Transplanted carcinoma in an immunosuppressed patient

Tumors after kidney transplantation: a population study

One of the main causes of post-transplant-associated morbidity and mortality is cancer. The aims of the project were to study the neoplastic risk within the kidney transplant population and identify the determinants of this risk. A cohort of 462 renal transplant patients from 2010 to 2020 was considered. The expected incidence rates of post-transplant cancer development in the referenced population, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) taking the Italian population as a comparison, and the absolute risk and the attributable fraction were extrapolated from these cohorts of patients. Kidney transplant recipients had an overall cancer risk of approximately three times that of the local population (SIR 2.8). A significantly increased number of cases were observed for Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) (SIR 195) and hematological cancers (SIR 6.8). In the first 3 years post-transplant, the risk to develop either KS or hematological cancers was four times higher than in the following years; in all cases of KS, the diagnosis was within 2 years from the transplant. Post-transplant immunosuppression represents the cause of 99% of cases of KS and 85% of cases of lymphomas, while only 39% is represented by solid tumors. Data related to the incidence, the percentages attributable to post-transplant immunosuppression, and the time of onset of neoplasms, particularly for KS and hematological tumors could help improve the management for the follow-up in these patients.

Donor-Transmitted Cancer in Orthotopic Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Donor-transmitted cancer (DTC) has major implications for the affected patient as well as other recipients of organs from the same donor. Unlike heterotopic transplant recipients, there may be limited treatment options for orthotopic transplant recipients with DTC. We systematically reviewed the evidence on DTC in orthotopic solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in January 2020. We included cases where the outcome was reported and excluded donor-derived cancers. We assessed study quality using published checklists. Our domains of interest were presentation, time to diagnosis, cancer extent, management, and survival. There were 73 DTC cases in liver (n = 51), heart (n = 10), lung (n = 10) and multi-organ (n = 2) recipients from 58 publications. Study quality was variable. Median time to diagnosis was 8 months; 42% were widespread at diagnosis. Of 13 cases that underwent re-transplantation, three tumours recurred. Mortality was 75%; median survival 7 months. Survival was worst in transmitted melanoma and central nervous system tumours. The prognosis of DTC in orthotopic SOTRs is poor. Although re-transplantation offers the best chance of cure, some tumours still recur. Publication bias and clinical heterogeneity limit the available evidence. From our findings, we suggest refinements to clinical practice.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020165001, Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020165001.

Renal Cancer in Recipients of Kidney Transplant

The aim of our study is to determine characteristics and outcomes of kidney cancer in renal transplant recipients. MEDLINE® database was searched in June 2015 to identify cases of kidney cancer in renal transplant recipients. We include also a new case. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Forty-eight (48) recipients reported in 25 papers met the eligibility criteria. The median age was 47 years (range 9-66); 27% were females. Chronic glomerulonephritis, cystic kidney disease and hypertension were common indications for renal transplant. Among donors 24% were females and the median age was 52.5 years (17-73); 62% of kidney cancers were donor-derived. The median interval between transplant and cancer diagnosis was shorter for cancer of recipient versus donor origin (150 vs. 210 days). Clear cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 17%. 25% had metastasis at diagnosis. Kidney explantation or excision was done in 90% and 84% of cases with and without metastasis respectively. The median survival was 72 months. Actuarial 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 73.4% and 55.1% respectively. Among the recipients from 7 donors who subsequently developed malignancy, 57% were dead within a year. Kidney transplant recipients have a small risk of kidney cancer, which affects younger patients and occurs within a year of transplant, likely due to immunosuppression. Whether the use of older donors may increase the likelihood needs further investigation. The presence of metastasis, explantation or excision of affected kidney and development of cancer in donors predict outcomes. The results may guide patient education and informed decision-making.

Cancers among US organ donors: a comparison of transplant and cancer registry diagnoses

Transmission of cancer is a life-threatening complication of transplantation. Monitoring transplantation practice requires complete recording of donor cancers. The US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) captures cancers in deceased donors (beginning in 1994) and living donors (2004). We linked the SRTR (52,599 donors, 110,762 transplants) with state cancer registries. Cancer registries identified cancers in 519 donors: 373 deceased donors (0.9%) and 146 living donors (1.2%). Among deceased donors, 50.7% of cancers were brain tumors. Among living donors, 54.0% were diagnosed after donation; most were cancers common in the general population (e.g. breast, prostate). There were 1063 deceased donors with cancer diagnosed in the SRTR or cancer registry, and the SRTR lacked a cancer diagnosis for 107 (10.1%) of these. There were 103 living donors with cancer before or at donation, diagnosed in the SRTR or cancer registry, and the SRTR did not have a cancer diagnosis for 43 (41.7%) of these. The SRTR does not record cancers after donation in living donors and so missed 81 cancers documented in cancer registries. In conclusion, donor cancers are uncommon, but lack of documentation of some cases highlights a need for improved ascertainment and reporting by organ procurement organizations and transplant programs.

Cancer transmission from organ donors-unavoidable but low risk

BACKGROUND

Donor origin cancer (DOC) in transplant recipients may be transmitted with the graft (donor-transmitted cancer [DTC]) or develop subsequently from the graft (donor-derived cancer [DDC]).

METHODS

Recipients with DOC between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, were identified from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry and database search at transplantation centers.

RESULTS

Of 30,765 transplants from 14,986 donors, 18 recipients developed DOC from 16 donors (0.06%): 3 were DDC (0.01%) and 15 were DTC (0.05%). Of the 15 DTCs, 6 were renal cell cancer; 5, lung cancer; 2, lymphoma; 1, neuroendocrine cancer; and 1, colon cancer. Recipients with DTC underwent explant/excision (11), chemotherapy (4), and radiotherapy (1). Of 15 recipients, 3 (20%) recipients with DTC died as a direct consequence of cancer. Early DTC (diagnosed ≤6 weeks of transplantation) showed a better outcome (no DTC-related deaths in 11 cases) as opposed to late DTC (DTC-related deaths in 3 of 4 cases). Five-year survival was 83% for kidney recipients with DTC compared with 93% for recipients without DTC (P=0.077). None of the donors resulting in cancer transmission was known to have cancer at donation.

CONCLUSIONS

DTC is rare but frequently results in graft loss and death. The risk of cancer transmission cannot be eliminated because, in every case, the presence of cancer was not known at donation. This information will allow informed consent for prospective recipients. Explantation/excision is likely to benefit recipients with localized cancer, but in transplants other than kidney/pancreas, the benefits should be balanced against the risks of retransplantation.

[Risk of cancer in patients following chronic dialysis and kidney graft]

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of renal insufficiency has been observed in cancer patients as well as a high incidence of de novo cancer in dialysis or renal transplant patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We aimed to determine the incidence of cancer in patients under dialysis and in kidney transplant recipients through a search of the literature.

RESULTS

Under chronic dialysis, the risk of cancer increases from 1.1 to 1.8 in comparison to the general population. These risks reach 2.5 to 3.9 in renal transplant patients, but depend on the type of tumor.

CONCLUSION

In transplant recipients, the risk of cancer induced by immunosuppressive therapy requires a specific follow-up and a screening for any medical history of cancer in the donor and the recipient.

Contagious cancer

Although cancer can on occasion be caused by infectious agents such as specific bacteria, parasites, and viruses, it is not generally considered a transmissible disease. In rare circumstances, however, direct communication from one host to another has been documented. The Tasmanian devil is now threatened with extinction in the wild because of a fatal transmissible cancer, devil facial tumor disease (DFTD). Another example is canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT or Sticker's sarcoma) in dogs. There is a vast difference in prognosis between these two conditions. DFTD is often fatal within 6 months, whereas most cases of CTVT are eventually rejected by the host dog, who then is conferred lifelong immunity. In man, only scattered case reports exist about such communicable cancers, most often in the setting of organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplants and cancers arising during pregnancy that are transmitted to the fetus. In about one third of cases, transplant recipients develop cancers from donor organs from individuals who were found to harbor malignancies after the transplantation. The fact that two thirds of the time cancer does not develop, along with the fact that cancer very rarely is transmitted from person to person, supports the notion that natural immunity prevents such cancers from taking hold in man. These observations might hold invaluable clues to the immunobiology and possible immunotherapy of cancer.

Monitoring immunosuppression with measures of NFAT decreases cancer incidence

Long-term immunosuppression causes a significantly increased risk for the development of malignancies in transplanted patients. A link between immunosuppression and incidence of cancer is well documented and involves the effect of immunosuppression on anti-tumor surveillance and antiviral adaptive immune responses. We present a 67-year-old patient with a history of recurrent non-melanoma skin cancer. After adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy under close pharmacodynamic control, the development of new malignant lesions could be prevented. The availability of a quantitative, quick laboratory test for an assessment of the individual functional activity of immunocompetent cells that are crucial for transplant rejection, defense against viral infection, and tumor surveillance along with the ability to adjust doses of immunosuppressive agents such that patients are largely protected against malignant disease and/or viral infection are important. NFAT-regulated gene expression measured in peripheral blood allowed us to predict "safe" immunosuppression. Thus patients could maintain a stable allograft function. This represents a breakthrough in transplantation medicine and advances our attempts to individualize treatment in transplanted patients.

Death from metastatic donor-derived ovarian cancer in a male kidney transplant recipient

Posttransplant malignancy developing in an allograft is an uncommon complication of organ transplantation. The tumor may represent malignant transformation of donor or recipient cells that were previously normal, metastatic malignancy of recipient origin or malignancy transmitted from organ donor to recipient. Establishing the origin of the malignancy is critical to treatment algorithms. It is generally believed allograft removal and immunosuppression withdrawal will lead to resolution of transmitted malignancies in cases where the renal allograft is the origin. We report a male patient who developed metastatic ovarian malignancy secondary to donor transmission.

Donor derived malignancy following transplantation: a review

Organ and tissue transplant is now the treatment of choice for many end stage diseases. In the recent years, there has been an increasing demand for organs but not a similar increase in the supply leading to a severe shortage of organs for transplant resulted in increasing wait times for recipients. This has resulted in expanded donor criteria to include older donors and donors with mild disease. In spite of implementation of more stringent criteria for donor selection, there continues to be some risk of donor derived malignancy. Malignancy after transplantation can occur in three different ways: (a) de-novo occurrence, (b) recurrence of malignancy, and (c) donor-related malignancy. Donor related malignancy can be either due to direct transmission of tumor or due to tumor arising in cells of donor origin. We will review donor related malignancies following solid organ transplantation and hematopoeitic progenitor cell transplantation. Further, we will briefly review the methods for detection and management of these donor related malignancies.

Post-transplant de novo malignancies in renal transplant recipients: the past and present

Post-transplant de novo malignancies are reviewed in three time periods: (i) the azathioprine (AZA) era from 1962 to 1980-1981, (ii) the cyclosporine (CYA) era (1980 to present) in which the calcineurin inhibitors, CYA and tacrolimus (TAC), were the mainstay of recipient immunosuppression, and (iii) the TOR inhibitor era starting in the year 2000. Both transplant registry and transplant center reports on malignancies occurring in the AZA era are reviewed. Reports from transplant centers and from the Cincinnati Transplant Tumor Registry (CTTR) in both the early CYA era (1980s) and the 1900-2000 CYA era are reported. Cancer incidence associated with AZA versus CYA, CYA versus TAC, and AZA versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is compared in both transplant center and registry reports including new, unreported Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data from 1998 to 2003. The malignancy incidence associated with lymphocyte-depleting antibody and corticosteroid immunosuppression is discussed. Reduced malignancy incidence recently reported with TOR inhibitors is compared with that of conventional immunosuppression. Important nondrug factors influencing the incidence of post-transplant malignancies from seven single and three registry reports are detailed. The substantial role that de novo malignancies play in post-transplant mortality is discussed. Finally, management recommendations for recipients who develop de novo post-transplant malignancies are briefly presented.

Transmission of donor melanoma to multiple organ transplant recipients

Malignant melanoma represents the most common tumour responsible for donor-derived post transplantation malignancies. We report the varied presentation and outcome of three graft recipients (two kidney and hepatic) who developed metastatic melanoma following cadaveric organ transplantation from a single multiorgan donor. Two of the recipients presented with symptomatic metastatic lesions and the third patient, despite being carefully monitored, developed evidence of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Two of the patients died as a direct result of their melanomas. The recipients of corneal and cardiac grafts remain disease-free. We conclude that despite careful screening, donor-derived tumours remain a not uncommon clinical entity. The identification of a lesion in one recipient should prompt immediate examination and investigation of the remaining recipients of multiorgan donations.

Therapeutic vaccination with tumor cells that engage CD137

Therapeutic cancer vaccination is based on the finding that tumors in both humans and experimental animals, such as mice, express potential immunological targets, some of which have high selectivity for cancer cells. In contrast to the successful vaccination against some infectious diseases, where most vaccines induce neutralizing antibodies that act prophylactically, the aim of therapeutic cancer vaccines is to treat established tumors (primarily micrometastases). Since most tumor-destructive immune responses are cell-mediated, therapeutic cancer vaccination needs to induce and expand such responses and also to overcome "escape" mechanisms that allow tumors to evade immunological destruction. Tumor antigens (as with other antigens) are presented by "professional" antigen-presenting cells, most notably dendritic cells (DC). Therefore DC that have been transfected or "pulsed" to present antigen provide a logical source of tumor vaccines, and some encouraging results have been obtained clinically as well as in preclinical models. An alternative and more physiological approach is to develop vaccines that deliver tumor antigen for in vivo uptake and presentation by the DC. Vaccines of the latter type include tumor cells that have been modified to produce certain lymphokines or express costimulatory molecules, as well as cDNAs, recombinant viruses, proteins, peptides and glycolipids which are often given together with an adjuvant. Several studies over the past 5 years have demonstrated dramatic therapeutic responses against established mouse tumors as a result of repeated injections of agonistic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the costimulatory molecule CD137 (4-1BB). However, the clinical use of such MAbs may be problematic since they depress antibody formation, for example, to infectious agents. The alternative approach to transfect tumor cells to express the CD137 ligand (CD137L) increases their immunogenicity, but vaccination with tumor cells expressing CD137L is ineffective in several systems where injection of anti-CD137 MAb produces tumor regression. Recent findings indicate that a more effective way to engage CD137 towards tumor destruction is to transfect tumor cells to express a cell-bound form of anti-CD137 single-chain Fv fragments (scFv). Notably, tumors from melanoma K1735, growing either subcutaneously or in the lung, could be eradicated following vaccination with K1735 cells that expressed anti-CD137 scFv. This was in spite of the fact that K1735, as with many human neoplasms, expresses very low levels of MHC class I and has low immunogenicity. Similar results were subsequently obtained with other tumors of low immunogenicity, including sarcoma Ag104. We hypothesize that the concomitant expression of tumor antigen and anti-CD137 scFv effectively engages NK cells, monocytes and dendritic cells, as well as activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (all of which express CD137) so as to induce and expand a tumor-destructive Th1 response. While vaccines in the form of transfected tumor cells can be effective, at least in mouse models, the logical next step is to construct vaccines that combine genes that encode molecularly defined tumor antigens with a gene that encodes anti-CD137 scFv. Before planning any clinical trials, vaccines that engage CD137 via scFv need to be compared in demanding mouse models for efficacy and side effects with vaccines that are already being tested clinically, including transfected DC and tumor cells producing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Transplant tumor registry: donor related malignancies

BACKGROUND

Transmission of donor malignancies has been intermittently reported since the early days of clinical transplantation. The incidence of United States donor related malignancies has not previously been documented.

METHODS

All donor related malignancies reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing from 4/1/94-7/1/01 in a cohort of 34,933 cadaveric donors and 108,062 recipients were investigated by contacting the transplant centers to verify that the reported tumors were of donor origin. Time and mode of discovery, as well as graft and patient outcome, were determined. The status of other recipients from the donor was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 21 donor related malignancies from 14 cadaveric and 3 living donors were reported. Fifteen tumors were donor transmitted and 6 were donor derived. Transmitted tumors are malignancies that existed in the donor at the time of transplantation. Derived tumors are de novo tumors that develop in transplanted donor hematogenous or lymphoid cells after transplantation. The cadaveric donor related tumor rate is 0.04% (14 of 34,993). The donor related tumor rate among transplanted cadaveric organs is 0.017% (18 of 108,062). Among patients developing donor related malignancies, the overall mortality rate was 38%, with that of transmitted tumors being 46% and derived tumors being 33%. The cadaveric donor related tumor mortality rate is 0.007% (8 of 108,062).

CONCLUSIONS

The United States incidence of donor related tumors is extremely small. The donor related tumor death rate is also extremely small, particularly when compared with waiting-list mortality.

Donor origin of neuroendocrine carcinoma in 2 transplant patients determined by molecular cytogenetics

Organ transplant recipients have an increased tumor incidence owing to their immunocompromised state. The origin of such tumors, whether donor or recipient, will have a clinical impact on decision-making concerning immunosuppressive therapy, retransplantation, and for recipients of other organs from the same donors. We report molecular cytogenetic determination of donor origin in 2 cases of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma developing in sex-mismatched transplant recipients (kidney and liver). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed on liver core needle biopsy material from the liver transplant patient and on liver fine needle aspiration cytopreparations from the kidney transplant patient. The results for the liver transplant patient were confirmed with microsatellite allelic analysis and with comparative genomic hybridization. In both cases, FISH showed the presence of only X chromosomes within the tumor cells, indicating the donor origin of the neoplasms. FISH is an excellent method to determine neoplastic origin in sex-mismatched transplant patients. HUM PATHOL 31:1425-1429.

Advanced donor-origin melanoma in a renal transplant recipient: immunotherapy, cure, and retransplantation

BACKGROUND

A kidney transplant recipient inadvertently contracted donor-origin melanoma, which was found to be very advanced at presentation. Withdrawal of immunosuppression failed to induce rejection, and interferon-alpha was required. When florid allograft rejection was in progress, the allograft was removed, before it was recognized that the transplanted melanoma was not being simultaneously rejected.

METHODS

Subsequent immunotherapy was required, which largely recapitulated treatment of recognized value in autologous melanoma and included interferon-alpha, use of cultured melanoma cells as tumor vaccine, pooled allogeneic cell vaccination, and adoptive immunotherapy using lymphokine-activated killer cells.

RESULTS

Prolonged immunotherapy eradicated the widespread malignancy, and the patient went on to a successful second renal transplant, with follow-up of over 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This unique case demonstrates the successful cure of advanced transplanted melanoma through the use of immunotherapy, which did not require sophisticated tumor vaccine technology, and successful retransplantation.

Tumour induction as a consequence of immunosuppression after renal transplantation

Immunosuppressed recipients of organ transplants have a higher incidence of carcinoma than the general population. A retrospective analysis was made at the Department of Urology of Bonn University, investigating 236 renal allograft recipients as to the incidence of neoplasms before and after transplantation. Eleven patients developed malignant tumours after transplantation. In 4 out of these 11 patients, case history showed pre-existing malignancies. Two of the 4 patients developed a second tumour, while the other two had tumour progression (latency period 21-77 months). Three of the 4 patients died of their tumours 21, 42 and 77 months after transplantation, whereas one female patient is still alive and free of neoplasms 32 months after transplantation. In 7 out of these 11 patients de novo tumours were diagnosed (latency period 3-88 months). All of them are still alive (NED between 15 and 85 months), six of them with good transplant function. There was no difference to be seen in the incidence of malignancies between kidneys supplied by Eurotransplant (n = 40) and ABO compatible kidneys from our own donors (n = 196). The higher incidence rate of neoplasms in transplant recipients requires high standards in preventive measures. Any suspicious change that may occur in the course of a thorough follow-up of transplant recipients must be removed and examined histologically. Patients with previous malignant diseases must be payed special attention, since they frequently tend to develop another malignant tumour and progression of existing tumours, respectively. As far as immunosuppression is concerned, therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of transplant recipients do not differ from those set up for patients on haemodialysis. Since immunosuppression with increased rates of tumour incidence can also be observed in dialysis patients, the mere fact of increased incidence of neoplasms cannot be taken as an argument against transplantation. With a more or less equal risk of tumour incidence the crucial factor should be the higher quality of life for transplant recipients.

Carbohydrate vaccines that induce antibodies against cancer. 1. Rationale

Carbohydrate antigens are the most abundant antigens expressed at the cancer cell surface and have been shown to be uniquely effective targets for immune recognition and attack. The basis for cancer vaccines that primarily induce an antibody response, such as vaccines against these carbohydrate antigens, is now well established in both experimental models and the clinical setting. In both cases, antibody administration or induction has been especially effective in the adjuvant setting when the targets are circulating tumor cells and micrometastases. The patterns of carbohydrate antigens expressed by different tumor types has been established, paving the way for polyvalent-antibody-inducing vaccines. This then forms the rationale for the construction and testing of carbohydrate vaccines against cancer, the focus of the second part of this review.

Donor origin of a posttransplant liver allograft malignancy identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the Y chromosome and DNA genotyping

Posttransplantation malignancy in the allograft is a rare complication of orthotopic liver transplantation. In the described case, an abnormal T-tube cholangiogram, performed 6 months after orthotopic liver transplantation between a male donor and a female recipient, prompted needle liver biopsy. A moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma was found. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the Y chromosome indicated male origin of malignancy. Donor-related disease was confirmed by comparative DNA analysis of genomic sequences from the donor liver, associated tumor, and recipient peripheral blood. Results of these investigations qualified the recipient for a second liver transplant.

Ganglioside conjugate vaccines. Immunotherapy against tumors of neuroectodermal origin

Gangliosides are known to be suitable targets for immune attack against cancer but they are poorly immunogenic. Active immunization with ganglioside/BCG or liposome vaccines results in moderate titer IgM antibody responses of short duration. Covalent attachment of poorly immunogenic antigens to immunogenic proteins is a potent method for inducing an IgG antibody response. GD3, a dominant ganglioside on malignant melanoma, was modified by ozone cleavage of the double bond in the ceramide backbone, an aldehyde group introduced and used for coupling via reductive amination to epsilon-amino-lysyl groups of proteins. Utilizing this method, GD3 conjugates were constructed with: 1. Synthetic multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) constructs expressing 4 repeats of a malaria T-cell epitope; 2. Outer membrane proteins (OMP) of Neisseria meningitidis; 3. Cationized bovine serum albumin; 4. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH); and 5. Polylysine. In addition, conjugates containing only the GD3 oligosaccharide were synthesized. All constructs were tested for antigenicity using anti-GD3 antibody R24, and for immunogenicity in mice. Serum antibody levels were analyzed by ELISA and immune thin-layer chromatography. Results in the mouse show a significant improvement in the IgM antibody response and a consistent IgG response against GD3 using GD3-KLH conjugates. Other carrier proteins and the use of GD3 oligosaccharide were significantly less effective. If improved immunogenicity and clinical benefit with conjugate vaccines can be demonstrated in patients with melanoma, this approach may be applicable to patients with other tumors of neuroectodermal origin, including gliomas, glioblastomas, astrocytomas, and neuroblastomas.

Misdiagnosed malignancy in transplanted organs

The case reports of three patients who received cancer-bearing organs at this institution are presented. A fourth recipient, who was to be transplanted with a cancerous kidney, was spared this disastrous complication. The relevant data regarding the donors is also alluded to, with special reference to the type and site of the primary malignancy. Following these case reports, the implications of these issues, their possible prevention, and further management are discussed.

Relationship between blood transfusion and tumour behaviour

Blood transfusion results in significant alterations in some parameters of immune function. Because some human cancers appear to stimulate immune responses and may be influenced by host immunity, the possibility arises that transfusion could alter the behaviour of tumours. Experimental studies indicate that allogeneic transfusion can directly alter tumour growth in some circumstances, but at present studies of human cancers do not provide evidence of a causal association between transfusion and tumour growth.

Intermittent combination chemotherapy with or without bacillus Calmette-Guérin for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood

Seventy-four children ranging in age from 6 months to 17.5 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia newly diagnosed between 1976 and 1979 were entered on a study incorporating intermittent chemotherapy with or without the addition of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The chemotherapy program consisted of induction with vincristine, dexamethasone, and intrathecal methotrexate, intensification with adriamycin and asparaginase, central nervous system treatment with cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate, and continuation treatment with 5-day courses of combination chemotherapy administered every three weeks. The first phase of continuation therapy incorporated vincristine, adriamycin, 6-mercaptopurine, and dexamethasone. In the second phase, oral methotrexate was substituted for the adriamycin in non-T-cell patients; in T-cell patients, cytosine arabinoside or cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in alternating cycles were substituted for the adriamycin and asparaginase was added. Total duration of therapy was approximately 2.5 years. Connaught BCG was administered by Heaf gun on days 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle for the first 8 months of treatment in approximately one-third of the patients. Actuarial disease-free survival with a median follow-up of 59 months shows no difference in outcome between the BCG and non-BCG poor-risk patients. However, there is an improvement in disease-free survival of BCG-treated good- and average-risk girls (P = 0.04). While patients were actively receiving BCG there was also a trend toward the development of fewer significant infections than when patients were not receiving BCG (P = 0.85). Toxicities from BCG administration included satellite rashes, local tenderness, lymphadenopathy, secondary infection, and residual scars. Overall disease-free survival by actuarial analysis is 60% at 6 years; for patients with unfavorable prognostic features it is 40%. In this trial the addition of BCG prolonged the disease-free survival of girls with good- and average-risk prognostic features and also may have decreased the susceptibility to infection while it was being administered. However, the benefit does not appear sufficient to warrant its routine use, especially in view of the toxicities encountered.

Transferral of malignancy as a complication of organ transplantation: an insuperable problem?

A case of inadvertent transplantation of malignancy is presented in detail. The donor was a 36-year-old woman with an unsuspected disseminated carcinoma of lung, and the renal and tumour transplant recipient a 53-year-old man. The transplanted tumour remained clinically "silent" and was discovered only a necropsy after the recipient's death from ischaemic heart disease. The phenomena of de novo primary and transferred (donor) malignancy in organ recipients, along with related immunological considerations, are briefly reviewed. Finally, with regard to the increasing frequency and variability of organ transplants, the routine clinical practice required to minimise the risk of these complications is re-emphasised, with additional recommendations.

Accidental transplantation of bronchial carcinoma from a cadaver donor to two recipients of renal allografts

Malignancy was transferred inadvertently to two patients, each of whom received a renal transplant from a cadaver donor who was found at necropsy to have a small, clinically silent carcinoma of lung. Both recipients died with metastatic bronchial carcinoma of the same histological type as the donor's tumour. The literature on transplanted malignancy is reviewed.

Successive appearance of carcinoma, tuberculosis and nephrolithiasis in a renal allograft

A small renal cell carcinoma was transplanted inadvertently with a kidney from a living donor and was treated with partial nephrectomy. Secondarily, tuberculosis of the renal allograft appeared, which was followed by nephrolithiasis. The kidney was left in place, immunosuppressive treatment was continued and renal function is normal more than 8 years after transplantation, with no sign of the cancer progressing or reactivation of the tuberculosis.

Impaired thymus-derived lymphocyte function in patients with malignant brain tumour

Cell-mediated immunity was evaluated in 28 patients with malignant glioma, using in vivo and in vitro tests of lymphocyte function. The results were compared to those found in patients with carcinomatosis (11 subjects), benign brain tumours (9), other neurological disorders (20) and normal, healthy controls (21). Significant impairments of delayed hypersensitivity responses to common antigens was found in patients with malignant glioma and in those with generalised malignancy. A less significant depression of lymphocyte responses was also detected in patients with meningioma. The impairment in cell-mediated immunity was shown not be due to a serum blocking factor. Our data indicate that there is defective T cell function in patients with glioma, similar to that reported in cases with malignancies outside the central nervous system. This impaired immunity may have clinical significance.

Metastatic malignant melanoma transplanted via a renal homograft: a case report

A case of transplantation of a malignant melanoma via a cadaver renal homograft is presented. The recipient developed a widespread malignancy ninteen months after renal transplantation. At autopsy the tumor was diagnosed as a malignant melanoma. Autopsy of the donor had previously revealed a spindle cell malignancy in the spleen. It is postulated that the splenic tumor in the donor represents a spindle cell variant of malignant melanoma, and hence this malignancy was inadvertently transferred to the recipient via the renal homograft.

Metastatic choriocarcinoma transplanted with cadaver kidney: a case report

A unique case of a metastasising choriocarcinoma, inadvertently transplanted to a man from a female cadaver kidney is reported. When the kidney was removed six days after transplantation, arterial blood vessel infiltration by chorio-carcinoma cells and high levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in the serum of the recipient indicated an haematogenous dissemination of viable neoplastic cells. The immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued after removal of the graft and the HCG levels in the recipient gradually decreased over a periode of eight weeks, indicating a slow immunologic rejection of the tumor cells. The recipient committed suicide seven months after the transplantation had failed. No metastases were found at a legal autopsy. It seems advisable, whenever there is evidence that neoplastic cells might have been transfered by a homograft, to remove the graft and discontinue the immunosuppressive therapy. Neoplastic cells already disseminated can still be eliminated when the immunologic system is intact and not suppressed.

Transplantation of tumour with a kidney graft

A cerebral glioma discovered by angiography and brain biopsy in a kidney donor was subsequently suspected of being a secondary tumour. By this time a biopsy of one of the transplanted kidneys had shown a clump of malignant cells in a glomerulus. Because of the psychological state of this recipient the transplant was not removed, but the recipient of the second kidney was immediately told of the danger of tumour cell transfer, and underwent nephrectomy. The patient remained well on haemodialysis; multiple sectioning of the kidney showed no signs of tumour. The transplant in the first recipient functioned well until his death, six months after operation. At necropsy undifferentiated tumour was found in the pleura, liver, pelvic peritoneum, and transplanted kidney. All cadaver donors should undergo full laparotomy after removal of the kidneys, particularly those with a high risk of cancer, and a full necropsy should also be performed shortly afterwards to exclude tumour and other unsuspected diseases. Then it is not too late to remove a transplanted kidney should a tumour be found.

Successful renal transplantation in patients with prior history of malignancy

Eleven selected patients with a history of cancer have received renal transplants. In three patients the malignancies were diagnosed and treated before renal failure developed. Two patients underwent bilateral nephrectomies for the treatment of bilateral renal malignancy. In six patients the malignancy developed while they were uremic, and they received transplants after treatment of the tumor. Recurrent tumor developed in only one of the 11 (9 per cent) patients after receiving the transplant. Thus, patients with a history of malignancy can receive a transplant without accelerating growth of the tumor. We recommend a minimum period of one year between tumor treatment and transplantation to observe for tumor recurrences or metastases. A longer period of observation may be necessary in patients who have tumors with a poorer prognosis.