Update version of the Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori, gastric precancerous lesions and gastric cancer: a multicenter, population-based cross-sectional study in Nanjing

BACKGROUND

Nanjing City has a high-incidence gastric cancer (GC), but the epidemiology of gastric precancerous lesions (GPLs) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, GPLs, and GCs in patients undergoing endoscopic examination in Lishui District, Nanjing.

METHODS

This retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted collaboratively by the Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital and six medical community units within the county between July 2022 and June 2023. Data on biopsies and 13C urea breath tests (13C-UBT) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 15,668 individuals were included, among whom 259 had GPL (1.65%) and 218 had GC (1.39%). The H. pylori infection rate in total patients was 5014 (32.00%) (males: 2684 (34.06%); females: 2335 (29.92%)). The H. pylori infection rate is 31.45% in benign gastric lesions, 44.40% in GPLs, and 55.50% in GC, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male (OR = 3.156, 95% CI: 2.865-3.376, P < 0.001), age (OR = 1.785, 95% CI: 1.703-1.876, P < 0.001), fresh vegetable, fruit, and white meat intake frequently (OR = 0.865, 95% CI: 0.506-2.061, P = 0.029), high-salt diet and high-fat diet intake frequently (OR = 1.906, 95% CI: 1.101-2.932, P = 0.014), rural residence (OR = 2.682, 95% CI: 1.010-4.754, P = 0.040), H. pylori infection (OR = 2.022, 95% CI: 1.155-2.865, P < 0.001) and atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia (OR = 4.875, 95% CI: 2.229-10.663, P < 0.001) were associated with GPLs. Male (OR = 2.021, 95% CI: 1.080-3.780, P = 2.028), age (OR = 1.201, 95% CI: 1.174-1.238, P < 0.001), digestive symptoms (OR = 2.256, 95% CI: 1.548-3.289, P < 0.001), bachelor degree below (OR = 4.792, 95% CI: 3.439-6.837, P < 0.001), farmer (OR = 1.039, 95% CI: 1.026-1.159, P < 0.001), fresh vegetable, fruit, and white meat intake (OR = 0.231, 95% CI: 0.141-0.379, P < 0.001), fried/barbecue/pickled food intake (OR = 6.781, 95% CI: 3.783-12.153, P < 0.001), high-salt diet and high-fat diet intake (OR = 4.374, 95% CI: 2.363-8.097, P < 0.001), rural residence (OR = 1.230, 95% CI: 1.121-1.437, P < 0.001), H. pylori infection (OR = 3.248, 95% CI: 2.357-4.477, P < 0.001) and atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia (OR = 4.875, 95% CI: 2.636-9.016, P < 0.001) were associated with GCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of implementing targeted prevention strategies and early detection programs in high-risk populations to mitigate the burden of GPLs and GCs in Nanjing.

Correlation between Tomographic and Histopathological Staging in Upfront Resected Gastric Cancer: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in the Era of Perioperative Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (MDCT) and to establish a correlation between radiological and histopathological staging in upfront resected localised gastric cancers (GC).

METHODS

All consecutive patients of resectable, localised GC who underwent upfront elective resection between 2010 and 2022 were included. The initial clinical staging determined during multidisciplinary meetings was compared with the pathological stage obtained after surgery. Subsequently, a retrospective, blinded review was conducted to assign a revised clinical staging, and accuracy was correlated.

RESULTS

The analysis of 138 patients revealed varying accuracy of MDCT in determining the T stage (66.9% for T1/T2, 64.6% for T3, and 87.2% for T4) and N stage (60.8% for N0, 63.7% for N1, and 83.2% for N2). The accuracy for stage group ranged from 71 to 78.65%. There was weak agreement observed between the T, N, and overall stage on clinicopathological correlation. However, a blinded radiology review by oncoradiologists resulted in improved accuracy, particularly in T1/T2 disease, and also improved pathological stage correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MDCT is a valuable initial staging tool for gastric cancer, we found weak agreement between the clinical and the pathological stages in upfront resected gastric cancers. By implementing an expert radiology review and standardising scanning and reporting protocols, we can significantly improve the accuracy and correlation of MDCT with pathology, even for T1/T2 disease. This may help in better selecting patients for upfront surgery versus perioperative chemotherapy, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation remain a public health issue worldwide. We assessed trends in cancer screening participation according to socioeconomic status in Japan between 2013 and 2022, considering the potential impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

Data from the nationally representative Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions (2013-2022: approximately 500,000 persons per survey) were analyzed for age-standardized self-reported cancer screening rates for stomach, lung, colon, breast (aged 40-69 years), and cervical (aged 20-69 years) cancers, stratified by education levels. An age-adjusted Poisson model was used to assess the statistical significance of changes between the survey years.

RESULTS

A clear socioeconomic gradient was observed, particularly in stomach cancer screening, where the 2022 rates ranged from 28.3% (low education) to 58.2% (high education) for men and 20.2% to 43.2% for women, depending on education level. Between 2019 and 2022, screening rates for stomach, lung, and colorectal cancers changed by -1.2%, -0.9%, and +0.6% for men and -1.0%, +0.1%, and +1.4% for women, respectively. Breast and cervical cancer screening rates declined by 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened inequalities, with a 3.1% decline in breast cancer screening among individuals with low education level, compared to a 1.0% decline among those with higher education level.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic had a minor impact on screening rates (counteracting increasing trends of screening rates), except for colorectal cancer screening rates; however, the impact was relatively severe for individuals with lower socioeconomic status, especially for women.

Assessing gastric cancer risk through longitudinal health check-up data: Insights from a national cohort study in South Korea

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related fatalities in South Korea. Although periodic screening policies are in place, the early detection and prediction of GC remain challenging. This study evaluated the risk of GC incidence by utilizing longitudinal health check-up data from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort spanning from 2009 to 2019. The criteria selected for this study are general health examination candidates aged 40 or older who have been eligible for health insurance since 2009. The exclusion criteria included individuals diagnosed with cancer prior to 2009 or before their examination date, as well as those who did not complete the examination questionnaire. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model was employed to analyze the time from health examination to the first GC diagnosis, comparing our results with previous cohort studies that evaluated the GC risk through general check-up parameters. Significant risk factors for GC incidence in both genders were age, high levels of AST and γ-GTP, low levels of ALT and hemoglobin. Among males, dyslipidemia, smoking and physical activities were also significantly associated with GC risk. Although further evidence is needed, low hemoglobin levels emerged as a promising potential risk factor for GC, ascertainable through routine general health check-ups.

Precision risk stratification of primary gastric cancer after eradication of H. pylori by a DNA methylation marker: a multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND

Precision cancer risk stratification for gastric cancer is urgently needed for the growing number of healthy people after Helicobacter pylori eradication. The epimutation burden in non-malignant tissues has been associated with cancer risk in multiple cross-sectional studies.

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the clinical usefulness of a DNA methylation marker for epimutation burden, and to identify a cut-off methylation level for a super-high-risk population.

DESIGN

Healthy people after H. pylori eradication with open-type atrophy were prospectively recruited. DNA methylation levels of a marker gene, RIMS1, were measured in biopsy specimens from gastric antrum and body. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of gastric cancer in quartiles of the methylation levels.

RESULTS

1624 participants had at least one endoscopic follow-up with a median follow-up of 4.05 years, and a primary gastric cancer developed in 27 participants. The highest quartile of RIMS1 methylation levels had a higher incidence rate (972.8 per 100 000 person-years) than the lowest quartile (127.1). Cox regression analysis revealed a univariate HR of 7.7 (95% CI 1.8-33.7) and an age- and sex-adjusted HR of 5.7 (95% CI 1.3-25.5). As a secondary objective, a cut-off methylation level of 25.7% (95% CI 1.7-7.7) was obtained to identify a population with a super-high risk based on the number needed to screen of 1000.

CONCLUSION

A DNA methylation marker can risk-stratify healthy people after H. pylori eradication even though all of them have clinically high risk. Individuals with super-high risk will need more frequent gastric cancer screening than currently recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN-CTR000016894.

Methylated Reprimo Cell-Free DNA as a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Gastric Cancer

Restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic abruptly reversed the slow decline of the diagnosis and mortality rates of gastric cancer (GC). This scenario highlights the importance of developing cost-effective methods for mass screening and evaluation of treatment response. In this study, we evaluated a non-invasive method based on the circulating methylated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of Reprimo (RPRM), a tumor suppressor gene associated with the development of GC. Methylated RPRM cfDNA was analyzed in three de-identified cohorts: Cohort 1 comprised 81 participants with GC and 137 healthy donors (HDs); Cohort 2 comprised 27 participants with GC undergoing gastrectomy and/or chemotherapy analyzed at the beginning and after three months of treatment; and Cohort 3 comprised 1105 population-based participants in a secondary prevention program who underwent esophagogastroduodenal (EGD) endoscopy. This cohort includes 180 normal participants, 845 participants with premalignant conditions (692 with chronic atrophic gastritis [AG] and 153 with gastric intestinal metaplasia/low-grade dysplasia [GIM/LGD]), 21 with high-grade dysplasia/early GC [HGD/eGC], and 59 with advanced GC [aGC]). A nested case-control substudy was performed using a combination of methylated RPRM cfDNA and pepsinogens (PG)-I/II ratio. The dense CpG island of the promoter region of the RPRM gene was bisulfite sequenced and analyzed to develop a fluorescence-based real-time PCR assay (MethyLight). This assay allows the determination of the absolute number of copies of methylated RPRM cfDNA. A targeted sequence of PCR amplicon products confirmed the gastric origin of the plasma-isolated samples. In Cohort 1, the mean value of GCs (32,240.00 copies/mL) was higher than that of the HD controls (139.00 copies/mL) (p < 0.0001). After dividing this cohort into training-validation subcohorts, we identified an area under the curve of 0.764 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.683-0.845) in the training group. This resulted in a cut-off value of 87.37 copies/mL (sensitivity 70.0% and specificity 80.2%). The validation subcohort predicted a sensitivity of 66.67% and a specificity of 83.33%. In Cohort 2 (monitoring treatment response), RPRM levels significantly decreased in responders (p = 0.0042) compared to non-responders. In Cohort 3 (population-based participants), 18.9% %, 24.1%, 30.7%, 47.0%, and 71.2% of normal, AG, GIM/LGD, HGD/eGC, and aGC participants tested positive for methylated RPRM cfDNA, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing normal/premalignant conditions vs. GC were 65.0% (95% CI 53.52% to 75.33%) and 75.9% (95% CI 73.16% to 78.49%), respectively, with an accuracy of 75.11% (95% CI 72.45% to 77.64%). Logistic regression analyses revealed an OR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.11-3.07, p = 0.02) and an odds ratio (OR) of 3.9 (95% CI 1.53-9.93, p = 0.004) for the risk of developing GIM/LGD and HGD/eGC, respectively. The combined methylated RPRM cfDNA and PG-I/II ratio reached a sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI 54.43% to 93.95%) and specificity of 63.04% (95% CI 52.34% to 72.88%) for detecting HGD/eGC vs. three to six age- and sex-matched participants with premalignant conditions. Our results demonstrate that methylated RPRM cfDNA should be considered a direct biomarker for the non-invasive detection of GC and a predictive biomarker for treatment response.

Endoscopic and histological assessment in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients undergoing gastroscopy: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

First-degree relatives of gastric cancer (GC) patients are known to have an increased risk of developing GC. However, guidelines in low-intermediate incidence regions often lack specific recommendations for managing both asymptomatic and symptomatic relatives at risk.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the differences in relevant histological findings (e.g. Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric precancerous and neoplastic conditions) between asymptomatic patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy due to first-degree relatives with GC and patients with symptoms or other clinical indications and presence of first-degree relatives with GC. The secondary aim was to identify the patient's risk factors of relevant histological findings.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies with the indication for first-degree relatives with GC from January 2008 to September 2022. They were analyzed in two groups based on whether they had additional symptoms or clinical indications for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

RESULTS

Overall, 283 patients were included (54.5% asymptomatic vs. 45.5% symptomatic). Histological findings that led to changes in patient management were identified in 32% of cases. No significant differences in histological findings between the two groups were observed ( P = 0.077). A subanalysis revealed that patients with male relatives affected by GC had a higher incidence of relevant histological findings than those with female family members with GC ( P = 0.013) with an odds ratio of 3.10.

CONCLUSION

First-degree relatives of GC patients may be at risk for H. pylori infection and gastric precancerous conditions regardless of symptoms or other indications, and a proactive endoscopic screening could be considered even in countries with low GC incidence.

Novel and Effective Blood-Based miRNA Diagnostic Panel for Gastric Cancer: A Pilot Study in a Japanese Population

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) has a high prevalence in Asian countries, and there is an unmet need for non-invasive and efficient GC screening methods. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of GASTROClear, a panel of blood serum miRNAs for the detection of GC, in a Japanese population.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot cohort study, comprising 103 patients with GC and 122 healthy controls. Serum samples were prospectively collected from study participants at two Japanese hospitals using a predefined blood-processing protocol. The diagnostic performance of GASTROClear was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff. By applying a logistic regression algorithm, we evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of novel combinations of GC diagnostic biomarker panels, consisting of GASTROClear and alternative serum markers (anti-Helicobacter pylori [Hp] antibody and pepsinogen).

RESULTS

Most patients had Stage I (58%) GC and were asymptomatic (59%). The area under the curve (AUC) value for the detection of GC using GASTROClear was 0.80, with 70.9% sensitivity and 75.2% specificity. GASTROClear performed equally well within the subgroups based on age, sex, symptoms, Hp status, and tumor characteristics. We improved the diagnostic performance of GASTROClear by combining it with an anti-Hp antibody and pepsinogen. This yielded an AUC value of 0.88, with the highest specificity (86.9%) at a fixed sensitivity (70.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

GASTROClear demonstrated competent diagnostic efficacy for GC in the detection of GC in our Japanese cohort, even in the early stages of cancer and asymptomatic cases. Its combination with existing serum markers may contribute to efficient risk stratification to detect GC.

Gastric Cancer Screening in the United States: A Review of Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. In the United States, gastric cancer incidence and mortality are substantially higher among non-White racial and ethnic groups and new immigrants from high-incidence countries. This is in large part related to the higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori -associated gastric premalignant changes in these populations. Apart from primary prevention, early detection of gastric cancer is the principal strategy to reduce gastric cancer mortality and improve survival. Extensive evidence in Asian countries has demonstrated the benefits of endoscopic screening in detecting early-stage gastric cancer and reducing gastric cancer-related mortality. By contrast, direct, high-quality US-based data, such as from large clinical trials or observational studies, on important outcomes of gastric cancer screening are still lacking. In this review, we evaluate and summarize the latest global evidence on the epidemiology and predisposing factors of gastric cancer as well as the efficacy, benefits vs. risks, and cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening. We further discuss the critical knowledge gaps and challenges in promoting gastric cancer screening in the United States. Dedicated research is urgently needed to enrich the US-based data on gastric cancer primary and secondary prevention to inform clinical practice and reduce gastric cancer-related morbidity and mortality in a cost and resource efficient manner.

Assessing Serum Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori Tests for Detecting Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer: Insights from a Large-Scale and Propensity-Score-Matched Study in Republic of Korea

The incidence of cancer and its associated mortality have increased over the past several decades [...].

Estimating the Amount of Air Inside the Stomach for Detecting Cancers on Gastric Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence: an Observational, Cross-sectional Study

Gastric radiography is an important tool for early detection of cancer. During gastric radiography, the stomach is monitored using barium and effervescent granules. However, stomach compression and physiological phenomena during the examination can cause air to escape the stomach. When the stomach contracts, physicians cannot accurately observe its condition, which may result in missed lesions. Notably, no research using artificial intelligence (AI) has explored the use of gastric radiography to estimate the amount of air in the stomach. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an AI system to estimate the amount of air inside the stomach using gastric radiographs. In this observational, cross-sectional study, we collected data from 300 cases who underwent medical screening and estimated the images with poor stomach air volume. We used pre-trained models of vision transformer (ViT) and convolutional neural network (CNN). Instead of retraining, dimensionality reduction was performed on the output features using principal component analysis, and LightGBM performed discriminative processing. The combination of ViT and CNN resulted in the highest accuracy (F-value 0.792, accuracy 0.943, sensitivity 0.738, specificity 0.978). High accuracy was maintained in the prone position, where air inside the stomach could be easily released. Combining ViT and CNN from gastric radiographs accurately identified cases of poor stomach air volume. The system was highly accurate in the prone position and proved clinically useful. The developed AI can be used to provide high-quality images to physicians and to prevent missed lesions.

Efficacy and safety of different drugs in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer: network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, there has been a significant advancement in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, leading to the discovery of new drugs and changes in the treatment approach for patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Although several drugs are available for treating these patients, there is still no consensus on their selection, and there has been limited direct or indirect comparison among them.

OBJECTIVE

To address this gap, a network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different drugs used in the treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer.

METHODS

By searching through databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, we identified 16 randomized controlled trials that involved a total of 4485 patients and utilized 9 different intervention measures.

RESULTS

Based on the current evidence, compared with chemotherapy alone, the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab were [hazard ratio (HR): 2.61 95%confidence interval (CI) (1.51, 4.51)] and [hazard ratio (HR): 2.01 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.18, 3.42)], respectively. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan were [hazard ratio (HR): 1.7 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 2.56)] and [hazard ratio (HR): 2.13 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.42, 3.22)], respectively. It is suggested that nivolumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan can effectively prolong overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer, while also reducing the risk of adverse events to some extent. Therefore, these two regimens, nivolumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan, are considered to be effective and safe options for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In previous studies, trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been a common treatment for HER2-positive gastric cancer. To a certain extent, our study provides a reliable direction for future treatment options for HER2-positive gastric cancer.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023420941.

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based system for real-time high-quality photodocumentation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Complete and high-quality photodocumentation in esophagoduodenogastroscopy (EGD) is essential for accurately diagnosing upper gastrointestinal diseases by reducing blind spot rates. Automated Photodocumentation Task (APT), an artificial intelligence-based system for real-time photodocumentation during EGD, was developed to assist endoscopists in focusing more on the observation rather than repetitive capturing tasks. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness and quality of APT's photodocumentation compared to endoscopists. The dataset comprised 37 EGD videos recorded at Seoul National University Hospital between March and June 2023. Virtual endoscopy was conducted by seven endoscopists and APT, capturing 11 anatomical landmarks from the videos. The primary endpoints were the completeness of capturing landmarks and the quality of the images. APT achieved an average accuracy of 98.16% in capturing landmarks. Compared to that of endoscopists, APT demonstrated similar completeness in photodocumentation (87.72% vs. 85.75%, P = .0.258), and the combined photodocumentation of endoscopists and APT reached higher completeness (91.89% vs. 85.75%, P < .0.001). APT captured images with higher mean opinion scores than those of endoscopists (3.88 vs. 3.41, P < .0.001). In conclusion, APT provides clear, high-quality endoscopic images while minimizing blind spots during EGD in real-time.

Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most prevalent neoplasm worldwide and the fourth with the highest mortality, and its geographical distribution is not homogeneous with high-risk, intermediate-risk (IR), and low-risk areas. Advanced stages at diagnosis are related to high mortality, but early detection greatly increases the chances of survival. Upper endoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for GC diagnosis. Several studies have investigated the relevance of endoscopic screening and how to implemente it in IR countries. However, most Western societies recommend screening only in selected populations with high-risk factors for GC. No systematic reviews on GC endoscopic screening in IR countries exist.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries.

METHODS

We will include randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and economic studies focusing on endoscopic screening of GC in the asymptomatic population of IR countries. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Embase, and Web of Science. Other gray literature sources will be additionally searched. Studies published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish until September 2024 will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of all search results. The selected studies will then be fully analyzed, and the data will be collected and coded in a database. To minimize the risk of bias, the included studies will undergo a quality analysis according to Cochrane risk of bias tools, RoB 2 of randomized trials and ROBINS-I for nonrandomized trials; Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control and cohort studies; and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute study quality assessment tools for cross-sectional studies. The data collected will be cataloged in 2 categories: efficacy or effectiveness data and economic data, and separate meta-analyses will be performed for each category if appropriate.

RESULTS

This study is expected to provide results on the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in an IR population. To date, 969 studies were screened for title and abstract, 75 were selected for full-text screening, and 44 were retained for data analysis. Additionally, 2 studies were selected from our manual search. Currently, the study is in the early stages of data extraction and risk of bias assessment and is expected to be published in the first quarter of 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this review will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness of endoscopic GC screening in IR countries. In doing so, we believe we will help guide future research, inform health care decisions and assist policy makers in this area, and support future decisions to implement GC screening programs in this type of population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024502174; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=502174.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56791.

Projection of future gastric cancer incidence and health-care service demand by geographic area in Kanagawa, Japan

Projections of future gastric cancer incidence and the demand for health-care services for gastric cancer patients by geographic area will assist local authorities in determining health-care needs, allocating medical resources, and planning services. This study aims to project the future incidence of gastric cancer, estimate the number of patients per medical institution, and decompose the net changes in cases to assess the impact of population aging by geographic area. Our projections are based on population-based cancer registry data, census data from 2000 to 2020, and the projected population for 2025-2045 in Kanagawa, Japan. We classified Kanagawa into urban, town, outer city, and rural areas based on geographic and population features. The number of medical institutions providing gastric cancer treatment was used to estimate the number of patients per medical institution. We projected a decrease of 25%, 52%, and 5% in gastric cancer cases in towns, outer cities, and rural areas from 2020 to 2045, respectively. However, cases are expected to increase by 9% in urban areas, primarily due to population aging. The annual number of gastric cancer patients per medical institution in urban areas is expected to increase from 54 to 59, while numbers in other areas are predicted to decline from 2020 to 2045. Our long-term projections indicate that the number of older gastric cancer patients will continue to increase in urban areas. While current measures effectively reduce gastric cancer risk, they need to be revised to address the impact of population aging.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Screening and Surveillance in Individuals at Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer in the United States: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of preventable cancer and mortality in certain US populations. The most impactful way to reduce GC mortality is via primary prevention, namely Helicobacter pylori eradication, and secondary prevention, namely endoscopic screening and surveillance of precancerous conditions, such as gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). An emerging body of evidence supports the possible impact of these strategies on GC incidence and mortality in identifiable high-risk populations in the United States. Accordingly, the primary objective of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update (CPU) Expert Review is to provide best practice advice for primary and secondary prevention of GC in the context of current clinical practice and evidence in the United States.

METHODS

This CPU Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These best practice advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these best practice advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: There are identifiable high-risk groups in the United States who should be considered for GC screening. These include first-generation immigrants from high-incidence GC regions and possibly other non-White racial and ethnic groups, those with a family history of GC in a first-degree relative, and individuals with certain hereditary gastrointestinal polyposis or hereditary cancer syndromes. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Endoscopy is the best test for screening or surveillance in individuals at increased risk for GC. Endoscopy enables direct visualization to endoscopically stage the mucosa and identify areas concerning for neoplasia, as well as enables biopsies for further histologic examination and mucosal staging. Both endoscopic and histologic staging are key for risk stratification and determining whether ongoing surveillance is indicated and at what interval. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: High-quality upper endoscopy for the detection of premalignant and malignant gastric lesions should include the use of a high-definition white-light endoscopy system with image enhancement, gastric mucosal cleansing, and insufflation to achieve optimal mucosal visualization, in addition to adequate visual inspection time, photodocumentation, and use of a systematic biopsy protocol for mucosal staging when appropriate. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: H pylori eradication is essential and serves as an adjunct to endoscopic screening and surveillance for primary and secondary prevention of GC. Opportunistic screening for H pylori infection should be considered in individuals deemed to be at increased risk for GC (refer to Best Practice Advice 1). Screening for H pylori infection in adult household members of individuals who test positive for H pylori (so-called "familial-based testing") should also be considered. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: In individuals with suspected gastric atrophy with or without intestinal metaplasia, gastric biopsies should be obtained according to a systematic protocol (eg, updated Sydney System) to enable histologic confirmation and staging. A minimum of 5 total biopsies should be obtained, with samples from the antrum/incisura and corpus placed in separately labeled jars (eg, jar 1, "antrum/incisura" and jar 2, "corpus"). Any suspicious areas should be described and biopsied separately. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: GIM and dysplasia are endoscopically detectable. However, these findings often go undiagnosed when endoscopists are unfamiliar with the characteristic visual features; accordingly, there is an unmet need for improved training, especially in the United States. Artificial intelligence tools appear promising for the detection of early gastric neoplasia in the adequately visualized stomach, but data are too preliminary to recommend routine use. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Endoscopists should work with their local pathologists to achieve consensus for consistent documentation of histologic risk-stratification parameters when atrophic gastritis with or without metaplasia is diagnosed. At a minimum, the presence or absence of H pylori infection, severity of atrophy and/or metaplasia, and histologic subtyping of GIM, if applicable, should be documented to inform clinical decision making. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: If the index screening endoscopy performed in an individual at increased risk for GC (refer to Best Practice Advice 1) does not identify atrophy, GIM, or neoplasia, then the decision to continue screening should be based on that individual's risk factors and preferences. If the individual has a family history of GC or multiple risk factors for GC, then ongoing screening should be considered. The optimal screening intervals in such scenarios are not well defined. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Endoscopists should ensure that all individuals with confirmed gastric atrophy with or without GIM undergo risk stratification. Individuals with severe atrophic gastritis and/or multifocal or incomplete GIM are likely to benefit from endoscopic surveillance, particularly if they have other risk factors for GC (eg, family history). Endoscopic surveillance should be considered every 3 years; however, intervals are not well defined and shorter intervals may be advisable in those with multiple risk factors, such as severe GIM that is anatomically extensive. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Indefinite and low-grade dysplasia can be difficult to reproducibly identify by endoscopy and accurately diagnose on histopathology. Accordingly, all dysplasia should be confirmed by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist, and clinicians should refer patients with visible or nonvisible dysplasia to an endoscopist or center with expertise in the diagnosis and management of gastric neoplasia. Individuals with indefinite or low-grade dysplasia who are infected with H pylori should be treated and have eradication confirmed, followed by repeat endoscopy and biopsies by an experienced endoscopist, as visual and histologic discernment may improve once inflammation subsides. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Individuals with suspected high-grade dysplasia or early GC should undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection with the goal of en bloc, R0 resection to enable accurate pathologic staging with curative intent. Eradication of active H pylori infection is essential, but should not delay endoscopic intervention. Endoscopic submucosal dissection should be performed at a center with endoscopic and pathologic expertise. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Individuals with a history of successfully resected gastric dysplasia or cancer require ongoing endoscopic surveillance. Suggested surveillance intervals exist, but additional data are required to refine surveillance recommendations, particularly in the United States. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Type I gastric carcinoids in individuals with atrophic gastritis are typically indolent, especially if <1 cm. Endoscopists may consider resecting gastric carcinoids <1 cm and should endoscopically resect lesions measuring 1-2 cm. Individuals with type I gastric carcinoids >2 cm should undergo cross-sectional imaging and be referred for surgical resection, given the risk of metastasis. Individuals with type I gastric carcinoids should undergo surveillance, but the intervals are not well defined. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: In general, only individuals who are fit for endoscopic or potentially surgical treatment should be screened for GC and continued surveillance of premalignant gastric conditions. If a person is no longer fit for endoscopic or surgical treatment, then screening and surveillance should be stopped. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: To achieve health equity, a personalized approach should be taken to assess an individual's risk for GC to determine whether screening and surveillance should be pursued. In conjunction, modifiable risk factors for GC should be distinctly addressed, as most of these risk factors disproportionately impact people at high risk for GC and represent health care disparities.

Effect of electroacupuncture on discomfort in patients undergoing colonoscopy: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Colonoscopy is currently the most commonly used and effective method for early detection, diagnosis and treatment of tumours of the colon and rectum. However, similar to other invasive procedures, it is associated with adverse reactions such as pain and abdominal distension. Electroacupuncture (EA) has been proposed as a potential treatment for relieving this discomfort; however, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of EA when used prior to colonoscopy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, randomised, controlled, patient-assessor-blinded trial will be conducted at three hospitals in China. A total of 500 participants will be randomly assigned to either the EA group or sham EA (SEA) group, in a 1:1 ratio. EA will be administered for 30 min before the colonoscopy. Participants will be asked to complete detailed questionnaires within 10 min after the procedure and 24 hours after the procedure to record their symptoms. The primary outcome will be assessed using discomfort numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. Secondary outcomes will include participants' tolerance levels, including standard NRS scores for abdominal pain, bloating and anal discomfort reported by the participants, as well as heart rate(HR), blood pressure(BP), surgical pleth index, participant satisfaction, nurses' and endoscopists' evaluations, incidence of adverse events and salivary cortisol levels collected before EA and after colonoscopy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (number 2023-1327-94-01), Ethics Committee of Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (number 2023LCSY059) and Ethics Committee of Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (number 2023-062-01). The results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. All potential participants will be provided informed consent before participating in the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300073485.

Oral Microbiome Signatures as Potential Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The oral microbiota was investigated for distinguishable characteristics between GC, premalignant gastric conditions (Pre-GC), and control participants.

METHODS

Mouthwash samples from GC, Pre-GC, and control participants at a tertiary care center were prospectively collected. Following DNA extraction and sequencing, analyses of oral microbiome biodiversity and composition were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to evaluate the discriminative power of oral microbiome signatures.

RESULTS

Oral samples from 98 participants included 30 (30.6%) GC, 30 (30.6%) Pre-GC and 38 (38.8%) controls. Of these, 61 (62.2%) were female, 31 (31.6%) were Hispanic, and 18 (18.3%) were smokers. GC compared to controls demonstrated notable differences in beta diversity (Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity, p<0.02). 32 bacterial genera were found to be differentially abundant when comparing GC and controls, and 23 bacterial genera demonstrated differential abundance when comparing Pre-GC and controls (W-statistic >2). Minimal compositional differences between GC and Pre-GC were found, with only three differentially abundant bacterial genera (W-statistic >2). Models were constructed from the most significant bacterial signatures (W-statistic >5). These models discriminated between GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.808, 0.952) and between Pre-GC and control oral samples with an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI 0.887, 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral rinses of GC and Pre-GC participants exhibited distinct but similar microbiome profiles, distinguishing them from controls. This compositional difference raises the possibility of utilizing these microbial signatures to predict GC risk.

Presentation, Treatment, and Survival Among Asians With Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In aggregate, Asian patients have a higher incidence and mortality from gastric cancer (GC) than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. However, there is a lack of data regarding outcomes among Asian-American subpopulations with GC.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with GC between 2004 and 2020. Asian patients were disaggregated by region, with a further subanalysis of Eastern Asians. Outcomes of interest included the initial localized/regional presentation versus metastatic disease and cancer care measures including undergoing surgical excision or resection for stages I-III, receiving guideline-concordant care, receiving delayed treatment (> 90 days for any treatment type), and overall survival. Outcomes were adjusted for patient/disease characteristics, treatment, and zip-code socioeconomic factors using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 182,811 patients with GC, 7.2% (n = 13,051) were classified as Asian. More than one-half of the Asian cohort was categorized as East Asian (n = 6,762, 50.1%), with Chinese patients compromising 44.0% (n = 2972) of this subcohort. East Asian patients had greater odds of presenting with nonmetastatic disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.59; P < 0.001), undergoing a curative-intent resection (OR 1.52; P < 0.001), and receiving guideline-concordant care (OR 1.26; P < 0.001) compared to NHW patients. Asians from outside of East, Southeast, and South Asia had increased odds of delayed treatment (OR 1.29, P = 0.024). Asians, in aggregate and by each subpopulation, had a lower mortality risk than NHW patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Asian patients with GC have improved outcomes in aggregate compared to NHW patients, largely driven by the East Asian subpopulation. All Asian subpopulations demonstrated improved survival in comparison with NHW patients.

A dual-gene panel of two fragments of methylated IRF4 and one of ZEB2 in plasma cell-free DNA for gastric cancer detection

Early detection is crucial for increasing the survival rate of gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to identify a methylated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) marker panel for detecting GC. The differentially methylated CpGs (DMCs) were selected from datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The selected DMCs were validated and further selected in tissue samples (40 gastric cancer and 36 healthy white blood cell samples) and in a quarter sample volume of plasma samples (37 gastric cancer, 12 benign gastric disease, and 43 healthy individuals). The marker combination selected was then evaluated in a normal sample volume of plasma samples (35 gastric cancer, 39 control diseases, and 40 healthy individuals) using real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP). The analysis of the results compared methods based on 2-ΔΔCt values and Ct values. In the results, 30 DMCs were selected through bioinformatics methods, and then 5 were selected for biological validation. The marker combination of two fragments of IRF4 (IRF4-1 and IRF4-2) and one of ZEB2 was selected due to its good performance. The Ct-based method was selected for its good results and practical advantages. The assay, IRF4-1 and IRF4-2 in one fluorescence channel and ZEB2 in another, obtained 74.3% sensitivity for the GC group at any stage, at 92.4% specificity. In conclusion, the panel of IRF4 and ZEB2 in plasma cfDNA demonstrates good diagnostic performance and application potential in clinical settings.

Cancer screening programs in Japan: Progress and challenges

National screening programs for gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and cervical cancers are offered in Japan. The initial introduction of cancer screening programs was decided based on experts' opinions. Since 2003, the research groups funded by the National Cancer Center have published screening guidelines for gastric, colorectal, lung, prostate, cervical, and breast cancers. Although such guidelines have increasingly contributed to promoting evidence-based screening, it is still insufficient. Cancer screenings have mainly been provided in communities and workplaces. Compared with the average of OECD countries, participation rates in breast and cervical cancer screening are lower. Participation rates cannot be accurately calculated due to a lack of comprehensive cancer screening registries at the national level. Alternatively, estimates are derived from questionnaire surveys conducted on randomly selected samples from the national population. The quality assurance system has been limited to community-based screening and was not adapted to workplace screening until 2018. While there is a long history of cancer screening, the complex program delivery system might be a barrier to increasing the participation rate. Continued efforts are necessary to offer evidence-based cancer screening and establish an effective quality assurance system.

Higher frequency of gastric neoplasia in advanced chronic liver disease patients: Impact of screening endoscopy in an intermediate-high risk country

BACKGROUND

The Baveno VII guidelines were proposed to identify which patients could safely avoid screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for gastroesophageal varices. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of gastric neoplasia in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients who underwent EGD for screening of gastroesophageal varices (GOEV) compared to a healthy population.

METHODS

Retrospective study that enrolled all cACLD patients who underwent EGD for GOEV screening (January 2008-June 2018) in a tertiary reference center. cACLD patients were compared with asymptomatic healthy individuals who underwent EGD in a private hospital setting (April 2017-March 2018).

RESULTS

We evaluated 1845 patients (481 cACLD patients, 1364 healthy individuals). A significantly higher frequency of gastric neoplasia was observed in patients with cACLD compared to healthy individuals (4.0% vs. 1.0 %; p < 0.001). Rare histopathological subtypes (WHO Classification) accounted for 28.7 % of gastric carcinoma cases in the cACLD cohort. Seven cases of gastric neoplasia (36.8 % of gastric neoplasia cases in the cACLD patients) were diagnosed in patients who, according to the Baveno VII criteria, would have not been submitted to EGD.

CONCLUSION

We found an increased frequency of gastric neoplasia in patients with cACLD in comparison with healthy individuals. In countries with intermediate-high risk for GC, continuing to perform EGD could be beneficial.

Where are we with gastric cancer screening in Europe in 2024?

The absolute number of annual cases of gastric cancer in Europe is rising. The Council of the European Union has recommended implementation of gastric cancer screening for countries or regions with a high gastric cancer incidence and death rates. However, as of 2024 no organised gastric cancer screening programme has been launched in Europe.There are several ways to decrease gastric cancer burden, but the screen and treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) seems to be the most appropriate for Europe. It has to be noted that increased use of antibiotics would be associated with this strategy.Only organised population-based cancer screening is recommended in the European Union, therefore gastric cancer screening also is expected to fulfil the criteria of an organised screening programme. In this respect, several aspects of screening organisation need to be considered before full implementation of gastric cancer prevention in Europe; the age range of the target group, test types, H. pylori eradication regimens and surveillance strategies are among them. Currently, ongoing projects (GISTAR, EUROHELICAN, TOGAS and EUCanScreen) are expected to provide the missing evidence. Feedback from the decision-makers and the potential target groups, including vulnerable populations, will be important to planning the programme.This paper provides an overview of the recent decisions of the European authorities, the progress towards gastric cancer implementation in Europe and expected challenges. Finally, a potential algorithm for gastric cancer screening in Europe is proposed.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of developing gastric cancer based on a questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

Background

Detection of gastric cancer (GC) at early stages is an effective strategy for decreasing mortality. This study aimed to construct a prediction nomogram based on a questionnaire to assess the risk of developing GC.

Methods

Our study comprised a total of 4379 participants (2326 participants from outpatient at Fengqing People's Hospital were considered for model development and internal validation, and 2053 participants from outpatients at the endoscopy center at the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University were considered for independent external validation) and gastric mucosa status was determined by endoscopy and biopsies. The eligible participants in development cohort from Fengqing people's Hospital were randomly separated into a training cohort (n=1629, 70.0%) and an internal validation cohort (n=697, 30.0%). The relevant features were selected by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and the ensuing features were evaluated through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, the variables were selected to construct a prediction nomogram. The discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram were evaluated by the C-index and calibration plot, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were used for the assessment of clinical benefit of the model. This model was developed to estimate the risk of developing neoplastic lesions according to the "transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis" (TRIPOD) statement.

Results

Six variables, including age, sex, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, education level, and Hp infection status, were independent risk factors for the development of neoplastic lesions. Thus, these variables were incorporated into the final nomogram. The AUC of the nomogram were 0.701, 0.657 and 0.699 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve showed that the nomogram was in good agreement with the observed outcomes. Compared to treatment of all patients or none, our nomogram showed a notably higher clinical benefit.

Conclusion

This nomogram proved to be a convenient, cost-effective tool to effectively predict an individual's risk of developing neoplastic lesions, and it can act as a prescreening tool before gastroscopy.

Personalized starting age of gastric cancer screening based on individuals' risk profiles: a population-based, prospective study

BACKGROUND

The current recommended starting age for gastric cancer screening lacks unified guideline and individualized criteria. We aimed to determine the risk-stratified starting age for gastric cancer screening in China based on individuals' risk profiles and to develop an online calculator for clinical application.

METHODS

In this multicenter, population-based, prospective study, we allocated participants enrolled between 2015 and 2017 (N = 59 771, aged 40-69 years) to screened and unscreened groups and observed them for primary endpoints: gastric cancer occurrence as well as all-cause and gastric cancer-specific death. Median follow-up was 6.07 years. To determine the reference starting age, the effectiveness of gastric cancer screening was assessed by age group after propensity score matching. Further, we categorized the calculated individual risk scores (using well-established risk factors) by quantile. Subsequently, we used age-specific, 10-year cumulative risk curves to estimate the risk-stratified starting age-that is, when the individual's risk level matches the reference starting age risk threshold.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 475 gastric cancer case patients, 182 gastric cancer-related deaths, and 1860 all-cause deaths occurred. All-cause and gastric cancer-specific mortality decreased among screened individuals 45 years of age and older and 50 to 59 years of age, respectively. Thus, the average population (referent) starting age was set as 50 years. The 10-year cumulative risk of gastric cancer in the average population aged 50 years was 1.147%. We stratified the starting age using 8 risk factors and categorized participants as low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk individuals whose risk-stratified starting age was 58, 50, and 46 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although high-risk individuals warrant starting gastric cancer screening 3 to 5 years earlier than for the average population (aged 50 years), low-risk individuals can tolerate delayed screening. Our online, personalized starting age calculator will help with risk-adapted gastric cancer screening (https://web.consultech.com.cn/gastric/#/).

High risk of multiple gastric cancers in Japanese individuals with Lynch syndrome

AIM

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a dominantly inherited syndrome characterized by an increased risk for LS associated tumors such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC). However, the clinical benefit of surveillance for GC remains unclear while it has already been recommended for CRC. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical features of GC in Japanese individuals with LS, and the risk of developing multiple GCs to build regional-tailored surveillance programs in LS patients with GC.

METHODS

Data on Japanese individuals with LS were retrospectively collected from a single institution. The clinical features of GC, including the cumulative risk of multiple GCs, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 96 individuals with LS (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6, 75:20:1), 32 GC lesions were detected in 15 individuals with LS (male/female, 11:4). The median age at initial GC diagnosis was 52.7 y (range: 28-71). Histological examination revealed a predominance of intestinal type (19/24: 87.5%). Moreover, the majority of the GC lesions (82%) were determined to have high-frequency of microsatellite instability. The cumulative risk of individuals with LS developing GC at 70 y was 31.3% (MLH1 36.1%, MSH2 18.0%). Notably, the cumulative risk of individuals with LS developing metachronous and/or synchronous GCs at 0, 10 and 20 y after initial diagnosis of GC was 26.7%, 40.7%, and 59.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Due to a higher risk of developing multiple GCs, intensive surveillance might be especially recommended for Japanese individuals with LS associated initial GC.

The Long-Term Results of Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER Database

BACKGROUND

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG). In this study, we compared the long-term results of proximal gastric cancer (PGC) patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy (TG).

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with PGC and receiving PG or TG between 2004 and 2020 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the PG and TG groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors affecting OS.

RESULT

A total of 3916 patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 2614 undergoing PG and 1302 undergoing TG. After 1:1 PSM matching, 912 pairs of data were included for analysis. Before PSM matching, PG group tended to have better OS and CSS outcomes. However, after PSM matching, both surgical approaches showed similar long-term results.

CONCLUSION

PG for PGC yields comparable long-term outcomes to TG and demonstrates safety in terms of oncologic outcomes.

Proteomic and serological markers for diagnosing cardia gastric cancer and precursor lesions in a Chinese population

Cardia gastric cancer (CGC) is prevalent in East Asia, and noninvasive, cost-effective screening methods are needed. This study investigated the diagnostic value of serum pepsinogen (PG), gastrin-17 (G-17), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibodies, and proteomic profiling for CGC and precancerous lesions. We conducted a case-control study involving biopsy-confirmed patients with CGC (n = 60), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CLGD, n = 60), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CHGD, n = 64), and healthy controls (n = 120) matched for age and sex from high-incidence areas in China. Serological markers including PGI, PGII, G-17, and H. pylori were measured using ELISA and Western blot, while plasma protein markers were assessed using Olink® technology. The VSOLassoBag algorithm and nine machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to identify crucial features and construct predictive models. Various evaluation metrics, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), were utilized to compare predictive performance. Elevated PGII levels, decreased PGR, and H. pylori infection were significantly associated with an increased risk of CGC and precancerous lesions (P for trend < 0.05). The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model performed best in discriminative ability among the 9 ML models. Following feature reduction based on predictive performance, a final explainable XGBoost model was developed, incorporating five protein biomarkers (CDHR2, ICAM4, PTPRM, CDC27, and FLT1). This model exhibited excellent performance in distinguishing individuals with CGC and precancerous lesions from healthy controls (AUC = 0.931 for CGC, 0.867 for CHGD, and 0.763 for CLGD), surpassing the traditional serological marker-based model. This study underscores the diagnostic potential of serological markers and proteomic profiling in the detection of CGC. Further validation and exploration of combined biomarker approaches are warranted to enhance early diagnosis and improve outcomes in high-risk populations.

Effectiveness of Risk-Adapted Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening in China: Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Previous studies have proved the effectiveness of endoscopic screening in rural areas; however, long-term, high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of risk-adapted upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGC) sequential screening strategies in resource-rich regions is currently lacking.

Objective

The objectives were to validate the effectiveness of risk-adapted sequential screening strategies in UGC prevention and control and assess the potential of sequential screening to lower mortality rates.

Methods

Based on the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China, a prospective, large-scale cohort study based on population was conducted to recruit individuals from 4 cities in China from 2013-2019. Those identified as having a high risk of UGC according to a validated risk-score model were advised to undergo endoscopy tests. Follow-up outcomes were tracked until June 2021. Incidence of UGC, UGC-related mortality, and all-cause mortality were evaluated between the screened and nonscreened cohorts.

Results

The study included 153,079 participants at baseline. In total, 113,916 (74.42%) of the participants were designated as low risk of UGC. The remaining 39,163 (25.68%) participants were deemed to be at high risk of UGC and were offered gastroscopy tests. Among the high-risk participants, 9627 (compliance rate 24.6%) adhered to the gastroscopy tests. Over a median follow-up of 6.05 (IQR 3.06-7.06) years, 622 UGC cases, 180 UGC deaths, and 1958 all-cause death cases were traced. The screened cohort exhibited the highest cumulative incidence of UGC (119.2 per 100,000 person-years), followed by the nonscreened and low-risk cohorts. Obvious reductions in both all-cause mortality and UGC mortality were observed between those who undertook screening (153.7 and 4.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively) and the nonscreened group (245.3 and 27 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). The screening population showed a significant 36% and 82% reduction in both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.83, P<.001) and UGC mortality (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.74, P=.02), respectively, compared to the nonscreened group. Reductions of 35% in all-cause mortality (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.86, P=.003) and 81% in UGC mortality (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.80, P=.02) were observed in participants aged older than 55 years in the screened group compared to the nonscreened group. The reductions in all-cause mortality and UGC mortality were statistically significant in males (all-cause mortality: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88, P=.005; UGC mortality: HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.72, P=.02), but significant reductions were not observed in females (all P values were >.05).

Conclusions

Our study suggests the significance of one-off risk-adapted UGC screening in reducing both all-cause mortality and UGC mortality, particularly among high-risk individuals, indicating its effectiveness in UGC prevention and management.

Development and external validation of a quantitative diagnostic model for malignant gastric lesions in clinical opportunistic screening: A multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

Clinical opportunistic screening is a cost-effective cancer screening modality. This study aimed to establish an easy-to-use diagnostic model serving as a risk stratification tool for identification of individuals with malignant gastric lesions for opportunistic screening.

METHODS

We developed a questionnaire-based diagnostic model using a joint dataset including two clinical cohorts from northern and southern China. The cohorts consisted of 17,360 outpatients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination in endoscopic clinics. The final model was derived based on unconditional logistic regression, and predictors were selected according to the Akaike information criterion. External validation was carried out with 32,614 participants from a community-based randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

This questionnaire-based diagnostic model for malignant gastric lesions had eight predictors, including advanced age, male gender, family history of gastric cancer, low body mass index, unexplained weight loss, consumption of leftover food, consumption of preserved food, and epigastric pain. This model showed high discriminative power in the development set with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.791 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.750-0.831). External validation of the model in the general population generated an AUC of 0.696 (95% CI: 0.570-0.822). This model showed an ideal ability for enriching prevalent malignant gastric lesions when applied to various scenarios.

CONCLUSION

This easy-to-use questionnaire-based model for diagnosis of prevalent malignant gastric lesions may serve as an effective prescreening tool in clinical opportunistic screening for gastric cancer.

Investigations and referral for suspected gastric cancer by primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Southeastern China

BACKGROUND

Early recognition and accurate diagnosis are particularly important in the context of gastric cancer. This study mainly aimed to investigate primary care physicians' (PCPs') clinical behaviour and their readiness to consider investigation or referral for symptoms possibly indicative of gastric cancer.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A self-administered online survey was carried out in five selected cities in the Fujian province of China between February 2022 and May 2022.

PARTICIPANT

PCPs working in the departments, such as Internal Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Internal Medicine, Internal Medical Oncology Gastrointestinal Surgery or other clinical departments, have the chance to diagnose or treat patients with suspected gastric cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of PCPs identifying gastric cancer patients either by undertaking an endoscopy at the primary hospital or by referring patients to an upper-level hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 1210 complete responses were received. Nearly half of responding PCPs (46.4%) only had less than 5 years of clinical experience, and the majority worked in suburban or rural regions (64.4%). Direct access to blood tests for cancer diagnosis (77.9%), X-ray (77.2%), CT (55.7%), ultrasound (85.3%), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (54.4%) and colonoscopy (51.9%) was common. Of the respondents, 85.5% reported that they could get specialist advice for a suspected cancer patient within 48 hours in terms of investigations and 84.0% in terms of referral. Patients' waiting time to either conduct a test or have a result was mostly less than 1 week. In patients indicative of gastric cancer, a total of 1148 (94.8%) physicians were ready to investigate cancer either by sending patients to an endoscopy test (49.7%) or referring them to an upper-level hospital (45.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that PCPs in five selected cities of Southeastern China have wide and rapid access to diagnostic tests and specialist advice. Furthermore, PCPs in this region seem to have a high level of readiness to consider investigation or referral for symptoms possibly indicative of gastric cancer.

A Novel Index Including Age, Sex, hTERT, and Methylated RUNX3 Is Useful for Diagnosing Early Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

As the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is increasing in East Asia including Japan, a simple blood test for early GC is needed as an alternative to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. We performed this study to address this issue.

METHODS

We collected serum samples from 319 participants comprising 225 healthy subjects without GC (control group) and 94 patients with early GC (early GC group). After evaluating copy numbers of serum hTERT and methylated RUNX3 (m-RUNX3) using the Combined Restriction Digital PCR (CORD) assay, which we developed, we assessed the diagnostic performance of hTERT and m-RUNX3 for early GC.

RESULTS

Serum levels of hTERT and m-RUNX3 were significantly higher in the early GC group than in the control group. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 for hTERT and 0.78 for m-RUNX3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, sex, hTERT copy number, and m-RUNX3 copy number to be independent factors for early GC. We then established a prediction formula and named it the ASTEm-R3 (age, sex, hTERT, and m-RUNX3) index. The AUC of the ASTEm-R3 index was 0.93 with a sensitivity of 79.7% and specificity of 91.1%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated excellent performance of the ASTEm-R3 index using the CORD assay to detect early GC. This index might be a promising alternative to UGI endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION

As the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is increasing in East Asia including Japan, a simple blood test for early GC is needed as an alternative to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. We performed this study to address this issue.

METHODS

We collected serum samples from 319 participants comprising 225 healthy subjects without GC (control group) and 94 patients with early GC (early GC group). After evaluating copy numbers of serum hTERT and methylated RUNX3 (m-RUNX3) using the Combined Restriction Digital PCR (CORD) assay, which we developed, we assessed the diagnostic performance of hTERT and m-RUNX3 for early GC.

RESULTS

Serum levels of hTERT and m-RUNX3 were significantly higher in the early GC group than in the control group. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 for hTERT and 0.78 for m-RUNX3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, sex, hTERT copy number, and m-RUNX3 copy number to be independent factors for early GC. We then established a prediction formula and named it the ASTEm-R3 (age, sex, hTERT, and m-RUNX3) index. The AUC of the ASTEm-R3 index was 0.93 with a sensitivity of 79.7% and specificity of 91.1%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated excellent performance of the ASTEm-R3 index using the CORD assay to detect early GC. This index might be a promising alternative to UGI endoscopy.

Challenges and advancing strategies of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: The puzzle of eCura C1

In this editorial, we explore the challenges of managing noncurative resections in early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), starting from the consideration recently made by Zhu et al. Specifically, we evaluate the management of eCura C1 lesions, where decisions regarding further interventions are pivotal yet contentious. Collaboration among endoscopists, surgeons, and pathologists is underscored to refine risk assessment and personalize therapeutic management. Recent advancements in ESD techniques and interdisciplinary collaboration offer opportunities for outcome optimization in managing eCura C1 lesions. Moreover, despite needing further clinical validation, molecular biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for enhancing prognostication. This manuscript highlights the ongoing research attempts to define treatment paradigms effectively and evaluates the potential of emerging options, ultimately aiming to improve patient care and outcomes in this complex clinical scenario.

Prevalence of Gastric Precursor Lesions in Countries With Differential Gastric Cancer Burden: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The prevalence of precursor lesions for gastric cancer (GC) and the differential burden between countries of varying GC risk is not well-understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of precursor lesions.

METHODS

We estimated the prevalence of atrophic gastritis (AG), gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM), and dysplasia in regions with low, medium, and high GC incidence. Because IM is an advanced manifestation of AG, we assessed the prevalence of less advanced precursors, regardless of the presence of more advanced lesions. Prevalence was sub-stratified by Helicobacter pylori infection, symptomatology, and period (<2000, 2000-2010, and >2010).

RESULTS

Among the 582 articles that underwent full-text review, 166 studies met inclusion criteria. The global prevalence estimates of AG, IM, and dysplasia were 25.4%, 16.2%, and 2.0%, respectively, on the basis of 126 studies that reported the prevalence of less advanced precursors, regardless of the presence of more advanced lesions. The prevalence of all precursor lesions was higher in high and medium compared with low GC incidence countries (P < .01). Prevalence of AG and IM was significantly higher among H pylori-infected individuals (P < .01) but not statistically different between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (P > .17). All precursors demonstrated a secular decrease in prevalence over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric precursor lesions have differences in prevalence in regions with differential GC incidence and are associated with H pylori infection. Because of the substantial prevalence of precursor lesions in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic evaluation may not be sufficient to identify individuals at risk. These estimates provide important insights for tailoring GC prevention strategies.

Peripherical Blood hsa-miR-335-5p Quantification as a Prognostic, but Not Diagnostic, Marker of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of death, and this pathology often receives a diagnosis in an advanced stage. The development of a less invasive and cost-effective test for detection is essential for decreasing the mortality rate and increasing the life expectancy of GC patients. We evaluated the potential targeting of CD54/ICAM1, a marker of gastric cancer stem cells, with miRNAs to detect GC in blood samples. The analyses included 79 blood samples, 38 from GC patients and 41 from healthy donors, who attended INCan, México City. The total RNA was obtained from the blood plasma, and RT-PCR and qPCR were performed to obtain the relative expression of each miRNA. Hsa-miR-335-5p was detected in the plasma of GC patients and healthy donors at the same levels. The ROC curve analyses indicated that this miRNA was not a candidate for the molecular diagnosis of GC. We did not observe a correlation between the expression of hsa-miR-335-5p and clinical variables; however, the Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that, in patients who survived more than 12 months, a lower expression of hsa-miR-335-5p was correlated with a better prognosis. It would be convenient to evaluate a larger panel of miRNAs, including miRNAs expressed in a limited number of cell types or with a low number targets, to obtain more specific candidates for developing a robust test for the diagnosis/prognosis of GC.

Global incidence and mortality trends of gastric cancer and predicted mortality of gastric cancer by 2035

OBJECTIVE

To study the historical global incidence and mortality trends of gastric cancer and predicted mortality of gastric cancer by 2035.

METHODS

Incidence data were retrieved from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) volumes I-XI, and mortality data were obtained from the latest update of the World Health Organization (WHO) mortality database. We used join-point regression analysis to examine historical incidence and mortality trends and used the package NORDPRED in R to predict the number of deaths and mortality rates by 2035 by country and sex.

RESULTS

More than 1,089,000 new cases of gastric cancer and 769,000 related deaths were reported in 2020. The average annual percent change (AAPC) in the incidence of gastric cancer from 2003 to 2012 among the male population, South Korea, Japan, Malta, Canada, Cyprus, and Switzerland showed an increasing trend (P > 0.05); among the female population, Canada [AAPC, 1.2; (95%Cl, 0.5-2), P < 0.05] showed an increasing trend; and South Korea, Ecuador, Thailand, and Cyprus showed an increasing trend (P > 0.05). AAPC in the mortality of gastric cancer from 2006 to 2015 among the male population, Thailand [3.5 (95%cl, 1.6-5.4), P < 0.05] showed an increasing trend; Malta Island, New Zealand, Turkey, Switzerland, and Cyprus had an increasing trend (P > 0.05); among the male population aged 20-44, Thailand [AAPC, 3.4; (95%cl, 1.3-5.4), P < 0.05] showed an increasing trend; Norway, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Slovakia, France, Colombia, Lithuania, and the USA showed an increasing trend (P > 0.05). It is predicted that the mortality rate in Slovenia and France's female population will show an increasing trend by 2035. It is predicted that the absolute number of deaths in the Israeli male population and in Chile, France, and Canada female population will increase by 2035.

CONCLUSION

In the past decade, the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer have shown a decreasing trend; however, there are still some countries showing an increasing trend, especially among populations younger than 45 years. Although mortality in most countries is predicted to decline by 2035, the absolute number of deaths due to gastric cancer may further increase due to population growth.

Gastric cancer detection rates using GI endoscopy with serologic risk stratification: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Efforts have been made to develop an endoscopic screening system incorporating serologic gastric cancer (GC) risk stratification (ABC classification) alongside annual population-based GC screening using barium. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare GC detection rates between the Ba-Endo group, which underwent annual barium tests for primary screening followed by detailed endoscopic examinations, and the ABC-Endo group, where endoscopy intervals were determined based on individual gastric cancer risk in the ABC classification.

METHODS

In total, 1206 individuals from Yurihonjo and Nikaho City, Akita Prefecture, were randomized through the minimization method using sex and age as allocation factors. The intervention study was conducted for both groups over 5 years. The Ba-Endo group received annual barium tests, and the ABC-Endo group underwent EGD at different intervals: group A, EGD only at entry; group B, EGD once every 3 years; group C, EGD once every 2 years; and group D, EGD every year.

RESULTS

There were 24 detected GC lesions, with a GC detection rate of 1.9%. GC detection rates in the Ba-Endo and ABC-Endo groups were 2.0% and 1.8%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups (P = 1.0). However, the rate of GC cured by endoscopic resection alone was 41.6% in the Ba-Endo group and was significantly higher at 90.9% in the ABC-Endo group (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences between the Ba-Endo and ABC-Endo groups in GC detection rates. However, the rate of detected GCs that could be cured by endoscopic resection alone was significantly higher in the ABC-Endo group. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000005962.).

Real-World Application of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Pathologic Gastric Atypia and Neoplastic Lesions

PURPOSE

Results of initial endoscopic biopsy of gastric lesions often differ from those of the final pathological diagnosis. We evaluated whether an artificial intelligence-based gastric lesion detection and diagnostic system, ENdoscopy as AI-powered Device Computer Aided Diagnosis for Gastroscopy (ENAD CAD-G), could reduce this discrepancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected 24,948 endoscopic images of early gastric cancers (EGCs), dysplasia, and benign lesions from 9,892 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between 2011 and 2021. The diagnostic performance of ENAD CAD-G was evaluated using the following real-world datasets: patients referred from community clinics with initial biopsy results of atypia (n=154), participants who underwent endoscopic resection for neoplasms (Internal video set, n=140), and participants who underwent endoscopy for screening or suspicion of gastric neoplasm referred from community clinics (External video set, n=296).

RESULTS

ENAD CAD-G classified the referred gastric lesions of atypia into EGC (accuracy, 82.47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76.46%-88.47%), dysplasia (88.31%; 83.24%-93.39%), and benign lesions (83.12%; 77.20%-89.03%). In the Internal video set, ENAD CAD-G identified dysplasia and EGC with diagnostic accuracies of 88.57% (95% CI, 83.30%-93.84%) and 91.43% (86.79%-96.07%), respectively, compared with an accuracy of 60.71% (52.62%-68.80%) for the initial biopsy results (P<0.001). In the External video set, ENAD CAD-G classified EGC, dysplasia, and benign lesions with diagnostic accuracies of 87.50% (83.73%-91.27%), 90.54% (87.21%-93.87%), and 88.85% (85.27%-92.44%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ENAD CAD-G is superior to initial biopsy for the detection and diagnosis of gastric lesions that require endoscopic resection. ENAD CAD-G can assist community endoscopists in identifying gastric lesions that require endoscopic resection.

Different trends of gastric cancer in China, Japan, Republic of Korea and United States of America

Gastric cancer exerts a significant healthcare burden worldwide and is highly geographically heterogeneous. This study investigates the burden of gastric cancer in China from 1990 to 2019 and compares it with Japan, South Korea, and the United States. The results indicated a declining trend in ASIR and ASDR in four countries. However, the incidence and death rates in China remain disproportionately high. Significant gender disparities exist in the incidence and death rates, with males experiencing significantly higher rates than females. Incidence and death rates were found to increase with age in all studied countries. In China, a transient upward trend was observed in the period effect, whereas the cohort effect has been declining. In contrast, the remaining countries showed decreasing patterns in both period and cohort effects. The burden of disease remains high in China, therefore, broaden the scope of gastroscopy screening and concentrate on high-risk groups is vital.

The Role of Screening and Early Detection in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

Upper gastrointestinal cancers are among the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide with exceptionally poor prognosis, which is largely attributable to frequently delayed diagnosis. Although effective screening is critical for early detection, the highly variable incidence of upper gastrointestinal cancers presents challenges, rendering universal screening programs suboptimal in most populations globally. Optimal strategies in regions of modest incidence, such as the United States, require a targeted approach, focused on high-risk individuals based on demographic, familial, and clinicopathologic risk factors. Assessment of underlying precancerous lesions has key implications for risk stratification and informing clinical decisions to improve patient outcomes.

The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Four studies (N.=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75-89%, I2: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79-97%, I2: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83-94%, I2: 38%). There was a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.

Stomach Cancer Prediction Model (SCoPM): An approach to risk stratification in a diverse U.S. population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Population-based screening for gastric cancer (GC) in low prevalence nations is not recommended. The objective of this study was to develop a risk-prediction model to identify high-risk patients who could potentially benefit from targeted screening in a racial/ethnically diverse regional US population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study from Kaiser Permanente Southern California from January 2008-June 2018 among individuals age ≥50 years. Patients with prior GC or follow-up <30 days were excluded. Censoring occurred at GC, death, age 85 years, disenrollment, end of 5-year follow-up, or study conclusion. Cross-validated LASSO regression models were developed to identify the strongest of 20 candidate predictors (clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters). Records from 12 of the medical service areas were used for training/initial validation while records from a separate medical service area were used for testing.

RESULTS

1,844,643 individuals formed the study cohort (1,555,392 training and validation, 289,251 testing). Mean age was 61.9 years with 53.3% female. GC incidence was 2.1 (95% CI 2.0-2.2) cases per 10,000 person-years (pyr). Higher incidence was seen with family history: 4.8/10,000 pyr, history of gastric ulcer: 5.3/10,000 pyr, H. pylori: 3.6/10,000 pyr and anemia: 5.3/10,000 pyr. The final model included age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking, proton-pump inhibitor, family history of gastric cancer, history of gastric ulcer, H. pylori infection, and baseline hemoglobin. The means and standard deviations (SD) of c-index in validation and testing datasets were 0.75 (SD 0.03) and 0.76 (SD 0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model may serve as an aid for pre-endoscopic assessment of GC risk for identification of a high-risk population that could benefit from targeted screening.

Barriers to upper gastrointestinal screening among the general population in high-prevalence areas: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In China, there are large differences between regions in the use of gastroscopies and public awareness of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) screening.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the current context and analyzed the barriers that influence UGI screening behavior among the general population in UGI cancer high-prevalence areas.

METHODS

A total of 320 participants anonymously answered an online questionnaire. The rank sum test was used to analyze the difference in the scores of the UGI screening awareness questionnaire among participants with different socio-demographic characteristics. Using the awareness level of UGI screening and gastroscopy as the dependent variable, and the socio-demographic characteristics as the independent variable, simple linear regression and binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors influencing attitudes toward gastroscopy screening. We used Spearman's correlation analysis to examine the correlation between UGI screening awareness level and willingness to undergo a gastroscopy.

RESULTS

There was a correlation between the willingness to undergo gastroscopy and the awareness level of UGI screening (r = 0.243, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis found that age, type of residence, education level, employment status, monthly income, history of gastroscopy, dietary habits, physical exercise, and convenience in obtaining information were significantly correlated with the awareness level of UGI screening ( p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis found that factors significantly associated with gastric cancer screening behavior include residence, monthly income, and self-perceived health status ( p  < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to improve education about UGI cancer and screening knowledge, with a focus on populations with lower education and income.

Efficacy evaluation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening for secondary prevention of gastric cancer using the standardized detection ratio during a medical check-up in Japan

We used standardized detection ratio to evaluate the quality of nasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening for the secondary prevention of gastric cancer, and examined the gastric cancer risk in the era of total Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. We performed 21,931 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies, 77 subjects were diagnosed with gastric cancer. Of these, 28 had gastric cancer after H. pylori eradication, 47 had gastric cancer with H. pylori-positive or others, and 2 had H. pylori-negative gastric cancer. The Standardized detection ratios for men and women were 5.33 and 4.82, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analyses performed exclusively on first endoscopy subjects, excluding H. pylori-negative gastric cancer, revealed that smoking was a risk factor for developing gastric cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-6.64; p = 0.001). A statistically significant interaction was found between daily alcohol consumpption and H. pylori eradication on gastric cancer development (p = 0.005). In conclusion, relatively high standardized detection ratio values suggest that an appropriate endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer should be performed during a medical check-up. Smoking is a risk factor for developing gastric cancer, and continued alcohol consumption suggests a possible risk for developing gastric cancer after H. pylori eradication.

Population-level cancer screening and cancer care in Bhutan, 2020-2023: a review

Screening of cancers is an important intervention in reducing the incidence and mortality related to cancers. Bhutan is one small country that is witnessing an increasing incidence and mortality related to cancers. The government implemented a time-bound population-level screening for gastric, cervical and breast cancers from 2020 to 2023 with an overall coverage of 91.2% of the eligible population. Among 370,225 individuals screened for H pylori, 32.4% tested positive; among 53,182 who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy, 255 (0.07%) had gastric cancer. Among 10,749 tested for HPV DNA, 9.3% were positive; among 9887 evaluated with colposcopy and biopsy, 154 (0.13%) had cervical cancer. For breast cancer screening, 72,283 underwent clinical breast examination, 845 mammography and cancer was detected in 73 (0.10%) individuals. In this article, we review how Bhutan implemented a population-level cancer screening programme with on boarding of multiple stakeholders and the participation of people across all districts.

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2

In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.

Gastric Cancer Surgery: Balancing Oncological Efficacy against Postoperative Morbidity and Function Detriment

Significant progress has been made in the surgical management of gastric cancer over the years, and previous discrepancies in surgical practice between different parts of the world have gradually lessened. A transition from the earlier period of progressively more extensive surgery to the current trend of a more tailored and evidence-based approach is clear. Prophylactic resection of adjacent anatomical structures or neighboring organs and extensive lymph node dissections that were once assumed to increase the chances of long-term survival are now performed selectively. Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been widely adopted and its indications have steadily expanded, from early cancers located in the distal part of the stomach, to locally advanced tumors where total gastrectomy is required. In parallel, function-preserving surgery has also evolved and now constitutes a valid option for early gastric cancer. Pylorus-preserving and proximal gastrectomy have improved the postoperative quality of life of patients, and sentinel node navigation surgery is being explored as the next step in the process of further refining the minimally invasive concept. Moreover, innovative techniques such as indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and robot-assisted gastrectomy are being introduced in clinical practice. These technologies hold promise for enhancing surgical precision, ultimately improving the oncological and functional outcomes.