Different E-box regulatory sequences are functionally distinct when placed within the context of the troponin I enhancer

Spotting the Pattern: A Review on White Coat Color in the Domestic Horse

Traits such as shape, size, and color often influence the economic and sentimental value of a horse. Around the world, horses are bred and prized for the colors and markings that make their unique coat patterns stand out from the crowd. The underlying genetic mechanisms determining the color of a horse's coat can vary greatly in their complexity. For example, only two genetic markers are used to determine a horse's base coat color, whereas over 50 genetic variations have been discovered to cause white patterning in horses. Some of these white-causing mutations are benign and beautiful, while others have a notable impact on horse health. Negative effects range from slightly more innocuous defects, like deafness, to more pernicious defects, such as the lethal developmental defect incurred when a horse inherits two copies of the Lethal White Overo allele. In this review, we explore, in detail, the etiology of white spotting and its overall effect on the domestic horse to Spot the Pattern of these beautiful (and sometimes dangerous) white mutations.

Two Novel Variants in MITF and PAX3 Associated With Splashed White Phenotypes in Horses

Mutations causing depigmentation are relatively common in Equus caballus (horse). Over 40 alleles in multiple genes are associated with increased white spotting (as of February 2023). The splashed white phenotype, a coat spotting pattern described as appearing like the horse has been splashed with white paint, was previously associated with variants in the PAX3 and MITF genes. Both genes encode transcription factors known to control melanocyte migration and pigmentation. We report two novel mutations, a stop-gain mutation in PAX3 (XM_005610643.3:c.927C>T, ECA6:11,196,181, EquCab3.0) and a missense mutation in a binding domain of MITF (NM_001163874.1:c.993A>T, ECA16:21,559,940, EquCab3.0), each with a strong association with increased depigmentation in Pura Raza Española horses (P = 1.144E-11, N = 30, P = 4.441E-16, N = 39 respectively). Using a quantitative method to score depigmentation, the PAX3 and MITF mutations were found to have average white scores of 25.50 and 24.45, respectively, compared to the average white coat spotting score of 1.89 in the control set. The functional impact for each mutation was predicted to be moderate to extreme (I-TASSER, SMART, Variant Effect Predictor, SIFT). We propose to designate the MITF mutant allele as Splashed White 9 and the PAX3 mutant allele as Splashed White 10 per convention.

Contribution of metabolic abnormalities to acute myeloid leukemia pathogenesis

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of myeloid precursors. Somatic mutations have long been accepted as drivers of this malignancy. Over the past decade, unique mitochondrial and metabolic dependencies of AML and AML stem cells have been identified, including a reliance on oxidative phosphorylation. More recently, metabolic enzymes have demonstrated noncanonical roles in regulating gene expression in AML, controlling cell differentiation and stemness. These mitochondrial and metabolic adaptations occur independent of underlying genomic abnormalities and contribute to chemoresistance and relapse. In this opinion article, we discuss the current understanding of AML pathogenesis and whether mitochondrial and metabolic abnormalities drive leukemogenesis or are a non-contributory phenotype.

miR-206 enforces a slow muscle phenotype

Striated muscle is a highly specialized collection of tissues with contractile properties that vary according to functional needs. Although muscle fiber types are established postnatally, lifelong plasticity facilitates stimulus-dependent adaptation. Functional adaptation requires molecular adaptation, which is partially provided by miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation. miR-206 is a muscle-specific miRNA enriched in slow muscles. We investigated whether miR-206 drives the slow muscle phenotype or is merely an outcome. We found that miR-206 expression increases in both physiological (including female sex and endurance exercise) and pathological conditions (muscular dystrophy and adrenergic agonism) that promote a slow phenotype. Consistent with that observation, the slow soleus muscle of male miR-206-knockout mice displays a faster phenotype than wild-type mice. Moreover, left ventricles of male miR-206 knockout mice have a faster myosin profile, accompanied by dilation and systolic dysfunction. Thus, miR-206 appears to be necessary to enforce a slow skeletal and cardiac muscle phenotype and to play a key role in muscle sexual dimorphisms.

Molecular Cloning and Motif Identification of the Sheep Musclin Gene Promoter

Musclin is a bioactive factor that functions in regulating the muscle growth and metabolism. To investigate the transcriptional regulatory mechanism of the gene, the 1.4 kb musclin promoter in sheep was cloned (GenBank accession: JX966391) and the sequence was analyzed to predict the motifs associated with muscle growth. Next the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was selected as the reporter gene and various wild-type and motif-mutant vectors were constructed. The transcriptional regulatory activities were compared by observing the fluorescence strength and detecting the EGFP mRNA expression in C2C12 myoblasts transfected with the vectors. The results showed that the different lengths of promoters could drive the transcription of EGFP and the mutation of some motifs up- or downregulated the activity of the promoter. Furthermore, the electrophoresis mobility shift assay showed that these motifs regulated the musclin gene transcription through binding to the corresponding transcriptional factors in sheep muscle tissue.

Functional studies of the Ciona intestinalis myogenic regulatory factor reveal conserved features of chordate myogenesis

Ci-MRF is the sole myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, an invertebrate chordate. In order to investigate its properties we developed a simple in vivo assay based on misexpressing Ci-MRF in the notochord of Ciona embryos. We used this assay to examine the roles of three structural motifs that are conserved among MRFs: an alanine-threonine (Ala-Thr) dipeptide of the basic domain that is known in vertebrates as the myogenic code, a cysteine/histidine-rich (C/H) domain found just N-terminal to the basic domain, and a carboxy-terminal amphipathic α-helix referred to as Helix III. We show that the Ala-Thr dipeptide is necessary for normal Ci-MRF function, and that while eliminating the C/H domain or Helix III individually has no demonstrable effect on Ci-MRF, simultaneous loss of both motifs significantly reduces its activity. Our studies also indicate that direct interaction between CiMRF and an essential E-box of Ciona Troponin I is required for the expression of this muscle-specific gene and that multiple classes of MRF-regulated genes exist in Ciona. These findings are consistent with substantial conservation of MRF-directed myogenesis in chordates and demonstrate for the first time that the Ala/Thr dipeptide of the basic domain of an invertebrate MRF behaves as a myogenic code.

Identification of RANBP16 and RANBP17 as novel interaction partners for the bHLH transcription factor E12

The ubiquitously expressed basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors E12 and E47, products of alternative splicing of the E2A/TCF3 gene, regulate diverse biological processes including cell growth, differentiation and development. To search for novel protein interactions for E12, we utilized the bHLH domain of E12 as a bait in yeast two-hybrid screening. Yeast two-hybrid, mammalian two-hybrid, and co-immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrate specific interaction of E12 with RANBP17, a novel member of the importin-beta superfamily; this interaction maps to the CRM1 homology region of RANBP17. Ectopic expression of RANBP17 leads to a approximately 3-fold increase in E2A/MyoD mediated transactivation of an E-box regulated luciferase reporter gene. Interaction and transactivation studies also revealed similar functions for RANBP16/XPO7. Furthermore, ectopic expression of either RANBP16 or RANBP17 resulted in increased level of endogenous transcript for the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21(Waf1/Cip1), a well-characterized E2A target gene. Together, these biochemical and functional data reveal RANBP16 and RANBP17 as novel regulators of E2A protein action.

Excitation-transcription coupling in skeletal muscle: the molecular pathways of exercise

Muscle fibres have different properties with respect to force, contraction speed, endurance, oxidative/glycolytic capacity etc. Although adult muscle fibres are normally post-mitotic with little turnover of cells, the physiological properties of the pre-existing fibres can be changed in the adult animal upon changes in usage such as after exercise. The signal to change is mainly conveyed by alterations in the patterns of nerve-evoked electrical activity, and is to a large extent due to switches in the expression of genes. Thus, an excitation-transcription coupling must exist. It is suggested that changes in nerve-evoked muscle activity lead to a variety of activity correlates such as increases in free intracellular Ca²⁺ levels caused by influx across the cell membrane and/or release from the sarcoplasmatic reticulum, concentrations of metabolites such as lipids and ADP, hypoxia and mechanical stress. Such correlates are detected by sensors such as protein kinase C (PKC), calmodulin, AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ), and oxygen dependent prolyl hydroxylases that trigger intracellular signaling cascades. These complex cascades involve several transcription factors such as nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), myogenic differentiation factor (myoD), myogenin, PPARδ, and sine oculis homeobox 1/eyes absent 1 (Six1/Eya1). These factors might act indirectly by inducing gene products that act back on the cascade, or as ultimate transcription factors binding to and transactivating/repressing genes for the fast and slow isoforms of various contractile proteins and of metabolic enzymes. The determination of size and force is even more complex as this involves not only intracellular signaling within the muscle fibres, but also muscle stem cells called satellite cells. Intercellular signaling substances such as myostatin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) seem to act in a paracrine fashion. Induction of hypertrophy is accompanied by the satellite cells fusing to myofibres and thereby increasing the capacity for protein synthesis. These extra nuclei seem to remain part of the fibre even during subsequent atrophy as a form of muscle memory facilitating retraining. In addition to changes in myonuclear number during hypertrophy, changes in muscle fibre size seem to be caused by alterations in transcription, translation (per nucleus) and protein degradation.

Genomic organization and evolution of immunoglobulin kappa gene enhancers and kappa deleting element in mammals

We have studied the genomic structure and evolutionary pattern of immunoglobulin kappa deleting element (KDE) and three kappa enhancers (KE5', KE3'P, and KE3'D) in eleven mammalian genomic sequences. Our results show that the relative positions and the genomic organization of the KDE and the kappa enhancers are conserved in all mammals studied and have not been affected by the local rearrangements in the immunoglobulin kappa (IGK) light chain locus over a long evolutionary time ( approximately 120 million years of mammalian evolution). Our observations suggest that the sequence motifs in these regulatory elements have been conserved by purifying selection to achieve proper regulation of the expression of the IGK light chain genes. The conservation of the three enhancers in all mammals indicates that these species may use similar mechanisms to regulate IGK gene expression. However, some activities of the IGK enhancers might have evolved in the eutherian lineage. The presence of the three IGK enhancers, KDE, and other recombining elements (REs) in all mammals (including platypus) suggest that these genomic elements were in place before the mammalian radiation.

De-phosphorylation of MyoD is linking nerve-evoked activity to fast myosin heavy chain expression in rodent adult skeletal muscle

Elucidating the molecular pathways linking electrical activity to gene expression is necessary for understanding the effects of exercise on muscle. Fast muscles express higher levels of MyoD and lower levels of myogenin than slow muscles, and we have previously linked myogenin to expression of oxidative enzymes. We here report that in slow muscles, compared with fast, 6 times as much of the MyoD is in an inactive form phosphorylated at T115. In fast muscles, 10 h of slow electrical stimulation had no effect on the total MyoD protein level, but the fraction of phosphorylated MyoD was increased 4-fold. Longer stimulation also decreased the total level of MyoD mRNA and protein, while the level of myogenin protein was increased. Fast patterned stimulation did not have any of these effects. Overexpression of wild type MyoD had variable effects in active slow muscles, but increased expression of fast myosin heavy chain in denervated muscles. In normally active soleus muscles, MyoD mutated at T115 (but not at S200) increased the number of fibres containing fast myosin from 50% to 85% in mice and from 13% to 62% in rats. These data establish de-phosphorylated active MyoD as a link between the pattern of electrical activity and fast fibre type in adult muscles.

The Notch targets Esr1 and Esr10 are differentially regulated in Xenopus neural precursors

The HES family of bHLH repressors plays a key role in regulating the differentiation of neural precursors in the vertebrate embryo. Members of the HES gene family are expressed in neural precursors as targets of the Notch signaling pathway, but how this occurs in the context of neurogenesis is not known. Here, we address this issue by identifying enhancers driving Notch-dependent gene expression of two Hes5-like genes expressed in Xenopus called Esr1 and Esr10. Using frog transgenesis, we identify enhancer elements driving expression of Esr1 and Esr10 in neural precursors or in response to ectopic expression of the proneural protein, Xngnr1. Using deletion and mutation analysis, we define motifs required for enhancer activity of both genes, namely Notch-responsive elements and, in the case of Esr10, E-box motifs. We find that Esr1 and Esr10 are differentially regulated both in terms of Notch input and its interaction with heterologous factors. These studies reveal inputs required for proneural expression of genes encoding bHLH repressors in the developing vertebrate nervous system.

The Ankrd2, Cdkn1c and Calcyclin Genes are Under the Control of MyoD During Myogenic Differentiation

Skeletal muscle development requires the coordinated expression of numerous transcription factors to control the specification of the muscle fate in mesodermal cells and the differentiation of the committed myoblasts into functional contractile fibers. The bHLH transcription factor MyoD plays a key role in these processes, since its forced expression is sufficient to induce the myogenesis in a variety of non-muscle cells in culture. Consistent with this observation, the majority of skeletal muscle genes require MyoD to activate their own transcription. In order to identify novel MyoD-target genes we generated C2C12 MyoD-silenced clones, and used a muscle-specific cDNA microarray to study the induced modifications of the transcriptional profile. Gene expression was analyzed at three different stages in differentiating MyoD(-)C2C12 myoblasts. These microarray data sets identified many additional uncharacterized downstream MyoD transcripts that may play important functions in muscle cell differentiation. Among these genes, we concentrated our study on the cell cycle regulators Cdkn1c and calcyclin and on the muscle-specific putative myogenic regulator Ankrd2. Bioinformatic and functional studies on the promoters of these genes clarified their dependence on MyoD activity. Clues of other regulatory mechanisms that might interact with the principal bHLH transcription factor have been revealed by the unexpected up-regulation in MyoD(-) cells of these novel (and other) target transcripts, at the differentiation stage in which MyoD became normally down-regulated.

Novel transcription regulatory elements in Caenorhabditis elegans muscle genes

We report the identification of three new transcription regulatory elements that are associated with muscle gene expression in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Starting from a subset of well-characterized nematode muscle genes, we identified conserved DNA motifs in the promoter regions using computational DNA pattern-recognition algorithms. These were considered to be putative muscle transcription regulatory motifs. Using the green-fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter, experiments were done to determine the biological activity of these motifs in driving muscle gene expression. Prediction accuracy of muscle expression based on the presence of these three motifs was encouraging; nine of 10 previously uncharacterized genes that were predicted to have muscle expression were shown to be expressed either specifically or selectively in the muscle tissues, whereas only one of the nine that scored low for these motifs expressed in muscle. Knockouts of putative regulatory elements in the promoter of the mlc-2 and unc-89 genes show that they significantly contribute to muscle expression and act in a synergistic manner. We find that these DNA motifs are also present in the muscle promoters of C. briggsae, indicating that they are functionally conserved in the nematodes.

RNA interference of achaete-scute homolog 1 in mouse prostate neuroendocrine cells reveals its gene targets and DNA binding sites

We have previously characterized a transgenic mouse model (CR2-TAg) of metastatic prostate cancer arising in the neuroendocrine (NE) cell lineage. Biomarkers of NE differentiation in this model are expressed in conventional adenocarcinoma of the prostate with NE features. To further characterize the pathways that control NE proliferation, differentiation, and survival, we established prostate NE cancer (PNEC) cell lines from CR2-TAg prostate tumors and metastases. GeneChip analyses of cell lines harvested at different passages, and as xenografted tumors, indicated that PNECs express consistent features ex vivo and in vivo and share a remarkable degree of similarity with primary CR2-TAg prostate NE tumors. PNECs express mAsh1, a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor essential for NE cell differentiation in other tissues. RNA interference knockdown of mAsh1, GeneChip comparisons of treated and control cell populations, and a computational analysis of down-regulated genes identified 12 transcriptional motifs enriched in the gene set. Affected genes, including Adcy9, Hes6, Iapp1, Ndrg4, c-Myb, and Mesdc2, are enriched for a palindromic E-box motif, CAGCTG, indicating that it is a physiologically relevant mAsh1 binding site. The enrichment of a c-Myb binding site and the finding that c-Myb is down-regulated by mAsh1 RNA interference suggest that mAsh1 and c-Myb are in the same signaling pathway. Our data indicate that mAsh1 negatively regulates the cell cycle (e.g., via enhanced Cdkn2d, Bub1 expression), promotes differentiation (e.g., through effects on cAMP), and enhances survival by inhibiting apoptosis. PNEC cell lines should be generally useful for genetic and/or pharmacologic studies of the regulation of NE cell proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis.

Upstream stimulatory factor represses the induction of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-Ibeta expression by PGC-1

Transcriptional regulation of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1beta (CPT-1beta) is coordinated with contractile gene expression through cardiac-enriched transcription factors, GATA4 and SRF. Metabolic modulation of CPT-1beta promoter activity has been described with the stimulation of gene expression by oleate that is mediated through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pathway. The coactivator, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator (PGC-1), enhances gene expression through interactions with nuclear hormone receptors and the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) family. PGC-1 and MEF2A synergistically activate CPT-1beta promoter activity. This stimulation is enhanced by mutation of the E-box sequences that flank the MEF2A binding site. These elements bind the upstream stimulatory factors (USF1 and USF2), which activate transcription in CV-1 fibroblasts. However, overexpression of the USF proteins in myocytes depresses CPT-1beta activity and significantly reduces MEF2A and PGC-1 synergy. Co-immunoprecipitation studies demonstrate that PGC-1 and USF2 proteins can physically interact. Our studies demonstrate that PGC-1 stimulates CPT-1beta gene expression through MEF2A. USF proteins have a novel role in repressing the expression of the CPT-1beta gene and modulating the induction by the coactivator, PGC-1.

Fiber-type-specific transcription of the troponin I slow gene is regulated by multiple elements

The regulatory elements that restrict transcription of genes encoding contractile proteins specifically to either slow- or fast-twitch skeletal muscles are unknown. As an initial step towards understanding the mechanisms that generate muscle diversity during development, we have identified a 128-bp troponin I slow upstream element (SURE) and a 144-bp troponin I fast intronic element (FIRE) that confer fiber type specificity in transgenic mice (M. Nakayama et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2408-2417, 1996). SURE and FIRE have maintained the spatial organization of four conserved motifs (3' to 5'): an E box, an AT-rich site (A/T2) that binds MEF-2, a CACC site, and a novel CAGG motif. Troponin I slow (TnIs) constructs harboring mutations in these motifs were analyzed in transiently and stably transfected Sol8 myocytes and in transgenic mice to assess their function. Mutations of the E-box, A/T2, and CAGG motifs completely abolish transcription from the TnI SURE. In contrast, mutation of the CACC motif had no significant effect in transfected myocytes or on the slow-specific transcription of the TnI SURE in transgenic mice. To assess the role of E boxes in fiber type specificity, a chimeric enhancer was constructed in which the E box of SURE was replaced with the E box from FIRE. This TnI E box chimera, which lacks the SURE NFAT site, confers essentially the same levels of transcription in transgenic mice as those conferred by wild-type SURE and is specifically expressed in slow-twitch muscles, indicating that the E box on its own cannot determine the fiber-type-specific expression of the TnI promoter. The importance of the 5' half of SURE, which bears little homology to the TnI FIRE, in muscle-specific expression was analyzed by deletion and linker scanning analyses. Removal of the 5' half of SURE (-846 to -811) results in the loss of expression in stably transfected but not in transiently expressing myocytes. Linker scanning mutations identified sequences in this region that are necessary for the function of SURE when integrated into chromatin. One of these sites (GTTAATCCG), which is highly homologous to a bicoid consensus site, binds to nuclear proteins from several mesodermal cells. These results show that multiple elements are involved in the muscle-specific activity of the TnIs promoter and that interactions between upstream and downstream regions of SURE are important for transcription in the context of native chromatin.

The haplolethal region at the 16F gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster: structure and function

Extensive aneuploid analyses had shown the existence of a few haplolethal (HL) regions and one triplolethal region in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Since then, only two haplolethals, 22F1-2 and 16F, have been directly linked to identified genes, dpp and wupA, respectively. However, with the possible exception of dpp, the actual bases for this dosage sensitivity remain unknown. We have generated and characterized dominant-lethal mutations and chromosomal rearrangements in 16F and studied them in relation to the genes in the region. This region extends along 100 kb and includes at least 14 genes. The normal HL function depends on the integrity of a critical 4-kb window of mostly noncoding sequences within the wupA transcription unit that encodes the muscle protein troponin I (TNI). All dominant lethals are breakpoints within that window, which prevent the functional expression of TNI and other adjacent genes in the proximal direction. However, independent mutations in these genes result in recessive lethal phenotypes only. We propose that the HL at 16F represents a long-range cis regulatory region that acts upon a number of functionally related genes whose combined haploidy would yield the dominant-lethal effect.

Identification of a novel slow-muscle-fiber enhancer binding protein, MusTRD1

The molecular mechanisms which are responsible for restricting skeletal muscle gene expression to specific fiber types, either slow or fast twitch, are unknown. As a first step toward defining the components which direct slow-fiber-specific gene expression, we identified the sequence elements of the human troponin I slow upstream enhancer (USE) that bind muscle nuclear proteins. These include an E-box, a MEF2 element, and two other elements, USE B1 and USE C1. In vivo analysis of a mutation that disrupts USE B1 binding activity suggested that the USE B1 element is essential for high-level expression in slow-twitch muscles. This mutation does not, however, abolish slow-fiber specificity. A similar analysis indicated that the USE C1 element may play only a minor role. We report the cloning of a novel human USE B1 binding protein, MusTRD1 (muscle TFII-I repeat domain-containing protein 1), which is expressed predominantly in skeletal muscle. Significantly, MusTRD1 contains two repeat domains which show remarkable homology to the six repeat domains of the recently cloned transcription factor TFII-I. Furthermore, both TFII-I and MusTRD1 bind to similar but distinct sequences, which happen to conform with the initiator (Inr) consensus sequence. Given the roles of MEF2 and basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins in muscle gene expression, the similarity of TFII-I and MusTRD1 is intriguing, as TFII-I is believed to coordinate the interaction of MADS-box proteins, bHLH proteins, and the general transcription machinery.

Molecular mechanisms of myogenic coactivation by p300: direct interaction with the activation domain of MyoD and with the MADS box of MEF2C

By searching for molecules that assist MyoD in converting fibroblasts to muscle cells, we have found that p300 and CBP, two related molecules that act as transcriptional adapters, coactivate the myogenic basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. Coactivation by p300 involves novel physical interactions between p300 and the amino-terminal activation domain of MyoD. In particular, disruption of the FYD domain, a group of three amino acids conserved in the activation domains of other myogenic bHLH proteins, drastically diminishes the transactivation potential of MyoD and abolishes both p300-mediated coactivation and the physical interaction between MyoD and p300. Two domains of p300, at its amino and carboxy terminals, independently function to both mediate coactivation and physically interact with MyoD. A truncated segment of p300, unable to bind MyoD, acts as a dominant negative mutation and abrogates both myogenic conversion and transactivation by MyoD, suggesting that endogenous p300 is a required coactivator for MyoD function. The p300 dominant negative peptide forms multimers with intact p300. p300 and CBP serve as coactivators of another class of transcriptional activators critical for myogenesis, myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2). In fact, transactivation mediated by the MEF2C protein is potentiated by the two coactivators, and this phenomenon is associated with the ability of p300 to interact with the MADS domain of MEF2C. Our results suggest that p300 and CBP may positively influence myogenesis by reinforcing the transcriptional autoregulatory loop established between the myogenic bHLH and the MEF2 factors.

Role of basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors in Sertoli cell differentiation: identification of an E-box response element in the transferrin promoter

Sertoli cells are critical for testicular function and maintenance of the spermatogenic process. The induction of Sertoli cell differentiation in the embryo promotes testicular development and male sex determination. The progression of Sertoli cell differentiation during puberty promotes the onset of spermatogenesis. The maintenance of optimal Sertoli cell differentiation in the adult is required for spermatogenesis to proceed. The current study was designed to investigate the transcriptional regulation of Sertoli cell differentiation through the analysis of a previously identified marker of differentiation, transferrin gene expression. Sertoli cells produce transferrin to transport iron to developing spermatogenic cells sequestered within the blood-testis barrier. The transferrin promoter was characterized and found to contain two critical response elements, designated Sertoli element 1 (SE1) and Sertoli element 2 (SE2). Through sequence analysis, SE2 was found to contain an E-box response element, which has been shown to respond to basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. The bHLH proteins are a class of transcription factors associated with the induction and progression of cell differentiation. bHLH proteins dimerize through the conserved helix-loop-helix region and bind DNA through the basic region. Nuclear extracts from Sertoli cells were found to cause an E-box gel shift when the cells were stimulated to differentiate in culture, but not under basal conditions. The SE2 gel shift of Sertoli nuclear extracts was competed with excess unlabeled SE2 or E-box DNA fragments. Several Sertoli nuclear proteins associate with the SE2 gel shifts, including 70-, 42-, and 25-kDa proteins. Therefore, the critical SE2 element in the transferrin promoter is an E-box element capable of binding bHLH transcription factors. The ubiquitously expressed E12 bHLH protein dimerizes with numerous cell-specific bHLH factors. A Western blot analysis demonstrated that E12 was present in Sertoli cell nuclear extracts and associated with the SE2 gel shift. A ligand blot of Sertoli cell nuclear extracts with radiolabeled E12 had apparent bHLH proteins when the cells were stimulated to differentiate. The E-box sequence in the SE2 fragment of the transferrin promoter was CATCTG and was similar in gel shifts to the consensus E-box elements (CANNTG) previously characterized. A bHLH inhibitory factor (Id) competed and inhibited formation of the Sertoli cell nuclear extract E-box gel shift. To extend this observation, Id protein was overexpressed in cultured Sertoli cells. A transferrin promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase construct was used to monitor Sertoli cell function. The presence of Id suppressed the activation of the promoter induced by Sertoli differentiation factors. Therefore, the inhibition of Sertoli bHLH factors by Id suppressed Sertoli cell differentiated function, as measured by transferrin expression. An E-box-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase construct was also found to be active in Sertoli cells when cells were induced to differentiate. Screening the computerized nucleotide data bases demonstrated that putative E-box response elements are present in the promoters of a large number of Sertoli cell differentiated genes. In summary, a critical E-box response element has been identified in the transferrin promoter that can be activated by bHLH factors (e.g. E12) present in Sertoli cells. Inhibition of Sertoli bHLH factors by Id suppresses Sertoli cell differentiated function (i.e. transferrin expression), suggesting that bHLH transcription factors may be important in regulating Sertoli cell differentiated functions.

The molecular biology of preprotachykinin-A gene expression

The expression of neuropeptides is largely tissue-specific and under strictly regulated and complex control. In view of the diversity of neuronal phenotypes, with concomitant plasticity of gene expression within any phenotype, it is obvious that there is coordinated activation and repression of genes. One of the central observations from these studies is that neuropeptide gene expression is dependent upon the combinatorial interaction of multiple transcription factors with the regulatory elements which determine mRNA synthesis. These factors mediate both tissue specific and stimulus inducible gene expression. We will illustrate some of the mechanisms that regulate neuropeptide gene expression utilizing our own studies on the rat preprotachykinin-A gene (rPPT) and, where appropriate, expand on the generality of these findings to other neuropeptide genes.

Neuronal-specific gene expression--the interaction of both positive and negative transcriptional regulators

Gene expression patterns in neurons are complex and are modulated in response to multiple extracellular stimuli. In addition, during development and as neurons differentiate into distinct neuronal phenotypes, there is a co-ordinated activation and repression of a variety of genes. It is becoming increasingly evident that negative regulatory elements are present in neuronal-specific promoters. These elements have been shown, in part, to restrict promoter activity to the correct physiological cell type, both in transient transfection and in transgenic mouse models. Repression can be effected by different mechanisms depending on location within the promoter of silencer complexes and their relationship to other bound transcription factors. This review will discuss the molecular mechanisms regulating promoter function, in particular: (1) the combinatorial interaction between transcription factors which generate regulated promoter function; and (2) the restriction of promoter function to the correct cell type by bound repressor molecules. Determination of the mechanism of regulated gene expression will allow advances in gene therapy and definition of novel targets for pharmaceutical intervention. At the more basic level, functional dissection of the promoters of specific neuronal expressed genes will provide information of importance in two key areas of neurobiology: (1) the mechanism by which extracellular factors, such as neurotrophins and cytokines, regulate gene expression; (2) the events which lead to the tissue-specific expression of genes in subpopulations of neurons, both in the adult and during development.

Defective myogenesis in NFB-s mutant associated with a saturable suppression of MYF5 activity

Myogenic cell lines have proved to be useful tools for investigating the molecular mechanisms that control cellular differentiation. NFB-s is a mutant myogenic cell line which fails to differentiate in vitro, and can repress differentiation in normal myogenic cells when fused to form heterokaryons. The NFB-s cell line was used here to study the molecular mechanisms underlying such myogenic repression. Using muscle-specific reporter genes, we show that NFB-s cells fail to activate fully the muscle differentiation program at a transcriptional level, although muscle-specific transcription can be enhanced by regulators of differentiation such as pertussis toxin. Paradoxically we find that the myogenic regulator myf5 is expressed at constitutively high levels in NFB-s cells, and retains DNA binding activity. Expression plasmids encoding NFB-derived myf5 cDNA can rescue the myogenic phenotype in NFB-s cells, demonstrating that a threshold level of positive regulators must be reached before the myogenic program is activated. Thus, the dominant negative phenotype does not appear to result from defective myf5, but is due to a dosage-dependent saturable mechanism that interferes with myf5 function. These studies demonstrate that the stoichiometric ratio of positive and negative regulators is critical for determining the myogenic differentiation state.

Flanking sequences modulate the cell specificity of M-CAT elements

M-CAT elements mediate both muscle-specific and non-muscle-specific transcription. We used artificial promoters to dissect M-CAT elements derived from the cardiac troponin T promoter, whose regulation is highly striated muscle specific. We show that muscle-specific M-CAT-dependent expression requires two distinct components: the core heptameric M-CAT motif (5'-CATTCCT-3'), which constitutes the canonical binding site for TEF-1-related proteins, and specific sequences immediately flanking the core motif that bind an additional factor(s). These factors are found in higher-order M-CAT DNA-protein complexes with TEF-1 proteins. Non-muscle-specific promoters are produced when the sequences flanking the M-CAT motif are removed or modified to match those of non-muscle-specific promoters such as the simian virus 40 promoter. Moreover, a mutation of the 5'-flanking region of the cardiac troponin T M-CAT-1 element upregulated expression in nonmuscle cells. That mutation also disrupts a potential E box that apparently does not bind myogenic basic helix-loop-helix proteins. We propose a model in which M-CAT motifs are potentially active in many cell types but are modulated through protein binding to specific flanking sequences. In nonmuscle cells, these flanking sequences bind a factor(s) that represses M-CAT-dependent activity. In muscle cells, on the other hand, the factor(s) binding to these flanking sequences contributes to both the cell specificity and the overall transcriptional strength of M-CAT-dependent promoters.

Casein kinase II increases the transcriptional activities of MRF4 and MyoD independently of their direct phosphorylation

The myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) are a subclass of a much larger group of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors which includes members of the E protein such as E47, E2-2, and HEB. Although the MRFs are unique in their ability to confer a myogenic phenotype on nonmuscle cells, they require E protein partners to form a MRF-E protein heterodimer, which represents the functional myogenesis-inducing complex. The mechanisms controlling homodimer and heterodimer formation in vivo remain largely unknown, although it is likely that posttranslational modification of one or both basic helix-loop-helix partners is critical to this regulatory event. In this respect, MyoD and MRF4, both members of the MRF family, exist in vivo as phosphoproteins and contains multiple consensus phosphorylation sites, including sites for casein kinase II (CKII) phosphorylation. In this study, we demonstrate that overexpression of CKII increases the transcriptional activities of MRF4 and MyoD in vivo. Interestingly, mutation of the individual CKII sites within MRF4 and MyoF does not alter the ability of CKII to enhance MRF transcriptional activity, suggesting that the effect of CKII expression on the MRFs is indirect. Given that the MRFs require dimerization with E protein partners to activate muscle-specific transcription, the effects of CKII expression on E protein function also were examined. Our studies show that E47 serves as an in vitro substrate for CKII and that CKII-phosphorylated E-47 proteins no longer bind to DNA. These observations were confirmed by in vivo experiments showing that overexpressing of CKII produces a dramatic reduction in E47 homodimer-directed transcription. We conclude from these studies that CKII may act as a positive regulator of myogenesis by preventing E protein homodimers from binding to muscle gene regulatory elements.

Muscle gene E-box control elements. Evidence for quantitatively different transcriptional activities and the binding of distinct regulatory factors

The muscle creatine kinase gene enhancer contains two regulatory elements (MCK-R and MCK-L) with the consensus E-box sequence (CAnnTG). A myocyte specific protein complex, MEF1, binds the MCK-R site. MEF1 contains several basic H-L-H myogenic determination factors (MDFs), each dimerized with ubiquitous members of the bH-L-H family (e.g. E12/E47). We now demonstrate that the ubiquitous bH-L-H factor E2-2 is a major component of the endogenous MCK-R site specific complex. Previous studies described the MCK-L site as a similar but low affinity MDF/bH-L-H heterodimer binding site. However, we find that the MCK-L site exhibits preferential binding of an unknown ubiquitous factor which contains neither E12/E47 nor E2-2, and that it exhibits differential transcriptional activity with muscle and non-muscle cells. The differential behavior of the MCK-L and MCK-R sites may be a general trait of E-box elements since one among several E-boxes in the MLC 1/3 enhancer also binds preferentially to the MCK-L factor. From our studies we now propose separate consensus sequences for MCK-R and MCK-L E-box types: AACAc/gc/gTGCa/t and GGa/cCANGTGGc/gNa/g. Our results suggest that while many muscle gene E-boxes are capable of binding the previously characterized spectrum of MDF/bH-L-H heterodimers in vitro, MCK-L type E-boxes probably bind qualitatively different factors in vivo.

Three immediate early gene response elements in the proximal preprotachykinin-A promoter in two functionally distinct domains

The preprotachykinin-A promoter contains two blocks of DNA sequence, with a high degree of homology to one another, both containing activator protein 1/cAMP response element-like elements which constitute cis-acting regulatory domains. These two domains are differentially regulated in HeLa cells and primary cultures of dorsal root ganglion neurons when they are placed in the context of a reporter gene driven by the c-fos minimum promoter. One of the domains, corresponding to a region of the preprotachykinin promoter spanning nucleotides -345 to -308, contains two activator protein 1 elements adjacent to an E-box binding protein consensus sequence. Both of the activator protein 1 elements can bind a complex containing c-fos/c-fos related antigen proteins and the adjacent E-box element is specifically recognized by proteins present in HeLa nuclear extract. This domain requires the synergistic action of both activator protein 1 elements to drive expression of the reporter gene in both HeLa and dorsal root ganglion cells. The second or proximal domain spans nucleotides -198 to -155 and contains a previously characterized activator protein 1/cAMP response element/ATF enhancer element which, in contrast to the activator protein 1 elements in the distal domain, functions in both HeLa and dorsal root ganglion cells as one copy. This domain is differentially regulated in HeLa and dorsal root ganglia. The previously characterized enhancer activity is repressed in the context of the extended cis-acting domain in HeLa cells but remains active in dorsal root ganglion, although no further enhancement of activity supported by the single enhancer is observed when in the context of the extended sequence. This proximal domain, in addition to binding the enhancer complex, can be bound by at least two other complexes, one of which binds to an E-box consensus sequence. As the elements corresponding to the E-box consensus in both domains cross-compete for binding of specific complex(es) it would appear that repression of the activity of the proximal domain is correlated with a specific protein complex binding adjacent to the characterized enhancer in the region spanning nucleotides -198 to -155. The preprotachykinin-A proximal promoter is therefore bound by multiple activator protein I complexes, which in the context of the cis-acting domains in which they are present can be differentially regulated. In the proximal domain their function may also be regulated in a tissue-specific manner by other proteins which bind to adjacent regulatory elements.

MyoD and myogenin act on the chicken myosin light-chain 1 gene as distinct transcriptional factors

Expression of MyoD, myogenin, MRF4, and Myf-5 converts nonmuscle cells to muscle cells. In an attempt to analyze the roles of these factors, we have investigated their effects on transcription driven by the promoter of the chicken myosin alkaline light-chain (MLC1) gene. The activation by CMD1 or c-myogenin (chicken MyoD or myogenin, respectively) was dependent on the existence of a muscle-specific regulatory region located from positions -2096 to -1743. Its distal half, containing a pair of E boxes (CANNTG), had been previously characterized as an enhancer responsive to CMD1 but not to c-myogenin. In this study, we report the identification of another enhancer in the muscle-specific regulatory region which is preferentially responsive to c-myogenin. Deletion and mutation analyses indicated that this enhancer requires a single E box and its flanking sequences. Furthermore, analysis of chimeric proteins of CMD1 and c-myogenin indicated that regions outside the basic helix-loop-helix domain of c-myogenin are involved in the specificity of the enhancer. These results show that CMD1 and c-myogenin act on the MLC1 gene by recognizing different upstream DNA sequences and that direct or indirect interactions between the regions outside the basic helix-loop-helix domain and flanking sequences of E boxes are involved in the target sequence specificity.

MyoD and myogenin act on the chicken myosin light-chain 1 gene as distinct transcriptional factors

Expression of MyoD, myogenin, MRF4, and Myf-5 converts nonmuscle cells to muscle cells. In an attempt to analyze the roles of these factors, we have investigated their effects on transcription driven by the promoter of the chicken myosin alkaline light-chain (MLC1) gene. The activation by CMD1 or c-myogenin (chicken MyoD or myogenin, respectively) was dependent on the existence of a muscle-specific regulatory region located from positions -2096 to -1743. Its distal half, containing a pair of E boxes (CANNTG), had been previously characterized as an enhancer responsive to CMD1 but not to c-myogenin. In this study, we report the identification of another enhancer in the muscle-specific regulatory region which is preferentially responsive to c-myogenin. Deletion and mutation analyses indicated that this enhancer requires a single E box and its flanking sequences. Furthermore, analysis of chimeric proteins of CMD1 and c-myogenin indicated that regions outside the basic helix-loop-helix domain of c-myogenin are involved in the specificity of the enhancer. These results show that CMD1 and c-myogenin act on the MLC1 gene by recognizing different upstream DNA sequences and that direct or indirect interactions between the regions outside the basic helix-loop-helix domain and flanking sequences of E boxes are involved in the target sequence specificity.

HLH forced dimers: tethering MyoD to E47 generates a dominant positive myogenic factor insulated from negative regulation by Id

Basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) class transcription factors bind DNA as hetero- and homodimers. In murine myogenic cells the HLH network includes multiple members of the E protein, MyoD, and Id families; changes in the network characterize muscle determination and differentiation and have been proposed as causal for these developmental transitions. To test the importance of HLH partner choice in these cellular decisions, we have designed a strategy in which the identity of a bHLH dimer is specified by joining two monomers via a flexible polypeptide linker. A MyoD-E47 polyprotein avidly bound the same DNA targets as its unlinked counterpart, but, unlike intermolecular dimers that are very sensitive to inhibition by Id, MyoD-E47 was resistant to Id challenge. In cells MyoD-E47 acted as a dominant positive myogenic factor, capable of initiating myogenic determination and also substantially bypassing negative regulation of differentiation by serum growth factors.

Transcriptional regulator Leu3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: separation of activator and repressor functions

The Leu3 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to specific DNA sequences present in the 5' noncoding region of at least five RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes. Leu3 functions as a transcriptional activator only when the metabolic intermediate alpha-isopropylmalate is also present. In the absence of alpha-isopropylmalate, Leu3 causes transcription to be repressed below basal levels. We show here that different portions of the Leu3 protein are responsible for activation and repression. Fusion of the 30 C-terminal residues of Leu3 to the DNA-binding domain of the Gal4 protein created a strong cross-species activator, demonstrating that the short C-terminal region is not only required but also sufficient for transcriptional activation. Using a recently developed Leu3-responsive in vitro transcription assay as a test system for repression (J. Sze, M. Woontner, J. Jaehning, and G. B. Kohlhaw, Science 258:1143-1145, 1992), we show that mutant forms of the Leu3 protein that lack the activation domain still function as repressors. The shortest repressor thus identified had only about 15% of the mass of the full-length Leu3 protein and was centered on the DNA-binding region of Leu3. Implications of this finding for the mechanism of repression are discussed.

Transcriptional regulator Leu3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: separation of activator and repressor functions

The Leu3 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to specific DNA sequences present in the 5' noncoding region of at least five RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes. Leu3 functions as a transcriptional activator only when the metabolic intermediate alpha-isopropylmalate is also present. In the absence of alpha-isopropylmalate, Leu3 causes transcription to be repressed below basal levels. We show here that different portions of the Leu3 protein are responsible for activation and repression. Fusion of the 30 C-terminal residues of Leu3 to the DNA-binding domain of the Gal4 protein created a strong cross-species activator, demonstrating that the short C-terminal region is not only required but also sufficient for transcriptional activation. Using a recently developed Leu3-responsive in vitro transcription assay as a test system for repression (J. Sze, M. Woontner, J. Jaehning, and G. B. Kohlhaw, Science 258:1143-1145, 1992), we show that mutant forms of the Leu3 protein that lack the activation domain still function as repressors. The shortest repressor thus identified had only about 15% of the mass of the full-length Leu3 protein and was centered on the DNA-binding region of Leu3. Implications of this finding for the mechanism of repression are discussed.