Comparative clinical and laboratory evaluation of the prophylactic capacity of ribavirin, amantadine hydrochloride, and placebo in induced human influenza type A

nucleoside analogues for the treatment of influenza: history and experience

Aim. In this study we retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of nucleoside analogues (Triazavirin© and ribavirin) with that of oseltamivir for treating moderate severe influenza in adults. Materials and methods. We have used data from 191 health records of patients with moderate severe PCR confirmed influenza A and B. Control group included 57 patients treated with oseltamivir, comparison groups – 53 and 81 patients, who received Triazavirin© and ribavirin accordingly. We compared infectious intoxication syndrome duration, fever duration, duration of acute rhinitis, acute pharyngitis, acute laryngitis, acute tracheitis, acute bronchitis, cough duration as well as pneumonia occurrence. Results. No statistically significant difference in the duration of developed syndromes in Triazavirin©-treated group and oseltamivir-treated group were observed. We have noticed that fever duration had been significantly longer in ribavirin group compared to control group (4,1±2,22 days vs. 3,1±1,94 days, p<0,05) as well as more frequent pneumonia occurrence (1,2% vs. 0,0%, p>0,05). Conclusion. New nucleoside analogue Triazavirin© showed good efficacy and safety profile in adult patients with influenza. This fact provides the opportunity to recommend it for treatment of influenza along with neuraminidase inhibitors.

The Influenza Virus Polymerase Complex: An Update on Its Structure, Functions, and Significance for Antiviral Drug Design

Influenza viruses cause seasonal epidemics and pandemic outbreaks associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and a huge cost. Since resistance to the existing anti‐influenza drugs is rising, innovative inhibitors with a different mode of action are urgently needed. The influenza polymerase complex is widely recognized as a key drug target, given its critical role in virus replication and high degree of conservation among influenza A (of human or zoonotic origin) and B viruses. We here review the major progress that has been made in recent years in unravelling the structure and functions of this protein complex, enabling structure‐aided drug design toward the core regions of the PA endonuclease, PB1 polymerase, or cap‐binding PB2 subunit. Alternatively, inhibitors may target a protein–protein interaction site, a cellular factor involved in viral RNA synthesis, the viral RNA itself, or the nucleoprotein component of the viral ribonucleoprotein. The latest advances made for these diverse pharmacological targets have yielded agents in advanced (i.e., favipiravir and VX‐787) or early clinical testing, besides several experimental inhibitors in various stages of development, which are all covered here.

Anti-Influenza Treatment: Drugs Currently Used and Under Development

La gripe es una enfermedad contagiosa altamente prevalente y con significativa morbimortalidad. El tratamiento disponible con fármacos antivirales, de ser administrado de forma precoz, puede reducir el riesgo de complicaciones severas; sin embargo, muchos tipos de virus desarrollan resistencia a estos fármacos, reduciendo notablemente su efectividad. Ha habido un gran interés en el desarrollo de nuevas opciones terapéuticas para combatir la enfermedad. Una gran variedad de fármacos han demostrado tener actividad antiinfluenza, pero aún no están disponibles para su uso en la clínica. Muchos de ellos tienen como objetivo componentes del virus, mientras que otros son dirigidos a elementos de la célula huésped que participan en el ciclo viral. Modular los componentes del huésped es una estrategia que minimiza el desarrollo de cepas resistentes, dado que estos no están sujetos a la variabilidad genética que tiene el virus. Por otro lado, la principal desventaja es que existe un mayor riesgo de efectos secundarios asociados al tratamiento. El objetivo de la presente revisión es describir los principales agentes farmacológicos disponibles en la actualidad, así como los nuevos fármacos en estudio con potencial beneficio en el tratamiento de la gripe.

Cellular Metabolism and Anti-Influenza Activity of 1,3,4-Thiadiazol-2-Ylcyanamide (LY217896)

LY217896 (1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylcyanamide) is a 2-substituted thiadiazole that is an effective inhibitor of influenza A and B viruses in vitro and in the mouse infection model. The in vitro anti-influenza activity of LY217896 is reversed by a 10-fold excess amount of guanine or guanosine. LY217896 (1 or 10μg ml−1) effected a selective 60% decrease in the levels of intracellular pools of GTP in MDCK cells. The extent of cytotoxicity of LY217896 is positively correlated with the amount of LY217896 metabolite formed intracellularly. A cell line, derived from parental MDCK cells, was selected for resistance to 50 ng of LY217896 per ml. Unlike parental MDCK cells, the resistant cells were able to undergo log phase replication in LY217896 (25 g ml−1) and were unable to metabolize the compound. Furthermore, LY217896 had no antiviral activity against influenza A/Ann Arbor (IC50 >200μg ml−1) or vaccinia virus (IC50 = 13 μg ml−1) in resistant cells. In contrast, LY217896 inhibited influenza A/Ann Arbor (IC50 = 0.5 μg ml−1) or vaccinia virus (IC50 = 0.13 μg ml−1) in the parental MDCK cells. A thiadiazole, with a guanidinyl group in the 2 position, and ribavirin were active in both the parental cells and resistant cells. Nicotinamide (up to 240-fold excess) did not reverse the anti-influenza activity of LY217896 in vitro or in the mouse infection model. A 10-fold excess of nicotinamide reversed the cytotoxicity of 2-aminothiadiazole but not that of LY217896.

Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in children and the elderly

BACKGROUND

Influenza is an acute respiratory illness caused by influenza A and B viruses. Complications may occur, especially among children and the elderly.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of amantadine and rimantadine in preventing, treating and shortening the duration of influenza A in children and the elderly.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1966 to September week 4, 2014) and EMBASE (1980 to October 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing amantadine and/or rimantadine with no intervention, placebo, other antivirals or different doses or schedules of amantadine or rimantadine in children and the elderly with influenza A.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results. We extracted and analysed data using the standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 studies (2494 participants: 1586 children and 908 elderly) comparing amantadine and rimantadine with placebo, paracetamol (one trial: 69 children) or zanamivir (two trials: 545 elderly) to treat influenza A.Amantadine was effective in preventing influenza A in children (773 participants, risk ratio (RR) 0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.30). The assumed risk of influenza A in the control group was 10 per 100. The corresponding risk in the rimantadine group was one per 100 (95% CI 0 to 3). Nevertheless, the quality of the evidence was low and the safety of the drug was not well established.For treatment, rimantadine was beneficial in abating fever on day three of treatment in children: one selected study with low risk of bias, moderate evidence quality and 69 participants (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91). The assumed risk was 38 per 100. The corresponding risk in the rimantadine group was 14 per 100 (95% CI 5 to 34).Rimantadine did not show any prophylactic effect in the elderly. The quality of evidence was very low: 103 participants (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.41). The assumed risk was 17 per 100. The corresponding risk in the rimantadine group was 7 per 100 (95% CI 2 to 23).There was no evidence of adverse effects caused by treatment with amantadine or rimantadine.We found no studies assessing amantadine in the elderly.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the evidence combined with a lack of knowledge about the safety of amantadine and the limited benefits of rimantadine, do not indicate that amantadine and rimantadine compared to control (placebo or paracetamol) could be useful in preventing, treating and shortening the duration of influenza A in children and the elderly.

Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in children and the elderly

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of amantadine (AMT) and rimantadine (RMT) for preventing and treating influenza A in adults has been systematically reviewed. However, little is known about these treatments in children and the elderly.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of AMT and RMT in preventing and treating influenza A in children and the elderly.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to June week 3, 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing AMT and/or RMT with placebo, control, other antivirals or different doses or schedules of AMT or RMT, or both, or no intervention, in children and the elderly.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and assessed methodological quality. We resolved disagreements by consensus. In all comparisons except for one, we separately analysed the trials in children and the elderly using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 12 studies involving 2494 participants (1586 children and adolescents and 908 elderly) compared AMT and RMT with placebo, paracetamol (one trial; 69 children) or zanamivir (two trials; 545 seniors). All studies were RCTs but most were still susceptible to bias. Two trials in the elderly had a high risk of bias because of incomplete outcome data. In one of those trials there was also a lack of outcome assessment blinding. Risk of bias was unclear in 10 studies due to unclear random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Only two trials in children were considered to have a low risk of bias.AMT was effective in preventing influenza A in children. A total of 773 participants were included in this outcome (risk ratio (RR) 0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.30). The assumed risk of influenza in the control group was 10 per 100 and the corresponding risk in the RMT group was one per 100 (95% CI 0 to 3). The quality of the evidence was considered low. For treatment purposes, RMT was beneficial for abating fever on day three of treatment. For this purpose one study was selected with low risk of bias and included 69 children (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91). The assumed risk was 38 per 100 and the corresponding risk in the RMT group was 14 per 100, 95% CI 5 to 34. The quality of the evidence was moderate.RMT did not show a prophylactic effect against influenza in the elderly, but the quality of evidence was considered very low. There were 103 participants (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.41, for an assumed risk of 17 per 100 and a corresponding risk in the RMT group of 7 per 100, 95% CI 2 to 23). We did not identify any AMT trials in the elderly that met our inclusion criteria.There was no evidence of adverse effects of AMT and RMT in children or an adverse effect of RMT in the elderly. We did not identify any AMT trials in the elderly that met our inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

AMT is effective in preventing influenza A in children but the NNTB is high (NNTB: 12 (95% CI 9 to 17). RMT probably helps the abatement of fever on day three of treatment, but the quality of the evidence is poor. Due to the small number of available studies, we could not reach a definitive conclusion on the safety of AMT or the effectiveness of RMT in preventing influenza in children and the elderly.

Triple-combination antiviral drug for pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

A recent in vitro study showed that the three compounds of antiviral drugs with different mechanisms of action (amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir) could result in synergistic antiviral activity against influenza virus. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination antiviral therapy in patients with severe influenza illness. A total of 245 adult patients who were critically ill with confirmed pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (pH1N1) virus infection and were admitted to one of the intensive care units of 28 hospitals in Korea were reviewed. Patients who required ventilator support and received either triple-combination antiviral drug (TCAD) therapy or oseltamivir monotherapy were analyzed. A total of 127 patients were included in our analysis. Among them, 24 patients received TCAD therapy, and 103 patients received oseltamivir monotherapy. The 14-day mortality was 17% in the TCAD group and 35% in the oseltamivir group (P = 0.08), and the 90-day mortality was 46% in the TCAD group and 59% in the oseltamivir group (P = 0.23). None of the toxicities attributable to antiviral drugs occurred in either group of our study, including hemolytic anemia and hepatic toxicities related to the use of ribavirin. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the odds ratio for the association of TCAD with 90-day mortality was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 1.42; P = 0.24). Although this study was retrospective and did not provide virologic outcomes, our results suggest that the treatment outcome of the triple combination of amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir was comparable to that of oseltamivir monotherapy.

Minimum Infective Dose of the Major Human Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Transmitted Through Food and the Environment

Viruses are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Determining the minimum dose of virus particles that can initiate infection, termed the minimum infective dose (MID), is important for the development of risk assessment models in the fields of food and water treatment and the implementation of appropriate infection control strategies in healthcare settings. Both respiratory and enteric viruses can be shed at high titers from infected individuals even when the infection is asymptomatic. Presence of pre-existing antibodies has been shown to affect the infectious dose and to be protective against reinfection for many, but not all viruses. Most respiratory viruses appear to be as infective in humans as in tissue culture. Doses of <1 TCID₅₀ of influenza virus, rhinovirus, and adenovirus were reported to infect 50% of the tested population. Similarly, low doses of the enteric viruses, norovirus, rotavirus, echovirus, poliovirus, and hepatitis A virus, caused infection in at least some of the volunteers tested. A number of factors may influence viruses' infectivity in experimentally infected human volunteers. These include host and pathogen factors as well as the experimental methodology. As a result, the reported infective doses of human viruses have to be interpreted with caution.

Chapter 7 Orthomyxovirus infections

The earth is a unity for influenza A virus in a manner not yet found for probably any other parasite and epidemics occur in all inhabited parts of the globe regardless of latitude, longitude, altitude, climate, rainfall, temperature, humidity, race and sex. Influenza A is the classic pandemic virus infection of man and influenza B virus also can cause sharp outbreaks, resulting in significant mortality. An overwhelming amount of data has accumulated on the biochemistry, cell biology, and epidemiology of influenza, but prospects of control of epidemics in the near future are dim. Meanwhile, a holding operation can be achieved using inactivated vaccine and rimantadine (100 mg/daily) in special risk groups in the population until new more effective vaccines and broad spectrum antivirals (active against influenza A and B virus) are developed. Research work is centered on biotechnology to produce immunogenic peptides and proteins and more logical searches for antivirals using amino acid sequence data and also virus specific enzymes such as the virion transcriptase as targets.

Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies

The dynamics of viral shedding and symptoms following influenza virus infection are key factors when considering epidemic control measures. The authors reviewed published studies describing the course of influenza virus infection in placebo-treated and untreated volunteers challenged with wild-type influenza virus. A total of 56 different studies with 1,280 healthy participants were considered. Viral shedding increased sharply between 0.5 and 1 day after challenge and consistently peaked on day 2. The duration of viral shedding averaged over 375 participants was 4.80 days (95% confidence interval: 4.31, 5.29). The frequency of symptomatic infection was 66.9% (95% confidence interval: 58.3, 74.5). Fever was observed in 37.0% of A/H1N1, 40.6% of A/H3N2 (p = 0.86), and 7.5% of B infections (p = 0.001). The total symptoms scores increased on day 1 and peaked on day 3. Systemic symptoms peaked on day 2. No such data exist for children or elderly subjects, but epidemiologic studies suggest that the natural history might differ. The present analysis confirms prior expert opinion on the duration of viral shedding or the frequency of asymptomatic influenza infection, extends prior knowledge on the dynamics of viral shedding and symptoms, and provides original results on the frequency of respiratory symptoms or fever.

Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in children and the elderly

BACKGROUND

Although amantadine (AMT) and rimantadine (RMT) are used to relieve or treat influenza A symptoms in healthy adults, little is known about the effectiveness and safety of these antivirals in preventing and treating influenza A in children and the elderly.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to systematically consider evidence on the effectiveness and safety of AMT and RMT in preventing and treating influenza A in children and the elderly.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2007, issue 3); MEDLINE (1966 to July 2007) and EMBASE (1980 to July 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing AMT and/or RMT in children and the elderly with placebo, control, other antivirals or comparing different doses or schedules of AMT and/or RMT or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and assessed methodological quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. In all comparisons except for one, the trials in children and in the elderly were analysed separately. Data were analysed and reported using Cochrane Review Manager 4.2. software.

MAIN RESULTS

In children, RMT was effective in the abatement of fever on day three of treatment. AMT showed a prophylactic effect against influenza A infection. AMT and RMT were not related to an increase in the occurrence of adverse effects. RMT also was considered to be well tolerated by the elderly, but showed no prophylactic effect. Different doses were comparable in the prophylaxis of influenza in the elderly, as well as in reporting adverse effects. Zanamivir prevented influenza A more effectively than RMT in the elderly.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

AMT was effective in the prophylaxis of influenza A in children. As confounding matters might have affected our findings, caution should be taken when considering which patients should to be given this prophylactic. Our conclusions about effectiveness of both antivirals for the treatment of influenza A in children were limited to a proven benefit of RMT in the abatement of fever on day three of treatment. Due to the small number of available studies we could not reach a definitive conclusion on the safety of AMT or the effectiveness of RMT in preventing influenza in children and the elderly.

Approaches and strategies for the treatment of influenza virus infections

Influenza A and B viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses. These viruses are responsible for severe morbidity and significant excess mortality each year. Infection with influenza viruses usually leads to respiratory involvement and can result in pneumonia and secondary bacterial infections. Vaccine approaches to the prophylaxis of influenza virus infections have been problematic owing to the ability of these viruses to undergo antigenic shift by exchanging genomic segments or by undergoing antigenic drift, consisting of point mutations in the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes as a result of an error-prone viral polymerase. Historically, antiviral approaches for the therapy of both influenza A and B viruses have been largely unsuccessful until the elucidation of the X-ray crystallographic structure of the viral NA, which has permitted structure-based drug design of inhibitors of this enzyme. In addition, recent advances in the elucidation of the structure and complex function of influenza HA have resulted in the discovery of a number of diverse compounds that target this viral protein. This review article will focus largely on newer antiviral agents including those that inhibit the influenza virus NA and HA. Other novel approaches that have entered clinical trials or been considered for their clinical utility will be mentioned.

Evaluation of the anti-influenza virus activities of 1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylcyanamide (LY217896) and its sodium salt

1,3,4-Thiadiazol-2-ylcyanamide (LY217896) and its sodium salt were shown to be effective against influenza A and B viruses in vitro and in the mouse model. In nondividing confluent MDCK cells, the 50% inhibitory concentration of LY217896 ranged from 0.37 to 1.19 micrograms/ml against various strains of influenza A virus and from 0.75 to 1.54 micrograms/ml against various strains of influenza B virus, with no apparent cytotoxicity. However, at a concentration of 0.31 microgram/ml, LY217896 inhibited the replication of dividing MDCK cells. LY217896 (9 mg/m2 of body surface area per day) administered in the diet, in the drinking water, by oral gavage, by intraperitoneal injection, or by aerosolization was well tolerated and protected CD-1 mice infected with a lethal dose of influenza A or B virus. Effective administration of the compound could be delayed for up to 96 h postinfection. Virus titer was reduced by 1 to 2 log10 units in lungs of mice given LY217896 in the drinking water. Mice treated initially with protective levels of LY217896 were resistant to a subsequent challenge of influenza virus in the absence of the compound, indicating that the animals were able to develop immunity to the initial infection. Administration of LY217896 to uninfected mice did not induce interferon-like activity or interfere with natural killer cell function. In the ferret, LY217896 was effective in preventing fever induced by influenza virus.

Antiviral agents

Amantadine is well established as the preferred antiviral agent for the prophylaxis of influenza A and may also be beneficial therapeutically when used early in the course of the disease. Idoxuridine is applicable only in the treatment of herpetic keratitis. Currently, acyclovir is the most effective agent for the treatment of herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections. Ribavirin has recently been released for use in aerosol form for severe respiratory syncytial virus infections that occur in infants and young children. Vidarabine, which previously was the drug of choice in the treatment of severe herpetic infections, has now been replaced by the more effective acyclovir. Ganciclovir, an experimental agent, has shown promise against cytomegalovirus infections in patients who have undergone kidney or liver transplantation, but its effects are only temporary in patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation and patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who have cytomegalovirus infections.

Antiviral Chemotherapyand Prophylaxis of Viral Respiratory Disease

Several antiviral agents are currently available for the treatment and prophylaxis of viral respiratory disease. These include oral amantadine for influenza A and aerosolized ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infections. Additional agents, such as rimantadine and intranasal interferons, and newer approaches, including thе use of combination chemotherapy, offer promise for the improved management of viral respiratory tract infections.

Clinical review of ribavirin

The recent approval of ribavirin aerosol for the treatment of severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and young children is a significant addition to the antiviral drugs available today. When administered as an aerosolized form by face mask or mist tent for 20 to 21 hours per day, ribavirin effectively decreases the symptoms of RSV infection and the shedding of RSV virus. Studies of other viral infections such as viral hepatitis, influenza A and B, Lassa fever, genital herpes, and herpes zoster have demonstrated promising, but inconclusive results. Further studies are needed to justify ribavirin therapy for these indications.

Changes in body temperature after administration of antipyretics, LSD, delta 9-THC and related agents: II

Antipyretics, in particular acetaminophen, aspirin and ibuprofen, constitute the single most important class of drugs used therapeutically for an effect on body temperature. Hallucinogens exert prominent actions on the central nervous system, and it is not surprising that, like so many other centrally-acting agents, they too often affect temperature. This compilation primarily covers the considerable amount of data published from 1981 through 1985 on the interactions of these drugs and thermoregulation, but data from many earlier papers not included in a previous compilation are also tabulated. The effects of agents not classically considered as antipyretics on temperatures of febrile subjects are also covered. The information listed includes the species used, the route of administration and dose of drug, the environmental temperature at which experiments were performed, the number of tests, the direction and magnitude of change in body temperature and remarks on special conditions, such as age or brain lesions. Also indicated is the influence of other drugs, such as antagonists, on the response to the primary agent.

Clinical considerations in the diagnosis of viral respiratory infections

Recent advances are allowing the transfer of sensitive and precise rapid viral antigen detection technology from sophisticated research laboratories to standardly equipped clinical diagnostic facilities. It is now possible to identify many viral respiratory pathogens directly from clinical specimens in less than 1 hr. Rapid antigen detection promises to be of the most value in the identification of respiratory viruses 1) for which antiviral therapy is available, 2) which can be prevented by employing isolation precautions, chemoprophylaxis, and/or immunization, 3) whose presence usually is associated with acute respiratory disease, not just asymptomatic colonization, and 4) which ordinarily are not associated with concomitant bacterial infection, and thus, whose early detection may allow withholding or withdrawing antibiotics. Based on these considerations, the relative usefulness of rapid viral antigen detection of commonly encountered respiratory pathogens will be discussed. In addition, the role of rapid viral detection in diagnosis of respiratory infections in high risk versus otherwise healthy individuals will be explored.

Ribavirin: a clinical overview

Ribavirin, a broad spectrum, non-interferon-inducing virustatic chemotherapeutic agent, demonstrates activity against a wide range of RNA and DNA viruses, including the retrovirus known to cause the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. The drug's proposed mechanism of action, as well as pharmacokinetics are discussed, and preclinical toxicity, safety and clinical efficacy studies are presented. To date, the best success has occurred in the use of ribavirin to treat respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants and young children and to treat influenza A and B virus infections in young adults. Viral infections, particularly viral pneumonia, are often life-threatening in infants with severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID), and ribavirin aerosol has been used successfully to treat respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infection of immunodeficient children. Special note is taken of ribavirin's clinical benefit in treating severe and life-threatening infections caused by the Lassa fever virus and the significant improvement over either the use of immune plasma or supportive therapy alone. Indeed, ribavirin thus emerges as the first antiviral drug that is able to reduce mortality in a highly lethal systemic disease by more than 90%. Additional studies demonstrate the drug's efficacy in acute viral hepatitis, herpesvirus infections, and measles. Controlled clinical trials are underway to test the drug in patients infected with the AIDS virus.

Hematological and bone marrow effects of ribavirin in rhesus monkeys

Ribavirin (Virazole, 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide), a broad-spectrum antiviral compound, was evaluated for effects on blood and bone marrow of rhesus monkeys when administered by intramuscular injection for 10 days in doses of 30 or 100 mg/kg/day (four monkeys/group). Both groups developed a normochromic, normocytic anemia that was mild in the low-dose group and severe in the high-dose group. A dose-related erythroid hypoplasia occurred during the treatment period. Myeloid precursors were not affected. Differential counts of erythroid precursors showed a significant decrease in late erythroid forms while early erythroid forms were either unchanged or increased. Megakaryocyte numbers were increased in both groups. Qualitative changes in marrow cells included vacuolization of erythroid precursors and of occasional white cell precursors and megakaryocytes, and the appearance of bone marrow histiocytes containing red cells in various stages of disintegration. Thrombocytosis occurred in both treatment groups, with platelet counts returning to control values after drug withdrawal. Platelet function was not affected by treatment. No drug-related changes were seen during the treatment period for total and differential leukocyte counts, mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. Reticulocyte counts and mean corpuscular volume increased after treatment then returned to control values. Osmotic fragility of erythrocytes was not changed. These data show that in monkey, ribavirin causes a dose-related decrease in circulating red blood cell mass that is due in part to suppression of late erythroid precursors in bone marrow. These effects are reversible when treatment is discontinued and are not predictive of potentially serious or lasting untoward effects of ribavirin.

Aerosolized ribavirin treatment of infants with respiratory syncytial viral infection. A randomized double-blind study

We evaluated a new antiviral agent, ribavirin, in the treatment of infants hospitalized with lower-respiratory-tract disease from respiratory syncytial virus. Ribavirin or placebo was administered to 33 infants in a double-blind manner by continuous aerosol for three to six days. Seventeen infants were treated with placebo, and 16 with ribavirin. By the end of treatment, infants receiving ribavirin had significantly greater improvement in their overall score for severity of illness, in lower-respiratory-tract signs, and in arterial oxygen saturation. Viral shedding was also diminished in the treated groups as compared with the placebo group. No side effects or toxicity were associated with the aerosol therapy. Isolates of respiratory syncytial virus obtained from the infants over the course of therapy showed no change in sensitivity to ribavirin.

Comparative activity of amantadine and ribavirin against influenza virus in vitro: possible clinical relevance

The activities of amantadine and ribavirin against influenza A viruses were compared against low-multiplicity (plaque inhibition) and high-multiplicity (protein synthesis inhibition) infections. Our results suggest that the predictive value of in vitro data for the clinic may be improved by consideration of tests against a high-multiplicity infection.

Ribavirin small-particle aerosol treatment of influenza

In an outbreak of influenza virus A/England/333/80(H1N1) infections in college students, 14 randomly selected patients were treated by inhalation of ribavirin small-particle aerosol through a face mask. They retained an average estimated 1.15 g of drug in 23 h of treatment given over 3 days. 17 patients served as controls. Ribavirin aerosol treatment had a therapeutic effect judged by the highly significant reduction in height and duration of fever, reduction in systemic illness, and disappearance of influenza virus from respiratory secretions. 1 additional patient with influenzal pneumonia caused by a strain of influenza virus A/Bangkok/79(H3N2) recovered promptly with ribavirin aerosol treatment.

Ribavirin and inosiplex: a review of their present status in viral diseases

A considerable amount of information has accumulated during the past 10 years in the search for antiviral agents. Ribavirin and inosiplex are 2 interesting developments to come out of this search. Ribavirin, a synthetic nucleoside, has an unusually wide spectrum of antiviral activity, especially when tested in vitro. A large number of RNA and DNA viruses are sensitive, especially herpes viruses, poxvirus, influenza, parainfluenza, reovirus, togavirus, and RNA tumour viruses. The in vivo antiviral spectrum of activity is much narrower, with activity against herpes virus, influenza, parainfluenza, measles and adenoviruses. However, controlled clinical trials have not been uniformly successful in treating influenza, hepatitis, herpes simplex and herpes zoster. Inosiplex has been shown to have antiviral activity in vivo against influenza, herpes simplex, rhinovirus and vaccinia virus infections. However, antiviral activity has not been consistently demonstrated, and this observation led to further studies which revealed its immunomodulating effects. The accumulated evidence has indicated that inosiplex is more a prohost agent rather than an antiviral drug. Immune functions which are depressed during viral infection can be restored to normal by inosiplex therapy. At present, neither ribavirin nor inosiplex alone has been shown to be uniformly successful in the treatment of human viral diseases. Nevertheless, their potential place in chemotherapy should not be neglected, although further data are needed to determine what this place will be. Whether combining them with other antiviral agents such as interferon, acyclovir, Ara-A, and so on, would produce a potentiation of action and improved antiviral chemotherapy, will be an interesting area for further study.

Plasma disappearance, urine excretion, and tissue distribution of ribavirin in rats and rhesus monkeys

Ribavirin has been shown to have broad-spectrum antiviral. To study its tissue distribution and disappearance rate, a single dose of 10 mg/kg which contained 10 microCi of [14C]ribavirin was injected intravenously into rhesus monkeys and intramuscularly into monkeys and rats. Except for peak plasma concentrations and the initial phases of the plasma disappearance and urine excretion curves, no significant difference was observed between plasma, tissue, or urine values for intramuscularly or intravenously injected monkeys. Plasma disappearance curves were triphasic; plasma concentrations of ribavirin were similar for both monkeys and rats. Rats excreted ribavirin in the urine more rapidly and to a greater extent (82% excreted in 24 h) than did monkeys (60% excreted in 72 h). In the rat, only 3% of the injected [14C]ribavirin was detected in expired CO2. Therefore, for both species, urine was the major route for the elimination of labeled ribavirin and its metabolites from the body. In monkeys, the amount of parent drug in blood cells increased through 48 h and remained stable for 72 h, whereas in rats, ribavirin decreased at a rate similar to the plasma disappearance curve. Concentrations of ribavirin at 8 h were consistently higher in monkeys than in rats for all tissues except the brain. Thus, these differences in blood cellular components and organ content and in urine excretion suggested that there was greater tissue retention of ribavirin in monkeys than in rats.

Enhancement of activity against influenza viruses by combinations of antiviral agents

In an investigation of alternative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of influenza virus infections, the antiviral activities of rimantadine hydrochloride, amantadine hydrochloride, ribavirin, and combinations of these drugs were assessed in vitro. Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers were inoculated with recent isolates of influenza viruses at low multiplicities of infection, and virus titers were determined after 24 h. The combination of rimantadine and ribavirin resulted in an enhanced antiviral effect (a decrease in virus titer of > 1.0 log10 plaque-forming unit per ml at 24 h relative to the maximal effect of a single drug) against A/USSR/90/77/H1N1, A/Texas/1/77/H3N2, A/New Jersey/76/HSW1N1, and A/PR/834/H0N1 viruses. The degree of inhibition depended on the virus strain used, the drug concentrations, and the virus inoculum. Amantadine and ribavirin showed enhanced activity. Ribavirin in combination with high (50 micrograms/ml), but not low (1.56 to 25 micrograms/ml), concentrations of rimantadine showed an enhanced antiviral effect against B/Hong Kong/72 virus. An assay of Madin-Darby canine kidney cell proliferation in the presence of drugs showed that the enhanced inhibitory effect of drug combinations was not due to increased cytotoxicity.

Effects of ribavirin on respiratory syncytial virus in vitro

Ribavirin was demonstrated to have an antiviral effect on respiratory syncytial virus in vitro. A 50% reduction in plaque number was observed at concentrations of 3 or 10 micrograms of ribavirin per ml. This effect was observed when the drug was added as late as 12 h postinfection. At concentrations of greater than 10 micrograms of ribavirin per ml, the size of the syncytial plaque also noticeably decreased. Ribavirin similarly decreased the number of infectious units released into the culture supernatant. The antiviral effect was observed to be inversely related to the size of the viral inoculum, although all concentrations above 3.2 micrograms of ribavirin per ml visibly lessened the cytopathic effect regardless of the inoculum. Cloning of respiratory synctial virus in inhibitory concentrations of ribavirin failed to show increased resistance to the drug.

Plaque inhibition assay for drug susceptibility testing of influenza viruses

The relative antiviral activities of four drugs against contemporary strains of influenza A and B viruses were determined in Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers with a plaque inhibition assay. This assay proved to be a reliable, rapid method of determining 50% inhibitory concentrations that correlated well with clinically achievable drug levels and the results of clinical trials. Contemporary strains of influenza A viruses (subtypes H1N1, H3N2, HSW1N1) required amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride 50% inhibitory concentrations in the range of 0.2 to 0.4 microgram/ml, whereas 50% inhibitory concentrations ranged from approximately 50 to 100 micrograms/ml against influenza B viruses. Ribavirin was approximately 10-fold less active than amantadine hydrochloride against influenza A viruses, and the ribavirin 50% inhibitory concentrations against both influenza A and B viruses ranged from 2.6 to 6.8 micrograms/ml. Inosiplex had no antiviral activity in this test system.

Determination of 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide (virazole) in blood and urine by chemical ionization-mass fragmentography

A combined gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric technique is described for the quantification of virazole in serum and urine. Proteins are removed by molecular filtration, lipids by extraction with dichloromethane and interfering endogenous constituents by acidic and basic ion-exchange resins. Virazole is quantified by monitoring the protonated molecular ions of the fully silylated derivatives of virazole (m/e 533) and the arabinose analog (internal standard) obtained by methane chemical ionization. The detection limit is 150 pg (0.6.10(-12) mole) of virazole injected. In serum 10 ng/ml (4.10(-8) mole) can be detected, 25 ng/ml quantified. In urine 0.5 microgram/ml can be quantified without preconcentration. Virazole was detected in serum for at least 96 h at the 70-ng/ml level.

Double-blind evaluation of oral ribavirin (Virazole) in experimental influenza A virus infection in volunteers

The prophylactic effectiveness of oral administration of ribavirin (1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide) against experimentally induced influenza A infection was evaluated in a double-blind clinical trial in normal volunteers. Fourteen men received ribavirin capsules (1,000 mg/day in four divided doses) and 15 other men received identical-appearing placebo capsules beginning 6 h after the intranasal inoculation of 3.4 log(10) 50% tissue culture infectious doses of influenza virus A/Victoria/3/75 H3N2 and continuing for 5 days after challenge. The total number of moderate-to-severe symptom scores and the total number of temperatures >/=100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C) were significantly lower in the ribavirin group compared with the placebo group. The mean quantity of virus shed in nasal wash specimens and the total number of days that there were viral titers greater than 1.0 log(10) 50% tissue culture infectious doses per ml were significantly greater in the placebo group. There was no difference between the frequencies of virus isolated or the antibody responses in the two groups. Therefore, prophylactic ribavirin ameliorated symptoms and fever indicative of moderate-to-severe illness, but had no effect on the manifestations of mild illness in response to influenza A challenge. A transient rise in total serum bilirubin occurred in 29% of the ribavirin-treated volunteers and in none of the placebo-treated volunteers.

Clinical evaluation of 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide (ribavirin) in a double-blind study during an outbreak of influenza

1-beta-D-Ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide (ribavirin) at a dosage of 300 mg/day, or disguised placebo was administered to patients in a closed population during an epidemic outbreak of influenza in Mexico City. Treatment consisted of capsules given three times daily for 5 days beginning with first signs of disease. The study was conducted in a double-blind fashion. Clinical manifestations of the disease, as well as in titer of recoverable virus and in specific serum antibody titer were significantly reduced in the ribavirin-treated group. None of the individuals in the study had any sign of toxic effects attributable to the drug. In the study, 21 patients received the drug and 24 received placebo.