), adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes (namely corticosteroid use, IBD-related hospitalization, and IBD-related surgery) were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline and weeks 8, 24, and 52.

RESULTS

Data from 563 patients (187 [33.2%] Crohn's disease, 376 [66.8%] ulcerative colitis; 410 [72.8%] SC, 153 [27.2%] IV) demonstrated no differences in disease activity, remission rates, and quality of life between the SC and IV groups at all time points. Drug persistence at week 52 was similar (81.1% vs 81.2%; P = .98), as were rates of treatment alteration due to either active disease (12.2% vs 8.9%; P = .38) or adverse events (3.3% vs 6.3%; P = .41). At week 52, there were equivalent rates of adverse events (9.8% vs 7.8%; P = .572) and disease-related outcomes. IBD control scores were equivalent in both IV-IV and IV-SC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to SC vedolizumab appears as effective, safe, and well tolerated as continued IV treatment and maintains comparable disease control and quality of life as IV treatment at 52 weeks.

Practical management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: an international expert consensus

INTRODUCTION

Although there are well-defined guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), there are still unmet needs. For this reason, we conducted an international expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild-to-moderate UC and provide practical guidance to clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

Based on Delphi methodology, 15 statements were approved after two rounds of voting, addressing several aspects of disease management from sequencing to treatment duration, from monitoring to optimization techniques and safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing knowledge of mild-to-moderate UC has led to the development of new ambitious outcomes such as histological remission and disease clearance. Furthermore, noninvasive tools for patient monitoring such as fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound are now available. Their implementation in clinical practice will allow clinicians to tightly monitor disease activity and promptly adapt treatment, avoiding complications and disease progression and targeting better disease control.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukins for systemic lupus erythematosus: updates in early clinical drug development

INTRODUCTION

The advent of biological therapies has already revolutionized treatment strategies and disease course of several rheumatologic conditions, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines and interleukins represent a considerable portion of this family of drugs. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) dysregulation of different cytokine and interleukin-related pathways have been linked to disease development and perpetration, offering palatable therapeutic targets addressable via such mAbs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of the different biological therapies under development targeting cytokines and interleukins, with a focus on mAbs, while providing the rationale behind their choice as therapeutic targets and analyzing the scientific evidence linking them to SLE pathogenesis.

EXPERT OPINION

An unprecedented number of clinical trials on biological drugs targeting different immunological pathways are ongoing in SLE. Their success might allow us to tackle present challenges of SLE management, including the overuse of glucocorticoids in daily clinical practice, as well as SLE heterogenicity in treatment response among different individuals, hopefully paving the way toward precision medicine.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with steroid-sparing medications is age-dependent - Results from a Danish nationwide cohort study, 2000-2018

BACKGROUND

Paediatric-onset and elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present unique treatment challenges.

AIMS

We investigated treatment patterns following a first and second course of systemic steroids in paediatric- and elderly-onset IBD and compared them to adult-onset IBD.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) between 2000 and 2018 were identified through the Danish healthcare registries. Patients were divided into groups based on their age at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier plots were prepared for medications and surgeries after diagnosis and after the first and second courses of systemic steroids. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate Cox regression analysis for steroid-sparing medications.

RESULTS

1851 CD (13%) and 1687 (6%) UC patients were paediatric-onset, while 2952 (20%) CD and 5812 (23%) UC patients were elderly-onset. Paediatric-onset more frequently received immunomodulators [CD: HR: 1.64, CI: 1.52-1.77, UC: HR: 2.29, CI: 2.02-2.61] and biologics [CD: HR: 1.43, CI: 1.25-1.65, UC: HR: 1.27, CI: 0.99-1.64], while elderly-onset less frequently received immunomodulators [CD: HR: 0.39, CI: 0.35-0.44, UC: HR: 0.58, CI: 0.50-0.67] and biologics [CD: HR: 0.19, CI: 0.14-0.25, UC: HR: 0.36, CI: 0.27-0.48] compared to adult-onset age groups. After two courses of systemic steroids, elderly-onset still received less steroid-sparing medications. High frailty was associated with lower usage of medications for elderly-onset.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the use of steroid-sparing medication between age of onset, even after two courses with systemic steroids. High frailty could account for some of these differences in elderly-onset IBD.

Role of Intestinal Ultrasound for IBD Care: A Practical Approach

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has recently become the imaging technique of choice for patients with different types of intestinal inflammation. IUS has a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value when diagnosing Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Further, it is now the preferred imaging modality for routine IBD reevaluations because of its non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, availability (at least in Europe), and reproducibility in all age groups. However, the clinical success of IUS requires IUS training for doctors and technicians who perform IUS with a standardised description of ultrasound findings of the terminal ileum and entire colon. Complications such as abscess formation, fistulae, and stenosis can be detected by either conventional IUS or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Lately, several disease activity scores have been proposed for Crohn's disease, postoperative Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis both in adults (including elderly) and in children. IUS was successfully used in randomised clinical trials in order to measure the treatment response. Therefore, IUS now plays a central role in clinical decision making.

Natural approaches for the management of ulcerative colitis: evidence of preclinical and clinical investigations

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a recurring autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation in the mucosal lining of the lower part of the large intestine. Conventional treatment options such as salicylates, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants often come with severe side effects, limited bioavailability, and the development of drug resistance, which hampers their therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, it is imperative to explore natural strategies as safe and alternative treatments for UC. Currently, around 40% of UC patients find relief through natural constituents, which can help reduce toxic side effects and maintain clinical remission. This review aims to provide a summary of both preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of various natural substances in the prophylaxis of UC. These natural options include plant extracts, essential oils, nutraceuticals, and phytochemicals. Furthermore, we will delve into the potential mechanisms that underlie the protective and curative actions of these novel herbal agents. In summary, this review will explore the effectiveness of natural remedies for UC, shedding light on their preclinical and clinical findings and the mechanisms behind their therapeutic actions. These alternatives offer hope for improved treatment outcomes and reduced side effects for individuals suffering from this challenging autoimmune condition.

Long-term outcomes and predictors of vedolizumab persistence in ulcerative colitis

Background

Long-term vedolizumab (VDZ) outcomes in real-world cohorts have been largely limited to 1-year follow-up, with few bio-naïve patients or objective markers of inflammation assessed.

Objectives

We aimed to assess factors affecting VDZ persistence including clinical, biochemical and faecal biomarker remission at 1, 3 and 5 years.

Design

We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study.

Methods

All adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who had received VDZ induction for ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD-unclassified (IBDU) were included. Baseline phenotype and follow-up data were collected via a review of electronic medical records.

Results

We included 290 patients [UC n = 271 (93.4%), IBDU n = 19 (6.6%)] with a median time on VDZ of 27.6 months (interquartile range: 14.4-43.2). At the end of follow-up, a total of 157/290 (54.1%) patients remained on VDZ. The median time to discontinuation was 14.1 months (7.0-23.3). Previous exposure to ⩾1 advanced therapy, steroid use at baseline and disease extension (E3 and E2 versus E1) were independent predictors for worse VDZ persistence. Clinical remission (partial Mayo < 2) was 75.7% (171/226), 72.4% (157/217) and 70.2% (127/181) at years 1, 3 and 5, respectively. Steroid use during maintenance VDZ therapy occurred in 31.7% (92/290), hospitalization in 15.5% (45/290) and surgery in 3.4% (10/291). The rate of serious adverse events was 1.2 per 100 patient-years of follow-up.

Conclusion

VDZ effectiveness appears enduring with favourable long-term safety profile. VDZ persistence was influenced by previous exposure to biologics/small molecules, disease distribution and steroid use at baseline in our study.

Switching within versus out of class following first-line TNFi failure in ulcerative colitis: real-world outcomes from a German claims data analysis

Background

Biologic agents have demonstrated efficacy in treating ulcerative colitis (UC); however, treatment failure to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is common in the real world. Data on preferential sequencing in clinical practice after failure remain limited.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of patients cycling to TNFis or switching to non-TNFi biologics following first-line failure with TNFis.

Design

Retrospective cohort study in Germany.

Methods

Adult patients with UC were identified using administrative claims data from 1 May 2014 to 30 June 2022 provided by a statutory sickness fund. Patients newly initiating first-line therapy with TNFis and then switching to another agent were identified. Patients were defined as within-class switched (WCS), if they cycled to another TNFi, or outside-class switchers (OCS), if they switched to a non-TNFi biologic [ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ)] and followed from index (switch date) to death, insurance end, or study end on 30 June 2022. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between groups, and weighted Cox regression models were used to compare primary (time to discontinuation and second treatment switch) and secondary outcomes (corticosteroid-free drug survival).

Results

We identified 166 patients initiating TNFis and switching to a subsequent treatment (mean age: 42.9 years, 49.4% female). Following IPTW, there were 71 and 76 patients in the WCS and OCS groups, respectively. Compared to OCS, WCS were more likely to discontinue the new therapy [hazard ratio (HR), 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-2.89, p = 0.012], and switch a second time (HR, 3.46, 95% CI, 1.89-6.36, p < 0.001). Moreover, WCS showed an increased likelihood of initiating prolonged corticosteroid therapy (HR, 1.42, 95% CI, 0.77-2.59, p = 0.260); however, the results were not significant.

Conclusion

Following first-line TNFi failure, this study suggests that real-world outcomes among patients with UC are less favorable when cycling to another TNFi, compared to switching to a non-TNFi such as UST or VDZ.

Bile acid metabolism modulates intestinal immunity involved in ulcerative colitis progression

The bile acids (BA) in the intestine promote inflammation by interacting with immune cells, playing a crucial role in the progression of UC, but the specific mechanism between the two remains elusive. This study aims to explore the relationship between BAMand UC inflammation and determine its potential mechanisms.Firstly, we employed a hybrid approach using Lasso regression and support vector machine (SVM) feature selection in bioinformatics to identify genes linked to UC and BAM. The relationship between these genes and immune infiltration was explored, along with their correlation with immune factors in the Tumor-Immune System Interaction Database (TISIDB) database. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) pathway enrichment analysis was then used to predict signaling pathways associated with key genes in UC. Single-cell data from the GSE13464 dataset was also analyzed. Finally, Five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to BAM (APOA1, AMACR, PEX19, CH25H, and AQP9) were significantly upregulated/downregulated in UC immune cells. The expression of important genes in UC tissue was confirmed in the experimental validation section and AQP9, which showed significant differential expression, was chosen for further validation. The results showed that the AQP9 gene may regulate the IFN - γ/JAK signaling axis, thereby promoting CD8+T cell activation. This research has greatly advanced our comprehension of the pathogenesis and underlying mechanism of BAM in immune cells linked to UC.

"Two-birds-one-stone" oral nanotherapeutic designed to target intestinal integrins and regulate redox homeostasis for UC treatment

Designing highly efficient orally administrated nanotherapeutics with specific inflammatory site-targeting functions in the gastrointestinal tract for ulcerative colitis (UC) management is a noteworthy challenge. Here, we focused on exploring a specific targeting oral nanotherapy, serving as "one stone," for the directed localization of inflammation and the regulation of redox homeostasis, thereby achieving effects against "two birds" for UC treatment. Our designed nanotherapeutic agent OPNs@LMWH (oxidation-sensitive ε-polylysine nanoparticles at low-molecular weight heparin) exhibited specific active targeting effects and therapeutic efficacy simultaneously. Our results indicate that OPNs@LMWH had high integrin αM-mediated immune cellular uptake efficiency and preferentially accumulated in inflamed tissues. We also confirmed its effectiveness in the treatment experiment of colitis in mice by ameliorating oxidative stress and inhibiting the activation of inflammation-associated signaling pathways while simultaneously bolstering the protective mechanisms of the colonic epithelium. Overall, these findings underscore the compelling dual functionalities of OPNs@LMWH, which enable effective oral delivery to inflamed sites, thereby facilitating precise UC management.

Integrated network pharmacology and bioinformatics to identify therapeutic targets and molecular mechanisms of Huangkui Lianchang Decoction for ulcerative colitis treatment

BACKGROUND

Huangkui Lianchang Decoction (HLD) is a traditional Chinese herbal formula for treating ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its mechanism of action remains poorly understood. The Study aims to validate the therapeutic effect of HLD on UC and its mechanism by integrating network pharmacology, bioinformatics, and experimental validation.

METHODS

UC targets were collected by databases and GSE19101. The active ingredients in HLD were detected by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PubChem collected targets of active ingredients. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were established with UC-related targets. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia (KEGG) of Genes and Genomes enrichment were analyzed for the mechanism of HLD treatment of UC and validated by the signaling pathways of HLD. Effects of HLD on UC were verified using dextran sulfate sodium (DDS)-induced UC mice experiments.

RESULTS

A total of 1883 UC-related targets were obtained from the GSE10191 dataset, 1589 from the database, and 1313 matching HLD-related targets, for a total of 94 key targets. Combined with PPI, GO, and KEGG network analyses, the signaling pathways were enriched to obtain IL-17, Toll-like receptor, NF-κB, and tumor necrosis factor signaling pathways. In animal experiments, HLD improved the inflammatory response of UC and reduced UC-induced pro-inflammatory factors such as Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). HLD suppressed proteins TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB expression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study systematically dissected the molecular mechanism of HLD for the treatment of UC using a network pharmacology approach. Further animal verification experiments revealed that HLD inhibited inflammatory responses and improved intestinal barrier function through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway.

Effectiveness of Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Experiencing Intravenous Infliximab Failure

Background/Aims

Studies on elective switching to the subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab revealed comparable efficacy and safety and higher infliximab level than those exhibited by intravenous (IV) infliximab. However, no studies have reported on the effectiveness of SC switching in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who experienced IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study included UC patients who had been switched to SC infliximab because of IV infliximab failure, between January 2021 and January 2023. Group A was defined as having clinically and biochemically active UC (secondary loss of response), and group B consisted of patients with stable symptoms but biochemically active UC.

Results

Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria: 15 in group A and eight in group B. The serum infliximab levels significantly increased after SC switching in both groups. The electively switched group also exhibited increased infliximab levels after SC switching. Patients in group A showed improved partial Mayo score with a significant decrease in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein after switching. In group B, the fecal calprotectin level significantly decreased without clinical relapse after switching. A high proportion of patients (≥80%) in both groups achieved clinical and/or biochemical responses at the last follow-up. During the follow-up period, only two patients in group A discontinued SC infliximab, and only one complained of severe injection site reaction.

Conclusions

In UC patients who experience IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment, switching to SC infliximab may be a promising option because of better efficacy and safety.

IBD Patients with Primary or Secondary Nonresponse to Ustekinumab Benefit from Dose Escalation or Reinduction

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of IBD. This drug has a well-established efficacy; however, patients may not respond or lose response. The availability of other biological therapies prompts the need for comparative data between different agents to suggest first- or second-line strategies. Aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab to other biologics in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as report the available data on dose escalation and reinduction. A systematic electronic search of the English literature was performed up to November 2023, using Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Conference proceedings were also screened. Out of 659 citations, 80 relevant articles were selected and included in the present narrative review. Head-to-head comparisons of different biological drugs are relatively scarce, mostly deriving from indirect comparison or retrospective studies. Overall available data indicate similar effectiveness in the treatment of IBD patients. Dose escalation and reinduction strategies are well documented, but the optimal treatment schedule is still to be defined. Response and remission rates vary in different studies, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical and endoscopic outcomes. However, both approaches are effective and safe in nonresponders and secondary loss of response. IBD patients may benefit from dose escalation or reinduction. Both strategies prove effective in regaining response in a proportion of patients, avoiding unnecessary early switch. Head-to-head trials are still needed to determine the exact placement of this drug compared to other biologics.