[A pharmacologic approach to treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease]

Mycobacterium abscessus is a fast-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria complex causing pulmonary infections, comprising the subspecies abscessus, massiliense and bolletii. Differences are based predominantly on natural inducible macrolide resistance, active in most Mycobacterium abscessus spp abscessus species and in Mycobacterium abscessus spp bolletii but inactive in Mycobacterium abscessus spp massiliense. Therapy consists in long-term treatment, combining multiple antibiotics. Prognosis is poor, as only 40% of patients experience cure. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data on M. abscessus have recently been published, showing that therapy ineffectiveness might be explained by intrinsic bacterial resistance (macrolides…) and by the unfavorable pharmacokinetics of the recommended antibiotics. Other molecules and inhaled antibiotics are promising.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid

Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with high potency against Gram-positive bacteria and currently prescribed in bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. The aim of the review was to summarize and critically review the key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of tedizolid. Tedizolid displays linear pharmacokinetics with good tissue penetration. In in vitro susceptibility studies, tedizolid exhibits activity against the majority of Gram-positive bacteria (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] of ≤ 0.5 mg/L), is four-fold more potent than linezolid, and has the potential to treat pathogens being less susceptible to linezolid. Area under the unbound concentration-time curve (fAUC) related to MIC (fAUC/MIC) was best correlated with efficacy. In neutropenic mice, fAUC/MIC of ~ 50 and ~ 20 induced bacteriostasis in thigh and pulmonary infection models, respectively, at 24 h. The presence of granulocytes augmented its antibacterial effect. Hence, tedizolid is currently not recommended for immunocompromised patients. Clinical investigations with daily doses of 200 mg for 6 days showed non-inferiority to twice-daily dosing of linezolid 600 mg for 10 days in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. In addition to its use in skin and skin-structure infections, the high pulmonary penetration makes it an attractive option for respiratory infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Resistance against tedizolid is rare yet effective antimicrobial surveillance and defining pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for resistance suppression are needed to guide dosing strategies to suppress resistance development.

Intracellular Accumulation of Novel and Clinically Used TB Drugs Potentiates Intracellular Synergy

The therapeutic repertoire for tuberculosis (TB) remains limited despite the existence of many TB drugs that are highly active in in vitro models and possess clinical utility. Underlying the lack of efficacy in vivo is the inability of TB drugs to penetrate microenvironments inhabited by the causative agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including host alveolar macrophages. Here, we determined the ability of the phenoxazine PhX1 previously shown to be active against M. tuberculosis in vitro to differentially penetrate murine compartments, including plasma, epithelial lining fluid, and isolated epithelial lining fluid cells. We also investigated the extent of permeation into uninfected and M. tuberculosis-infected human macrophage-like Tamm-Horsfall protein 1 (THP-1) cells directly and by comparing to results obtained in vitro in synergy assays. Our data indicate that PhX1 (4,750 ± 127.2 ng/ml) penetrates more effectively into THP-1 cells than do the clinically used anti-TB agents, rifampin (3,050 ± 62.9 ng/ml), moxifloxacin (3,374 ± 48.7 ng/ml), bedaquiline (4,410 ± 190.9 ng/ml), and linezolid (770 ± 14.1 ng/ml). Compound efficacy in infected cells correlated with intracellular accumulation, reinforcing the perceived importance of intracellular penetration as a key drug property. Moreover, we detected synergies deriving from redox-stimulatory combinations of PhX1 or clofazimine with the novel prenylated amino-artemisinin WHN296. Finally, we used compound synergies to elucidate the relationship between compound intracellular accumulation and efficacy, with PhX1/WHN296 synergy levels shown to predict drug efficacy. Collectively, our data support the utility of the applied assays in identifying in vitro active compounds with the potential for clinical development. IMPORTANCE This study addresses the development of novel therapeutic compounds for the eventual treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Tuberculosis continues to progress, with cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) resistance to first-line medications increasing. We assess new combinations of drugs with both oxidant and redox properties coupled with a third partner drug, with the focus here being on the potentiation of M. tuberculosis-active combinations of compounds in the intracellular macrophage environment. Thus, we determined the ability of the phenoxazine PhX1, previously shown to be active against M. tuberculosis in vitro, to differentially penetrate murine compartments, including plasma, epithelial lining fluid, and isolated epithelial lining fluid cells. In addition, the extent of permeation into human macrophage-like THP-1 cells and H37Rv-infected THP-1 cells was measured via mass spectrometry and compared to in vitro two-dimensional synergy and subsequent intracellular efficacy. Collectively, our data indicate that development of new drugs will be facilitated using the methods described herein.

A mean-field approach for modeling the propagation of perturbations in biochemical reaction networks

Often, the time evolution of a biochemical reaction network is crucial for determining the effects of combining multiple pharmaceuticals. Here we illustrate a mathematical framework for modeling the dominant temporal behaviour of a complicated molecular pathway or biochemical reaction network in response to an arbitrary perturbation, such as resulting from the administration of a therapeutic agent. The method enables the determination of the temporal evolution of a target protein as the perturbation propagates through its regulatory network. The mathematical approach is particularly useful when the experimental data that is available for characterizing or parameterizing the regulatory network is limited or incomplete. To illustrate the method, we consider the examples of the regulatory networks for the target proteins c-Myc and Chop, which play an important role in venetoclax resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. First we show how the networks that regulate each target protein can be reduced to a mean-field model by identifying the distinct effects that groups of proteins in the regulatory network have on the target protein. Then we show how limited protein-level data can be used to further simplify the mean-field model to pinpoint the dominant effects of the network perturbation on the target protein. This enables a further reduction in the number of parameters in the model. The result is an ordinary differential equation model that captures the temporal evolution of the expression of a target protein when one or more proteins in its regulatory network have been perturbed. Finally, we show how the dominant effects predicted by the mathematical model agree with RNA sequencing data for the regulatory proteins comprising the molecular network, despite the model not having a priori knowledge of this data. Thus, while the approach gives a simplified model for the expression of the target protein, it allows for the interpretation of the effects of the perturbation on the regulatory network itself. This method can be easily extended to sets of target proteins to model components of a larger systems biology model, and provides an approach for partially integrating RNA sequencing data and protein expression data. Moreover, it is a general approach that can be used to study drug effects on specific protein(s) in any disease or condition.

In Vitro Models for the Study of the Intracellular Activity of Antibiotics

Intracellular bacteria are poorly responsive to antibiotic treatment. Pharmacological studies are thus needed to determine the antibiotics which are the most potent or effective against intracellular bacteria as well as to explore the reasons for poor bacterial responsiveness. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model is described, consisting of (1) phagocytosis of preopsonized bacteria by eukaryotic cells, (2) elimination of noninternalized bacteria with gentamicin, (3) incubation of infected cells with antibiotics, and (4) determination of surviving bacteria by viable cell counting and normalization of the counts based on sample protein content. The use of strains expressing fluorescent proteins under the control of an inducible promoter allows to follow intracellular bacterial division at the individual level and therefore to monitor bacterial persisters that do not multiply anymore.

Mycobacterium abscessus Associated Peritonitis with CAPD Successfully Treated Using a Linezolid and Tedizolid Containing Regimen Suggested Immunomodulatory Effects

Patient: Female, 38-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Peritonitis

Symptoms: Abdominal and/or epigastric pain

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Infectious Diseases

Tedizolid (torezolid) for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

INTRODUCTION

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are among the most frequent infectious diseases. Recently, several new antibiotics with activity against MRSA have been approved. Tedizolid, a second-generation oxazolidinone approved for ABSSSI offers theoretical advantages over first-generation oxazolidinones.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive online search of Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference presentations was made, selecting articles between January 2000 and April 2020. In this review, the authors discuss the chemical and microbiological properties of tedizolid, summarize its efficacy, safety, and potential role in the treatment of ABSSSI as well as the potential for future indications.

EXPERT OPINION

Tedizolid has proven to be non-inferior compared to linezolid for the treatment of ABSSSI in two registrational phase III clinical trials, being well tolerated. Tedizolid exhibits antibacterial activity against the most important ABSSSI pathogens (including multidrug-resistant strains of MRSA), as well as mycobacteria and Nocardia. It appears to have a safe profile, including decreased myelotoxicity and no significant drug interactions. Preliminary studies with longer duration of therapy seem to confirm these potential benefits. Overall, tedizolid expands the newly acquired armamentarium to treat ABSSSI. The role of tedizolid for other indications is under investigation and has yet to be determined.

Emerging erythromycin and clindamycin resistance in group A streptococci: Efficacy of linezolid and tedizolid in experimental necrotizing infection

OBJECTIVES

Clindamycin (CLI) and erythromycin (ERY) resistance is increasing among group A streptococci (GAS) causing invasive disease and alternative treatments are urgently required. In this study, the efficacy of the newer oxazolidinone tedizolid (TZD) was compared with the first drug in this class, linezolid (LNZ), in experimental murine myonecrosis caused by ERY-susceptible/CLI-susceptible (ERY^S/CLI^S) or ERY- resistant/CLI-resistant (ERY^R/CLI^R) GAS.

METHODS

Normal adult outbred Swiss Webster female mice (10 per group) were infected intramuscularly with ERY^S/CLI^S (ATCC 12384) or ERY^R/CLI^R (15-003) GAS. Treatments began 4 h post-infection and continued for 72 h. TZD and LNZ (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) were given intraperitoneally every 12 h. Saline, penicillin (PEN), CLI and ERY were given every 6 h. Survival and infection severity signs and symptoms were followed for 12 days.

RESULTS

Both GAS strains were susceptible to LNZ, TZD and PEN; strain 15-003 was confirmed as constitutively resistant to ERY and CLI. Blood levels following a 40 mg/kg dose of LZD and TZD were 30.9 ± 4.0 μg/mL and 21.9 ± 5.3 μg/mL, respectively. Both TZD and LNZ were highly efficacious for the treatment of severe experimental myonecrosis caused by ERY^S/CLI^S and, importantly, ERY^R/CLI^R GAS.

CONCLUSION

In the current era of emerging macrolide/lincosamide resistance among GAS, these data support the use of TZD and LNZ as first-line antibiotics for the treatment of life-threatening GAS infections in humans.

Comparative in vitro potency and kill curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid against Gram-positive bacteria isolated from Chinese hospitalized patients in 2013-2016

We compared the kill-curve activity of tedizolid and linezolid at clinically relevant (total or free plasma, lung) concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) isolated from Chinese patients. Tedizolid had greater in vitro potency than linezolid against staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci species (tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range: ≤ 0.016-0.5 µg/mL; linezolid MIC range: 0.25-2 µg/mL). In kill-curve experiments, growth of MRSA was inhibited at tedizolid concentration of 0.6 µg/mL (i.e. 4.8 × MIC; MIC = 0.125 µg/mL) and linezolid concentration of 2 µg/mL (2× MIC; MIC = 1 µg/mL). Against PRSP, tedizolid at a concentration of 0.25 µg/mL (representing its MIC) was bacteriostatic, but exerted a bactericidal effect at higher concentrations. Results were similar for linezolid, however, even at 21 µg/mL, a small proportion of organisms survived beyond 24 h. The results demonstrated the potency of tedizolid against clinical strains of Gram-positive pathogens supporting its use as a suitable alternative to linezolid in Chinese patients.

In Vitro and Intracellular Activity of Imipenem Combined with Tedizolid, Rifabutin, and Avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus

Mycobacterium abscessus infections are difficult to treat because of their resistance to many antibiotics. In vitro, tedizolid combined with imipenem displayed a moderate synergistic effect (fractional inhibitory concentration index, 0.41) but no bactericidal activity. Intracellularly, tedizolid 2 μg/ml (half of the MIC), corresponding to the peak serum concentration, increased the efficacy of imipenem at 8 and 32 μg/ml. Addition of avibactam and rifabutin, alone or in combination, improved the activity of the imipenem-tedizolid combination.

Exosome-encapsulated antibiotic against intracellular infections of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Background

Staphylococcus aureus survival inside phagocytes is considered to provide a reservoir of bacteria that are relatively protected from antibiotics, thus enabling long-term colonization of the host and explaining clinical failures and relapses after antibiotic therapy.

Purpose

The objective of this study was to develop a nanovesicle using exosomes loaded with linezolid to overcome intracellular infections by pathogenic bacteria.

Methods

Exosomes were collected from the culture supernatants of RAW 264.7 cells. Their size distribution and zeta potential were characterized by dynamic light scattering, their morphology was characterized by transmission electron microscopy, and their protein content (CD63 and Flotillin 1) was assessed by Western blotting. Linezolid was incorporated into exosomes by co-incubation at 37°C and it’s accumulation in RAW264.7 cells and release in vitro were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The intracellular bactericidal effect was evaluated in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)-infected macrophages in vitro and MRSA peritonitis model in vivo.

Results

We prepared a nanoformulation of the antibiotic linezolid using exosomes harvested from mouse RAW264.7 macrophages. The exosomal formulation of linezolid was more effective against intracellular MRSA infections in vitro and in vivo than the free linezolid. Our data also showed no signs of cytotoxicity in macrophages.

Conclusion

Exosomes provide an effective alternative for intracellular antibiotic delivery of antibiotic that is efficacious, cost-effective, and safe. This regimen can be viewed as a potential antimicrobial agent for use against intracellular infections.

Pharmacokinetics of Tedizolid in Plasma and Sputum of Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

Over the past decade, the prevalence of infections involving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased significantly. Tedizolid (TZD) demonstrates excellent activity against MRSA and a favorable safety profile. The pharmacokinetics of several antibiotics have been shown to be altered in CF patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of tedizolid in this population. Eleven patients with CF were randomized to receive tedizolid phosphate at 200 mg orally or intravenously once daily for 3 doses with a minimum 2-day washout, followed by crossover to the remaining dosage form. Plasma and expectorated sputum were collected following the third dose of each dosage form for analysis. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood expectation maximization method, and the disposition of TZD was described by a two-compartment model. The sputum concentrations exceeded the unbound plasma concentrations with an estimated mean sputum-to-unbound plasma penetration ratio of 2.88 (coefficient of variation, 50.3%). The estimated population mean ± standard deviation of total clearance, central volume of distribution, and bioavailability were 9.72 ± 1.62 liters/h, 61.6 ± 6.94 liters, and 1.04 ± 0.232, respectively. The total clearance was higher in CF patients than in healthy volunteers; however, it was similar to published data for patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs). This study demonstrates that the oral bioavailability of tedizolid is excellent in patients with CF and that the plasma pharmacokinetics are similar to those reported for patients with cSSSIs.

Cellular Pharmacokinetics and Intracellular Activity of Gepotidacin against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Different Resistance Phenotypes in Models of Cultured Phagocytic Cells

Gepotidacin (GSK2140944), a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor, is currently in clinical development for the treatment of bacterial infections. This study examined in vitro its activity against intracellular Staphylococcus aureus (involved in the persistent character of skin and skin structure infections) by use of a pharmacodynamic model and in relation to cellular pharmacokinetics in phagocytic cells. Compared to oxacillin, vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, azithromycin, and moxifloxacin, gepotidacin was (i) more potent intracellularly (the apparent bacteriostatic concentration [C_s] was reached at an extracellular concentration about 0.7× its MIC and was not affected by mechanisms of resistance to the comparators) and (ii) caused a maximal reduction of the intracellular burden (maximum effect) of about −1.6 log₁₀ CFU (which was better than that caused by linezolid, macrolides, and daptomycin and similar to that caused by moxifloxacin). After 24 h of incubation of infected cells with antibiotics at 100× their MIC, the intracellular persisting fraction was <0.1% with moxifloxacin, 0.5% with gepotidacin, and >1% with the other drugs. The accumulation and efflux of gepotidacin in phagocytes were very fast (k_in and k_out, ∼0.3 min⁻¹; the plateau was reached within 15 min) but modest (intracellular concentration-to-extracellular concentration ratio, ∼1.6). In cell fractionation studies, about 40 to 60% of the drug was recovered in the soluble fraction and ∼40% was associated with lysosomes in uninfected cells. In infected cells, about 20% of cell-associated gepotidacin was recovered in a sedimentable fraction that also contained bacteria. This study highlights the potential for further study of gepotidacin to fight infections where intracellular niches may play a determining role in bacterial persistence and relapses.

Mitochondrial Alterations (Inhibition of Mitochondrial Protein Expression, Oxidative Metabolism, and Ultrastructure) Induced by Linezolid and Tedizolid at Clinically Relevant Concentrations in Cultured Human HL-60 Promyelocytes and THP-1 Monocytes

Linezolid, the first clinically available oxazolidinone antibiotic, causes potentially severe toxicities (myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, and neuropathies) ascribed to impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis and consecutive mitochondrial dysfunction. Tedizolid, a newly approved oxazolidinone, shows an enhanced activity compared to linezolid but is also a more potent inhibitor of mitochondrial protein synthesis. We compared linezolid and tedizolid for (i) inhibition of the expression of subunit I of cytochrome c-oxidase (CYTox I; Western blot analysis), (ii) cytochrome c-oxidase activity (biochemical assay), (iii) mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (Seahorse technology), and (iv) alteration of mitochondrial ultrastructure (electron microscopy) using HL-60 promyelocytes and THP-1 monocytes exposed to microbiologically (multiples of modal MIC against Staphylococcus aureus) and therapeutically (C_min - C_max) pertinent concentrations. Both drugs caused a rapid and complete (48 to 72 h) inhibition of CYTox I expression, cytochrome c-oxidase activity, and spare respiratory capacity, with conspicuous swelling of the mitochondrial matrix and loss of their cristae. Globally, tedizolid was a more potent inhibitor than linezolid. For both drugs, all effects were quickly (48 to 72 h) and fully reversible upon drug withdrawal. Using an alternation of exposure to and withdrawal from drug mimicking their approved schedule of administration (twice daily and once daily [qD] for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively), only partial inhibition of CYTox I expression was noted for up to 96 h. Thus, rapid reversal of toxic effects upon discontinuous administration may mitigate oxazolidinone toxicity. Since tedizolid is given qD, this may help to explain its reported lower preclinical and clinical toxicity.

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Tedizolid against Isolates of Nocardia

There is a paucity of efficacious antimicrobials (especially oral) against clinically relevant species of Nocardia To date, all species of Nocardia have been susceptible to linezolid, the first commercially available oxazolidinone. Tedizolid is a new oxazolidinone with previously reported improved in vitro and in vivo (intracellular) potency against multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium sp. and Nocardia brasiliensis Using the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended broth microdilution method, 101 isolates of Nocardia spp., including 29 Nocardia cyriacigeorgica, 17 Nocardia farcinica, 13 Nocardia nova complex, 21 Nocardia brasiliensis, 5 Nocardia pseudobrasiliensis, and 5 Nocardia wallacei isolates and 11 isolates of less common species, were tested for susceptibility to tedizolid and linezolid. For the most common clinically significant species of Nocardia, tedizolid MIC₅₀ values were 0.25 μg/ml for N. nova complex, N. brasiliensis, N. pseudobrasiliensis, and N. wallacei, compared to linezolid MIC₅₀ values of 1, 2, 0.5, and 1 μg/ml, respectively. Tedizolid and linezolid MIC₉₀ values were 2 μg/ml for N. nova complex and N. brasiliensis Tedizolid MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values for both N. cyriacigeorgica and N. farcinica were 0.5 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml, respectively, compared to linezolid MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values of 2 and 4 μg/ml, respectively. Based on MIC₉₀ values, this study showed that tedizolid was 2- to 3-fold more active than linezolid in vitro against most common species of Nocardia, with the exception of the N. nova complex and N. brasiliensis, for which values were the same. These results may warrant evaluation of tedizolid as a potential treatment option for Nocardia infections.

In vitro activity of tedizolid against the Mycobacterium abscessus complex

Infections due to Mycobacterium abscessus carry a poor prognosis since this rapidly growing mycobacterium is intrinsically resistant to most antibiotics. Here, we evaluate the in vitro activity of the new oxazolidinone tedizolid against a collection of 44M. abscessus clinical isolates. The MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s of tedizolid (2 and 8μg/mL, respectively) were 2- to 16-fold lower than those of linezolid. There was no difference between the 3M. abscessus subspecies. Time-kill assays did not show any bactericidal activity at 4- and 8-fold the MIC. Combination of tedizolid with clarithromycin was synergistic against 1 out of 6 isolates, while indifferent interactions were observed for tedizolid combined with tigecycline, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin.

Efficacy of tedizolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in thigh mixed-infection mouse model

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the antimicrobial activity of human simulated exposures of tedizolid 200 mg daily, and linezolid 600 mg every 12 h for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) caused by MRSA and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in both the neutropenic mice thigh mixed-infection models.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Tedizolid phosphate and linezolid were used for all in vivo testing. A total of one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates were utilized. Antimicrobial efficacy was calculated for each isolate as the change in bacterial numbers (Δlog₁₀ CFU/ml) obtained in the treated mice after 24 h compared with the numbers in the starting control animals (0 h).

RESULTS

The tedizolid and linezolid MICs for MRSA was 0.25 and 2 μg/ml. Tedizolid MIC for P. anaerobius was 0.12 μg/ml, and linezolid MICs for two P. anaerobius isolates were 0.5 and 1 μg/ml. In mixed infection model, tedizolid therapy showed similar antimicrobial activities for one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates evaluated, compared with linezolid therapy. Additionally, when comparing the activity of tedizolid and linezolid monotherapy between single infection and mixed infection model, antimicrobial activities of both antimicrobials were attenuated when mixed infection model was used.

CONCLUSION

In the neutropenic murine thigh infection model, human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid resulted in similar efficacies against MRSA, even though single and mixed infection models were used. These data support the clinical utility of tedizolid for use against MRSA and P. anaerobius in the treatment of cSSSI.

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Tedizolid against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Tedizolid is a new oxazolidinone with improved in vitro and intracellular potency against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant strains, and some species of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) compared with that of linezolid. Using the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-recommended method of broth microdilution, susceptibility testing of 170 isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria showed equivalent or lower (1- to 8-fold) MIC₅₀ and/or MIC₉₀ values for tedizolid compared with that for linezolid. The tedizolid MIC₉₀ values for 81 isolates of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and 12 isolates of M. abscessus subsp. massiliense were 8 μg/ml and 4 μg/ml, respectively, compared with linezolid MIC₉₀ values of 32 μg/ml for both. The MIC₉₀ values for 20 isolates of M. fortuitum were 2 μg/ml for tedizolid and 4 μg/ml for linezolid. Twenty-two isolates of M. chelonae had tedizolid and linezolid MIC₉₀s of 2 μg/ml and 16 μg/ml, respectively. One hundred forty-two slowly growing NTM, including 7/7 M. marinum, 7/7 M. kansasii, and 7/11 of other less commonly isolated species, had tedizolid MICs of ≤1 μg/ml and linezolid MICs of ≤4 μg/ml. One hundred isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex and eight M. simiae isolates had tedizolid MIC₅₀s of 8 μg/ml and linezolid MIC₅₀s 32 and 64 μg/ml, respectively. Nine M. arupense isolates had MIC₅₀s of 4 μg/ml and 16 μg/ml for tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. These findings demonstrate a greater in vitro potency of tedizolid than linezolid against NTM and suggest that an evaluation of tedizolid as a potential treatment agent for infections caused by selected NTM is warranted.

Emerging drugs for nosocomial pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the leading nosocomial infections worldwide and is associated with an elevated morbidity and mortality and increased hospital costs. Nevertheless, prompt and adequate antimicrobial treatment is mandatory following VAP development, especially in the face of multidrug resistant pathogens.

AREAS COVERED

We searched Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov site reports in English language of phase III clinical trials, between 2000-2016 referring to the antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. We provide a summary of latest approved drugs for HAP and emerging drugs with potential indication nosocomial pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

There are several promising compounds on their way, as tedizolid-a new oxazolidone, iclaprim-a novel drug, related to trimethoprim, plazomicin-a new aminoglycoside and two combinations of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR bacteria, especially against MRSA and Gram-negative ESBL bacteria.

In Vitro Models for the Study of the Intracellular Activity of Antibiotics

Intracellular bacteria are poorly responsive to antibiotic treatment. Pharmacological studies are thus needed to determine which antibiotics are most potent or effective against intracellular bacteria as well as to explore the reasons for poor bacterial responsiveness. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model is described, consisting of (1) phagocytosis of pre-opsonized bacteria by eukaryotic cells; (2) elimination of non-internalized bacteria with gentamicin; (3) incubation of infected cells with antibiotics; and (4) determination of surviving bacteria by viable cell counting and normalization of the counts based on sample protein content.

Tedizolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Tedizolid is a newly approved drug of the oxazolidinone class. It has high in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains. Peak plasma concentration of tedizolid is obtained within 3 h of oral dosing (PO), with high bioavailability. Tedizolid is mostly metabolized via the liver, and is excreted in feces in the form of a sulfate conjugate. Tedizolid 200 mg taken once daily demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and a good safety profile in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Results of two pivotal Phase III clinical trials showed that 6 days of 200 mg tedizolid PO or sequential intravenous (IV)/PO once-daily treatment was non-inferior to 10 days of 600 mg linezolid PO or sequential IV/PO twice-daily treatment at 48-72 h (primary end point) and at the test-of-cure in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. The Phase II and Phase III trials also demonstrated that tedizolid was well tolerated.

Cellular pharmacokinetics and intracellular activity of the novel peptide deformylase inhibitor GSK1322322 against Staphylococcus aureus laboratory and clinical strains with various resistance phenotypes: studies with human THP-1 monocytes and J774 murine macrophages

GSK1322322 is a peptide deformylase inhibitor active against Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to currently marketed antibiotics. Our aim was to assess the activity of GSK1322322 against intracellular S. aureus using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model and, in parallel, to examine its cellular pharmacokinetics and intracellular disposition. For intracellular activity analysis, we used an established model of human THP-1 monocytes and tested one fully susceptible S. aureus strain (ATCC 25923) and 8 clinical strains with resistance to oxacillin, vancomycin, daptomycin, macrolides, clindamycin, linezolid, or moxifloxacin. Uptake, accumulation, release, and subcellular distribution (cell fractionation) of [(14)C]GSK1322322 were examined in uninfected murine J774 macrophages and uninfected and infected THP-1 monocytes. GSK1322322 demonstrated a uniform activity against the intracellular forms of all S. aureus strains tested, disregarding their resistance phenotypes, with a maximal relative efficacy (E max) of a 0.5 to 1 log10 CFU decrease compared to the original inoculum within 24 h and a static concentration (C s) close to its MIC in broth. Influx and efflux were very fast (<5 min to equilibrium), and accumulation was about 4-fold, with no or a minimal effect of the broad-spectrum eukaryotic efflux transporter inhibitors gemfibrozil and verapamil. GSK1322322 was recovered in the cell-soluble fraction and was dissociated from the main subcellular organelles and from bacteria (in infected cells). The results of this study show that GSK1322322, as a typical novel deformylase inhibitor, may act against intracellular forms of S. aureus. They also suggest that GSK1322322 has the ability to freely diffuse into and out of eukaryotic cells as well as within subcellular compartments.

Nonclinical and pharmacokinetic assessments to evaluate the potential of tedizolid and linezolid to affect mitochondrial function

Prolonged treatment with the oxazolidinone linezolid is associated with myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, and neuropathies, toxicities likely caused by impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis (MPS). To evaluate the potential of the novel oxazolidinone tedizolid to cause similar side effects, nonclinical and pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted. In isolated rat heart mitochondria, tedizolid inhibited MPS more potently than did linezolid (average [± standard error of the mean] 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] for MPS of 0.31 ± 0.02 μM versus 6.4 ± 1.2 μM). However, a rigorous 9-month rat study comparing placebo and high-dose tedizolid (resulting in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve values about 8-fold greater than those with the standard therapeutic dose in humans) showed no evidence of neuropathy. Additional studies explored why prolonged, high-dose tedizolid did not cause these mitochondriopathic side effects despite potent MPS inhibition by tedizolid. Murine macrophage (J774) cell fractionation studies found no evidence of a stable association of tedizolid with eukaryotic mitochondria. Monte Carlo simulations based on population pharmacokinetic models showed that over the course of a dosing interval using standard therapeutic doses, free plasma concentrations fell below the respective MPS IC50 in 84% of tedizolid-treated patients (for a median duration of 7.94 h) and 38% of linezolid-treated patients (for a median duration of 0 h). Therapeutic doses of tedizolid, but not linezolid, may therefore allow for mitochondrial recovery during antibacterial therapy. The overall results suggest that tedizolid has less potential to cause myelosuppression and neuropathy than that of linezolid during prolonged treatment courses. This, however, remains a hypothesis that must be confirmed in clinical studies.

Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone with activity against a wide range of Gram-positive pathogens, was evaluated in two noninferiority phase 3 acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection trials. The data from individual trials showed its noninferior efficacy compared to that of linezolid and a favorable tolerability profile. To evaluate potential differences, the pooled data were analyzed. The patients received 200 mg of tedizolid once daily for 6 days or 600 mg of linezolid twice daily for 10 days. Efficacy was evaluated at 48 to 72 h (primary endpoint), on days 11 to 13 (end of therapy [EOT]), and 7 to 14 days after the EOT (posttherapy evaluation). Treatment-emergent adverse events and hematologic and clinical laboratory parameters were collected. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups: 852/1,333 (64%) patients were from North America, and the majority of infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid (early clinical responses, 81.6% versus 79.4%, respectively). The early responses remained relatively consistent across various host/disease factors and severity measures. Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse event (tedizolid, 8.2%; linezolid, 12.2%; P=0.02), with onset occurring primarily during the first 6 days. Fewer tedizolid than linezolid patients had platelet counts of <150,000 cells/mm3 at the EOT (tedizolid, 4.9%; linezolid, 10.8%; P=0.0003) and during the postbaseline period through the last day of active drug visit (tedizolid, 6.4%; linezolid, 12.6%; P=0.0016). Efficacy was achieved with a 6-day once-daily course of therapy with the option of an intravenous/oral regimen, and fewer low platelet counts and gastrointestinal side effects were reported with tedizolid than with linezolid, all of which aligns well with antimicrobial stewardship principles. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01170221 and NCT01421511.).

Tedizolid for the management of human infections: in vitro characteristics

The emerging antibiotic resistance of Gram-positive pathogens represents a significant challenge to the management of human infections. The novel oxazolidinone tedizolid demonstrates antimicrobial activity across a broad range of Gram-positive pathogens and greater potency than linezolid against wild-type and drug-resistant pathogens, including linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains possessing mutations in chromosomal genes encoding 23S rRNA or ribosomal proteins L3 or L4. Strains harboring such mutations are also selected for much less frequently with tedizolid than with linezolid. In addition, tedizolid has a significant potency advantage over linezolid-resistant strains carrying the horizontally transferable cfr gene. Methylation of A2503 of 23S rRNA by the Cfr methyltransferase confers resistance to linezolid (and a variety of other 50S ribosomal subunit-targeted antibiotics) but not to tedizolid because of structural differences in A-ring C5 substituents between the 2 drugs. The greater potency and improved resistance profile of tedizolid provides the microbiologic basis for considering this molecule as an alternative to linezolid for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens.

Potential role of tedizolid phosphate in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections

Tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), a prodrug of tedizolid (TR-700), is a next-generation oxazolidinone that has shown favorable results in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in its first Phase III clinical trial. Tedizolid has high bioavailability, penetration, and tissue distribution when administered orally or intravenously. The activity of tedizolid was greater than linezolid against strains of Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. in vitro studies, including strains resistant to linezolid and those not susceptible to vancomycin or daptomycin. Its pharmacokinetic characteristics allow for a once-daily administration that leads to a more predictable efficacy and safety profile than those of linezolid. No hematological adverse effects have been reported associated with tedizolid when used at the therapeutic dose of 200 mg in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials of up to 3 weeks of tedizolid administration. Given that the clinical and microbiological efficacy are similar for the 200, 300, and 400 mg doses, the lowest effective dose of 200 mg once daily for 6 days was selected for Phase III studies in acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections, providing a safe dosing regimen with low potential for development of myelosuppression. Unlike linezolid, tedizolid does not inhibit monoamine oxidase in vivo, therefore interactions with adrenergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic drugs are not to be expected. In conclusion, tedizolid is a novel antibiotic with potent activity against Gram-positive microorganisms responsible for skin and soft tissue infections, including strains resistant to vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, thus answers a growing therapeutic need.

Activity of ceftaroline against extracellular (broth) and intracellular (THP-1 monocytes) forms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin

BACKGROUND

Ceftaroline fosamil is approved for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We examined the activity of its active metabolite (ceftaroline) against intracellular forms of S. aureus in comparison with vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid.

METHODS

Two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 11 MRSA strains with ceftaroline MICs from 0.125 to 2 mg/L [two strains vancomycin- and one strain linezolid-resistant (EUCAST interpretative criteria); VISA and cfr+] were investigated. The activity was measured in broth and after phagocytosis by THP-1 monocytes in concentration-dependent experiments (24 h of incubation) to determine: (i) relative potencies (EC(50)) and static concentrations (C(s)) (mg/L and × MIC); and (ii) relative activities at human C(max) (E(C)(max)) and maximal relative efficacies (E(max)) (change in log(10) cfu compared with initial inoculum). Ceftaroline stability and cellular accumulation (at 24 h) were measured by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Ceftaroline showed similar activities in broth and in monocytes compared with vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid, with no impact of resistance mechanisms to vancomycin or linezolid. For all four antibiotics, intracellular E(C)(max) and E(max) were considerably lower than in broth (∼0.5 log(10) versus 4-5 log(10) cfu decrease), but the EC(50) and C(s) showed comparatively little change (all values between ∼0.3 and ∼6× MIC). The mean cellular to extracellular ceftaroline concentration ratios (20 mg/L; 24 h) were 0.66 ± 0.05 and 0.90 ± 0.36 in uninfected and infected cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In vitro, ceftaroline controls the growth of intracellular MRSA to an extent similar to that of vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin for strains with a ceftaroline MIC ≤ 2 mg/L.

Activity of tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) in murine models of infection with penicillin-resistant and penicillin-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae

The in vitro activity of tedizolid (previously known as torezolid, TR-700) against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) clinical isolates and the in vivo efficacy of tedizolid phosphate (torezolid phosphate, TR-701) in murine models of PRSP systemic infection and penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (PSSP) pneumonia were examined using linezolid as a comparator. The MIC(90) against 28 PRSP isolates was 0.25 μg/ml for tedizolid, whereas it was 1 μg/ml for linezolid. In mice infected systemically with a lethal inoculum of PRSP 1 h prior to a single administration of either antimicrobial, oral tedizolid phosphate was equipotent to linezolid (1 isolate) to 2-fold more potent than linezolid (3 isolates) for survival at day 7, with tedizolid phosphate 50% effective dose (ED(50)) values ranging from 3.19 to 11.53 mg/kg of body weight/day. In the PSSP pneumonia model, the ED(50) for survival at day 15 was 2.80 mg/kg/day for oral tedizolid phosphate, whereas it was 8.09 mg/kg/day for oral linezolid following 48 h of treatment with either agent. At equivalent doses (10 mg/kg once daily tedizolid phosphate or 5 mg/kg twice daily linezolid), pneumococcal titers in the lungs at 52 h postinfection were approximately 3 orders of magnitude lower with tedizolid phosphate treatment than with linezolid treatment or no treatment. Lung histopathology showed less inflammatory cell invasion into alveolar spaces in mice treated with tedizolid phosphate than in untreated or linezolid-treated mice. These results demonstrate that tedizolid phosphate is effective in murine models of PRSP systemic infection and PSSP pneumonia.

Skin and soft tissue concentrations of tedizolid (formerly torezolid), a novel oxazolidinone, following a single oral dose in healthy volunteers

Plasma concentrations of antimicrobial drugs have long been used to correlate exposure with effect, yet one cannot always assume that unbound plasma and tissue concentrations are similar. Knowledge about unbound tissue concentrations is important in the development of antimicrobial drugs, since most infections are localised in tissues. Therefore, a clinical microdialysis study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of tedizolid (TR-700), the active moiety of the antimicrobial prodrug tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), into interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle tissues following a single oral 600 mg dose of tedizolid phosphate in fasting conditions. Twelve healthy adult subjects were enrolled. Two microdialysis probes were implanted into the thigh of each subject, one into the vastus medialis muscle and one into subcutaneous adipose tissue. Probes were calibrated using retrodialysis. Dialysate samples were collected every 20 min for 12h following a single oral dose of 600 mg tedizolid phosphate, and blood samples were drawn over 24h. Unbound tedizolid levels in plasma were similar to those in muscle and adipose tissue. The ratios of unbound (free) AUC in tissues over unbound AUC in plasma (fAUC(tissue)/fAUC(plasma)) were 1.1 ± 0.2 and 1.2 ± 0.2 for adipose and muscle tissue, respectively. The median half-life was 8.1, 9.2 and 9.6h for plasma, adipose tissue and muscle tissue, respectively. Mean protein binding was 87.2 ± 1.8%. The study drug was very well tolerated. The results of this study show that tedizolid distributes well into ISF of adipose and muscle tissues. Unbound levels of tedizolid in plasma, adipose tissue and muscle tissue were well correlated. Free plasma levels are indicative of unbound levels in the ISF of muscle and adipose tissues.

Tedizolid (TR-701): a new oxazolidinone with enhanced potency

INTRODUCTION

Tedizolid phosphate (TR-701) is a new oxazolidinone prodrug that is transformed in the serum into the active drug tedizolid (TR-700). Tedizolid acts by inhibiting protein synthesis and has broad activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including strains that are resistant to linezolid.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the currently available data on this new antimicrobial agent. In vitro activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and safety are all addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Tedizolid will provide a useful addition to the antimicrobial armamentarium, particularly in complicated skin and skin structure infections, due to its high oral bioavailability and once-daily dosing. The results of future studies will serve to better position tedizolid among the newly approved agents for infections caused by Gram-positive organisms.

The oxazolidinones: past, present, and future

The success of linezolid stimulated significant efforts to discover new agents in the oxazolidinone class. Over a dozen oxazolidinones have reached the clinic, but many were discontinued due to lack of differentiated potency, inadequate pharmacokinetics, and safety risks that included myelosuppression. Four oxazolidinones are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. The Trius Therapeutics compound tedizolid phosphate (formerly known as torezolid phosphate, TR-701, DA-7218), the most advanced, is in phase 3 clinical trials for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Rib-X completed two phase 2 studies for radezolid (Rx-01_667, RX-1741) in uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired pneumonia. Pfizer and AstraZeneca have each identified antitubercular compounds that have completed phase 1 studies: sutezolid (PNU-100480, PF-02341272) and AZD5847 (AZD2563), respectively. The oxazolidinones share a relatively low frequency of resistance largely due to the requirement of mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA genes. However, maintaining potency against strains carrying the mobile cfr gene poses a challenge for the oxazolidinone class, as well as other 50S ribosome inhibitors that target the peptidyl transferase center.

Antibiotics in development targeting protein synthesis

The resolution of antibiotic-ribosomal subunit complexes and antibacterial-protein complexes at the atomic level has provided new insights into modifications of clinically relevant antimicrobials and provided new classes that target the protein cellular apparatus. New chemistry platforms that use fragment-based drug design or allow novel modifications in known structural classes are being used to design new antibiotics that overcome known resistance mechanisms and extend spectrum and potency by circumventing ubiquitous efflux pumps. This review provides details on seven antibiotics in development for treatment of moderate-to-severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and/or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: solithromycin, cethromycin, omadacycline, CEM-102, GSK1322322, radezolid, and tedizolid. Two antibiotics of the oxazolidinone class, PF-02341272 and AZD5847, are being developed as antituberculosis agents. Only three antibiotics that target the protein cellular machinery, TP-434, GSK2251052, and plazomicin, have a spectrum that encompasses multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. These compounds provide hope for treating key pathogens that cause serious disease in both the community and the hospital.

Pulmonary disposition of tedizolid following administration of once-daily oral 200-milligram tedizolid phosphate in healthy adult volunteers

This study assessed the pulmonary disposition of tedizolid, an oxazolidinone, in adult volunteers receiving 200 mg of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate orally every 24 h for 3 days to steady state. Plasma samples were collected over the dosing interval, and participants were randomized to undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 2, 6, 12, or 24 h after the last dose. Drug concentrations in plasma, BAL fluid, and alveolar macrophages (AM) were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and the urea correction method was used to calculate epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods followed by compartmental population pharmacokinetics. Penetration was calculated as the area under the concentration-time curve during the dosing interval (AUC(0-24)) for ELF and AM relative to the free AUC(0-24) (fAUC(0-24)) in plasma. The half-life and volume of distribution in plasma were 9.23 ± 2.04 h and 108.25 ± 20.53 liters (means ± standard deviations), respectively. Total AUC(0-24) in plasma was 25.13 ± 5.78 μg · h/ml. Protein binding was 89.44% ± 1.58%, resulting in a mean fAUC(0-24) of 2.65 ± 0.72 μg · h/ml in plasma. Mean concentrations (μg/ml) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h were 9.05 ± 3.83, 4.45 ± 2.18, 5.62 ± 1.99, and 1.33 ± 0.59 in ELF and 3.67 ± 1.02, 4.38 ± 2.18, 1.42 ± 0.63, and 1.04 ± 0.52 in AM. ELF and AM penetration ratios were 41.2 and 20.0. The mean ELF penetration ratio after population analyses was 39.7. This study demonstrates that tedizolid penetrates into ELF and AM to levels approximately 40-fold and 20-fold, respectively, higher than free-drug exposures in plasma.

Impact of granulocytes on the antimicrobial effect of tedizolid in a mouse thigh infection model

Tedizolid (TR-700, formerly torezolid) is the active component of the new oxazolidinone prodrug tedizolid phosphate (TR-701). We had previously demonstrated that tedizolid possessed potent antistaphylococcal activity superior to that of linezolid in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model (A. Louie, W. Liu, R. Kulawy, and G. L. Drusano, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3453-3460, 2011). In the current investigation, we used a mouse thigh infection model to delineate the effect of an interaction of TR-700 and granulocytes on staphylococcal cell killing. We compared the antistaphylococcal killing effect of doses of TR-701 equivalent to human exposures ranging from 200 to 3,200 mg/day in both granulocytopenic and normal mice. The mice were evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h after therapy initiation. In granulocytopenic mice, a clear exposure response in which, depending on the time point of evaluation, stasis was achieved at "human-equivalent" doses of slightly below 2,300 mg/day (at 24 h) to slightly below 2,000 mg/day (at 72 h) was observed. In immune-normal animals, stasis was achieved at human-equivalent doses of slightly greater than 100 mg/day or less. The variance in bacterial cell killing results was attributable to the presence of granulocytes (without drug), the direct effect of TR-700 on Staphylococcus aureus, and the effect of the drug on Staphylococcus aureus mediated through granulocytes. The majority of the bacterial cell killing in normal animals was attributable to the effect of TR-700 mediated through granulocytes. Additional studies need to be undertaken to elucidate the mechanism underlying this observation.

Activity of fusidic acid against extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: influence of pH and comparison with linezolid and clindamycin

BACKGROUND

Emergence of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has triggered a reassessment of fusidic acid (CEM-102, sodium fusidate).

METHODS

Fusidic acid was examined for (1) activity against recent methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates; (2) modulation of activity by acidic pH; and (3) accumulation by phagocytic cells and intracellular activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA.

RESULTS

About 96% of strains (N = 94) were susceptible (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint [≤ 1 mg/L]). Activity was enhanced at pH 5.5 (6 dilutions decrease for minimum inhibitory concentration) in parallel with an increase of drug bacterial accumulation (opposite effects for clindamycin; linezolid remained unaffected). Fusidic acid accumulated in THP-1 cells (about 5.5 fold), with further accumulation at pH 5.5 vs pH 7.4. The intracellular activity of Fusidic acid was similar to that of clindamycin and linezolid (maximal relative activity, 0.4-0.6 log(10) colony-forming unit decrease). No cross-resistance to vancomycin or daptomycin was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Fusidic acid is active against S. aureus in broth as well as intracellularly, with no cross-resistance to other antibiotics.

Determination of tissue penetration and pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients with diabetic foot infections using in vivo microdialysis

Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, continue to be the predominant pathogens associated with diabetic foot infections. Consequently, linezolid is often used to treat these infections. The purpose of the current study was to describe the pharmacokinetic profile and determine the level of penetration of linezolid into healthy thigh tissue and infected wound tissue of the same extremity in 9 diabetic patients with chronic lower limb infections by use of in vivo microdialysis. Hourly plasma and dialysate samples were obtained over a 12-h dosing interval following 3 to 4 doses of linezolid (600 mg intravenously every 12 h). Plasma protein binding was also assessed at 1, 6, and 12 h postdose. The means ± standard deviations (SD) for the maximum concentration in serum (C(max)), the volume of distribution at terminal phase (V(z)), and the half-life (t(1/2)) for linezolid in plasma were 11.99 ± 3.67 μg/ml, 0.71 ± 0.25 liters/kg of body weight, and 4.71 ± 1.23 h, respectively. Mean protein binding was 14.78% (range, 3.85 to 32.03%). The mean areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 12 h for the free, unbound fraction of linezolid (fAUC(0-12) values) ± SD for plasma, wound tissue, and thigh tissue were 51.24 ± 12.72, 82.76 ± 59.01, and 92.52 ± 60.44 μg · h/ml, respectively. Tissue penetration ratios (tissue fAUC to plasma fAUC) were similar for thigh (1.42; range, 1.08 to 2.23) and wound (1.27; range, 0.86 to 2.26) tissues (P = 0.648). With the currently approved dosing regimen, linezolid penetrated well into both healthy thigh tissue and infected wound tissue in these diabetic patients.

In vivo pharmacodynamics of torezolid phosphate (TR-701), a new oxazolidinone antibiotic, against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in a mouse thigh infection model

Torezolid phosphate (TR-701) is the phosphate monoester prodrug of the oxazolidinone TR-700 which demonstrates potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The pharmacodynamics of TR-701 or TR-700 (TR-701/700) against S. aureus is incompletely defined. Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in mice for TR-701/700. Forty-eight-hour dose range and 24-hour dose fractionation studies were conducted in a neutropenic mouse thigh model of S. aureus infection using MRSA ATCC 33591 to identify the dose and schedule of administration of TR-701/700 that was linked with optimized antimicrobial effect. Additional dose range studies compared the efficacies of TR-701/700 and linezolid for one MSSA strain and one community-associated MRSA strain. In dose range studies, TR-701/700 was equally bactericidal against MSSA and MRSA. Mean doses of 37.6 and 66.9 mg/kg of body weight/day of TR-701/700 resulted in stasis and 1 log CFU/g decreases in bacterial densities, respectively, at 24 h, and mean doses of 35.3, 46.6, and 71.1 mg/kg/day resulted in stasis and 1 and 2 log CFU/g reductions, respectively, at 48 h. Linezolid administered at doses as high as 150 mg/kg/day did not achieve stasis at either time point. Dose fractionation studies demonstrated that the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) was the pharmacodynamic index for TR-701/700 that was linked with efficacy. TR-701/700 was highly active against MSSA and MRSA, in vivo, and was substantially more efficacious than linezolid, although linezolid's top exposure has half the human exposure. Dose fractionation studies showed that AUC/MIC was the pharmacodynamic index linked with efficacy, indicating that once-daily dosing in humans is feasible.

Activity of moxifloxacin against intracellular community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with clindamycin, linezolid and co-trimoxazole and attempt at defining an intracellular susceptibility breakpoint

BACKGROUND

Co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and linezolid are used to treat community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections, but little is known about intracellular activity. Moxifloxacin is active against intracellular methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), but CA-MRSA has not been studied.

METHODS

We used 12 clinical CA-MRSA, 1 MSSA overexpressing norA and 2 hospital-acquired MRSA (moxifloxacin MICs: 0.03 to 4 mg/L). Activity was assessed in broth and after phagocytosis by THP-1 macrophages or keratinocytes {concentration-dependent experiments [24 h of incubation] to determine relative potencies [EC(50)], static concentrations [C(s)] and maximal relative efficacies [E(max) (change in log(10) cfu compared with initial inoculum)] and time-dependent experiments [0-72 h] at human C(max)}.

RESULTS

Concentration-dependent experiments: in broth, EC(50) and C(s) were correlated with the MIC for all antibiotics, but moxifloxacin achieved significantly (P < 0.01) greater killing (more negative E(max)) than the comparators; and in THP-1 cells and keratinocytes, moxifloxacin acted more slowly but still reached a near bactericidal effect (2 to 3 log(10) cfu decrease) at 24 h with unchanged EC(50) and C(s) as long as its MIC was ≤0.125 mg/L (recursive partitioning analysis). Clindamycin and linezolid were static, and co-trimoxazole was unable to suppress the intracellular growth of CA-MRSA. At human C(max) in broth, moxifloxacin killed more rapidly and more extensively (≥5 log(10) cfu decrease at 10 h) than clindamycin (4 log(10) cfu at 48 h) or co-trimoxazole and linezolid (1-2 log(10) cfu at 72 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Moxifloxacin is active against both extracellular and intracellular CA-MRSA if the MIC is low, and is more effective than clindamycin, co-trimoxazole and linezolid.

Cellular pharmacokinetics of the novel biaryloxazolidinone radezolid in phagocytic cells: studies with macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophils

Radezolid (RX-1741) is the first biaryloxazolidinone in clinical development. It shows improved activity, including against linezolid-resistant strains. Radezolid differs from linezolid by the presence of a biaryl spacer and of a heteroaryl side chain, which increases the ionization and hydrophilicity of the molecule at physiological pH and confers to it a dibasic character. The aim of this study was to determine the accumulation and subcellular distribution of radezolid in phagocytic cells and to decipher the underlying mechanisms. In THP-1 human macrophages, J774 mouse macrophages, and human polymorphonuclear neutrophils, radezolid accumulated rapidly and reversibly (half-lives of approximately 6 min and 9 min for uptake and efflux, respectively) to reach, at equilibrium, a cellular concentration 11-fold higher than the extracellular one. This process was concentration and energy independent but pH dependent (accumulation was reduced to 20 to 30% of control values for cells in medium at a pH of <6 or in the presence of monensin, which collapses pH gradients between the extracellular and intracellular compartments). The accumulation at equilibrium was not affected by efflux pump inhibitors (verapamil and gemfibrozil) and was markedly reduced at 4 degrees C but was further increased in medium with low serum content. Subcellular fractionation studies demonstrated a dual subcellular distribution for radezolid, with approximately 60% of the drug colocalizing to the cytosol and approximately 40% to the lysosomes, with no specific association with mitochondria. These observations are compatible with a mechanism of transmembrane diffusion of the free fraction and partial segregation of radezolid in lysosomes by proton trapping, as previously described for macrolides.

A small-molecule inhibitor of BCL6 kills DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo

The BCL6 transcriptional repressor is the most frequently involved oncogene in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We combined computer-aided drug design with functional assays to identify low-molecular-weight compounds that bind to the corepressor binding groove of the BCL6 BTB domain. One such compound disrupted BCL6/corepressor complexes in vitro and in vivo, and was observed by X-ray crystallography and NMR to bind the critical site within the BTB groove. This compound could induce expression of BCL6 target genes and kill BCL6-positive DLBCL cell lines. In xenotransplantation experiments, the compound was nontoxic and potently suppressed DLBCL tumors in vivo. The compound also killed primary DLBCLs from human patients.

Cellular pharmacodynamics of the novel biaryloxazolidinone radezolid: studies with infected phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells, using Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Legionella pneumophila

Radezolid is a novel biaryloxazolidinone in clinical development which shows improved activity, including against linezolid-resistant strains. In a companion paper (29), we showed that radezolid accumulates about 11-fold in phagocytic cells, with approximately 60% of the drug localized in the cytosol and approximately 40% in the lysosomes of the cells. The present study examines its activity against (i) bacteria infecting human THP-1 macrophages and located in different subcellular compartments (Listeria monocytogenes, cytosol; Legionella pneumophila, vacuoles; Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, mainly phagolysosomal), (ii) strains of S. aureus with clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance, and (iii) isogenic linezolid-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus strains infecting a series of phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells. Radezolid accumulated to similar levels ( approximately 10-fold) in all cell types (human keratinocytes, endothelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells, osteoblasts, macrophages, and rat embryo fibroblasts). At equivalent weight concentrations, radezolid proved consistently 10-fold more potent than linezolid in all these models, irrespective of the bacterial species and resistance phenotype or of the cell type infected. This results from its higher intrinsic activity and higher cellular accumulation. Time kill curves showed that radezolid's activity was more rapid than that of linezolid both in broth and in infected macrophages. These data suggest the potential interest of radezolid for recurrent or persistent infections where intracellular foci play a determinant role.

Activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus with various resistance phenotypes

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of chronic or recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections may require using antibiotics with activity against intracellular multiresistant organisms. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (3:7) has been examined in this context.

METHODS

Quinupristin and dalfopristin were used separately or mixed. Strains used were: (i) methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA); (ii) one vat(B) MSSA and msr(A/B) MRSA; (iii) erm(A)+ [MSSA, MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA)]; and (iv) one erm(A/B)+ cfr+ MRSA resistant to quinupristin, dalfopristin and their combination. Assessment of activity was determined by: (i) MICs (CLSI method); and (ii) concentration-response curves in broth and after phagocytosis by THP-1 macrophages, with descriptors of the model (Emin) and the pharmacodynamic response [maximal relative efficacy (Emax), relative potency (EC50) and apparent static concentration (Cstatic)].

RESULTS

erm(A)-positive strains were all susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin (except strain CM05), with MICs not adversely influenced by acid pH or by the MRSA, VISA or VRSA character of the strain. In concentration-response experiments, quinupristin/dalfopristin showed similar patterns for all strains (except strain CM05), with a >3 log10 cfu decrease in broth and a 1.3 [erm(A) strain] to 2.6 [fully susceptible, vat(B) and msr(A/B) strains] log10 cfu decrease for intracellular bacteria at the maximal extracellular concentration tested (25 mg/L). Maximal extracellular and intracellular activity was obtained for a quinupristin/dalfopristin ratio of 3:7. For strain CM05, quinupristin/dalfopristin was static in all conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on historical comparisons with rifampicin, fluoroquinolones, lipoglycopeptides and other antistaphylococcal drugs with a large accumulation in eukaryotic cells, quinupristin/dalfopristin appears to be one of the most active antibiotics against intracellular S. aureus studied in this model so far, largely irrespective of its resistance phenotype.

Intra- and extracellular activity of linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo and in vitro

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections remains problematic (slow responses and frequent recurrences). Intracellular persistence of the S. aureus could explain those difficulties because of impaired intracellular efficacy of antibiotics. Our aim was to study linezolid for its intracellular activity.

METHODS

(i) Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of intracellular activity using in vitro (THP-1 macrophages) and in vivo (mouse peritonitis) models with determination of key dose-response parameters [maximal relative efficacy (E(max)), relative potency (EC(50)) and static concentration (C(static))] towards methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (ATCC 25923; clinical isolate) with linezolid MICs of 4 mg/L; (ii) pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis in uninfected mice for determination of C(max), AUC and half-life for total and free drug; and (iii) determination of the predictive PK/PD parameter (fT > MIC, fAUC(24)/MIC or fC(max)/MIC) for therapeutic outcome.

RESULTS

In vitro, linezolid showed an E(max) of approximately 1 log(10) cfu reduction compared with initial inoculum both intra- and extracellularly and an approximately 3-fold increased relative potency (lower EC(50) and C(static)) intracellularly. In vivo, the efficacy of linezolid was impaired (<0.5 log(10) reduction extracellularly; failure to reduce the cfu to less than the initial load intracellularly) with, however, an increased intracellular potency (lower EC(50)). Infection outcome correlated better with the fAUC(24)/MIC (R(2) = 55%) than with the fT > MIC parameter (R(2) = 51%) for the extracellular compartment, but no parameter emerged as significant for the intracellular compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid exerts only a weak intracellular activity against the strains of S. aureus tested, even though, in contrast to most other antibiotics, its potency does not appear impaired in comparison with the extracellular activity.