Comparison of Claudin 18.2 expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in Japanese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

Claudin 18.2 Expression in 1404 Digestive Tract Adenocarcinomas Including 1175 Colorectal Carcinomas: Distinct Colorectal Carcinoma Subtypes Are Claudin 18.2 Positive

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) immunohistochemical (IHC) expression can be used to select patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas for zolbetuximab (IMAB362) therapy, zolbetuximab (IMAB362) being a monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2. The aim of this study was to correlate IHC expression of CLDN18.2 with clinicopathologic and molecular features in a large series of digestive tract cancers. IHC for CLDN18.2 was performed on tissue microarrays from 1404 adenocarcinomas including 155 gastric/gastroesophageal, 74 pancreatic ductal, and 1175 colorectal (576 in the initial test cohort; 599 in the subsequent validation cohort), and correlated with HER2 and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Cases were scored as CLDN18.2 positive or negative, with positivity defined as moderate-to-strong membranous staining in ≥75% of tumor cells. CLDN18.2 expression was correlated with clinicopathologic and molecular features for all colorectal adenocarcinomas. CLDN18.2 was positive in 39% (61/155) of gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, 38% (28/74) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, and 3.4% (40/1175) of colorectal adenocarcinomas (P < .001). For gastric/gastroesophageal and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, there was no correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and either HER2 or MMR status. In contrast, CLDN18.2-positive colorectal adenocarcinomas had distinct clinicopathologic and molecular features. CLDN18.2-positive colorectal adenocarcinomas were more frequently proximally located and were more often MMR deficient and BRAF V600E positive (all with P < .05). Quantitative pathologic analysis using the digital pathology biomarker QuantCRC (Aiforia) demonstrated marked differences in histologic features between CLDN18.2-positive and CLDN18.2-negative colorectal adenocarcinomas, with CLDN18.2-positive tumors having an increased tumor:stroma ratio and %mucin but decreased %immature stroma in both the test and validation cohorts (all with P < .05). In conclusion, CLDN18.2-positive colorectal adenocarcinomas are frequently MMR deficient and BRAF V600E mutated, and demonstrate distinct histologic features. Future studies addressing the efficacy of zolbetuximab therapy in this subset of colorectal cancers are needed.

Claudin 18.2 Expression in Gastric Tumors and Other Tumor Types With Gastric Epithelium-like Differentiation

BACKGROUND/AIM

Claudin 18.2 is an emerging biomarker for claudin 18.2-targeted therapy. We investigated claudin 18.2 expression in diverse tumor types.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 67 gastric tumors (61 surgically resected and six biopsy specimens) and 73 other tumor types (69 resected and four biopsy specimens), including those from the pancreas, hepatobiliary system, lung, ovary, uterine cervix, and others. Claudin 18.2 expression and positivity (≥75% of tumor cells showing moderate to strong membranous staining) were assessed using claudin 18 immunostaining (clone 43-14A).

RESULTS

Claudin 18.2 positivity was found in 47.8% (32/67) of gastric tumor samples. Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer showed a higher frequency of positivity (6/7, 85.7%), although not statistically significantly (p=0.216). Among gastric tumors from patients with lymph node or distant metastasis (n=20), four (20.0%) exhibited discrepancies in claudin 18.2 positivity between the primary and its metastasis. In other tumor types, claudin 18.2 positivity was more frequent in those with gastric epithelium-like differentiation, including pancreatic tumors (2/9, 22.2%), hepatobiliary carcinoma (2/8, 25.0%), invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma (4/5, 80.0%), and mucinous ovarian tumor (5/5, 100.0%) than in those with other histology (p<0.001). Interestingly, pancreatic tumors, potential candidates for claudin 18.2-targeted therapy, often exhibited reduced or lack of claudin 18.2 expression in the invasive component.

CONCLUSION

Overall, claudin 18.2 positivity occurred primarily in a significant proportion of gastric tumors and other tumors with gastric epithelium-like differentiation. Evaluating claudin 18.2 expression in all such tumors can benefit patients by guiding targeted therapy. Additionally, claudin 18.2 immunostaining serves as a lineage marker for gastric origin or gastric-like differentiation.

Classical biomarkers and non-coding RNAs associated with diagnosis and treatment in gastric cancer

One of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, stomach cancer still has a high incidence and fatality rate in China, and the number of young people developing early-onset gastric cancer is steadily increasing. The 5-year survival rate of stomach cancer is typically 30%-35%, the prognosis is bad, the patients' quality of life is low, and the progression of advanced gastric cancer cannot be effectively managed despite the use of surgical surgery, chemotherapy, and other medicines. We urgently need molecular biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity to increase the early gastric cancer detection rate, extend patient survival, and improve patient quality of life. The initial diagnosis of gastric cancer primarily depends on gastroscopy and biopsy, and invasive procedures cause significant discomfort to patients. Similar to this, treating advanced and metastatic stomach cancer is a pressing issue that requires attention. More and more immune checkpoint molecules have been discovered, and corresponding inhibitors are gradually being applied to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Recently, some non-coding RNAs have begun to be used as new targets for the treatment of gastric cancer. Some non-coding RNAs are highly present in the serum or urine of gastric cancer patients and can be used as diagnostic markers or prognostic indicators. Many clinical trials targeting non-coding RNAs have also shown good therapeutic effects. In general, targeting non-coding RNAs has shown good therapeutic effects. The biomarkers for gastric cancer detection and treatment are reviewed in this article, focusing on the new non-coding RNAs used in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Patients with stomach cancer should have access to more precise and efficient diagnosis and treatment choices as a result of ongoing technological advancements and thorough research.

Discordance in Claudin 18.2 Expression Between Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Patients With Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for CLDN18.2-expressing gastric cancer (GC). We sought to examine the heterogeneity of CLDN18.2 expression between primary GC (PGC) and metastatic GC (MGC) using various scoring methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 102 patients with pathologically confirmed paired primary and metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. CLDN18.2 expression was evaluated through immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. We assessed CLDN18.2 positivity using multiple scoring approaches, including the immunoreactivity score, H-score, and the percentage of tumor cells showing moderate-to-strong staining intensity. We analyzed the concordance rates between PGC and MGC and the association of CLDN18.2 positivity with clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

CLDN18.2 positivity varied from 25% to 65% depending on the scoring method, with PGC consistently showing higher expression levels than MGC. Intratumoral heterogeneity was noted in 25.5% of PGCs and 19.6% of MGCs. Intertumoral heterogeneity, manifesting as discordance in CLDN18.2 positivity between PGC and MGC, was observed in about 20% of cases, with moderate agreement across scoring methods (κ=0.47 to 0.60). In PGC, higher CLDN18.2 positivity correlated with synchronous metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis, poorly differentiated grade, and biopsy specimens. In MGC, positivity was associated with synchronous metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis, and metastatic peritoneal tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN18.2 expression demonstrates significant heterogeneity between PGC and MGC, with a 20% discordance rate. Comprehensive tissue sampling and reassessment of CLDN18.2 status are crucial, especially before initiating CLDN18.2-targeted therapies.

Prognostic role of claudin-18.2 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Claudins are key components of tight junctions, essential for maintaining cellular adhesion, regulating intercellular molecule transport, and preserving cell polarity. Altered claudin expression can lead to tight junction dysfunction, potentially disrupting signaling pathways and contributing to the development of epithelial cancers. This study aims to explore the understudied role of CLDN18.2 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its relationship with clinical outcomes. We analyzed tissue samples from 182 patients who underwent curative surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our research examined the relationship between CLDN18.2 expression and various clinical factors, including patient characteristics, pathological findings, and survival metrics such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MeFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Overexpression of CLDN18.2 showed significant associations with R1 resection (p = 0.032) and advanced T stage (p = 0.043). Univariate analysis revealed that high CLDN18.2 expression was correlated with poorer OS (p = 0.0002), DFS (p < 0.0001), LRFS (p < 0.0001), and MeFS (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis further confirmed that high CLDN18.2 expression was independently associated with worse OS (p = 0.015), DFS (p < 0.001), LRFS (p < 0.001), and MeFS (p < 0.001). Overexpression of CLDN18.2 was associated with unfavorable clinical prognosis and adverse pathological features in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. These findings suggest that CLDN18.2 could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Treatment Selection for Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer Expressing Claudin 18.2 and PD-L1

Combination therapy of chemotherapy and zolbetuximab demonstrated a significant survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, claudin (CLDN) 18.2-positive metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Consequently, it has been approved as a standard first-line therapy for these patients. Combination therapy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-either nivolumab or pembrolizumab-is a standard first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative mGCs that are positive for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as defined by a combined positive score (CPS). Although approximately 13-22% of CLDN-positive mGCs are also CPS-positive, optimal treatment for mGC patients expressing both CLDN and PD-L1 remains undetermined due to the absence of direct comparative studies between zolbetuximab and ICIs. Treatment selection under this condition has become a critical issue. In this review, we discuss the appropriate treatment selection for HER2-negative mGC patients who are double-positive for CLDN 18.2 and PD-L1 based on clinical data and differences in the mechanism of action and safety profile between zolbetuximab and ICI.

Claudin18.2 expression in gallbladder cancer correlates with immune activation and a favourable prognosis

AIMS

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is frequently diagnosed and treated in advanced stages and has a poor prognosis. Recent studies have identified claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) as a promising target in digestive system cancer. In this study, we aimed to determine the expression of CLDN18.2 and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics in patients with GBC.

METHODS

The expression of CLDN18.2 of 228 patients with GBC was studied via immunohistochemistry. Immunostained samples were evaluated according to the H-score. The samples were divided into low/negative (H-score=0-49) and high/positive (H-score=50-300) expression groups. The correlations between CLDN18.2 and various clinicopathological characteristics, including survival, were assessed. Multiplex immunofluorescence and image acquisition were used to analyse the relationship between CLDN18.2 expression and the immune microenvironment.

RESULTS

The overall positive CLDN18.2 staining rate was 39.91% (91/228); 137 (60.08%) were given 0 points, 30 (13.15%) were given 1 point, 28 (12.28%) were given 2 points and 33 (14.47%) were given 3 points. Low CLDN18.2 expression was correlated with adverse prognostic factors, including poor differentiation, deep infiltration depth, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. High CLDN18.2 expression was associated with better survival. Furthermore, the distribution of immune cell subsets significantly differed between the high and low CLDN18.2 expression groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlations between the expression of CLDN18.2 and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis suggest that early-stage patients could benefit more from future anti-CLDN18.2 treatment and that CLDN18.2 may function as a pivotal regulatory molecule in patients with GBC. The underlying mechanism may be related to immune activation caused by high CLDN18.2 expression.

Claudin 18.2 expression profile in primary tumors and their ovarian metastases: implications for targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein predominantly expressed in the normal gastric epithelium, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic target in various solid tumors. Despite growing interest, comprehensive data on CLDN18.2 expression across primary tumors from different organs and their corresponding metastatic lesions remain limited.

METHODS

This study analyzed CLDN18.2 expression in 102 patients with primary adenocarcinomas from various organs and their corresponding ovarian metastatic carcinomas and in 81 cases of primary ovarian mucinous tumors using immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The highest CLDN18.2 positivity rate was observed in gastric adenocarcinomas (40%, 12/30), followed by cervical adenocarcinomas (20%, 1/5) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (4%, 2/50). Notably, primary ovarian mucinous tumors showed remarkably high expression rates, reaching 77% overall and 100% in mucinous borderline tumors. In contrast, adenocarcinomas of the appendix and breast lacked CLDN18 expression. While CLDN18.2 expression was generally maintained during metastasis, some variations in expression patterns were observed, particularly in gastric cancers (13%, 4/30). Our analysis found no significant correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and overall survival in the patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

The preserved expression of CLDN18.2 in metastatic tumors underscores its potential utility as a target for therapeutic approaches. Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating CLDN18.2 status in both primary and metastatic tumors to refine therapeutic strategies.

Future Landscape of Anti-Claudin 18.2 Antibodies in Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) carries a poor prognosis. Targeted therapy in GAC has traditionally been limited to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Recent years have brought immune checkpoint therapy to the GAC treatment landscape. However, continued discovery of targeted therapy in GAC is needed. Claudins, transmembrane proteins located in tight junctions of epithelial and endothelial cells, help regulate cellular polarity. Claudin dysregulation has been linked to cancers and other diseases. Claudin 18.2 specifically has become a new novel and exciting biomarker for GAC. Many agents are in the investigative pipeline, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric T-cell therapy. Recently, zolbetuximab, an anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody, was the first of these agents to get FDA approval. Here, we review zolbetuximab's place in therapy along with other agents being explored.

CAR-γδ T Cells Targeting Claudin18.2 Show Superior Cytotoxicity Against Solid Tumor Compared to Traditional CAR-αβ T Cells

BACKGROUND

Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) is highly expressed during the development of various malignant tumors, especially gastric cancer, and CAR-T cells targeting CLDN18.2 have therapeutic potential. However, their dependence on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) for antigen recognition limits their application. Human Gamma Delta (γδ) T cells, with strong MHC-independent cytotoxicity to most solid tumors both in vivo and in vitro, are emerging as ideal cells for the generation of robust universal CLDN18.2 CAR-T cells to treat solid tumors. Our aim was to construct a universal CAR-γδ T cell targeting CLDN18.2.

METHODS

We constructed novel CAR-CLDN18.2-γδ T cells by lentiviral infection and compared their superior efficacy in the treatment of CLDN18.2-positive solid tumors in vivo and in vitro.

RESULTS

CD3ζ expression was verified in HEK293T cells after lentiviral transfection of CLDN18.2 CAR, and the lentivirus was packaged and concentrated to a titer of 4.90 × 108 TU/mL. Primary γδ T cells and αβ T cells were infected with efficiencies of approximately 31.76 ± 4.122% and 44.13 ± 4.436%, respectively. CAR-CLDN18.2-γδ T cells exhibited specific cytotoxicity against CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer cells and secreted relatively high levels of Granzyme-B, Perforin-1, and IFN-γ. CAR-γδ T cells also showed superior cytotoxicity to target cells compared to classical CAR-αβ T cells in vitro. Finally, the antitumor activity of γδ T-CAR-CLDN18.2 cells was evaluated in tumor-bearing NSG mice, and CAR-CLDN18.2-γδ T cells significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival of the mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that universal CAR-CLDN18.2-γδ T cell is promising for the treatment of CLDN18.2-positive solid tumor and provide insights for the development of more universal CAR-γδ T-cell strategies for tumor immunotherapy.

Development and Characterization of 4A7: A High-Affinity Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Claudin18.2

Purpose

Claudin18.2 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target due to its high expression in gastric (GC) and pancreatic cancers (PC). However, patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic GC or PC face poor prognoses, highlighting the urgent need for more effective Claudin18.2-targeted therapies.

Methods and Results

We developed 4A7, a fully human monoclonal antibody with superior affinity and specificity for Claudin18.2, using a rigorous positive and negative screening strategy to eliminate cross-reactivity with Claudin18.1. In vitro, 4A7 demonstrated significantly enhanced binding activity, as well as robust antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), outperforming IMAB362, a clinical investigational antibody. In vivo, 4A7 exhibited remarkable tumor growth inhibition both as a monotherapy and in combination with anti-mPD-1, achieving superior efficacy compared to IMAB362. Additionally, 4A7 demonstrated a higher degree of humanization and comparable stability, supporting its translational potential.

Conclusion

4A7 shows great promise as a next-generation therapeutic for Claudin18.2-positive cancers, offering improved efficacy and reduced immunogenicity. This study not only highlights 4A7's potential to address unmet clinical needs but also provides a foundation for future innovations in monoclonal antibody-based cancer therapy.

Claudin 18.2 Immunohistochemistry Expression in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Claudin 18.2 is a transmembrane protein, part of the tight-junction complex, selectively expressed in gastric epithelium. It is showing promising results as a target in advanced gastric cancer in phase 3 clinical trials using a monoclonal antibody against claudin 18.2. A systematic review on expression of claudin 18.2 in gastric cancer was performed using the PubMed database. The following search expression was used: ("Stomach Neoplasms" [Mesh]) AND (("claudin-18[TIAB]") OR ("CLDN18[TIAB]")). A total of n=99 articles were retrieved. Of those, 17 preclinical studies about claudin 18.2 expression by immunohistochemistry were selected. The results of those studies showed great variability in the criteria used for defining the thresholds for positivity of the stain. The proportion of claudin 18.2 positive cases varied between 24% and 83%. In works using a positivity threshold set at >40% or >70% of cells with membranous/cytoplasmic staining at 2+/3+ intensity, the average rate of positive cases was 50% or 30%, respectively (similar with clones 43-14A and EPR19202). Positivity of claudin 18.2 was associated with advanced stage, diffuse phenotype and PD-L1 and EBV positivity in some of the studies. Variability in criteria used to define claudin 18.2 positivity, as well as methodological differences, could explain the variation in the proportion of positive cases described, as well as the inconsistency of the association with clinical, molecular, and survival variables. The upcoming anticlaudin 18.2 therapy in advanced gastric cancer should prompt pathology laboratories to adjust their staining protocols and evaluation criteria in their series of patients, to further establish the association of claudin expression with clinical and molecular variables.

Expression of therapy target molecules in esophagogastric junction and Barrett's adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, novel molecular targeted therapies have been developed for gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas. We examined the status of therapeutic target molecules in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays were constructed from 114 cases of non-Barrett's EGJ adenocarcinoma and 30 cases of Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins, PD-L1, HER2, CLDN18, FGFR2b, and EBER-ISH was performed. When HER2 immunohistochemistry was 2 + , gene amplification was examined using in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

EBER positivity, mismatch repair deficiency, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1, CLDN18 expression ≥ 75%, FGFR2b expression, and HER2 positivity were observed in 7 (6.1%), 11 (9.6%), 70 (61.4%), 38 (33.3%), 6 (5.3%), and 11 (9.6%) cases of EGJ adenocarcinoma as well as in 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 23 (76.7%), 7 (23.3%), 2 (6.7%), and 6 (20.0%) cases of Barrett's adenocarcinoma, respectively. PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 cases had longer recurrence-free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) than CPS < 1 cases. Other target molecules were not associated with survival. A total of 93/114 (81.6%) cases of EGJ adenocarcinoma and 26/30 (86.7%) cases of Barrett's adenocarcinomas expressed at least one target molecule.

CONCLUSIONS

Most EGJ and Barrett's adenocarcinomas may be eligible for molecular targeted therapy. Appropriate patient stratification based on these molecular tests will be important for precision medicine of the EGJ and Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Expression of Claudin18.2 in metastatic lesions in peritoneum of gastric cancer

Background

Patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal involvement have a dismal prognosis. Recent clinical trials have shown that anti-Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) antibody (zolbetuximab) enhances survival in patients with GC expressing high levels of CLDN18.2. However, the effectiveness of the zolbetuximab in patients with peritoneal metastases (PMs) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the expression of CLDN18.2 in disseminated lesions to assess the clinical utility of zolbetuximab in the treatment of GC with PM.

Methods

In 42 patients diagnosed with stage IV GC with PM, biopsy samples from the primary tumors and peritoneal metastatic nodules were collected and immunostained using the specific antibody (43-14A, Ventana). The expression of CLDN18.2 was comparatively evaluated based on staining intensity and the proportion of positive cells.

Results

Positive immunoreactivity of CLDN18.2 was observed in 37 (88%) of the primary tumors. Specifically, CLDN18.2 positivity was identified in 26 (62%) or 12 (29%) patients based on moderate to strong membrane staining in at least 40% or 75% of tumor cells, respectively. In comparison, the staining intensity in tumor cells was consistently reduced in PM across all patients. CLDN18.2 expression was absent in PM of 29 (69%) patients, while 3 (7.1%) cases were determined to be CLDN18.2-positive based on a cutoff value of 40% for high staining. This trend was particularly pronounced in cases with undifferentiated type and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative primary tumors.

Conclusions

Although CLDN18.2 expression in PM mirrored that in primary lesions, the levels were generally reduced. When zolbetuximab is used for GC patients with peritoneal involvement, it is preferable to assess the expression of CLDN18.2 in the disseminated lesions.

Clinicopathologic and molecular characterization of stages II-IV gastric cancer with Claudin 18.2 expression

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a promising target for targeted therapies in gastric cancer (GC). This study investigated the prevalence of CLDN18.2 expression in patients with stages II-IV GC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathologic features and other crucial GC biomarkers.

METHODS

We enrolled 1000 patients diagnosed with stages II-IV GC after surgical treatment. Immunohistochemistry for CLDN18 (43-14A clone), PD-L1 (22C3 pharmDx), HER2, and FGFR2 was performed. CLDN18.2 positivity was defined as moderate-to-strong (2+/3+) membranous staining in ≥75% of tumor cells. CLDN18.2 expression was compared with biomarker expression, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) association and microsatellite instability status, and clinicopathologic features.

RESULT

CLDN18.2 was positive in 34.4% of the patients. CLDN18.2 positivity was significantly higher in the middle and upper thirds than in the lower third gastric location (P < .001), but there was no correlation with age, sex, or stage (P > .05). CLDN18.2 positivity was rare (2.8%) in mucinous adenocarcinoma but frequent (90.9%) in a majority of gastric carcinomas with lymphoid stroma. CLDN18.2 positivity was higher in EBV-associated (P < .001) and PD-L1-positive (PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5) GC (P = .014) but lower in HER2 positive GC (P = .005). CLDN18.2 positivity was not significantly associated with overall survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of CLDN18.2 status and its correlation with the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with stages II-IV GC in Korea and with crucial biomarkers. It may be valuable for guiding future drug development, expanding treatment options, and ultimately improving patient outcomes in GC.

Current Landscape of Molecular Biomarkers in Gastroesophageal Tumors and Potential Strategies for Co-Expression Patterns

The treatment of metastasized gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma largely depends on molecular profiling based on immunohistochemical procedures. Therefore, the examination of HER2, PD-L1, and dMMR/MSI is recommended by the majority of clinical practice guidelines, as positive expression leads to different treatment approaches. Data from large phase-III trials and consequent approvals in various countries enable physicians to offer their patients several therapy options including immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or both combined with chemotherapy. The introduction of novel therapeutic targets such as CLDN18.2 leads to a more complex decision-making process as a significant number of patients show positive results for the co-expression of other biomarkers besides CLDN18.2. The aim of this review is to summarize the current biomarker landscape of patients with metastatic gastroesophageal tumors, its direct clinical impact on daily decision-making, and to evaluate current findings on biomarker co-expression. Furthermore, possible treatment strategies with multiple biomarker expression are discussed.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Preclinical Development of T Cells Engineered to Express a T-Cell Antigen Coupler Targeting Claudin 18.2-Positive Solid Tumors

The T-cell antigen coupler (TAC) is a chimeric receptor that facilitates tumor antigen-specific activation of T cells by co-opting the endogenous T-cell receptor complex in the absence of tonic signaling. Previous data demonstrate that the TAC affords T cells with the ability to induce durable and safe antitumor responses in preclinical models of hematologic and solid tumors. In this study, we describe the preclinical pharmacology and safety of an autologous Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2)-directed TAC T-cell therapy, TAC01-CLDN18.2, in preparation for a phase I/II clinical study in subjects with CLDN18.2-positive solid tumors. Following a screen of putative TAC constructs, the specificity, activity, and cytotoxicity of TAC T cells expressing the final CLDN18.2-TAC receptor were evaluated in vitro and in vivo using gastric, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic tumor models as well as human cells derived from normal tissues. CLDN18.2-specific activity and cytotoxicity of CLDN18.2-TAC T cells were observed in coculture with various 2D tumor cultures naturally expressing CLDN18.2 as well as tumor spheroids. These effects occurred in models with low antigen levels and were positively associated with increasing CLDN18.2 expression. CLDN18.2-TAC T cells effectively eradicated established tumor xenografts in mice in the absence of observed off-target or on-target/off-tumor effects, elicited durable efficacy in recursive killing and tumor rechallenge experiments, and remained unreactive in coculture with human cells representing vital organs. Thus, the data demonstrate that CLDN18.2-TAC T cells can induce a specific and long-lasting antitumor response in various CLDN18.2-positive solid tumor models without notable TAC-dependent toxicities, supporting the clinical development of TAC01-CLDN18.2.

Emerging Claudin18.2-targeting Therapy for Systemic Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Seeking Nobility Amidst Danger

Gastric cancer in advanced stages lacked effective treatment options. claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a membrane protein that is crucial for close junctions in the differentiated epithelial cells of the gastric mucosa, playing a vital role in barrier function, and can be hardly recognized by immune cells due to its polarity pattern. As the polarity of gastric tumor cells changes, claudin18.2 is exposed on the cell surface, resulting in immune system recognition, and making it an ideal target. In this review, we summarized the expression regulation mechanism of claudin18.2 both in normal cells and malignant tumor cells. Besides, we analyzed the available clinical results and potential areas for future research on claudin18.2-positive gastric cancer and claudin18.2-targeting therapy. In conclusion, claudin18.2 is an ideal target for gastric cancer treatment, and the claudin18.2-targeting therapy has changed the treatment pattern of gastric cancer.

Canadian Consensus Recommendations for Predictive Biomarker Testing in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Gastric cancer is common globally and has a generally poor prognosis with a low 5-year survival rate. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have improved the treatment landscape, providing more options for efficacious treatment. The use of these therapies requires predictive biomarker testing to identify patients who can benefit from their use. New therapies on the horizon, such as CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody therapy, require laboratories to implement new biomarker tests. A multidisciplinary pan-Canadian expert working group was convened to develop guidance for pathologists and oncologists on the implementation of CLDN18.2 IHC testing for gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma in Canada, as well as general recommendations to optimize predictive biomarker testing in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The expert working group recommendations highlight the importance of reflex testing for HER2, MMR and/or MSI, CLDN18, and PD-L1 in all patients at first diagnosis of G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Testing for NTRK fusions may also be included in reflex testing or requested by the treating clinician when third-line therapy is being considered. The expert working group also made recommendations for pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic considerations for predictive biomarker testing in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Implementation of these recommendations will provide medical oncologists with accurate, timely biomarker results to use for treatment decision-making.

Clinicopathological analysis of claudin 18.2 focusing on intratumoral heterogeneity and survival in patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) positivity, with a particular focus on intratumoral heterogeneity, and its association with clinicopathological features in metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer (GC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated 400 patients who received systemic chemotherapy for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent GC. Immunohistochemistry for CLDN18 (43-14A), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, as well as HER2 silver in situ hybridization (ISH), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) ISH, and microsatellite instability testing were carried out. CD3+, CD8+, CD4+, and Foxp3-positive immune cell densities were calculated using digital image analysis.

RESULTS

In GC cases with any CLDN18.2 expression, more than half of the cases (61.3%) showed different expression results between four different tissue microarray (TMA) cores. When comparing CLDN18.2 status between whole tissue sections and the combined results from the four TMA cores, discrepancies were observed in only 2 out of 85 GC cases (2.4%), with 1 false positive and 1 false negative. After considering intratumoral heterogeneity, a CLDN18.2 positivity rate of 31.3% was observed among the 400 GC patients. CLDN18.2 positivity was rare in GCs located in the antrum (or lower third) and in HER2-positive cases but was common in EBV-positive GCs (P < 0.05). No differences in overall survival (OS) were observed according to CLDN18.2 positivity (P = 0.116). Additionally, there was no association between OS and CLDN18.2 positivity in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab, and immuno-oncologic agents. CLDN18.2-positive/PD-L1-high GCs showed statistically significantly longer OS than others (P = 0.025) and higher CD8+ T-cell densities in both the tumor center and periphery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Characterizing unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent GC with positive CLDN18.2 expression and evaluating intratumoral heterogeneity and prognostic implications of various therapeutics help advance treatment strategies and develop new therapies for patients with GC.

Effect of antiemetics on zolbetuximab-induced gastric injury and emesis in ferrets

Claudin-18 splice variant 2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein, is a highly cell type-specific antigen that is expressed by differentiated gastric mucosa cells. The expression of CLDN18.2 in gastric mucosa cells may be retained upon malignant transformation and is displayed on the surface of several tumors, including gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab is a genetically engineered, highly purified chimeric (mouse/human IgG1) antibody directed against CLDN18.2. Nausea and vomiting were observed as adverse events of zolbetuximab. To investigate the mechanism of nausea and vomiting in humans, we evaluated emesis (retching and vomiting) and conducted histopathologic assessment in ferrets after the administration of zolbetuximab. Emesis was frequently observed in all ferrets treated with zolbetuximab in the first hour after administration. Histopathologic assessment revealed the surface of the gastric mucosa was the primary site of emesis-associated tissue damage. The effect of antiemetics (dexamethasone, ondansetron, fosaprepitant, and olanzapine) on emesis induced by zolbetuximab was investigated. Fosaprepitant showed suppressive effects on emesis, and use of dexamethasone or concomitant use of fosaprepitant with other antiemetics tended to alleviate gastric tissue damage. The onset of emesis in humans receiving zolbetuximab may be associated with damage in the gastric mucosa, and antiemetics may mitigate gastrointestinal adverse events.

Claudin-18.2 Immunohistochemical Evaluation in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas to Direct Targeted Therapy: A Practical Approach

Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) expression evaluated by immunohistochemistry is a new biomarker for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas that will soon have market authorization for implementation into routine clinical practice. Despite successful testing in the setting of clinical trials, no specific practical testing guidelines have been proposed. Several preanalytical and analytical variables may interfere with adequate CLDN18.2 staining interpretation; thus, this article provides practical guidance on CLDN18.2 testing and scoring in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas to identify patients who may respond to targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies directed against CLDN18.2. Based on available data, moderate to strong (2+/3+) membrane staining in ≥75% of adenocarcinoma cells is the proposed cutoff for clinical use of monoclonal antibody anti-CLDN18.2 (zolbetuximab).

Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Features and Emerging Therapeutics

Diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) accounts for approximately one-third of gastric cancer diagnoses but is a more clinically aggressive disease with peritoneal metastases and inferior survival compared with intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). The understanding of the pathogenesis of DGC has been relatively limited until recently. Multiomic studies, particularly by The Cancer Genome Atlas, have better characterized gastric adenocarcinoma into molecular subtypes. DGC has unique molecular features, including alterations in CDH1, RHOA, and CLDN18-ARHGAP26 fusions. Preclinical models of DGC characterized by these molecular alterations have generated insight into mechanisms of pathogenesis and signaling pathway abnormalities. The currently approved therapies for treatment of gastric cancer generally provide less clinical benefit in patients with DGC. Based on recent phase II/III clinical trials, there is excitement surrounding Claudin 18.2-based and FGFR2b-directed therapies, which capitalize on unique biomarkers that are enriched in the DGC populations. There are numerous therapies targeting Claudin 18.2 and FGFR2b in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. Additionally, there have been preclinical advancements in exploiting unique therapeutic vulnerabilities in several models of DGC through targeting of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Hippo pathways. These preclinical and clinical advancements represent a promising future for the treatment of DGC.

Expression of claudin 18.2 in poorly cohesive carcinoma and its association with clinicopathologic parameters in East Asian patients

BACKGROUND

Poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is a distinct subtype of gastric cancer with limited therapeutic options. This study investigated claudin (CLDN) 18.2 expression status in PCCs using a 43-13 A clone.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 178 consecutive surgically resected stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ gastric cancer samples. Tissue microarray blocks were constructed for CLDN18.2 immunohistochemical staining. We studied CLDN18.2 expression and its association with clinicopathologic parameters.

RESULTS

CLDN18.2 positivity (defined by ≥ 75 % of tumor cells showing moderate to strong membranous positivity) was found in 34.8 % of the PCC cases (62/178). Approximately half of the CLDN18.2 positive PCCs demonstrated heterogeneous expression (51.6 %, 32/62). CLDN18.2 positivity was not associated with any clinicopathologic parameters examined. However, CLDN18.2 positivity tended to be more frequent in E-cadherin-positive PCCs (no loss of expression) than in E-cadherin-negative PCCs (loss of expression) (50 % vs. 27.7 %). The CLDN18.2 expression level, represented by the H-score, gradually decreased as the paraffin block storage time increased (P = 0.046). Overall survival and disease-free survival analyses showed no significant difference between CLDN18.2-positive and negative PCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion of surgically resected PCC specimens showed CLDN18.2 positivity. Additionally, since the expression level of CLDN18.2 gradually decreases with increased paraffin block storage time, reflex testing can be considered at the time of the cancer diagnosis.

The Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Endocervical Gastric-Type Adenocarcinoma and the Use of Claudin18.2 as a Potential Therapeutic Target

Endocervical gastric-type adenocarcinoma (GAS) is an aggressive type of endocervical mucinous adenocarcinoma characterized as being unrelated to human papillomavirus (HPV) and resistant to chemo/radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the histology, immunohistochemistry patterns, and molecular characteristics in a large cohort of GAS (n = 62). Histologically, the majority of GAS cases exhibited a distinct morphology resembling gastric glands, although 2 exceptional cases exhibited HPV-associated adenocarcinoma morphology while retaining the characteristic histology of GAS at the invasive front. By immunohistochemistry, Claudin18.2 emerged as a highly sensitive and specific marker for GAS. Additionally, the strong expression of Claudin18.2 in patients with GAS indicated the potential of anti-Claudin18.2 therapy in the treatment of GAS. Other immunohistochemistry markers, including Muc6, p16, p53, Pax8, ER, and PR, may provide additional diagnostic clues for GAS. Quantitative methylation analysis revealed that the overexpression of Claudin18.2 in GAS was governed by the hypomethylation of the CLDN18.2 promoter CpG islands. To further elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of GAS and its relationship with gastric adenocarcinoma, we performed whole exome sequencing on 11 GAS and 9 gastric adenocarcinomas. TP53, CDKN2A, STK11, and TTN emerged as the most frequently mutated genes in GAS. Mutations in these genes primarily affected cell growth, cell cycle regulation, senescence, and apoptosis. Intriguingly, these top mutated genes in GAS were also commonly mutated in gastric and pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas. Regarding germline variants, we identified a probably pathogenic variant in SPINK1, a gene linked to hereditary pancreatic cancer syndrome, in one GAS sample. This finding suggests a potential pathogenic link between pancreatic cancers and GAS. Overall, GAS exhibits molecular characteristics that resemble those observed in gastric and pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas, thereby lending support to the aggressive nature of GAS compared with HPV-associated adenocarcinoma.

Cluster classification of a Brazilian gastric cancer cohort reveals remarkable populational differences in normal p53 rate

BACKGROUND

Queiroz et al. showed that the application of cluster methodology for classifying gastric cancer is suitable and efficient within a Brazilian cohort, which is known for its population heterogeneity. The study highlighted the potential utilization of this method within public health services due to its low-cost, presenting a viable means to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND

Our Brazilian cohort with gastric cancer has a distinct distribution between mutated and normal p53.

BACKGROUND

New genetic marker-based classifications improve gastric cancer diagnosis accuracy.

BACKGROUND

Machine learning integration enhances predictive value in gastric cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Molecular biomarkers complement clinical decisions, advancing personalized medicine.

OBJECTIVE

Gastric adenocarcinoma remains an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, as evidenced by a 5-year survival rate of approximately 31%. The histological classifications already proposed do not accurately reflect the high biological heterogeneity of this neoplasm, particularly in diverse populations, and new classification systems using genetic markers have recently been proposed. Following these newly proposed models, we aimed to assess the cluster distribution in a Brazilian cohort. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the inclusion of other clinical and histological parameters could enhance the predictive value.

METHODS

We used a previously described four-immunohistochemistry/EBER-ISH marker to classify a cohort of 30 Brazilian patients with gastric adenocarcinoma into five different clusters and compared the distribution with other genetically diverse populations. Furthermore, we used artificial intelligence methods to evaluate whether other clinical and pathological parameters could improve the results of the methodology.

RESULTS

Disclosing the genetic variability between populations, we observed a more balanced distribution of the aberrant/normal p53 ratio (0.6) between patients negative for the other markers tested, unlike previous studies with Asian and North American populations. In addition, decision tree analysis reinforced the efficiency of these new classifications, as the stratification accuracy was not altered with or without additional data.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the importance of local research in characterizing diverse populations and highlights the complementary role of molecular biomarkers in personalized medicine for gastric adenocarcinoma, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and potentially improving survival rates.

Claudins: from gatekeepers of epithelial integrity to potential targets in hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers

Claudins, a family of tetraspan transmembrane proteins, are critical to the integrity of tight junctions in epithelia and endothelia, influencing cellular processes such as development, differentiation, and apoptosis. Abnormal claudin expression is associated with various malignancies, particularly affecting tissue architecture and potentially facilitating tumor invasion and metastasis. In this comprehensive review, we explore the multifaceted functions of claudins: their expression, specific roles in cancer with a focus on hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies and highlight their potential as therapeutic targets. We discuss current claudin-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engager and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. These approaches show promise in pre-clinical and clinical studies, particularly in hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers with large unmet needs. Despite these early signs of efficacy, challenges remain in effectively targeting these proteins due to their structural resemblance and overlapping functions.

Global prevalence of claudin 18 isoform 2 in tumors of patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist for global prevalence of claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) positivity and association of CLDN18.2 status with clinical and tumor characteristics in patients with locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. We report prevalence of CLDN18.2 positivity (phase 3; SPOTLIGHT, NCT03504397; GLOW, NCT03653507) and concordance of CLDN18.2 status between a subset of pair-matched tumor samples (phase 2, ILUSTRO, NCT03505320; phase 1, NCT03528629) from clinical studies of zolbetuximab.

METHODS

Tumor samples from patients with LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma were tested for CLDN18.2 status by immunohistochemistry. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression was tested per central or local assessment.

RESULTS

Across SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, the prevalence of CLDN18.2 positivity (≥ 75% of tumor cells demonstrating moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining) was 38.4%. Prevalence was similar in gastric versus GEJ adenocarcinoma samples and regardless of collection method (biopsy versus resection) or collection site (primary versus metastatic). CLDN18.2 positivity was most prevalent in patients with diffuse-type tumors. In ILUSTRO and the phase 1 study, concordance of CLDN18.2 positivity was 61.1% between archival (i.e., any time before treatment) and baseline (i.e., ≤ 3 months before first treatment) samples, and concordance of any CLDN18 staining (≥ 1% of tumor cells demonstrating moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining) was 88.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN18.2 was a highly prevalent biomarker in patients with HER2-negative, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. CLDN18.2 positivity remained relatively stable over time in many patients. Biomarker testing for CLDN18.2 should be considered in standard clinical practice in these patients.

Health-related quality of life in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW clinical trials

BACKGROUND

First-line zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy (SPOTLIGHT, mFOLFOX6; GLOW, CAPOX) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors were claudin 18 isoform 2-positive in the phase III SPOTLIGHT (NCT03504397) and GLOW (NCT03653507) studies. We present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from these studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured in the full analysis sets using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and Oesophago-Gastric Module (QLQ-OG25), Global Pain, and 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. Analyses focused on key PRO domains: global health status (GHS)/QoL, physical functioning, abdominal pain and discomfort, and nausea/vomiting. Least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline and time to first definitive deterioration (TTDD) were evaluated combined across SPOTLIGHT and GLOW and for individual studies. Time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) was evaluated independently for SPOTLIGHT and GLOW.

RESULTS

The combined analysis set included 1072 patients (zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy, 537; placebo plus chemotherapy, 535). Compliance rates were similar between treatment arms. Similar trends were observed in the zolbetuximab versus placebo arms for LSM changes from baseline in key PRO domains, with no clinically meaningful deterioration. Nausea/vomiting worsened during the first few zolbetuximab cycles but later returned to baseline levels. Overall TTCD and TTDD results were similar between arms in both studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in SPOTLIGHT and GLOW maintained measured HRQoL relative to baseline when treated with first-line zolbetuximab added to chemotherapy. Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy improved PFS and OS without negatively affecting HRQoL in key PRO domains compared with placebo plus chemotherapy.

Heterogeneity of claudin 18.2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer

Claudin 18.2 has emerged as a viable therapeutic target in gastric cancer (GC), but little is known about the heterogeneity of its expression in GC. This study investigated the heterogeneity of claudin 18.2 expression in 166 patients with metastatic GC whose surgical or paired primary-metastatic specimens were available. The prevalence of claudin 18.2 positivity (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥ 75% by the 43-14A clone) was 47.0%. Claudin 18.2-positive tumors exhibited more frequent peritoneal metastasis and a lower incidence of hepatic and distant lymph node involvement. Survival outcomes were comparable between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. Intratumoral heterogeneity was noted in 38.5% of surgical specimens. Paired primary-metastatic site analysis revealed that 25.2% of patients had discordant results for claudin 18.2 positivity. Across different metastatic organ categories, peritoneal lesions showed the highest positivity rate (44.3%) and positive concordance rate (31.4%), whereas liver lesions had the lowest positivity rate (17.9%) and concordance rate (12.8%). In conclusion, claudin 18.2 expression exhibits intratumoral and intrapatient spatial heterogeneity in metastatic GC. Claudin 18.2 positivity is associated with more frequent peritoneal metastasis, and peritoneal lesions are more likely to have positively concordant claudin 18.2 results with the primary site than other metastatic sites.

A novel highly sensitive inner filter effect-based fluorescence immunoassay with quantum dots for bioanalysis of zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody used for immunotherapy of gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Zolbetuximab (ZOL) is a groundbreaking monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN 18.2, a cancer cell surface protein. It is a first-in-class therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, there is currently any immunoassay available for bioanalysis of ZOL, hindering its pharmacokinetic studies, therapeutic monitoring, and safety profile refinement. To address this gap, this study presents the development and validation of a novel highly sensitive inner filter effect-based fluorescence immunoassay (IFE-FIA) with quantum dots (QDs) as a probe. This assay enables the quantitative determination of ZOL in plasma samples. The assay involved non-competitive capturing of ZOL from the samples using a specific antigen (CLDN 18.2 protein) immobilized on assay plate microwells. A horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labelled anti-human IgG was used to measure the immune complex. The assay's detection system relies on the formation of a light-absorbing colored product through an HRP-catalyzed oxidative reaction with the substrate 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine. This light absorption efficiently quenched the fluorescence of QDs via the IFE. The measured fluorescence signals corresponded to the concentrations of ZOL in the samples. The conditions of the IFE-FIA and its detection system were refined, and the optimum procedures were established. Following the guidelines of immunoassay validation for bioanalysis, the assay was validated, and all the validation criteria were acceptable. The assay demonstrates high sensitivity, accurately quantifying ZOL at concentrations as low as 10 ng/mL in plasma samples, with acceptable precision. Importantly, it avoids interferences from endogenous substances and plasma matrix. The recoveries in spiked human plasma ranged from 96.8 % to 104.5 %, with relative standard deviations of 4.1 %-6.5 %. The proposed IFE-FIA represents a valuable tool for quantifying ZOL in clinical settings, enabling assessment of its pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring, and safety profile refinement.

Effect of anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody zolbetuximab alone or combined with chemotherapy or programmed cell death-1 blockade in syngeneic and xenograft gastric cancer models

The development of targeted cancer therapies based on monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens has progressed markedly over recent decades. This approach is dependent on the identification of tumor-specific, normal tissue-sparing antigenic targets. The transmembrane protein claudin-18 splice variant 2 (CLDN18.2) is frequently and preferentially displayed on the surface of primary gastric adenocarcinomas, making it a promising monoclonal antibody target. Phase 3 studies of zolbetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2, combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in advanced or metastatic first-line gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have demonstrated favorable clinical results with zolbetuximab. In studies using xenograft or syngeneic models with gastric cancer cell lines, zolbetuximab mediated death of CLDN18.2-positive human cancer cell lines via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro and demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy in vivo. Mice treated with zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy displayed a significantly higher frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells versus vehicle/isotype control-treated mice. Furthermore, zolbetuximab combined with an anti-mouse programmed cell death-1 antibody more potently inhibited tumor growth compared with either agent alone. These results support the potential of zolbetuximab as a novel treatment option for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Biomarker-oriented chemo-immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

The biomarker-oriented chemo-immunotherapy is useful and promising in the development of new anticancer agents, since the responders can be enriched by selecting patients with biomarkers. Compared to colorectal and lung cancers, the development of biomarker-driven molecular-targeted therapeutics for gastric cancers has been straggled. However, several new biomarkers in gastric cancers have been discovered and clinical trials in enrichment design with certain biomarkers have been conducted. Therefore, there are currently several treatment options to treat gastric cancer patients based on individual biomarker-oriented strategies. In the present review, we describe the useful biomarkers in gastric cancer, with focusing on HER2, PD-L1, and Claudin18.2, in relation to their clinical significance and associated targeted agents.

Potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer (GC), a malignant epithelial tumor, is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Therapeutic strategies for GC, despite the biggest challenges, can significantly improve survival rates through early detection and effective screening methods.

Aim

To provide brief information on the necessity of multiple specific diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers for GC.

Methods

This review was conducted using a variety of search engines, including PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and others.

Results

Some potential biomarkers that provide essential information include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), DNA methylation, claudin 18.2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), microRNAs, and serum pepsinogens.

Conclusion

Multiple tumor markers are essential for screening, tumor identification, staging, prognostic assessment, and monitoring recurrence after therapy due to the absence of a single tumor indicator for diagnosing, prognosticating, and predicting GC.

Claudin-18 status and its correlation with HER2 and PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination (PD) has a dismal prognosis, and current treatments have shown little efficacy. CLDN18.2-targeted therapies have shown promising efficacy against gastric cancers that express high levels of CLDN18. Because of the limited information regarding CLDN18.2 status in PD, we analyzed PD-positive gastric cancers for CLDN18 status in both primary and PD, along with HER2 and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS).

METHODS

Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 84 gastric cancer cases using paired primary and PD tissue samples.

RESULTS

At 40% cut-off, CLDN18 was positive in 57% (48/84) primary tumors and in 44% (37/84) PDs. At 75% cut-off, 28.6% (24/84) primary tumors and 20.2% (17/84) PDs were CLDN18-positive. The concordance rate between primary tumors and PD was 79.8% at 40% cut-off and 75% at 75% cut-off. When comparing biopsy and surgical specimens, the concordance rates were 87.5% at 40% cut-off and 81.3% at 75% cut-off. Within a tumor, the superficial area tended to have a higher CLDN18-positive rate than the invasive front (P = 0.001). Although HER2 -positivity was only 11.9% in this cohort, CLDN18 positivity in HER2-negative tumors (n = 74) was relatively high: 60.8% at 40% cut-off and 28.4% at 75% cut-off. Among double-negative (HER2 - and PD-L1 CPS < 1) tumors, CLDN18 positivity was 67.6% at 40% cut-off and 26.5% at 75% cut-off.

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN18 expression is generally maintained in PD and is relatively high even in double-negative tumors, making it a promising therapeutic target for PD-positive gastric cancer.

Progress of Clinical Studies Targeting Claudin18.2 for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Claudin18.2 is a tight junction protein, highly selective, generally expressed only in normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells, which can effectively maintain the polarity of epithelial and endothelial cells, thus effectively regulating the permeability and conductance of the paracellular pathway. Abnormal expression of Claudin18.2 can occur in various primary malignant tumors, especially gastrointestinal tumors, and even in metastatic foci. It regulates its expression by activating the aPKC/MAPK/AP-1 pathway, and therefore, the Claudin18.2 protein is a pan-cancer target expressed in primary and metastatic lesions in human cancer types. Zolbetuximab (IMAB362), an antibody specific for Claudin18.2, has been successfully tested in a phase III clinical trial, and the results of the study showed that combining Zolbetuximab with chemotherapy notably extends patients' survival and is expected to be a potential first-line treatment for patients with Claudin18.2(+)/HER-2(-) gastric cancer. Here, we systematically describe the biological properties and oncogenic effects of Claudin18.2, centering on its clinical-pathological aspects and the progress of drug studies in gastric cancer, which can help to further explore its clinical value.

Claudin 18.2 as a novel therapeutic target

Claudin 18.2, a tight-junction molecule predominantly found in the nonmalignant gastric epithelium, becomes accessible on the tumour cell surface during malignant transformation, thereby providing an appealing target for cancer therapy. Data from two phase III trials testing the anti-claudin 18.2 antibody zolbetuximab have established claudin 18.2-positive advanced-stage gastric cancers as an independent therapeutic subset that derives benefit from the addition of this agent to chemotherapy. This development has substantially increased the percentage of patients eligible for targeted therapy. Furthermore, newer treatments, such as high-affinity monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells and antibody-drug conjugates capable of bystander killing effects, have shown considerable promise in patients with claudin 18.2-expressing gastric cancers. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional targets, such as driver gene alterations or growth factors. In this Review, we highlight the biological rationale and explore the clinical activity of therapies that target claudin 18.2 in patients with advanced-stage gastric cancer and explore the potential for expansion of claudin 18.2-targeted therapies to patients with other claudin 18.2-positive solid tumours.

Claudin 18.2 expression in digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: a clinicopathological study

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18.2-targeted therapy has shown significant efficacy in treating claudin 18.2-positive cancers. However, limited systematic studies have investigated characteristics of claudin 18.2 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

Data and specimens from 403 cases of digestive NENs were retrospectively collected, and claudin 18.2 expression was detected using immunochemical staining.

RESULTS

Claudin 18.2 was positive in 19.6% (79/403) of the digestive NENs. The highest positive rate of claudin 18.2 was observed in gastric NENs (72/259, 27.8%), accounting for 91.1% (72/79) of all positive cases. The positivity rate was significantly higher in gastric NENs compared to pancreatic (2/78, 2.6%) or colorectal NENs (2/38, 5.3%; p < 0.05). For digestive NENs, claudin 18.2 positivity was significantly higher in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (37/144, 25.7%) than in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs; 14/160, 8.8%; p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between gastric NECs (59/213, 27.7%) and gastric NETs (13/46, 28.3%; p > 0.05). The positivity was significantly higher in large-cell NECs (LCNECs; 28/79, 35.4%) and MiNEN (mixed neuroendocrine-non- neuroendocrine neoplasms)-LCNECs (23/66, 34.8%) compared to small-cell NECs (SCNECs; 9/65, 13.8%) and MiNEN-SCNECs (5/33, 15.2%; p < 0.05). Claudin 18.2 expression was more prevalent in gastric NENs than in pancreatic (12.5 ×; p = 0.001) and colorectal NENs (5.9 ×; p = 0.021). Claudin 18.2 staining was a useful method for identify the gastric origins of NETs, with a sensitivity of 28.3% and a specificity of 99.1%.

CONCLUSION

The expression characteristics of claudin 18.2 in NENs were characterized, which may provide a clinicopathological reference for targeted therapies in patients with NENs.

Retrospective Study of Claudin 18 Isoform 2 Prevalence and Prognostic Association in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is an emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to obtain deeper understanding of CLDN18.2 positivity patterns, prognostic implications, and associations with various demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Archived tumor tissue samples from 304 patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States were assessed for CLDN18.2 positivity by immunohistochemistry. CLDN18.2 positivity was defined as ≥50% or ≥75% of tumor cells with CLDN18 staining intensity ≥2+. CLDN18.2 positivity patterns were analyzed for association with prognosis and clinicopathologic/demographic characteristics. Where possible, CLDN18.2 positivity was analyzed for matched tissue samples to assess concordance between primary and metastatic tumors and concordance before and after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of CLDN18.2-positive tumors (with ≥75% cutoff) was 44.4% (n = 135 of 304). CLDN18.2-positive tumors had a prevalence of 51.4% (n = 91 of 177) in gastric and 34.6% (n = 44 of 127) in GEJ adenocarcinoma. With a ≥50% cutoff, the prevalence of CLDN18.2-positive tumors was 64.4% (n = 114 of 177) in gastric adenocarcinoma and 44.9% (n = 57 of 127) in GEJ adenocarcinoma. There was no association between overall survival and CLDN18.2 positivity using either threshold. Statistically significant associations were noted between CLDN18.2 positivity and sex, histologic type of G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, and adenocarcinoma subtype (≥75% cutoff), and metastasis site and tumor grade (≥50% cutoff). The overall concordance of CLDN18.2 positivity (≥75% cutoff) was 73% (27 of 37) for matched primary versus metastatic tumor samples and 74% (29 of 39) for matched samples before and after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that CLDN18.2 positivity did not correlate with survival in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, consistent with published data. On the basis of matched sample analysis, CLDN18.2 appears to demonstrate >70% concordance as a biomarker. Observed correlations with certain patient/tumor characteristics warrant further study.

Clinicopathological significance and immunotherapeutic outcome of claudin 18.2 expression in advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study

Objective

Immunotherapeutic outcomes and clinical characteristics of claudin 18 isoform 2 positive (CLDN18.2-positive) gastric cancer (GC) vary in different clinical studies, making it difficult to optimize anti-CLDN18.2 therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis to explore the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and immunotherapeutic outcomes in GC.

Methods

A total of 536 advanced GC patients from 2019 to 2021 in the CT041-CG4006 and CT041-ST-01 clinical trials were included in the analysis. CLDN18.2 expression on ≥40% of tumor cells (2+, 40%) and CLDN18.2 expression on ≥70% of tumor cells (2+, 70%) were considered the two levels of positively expressed GC. The clinicopathological characteristics and immunotherapy outcomes of GC patients were analyzed according to CLDN18.2 expression status.

Results

CLDN18.2 was expressed in 57.6% (cut-off: 2+, 40%) and 48.9% (cut-off: 2+, 70%) of patients. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CLDN18.2 were co-expressed in 19.8% [combined positive score (CPS)≥1, CLDN18.2 (cut-off: 2+, 40%)] and 17.2% [CPS≥5, CLDN18.2 (cut-off: 2+, 70%)] of patients. CLDN18.2 expression positively correlated with younger age, female sex, non-gastroesophageal junction (non-GEJ), and diffuse phenotype (P<0.001). HER2 and PD-L1 expression were significantly lower in CLDN18.2-positive GC (both P<0.05). Uterine adnexa metastasis (P<0.001) was more frequent and liver metastasis (P<0.001) was less common in CLDN18.2-positive GC. Overall survival and immunotherapy-related progression-free survival (irPFS) were inferior in the CLDN18.2-positive group.

Conclusions

CLDN18.2-positive GC is associated with poor prognosis and worse immunotherapeutic outcomes. The combination of anti-CLDN18.2 therapy, anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy, and chemotherapy for GC requires further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy for advanced CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adding Zolbetuximab to the treatment in patients with Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJ) is not yet fully elucidated.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma. We computed hazard-ratios (HRs) or odds-ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Three studies and 1,233 patients were included. Comparing with Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49-0.84; p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS) rate (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.62-0.83; p < 0.01) were significant in favor of the Zolbetuximab group. Regarding effectiveness, the Objective Response Rate (ORR) was (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.87-1.53; p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, the incorporation of Zolbetuximab alongside chemotherapy offers a promising prospect for reshaping the established treatment paradigms for patients diagnosed with advanced CLDN18.2-positive GC/GEJ cancer.

Claudin 18.2 as a New Biomarker in Gastric Cancer-What Should We Know?

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a formidable global health challenge, ranking among the top-five causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The majority of patients face advanced stages at diagnosis, with a mere 6% five-year survival rate. First-line treatment for metastatic GC typically involves a fluoropyrimidine and platinum agent combination; yet, predictive molecular markers have proven elusive. This review navigates the evolving landscape of GC biomarkers, with a specific focus on Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) as an emerging and promising target. Recent phase III trials have unveiled the efficacy of Zolbetuximab, a CLDN18.2-targeting antibody, in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CLDN18.2-positive metastatic GC. As this novel therapeutic avenue unfolds, understanding the nuanced decision making regarding the selection of anti-CLDN18.2 therapies over other targeted agents in metastatic GC becomes crucial. This manuscript reviews the evolving role of CLDN18.2 as a biomarker in GC and explores the current status of CLDN18.2-targeting agents in clinical development. The aim is to provide concise insights into the potential of CLDN18.2 as a therapeutic target and guide future clinical decisions in the management of metastatic GC.

Claudin-18.2 testing and its impact in the therapeutic management of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas: A literature review with expert opinion

Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a member of the tight junction protein family and is a highly selective biomarker with frequent abnormal expression during the occurrence and development of various primary malignant tumors, including gastric cancer (GC) and esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinomas (EGJA). For these reasons, CLDN18.2 has been investigated as a therapeutic target for GC/EGJA malignancies. Recently, zolbetuximab has been proposed as a new standard of care for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced and metastatic GC/EGJA. The use of CLDN18 IHC assays to select patients who might benefit from anti-CLDN18.2 therapy is currently entering clinical practice. In this setting, pathologists play a central role in therapeutic decision-making. Accurate biomarker assessment is essential to ensure the best therapeutic option for patients. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview of available evidence on CLDN18.2 testing and its impact on the therapeutic management of patients with GC/EGJA, as well as some practical suggestions for CLDN18.2 staining interpretation and potential pitfalls in the real-world setting.

Zolbetuximab for Claudin18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

Claudins (CLDNs) are a family of major membrane proteins that form components of tight junctions. In normal tissues, CLDNs seal the intercellular space in the epithelial sheets to regulate tissue permeability, paracellular transport, and signal transduction. Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2), a member of the CLDN family, is expressed specifically in gastric mucosal cells in normal tissue, and its expression is often retained in gastric cancer cells. CLDN18.2 is ectopically expressed in many cancers other than gastric cancer such as esophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, biliary tract cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. Structurally, CLDN18.2 is localized on the apical side of the cell membrane and has extracellular loops capable of binding monoclonal antibodies. Upon malignant transformation, CLDN18.2 is exposed to the cell surface of the whole membrane, which enables the binding of monoclonal antibodies. Based on these characteristics, CLDN18.2 was considered to be optimal for target therapy, and zolbetuximab was developed which is a first-in-class chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody highly specific for CLDN18.2. It binds to CLDN18.2 on the tumor cell surface and stimulates cellular and soluble immune effectors that activate antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Recently, zolbetuximab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with CLDN18.2-positive and HER-2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers in the global phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials. From these clinically meaningful results, CLDN18.2-targeting therapy including zolbetuximab has attracted a lot of attention. In this review, we summarize the clinical implications of CLDN18.2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer, and CLDN18.2-targeting therapy, mainly for zolbetuximab.

Global Ring Study to Investigate the Comparability of Total Assay Performance of Commercial Claudin 18 Antibodies for Evaluation in Gastric Cancer

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), the dominant isoform of CLDN18 in gastric tissues, is a highly specific tight junction protein of the gastric mucosa with variably retained expressions in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Additionally, CLDN18.2-targeted treatment with zolbetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy, has recently been assessed in 2 phase-III studies of patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. These trials used the investigational VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A) RxDx immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay on the Ventana BenchMark platform to identify patients eligible for CLDN18.2-targeted treatment. We report the findings of a global ring study evaluating the analytical comparability of concordance of the results of 3 CLDN18 antibodies (Ventana, LSBio, and Novus) stained on 3 IHC-staining platforms (Ventana, Dako, and Leica). A tissue microarray (TMA), comprising 15 gastric cancer cases, was stained by 27 laboratories across 11 countries. Each laboratory stained the TMAs using at least 2 of the 3 evaluated CLDN18 antibodies. Stained TMAs were assessed and scored using an agreed IHC-scoring algorithm, and the results were collated for statistical analysis. The data confirmed a high level of concordance for the VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A; Ventana platform only) and LSBio antibodies on both the Dako and Leica platforms, with accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity rates all reaching a minimum acceptable ≥85% threshold and good-to-excellent levels of concordance as measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient. The Novus antibody showed the highest level of variability against the reference central laboratory results for the same antibody/platform combinations. It also failed to meet the threshold for accuracy and sensitivity when used on either the Dako or Leica platform. These results demonstrated the reliability of IHC testing for CLDN18 expression in gastric tumor samples when using commercially available platforms with an appropriate methodology and primary antibody selection.

[Claudin-18.2 and gastric cancer: from physiology to carcinogenesis]

Today a global problem for humanity is represented by cancer, in particular gastric cancer, which is characterized by high mortality and aggressive course. In this regard, there is a search for new approaches to the diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer, one of these areas is the study of the expression level of the intercellular adhesion molecule claudin-18.2 in tumor tissue and its use as a target molecule. In the case of various pathological processes, including tumors, the expression profile of claudin-18.2 changes, which indicates its possible role in the initiation and progression of cancer. The aim of this review is to systematize the data on claudin-18.2, its role in normal cell physiology and embryology, as well as in the development of pathological processes in the stomach, its relation to the clinical and morphological characteristics of gastric cancer and importance in biological therapy.

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic value of claudin 18.2 overexpression in patients with resectable gastric cancer

Claudin 18.2 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in gastric cancer based on phase 3 studies. However, clinicopathologic features associated with claudin 18.2 overexpression have not been comprehensively studied specifically for patients with resectable gastric cancer. This retrospective study included 299 patients with stage I-III resectable gastric cancer who underwent curative surgical resection. Possible associations between claudin 18.2 overexpression (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥ 75% by the 43-14A clone) and clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were analyzed. There were 90 (30.1%), 96 (32.1%), and 113 (37.8%) patients with stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. Claudin 18.2 overexpression was noted in 139 out of 299 patients (46.5%). Claudin 18.2 overexpression was associated with a younger age, a lower invasion depth limited to the mucosa/submucosa, and less frequent lymphovascular invasion. Claudin 18.2 overexpression was also associated with Borrmann type 4 among patients with advanced gastric cancer and the diffuse histological type. Claudin 18.2 overexpression was not an independent factor for survival outcomes. In conclusion, claudin 18.2 was overexpressed in almost half of resectable gastric cancer patients. Claudin 18.2 overexpression was associated with some clinicopathological characteristics, but was not an independent prognostic factor in a localized setting.

Current and Emerging Role of Monoclonal Antibody-Based First-Line Treatment in Advanced Gastro-Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and one of the main causes of cancer-related death. While surgical treatment is the only curative option for early disease, many have inoperable or advanced disease at diagnosis. Treatment in this case would be a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Gastro-esophageal (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC) genetic profiling with current molecular diagnostic techniques has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape in advanced cancers. The identification of key players in GEJ and GC survival and proliferation, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), has allowed for the individualization of advanced cancer treatment and significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients. This review comprehensively examines the current and emerging role of monoclonal antibody-based first-line treatments in advanced GEJ and GC. We explore the impact of monoclonal antibodies targeting HER2, VEGF, PD-1/PD-L1, and Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) on the first-line treatment landscape by talking about key clinical trials. This review emphasizes the importance of biomarker testing for optimal treatment selection and provides practical recommendations based on ASCO guidelines.